VAR 07.69TO pridIgZmeweLl"
�i
.
..
ynp
Ygl�i1a lk
Via . X4;4 .�
'
SUBJECT: a>„3,�
4Fin.�- bo
MI6•
P DATE.'
FOLD
.. .. ,.77i.
h
'- ,q,
777
-
7�T
r
r
Is,
1440,
....t
PLEASE
EP1Y Tb'-r--� SIGNED
-FOLD
DATE;"
�-'C'� SIGNED
p
4.
z
SEND MITE AND PINK COPIES
WIT" CARBON
INTACT PINK
COPY
IS!I RMRNED WITH REPLY.
l
a®- �y
.APPLICATION *TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS AND CITY COMCIL
FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE IN REQUIREMEWTS OF
CERTAIN ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
(Applicant to complete items 1, 2, 3)
1. Name and Address of Applicant
t n/�C—,A i s
2. Legal Description of Property (also general location, such as. -"north-
east corner of 64th Avenue and 5th Street6° or 6415 Fifth Street")
3. DeecTibe the variance requested. (Attach Flat oT SuLvay of �oPc�t�y
®wowing location of proposed bmiZdi ng, etc., also zdjoininS Propert'Teg
and ownership within 200' of said property.)
]t�Ri fttOce OF.S-
iJ«<4
4A AnJ
ops
4. Coments by administrative official denying original request for building
permit or other permit. (To be completed by administrative o7ficinl.
Appropriate ordinances and section of ordinancem to be c,.ted.
0 2 0
�. Do�ice of Hearing a eared in official Newspaper on the following
dotes s, , p !R , / 9 9
(sat ba,�at toast on6k 10 days before meeting copy of notice to
attached).
d. Board Members i2otified of meeting by, /i. ) 9(c 9
list X ers, Date Notified, and "'real'W 1e11or Alava to attaand
hearI ng) . a
Z,QU41, A Wk.—M-49 46RI --U� &,-
"
—
Tb* jP®j$m+Iu; Board Members and interested parties were premant at the
MOT144 s
BOMD MBMBBBS
je
J
w
.�
Z
I
W
�.
uj
Z,QU41, A Wk.—M-49 46RI --U� &,-
"
—
Tb* jP®j$m+Iu; Board Members and interested parties were premant at the
MOT144 s
BOMD MBMBBBS
- 3 -
OTHER ]PARTIES:
NAME
ADDRESS
9e optnic= and recommendations by BOARD OF APPEALS:
�0 , For above zacormendatiosns Against Recownendati®ns
11, Agti®n by City Council and Date:
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
BOARD OF APPEALS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of Appeals of the City of
Fridley will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on
Wednesday, July 16, 1969 to consider the following matter:
Mr. Arthur Deys, 6036-21 Street N.E.,
Fridley is requesting three variances
of the City Code to allow him to split
his lots and make two buildable sites.
The variances are of Section 45.23 to
reduce the sideyard requirement on the
existing house from 10 feet to 2.8 feet,
Section 45.27 to reduce the average
depth of existing front yard setbacks
for proposed house, from 48 feet to 35
feet and Section 45.35 (1) to permit
the moving of existing garage into the
sideyard of -existing dwelling located
on Lots 3, 4, & 5, Block 7, Hyde Park
Addition the same being 6036-21 Street
N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter may be
heard at this meeting.
DONALD MITTELSTADT
CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF APPEALS
PUBLISH: June 25, 1969
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
BOARD OF APPEALS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of Appeals of the City of
Fridley will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on
Wednesday, July 16, 1969 to consider the following matter:
Mr. Arthur Deys, 6036-21 Street N.E.,
Fridley is requesting three variances
of the City Code to allow him to split
his lots and make two buildable sites.
The variances are of Section 45.23 to
reduce the sideyard requirement on the
existing house from 10 feet to 2.8 feet,
Section 45.27 to reduce the average
depth of existing front yard setbacks
for proposed house, from 48 feet to 35
feet and Section 45.35 (1) to permit
the moving of existing garage into the
sideyard of -existing dwelling located
on Lots 3, 4, & 5, Block 7, Hyde Park
Addition the same being 6036-21 Street
N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter may be
heard at this meeting.
DONALD MITTELSTADT
CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF APPEALS
PUBLISH: June 25, 1969
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
BOARD OF APPEALS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEDT THAT the Board of Appeals of the City of
Fridley will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on
Wednesday, July 16, 1969 to consider the following matter:
Mr. Arthur Deys, 6036-21 Street N.E.,
Fridley is requesting three variances
of the City Code to allow him to split
his lots and make two buildable sites.
The variances are of Section 45.23 to
reduce the sideyard requirement on the
existing house from 10 feet to 2.8 feet,
Section 45.27 to reduce the average
depth of existing front yard setbacks
for proposed house, from 48 feet to 35
feet and Section 45.35 (1) to permit
the moving of existing garage into the
sideyard of -existing dwelling located
on Lots 3, 4, & 5, Block 7, Hyde Park
Addition the same being 6036-21 Street
N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter may be
heard at this meeting.
DONALD MITTELSTADT
CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF APPEALS
PUBLISH: June 25, 1969
(Offidal Pabllcationl
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITXQF FRIDLEY
PUBf.1CHEARING
RV?VnR£.TRR
Mr. Arthur beys, W30-2T/n Street N.E..
Fridle3 Is revesting three vatlaaces of
t� City Code to allliow him .to sollt his
house from 10 feet to�2.8 Peet, Section
4527 to reduce 'the average depth of
esistb(g front yard setbacks for proposed'
house, from 18 feet to 25 feet and 3ectioa
g455M ((II -to permit themovingof existing
into theaw iia ing located on�1 3, 498, 8�i lock
7 Hiydde Park Addition the same being
i639M Skeet N.E.. Fridley. M mmsota.
Anyone .desiring to be heard withrofer-
V_to:_the above mattie may be heard at
this meati g.
DONALD MITTELSTADT
�. Chairman'
Board of Appeals
(Jane 25.1869)—TC
(Official PubRmtloal .
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRMLEY
PUBLIC
ET!'
LFIICCO HEAR1IIIIENG
BOAhD OFppppE'ALS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the
Board of Appeals of the City of Fridley
wRl
meet in the Council Chambers of the
City Hall at 7:30 m,. on Wednesday, July
16:1969to consider the#ollowiug matter:
Mr. Arthur Days, 80362 Street N.E.
Fridley is regit�n�� three vailances R
the City Code 'W allow him to split his
lots aad make two buildable sites. The
varlances are of Section 4523 to -reduce
the sideyard requirement on the existing
house from 10 feet .to 28 Ieet, Section
4527 to reduce the 'average _depth of
A existing front yard setbacks 4or proposed'
dwemag
7, Hyde
80362. desiring to, be hears with rarer -
the above mattermay beibearl at
sting. DONALD ,MITTELSTADT
1airman--
Board of Appeals - -:---
(June25,1969)—TC `
i
i
I '
�. ,
i
3, 4
the
l
} THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF JULY 161 1969
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Mittelstadt at 7:36 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mittelstadt, Minish, Harris
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ahonen, O'Bannon
OTHERS PRESENT: Clarence Belisle -Building Inspector
MOTION by Minish to approve the minutes, of July 2, 1969, as written.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
1. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.24 TO REDUCE THE SIDEYARD REQUIREMENT. FOR
ASSESSORY BUILDINGS, FROM 24.7 FEET TO 17.5 FEET TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
GARAGE TO DE LOCATED ON LOT 15, BLOCK 1 REARRANGE i' OF BLOCKS 13, 1 & 1
PLYMOUTH ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 4591-2. STREET N.E., FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA.
Mr. Kopecky was present to present his proposal to the Board. Pictures of the
property were shown to the Board.
MOTION by Minish to receive a letter from the ajoining property owner, Mr. John
A. Reno, stating he did not object to the garage being built closer to the
street thaA his house.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Kopecky expl,Ained to the Board that his present home faces 2J Street and the
garage will face 46th Avenue. Mr. Reno's house also faces 46th Avenue. The
proposed garage will be in line with the applicant's home but will be ahead of
Mr. Reno's home. With this setback there will be enough room to park a car out
of the garage without parking in the street.
MOTION by Harris to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Minish. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Minish to grant the request for the following reasons:
1. The sideyard setback will be in line with the existing home.
2. There will be no traffic hazard by placing the garage at this spot on the
property.
3. There will be room to park a car in the driveway without parking in the street.
4. There were no objections from the adjoining neighbor even though the garage will
be in front of his house.
5. It will be an improvement to the property.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
2. MR. ARTHUR DAYS, 6036-21 STREET N.E., FRIDLEY IS REQUESTING THREE VARIANCES OF THE
PERMIT THE MOVING OF EXISTING GARAGE INTO THE SIDEYARD OF EXISTING DWELLING LOCATED
ON LOTS 3. 4. & 5. BLOCK 7, HYDE eARz-i DDITION, THE DAME BEING 6036-21 STREET N.E�
FRTT1T.F'Y. MINNESOTA.—���••�
The Minutes Of The Board Of Appeals Meeting of July 16, 1969 Page 2
Mr. Arthur Deys was present to present his request to the Board.A Survey and.pictures
of the property were shown to the Board. The. survey showed that the lot is beim
split in an angular manner.
A discussion followed which involved where the present garage could be located,
having the garage torn down all together, having the house, which is presently
there, torn down before the lot split. They also discussed the distance between
the present structure and the proposed structure. As it now stands, there will be
10 feet between them and the Oode does call for 15 feet for fire control.
The Board did recommend to the applicant that he should split his lots into'60 foot
lots instead of in the angular manner.
MOTION by Minish to table the request until July 30, 1969 to allow the applicant
to bring in a preliminary sketch showing how the proposed home is to be positioned
on the lot. This will show the Board a truer picture of the exact measurements
between structures.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
ADJOU'RNMMU :
The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Mittelstadt at 8:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
5170A,U
O
MARY HINIZ
Secretary
THE 111 r "TL� ES 'OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF JULY" 30,
`i -le meeting was called to order by Chairman Mittelstadt at 7:34 P -M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mittelstadt, Minish, Harris
HERS ABSENT: 0°Bannon, Ahonen
OTHERS PRESENT: Hank Muhich-Building Official
MOTION by Minish to approve the minutes of the July 16, 1969 meeting as .written.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MR. ARTHUR DEYS, 6036-21 STREET N.E., FRIDLEY IS Ef&UESTING THREE VARIANCES OF
THE CITY CODE TO ALLOW HIM TO SPLIT HIS LOTS AND MAKE TWO BUILDABLE SITES. THE
VARIANCES ARE OF SECTION 45.23 TO REDUCE THE SIDEYARD REQUIREMENT ON THE EXISTING_
HOUSE FROM 10 FEET TO 2.8 FEET, SECTION 45.27 TO REDUCE THE AVERAGE DEPTH OF
EXISTING FRONT YARD SETBACKS FOR THE PROPOSED HOUSE FROM 8 FEET TO 35 FEET
AND SECTION 45-35 1 TO PERMIT THE MOVING OF EXISTING GARAGE INTO THE SIDEYARD
OF EXISTING DWELLING LOCATED ON LOTS 3, 4 & 5, BLOCK 7, HYDE PARK_ ADDITION, THE
SAME BEING 6016-2u STREET N.E.. FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA.
Chairman Mittelstadt continued the public hearing from the July 16, 1969 meeting.
This item was tabled from the July 16, 1969 meeting to allow the applicant time
to bring, before the Board, a preliminary sketch , drawn up by his contractor,
showing the position of the proposed home on the lot. The Board requested this
sketch to find out the exact measurements between structures to determine whether
there could be room for adequate fire control. The sketch showed there will be
24 feet between structures and 18 feet between the garage and the living quarters
of the home. This is above our minimum code requirements. The new garage will
be 5 feet from the new lot line of the proposed lot split and the buildings as
drawn on the sketch would allow the applicant to divide his lot into two 60 foot
frontage lots instead of the angular split he first p=oposed.
MOTION by Minish to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Harris® Upon a. voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Minish to:
1. Deny variance No. 1, of Section 45.23, and variance No. 3, of Section 45035,
as they are now superfluous as a result of the relocation of the proposed
house on the lot.
2. Approve variance No. 2, of Section 45.27, to reduce the average depth of
existing front yard setbacks for proposed house from 48 feet to 30 feet
instead of proposed 35 feet.
3. Recommend to the Planning Commission to Deny the lot split (L.S. #69-15)
before them at the present time.
4. Also recommend to the Planning Commission the following order of events;
&.-.Applicant to remove existing garage.
b. Applicant to be allowed_to build his proposed home on the lot as it is
now drawn on sketch submitted to the Board.
o. Applicant to tear down existing home as soon as possible after proposed
home is built.
d. Applicant to reapply for a lot split to split his lot into 2-60 foot
2.
3 -
Minutes of the Board of Ap als Xeeting of July 30, 1262_Page 2
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Erickson was present to -present his request. He brought with him a survey of
Lot 4 showing the layout of the house on the lot. The structures on either
adjacent side lot were also shown on the survey for the purpose of denoting how
many feet there would be between the proposed structure and the existing structures.
Mr. Erickson explained that there is a tremendous bank on the back of this lot
and it would require removing a lot of dirt to build back farther on the lot.
To build on the lot as it is now requires the two variances. Without the
variances the lot would be unbuildable.
MOTION by Minish to receive a survey with three property owners signatures on
it stating they know about but do not object to the requested variances. The
signatures are: Ben Douglas, 6054 Woody Lane, T.G. Schnagel, 6053 Central and
Richard Inlow, 6057 Central Avenue.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote., there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Harris to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Minish. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Harris to approve the request for the following reasons:
1. The front yard setback is compatible with the adjacent structures.
2. The building is well situated on the lot to allow a 5 foot sideyard setback.
The structure does abut a drainage and utility easement, which is a ten foot
easement, so there should be no problem with distance between this structure
and any future structures that may be built by the adjacent property owner.
3. In order for the applicant to build on this lot he does need the variances.
This lot would be unbuildable without them.
4. The applicant also maintains the 15 feet between his structure and the structure
on the South.
Seconded by Minish. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
Minutes of the Board of A peals Meeting of July 302 1969 Page 3
Mr. Silker along with his builder and planner Mr. D. Pearson and Mr. E. Hanson
were present to present his request.
Mr. L. Stanley, 7661 East River Road, was present to find out more about the
proposed building. He had no objections to the building but wanted to make
pure that there would be an adequate parking area planned for the building
and that they would have adequate refuse facilities.
Mr. Silker explained what the building will look like, landscaping and layout
on the lot, drainage, etc., to the Board. He also explained that the building
can't be moved back as they need the room in the back df the lot for an
adequate parking area. The corner involved could be removed but it would ruin
the aesthetics of the building.
MOTION by Minish to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Minish to approve the request for the following reasons:
1. The variance is for only one corner of the building and to remove that
corner from the building would be a hardship as it would ruin the aesthetic
value.
2. Adjacent property owners had no objections to the building.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
r420 i i 124
The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Mittelstadt at at 8:41 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
LA a � a
MARY HINTZ
Secretary