VAR 02.66u
APPLICATION TO $OARD OV. APP MS AND CITY COUNCIL
FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE IN REQUIREMENTS OF
CERTAIN ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
(Applicant to complete items 1, 2, 3)
1. Name and Address of Applicant
7)14
2. Legal Description ofProperty(also general location, such as;"north'
east corner of 64th Avenue and 5th Street" or 6415 Fifth Street")
3. Describe the variance requested. (Attach Plat or Survey of Property
showing location of proposed building, etc;, also adjoining properties
a,��nerbhip within 200' of said property6) y
4. Comments by administrative official denying original request for building
permit or other permit. (To be completed by administrative official.
Avorooriate ordinances and section of ordinances to be cited.)
�'l�
•
- 2 -
•
5. Notice of Hearing appeared in Official Newspaper on the following
dates: February 9, 1966 and February 16, 1966
(must be at least once 10 days before meeting -- copy of notice to 1
attached).
6. Board Members notified of meeting by mailing Of notice - 2-4-66 .
(List Members, Date Notified, and "Yed" or "Nd' for plans to attend
hearing). .A
Name Date Plan to Attend
_ %
All members notified by mailing of notice 2-4-66
01
7. Person making appeal and the following property owners having property
within 200' notified:
By Phone Notified by
Name Date or Mail (Initial)
Robert Jaeger, 3610 Central Avenue N.E. M 2-4-66
William Huge, 5613 - 4th Street N.E. M 2-4-66
e --
Thomas Hillerans - 5519 - 4th Street N.E. M 2-4-66
Davla Peterson - 5600 - th street K.E. —M- 2-4-66
M. K. Burton - 5604 - 5th Street N.E. M 2-4-66
8. The Following Board Members 8nd interested parties were present at the
Hearing: February 23, 1966
BOARD MEMBERS
Chairman Nawrocki
Member Fitzpatrick
'WaVTes"iGCTT6bert Jaeger,
Member Jankowski ab4ent
Member Saunders - absent
petitioners - present
C
0
The City Manager showed the Council a site plan of the proposed dental
laboratory and stated that Mr. Robert Jaeger was present if the Council had
any questions. Councilman Wright asked if all the neighbors had received
individual notices to the Board of Appeala Meeting. Mr, Wagner said that
three of the five neighbors notified had been at the meeting. Councilman
Samuelson asked Mr. Jaeger about the landscaping as pictured on the plan.
Mir. Jaeger stated that three of the trees pictured were on the lot at present
and he would do the beet he could to have.it landscaped nicely.
Lotion by Cou lflman Wright to approve the Special Use Permit requested by
Mrs Robert Jaeger to permit construction of a dental laboratory, subject
to the recommendation of the Board of Appeals that there be a fence on the
rear property line and that the drainage plan for the blacktop area be
approved by the City Engineer. Seconded by Samuelson. The vote on this
item was delayed while the City Attorney checked to see if a Public Hearing
were required, at the request of Councilman Sheridan. The City Attorney
reported later that he could find no requirement that a Public Hearing be
held. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried.
3 -
OTHER PARTIES:
NAME
Mrs. Huge
Mrs. David Peterson
ADDRESS
5600 - 5th street Northeast
T!, I T� __
9, Opinions and recommendations by BOARD OF APPEALS: February 23, 1966
Mr. Charles Jaeger and Mr. Robert Jaeger, the petitioners were
present. Mrs. Huge, 5613 -4th Street N.E., Mrs. David Peterson,
5600 -5th -Street N_E.,, and Mr. M- K- Burton; 5604 -5th Street N_F.
were present. The Board and the interested parties discussed the pro-
ent
was that they wanted the building and property kept neat, the parking
area carexully plannea so tnat cars VMIUNIT 35 parxed a over the
place, and that they wanted a fence on the rear property line. The
Jaegers advised that they would accede to these wishes. Motion by
Goodrl ch, seconded by Fitzpatrick, to recommend to the CounCil +hat
the Special Use Permit be granted with the condition that a solid type
ma.a,
there being no nays airman Nawrocki declared the motion carried.
10; For Abbcwe,Recomi4n,i ..ons, Against Recommendations
Unanimous
1. ction by tity onnc -arni Date• 14arch 7, �--`=' i�� er��resent
L
•
.'>. .t.;:: Vii.^.•;!`':
•
�i �p Will
i6 V$illkO�ii /t�,�yh�at Sawa ®�+�-A �8Q®f �4®�city
of
WW � In the co ,�,�y��p�u s of /fie l/��1 Y M��14M1{��at
�O O DOclVIk POM6Q O p�/� •� 230 19"0
o G=W lder the
following mattwee
mWone d"IrIng to be howd with re to the above
MfttAws Will be howd at ,
1.
2.
Ll
•
BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MNUTES - FEBRUARY 23, 1966
The Meeting was caked to order by Chairman Nawrocki at 7230 P.M.
MDMRS PRESENT.- Hawrocki, Fitzpatrick, Goodrich
NDIBERS ABSENTt. Jankowski, Saunders
A REQUEST FOR A
TO
STREET NORTHEAST„ 1DY4YMINNESOTA AS PER CITY CODE OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA,
1963, REVISED DECEMBER 1.96 5., SECUON 45.OS (Sel. QUEST BY RCIERT JAEGER, 3610
CENTRAL AVEMTE NORTI LRAST. Dg -NNE US w IIINNE82 A➢ a*
Lir. Charles Jaeger and Mr. Robert Jaeger, the petitioners dere present.
Mrs. Huge, 5613 4th Street Northess_t, -a.. David Peterson, 5600 5th Street
Northeast, and Pyr. H. R. Barton, 56M& 5th Street Northeast were present.
The Board and the Interested parties discussed the proposed structure and
site p Aan. The consensus of the people present was that they wanted the
building and property kept meat, the parking area carefully planned so that
caws would -40t be parked all over the place, and that they wanted a fence on
the rear property latae. The Jaegergs advised that they would accede to these
wishes.
motion aby!.,ocdricie,, seconded X41
the Sp cin U�� SPe it ai�e _ ate
be ca�natructed on the rear pr
nays, ChairmenNawrockideclared
to
Upon a voice vote,
ion carried.
no
Mr. Peterson: was present. No others were prevent either for or against the variance.
Notion LFitzpatrick, seconded by GiRpdrich to _recoeaaad that the variance be
Up= a voice vote, there being no nays, Chaim Nawrocki declared
the mation carried.
AD.7II►�N'�m
There being no further business, Chairama Nawrocki declared the meeting adjourned
at 5203 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Earl P. Wagner
Secretary to the Board
OFFICIAL RICE
1WIC6° is mmmy oxym that the Bomcd Of ' s Of the city
Of FCMW wlU Mmt In fit.® eCQm¢ IX s of the City Hau ark
i:IA o0clOcc P,*,, YJ sdaYO -webzvgW 238 IL9660 to emsidw the
faxlcwblg matters a
AWMS l'itg tO b® hGWd with refecome to the abava
mattAws will be heard at s mmftSM9,
Hwy Namock.i
Publish: FObXUWY '90 1366 cahnumn
Fabrufty 160 1966 BOM OP APPRAW
I
1.
21
BOARD OF APPEALS nUTING WINUTES - FEBRUARY 23, 1966
The Meeting was called to order by Chatrazim Nawrocki at 7-.30 F-M
HIMMS PRESENTe Nawrocki, Fitzpatrick, Goodrich
NMWRS ABSENT-. Jankmeki, Saundem
FOR A SLECL,,tL USE ln'RHXT TO
-3 DISTRiCT 014 LOIS 16 AM 17
ANIOU CCUN'T!.'m".110KESUrA. SA14
kaNNEWTA AS PER CIN CODE of
. SECNION 45 08 f8e). =-Oug
9NTRAI� AVENIM,
Mr. Charles Jaeger and Hr, 'Robert Jaeger, the petitioners were present.
lira. Huge, 561.3i 4th Street Northeas.t., Yr -g-. I)avid Peterson, 5600 5th Street
Nartheastp Sad Mr. IL. 1". Berton, 5604. -r"t:h St-reet North,� ast were present.
The Board and the lnterszted parties discussed the proposed structure and
site P;AAn. The com.sia3us of the people present mae that they wanted the
building aad property kept neat, the parking a-rc4a carefully planned so that
care vauld?ilt be pzsrked all ever the place, and that they wanted a fence on
the rear p:roperty line. The Jeegera advised that they tould accede to these
'Wishes.
seconded b to recommend to the Council that
pers"Ic ....
....
b -arented with r.he coed tion that a solid type fence
_he. ecastructed on the rear Property li-2e. Upon a voice vate, there being no
nays, Chairman Hawracki declared, the motion carried.
3.
6
Mr. Pv;,ersonwas present. No others were prezez,: for or against the variance.
Motion by FitzratrIck., oecoaded by Goodrich, to -read-read that the variance be
Upm a voice -cte, -there being m nayv, Chalma. Havrocki declared
the ,aotion carried,
There being no furt'her buaiaess,. t7htirmAm Nawrocki declared the meeting adjourned
at 8%1103 ?,-A,
&m
Earl F. Wagner
Secretai-
y to the ZoArd
CITY OF FRIDLEY
LEGAL NOTICES
(official Publication)
,at 7:30 o'clockp m., Wednesday,
February 23, 1966, to consider the
following matters:
1. A request for a variance from.
Section 45.24, City Code of
Fridley, Minnesota 1963, Re-
vised December 1964, by waiv-
er of side, yard requirement
from 5 feet to .3.67 feet to
permit construction of as at-
tached double garage on Lot
23, Block 3, Rice Creek -Ter.
race Plat 7, Anoka County,
Minnesota, same being 6872
7th Street Northeast, "dley,
Minnesota. (Request by Har-
vey Peterson 151 Glen Creek.
Road F r i a 1 e y, Minnesota,
5543zi.
2. A request for a Special gg
Permit to permit con
of a dental laboratory in an
R-3 Dist�ct on Lots 16 and
i7I " lock 3, Hamilton's? Addi.
tion to Mechanicsville, Anoka
County, Minnesota, same be-
ing 5601 - 4th Street Northeast,
Fridley, Minnesota as ner City
Code of Fridley, Minnesota
1963, Revised December 1964,
Section 45.08 (8e). (Request by
Robert Jaeger, 3610 Central
Avenue Northeast, Minneapo.
Hs, Minnesota).
Anyone desiring to be heard
with reference to the above mat-
ters will be heard at this meeting.
HARRY NAWROCKI,
M OF
OF APPEALS
(Feb. 9, 16, 1968)—TC-2A
K� D
CENTRAL DENTAL LABOR TO Y4
5601 FOURTH STR E
E T N.E.
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
PHONE: 560.2230 BOX 4457
AUGUST 29, 1968
CITY MANAGER OF FRIDLEYe
THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED TO BUILD A DENTAL LABORATORY
AT 5601 4th STREET N.E., REQUIRED THE OWNERS TO CONSTRUCT A
FENCE ON THE NORTH AND EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY
OWNERS ABUTINC THE ABOVE PROPERTY NOW DO NOT WISH TO HAVE A
FENCE. THE ADDRESSES AND SIGNATORES OF PROPERTY OMRS APPEAR
BELOW.
�d loo�
7 -A '�' - *e elg't4�
';�L' -'' —
Ategular Council Meatiag ® April 4, 1966
regarding a code he ,could like the Pleading Commission to study. He stated that
the Plaasaing Commission Le not enthusiastic about any of the codes suggested.
Councilman Sheridan stated that he and Councilman Samuelson still plan to work
over some of the stems For a housing code, and at the time the Health Inspector°s
proposal Is presented, they will outUne what their general thinking to.
:..SIG CM-NISSION tMTiJ -S s REWNTNG REQUEST-, ZOA #66-02 UNZ RIEDEL-
Couacilman Samuelson asked how far bad
City ttanager stated that he had given
Attorney has -wade exp a Public Uearing
that it has some flexibility, and will
on Apra,14, 1966.
this rezoolog request progressed. The
this to the CUT Attorney and the City
Votice for ithe Planning Comm.iasion so
coma sap More the Planning Commission
BUI.?.d3EIG ' Y.�.
D METING IVVES n MARCH 30, 196Ga
I
The City Manager read the Building Board motion that any action on this item
be takentby the Council. The City Attorney explained a letter he had written
the Building,Board that a commercial dog kennel would be allowed in X -1 -but not
In the residential rove ties. Lund is in, but he did not feel he should make the
determination as to whather this is camc►erci.al or her own private kennel.
Notion by;Councilman Samuelson that the Council deny the request for construction
of a keuns�-. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, these being
no Gaya, Mayor.Kirkham declared the motion carried.
Iro. Fused arrivdd later in the meeting, and this item was discussed further
under t4eZVLeltor®s section of the Council Meeting).
UILD IG ZOARD Jlft'ES d CtiJ$1: T4TIA,TTON OF CONSTItiJCaZCiV OF A DENTAL WMLTORI
AT 5601 - 4TH 91=,T NOi'w'CMST(LOTS 16 ,6ND 17 BLOCK 3 MI. LTON' S ADDIT,I(XI
TO IXCCSO i 111 APPLICATION BY ROBERT JAEGER9 3610 CENTRAL AV ENM NOIt AST
1UTN Usg UMSOTA, 55421s
Councilman .Samuelson expl ned to Mr. Jaeger, who wars present at the Council
VAQting,Vthat- the -, ldin Board had recommended approval of the building,
permit with'tba condition hat he build a Fence on the north and -east side
and landscape to take'car of some of the height. He askod . Jaeger if he
planned to -construct the videwalk as shown on the site plan. Mr. Jaeger
stated he diet : riot know why that had been pant on, and whe r e would be
required for wild it now.. Councilman Samuelson said the City could not require
hila to build it. Councilman Wright said that there was just a queation" as it
is shoran `'on City- land and they wondered if he was serious about it. the. Jaeger
asked lum high the fence will have to be. Councilman Samuelson stated that he
assumed &,60 standard height fence, and he recommended stained redwood as there
1s less maintenance. It was suggested he build the fence on the north aide just
to 'Oe ��nt of the building and not all the way.to the front of the 1®t. There
vas's discussion of a way to gain roam fora few move cars to park and attli
have ":foie .1 ecapi*;.
COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 16, 1968 • PAGE 13
reial 01La VX y15PYVAL CLINIC AT 5601 4TH STREET NORTHEAST:
The City Engineer explained that it was a stipulation at the time
Of the building permit, that a fence be erected. He said that a
letter has been received from Central Dental Laboratory, dated
August 29, 1968, signed by the abutting property owners stating
that they do not wish to have the fence erected.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to agree with the property owners
request that the fence not be erected. Seconded by Councilman
Lieblf Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham de-
clared the motion carried.
The City Engineer explained that Mr. Ratley is being sued for
divorce by Mrs. Ratley. The letter in the Agenda it from Mr.
Charles Mayo, Mrs. Ratley's father and he is the fee owner. The
daughter and son-in-law are contract for deed purchasers.
Mr. Gibbs said that he would recommend revocation of the building
permit and stopping action on the lot split request until such
time as they get their affairs in order. The City Engineer asked
what was going to be done about the hole that has been dug there.
Mr: Gibbs said that he has written to Mr. Mayo, saying that as it
appears Mr. Ratley has disappeared, Mr. Mayo will be regaining
the property, so he is to fill up this hole.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to concur with the recommendation of
the City Attorney's office and revoke the building permit and
amend any previous action on the lot split as may be necessary
to return the land to it's original state before the request.
Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
DISC[TSSI�T OF ABLOMINOl115 LEA IRM U1�TIVIaRSITY AV�iVEa
The Ci#y Engineer explained that this line would be moved from
Main Street and University Avenue to the east side of the rail-
road tracks and running parallel to the tracks. He said that
they would be single wooden poles like there is on University
Avenue now. He said that if the Council.agrees with this, NSP
Will go to the railroad for their approval. He said that there
were some minor changes made in the southwest corner to run the
line along I. 694 which is different from their original plan
discussed, but that the over-all plan was good.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 16, 1968 PAGE 14
MOTION by Councilman Harris to
relocation of the 115 KV line.
Upon a voice vote, all voting
Notion carried.
approve of the re-routing and
Seconded by Councilman Liebl.
aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the
029-1968 RF.9=39G NO PARKING SIGNS ON ONE SIDE J&
SEM AT, 1050 —1170 52ND AVENUE N. E. s
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive Petition #29-1968. Seconded
by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting -.aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
The City Engineer said that this is a 30' road which runs between
the 6kywood Mall Shopping Center and Robert Hall's and carried
a lot of traffic. The problem is that there is not enough
parking space provided by the apartment house owner. There is
a lie parking space per unit required, but they may be being used
by boats and trailers etc. Councilman Sheridan suggested the
possibility of having 2 hour parking between certain hours, but
that there cannot be 24 hour parking as this is against the City's
ordinance.
Mr. Paul Spears, 1050 52nd Avenue. N.E. said that he had measured
Lincoln Street which has private residences on it, and there was
2" difference between that street and 52nd Avenue, yet they have
no restrictions on them. The children who live in the apartment
houses play in the back a great deal, and this is where all tie
deliveries have to be made, and he said that th®se apartment
dwellers feel that this is a hazard to the children, as the
drivers are not aware of the many children which play behind
the building. He said that if the no parking signs absolutely
cannot come down, then he would at least like to have a 25 mile
per hour speed limit, as he feels that the care take advantage
of this clear street and go through this areatw fast.
Councilman Harris said that he had looked at this and he felt
that some of the problem was that the grading is such in the back
that it will not accommodate a large amount of cars. He said that
he also noticed that some of the cars were not parked properly
and were actually taking up two Faces. 8e said that during the
winter the snow plow cannot get down the street, as the cars
are not moved for 24 hours ,in some areas. The City Engineer
commented that apartment house people seem to have a tendency
toward parking on the streets.
Councilman Barris suggested limiting parking, such as iron 6:00
A.& to 6:00 PA. there would be no parking on the street, thersiby
providing evening visitors a place to pag)%r
DATE: August 29, 1996
MEMORANDUM
PLANNING DIVISION
TO: Fritz Knaak, City Attorney
FROM: A=ele
Hickok, Planning Coordinator
McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: Miscellaneous Zoning Code Interpretations
We have the following questions regarding staffs interpretation on two separate zoning
issues. The issues are cellular phone (personal communications) antennae
installations, building -mounted versus tower -mounted, and re -use of a building at 5601
- 4th Street which was issued a special use permit for a dental laboratory. Blease
respond in writing with separate opinions regarding each item by September 11, 1996.
Personal Communication Antennae Installations. Tower versus Building Mounted
We are currently receiving multiple requests for the installation of personal
communication antennae within the community. The City is considering a lease
agreement for the installation of antennae on the water tower located on Highway 65.
Scheduled for review by the Council on September 16, 1996, is a request by a separate
company to install antennae on the St. Paul Waterworks Tower located on 75th Way.
We have had numerous other requests for similar installations at various sites
throughout the community.
The M-1, Light Industrial District, Section 205.17.0.1.C.(7), and the M-2, Heavy
Industrial District, Section 205.18.01.C.(7), allow radio transmitters and microwave
towers with a special use permit. Staff has taken the following interpretation: Building -
mounted personal communications antennae will be considered an accessory use in
the M-1, M-2, and P -Public districts. If the antennae are tower -mounted on a separate
tower or mono -pole, they will only be permitted in the M-1, Light Industrial District, the
M-2, Heavy Industrial District, and the P -Public District with a special use permit
requiring Planning Commission and City Council approval. Is this a correct
interpretation based on your review of the zoning ordinance? We are not prohibiting
them outright as prohibited by the Federal Communications Commission.
Miscellaneous Zoning Code Interpretations
August 30, 1996
Paae 2
Re -Use of Property at 5601 - 4th Street N.E.
In 1996, the City issued a special use permit for the above referenced property to allow
a dental laboratory. The property is zoned R-3, General Multiple Dwelling. At that time
the special use permit was issued, this use was permitted with a special use permit.
Since that time, the zoning code has been changed to eliminate these special use
permit provisions. The owners of the dental lab are nearing retirement and are
attempting to market the property. The real estate agent has proposed several
alternative uses and has requested an interpretation on what uses would be permitted
under the special use permit provision (minutes attached). Some uses proposed by the
real estate agent included day care, other minor offices, or laboratories, etc.
Based on the motion to approve by the Council, staff has determined that the only
permitted use of the building is for a dental laboratory. The owner could convert the
building back to a residential use. Please confirm that this interpretation is correct.
If you need any further clarification regarding these two items, please contact Scott at
572-3599 or Michele at 572-3593.
MM:Is
M-96-408
0
COUNCIL IaDTUTiS MARCH 7, 1966
PAGE 4
Councilman Wright asked if there was any evidence that the bidders get
together and submit a single bid in rotation. The City Manager angered,
'No". Councilman Samuelson atated that it was his understanding that the
City usually only receives once bid. The City Manager stated that two bids
had been received last time, but these specifications dere for heavy cars and
this might explain why some of the companies had not bid.
Motion by Councilman alright to accept the bid -o£ River Motors, 656 E. Main
Street, Anoka, Minnesota for two Dodge DP. 41 Poltaras, and trade in two 1965
Dodge police cars for a net cost of $3500. Seconded by Councilman Harris.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion.
carried.
BOARD OF APMA%S IMET3NG MWTES, FEBRUARY 23, 1966;
3- 7 *�-G6-
The City Manager showed the Council a site place of the proposed- dental
laboratory. and stated taut Mr..- Robert Jaeger was p-reacnt if the CouncWhad
any questifts. Councilman Wright asked if all the neigl4bors had received
i aadividual notices to the Board of Appealg-Meeting. Mr.' Wagner- said-_ that.
three of the five neighbors notified had been at the Meting. Councilman
Samuelson asked 1x. Jaeger about the landscaping as pictured on the plan.
14r. Jaeger stated that three of the trees pictured were on the lot -at present
and he would do the best he could to have it landscaped nicely.
Motion by Councilman Wright to approve the Special Use hermit requested by
Mr. Robert Jaeger to permit construction of a dental laboratory, subject
to the recommendation of the.Board-of Appeals -that there be a fence on the
rear property -line and that the drainage plan for the blacktop area be
Approvedby the.City Engineer. Seconded by Samuelson. The vote on this
item was delayed while the City Attorney checked to see if a Public Hearing
were required, at the request of Councilman Sheridan. The City Attorney
rep=tesilater that he -could find no requirement that a Public Hearing be
held. 'Upon a voice vote,. there being no naps, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried.
Councilman Wright asked if there is a Certificate of Survey and letters from
the affected neighbors. The City Manager explained that the petitioner also
mms the neat lot.
..u.0 a puunc street as approved
9y the zoning administrator as
adequate for the purpose.
3ecticn 5.1—USES PERMITTED,
3-1 DISTRICTS—ONE FAMILY
DWELLING DISTRICTS
L. One Family Dwellings.
?. Agriculture, gardening, truck
gardening, dairying, horticulture,
stock, animal and poultry raising,
and general farming, provided
that the following buildings and
uses shall not be located within
500 feet of the boundary line of
any R-1, R-2 or R-3 District;—
(a). Animal barns, pens or ken-
nels, or feeding or grazing areas.
(b) Fowl raising.
(c) Slaughter of animals or fowl.
Nurseries and greenhouses for
the propagation, cultivation and
growing of plants only.
.. Sale on the premises, in season
only, of farm products, truck gar-
dening products and nursery and
greenhouse products, produced
on the premises.
. Golf courses, country clubs,
yacht clubs, tennis courts, swim-
ming pools, and additional pri-
vate recreational uses, all non-
commercial.
. Churches, parish houses, con-
vents, child nurseries, nursery
schocls, and private schools for
educational purposes similar tb
public elementary and secondary
<ellools.
Public buildings and uses of the
fallowing kinds: elementary and
-rondary schools, school nt.hletic
f irlds, parks, playgrounds, librar-
ies, museums, community centers
•,nd recreation centers.
One only sign not more than 12
square feet in area pertaining to
the lease, hire or sale of land or a
building on which located, one
only outdoor bulletin hoard net
more than 12 square feet in area
for a church or school on the pro-
?erty on which located, and one
only name plate of not more than
1 square foot in area pertaining
to a home occupation or permit-
ted use, provided none shall emit
my flashing, flickering or glaring
light, direct or reflected, none
35 feet of the street when there
is no main building on the lot.
9. The following uses, but only
after securing a use permit for
the establishment, reconstruction,
structural alteration, enlarge-
ment, or moving of any such use,
after approval of such permit by
the Board of Appeals and the
City Council, and subject to any
condition imposed by such use
permit, as provided in Section 10,
or other section hereof;
(a) Thansformer stations, electric
substations, pumping stations, gas
regulator stations, public drains,
sewers, water lines, water stor-
age, treatment and pumping fa-
cilities and other similar public
utility and public service facili-
ties. (Item 9 enacted by Ordi-
nance No. 107, passed September
11, 1958).
Section 5.2—USES PERMITTED
IN R-2 DISTRICTS—LIMITED
MULTIPLE DWELLING DIS-
TRICTS
I. Uses permitted in R-1 Districts
2. Two-family Dwellings, multiple
dwellings and dwelling groups.
3. Boarding and lodging houses.
Section 5.3—USES PERMITTED
IN R-3 DISTRICTS—GENERAL
MULTIPLE DWELLING DIS-
TRICTS
1. Uses permitted in R-2 Districts.
2. Multiple dwellings and dwelling
groups.
3. Automobile courts, hotels, apart-
ment hotels, motels and tourist
homes, provided no business shall
be conducted except as a service
for guests thereof, accessible to
customers from inside the build-
ing only.
4. Resort transient cabins and
housing accommodations and' the
following accessory uses for the
accommodation of guests; boat
and motor storage and rentals,
bait shops, dining rooms, soft
drink and snack bars.
5. Colleges and Universities.
6. Fraternity and sorority houses.
7. Private clubs, lodges, libraries
and museums, except any that are
'
after securing a use permit for
the establishment, reconstruction,
structural alteration, enlarge-
ment, or moving of any such use,
after approval of such permWby
MhD
the board of appeals and the city
council, and subject to any condi-
tions imposed by such use permit,
A_
as provided in Section 10, or
other section hereof;
(Item (a) Repealed by Ordinance
No. 97, passed May 8, 1958).
(b) Clothes cleaning or launder-
f
ing pick-up stations, clothes
pressing and tailoring shops, and
self-service laundries.
(c) Flower, fruit and vegetable
sales and stands.
(d) Gasoline service stations and
accessory greasing, servicing,
cleaning and washing of automo-
biles, including 'minor adjust-
ments and repairs, but not general
l
repairs, overhauling, rebuilding,
demolition or spray painting.
e) Offices and office buildings
for business and professional
i
uses, including banks, medical
i
'and dental clinics.
f) Public offices and office
t
buildings, policearid fire stations,
post offices.
(g) Public utility offices and of-
fice buildings, telephone ex-
changes, transformer station%
electric substations or pumping
stations.
(h) Restaurants, refreshment
stands, but not any selling or
serving of alcoholic beverages.
Section 5.4—USES PERMITTED
AND EXCLUDED, P DISTRICTS
— PUBLIC FACILITIES DIS-
TRICTS
P Districts include such land areas,
waterways and water areas as are
owned, controlled, regulated, used
or proposed to be used by the City
of Fridley or other public body.
A. "USES PERMITTED:
1. Public buildings and uses.
2. Public parks, plitygrounds, ath-
letic fields, golf courses, airports,
parking areas.
3. Public streets, alleys, easements
and other public ways, highways
and thorbughfar-es.
r•
4. Public drains, sewers, water
public utility and public service
facilities.
5. Temporary public housing re-
quired and designed to relieve a
critical housing shortage.
6. Dwellings or dwelling units for
employees having duties in con-
nection with any premises requi+•-
ing them to live thereon, includ-
ing families of such employees
when living with there.
7. Other public purposes and uses,
except any excluded hereinafter.
B. USES EXCLUDED:
1. Dwellings or dwelling units ex-
cept those enumerated under
Lases Permitted.
2. Private trades, businesses, or
industries, except any that are
only accessory uses and necessar-
ily incidental to permitted uses.
3. Any uses which are objection-
able because of emission of odor,
dust, smoke, gas, vibration or
noise, or because of subjection of
life, health or property to hazard.
4. Dumps, junk yards.
Section 5.5—USES PERMITTED
AND EXCLUDED, C-1 and C -1S
DISTRICTS—LOCAL BUSINESS
AND SHOPPING CENTER DIS-
TRICTS
A. USES PERMITTED:
I. Uses permitted in R-3 Districts,
except auto camps and trailer
courts.
2. Retail stores and shops anri
small service businesses stirl, ;Is.
nrt shops; professional studios;
clothing, drug, grocery, fruit,
meat, vegetable, confectionery,
hardware, sporting goods, str,-
tionery, music, variety and notion
stores; household appliance, fix-
ture and furnishing stores and
repair shops in connection there-
with; stores and shops for bar-
bers, beauticians, cabinet makers,
electricians, jewelers, watchmak-
ers, locksmiths, painters, plumb-
ers, shoemakers, tailors, dress-
makers, clothes pressers, job
printers, blueprinters, photogra-
phers.
3. Advertising signs, appurtenant
to the use of the property on