PRE 2010 DOCSCity of Fridley
SUBJECT Permit No.
r
4.
PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATI011
r tU-------- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV,
PROTCCTIVQ EdSPMCTIQp MPT.
CITY HALL FRIDL&Y 9042
.J G1a-600-3490
NkrA iR§V.
PAA@ 1
A FiOVE0 BY
-Fl
0
JDATE
2/15/73
1 1
800
Job Address
ner Address Phone
�v 726 0aj e
CRntracto� � Address P o
Kind of Buildi
Use
Completion Date
stimateCL Cost
/
Plumbing Fixture Rates: NO. RATE TOTAL
FI
I I I I
/
Number Fixtures$2.00
--c�—(, . x
Future Fixtures —3 ' x $1.50
3aNYal
SYD
m
•
I i I o0
New Fixture -Old Open. x $1.50
i
Catch Bagtn x $3.25
',ddY
_I
i
Water Heater -99,000 BTU l x $3.00. b
X,�
•°sIw
l
I
1 I
+
I I
Ground Run old Bldg. x $3.25
•saa,
+
°
•nnNIYaI
l I I I
!!!
Elec. Water Heater x $2.00
m
SNISYS
I I �
H�lY7
t W
I
Gas Fitting Fees
—
It�w
39MtlO°Yaal
`V.
0I
I I I Oao
1st 3 Fixtures % x $2.00 Com,
O
Sa3MCHs
I I I
Z3
Additional Fixtures x$ .75
'1Nn°3I
NNIaa
Gas Range -199,000 x BTU $5.00
q c
HSYne.
�
o
Repairs & Alterations
A
See
ZSNNIS
_ U
Description: Code
l I (
_State Surcharge 50
SNISV9)
—az)l
TOTAL FEE $
H.LVSl
The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit
s,YNIanI
I
I I I v
for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work
in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling
a3iYMl
of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declare that
all the facts and representations stated in this
application are true and correct.
Sign ure ate i
r
9- 7 - -)'r 'f�
City of Fridley -
suBlEcr
PER 12304
AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS
LI I I D I T D C D A A I T
BUILDING
r
D L ' V �" L "' Y' 1
RE .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV.
INSPECTION
PROTECTIVE SEC.L98
n
_oNO -99
1 =
CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432
NUMBER
TV.
DATE
PAGE OF
APPROVED By
612-560-3450
910-F15
8/3073
JOB ADDRESS 148 - 53rd Avenue N.E.
1 LEGAL
LOT NO.
BLOCK
TRACTOR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED
DESCR.
5
Z
Carlson's Summit Manor North Addition SHEET
2 PROPERTY OWNER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE
James R. Lund Construction 7709 Woodlawn Drive N.E. 784-2597
3 CO TRACTOR MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO.
ame
4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO.
5 ENGINEER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO.
6 USE OF BUILDING Residential
7 CLASS OF WORK
7 NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE
8 DESCRIBEWORK Construct a 24' x 40' Dwelling and a 25' x 22' Garage
9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO
STIPULATIONS Drywell as per City specifications to be approved by the Engineering
Department and installed before the rough in inspection can be okayed.
Provide a hard surface driveway. Provide a verifying survey before
capping. All lumber to be stamped to meet Codes. As per soils an lysis
22 1972
of March 40" deep must be mane in
soil investigation boriWT5
excavatio rior &4 ap�provI of f�otiy $Qt responsible for founda
SEWER LOCAT ON: 6 Ea t o Manho a lJ�. v. 1 failure due to onsite
Wye Eley. 836.28 conditions.
Top of Footing: 839.68 Minimm
WATER LOCATION: 10' West of Sewer Service
SEPERATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WIRING,
HEATING, PLUMBING AND SIGNS..
TYPE OF CONST.
OCCUPANCY GROUP
OCCUPANCY LOAD
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING,
Wood Frame
VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
ZONING
SO. FT.
CU. FT.
AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION
R-1
18,200
OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT
ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
NO. DWLG. UNITS
OFFSTREET PARKING
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION
Z
STALLS GARAGES
AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND.CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS
VALUATION
SURTAX
AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED
$19,542
9.77
WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT
DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE
PERMIT FEE
SAC CHARGE
PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON-
44.00
275.00
STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE O ONSTRUCTION.
PLAN CHECK FEE
TOTALFEE
OGWXTURE
328.77
OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (DATE)
HEN PROPERLY ALIDATED.T I YOU PERMIT 4.
BLDG INSP DATE
SIGNATURE OF OWNER IIF OWNER BUILDERI (DATE))
:ion
roil
a �� CARLSON, .� ICATE : F SURVEY
dn
2324 WEST 19oih STREET
fW3 .aM.Aa
apt
SURVEY FOR:
1 .DAMES LUND CCNST. ® INC. -LAND SURVEYORS
Licensed, Insured & Bonded
I e�
;n
fC_t�oQ f
C4GU,--6`-6` __
dc. IH_ S A M A7 AwtoC t
E i5I � vR A M —
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
af'
to
1.8 6 ilk
DR
a -
9 s
I
t
11 *k A-+ a 4 r tr P�rr1X. .
ih/ A7 P (! CLC" LO V APS
t
LOT 59 BLorK 19 %ARLSON I S SUMMIT MANOR NORTH— i
ADD ! T t ON .
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS 15 A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION
OF A SURVEY OF THE GOUKDA91 ES OF THE LAND ,ABOVE. DESCR I BED AND OF
THE LOCATIOR OF ALL BUILDINGSt tF• ANY.® THEREORl9 ARID ALL VISIDLE
ENCROACMMENTSs IF ANY* FROM OR ON SAID LANDv AS SURVEYED BY US
THIS 3RD DAY OF JULY, 1973.
.r,o.-.r.�.w - � f-' n P.. �,J. a r-'.�'m.•_ k_;.�......•�w+ :N
�-
INC. LAND SURVEYORS
Licc,, ssluu, Insumd Bonded
s _ 4
WN
-1 �OO vo
J
J
vt \
1 y
+•+a .s Y
V
'I ® LOT 5- 6:-OCK 1 , CARL SON f S SUMMIT MANOR NORT1
ADD I i I n°s e
"I FY THAT 'I?liI S IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION
THE -BOUNIDARI ES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF
1F ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANYp THEREONO AND ALL VISIBLE
IF ANY O FROM OR ON SAID LAND,-AS SURVEYED BY US
W JULY, 1973.
sew ec &C-iqT-161-L)
�� 7 / CvV.34,-51:�
WY
el�l OF
�RTT- K' Lo G►ct —(I Oro
o F PGS
zoG197-10- o't%
3
93 r"c
}
APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL, ALTERATION,
OR ADDITION BUILDING PERMIT
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
OWNER ` SP .�"z BUILDER : _
ADDRESS • 8 ADDRESS : D�
NO • STREET: 0(1 - E
LOT: BLOCK: I ADDITION: 091V&'_Sia ,�• �� �����
CORNER LOT: INSIDE LOT:_ %' SETBACK: _� S SIDEYARD: /3r
Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed
building location drawn on these Certificates.
DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING
To Be Used As:
�G Front: Depth: 0 Height; V
Square Feet: Cubic Feet:
Front:
Depth: Height: �y
Square Feet; 'b - %OCubic Feet:
Type of Construction: Estimated Cost; -$
To Be Completed:
r /
The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein
specified, agreeing to do all work in sti-ict accordance with the City of
Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby
declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application
are true and correct.
l
DATE: 2 73 SIGNATURE• �
rq
(See Reverse Side For Additional Informat on.) r, ,
4
d
F,
645-3601
TWIN CITY TESTING mD ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
P%NO,N+ ENGINEERS AND CHEMISTS ry°ec too
662 Cromwell Avenue -St. Paul, Minn. 55114 - z
�3 REPORT OF: SOILS INVESTIGATION , y
PROP. RESIDENTIAL LOTS eS�
PROJECT: LOTS 3 - 5, BLOCK 1 DATE: March 22, 1972
53RD AVENUE NORTHEAST & MAIN STREET
REPORTED TO: FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA FURNISHED BY:
Mr. James Lund COPIES TO:
7709 Northeast Woodlawn Drive
Minneapolis, MN, 55432
LABORATORY No. 9=3731
INTRODUCTION
This report concerns the recent soils investigation we performed at the above referenced
site. The site topography is relatively level with a 2' elevation difference between the
street and the rear of the area. The surficial geology of the area is generally defined
by granular outwash materials with surface alluvial deposits in depression areas.
We understand the irregular shaped trapezoidal area was site graded 10 to 15 years ago.
At that time a considerable quantity of fill was placed. Presently there are plans to
construct three, gne-story single family dwellings at the site.
Prior to the initiation of these construction operations, we were requested to perform a
preliminary soil investigation. Based on this investigation, we were requested to offer
general recommendations concerning the feasibility of constructing the proposed residences.
INVESTIGATION
On March 20, 1972, we put down four hand auger Borings at locations illustrated on the
attached sketch. The depth of the borings varied from 7' to 121. Because of the method
of sampling, the determination of the extent and consistency of the various soil layers
is somewhat approximate.
In addition to the hand auger borings, we employed'a, hand penetrometer to aid in the
evaluation of the relative density of the fill material and the consistency of the natural
soils encountered in the borings. The hand penetrometer relates the compressive strength
or bearing capacity of soil from its resistance to be,penetrated by a special steel tipped
probe.
At boring hocations 1, 2, and 4,we encountered 5' to 8' of generally fine-grained brown
sand fill. Our penetrometer readings indicated the fill was consistently in a relatively
dense state. The underlying natural soils at these boring locations varied from at least
2' of black, medium consistency silty clay in boring #4 to at least 4' of soft to
medium consistency clayey silt in boring #1. In boring #2, the underlying soils included
a 6" black silty sand layer underlain by 1,5' of gray, medium consistency silty clay and
then at least 1' of reddish -brown, fine-grained sand.
In boring #3, we encountered granular soils consisting of a 2' layer of black silty sand
underlain by brown, fine to medium -grained sand and silty sand.
No ground -water was encountered at the boring locations. However, surface drainage in,the
b
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS, AND AUTHOR-
IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS 18 RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL.
645-3601
TWIN CITY TESTING AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
ENGINEERS AND CHEMISTS iePeCr�o
662 Cromwell Avenue - ST. Paul, Minn. 55114
REPORT OF: SOILS INVESTIGATION rests
DATE: March 22, 1972
LABORATORY No. 9-3731
rear portion of
minor quantities
soil interfaces
INVESTIGATION
—(cont.
the site had caused the granular fill
of perched water were encountered i'n
at boring locations #1 and #4.
ANALYSIS
PAGE: 2
to become quite moist. In addition,
the vicinity of the fill -natural
Based on our investigation, it is our opinion that from the point of view of the existing
soil conditons it would be economically feasible to construct single family structures at
the site. Except at boring_#3, in the southeast portion of the site; the granular fill
appears quite uniform and is in a relatively dense state. Assuming our borings are re-
presentative of the fill condition throughout the site, the fill should not undergo
detrimental setttlement under the relatively light unit loadings of the proposed structures.
As noted in the investigation section, we encountered considerable depths of black cohesive
clays and relatively soft silty clays and clayey silts at nearly all boring locations. In
generally,the depth of underlying cohesive material appeared to increase from south to north.
The natural soils have been consolidated under the weight of the 5' to 8' thickness of
fill material for a period of 10 to 15 years. However, the presence of these somewhat
marginal soils does necessitate placing the structural foundations a vertical distance
above the natural soils equal to twice the footing width. Assuming a nominal 20" footing
width, a minimum 3' depth of fill should be maintained between the bottom of the footing
and the underlying cohesive soils.
Due to the cursory nature of the present investigation and the variable soil conditions
encountered at the boring locations, we recommend all footing excavations be inspected
prior to placement of the footing forms. The inspection would be in the form of placement
of a number of relatively shallow hand auger probes through the fill material into the
underlying natural soils. Although it appears the likelihood of encountering inferior
organic soils or extremely soft alluvial soils is somewhat remote, the presence of such
soils within the influence zone of the footing would necessiate further excavating.
In addition, we recommend surface compaction and density evaluation be made of the fill
material in the footing areas within the influence zone of the footings. This evaluation
would be in the form of a small number of field density determinations.
REMARKS
Because the area of the borings in relation to the entire area is very small and because
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS, AND AUTHOR-
IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL.
645-3601
TWIN CITY TESTING ±ND ENGINEERING LABORATORY. INC.
ENGINEERS AND CHEMISTS
(4*PNWN*A
662 Cromwell Avenue - St. Paul, Minn. 55114
REPORT OF: SOILS INVESTIGATION \C I
t
F S4
DATE: March 22, 1972
LABORATORY No. 9-3731 Rs%GE:
REMARKS
cont.
of the method of sampling, we do not,warrrant conditons below the depths of our borings
or that strata logged from our borings are necessarily typical of the entire site or are
precisely accurate.
TWIN CITY TESTING AND
ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
Gyne Kilker
Civil Engineer
BriayrR. Dobie, P.,g/, -- -
Supervisor, Soils & Inspection Department
WK: BRD:rw
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS, AND AUTHOR-
IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL.
#3 #40
LOT 5 LOT 4 LOT 3
#2 O #10
53RD AVEI4UE
~ DRAWN BY WK CHECKED BY BD
S01 L TEST BORI NGSSCALE: NO SCALE JOB NO. 9.3731
1 -
TWIN
PROJECT:
REPORTED TO:
645-3601
CITY TESTING mu ENGINEERING LABORATORY. INC.
ENGINEERS AND CHEMISTS
662 Cromwell Avenue - St. Paul, Minn. 55114
REPORT OF: EXCAVATION INSPECTION
PROPOSED RESIDENCE - LOT #3
53RD AVENUE NORTHEAST & MAIN STREET DATE:
FR 1EY, MINNESOTA
.JW. James Lund FURNISHED BY:
7709 Northeast Woodlawn Drive COPIES TO:
Minneapolis,, MN 55432
LABORATORY No. 9-3746
GENERAL
March 30, 1972
Fridley Building Inspection
Department
This report presents the results of our recent soils investigation at the above referenced
project. Our report of March 22, 1972, describes the previous grading work performed at
this site. In addition, we described the conditions encountered in our 7' to 72' deep
hand auger borings. At the time of previous inspection, we were not aware of the exact
dimensions, location and depth of excavation of the proposed construction. Therefore,
we indicated the necessity for an on-site inspection prior to placement of the footings
In the proposed structures.
Th,e proposed structure for Lot #3 is a one-story, single family residence 24' by 42' in
plan with a full basement. The structure will be supported on continuous strip footings.
We have no information regarding the building loads but assume the foundation design was
based on allowable bearing capacity of up to 1500 psf. The footings will be located
approximately 5' below the existing exterior grade.
We understand the foundation plan is to excavate the basement to proposed footing eleva-
tion and support the structure on the exposed soils. The purpose of our inspection was
to determine if the exposed soils will provide adequate support for the designed_ unit
loadings.
INVESTIGATION
On March 29, 1972, we performed a visual inspection of the excavation. The exposed soils
were visually and manually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification
System and estimates were made of their strength properties.
Several shallow hand auger borings were put down to determine local subsurface soil
conditions. Hand penetrometer readings were performed in the underlying soils. In addi-
tion, several in-place moisture density tests were performed in the granular fill material.
The density tests were evaluated according to 95 percent of the moisture -density relation
of soils as designated by ASTM:D698-70. The results of these tests are attached.
In general, the depth of fill increased from west to east. Along the west footing line,
the soils encountered in our hand auger borings varied from at least 4' of medium to rather
stiff consistency gray silty clay and clayey silt in the northwest corner to 1.5' of
fine-grained brown sand fill underlain by at least 3.5' of brownish -gray silty clay of
medium to rather stiff consistency in the southwest corner. In the center portion of the
excavation, we encountered 2' of fine-grained brown sand fill underlain by at least 3' of
brownish -gray medium to rather stiff consistency silty clay. In the east portion of the
site, we•encountered up to 3.5' of fine-grained brown sand fill underlain by at least 3'
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHOR-
IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL.
645-3601
TWIN CITY TESTING AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY. INC.
�.dcneNaN ENGINEERS AND CHEMISTS yQ6Cr�0
662 Cromwell Avenue - St. Paul, Minn. 55114 a s
REPORT OF: EXCAVATION INSPECTION
s
DATE: March 30, 1972
LABORATORY No. 9-3746 PAGE: 2
INVESTIGATION
cont.
of brownish -gray medium consistency silty clay.
Field density tests were performed in the central and eastern portions of the excavation.
The test elevations varied from 6" to 1.5' below planned bottom footing grade. The test
taken at the higher elevation indicated a relative compacted density of 98 percent. The
tests taken lower within the sand fill stratum were found to have a somewhat lower relative
density of 93 percent. A series of hand penetrometer probes indicated that the decrease
in compacted density with depth occurred uniformly throughout the excavation area.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the results of our inspection it is our opinion that the natural soil foundation
system for the above referenced project will adequately support the designed unit loads
with no resulting detrimental settlement. With respect to the fill material, we recommend
the east portion of the site be surface compacted prior to placement of the footings. The
compactive effort should be applied with a vibratory roller or relatively heavy hand
operated compaction equipment. Providing the fill is surface compacted, it is our opinion
the fill material will be sufficiently dense to adequately support the relatively light
unit loading.
Because no deep penetration borings were performed at this site, we cannot warrant the soil
conditions below the depths of our shallow hand auger borings. However, available inform-
ation suggests the likelihood of encountering inferior soils at depth is somewhat remote.
TWIN CITY TESTING AND
ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
Wayne Kil Wr
Civil Engineer
Brian R. Dobie, P. E.
Supervisor, Soils & Inspection Dept.
WK: BRD:rw
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS. THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENT$. AND AUTHOR.
IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL.
TWIN
o/.ao>ow,cy�
PROJECT:
REPORTED TO:
• ` 645-3601
CITY TESTING mD ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
ENGINEERS AND CHEMISTS
662 Cromwell Avenue - St. Paul, Minn. 55114
REPORT OF. DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL
RES- LOT #3 - 53RD AVE. NE & MAIN ST. DATE:
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
James Lund COPIES TO:
7709 Northeast Woodlawn Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55432
LABORATORY No. 9-3746
TEST NUMBER: 1
DATE TAKEN: March 29, 1972
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sand, mostly fine
(Moisture -Density Sample grained, trace of
Number) gravel, brown
(SP -SM) -1
LOCATION: 16% of SE
building corner
DEPTH BELOW FOOTING ELEVATION: 1'
DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 11
FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION:
N
:gV �
March 30, 1972
(1) Fridley Building Inspection
Department
March 29, 1972
Sand, mostly fine
grained, trace of
gravel, brown
(SP -SM) -1
10'W of SE
building corner
1.5'
1.5'
3
March 29, 1972
Sand, mostly fine
grained, trace of
gravel, brown
(SP -SM) -1
Center of
building
5%
M
Method Density in Place By Sand -Cone Method, ASTM: D1556-64 (44 Basis)
Dry Density (pcf) 100 100 106.5
Moisture Content (%) 5.8 6.4 6.4
Plus #4 Material W 1 1 1
LABORATORY MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL:
Method ASTM:D698-70, Method "A", (44 Basis)
Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 107.7 107.7 107.7
Optimum Moisture W 14.5 14.5 14.5
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS:
Compaction (%) 93 93 98
Recommended Compaction%) 95 95 95
REMXRKSS: The above test locations were selected by Twin City Testing and Engineering
Laboratory, Inc. Compaction meets specifications in the above test area #3
but is below specifications in the other test areas #1 and #2.
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHOR-
IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IB RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL
Twin City Testing and ngineering Laboratory, Ine.'
By
848.3801
TWIN CITY TESTING AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY. INC.
ENGINEERS AND CHEMISTS yp6Ct�o
g 662 Cromwell Avenue - St. Paul, Minn. 55114 : s
y a
MOISTURE - DENSITY CURVE SAMPLE No. 1 4F S-%
RES -LOT #3 - 53RD AVE. NE & MAIN STREET March 30
PROJECT: FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA DATE: , 1972
REPORTED TO: James Lund COPIES TO:
LABORATORY NO. #9-3746
109
108
44
d
107
5i
W 106
105
104
METHOD OF TEST: ASTM:D698-70, Method "A", (44 Basis)
TYPE OF MATERIAL: Sand, mostly fine grained, brown (SP -SM)
MAXIMUM DENSITY: 107.7 lb. /Cu. ft. OPTIMUM MOISTURE: 14.5 %
12 13 14 15 16 17 .`
MOISTURE CONTENT°la
V Ir
Application for Power Plants and Healing, Cooling, Yentilattn. Re/dgerafioe and
Air Conditioning Systems mid Devices
PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE
GRAVITY WARM AIA: RATE TOTAL
Furnace Shell & Duct Work ................ .. $10.00 $
Replacement of Furnace .... . ..... ..... .. 6.00 $
Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 6.00 $
Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 3.00
MECIL WARM AIA
Furnace Shell & Duct Work to 130,000 BTU ...... . ..$10.00 $_CPCD
each add. 60,000 BTty .................... .. 3.00 ;
Replacement of Furnace 6.00 $
Repairs & Alterations --up to $500.00 6.00 $
Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 3.00 $
STEAM or HOT WATER SYSTEM
Furnace Shell & Lines—to 400 sq. ft. EDR Steam $10.00
Furnace Shell & Line --to 640 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water 10.00 $_
Each add. 200 sq. ft. EDR Steam 3,00
Each add. 320 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water
3.00 $---
OIL BURNER—to 3 gal. per hour 6.00 $— _
over 3 gal. per hour—See Fee Schedule
GAS BURNER (up to 199,000 BTU)�"
6.00 $
-o O
over 199,000 BTU See Fee Schedule
GAS FITTING FEES: NO RATE TOTAL
1st 3 Fixtures x$ 200 $—�
Additional Fixtures x .76 $
Gas Range to 199,000 a$ 6.00 $
AIR CONDI -jai fa
FAN HEATING SYSTEM See Fee Schedule
VENTILATING SYSTEM $
ALTERATIONS & REPAIRS TOTAL FEE 1 ®Z
ROUGH
FINAL 4/- 9 -7 h`
Dept. of BldgL /P'hone 890.480
3
L.M.7 J `51.� A'L-9-
City of Fridley:
The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work hereir
specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances
and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts
and representations stated in this application are true and correct.
a G� Fridley, Minn- 1 18
Owner �y�
Kind of Building
Used as
To be completed about
Estimated Cost,
Old ew. uilding Permit No. Permit No. -S-90-51,
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
HEATING or POWER PiAANTSSteam, Hot Water, arm Air No
/�
Trade Name S Ne..G[ r°�9, ` s7 - a Z)
ill
Capacity—_ Sq. Ft. E.DR BTU H,p
Total Connected Load 14 ® 2 Kind of F1te
BURNER — Trade Name Size
Capadty Sq. FL E.DR BTU Hp
(REMARKS -OVER)
_01A
rP1 I
HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS FRIDLEY, _MINN.
Weatherstrips A.S.H.W.E. Construction No. Insulation
Guide
Windows I Doors Reference Out. Wall Int. Wall Ceiling Roof Floor Kind How Applied
Yes—No Yes—No 19_
F1.1 Room Length Width /2 Height ff F1.1 _Room I Lengthd Width Height
Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area
Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area
No. of Wane of Wane 11. to of crack sq. ft.
Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area
Width Height No. of Lineal f . Area
No. of pane of Dane lights of crack eq. ft.
1 otal Btu. !
Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area
41.1 k? t- M Room ( L.entith f Width c/ Heiaht
Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area
Coef.1 Btu
It Infiltration /
Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area
No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. it.
7 9
-16 .2 /0
Exp. wall 9200
z
Coef.
Btu
Infiltration 1
160
00
Glass J9
IS5T
to V-5—
Exp. wall /
S51—
Ceiling
Net exp. wall
Q
7J?)
Int. wall
Int. wall
Ceiling
Floor
#W
17
106 F
1 otal Btu. !
Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area
41.1 k? t- M Room ( L.entith f Width c/ Heiaht
Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area
Coef.1 Btu
It Infiltration /
Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area
No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. it.
7 9
si-I to
Exp. wall 9200
z
Net exp. wall 1411,
Coef.1
Btu
Infiltration
Ceiling 5`6
1:0
Floor 6
Glass
Total Btu.
S51—
Ceiling
Exp. wall
Net exp. wall
o
1D
(,
Int. wall
Ceiling AfY
/:j
Ceiling
Floor 110A
/009
Floor,
j
Total Btu.
Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area
' Fl. Room I Length 1, 1 Width
Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area
Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area
No. of Dane of Dane Ilghte of crack eu. ft -
I I I I
Coef.1 Btu
It Infiltration /
('61 0 0
Glass /9
si-I to
Exp. wall 9200
z
Net exp. wall 1411,
ID elD
Int. wall
Infiltration
Ceiling 5`6
t 2,
Floor 6
Int. wall
Total Btu.
Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. leader area
Ceiling
Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area
y,�P Fl.l n: — A, Room I Lenath / 2 Width 1 Heiaht ..v
Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area
Coef.
Btu
Infiltration
G LO
14-0
Glass
z
Coef.
Exp. wall
Infiltration
Infiltration
Net exp. wall
a
9-3
Int. wall
Exp..wall I CM
Ceiling
0 I;Z
o
Floor
Total Btu.
Inc. wall
C/ n C)
Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area
y,�P Fl.l n: — A, Room I Lenath / 2 Width 1 Heiaht ..v
Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area
Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area
No. of pane of pane Ilights of crack sq. ft.
l 31; 7
.y
Coef.
Btu
Infiltration
Infiltration
o�
Glass
S�
Glass
Exp..wall I CM
Net exp. wall
10
J81-30 .
Inc. wall
Net exp. wall
Ceiling AfY
/:j
7X
Floor 110A
/009
Total Btu. 14 LJ 9
Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ms. W.A. Leader area
I Fl.I ZZ- e/Zi Y.Room I L.enath `7 Width =7 Heiaht7
Windows andboors--Crackage and Area
Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area
No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. ft.
.y
Coef.
Btu
Infiltration
1 Win
Glass
3 5—
Exp.
Exp. wall
gL® b
Net exp. wall
0
1&ao
Int. wall
Ceiling
Floor
Z
rotal Btu.
Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sa. ins. W.A. Leader arra
560.3450
(Zit Of riaffe
ANOKA COUNTY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE February 4, 1975 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
James Lund Construction, Inc.
2417 - 148th Avenue N.E.
..Anoka, Minnesota 55303
Re: 148 - 53rd Avenue N.E.
Dear Mr. Lund:
An inspection on this date indicates the following deficiencies exist at
148 - 53rd Avenue N.E. These:;items must be corrected before the City can final
out our records. r
1. A hole has been cut in the firewall in the garage. Although there is
a scuttle in one of the closets, the owner says no cover exists for
this opening.
2. There is an excessive build up of effervescence or lime deposit on most
of the basement blocks. They should be cleaned off and the cause
corrected.
3. Water is entering the wall where the garage abuts the house. Since
the.basement blocks are wet in that area, water may be penetrating
all the way down. Also water is coming out of the soffit vents near
the west kitchen window indicating a roof backup leak in that area
or condensation in the attic.
4. The bathtub needs to be resealed to the tile wall.
5. The owner says the patio deck is loaded on loose blocks. If this is
so, please pour pier footings to 3 foot 6 inch frost line.
We realize some of the above will have to wait until weather permits such
repairs, but in the meantime, any damage to this house caused by delay of repair
will also be your responsibility. Items # 1 through # 4 need immediate attention
and must be corrected by March 1, 1975. Item # 5 must be corrected by June 1, 1975.
CJB/mh
CC : • 1101n6 61VA1
Respectfully,
CLARENCE J. BELISLE
Building Inspector
G
sueJEtr
PERMI
City Of Fridley
31 22
AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS
BUILDING
PERMIT
RECEIPT NO.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV.
INSPECTION SEC.
/
r PROTECTIVE
1q6
1 . �
NUMEIER
REV
DATE
PAGE OF
APPROVED BY
CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432
L J` 612-571-3450
910415
6/30/00
JOB ADDRESS 148 - 53rd Avenue NE
1 LEGAL
LOT NO.
BLOCK
TRACT OR ADDITION
SEE ATTACHED
DESCR.
5
1
Carlson's Summit Manor North Addition SHEET
2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS
ZIP PHONE
June Nordling 148 - 53rd Ave. NE
3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS
ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO
All Systems Roofing, Inc., 2140 Charles Ave., St. Paul, MN 55114 651-646-3533 8963
4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS
ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO
5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS
ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO
6 USE OF BUILDING
Residential
7 CLASS OF WORK O NEW 0 ADDITION 0 ALTERATION IN REPAIR O MOVE O REMOVE
8 DESCRIBE WORK
Reroof (Tear Off) 4 Gutters
9 CHANGEOFUSEFROM TO
STIPULATIONS
Underlayment must comply with the State Building Code.
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL. PLUMBING, HEATING.
TYPE OF CONST.
OCCUPANCY GROUP
OCCUPANCY LOAD
VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
ZONING
SO. FT
CU FT.
AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION
OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT
ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
NO DWLG. UNITS
OFFSTREET PARKING
'HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION
1
ISTALLS GARAGES
AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS
VALUATION
SURTAX
AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED
WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT
o
%1,923.00
$•96
DOES NOT PRESUM TO GI AUTHORITY TO IOLATE OR CANCEL THE
PERMIT FEE
SAC CHARGE
PROVISIONS OF OTH RST E OR LO W REGULATING ON-
S UCT T PER CTION
$69.25
Fire SC $1.92
E OF CO ,
PLAN CHECK FEE
EE
TO77.13
(/� �)
3U Zj
S NATURE OF CON RA TOR OR AUTHORED AGE t0 Ei
EN PROP
Y LIDATED HI$ IS V R PE MIT
1LQ6 [NSP
GATE
S�GN4TURE OF OWNERJF OWNER BWLDERI [DATE,
G
NEW [ ] Effective 1/1/2000
ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY (763) 572-3604 Bldg Insp
ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
2
Construction Address:
Legal Description:
Owner Name & Address: U Aj e, 12 Tel. # p
Contractor: l % o 1N MN LICENSE #
Address: Tel. #�'�oy�6
Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the
lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale.
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT
LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft
GARAGE AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft
DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft
OTHER:
or
Construction Type: / ) T � A A 4�4' � )WOesti�ated Cost:
�- �;u 71e CAC '
Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Ft x $ =$
DATE: d/ /APPLICANT: Tel. #
CITY USE ONLY - Call (763) 572-3604 for Permit Fees if mailing in application
Permit Fee Fee -Schedule on Reverse Side
Fire Surcharge $ / 9 .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%)
State Surcharge $ $.50/$1,000 Valuation
SAC Charge $ $1100 per SAC Unit
License Surcharge $'_ $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors)
Driveway Escrow $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above
Erosion Control $ $450.00 Conservation Plan Review
Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering
Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ]
TOTAL
Shs ULATIONS: