Loading...
PRE 2010 DOCS0 0 Village of Fridley, Minn. BUILDING PERMIT NO 0I0 Office of INSPECTOR OF BUILDING'S Owner _ T ,ow f, Architect Fridley, Minn.- Jyil, " Builder �., /7zo Q LOCATIO OF BUILDING No. Street - '`'�'" Part of Lot Lot Block Addition or Sub -Division DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING r � Front ,?_ De�) t. �," L` -c pth ��l Height + stories Manner of Construction ' To be used as z"',r `� "`= `�-41 To be completed �- ` ''' 'p Estimated Cost ''�"- Permit is hereby graated to '.�✓»,� ..;,x .; ® ga��_e•.5... _.._s x the building 'I1`'g described in the above statement. This permit is granted upon the express condition that the person to whom it is granted, and his agents, employees and workmen, in all the work done tn,;'around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordi- nances of Fridley, Minn., regarding the construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings within the city limits, and this permit may be revoked at any time upon violation of any of the provisions of said ordinances. Inspector of Buildings. AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT In consideration of the issue and, delivery to me by the Inspector of Buildings of Fridley of the above permit, I hereby agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the description above set forth and according to the provisions of the ordinances of Fridley, and, being first duly sworn, I hereby` state and say that the facts stated by me and contained in the above permit are true as thereinstated. Subscribed •alid sworn to before me at Fridley, day of 4- A.D. 19-x' C� J Minnesota, this `' ` MEMO TO: Gerald R. Davis, City Manager and City Council MEMO FROM: Richard Sobiech, Assistant Engineer MEMO DATE: April 11, 1973 REFERENCE: Request by Glen Ramsdell40 7th Place to Construct Fence in Public Right of The Engineering Department recommends approval of the request of Mr. Ramsdell, subject to the applicant signing the attached agreement. Upon review of the site, it was noted that the roadway is not travelled now and there are already barricades at each end. In considering this request by the Ramsdells', the Council should be aware of the approval given to the Amborns' in October, 1972 (Minutes attached for reference). Their request was very similar to the Ramsdells'. There are existing sanitary and storm -sewer lines in place in this right of way. Richard Sobiech Assistant Engineer RNS/ j m 5 A 5A C7/�h P.i2-msjc--.1j C)y y loi�aT/ 4h/d- pe 0)0,ee ty Gcl JGC ch-� c J67L Ghd fiof block C04 h � / -74r,6 W 6 s O v c r ®!� � � ,,yam els 6;k cS an bl,e-v C -I" hG'4r by C-ql 5-i,ajS 1.5 ScaA,=r,=c( `l G rc q -Ar #, � -jz C 14,E,,q n , y 10. I y -der G- 16, S r 4 ectf i '1e - ercrhGleS 5� .S�(4 b G/IJ IS/ 0 //I', A L Ic r � Gh, 6Qrh -ya 5 S7 CI v. /�l, t. rr,,d /,ey , / / h REGULAR 6 PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF OCTOBER 10, 1972 PAGE 10 S C at that time wanted to build a double bungalow. Now, some of the people are not in favor of this proposal either, the couple living next door are very disturbed. He said he could not see why the Planning Commission tabled this three times when there was a lot of objections and then decided to approve it. He said this structure would be a lot larger than a double bungalow. He thought this would require a rezoning as it would be in the same catagory as hospitals and nursing homes. The City Engineer explained that there is a provision in the ordinance covering R-1 for nursing homes, clinics, hospitals, nurseries, churches, etc. up to 100 units and is under the control of the Council through a special use permit process. Mayor Liebl said this is on 69th g Central - what is the surrounding zoning? The City Engineer said that there is industrial to the west and north, directly to the east is R-1 and further to the east is multiple. Just to the south is R-1, then.City property. This lot is located on Central Avenue which Is a county road and 69th Avenue, a City street. Mayor Liebl asked if the petitioner was present, with no response. NOTION by Councilman Utter to table this item. Seconded by Councilman Mittelstadt. The City Attorney suggested that notices be sent out to both the petitioner and the surrounding property owners notifying them that this item will again be on the Agenda November 6th. He added that the Council shouldmake specific findings if the request for a special use permit is denied. If the ordinance says that such a use is permissible with a special use permit, then it is denied, the Council has to have a good reason for denial, or the courts may turn .the findings over. THE VOTE UPON THE MOTION, being a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #72-13, BY GORDON G. SWENSON: To construct a building to be used for repair shop, specializing i brakes under City Code 45.101, B, 3 D, at 1010 Osborne Road. MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the request for a special use permit by Gordon Swenson: §econded by Councilman Mittelstadt. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #72-14, BY ERNEST M. HARPER: To construct a second garage to house one car & boat on Lot 2, Block 1, Rice Creek Plaza North Addition per Code 45.051, 2, A MOTION by Councilman Utter to approve the request by Ernest M. Harper. Seconded by'Councilman Mittelstadt. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO PUT A FENCE ACROSS AN EASEMENT BY ROBERT AMBORN: Easement next to Lot 1, Block 4, City View Addition. The City Engineer explained thet Mr. Ambqrri Wanted to put a fence across the public easement. There Is a po$s4ility_.9r ygpating this easement, but it could be fqund to be needed in the future. The City Attorney said that he could 1 REGULAR g PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1972 PAGE 11- 5D ". not see any problem with allowing the fence providing that he understands that the easement could be needed in the future, and in that event, he would be responsible for moving the fence and the costs involved. Allowing the fence would be better than vacating, then finding that the easement is needed at Some future date. MOTION by Councilman Breider to allow Mr. Amborn to construct the fence pro- viding that the City retains the right to use the easement if needed, and if utilities need repair, Mr. Amborn will remove and repair the fence at his expense. Seconded by Councilman Mittelstadt. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 4, 1972. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS - DESIGN CONTROL MEETING OF OCTOBER 5, 1972: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A MUNICH -AL LIQUOR STORE ON LOT 8, ALL OF LOT 7, EXCEPT THE EAST 35 FEET THEREOF, ALL Il' =LOCK 2, MOORE LAKE HIGHLANDS 3RD ADDITION THE SAME BEING 6289 HIGHWAY #65 NS., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE -NE., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA): ,✓ MOTION by (buncilman Breider to concur with the recommendation of the Building Standards - Design Control and approve the plans for the municipal liquor store, subject to their stipulations. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the Minutes of the Building Standards Design Control Meeting of October 5, 1972. Seconded by Councilman Mittelstadt. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF REPORT ON PHASING OUT OF LONGEVITY PAY FOR NON-UNION PERSONNEL. ,The City Manager -said that the City has had longevity pay for non-union 1personnel,and some of the union personnel.- This is an unnecessary cost for f retention of employees and his suggestion was to phase out this program on all employees hired after this date, with no effect on existing employees. As far as the unions are concerned, this is a negotiable item. MOTION by Councilman Breider to concur with the recommendation of the City • Manager outlined in his memo dated October 13, 1972 to phase out this program, with the understanding that this does not affect existing non- union personnel. Seconded by Councilman Mittelstadt. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER #4 - SW&SS PROJECT #102: MOTION by Councilman Mittelsta4t to apprpve Change Order #4 for SW&SS #102 in the amount of Deduct $1,030.00. Seconded by �qq Dcilman Utter. Upon a "voice vote, all ayes, Mayoip.Liebl declarred-the motion carried unanimously. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT entered into this day of 1973, by and between hereinafter designated as "Owners", and the City of Fridley, a municipal corporation, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the Iscit ll . WHEREAS, the Owners have requested that the City allow the place- ment of fencing across the following described property: That property lying between Lot 1, Block 5, City View and Lot 15, Block 6, City View, from 57th Avenue N.E. to 57th Place N.E.; as shown on the attached map which is made part of this agreement, and; WHEREAS, the Owners understand that the above described property is a public right of way, and; WHEREAS, the Owners and the City understand that sanitary sewer and storm sewer piping exists in the public right of way, and; WHEREAS, the City understands that the public right of way is not presently open to through traffic. NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: ` 1. The City shall allow the Owners, at their own expense, to place a fence across the above described property in the following location: 2. In the event the public right of way is required for use by the City and/or other utility companies, the Owners, at their own expense, shall remove and/or replace the fence; Agreement Page Two 3. That after placement of the fencing, the inaccessible portion. of _. the public right of way shall be maintained by the abutting property owners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunder caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. Witness Witness .Wi tnes s Witness CITY OF FRIDLEY MAYOR - FRANK G. LIEBL CITY MANAGER - GERALD R. DAVIS OWNER OWNER 117. oz j"O'lloo sf ' sf I �� . i �, i - - W'. �,lj t- A ` W I Iwo P y O r � ;: W• ' ° v �;Q...: .d � . �'a ;. . a ,tom• 2v • .Q �. - J CO I is a a` Z W z PRopz a rY w LLj 2 �r ti S } S Iwo CO I is TV } PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE DIVISION CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMO TO: Richard Sobiech, Public Works Director MEMO FROM: Ralph Volkman, Superintendent of Public Works MEMO DATE: October 17, 1978 SUBJECT: Complaint by Residents at 400 - 57th Place. Action Request by Councilman Hamernik. Memo DS 524 I have investigated this complaint, and agree that during heavy rains, the water would run over the driveway depres- sion and into the yard. There are a couple of solutions that I might suggest: possibly a berm that would split the street from the driveway, which would hold some water back. This might make it a little more difficult to drive into the driveway. To the east is a de- pression which runs between the houses, which would take water off his driveway if he would make some slight alterations in his yard --simply by lowering the grass area immediately adjacent to the blacktop driveway. The latter, I believe, would take care of theproblem. Other than these suggestions, I can see no other solu- tions. Please see attached pictures. . RV:ik Attach: 4 r /X 7• Froin the desk of NASIM QUIMSII1 MEMORANDUM DS -5e3- CITy MANAGEIVS OFFICE i )ATE: October 13 1978 TO ACTION INFO Dick Sobiech O ►UBJECT: Complaint by Residents at 00 57th Place. Action Request by Councilman Hamernik The residents of this address complained that the catch basin does not take the water when it rains heavily and the water runs into their driveway and garage. Please look into the matter and take appropriate action. NMQ/ms ' 10/31/78 - Please note attached memo from Public Works personnel regarding the drainage problem. It appears with some minor grading of the sodded area, the water can be directed away from the garage. Also note the picture that indicates quite a depression east -of the garage which would hold quite an amount of water and not cause any problems. The water enters the garage not from the driveway opening,.but over the curbing when storms occur in excess of the design of the system. I'm sure during this past year, a couple of the storms were over the capacity..of the storm sewer system. The property owner has been advised of these ideas and will call back if he needs any additional -help. DS/jm From the desk of NASBY QURESHI MEMORANDUM JF -103 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE )ATE: July 29. 1981 TO ACTION INFO iUBJECT: John Flora, DPW 8/5/81 Complaint on Water Running in Garage. Action Request by Councilwoman Moses Mr. Glen Ramsdale, 400 57th Place H: 571-7593 0: 373 -4171 -complained that when we did 57th Place, water runs into his garage and the City was going to do some corrective action and provide him with some sod. Please look into the request and take appropriate action. Thank you for your assistance. NMQ/ms 7/30/81 Mr. Ramsdale's entire driveway was paved by the City in 1977, after he complained that water from the street was running into his. garage as a result of street im- provements completed in 1976. When the driveway improvement was done, a swale was incorporated into it which pre- vents water from running from the street into his garage. In addition to the paving, both sides of Mr. Ramsdale's driveway were sodded when the driveway improvement was completed in 1977. Mr. Ramsdale was advised by staff in 1978 to do some minor grading in his yard to prevent water from running over his yard into his garage. This work has not been completed and is still the reason Mr. Ramsdale has water in his garage. It is sug- gested that Mr. Ramsdale complete the grading to help relieve his water problem at his garage. JGF/MLB:ijk From the dusk of NASIDI QURESIII cITy MANAGER'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM DS -5e -3 - 11 ATE: October 13 1978 1BJECT: Complaint by Residents at OO 57th Action Request by Councilman Hamer The residents of this address complained that the catch basin does not take the Pleaseilook�intoethelmattertandwtake appropriatens into eir action. driveway and garagege.. action NMQ/ms ' 10/31/78 - :Please note attached memo from Public Works personnel regarding the drainage problem. It appears with some minor grading of the sodded area, the water can be directed away from the garage. Also note the picture that indicates quite a depression east -of the garage which would hold quite an amount of water and not cause any problems. The water enters the garage not from the driveway opening,but over the curbing when storms occur in excess of the design of the system. I'm sure daring this past year, a couple of the storms were over the capacity..of the storm sewer system. The property owner has been advised of these ideas and will call back if he needs any additional -help. DS/jm INFO i" PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE DIVISION CITY OF FRIDLEY 1 MEMO TO: Richard Sobiech, Public Works Director MEMO FROM: Ralph Volkman, Superintendent of Public Works MEMO DATE: October 17, 1978 SUBJECT: Complaint by Residents at 400 - 57th Place. Action Request by Councilman Hamernik. Memo DS 524 I have investigated this complaint, and agree that during heavy rains, the water would run over the driveway depres- sion and into the yard. There are a couple of solutions that I might suggest: possibly a berm that would split the street from the driveway, which would hold some water back. This might make it a little more difficult to drive into the driveway. To the east is a de- pression which runs between the houses, which would take water off his driveway if he would make some slight alterations in his yard --simply by lowering the grass area immediately adjacent to the blacktop driveway. The latter, I believe, would take care of the problem. Other than these suggestions, I can see no other solu- tions. Please see attached pictures. . 1 RV: ik Attach: 4 _5-74h r VA 1.41 -t�goo Gurope 5 -7-4 � t6r 1/C SUBiEt1 111.1 City of Fridley 2785CD AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. PR( e ��� (55132 CIT H L F IDLE NUMBER REV GATE r WAGE OF APPROVED By 612-571-3450 910415 9/18/98 JOB ADDRESS 400 57th Place NE 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Glen R Ramsdell 571-7593 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO Owner SAme 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK O NEW 0 ADDITION O ALTERATION (j REPAIR 0 MOVE 0 REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Reroof house & garage (24SQ) Tear -off 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Underlayment must comply with the State Building Code. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL. PLUMBING. HEATING. TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT CU FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS. OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $2,056.00 $1.03 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- $7/x .75 Fire SC $2.06 STRUCTION R THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK FEE TOTA E $77.84 UR O C T A OR AUTHORIZED AGENT IDATEI EN P OP R A OAT s ISyC,AR M T \I&rY BLDG INSP G P MATE S-GNATURE OF O%KNER..r OWNER BUILOW, IDATEI NEW [ ] Effective 1/1/98 ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY / ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 6 n BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ConstructionAddress: pf d C t ,✓_,E, Legal Description: Owner Name & Address: ��eti d: s�� Tel. # S71-71113 Contractor: -Sc)- MN LICENSE # Address: LIVING AREA: GARAGE AREA: DECK AREA: OTHER: Tel. # Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT Length Width HeightSq. Ft. Length Width Height Sq. Ft. Len Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. Construction Type: A b + /Geo 1'eccs Estimated Cost: $ dos? (Fee Schedule on Back) Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Ft x $ _ $ DATE: ?Ilxlfjl APPLICANT: VTel. #YZO Permit Fee Fire Surcharge State Surcharge SAC Charge License Surcharge $ Driveway Escrow $ Erosion Control $ Park Fee $ Sewer Main Charge $ TOTAL STIPULATIONS: CITY USE ONLY Fee Schedule on Reverse Side .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) $.50/$1,000 Valuation $1000 per SAC Unit $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Fee Determined by Engineering Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] This is a summary of a meeting held on 11-17-10 @ 3:30 pm concerning a tree trimming complaint received from Dan O'Neil who resides at 390 57th Place. Individuals present at said meeting are Mr. Bill burns — city manager Ray Statler — engineer tech Dan O'Neil - resident @ 390 57th Place Glen Ramsdell — resident @ 400 57t` Place After having a telephone conversation with Mr. O'Neill it was determined that the property in question was unimproved right-of-way. Upon reviewing the building files for Mr. O'Neil and Mr. Ramsdell there was and agreement found between the City of Fridley and the abutting property owners dated 5-25-73. The document specifically stated that the abutting property owners could fence the unimproved R/W, but would be responsible for the maintenance of said area. Upon having a telephone conversation with Mr. Ramsdell, he stated that he alone was using the unimproved R/W and had offered to remove the trees 10-12 years earlier. At that time Mr. O'Neill did not want the trees removed. Mr. Ramsdell moved his fence 2' east of the trees to accommodate Mr. O'Neill (this was confirmed in the meeting). Both parties contradicted each others statements throughout the meeting. Both parties did agree that Mr. Ramsdell alone has benefited from the unimproved R/W. Mr. O'Neil made the statement that he might hire an attorney to review the agreement or have the property line surveyed. It was pointed out that taking either action would cost approximately the same amount as to have the trees trimmed. Mr. Ramsdell was willing to split the cost for tree ramming but Mr. O'Neil was not. Both parties requested financial help from the City. This was denied by Mr. Burns. Vacation of the R/W was discussed. Mr. Ramsdell said he would accept the property, but Mr. O'Neill refused to accept any portion of the property, neither party was willing to contribute to the cost of the vacation. The meeting was adjourned at 4:00 pm with no resolution for the complaint.