The URL can be used to link to this page

VAR 96-15r 6A CK 0 v- ,�� CII CITY OF FRIDLEY p 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: Property Identification Number Legal description: CJ -t,vie 1'jLot 3 Block 1 �j Tract/Addition Current zoning: J2 CS AISTa Square footage/acreage c/,T oo -5A, Reason for variance and hardship: & Se,r vg- Iia K V a r AS- W -r �-e r Y1,Tc k 12 &'. Section of City CoAe: Have you operatefa bu ess in a city which required a business license? Yes No _ If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME ADDRESS DAYTIMEPHONE SIGNATURE DATE PETITIONER INFORMATION SIGNATURE Fee: $100.00 DATE 2=7:fj $ 60.00 for residential properties Permit VAR # -(P - /S Receipt # _ _ to Application received by: Scheduled Appeals Commission date: Scheduled City Council date. APPLICATION DATE City of Fridley Community Development Variance Process APPEALS COMMISSION DATE CITY COUNCIL DECISION CITY RECORDS ACTION AT ANOKA COUNTY • :7 SERDAHL - 409 57TH PLACE N.E. VARIANCE REQUEST DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Roger Serdahl has requested a 131 variance to allow a reduced rear yard setback. The property is a double -fronted lot located at 409 57th Place SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Code Section 205.07.03.(D).(4).(b), states, "The setback for garages and accessory buildings in the rear yard will be the same as for the front yard". A 30' x 20' house and a 20' x 16' free-standing garage currently exist on site. Access to the existing garage is taken from 57 1/2 Avenue N.E. The current proposal would provide a second, detached 12 x 22' garage that would also take access from 57 1/2 Avenue N.E. Staff discussed options that would consolidate the buildings on the Serdahl property. Mr. Serdahl expressed an interest in building a separate structure due to his desire to not disturb the asbestos siding that exists on his home or existing garage. Staff has discussed this issue with the City Building Official and individuals in the asbestos clean-up industry. Staff determined there are disposal mechanisms that would allow this property owner to remove the asbestos siding and dispose of the siding in an environmentally conscious manner. Staff believes there are numerous alternatives for either an attached or detached garage structure on this site. Without consolidating structures an addition such as the proposed will create visual clutter and create a "compound" of structures near 57 1/2 street. HARDSHIP STATEMENT: In response to the reason for variance/hardship question, Mr. Serdahl has responded with, [a desire to] "Preserve the back yard and better match the existing garage". RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff recommends denial of VAR #96-15 due to the existence of alternatives that allow consolidation of structures and elimination of a need for a variance on this site. P R O J E C T D E T A I L S Petition For: A variance to reduce the rear yard setback of an accessory structure on a double fronted lot from 35' to 22' to allow construction of a 12' x 23' second garage. Location of Property: 409 57th Place N.E. Legal Description of Property: Lot 3, Block 4, City View Addition size: 5,680 square feet Topography: Gradually sloped from 57 1/2 Avenue toward dwelling Existing Vegetation: Urban landscape Existing Zoning/Platting: R-1, Single Family, City View Addition Availability of Municipal Utilities: Available Vehicular Access: 57 1/2 Avenue N. E. Pedestrian Access: NA site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE SMOMRY OF ISSUES: HISTORY: 1953 - House and garage constructed 1962 - A 9' x 12' bedroom addition was constructed. 1965 - Storm damage repaired 1996 - A variance is requested to allow a reduces setback from 57 1/2 Avenue. Code Section 205.07.03.(D).(4).(b), states, "The setback for garages and accessory buildings in the rear yard will be the same as for the front yard". A 30' x 20' house and a 20' x 16' free-standing garage currently exist on site. Access to the existing garage is taken from 57 1/2 Avenue N. E. The current proposal would provide a second, detached 12 x 22' garage that would also take access from 57 1/2 Avenue N. E. Engineering Issues: WEST: SOUTH: EAST: NORTH: Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: ACTIONS: Staff discussed options that would consolidate the buildings on the Serdahl property. Mr. Serdahl expressed an interest in building a separate structure due to his desire to not disturb the asbestos siding that exists on his home or existing garage. Staff has discussed this issue with the City Building Official and individuals in the asbestos clean-up industry. Staff determined there are disposal mechanisms that would allow this property owner to remove the asbestos siding and dispose of the siding in an environmentally conscious manner. Staff believes there are numerous alternatives for either an attached or detached garage structure on this site. Without consolidating structures an addition such as the proposed will create visual clutter and create a "compound" of structures near 57 1/2 street. Several garages exist along 57 1/2 Avenue that do meet the current 35' setback requirement. Recognizing a grade differential between 57 1/2 Avenue and the house a trench drain may be necessary to accommodate runoff and eliminate flow toward the garage ADJACENT SITES Zoning: R-1 Land Use: Zoning: R-1 Land Use: Zoning: R-1 Land Use: Zoning: R-1 Land Use: Consistent To be taken Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Staff recommends denial of VAR #96-15 due to the existence of alternatives that would allow consolidation of structures and elimination of a need for a variance on this site. 3 • City of Fridley PUBLIC HEARING BCOMEFORE THE PLAN iven thaldthereISSi will. be a ON Notice is hereby. g public hearing of the Fridly Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E on Wednesday, August 21, 1M at 7e30 p.m for the purpose otlal use permit, SP Conaideryyation of a spec 205.07.#96-1401.C.() Rogerf the FridleyCity Code, er to avow an accessory building other than the fist accessory building, over 240 square feet, on Lot 3, Block 4, City View, generaily located at 409 -y57th Place N.E. Anand lpersons desiring be h shall be givenann opportunityat the oabove s�tad ed time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Community Development Department at 572-3593. persons Hearing impaired ons planning to attend or who need an interprere auxilliarypaids shons o d disabilities who requ contactRobert-Collins at 572-3500 no later ihanAu1996- MANE SAVAGE CHAIR OMMIsSION (p ugust 6NguNIN0 5 9%) Fddley Focus News • 0 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, August 14, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #96-15, by Roger Serdahl: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(4).(b) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the rear yard setback of an accessory structure on a double fronted lot from 35 feet to 22 feet to allow the construction of a 12 foot by 23 foot second garage on Lot 3, Block 4, City View Addition, the same being 409 - 57th Place N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. LARRY KUECHLE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 572-3593. Hearing-impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than August 7, 1996. VAR #96-15 • i ROGER SERDAHL 409 - 57TH PLACE NE MAILING LIST ROGER SERDAHL 409 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 M R KONIECZNY & J W FRANK OR RESIDENT 369 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 EDWARD & MARY JO GUZEK OR RESIDENT 455 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 MARTHA FUENTES OR RESIDENT 5810 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 J P GRAVELLE & K J KALLMAN OR RESIDENT 5811 4TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 NINA LANDT OR RESIDENT 5830 6TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 JOHN & CAROL SLOPEK OR RESIDENT 5800 6TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 ROBERT DE LA MARTRE OR RESIDENT 5821 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 OTTO TAUER 521 S CEDAR LAKE RD MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 ROBERT & KATHLEEN AMBORN 405 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 MICHAEL HEATH OR RESIDENT 5830 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 STANLEY GOZEL JR OR RESIDENT 5800 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 DELORES PREEKETT OR RESIDENT 5821 4TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 ELIZABETH PEKA OR RESIDENT 5820 6TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 RICHARD & BARBARA HUBBARD OR RESIDENT 5801 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 LYLE & LAVERNE RICHTER OR RESIDENT 5831 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 MAILED 8096 RESIDENT 359 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 MONIQUE EMERY OR RESIDENT 451 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 ALFRED & BETTY ENGELSTAD OR RESIDENT 5820 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 THOMAS GABRELCIK OR RESIDENT 5801 4TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 REGINALD & SHARON COSTIGAN OR RESIDENT 5840 6TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 JAMES & LUCILLE LEWIS OR RESIDENT 5810 6TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 JAMES & KATHRYN OLSON OR RESIDENT 5811 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FLORUS & ELEANOR ROBECK OR RESIDENT 5841 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 WAYNE & JANE SIMONEAU GLEN & CHERYL RAMSDELL WARREN & ANN SUNDERLAND 465 57TH PLACE NE OR RESIDENT OR RESIDENT FRIDLEY MN 55432 400 57TH PLACE NE 410 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 VAR #96-15 409 - 57TH PLACE NE MAILING LIST - PAGE 2 DAVID PUDNEY OR RESIDENT 420 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 DAVID & NOREEN YURKEW 6502 HICKORY STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 RESIDENT 380 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 J J HEIDER & J A KARSTEN OR RESIDENT 417 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 DARLENE SORENSON OR RESIDENT 5632 6TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 RESIDENT 5648 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 DONALD & SHARON HIPPEN OR RESIDENT 464 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 MARILYN YOUNG OR RESIDENT 430 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 RESIDENT 360 57TH AVENUE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 DANIEL O'NEILL OR RESIDENT 390 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 ANN AGNES MISTELSKE OR RESIDENT 5801 6TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 DENNIS & MARION WORK OR RESIDENT 5659 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 JOCHEN WOELFLE OR RESIDENT 5638 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 LARRY KUECHLE 202 MERCURY DRIVE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 CAROL OLSEN OR RESIDENT 440 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 ACCAP 1201 89TH AVENUE NE STE 345 BLAINE MN 55434 THERESA SCHOENBERGER OR RESIDENT 435 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 STEVEN & NANCY JACKSON OR RESIDENT 5821 6TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 RAYMOND GULLICKSON HC77 BOX 170 PINE RIVER MN 56474 SANDRA JOSWIAK OR RESIDENT 450 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER • CITY OF FRIDLEY • APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 14, 1996 ROLL CALL: Chairperson Kuechle called the August 14, 1996, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Lary Kuechle, Carol Beaulieu, Ken Vos Members Absent: Diane Savage Others Present: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Michael & Sherry Perreten, 5980 5th Street N.E. Alvan Schrader, 5501 Lakeland Avenue N., Crystal, Minnesota Michael Schrader, 5501 Lakeland Avenue N., Crystal, Minnesota Steve Rosburg, 9920 Zilla Street N.W., Coon Rapids, Minnesota Jim Saefke, City of Fridley Margaret Christenson, 1327 66th Avenue N.E. Bob Joslin, Stillwater, Minnesota Richard T. Murphy, Sr., 701 24th Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota Curtis Barsness, 6581 Central Avenue Tim Chies, 9920 Zilla Street N.W., Coon Rapids, Minnesota.. APPROVAL OF JUNE 26. 1996. APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Dr. Vos, to approve the June 26, 1996, Appeals Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #96-15— BY ROGER SERDAHL: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(4).(b) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the rear yard setback of an accessory structure on a double -fronted lot from 35 feet to 22 feet on Lot 3, Block 4, City View Addition, the same being 409 - 57th Place N.E. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Dr. Vos, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. • APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 14, 1996 PAGE 2 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the request is for 409 - 57th Place N.E. to allow a reduced rear yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet. The property is a double fronted lot which is long and narrow. 571/2 Street is to the north and 57th Place is to the south. Currently on the site is an existing residential dwelling and existing garage measuring 16 feet x 20 feet. The request proposes a second detached garage to be constructed measuring 12 feet x 22 feet and using the same access drive as the existing garage. The proposed garage is located between the house and the street, and creates something of a compound of structures on the north edge of the property. Mr. Hickok stated there are a number of garages that do exist along 57 1/2 Place. There are some existing garages that have deficient setbacks. In evaluating the site, it was determined that the proposal exacerbates the problem that already exists. Mr. Hickok stated staffs recommendation is to deny the variance request because of the numerous alternatives that exist. The site does slope downward from 57 1/2 to the dwelling unit. Staff believes there is an opportunity for an attached garage with access off 57th Place which could also allow expansion of the living area. There are other garage alternatives that would allow for a consolidated structure, such as a double garage, to provide.the space necessary at a 35 -foot setback while still preserving some yard between the house and the garage. Staff recommends denial of the variance request. Staff has talked with the petitioner about the recommendation. Ms. Beaulieu asked if it would be okay to have two separate distinct garages. Mr. Hickok stated the City has had second accessory requests. There is also a special use permit running simultaneously with this that would recognize a second accessory building in excess of 240 square feet. Dr. Vos asked the dimensions of the lot. Mr. Hickok stated the lot is 40 feet x 120 feet. Mr. Kuechle asked, if the petitioner were to consolidate the garages and put up another in its place, would he still need a variance. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 14 1996 PAGE 3 Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner could tear it down and set the garage back 35 feet. In the hardship statement, the owner states he is hoping to preserve as much rear yard as possible, but it is possible to construct at 35 feet and still have ample room for a yard. Mr. Kuechle asked, if the petitioner built a consolidated garage in the same place, would he need a variance. Mr. Hickok stated yes. Mr. Kuechle asked staff to indicate on the aerial map the location of the 35 foot setback. Mr. Hickok stated the 35 -foot like would end just beyond the existing driveway. There is a grade difference at that point which would require a few additional courses of concrete block. This is not unusual and is a workable construction situation. The petitioner was not present at the meeting to answer questions. Mr. Kuechle stated he would like to discuss the request with the petitioner and asked for a motion to table the request. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to table consideration of Variance Request, VAR #96-15, until the next meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERA ON OF A VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #96-16 BY TIM CHIES: Per Section 205.07.03.(D).(4).(b) o he Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the rear yard setback for an accessory struct a on a double fronted lot from 35 feet to 7 feet on Lot 1, Block 2, Nagels Woodlan , generally addressed as 7595 Able Street N.E.; from 35 feet to 15 feet on Lot 2, Block 2, Nagels Woodlands, generally addressed as 7579 Able Street N.E.; fr 35 feet to 15 feet on Lot 3, Block 2, Nagels Woodlands, generally addressed a 7565 Able Street N.E.; from 35 feet to 15 feet on Lot 4, Block 2, Nagels Woodlan s, generally addressed as 7553 Able Street N.E.; from 35 feet to 15 feet on Lot 5, B ck 2, Nagels Woodlands, generally addressed as 7539 Able Street N.E.; and from 5 feet to 15 feet on Lot 6, Block 2, Nagels Woodlands, generally addressed as 27 Able Street N.E., to allow the construction of detached two -car garages. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner had a conflict and ha�\not yet arrived at the meeting. M, h � / n A ti a � 3a y r - n G7 TtJ N. l 6.60 /3660 dos,; 6 9 .:s!✓ 1`1 IJ,4 67 /4 / 66 s.6a .rT f..16 a v 9 29 /3664 n a, <v12B 3 til r a 68. �, 59 TH '„ . PLACE t ti a � 3a y r - n G7 TtJ N. l 6.60 /3660 dos,; 6 9 .:s!✓ 1`1 i4 / .rT f..16 r 29 z l+l , y0 Z8 3 ultl . ti a � 3a y r - n G7 TtJ N. E. 6.60 /3660 6 9 .:s!✓ 1`1 E .J" .rT f..16 3a y r - is �-.•='y...: G7 TtJ N. E. /-��. .:s!✓ 1`1 r 29 z l+l , y0 Z8 3 ultl . <v12B 3 til r a 68. ..\. 27 26 — �. _ , M` -d "z/ g ,.til . Il Z9 8 = til 96. gt `� b- `3 `1 /8 �J3 �^1 � F' /B j3 \1a � t1/B � r /3 lad —�1—•�+f--- � � i i CITYOF CITY OF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW File Number 36 File Date July 3, 1996 Meeting Date. August 14, 1996 Description: VAR 496-15, by Roger Serdahl To reduce the rear yard setback of an accessory structure from 35 feet to 22 feet Return to the Community Development Department Barbara Dacy Community Development Director John Flora Public Works Director Ed Hervin City Assessor Scoff Hickok Planning Coordinator Ron Julkowski Chief Building Official Dick Larson Fire Marshall Michele McPherson Planning Assistant Dave Sallman Police Chief Jon Wilczek Asst. Public Works Director Sep -11-96 02:15P 0 � t,): c o T t 44 'c ko k s'7/- / �o� a r� G a -e WOj(� m S / u y P V4�1( i a k Ce r e e S -rt y u --�4 C, kAVe ee P. 03. C urr y lie {Do o� +0 t� s S i ` . uck_tIf dIN^ X70 o��r 0 CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 28, 1996 ROLL CALL: Chairperson Kuechle called the August 28, 1996, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Lary Kuechle, Ken Vos, Diane Savage Members Absent: Carol Beaulieu Others Present: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Roger Serdahl, 409 N.E. 57th Place Betty Loewen, 278-- 58th Avenue N.E. Dorothy & Raymond Hegna, 5770 - 3rd Street N.E. APPROVAL OF Auqust 14. 1996 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Savage, to approve the August 14, 1996, Appeals Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Per Section 205.07.03.D.(4).(b) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the rear yard setback of an accessory structure on a double fronted lot from 35 feet to 22 feet on Lot 3, Block 4, City View Addition, the same being 409 - 57th Place N.E. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Savage, to remove the request from the table and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:34 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the variance request is to reduce a setback from 35 feet to 22 feet. The property is located between 57th Place and 57 1/2 Avenue. The lot is 40 feet wide and is a double -fronted lot. The petitioner has asked for a variance to allow construction of a second garage on the site. Currently on the site is a single family home and a 20 foot x 16 foot detached garage which is to the back. The proposal is to construct a second 22 foot APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 28. 1996 PAGE 2 by 12 foot detached garage perpendicular to the existing garage and 22 feet from the property line. The hardship statement by the petitioner states there is a desire to preserve as much of the back yard space as possible and to better match the existing garage. Mr. Hickok stated that in evaluating the request, staff believed that it makes more sense to consolidate the additional garage stall with the existing garage. The petitioner was concerned about the asbestos siding on the existing garage. Staff talked to the building official and others in the industry. It was determined there are environmentally safe ways to replace the siding. Because of that, staff recommends the petitioner consider consolidation for this site. There are a number of garages that exist along the same frontage area that have less than a 35 foot setback. Staff believes that the addition of another garage would create a compound appearance along that street frontage. Although the existing structures are substandard in their setbacks, staff would hope that over time as the units are reconstructed, the appropriate setback would be achieved. If there was not a consolidation, putting the garage at the proper setback would minimize somewhat that clustered effect of the units. Mr. Hickok stated another issue is that the home, by today's minimum footprint requirement of 10,020 square feet, is substandard in terms of square footage. A garage attached to the rear of the home could provide an opportunity to provide additional square feet of living space above the garage and provide an opportunity to consolidate the garages. Mr. Hickok stated staff has recommended denial of the request. Ms. Savage asked what the Planning Commission had decided regarding the request for a special use permit. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner was riot present at the Planning Commission meeting so the Planning Commission tabled the request. Dr. Vos stated one of staffs suggestions was to expand the existing garage into a two -stall garage. Would this still require a variance because of the location of the existing garage? Mr. Hickok stated, yes. Staff believes this would improve the dilemma of the compound effect of the garages. Dr. Vos stated that if the petitioner wanted to set the garage back 35 feet, it would be only 3 feet from the house. Mr. Hickok stated that is correct. Mr. Kuechle asked if there were restrictions on the size of the garage that can be built in relation to the size of the house. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 28 1996 PAGE 3 Mr. Hickok stated, yes. The size of the garage cannot exceed the main floor area of the house. Consolidated accessory buildings cannot exceed 1,400 square feet. Ms. Savage asked if there was prohibition for a second detached garage. Mr. Hickok stated it is not unusual to have two detached garages on a residential site. What is unusual about this variance request is the combination of two garages with narrow lot dimensions. The narrow lot with two garages and the juxtaposition of the garages compounds the problem. Ms. Savage stated she did not see two detached garages as aesthetically pleasing but asked if it was possible under the code. Mr. Hickok stated it is possible under the code. Mr. Serdahl stated he had nothing to add. Mr. Kuechle asked the petitioner what he thought of the idea of consolidating the garages. Mr. Serdahl stated he had no desire to have anything but a single garage due to the age of the existing garage. With the location of where everything is, it is not possible to put a car into it. It is not worth it as far as he is concerned. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Dr. Vos, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:42 P.M. Ms. Savage stated the property looks very small and crowded, and she does not see the feasibility of a second detached garage. It seems like there are other alternatives to accomplish what the petitioner needs to accomplish. Given the fact of the crowding situation and the alternatives, she would not be able to recommend approval. Mr. Kuechle concurred. He stated there could be some adjustment in getting close to 22 feet in order to retain some yard. In the case where the petitioner is basically putting two single -car garages there, for some additional money the petitioner could get a double garage, get the desired space, and have a minimum impact on the property. He would recommend denial. Dr. Vos agreed. There are so many alternatives. Not all of them may be desirable to the petitioner. The hardship for an existing garage being enlarged would be more favorable APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 28 1996 PAGE 4 than to approve a second nonconforming single garage. He would vote for denial of this request. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Dr. Vos, to recommend denial of variance request, VAR #96-15, by Roger Serdahl to reduce the rear yard setback of an accessory structure on a double fronted lot from 35 feet to 22 feet on Lot 3, Block 4, City View Addition, the same being 409 - 57th Place N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Hickok stated the City Council would consider this request on September 16. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION BY BETTY LOEWEN: Per Section 205.21.05.D.(1) of the Fri setback from 35 feet to 20 feet to al detached garage on Lots 1, 2, and 3, 276-278 58th Avenue N.E. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Dr. Vos, to notice and to open the public hearing. EST. VAR Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard the relocation of a 22 -foot by 23 -foot -k 27, Hyde Park, generally located at UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRI MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Hickok stated the request is to reduce the ga allow placement of a two -car garage at 276-278 - the reading of the public hearing KUECHLE DECLARED THE AT 7:45 P.M. setback from 35 feet to 20 feet to Avenue N.E. Mr. Hickok stated the Planning Commission recently regi this location on the comer of 3rd Street and 58th Avenu( that runs deep on the lot, and there is an. open site betwe a garage in the southeast corner. The lot split provic condition of the lot split, the property owner was requii from the newly created building site within one year after Ms. Loewen is interested in purchasing the site. She we that at the time of closing on the property, all variance i Ned and approved a lot split at There is a side-by-side duplex the duplex and 3rd Street with I a second buildable lot. As a Vo remove an existing garage approval date of the lot split. j�ike to process a variance so u s will be behind her. Mr. Hickok statedthe garage itself is usable and could be ;ov d to another location. The code does not allow an accessory structure before a princal tructure. This garage was one of the considerations of the petitioner when looking at the site. Ms. Loewen is interested in buying the property and constructing a new garag or moving this garage to PLOT PLAN 4-4- {q-- i y -T NAME SS Mr. Roger Serda'hl 409 NE 57th Place . ....... Fridley, MN 55432 CITY ILI LEGAL DESCRIPTION 7'7.. LOT: BLOCK: ADDITION: 7-7 - f -4- LOT SIZE: t HOUSE SIZE, SQ. FT. J CROSS STREETS: 4� AND 7-7 DIRECTION t MMMN is W.---- --- Mr. Roger Serdahl #6497 low lllliWl��GAIUW-- 409 NE 57th Place 1852 COMO AVENUE NAME_ Fridley, MN 55432 ST. PAUL, MN 55108 H 571-8072 W 785-8885 permit by JOB ADDR Legal Descript on Lot. BLDG COD _ 12X22 Det.Allbilt W/Cont. Blk 6/19/96 Dennis Jarnot I Add'n SALESMAN Value Type Const. SLAB: E�E i -=-j j ❑ By SUSSE L- O By Owner Approx. l/l O In I 1 2 -STARTING POINTS ONLY S. P. L. '3 S.S.P.L. R.P.L. l._ _ 1Alley-,- -- II J. House iF. Street Other && t. G.9i tt--r••w7 e / I .'.. i�� ❑Square With isq(A. �` = � O Sod Rem. - By — ❑ A.B.U. i—L ❑ 0 Grade Point I ❑Conduit- ^` - - Z7 Blocks: ❑ey Owner ❑By Sussel r- f v O Wtr.proof: ❑By Own. ❑By Sus. ❑Backfill: ❑By Own. ❑By Sussel � 6-3- , pL�l4aintain 8' Total Wall Height S� G Including Blocks OR moi_ O Maintain 8' Wall Height on Top of Blocks -•---i -� !'--- - Block Size (Top course) \ W4' Wall Height other then �9 i L T 37 Al �PExisting garage: No ❑ CJ Detached ❑ Attached Yes ❑ Size of existing: _--_xJ l j Existing garage will be: r• /�- -- +- - ❑ Left as is C: Converted to L.S. - By owner - - r• � '- _ ' L� Removed By: Owner ❑ Sussel ❑ i S�( I'1 __•_-- - Junk Must Be Removed By Owner �� 111 Stakes visible - C] Yes ❑ No Survey available - O Yes ❑ No i '7 Special instructions from Cement Man P-iACCESS - DIRECTION --- O Good 13 Fair ❑ Poor PURCHASER'S INITIALS: I /4�� 0 �� ARAGES ROOF: GABL REVERSE GABLE HIP EAVE OVERHANG: RAKE OVERHANG: SEAL DOWN SHINGLES WITH PLYWOOD OR WAFERBOARD ROOF SHEATHING AND 15 LB. FELT Roof Sheathing Manufactured Trusses ---/ 2" x 4" Double Top Plate Seal Down Shingles Trim 1"x4' Sub Fascia III \ \ Fascia Soffit 3i4" Cove NOTE: 2" x 4" Studs 1) Roof approved by Minn. State Building Dept. as meeting Minn. State Code Requirements of 30# snow load. 2) Hip roofs consist of 2" x 6" rafters, 2" x 6" cross ties 48" O.C., 2" x 8" Siding hip rafters and no plywood gussets are used. RAFTERS:Trusses ®24" O.C. STUDS: 2 ;!4" 16" 0. . 24" O.C. WALL SHEATHING: WAF1-(—$0-4'-40 SIDING: ' 12 �A -.0' OVERHEAD DOOR HEADER Double 2" x 12" or 2 - Micro Lams—x- 1 ams x 1 i2" x 7" Anchor Bolt Slab on grade construction approved per Minnesota State Code. Refer to State Building Code Letter Number 11. 2" x 4" Treated Bottom Plate SLAB: 4" WITH MESH 6" x 6" #10 Gauge � C:, 'v s Grade _ 45 1 a' LUMBER SPECIFICATIONS MEMBER FORCES FROM LEFT iO RIONTT TOP CHORD 2X4 1850E=1.5E MSR 9 -P -F TOP CHORD BOTTOM CHORD NESS REACTIONS i to -1081 B la 1028 N 1= l20 REACTION e 8 In 9l2 BOT CHORD 2X4 LBSOF-I.SE HSR S -P -F T 2= -LOBI B 2= 1028 REACTION a B 3= W WEBS 2X4 m3/STUD S -P -F ~'-"" iRU99 LORDING ICON 1) BEARING REQUIREMENTS UNIFORM LL ON TOP CHORD = 40.0 PSF ALL BEARINGS SHORN RRE 3.5' EXCEPT AS NOTED$ UNIFORM OL ON TOP CHORD s 7.0 PSF UNIFORM DL ON BOT CHORD = '10.0 PSF TOTAL DESIGN LOAD m 57.0 PSF LOCATE ENTER -PANEL SPLICES AT t/4 PANEL LENGTH ADDITIONAL LORDING 12 INCHES FROM EITHER END OF THE PANEL INDICATED. CONCI TC VERT 228.01 180-OLLI LBS AT PANEL POINT 1 CONCI TC VERT 228.01 160.OLL) LBS RT PANEL POINT 3 DEVELOPED BT THE COiMIPONENiRMAANUFACTURREERUTER INPUT LORD DURATION INCREASE = 1.15 PLATE ROTATED 90 DEC. 3.5-4 t2 l2 4 L--- Q4 E3 ... •� JO 2 , iEGISTERED OFESSIONAL ENGINEER jm s see lit -0.U" 24.0 ' I2'-0.0' OVERALL SPAN 24.0 PLATE CODE PACING DATE I1 15 1HE RESPONSIBILITY OF OTNER5 10 ASCERTAIN THAT THE LORDS VTIL1[EO ON 1X15 OEOION REST 0R EXCEED 1Nt MOOEL20 TPI 24.00OI O.C.1/18/69 ACIUHL 0100 LORDS ICNPOSECCO By TME STRUCTURE pANO tTH[ eeLlptpE LRO[R06 IRt06E)1 0T TAH�E VOCAL IU1BE �EnX Ci00[ 011 OPIN On PIC1108RTI0 FBlNICNIION- CDNNECT7O7TRI%LpN01It of TO IS. Is ND!'Lr [OCDCDROE N5 `vffhICD�EE INUSMMLIIIDIUSCOM OR111.1. MURRLL. ALL PANELS NOTLTI:fCIfICNLLTR0E870NRif01NMET10tlEPE0UALl150Ilull B.1P i1 We R N A N Y T R U S ® - D E S ,I G N. �" S►EC InL CU 1tIN6. DNLT LATERAL 5NRC1N0 SEOU ]REO OF IMOIYIOGRL 1RU55 HERDERS IS NOTED 0M 1X15 ORANINEO. _ R U S W A mte Dfa1aR R66UNE5 1ItE TOP CHORD 10 DEOCOTNIDOOiIUN CHORD. ITYBHOLLTCEIBRAACCEO58i lM1EA,IRL5i1RROEt[><C[lo1ND NO 81010 CEILING ID cAPPLiED DIRECTLY Yt I e ` [ (�1 BADGING NN ICIDIO NLMpTBNNE OU INE OB TDO[ CAUTIONED To NOH "NOP€COMING]NO ADVICE REGARDING IMlB0C,N6 X000 i1UBtNe CONMENIRRI AND RECOMNENOA11ON11- ITP11. DHECRcE CONFUSION NOT R[EXIST CONCERNINGPROPERPROPER FIELD ENEC110N. ONO. 2 7 9 7 7 FILE- - 1 -•__ SYSTEMS jpg pl�Rjj�j•INiMO86[S OBNLLNx01 OEDlT'LNCEO INN00TEENIDlIItONNENI TDMN,DNILLDCRNOE TNfBIB1011tG11fDEVENEN1'NPROPER -- HE IRUSHRL SYSTEMS CORPaRnitoo R 910NOOf COMPnMT 110110 10 EXCEED 19% RUBIOR CRUSE CONNEECTOR ►LAVE CORR0010N. CRNDER. NHEN NECESSARY. 15 BEST Ott[RNIREO Bi nIGiC10U6 A/PL ICRIIOM Gi [i►ERIE HCk' AND THERE►ORE 15 OUTSIDE THE SCO►E 0► RESPUBIAL11T OF TRUSHRL. .Bee ., rnrn r i� 3-4 3-4 l•5-3 lit -0.U" 24.0 ' I2'-0.0' OVERALL SPAN 24.0 PLATE CODE PACING DATE I1 15 1HE RESPONSIBILITY OF OTNER5 10 ASCERTAIN THAT THE LORDS VTIL1[EO ON 1X15 OEOION REST 0R EXCEED 1Nt MOOEL20 TPI 24.00OI O.C.1/18/69 ACIUHL 0100 LORDS ICNPOSECCO By TME STRUCTURE pANO tTH[ eeLlptpE LRO[R06 IRt06E)1 0T TAH�E VOCAL IU1BE �EnX Ci00[ 011 OPIN On PIC1108RTI0 FBlNICNIION- CDNNECT7O7TRI%LpN01It of TO IS. Is ND!'Lr [OCDCDROE N5 `vffhICD�EE INUSMMLIIIDIUSCOM OR111.1. MURRLL. ALL PANELS NOTLTI:fCIfICNLLTR0E870NRif01NMET10tlEPE0UALl150Ilull B.1P i1 We R N A N Y T R U S ® - D E S ,I G N. �" S►EC InL CU 1tIN6. DNLT LATERAL 5NRC1N0 SEOU ]REO OF IMOIYIOGRL 1RU55 HERDERS IS NOTED 0M 1X15 ORANINEO. _ R U S W A mte Dfa1aR R66UNE5 1ItE TOP CHORD 10 DEOCOTNIDOOiIUN CHORD. ITYBHOLLTCEIBRAACCEO58i lM1EA,IRL5i1RROEt[><C[lo1ND NO 81010 CEILING ID cAPPLiED DIRECTLY Yt I e ` [ (�1 BADGING NN ICIDIO NLMpTBNNE OU INE OB TDO[ CAUTIONED To NOH "NOP€COMING]NO ADVICE REGARDING IMlB0C,N6 X000 i1UBtNe CONMENIRRI AND RECOMNENOA11ON11- ITP11. DHECRcE CONFUSION NOT R[EXIST CONCERNINGPROPERPROPER FIELD ENEC110N. ONO. 2 7 9 7 7 FILE- - 1 -•__ SYSTEMS jpg pl�Rjj�j•INiMO86[S OBNLLNx01 OEDlT'LNCEO INN00TEENIDlIItONNENI TDMN,DNILLDCRNOE TNfBIB1011tG11fDEVENEN1'NPROPER -- HE IRUSHRL SYSTEMS CORPaRnitoo R 910NOOf COMPnMT 110110 10 EXCEED 19% RUBIOR CRUSE CONNEECTOR ►LAVE CORR0010N. CRNDER. NHEN NECESSARY. 15 BEST Ott[RNIREO Bi nIGiC10U6 A/PL ICRIIOM Gi [i►ERIE HCk' AND THERE►ORE 15 OUTSIDE THE SCO►E 0► RESPUBIAL11T OF TRUSHRL. .Bee ., rnrn r i�