VAR 05.84CITY OF FFRIOLEY, SUBJECT
6439 UNIVERSITY AVG. NG. VARIANCES
VVV FRIDLEY, MN. B543E 46921571-3450
ADDRESS �- lnI SC kI �DATE
APPEALS C014MISSION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED _ DATE GS N0.
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW: REQUIRED: YES—
CITY
ES_
CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO.
STIPULATIONS:
NAME FEE ` 0 ®�J RECEIPT No. /_
LO! T NO. BLOC_ K NO. TRACT OR ADDITION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
VARIANCE-REQUEST(S): (Attach plat or survey of property showing building, variances,
etc., where applicable)
5o ®;E Wo Fno►A . /() 1b s7 +
Section(s) of the City Code:
List specific hardship(s) which requires the variance(s): NVOMOPAL, L 1� Nq
�toZE107a -:POz ZNc
"tL� 1 PLUS l i°l��l� 1� bTMA 1 U I 1
coy sio Tions s\)AZT A l Omo To `MV
DATE V1.2 SIGNATURkAa&f������
ADDRESS 1& 6-1 -L�
,t4,3�2 TELEPHONE NO,S-
..
VARIANCES • FOR CITY USE ONLY
Board members notified of meeting by May A- 1984 list memo
date notified. and •Yes" or •1:o' for plans to attend- Rearing.
• Plan
44 • te' To Atten
Patricia Gabel (Chairwomen 5 -4 -SAF
d
Alex P. Barna Vice chairperson)
Can 4REQU
—Donald Retznld
James P1emel
Person making appeal and the following property owners having prope ty within 200 feet
notified:
Name By Whom
Date Phone or Mail Notified
/M Lee Tech, 1651 61st Avenue N.E. 5-4-84 Mail
MZM Grover A. Cleveland, 1641 61st Avenue N.E. .
M Brett W. -Hart, 1631 61st Avenue N.E.
M/M Clarence F. Cassell, 1621 61st Avenue N.E.
M/M Duane C, Retzen, 6130 Stinson Blvd, N,E.
M/M James C. Sovada, 6116 Stinson Blvd.-N.E.
M/M Frank S. Wrzos, 6100 Stinson Blvd. N.E.
"
M/M John M. Sell, 6070 Stinson Blvd, N.E.
M/M John Livingston, 6060 Stinson Blvd, N,E.
M/M Harlen-Hanscom, 6000 Stinson Blvd. N.E.
I
M/M Jens W. Jensen, 6156 Stinson Blvd. N.E.
-
M/M Gerald L. Keller, 6064 McKinley St. N.E.
M/M Paul P. Jahnke, 6054 McKinley St, N.E.
M/M Costas Nichois, 6055 McKinley St. N.E.
M/M Ralph E. Stouffer, 6065 McKinley St, N.E.
M/M Larry L. Poundstone, 6135 Briardale Ct. N.E.
M/M Donald David, 6145 Briardale Court N.E.
-
r
M M Jack Mu an, 6155 Briardale Court N.E.
M/M Louis Miskowic, 6180 Briardale Ct, N,E,
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 6
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR
A VARIANCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE
SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 10 FT. TO 5 FT. TO ALLOW EXPANSION IN LIVING AREA
ABOVE THE ATTACHED GARAGE, LOCATED ON LOT 5, BLOCK 2, HEATHER HILLS THIRD
ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 6150 KERRY LANE N.E., WITH THE STIPULATION THAT
NO WINDOWS BE ADDED TO THE NQRTH SIDE OF THE ADDITION.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. REQUEST FOR VARIANCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER _205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO
t 5AME BEING Ib51 - b151 AVENUE N.E. kKequest by Margo P. iecn, 10DI -
st Ave. .E., Fridley, Mn. 55432)
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC
HEARING OPEN AT 8:23 P.M.
Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report:
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
1651 - 61st Avenue N.E.
A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT:
Section 205.07.3D.2a requires a minimum setback of 10 feet between
any living area and side property lines.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of
20 feet betweeniving areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between
garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce exposure to
conflagration of fire. It is also to allow for aesthetically pleasing
open areas around residential structures.
B. STATED HARDSHIP:
"Additional living and bedroom space required for increase in family
size plus additional storage requirements. Economic considerations
suggest addition to the existing garage to accommodate the increased
living needs."
C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
The neighbor to the west, 1641 - 61st Avenue, was granted a variance
in 1982 to place living area 5 feet off the common lot line. The
variance was granted with the stipulation that no windows be placed
in the east wall of the addition.
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 5
Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of
20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet
between garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce
exposure to conflagration of fire. It is also to allow for aestheti-
cally pleasing open areas around residential structures.
B. STATED HARDSHIP:
"Pie shaped lot (narrow at front, wide at back) coupled with drop-off
point relatively near front of lot leaves narrow building area."
C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
This home is presently under construction; it was granted a front yard
variance on May 24, 1983. The present side yard width was to have been
5 feet to the garage and 10 feet to the living area. Now they would
like to utilize some of the space over the garage for living area.
Therefore, they need a variance for the living area closer than 10 feet
to the side lot line.
The house to the north is 11 to 12 feet off the common lot line.
The staff has no suggested stipulations if the Board moves to approve
the request.
Mr. Sampson stated the reason for the request was as stated in the staff
review. He showed the Commission members the plans for the house. He
stated the variance request does not change any of the construction as
already approved. They do not intend to put any windows in the addition.
Ms. Gabel stated she talked to the neighbors to the south of Mr. Sampson,
and they had no objections.
NOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC
HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M.
Mr. Betzold stated this request does not change anything about the lot or
the structure that is going onto the lot; it is more of an internal matter.
He did not see any reason to deny the variance request; however, he would
like to add the stipulation that there be no windows on the north side of
the addition.
Mr. Barna stated he agreed. He stated the petitioner is not changing the
structure at all, and he had no problem with the variance.
Ms. Gabel stated she felt they met the spirit of the code. There will still
be the 15 ft. between dwellings, and she would also like to see the stipula-
tion that there be no windows on the north side of the addition.
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 7
If this variance is granted, the two living areas would be 10 feet
apart. Therefore, if the Board approves this request, we suggest
the Board recommend no windows be placed in the west wall of the
addition.
Mr. John Ahl, architect for the petitioners, stated what they plan to do
is build a loft/library over the back portion of the garage and then a
master bedroom extending past that. They do not plan on putting any
windows on the west side and are angling the addition so they do not have
the long corridor and tight space.
Mrs. Margo Tech stated they had letters from all the neighbors who border
their lot, as well as across the street to the front, stating they do not
object to this addition.
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO RECEIVE INTO THE RECORD
THE LETTERS FROM SIX NEIGHBORS STATING NO OBJECTION TO THE ADDITION.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Ms. Gabel stated the stated hardship seemed a little vague, and maybe the
petitioner could explain the hardship in a little more detail.
Mr. Lee Tech stated that right now the whole house is finished, and they
do not have any storage area. They are using two rooms for storage at the
present time. There are three of them living in the home and there is the
possibility of his mother and father moving in with them.
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC
HEARING CLOSED AT 8:45 P.M.
Mr. Barna stated that presently there is 10 ft. between the two structures
by the variance granted previously to the property owners at 1641 - 61st
Ave. N.E. He thought at that time the Appeals Commission considered the
hazard of living area adjacent to garage, and now they are talking about
living area adjacent to living area. He really felt living area adjacent
to living area was less hazardous than living area adjacent to garage. The
two neighbors are the ones that will have to live with the 10 ft. between
their two homes. As far as fire fighting, there will be as much room after
construction as there is now. He did not think living area caused that much
more chance of a fire over a garage and,properly constructed, the living area
without windows should have less chance of conflagration transfer between
the two structures. Basically, the code is not being varied any more than
it is presently being varied. He preferred the well -thought out, well-
designed addition rather than the regular box on the back of a box -type
addition.
Mr. Betzold stated that as far as the considerations about living areas
and garage areas, he was. not sure he could agree with that because it is
not really the Commission's function to decide which parts of the code they
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 8
like or don't like. He stated he could go along with the variance in this
particular case just the way it has been utilized, with the stipulation that
there be no windows on the west wall. He felt that was very important.
He was also concerned, not so much in this particular situation, about
more and more variances getting closer to the property line, and it is
starting to set kind of a bad precedent. He hoped they were not violating
the very reasons why the code was established. He appreciated what the
petitioners were trying to do and why they were trying to do it, but he
was not quite so sure that was what the code was intended to do.
Ms. Gabel stated Mr. Betzold's point was well taken. However, she felt that
when the neighbors do not object and it seems to be a livable situation
within the neighborhood, the Commission should go along with it.
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO APPROVE REQUEST FOR
VARIANCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE
REQUIRED SIDE YARD FOR LIVING AREA FROM 10 FT. TO 5 FT, TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION ON LOT 28, BLOCK 3, BRIARDALE ADDITION, THE
SAME BEING 1651 - 61ST AVENUE N.E., WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THERE BE NO
OPENINGS OR WINDOWS IN THE WEST WALL.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADJOURNVENT:
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A
VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MAY 15, 1984, APPEALS
COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Lynn# Saba
Recording Secretary
r
land Planning
Iland 1wrweving
1G.11 Testing yme\OrWi/e. •vM4.
.n ,/
C...1 Iwq.wee. �nq
Municipc.l Inq.nerr.nq Engineerpl & Surv!•}'ctrti
611v% No 6S N 1
rd.nneup.tl.�.
+Mnw SSc37
1.•I..NhAnr 7Re •6066
A. r.. Cnd. 617
Cert ificate or* Survey for A �...�. -fit:.• i• �• ;��
ft
7��.GG ►�c�c� { h
• o r�yt�i
*1641 1 GI►R.
--I
10. a4. I
1 r�
GI ST AVENUE N. E.
SOT 2�BLO
C 3 GRIARDALE
JinoiK Iron monumani )L`�_\nOka Counij
✓1'OtAOQ7
I horeby toctily that this i{ a Icwe end correct representation of a fuev►y of the bovndar•wt of tl•e oba.0
detcc.bed land, and of the location of all baildinq.c thereon, and all visible encroachments. .t a••r, f•o• or a••
said land At Surveyed by me thi• day o/ A
t p f
Item #1, May 15, 1984
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
1651 - 61st Avenue N.E.
A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT:
Section 205.OT.3D•2a requires a minimum setback of 10 feet between any
living area and side property lines.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20
feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between garages
and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce exposure to conflagration
of fire. It is also to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas around
residential structures.
B. STATED HARDSHIP:
"Additional living and bedroom space required for increase in family size
plus additional storage requirements. Economic considerations suggest
addition to the existing garage to accommodate the increased living needs."
C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
The neighbor to the west, 1641 - 61st Avenue, was granted a variance in 1982
to place living area 5 feet off the common lot line. The variance was
granted with the stipulation that no windows be placed in the east wall of
the addition.
w
If this variance is granted, the two living areas would be 10 feet apart.
Therefore, if the Board approves this request, we suggest the Board
recommend no windows be placed in the west wall of the addition.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
TELEPHONE ( 612)571-3450
May 4, 1984
AMENDED
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley
t a Public Hearing in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University
heast at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday,May 15, ,1,984 in regard to the
utter:
Request for variance pursuant to Chapter
205 of the Fridley City Code, to reduce
the required side yard for living area
from 10' to 5', to allow the construction
of an additon on Lot 28, Block 3, Briardale
addition, the same being 1651 -61st Ave. N.E.
Notice is hereby given that all persons having an interest therein will be
given the opportunity to be heard at the above time and place.
PATRICIA GABEL
CHAIRWOMAN
APPEALS COMMISSION
Note: The Appeals Commission will have the final action on this request, unless
there are objections from surrounding neighbors, the City Staff, or the petitioner
does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the
request will continue to the City Council through the Planning Commission with only
a recommendation from the Appeals Commission.
1y
F7
CITY OF FRIDLEY,
F MINNESOTA
COMMISSION APPLICATION
REVIEW
Wport s - Number Rev I rope Approves or
c
Ft NOi ADDRESS
COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLISTS 41`J
RETURN TO PLANNING
acre �
J1 M COMMEN
FILE ,I/��i
DUE C -147E
4' `
Date 7
To Whom It May Concern:
We have discussed the proposed remodeling plans of Lee and Margo
Tech, 1651 61st Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432. We have no
objections.
N MY
,'I—crnature
Address
Date '5- o9- - zpj�
To Whom It May concern:
We have discussed the proposed remodeling plans of Lee and Margo
Tech, 1651 61st Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432. We have no
objections.
1
NOR
/i PRAT �� � ��ILL WIN 1w
Date
To Whom It May Concern:
We have discussed the proposed remodeling plans of Lee and Margo
Tech, 1651 61st Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432. We have no
objections.
Signature
Address
Date
To Whom It May Concern:
We have discussed the proposed remodeling plans of Lee and Margo
Tech, 1651 61st Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432. We have no
objections.
P
Signature
�-6 pJ
Address
Date �- -
To Whom It May Concern:
We have discussed the proposed remodeling plans of Lee and Margo
Tech, 1651 61st Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432. We have no
objections.
71:e. G - of .
Signature
Address
r,e
Date � -)-
To Whom It May Concern:
We have discussed the proposed remodeling plans of Lee and Margo
Tech, 1651 61st Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432.�� have no
objections.
ure
Address
a
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF FRIDLEY
0619,169
APPEALS COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS
In the Matter of ayar'ance to reduce the reo,ui,red cidP
allow the construction of an addition
Avenue N.E.
t
Margo P. Tech , Owner
VARIANCE
The above entitled matter came before the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley
and was heard on on the 15th day of Ma , 19� 84, on a petition
for a variance pursuant to the City of Frid ey s oning Ordi ance, for the
following described property:
Lot 28, Block 3, Briardale
IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or
reasons:
See Appeals minutes of May 15, 1984
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss.
CITY OF FRIDLEY )
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, Sidney C. Inman, City Clerk for the City of Friley with and in for said City
of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order
granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and
live found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley,�s
Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the /,fa day of �� ,''' ,
DRAFTED BY: Vr�
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432 SIDNEY C. 1AN, Ill"C,LERk ,
Variances are valid for a period of one year following apprva shaj4e ,•
considered void if not used within that period. '� =
9 (SEAL)
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 6
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY"MR. BARNA, TO APPROVE THS REQUEST FOR
A VARIANCE PV -MT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE
SIDE YARD SETBACK R731►h�,.('T'. TO 5 FT. TO ALLOW EXPANSION IN LIVING AREA
ABOVE THE ATTACHEDGE' ,LOCATED ON LOT 5, BLOCK 2, HEATHER HILLS THIRD
ADDITION, THE SAT SING 6150r"KERRY LANE N.E., WITH THE STIPULATION THAT
NO WINDOWS BE_0DED TO THE NORTH gYZT OF THE ADDITION.
UPON A FORCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE,
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. REQUEST FOR VARIANCE PURSUAN
REDUCE THE REQUIRED SIDE YAR
SHE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDIT
HE SAME BEING 1651 - 61ST
61st Ave. ., Fridley, ME.
CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED 2WE MOTION
05 OF THE FRIDLEY
REA FROM 10 FT. T
BLUCK 3, BRIARDA
quest by Margo P.
TY CODE TO
, luai -
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC
HEARING OPEN AT 8:23 P.M.
Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report:
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
1651 - 61st Avenue N.E.
A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT:
Section 205.07.3D.2a requires a minimum setback of 10 feet between
any living area and side property lines.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of
20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between
garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce exposure to
conflagration of fire. It is also to allow for aesthetically pleasing
open areas around residential structures.
B. STATED HARDSHIP:
"Additional living and bedroom space required for increase in family
size plus additional storage requirements. Economic considerations
suggest addition to the existing garage to accommodate the increased
living needs."
C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
The neighbor to the west, 1641 - 61st Avenue, was granted a variance
in 1982 to place living area 5 feet off the common lot line. The
variance was granted with the stipulation that no windows be placed
in the east wall of the addition.
J
1A
APPEALS C014MISSION MEETING, MAY 15, 1954 PAGE 1
If this variance is granted, the two living areas would be 10 feet
apart. Therefore, if the Board approves this request, we suggest
the Board recommend no windows be placed in the west wall of the
addition.
Mr. John Ahl, architect for the petitioners, stated what they plan to do
is build a loft/library over the back portion of the garage and then a
master bedroom extending past that. They do not plan on putting any
windows on the west side and are angling the addition so they do not have
the long corridor and tight space.
Mrs. Margo Tech stated they had ieLters From all the neighbors who border
their lot, as well as across the street to the front, stating they do not
object to this addition.
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO RECEIVE INTO THE RECORD
THELEETTERS FROM SIX NEIGHBORS STATING NO OBJECTION TO THE ADDITION.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Ms. Gabel stated the stated hardship seemed a little vague, and maybe the
petitioner could explain the hardship in a little more detail.
Mr. Lee Tech stated that right now the whole house is finished, and they
do not have any storage area. They are using two rooms for storage at the
present time. There are three of them living in the home and there is the
possibility of his mother and father moving in with them.
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC
HEARING CLOSED AT 8:45 P.M.
Mr. Barna stated that presently there is 10 ft. between the two structures
by the variance granted previously to the property owners at 1641 -'61st
Ave. N.E. He thought at that time the Appeals Commission considered the
hazard of living area adjacent to garage, and now they are talking about
living area adjacent to living area. He really felt living area adjacent
to living area was less hazardous than living area adjacent to garage. The
two neighbors are the ones that will have to live with the 10 ft. between
their two homes. As far as fire fighting, there will be as much room after
construction as there is now. He did not think living area caused that much
more chance of a fire over a garage and,properly constructed, the living area
without windows should have less chance of conflagration transfer between
the two structures. Basically, the code is not being varied any more than
it is presently being varied. He preferred the well -thought out, well-
designed addition rather than the regular box on the back of a box -type
addition.
Mr. Betzold stated that as far as the considerations about living areas
and garage areas, he was not sure he could agree with that because it is
not really the Commission's function to decide which parts of the code they
1
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 8
r
like or don't like. He stated he could go along with the variance in this
particular case just the way it.has been utilized, with the stipulation that
,there be no windows on the west wall. He felt that was very important.
He:was also concerned, not so much in this particular situation, about
mare and more variances getting closer to the property line, and it is
starting to set kind of a bad precedent. He hoped they were not violating
the very reasons why the code was established. He appreciated what the
petitioners were trying to do and why they were trying to do it, but he
was not quite so sure that was what the code was intended to do.
Ms. Gabel stated Mr. Betzold's-point was well taken:. However, she felt that
when the neighbors do net object and it seems to be'a livable situation
within the neighborhood, the Commission should go along with it.
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO APPROVE REQUEST FOR
VARIANCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE
REQUIRED SIDE YARD FOR LIVING AREA FROM 10 FT. TO 5 FT. TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION ON LOT 28, BLOCK 3, BRIARDALE ADDITION, THE
SAME BEING 1651 - 61ST AVENUE N.E., WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THERE BE NO
OPENINGS OR WINDOWS IN THE WEST WALL.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADJOURNMENT •
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY AR. BETZOLD, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A
VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MAY 150 1984, APPEALS
COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Lyn Saba
Recording Secretary
669.69
»ems
Q=wr
• Reox&d
c>"
M=gin
1r. Index
OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF ANOKA
hereby certify Mat the within instru-
ment was filed in this office for record
on the,_ n 2 5 Z A.D., 19
�4. �Fj o'clock/M., anJ was duly recorded
in book page
,.Q�G
C�o—1 nty—Recorder
By/
Deputy
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Attn: Planning Department