The URL can be used to link to this page

PRE 2010 DOCSCity of Fridley SUBJECT P IT NO. 15341 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r RECEIPT1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. S/ r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. , CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 L NUMBERDATE REV. PAGE OF APPROVED BY 612-571-3450 910-F15 7/17/79 JOB ADDRESS 415 - 63rd Avenue N. E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 22 1 Alice Wall Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Rodney Billman, Inc. 151 Silver Lake Road, New Brighton 633-0536 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. ZIP EF LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESSSEPERATE PERMITS E U'RPH© 6 USE OF BUILDING UM11ING AND SIGNS. Res identia 1 7 CLASS OF WORK NEW ❑ ADDITION O ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Obnstruct a 24' x 42' Dwelling and a 30' x 27' (approx.) garage 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Provide a hard surface driveway. Provide sod in the front and side yards. Provide City with copy of verifying survey. Increase roof pitch to 3:12 or use pitch and gravel roofing. SEWER LOCATION: 2' E. of Water Service . Expose service prior to establishing top of footing elevation. WATER LOCATION: 161' E. Of Manhole DRIVEWAY ESCROW: N/A LOWEST BASEMENT FLOOR ELEV: 846.5 LOWEST GRADE AT FOUNDATION: 851.0 WANING JW off Co !!MM DM NOT OYAWM WO AMMO OF UMM OCAMM AND WA" Sew ftft >d we to THIS DATA 4 MR WOMAIM PUMSU ONLT IMO TRW* - RECT • 4A% at PERSONS U06 A RNOWD VM TO MAMMON "01 11Rr- 911 AW SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, TYPE OF CONST. OC O COPAY L AD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. Wood Frame THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 ISTALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $19.90 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $39,800 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. $113.04 $425.00 STRUCTIO R THE PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE �� "�✓r�2�s<ytc° $ 28.26 $586.20 SIGNATURE (DATE) WHEN PROPERLY LI DDA�TE/DpD THIS IS YOUR PERMIT O,.Fa�CONTACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT � _ � 11 ! 6 v�.�i� - , (QX NATO OF OWNER IIF O NER LDERI IDATE'�� BLDG INSP I 0AfEj CITY OF FRIDLEY APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS (New, Alterations, Additions, or Repairs) 1 i 1 ADDRESS: ...r —1jA1,—;/ /ADDRESS- TEL '11' O: TEL NO: Construction Location STREET NO: 4 % J STREET: CQ,3 Rao LOT: BLOCK: ADDITION: Corner Lot: Inside Lot: I" Setback: Sideyards: Applicant attach to this form two Certificates of Survey of lot and proposed building location drawn on certificates to scale. ��.p,,�, ;" ��iJ DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION Front: jE ZL Depth: yL L Height: e G Square Feet: / Cubic Feet: Front: Depth: Height: Square Feet: Cubic Feet: 7 � Type of Construction: �y Estimated Cost: $ �- 3�. 804. eu To Be Oompleted: � f �7� Alt. A Alt. B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: $ $ SEE REVERSE SIDE OF SHEET'. The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application ar true and corre� --r DATE: — --J'— 7:2 SIGNATURE: Stipulations:,,�s �AaCrr►°.+� f�.a�tl. �LE� 8-- =_ (aT �ew►o,orr►o.. S d St& tJ AC,%ZrrnC� . Fan. tau* -S Lid u, L.ow Ear Glc ft%I 4�AL�C 6 VT fzl. $s'.o P.¢.. sg Ac- -ry .ti.90 sec Ln -S o Si6ad 3:12 CM uEeo .&,r, P,i�,t* ra use. p ��►� � C�29tiE.t.. Z"o 20e 42- = we x 9 $oc4 CA,_ w, a�J�Cq--zz loot w rZ c&,." FOQC4%. G fro s 60 x (-z z r 20. G R(ZMC ?Ax a7 = 8/6 �3 8 xl v = � iso cw.QJ4. 100'a x 6 4 f _ -(0 4 q I .SZ. loos yc 2S.31 2S,5TI I'1. (90 )c 2j.II 15Z3. 40 39, �Ct.M�r 2�.2Co x P e 28.2 Ste- 4zs o(j AfsSto. 20 if 19 , too X HARRY S. JOHNSON COMPANIES INC_ I •L o 401 WEST 79TH -STREET"_ BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 55420 (, irq - "$ PHONE (6121 694.5341 '�``�EAiT__._� 40 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEI a �I�32•°' LL CO OF. a e FOR J� Qo1 "WVY DOW NOT GUARMWE IA: o • a l ,o' 4UMEP_ bATuM . AGtjRAfF--m LOTIONS AND EIEVATIGr#�. o TMJs DATA IS FOR WFORMA110N PURPOSES ONLY AN:) .; NS USING R Sf10�11D VERlF� THE INPO&MAT1Gro «' �2y9 ' - �� / N89 59 33 w ON THE Sl�' , 120.01 - 0 1 10 o W GE2TSEY -tAA7_ T1i15A5- A_Y2t1E _ — - -- 1 28.04 - o ANr> GOiztLEt-T 2lPe�5E1�•{Az3��.t-aF A__-- -.- - i N!9.59.33 -1R �iURVE�(. G THE eiouNDAR1�S- cF:_ Lc-rs_ - - 120.01 ~ 8-1�i, btocic �, of TAf: ALiil;- WALL WI : , co APPIT100, HS"gEPIM r-OU14M KjW1l1B5oTA,- AS SuRVE:`(Er.p fv�( ME 'jN1S q� DA�r it g Nl g of NoVEMP'612 , 1918. - s -r. vows NoT PuRPdR[ ® ' �1 27.04 -ro SHOW iMPRoVEME1JT�i o2 �IJGROAGH- 09. -MF- j`i 1F ANC, - S �p I�=N®9•59*33"W 120.01. o o - 0 0 1 e .n o 12 0 ti • �f26si N!9.59. IF LANs_ 7juRVt~'(o�Z_- _=_-- .-- -- ji! , 120.01 _ ®�j0C! 1 13 6 0 0:1 IT h�� Q � f ' � ►o' �1 25.00 .. ' - �• i y 1 ut1�1�1e$ O s Nd9.59�3l-tr d+ggi�� 11 , 1!0.01 w lanae G�E.E1.ECjR�C o ULE Q 1.AId o -' _-14 P� J 7 / 1 Nes s9 33ti r zr �/ 15 N 89059,113-• a z -s qt 0 U) IN '5i 60.00 _ 474.19 75.00_—_ N69.59*33'M " o� d 16 - _ ---75.00__- —_75-00_ 94J9_—_ _75.00_ - O 1 N 09•s9'iitir u O 1 _ �O f( 1 1!0.01 231 1.09 Is •119 _o 3/% h 13.20 13.00 w°' 73.00 7s.00� 94.3! 75.00 fs 99 74 6057 664.53 -N89°59'33"W jCI,Wj1 J 4,r u - O" "F- -o ca i">10C.' e-47-5, le �6 / , !�7, of W, A/zz j Al � � -5-le.,4J g t t 1 �`(` Yt�,•y•ys .77 "` X, itiORl; ENVELdpE MTI,OX, -�11+.,,;; wn , a4+ i` •,°bs! r' a d; a a� SITE A'DDUPS, 'S.- I £ Det 37Cl11�,rt work�.ng gc sre €gotage of each., s A. �• �'� " �� ' t � 1`� � 4 •� � ,.� i `� . �r � �� 2 a;°� �, iFy �.ia ;=a Y , �` 1•'�° Total , e9posea w.l' azea �. �..LZ?_g+Q' ft! .;;:�• yyam�,., Total. `�rooflcer�.l�.�hg areae ._ . _.. �,` ft•it' 1� " T l . expo wa 11 area 4bflve i loor ; Ry,. �+► �q�.a�I � -dotal, 71fi�� '•M�N4V7f' � area -,i'. • e • • �ld�:I �. ��1 w4 `�• . • • • �. .:. � i .��i �1��,�� !/�>� .i�� 1 � - l T b! 'TCta _ ddbr' aria•'-� r �• .'..;. v • • . y, .. • . �!• • • • .'! ri:�.. •'� l01�� !d _ i� i{ d s . Vota'l sl d�.rhg 1466 door • area............7... , .; • ..� � �.� �. . .�,'r..,.:e..� 'Total f 6' "lace t�a�.�., �rea.`.::.� � .. � � ..... � �`'•s. • � ,, aY �* Tota , Wa l I �cam�.eg 'a�c�ea 0 iierac � � • ... • �°r , r • r;;' "•' �,. r' f,. Total net "watl� � Asea' above f loo «., ..... i � .....; �. ..Tota.R...... • . 4 ' «. rt, iY...... ....' . �• r4 °; ,r�.�I ,,; A �. p j I'tal ex aed fnund tion area y: �+.�y,,,1 - 'h!M'Tdta�+ f6411datidf9l !M• YA a 1�'R ll'7�. •`� • �� } a: Tdta.i ,fnun+datoa abrsecade.% .y.._n.�M xr ine 'gip to ub,, Of tc1 wall segment. 441 �„r -t* - 'r�us Oii 1,3 ' 'k ''�j F - t j 'K'y U yr ir " 3 ,n.� .��}} '4 t( it j�-_I�dl'.i:"d�� 'fk' f►�1�� j''fK, ,Rw G JI JIOU •y �J -� P rd i wl�sir� w w iR '^'�.T r+�r��r 'tk S4," aW� y.�� 1W a 4"wo w-04 d'tx f rr� '� 'Ss � v ,�, c _ � � ban �1'j kr v a• f " � � d J' MOL 1 - - 3� µ i �'d4 11. 4 -2 - If item #3 on previous page is the same as, or less than item #1, you have met the intent of SBC 6006(c)2. Total exposed roof/ceiling area = j. Total skylight area .......................... —.& k. Total roof/ceiling framing area (average 10%) ___.,, o ^7 1. Total net insulated roof/ceiling area........ I Determine "U" value for each roof/ceiling segment. j— O — X flu of •- s — 1. 1e. / X uU" .AV �/% = 49, a 4..................................Total = , _1 If total of #4 above is the same as, or less than #2, you have met the intent of SBC 6006 (c) 1. Alternate Building Envelope Design To utilize the total envelope system method, the values established by the sum of items #3 and #4 shall not be greater than the sum of items #1 and #2. 1. +2. 3. +4. - r y BRAUH ENGINEERING TESTING — MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL 6800 S. County Rd. 18, P.O. Box 35108, Mpls., MN / 612-941.5600 NORTHERN MINNESOTA 3219 E. 19th Avenue, Hibbing, MN 55746 CENTRAL MINNESOTA 1520 - 24th Ave. N., P.O. Box 189, St. Cloud, MN 56301 DULUTH/SUPERIOR 5431 Airpark Blvd., Duluth, MN 55811 SOUTHERN MINNESOTA 40 - 16th St. &E., Rochester, MN 55901 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Date: June 29, 1979 Project: 79-333 COMPACTION TESTS House Lot Lot 22, Blk. 1 Reported To: Mr. Rodney Billman Copies To: 63rd & 5th St. 151 Silver Lake Rd. Fridley, MN -New Brighton, MN 55112 est #: 1 2 3 4 Nate: 6/27/79 6/27/79 6/27/79 6/27/79 Wcation: 14'S, WE of 5'S, 25'E of 5'S, 33'E of 13'S, 5'E of NW Bldg. NW Bldg. NW Bldg. NW Bldg. Corner Corner Corner Corner Elev tion: -44 -12 Below street elev. Soil Classification: P-2 P-1 P-1 P-2 Field Density Determination: ® Sand Cone Method ASTM: D1556-70 (44 Sieve Basis) ® Nuclear Method ASTM: D2922-70 (44 Sieve Basis) Lary Density (pcf) Koisture Content W -114 Sieve Material M 98.5 104.5 14.0 10.1 108.2 111.8 7.6 8.8 Laboratory Moisture - Density Determination: []Standard Proctor ASTM: D698-70 (Method ) Modified Proctor ASTM: D1557-70(Method A) PYa x imam [sry Density (pcf) 109.7 105.8 105.8 105.8 C : P t imum Moisture Content (7.) 16.0 13.3 13.3 13.3 t,. -,,SULTS Relative Compaction (7 of Proctor) 90 99 102 1052 Specified Minimum M 90 90 90 90 REMARKS: The above tests meet the specified minimum compaction. BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. �✓ ' 42 NORMAN E. HALL Laboratory Supervisor BRAUn'" ENGINEERING TESTING MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL 6800 S. County Rd. 18, P.O. Box 35108, Mpls., MN / 612.941-5600 NORTHERN MINNESOTA 3219 E. 19th Avenue, Hibbing, MN 55746 CENTRAL MINNESOTA 1520 - 24th Ave. N., P.O. Box 189, St. Cloud, MN 56301 DULUTH/SUPERIOR 5431 Airpark Blvd., Duluth, MN 55811 SOUTHERN MINNESOTA 40 - 16th St. S.E., Rochester, MN iWPACTION TEST RESULTS Date: June 29, 1979 U1�Y Project: 79-333 COMPACTION TESTS House Lot Lot 22, Blk. 1 Reported To: Mr. Rodney Billman copies To: 63rd & 5th St. 151 Silver Lake Rd. Fridley, MN New Brighton, MN 55112 gest ll: Date: 6/27/79 Location: 6'N, 8'E of SW Bldg. Corner Lievation: Below street -22 grade Soil Classification: P-2 Iield Density Determination: ® Sand Cone Method ❑ Nuclear Method Lig y Density (pcf ) 100.3 t';oisture Content (%) 19.8 -4'4 Sieve Material (%) AI 6/27/79 122'S, 20'E of NW Bldg. Corner -3% 2 P-2 ASTM: D1556-70 ASTM: D2922-70 102.8 11.9 (44 Sieve Basis) (4 4 Sieve Basis) Laboratory Moisture - Density Determination: ❑ Standard Proctor ASTM: D698-70 (Method ) Y�]X Modified Proctor ASTM: D1557 -70( -Method A) ^L:x imum [try Density (pcf) 109.7 109.7 Uptimum Hoisture Content (%) 16.0 16.0 E:ESULTS Relative Compaction 91.5 93.5 1.% of Proctor) pecif ied Minimum (7.) 90 90 Pxi- s: The above tests meet the specified minimum compaction. BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. NOMN E. HALL Laboratory Supervisor MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL 6800 S. County Rd. 18, P.O. Box 35108, Mpls., MN / 612-941.5600 NORTHERN MINNESOTA 3219 E. 19th Avenue, Hibbing, MN 55746 CENTRAL MINNESOTA 1520 - 24th Ave. N., P.O. Box 189, St. Cloud, MN 56301 DULUTH/SUPERIOR 5431 Airpark Blvd., Duluth, MN 55811 SOUTHERN MINNESOTA 40 - 16th St. S.E., Rochester, MN 55901 107 106 105 w U 104 z N a 103 102 101 HRAun- INEERING TESTING — LABORATORY MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATION Project No. 79-333 Sample No. P-1 Date Tested 6/28/79 Modified Proctor ASTM D: 1557 -70 Method: A UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION: SILTY SAND, fine grained, gray (ASTM D2487 & D2488) MAXIMUM DENSITY: 105.8 OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT: 13.3 10 11 12 13 14 15 T MOISTURE CONTENT, MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL 6800 S. County Rd. 18, P.O. Box 35108, Mpls., MN / 612.941-5600 NORTHERN MINNESOTA 3219 E. 19th Avenue, Hibbing, MN 55746 CENTRAL MINNESOTA 1520 - 24th Ave. N., P.O. Box 189, St. Cloud, MN 56301 DULUTH/SUPERIOR 5431 Airpark Blvd., Duluth, MN 55811 SOUTHERN MINNESOTA 40 - 16th St. S.E., Rochester, MN 55901 111 110 109 w U 108 z w a �a 107 106 105 Hmun- ENGINEERING TESTING LABORATORY MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATION Project No. 79-333 Sample No. P-2 Date Tested 6/28/79 Modified Proctor ASTM D: 1557 -70 Method: A UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION: SILTY SAND, fine grained, black, with a trace (ASTM D2487 & D2488) of organics MAXIMUM DENSITY: 109.$ OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT: 16.0 13 14 15 16 17 18 MOISTURE CONTENT, S •U„t :�� f r.. CITY 03= FPJ33LEE 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, M'INMESOTA-.5543-2 TELEPHONE (612)571.3450 -January-ll; 1978 Mr. Frederick Wall The Wa11 Corporation .. 8200 Normandale Boulevard Bloomington; Minnesota 55437 Dear Mr. • Wall : , In response.to*your request as to a division of the charges on the Alice Wall Addition for sewer and water lateral and service charges, following is the information: That portion which will have the Elderly Mid -Rise building consist- ing of Lots 1-7 and a portion of Lot 24 will have a new cost at this z " timeof ........................... ,............ .............. ... $ 4,710.06 r •., Lots 8-16 will require a lot of work by the Developer, so the new cost estimate of $13,026.69 will cancel the charges of $12,636.36.• - 0 .. Lot 17 $ 1,550.99 Lot 18 1,507.88 .Lot 19 1,598.89 Lot 20 1,507.88 Lot 21 907.88 Lot 22 907.88 Lot 23 931.83 .................... The regular apartment portion of Lot 24 will have a charge for sewer on Fifth Street from the Library parcel to 64th Avenue. There will be no charge for water as you are connecting to your own internal waterline ... .......................................... TOTAL We will point out at this time that if this property will ever hook up to the existing water line on Fifth Street from 64th Avenue North to the Library property, a charge will be made for it: Also, we are not charging any assessment at this time on Fifth Street from 64th Avenue to south property line of Lot 24 extended west as there are no water or sewer lines at present. 82,913.23 1, 096.81 $14,720-J-0 We have no project at this time, so therefore no pending assessments will show, but if and when a project is ordered in, the owners -of record at that time will be notified before the preliminary assess- ment hearing so they can voice their opinion. If the present or neer owners would prefer to have an assessment at this time on the stretch . from 64th Avenue south, we could come up with an amount and keep this in escrow for such lines later. This is up to you people to decide. Sincerely, Refvi n J. Herrmann MJH ps Assessor CITY OF FRIDLEY APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, REFRIGERATION AND $ .AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE $ $10.00 $ GRAVITY WARM AIR: RATE TOTAI, Job Address Furnace Shell & Duct Work $12.00 $ Replacement of Furnace Repairs & Alterations -up to $500.00 7.00 7.00 $ $ Department of Buildings Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 4.00 $ City of Fridley Tel. #571-3450 MECHANICAL WARM AIR: Furnace Shell & Duct Work to 100,000 BTU each add. 50,000 BTU Replacement of Furnace Repairs & Alterations -up to $500.00 Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 SM*1 OR HOT XkTER SYSTEM: Boiler & Lines up to 100,000 BTU each addn. 50,000 BTU Boiler only up to 100,000 BTU each addn. 50,000 BTU OIL BURNER -'to 3 gal. per hour each add. 3 gal, per hour GAS BURNER- from 100,000 BTU to 199,999 BTU (over 199,999 BTU see Fee Schedule) The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein $12.00 $ specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes 4.00 $� and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the 7.00 $ facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. 7.00 $ C 4.00 $ Fridley, Minn.19� OWNER k 1 ///nnl/l $12.00 $ 4.00 $ 7.00 $ 6.00 $ $10.00 $ 10.00 $ $10.00 $_ GAS FITTING FEES: 1st 3 Fixtures x $ 3.00 $_V--" Additional Fixtures x $ 1.00 $ Gas Range to 199,000 BTU x $10.00• $ AIR CONDITIONING $_%lCo FAN HEATING SYSTEMS See Fee Schedule $ VENTILATING SYSTEMS $ ALTERATIONS $ REPAIRS $ State Surcharge $ .50 TOTAL FEE $ J ,. O ROUGH INSP. Date FINAL INSP. j20 9-0 Date APPROVAL FOR PERMIT r W REINSPECTION FEE ($10.00) MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING PERMIT IS $7.50 PLUS $.50 STATE SURCHARGE KIND OF BUILDING USED AS TO BE COMPLETED ABOUT ESTIMATED COST 3000-____ OLD -BUILDING PERMIT NO. PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE/BURNER BEATING or POWER PLANTS, Steam, Hot Water, _arm Air- ``No. d / Trade Name � 1.!0Size No. 106 Capacity 1/61 �> P�f3Q Sq. Ft.�1EDR BTU HP Total Connected Load G.' /Yi/S0� Kind of Fuel BURNER - Trade Name' Size No. Z o'16 (v Capacity 106,0 i Sq. Ft. EDR BTU HP, company RAY N. WELTER HEATING CO. .4637 C%icaga Ave. Signed By Tel. No. CITY OF FRIDLEY APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING AND GAS FITTING PEtt7IT PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING•FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE W !� x $3.00 �. m $2.00 b x V Catch Basin x b+ Water Heater - to 99,000 BTU Water m m W $10.00 Water Softener x spa a 4 a x ' Electric Water Heater 41 w w Heater m e o E "1C(i moi a' ►Q+ x e ani a N O yU a 43 m y 0 3 •N O o W O O W 4j N U a 1j N 3 M N N�y o as lec cCA C7 f 1st 2nd 3rd 4th (R) = Future Connection Opening Connected with Sewer (*) = New Fixture, Old Opening Water PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING•FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE Number Fixtures !� x $3.00 Future Fixture Opening x $2.00 New Fixture, Old Opening x $2.00 Catch Basin x $5.00 Water Heater - to 99,000 BTU x $5.00 100,000 BTU to 199,000 BTU x $10.00 Water Softener x $7.00 New Ground Run.Old Building x $5.00 Electric Water Heater �- x $5.00 GAS FITTING FEES: 1st 3 fixtures x $3.00 Additional Fixtures x $1.00 Gas Range to 199,000 BTU x $3:0.00 REPAIRS $•,ALTERATIONS First $100.00 $5.00 each add. $100.00 or fraction $2.00 State Surcharge TOTAL FEE REINSPECTION FEE ($10.00) TOTAL $-3LIOD Job Address Department of Buildings City of Fridley Tel. #571-3450 The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and roprosentations stated in this application are true and correct Fridley, Mn. R SC- OWNER GOWNER O D i� C— '� t �- L y+- A Cori $ T-/?-, KIND OF BUILDING A yu USED AS G— S% y7 E JC- C— TO TO BE COM`PLETED ABOUT l / ! ! 7 ESTIMATED COST OLD - NEW BUILDING PERMIT NO. PERMIT NO. g I 7 9 Company rj C Signed By Tel. No.%/- / % 3.3 ROUGH INSP. Date FINAL INSP. ?Q &® Date APPROVAL FOR PERMIT J�( MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY PLUMBING PERMIT IS $7.50 Pygg $.50 STATE SURCHARGE 4 � s /AKS,.. 5.�. r__c�►.ci,►.P._ ............Nk , 3 _.x.� ,r 9= 1 .` SIGNATURE REPLY:— _._ . Y 1 ,y Y �1� � F _ i io-z5-7°1 , -t T)c ) I - a� X415 I�3KD , ,+,j . � 11, I-RIDLEY Nil NIC'IPAL CEN'I'ER •'6431 UNIVERSI'T'Y AVE N.(. 1'RIDLEY. MN 55432 • (612) S71-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 August 9, 1996 Coachman Companies Mr. Jeff Stock 1500 Cheyenne St Lincoln, NE 68502 Re: Storm Damaged Building at 100 Osborne Road NE, Fridley, MN Dear Mr. Stock: On August 7, 1996, an inspection was conducted after the wind storm, to determine whether the above noted building was damaged to the point of being a hazard.. Per Section 102 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code which states in part, any structure that constitutes a hazard to safety, or health, or public welfare by reason of disaster or damage, shall be considered unsafe. All unsafe buildings shall be declared a public nuisance and shall be abated by .repair or demolition as referenced in the Dangerous Building Code. Section 302 of the Dangerous Building Code states that any building or structure which has any or all of the conditions or defects herein described shall be deemed a hazardous building, provided that such conditions or defects exist to the extent that the life, health, property or safety of the public or its occupants are endangered. The following items deem the building to be dangerous; 1) Whenever the stress in any materials, member or portion thereof, due to all dead and live loads, is more than one and one half times the working stress or stresses allowed in the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location. 2) Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, ox by any other cause, to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially :Less than it was before the catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure. f r t Re: Coachman Companies August 9, 1996 Page 2 3) Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property. 4) Whenever any portion of a building, or any member, appurtenance or ornamentation on the exterior thereof is not sufficient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of one half of that specified in the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location without exceeding the working stresses permitted in the Building Code for such buildings. 5) Whenever any portion thereof has inracked, buckled or settled to such an extent, that walls or other structural portions have materially less resistance to winds or earthquakes than is required in the case of similar new construction. 6) Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose for which it is being used. 7) Whenever the exterior walls or other vertical structural / members list, lean or buckle to such an. extent that a plumb line passing through the center of gravity does not fail inside the middle one third of the base., 8) Whenever the building or structure, exclusive of the foundation, shows 33 percent or more damage or deterioration of its supporting members or 50 percent damage or deterioration of its nonsupporting members, enclosing or outside walls or coverings. ` 9) Whenever the building or structure which, whether or not erected in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances, has in any nonsupporting part, member or portion less than 66 percent of the strength, fire resisting qualities or characteristics or weather resisting qualities or characteristics required by law in the case of a newly constructed building of like area, height and occupancy in the same location. 10) Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidation, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections or heating equipment or other cause, is determined by the Fire Marshal to be a fire hazard. 11) Whenever any building or structure is in such a condition as 10-01 to constitute a public nuisance known to the common law or in equity jurisprudence. Re: Coachman Companies August 9, 1996 Page 3 Per Section 403 of the Dangerous Building Code, you are hereby ordered to demolish the entire structure, including foundation, because of the extreme damage to the building. Demolition shall be started no less than 72 hours from the date of this letter. The buildings"is. posted as an unsafe building. No entry will be allowed. If entry to the building is to be made during demolition, a registered structural engineer shall be on site to determine the safety of the people entering the building. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact.me at 572-3602. Sincerely, Chief lding Official RJ/mh CC: Jeff Stock, 100 Osborne Road NE Dick Larson, Fire Marshal Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Donald Harrop, Westfield Companies October 7, 1996. Mr. Chuck Jaeger 1340 Pike Lake Ct. New Brightion MN 55112 Re: Fire damage at 5601 - 4th Street, Fridley, MN. Dear Mr. Jaeger; On October 3, 1996 an inspection was conducted after the fire to determine the extent of damage. Per Section 102 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code which states in part ucture that constitutes a hazard to safety,'or healt or damage shall be considered unsafe. All unsafe buildings D- declared a public nuisance and shall be abated by repair or demolition as referenced in the Dangerous Building Code. Section 302 of the Dangerous building Code states that any building or structure which has any or all of the conditions or defects herein described shall be deemed a hazardous building, provided that such conditions or defects exist to the extent that the life, health, property or safety of the public or its occupants are endangered. The following items deem the building to be dangerous: 1) Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause, to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before the catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure. 2) Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property. 3) Whenever any portion of a building, or any member, appurtenance or ornamentation on the exterior thereof is not sufficient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of one half of that specified in the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location without exceeding the working stresses permitted in the Building Code for such buildings. 4) Whenever any portion thereof has inracked, buckled or settled to such an extent, that walls or other structural portions have materially less resistance to winds or earthquake than is required in the case of similar new construction. 5) Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose for which it is being used. 6) Whenever the building or structure, exclusive of the foundation, shows 33 percent or more damage or deterioration of its supporting members or 50 percent damage or deterioration of its nonsupporting members, enclosing or outside walls or coverings. 7) Whenever the building or structure which, whether or not erected in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances, has in nonsupporting part, member or portion less than 66 percent of the strength, fire resisting qualities or characteristics or weather resisting qualities or characteristics required by law in the case of a newly constructed building of like area, height and occupancy in the same location. 8) Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidation, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections or heating equipment or other cause, is determined by the Fire Marshal to be a fire hazard. 9) Whenever any building or structure is in such a condition as to constitute a public nuisance known to the common law or in equity jurisprudence. Per Section 403 of the Dangerous Building Code, you are hereby ordered to demolish the entire structure, including the foundation, because of the extreme damage to the building. Demolition shall be completed within 60 days from the date of this letter. The building has been posted as a unsafe building. Per your letter dated October 3, 1996, the City has boarded the building, and will bill you for the expenses for securing the building from trespass. The building shall remain secure until demolition is completed. Prior to demolition, a permit must first be obtained from the City. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at 572-3602. Sincerely, Ron Julkowski Building Official CC: Barb Dacy, Dick Larson /e -Xe iL. CIlYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 February 19, 1998 Mr. Dick Reiling 8050 Ranchers Road NE Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Fire Damaged Building at 7871 Hickory Street NE, Fridley, MN Dear Mr. Reiling: On February 17, 1998 an inspection was conducted after the fire to determine whether the above noted building was damaged to the point of being a hazard. Per Section 102 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code which states in part, any structure that constitutes a hazard to safety, or health, or public welfare by reason of disaster or damage, shall be considered unsafe. All unsafe buildings shall be declared a public nuisance and shall be abated by repair or demolition as referenced in the Dangerous Building Code. Section 302 of the Dangerous Building Code states that any building or structure which has any or all of the conditions or defects herein described shall be deemed a hazardous building, provided that such conditions or defects exist to the extent that the life, health, property or safety of the public or its occupants are endangered. The following items deem the building to be dangerous; 1) Whenever the stress in any materials, member or portion thereof, due to all dead and live loads, is more than one and one half times the working stress or stresses allowed in the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location. 2)._ Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause, to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before the catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure. Re: Dick Reiling February 19, 1998 Page 2 . 3) Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property. 4) Whenever any portion of a building, or any member, appurtenance or ornamentation on the exterior thereof is not sufficient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of one half of that specified in the Building Code .for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location without exceeding the working stresses permitted in the Building Code for such buildings. 5) Whenever any portion thereof has inracked, buckled or settled to such an extent, that walls or other structural portions have materially less resistance to winds or earthquakes than is required in the case of similar new construction. 6) Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose for which it is being used. 7) Whenever the exterior walls or other vertical structural members list, lean or buckle to such an extent that a plumb line passing through the center of gravity does not fail inside the middle one third of the base. 8) Whenever the building or structure, exclusive of the foundation, shows 33 percent or more damage or deterioration of its supporting members or 50 percent damage or deterioration of its nonsupporting members, enclosing or outside walls or coverings. 9) Whenever the building or structure which, whether or not erected in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances, has in any nonsupporting part, member or portion less than 66 percent of the strength, fire resisting qualities or characteristics or weather resisting qualities or characteristics required by law in the case of a newly constructed building of like area, height and occupancy in the same location. 10) Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidation, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections or heating equipment or other cause, is determined by the Fire Marshal to be a fire hazard. Re: Dick Reiling February 19, 1998 Page 3 11) Whenever any building or structure is in such a condition as to constitute a public nuisance known to the common law or in equity jurisprudence. Per Section 403 of the Dangerous Building Code, you are hereby ordered to demolish the entire structure, including foundation. Demolition shall be started no less than 72 hours from the date of this letter. All demolition shall be coordinated with Dick Larson, City Fire Marshal, to assist with his fire investigation. 'Please copy all environmental reports to the City of Fridley. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at 572-3602. Sincerely, RJ/mh_ CC: -.Steve Forsythe, Spec Plating 160 83 Ave NE #109, Fridley Russ Thole, Belair Excavating 2200 Old Hwy 8, New Brighton Dick Larson, Fire Marshal Barbara Dacy, Community Development Adm IN SUBJECT P City of Fridley 26642 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT RECE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. A _ _ •�, ____ r � � PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. 1 . � NUMBER REV ATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 612-571-3450 910-F15 1;/15/98 JOB ADDRESS 415 63rd Ave 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 22 1 Alice Wall Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER - MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Tim Fowler 415 63rd Ave. 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Owner 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION Lj REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Reroof house and garage 26 S Tear -off 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO. STIPULATIONS Underlayment must comply with State Building Code. TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL. PLUMBING. HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT 216$ $1.08 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. $74.75 Fire SC $2.16 PLAN CHECK FEE TOT ;FEE 1___) - / $ 7.99 SIG FCO -RACT RORAUTrIZEDAGENT (DATE] N R VALIDA THIS I .YOUR PERM 4 i� BILL19 INSP IF !� GATE SIGN RE OF OWNER IF BUILDER] ]DATE] IN NEW [ ] Effective 1/1/98 ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION P ConstructionAddress: "— 6 '-� oel' Legal Description: _ Owner Name & Address: `moi p/�1 Tel. # Contractor: aileez= MN LICENSE # Address: Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT Tel. # LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE -AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: z ��2 0 Construction Type: Estimated Cost: $ Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = (Fee Schedule on Back) Ft x $ = $ DATE: APPLICANT: �` , 0 le Tel. # �, � ZW STIPULATIONS: CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee $ ✓ �S^ Fee Schedule on Reverse Side Fire Surcharge $ = J .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) State Surcharge $ J. (� $.50/$1,000 Valuation SAC Charge $ $1000 per SAC Unit License Surcharge $ $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Driveway Escrow $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Erosion Control $ $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] TOTAL $ 9 STIPULATIONS: SUBJECT P City of Fridley 26801 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT ` RECEIPT NO. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. ~ PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC.5,3 r (� NUMBER REV DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 IL'""A 612-571-3450 910415 7/23/98 10B ADDRESS 415 63rd AVf I LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 22 1 1 Alice Wall Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Fowler 415 63rd Ave 571-7820 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Owner 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 8 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW j7 ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION E REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 24'x8' Deck; reside house 9 CHANGEOFUSEFROM TO STIPULATIONS Call for building wrap inspection before covering. See notations on plan. Before digging call for all utility locations 454-0002 REQU-RED%BY LAW TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL. PLUMBING. HEATING. VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 80 DAYS. OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 ISTALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL 13ECOMPLIED $1.88 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF APERMIT $3750.94 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- $87.25 Fire SC $3.75 STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE $92.88 SIGMA OFCONTR TOR AUTHORIZ DAGENT IDATEI PROPERLY IDATED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT re`s' G.�-- �- A--S.GNATUREOFOWNERIIFOWNERSUIL _40,yyH�(� BLDG NSP QATE ERI IDATEI NEW [ ] Effective 1/1/98 ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 (y 1 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION�j ConstructionAddress: -y 7� 6 9 Legal Description: Owner Name & Address: ® Tel. #-,,5— 2Z 2 Contractor: MN LICENSE # Address: ((/ �(� Tel. # 6- % 9,?,? 0 Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGEAREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: ngth y Width _ Hgt/Ground �- Sq. Ft. / OTHER: &9', �q )y / k' �3 ' Q EeX ' - - �779 7 �S rOE 4)ct-S L Construction Type: Estimated Cost: $ Ss&Ag 2 (Fee Schedule on Back) , Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Ft x $ _ $ DATE: 3 APPLICANT: �- / Tel. # , 22 9 CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee $ /, 2 Fee Schedule on Reverse Side Fire Surcharge $ .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) State Surcharge $ $.50/$1,000 Valuation SAC Charge $ $1000 per SAC Unit License Surcharge $ $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Driveway Escrow $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Erosion Control $ $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary TOTAL $ STIPULATIONS: -�/ /.s- &3/d JOHN J. RYAN CO. 1596 SELBY AVENUE, ST. PAUL 66104 SCALE: 1 INCH L O FEET TELEPHONE: 8468 PLAT OF SURVEY OF PROPERTY OF LOCATION �.� A!/e-i✓ !71— DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS .00,7 tl 4 2 so l - ._.... 1�. 'Pp/ /G .�.� - - - 7.> D -- - = - - •'' 'VOTE.' ,5fpv6/rc rd ci!a°r ouf54 407 S• 63 ,q!/�/VUE /1�� ofZ.of a2 CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION OF BUILDING I hereby cerWy that on -6-11 19 ez this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervWorya, that I duly Registered Land Sur- veyor olff the j "B of the. S of innesota. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I iierAy certify that on 19 ' this survey, plan, at report was preparod.by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. /1/0 V 5 L... r�!,Odi &OU 41,1AOW (' � ou / <rn /. 17 G' 12 12* 6furlo � �. i� i e • CITY OF FRIDLEY INSPECTION DIVISION �� 6431 University Ave NE ` 4-LIL � �) Effective On January 1, 2000 Fridley, MN 55432 APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, 572.3604 REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES JOB ADDRESS RATE SCHEDULE Residential Rate TOTAL OWNER Furnace Shell and Duct Work, Burner - BUILDING USED AS_ C Also Replacement Furnace $ 30.00 $ _ (Side Vent - Fill Out Back) ESTIMATED COST PERMIT N0.� Gas Piping (Needed with new furnace, $ 10.00 $ Gas Range but not replacement) DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE AND OR BURNER $ 10.00 $ No. of Heating Units Circle One (Steam) (Hot Watery arm A' Gas Dryer $ 10.00 $ Trade Name_ �� 'o (� Size No. iW �, BTU— HP EDR *Air Conditioning - All Sizes $ 25.00 $ Fuel Total Connected Load All Others/Repairs & Alterations (LIST ON BACK) Burner Trade Name Size No. 1% of Value of Appliance or Work $ BTU HP EDR Commercial/Industrial 1.25% of Value of Appliance or Work $ The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes an State Surcharge $ .50 rulings of the Building Division, and hereby declares that all the facts and TOTAL FEE $ �(�'' representations stated in this application are true and correct. 11 DATE ®� l 60 MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING/COOLING/VENTILATION HEATING CO REFRIGERATION/AIR CONDITIONING PERMIT IS $25 00 PLUS THE $ 50 STATE SURCHARGE Signed �e %� R� �— TEL # REINSPECTION FEE $47.00/Hr A *Air Conditioners can not be placed in a side yard without Approved By Rough -In Date Final Date written permission from adjoining property owner. COMMON VENT VENT CONNECTOR AND COMBUSTION AIR VERIFICATION When replacing an existing furance, the undersigned hereby verifies that the venting has been examined and is free from rust, deterioration, obstructions, and is securely supported and firestopped where required. Yes () No ( ) The venting system is plastic/PVC and meets all current codes and manufacturer specifications including sizing, length, number of elbows and termination. Yes () No ( ) The undersigned also verifies that the replacement unit is a listed assembly and meets the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. This does include AGA-GAMA Category I Central Furnace Venting Tables for fan assisted and natural draft appliances. _ Yes () No ( ) The existing combustion air is sized and installed to meet the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. Yes () No ( ) When required to install a new combustion air. it will be sized and installed To meet the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. Yes () No ( ) When installing a new venting system, the undersigned hereby verifies that it is a listed assembly and meets the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. This does include AGA-GAMA Category I Central Furnace Venting Tables for fan assisted and natural draft appliances. Yes () No ( ) Is the common vent and vent connectors sized and installed correctly after an appliance has been removed from the common vent and vented separately as per current codes. Yes( )No( ) Appliance Type and Size/Common Vent and Vent Connector Information Appliance #1 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat Appliance #2 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat Appliance #3 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat Total Appliances Total Btu Input Common Vent Type Vent Height Diameter inches Appliance #1 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter in Type Appliance #2 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter in Type Appliance #3 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter in Type ALTERATIONS: (Describe) I®00e P.7 HEATING CO: a Signed By: Date CITY OF FRIDLEY INSPECTION DIVISION g Effective On Janua � 1 1999 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VEN LATION, 572-3604 REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES RATE SCHEDULE Residential Furnace Shell and Duct Work, Burner - Also Replacement Furnace (Side Vent - FII Out Back) Gas Piping (Needed with new furnace, but not replacement) Gas Range Gas Dryer *Air Conditioning - All Sizes All Others/Repairs & Alterations (LIST ON BACK) 1 % of Value of Appliance or Work Commercial/Industrial 1.25% of Value of Appliance or Work JOB ADDRESS �1/ S C0 / Af eye State Surcharge TOTAL FEE $ .50 $ MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING/COOLINGNENTILATION REFRIGERATION/AIR CONDITIONING PERMIT IS $25.00 PLUS THE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE REINSPECTION FEE $42.00/Hr Bumer Trade Name Size No. BTU HP EDR HEATING COMPANY X/1? 2 % bqNrti � ¢ Me S /I Signed By A&Aa6.„h -- Tei No. 7 f O -3eQD 1 Approved By Rough -In Date Final Date *Air Conditioners can not be placed in a side yard without FILL OUT BACK SIDE FOR STACK VERIFICATION ON REPLACEMENT FURNACE written permission from adjoining property owner. The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein Rate TOTAL specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes and rulings of the Building Division, and hereby declares that all the facts and $ 30.00 $ representations stated in this application are true anp correct. Z $10.00 $ i OWNER T//'l F0 Gid L e ez $10.00 $ BUILDING USED AS E' S P �✓ S �e $10.00 $ �/ ESTIMATED COST Z 0 ® PERMIT NO. $ 25.00 $ -25,00 DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE AND OR BURNER $ No. of Heating Units Circle One (Steam) (Hot Water) (Warm Air) Trade Name Size No. BTU HP EDR $ Fuel Total Connected Load State Surcharge TOTAL FEE $ .50 $ MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING/COOLINGNENTILATION REFRIGERATION/AIR CONDITIONING PERMIT IS $25.00 PLUS THE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE REINSPECTION FEE $42.00/Hr Bumer Trade Name Size No. BTU HP EDR HEATING COMPANY X/1? 2 % bqNrti � ¢ Me S /I Signed By A&Aa6.„h -- Tei No. 7 f O -3eQD 1 Approved By Rough -In Date Final Date *Air Conditioners can not be placed in a side yard without FILL OUT BACK SIDE FOR STACK VERIFICATION ON REPLACEMENT FURNACE written permission from adjoining property owner. Remarks: List ALTERATIONS Being Done: HEATING CO: Signed By: Date: IN C- CH MNEY AND STACK VERIFICATION The undersigned. hereby verifies that the existing chimney or stack: L Has been carefully examined Yes () No ( ) 2. Is free from rust or deterioration Yes () No (. ) 3. Has no foreign objects lodged within Yes () No ( ) 4. Is securely supported Yes () No ( ) 5. Meets all current Code requirements for size and total BTU's connected Yes () No ( ) 6 Has total heating BTU's of All other BTU's TOTAL BTU's 7. Has a liner been provided for water heater Yes ( ) No ( ) 8. Has combustion air been provided for water heater Yes ( ) No ( ) Remarks: List ALTERATIONS Being Done: HEATING CO: Signed By: Date: IN C- Cfil'OF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER - 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 - (763) 571-3450 - FAX (763) 571-1287 October 17, 2001 Mr. Tim Fowler 415 63 Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Final Inspection at 415 63 Avenue NE Contractor: American Heating & Air Supply & Sharp Heating & AC Dear Mr. Fowler: Mechanical permits were issued on June 3, 1999 and October 30, 2000 to install a furnace and an air conditioner at your address. According to section 305 (a) of the 1991 Uniform Mechanical Code, a final inspection shall be conducted on the mechanical work authorized by these permits. As of this date, no inspection has been called for. The permit fees that were paid cover the inspections to make sure the work was completed according to the Mechanical Code. We will keep your permit open for another 30 days and if we do not hear from you within this time to set up the inspection, we will expire the permits and no further action will be taken. To set up the inspection or to have any questions answered, please contact the Building Inspection Division at (763) 572-3604. Sincerely, 13AVE JENSEN Building Inspeq4 DJ/mh INSPECTION REPORT CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA (763) 572-3604 ADDRESS OWNER BUILDER DATE —PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION INSPECTION REPORT DATE REPORT -T, If no corrections are listed above, approval is hereby given to proceed. You will be in violation of the ordinance if you do not call for the proper inspections and make corrections as called for. 147181 S INSPECTION REPORT CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA (763) 572-3604 ADDRESS J OWNER a BUILDERr` zz e' DATE �9a p =' PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION�i- INSPECTION REPORT DATE REPORT �rq � 1: / If no corrections are listed above, approval is hereby given to proceed. You will be in violation of the ordinance if you do not call for the proper inspections and make corrections as called for. INSPECTION REPORT CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA (763) 572-3604 -ADDRESS OWNER BUILDER DATE DESCRIPTION DATE 147474 PERMIT NO. 71 INSPECTION REPORT REPORT M If no corrections are listed above, approval is hereby given to proceed. You will be in violation of the ordinance if you do not call for the proper inspections and make corrections as called for. e� /z.44WZ If no corrections are listed above, approval is hereby given to proceed. You will be in violation of the ordinance if you do not call for the proper inspections and make corrections as called for. I --; =��- AIT r 71-dAlg:� le<T- - ,�'`,el �'Aj . 40 /A Document Name: Taxsys MSTINT049852JAN17020201 M A S T E R KEY:00458356 YEAR:2002 ACCT:R14 30 24 31 0027 LOC:20 415 NE 63RD AVE LEGAL:LOT/UNIT:22 BLOCK/TRACT: ALICE WALL ADD I N Q U I R Y S C R E E N C P OWNER:FOWLER TIMOTHY J & CHERYL A TAXPAYER:BILLMAN RODNEY 151 SILVER LK RD 1 NEW BRIGHTON MN 55112 ASSESSOR:FOWLER TIMOTHY J & CHERYL A CITY:FRIDLEY PC: 415 63RD AVE NE CREATE:1983 FRIDLEY MN 55432 ACRES: PP REF: PARENT: VALUATIONS ******************** 2001 DATA ************************** LAND: 37300 * TAX DUE TAX OUTST P/I/C TOTAL DUE IMPR: 101600 * 2314.70+ EST MKT: 138900 *STC:lA SPEC: 875.05+ TAX MKT: 135100L * NOTES: ADJ-N NAL -Y DELQ-N TAX CAP: 1351 *ACT CD: DESC: ********************************************************* BUILDING INFO DITCH: BEN ACRES: BEN AMT: TYPE:SF LEVY:23014I AREA:FR01 INCDST:A2 AG P: WASTE:IR BLT:1980 EFF:1984 LAST SALE:9999/99/99 PCA:2113 EXEMPTIONS: CONST. ACTIVITY:2001/02/22 STC..4BB RES -NON -HST SFD CHAIN:*NONE* FDNC: DATA: SUB: YR:2002 / MESSAGE: @ U Date: 1/17/ 2 Time: 3:48:44 PM K !' Al • Gd / Y �/� �V �1� ��/ C� 'A o �eE-?�R z el E- IZZ -5- e-o'l 4C -5" �� %��Ti®� 10 O -V cz? ol ,400l,r ,0007 —.4 "C ITJ 3/700, 0"0�7 u i ! i� ' ® �' � Y i ' J I '. f �. I I F i I I c zo _ _aZ k000�m_ C 211 eg OP w Par 7�-C ®I �r��A a,) 4P A tD f' C-� AW J' 7;e ee.9 s e'.r) /&,w Aolo� i r �.^ r ♦ (/ itf4 T ®`< • w fir- v A, . y � /- ...� i f i Z* 7— r 7 w -_j a71-4:-Zr Qcr,;— r�+ o -�-® �� iii•-� '7�/� �� - .oeoe 2S R- - - - - - - - - - - - j Mv. 0,111111111 - H -I eczaol —,4 CAP, ts� ;47 C7�O� .00. ;;Opo eve Zoe,® looe 0 C`77 oe <p .7 '40OW Fk I �� r P F r Fr I r �. k I� h G P I� If Ih i r F I� F h I Ift Hickok, Scott From: Hickok, Scott Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:18 AM To: Billings, Steve Cc: Burns, Bill Subject: RE: Home at 415 63rd Steve: Thank you for your e-mail explanation of your concern. For the record, Kevin Hanson is an excellent Building Official whose interests are only those of the City. His credentials allow him to not only do heating and mechanical inspections, but also, all Certified Chief B.O.-type inspections since he is a certified Chief B.O. He is entirely trustworthy and professional. Ron Julkowski is undoubtedly one of, if not the top Building Official in the State. When Ron takes a half day off, a Building Official that he trusts, with the enormous responsibilities of his work, is Kevin Hanson. We all know who it is that we believe in and who we trust as individuals. I know for certain that I trust Kevin Hanson. I don't know Tay Kersey. I would be glad to have you meet Kevin and I will be equally glad to share his credentials with you. I can tell you this, Tim Fowler has wanted the City to tell him to tear down his house ever since this incident happened. A good staff knows pitfalls, knows games people like to play, a good staff knows when to stay clear. It is not this staffs responsibility to determine who owes what on their mortgage, nor who gets paid what by their insurance company. It is this staffs responsibility to make certain that Building Codes are enforced and peoples lives are safe in the structures approved. The home at 415 63rd stands in a questionable state. It is not up to this City staff to provide engineering analysis that says whether the house stands or is demolished. However, the home cannot stand forever in this state of uncertainty. If it is to be repaired, privately commissioned engineering is required. If someone who has access to the inside of the home, has an interest, and is of the position that the home can be saved, he needs to get the engineering to support that position. If there is no engineering proof, the home eventually must come down. The City does not want a burned house standing in a state of disrepair for many reasons. A solution is what is required, whether that solution is to rebuild the home, or to have it demolished, is left to be seen. Though I have not been with Kevin on his field inspections, the beauty of having expert staff is that I don't need to be. They do their job and they do it right. If they don't, we deal with that issue too. And finally noone on our staff winks (at least on company time, doing company business). There are known winkers that come into our Building counter. Our staff knows that it is no secret that a wink is often linked to unsavory dealings. Kevin is not a winker and would be insulted. More importantly though, I will invite you to kick mine, Kevin's, or other staff members rear end when you rightfully determine that this is how we are we are doing business. Until then, we appreciate your trust. You are right that there are many stories in this big City. Some of the discussion/speculation out there is that of uninvolved, passively interested parties who like to have an opinion. Other speculation is of a more dangerous variety. That type can have Council members questioning staff motives. I've always appreciated your support of staff and your willingness to get to the bottom of issues. I've also always appreciated your direct approach. If we have a problem, we talk about it. This time is no different. I am sorry that I was not available to talk to you on Friday directly. Direct is my favorite approach. I have discussed this matter with Fritz and he again reminds us that discussions about elements of this case, outside of the normal, official arena are not advised. The likelihood of us visiting some matter related to this case in Court is high. As a result, we should seek to limit any and all discussion that could impact the outcome of our case. Scott -----Original Message ---- From: Billings, Steve Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 2:55 PM To: Hickok, Scott; Julkowski, Ron Subject: RE: Home at 415 63rd Good Day.... 'Yes, I am sorry that I missed you yesterday. Unfortunately, City offices are closed on Monday, and I will be out of the City on Tuesday and Wednesday. Rodney Billman is the fee owner of the property. Mr. and Mrs. Fowler are purchasing from him via a contract for deed. Mr. Billman lives in, and currently is in California. Kevin met Mr. Tay Kersey and Robert Granger, both employees of Mr. Billman. Billman had been in the business of building homes in and around Fridley for years. It is my understanding that there are many stories in the Big City. Many of which are attributed to Mr. Fowler. As I understand it, Mr. Fowler owes something like $ 100K. Billman has insurance payable to Billman in the neighborhood of $ 150K. It is my further understanding that Mr. Fowler had little or no insurance. The big problem, is does Billman take the balance that is owed on the Contract from the insurance and disappear? This is actually all that Billman is likely entitled to, and actually the reason he had insurance protection in the first place, to protect his financial interest in the property. However, that leaves the neighborhood with a fire damaged building, Mr.Fowler then the new Fee owner, and no funds available for anything. Mr.Kersey would like to help Mr. Fowler as best he can. They appear to be willing to reinvest the insurance proceeds into the home, and then allow Mr. and Mrs. Fowler to continue to make payments to them on the current balance owed. However, it sounds like a complete knock down and rebuild, including the two fireplaces, could easily cost more than the insurance proceeds of $ 150,000.00. Mr. Billman is not motivated to put additional funding into the property for Mr. Fowler's benefit. Mr. Fowler, according to rumors is pushing for the total knock down and rebuild. If that is truly his position, he (and the neighborhood) could end up with an empty lot, and the insurance company could save $ 50,000.00. 1 rent office space from Billman. Some of the above information may, in fact, be privileged information. I have received most of it from either neighborhood rumor, or over hearing discussions in the office next to me. This brings me to my reason for calling. Mr. Kersey has heard most of the neighborhood stories by and about Mr. Fowler. Additionally, Mr. Fowler appears to have several "friends" that are employed by the City Fire, Police, and others. I do not know what Kevin said, I do now what Mr. Kersey heard. Your version and his are quite similar. It is the way a phrase is turned that makes a difference. Mr. Kersey's interpretation was that the building MUST BE TORN DOWN, UNLESS HE CAN GET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO CERTIFY THAT A PORTION MAY BE SAVED. While similar to the official City position, I believe that our position is rebuilding is possible, we require structural examination IF they wish to save any portion of the building. What caused concern on the part of Mr. Kersey, was an alleged "wink" from Kevin to Mr. Fowler while Kevin was stating that the house must come down. This may have been a poor time for a particle of dust to get into Kevin's eye, but based on Mr. Fowler's self proclaimed association with City employees, it caused concern for Mr. Kersey. Mr. Kersey approached me, and wondered if Kevin actually worked for the City and who he was. While I knew that Kevin did our heating and mechanical inspections, I was not aware of his involvement with this case. Hence the phone call to you. Now that I have the facts, I can relate them to Mr. Kersey, and he can take whatever action he deems appropriate for the reconstruction of the building. I appreciate your efforts to reach me. I was not questioning your departments actions, merely trying to identify the players, and to determine what OUR position actually was PRIOR to expressing said position. —Original Message— From: Hickok, Scott Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:49 PM To: Billings, Steve; Julkowski, Ron Subject: FW: Home at 415 63rd Steve: Kevin Hanson is an excellent Certified Building Official who works in our office under my and Ron's direction. Kevin is extremely competent and was here on the morning after the fire. At that time, Ron was on a well deserved half-day vacation as he managed some personal business at his home. Ron was in constant contact with us from home that morning and returned to the office by noon. It is our practice to have only one contact for the homeowners in a situation like this. Kevin started the process, so we asked Kevin to continue for continuity. However, each conversation he has he relays back to Ron and I, immediately after it occurs. Scott -----Original Message ----- From: Hickok, Scott Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:38 PM To: Billings, Steve Cc: Bums, Bill; Julkowski, Ron Subject: FW: Home at 415 63rd Steve: Kevin did not tell Mr. Fowler that the home had to be torn down. A copy of Kevin's letter is still hanging on the front of Fowler's home. The letter indicates it is up to Fowler's structural engineer to make a determination on the structure and his future plans will depend on the findings of his engineer. This e-mail I sent to Bill today should help clarify. I also called an left a message on your home phone and thought this e-mail would further help you to understand this matter. Scott --Original Message ----- From: Hickok, Scott Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:49 AM To: Burns, Bill Cc: Julkowski, Ron; Bolin, Paul; Hintz, Mary Subject: Home at 415 63rd Good Morning Bill: Just a quick note to give you a heads -up and to let you know that our staff is taking a stand -back position on dealing with the homeowners at 415 63rd. Yesterday, Kevin Hanson, one of our Building Officials, was called to the Fowler home at 415 63rd. The premise was that the insurance adjuster would be there and Mr. Fowler wanted our building folks to be present. As it turned out, Kevin stopped at the pre -determined time, only to find Mr. Fowler and Rodney Billman, a Mr. Granger, no insurance adjuster. While there, Mr. Billman and Mr. Fowler began to argue about ownership of the house. Kevin left them to their private business. Kevin returned to the office and we called Fritz. Our staff has given the homeowners everything they need to know at this point. The next thing we expect to see happen is a plan from 415 (Fowlers), signed by a structural engineer. Without engineering verification of structural viability that home, and ability to rebuild, the home will need to be demolished as well. Kevin also told them that the house will be rebuilt to all current codes. As a result of the information now dispensed and Fritz's advice, our staff will only be talking to Mr. Fowler, if he has an engineering plan, or if he has other business, unrelated to the recent damage to his home. Please let me know if you have additional questions regarding this matter. Scott NOTICE OF STRUCTURE FIRE To: Building Inspection Assessing Water Billing From: Ralph Messer, Fire Marshal Date: January 7, 2002 Subject: Fire Damaged Structure Location of Fire: 401 63`d Avenue, N.E. 415 63d Avenue, N. E. Date of Fire: January 6, 2002 Other pertinent details: • 401 63`d Avenue, N.E.: Structure of origin. Structure also damaged by an explosion of unknown origin. The rear of structure was partially razed at the direction of the Fire Department for extinguishment. Not repairable. 415 63d Avenue, N.E. Fire communicated to this structure. Considerable damage but believed to be repairable. Uninhabitable and not occupied at this time. Four fire departments assisted Fridley with this fire. Those departments included Columbia Heights, St. Anthony (under the Automatic Aid agreement), New Brighton and Brooklyn Center. Although both structures were occupied at the time of the fire, no injuries were reported to either occupants or firefighters. If you have questions concerning this fire, please contact me at x3621 or Asst Chief John Berg at x3611. f CITYOF FRID• l FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER - 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 - (763) 571-3450 - FAX (763) 571-1287 January 9, 2002 Timothy J & Cheryl A Fowler 415 63 Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Fire Damaged House & Garage at 415 63 Avenue NE, Fridley Dear Timothy & Cheryl Fowler: On January 7, 2002, an inspection was conducted to determine whether the above noted building was damaged to the point of being a hazard. Per Section 102 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code, which states in part, any structure that constitutes a hazard to safety, or health, or public welfare by reason of disaster or damage, shall be considered unsafe. All unsafe buildings shall be declared a public nuisance and shall be abated by repair or demolition as referenced in the Dangerous Building Code. Section 302 of the Dangerous Building Code states that any building or structure which has any or all of the conditions or defects herein described shall be deemed a hazardous building, provided that such conditions or defects exist to the extent that the life, health, property or safety of the public or its occupants are endangered. The following items deem the building to be dangerous: 1) Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood, or by any other cause, to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before the catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure. 2) Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property. Timothy J & Cheryl A Fowler Re: 415 63 Avenue NE January 9, 2002 Page 2 3) Whenever any portion of a building, or any member, appurtenance or ornamentation on the exterior thereof is not sufficient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of one half of that specified in the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location without exceeding the working stresses permitted in the Building Code for such buildings. 4) Whenever any portion thereof has inracked, buckled or settled to such an extent, that walls or other structural portions have materially less resistance to winds or earthquake than is required in the case of similar new construction. 5) Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose for which it is being used. 6) Whenever the building or structure, exclusive of the foundation, shows 33 percent or more damage or deterioration of its supporting members or 50 percent damage or deterioration of its nonsupporting members, enclosing or outside walls or coverings. 7) Whenever the building or structure which, whether or not erected in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances, has in nonsupporting part, member or portion less than 66 percent of the strength, fire resisting qualities or characteristics or weather resisting qualities or characteristics required by law in the case of a newly constructed building of like area, height and occupancy in the same location. 8) Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidation, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections or heating equipment or other cause, is determined by the Fire Marshal to be a fire hazard. 9) Whenever any building or structure is in such a condition as to constitute a public nuisance known to the common law or in equity jurisprudence. Per Section 403 of the Dangerous Building Code, you are hereby ordered to demolish or repair the structure within 20 days after the City of Fridley Fire Investigation. All demolition shall be coordinated with Ralph Messer, City Fire Marshal, to assist with his fire investigation. This building has been posted as an unsafe building. The building must be secured until demolition or repairs are completed. City permits are required before starting repairs or demolition. Please also notify your insurance company of these requirements and encourage them to call my office if they have questions regarding these matters. Timothy J & Cheryl A Fowler Re: 415 63 Avenue NE January 9, 2002 Page 3 If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at 763- 572-3602. Sincerely, RON JULKOWSKI Building Official RJ/mh CC: Ralph Messer, Fire Marshal Scott Hickok, Community Development Adm Fritz Knaak, City Attorney s FEB -6-2002 11:39A FROM: O RNI1 STR091 P.1. February 5, 2002 Mr. Tim Fowler 415 63rd Avenue, NE Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Structural Report on Explosion & Fire Damage at 415 63rd Avenue NE, Fridley, MN Dear Mr. Fowler. TO:7635711287 P:1/2 {�siM�E�ias S190C1U�ll CUfISUl11R6 This report concerns my recent visit to. your house located at 415 63rd Avenue NE in Fridley, Minnesota. Your house is a single family dwelling that is located next to a house that recently sustained a major explosion. It is evident that your house due to its close proximity to the scene of the accident sustained significant damage as a result of the explosion and fire damage that appears to have totally destroyed the house next door. The purpose for my visit was to inspect and assess the extent of both the obvious and possibly hidden structural damage resulting from the fire and explosion. The City of Fridley Building Inspector and the local Fire Department Inspector were also present at the house at the time of my inspection. My observations and recommendations. are summarized in this report. General Observations -It appears that the west side of the house sustained the greatest damage. This is the side of the house that faces the neighboring house which was the scene of the explosion. -The roof trusses over the main living area of the house are damaged beyond repair. Many of the roof trusses have a damaged or missing top chord member due to fire. This makes the roof trusses very susceptible to collapse under any additional snow loads. The west wall of the house appears to be out of plumb and has sustained visible impact damage from the explosion. This wall is bearing the floor and roof trusses along the west side of the house. The south wall of the house has sustained damage and appears to have racked noticeably out of plumb. - There is evidence of displacement at the exterior north wall of the house and in the attached. exterior deck. - The attached garage on the east side of the house appears to have slight dip in the roof ridge line. The gate on the exterior fence which is attached to the east garage wall does not close properly which indicates that the garage may have sustained some impact and possible lateral movement which is not readily visible. - There are visible cracks in the wood burning masonry fireplace in the combustion chamber and in the exterior brick chimney and cap. 1128 SIBLE1 MEMORRI 11168111, MU11111 8E160S, 9..1 55118 — FAX. 1011 4S4 -511H OFFICE: 16511 454-8455 — E-MAILT S18O8E861YEE8116®9O11101E1.d1F.IH FEB -6-2002 11:40A FROM: TO:7635711287 P:2/2 r Structural Report on Explosion & Fire Damage at 415 63rd Avenue NE, Fridley, MN page 2 CONCLUSIONS As I indicated during our meeting at the house, a thorough assessment of the visible and likely hidden structural damage would require extensive demolition of the interior gypsum board and other finished surfaces at the walls and ceilings. This will be costly and time consuming work and will expose the remaining intact structural wood framing to additional weathering and moisture damage, ie., mold growth, corrosion, warping and delamination of plywood, etc. The present condition of the damaged roof trusses can only be described as hazardous. Prior to any subsequent demolition work or other activity in the house in these areas, I would strongly recommend either complete removal of the roof trusses or extensive temporary shoring. The shoring would have to be designed to sustain a minimum snow load of 20 psf in addition to the dead load of the roof trusses. The exterior walls which are normally braced by the (intact) roof trusses would also need to be braced at the top laterally for wind loads. I would recommend a minimum wind design load of 40 mph for the lateral bracing, which is one-half of the normal 80 mph wind load design criteria of the State of Minnesota Building Code. I am not in the position of being able to declare the remaining structure as a total loss or as unsalvageable based on my initial observations only. This determination can only be made by your insurance company. As a Professional Engineer, based on my experience with residential wood construction, the extent of the visible damage, in my opinion, indicates to me that additional investigation is warranted in order to fully assess the structural integrity of this house. Your insurance company is fully aware that additional costs for demolition, temporary bracing and shoring, professional masonry fireplace/chimney inspection and testing, professional electrical, mechanical and plumbing system testing and inspection and final structural engineering inspections will be incurred. The cost of these items will undoubtedly weigh in their decision relative to the final repair costs or demolition and replacement cost of the house. A copy of this report will be sent to the City of Fridley Building Inspector. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments regarding this report or if I can be of any further service at this time. Sincerely,��•.... V, Stroh Stroh Engineering RF REGISTERED ; c PROFESSIONAL ; Bernie Stroh, P.E. i ENGINEER �'�►'• 14269 Cc: Ron (City of Fridley Building Inspections Department) ��V 'V"1i�„of11t!!,a�`��` February 21,2001 Code Enforcement City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Code Enforcement, RE: Fire/Explosion Date of Loss: 1-06-02 I am the property owner located next door to Mr. David Miller. On Sunday morning, January 6, 2002 at approximately 1:53 AM, Mr. Miller's house exploded and caught on fire. The explosion shook and moved my house off its foundation. My house was located at 415 63 Ave. NE the ensuing fire ignited my house and it is a total loss. My family escaped only with the clothes they were able to wear. Mr. Miller caused this loss by recklessly and illegally storing numerous liquefied propane tanks in his garage. At least eleven 401b tanks were noted by an investigator on or around the fire scene. This is a violation of the National Fire Code Standard #58, which only allows 21b LP stored inside a building. This clearly was an increased risk to the entire neighborhood. The city had been notified several times prior to the fire about the storage of these tanks, but elected to ignore the information. In addition, the Fridley Fire Department was also notified, and aware of the stored tanks. Mr. Miller was a very good friend with a full time fire department employee as well. The home, in which Mr. Miller resided in, was a duplex. I am yet to obtain the rental inspection report that is required of all rental units in Fridley. I'm asking you to accept this letter as formal notification of a liability claim. I intend to pursue a claim against you and expect to become whole again. Because of my circumstance, I would prefer not to have to retain an attorney. I can't afford the additional expense. 13y writing you this letter, I am trying to keep my expense down by dealing with you directly. If there is delay, however, I will have no alternative but to sue you. A suit in which the city will undoubtedly have to defend. It seems quite obvious I would win such a suit. I just need to get my family back on track, repair the damage the fire has caused and move on. I am currently in the process of rebuilding. My temporary phone number is 651-697-1145. 1 would appreciate hearing from you in the next few days. Sincerely, Cheryl Trocke-Fowler Tim Fowler 14 928 INSPECTION REPORT CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA (763) 572-3604 ADDRESS OWNER BUILQER If no correct, are listed above, approv�is hereby given to proce You will be in violation of thwrdinance if you do notly��Il for the proper inspections and make corrections as called for. I I t Q14777� INSPECTION REPORT CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA (763) 572-3604 ADDRESS OWNER BUILDER INSPECTION REPORT If no correct are listed above, appr/asrhereby given to prose You will be in violation of the ordinance if you do notthe proper inspections -and make corrections as called for. 1 I DATE �J✓ f PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION .13O INSPECTION REPORT If no correct are listed above, appr/asrhereby given to prose You will be in violation of the ordinance if you do notthe proper inspections -and make corrections as called for. 1 I vj� 147474 INSPECTION REPORT CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA (763) 572-3604 ADDRESS 3yf�u OWNER BUILDER DATE PE MIT NO. DESCRIPTION w � O INSPECTION REPORT DATE REPORT If no correct are listed above, approval is hereby given to prop You will be in violation of b—ordinance If you do not call for the proper Inspections -end make corrections as called for. (147327 t INSPECTION REPORT CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA (763 572-3604 ` -� n A, ADDRESS AZ OWNER BUILDER INSPECTION REPORT If no correct are listed above, appl is hereby given to prose You will be in violation of tho ordinance if you do not All for the proper Inspection"rid make corrections as called for. R I 147181 INSPECTION REPORT CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA (763) 572-3604 ADDRESS OWNER BUILDER DATE/- � d %� PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION INSPECTION REPORT DATE REPORT eve o�S� ' �lr .eo a sG � � t ,S %1/ r ,� If no correct are listed above, approval is hereby given to prose You will be in violation of the ordinance If you do not call for the proper inspections and make corrections as called for. I q46586)' INSPECTION REPORT CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA (763) 572-3604 q ADDRESS / -'� > OWNER BUILDER DATE / 1 r - PERMIT NO. /n� ,. DESCRIPTION Sft l f /U% ,v INSPECTION REPORT If no correct' are listed above, approval is reby given to prod You will be in violation of b,_.,rdinance if you do not call fo a proper inspection,.—nd make corrections as called for. S INSPECTION REPORT CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA (763) 572-3604 ADDRESS IS OWNER BUILDER �a4453 DATE l040/ PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION ,A DATE INSPECTION REPORT If no correcr are listed above, appro al i hereby given to procr ' You will be in violation of L,__irdinance if you do not II r the proper Inspection id make corrections as called for. I SUBJEGT PERMIT NO. City ofFridley WRECKING 32425 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS '010 PERMIT( r RECEIPT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. L PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. r NUMBER REV DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 612-571-3450 910-Ft5 2/14/02 JOB ADDRESS 415 63 Avenue NE 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 22 1 1 Alice Wall Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Tim Fowler 415 63 Avenue NE 697-1145 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO Same d ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO 8 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK D NEW 0 ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR O MOVE REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Remove 42' x 32' Dwelling and a 22' x 27' Garage (FOUNDATION TO REMAIN) 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS House & Garage to be removed by February 22, 2002. Foundation must have a fence around entire perimeter. Remove all demolition debris from site. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT CU FT AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS. OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. ' NO DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISION F ANY OTHER TATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON. $SO.00 STR JCTI O THE PER OR ANCE OF ONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK FEE TOTA FEE �-- SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZEO AGENT (OATEI HEN PRO VALIDATEO THIS IS YOUR PERMIT 0000/ 2 B G INSP GATE S,GNATURE OF OWNEROF OWNER BUILDERI IDATE, Effective 1/1/01 CITY OF FRMLEY MOVING [ ] WRECKING PERMIT APPLICATION 6431 University Ave NE Fridley MN 55432 (7 63) 572-3604 Job Address: f G S f—;'j— Legal Description: Owner & Address: k IDA t1IE` 1,. Tel. #9�a Contractor • 1. �-' Address: State License # DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING HOUSE: LengthWidth Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE:Length j2�L Width Height Sq. Ft. OTHER: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. Estimated Cost $ Approx. Completion Date Tel. # Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE AT 651-454-0002 FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. CALL ALL UTILITIES FOR DISCONNECTS BEFORE WRECKING/MOVING STRUCTURE. Water Bill Paid: Yes [ ] or Collect [$ Moving Route: ] Signature The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit to wreck/move the building described above, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and rulings of the Building Division, and the State Code which requires any water well on the property to be sealed by a State licensed water well driller, and hereby declares that all facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. ALL /!�/ a9 - Date Moving Wreckins Principle building into Fridley .... $300.00 For each 1,000 cubic feet or fraction...... $1.25 Accessory building into Fridley ...$ 42.00 For structures which would be impractical to Through or within the City ...... $ 20.00 cube, the fee shall be based on the total cost Move a building out of City ...... $ 20.00 of wrecking at the rate of $6.00 for each $500.00 or fraction. I.r CIO PERMIT FEE: 5 () MINIMUM $20.00 STIPULATIONS: SUBJECT PERMIT NO. City of Fridley 32436 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT RENO. • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. 16 L ------ o r � PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. 1 : CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY 612-571-3450 910415 2/27/02 JOB ADDRESS 415 63rd Ave NE 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 22 1 Alice Wall Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADORES$ ZIP PHONE Tim Fowler, 415 63rd Ave NE, Fridley, MN 55432 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO Tim Fowler (same address) a ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO 8 USE OF BUILDING Dwelling 7 CLASS OF WORK Ck NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct new home and garage (54' x 24' House and a 30' x 31' Garage) Rebuild on partially existing foundation after fire damage caused removal of house & garage 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS See notations on plans. Provide City with copy of verifying survey before capping. Provide sod in the front and side yards. Provide a hard surface driveway. MR WAREJ PING SEPARATE PERMITS Before digging call for REQUIRED FOR: all utility locations WIRING HEATING, 454.0002 FLUINRING AND SIGNS � M Y LI%" SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REOUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL. PLUMBING. HEATING, TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT CU FT AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT R-1 ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. ' NO DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 ISTALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL I;E COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $165,696.78 $82.85 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION $1,363.35 $165.70 Fire SC PLAN CHECK FEEOTAL FE $1,6 .90 SI ATURE OF ONTR CTOR ORA THORiZED AGENT IDATEj PR ERLY DATE T SIS YOUB PERMIT �J 0 ;2 OE V O� s � , / BErJGS� OAtE S-GNATURE OF OW/ ER ai CKNE, BUR D, iDATE' NEW [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY Effective 1/1/2002 ADDN [ ] 6431 University Ave NE, Fridley, MN 55432 (763) 572-3604 Bldg Insp ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Construction Address: —7-1m w'`� %� �� A Legal Description: L7 C2 L Owner Name & Address: Zlih uJ Tel. # Contractor. MN LICENSE # Address: Tel. # Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT o . , LIVING AREA: Length s 4- Width Height Sq. Ft 7 a k1-5404?& GARAGE AREA: Length Width S1� , O Height Sq. Ft DECK AREA: 1,Tgth /Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft ,r OTHER: c of:F /u / 1 �c fly ICp.C,(-1 1/ Construction Type: ZI )n6 )) AEstimated Cost: $ /c.l�� Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft + 6 Ft = Ft x $ =$ DATE: APPLICANT: Tel. # Call (763) 572-3604 for Permit Fees if mailing in application or Fax to 763-571-1287 if using credit card and we will call you for card number. Permit Fee Fire Surcharge State Surcharge SAC Charge License Surcharge Driveway Escrow Erosion Control Park Fee Sewer Main Charge TOTAL CITY USE ONLY - $ /6//•9i Fee Schedule on Reverse Side .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) $.50/$1,000 Valuation $1200 per SAC Unit $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Fee Determined by Engineering Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] STIPULATIONS: JOHN J. RYAN CO.� 1595 SELBY AVE U S 04 N E �y , T. PAUL 561 SCALE: 1 INCH L O FEET PLAT OF SURVEY 60 j" °3" OF PROPERTY OF LOCATION r� OESCROED AS FOLLOWS ZOO /.S G7 2.2 a A � � z Oki 77 ' Z — -- 1 I I hl. 1 0 T ,I\ 0 `'�-q'0e" / //h e CEFMFICATE OF LOCATION OF BUILDING I. hereby certify that on t '6-11 19 8 z survey, rvey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisio and that I a duly Registered Land Sur- veyor under the s of the 3 of innesota. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I hereby certify that on 19 this survey, plan,. or report was prepared.by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. FROM : FOX—I—DRAFTING PHONE NO. : 651 8940016 Feb. 26 2002 04:38PM P1 4155 Old Sibley Memorial Wighway Eagan, MN 55122 Phone 651-8943990 Fax 651-894-0016 DATE: Z.''Z.L,t-0 ?. AM. &4 5'4U--Vt--0wsLr-1 FROM: Gael COO) OLA.Y Number of pages hwJuding cover: _ Tnff: +-509M FAX NUMER: _-7Le j! - 5-1 l —1 Z$-7 NAM, M-tv, 'Ti M '5iowt-fa- , Sc spv w� X0 a „ .Mw mss_* -m i w>>s �l KP -Yi�E, , ►�. 'T+�ka w�, -r+►�.s►c�.o AcBo.,.T as -o 'til, 5 www Gfx t A K kou ► N 4 hs QCs - `P'p�.Q, stir � (.t�f.►G'�,�t�'�� l,.,l1.a, GJ� YA,. �a�� 1�.oG't' 9.RC.E1�. S CONTINUE FROM PREUIOUS PAGE 001 MNcheck COMPLIANCE REPORT Minnesota Energy Code M1check Software Version 3.0 COUNTY: Hennepin STATE: Minnesota ZONE: 2 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Single Family DATE: 2-26-2002 DATE OF PLANS: 2/25/02 PROJECT INFORMATION: Fowler Residence Fridley , MN COMPLIANCE: PASSES Required UA - 460 Your Home = 407 11.5% Better Than Code Permit # Checked by/Date Area or Cavity Cont. Glazing/Door Perimeter R -Value R -Value TJ -Value --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CEILINGS: Raised Truss 2072 44.0 0.0 WALLS: Wood Frame, 1611 O.C. 687 19.0 2.0 WALLS: Wood Frame, 1611 O.C. 1330 19.0 2.0 WALLS: Wood Frame, 1611 O.C. 682 19.0 2.0. BSMT: Conc. 3.51 ht/3.01 bg/3.51 insul 546 10.0 0.0 GLAZING: Windows or Doors, Above Grade 140 0.350 GLAZING: Windows or Doors, Above Grade 176 0.350 GLAZING: Windows or Doors, Above Grade 53 0.350 DOORS 42 0.350 FLOOR$: Over Unconditioned Space --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 745 30.0 0.0 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the requirements of the Minnesota Energy Code. Builder/Designer Date FROM : FOX -1 -DRAFTING PHONE NO. : 651 8940016 Feb. 26 2002 04:39PM P2 Minnesota Energy Code MNcheck Software Version 3.0 DATE: 2-26-2002 PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION ISSUES This list of items may be helpful for Plan Reviewers and Building Inspector use as a guide for -enforcing the Minnesota Energy Code. The items apply to Group R, Division 3 Occupancies, one- and two-family residential -dwellings. The items marked with * apply only to detached one- and two-family residential dwellings. PLAN REVIEW ISSUES FOUNDATION INSULATION foundation wall insulation R-5 minimum foundation insulation extends from top of wall down to top of the footin exterior foundation insulation is covered by a protective coating finish CONCRETE SLAB OR UNDER -SLAB INSULATION - slab on grade perimeter insulation R-5 minimum - slab insulation extends from top of slab to design frost line or top of footing - floors over unheated space R-30 minimum WINDOWS / DOORS / SKYLIGHTS average U -value is 0.37 maximum foundation windows) window U -value consistent with window and door area consistent for windows and glass doors (excludes building plan and MNcheck Report with building plan and MNcheck Report MECHANICAL VENTILATION ISSUES residential mechanical ventilation system provides adequate ventilation per code requirements* furnace efficiency is consistent with MNcheck or building design plan protection against excessive depressurization is installed per code requirements* ENVELOPE INSULATION FOR PLAN REVIEW - interior basement insulation R-5 minimum (if no exterior insulation) - ceilings with attics R-38 or consistent with building plan and MNcheck Report - wall framing and insulation level is consistent with building design and MNcheck Report INSPECTION ISSUES CONCEALED INSULATION FRAMING AND SHEATHING - wind wash barrier installed at attic edge - exterior wall corners framed so that insulation can be installed after exterior sheathing is installed - intersections of interior partition walls and exterior walls are frame that insulation can be installed.between-..the partition and exterior sheathing after exterior •sheathing.is installed - gaps between framing less -than one -•half inch are eliminated by securin framing -together or are insulated - at - the- time of assembly - all penetrations between conditioned -and. -unconditioned spaces made FROM FOX-1_DRAFTING PHONE NO. : 651 8940016 Feb. 26 2002 04:39PM P3 prior to framing inspection are sealed INTERIOR AIR BARRIER - all fire stops are air sealed - pipes, ducts, wires, equipment and flues and chimneys through the ince air barrier are sealed - a sealed continuous interior air barrier is installed on the warm side the building envelope at ceilings,�walls, and floor rim joist areas* - .air barrier behind tub and shower is sealed and protected recessed light fixtures -are sealed ENVELOPE INSULATION - basement insulation R-5 minimum - wind wash barrier on wall separating house and garage is sealed - loose fill insulation is prevented from entering the eaves - insulation on skylight shafts and walls exposed in attics is supported on the unconditioned side ATTIC INSULATION - attic access panel insulated to R-38 for ceiling panel wall panel - attic card attached to framing near access opening - notification of attic R -value and date of installation permit inspection card and R-19 for posted near This is a summary only. Other requirements may apply. See the Minnesota Energy Code. Questions? Call the Department of Public Service Information Center at 651-296-5175 or 1-800-657-3710. CITY OF FRiULt- i i446FEG 11UN UIV. 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 (763) 572-3604 APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING AND GAS FITTING PERMIT MARK NUMBER OF FIXTURES TO BE INSTALLED ON EACH FLOOR Effective Un Jail 1, 2002 PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: New Fixtures~ CZE Old Opening, New Fixture Beer Dispenser Blow Off Basin Catch Basin Rain Water Leader Sump/Receiving Tank Water Treating Appliance Water Heater -Electric Water Heater - Gas** NO. RATE Gas Range*" _ Gas Dryer** _ Back Flow Preventer Required ( )Yes () No Type, $ 7.00 $ 4.00 $ 5.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $10.00 $ 7.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $15.00 TOTAL JOB ADDRESS `4 t 5� 6 '3 1 A VAS 1� The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the city codes and rulings of the Building Division, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Z� .2002— Owner -Tk,.,— ,.,— Te-) "3 l -L �1— 1 Building Used As 17— Cz Estimated Cost PERMIT NO. ! 3 PLUMBING COMP)�VY!-k % Reinspection Fee $47.00/Hr SIGNED BY TEL N0. '7 6 3 L( Li L/ 6 1 ALL OTHERS AND/OR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FAX # -7 3 - 9 y y - y 6 DJ 1.5% of Value of Fixture or Appliance% Approved B Rough -In Date Final Date State Surcharge .50�'�� o MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY PLUMBING/GAS PERMIT IS $20.00 TOTAL FEE$ D�� PLUS THE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE COMBUSTION AIR SHALL BE PROVIDED PER UMC SECTION 504(A) AND TABLE 6-A. COMMON VENT INFO ON BACK SIDE THE BELOW MUST BE FILLED IN WHEN REPLACING FUEL BURNING APPLIANCES OR THE APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED COMMON VENT- VENT _ANNE _TnR AND .OMR1 IRT1ON AIR VFRIFI ATION When reIn acing an exi_s±ingft ira nnp, the undersigned hereby verifies that the venting has been examined and is free from rust, deterioration, obstructions, and is securely supported and firestopped where required. Yes( ) No( ) The venting system is plastic/PVC and meets all current codes and manufacturer specifications including sizing, length, number of elbows and termination. Yes( ) No( ) The undersigned also verifies that the replacement unit is a listed assembly and meets the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. This does include AGA-GAMA Category I Central Furnace Venting Tables for fan assisted and natural draft appliances. Yes () No ( ) The pxic_ting cnmb ,stinn air is sized and installed to meet the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. Yes( ) No( ) When required to install a now _nmhustien airy it will be sized and installed to meet the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. Yes( ) No( ) When ins ailing a new ventinActem, the undersigned hereby verifies that it is a listed assembly and meets the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. This does include AGA-GAMA Category I Central Furnace Venting Tables for fan assisted and natural draft appliances. Yes( ) No( ) Is the common vent and vent connectors sized and installed correctly after an appliance has been removed from the common vent and vented separately as per current codes. Yes( )No( ) Appliance #1 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat Appliance #2 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat Appliance #3 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat Total Appliances Total Btu Input Common Vent Type Vent Height Diameter inches Appliance #1 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter in Type Appliance #2 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter in Type Appliance #3 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter in Type HEATING CO: Signed By: Date : CITY OF FRIDLEY INSPECTION DIViSION 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, (763) 572-3604 REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES RATE SCHEDULE Residential Furnace Shell and Duct Work, Burner - Also Replacement Furnace (Side Vent - Fill Out Back) Gas Piping (Needed with new furnace, but not replacement) Gas Range Gas Dryer *Air Conditioning - All Sizes All Others/Repairs & Alterations (LIST ON BACK) 1% of Value of Appliance or Work Commercial/Industrial 1.25% of Value of Appliance or Work Rate $ 30.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 25.00 State Surcharge TOTAL FEE MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING/COOLING/VENTILATION REFRIGERATION/AIR CONDITIONING PERMIT IS $25.00 PLUS THE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE REINSPECTION FEE $47.00/Hr *Air Conditioners can not be placed in a side yard without written permission from adjoining property owner. TOTAL 3a� $ $ $ �-? • 66r $ .50 $�D JOB ADDRESS .� 1�5;Z�g Effective On January 1, 2002 OWNER BUILDING USED AS ESTIMATED COST PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE AND OR BURNER No. of Heating UnitsCircle One (Steam) (Hot Water) (Warm Air) Trade Name —Z Size No. BTU HP EDR Fuel Total Connected Load Burner Trade Name Size No. BTU HP EDR The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes an rulings of the Building Division, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. HEATING Signed FAX # Approved By, � u� Rough -In Date DATE TEL # (,,S- &9 % � Final Date �O THE BELOW MUST BE FILLED IN WHEN REPLACING FUEL BURNING APPLIANCES OR THE APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED COMMON VFNT, VFNT CONNFCTOR ANn COMR11STION AIR VIFRIFI ATION When ra In acing an existing fu nm, the undersigned hereby verifies that the venting has been examined and is free from rust, deterioration, obstructions, and is securely supported and firestopped where required. Yes( ) No( ) The venting system is plastic/PVC and meets all current codes and manufacturer specifications including sizing, length, number of elbows and termination. Yes( ) No( ) The undersigned also verifies that the replacement unit is a listed assembly and meets the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. This does include AGA-GAMA Category I Central Furnace Venting Tables for fan assisted and natural draft appliances. Yes( ) No( ) The existing enmb ,Minn air is sized and installed to meet the current codes and manufacturers specifications. Yes( ) No( ) When required to install a new _emb uetinn air, it will be sized and installed to meet the current codes and manufacturers specifications. Yes( ) No( ) When installing a naw venting nystem, the undersigned hereby verifies that it is a listed assembly and meets the current codes and manufacturers , specifications. This does include AGA-GAMA Category I Central Furnace Venting Tables for fan assisted and natural draft appliances. Yes( ) No( ) Is the common vent and vent connectors sized and installed correctly after an appliance has been removed from the common vent and vented separately as per current codes. Yes( ) No ( ) Appliance #1 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat Appliance #2 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat Appliance #3 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat T Total Appliances Total Btu Input Common Vent Type Vent Height Diameter inches Appliance #1 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter in Type Appliance #2 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter in Type Appliance #3 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter in Type HEATING CO: Signed By: Date :