The URL can be used to link to this page

VAR 93-24FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Cecilia Rosenberg 17354 Weaver Lake Drive Maple -grove, MN 55311 Dear Ms. Rosenberg: October 7, 1993 On October 4, 1993, the Fridley City Council officially denied your request for a Variance, VAR #93-24, to allow the construction of a single car garage when a two car garage is required on Lots 19 and 20, Block 15, Fridley Park, the same being 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. However, the variance to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet to allow an existing encroachment was approved. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3590. Sincerely, Barbara Dacy, AICP Community Development Director BD/dn FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 4. 1993 PAGE 5 Ms. Prasek stated that if it makes more sense to request a variance for the amount of square footage of their signs, the church would be willing to apply for the variance. Mr. Burns, City Manager, asked if the variance would be for the size of the sign or for a second, detached sign. Ms. Dacy stated that there are two options. She stated t t there could be a variance request for the amount of square ootage for both_ signs, which is. not 'to exceed :.80 square...fee The .other op't'ion is a: wall . sign. variance. Ms. ..Prasek stated -that if• the Council would She ee to a'shorter' time period for the temporary sign, such as o year, this would be acceptable to the church. Councilwoman .atJorgenson stated that/she she has a difficult time determining how this variance coul be granted without setting a precedent. She stated that it ap ears the Council has to look at how square footage for signs ' allotted for churches and non- profit organizations. Councilman Billings stated hat he -views this as a pion -traditional residential use in. a resi ential zoning district, and he fel•t'there are times when /the'eariahce s need to be made.. to the sign -'code. He pointed out that which was approved for a sign for a home day. care River Road was in a residential zoning district. He stperhaps there should be a variance to the square footage. Councilman Sc eider stated that he would be more comfortable with a variance n the square footage than with an extension of the temporary ign. Xow y Councilman Billings to table this item to the October 18, ncil meeting at. which time staff should submit a revised• and, further, to extend the time of the temporary sign to to remain until this issue is resolved. Seconded by an Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. B. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #93-24 BY CECELIA ROSENBERG TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 22 FEET TO CORRECT AN EXISTING ENCROACHMENT, AND TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE CAR GARAGE WHEN A TWO CAR GARAGE IS REQUIRED GENERALLY LOCATED AT 71 63-1/2 WAY N.E. (TABLED SEPTEMBER 27 1993)• MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to remove this item from the table. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 4 1993 PAGE 6 Ms. Dacy stated that this variance consists of two parts: to reduce the front yard setback and to construct a single car garage when a two car garage is required. She stated that there is a single family home on the property, and the petitioner wants to construct a one car garage. Ms. Dacy stated that the Appeals Commission unanimously recommended approval of the encroachment portion of the variance but denied the variance for a one car garage. Ms. Rosenberg, the petitioner, stated that the home is very narrow, and constructing a two car garage would make it seem out of proportion. She stated that about 20 percent of the homes in the area do not have a garage; 25 percent have a one car garage; and 55 percent have a two car garage. She stated that if a two car garage was constructed, it would be located very close to the home and block out the daylight. She stated that if a two car garage was constructed to the rear of the property, it would mean a 100 foot driveway, and this. expense would not. be economically feasible. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked. Ms.. Rosenberg if -she intended this home to be her residence. Ms. Rosenberg stated that one of her 'children . may live there or else .she would sell or rent it. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the problem is that persons often have more than one vehicle per household and may need the additional space for another vehicle or for storage. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked Ms. Rosenberg if she anticipated that there may be an addition to the home in the future. Ms. Rosenberg stated that she doubted there would be an addition,. as. there have been several additions -since it was originally constructed. Councilman Schneider asked Ms. Rosenberg if she was aware that a double car garage was required when she purchased this home. Ms. Rosenberg stated that she was not aware that a double car garage would be required. Councilman Billings stated that the goals and objectives of the City is to provide two car garages, and it is probably in the best interests of the City that the variance for the one car garage be denied. Councilwoman Jorgenson suggested that perhaps a longer period of time could be given for the owner to provide a hard surface driveway to ease the financial burden. She asked if the City could 0 - 0 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 4, 1993 PAGE 7 require the property owner to construct a garage if there was not one on the property when she purchased it. Mr. Herrick stated that the City can require a double car garage, but if the variance request for a single car garage is denied and the property owner chooses not to build any garage, he would have to check further to determine if the City can require that a garage be constructed. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant that portion of Variance Request, VAR #93-24, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet and deny that portion of the variance to allow construction of a single car garage when a two car garage is required. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Billings, and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilwoman Jorgenson voted against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion.carried. 5. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to remove this item from a table.. Seconded by. Couricilinan Billings.. Upon a voice vote all* -voting aye, Mayor Nee .declared. -he' motion carried unanimo ly. Mr. Flora, Public WorksZberemoved or, stated at the City is attempting to maximize thcipal Sta Aid (MSA) mileage authorization for the Cityder to o ain maximum funds and establish the ability to cothe MS system. He stated that the streets proposed to be d as unicipal State Aid Streets are portions of Arthur Streon n Street, Ashton Avenue, and 61st Avenue. Mr. Flora hat Arthur Street cannot be extended to Rice Creek Roado development that has occurred. He stated that .the Councitaken.the position that Ironton Street will . not --..-be impedor expanded . -and the Ashton" Avenue/Ironton Street loop be removed from the MSA system. He stated that the porti of 61stAvenue between Main Street and East River Road that i unbuildable is being removed. MOTION by Councilm,6 Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 77-1993. Seconded by Counc woman Jorgenson. C/recerievsetd.e n Bil ings asked if the City must reimburse the state if se moved from the MSA system and the City has used these fe streets. Mstated that the City may have to return some funds rto Ashton Avenue. He stated that this would be a ne item with the state based on the amount of funds eand the amount of time that has elapsed since these funds wived. He stated that the amount the City may have -to FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 4, 1993 PAGE 8 refund to the state would be based on the cost of the street and when it was constructed. i Mayor Nee stated that if this were the case, it would cout of the MSA funds. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all votin aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Ken Sahnow, 196 Ely Street, asked what happe when a street is designated as a State Aid street and then this designation is removed. Mr. Flora stated that the street becomes aCi y street and is still maintained by the City regardless if it is r is not designated as an MSA street. M MOTION by Councilman Schneider to r move this item from the :table. Seconded -by Councilwoman Jorgenso Upon a voice vote; ,all voting. aye, Mayor' Nee declared• the moti n carried unanimously'..*, Mr. Flora, Public Works Direc or,.Stated that the•designation.of . Municipal State -Aid streets' involved. are Squire * Drive, Camelot Lane, Stinson Boulevard; 79 Way,.Riverview Terrace, and Kimball Street. He stated that* w' h the TCAAP system, Squire Drive and Camelot Lane will be rec structed to MSA standards. He stated that Stinson Boulevard is proposed to be upgraded between 73rd Avenue and Osbor a Road. He stated that the City has informally requested t e Minnesota Department of Transportation to designate 79th Way, Riverview Terrace, and Kimball Street as an MSA route to support th Great River Road system and to provide for a - collector street.i thi$ area. MOTION by Counc' man Schneider to adopt Resolution No. .78-1993. Seconded by Co cilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. PROJECTS OF HUMAN SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS (TABLED SEPTEMBER 27. MOTION Second aye, M MOTI SecO Councilman Billings to remove this item from the table. by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting r Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 79-1993. ed by Councilman Schneider. e STAFF REPORT ICommunity Development Department U Appeals Commission Date September 14, 1993 Planning Commission Date City Council Date Septenber 27, 1993 REQUEST Permit Number Applicant Proposed Request Location SITE DATA Size Density Present Zoning Present Land Use(s) Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use(s) Utilities Park Dedication Watershed District ANALYSIS Financial Implications Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning and Uses Environmental Considerations RECOMMENDATION Staff Appeals Commission Planning Commission Author MM:ls VAR #93-24 Cecelia Rosenberg Th reduce the front yard setback froin 35 ft. to 22 ft. and to allow the construction of a single car garage when a two -car garage is required 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. 10,836 sq. ft. R-1, Single Family Dwelling Single Family R-2, Single Family Dwelling, on all sides Residential on all sides N/A Six Cities See Staff Update Staff Report VAR #93-24, 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E., by Cecelia Rosenberg Page 1 A. STATED HARDSHIP: "Wish to 'mirror' front of house for a balanced look." B: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioner requests two variances: 1. To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet 2. To allow construction of a single car garage when a two - car garage is required The request is for 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Site Located on the subject parcel is a single family dwelling unit and a "garage" which was originally used as a chicken coop. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are all adjacent properties. Analysis Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code requires a front yard setback of not less than 35 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off- street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. The petitioner is proposing to add a small portico to the front entry of the dwelling unit. The portico is 6 feet by 8 feet. The proposed addition is well outside the required front yard setback area. The petitioner has requested that the existing encroachment be addressed by the Appeals Commission. The location of the dwelling as it exists does not adve sely impact adjacent properties. There is adequate sight didtance from adjacent properties and from the driveway. Section 205.07.05.B.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code requires that all lots having a minimum lot area of 9,000 square feet shall have a double car garage. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate off-street parking and storage of vehicles and materials which would otherwise cause visual pollution. • Staff Report VAR #93-24, 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E., by Cecelia Rosenberg Page 2 The second variance request is to allow the construction of a single car garage when a two -car garage is required. The existing "garage" or chicken coop is located on the side lot line in the rear yard. As it is not structurally sound, the petitioner is proposing to remove this existing structure and construct a new garage closer to the front of the yard. This will create a usable rear yard and provide a separation of "public" and "private" space. There is adequate room on site to construct a two -car garage. The petitioner has proposed to locate the garage 16 feet from the side (west) lot line. This would provide adequate room between the proposed garage and the side lot line if the petitioner or a future property owner chooses to expand the garage. The location of the proposed garage meets the minimum setback requirements for the front yard and side yard. Adequate off-street parking would be provided with the proposed driveway. If the Commission chooses to approve the variance request to allow a single car garage, staff recommends that the following stipulations be a condition of approval: 1. The petitioner shall provide a hard surface driveway by September 1, 1994. 2. The existing structure shall be removed within 60 days of completion of the proposed garage. Appeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to approve the variance request to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet. The Commission voted unanimously to deny the variance request to construct a single car garage. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission action. Eel Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 30, 1993 �{ TO. William Burns, City Manager 44 FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #93-24, by Cecelia Rosenberg, 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. The Appeals Commission reviewed this variance request at its September 14, 1993, meeting. The variance request is in two parts: 1. To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet 2. To allow the construction of a single car garage when a two -car garage is required The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to approve the variance request to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet. This is to correct an existing encroachment by the single family dwelling unit on the subject parcel. The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to deny the variance request to construct a single car garage. As the Appeals Commission denied a portion of the variance request, the City Council is required by ordinance to review the request. MM:ls M-93-554 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 PAGE 14 Mr. Wold stated that he would probably bring items in and out every week. Mayor Pro Tem Schneider asked Mr. Wold if he had planned to provide a hard surface driveway. Mr. Wold stated that his plan was to provide a hard surface drive, and he would install it by September 1, 1994 as outlined in the stipulation. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all ved aye, and Mayor Pro Tem Schneider declared the motion carri unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Billings to receivea minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of September 1993. Seconded by Couhcilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vo all voting aye, Mayor Pro Tem Schneider declared the motion rried unanimously. 13. SEPTEMBER 14, 1993: A. SI Ms. Dacy, Commu ty Development Director, stated that the petitioner has quested this item be tabled to the next Council meeting. Sh stated that they felt they were not adequately notified o he Council meeting. MOTIO by Councilwoman Jorgenson to table this item to the Oc er 4, 1993 Council meeting. Seconded by Councilman Billings. on a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Pro Tem Schneider declared the motion carried unanimously. B. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #93-24, BY CECELIA ROSENBERG, TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 22 FEET TO CORRECT AN EXISTING ENCROACHMENT, AND TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE CAR GARAGE WHEN A TWO CAR GARAGE IS REQUIRED, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 71 63-1/2 WAY N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that Ms. Rosenberg was not in attendance. The Council, therefore, took the following action: MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item to the October 4, 1993 Council meeting. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Pro Tem Schneider declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 27 1993 PAGE 13 11. I m 113.07 AND CHAPTER 11. 11GENERAT, PRnVT14TOM.q nun 'T.<VVC a Vnn Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated hat the solid waste abatement fee is currently $2.50 per quart per household, and this ordinance would increase the fee to quart/ .00. She stated that the reason for the increase is that c sts are exceeding revenues. MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the eading and approve the ordinance on first reading. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor ro Tem Schneider declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. A. SEPTEMBER 8, 1993: DRIVE N.E.• Ms. Dacy, Community De elopment Director, stated that the petitioner, Mr. Woldyproerty 'hes to construct a 24 foot by 24 foot second garage on his at 1425 Meadowmoor Drive. She stated that the Planning Coon recommended approval of this request with four stipulatio MOTION by Council oman Jorgenson to grant Special Use Permit Request, SP #93- 4, with the following stipulations: (1) the accessory struct re shall be architecturally compatible with the existing dwell�Vyly unit; (2) the petitioner shall provide a hard surface drivew September 1, 1994; (3) the accessory structure may not excee 14 feet in height; and (4) the accessory structure may not be u ed to conduct a home occupation as defined in Section 205.03.34 f the Fridley Zoning Code. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Council an Billings asked Mr. Wold how often he would use the accessry building or if it would be mostly for storage. Mrold stated that 'it would be mostly for storage of a boat and an/antique truck. Izouncilman Billings stated that in the need for preserving green areas, there have been instances where residents only brought items in and out of storage several times a year, and a hard surface driveway was not requested. He asked the use of this structure in terms of bringing vehicles in and out. Community Development Department PtANNwGDnqsioN City of Fridley DATE: September 21, 1993 11,� TO: William Burns, City ManagerAj� FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #93-24, by Cecelia Rosenberg, 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. The Appeals Commission reviewed this variance request at its September 14, 1993, meeting., The variance request is in two parts: 1. To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet 2. To allow the construction of a single car garage when a two -car garage is required The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to approve the variance request to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet. This is to correct an existing encroachment by the single family dwelling unit on the subject parcel. The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to deny the variance request to construct a single car garage. As the Appeals Commission denied a portion of the variance request, the City Council is required by ordinance to review the request. MM:ls M-93-554 13P 14- t • a _ - o# Y, dja4- • "4 -4-o -D • did 4-0 0 0 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 PAGE 5 Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on September 27, 1993. 2. CONSIDERATION OY, VARIANCE REOUEST, VAR #93-24 Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet to correct an existing encroachment; Per Section 205.07.05.8.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to allow the construction of a single car garage when a two -car garage is required; On Lots 19-20, Block 15, Fridley Park Addition, the same being 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Dr. Vos, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:19 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated this property is located between East River Road and the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks south of Mississippi Street. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are all adjacent properties. Ms. McPherson stated that a single.family dwelling unit is located on the property. A garage which was originally a chicken coop has been removed from the property by the petitioner. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is proposing to add a 6 ft. by 8 ft. entry addition to the front of the dwelling and to construct a single car garage. Ms. McPherson stated the first variance request is to address the existing front yard encroachment which reduces the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet. The proposed addition is well outside.the setback requirement of 35 feet. The petitioner has asked that the existing encroachment be addressed. The existing location of the dwelling unit does not adversely impact adjacent properties, and there is adequate sight distance from the adjacent structures to the street. Ms. McPherson stated the second variance is to allow the construction of a single car garage when a two -car garage is required by code. The garage which was originally a chicken coop has been removed from the property. The petitioner is proposing to locate the new garage at the front setback line which would provide a separation between the front yard and rear yard and provide a separation of "public" and "private" space. There is 4W APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 PAGE 6 adequate room on the site to construct a two -car garage and the petitioner is leaving adequate room between the proposed garage and the westerly lot line in which to expand the garage if the variance is not granted by the Appeals Commission and City Council. Ms. McPherson stated the location of the garage meets the minimum setback requirements and would not adversely impact the adjacent properties. There is also adequate off-street parking with the proposed driveway to meet the minimum parking requirements. Ms. McPherson stated that if the Appeals Commission chooses to grant the variance request to allow the single car garage, staff has one stipulation: 1. The petitioner shall provide a hard surface driveway by September 1, 1994. Ms. Cecelia Rosenberg stated the existing house is very long and narrow so all that is seen from the street is the 14 foot wide front. If a double car garage is constructed, it will not be in proportion with the house as there will be a huge garage and a little house. So, her main reason for the single car garage is for aesthetic reasons, to give the property a "planned" look. She wants to keep the look of the property as balanced as possible. A single car garage also makes sense financially. A double car garage could possibly over -price the property. Dr. Vos stated one of the reasons the code requires a double car garage is for the inside storage of vehicles and materials. Is there adequate room on the property for the inside storage of materials? Ms. Rosenberg stated there is a full basement under the house, and she only has one car. Ms. Savage asked about the marketability of the house with a single car garage. She stated that most people want a double car garage. Ms. Rosenberg stated that she has looked at other houses in the area. The homes across the street have no garages. Approximately 25% of the homes have single car garages, either detached or attached, approximately 25% of the homes have no garages, and the rest have double car garages, so it is a real mixed bag in -this area. She did not think there would a proper selling price for the house if a double car garage has to be added. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:35 P.M. W14- APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 PAGE 7 MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend approval of variance, VAR #93-24, by Cecelia Rosenberg, per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet to correct an existing encroachment on Lots 19-20, Block 15, Fridley Park Addition, the same being 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Kuechle stated that regarding the second variance for a single car garage, he would recommend denial for following reasons: 1. He believes the requirement for a double car garage is a good one and only in exceptional cases should they deviate from that requirement. In this case, there is enough room for a double car.garage. 2. There is somewhat of a hardship in the additional cost involved in going from a single car garage to a double car garage. In this case, the additional cost should not be extravagant because it would only be about a 40% Increase in square footage, so the increase in cost should be less than 40%. He believed most of that added cost could be recovered in the sale of the property. 3. As far as the aesthetic considerations, placing the garage closer to the house might help the visual association. He understood the petitioner's concern about the house being very narrow and the double car garage looking much larger in perspective, but he did believe something could be done with the placement of the garage to alleviate some of that concern. Dr. Vos agreed that other options are available to reposition the garage on the property to lessen the visual impact. He believed that if the garage is positioned differently, the petitioner might find that a double car garage is an asset rather than a liability. He would also recommend denial for the single car garage. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Dr. Vos, to recommend to City Council denial of variance, VAR #93-24, by Cecelia Rosenberg, per Section 205.07.05.B.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to allow the construction of a single car garage when a two -car garage is required on Lots 19-20, Block 15, Fridley Park Addition, the same being 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson stated this will go to the City Council on September 27, 1993. M PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, September 14, 1993, at 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #93-24, by Cecelia Rosenberg: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 22 feet to correct an existing encroachment; Per Section 205.07.05.B.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to allow the construction of a single car garage when a two -car garage is required; On Lots 19-20, Block 15, Fridley Park Addition, the same being 71 - 63 1/2 Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432 Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than September 7, 1993. VAR #93-24 ~ 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E., Cece* Rosenberg Cecilia Rosenberg 17354 Weaver Lake Drive Maple Grove, MV 55311-1442 John Doyle 4141 Lyndale Ave. N./ Camden Street Minneapolis, M 55412 Linda Denny 6305 East River Road Fridley, NAV 55432 Joan Olson 57 - 63rd "Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Kent Erlandson 12 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, NAV 55432 Mark Hinkel 20 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, MV 55432 Brian Nelson 40 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, MV 55432 Joseph Maertens 7419 McKinley Street N.E. Fridley, MV 55432 Joseph Maertens/Resident 60 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, M 55432 Walter Doelz 4928 Washburn Avenue S. Minneapolis, NAV 55410 Walter Doelz/Resident 70 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, NAV 55 432 Resident 80 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, NAV 55432 Ronald Groat 5107 Wooddale Ave. Minneapolis, NAV 55424 Ronald Groat/Resident 90 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, MSV 55432 Resident 100 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, NAV 55432 6390 Ashton Avenue N.E. Fridley, MV 55432 MAULING LIST Mailed: 9/3/93 Levis Doyle 25 - 63rd Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Gerald Langendorger 15 - 63rd Way N.E. Fridley, M!V 55432 Lavern Dornbusch 40 - 64th Way N.E. Fridley, MST 55432 Robert McCready 122 - 64th Way N.E. Fridley, NAV 55432 James Braziel 110 - 64th Way N.E. Fridley, M 55432 Ricky Radman 98 - 64th Way N.E. Fridley, M 55432 Mildred King 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, MV 55432 Barry Aanold 39 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, MV 55432 Joseph Maertens/Resident Loren Wolle Frances Morrison 50 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. 33 - 63rd Way N.E. 19 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, MV 55432 Fridley, MV 55432 Fridley, MV 55432 VAR, #9 3-2 4 • Mailing List - Page 2 Hazel Anderson 15 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, My 55432 James Langenfeld 79 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, MJ 55432 Robert Smith 20 - 64th Way N.E. Fridley, MLS 55432 James Fish 110 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, MV 55432 James Goehring 111 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, M 55432 Diane Savage 567 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, MV 55432 City Manager City Council 7u, 66te" 0 CITY OF FRIDLEY p 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRMLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached 7 Address: !/ 63'1z- 00 Al—'E. t Pk11)16y Property Identification Number (PIN) /5 - 30 o9- V - /Y/ - 6>0.30 Legal description: �T5 /1 o2y, ptock/ S, }-,ethcw AfeK, A SW$C®d/�`Y, ��✓i� Block /S Tract/Addition Fklbtfl fiR�C Current zoning: Square footagetacreage /0 40.3(o Reason for variance and hardship: M5,# TD "Al1k'A614" AQ507- BP —44-AleC-b Z-aDK Section of City Code: Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No )/- If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME 6�i- 14 - ADDRESS 17?0 A)C J G � . iJ�j �9 A[�C- 4o4YIC- Alfl DAYTIME PHONES SIGNATURE DATE A,42' PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME ADDRESS DAYTIME PHONE SIGNATURE DATE Fee: $100.00 �~ 60.00 � ,~~~ for residential properties Permit VAR #�� `7 Receipt # 3 o C'7 9 Application received by: Scheduled Appeals Commission date: -AT- Scheduled City Council date: 4V m COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW 7) ApPFJa S FILE NUMBER FILE DATE MEETING DATE_ FILE DESCRIPTION VAR #93-24 CITYOF ' 50 B-26-93 9-14-93 71 - 63 1/2 Way N.E. FRIDLEY COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST AND RETURN TO PLANNING DEPT. B D. COMMENTS )c ELE M. - I .1;!R - SCOTT E. '�'-z -li 7 [� JOHN F. ❑,TOM B.. 9—c— M. q-� LEON M. DICK L. --�,,' qo 31 co _v�/� a, -ems i i � V �tC!cJ a . U NEW [ ] Effective 5/26/93 ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY • ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 Building Permit Application Construction Address: 7/ 04K /)/, 5, /CA -4 /kerV Legal Description: Z-475 /? 4D ozock /.S— 1z1jeFV C'OUAw /f . sQs�r 8�2� Owner Name & Address: 173 g wC-WV�Poc,W� . %/ i�� '�/� �%lrs>/ s3"� / Tel. # 4420 --Z�o Contractor: O 66J MN LICENSE # Address: Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF B&PROVEMENT Tel. # LIVING AREA: Length, Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length Width / Height Sq. Ft. 62 40 DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. 4'�g OTHER:U 6c j) Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot [ ] Ft. Yd Setback Type of Construction: Approx. Completion Date: (0--r g - q3 Side Yard Setbacks Estimated Cast: $ 3.300 "�-o (Cost on Back) Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Rx $ DATE: APPLICANT: Permit Fee Fire Surcharge State Surcharge SAC Charge License Surcharge Driveway Escrow Erosion Control Park Fee Sewer Main Charge TOTAL $ Fee Schedule on Reverse Side $ .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) $ $.50/$1,000 Valuation $ $750 per SAC Unit $ $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above $ Conservation Plan Review $450.00 $ Fee Determined by Engineering $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] $ STIPULATIONS: Tel. # -pb z N .t T- tn /I r RiV E VAR #93-24 Cecelia Rosenberg 40 ZONING MAP �� t FLAN VAR 493-24 Cecelia Rosenberg y 4S SITE PLAN 16-"A. Mij urti.., survey i nS TO 7-' j P.02 L.S. #93-02 Mildred King CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR kl IL -D -vain KiN�,� KURTH SURVEYING INC. IMCRLUY CCFTIFt ThAT ThIS swnvEY, PLAN, ON RCPOHT WAS r0cpAheo 4002 JEFFERSON STREET N.E. 44Th OR UNDER MTOIRCCT SUPCRVI5i0n AND THAT I AM A DULY COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MINNESOTA 53421 CUTS' Al Lw' p S ' V �NOCG 6wx5 Of THC 3TATC Of MINK[SOTA. 612- YOU- 97GY DATE �^ SCALE 1"+ MN N E to OTA REGISTRATION N0. -1011a O -IRON MONUMENT ' 14„` I�a.1.�`C EI\��..r0.Tcx"'c Cu\N1thYSLOY�.Si� . 0 4 - - - -� ~ 1 . 4r _ j.• �.. Lo 01 , 9 l 1 A r 7 (� P •� L01i d i 7 \ `moi ` ff •` � • %� � . � �_� • �, (n � r v 4 CiL% Q Y vw vwvj EXISTING LEGAL DS Iql� Tots 19, 20, 21, and 22, Blo* 15, Fridley Park, Anoka County, Minnesota. #fir -apo m PARCFr. A All of Lots 19 and 20, and the west 6.00'fest of Lot 21,,Block 15, Fridley Park, Anoka County, Mlrmesota. �or�osFu �A1tc�G� • . All of Lot 22 and.that part Of Lot 21 lying.easterly of the west 6.00 feet Hereof, Block 15, Fridley Park, Anoka County, Minnesota. 11H 4T . VAR #93-24 vi ecelia Rosenberg ,\ d., m m ELEVATION 7 �'�b1�1 i — SDcJTK s 11�E �-�' _____ SSP✓i _ 4t 4 5; 5 i06fi.�/N 4 11�0 G5F Var #93-24 Cecelia Rosenberg 4U q/ ;—"C/L%1 i RCAC/< V1551e65 i i ELEVATION -Pko GSH Nt zF PAbI� i - 5007rt( s ibe < r c $FaPdi t-15; iDE/No �5 F WKSi —54bE b4c,A� - /vim f Sri OJi 5M-4 ®je 9' &1-/4- 4�. 'Z OS6me�Qc-, ql-r 0153 • 43 G zv 71 — A 3 !/y LIQ' o�/. -'.® � kylsh�J� lla ',/ �T S'/L- df� X 1.26 C4�eq�50 CcgwO 7Z) �;YOI,-Ef OA/ 4,�V-44Q--) 7 'f2- S" 16TA70vs .21l Pear )qemf doet