Loading...
VAR 95-08FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY. MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Russell and Bonnie Japs 1422 - 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Japs: May 11, 1995 On May 8, 1995, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a variance, -VAR x#95-08, to reduce the rear yard setback from 30 feet to 27 feet to allow the construction of an addition on Lot 2, Block 2, Creekridge Addition, the same being 1422 - 66th Avenue N.E. You have one year from the date of City Council action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 5723590. y. r B<frbara Dacy, AICP" Community Development Di BD/dw Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by May 25, 1995. Concur with action taken. r1 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 10 MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousi. 7. 30-1995. 1 voting rOT)'F._ (`HAWPVU ')nr, T?WrPTTT.Vn 11nTTTT_TT1kT!_ 11 nV AWV1w1rnT1kT/- Councilman Schneider stated that h would like to know the actual costs to the City to process the permits. He felt that the City should keep the fees as low s possible to encourage people to remodel and update their ho s. Ms. Dacy, Community Di analysis of the fees copies for the ne ml permits, the cos for stated that t City spends a go deal of yelopment Director, stated that there was an ompleted two years ago, and she could supply eting. She stated that on a majority of the the City to process did exceed the fee. She is not making money on the fees, as staff time, especially with residential permits. MOTION Councilwoman Bolkcom to table this item to the Special Counc' Meeting on May 15, 1995. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upo a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion c ried unanimously. 10. VARIANCE REQUEST. VAR #95-08 BY RUSSELL AND BONNIE JAPS TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 30 FEET TO 27 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION. GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1422 66TH AVENUE N.E. (WARD 2): Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request for a variance to reduce the rear yard setback from 30 to 27 feet to allow the addition of a porch. He stated that at the Appeals Com- mission meeting, there was a comment from an adjacent property owner regarding the closeness to her property and if there would be a fence. He stated that this issue has been resolved, and a letter has been received from this neighbor at 1455 Creek Ridge Lane that they are not opposed to this variance. He stated that he understands there has been an agreement that the petitioner will construct a privacy fence along the rear portion of their property. Councilman Schneider asked if the fence is a separate agreement a stipulation of this variance. Mr. Hickok stated that, at this time, it is an agreement between the two property owners. He stated that they apparently came to an understanding, and the property owners at 1455 Creek Ridge Lane, Patty and Robert Traczyk, have sent a letter stating they are not opposed to the variance. Mr. Hickok then read the letter to the Council. FRIDLEY CITY COURC� MEET ING OF MAY 8 1995 OTION by Councilman Sc PAGE IJ obert Tracz hneider to /-all re not o �'k' 1455 Creek Rid receive the lett PAosed t pon a ge Lane, which er from Patty voice vote this variance. indicated Y and carried unanimously all voting ayes Manned by Councilman Bhat they Mayor Nee declared the llings. MOTION by he motion of the Appeals Co Schneider to co Seconded by Co Commission and recur with the aye, Ma uncilwoman Jorgenson. Variance Requestrecommendation yor Nee declared the Benson. Upon a vo, VAR #95 -pg- motion carried voice vote, all voting 17. INFORMAL STATUS unanimously. REPORTS• Mr. Burns, Cit went Directory Manager stated week. would present an that Barb Dach Co update on unity Ms e city-wi--=.iup- Co• Dacy stated that cleanup mmittee will on Wednesday, Ma She stated meet and review the Cit that the Co Proposal 10 Cleanup Will In half, so that the will evaluate forthurbside Week have a collectionthe residents norththe dea to divide thpickue Mississi hone ave weekend e She stated Ppi Street will and Mississippi Street ude that in the re a Coll residents there would be included for collectio of forrus the followin south of scrap metal weekend at t be feedback from hratoshe' curb. quote would he curb the aulersure• She stated or collectin gardin that Ms • Dacy stated held by the that an informa the result Cleanup Week revise Of input from CO JulyWil. then obe tmade request for pry Y• June ith Councilwoman aJorgen : definition of "scrap Xs*Dacy stated 1 Week mmitteels t . Burns sta is meeting. and the of -h. ; MOTION by Cou, Nee d Of th/Q Re 'felt tal. to at thecentral dro collecting P -off site. oval meetingon for haulers will be .e tinay 17. She stated that sal, specifications as gog, action by stated that Will be Y Council, ho a report P fully, in that the public � she would bring this tention. should be given a suggestion to the Cleanup that • he had two is the1Flood s the ringbrooktereek discuss informally of Plain and Shorela Creek/Locke Lake ter red Ordinance. NCouncilwoman Jorgenson cllman Schneider. to adjourn lared the motion Upon a voice urn the meeting. Fridleycarried unanimous) e' all voting Seconded City Council of Y and tg aye, Mayor Cully May 8. 1995 adjourned Regular Meeting Y submitted, at 8;38 p.m. c:arole Haddad Secretary to the City Council William J. Nee Mayor FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 5 10. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #95-08, BY RUSSELL AND BONNIE JAPS TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 30 FEET TO 27 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION. GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1422 66th AVENUE N.E. (WARD 2): Mr. Burns stated that this is a request for a variance to reduce the rear yard setback from 30 feet to 27 feet. He stated that the Appeals Commission unanimously recommended approval of this variance. THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR AGENDA, AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILMAN SCHNEIDER. 11. APPROVE KENKO, INC.. ESTIMATE ADJUSTMENT FOR PROJECT NO. 248: Mr. Burns stated that at the April 24, 1995 Counc meeting, a partial estimate was approved for Kenko, Inc. the amount of $8,770.67 for the TCAAP project. He state that an audit was completed by the City of New Brighton, nd a new final cost was identified as $7,758.52. He state that it is recom- mended that this final estimate of $7,7 .52 be approved to replace the partial estimate approv by the Council on April 24, 1995. APPROVED FINAL ESTIM/GH TO KENRO, INC. TO REPLACE THE PARTIAL ESTIMATPROVED ON APRIL 24, 1995. 12. CLAIMS: APPROVED - NOS. 615. 13. LICENSES: APPROVED AS ON FILECLERK'S OFFICE. 14. ESTIMATES: APPROVED, AS F LLOWS: Kenko, Inc. 1694 91st Avenu N.E. Blaine, MN 55 9 Twin C' ties Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) Inter City Waterline Project No. 248 FI ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . .*$7,758.52 *As approved under the consent agenda, Item 11 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 6 Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. 400 Northtown Financial Plaza 200 Coon Rapids Boulevard Coon Rapids, MN 55435-5489 Services Rendered as City Attorney for the Month of April, 1995 . . . . . . . . ,790.54 F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. 14203 West 62nd Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 South Marian Hills Storm Sewer & Clover Pond Diversion Project No. 2 2 Estimate No. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5, 920.00 There were no comments from the audiice regarding the consent agenda items. J Councilman Schneider requested that jitems 7 and 10 be removed from the consent agenda. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenso to approve the consent agenda, with the exception of Items 7 a 10 which are to be placed on the regular agenda. Seconded by uncilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayo Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilman Sc eider to adopt the agenda as submitted, with the addition of co sent agenda Items 7 and 10. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. pon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion c rried unanimously. Mr. Frank van Da , 6342 Baker Street, stated he felt that the present theme of he Fridley 149er Days celebration was not repre- sentative of Fr' ley's history. He stated that it is historically incorrect, but ridley is the second oldest community in the state. He said that a City's annual celebration is called 149er Days, because of t e Gold Rush in 1849 in California, and he does not know how it relates to Fridley. He stated that before the rail link to W' nipeg in 1885, the only way persons could get to Winnipeg w s from Fridley and St. Paul. He stated that Minneapolis and St. thony did not even exist, and the Banfill House was an importan link. He stated that transportation was by ox carts, and John Ba fill built a ferry .across the river. He thought that ox carts ould be included in the parade and the celebration renamed to Po sibly Manomen Days. He stated that originally this area was called Manomen which was the Indian name for wild rice. t 1422 - 66TH AVENUE REAR YARD VARIANCE REPORT DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The petitioner requests that a variance be granted to reduce the rear yard setback from 30 feet to 27 feet to allow construction of a 14 x 16 foot addition. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The subject parcel is located on the curve of a residential street thereby causing the property to be shallower than a typical residential lot. The petitioner, however, does have the following alternatives: 1. Reducing the size of the addition to 14 feet by 13 feet thereby eliminating the need for a variance, 2. Reconfiguring the addition to 13 x 17 feet which would include nearly the same number of square feet, thereby eliminating the need for a variance, or 3. Reducing the size of the addition to a dimension less than 16 feet, thereby reducing the amount of variance requested. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The City has granted similar requests in the past. Staff has no recommendation for the City Council regarding this request. APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION: The Appeals commission voted unanimously to approve the request. A neighbor objected to the request. n •1422 -66TH AVENUE NX REAR Y VARIANCE REQUEST PROJECT DETAILS Petition For. Variance to reduce the rear yard setback from 30' to 27. Location of Property: 1422 - 66th Avenue N.E. Legal Description of Property: Lot 2, Block 2, Creekridge Addition Size: 83.5' x 120' (approx.) 10,026.68 sq. ft. Topography: Flat Existing Vegetation: Typical Suburban; Sod and Trees Existing Zoning/Platting: R-1, Single Family Availability of Municipal Utilities: Connected Vehicular Access: 66th Avenue N.E. Pedestrian Access: N/A Engineering Issues: N/A Site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley City Code requires a minimum rear yard setback equal to 25% of the lot depth with a minimum of 25 feet and a maximum of 40 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. Petitioner is proposing to construct a 14 x 16 foot addition to the rear of the existing dwelling unit. The dwelling was constructed in 1984. In 1990 a permit was issued to finish a basement bedroom and bath. 10.0-2 The petitioner's lot is looted on the curve of 66th Avenue. As a result, the she of the lot is somewhat pie -shaped with the middle of the lot being shorter as a result of the curve. Only a portion of the proposed addition will require the granting of a variance (see attached site plan). The petitioner does have the options of: 1. Reducing the size of the addition to 14 feet by 13 feet thereby eliminating the need for a variance, 2. Reconfiguring the addition to 13 x 17 feet which would include nearly the same number of square feet, thereb eliminating the need for a variance, or 3. Reducing the size of the addition to a dimension less than 16 feet, thereby reducing the amount of variance requested. The City has, in the past, granted similar variance requests; therefore, staff has no recommendation regarding the request. ADJACENT STIES WEST: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Single Family Dwelling SOUTH: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Single Family Dwelling EAST: Zoning: R 1, Single Family Land Use: Single Family Dwelling NORTH: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Single Family Dwelling Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: 3 10.03 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. APRIL 25, 1995 PAGE 6 thing that has come out and the only reason she would consider approval is that the new sign would be smaller and there w ld be one sign as opposed to two. She is always concerned about visual pollution on University Avenue. The U.S. S ' and Fitness has a large sign. She does have to agree with issioner Vos that the conditions have not been met>p;a The are alternatives and there is the problem of the bike She would vote against the request as well. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconde y Ms. Smith, to deny Variance Request, VAR #95-07, by Bro tone Real Estate to reduce the setback of a free-standisign to a property line from 10 feet to 3 feet on Lots 4, 5 nd 6, Block 1, Paco Industrial Park, generally located>a 120 - 7190 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota. UPON A VOI VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE XOTXOff CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ckok stated the City Council would consider this request on y 8. 2�- -- ANSI DERATIIIN ANCE-. REOIIEST. _ 0-5--Q $Y- - RU * I • -e Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the rear yard setback from 30 feet to 27 feet to allow the construction of an addition on Lot 2, Block 2, Creekridge Addition, the same being 1422 - 66th Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota. MOTION by Mr. Ruechle, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:53 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the request is for a variance to the rear yard from 30 feet to 27 feet. The subject parcel is located on 66th Avenue N.E. and surrounded by property that is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling. The lot is set on a curve in the street. Creek Park Lane to the south also has a curve. He will talk about the curve and its impact on the dimensions of the lots. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner is asking for a variance to construct a 14 foot x 16 foot addition onto the rear of their home. The addition would be located in a manner that it would protrude into the rear yard area. The area of the variance to the east is increased toward the east. The full 3 foot dimension being requested is for the east side. At the west side, the addition comes very close tom. a 30 foot setback. The curve of 10.07 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 25, 1995 PAGE 7 the street has caused the homes to be situated in a manner that makes a consistent setback along the street side but has caused the front setback to be pushed back towards each other on the opposing curves. Mr. Hickok stated the staff report points out that although there is a condition that allows homes to be pushed between the curves, there are alternatives, as follows: 1. Reducing the size of the addition to 14 feet x 13 feet thereby eliminating the need for a variance, 2. Reconfiguring the addition to 13 feet x 17 feet which would include nearly the same number of square feet, thereby eliminating the need for a variance, or 3. Reducing the size of the addition to a dimension less than 16 feet, thereby reducing the amount of variance requested. Mr. Hickok stated there are alternatives. Staff has no recommendation regarding this request. The City has granted similar requests in the past. Dr. Vos asked, according to the site plan, is the setback of 38.8 feet from the property line to the garage or from the curb to the garage. Mr. Hickok stated it is 38.8 feet from the garage to the curve of the road. Dr. Vos stated the structure could have been built at the 35 -foot setback so it is really 3.5 feet back. Mr. Kuechle stated the house may be setback 35 feet if measuring from the radius of the curve in the road. Dr. Vos stated it might be but he was not sure. This is also a shallow lot and the house is 2 or 3 feet off already. Ms. Japs responded to the alternatives proposed by staff. They cannot construct an addition 17 feet wide because of the existing roof line. As far as shortening the addition, she would like the room to be usable for her family which is why they came up with the dimensions as stated. Dr. Vos asked what the addition would be used for. Ms. Japs stated this would be a four season sun room. Dr. Vos asked if there were any windows on the south side. 10.08 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 25, 1995 PAGE 8 Ms. Japs stated there is a patio door and another window to the side of the patio door. If the addition was the 17 -foot dimension, they would have to cover a window. Also, the roof line would not work for that dimension. Ms. Savage asked about their neighbor to the rear. Ms. Japs stated the neighbor was at the meeting. Ms. Japs presented a rough drawing of the proposed addition. Ms. Savage stated the drawing as presented shows an addition measuring 15 feet x 16 feet but the staff report stated 14 feet x 16 feet. Ms. Japs stated they are talking about an addition of 14 feet x 16 feet. Their builder came up with the 15 foot x 16 foot dimension. Dr. Vos stated the variance gets more severe as you go to the east. As you go west, you get closer to meeting the variance. Ms. Tracyk is the neighbor residing directly behind this property. Her house has bay windows in the back. Because of the closeness right now and with the variance, she feels that with the addition they would be on top of each other. She realizes they cannot expand anywhere else. She was just wondering if they would be willing to do anything with a privacy fence. Her concern is that they will be too close. Dr. Vos stated according to the map it looks that the neighbor to the east and to the west have a fence. Is there a fence separating these two properties? Ms. Tracyk stated there are existing fences to the east and west but no fence separating these two properties. Ms. Savage asked if the petitioner had considered a privacy fence. Ms. Japs stated they had not considered it but they are not opposed to it. This seems reasonable. Ms. Tracyk stated that most of the time they have their blinds down because of the closeness and she feels 3 feet will bring that much closer. Ms. Savage asked if Ms. Tracyk understands the petitioner can expand to the rear but not quite as far. 10.09 I APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 25, 1995 PAGE 9 Ms. Tracyk stated she understands the conversation. Her husband went to talk to the petitioners but did not get a response so she came to the meeting to voice her opinion. Dr. Vos stated he would assume that, in looking at the site plan for the Tracyk property, they cannot go back very far or they would also run into a variance problem. Mr. Hickok stated their bay window is set at 30 feet. Dr. Vos stated that the Tracyk house is right at the minimum setback from the back property line. The petitioner is already living with someone at the minimum setback, and they are asking to go 3 feet over. It appears that the builder, in both case, could have put the houses more forward. Ms. Tracyk stated however they can expand is fine. She just feels that if they did not have so many windows and with the variance that it is close. Ms. Japs stated, when they originally designed their house, their plan was such that this was going to be an addition but they could not afford to do it at the time the home was built. This addition was in the original plan. Mr. Kuechle asked if the existing patio has a frost footing. Ms. Japs stated yes. The existing patio is very small so there will be new footings placed. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Dr. Vos, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYEr CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:12 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he would recommend to the City Council approval. The public purpose is that the back yard and green areas not be reduced unduly. He thought that 3 foot x approximately 1 foot over 14 feet will be 7 or 8 square feet which will be very small. With the back dimension of the lot, there should be at least 60 feet between the buildings. The visual impact is minimal. As far as the privacy fence, he would be reluctant to recommend a stipulation. He thought that would be something to be considered by the neighbors. Ms. Smith stated the configuration of the lot is part of the hardship which is why they are discussing. She would vote for approval. 10.10 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 25, 1995 PAGE 10 Ms. Savage agreed. This is a unique lot. The variance request is minimal. The public purpose is being met. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend approval of Variance Request, VAR #95-08, by Russell and Bonnie Japs to reduce the rear yard setback from 30 feet to 27 feet to allow the construction of an addition on Lot 2, Block 2, Creekridge Addition, the same being 1422 - 66th Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Hickok stated the City'.Council would consider this request on May 8. 3. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL ACTIONS Mr. Hickok provided an update on Planning Commi on and City Council actions. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Ruechle, secondeMs._Beaulieu, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL V,OWING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND APRIL 25, 1995, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED A 8:15 P.M. Respectfully s mitted,. V � Lav.,ofin Cooper cording Secretary 10.11 C ) `- ,s VAR ##*3-08 41AING LIST41A�D: 4/7/95 Leon & Virginia Pacquette Lillian M. Radil Beth A Dahlmeier 1479 Mississippi N.E. 6655 Anoka Street 1358 - 66th Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Doris A. Asp Chris & Mary Lawther Robert O. & Doris L. Nelson 1486 - 66th Ave. NE 1472 - 66th Ave. NE 1439 Mississippi NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Paul Nei & Robin Browen Joseph & Joan Menth Curtis & Mary Loschy 1465 Mississippi NE 1388 - 66th Ave. NE 1399 - 66th Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Roland & Betty Zacharias Robert & Mary Bridgeman Kenneth & Judy Biegelow 1387 - 66th Ave. N.E. 1375 - 66th Ave. N.E. 1363 - 66th Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Tor & Beth Gloppen Gerald & Carole Jensen Michael & Diane Guzik 1421 - 66th Ave. N.E. 1475 - 66th Ave. NE 1485 - 66th Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 John Truckenbrod David & Leann Larson Gary & Cynthia Brawn 1491 - 66th Ave. NE 1410 - 66th Ave. N.E. 1436 - 66th Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Jack & Susan Krichen Frederic & Connie Bischke Joseph & Mary Laconic 1450 - 66th Ave. N.E. 1490 - 66th Ave. NE 6644 Arthur St. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 David & Mary Jedinak Stephen & Susan Jackson William & Carroll Carlson 6632 Arthur St. NE 6616 Asthur St. NE 1495 Creek Park Lane N. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Roger & Joanne Riebel Robert & Patricia Tracyk Carolyn Geyer 1475 Creek Park Lane NE 1455 Creek Park Lane 1425 Creek Park Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Daniel * Holly Arnold 14Q5' Creek Park Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Clem & Eva Coverston 1424 Creek Park Lane Fridley, MN 55432 Donald & Patricia Klarkowski 6560 Arthur St. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas & Christine Johnson 1379 Creek Park Lane Fridley, MN 55432 Norwest Mortgage, Inc. 1400 - 66th Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Alex Sawicki 6583 Arthur St. NE 2 la Fridley, MN 55432 James & Jennifer Pearson 6645 Arthur St. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Deborah F. Johnson RR 73, Box 1215 Deadwood, SD 57732 Diane Savage 567 Rice Creek Terrace NE Fridley, MN 55432 6Obert E. Swanson ,,,Steven & Barbara Gaynor 400 Creek Park Lane NE 414 Creek Park Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Michael & Karen McCulloch Ronald & Nancy Newport 1454 Creek Park Lane NE 1494 Creek Park Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas & Marlene Speath Herbert & Jan Egeness 6550 Arthur St 1465 - 66th Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Steven & Colleen Scherber Brickner Builders, Inc. 1376 - 66th Ave. NE 1391 Creek Park Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Bernard & Loralee Kriens Colin T. Gerrety 1362 - 66th Ave. NE 6573 Arthur St. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Jeffrey R. Charioli Curtis & Gwen Hagen 6583 Arthur St. NE 6611 Arthur St. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Bradley & Cheryl Peterson Deborah F. Wood 6633 Arthur St. NE 6587 Arthur St.,e } dol Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 - a Russell & Bonnie Japs City Council (6) 1422 - 66th Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, April 25, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #95- 08, by Russell & Bonnie Japs, pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the rear yard setback from 30 feet to 27 feet to allow the construction of an addition on Lot 2, Block 2, Creekridge Addition, the same being 1422 - 66th Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 572-3592. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than April 18, 1995. CIIYOF FRIDLEY; • 0 CITY OF FRIDLEY COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW File Number File Date Meeting Date VAR #95-08 4/5/95 4/x/95 File Description: VAR #95-08 Petitioner: Russell & Bonnie Japs 1422 - 66th Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Complete Review Checklist= Return to The Community Development Department *** Comments *** Barbara Dacy Scott Hickok Michele McPherson 'JOKwttc SCa Fri nk&G John Flora John Palacio Clyde Moravetz Leon Madsen Dave Sallman 4rl�zn,A7-10--- Do �X�s� - 44 1 o'f lI�,�le.�'ppvr��-�l_. I,I 04- f- L/_ Dick Larson � '/-,,'3 - $'Sr 17_� CITY OF FRIDLEY p 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: 14aa - CQ444-h kaz_Nf- Property Identification Number (Ply Legal description: Lot 2. Current zoning: Block a- Tract/Addition tt:t-N-A4AA: zo_ Square footage/acreage Reason for variance and hardship: 76 vin K*- lanatr- Q Si,Section of City Code: 'L< D]. 0;2 y Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No ✓ If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as .it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAMEussgk\ K. ADDRESS I as a - la .9.*t . P­� ML F c : �A!:t DAYTE\4E PHONE C�a'[ 3c a,, az l8aR SIGNATURES �.a n DATE PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME sa",L a-- o6ov-e- ADDRESS DAYTIMEPHONE SIGNATURE `%,,.�.� a DATE Fee: $100.00 $ 60.00 for residential Permit VAR # „Receipt # ,--7„ W Application received by: Scheduled Appeals Commission date: Scheduled City Council date: LJ - 9.!f" CITY OF FRIDLEY PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicants for vacations must submit the legal description of the parcel (easement, street, etc.) to be vacated. Complete site plans, signed by a registered architect, civil engineer, landscape architect, or other design professional, to include the following: A. Generals 1. Name and address of project 2. Legal description (certificate of survey may be required) 3. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant, engineer, and owner of record 4. Date proposed, north arrow, scale, number of sheets, name of drawer S. Description of intended use of site, buildings, and structures including type of occupancy and estimated occupancy load 6. Existing zoning and land use 7. Tabulation box indicating: (i) size of parcel in sq. ft. (ii) Gross floor area of buildings (iii) Percent of site covered by building (iv) Percent of site covered by impervious surface (v) Percent of site covered by green area (vi) Projected number of employees (vii) Number of seats if intended use is a restaurant or place of assembly (viii) Number of parking spaces required (ix) Number of parking spaces provided including handicapped (x) Height of all buildings and structures and number of stories B. site Plan: 1. Property line dimensions, location of all existing and proposed structures with distance from boundaries, distance between structures, building dimensions and floor elevations 2. Grading and drainage plan showing existing natural features (topography, wetlands, vegetation, etc.) as well as proposed grade elevations and sedimentation and storm water retention ponds. Calculations for storm water detention/retention areas. 3. All existing and proposed points of egress/ingress showing widths of property lines, turning radii abutting rights-of-way with indicated center line, paving width, existing and proposed median cuts, and intersections of streets and driveways 4. Vehicular circulation system showing location and dimensions for all driveways, parking spaces, parking lot aisles, service roads, loading' areas, fire lanes, emergency access (if necessary), public and private streets, alleys, sidewalks, bike paths, direction of traffic flow, and traffic -control devices 5. Landscaping Plan 6. Location, access, and screening detail of trash enclosures 7. Location and screening detail of rooftop equipment S. Building elevations from all directions 9. Utility plan identifying size and direction of existing water and sewer lines, fire hydrants, distance of hydrant to proposed building • is . V 66th Avenue NX VAR #95-08 �ussel1 Japs �7 il15) i 13 j C3 in) IT) ]PPi Stmt The applicant requests that the required distance from an addition to the rear property. line be reduced from -30' to 27' 1vT�AP_ _LOCA _ON M = I RONALD F. MEYER LA" SURVEYOR LAND SURVEYING sunml VilION DesioN TELErm0Nz 771-4586 085 JE861E ST. ST. PAUL. MINN- 55101 I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. A.. , Reg. No. 9051 Date: InI /�%. Lo Carron .9p✓� 27/985 i R O Indicates iron monument placed N\ O W �\yZ�2' L N �. a � 0 2 � 5 / Scale: 1" = 30' a lvr Lot 2,�'Blockr2o CREEMDGE, Anoka Countyq Minnesota. -A da S . .� s` w S O Indicates iron monument placed N\ O W �\yZ�2' L N �. a � 0 2 � 5 / Scale: 1" = 30' a lvr Lot 2,�'Blockr2o CREEMDGE, Anoka Countyq Minnesota. VAR #95-08 _,Russell Japs mmomm • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 443 • • • • • '(tact •_ • • • • • • • 1 ac6$.._ AVE. s W /2 • ` 6 C ` �� r �' • • • • • • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • H. AVEQ • • • • • • • • • • ey� RICF, K ��'., o� � �� •f•� • 239 'PARK '`�• '�•�jT� 7�Z2 Zi 24 4. 4 �''• • • 4 - � ..� "�c11•�.r IIS. f i _ _ - t� � • • •i• 4-� T � .. �, \aI� \ � - fir" A%"� �' '' al • ---� � R 2 rr /� a j 7A q.o 4-E g• I � 440 •moi �/ ' s rii -r 1 Y• � B S J t z 3 s a T s /e pit • to 28 4-i 3 7a • 9 t0_4 -4 W 29 4-° TH. AVE. N.E. � ' z `,•;; }}�� Z 66TH. AEN It CUA nil; /3 2 /3 Z /h • e • 14 2 - - -- 169 \• Z S 3 /Z 3 /Z 3 +w W `S- V 9 6 f 6 a Q - --lAISSISSFApl--- - - -- ---o T WE -E -T --- /;2 • u41 - 9 V 88 27 S W ••133 u, > �— W - 0 f �. � o �• p7 z IltAtf 1.1Q.1.1 i■■■ 1■■■ loss I" i■■■ l•■. inloss 25 ! 4 3 Z 4 A 23 -4 5 v v n 40 C. s (P!+?K HARRIS ZD L I2 V 1 / POND ::::. o© L , ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦� ♦.*♦�� + ►♦♦��♦♦♦j i 88 ■ CIX_ ��1w: ♦'���i♦♦ s t V Aft tv Ao V e w A'F w `+ ,�',--' •.. ` A, N_.• 4 Vii` � t..� b /i_T` i, -.1 � i ZZ '- ' I \ a c r 7 I d1 ••� *44DD. g r h 1 -i zcs All �,'� � � `�= .�• `j+eu pro �.m�°,' w -, i \°,�rn��Nti y•��' oti' >•� �; rt, 1 ` 4 ohe+♦.� D 1'Ociia c.. v . bs � B� . i %� � "n, � L r4A ��.ti � �� � �' ', �, vo I ►' iY�/.ca/f ^ P n ^l~5t r e b &V. �. 66 _ Tom' �' t' ►: •. C/e�vdG.{'Louii/ s�s9 a QW� 4ip p'c5 _, 8 I L. ✓YB/ r �L A �4y� e g c♦L ti d -u ` �' `°^� 40 a• '17. � E. .0 -'4- o v -. �. CJI �• �+ :� •meq' rl.rr...r " v ti �k Q•L n ./ - 3: •-- V v v � , • J- _ a�'y .. u �ilG..' � OL � ` a -� ^ ^ ova -* N , 4 b W 30 9 �' L Bl BD SD� f'• d,• `� >i fs /M _a .%✓: S; S..y,� �_ • 0 4. 33 - - - o =}ate o ANOKA ST. N. E. H ,= _ v. r Jo cse 0 •�\ 4 � � u o (��(��� q bN to 'A as ff qo r� `C v " . I \11 � ob J A : 1 J tA•� Q 4r N O v w. a� A W N 1 4o f Oo o ANOKA ST. N. E. H ,= _ v. r Jo cse •�\ 4 � � u o (��(��� q bN to 'A as ff qo r� `C v " . •.../ o ANOKA ST. N. E. H ,= _ FRIDLEY ST. E. abw' t>� to 'A \11 � J FRIDLEY ST. E. abw' t>�