VAR 87-10• ��us CITEF FRIDLEY`
. s y 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E.
aF FRIDLEY, MN 55432
(612) 571-3450
VARIANCE REQUEST FORM
VARIANCE # 27-10
VARIANCE FEE N �o RECEIPT # al
SCHEDULED APPEALS MEETING DATE —K
PROPERTY INFORMATION
/
PROPERTY ADDRESS 7 T — 171 40, , ' Y
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT 26 BLOCg 4� TRACT/ADDITION iRk.c& C -4- PL -,Am& )j '00,
PRESENT ZONING
VARIANCE REQUEST(S): Attach a plat or survey of the property showing building,
variance(s), where applicable.
(a cs `►'v p 31 +��� �� 4.45- C scro To AL'Low.
At
Section of the Code:
�'---List specific hardship(s) which require the variance(s):
FEE OWNER INFORMATION
NAME (please print)
Al 7-404V
K- `� �ZL
PHONE :5
ADDRESS —
)/' �;e -
�Y • P
SIGNATURE DATE 6.11=-7
#
Note F # 1FiFi�`1#si!'#fi '�1Fjoi#j,0#1,roce 1Fjnk,,######
PETITIONER INFORMATION
NAME (please print
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE DATE
##################################################################################
APPEALS COMMISSION: APPROVED DENIED DATE
CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DENIED DATE
STIPULATIONS:
FOB CITY USE OHLT
Notification of petitioner and property owners Within 200 feet:
Name/Address
:•
Date notified
'
r
t
i
s
t
t
1
e
i
I
I
..
®
COMMISSION APPL ► KATION REVIEW
Department Number File Date Meeting Date
C17YOF Planning
FRI DLEY
29 1 3/27/87 1 4/14/87
File Address/Description VAR #87-10 [.COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST
194 - 69th Ave. reduce rear yard s.b. from
31 feet to 4.45 feet. by Anthony Krall RETURN TO PLANNING
DARYL COMMENTS
�-0 E B B 1 E 0ff 1r �,/ IN i S �` a.OkA c V1 1 -z 5 Qac S� � m� e
z�11 �Q.Pi ti .1 5 , TIS V° ►MV �`�` '
JOHNO` b� n�; we t'7 t I i
-^�D E B B I E � ' � VNVI.�F,d� �
/ _TORI ��� Cov� �`►'�'` a0,_cv�_
DARREL
T -D E B B-1 E_
,CLYDE
cDEBBIE �--
MARK
—DEBBIf!
LEON-�
DEBBIE--
JACV yc e,
U
rAW
G7YOF
FRIDLEY
CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley
will conduct a Public Hearing in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University
Avenin Northeast at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, April 14, 1987, in regard to the
following matter:
Consideration of a variance request, VAR #87-10, by Anthony
Krall, pursuant to Chapter 205.07.3, D, 3a, of the Fridley
City Code, to decrease the required rear yard setback f ram 31
feet to 4.45 feet to allow for the conversion of an existing
garage into living space and the construction of a new
attached garage, on Lot 20, Block 4, Rice Creek Plaza North
Addition, the same being 194 - 69th Avenue N. E. , Fridley,
Minnesota, 55432.
Notice is hereby given that all persons having an interest therein will be
given the opportunity to be heard at the above time and place.
DONALD BEZZCLD
« IAIRMAN
APPEALS COMMISSION
Note: The Appeals Commission will have the final action on this request,
unless there are objections from surrounding neighbors, the City Staff, or
the petitioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of
these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council through the
Planning Commission with only a recommendation frau the Appeals Commission.
Anthony Krall
194 - 69th Ave.
Fridley, MN 55432
Robert Thompson
218 - 69th Ave.
Fridley, MN 55432
John Nelson
210 - 69th Ave.
Fridley, MN 55432
Louis Kahnk
209 Rice -Creek Blvd.
Fridley, MN 55432
Curtis Dah lb erg
205 Rice Creek Blvd.
Fridley, MN 55432
Melvina Schumm
201 Rice Creek Blvd.
Fridley, MN 55482
William Doig
215 69th Place
Fridley, MN 55432
VAR #89-10
194 - 69th Ave. N.E.
Henry Parker
216 Rice Creek Blvd.
Fridley, MN 55432
Marguerite McGie
210 Rice Creek Blvd.
Fridley, MN 55432
Donald Blair
206 Rice Creek Blvd.
Fridley, MN 55432
Dennis Moore
200 Rice Creek Blvd
Fridley, MN 55432
Marvin Ruuska
225 - 69th Ave.
Fridley, MN 55432
Glen Carlson
217 - 69th Ave.
Fridley, MN 55432
John Boser
209 - 69th Ave.
Fridley, MN 55432
Appeals 3/31/87
John Falldin
201 - 69th Ave.
Fridley, MN 55432
Walter Traczyk
191 - 69th Ave.
Fridley, MN 55432
Jean Reveling
181 - 69th Ave.
Fridley, MN 55432
Anoka County
325 Main Street
Anoka, MN 55303
Item #3, April 14, 1987
ADMINISMAT1VE STAFF REPORT
194 - 69th AVENUE N. E.
VAR #87-10
A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT:
Section 205.07.3, D. 3a, requires a rear yard with a depth of not less
than 25 percent of the lot depth, and not less than 25 feet permitted
or more than 40 feet required for the main building.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space
to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood.
B. SMTED HARDSHIP:
Please see attached descriptions of hardships.
C. AUKINISZRATIVE SMkFF REVIEW:
9iis house faces the side street. ![he new garage is in the rear of the
lot. Also, adjacent to the rear lot line is a city park. 9ie request
has been reviewed by the City Parks Department and would have no
objection to this request.
If approved, staff recommends that no windows be placed in the west
wall.
Specific Hardships:
We need more space on our main floor. We no -ed a bedroom or den or office
or combination thereof, because we have NO private place, any longer,
for our aging parents and relatives, who depend upon our home for a
temporary place to stay or a stop over place on their way to the hospital.
It was just fine when they were younger because we housed them in our
basement. Now, they cannot walk the stairs to the bathroom. We have one
bathroom and that is on the main level. From August, 1985 through January
4th, 1986, the date he passed away, my 82 year old father was living with
us until we were able to put him in a nursing home (December, 1985).
He had to stay on the main floor in my daughter's room and we moved
all of her things downstairs, which kept us in turmoil, since we have
only the one bathroom. Now we have my husband's 86 year old mother
fzzm northern Minnesota, (4 hours away), who has to visit the University
Hospitals, periodically, and stay with us on the main floor of our home,
because of her arthritic condition, she cannot climb the stairs. At the
same time, my 74year old aunt has osteoporosis and is from the same
northern Minnesota town (4 hours away) has to stop here on her way to
the Mayo clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, where she was hospitalized to
have her hip ball changed. She used to be on a cane and now she is
in a wheel chair. Our bedroom -hall area is too small for her to move
about in this wheel chair. Our kitchen is small (10 ft. X 11 ft.).
When we are "four" we manage to fit at our table in the kitchen just fine.
With five or six people and a wheel chair we must move to the diningroom.
The diningroom ( 9 ft. X 10 ft.) is too small. IF WE PUT THE ADDITION
ON THE DININGROOM WOULD BE EXTENDED 8 feet and we could turn the table
the other way -and manage quite well. We have four cars and try to
keep them in the driveway. Our daughter and son each have their car
parked in the driveway. With the driveway being moved over, we would
also keep half of the present driveway for their cars.
If we can move our den from the basement and all of the file cabinets
to this extended room upstairs, we would be able to put a bathroom
downstairs in that present area of the den -office.
Our son attends a local college and lives at home. Our daughter attends
a college out of state, but will be living at home beginning this May,
because she is transferring to a local college and will be living at
home, again.
NW CORNER r5go .gp '
SEC. /4 Jta,• I
.B 7B .... 7B .... 76, B° d/A3f 0 •• f
6 7 J GGA y�57 • ° ' ol!' ' o.f°°nJ�q
B¢ 7 7 °p,,•or,z
0
69 TH AVE. N. �. ,, N 3 -� (Lz) w
---- .oaoo
AZ.
%1 "1
A raba6b 77 77 77 77 U9S9 A1O ('f� 30
– _-
y °1eses D-
5 4 261 2
�'J W
8s 77 77 77 77 ° G / 1 _ 21 717
q Ad"
c az /1i AyV 0 �27) — 6(T5) yyl/ 20 ° a°L7� °j65 `nfait
4
n o y `7` i��L� /se1 6 (ZB� a•4 )% �e 8° p,L3°n 'Bp 85 1;57/a o
so
k 16
z •w ° 'q4t53b� 6OJ 610D 1% z 1pLye •� ( �i)
6 �10
1 /44)
1 +
12 _
3 dL o
•7�i %� ` ay {'� ° a B6 (61)
r ao be Cif) I x(40)
i8 `� Q.• ' �' 6 3a v - i I I
rkl
go
I
y b I
'� Csr> w �{4�:p• �� lgo) noj0^. � 3 'o b` 2 �i I
G
DOW141 • 8' i 0° ,r• r IL 1 I 0 I
2)r 'f�' 9_ s"4 ! °.. �b R ;so',e' ho,7md•
99
8671 Be7�
(sU)
18/2 S 3
01) yl°aa•f� 1 L' �o
-,
w
s .
z ° vd' f7 �p°f ° •'� : �
°ao 70 90 O a
T�)
1y° N � °•t°si� 2°r• .
/7
2 a; (M)/B a��P�p bili •�z 6v
g �7) �' C o e ro O'^ �Z8/o • f ° ,.1~ o. S67g
V age do floes a O NB°'�7 S°"p N (s) , ; IA�C ° �0) 2°be fpy7ao �I
I � 3 n peg s • `'. '' 26 (a9) & /9 d,`�,, a b ,o � =•, �°e' � � �`�; o •`°
S< �.
/� �� °.� 5 .. S i.`' ,.��,'•;4rn�., e�P.cm — — art — -��.a � ""� �' __
i
Aly a
9 - /c t _
Rk
fio
(A,� : 0000
�..-.-.-.-.•_•.❖. �.
�.�+ ma'''y :� t. � , ��! i �•�'' �♦♦♦�
Arm r `I'�i79
■ou.. �� �� ���.�� �,
7
h.
rt44 y.
p
CITY OF
FRIDLEY
CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450
Anthony Krall APPEALS CONIIISSION April 16, 1987
194 - 69th Avenue
Fridley, NN 55432 ACTION TAKEN NOTICE
On April 14, 1987 , the Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved
your request for a variance, VAR #87-10, by Anr onyx,-aj i ,—purguant to
Chapter 205.07.3, D, 3a, of the Fridley City Code to decrease the ren��,T 'rP�__
rear yard setback from 31 feet to 4.45 feet to allow for rhe conyers;nn of
an existing garage into living space and the construction of a new attached
garage, on Lot 20, Block 4, Rice Creek Plaza North Addition the same being
194 - 69th Avenue N.E., Fridley, Wnnesota, 55432
with the following stipulation(s):
No windows be placed in the west wall.
If the work has not commenced within one (1) year after granting this variance
then the variance shall become null and void.
If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning
Department at 571-3450.
(::
e40ar
arre
Chief Building Official
DC/ln
r'
Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one
copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by April 27, 1987
I� concur with the action taken.
r
Land Plane ny *CS AtE.
Land SurWY;7y Mtniw) o/s ?l,
Sa►ls Testing ENGINEERING, INC. *w-vla
Civil & Afumapal SU1i)d4 066
£nimmcrmy Engineers Survecyor.5
certificate of sutvei3FRG S TleOAl CONST Ce.
®2. 24 Tref Tr- 2
n
1
L
— 12-5,0/ -
Lot ZD 13Lo < 4
R! C E C R E ff PL .4 z,q No A 7-Y A901 t/ON
/beneby crfify #wt lhis o carrecf repmsenfafron 0 surety e& bwndores of hie 46arr &scr-,kd land, and
o�'li�fr lacvfiivi� 'o// dw/dk ry5, l/irreaa, i risible air vor ww1s , if aay, f n a* antaid /aid. As wrrryed 6y nx fibs- °6y
A.O. d.2--/ !INC.
SUB UP 8" ENG/NEE2 IVG , l
.o().+,t ttet#, sse'[
curio OU VT OWE
1 Q
1 �ry
� h
ti
�1
J
— 12-5,0/ -
Lot ZD 13Lo < 4
R! C E C R E ff PL .4 z,q No A 7-Y A901 t/ON
/beneby crfify #wt lhis o carrecf repmsenfafron 0 surety e& bwndores of hie 46arr &scr-,kd land, and
o�'li�fr lacvfiivi� 'o// dw/dk ry5, l/irreaa, i risible air vor ww1s , if aay, f n a* antaid /aid. As wrrryed 6y nx fibs- °6y
A.O. d.2--/ !INC.
SUB UP 8" ENG/NEE2 IVG , l
.o().+,t ttet#, sse'[
curio OU VT OWE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF FRIDLEY
In the Matter of
APPEALS COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS
Owner
Not filed in Torrens
VARIANCE
The above entitled matter came before the Appeals Commission of the City of
Fridley and was heard en the14f7h— day of A=il , 19-_a7-1
City on a petition for a variance pursuant to the Cy of Fridley's Zoning
Ordinance, for the fol owing described property: Reduce the required. rear yard
setback from 31 feet 4.45 feet to allow the construction of an existing
garage into living s e and the construction of a new attached garage on Lot 20,
Block 4, Rice Creek N Addition, the same being 194 - 69th Avenue N.E.
IT IS ORDERED that a
reasons:
See Appeals
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
CITY OF FRIDLEY )
I, Shirley A. Haapala,
said City of Fridley,
copy and Order grants
in my office, and have
the whole thereof.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,
Fridl y, Mink�nepota,
DRAFTED BY:
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue
Fridley, MN 55432
Variances are valid fa
considered void if not
be granted as upon the following conditions or
minutes of April 14, 1987.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
City Clerk for the City of Fridley with and in for
o hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing
a variance with the original record thereof preserved
found the same to be a correct and true transcript of
I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of
n the County of Anoka on the day of
9�
I N. E.
SHIRLEY A. HAA ALA, CITY CLE
h a period of one year following approval and shall be
fused within that period.
(SEAL)
Ilk
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 14, 1
PAGE 7
story onto the south half of the garage would probably conform better /tthe
two houses than if he built a one-story garage with a very flat roof.
Aesthetically, what 1.1r.Westover intended to do looked better.
Mr. _Westover stated his neighbors to the east did not object to/is proposal.
MOTION BY MS. SAVAGE, SECONDED BY DR. VOS, TO CLOSE THE PUB C HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERS011 BA DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:08 P.M.
Mr. Barna commended the petitioners on a very well stated hardship. The
petitioner would definitely be bringing the hous , even with the variance,
closer to code complianc/Savage.
it has been si a the new code was established.
Ms. Savage stated she agIn looking the property, she noted the
public purpose was to maesthetic ly pleasing community, and it seemed
to her that this garage ned wou certainly do that. She would be in
favor of granting the va
Mr. Sherek stated he agrs. Savage. The garage was definitely well
designed. He, too, wantpliment the petitioner on the preparation he
Ax did in preparing the stadship description. Most hardship descriptions
are very sketchy, and mathe Commissioners are not even sure a
.petitioner has a hardshi
Dr. Vos statedthis v s a very creative solution. He had driven by the
property many times and never realized there was no garage. The way the
garage was desig d and the location into the hill would really look nice.
MOTION BY DR. OS, SECONDED BY MS. SAVAGE, TO APPROVE VARIANCE REQUEST,
VAR BY BRIAN WESTOVER, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 204.07.1, B, 3, OF THE
FRIDLEY C Y CODE TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT OF A GARAGE FROM
14 FEET 20 FEET ON LOT 3, BLOCK 1, HEATHER HILLS ADDITION, THE SAME
BEING 274 BEN MORE DRIVE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, 55432.
N A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THF.
OTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #87-10, BY ANTHONY KRALL, PURSUANT
TO CHAPTER 205.07.3, D, 3a, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO DECREASE THE REQUIR
REAR YARD SETBACK FRO14 31 FEET TO 4.45 FEET TO ALLOW FOR THE CONVERSTION OF
AN EXISTING GARAGE INTO LIVING SPACE AND THE CONSTRUCTIO14 OF A NEW ATTACHED
GARAGE ON LOT 20, BLOCK 4, RICE CREEK PL ZA NORTH ADDITION, THE SAVE BEING
194 - 69TH AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, 11INNESOTA, 55432.
MOTION BY MS. SAVAGE, SECONDED BY MR. SHEREK, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC'.HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE- CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:14 P.M.
r,
APPEALS CC. a'S?SS?Ot,1 MEETING, APRIL 14, 1987 PAGE 8
Vice -Chairperson Barna read the Administrative Staff Report:
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
191 - 69th Avenue N.E.
VAR #87-10
A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT:
Section 205.07.3, D, 3a, requires a rear yard with a depth of not less
than 25 percent of the lot depth, and not less than 25 feet permitted
or more than 40 feet required for the main building.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space
to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood.
B. STATED HARDSHIP:
"We need more space for our main floor. We need a bedroom or den or
office or combination thereof, because we have NO private place any
longer for our aging parents and relatives who depend upon our home for
a temporary place to stay or a stop -over place on their way to the
hospital. It was just fine when they were younger because we housed
them in our basement. Now, they cannot walk the stairs to the bathroom.
We have one bathroom and that is on the main level.
From August 1985 through January 4, 1986, the date he passed away, my
82 -year old father was living with us until we were able to put him in
a nursing home (December 1985). He had to stay on the main floor in my
daughter's room and we moved all of her things downstairs which kept us
in turmoil since we have only the one bathroom.
Now we have my husband's 86 -year-old mother from Northern Minnesota
(4 Fours away) who has to visit the University Hospitals periodically
and stay with us on the main floor of our home. Because of her arthritic
condition, she cannot climb the stairs.
At the -same time, my 74 -year-old aunt has osteoporosis and is from the
sane northern Minnesota town (4 hours away) has to stop here on her way
to the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, where she was hospitalized
to have her hip ball changed. She used to be on a cane, and now she is
in a wheelchair. Our bedroom hall area is too small for her to move
in a wheelchair.
Our kitchen is small (10 ft. x 11 ft.). When we are "four" we.manage
to fit at our table in the kitchen just fine. With five or six people
and a wheelchair, we must move to the dining room. The dining room
(9 ft. x 10 ft.) is too small. IF WE PUT THE ADDITION ON, THE DINING ROOM
WOULD BE EXTENDED 8 feet and we could turn the table the other way and A
manage quite well.
is r
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 14, 1987 PAGE 9
We have four cars and try to keep them in the driveway. Our daughter
and son each have their car'parked in the driveway. With the driveway
being moved over, we would also keep half of the present driveway for
their cars.
If we can move our den from the basement and all of the file cabinets
to this extended room upstairs, we would be able to put a bathroom
downstairs in that present area of the den -office.
i
Our son attends a local college and lives at home. Our daughter attends
a college out of state but will be living at home beginning this flay
because she is transferring to a local college and will be living at
home again.
C. ADHININISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
This house faces the side street. The Yiew garage is in the rear of the
lot. Also, adjacent to the rear lot line is a city park. The request
has been reviewed by the City Parks Department and they would have no
objection to this request.
If approved, Staff recommends that no windows be placed in the west wall.
Mr. Clark stated the petitioner would like to convert his existing garage to
living space and add a two -car garage toward the park, resulting in a 4.5 ft. setback
to the west property line. The park was a passive park. There was some play-
ground equipment, but no athletic functions. There might be children or
adults playing Frisbee or Jarts or something like that, and that was the
reason for the stipulation of no windows in the west wall.
Mr. Clark stated they get into the semantics of whether this was really the
side yard or the rear yard. The legal front of the °lb-t.was the short side
of the lot when it is a corner lot, so the front yard was on'itice Creek Blvd.
and the garage would be built in the rear yard. If this was'the side yard,
then the garage could be built within 5 ft. of the property line. With the
house across the street, because of the shape of the lot, it was the side yard.
Mr. Krall stated the main reason for their request was they need more floor
space.
Mr. Barna stated be felt the .variance was created by the way the house faces
on. the .lot.
WTION BY MS. SAVAGE, SECONDED BY MR. SHEREK, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE PUBLIC
HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M.
14r: Sherek stated he felt this was a good plan. If the designation of the
front and side yards were more appropriate, there would be no problem. There
A
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 14, 1987 PAGE 10
would be no distractions from the appearance of the neighborhood, so he
felt the spirit of the code was.being met, and he would vote in favor of
the variance.
Ms Savage stated she agreed that the spirit of the code was being met
because of the park being next to the proposed addition. She would vote in
favor of granting the variance.
Dr. Vos stated he had no problem with this variance as requested.
Mr. Barna stated he agreed with the other Commissioners. If they took the
technicality of the narrow side of the lot being the front of the lot, and
allowed the front of the house to be the front of the house, they would then
have a side yard which was required at 5 ft, and only a 1/2 ft. variance
would be needed.
MOTION BY MS. SAVAGE, SECONDED BY MR. SHEREK, TO APPROVE VARIANCE REQUEST,
VAR X187 -I0, BY ANTHONY KRALL, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205.07.3, D, 3a, OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO DECREASE THE REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 31 FEET TO
4.45 FEET TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXISTING GARAGE INTO LIVING
SPACE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW ATTACHED GARAGE ON LOT 20, BLOCK 4, RICE
CREEK NORTH ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 194 - 69TH AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY,
MINNESOTA, 55432,WITH THE STIPULATION THAT NO WINDOWS BE PLACED IN THE WEST
WALL OF THE ADDITION.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE
BISTODEA , PURS NT To -CH
INCREASE THE PERCENTAGE 0
AND ALL ACCESSORY BUILDIN
205.21.5, D, 3a, OF THE F
ON A STREET SIDE OF A COR
CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITI
94 EXISTING 12 F00 SIDE
BLOCK 1, CITY VIEW ADDITI
MINNESOTA_, 55432.
MOTION BY DR. VOS, SEsph*b
STS, VAR #87-12, BY RICHARD AND JUDI
205.21.5. C. OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CM
BY MS. SAVAGE, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE YAM, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE
>Vice-C
HE NG OPEN AT 8:23 P.M.
airperson Barna read the Administrative Staff Report:
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
101 - 57th Place
VAR #87-12
EY