VAR 02-20STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF FRIDLEY
In the Matter of: ;VAR #02-20
Owner: Jason P. Zemke and Rochelle M. Zemke
APPEALS COMMISSION
PROCEEDINGS VARIANCE
The above entitled matter came before the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley and was heard on the
13th day of November, 2002, on a petition for a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for
the following described property:
To reduce the side yard setback for living area from 10 feet to 7.1 feet to
recognize an existing nonconformity on Lot 2, Block 1, Rice Creek Plaza
North Addition, generally located at 257 69th Avenue NE
IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons:
Approved with 3 stipulations. See attached Appeals Commission minutes
dated November 13, 2002.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
CITY OF FRIDLEY )
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk for the City of Fridley, with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I
have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in
my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in the
County of Anoka on the 9% day of , 2003.
DRAFTED BY:
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk
e �qEA Q
Variances are valid for a period of one year following approval and shall be considered void if not used within
that period.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 13, 2002
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Kuechle called the November 13, 2002, Appeals Commission meeting to order at
7:28 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Larry Kuechle, Ken Vos, Sue Jackson
Members Absent: Blaine Jones, Gary Zinter
Others Present: Stacy Stromberg, Planner
Jason & Rochelle Zemke, 257 - 69h Avenue NE
APPROVE THE OCTOBER 23. 2002, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES:
MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Dr. Vos, to approve the October 23, 2002, Appeals
Commission meeting minutes as presented.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #02-20, BY JASON & ROCHELLE
ZEMKE:
Per Section 205.07.03.d.(2) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the side yard setback
for living area from 10 feet to 7.1 feet to recognize an existing nonconformity on Lot 2,
Block 1, Rice Creek Plaza North Addition, generally located at 257 69h Avenue NE.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:30 P.M.
Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioners are requesting a variance to reduce the side yard setback
from 10 feet to 7.1 feet to recognize an existing non -conformity at their residence at 257 - 690,
Avenue. The recognition of this non -conformity is required prior to issuance of any building
permits for this property.
Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioner's hardship states: "The house was built in 1962, out of
compliance with current zoning ordinances, through no fault of our own. The proposed addition
will not affect compliance with zoning and will not alter the character of the neighborhood."
Ms. Stromberg stated the property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are all surrounding
properties, with the exception of Community Park which is located to the north. The existing
home and garage were built in 1962, and an addition to the garage was constructed in 1973.
The City Code requires a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet between living area and the
side yard property lines.
A
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 13, 2002 PAGE 2
Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioners are planning to construct an 8 foot by 24 foot addition off
the back of their home. This proposed addition will meet all setback and lot coverage
requirements. In order to construct an addition to the home, recognition of the side yard
setback non -conformity is required.
Ms. Stromberg stated City staff has no recommendation as similar variances have been granted
in the past. At 1353 Hillcrest Drive, a variance was granted to reduce the side yard setback 10
feet to 5 feet to recognize an existing non -conformity; and at 561 Lafayette Street, a variance
was granted to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 6.5 feet to recognize an existing
non -conformity. If the variance is granted, staff recommends the following stipulations:
1. The petitioners shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction of
an addition.
2. The addition shall meet all zoning code requirements including, but not limited to,
setbacks, height, and lot coverage.
3. The addition shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished
with complementary siding and color scheme.
Dr. Vos stated this is a visual setback problem. There is 10 feet on the living side and 5 on the
other side. There should be 15 feet between there. If one looks at the plat, you can see it could
have gone the other way, 4 feet on the east side and 5 feet on the other side.
Mr. Kuechkle asked whether there was anything in the file saying how this happened.
Ms. Stromberg stated there wasn't.
Mr. Kuechkle stated it looked like an "as of built survey. Being from 1962 indicates they were
doing "as of surveys.
Mr. Jason Zemke, petitioner, stated he had no concerns with the stipulations.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to close the hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:38 P.M.
Dr. Vos stated he would approve this variance so the petitioners can construct an addition.
Ms. Jackson agreed and stated there is no reason to limit the petitioners' improvement of their
property because of something that happened in 1962.
Mr. Kuechle agreed that it was something over which the petitioners had no control and was
through no fault of their own, and the proposed addition certainly does not affect the setback at
all.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to approve Variance Request, VAR #02-20, to
reduce the side yard setback for living area from 10 feet to 7.1 feet to recognize an existing
nonconformity on Lot 2, Block 1, Rice Creek Plaza North Addition, generally located at 257 69'
Avenue NE., with the following stipulations:
1. The petitioners shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction of an
addition.
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 13, 2002
PAGE
2. The addition shall meet all zoning code requirements including, but not limited to,
setbacks, height, and lot coverage.
3. The addition shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished with
complementary siding and color scheme.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. APPROVAL OF MEETING DATES FOR 2003.
MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Dr. Vos, to approve the 2002 meeting dates.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION & CITY COUNCIL UPDATE
Ms. Stromberg stated she did not have any updates since the Planning Commission has not
met for some time.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to adjourn the meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE NOVEMBER 13, 2002, APPEALS COMMISSION ADJOURNED
AT 7:40 P.M.
R
e
s
pectfully submitted,
Denise M. Letendre ,&
Recording Secretary
ABSTRACT
Receipt # 0 '"
/ZyNon-standard
Date/Time d-•
Document Order /of
PINs
❑ incorrect/No Reference #
Document
❑ Certified Copy/
Recordability��
Filing Fees
Copy/Additional Pg Fees $
❑ Tax Lien/Release
❑ Transfer
Well Cert Fees $
❑ Division
❑ Status
❑ Incomplete Form
❑ Missing Attachment
❑ New legal Description
❑ No Legal Description
❑ GAC
❑ Non-existent Legal Description
rred Specials
E]Part(s) Illegible
�Zchange
DOCUMENT NO.
ANOKA C LINTY I19NESAD&A
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT WAS FILED IN THIS OFFICE
FOR RECORD ON
AT rr,,�((�� nn JAN 22 2003
AND WAS DULY RECORDED.
FEES AND TAXESII�THEAI�OUNT OF $20.00 PAID.
RECEIPT NO. 2003024090
MAUREEN J. DEVINE
ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES
BY DPP
DEPUIYPROPERTYTAX ADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES
FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (763) 571-3450 • FAX (763) 571-1287
APPEALS COMMISSION
ACTION TAKEN NOTICE
November 18, 2002
Jason & Rochelle Zemke
257 69" Place NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Zemke:
On November 13, 2002, the Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved a request for
variance, VAR #02-20, to reduce the side yard setback for living area from 10 feet to 7.1 feet to
recognize an existing non -conformity on Lot 2, Block 1, Rice Creek Plaza North Addition,
generally located at 257 69th Place NE, with the following stipulations:
1. The petitioners shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction of
an addition.
2. The addition shall meet all zoning code requirements including, but not limited to,
setbacks, height, and lot coverage.
3. The addition shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished
with complementary siding and color scheme.
You have one year from the date of the Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If
you cannot begin construction during this time, you must submit a letter requesting an
extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date.
If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3595.
Sincerely,
tu �( rl� v
S mberg
Planner
Please review the above action, sign below, and return the original to the City of Fridley
Planning Department by December 2, 2002.
SS:Is
4 /
1®�
C cur wit tion taken
City of Fridley Land Use Application
VAR #02-20 November 13, 2002
GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION
Applicant:
Jason & Rochelle Zemke
257 69' Avenue NE
Fridley MN 55432
Requested Action:
Variance reducing the required side yard
setback for living area, in order to
recognize an existing non -conformity.
Existing Zoning:
R-1 (Single Family Residential)
Location:
257 69b Avenue NE
Size:
10,280 sq. ft. .24 acres
Existing Land Use:
Single Family Home.
Surrounding Land Use & Zoning:
N: Community Park & Public Facilities
E: Single Family & R-1
S: Single Family & R-1
W: Single Family & R-1
Comprehensive Plan Conformance:
Consistent with Plan
Zoning Ordinance Conformance:
Section 205.07.3.D (2) ((a)) requires a
side yard setback of ten (10) feet
between any living area and side
property lines.
Zoning History:
1959 — Lot is platted.
1962 — Home and garage are built.
1973 — Addition to garage.
Legal Description of Property:
Lot 2, Block 1, Rice Creek Plaza North
Addition
Public Utilities:
Home is connected.
Transportation:
69' Avenue provides access to the
residence.
Physical Characteristics:
Typical suburban lot and landscaping.
SUMMARY OF PROJECT
The petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Zemke are
seeking to reduce the required side yard setback
for living area from 10 feet to 7.1 feet in order
to recognize an existing non -conformity at 257
Wh Avenue.
SUNEMIARY OF HARDSHIP
"The house was built in 1962, out of compliance
with current zoning ordinances, through no fault of
our own. The proposed addition will not affect
compliance with zoning and will not alter the
character of the neighborhood. "
- Jason and Rochelle Zemke
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
City Staff has no recommendation as this request is
within previously granted dimensions.
Similar variance granted:
• VAR #00-19 1352 Hillcrest Drive
Variance to reduce the side yard setback for
living area from 10 ft. to 5 ft. to recognize an
existing non -conformity.
• VAR #99-23 561 Lafayette Street
Variance to reduce the side yard setback for
living area from 10 ft. to 6.5 ft. to recognize an
existing non -conformity.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION/ 60 DAY DATE
City Council — December 9, 2002
60 Day — December 8, 2002
60 Day Agency Action Extension —
February 5, 2002
(Existing Home & Garage)
Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg
VAR #02-20
REQUEST
Petitioners, Jason and Rochelle Zemke are seeking a variance to reduce the required
side yard setback from 10 feet to 7.1 feet in order to recognize an existing non-
conformity at their residence at 257 691 Avenue. The recognition of this non -conformity
is required prior to issuance of any building permits for this property.
SUMMARY OF HARDSHIP
"The house was built in 9962 out of compliance with current zoning ordinances, through
no fault of our own. The proposed addition will not affect compliance with zoning and
will not after the character of the neighborhood."
- Jason and Rochelle Zemke
ANALYSIS
The property is zoned R-1 Single Family as are all surrounding properties, with the
exception of Community Park to the north. The property is located on 69th Avenue,
west of University Avenue. The existing home and garage were built in 1962, with an
addition to the garage being added in 1973.
Existing Home and Garage
City staff has received no comments from neighboring property owners.
CODE REQUIREMENTS
City Code requires a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet between living area and the
side yard property lines. The petitioners are seeking a variance to reduce the side yard
setback from 10 feet to 7.1 feet to simply recognize an existing non -conformity.
Existing Side Yard Setback
The petitioners plan to construct an 8 foot by 24 foot addition off the back of their home.
The proposed addition will meet all setback and lot coverage requirements. As was
stated earlier in order to construct an addition to this home, recognition of the side yard
setback non -conformity is required.
RECOMMENDATIONS
City Staff has no recommendation as this request is within previously granted
dimensions.
Similar variance granted:
• VAR #00-19 1352 Hillcrest Drive
Variance granted to reduce the side yard setback for living area from 10 feet to 5
feet in order to recognize an existing non -conformity.
• VAR #99-23 561 Lafayette Street
Variance granted to reduce the side yard setback for living area from 10 feet to 6.5
feet in order to recognize an existing non -conformity.
STIPULATIONS
Staff recommends that if the variance is granted, the following stipulations be attached.
1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction of an
addition.
2. Addition shall meet all zoning code requirements, including but not limited to
setbacks, height and lot coverage.
3. Addition shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished with
complementary side and color scheme.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 13, 2002
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Kuechle called the November 13, 2002, Appeals Commission meeting to order at
7:28 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Larry Kuechle, Ken Vos, Sue Jackson
Members Absent: Blaine Jones, Gary Zinter
Others Present: Stacy Stromberg, Planner
Jason & Rochelle Zemke, 257 - 69th Avenue NE
APPROVE THE OCTOBER 23. 2002. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES:
MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Dr. Vos, to approve the October 23, 2002, Appeals
Commission meeting minutes as presented.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: VARIANCE REQUEST. VAR #02-20. BY JASON & ROCHELLE
ZEMKE:
Per Section 205.07.03.d.(2) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the side yard setback
for living area from 10 feet to 7.1 feet to recognize an existing nonconformity on Lot 2,
Block 1, Rice Creek Plaza North Addition, generally located at 257 69th Avenue NE.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:30 P.M.
Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioners are requesting a variance to reduce the side yard setback
from 10 feet to 7.1 feet to recognize an existing non -conformity at their residence at 257 - 691'
Avenue. The recognition of this non -conformity is required prior to issuance of any building
permits for this property.
Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioner's hardship states: "The house was built in 1962, out of
compliance with current zoning ordinances, through no fault of our own. The proposed addition
will not affect compliance with zoning and will not alter the character of the neighborhood."
Ms. Stromberg stated the property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are all surrounding
properties, with the exception of Community Park which is located to the north. The existing
home and garage were built in 1962, and an addition to the garage was constructed in 1973.
The City Code requires a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet between living area and the
side yard property lines.
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 13, 2002 PAGE 2
Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioners are planning to construct an 8 foot by 24 foot addition off
the back of their home. This proposed addition will meet all setback and lot coverage
requirements. In order to construct an addition to the home, recognition of the side yard
setback non -conformity is required.
Ms. Stromberg stated City staff has no recommendation as similar variances have been granted
in the past. At 1353 Hillcrest Drive, a variance was granted to reduce the side yard setback 10
feet to 5 feet to recognize an existing non -conformity; and at 561 Lafayette Street, a variance
was granted to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 6.5 feet to recognize an existing
non -conformity. If the variance is granted, staff recommends the following stipulations:
1. The petitioners shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction of
an addition.
2. The addition shall meet all zoning code requirements including, but not limited to,
setbacks, height, and lot coverage.
3. The addition shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished
with complementary siding and color scheme.
Dr. Vos stated this is a visual setback problem. There is 10 feet on the living side and 5 on the
other side. There should be 15 feet between there. If one looks at the plat, you can see it could
have gone the other way, 4 feet on the east side and 5 feet on the other side.
Mr. Kuechkle asked whether there was anything in the file saying how this happened.
Ms. Stromberg stated there wasn't.
Mr. Kuechkle stated it looked like an "as of built survey. Being from 1962 indicates they were
doing "as of surveys.
Mr. Jason Zemke, petitioner, stated he had no concerns with the stipulations.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to close the hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:38 P.M.
Dr. Vos stated he would approve this variance so the petitioners can construct an addition.
Ms. Jackson agreed and stated there is no reason to limit the petitioners' improvement of their
property because of something that happened in 1962.
Mr. Kuechle agreed that it was something over which the petitioners had no control and was
through no fault of their own, and the proposed addition certainly does not affect the setback at
all.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to approve Variance Request, VAR #02-20, to
reduce the side yard setback for living area from 10 feet to 7.1 feet to recognize an existing
nonconformity on Lot 2, Block 1, Rice Creek Plaza North Addition, generally located at 257 69th
Avenue NE., with the following stipulations:
1. The petitioners shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction of an
addition.
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 13, 2002 PAGE 3
2. The addition shall meet all zoning code requirements including, but not limited to,
setbacks, height, and lot coverage.
3. The addition shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished with
complementary siding and color scheme.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. APPROVAL OF MEETING DATES FOR 2003.
MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Dr. Vos, to approve the 2002 meeting dates.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION & CITY COUNCIL UPDATE
Ms. Stromberg stated she did not have any updates since the Planning Commission has not
met for some time.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to adjourn the meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE NOVEMBER 13, 2002, APPEALS COMMISSION ADJOURNED
AT 7:40 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Denise M. Letendre ,
Recording Secretary
City of Variance Request
Fridley #02-20
Q
LEGEND N Sources:
Fridley Engineering
Jason and Rochelle Zemke Fridley GIS
257 69th Avenue Anoka County GIS
Fridley 55432
Map Date: 10/28/02
G'fYOF
FRIDLEY
FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER - 6.31 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY. MN 55432 - (763) 571-3450 • FAX (763) 571-1237
October 21, 2002
Jason and Rochelle Zemke
257 69`5 Avenue NE
Fridley MN 55432
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Zemke:
Per Minnesota Statute 15.99, local government units are required to notify land use
applicants within 10 working days if their land use applications are complete. We
officially received your application for a variance on October 11, 2002. This letter
serves to inform you that your application is complete.
Your Variance application hearing and discussion will take place at the City of Fridley
Appeals Commission Meeting on November 13, 2002 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council
Chambers at 6431 University Avenue. If your variance application needs to be
reviewed by the City Council, the meeting will be held on December 9, 2002 at 7:30 in
the City Council Chambers.
If you have any questions regarding this letter or the process, please feel free to contact
me at 763-572-3595.
Sincerely, l
Stacy tromberg
Planner-'
C-02-127
_i
CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
(763) 572-3592
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR:
Residential Commercial/Industrial Signs
PROPERTY INFORMATION: site plan required for submittal, see attached)
Address:
Property Identification Number: ZZ G+6 ®2
Legal Description: Lot e Block _ ract/Addition
Current Zoning: Square Footage/acreage: a Z-5 'o
Reason for Variance: -r#g #aj5L I lUA911-f1y /%Z dzroF W/M go-aw rzdy ✓4 �l�A►PP�g
rclo
a�i RaT"-A o -W- P"®sOb A RD17 241 WIUAM7- .FFA C4,MPUMkO iJcr# ZOVrN6 AND �9f ,'-Mdr
CAARA�7eP- 6F=
Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license?
Yes No If Yes, which City?
If Yes, what type of business?
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No
FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title)
(Contract purchasers: Fee owners must sign this form rior to processing.)
NAME: J45W PSNI0- , r� M. c z
ADDRESS: i
DAYTIME PHONE: SIGNATURE/DATE:
PETITIONER INFORMATION
NAME: n
ADDRESS: AJi5 AV
DAYTIME PHONE:I&.3 SIGNATURE/DATE:
Section of City Code:
FEES
Fee: $100.00 for commercial, industrial, or signs:
Fee: $60.00 for residential roperties: Receipt #: Received By:
Application Number: 114 4 b
Scheduled Appeals Commission Date: n'j l aooU ®–
Scheduled City Council Date: Rn A
10 Day Application Com lete Notification Da e: At
60 Day Date: _ �u,� G 1 .J� �
VARIANCE APPLICATION
SUBMISSION CHECKLIST
The following shall be the minimum submission requirements to the Appeals
Commission. Applications will not be accepted if the following is not submitted:
RESIDENTIAL:
ITEM
SUBMITTED
RECEIVER'S
COMPLETE
REVIEWER'S
INITIALS
INITIALS
Completed application, with fee
(Application is considered complete if
all blanks are completed, and both fee
owner
and.petitioner have signed.)
Scaled site plan of property showing
north arrow, existing and proposed
structures, lot and block number,
adjacent street names, and buildings
on adjacent
lots within 10 feet of the common lot
lines.
Elevation of building and description of
materials.
Narrative of proposed building, and
summary of hardship.
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL:
ITEM
SUBMITTED
RECEIVER'S
COMPLETE
REVIEWER'S
INITIALS
INITIALS
Completed application, with fee
(Application is considered complete if
all blanks are completed, and both fee
owner and petitioner have signed.)
Scaled site plan of property showing
north arrow, existing and proposed
structures, lot and block number,
adjacent street names, and buildings
on adjacent lots within 10 feet of the
common lot lines.
Elevation of building and description of
materials.
Landscape plan for all projects
requiring a parking lot expansion of
four 4 or mores aces.
Grading and drainage plan.
Erosion control plan.
Calculations for stormwater runoff.
n
►k�� tri �.hi� Vr ULt,VYANGj
Application for a Certificate of Occupancy shall be mads ten (10) days prior
to the use Or Occupancy of Oxy structure for which A building permit has been
issued, std said structure shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate
of 00cupancy has been issued.
SIVOI:FI n -211l :�:'F::tri 30 "ZOUN'DrYl $0 3Z;',^FiFZ2I.i0
= - ..
• �w
.��� : ' 69. -LS_
E.9 V41
-�
^
��7� Z SM0110A Sv 038la293q
t U
,
•
-Aa 6.tLJi is &i.0 ��tF3 riCL J
ZLOO d 'IW
BGbfl'9 'IW
}63NONd3131
Z SIIOdV3NNIW 'DNIO-Iine 1VNOIIYN got 1334 HOW 1. ja1VOS
V VIVd 1NIVS "3AV AlISU3A1Nn fret 0�
1130.4 13-41
'Oa wnnomoanw •a •3 '1H1
CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION
TO:
Residents within 350 feet of 257 69th Avenue NE
CASE NUMBER:
VAR #02-20
APPLICANT:
Jason & Rochelle Zemke
257 69`x' Avenue NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Petitioner or representative must be at meeting.
PURPOSE:
To reduce the side yard setback for living area from 10 feet to
7.1 feet to recognize an existing nonconformity
LOCATION OF
PROPERTY:
257 69 h Avenue NE
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION:
Lot 2, Block 1, Rice Creek Plaza North
DATE AND TIME
Appeals Commission Meeting, Wednesday, November 13,
OF HEARING:
2002, at 7:30 p.m.
The Appeals Commission meetings are televised live the
night of the meeting on Channel 17.
PLACE OF
Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers
HEARING:
6431 University Avenue
HOW TO
1. You may attend hearings and testify.
PARTICIPATE:
2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Paul Bolin,
Planning Coordinator, or Stacy Stromberg, Planner, at
6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or fax at
763-571-1287.
SPECIAL
Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an
ACCOMMODATION:
interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require
auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500
no later than November 6, 2002. (TDD 763-572-3534)
ANY QUESTIONS:
Contact Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator, at 763-572-3599,
or Stacy Stromberg, Planner, at 763-572-3595.
Mailing Date: November 1, 2002
THOMPSON ROBERT W ZEMKE JASON P & ROCHELLE M ANOKA COUNTY OF
218 69TH AVE NE 257 69TH AVE NE Bad Address 3
FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 ANOKA,MN 55303
BUCHANAN PAUL K & MICHIKO T
260 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
CURRENT RESIDENT
UNIVERSITY AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 0
EARLEY DENNIS P
267 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
GILL RICHARD F & MILDRED H
273 RICE CREEK BLVD NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
KLEZENBERG KEVIN & LAURIE
238 69TH PL NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
LANGENBRUNNER JULIE A
281 RICE CREEK BLVD NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
MADSEN JEFF
280 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
PEARSON DENNIS HAROLD
266 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
CARLSON GLEN C & ANGELA R
217 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
DOHERTY RICHARD & AMY
225 69TH PL NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
FALLDIN KENNETH E & HAZEL A
269 RICE CREEK BLVD NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
HUGHES JOSEPH F & LOIS C
295 RICE CREEK BLVD NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
KOZLOWSKI ANNA & PRZEMYSLAW
252 69TH PL NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
LARSON ERIC J & KELLY M
232 69TH PL NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
MURPHY JOAN M
242 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
PEDERSON KENNETH P
277 RICE CREEK BLVD NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
CARLSON RONALD D & CAROL A
241 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
DUNCAN NEIL D & JANAHN A
233 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
GARRETT ROBERT II & NOVAK JOHN
274 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
JOHNSON SCOTT A & LYNN M
285 RICE CREEK BLVD NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
KUEHNI MELVIN M & JOAN Y
246 69TH PL NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
LECLAIR LONNIE L & MARSHA J
234 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
NORBERG DANIEL A & SOPHIA A
249 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
ROSTAD DEAN ALAN & BARBARA
6890 UNIVERSITY AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432
RUUSKA MARVIN W & BARBARA 0 SIMONS RONALD A & JANICE L SNYDER BRIAN D & JENNIFER R
225 69TH AVE NE 289 RICE CREEK BLVD NE 226 69TH AVE NE
FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432