PRE 2010 DOCSCity of Fridley, BE
B ::'
1: Y
Owner: Builder
Addmn Address
,. O ION F B WING
No. erect A t - Part t
Lot Block Addition or Sub-Dfvisio
Corner Lot _ Inside Lot Setback Side
Sewer Elevation .._,_ Foundation Elevation
DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING
To Used asFr.
nt Depth Height_ Sq. Ft. Cu.
Finn Depth light •` -Sq. Ft- Cu. Ft.
f1. WOW
Type of Construction Est. cost"_b be completed
APPROVED SUEj_""C_T TO
%170
CITY O.F FRI
• L -t
In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above I agree to do
the proposed work in accordance with the description above set forth and in compliance with 21 provisions of
ordinances of the city of Fridley.
Inconsideration of the payment of a fee of $ F ,a"@r� permit is hereby granted to
to construct the building or addition as described above. This permit is granted upon
the express condition that the person to whom it is granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work
done in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of
Fridley, Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings
within the city limits and this permit may be revoked at any timeupon violation of any of the provisions of said
ordinances. �,'"a V? .I°"'+►.
ding Inspector
f
NOTICE
This permit does not cover the construction, installation for wiring, plumbing, gas heating, sewer or water. Be auto to we
the Building. Inspector „fele separate permits for these items.
6 -
Application for Power Plants and Heating, Cooling. Ventilation, ReFrygeration and
Air Conditioning Systems and Devices
PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE
GRAVITY WARM AIR: RATE TOTAL
Furnace Shell & Duct Work .......................... 8.00 $
Replacement of Furnace 5.00 $
Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 ................. 5.00 $
Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 ............... 2.50 $
MECH. WARM AIR
Furnace Shell & Duct Work to 120,000 BTU ............ 8.00 $
each add. 60,000 BTU ....................... 2.00 $
Replacement of Furnace ............................. 5.00 $
Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 ................. 5.00 $
Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 .............. 2.50- $
STEAM or HOT WATER SYSTEM
Furnace Shell & Lines—to 400 sq. ft. EDR Steam ......
8.00
$
Furnace Shell & Line—to 640 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water
. 8.00
$
Each add. 200 sq. ft. EDR Steam ......................
2.50
$
Each add. 320 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water ..................
2.50
$ Z �'
OIL BURNER—to 3 gal. per hour ......................
. 5.00
$
over 3 gal. per hour—See Fee Schedule
GAS BURNER (up to 400,000 BTU) .....................
. 5.00
$
GAS FITTING FEES:
NO RATE TO�
1st 3 Fixtures ......................
x $1.50
$
Additional Fixtures .................
x .50
$
Gas Range to 200,000 BTU ...........
x 2.00
$
AIR CONDITIONING
$
FAN HEATING SYSTEM See Fee Schedule
VENTILATING SYSTEM
$
ALTERATIONS & REPAIRS TOTAL FEE
$
ROUGH
FINAL
Dept. of Bldgs. Phone SU 4-7470
Location x
City of Fridley:
The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein
specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances
and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts
and representations stated in this application are true and correct°
Fridley, Minn —
Owner
).-A= -�t-
Kind (
Used a
To be
Estimated Cost, $- ``a C✓U ---
Old—New. Building Permit No. r4 Permit No. --�2
DESCRIPTION OF W
HEATING or POWER PLANTS --S am, t Wa arm Air—No
Ste'
Trade Name _�r�mA� S��izeey No
Capacity Sq. Ft. E.D.R �'���BTU H.P.
Total Connected Load Kind of Fuel.
BURNER — Trade Name Size No-,
Capacity.
(REMARKS—OVER)
4z 2M
Sq. Ft. E.D.R BTU H.P.
r
Signe
By—
.J�eafisa� si"'iaCU
Busines$¢ghWie70 .
.c
LOCATION 181 - 79th �vl enu N - E . ' OWNER
v
LOT 3-4-5-6 BLOCK 4 ADD. Spring Brook Park
Permit No. Construction
Dat®
Contractor
Cost
Final
5889
Building Permit, 8 Unit
Apartment
5/10/62
Ja-Ken, Inc.
$62.00
2536
Plumbing Permit
10/26/62
Hoglund Plumbing Co
$74.00
7/15/63
5331
Water, Sewer, Meter
10/31/62
Hoglund Plumbing Co
$145.91
2158
Heating Permit
11/8/62
Ethier-Stolpe-Paar
$17.00
3504
Electrical Permit
12/5/62
Royal Electric Co.
$48.35
4/11/63
3545
Electrical Permit
12/24/62
American Electric
$2.00
1/4/63
3504
Electrical Rough
12/7/62
2536
Plumbing Rough
12/6/62
2536
Plumbing Rough
12/11/62
(Rejected Gas Line)
2536
Plumbing Rough
12/12/62
Air Test
2536
Plumbing Rough
12/14/62
Gas OK
MEMO T0:
FRO`,1:
DATE:
WMO:
CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR
SCTING CITY MANAGER
ROVE1,4BER 9, 1970
#234-119-70
' Councilman Kreider called today and asked what the code
was when some of the buildings north of 79th Avenue were built.
lair. Breider felt the general appearance of the buildings, fences,
etc. in these areas leave something to be desired. He feels that
if there is any way that the City can force a landscaping code or
plan they should do it.
Mr.. Breider asked if one of the Inspectors could be put on
this project to really go over the building permit applications
.in detail and to make an inspection of all the buildings in the
general -area to determine whether there is something that can
be done by the City to force these people to do some landscaping
and upgrading of the appearance of their properties.
11/24/70
I
The surveys of the buildings in this area have been
completed and attached is a summary report of the survey.
The complete report is over one hundred pages long and can
be reviewed in the Building Inspection Office.
We hope to work with the property owners to see that they
improve their property's appearance and landscaping early next
summer.
We will seek voluntary compliance as much as possible
and then proceed with the legal actions available to the City.
ASIM INI QURESHI, P.E.
City Engineer -Director of Planning
1
' Councilman Kreider called today and asked what the code
was when some of the buildings north of 79th Avenue were built.
lair. Breider felt the general appearance of the buildings, fences,
etc. in these areas leave something to be desired. He feels that
if there is any way that the City can force a landscaping code or
plan they should do it.
Mr.. Breider asked if one of the Inspectors could be put on
this project to really go over the building permit applications
.in detail and to make an inspection of all the buildings in the
general -area to determine whether there is something that can
be done by the City to force these people to do some landscaping
and upgrading of the appearance of their properties.
11/24/70
I
The surveys of the buildings in this area have been
completed and attached is a summary report of the survey.
The complete report is over one hundred pages long and can
be reviewed in the Building Inspection Office.
We hope to work with the property owners to see that they
improve their property's appearance and landscaping early next
summer.
We will seek voluntary compliance as much as possible
and then proceed with the legal actions available to the City.
ASIM INI QURESHI, P.E.
City Engineer -Director of Planning
N
Report On Area North Of 79th Way As Requested By The City Manager In Response_
To A Request By Councilman Breider
181 Ely'Street N.E.: Building Permit #6229 issued 10/18/62
Building Permit #9116 issued 12/7/66
A building permit for construction of ad6.tional storage area was grant..d
to Aladdin Pools Incorporated on December 7, 1966, subject to the following
conditions;
1. All exposed concrete block (old and new) be painted.
2. A 7 foot redwood fence (stained or painted) be provided to enclose
the storage yard.
3. Crushed rock or blacktop (or better) be provided off Ashton, North
of'the fence and also front drive and parking lot. The remainder of
the lot outside the fence to be sodded or landscaped.
4. A Certificate of Occupancy be issued when all the requirements are met.
Inspection shows the following discrepancies;
1. Areas to be sodded or seeded are overgrown with weeds.
2. Fence has not been painted or stained. One section in the Northwest
corner is falling down.
3. Only the front of the building has been painted. All other areas are
unpainted block.
4. There is no driveway North of the fence.
5. No Certificate of Occupancy has been issued.
We can use stipulations of building permit for landscaping.
161 Ely Street N.E.: Building Permit #5790 issued 3/2/62
Board of Appeals variance to reduce front yard setback from 100 feet to
44 feet 6 inches to build an addition was granted on December 1, 1965, and
approved by Council but a building permit for the above addition apparently
was never issued.
There is some planting and landscaping on the front of building (South side).
There is concrete curb in front of the building and on the East side of the
front parking area. Some precast concrete bumpers are stacked in parking area.
There is a circular drive with some rock but most of the area is dirt.
Most areas are overgrown with weeds.
Parking area can be required under 1961 City Ordinance and lots can be
maintained undei pr9sent nuisance ordinances.
Compliance to the 1969 City Code can be required by January 1, 1973.
Report on Area North of 79th Way
Requested by City Manager Page 2
160 Ely Street N.E.: Building Permit #5529 issued 9/11/61
Building Permit #6824 issued 11/5/63
Original building permit stipulates front of building to be stucco and
brick with side yard setback on East to be 5 feet and front yard setback to
be 35 feet.
The building permit for the addition in 1963 stipulates a front yard
setback of 35 feet and a side yard setback of 20 feet. The sketch attached to
the building permit shows the 20 foot side yard on the West side of the
building. The sketch also shows a blacktop parking area in front of the building.
Inspection shows no blacktopping in front of building and no landscaping
of any kind. Front yard setback appears too short.
Some improvements could be made by compliance with 1963 building permit,
also by using 1963 Zoning Ordinance in effect at time of second building permit.
Other compliance can be made by January 1, 1973.
140 Liberty Street N.E.: Building Permit #5159 issued 3/16/61
Building Permit #10,532 issued 1/2/70
Original permit stipulated that front of building must be stucco or
brick or both. Front yard setback was 35 feet and East side yard was 0 feet.
The second building permit was for interior alterations only.
No stipulations were noted on the building permits.
This building should be considered with 148 Liberty Street because there
is only five feet between buildings and originally the permit was granted for
a common wall.
148 Liberty Street N.E.: Building Permit #6380.issued 3/11/63,
Originally, permit was granted for addition to existing building at
140 Liberty.but nearly 1 year after permit was issued (2/21/64) apparently a
verbal arrangement was made to separate the two buildings with the second
addition being added to the existing building as per permit plans. There
are now two separate buildings approximately 5 feet apart.
Inspection shows one concrete drive up to East end of building and one
concrete drive to loading ramp at West end of building. Rest of lot is dirt
with no landscaping.
Parking, and landscaping can be enforced under some provisions of the
1963 City Ordinances, and balance by January 1, 1973.
Report on Area North of 79th Way
Requested by City Manager Page 3
151 Longfellow Street N.E.: Building Permit #6398 issued 3/28/63
A front yard variance from 100 feet to 60 feet was granted on March 21,
1962 to allow erection of the above building. The Board of Appeals also
stipulated that the building was to be 50 feet from the West property line.
The Council concurred.
A sketch attached to the Board of Appeals minutes shows a building
68 feet by 70 feet with the West side 50 feet from the property line.
The building permit issued was for a building 85 feet by 44 feet. The
building on the site is considerably less than 50 feet from the West property
line.
Stipulations on the building permit stated that the parking lot and
driveway must be blacktopped with the balance of the front to be sodded and
planted.
A recent complaint was issued against this property because water and oil
were running from this building into a shallow pool adjoining the residential
property on the West and the water and oil seeped onto.the lawn. There were
also complaints of illegal parking and poor maintenance.
The owner was notified and the vehicles were parked in a different area;
the lot was cleaned up; interior masonry work eliminated the water and oil flow;
and the owner has stated that a six foot screen fence will be erected between
his property and the residential property West of the building. The fence is
to be done by November 24, 1970 and the holes along the west side of the building
filled shortly thereafter.
Compliance in this case is voluntary, for the most part, but compliance
can be obtained under 1963 Ordinances and present ordinances.
181 -79th Way N.E.: Building Permit #5889 issued 5/10/62 P.
This is an 8 unit apartment building which is landscaped and being
maintained in an adequate manner.
211 -79th Way N.E.: Building Permit -#5751 issued 2/10/62
This is an8 unit apartment building which is landscaped and being
maintained in an adequate manner.
231 -79th Way N.E._: Building Permit #10,059 issued 12/10/68
This is a..7 unit apartment building which is landscaped and being
maintained in an adequate manner.
4
Report on Area North of 79th Way
Requested by City Manager Page 4
136 Liberty Street N.E.:
This is a nonconforming use of an automobile junk yard. According to the
Zoning Ordinance this may continue as a nonconforming use if it is enclosed in
a fenced area.
The owner has been notified to move all vehicles onto his own property
and fence the area from public view.
The fence has been started and one section is complete. Materials and
equipment are on the site. Vehicles are being moved from adjoining property.
CONCLUSION:
It seems although no specific area was mentioned that the area North of
79th Way mentioned by Mr. Breider would most likely be the industrial buildings
along the West side of the railroad tracks. The apartment buildings along
79th Way seem adequate in appearance and maintenance and the residential
area for the most, also appears adequate.
The industrial area is being improved in those areas where we have
proper authority under applicable ordinances and some problems will be
eliminated this fall.
However, a general plan for the area should be worked out so that a
concerted effort could be made to improve the whole area at once, probably
beginning next spring. In the meantime specific ordinance violations such
as undue amount -of litter or poor maintenance can be corrected as they occur.
AL D. BAGSTAD
Building Off cial-Inspector
ADB/mh