VAR 90-16r • ,
920.945
STATE OF MINNESOTA APPEALS COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF FRIDLEY
In the Matter of a variance, VAR #90-16
VARIANCE
Steve Bodinski , Owner
The above entitled matter came before the Appeals Commission of the City of
Fridley and was heard on the 7th day of August , 19 90 ,
on a petition for a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning
Ordinance, for the following described property:
To reduce the setback on the street side of a corner lot from 17.5 feet to
12.5 feet; to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 34.31 feet, to
correct an existing nonconformance to the City Code, on Lot 3, Block 1,
Oliver Olson Addition, the same being 110 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or
reasons:
See Appeals Commission meeting minutes of August 7, 1990.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
CITY OF FRIDLEY )
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, Shirley A. Haapala, City Clerk for the City of Fridley with and in for
said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing
copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved
in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of
the whole thereof.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at, the City of
Fr ley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the /d day of
DRAFTED BY:
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
^I
SHIRLEY A. 11AAPALA, CITY CLERK
Variances are valid for a period of one year following approval an eS r�,J:.beo.
considered void if not -used within that period.
• ( SEAL)
0 0 _Mnckj�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
AppEALs COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 7, 1990
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Savage called the August 7, 1990, Appeals Cission
meeting to order at 7:32 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Diane Savage, Cliff Johnson, C yISmith
Members Absent: Larry Kuechle, Ren Vos
Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coo dinator
Michele McPherson, Plann g Assistant
Steve Bodinski, 15515 U versity Avenue N.E.
Dareld & Carolyn Kelso 1365 73rd Avenue N.E.
Richard Harris, 6200 verview Terrace
Warren Stock, 289 Li rty Street
Marlys Jensen, 7763 lm St. N.E.
David Asplund, 771 Elm St. N.E.
Francis Anderson, 748 Elm St. N.E.
Lois Anderson, 7 48 Elm St. N.E.
Mary Novack, 21 7th Way N.E.
Mr. Schultz, 7 51 Elm Street
-1111 , eon wwomla .c r-nMMTSSTON MINUTES:
NOTION by Mr. Johnson, second by Ms. Smith, to approve the July
24, 1990, Appeals Commission inutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTI G AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSL .
1.
A. Pursuantt Section 214.11.02.B of the Fridley City Code
to increa a the maximum square footage of a free-standing
sign fr 80 square feet to 104 square feet;
B. PursFt'frontage; t to Section 214.11.02.A of the Fridley City Code
to alow a second free-standing sign along the same
str
To al w an existing 24 square foot free-standing sign to
remai on Lots 4, except the northerly 35 feet, Lots 5 and 6,
Bloc 1, Paco Industrial Park, the same being 7110-7190
Un' ersity Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432.
•IIGIIST 7 GE
APPEALS CONXIBSION MEETING,
Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner wa unable to come to the meeting
due to a family emergency. Th item has therefore been tabled
until the Appeals Commission eeting of August 21.
2. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #90-16, By STEVE
BODINSKI:
A. Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D. (2). (c) ((1)) of the
Fridley City Code to reduce the setback on the street
side of a corner lot from 17.5 feet to 12.5 feet;
B. Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City
Code to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to
34.31 feet;
To correct an existing nonconformance to the City Code, on Lot
3, Block 1, Oliver Olson Addition, the same being 110 - 64 1/2
Way N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432.
MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. Johnson, to open the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:34 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated this request by the petitioner is for Lot 3,
Block 1, of the Oliver Olson Addition. It is zoned R-1, Single
Family, as are the parcels to the east, south, north and west. The
petitioner has recently completed construction of a single family
dwelling with an attached two -car garage. This request is to bring
the property into conformance with the Code to correct the
nonconformances on the side corner setback adjacent to the public
right of way on East River Road and also the front yard setback.
Ms. McPherson researched the reasons why a variance would be
necessary for a recently constructed home. When the building
permit was applied for, the petitioner presented a layout that was
more parallel to the 64 1/2 Way right-of-way. The house is
actually canted toward 64 1/2 Way right of way which puts the house
into a nonconconforming situation. The Building Inspector checks
to see that the building is laid out to meet the setback
requirements. He had checked the front yard setback and had the
contractor make some adjustments, which were not fully made. At
that time he could not check the side corner setback as the
contractor had placed a majority of the fill from the lot along
the East River Road right of way. The encroachments do not appear
to cause any site line problems as 64 1/2 Way is a right in, right
out only from East River Road.
Ms. McPherson stated the Appeals Commission could deny the variance
and require that the garage be reconstructed to meet the setback
requirements. However, the encroachments do not adversely impact
PPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. ADGIIST 7. 1990 PAGE
the surrounding property or impact the public safety. Further, the
petitioner would incur additional expenses and it could result in
an unusual architectural appearance. Because the amount of
correction is minor, it may be more practical to grant the variance
than to reconstruct the house. Staff therefore recommends approval
of the variance as requested.
Mr. Bodinski attended the meeting, but had no additional comments.
NOTION by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Ms. Smith, to close the public
hearing. -
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIIBLICRSO�NSAVAGEIGLOSED AT D8e38
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE
P.M.
Commission members had no further comments regarding the request.
NOTION by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Ms. Smith, to approve Variance
Request, VAR #90-16, to correct the existing nonconformance to the
City Code, on Lot 3, Block 1, Oliver Olson Addition, the same being
110 - 64 1/2 Way N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Ms. Dacy stated that the variance was now considered approved since
there were no objections from the neighborhood and the Commission
agrees with the staff recommendation.
3. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST VAK $yV--X131 -- --- the
NELSON: Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c)•((1))
Fridley City Code, to reduce the setback on the s et side
of a corner lot from 17.5 feet to 10 feet, t allow the
expansion of an existing garage, on the west feet of Lot
20, Auditor's Subdivision #129, the same ing 1365 - 73rd
Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432.
MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. J son, to open the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING , CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY THE PUBLIC BEARING OPEN AT 7:40 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated a property is located at the intersection
of Evert Court and rd Avenue. The property is zoned R-2, Two
Family Dwelling. Property to the east, north and west are also
zoned R-2, an o the south, M-2, Heavy Industrial.
Ms. McP rson stated the petitioner is requesting a variance to
expa an exiting single garage to a two -car garage and utilize the
e ting driveway and curb cuts. If the petitioner's lot had been
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. AUGUST 7. 1990 PAGE4
an interior lot, the Code allows a garage to ba expanded to within
3 feet of the lot line. However, this is a corner lot and the 7.5
foot setback from the property line needs to be maintained
Ms. McPherson stated Evert Court was construYause
y the ty in
1978 after the house was already existing. Ty the provided
for the house to meet the 17.5 foot setbquir went. In
reviewing the plat, approximately 8 feet wad t the lot to
meet the setback requirement. The lot is appt y 10,000 sq.
ft. with an approximate rear yard of 89.7 he petitioner
does have the alternative to construct a dgarage in the
rear yard facing Evert Court. There is a nd it could be
adjusted for a driveway cut for access. se there is an
alternative which meets the Code requts, staff is
recommending the commission deny the variancest.
NOTION by Mr.ohnson, seconded by Ms. S th, to accept the two
handouts as provided by the petitioner.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CSA PERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Nelson stated he understands there is the possibility of
putting a gar ge in the rear y d; however, he would like to
convert the existing single car g rage into a double garage. Staff
has stated in the report that a existing garage could be made
into living space. The curr t garage was designed as a garage
and, when built, an inter' r entrance to the house was not
constructed. The existing use is a 4 -bedroom house and they do
not need additional living space. The structure would remain as
a garage. Building in a rear yard would require a change in
landscape. If � the garag were built in the back, they could not
use the existing drivew and curb cut and they would have to make
a significant jcul in a embankment for an entrance from Evert
Court. A tree would eed to be cut down along the fence line and
a power pole is clos to where the entrance would have to be. This
would also mean additional cost. Since receiving this
recommendation, Mr Nelson did some checking on the cost and found
it would be appr imately 2 1/2 t mes more expensive. Regarding
the current use f the area, there is an existing chain link fence
that is visual in line with wher the addition would be so there
would be some conformity with exi ting appearance. A second car
currently si s on the area of a driveway where the proposed
driveway wo ld be. Going back othe original ordinance, the
Public ose served by the requirement, the purpose of the
ordinanc was to maintain high t affic visibility. Mr. Nelson
stated at the addition to the garage would not incur traffic
visibi ty limitations. A car rrently sits where the garage
would e. He was not clear on the line of site into the neighbors
yar From his visualization, he ould not see where it encroaches
on a line of site nor is a hindr nce because of a 39 foot setback
from the curb. Evert Court is a cul de sac. In his drawing of
E
11
92095
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA
FRIDLEY CITY CLERK
6421 UNIVERSITY AVE NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
3>
oF� �F �uNTr
STATE OF MINNESOM COUNTY OF ANOKA
I hereby cerdfY that the "stru'
rnent was Md in this OMCO Tar recasd
an the
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA
FRIDLEY CITY CLERK
6421 UNIVERSITY AVE NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
CITYOF
FRIDLEY
FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287
APPEALS COMMISSION
ACTION TAKEN NOTICE
August 9, 1990
Steve Bodinski
15515 University Avenue N.E.
Anoka, MN 55304
Dear Mr. Bodinski:
On Tuesday, August 7, 1990, the Fridley Appeals Commission
officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #90-16, to
reduce the side yard setback on the street side of a corner lot
from 17.5 feet to 12.5 feet and to reduce the front yard setback
from 35 feet to 34.31 feet, to correct an existing nonconformance
to the City Code, on Lot 3, Block 1, Oliver Olson Addition, the
same being 110 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
Since/rel
j Ba ara
Da
l Planning Coordinator
V
BD::ls
Please review the above action, sign the statement below, and
return one copy to the City of Fridley. Community Development
Department by August 20, 1990.
0
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. AUGUST 7. 1990 PAGE 2
Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner was unable to come to the meeting
due to a family emergency. This item has therefore been tabled
until the Appeals Commission meeting of August 21.
2. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST. VAR #90-16. BY STEVE
BODINSKI:
A. Pursuant to Section 2 05. 07. 03. D. (2) . (c) ( (1) ) of the
Fridley City Code to reduce the setback on the street
side of a corner lot from 17.5 feet to 12.5 feet;
B. Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City
Code to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to
34.31 feet;
To correct an existing nonconformance to the City Code, on Lot
3, Block 1, Oliver Olson Addition, the same being 110 - 64 1/2
Way N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432.
MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. Johnson, to open the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:34 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated this request by the petitioner is for Lot 3,
Block 1, of the Oliver Olson Addition. It is zoned R-1, Single
Family, as are the parcels to the east, south, north and west. The
petitioner has recently completed construction of a single family
dwelling with an attached two -car garage. This request is to bring
the property into conformance with the Code to correct the
nonconformances on the side corner setback adjacent to the public
right of way on East River Road and also the front yard setback.
Ms.. McPherson researched the reasons why a variance would be
necessary for a recently constructed home. When the building
permit was applied for, the petitioner presented a layout that was
more parallel to the 64 1/2 Way right-of-way. The house is
actually canted toward 64 1/2 Way right of way which puts the house
into a nonconconforming situation. The Building Inspector checks
to see that the building is laid out to meet the setback
requirements. He had checked the front yard setback and had the
contractor make some adjustments, which were not fully made. At
that time he could not check the side corner setback as the
contractor had placed a majority of the fill from the lot along
the East River Road right of way. The encroachments do not appear
to cause any site line problems as 64 1/2 Way is a right in, right
out only from East River Road.
Ms. McPherson stated the Appeals Commission could deny the variance
and require that the garage be reconstructed to meet the setback
requirements. However, the encroachments do not adversely impact
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 7, 1990 PAGE 3
the surrounding property or impact the public safety. Further, the
petitioner would incur additional expenses and it could result in
an unusual architectural appearance. Because the amount of
correction is minor, it may be more practical to grant the variance
than to reconstruct the house. Staff therefore recommends approval
of the variance as requested.
Mr. Bodinski attended the meeting, but had no additional comments.
MOTION by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Ms. Smith, to close the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:38
P.M.
Commission members had no further comments regarding the request.
MOTION by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Ms. Smith, to approve Variance
Request, VAR #90-16, to correct the existing nonconformance to the
City Code, on Lot 3, Block 1, Oliver Olson Addition, the same being
110 - 64 1/2 Way N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Ms. Dacy stated that the variance was now considered approved since
there were no objections from the neighborhood and the Commission
agrees with the staff recommendation.
3. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REOUEST. VAR #90-19. BY DARELD DEAN
NELSON: Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((1)) of the
Fridley City Code, to reduce the setback on the street side
of a corner lot from 17.5 feet to 10 feet, to allow the
expansion of an existing garage, on the west 67 feet of Lot
20, Auditor's Subdivision #129, the same being 1365 - 73rd
Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432.
NOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. Johnson, to open the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:40 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the property is located at the intersection
of Evert Court and 73rd Avenue. The property is zoned R-2, Two
Family Dwelling. Property to the east, north and west are also
zoned R-2, and to the south, M-2, Heavy Industrial.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting a variance to
expand an exiting single garage to a two -car garage and utilize the
existing driveway and curb cuts. If the petitioner's lot had been
•
STAFF REPORT
APPEALS DATE August 7, 1990
CITY OF PLANNING COMMISSION DATE
HUDL>rY CITY COUNCIL DATE AUT14OR r/lS
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
LOCATION 110 - 64 1/2 Way
SITE DATA
SIZE
DENSITY
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LAND USES
& ZONING
UTM'ES
PARK DEDICATION
ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
CONFORMANCE TO
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
COMPATIBILITY WITH
ADJACENT USES & ZONING
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS `
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
APPEALS RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
VAR #90-16
'Steve sodi.nski
To reduce the front yard setback fran 35 ft. to 34.31 ft.;
and to reduce the side yard setback on the street side of a
corner lot from 17.5 ft. to 12.5 ft.
Approximately 10,275 sq. ft.
R-1, Single Family ]welling
R-1, Single Family Dwelling, to E, S, N, & W
Staff Report
VAR #90-16, 110 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
Page 2
A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT:
Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((I)) requires a side yard setback
on a street side of a corner lot to be not less than 17.5
feet.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a
higher degree of traffic visibility and to reduce the "line
of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard.
Section 205.07.03.D.(1) requires a front yard setback of not
less than 35 feet.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-
street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way
and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building
"line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard.
B. STATED HARDSHIP:
None stated.
C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
Request
The petitioner, Steve Bodinski, is requesting that two
variances be granted, one to reduce the front yard setback
from 35 feet to 34.31 feet and the other to reduce the side
yard setback on the street side of a corner lot from 17.5 feet
to 12.5 feet, to correct an existing encroachment. The
request is for Lot 3, Block 1, of the Oliver Olson Addition,
the same being 110 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
Site
A single family dwelling unit with an attached two car garage
was recently constructed on the parcel. The site is zoned R-
1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the parcels to the north,
east, south, and west.
Analysis
In reviewing the variance request, staff researched the
building permit application for reasons as to why the variance
is necessary as the dwelling unit and garage were recently
constructed. When the petitioner first submitted the building
permit application, the drawing on the lot survey indicated
that the garage and house were to be placed in such
Staff Report
VAR #90-16, 110 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
Page 3
a manner that they would be parallel to the front property
line along 64 1/2 Way (please see attached original proposal).
The as -built survey indicates that the house appears to be
slightly canted on the lot with an angle to the north and
east. It appears that during the process of constructing the
dwelling unit, the location of the house was shifted by the
petitioner and his contractor. It is the Building Inspector's
policy to check to see that the structure meets the required
setbacks when doing his footing inspections. The Building
Inspector indicated that he had checked the front yard and
side yard setbacks and had the contractor adjust the location
of the footings to meet the front yard setback, which was not
fully corrected, as indicated on the as -built survey. The
Building Inspector indicated he was unable to check the
setback on the street side of the corner lot as the contractor
had placed a majority of the fill material along this portion
of the lot.
The encroachments do not appear to cause problems as to
traffic visibility, "line of sight" encroachments, or adequate
parking areas. Further, turning movements into the street are
limited to right -in and right -out only movements because of
the median in East River Road.
Recommendation
The Appeals Commission could choose to deny the variance and
require the petitioner to reconstruct the garage in such a
manner as to meet the required setbacks of 17.5 feet and 35
feet; however, the encroachments will not cause an adverse
impact onto adjacent properties. Further, the petitioner
would incur additional expenses in rebuilding the structure
which may result in an unusual architectural appearance.
Because of the amount of correction necessary, granting the
variance may be more practical than forcing reconstruction.
It is for these reasons that staff recommends that the Appeals
Commission approve the request by the petitioner.
•
PUBLIC BEARING
BEFORE THE
APPEALS COMMISSION
•
Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of
Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal
Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E.'on Tuesday, August 7, 1990,
at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of:
Consideration of variance request, VAR #90-16,
by Steve Bodinski, pursuant to Section
205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((1)) of the Fridley City
Code, to reduce the setback on the street side
of a corner lot from 17.5 feet to 12.5 feet to
correct an existing nonconformance to the City
Code, on Lot 3, Block 1, Oliver Olson Addition,
the same being 110 - 64 1/2 Way N.E., Fridley,
Minnesota, 55432.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the
opportunity at the above stated time and place.
DIANE SAVAGE
CHAIRPERSON
APPEALS COMMISSION
Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley
Community Development Department, 571-3450.
City Council
City Manager
Diane Savage
567 Rive Creek Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Oliver Olson
140 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Steve Bodinski
15515 University Avenue N.E.
Anoka, MV 55303
Kevin Proctor
120 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Kurt Klockman
121 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
Fridley, PN 55432
Walter Luckow
161 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Bernadine Matushak
141 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Gary Ande]in
Murphy Oil
4600 W. 77th Street, #304
Minneapolis, MN 55435
0 NAILING LIST FOR
VARIANCE # 90-16
110 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
Stuart Anderson
6409 East River Road
Fridley, M 55432
•
Stuart Anderson !-d'
1322 - 42 1/2 Ave. N.E.
Columbia Heights, MN 55421
Maureen Bozloff
6437 East River. Road
Fridley, MN 55432
Kenneth Raymond
6420 East River Road
Fridley, MQ 55432
Steven Smuder
6414 East River Road
Fridley, MV 55432
David Kari
6408 East River Road
Fridley, MN 55432
Chris Zelevarov
160 Mississippi Place
Fridley, MN 55432
Nancy Dmohoski
6410 Fast River Road
Fridley, NN 55432
July 27, 1990
William Corcoran
111 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
Fridley, NN 55432
Eugene Henriksen
2944 - 37th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55406-5432
Eugene Henriksen /)ER '
120 Mississippi Place
Fridley, MQ 55432
Ronald Lafond & Lewascko
459 - 69th Avenue
Blaine, MN 55432
Ronald Lafond & Iewasck/`ob
o�
�
140 Mississippi Place
Fridley, MN 55432
Peter Bernal
6431 East River Road
Fridley, MV 55432
rjAw COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW
FILE NUMBER FILE DATE MEETING DATE FILE DESCRIPTION T.. #90-16
CITYOF 39 7-18-90 8-7-90 � - 64 1/2 Way N.E.
FRIDLEY
COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST AND RETURN TO PLANNING DEPT.
❑ BARB D.
IdMICHELE M. l
MARK
I qJOHN F.
C.
COMMENTS
LEON M. ?- z b
. ' i - z?
❑ BOB A.
CITY OF FRID?E► . •
6431 MEMMSITY AVWM N-Z-
PRMXEY� M 55432 Caa®mity Develcpnent DeDardomt
(612) 571-3450
VARIAMM APPLICATICH
PWPERTY II90109MICaT - site plan required for submittals; see attached
Address • k, l
Legal description:
Lot -*y- Block / Tract/Addition i ., 6 S®,, ��•
Current zoning: Pe4jrsxji4 Square footage/acreage
Reason for variance and hardship:
Section of City Code:
FEE CmlMR II�Oi iTldrT
(Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing)
NAME �.(//���Q, �, rY �f✓,As/!�l.� 7 s G'�� �!� �
ADDRESS /'l® 4 V e!J
r, F _1_11 ; �_ - rL/.�e - i/5�.�%��1Mi
R111,11F
nay=
SICNA=
Fee: $100.00
$ 60.00 for residential properties
Permit VAR # Reoepit # � C
Application reoei ed
Scheduled Appeals bion date:
Scheduled City Omuicil date:
ERMT00
CITY OF lRIDLET PLAR REVIEW CSECELIBT
Applicants for vacations must submit the legal description of the
parcel (easement, street, etc.) to be vacated.
Complete site plans, signed by a registered architect, civil
engineer, landscape architect, or other design professional, to
include the following:
A. General:
1. Name and address of project
2. Legal description (certificate of survey may
be required)
3. Name, address, and telephone number of
applicant,
engineer, and owner of record
4. Date proposed, north arrow, scale, number of
sheets, name
of drawer
5. Description of intended use of site, buildings, and
structures including type of occupancy and
estimated
occupancy load
6. Existing zoning and land use
7. Tabulation box indicating:
(i) Size of parcel in areas of sq. ft.
(ii) Gross floor area of buildings
(iii) Percent of site covered by building
(iv) Percent of site covered by impervious surface
(v) Percent of site covered by area
(vi) Projected number of employees
(vii) Number of seats if intended use is a restaurant or
place of assembly
(viii) Number of parking spaces required
(ix) Number of parking spaces provided including
handicapped
(x) Height of all buildings and structures and number of
stories
B. Site Plan:
1. Property line dimensions, location of all existing and
proposed structures with distance from boundaries,
distance between structures, building dimensions and
floor elevations
2. Grading and drainage plan showing existing natural
features (topography, wetlands, vegetation, etc.) as well
as proposed grade elevations and sedimentation and stop
water retention ponds. Calculations for storm wat
detention/retention areas.
3. All existing and proposed points of egress/ingress
showing widths of property lines, turning radii abutting
rights-of-way with indicated center line, width, paving
width, existing and proposed median cuts, and inter-
sections of streets and driveways
4. vehicular circulation system showing location and
dimensions for all driveways, parking spaces, parking lot
aisles, service roads, loading areas, fire lanes,
emergency access (if necessary), public and private
streets, alleys, sidewalks, bikepaths, direction of
traffic flow, and traffic -control devices
5. Landscaping Plan
6. Location, access, and screening detail of trash
enclosures
7. Location and screening detail of rooftop equipment
a. Building elevations from all directions
9. Utility plan identifying size and direction of existi�
water and sewer lines, fire hydrants, distance of
hydrant to proposed building
1/2 SEC. 15, T. 30, R. 24
CITY OF FRIDLEY
cowomovx/ NO B
1$
41 I JL
LI
�• aof'd��n�ns%ans s.>arn I n o/d/) u..m
R�eoeN P.b»
LOCATION MAP
ZONING MAPS
T..
�R`,/J
��:� 0 ���NoiII
.. Edi �� t�
wirrm
��• mmmwmrTr.-�� mum
01Im
Y— N �Xlm.,�
® Niglio
•
MEMO
WIN
.
MEMO: I
AIr
aI E�s�
"m � 009000101912-11NE
m
o
�Qviw
INE
PUMPo115
ZONING MAPS
rn
—NAV,5t'36" W.
131.19 Plat
---131.81 Meas. ----
Utility_Easeme"+ J--
S� 10
t'I J
14. o 12.4
CL
oaim I `
its o
z
,o •
I 34.63
�-
I
o Drainage and Easemer� o
• � --- l.* 138.49 ---
p� 0°41'26"
R• 114b9.11
EAST RIVER ROAD
z`
Z
•
•
0
TP.2 ^IiY GF FR �OL�' D,^E:_ NOT Gi!aI''.�'JTcr �
�iS ..ACY OF U'r11LI"J"Y L 1 ±-�i,!c �,R� . Th;
DATA IS FOR !N FOR F',IR? _,SES O'JLY
AND PERSONS USING 1 Hi;,
VEINFOR�;q rIU; J SHOULD /
nIFY IT ON THE SITE. j�
10 q
1 / PrtU': r.L OF "i H-7 CJ' 0f
°21.24
516 56
00
\ • ` ,s I v
\\z\'
tot
dl�glt►� . ans ` •. 1 � �� .
fA1\ utd 0002 �Rv1j ` \
1� °Q
y �
i
< 0e
fpm .L
N
N
`V hZ \ -to 00-? -c
• 24
N16e 21
a
MOW
Unit(
n�
(� C ou�ik dC�SCi�J
:5&-� ) I!= �01
UTA—Ay ar-j vratnase- I"emet4
a•re rp6awn 'T6b6
6+c
I hereby cc
tation of
placed in t
be designat