Council DocumentationOle. 40 40ree.
S?i /
APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS AND CI7V CGVWIL
FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE IN REQUiREMNTS OP'
CERTAIW ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PVIDLE'Y
(Applicant to complete items 1, 2, 3)
1. Name and Address of Applicant SitEncrafters Outdoor DisD ay. TnC
13 —?7th Way N. E.
Fridley, Minn. 55432
2. Legal Description of Property (also general locatic;a, such nsj"north-
east corner of 64th Avenue and 5th Streett0 or 6415 Fifth Strost")
Fridley As emb,'1Xf God Church
3. inscribe the variance requested. (Attmah Plat or SurvW► nt hoptrty
showing location of proposed building, etas., al0a ad,jolnLng Properties
and ownership within 200' of said property.)
Request variance from institutional sign square footage from
24 square feet.to 48 square feet and height variance from
6 feet to 10 feet.
4. Comments by administrative official denying original request for buildins
permit or other permit. (To be completed by adcain!strativa officiAl.
Appropriate ordinances, and section of ordinances it., be cited.)
s
S.
Notice of Hearing appeared
dates:
(must be at least once 10
attached).
- 2 -
tat Newspaper on the following
i. Board Members notified of meeting by •
(List Members, Date Notified, and "Yes" or "N ' for puns to ettend
hearing). e
Date
/-I I.-
�o
Llaa to Attemd
_ leo
7. Person making appeal and the following property emers !raving property
within 200' notified:
Name
.a®
Date
By Pbous Notified by
or Mail _ (initial)
.
UiUi U. ,4Jr-. AJ •8 .
to ita Following Board Members and interested parties were present at the
Bearings
BOARD MMBRS
3 -
OTHER PARTIES:
NAME
9. opinions and recommendations by BOARD OF APPEALS:
A
ADDRESS
Xb
10. For Above Recommendations Against -Recommendations
11. -Action by City Council and Date;
i
EN
THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF DECEMBER 14, 1971
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Minish at 7:35 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Minish, Sondheimer, Wall
MEMBERS ABSENT: Harju, Drigans
OTHERS PRESENT: Clarence Belisle -Building Inspector
MOTION by Sondheimer to approve the minutes of the November 23, 1971 meeting
as written.
Seconded by Wall. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
Chairman Minish reported to the Board that the Council had concurred with the
Board's recommendations on the November 23, 1971 items.
1. A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF: SECTION 56.05, 1B. FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO INCREASE
THE WME SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR AN INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN AN R-1 DISTRICT FROM
24 SQUARE FEET TO 48 SQUARE FEET AND SECTION 56.05. lE TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF AN INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN AN R-1 DISTRICT FROM 6 FEET ABOVE LOT GRADE
Mr. Charles Peugh and Mr. Jack Lawrance, representing Signcrafters, were present
to present the request. Mr. Marvin Anderson, a member of the church, was also
present.
Mr. Peugh explained the reason they are requesting the area variance is because
the overall area of the sign is 6 feet by 8 feet but the copy area of the sign
is only 5 feet by 7 feet. The remaining area of the sign is molding. The
variance on the height is being requested, to get the sign high enough so the
children in the area would not be able to get into the sign to change the
message on it. The height is also wanted to get the sign higher than the average
pile up of snow so it could be seen during the winter months.
Mr. Lawrance stated the sign will be a double face interior illuminated, soft
glow, sign with a total height of 10 feet. It will have a plastic face with
all steel construction. The top of the sign, which will have the church name,
pastor's name and service times, will have a black background with white letters.
The bottom, a five line attraction panel, will be white with black letters.
The Board asked why they couldn't use smaller letters and decrease the sign size.
Mr. Lawrance answered there are stock letters of 2 inches, 4 inches and larger.
They are using the 4 inch letters on this sign as it will be positioned about
50 yards from Osborne Road and they want the moving traffic to be able to see
and to read the sign. He added again that the total copy area is only 5 feet by
7 feet.
Mr. Belisle stated the City would like to see a lower profile sign and he added
this sign is 100 per cent over the Code requirements.
The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of December 14. 1971 Paae 2
Mr. Lawrance said they could lower the sign 1 foot in height, which would
make it 3 feet off the ground, but they would not like to see it any
lower than that. The sign will have a lock on it but when a sign is low
enough for children to reach it they are bound to try to get into it.
The Board asked for the exact location of the sign.
Mr.Peugh answered it would be placed on the sod that is 4 feet from the
front of the new church addition.
Mr. Lawrance added there are two windows in the front of this addition
and the sign will be placed in the middle of them so it would not obstruct
the view from the windows.
Mr. Anderson said it would be approximately where the old temporary sign
was, that is now down, but will be closer to the building.
Mr. Sondheimer asked how far this would be from the sidewalk.
Mr. Peugh answered 38 feet and Mr. Belisle added the minimum is 18 feet.
The Board agreed the sign should be lowered to be only 9 feet high.
Mr. Wall felt a planter should be added at the bottom of the sign to add
attractiveness to the sign and also would prohibit children from walking
under the sign.
Mr. Anderson said they do have some bricks left over from the church
addition and it was thought they would use them for that purpose. Some
people from the congregation would be doing this work when the weather
permits.
The Board questioned what type of zoning was across the street. On the
City Zoning Map it shows that area, in Spring Lake Park, zoned R-1. The
land is vacant at this time.
Mr. Lawrance said he thought there was going to be a medical center across
the street.
MOTION by Wall to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Sondheimer. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
WTION by Wall to recommend to the Council approval of the area variance
from 24 square feet to 48 square feet and the height variance from 6 feet
to only 9 feet, provided the sign is located in the center of the new
church addition, below the peak, approximately 4 feet from the front of
the structure, and for the following reasons:
1. There is more than adequate space on either side of the sign.
The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of December 14, 1971 Page 3
2. There is no safety or other factor that would make it dangerous„ as
it does not obstruct traffic visibility.
3. It provides readability at the large setback.
4. No one was present who was in opposition to the sign.
Seconded by Sondheimer. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
AWOURNMENT :
The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Minish at 8:10 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
0
I Z2
MAR'S HINT
Secretary
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
BOARD OF APPEALS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
No. 1
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of Appeals of the City of Fridley
will meet in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday,
December 14, 1971 to consider the following matter:
A request for variances of: Section 56.053, lb,
Fridley City Code, to increage the maximum
square footage for an institutional sign in an
R-1 District from 24 square feet to 48 square
feet and Section 56.05, le, to increase the
maximum height of an institutional sign in an
R-1 District from 6 feet above lot grade to
10 feet, to allow the erection of an institutional
identification sign to be located on Lot 2,
Block 1, Osborne Manor 2nd Addition, the same
being 472 Osborne Road N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.
(Fridley Assembly of God Church)
(Request by Signcrafter's Outdoor Display, Inc.,
13 -77th Way N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.)
Anyone who desires to be heard with reference to the above matter may be
heard at this meeting.
ROBERT A. MINISH
CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF APPEALS
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 20, 1971
PAGE 8
MOTION by Councilman Breider to concur with the recommendation of the Building
Standards - Design Control Subcommittee and approve the request to construct
an industrial warehouse and office building subject to the stipulations set by
the Board and the stipulations that they request the City to improve the alley
and that they come back for approval if the use -is changed to manufacturing.
Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw.
Councilman Mittelstadt questioned whether this should go to the Planning Com-
mission first for them to review. Mr. Zeglen, Chairman of the Building Standards -
Design Control Subcommittee and member of the Planning Commission, was in the
audience and said he felt they had already discussed it satisfactorily.
THE VOTE upon the motion, being a voice vote, all ayes, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to receive the Minutes of the Building Standards
Design Control Subcommittee Meeting of December 9, 1971. Seconded by Council-
man Mittelstadt. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, the motion carried unanimously.
1�r RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF DECEMBER 14, 1971:
A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF: SECTION 56.05E 1B FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO INCREASE
THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FCbTAGE FOR AN INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN AN R-1 DISTRICT FROM
24 SQUARE FEET TO 48 SQUARE FEET AND SECTION 56.05, 1E, TO INCREASE THE MAXI-
MUM DIGHT OF AN INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN AN R-1 DISTRICT FROM 6 FEET ABOVE LOT
GRADE TO 10 FEET, TO ALLOW THE ERECTION OF AN INSTITUTIONAL IDENTIFICATION
SIGN TO BE LOCATED ON LOT 2, BLOCK 1, OSBORNE MANOR 2ND ADDITION, THE SAME
BEING 472 OSBORNE ROAD N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (FRIDLEY ASSEMBLY OF GOD
CHURCH) (REQUEST BY SIGNCRAPTER'S OUTDOOR DISPLAY, INC., 13 77TH WAY N.E.,
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA):
Mr. Charles Peugh, representing Signcrafters Outdoor Display, Inc., said that
this sign will be similar to the billboard sign in front of City Ball, but
smaller, with the copy area being only 5' X 71. The City Engineer said that the
sign meets the code requirements except that it is bigger, so they want it
closer to the building. The Council looked at a picture of the sign. The Council
discussed where they thought the sign should be located. Mr. Peugh said he be-
lieved the Pastor of the Church wanted it close to the Church. Councilman Harris
pointed out that on the picture itlooked like the old sign was 15' to 18' back
from the sidewalk., The Council agreed that about 15' back from the sidewalk
sounded like the appropriate place for the sign. Mr. Peugh was told that if the
Pastor wanted the sign closer to the Church, he could ask the Council to reconsider.
MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to concur with the recommendation of the Board of
Appeals and approve the area variance and the height variance as recommended with
the stipulation that the sign be approximately 15' from the sidewalk. Seconded by
Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Mittelstadt to receive the Minutes of the Board of Appeals
Fleeting of December 14, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote,
there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
a
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Or DECEMBER 20, 1971 PAGE 7
different recommendations for each individual lots two could be made larger by
vacating 97th and 48th Avenue, some could be utilized by building smaller houses
on them, but they would still want these to go through the Board of Appeals so
neighbors can bring forth any objections. There are several lots that should
not be built upon because of traffic situations.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to concur with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission on the lots of substandard size that they have reviewed. Seconded
by Councilman Kelshaw.
The City Attorney said that he would like to do some further research, so there
would be no trouble granting a request to build on one lot and refusing a request
on another. Mayor Kirkham said he would have liked to see a policy for all lots,
but it seems each individual one is different.
THE VOTE upon the motion was a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Mittelstadt to receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of December 8, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. upon a voice vote,
there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BUILbING STANDARDS - DESIGN CONTROL XMING OF
DECEMBER 9, 1971:
1. CONSIDERATION OF A BEQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO THE PRESENT BUILDING
LOCATED ON LOT 27,_ 2, COMMERCE PARK ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 7541
COMMERCE LANE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY MOGUL CORPORATION,
E.
The City Engineer showed the plans for the addition to the present building and
said that this will give the company double storage capacity, and they will be
using the same exterior scheme as they presently have.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to concur with the recommendation of the Building
Standards - Design Control Subcommittee and approve the request to construct an
addition. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, there being no
nays, the motion carried unanimously.
2.
The City Engineer explained that this is the first building of a three phase
construction. He said that originally there was`a request before the City Council
for vacating the alley and road, but this would necessitate opening the alley
for access. He suggested two stipulations: -That-the City get a letter re-
questing the City to improve the alley to serve the building, and if the use of
the building is ever changed from a warehouse and office to manufacturing, the
petitioner came back to the Council for approval to make sure there is adequate
parking on the site.
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
BOARD OF APPEALS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
No. 1
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of Appeals of the City of Fridley
will meet in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday,
December 14, 1971 to consider the following matter:
A request for variances of: Section 56.05, lb,
Fridley City Code, to increage the maximum
square footage for an institutional sign in an
R-1 District from 24 square feet to 48 square
feet and Section 56.05, le, to increase the
maximum height of an institutional sign in an
R-1 District from 6 feet above lot grade to
10 feet, to allow the erection of an institutional
identification sign to be located on Lot 2,
Block 1, Osborne Manor 2nd Addition, the same
being 472 Osborne Road N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.
(Fridley Assembly of God Church)
(Request by Signcrafter's Outdoor Display, Inc.,
13 -77th Way N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.)
Anyone who desires to be heard with reference to the above matter may be
heard at this meeting.
ROBERT A. MINISH
CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF APPEALS
BUILDING STANDARDS -DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 31, 1974 -PG. 4
Mr. Rebse said this is not a child orientated complex, but more for singles
or chililess couples.
Mr. Reese said the garages would have the same design as the complex,
white stucco and mission tiles. Also, a sign will be located on Sth Street
directly off of 64th Avenue.
Mr. Reese asked if there are any questions.
Mr. Simoneau asked'if they would be developing the R-1 area. Mr. Dante
said they had discussed this with the City and since they (Wall Corporation)
are not a residential builder, they would like to sell the land to one developer.
This would insure a more controlled effect on the construction and not a piece-
meal effect. Mr. Dante said he does have some interested parties.
Mr. Simoneau also asked what would be done to a large cluster of oak
trees. He said Senior Reidel had told him that these trees were full grown
when he. was a boy, around 1912. Mr. Simoneau thought it would be a shame to
waste these trees. Mr, Dante said these trees are, on the County property,
but that he would not take them out. Mr. Reese said they will be weeding a
few unhealthy trees, also removing a retaining wall and some buildings.
A general discussion followed about the renting and use of the complex.
Mr. Boardman said he d'finitely wants cross sections through the entire
property b rought'in for the February 7, 1974 meeting.
MOTION by Simoneau, seconded by Treuenfels to table this item until
the joint meeting of Board of Appeals and this Board on February 7, 1974.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Boardman asked the Board members if they wanted the background infor-
mation onthe Wall Corporation (stipulations, agreements, minutes of committees)
by the February 7th meeting. The Board said they would like this material
for study.- %,
31.) CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO THE PRESENT
STRUCTURE FOR USE AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLASSROOM PURPOSES; LOCATED
ON LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1, OSBORNE MANOR 2ND ADDITION; THE SAME BEING
472 OSBORNE ROAD N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY THE FRIDLEY
ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH. 472 OSBORNE ROAD N.E.. FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA)
Mr. Severin Hallblade was present for the request. Mr. Hallblade said
he is on the Board of Directors for the church.
Mr. Hallblade said this will be a 2nd story addition. Mr. Tonco asked
if there were footings in the first floor for a second floor. Mr. Hallblade
said he was not sure but assumed the builder had checked into this. He said
the same contractor would be doing this addition as had done the previous
work.
BUILDING STANDARDS-DESING CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 31, 1974 -PG. 5
Mr. Simoneau asked about parking.
area not blacktopped if it was needed.
requirements for this type of use.
Mr. Hallblade said there is plenty of
Mr. Boardman checked into the parking
Mr. Tonco asked if there was concrete curbing around the parking lot as
shown on the plans. Mr. Hallblade was not sure as to what type and where
curbing was supplied. Mr. Boardman said he had talked to another Board member
of the church who said the plan shown here is not what is actually there.'
Mr. Tonco asked if this would be a financial hardship for the church to
put concrete curbing around the entire blacktopped area. Mr. Hallblade felt
it could be done now. Mi. Tonco asked if the church expected any type of
future expansion. Mr. Hallblade said the only possibility would be making the
sanctuary larger.
Mr. Boardman asked if Mr. Hallblade felt the church could at present
financially place the curbing now if the Board stipulated or if they would
need an approximate two year period, especially if they planned any type of
expansion. Mr. Hallblade said he had talked to the Pastor who said it would
be ideal to have it curbed.
The Board stipulated that the church be given an option; either to do
the curbing now is they so desire or have two years (2-1-76) to complete the
curbing, at which time, if still unfeasible, the church would go before the
Board of Appeals fora variance on the curbing.
Mr. Hallblade said the addition would be matching brick. The Board asked
if the structure wall would be able to hold this weight. Mr. Hallblade said he
was not sure. The Board stipulated that if the structure is unable to hold
this type of construction, the wall can be changed, but the Board would like
to see it done this way.
Mr. Lindblad asked if there would be any wood on the exterior. Mr. Hallblade
said no, it will be constructed of brick and follow the same design as the
present sturcture.
The Board briefly discussed thc.facilities for the handicapped. They felt,
the needs can be met with no problems::. ..r. Boardman said the Building Inspection
Department would work out any type of problem with the church.
MOTION by Tonco, seconded by Simoneau, to recommend to the City Council
approval of the addition with the following stipulations:
1. The church be given the option of doing the curbing now or
have a two year (2-1-76) period to finish the curbing. If'un-
feasible at the end of two years, the church will go before the
Board of Appeals for a variance on the curbing.
2. If the brick wall cannot be built due to structural reasons, the
design can be changed, but the Board would like to see something
similar to this constructed.
BUILDING STANDARDS -DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 31, 1974 -PG. 6
UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Chairman Lindblad adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Paula R. Long
S ecretary
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF FEBRUARY 11, 1974 PAGE 5
Councilman Utter.
Councilman Breider said he would favor this type of statement being incorporated
in the motion because this would have to be determined when the assessment roll
is figured and they were unable to say at the present time what the assessment
cost would and should be. He said he would like the developer to be aware
that he may be responsible for more of the assessment.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried
unanimously.
The City Manager said this item would be taken care of during the next item
on the agenda.
TION OF A
AN ADDITION TO THE PRESENT
minnncrc. 1 hrhtth nm 11Tc
E.
The City Manager pointed out that this proposed construction would be an
addition to the Fridley Assembly of God Church. He said the Subcommittee had
recommended approval of the request with the stipulations that the curbing
be provided now or in the period of two years, and that if the brick is
structurally impossible due to the design of the building, new plans would
be drawn to present a similar construction to what is existing at the present
time.
The City Manager placed the plan for the construction on the easel. Mayor
Liebl asked if the construction would be a continuation of the current struct-
ure styling. The City Manager said yes, there would be brick to allow a
continuous looking type of structure.
Mr. Jerry Boardman, Planning Assistant, pointed out the area of the proposed
construction on the plan on the easel and said the original plans called
for construction of block and the Subcommittee had recommended this be brick
to blend with the existing structure. He said if this is structually impossible,
new plans would be developed to allow a continual effect in the addition
construction.
MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the request for the construction of the
addition with the stipulations of the Building Standards Design Control Sub-
committee. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the minutes of the Building Standards -
Design Control Subcommittee of January 31, 1974. Seconded by Councilman Utter.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS -DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING
OF FEBRUARY , 1974:
OF A RE
CANOPY OVER THE EXISTING DRIVE -UP
C
The City Manager said the proposal was for th� construction of a canopy type
construction over the existing drive -up teller window and an addition to a new
remote teller. He said.this request had been made by Twin City Federal. The
City Manager said this canopy would be constructed on the north side of the
building. He pointed out that the Subcommittee had recommended approval of the
request with three stipulations. He said there was no problems with the approval
of the stipulations.
62
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF FEBRUARY 11, 1974 PAGE 6 i
MOTION by Councilman Starwal.t to approve the request for the construction
by Twin City Federal with the three stipulations as recommended by the
Building Standards Design Control Subcommittee. Seconded by Councilman
Breider. Upon -a -voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion
carried unanimously.
The City Manager explained there had been a joint meeting of the Board of
Appeals and the Building Standards committees for consideration of the item.
He said this would be a rather large construction which would be adjacent
to City Hall on 5th Street. He said the building would be a north/south
building and he referred to the plan on the easel for the proposed elevations.
He recalled the Council had approved the parcel rezoning and there had been
an agreement with the developer at that time. He pointed out there would
be a need for the approval of some variances as indicated in the minutes
of the meeting. He advised the Council that the Boards had recommended
approval of the request with the 11 stipulations listed. The City Manager
commented he assumed the developer would like to proceed through the proper
channels and receive the additional variances which may be required before
the construction of the complex.
Councilman Breider listed the various additional variances which may be required.
Mayor Liebl said the proposal would include three different types of units,
the effeciency or studio, the one bedroom and the twdbedroom with the possible
adaptation of the second bedroom being a den or study. Mayor Liebl asked if
the recommending bodies had concurred with the proposal. The City Manager
said yes, with the recommended stipulations. Mayor Liebl asked Mr. Arvil
Miller, resident of the area, if he agreed with the proposal.
Mr. Arvil Miller addressed the Council and said if this proposal was the same
as presented and agreed upon at the Subcommittee meeting, he would concur in
it. He said if the proposal had not changed, he would have no objections.
Mayor Liebl asked if any of the other -area residents were concerned about this
proposal. Mr. Miller indicated he was the only area resident present.
The City Manager said Mr. Rudolph Dante and Mr. Richard Reese, Wall Corporation,
and Mr. Jerry [bardman, Planning Assistant, City of Fridley, were present
at the meeting.
Mayor Liebl said the proposal had not changed much from the original proposals
of the area. He indicated there would be R-1 residential single family homes
constructed on the perimeter of the complex with the exception of the City Hall
side.
Mayor.Liebl said he would like some indication if the Developer would agree to
the stipulations of the Subcommittee. Mayor Liebl read the stipulations aloud
to the Council and audience and asked Mr. Rudolph Dante if he agreed with the
stipulations, and Mr. Dante indicated he was in agreement.
Mayor Liebl questioned the item listed where parking was not sufficient. Mr.
Dante said he felt with the inside parking, this would provide ample parking
for the complex. He said they were reluctant to increase the amount of parking
area for aesthetic reasons. He said if this is not sufficient, the developer
would be the first one to want to increase the amount of spaces. Mr. Dante
commented, he would not like to have a line of cars in the front of the buildings
If this was not necessary.
Mayor Liebl asked Mr. Dante if he would agree with the plans for the development
of the drainage system in the area and Mr. Dante said they agreed with this
stipulation.
Mayor Liebl qeustioned if in the future, there is a need for a storm sewer
installation in the area, would the Wall Corporation pay their.fair share of
.this construction cost. Mr. Dante said this.would be agreeable.
t
Panning:'Commission Meeting -.August 6, 1975 Page 8-
. 2.. The curbing as designated on plan by 6"x18" poured concrete..
3.: Solid screening be provided along West property line and East along
Longfellow Street to screen.possible storage area.
4. Extensive landscaping be provided in conjunction with,' oil berming-to
provide visual protection and screening for existin residential areas.
(As per approved plan).
Mr. Clark sai the petitioner was before the Pl fining Commission and.Council
a couple of months go asking for an alley vacation o this addition could be built.
He pointed out on th plot plan where there will -Pe berming, landscaping and a
blacktop area that wi�l provide access across the%tracks to John Hayes' property.
Mr. Clark reviewed the uilding permit stipulaons and said they were basically
about the screening as s�hown on the plot plan,,,,,,/
Mr. Langenfeld said h would apprecia ,6 a Letter definition of solid screening.
Mr: Clark said that in thisRinstance it w 's a slatted chain link fence. Mr. Langenfeld
said•he would like the administrative s ff report to'state what type of solid screening
they were recommending.
Mr. Lindblad said that he was n'ver very happy with slats in a chain link fence.
He said they looked good when thd`j/were first slatted, but in a short time they were
in poor repair and didn't seem tote maintained. Mr. Clark said there was a section
in the City Code on the maintena,ce>,aof blacktop, landscaping and fences. Mr. Lindblad
asked how this was policed, wast Mostly by citizen complaints? Mr. Clark said that
this was basically true at the�presen't time, because the staff didn't have the time
to go around looking for code`'violations,.but that they hoped to be using some CETA
people to start setting up ,ograms so that we can visit facilities in the City
periodically, at least on a year, to remind them of things that need to be repaired
or maintained.
Mr. Drigans asked hat this company manufactured. Mr. Lindblad said it was small
metal parts.
Chairman Harris /asked if the situation with John• Hayes had been taken care of. Mr.
Clark said he didn', know if Mr. Hayes had been-�onfronted with the plans for this
addition or not. e said that Mr. Schaul had been requested to talk to Mr. Hayes
and inform him th t his access to Longfellow woul be cut off with this addition. Mr.
Hayes will still;�'have access to Liberty Street.
Mr. David/Harris said he thought the administrative staff report should state the
size of thee isting building and the size of the adaption. Mr. Clark said they were
working on p eparing a form which would have a place fpr this, and would also include
the valutio of the construction covered under the building permit request.
MO11voting
'
by Harris, seconded by.Lindblad, that the Pl ing Commission recommend
approvaa building permit for a plant addition to Mac ping, Inc., 140 Liberty
Street,h the four stipulations of the administrative staff report. Upon a voice
vote, a aye, the motion carried unanimously.
E. Church Addition and New Gymnasium, Fridley Assembly of God Church 472 Osborne
Road N.E.
.Planning Commission Meeting - August 6, 1975 Page 9
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
. General Description:
This permit is for a building addition to the Assembly of God Church
at 472 Osborne Road N.E. The addition will provide for an extension of the.
existing sanctuary and a gymnasium. An extension of parking facilities will
be provided to allow for approximately 128 stalls. They are also working
on a joint parking facility agreement with the hospital to the South.
.The addition to the sanctuary will,be constructed of brick and will
match the existing sanctuary, the gymnasium will be attached to the existing
Sunday School unit;, and will coincide with the overall design scheme of the
existing facility and will be constructed of concrete block which will tie
into the block construction of the Sunday School unit.
Engineering:
. We' don'.t foresee any Engineering problems. The grade is sufficient
enough to drain the parking lot to the street. The extension of the parking
facility will,also allow for -drainage to the south through the hospital.
facilities, if joint agreements are drawn.
Environment:
We don't foresee any major environmental inpact on the surrounding area
with the proposed construction. The residential property to the west of the
church abuts the large parking facility and should be protected by closely
grown landscaping or a solid screen fence.
Building Permit Stipulation:
1. The curbing and landscaping related to the gymnasium be completed with
the addition. The west parking lot and all of the related landscaping
will be completed by June 1, 1977, and the east parking lot and all.
related landscaping will be completed by June 1, 1978. (as per approved
plan).
2. Maintain planting area between church parking and Unity Hospital parking,
3. Provide screening for residential area along West property line.
Mr. Clark said this item appears three times on the agenda because it requires
three different actions by the City. One is the building permit, one i§ -a lot split,
which will move the lot line to a more southerly location, and the other was a request
to -vacate the exising drainage and utility easement that exists on the present property
line.
Mr, Clark said the stipulations related more to updating the'present facilities
as far as curbing on the existing parking lots. He said the new addition will be
just a little higher than the existing structure. Mr. Clark said the petitioner was
able to purchase some property from the North Suburban Hospital District which will
make their lot more rectangular and will allow them to meet all the code requirements
for -the addition. He said the N.S.H.D. was in favor of the lot split and vacation
request and had signed the application, so they must be .in favor of the proposal.
Planning.Commission Meeting - August 6, 1975 Page 10
Mr. Langenfeld said that in the Engineering section of the administrative staff
report, it states that the extension of the parking facility will allow for drainage
to the south through the hospital facilities, if joint agreements are drawn. It then
mentions in the second building permit stipulation to maintain planting area between
church parking and.Unity Hospital parking. Mr. Langenfeld asked if this would be a
stipulation if a joint agreement was drawn. Mr. Clark said there would be driveways
between the two properties and this would allow the drainage to go from the church
parking lot to the hospital parking lot and from there to the storm sewer system.
-Mr. Langenfeld said that in the environmental section of the administrative staff
report, it states that the residential property to the west of the church abuts the
large parking facility and should be.protected by a closely grown landscaping or a
solid screen fence. He said he would prefer the -word must to should. Mr. Clark said
the third stipulation takes care of this.
Chairman Harris -asked what rear yard setback requirement they were following -on
this property., residential or commercial? Mr. Clark said the setback was 30 feet, which
would meet either requirement.
Mr. David Harris asked what the significance.was'of the dates mentioned on the
completion of 'certain items in the first building permit stipulation. 'Mr. Clark said
this was a large budget item, curbing, and this was for the existing parking lot... .
The dates mentioned was the program the church felt they could meet. Mr. Harris said
he.had brought this up because while he'did understand the problemslof -ghurches' and.
other non-profit organizations who were dependent upon-ffree"will gifts o -r offerings -
to maintain their entitiy, and we have had some cases whete-work, has been done very
-nicely by'various people, but some of the work never seems"to-get done. He said there
were a couple that weren't done that were started in the early '70's.
Mr. Clark said the City had had experience with this church before, when the
sidewalk was put in along Osborne Road. He said this -was completed by the agreed date,
and they had done an adequate job. He said our experience with this church was pretty
good as to volunteer.work. Mr. Harris said he knew they had done a good job, but he
thought for over-all planning City-wide, when we get these requests that ask fora
delay because they were too -large -of a committment to meet on a yearly budget, we should
have.some control.
Mr. Clark said that when someone comes in for an addition, we try.to sit down
with the developer or owner of the property and be as harsh as we think we can be,
and Yet be as lenient as we feel we can be, without jeapardizing the City's thoughts
and goals in getting all these things done,and quite often the petitioner will agree
to do what the City requests if we will agree to certain dates. He said that if Mr.
Harris was asking what would happen if these dates were not met, he thought they would
have to cross that bridge at that time. He said there should be some goals and objectives
set up so we could handle this. He said that when the City sets up certain completion
dates for improvements, and these weren't met, but would be in a reasonable time, he
thought the staff could handle this, but if they need an extension of months or a year,
then perhaps they should have to appear before the Council and state publicly why they
couldn't -meet the schedule and get Council approval'of the time extension. Mr. Harris
said he thought this could be a solution. Mr. Clark said this should apply to all
properties, both non-profit and commercial property.
MOTION by•David Harris, seconded -by Scott, that the Planning Commission recommend
approval of the building permit for a church addition and new gymnasium for the Fridley
Assembly of God Church, 472 Osborne Road N.E. with the three building permit stipulations
Planning Commission Meeting - August 6, 1975 Page 11
.of the Administrative Staff Report. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #75-05, FRIDLEY ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH: Split off that
part of Lots 8 - 12, Block 1, Osborne Manor 2nd Addition, that lies North of
the -following described line: Beginning at a point in the West line of Lot 8,
located 5 feet South -of the Northwest corner, thence Easterly to a point in the
East line of Lot 12, being 75 feet South of the Northeast corner and there
terminating, the same being 472 Osborne Road N.E.
Rev. G. Mark Denyes was present.
Mr.'Clark said the present lot line would sever what they want to add on to
the church. They have purchased this property from the North Suburban Hospital
District, who had picked up these lots from the tax forfeit rolls. The Hospital
Board will use this property for a parking lot and evidently, this part of the
property was in excess of what they will need.
He said the staff recommendation was that this request for a lot split be
approved so the church can proceed with its expansion.
MOTION by David Harris, seconded by Lindbald, that the Planning Commission
recommend to Codncil approval of the lot split request, L.S. #75-05, by the Fridley
Assembly of God Church, to split off that part of Lots 8 - 12, Block 1, Osborne Manor
2nd Addition, that lies North of the following described line: Beginning at a point
in the West line of Lot 8, located 5 feet South of the Northwest corner, thence
Easterly to a point in the East line of Lot 12, being 75 feet South of the Northeast
corner and there terminating, the same being 472 Osborne Road N.E. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
3.. VACATION REQUEST, SAV #75-09, FRIDLEY ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH: Vacate the 12.fo6t
drainage and utility easement that lies between Lots 1 and 5, and Lots 8 and 12,
Block 1, Osborne Manor 2nd Addition and move it,to the center line of the new
property line, the same being 472 Osborne Road N.E..
Rev. G. Mark Denyes was present
Mr. Drigans asked if 76th Avenue N.E. hadn't just been vacated recently. Mr.
Clark said it had. Mr. Drigans asked if the entire street had been vacated. Mr.
Clark said yes, but we did keep the utlity easement because we have sewer and water
in this easement.
Chairman Harris said there was a letter in.the agenda from Northern States Power
Company asking for written permission from the petitioner to retain and have access
to their existing facilities off the new location of the easement. He asked Rev.
Denyes if he was in agreement with this request. Rev. Denyes said he hada copy of.the
letter they had written to Northern States Power Company giving them this permission.
MOTION by Langenfeld; seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission.receive
a copy of the letter written by G. Mark Denyes, pastor of Fridley Assembly of God
Chu_rch to Northern States Power Company, dated August 5, 1975, giving them access to
to their existing'facilities off the new location of the easement. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Meeting -_August 6, 1975 Page 12
MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Scott, that the Planning Commission recommend
to Council, approval of the vacation request, SAV #75-09, by the Fridley Assembly
of God Church, to vacate the 12 foot drainage and utility easement that lies between
Lots 1 through 5, and Lots 8 through 12, Block 1, Osborne Manor 2nd Addition, and
move it to the center line of the new property line. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, the motion carried unanimously.
4. CONTINUED: VACATION REQUEST, SAV #75-05, BY RICHARD KOK: Vacate the 6 foot
drainage and utility easement on the South side of Lot 6, Block 1, Clark'.s
'Addition, the same being 6517 McKinley Street N.E.
Mr. Richard Kok was present.
Mr. Clark said this item had been continudd couple of times, once because
the petitioner was not present and another time o allow the Engineering staff to
determine the utility patterns in this particul r block. He said there was a memo
and a map in- the agenda explaining the part of ',is easement that had to be retained.
Mr- Clark continued th�t the Engineering Dep ,'tment had no objection to 85.31 of
this easement being va ted on Lot 6, Block, , Clark's. Addition, but they would
need'the balance of thi easement to line p with an easement they would need to
follow the North-South bo ndaries of Lot 7 Block 1, Clark's Addition, and Lot 8,
Block*3, Moore Lake Park st Addition. e said the mapshowed that the -existing garage
did encroach into the 6 fo't easement. 'By retaining part of this easement, a very
small portion of the garage was still.ln the easement, but the recommendation was to
allow this very small portio to encr�ach into the easement.
Chairman Harris asked if he
easement on the North boundary` f
any recommendation, just that i
easement was retained as on the ,
utilities in this easement, the .
area, they would be aware tha/rth
6, and it must trap -water. I; th
to drain that low area, we wiuld
into this area, and feel th4"t the
E ff gineering staff was recommending that the 6 foot
dot 7 be vacated also. Mr. Clark said there wasn't
t was vacated, to be sure the same part of this
uth side.of Lot 6. Mr. Clark said there were no
anted to retain, but if they have looked at the
re was a low spot North of Lot 8., and East of Lot
',,people in the area should ever petition the City
ve to have.an easement to get a storm sewer back
1"gical alignment would be between Lots 7 and 8.
Mr. Drigans said he ould see n",,purpose to keep the 6 foot easement on the
North side of Lot 7, if fte easement was vacated on Lot 6,, except for -the part needed
for a potential storm sower easement.';, A half of an easement wasn't good for anything.
Mr. David Harris said �6 agreed with r. Drigans.
Mr. Kok asked if -this small amoun of his garage that would be allowed to encroach
in this easement wovi,d cause him probl ms if he wanted to sell this property. He
thought he should get something in writ�ing that the City would allow this encroachment.
Mr. David Ha,`ris said what Mr. Ko Owas questioning was that if a title search
was done on'this,property, prior to sel ling it, he -might have a problem. Mr. Clark
said this could a handled by a letter o' a Council resolution, or by a motion. There
were many ways Of handling this.
Mr. Clark said this could.be put in 'the staff report.
dblad, that the Planning Commission recommend
MOTION by Langenfeld, seconded by Li '
to Council approval of the vacation regiies , SAV #75-05, bq Richard Kok, to vacate the
Westerly 85.31 feet of the 12 foot drains e and utility easement on -the South
SUBJECT % WU %/A t 1�
_ CITY OF OTA LEY,
REVIEW
COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST
RETURN TO BUILDING INSPECTION
ASM - OF 6o 4 %-.4`tUd
COMM Eta
FILE DAT
DUE DATI
/®/ir/A
4&�
Fo R— tvA, L/ &e._. a r- �i- F,
8.1
8A.
8B.
8C.
The representative of the Assembly of God Church stated the trailers would
be white aluminum purchased from Hilltop Trailer Sales and would be used as
classrooms. He stated they currently use three classrooms at Unity
Hospital, but still need additional space. He stated they plan to start
construction on their new facility next spring.
MMON by Councilman Hamernik to grant the request for a house trailer
permit for two trailers to be used for classrooms for a two year period,
and waive the fee, as requested by the Assembly of God Church. Seconded by
Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
M
Mr. Flora, Public WOA6 Director, stated the a are actually three requests
for this parcel of pro ty involving a sial use permit, a lot split,
and variances.
Mr. Flora stated Superamer a is p posing a service station on the
southeast corner of 73rd Ave -
.
and ighway 65 and to split this parcel
into two (Parcels A & B), with service station located on Parcel A. He
stated at this time, they have p for development of Parcel B.
Mr. Flora stated in conjunctit with th development, a service drive or
loop back is proposed. He ted, if the roceed with the loop back, it
would mean a variance is ssary on the 1 size and setbacks.
Mr. Flora stated the P1 'ng Commission heard a request for the special
use permit which is r 'red in order to constru the service station in a
C-2 zone, and reco ended approval of this spec 1 use permit. The
Planning Commission also recommended approval of the t split, L. S. #83-
04, with the sti ulation that a 15 foot bikeway/wa way easement be
retained along 7 d Avenue and removal of the existing Na ele sign on the
property upon se termination.
Mr. Flora s ted the Appeals Commission addressed the variance equests to
reduce the of setback from the required 20 feet on the side and to 15
feet and o reduce the rear yard setback from the required 20 f t to 11
feet to reduce the lot size from the required 1-1/2 acres to 1. acres
on 1 A and to reduce the lot size from the required 1-1/2 acr to1,Pa
5 acres on Parcel B. He stated these variances were subject oeis of record, as well as adequate landscaping being installed, and1foot bikeway/walkway easement being dedicated.
4.
5.
6.
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to table this item to the npit regular
meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vo,all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
LOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the econd reading and adopt
Ordinance No. 789 on the second reading and ordgr publication. Seconded by
Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all ting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
n
n
Mr. Flora, Public Works DireWthe
stated this ordinance is based on the
Blaine ordinance covering nerdous waste facilities. He stated it
addresses the facilities fordous waste storage and treatment. He
suggested this be referred tPlanning Commission for their review.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the last time the Council discussed the
issue, the approach was o adopt the ordinance on first reading and then
refer to the Planning 'ssion and the Planning Commission can refer it
to the Environmental Q6ality Commission, if they desire.
Mr. Herrick, City Otorneyr stated the Pollution Control Agency adopted the
criteria that/hato be met in order for a hazardous waste site to be
approved. Heested staff obtain copies and transmit those to the
Planning Comm, as he felt it might be possible to strengthen the
ordinance by orating some of those limitations.
MOTION by ouncilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the
ordinance n first reading. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a
voice vo e, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimo lv.
by Councilman Fitzpatrick to refer this ordinance to the Planning
,ion for their rec=miendation before the second reading. Seconded by
lman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
:d the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the Assembly of God Church is
requesting a permit to place two trailers on the adjacent property owned by
Unity Hospital to be used for classrooms for Sunday School. He stated the
church is planning on constructing a new facility and needs some space to
hold their classes until the new building is completed.
He stated it is proposed to locate the trailers on the east property line
between Unity Hospital and the church.
f
Com-
Am
CITYOF '
FRIDLEY
CIVIC CENTER • 6431 ERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 - PHONE (612) 571-3450
Harris Ratnayake ---CITY COUNU L June 3, 1986
298 Liberty Street N.E,
Fridley, MN 55432 ACTION TAKEN NOTI-CE
On June 2, 1986, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a
Special Use Permit, SP #86-05, to allow a Montessori/day care facility on Lots
1 through 5 and part of Lots,8 through 12, Block 1, Osborne Manor Second Addition,
the same being 472 Osborne Road N, -E.
wit the following stipulations;
Petitioner to provide a fenced area with tot lot equipment prior to occupancy.
2, Owners to work with staff to provide
City Codes,
3. Owner to provide performance bond in
improvements
4. Items 2 and 3 to be held in ,9beyance
to be enforced if property to remain
landscaping and concrete curbing to meet
the amount of $5,000 to cover site
until September 1,,1986, At that time
as a church.
If you have any questions regarding the above act ion, please call the Planning
Department at 571-3450, < -6-,a'1 Mr �-�yKe 00.0ed 10-5�8
Sincerely6-ob;inson +kozfxA l wi1\ -%vx" O-jerjy�ss' CaLre
r�-��
ehocc Lom lease by
C:ames L.
Planning Coordinator
JLR/dm
Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one
copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by June 17, 1986,
Concur with action taken
8
I t NV1: x N!z_ •n FT7i _'
MDTION by Councilman Schneider to waive #he --f rs reading and approve the
ordinance upon first read_ in -.--Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a
voice vote, alll dgot �aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimousl- .--
A.
Mr. Robertson, Gm nunity Development Directory -stated this is a request for
a special use permit to allow extra outsiddl storage of materials at 55 -
77th Way N. E. Mr. Robertson stated in,,conj unction with this special use
permit, there are also requests for a,.Vacation and variance.
Mr. Robertson stated the Planning�'Commission has recommended approval of
this special use permit with si' stipulations, which he outlined.
MOTION by Councilman Goodsseed to approve special use permit, SP #86-04,
with the following stiations: (1) provide an 8 foot high screening fence
around the perimeter) of the storage area except that screening not be
required on the west�'side adjacent to the railroad right-of-way (solid wood
or chain link with slats); (2) provide a berming, landscaping, and
irrigation plan dor Staff approval; (3) provide a storm drainage plan for
Staff approval (4) work with Display Arts to accomplish a joint driveway
easement on;fhe west half of vacated Gumwood, lying south of Lot 11; (5)
provide a lite performance bond equal to 3% of construction value; and (6)
no material to be stored so as to be visible from the right-of-ways. This
speci,4 use permit is contingent on approval of the vacation request.
Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nom' decl ar ed the motion carried unanimously.
B.
A MiONTESSOMZDAY CARE FACILITY, GENERALLY IDCATID AT�472�°c
'''`{f "OSB4RNE ROAD N.E..-By HARRIS RATNA E:
Mr. Robertson Cdnmunity Development Director, stated this is a request for
a special use permit to allow a Montessori/Day Care Facility at 472 Osborne
Road. He stated the proposal was for a facility for up to 30 children
ranging frau 2- 1/2 to 6 years old. He stated an application has been made
to the State to license the facility and the hours of operation would be
f ran 7 a.m. to 6 p. m. , Monday through Friday.
Mr. Robertson stated the Planning Commission has recommended approval with
three stipulations. He stated the Planning Commission has recommended
stipulations No. 2 and 3 be held and reviewed by the Staff in September or
when the disposition of the property is decided.
Mr. Ratnayake, the petitioner, stated the church, from whom they are
leasing, is in the process of selling the property, therefore, the Planning
Commission requested their recommendation for landscaping and concrete
- 11 -
2. 198
curbing and a performance bond be reviewed by City staff in September, or
when disposition of the property is decided.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated the Council may want to make this special
use permit for one year and, if the present occupants want it for a longer
period, they could apply for a renewal.
MDTION by Councilman Goodspeed to approve special use permit, SP #86-05, to
Salon Montessori School for operation of their day care facility for a
period of one year, with the following stipulations: (1) petitioner to
provide a fenced area with tot lot equipment prior to occupancy; (2) owners
to work with Staff to provide landscaping and concrete curbing to meet City
Codes; and (3) owner to provide performance bond in the amount of $5,000 to
cover site improvements. Further, stipulations 2 and 3 are to be reviewed
in September by City Staff, or when the disposition of the property is
decided. If the disposition is to another church, then these improvements
must be made at that time; if the property is sold to Health Central, then
the City will take the matter up with them. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the
motion carried unanimously.
C. CQNSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #86-06. TO ALIfxV
OFFICES NOT ASSOCIATED WITH A PRINCIPAL USE, GIIQERAILY
LOCATED ON for 4. EXCEPT THE NORTHERLY 35'. WrS 5 AND 6.
BLOCK 1, PACO INDUSTRIAL PARK, BY WINFIELD DEVEIAF�9II�TT•
Mr. Robertson,Community Development Director, stated this is a request for
a special use permit to allow offices not associated with a principal use
for property located west of University Avenue, south of U.S. Swim &
Fitness, and north at"the Community Park.
Mr. Robertson stated the"proposal was for an office/warehouse facility
located in M+-1 industrial zoiitng and the special use permit is for office
use in an industrial zone.
Mr. Robertson stated the Planning Carmmission recommended approval of this
special use permit with nine stipulat tips, which he outlined.
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to approve 'special use permit, SP #86-06,
with the following stipulations: (1) developer to provide written
commitment to Fay all costs associated with the realignment of cul-de-sac;
(2) developer to supply ongoing tenant informationt,_ prior to each occupancy,
to allow the City to monitor parking need on a case-by-case basis (parking
demand not to exceed supply); (3) provide a landscape''plan which includes
plantings and berming of all perimeter areas; heavy screeching to be provided
to buffer loading area; (4) all dumpsters to be located inside or within
approved masonry structures; (5) all roof equipment to be screened to mute
visual affect; (6) easement for joint parking with U.S. swim & Fitness to be
recorded against properties prior to building permit; (7) provide dosnecting
sidewalk between the U.S. swim & Fitness Center and proposed develoWnent;
(8) petitioner to combine lots for tax purposes; and (9) petitioner,, to
submit a comprehensive sign plan. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upaki
-12- ,.
�'11 r11WA
�
EL
RSI I p
5�?
d� C'11 ®F '
FRIDLEY
CIVIC CENTER • 6431 ERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450
Harris Ratnayake --CITY COUNCIL June 3, 1986
298 Liberty Street N,E,
Fridley, MN 55432 ACTION TAKEN NOTICE
On June 2, 1986' the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a
Special Use Permit, SP 086-05, to allow a Montessori/day care facility on Lots
1 through 5 and part of Lots 8 through 12, Block 1, Osborne Manor Second Addition,
the same being 472 Osborne Road N, -E.
wit the following stipulations:
Petitioner to provide a fenced area with tot lot equipment prior to occupancy.
2, Owners to work with staff to provide landscaping and concrete curbing to meet
City Codes,
3. Owner to provide performance bond in the amount of $5,000 to cover site
improvements
4. Items 2 and 3 to be held in abeyance until September 1,•1986, At that time
to be enforced if property to remain as a church,
If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning
Department at 571-3450,
Sincerely,
C�iQivnpXL � ,
ames L. Robinson
Planning Coordinator
JLR/dm
Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one
copy to the City of Fridley Pl-anning Department by June 17, 1986,
Concur with action taken
A
Iden Ford
Fridley Assembly of God
472 Osborne Road N.E.
Minneapolis, M 55432
August 4, 1987
On July 201, 1987 the Fridley City Council officially approved your request
for extension of time for the removal of trailers used for classrooms at
Fridley Assembly of God, 472 Osborne Road N.E. with the following
stipulations:
1. Trailers to be removed by April 1, 1988.
If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the
Planning Department at 571-3450.
Sincerely,
James L. Robinson
Planning Coordinator
JLR/dm
Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one
copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by August 18, 1987.
Concur with action taken
CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK
OFFICIAL PUBLICATION
Public Hearing before the City Planning and Zoning Commission.
To Whom It May Concern:
Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing
of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Spring
Lake Park in the Spring Lake Park Community Center at 1301
81st Avenue N.E. JULY 10, 1986 in the Council
Chambers at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following matter:
Property Owner: Fridley Assembly o_God Church
Applicant . 'Fridley Assembly of God Church
Location That Property in -the SW Corner of the City
.of Spring Lake Park Lying Directly South
of Northtown Apartments and Terrace Park
Between University Avenue N.E. and Terrace
Road.
Petition Special Use Permit to Construct a Church
in a C-3 Zone. The property is legally
described as that part of the SE 1/4 of the
SW 1/4 lying West of the East 639 feet
thereof and lying South of the North 730
feet thereof except RD subject to easement
of record and the East 639 feet of the South
587 feet of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 as
measured along and perpendicular to the,
East line thereof except RD subject to
easement of record.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity
at the above stated time and place,
Donald B. Busch
Clerk/Treasurer
Publish: June 27, 1986
r
f
CIiYOF
FRIDLEY
CIVIC CENTER • 6331 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE 161'_1571-3450
North Suburban Hospital District October 7, 1986
Dennis Buratti
2200 First Bank Place East CITY COUNCIL
Minneapolis, MN 55402
ACTION TAMN NOTICE
On Cctcber 6, 1986, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request
for a special use permit, SP #86-15, to allay a daycare facility, an autanabile
parking lot for off-street parking spaces and a clinic on Lots 1 through 5 and
those parts of Lots 8 through 12 lying Northerly of a line drawn fran a point
on the West line of said Lot 8 distant 5 feet Southerly of the Northwest corner of
said Lot 8 to a point on the East line of said Lot 12 distant 75 feet Southerly
of the Northeast corner of said Lot 12, all in Block 1, Osborne Manor 2nd Addition,
the same being 472 Osborne Road N.E., together with Lot 6, Block 1, Osborne Manor
2nd Addition, the same being 400 Osborne Road N.E., together with Lot 7, Block 1,
Osborne Manor 2nd Addition together with adjoining vacated 76th Avenue N.E. the
same being 401 - 76th Avenue N.E.
with the following stipulations:
1. Provide hardsurface setback of 20 feet from Osborne right-of-way by 6/30/88.
2. Provide landscaping plan to include berming and plantings to screen hardsurface
areas, existing and proposed. Install approved plan by 6/30/88.
3. Provide automatic lawn sprinkling for all green areas by 6/30/88.
4. Provide a fenced tot lot area, approximately 20' x 30', with City approved tot
lot equipment, prior to day care start up.
5. Pathway to be installed frau day care to tot lot prior to day care start up.
6. Provide concrete curb and gutter for hardsurface areas and driveways including
five feet setback from building by 6/30/88-
7. Sealcoat and restripe parking lot and provide required handicapped stalls by
6/30/88.
8. Provide one-way directional signage where needed by 6/30/88.
9. Provide an approved duster enclosure by 6/30/88.
10. Remove trailers frau property east of church by 10/31/87.�x?��.it)'=-I� 1-D
11. - Provide a drainage plan for approval prior to parking lot work.
1
FRIDLEY
If
%
G. MARK DENYES, SENIOR PASTOR
472 OSBORNE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55432
CHURCH PHONE (812) 784.7557
June 24, 1987
STAFF
Mr. Jams Robinson
BRYAN J. BUCH
City Planner
CHILDREN'S PASTOR
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
IDEN C. FORD
Dear Mr. Robinson:
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR
This letter is written at your request pursuant to my telephone
conversation with your office today concerning our request for a
TED GROAT
extension of previous council action.
MINISTER OF MUSIC
When we originally sold our property to North Suburban Hospital
District, one of councils stipulations to issueing them a special
LEO PIER DOMINICI
use permit was that two trail ors that we presently use for class -
YOUTH PASTOR
rooms be removed from their present position by October 31, 1987.
Due to a delay in construction, Fridley Assembly has renegotiated
LAVERN THOMPSON
our closing date with North Suburban Hospital District to no
MINISTER OF VISITATION
later then April 1, 1988. We would therefore request an extension
to move our traitors until that date.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any
further questions or comments, don't hesitate to contact me. I'll
look forward to hearing your final disposition in this matter.
Sincerely in Christ,
Iden Ford
Business Administrator
IF/ba
"MAJORING IN THE WORD"
COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 20, 1987
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated in 1984, the State
Legislature passed the Pay Equity Act of 1984 which requires all
subdivisions of the State to conduct a study and establish equitable
compensation relationships between all positions. He /stated one of the
major factors must be the internal equity.
Mr. Hunt stated in 1984 and 1985, the Metro Area Management Association
conducted a series of interviews and entered into ';a contract with -Control
Data Business Advisors, Inc. to conduct an exte/isive study based on task
analysis. He stated each task, not job titles,/was individually evaluated
and assigned a point value. He stated these tasks which compromise a
particular position are weighted by the time/spent in each of those tasks
and a point value for that job is created./ He stated some of the jobs are
grouped together as benchmarks. ;P
Mr. Hunt stated the maximum earning po ential of each position is plotted
against the point value using standar=atistical procedures to develop two
trend lines, one for non-exempt emplibyees and one for exempt employees. He
then explained how the salary rams are determined for each group and the
ranges which extend from 80% tq 110% of the corresponding dollar value
associated with that group's migpoint value. He stated these actual ranges
should be available in October!
Mr. Hunt stated Control Date Business Advisors, Inc. has sold their rights
to Personnel Decisions, ne. and they are continuing to work on the
statistical end of the so udy. He stated he felt the classification and
compensation plan establishes equitable compensation among all employees.
Mr. Hunt stated Fridley was probably one of the most involved cities. He
stated most of the department heads acted as specialists in the study and he
served on the advisory committee. Mr. Hunt stated he would be the last to
say the plan is absolutely foolproof and tried to build in safeguards and
al l owanee s for appeal.
Councilman S eider asked if there were a lot of appeals. Mr. Hunt stated
only one has en received, but he anticipates more before the appeal period
expires. H stated the purpose is not to discourage appeals, but to arrive
at an equiAble point total for each position.
MOTION Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 59-1987. Seconded by
Counei an Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the m tion carried unanimously.
or Nee thanked Mr. Hunt for all his work on this compensation plan.
19. CONSIDERATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE REMOVAL OF TRAILERS USED FOR
CLASSROOMS AT FRIDLEY ASSEMBLY OF GOD, 472 OSBORNE ROAD:
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated when this property was
sold to the North Suburban Hospital District, one of the stipulations
regarding the special use permit was the two trailers used for classrooms
were to be removed by October 31, 1987. He stated a letter has been
received from Iden Ford, Business Administrator for the Fridley Assembly of
-15-
J
COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 20, 1987
Goll, which indicates a delay in construction and they have renegotiated
their closing date on the property to April 1, 1988. He stated they are
requesting the trailers be allowed to this date.
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to approve the extension of time for removal
of the trailers at the Fridley Assembly of God to no later than April 1,
1988. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the trailers were inspected by the City
staff.
Mr. Robertson stated he believed they had to be inspected since they are
used for public purposes.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated at the last Task Force meeting, there was a
tour of the facilities and she noticed a number 'of fire code violations, and
wondered about the inspections. The City staff was requested to check on
this further.
20. ORDINANCE NO. 892 RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING APPENDIX F
TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADJUSTMENT OF SALARIES FOR THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2.07 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to waive the second reading of'•'Ordinance No.
892 and adopt it on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting ayei/ Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
21. CLAIMS:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize,,payment of Claims No. 15328
through 15581. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion/carried unanimously.
22. LICENSES:
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to .approve the licenses as submitted and as
on file in the License Clerk's 0,ffice. Seconded by Councilman Schneider.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
23. ESTIMATES:
MOTION by CouncilmaXFitzpatrick •to approve the estimates as submitted:
Layne Minnesot Co.
3147 Califor a St., N.E.
Minneapoli MN 55418
Re it of Well No. 3 Project #175
NAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15, 794.30
-16-
0
Iden Ford
Fridley Assembly of God
472 Osborne Road N.E.
Minneapolis, MtV 55432
August 4, 1987
on July 20, 1987 the Fridley City Council officially approved your request
for extension of time for the removal of trailers used for classrooms at
Fridley Assembly of God, 472 Osborne Road N.E. with the following
stipulations:
1. Trailers to be removed by April 1, 1988.
If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the
Planning Department at 571-3450.
Sincerely,
James L. Robinson
Planning Coordinator
JLR/dm
Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one
copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by August 18, 1987.
Concur with action taken
0
IRA
I'T IT
NL -W
11
I
45
Rao-
FRIDLEY ASSEMBLY - OF
GOD CHURCH ADDITIOr
472 OSBCRN-- ROAD
v
s�
�I
i
1 vr�l wi:
v
i
�I
i
CITYOF
FRIDLEY
CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N. E. FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE 4612) 571-3450
ACTION TAKEN NOTTM
—rr--D cn eo-
Iden Ford" rhbtn August 4, 1987
Fridl ey Assembly of God ($7ek---7 5 5 -- 1
472 Osborne Road N. E.
Minneapolis, MV 55432
On July 20, 1987 the Fridley City Council officially approved your request
for extension of time for the removal of trailers used for classrooms at
Fridley Assembly of God, 472 Osborne Road N.E. with the following
stipulations:
1. Trailers to be removed by April 1, 1988.
If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the
Planning Department at 571-3450.
Sinoerely,
,�'James L. Robinson
Planning Coordinator
JLR/dm
Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one
copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by August 18, 1987.
Concur with action taken
19
FRIDLEY
9
'C� o
G. MARK DENYES, SENIOR PASTOR
472 OSBORNE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55432
CHURCH PHONE (812) 784.7557
June 24, 1987
STAFF
Mr. James Robinson
BRYAN J. BUCH
City Planner
CHILDREN'S PASTOR
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
[DEN C. FORD
Dear Mr. Robinson:
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR
This letter is written at your request pursuant to my telephone
conversation with your office today concerning our request for a
TED GROAT
extension of previous council action.
MINISTER OF MUSIC
When we originally sold our property to North Suburban Hospital
District, one of councils stipulations to issueing them a special
LEO PIER DOMINICI
use permit was that two traitors that we presently use for class -
YOUTH PASTOR
rooms be removed from their present position by October 31, 1987.
Due to a delay in construction, Fridley Assembly has renegotiated
LAVERN THOMPSON
our closing date with North Suburban Hospital District to no
MINISTER OF VISITATION
later then April 1, 1988. We would therefore request an extension
to move our trailors until that date.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any
further questions or comments, don't hesitate to contact me. I'll
look forward to hearing your final disposition in this matter.
Sincerely in Christ,
Iden Ford
Business Administrator
IF/ba
"MAJORING IN THE WORD"
g SP #86-15 1 9A:
North suburban
• t',� Hospital District _
111�fON
Z-
1
Ct r4) 40
ETIal
I
. ��i
le
r te' � I ;
I
J �
� a
—T—rUN
COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 20, 1987
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated in 1984y the State
Legislature passed the Pay Equity Act of 19814 which/requires all
subdivisions of the State to conduct a study and estish equitable
compensation relationships between all positions. Hekted one of the
major factors must be the internal equity.
Mr. Hunt stated in 19814 and 1985, the Metro Area nagement Association
conducted a series of interviews and entered into contract with Control
Data Business Advisors, Inc. to conduct an exte sive study based on task
analysis. He stated each task, not job titles, as individually evaluated
and assigned a point value. He stated th se tasks which compromise a
particular position are weighted by the time spent in each of those tasks
and a point value for that job is created. He stated some of the jobs are
grouped together as benchmarks.
W. Hunt stated the maximum earning po ential of each position is plotted
against the point value using standar statistical procedures to develop two
trend lines, one for non-exempt em p oyees and one for exempt employees. He
then explained how the salary r s are determined for each group and the
ranges which extend from 80% t 110% of the corresponding dollar value
associated with that group's mi point value. He stated these actual ranges
should be available in October
W. Hunt stated Control Dat Business Advisors, Inc. has sold their rights
to Personnel Decisions, ne. and they are continuing to work on the
statistical end of the s udy. He stated he felt the classification and
compensation plan eLs ab ashes equitable compensation among all employees.
Mr. Hunt stated Fridl was probably one of the most involved cities. He
stated most of the d partment heads acted as specialists in the study and he
served on the advis ry committee. Mr. Hunt stated he would be the last to
say the plan is a olutely foolproof and tried to build in safeguards and
allowances for a al.
Councilman S ider asked if there were a lot of appeals. Mr. Hunt stated
only one has en received, but he anticipates more before the appeal period
expires. H stated the purpose is not to discourage appeals, but to arrive
at an equi able point total for each position.
MOTION Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 59-1987. Seconded by
Counci an Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the m tion carried unanimously.
Nee thanked Mr. Hunt for all his work on this compensation plan.
19. CONSIDERATION OF E%TENSION OF TIME FOR THE REMOVAL OF TRAILERS USED FOR
CLASSROOMS AT FRIDLEY ASSEMBLY OF GOD, 472 OSBORNE ROAD:
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated when this property was
sold to the North Suburban Hospital District, one of the stipulations
regarding the special use permit was the two trailers used for classrooms
were to be removed by October 31, 1987. He stated a letter has been
received from Iden Ford, Business Administrator for the Fridley Assembly of
-15-
20.
COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 20, 1987
God, which indicates a delay in construction and they have renegotiated
their closing date on the property to April 19 1988. He stated they are
requesting the trailers be allowed to this date.
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to approve the extension of time far removal
of the trailers at the Fridley Assembly of God to no later than April 1,
1988. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the trailers were inspected by the City
staff.
Mr. Robertson stated he believed they had to be inspected since they are
used for public purposes.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated at the last Task Force meeting, there was a
tour of the facilities and she noticed a number 'of fire code violations, and
wondered about the inspections. The City staff was requested to check on
this further.
RE
CODE
TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADJUSTMENT OF SALARIES FOR THE MAYOR AND COUNCUMEMBERS
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to waive the second reading
892 and adopt it on the second reading and order publicati
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye
the motion carried unanimously.
21. CLAIMS:
of -'Ordinance No.
n. Seconded by
Mayor Nee declared
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize `ayment of Claims No. 15328
through 15581. Seconded by Councilwoman Jor enson. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor flee declared the motion arried unanimously.
22. LICENSES•
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to prove the licenses as submitted and as
on file in the License Clerk's 0 ice. Seconded by Councilman Schneider.
Upon a voice vote, all voting e, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
23. ESTIMATES:
MOTION by Council m Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted:
Layne Minna sot Co.
3147 Califor a St., N.E.
Minneapoli MN 55418
dir of Well No. 3 Project #175
ALESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15,794.30
-16-
Iden Ford
Fridley Assembly of God
472 Osborne Road N.E.
Minneapolis, M 55432
August 4, 1987
On July 20, 1987 the Fridley Coity Council officially approved your request
for extension of time for the removal of trailers used for classrooms at
Fridley Assembly of God, 472 Osborne Road N.E. with the following
stipulations:
1. Trailers to be removed by April 1, 1988.
If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the
Planning Department at 571-3450.
Sincerely,
Jaynes L. Robinson
Planning Coordinator
JLR/dm
Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one
copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by August 18, 1987.
Concur with action taken
y 72 aye R ( .
CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450
September 24, 1987
Mr. Harris Ratnayake
298 Liberty Street
Fridley, MN 55432
RE: Special Use Permit #86-05
Dear Mr. Ratnayke:
I am writing in regards to your Special Use Permit #86-05 which allows a Day
Care Facility in the Fridley Assembly of God. A recent inspection proved that
stipulations 2 & 3 have not been met. These stipualtions called for the
site's landscaping and curbing meet City codes and the provision of a 55400.
performance bond to cover these improvements. These two items were held in
temporary suspension until September 1, 1986. Since the property has remained
as a church, these stipualtions need to be enforced.
We must regulate the site as if it were a permanent Day Care Facility. The
City would like to see the tot lot moved to a safer part of the property such
as the east side. A pathway would also have to be installed from the Day Care
Facility to the outside play area. These are a few of the considerations
involved when planning a day care facility.
Please contact me as soon as possible about your future plans for the Day Care
Center. A year has already past since the project should have been completed.
I apologize for this delay. We are eager to complete this process with you.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Rathlyn Castle
Planning Assistant
ICAc