The URL can be used to link to this page

COUNCIL MINUTESBUILDING BOARD DMETING NRIUTEg - MAY 25, 1966: Al'1L1CATXON FOR A BtJTLDYNG FERMI.T' FOR,24 GARAGES FOR THE APARTMENT BUILDING AT 155 AND 175 SATCL1 R°TE LANE. APPLICANT STEVE 11AWRYSH, 266 MERCURY DRIVE N0"j1.'VEA2T, kR01EY, W.NIMSGTA: The City Manager showed the plan for the garages to the Council. Councilman Samucloon explained"the action of the Building Board and their recommendation for approval. Tie Council discussed a future road and whether there would be room for it, and the finish of the exteriors of the garages. MMION by Councilman Wright to concur with the recommendation of the Building Board and grant the permit with the stipulation that the south end face is Lo be brick, and the north and east walls (all exposed concrete block) to be decorated block, stucco, or brick. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voices vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. Eater in the meeting applicant Mr. Steve Hawsrysh was present and discussed this further with the Council. He pointed out that to match the expensive brick he had used would be prohibitive as the price of brick has gone up, and he could catch the color of the stucco to the brick instead. Councilman Harris asked if it could be brick partway upas nothing looks worse than wet stutco, Mr. Hawryah said that thin would not solve the problem, and that he has a blacktop surface. Mayor Kirkham said he thought the garages were a big improvement. MOTION by Councilman Wright to reconsider his previous motion and amend it deleting the words "south end face is to be brick" and replace it with "south end face is to be stucco". Secoaded by Councilman Saauel6on. Upon a voice vote, there being no aay&, 'tlayor Kirkham declared the motion c -,cried. At"FAACA"i;TUN FOR BULLO-RIG F O".k 7T BY FOD 0. WATSON COv'2ANY, 1409 1 TU" gn TA WQ-1 EA-VOLIS., R-(N1+TE 071 A, TO CONSTRUCT A CLENIC BUZIDYNG ON PROPE111,TY MMEDIATELY EAST OF MITTY HOSPXTA:L. GSA 1ROEPTY PRESENTLY 20NE.D CYC --11 The City Manager read the Building Board's recommendation that the Building Permit be granted, and the Council looked at the plans:. Councilman Samuelson said that these were nicely done plana and that this `building will be an asset to the Unity Hospital area. MOTION by Councilman Harris to concur with the reco=endation of the Building Board and grant the Building Permit as requested. Seconded by Councilman Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nay&, Mayor Kirkham declared the motioA carried. NMUTFS OF MAY 26. 1966 ti'-'-WXON by Hai rju to receive and file the minutes at' the Planning �7;--Jllsulote 'I'leetinc, of May 26, 1966. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon voice vote, there being no naya, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. *4 BUILDOG BOUM) ai:IUG MITLY, .ZS - MY 25, 1966 TLe K=tlag was called yO order by Chairman Xvavik at 7&40 P.M. RM -14 UIX CZt,'--aette, Samuelson, Kravik, Tonco (WARD 2) R:.'IUSO' TTON rOR Al. rl*UA�rJ�.�":I'G 902 24 GARLCES ITOR THE AT 155 NND AP:f:I-T_'Ci'_T9 STEVE "S'T. FFR'I'DtEY_ MENMSOTA-� EZ111CURY DRI'M VLO B=Td diaCUSUCL& Lha: ,,:)foposal witli 16T. Havarysh. Mr. S=uelson if M_;% Uawajoh 1,,)ut scL,,r brick fey Ing ou one end of the SaTv'-pG' and Mx% ITavZyL;'-' SZId he intviaed ,.o sLucco them. NOTION 'by by Lo recommead approval of a voice nays (.`:&z-,I.v=P,a Xz-zlvik the nmtloa earrLed. A BU '.: ,T%G , M'110C B'y F-RaID 0. WA, M COMP.AIT 1"'iNNESOUL TO CONSTRUCT A CLINIC BU i-'D� )DLY BAST Or- MINT E02371TAL. T ON G CY PIZ. L "'-_,z- ';Jan D.J. Parrenoad of Watson Construction _=d '�-Ioser S"h201 0'4L' Vlat"-On Construction Comqxmy. The tha pinn, set -backs, parking aad ilith tho-J�� r'ca,=evd that the N vS=Uelsoa.' by Chenotte to F04pi70.' Upoa a vo ce vote" t here being no nz;v;' chair=n '_;".-L4zv4k Ono Lotion carried. Ip '00 Vz2va being no kurther busftab,?.�, rbe meeting adjourned at 80I3 PM. R,-��pectful'_iy uub-nttted, Acting Secretary to the3o;zrdl 'FR � . �..s r hti.(�� .e. x� a �`t s f � !r-�.- eib ka:�n,:�n'i%,adi'#sivY�.dt9�.�ast`-�"�>tn�+.� ,��± s. �'#+� •..�,: z� _ . - J'.' V f 3K+ t M 7 ` �•4. 3 a A E 7 JtW'M" .fes • NPR4111-690 � 1 t41 DDI _ law -�" , ,� ,► 'Mrs -M44 735 b 11540� 3B 99; ao s/ !e755•. 00 Ap* 8�; A ,• '�!',b Ta9b 7494 7496 "�► 2�� $� tip TJi'i , ��; 35 3 6 ^� ��• '� � �� ate. f" 2 s 711 1� q20— SAM •+ONC TO,,q ' �` , �.►: 74 7iNui � �c.}�+��,....�r►!i'�i � .�.�. p�1� �.: � 'fd�'"= %� ��3 743 ' - - 37- I m aAaElk �; m Fridley Appeals Commission Meeting of August 10, 1976 Page 11 35 and it would be costly to the petitioner. He said it was just mentioned as a suggestion. MOTION by Barna, seconded by Kemper, to close the Public Hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 2110TI0:3 by Kemper, seconded by Barna, that the Appeals Commission approve the request for variance. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairperson Schnabel asked Mr. Holden about the statement in the Administrative Staff Report saying that "Staff's concern in this matter is that the 'intent' of the ordinance is maintained". Mr. Holden stated that Steve Olson, the Environmental Officer, was concerned that granting this variance would open the door for someone else to get it back doirn. Mr. Holden said he tried to assure him that each case was considered on its individual basis, apd said he hentt the ee into complytbecuse it was a withathe ordinancenwascthereble whenence. Mr. Plemel Mr. Gustafson said t built the fence. 4. A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, SECTION 205.113, Lt, (A21) TO REDUCE THE REQUIRE1-1E1.--iT OF A MINII•SUM FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 20 FEET FOR USES OTHER THAI? THE MAIN BUILDIIJG TO 0 FEET FOR A PARKING LOT, AND SECTION 205.113, Lt, (C,1), TO REDUCE THE REQUIRE•IENT OF A MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK OF 25 FEET TO 13 FEET TO ALIUVI MORE CONVENIENT PARKING FOR Ti:E ILL Ai3D HANDICAPPED ON PROPERTY ZONED CR -1 (GENERAL OFFICE AND LIMITED BUSINESS) LOCATED ON THE NOR 1100 FEET OF THE �•7EST 217.60 FEST OF OUTLOT 1, MELODY MANOR LITH ADDITIONS THE SAME BEING 7675 MADISON STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, 1•II1J.NESOTA. (Request by FMC & Associates --Fridley Medical Center --7675 Madison Street N.E., Fridley, P•Iinnesota 55432)• MOTION by Barna, seconded by Kemper, to open the Public Hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY RE�-,)UIRE'•iENT: Section 205.113, 4, 4, minimum front yard setback of -20 feet on CR -1 zoned property. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide sufficient area for a landscape buffer between commercial structures and the public right of way. Section 205.1139 49 C1, minimum rear yard of 25 feet on CR -1 zoned property. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space around commercial structures for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. B. STATED HARDSHIP: Request for variance on distance from property line to parking lot. Request a setback as presently used on present site. If we are required to abide Fridley Appeals Commission Meeting of August 109 1976 Page 14 37 the Appeals Commission received from Mayor tree and her reply to him. She explained that when the members of the Planning Commission read Mayor Nee's remarks there was considerable discussion; there were some points brought out and questions raised. She continued that some of the questions raised were very similar to the questions the Appeals Commission raised, such as could certain allegations he made be substantiated, etc. Mrs. Schnabel said that another question that was raised was if these lots are taxed as buildable sites, and if so, did the City have any legal rights to deny building on them. She said it appeared that they are not taxed as buildable sites, so there was no legal problem in that area. She stated that another question that was asked was what happened if the property was tax - forfeit land, and who would pay for the maintenance? A point made by Jerry Boardman, she said, was that in a discussion with someone from the Fridley State Bank he discovered that only 25% of families can afford housing as it currently exists. She said that the Mayor had stated that perhaps they had a. responsibility to the current residents of Fridley who possibly built with the intent of keeping some open spaces. Chairperson Schnabel said that the Planning Commission passed a motion to request an informal meeting with the members of the City Council at a time and date to be set. That motion passed, she stated, and it was also part of the recommendation in the letter the Appeals Commission sent to the Mayor. Mrs. Schnabel continued that following the Planning Cornrnilsion meeting she met tfUfor Nee across the hall and told him they had just had a discussion, and asked if he had received her letter to him concerning the !r0' lots, and he replied he had. She said they talked about the situation and were joined by Dick Harris, Chairperson of the Planning Commission. She stated that they agreed they should take another look at the 40' lot as a building site, and agreed to set up a meeting. Mrs. Schnabel explained she would be having surgery the end of the week, and it was felt that when she was able to participate in the meeting following that surgery, a time would be set up. She stated it probably wouldn't be until September. Chairperson Schnabel said the one thought that came out of their discussion was that somehow or other they would like to see some type of control by the City over the type of dwellings that are put on 40' lots. She stated she had brought up that Mr. Barna had brought in a book of houses that could be constructed on 40' lots with no variances required. She said if they had some means of having control over 40' lots, a speculator couldn't come in and buy a strip of 40' lots just to make money. She stated that another thought that came out of their discussion was to perhaps put all lots that are under minimum size under a PUD code so that there could be some type of control. She explained that PUD stood for Planned Unit Develop- ment, and the land in Innsbruck North where there was a combination of townhouses, apartment houses and private residences was all zoned PUD.* Mrs. Schnabel stated that thought was something they should probably pursue if they decided they wanted to have any construction on 40' lots, but they might decide for one reason or another that they didn't want to. *(Staff correction: North Innsbruck zoned by individual development). Chairperson Schnabel said that at this point it was the intent to get together the Planning Commission, the City Council, and any other people who were interested from the various subcommissions for an informal meeting concerning utilization of 40' lots. Planning Commission Meeting - August 189 1976 Page 10 Mrs. Shea said she would like to discuss the motion by the Human -Resources Commissionidley that $12000 be designated, for FinenArtsext sCommitteeix �could notto the support She stated that the She explained Fine Arts Committee. had requested itself, and they felt it was a worthwhile venture last year they that this year they were asking for $190001 and last y six hs s a se a little bit more. She further explained that tshould gettmoreathancther$12000. simply because most of the Commission felt th Y lied that program was, and Mrs. Shea rep Chairperson Harris asked what p and over the winter they hoped to sponsor la coming up expenditure last year, which they had another play School's money. concerts. She explained that the play was the and Community and o far as came to $2,800; and they usehadthe made$750 on thmone play total receipt, Mrs. Shea said that they the would ever break even. Mr. Peterson they could see there was no way Y great effort through asked if they made any kind of an effort to broaden their base as far as participation went, and Mrs. Shea replied that they. made g the paper• which said that he had seen the play "You Can't Take It With You", Mr. Bergmanpercentage of the had run three nights, and there had been an awfully small p the figures, He stated he was bothered a little bit byo le's population in attendance* ed trying to force culture down pe P and felt that possibly they mightin culture. He added that if the throats who weren't that interested in buying 800 that said something. He play receipts were $750 and the costs were $2$ aid for by the other citizenry, further added that the $2,100 deficit was being p whether they knew it or not; and if they weren't that interested, should thought money be spent that way? Mrs. Gabel stated that on the other hand, should be given some time for the exposure to culture, and she the community Peterson commented that the Footlighters would like to give it a chance. Mr. went out of existence for the same reason. Mr. Langenfeld as to Mrs. Shea said that the idea behind the Fine �tsiven somentimeuce local artis s, and she felt it was a new concept and ed t g on a rock n roll Shea and added that the Fine Arts Committee was just said he agreed with Mrs. ir►ight make money rock s. He getting their feet wet. He stated that nsate for the loss of the plays- type musical, or something else to a Ho Plan, in which there was an to the Housing were becoming more mature, further stated that according effort was continued. intensive study, they found the residents of Fridley and perhaps they would become more culture -minded if an re was as great as it Mrs. Gabel commented that she didn't think the expo could be. .Harris stated that before he could vote for this in good conscience Chairpersonram for the next six months to see how the money he would like to see their program would be spent. seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission table the MOTION by Shea, Fine Arts Committee discussion on the $1,000 U o e avoiceavote,oallevotingeaye., the motion carried until the next meeting. P unanimously. RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: AUGUST 10 lYfo that the Planning Commission receive the Aseconded by of August 10, 1976• Upon a voice MOTION by Bergman peals Sheal als Commission meeting minutes of the pe REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1976 PAGE 4 Mayor Nee then asked if r. Barker was present or anyone else on this matter and there was no response. Councilman Hamernik stated at although Mr. Ketroser, et al, did a tremendous job in making these plans iIable to the City Council, he felt that the plans shoul lso be made able to the Appeals Commission for their review in this regard. Mr. m Qureshi, the City Manager, then suggested that perhaps more time c d be given in this matter since there were objections at the Appeals mmis 'on level and the fact that Mr. Barker was not in attendance this ening, in t hope that some type of solution could be reached. MOTION by Counci_1m6n Hamernik to table this matter til the meeting of September 20, 1976. SgXfided by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a ce vote, all voting aye, Mayor Pee declared the motion carried unanimously. FLEY MEDICAL CENTER, 7675 MADISON: Dick Sobiech, the Public Works Director, led the discussion and stated that was a request by the Fridley Medical Center for variances to the rear yard and front yard setback in order to allow expansion to an existing building. He then made reference to a diagram on the easel. Ms. Vivian Linquist, `?:,Administrator, Fridley Medical Center, then addressed the City Council. She ��commented that Dr.. Herb Strait could not be present as he was called away on an emergency. Ms. Linquist continued that the apartment building was south: and east of their present building and that there was an empty lot between buildings. Mr. Sobiech stated thatthe Appeals Commission did recommend approval of the request at their August 10th meeting. Pts. Linquist proceeded � to show a survey sheet to the City Council. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant the variance. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PAKO PHOTO, INC., 248 MISSISSIPPI ST., SP if 6-12: Mr. Mario Fernandez isplayed to the City C uncil a miniature film processing drop-off model struct a and stated that t e proposed building would be basically the same size as what w there. He furth r stated that a?1 of the plans have been submitted to the bui ding department nd they have reviewed them; and after being in contact -with them this date, all that was pending was the Council's acting upon this. Mr. Sobi h then cormneted to the City Council that Mr. Fernandez had agreed to comply with the previous s ipulations. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik t concur ith the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant the special se pe mit with the five stipulations as specified in the Planning Commission's minut of August 18, 1976. Seconded by Council- woman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, 11 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee then asked to take item nu er 6 out of order, and the remainder of the Planning Commission items were di scu sed 1 ter in the meeting. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGREEME BETWEEN TY OF FRIDLEY/CARLSON/SKOINJ AMERNICAN LEGION FOR USE OF PROPERTY AT 7365 CENNL AVENUE N.E. AND CONSIDERATION OF TRANSFER OF LIQUO LICENSE FOR THE ERICAN LEGION CLUB, 1315 RICE CREEK ROAD TO THE FRONTIER CLAJB, 7365 CENTRAL AVENE AND ORDERING PUBLICATION OF ORDINAN N0. 621 TO AMEND THE CI CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BB -KING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS: Mayor Nee stated that handwri ten letters were received sepdrat y from two property owners adjacent to the area hich letters indicated that they wi permit overflow parking in their lots and t at it would be in order to receive suc letters. i t I 137 ' REGULAR COUNCIL• MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1976 PAGE 3 CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECT ON 11.10 QF FRID EY CITY CODE REEVING TO FEES: M Dick Sobiech, Public Works Director, responded/detemination his matter st ting that the Fin nce Director is basically responsible for Chap1. However most of the special i use ermit procedures goes through the Public Workartment. Sobiech then state that the special use permit service providethe City s variable, varyinq. in cos from one situation to another. In order termine a proper fee, an average of a number of actual applications was takappro riately determine a fee to c arge for this service. Depending upon thrcumst nces involved in a particula request, it could end up with more or ltaff time in processing the applicatio However, what was determined was thhe ecial use permit requirement for the sec d accessory buildings occurred mainlyre idential areas, and in previous cas was basically a second garage. Kno't is always a second garage and always in residential area, this demonstratee a more consistent and repetitive type of procedure and did not involve aerage determination of time and cost, theref e, knowing also that it did resun a lower amount in cost and Staff time involv in processinci such application Mr. Sobiech further ated that based on the :Mmentioned, he felt confident that with the reductio in cost for special use permits for second accessory buildings from $120 to $80; the C y's cost would still a covered in processing the applications. He also pointed out'that ased on the City Co ncil's motion at the last meeting, they have begun charging o y the $80 fee an a refund was given to a previous applicant who paid the $120 ee in anticipa ion of the reconsideration of the original fee. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to wive t reading and adopt the ordinance on the first reading which amends Cha ter Section 11.10. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all vo ng aye, Mayor Nee declared the -gotion r carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANN NG COMM SION MEETING OF AUGUST 18, 1976: CONSIDERATION OF APPEALS COMMI ION MINUTES F AUGUST 10, 1976: M & I SUPPLY, 6005 UNIVERS Y AVENUE N.E.: Mr. Dick Sobiech, Public Porks Director, was ca led upon by Mayor Nee to discuss the matter. He tated that this was a v riance request by M & I Supply located at/6005 University Avenue wh ch consisted of: (1) reduce the rear yard setback rom 25' to 10', and (2) red a the side yard setback from 35' to 17'. It hould be noted that the side rd setback is presently existing with the ex sting structure. He also no hat there was quite a bit of discussion at the Appeals Commission meeting f August 10, 1976; however, they did recommend to City Council approval of the vari ce renuest with stipulations. Mr Sobiech then noted the stipulations an the expansion plan diagram, which a unted to expanding the building to the st of the present existin structure, and that the rear yard setback riance and the side yard setba k variance was needed. Ma/dd e then asked who was present and Mr. Ketroser, Attorney\been M & I Suresp ded and stated that Mr. Benson of Shepherd Conston Coand r. Holden of M & I Supply were also in attendanceKetroser stthat since the matter was considered by the Appeals Como more ded d swings have been made by an architect concerning thpo d coct* n. To the best of Mr. Ketroser's knowledge, the arct h been ina with the Engineer's office in Fridley attempting toose t coion that would comply with the requirements of approvthe Ap ealsCoon. Mr. Ketroser along with Mr. Benson and fir. Holdenproceedto`several plans to the City Council. After some discussCouncilmanHak raised the question about the concern of the propertyr directlybeas to the view he is going to have. lie. Ketroser statet this wasa rcial area and that the property owner knew this when hlt his home. I I 1 City of Fridley APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY FEBRUARY 15 1983 PAGE 1 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Gabel called the Appeals Commission Meeting of Tuesday, February 15, 1983, to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Patricia Gabel, Alex Barna, Jim Plemel, Jean Gerou, Donald Betzold Others Present: Kent Hill, City of Fridley Ing Siverts, 6850 Siverts Lane N.E., Fridley Vivian Hoese, 7675 Madison Street N.E., Fridley Blanche Erkel, 567 Rice Creek Terrace, Fridley Ivy and Jack Young, 17925 -26th Avenue North Les Gerdin, 6739 Kennaston Drive N.E. APPROVAL OF APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 18 1983: The word "asked" was inserted as the third word on the first line, page 3. Mr. Siverts had corrections on page 6, third paragraph line 5, should read"5 feet apart" instead of 10-12 feet apart and line 9, should read "walk to their bedroom window" instead of through their bedroom window; and line 19, the words "on a lower level" should be stricked. MOTION by Mrs. Gerou, seconded by Mr. Betzold, to approve the minutes as corrected. UPON A VOICE VOTE ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. I. TABLED: VA UANT COU J1YtKIJ LANt N.E. (Request .E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432). R 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, OM -7FEET TO 10 FEET IN THE REAR D --SURVEY NO. 3, THE SAME BEING s. Ing Siverts, 6850 Siverts Lane MOTION by Mr. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Barna, to remove this agenda item from the die. UPON A VOICE VOTE ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Betzold, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:35 P.M. Mr. Hill submitted drawings to the Commission and said that the petitioner has withdrawn his request for the south side yard variance, and that 7 feet has been agreed upon by the parties. Mr. Siverts was present for this matter. Ms. Gabel said she spoke with Mr. Clark and the fence is not structurally sound as it stands now and these plans are what is necessary to make the fence structurally sound; that the specifications have to be followed. Mrs. Gerou stated she visited the area and found the fence to be wobbly, tied with phone wire, that the vertical boards are uneven and do not run in a straight line and the horizontal boards are bowed. She also said the angle support beams are on the neighbor's side of the fence and 3 feet of the fence is above the Appeals Commission Meeting —February 15 1983 Paae 2 support beams. Ms. Gabel said, according to the blueprint, the fence can be made structurally sound. Mrs. Gerou asked the petitioner why the angle support beams are facing the neighbor's and if he takes care of the property on the other side of the fence. Mr. Siverts said the support beams are on his property and he does not take care of the property on the other side of the fence. Ms. Gabel noted that his neighbor objected to that at the last hearing. Mr. Barna said he visited the area and looked at the walkway at the Medtronics building and he could not see the hardship as stated and said the Commission is looking for a sounder hardship. He said the parking lot is not on the street side and he does not have street sounds. Ms. Gabel said she visited the area also and that everyone in the neighborhood is subject to the same conditions and if they allowed a 10 -foot fence to be put up, the whole neighborhood could put one up. Mr. Siverts asked if the Commission thought the fence would be out of place aesthetically and Ms. Gabel, Mrs. Gerou, Mr. Barna and Mr. Betzold agreed it would. He then asked how important the neighbors opinions were and Ms. Gabel said it is one factor and that is why the public hearing notices are sent out and having a definite hardship is another factor. Mr. Barna said if objections exist either with the neighbors or the commission, then it is up to the City Council and even if the fence was a joint venture with the neighbors, there would still have to be a hardship. Mr. Siverts presented two letters from two neighbors who had no objection to the fence. MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna, to receive the two letters from Mr. Siverts' neighbors and they both do not object to the fence. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Siverts said there is a constant humming sound coming from somewhere and Mr. Barna said that it was the reflection of sound of tires off Highway 65. Mr. Siverts felt the fence would be a protector from he sound and in some placed a 7 foot fence would not be adequate because of the elevation of the terrain in the area. MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Betzold, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M. Mr. Betzold said he has visited the area during the daytime and evening and he is not convinced of the hardship. Mr. Plemel said the Siverts' home is in a unique setting and did not see where the fence would be readily visible by others. Mrs. Gerou felt the fence is an eyesore and was not convinced of the hardship. Ms. Gabel said she was not convinced of the hardship either. MOTION by Mr. Betzold, seconded by Mrs. Gerou, that the Appeals'Commission recommend to the City Council, through the Planning Commission, denial of the variance request to increase the maximum height of a fence from 7 feet to 10 feet in the rear yard and side yards of Lot C, Registered Land Survey No. 3, the same being 6850 Siverts Lane N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432. UPON A VOICE VOTE, THREE VOTING AYE AND TWO VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. 2. VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 15 FEET TO 13 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRI F AN ADDITION OF APPROXIMATELY 3,000 SQUARE FEET, TO BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL OFFICE AND MEDICAL SPACE, LOCATED ON THE NORTH 400 FEET OF THE WEST 217.8 FEET OF OUTLOT 1 MELODY MANOR 4TH ADDITION THE SAME BEING 7675 MADISON STREET N.E. Request by Vivian Hoese, B. M. C. i Associatef Fridley Medical Center Bldg. 8 Land),7675 Madison Street N.E.. Fridley, Minnesota 55432). ION Appeals Commission Meeting - February 15, 1983 Page 3 MOTION by Mrs. Gerou, seconded by Mr. Barna, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:05 P.M. Ms. Vivian Hoese was present for this matter. Mr. Hill presented the Commission with plans of the proposed addition. 14s. liese said they would probably put the airconditioning unit on the roof of the building. Ms. Gabel asked if there would be a loss of parking and Ms . Hoese said there would not be and Mr. Hill stated they would still be within the code but they are asking the petitioner to replace the temporary bumper blocks with poured concrete. The additional landscaping suggested in the Staff Report was questioned and Mr. Hill noted thatittte landscaping appeared adequate.. Ms. Hoese stated that the patient and employee parking will be separated and there will be no problems with entrances and exits. Mr. Hill said that Items 3 and 4 on the Staff Report, regarding parking, may not be feasible for this situation. Ms. Gabel noted that all they are doing is just extending what they have done previously and she could not see any problems. Mr. Barna said his only question he had was visibility in the parking lot and he drove through the area and found no problems. Chairperson Gabel read the Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 7675 Madison Street N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.113, 4 (b) requires a minimum of 15 feet for a side yard setback. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space around commercial structures for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. B. STATED HARDSHIP: Existing sideyard setback is 13 feet. New addition would be built even with existing building. Additional space is needed for offices, orthopaedic coverage and physical therapy." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: This request is to vary a side yard setback in a CR -1 District from the required 15 feet to 13 feet, to enable construction of a 68 foot by 48 foot (3,264 square feet) addition to an existing structure. This addition will be used for additional office space and patient treatment rooms. On September 13, 1976, two variances were approved by the City Council: a front yard parking setback from 20 feet to 0 feet and a rear yard building setback from 25 feet to 13 feet. However, this request should have been to vary a side yard parking setback from 5 feet to 0 feet and another side yard building setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The actual variances would vary less than the request and since there was no opposition to the variance or construction, the request was not changed. If this variance is approved, the Appeals Commission may want to'consider the following: A peals Commission Meeting - February 15, 1983 Page 4 1. upgrade temporary concrete curbing to permanent 6 inch poured concrete. 2. plant additional landscape/screen along Osborne Road and Madison Street. 3. parking aisles are not 25 feet, but 20 feet 4. parking stalls are not 10 feet by 20 feet, but 10 feet by 15 feet. Items 3 and 4 may not be feaisble to complete, except to the south of the building. MOTION by Mr. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:17 P.M. Mr. Barna said that this does provide open space around the structure for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes; it is still accessible and the addition will not change anything. Mr. Plemel stated he had no objection to this addition. MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mrs. Gerou. that the Appeals Commission recommend to the City Council, through the Planning Commission, approval of the variance request to reduce the required side yard setback from 15 feet to 13 feet, to allow the construction of an addition of approximately 3,000 square feet, to be used for additional office and medical space, located on the north 400 feet of the west 217.8 feet of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition, the same being 7675 -Madison Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432, with the stipulation that the petitioner upgrade the temporary concrete curbing to permanent 6 inch poured concrete. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. OTHER BUSINESS: Ms. Gabel said she has spoken to Mr. Deblon and apparently he had a variance request that he thought was withdrawn and the petitioner thought it was on the agenda and further stated they could discuss this matter but the Commission could take no action on it as there had been no public notices sent out, etc. Mr. Hill explained that Mr. Les Gerdin was purchasing a home from Blanche Erkel and they made a re- quest sometime in the middle of January to vary the code regarding the flood plain. Apparently, Mr. Gerdin was planning to convert the present garage into living quarters and to construct a new garage in front of the present garage. He stated that the City ordinance, the Department of Natural Resources and the federal govern- ment does not allow any building to exist below the flood Olevation. He also stated that this situation might require a special use permit rather than a variance and to go through the Planning Commission on March 16th. Ms. Gabel said the City staff is doing some research on this now as this is a non -conforming use. Mr. Hill suggested the petitioner to give some consideration to constructing vertical rather than horizontal; that by building up, they would be outside the flood elevation. Mr. Hill thought it best that the parties involved get together with the Staff to discuss this situation. Mrs. Erkel said she has talked to the neighbors and they have no objections. Ms. Gabel said she could'eot see any problems either except for the flood plain restrictions. Appeals Commission Meeting - February 15, 1983 Page 5 Mr. Hill said that any construction done would have to go before the DNR and Rice Creek Watershed for approval. Mrs. Erkel said she bought the house in 1964 and as far as she knew, there have been no problems with flooding for 82 years. Mr. Hill stated that as of January 1, 1983, the State has required the City to file with Anoka County any variances, special use permits and lot splits and they will become part of the deed. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mrs. Gerou, to adjourn. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15, 1983, ADJOURNED AT 8:40.P.M. Respectfully submitted, Deb Niznik, Recording Secretary 41'co'00 CITY OF FRIOLBY, SUBJECT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. NE. FRIDLEY. MN. 65438 96-WOr 1-3460 VARIANCES ADDRESS 7675 Madison St. N.E. DATE N 2- T1 VP 2-" APPEALS COMMISSION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW: CITY COUNCIL: STIPULATIONS: REQUIRED: YES APPROVED DISAPPROVED NAME B.M.C. & Associates C R I (Fridley Medical Center Bldg. & Land DATE NO. FEE $100.00 RECEIPT NO.J%a2— LOT. NO. BLOCK NO. TRACT OR ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The north 400 feet of the west 217.8 feet of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition, subject to an easement over the west 30 feet thereof 1 -vee 6,_.. efts;6 IG fee+ % eof for utilities VARIANCE REQUEST (S): (Attach plat or survey of property showing building, variances, etc. = where pp)icable) �a �- f �ro� / fo To %-f- e ��e r�ceired stdila&d r � X121 � % II rczG ,©f1 ®T '2600, 3/ 000 s 94"J oedhj 'e List specific ha dship(s) which requires the variances(s): 1 ®® xr S fi�l �,� � o` e70�� / S /3 . Ale, to a/0 //;P^ woo .� y/" i,?/ --",A ?ee t1e4lew 10r Ac es® 01-0 ®pee e Cov 4ye aoX71 ,0064Si col DATE 'I�� I g'� / SIGNATURE ADDRESS 7675 Madison St. N.E. Fridley, Minn. TELEPHONE NO. 786-2700 y VARIANCES FOR CITY USE ONLY Board members notified of meeting by VCCet-KZ63 2/11/83 List members, ' date notified, and "Yes" or "No" for plans to attend hearing. Plan Gabel Name Date To Attend rtiau:i owning appcai aim wiC rvi�vwing pwNCrLy owners naving proper -Ly wizmn [UU Teet notified: Name By Whom - Date Phone or Mail Notified Yi.xiaII HnPSP_R- jam. —r %•- Street N.E. 2/4/83 Mail DE Administrator, Frfdley Convalescent Home j �.(Zryrir I ane Nom, 550 Osborne Road N.E. Highland Park Development b4�=Rand Tewer, Np4s 55492 P.B.Q. Stores- 3310 University Avenue Madison, — W! 53785 --- ht --r}--Rupprert and e. A. towe ETAt- 620 Osborne Road N.E. City of Snrina Lake Park ..� 11301 81st Avenue N- F- iI i '1'"—'--r Spring Lake Park, Mn 55432 Item #2 February 15, 1983 ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 7675 Madison Street N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.113, 4 (b) requires a minimum of 15 feet for a side yard setback. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space around commercial structures for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Existing sideyard setback is 13 feet. New addition would be built even with existing building. Additional space is needed for offices, orthepaedic coverage and physical therapy." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: This request is to vary a side yard setback in a CR -1 District from the required 15 feet to 13 feet, to enable construction of a 68 foot by 48 foot (3,264 square feet) addition to an existing structure. This addition will be used for additional office space and patient treatment rooms. On September 13, 1976, two variances were approved by the City Council: a front yard parking setback from 20 feet to 0 feet and a rear yard building setback from 25 feet to 13 feet. However, this request should have been to vary a side yard parking setback from 5 feet to 0 feet and another side yard building setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The actual variances would vary less than the request and since there was no opposition to the variance or construction, the request was not changed. If this variance is approved, the Appeals Commission may want to consider the following: I. upgrade temporary,concrete curbing to permanent 6 inch poured concrete. 2. plant additional landscape/screen along Osborne Road and Madison Street. 3. parking aisles are not 25 feet, but 20 feet 4. parking stalls are not 10 feet by 20 feet, but 10 feet by 15 feet. Items 3 and 4 may not be feaisble to complete, except to the south of the building. lee7l CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE ( 812)571-3450 February 4, 1983 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley l will conduct a Public Hearing in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue Northeast at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 15, 1983 in regard to the following matter: Consideration of a variance request pursuant to Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the required side yard setback from 15 feet to 13 feet, to allow the construction of an addition of approximately 3,000 square feet, to be used for additional office and medical space, located on the north 400 feet of the west 217.8 feet of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition, the same being 7675 Madison Street N.E. Notice is hereby given that all persons having an interest therein will be given the opportunity to be heard at the above time and place. PATRICIA GABEL CHAIRWOMAN APPEALS COMMISSION w 0. and it would be costly to the petitioner. He said it was just mentioned as a suggestion. MOTION by Barna,, seconded by Kemper, to close the Public Hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Kemper, seconded by Barna, that the Appeals Commission approve the request for variance. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairperson Schnabel asked Mr. Holden about.the statement in the Administrative Staff Report saying that "Staff's concern in this matter is that the 'intent' of the ordinance is maintained". Mr. Holden stated that Steve Olson, the Environmental Officer, was concerned that granting this variance would open the door for someone else to get it back down. Mr. Holden said he tried to assure him that each case was considered on its individual basis, and said he felt the intent was met because it was a non -climbable fence. Mr. Plemel said the intent to comply with the ordinance was there when Mr. Gustafson built the fence. �. A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, SECTION 205.113, 4, (All) TO REDUCE THE REQUIREMENT OF A MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 20 FEET FOR USES OTHER THAN THE MAIN BUILDING TO 0 FEET FOR A PARKING LOT, AND SECTION 205.113, 4, (C11), TO REDUCE THE REQUIREMENT OF A MINIMUM )ILAR YARD SETBACK OF 25 FEET TO 13 FEET TO ALLOW MORE CONVENIENT PARKING FOR THE ILL AND HANDICAPPED ON PROPERTY ZONED CR -1 (GENERAL OFFICE AND LIMITED BUSINESS) LOCATED ON THE NORTH 400 FEET OF THE WEST 217.30 FEET OF OUTLOT 12 MELODY MANOR 4TH ADDITION, THE --SAME BEING 7675 MADISON STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (Request by FMC & Associates --Fridley Medical Center --7675 Madison Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432)• MOTION by Barna, seconded by Kemper, to open the Public Hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.113, 4, 4, minimum front yard setback of 20 feet on CR -1 zoned property. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide sufficient area for a landscape buffer between commercial structures and the public right of way. Section 205.113, 4, C�, minimum rear yard of 25 feet on CR -1 zoned property. ablic purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space round commercial structures for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. B. STATED HARDSHIP: Request for variance on distance from property line to parking lot. Request a setback as presently used on present site. If we are required to abide y , Fridley Appeals Commission Meeting of August 10, 1976 Page 12 e - It with present codes, it would destroy the appearance of attempting to follow thru with a building design such as we have now. Also, it would eliminate many parking stalls near the building which.is important for injured, ill, or handicapped patients. Request for rear yard setback is an attempt to make the existing building a functional entity. It is felt that by adding 2688 square feet to the rear of the building will enable better patient flow and result in more efficient care. It would,also serve as a service area; keeping trucks, deliveries, and employee parking to the rear of the building. Again, allowing the front area for convenient parking for our patients. C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The proposed Fridley Medical Center addition is designed to come within 13 feet of the rear lot line (see attached drawing). This rear addition is intended to accommodate office space, nurses lounge, doctors lounge and records storage. This rear (east) lot line is adjacent to an existing blacktopped driveway. Present plans do not indicate -if this 13 feet area would be paved or not. The variance request includes a zero setback in front to continue parking as it now exists. Compliance with the Code would eliminate several parking stalls proposed to be adjacent to the front of the building. The existing zero setback for parking in the front of the building is the result of a 30 foot roadway dedication secured from the property owners in 1965. Doctor Herb Strait and Ms. Vivian Linquist, Administrator, approached the Board to present their request. Doctor Strait showed the Corimissioners a survey of the existing building they have now, and said they started in a five -man building and now had 13. He showed where they wanted to put the addition, and said they were asking for a variance so they could continue the boulevard and keep the parking spaces, and also put this addition within i51 of the property line. Chairperson Schnabel asked if the proposed addition would come out about half way and split the parking lots into staff and patient, and Ms. Lindquist answered that was correct. Doctor.Strait explained that in order to get the space they needed without a variance, they would have to.build the addition the other way. He added that the hardship was they needed more space, and the proposed plan was the best way to give them the excessive parking spaces they needed. Air. Kemper asked what percent.coverage there would be, and Mr. Holden replied 17% lot coverage. Mr. Kemper asked when they intended to start construction, and Doctor Strait said as soon as they could. He added that right now they were moving their OB Department to get some breathing space. Ho'further stated that the exterior was pretty well set as far as size, etc., and they thought their plan was pretty workable. He said their would be no access or egress in the back of the building, and between the building and the driveway would be green area. { Fridley Appeals Commission Meeting of August 100 1976 Page 13 Chairperson Schnabel commented that it was a vital addition to the community, also. She noted that there was some correspondence in the file concerning the soil tests, and suggested the City.would like to review those. Mr. Holden said most certainly. MOTION by Kemper, seconded by Plemel, to close the Public Hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Holden said his only concern was the business of obtaining access through the driveway. MOTION by Kemper, seconded by Barna, that the Appeals Commission recommend to Council approval of the request for variance with the stipulation that if access for the Doctor's parking lot isn't acquired as drawn, the Appeals Commission be given the opportunity to review the plans again. Doctor Strait said if they couldn't get that, they would try to get another access off of Osborne, or vacate the area. Mr. Kemper said that part of the analysis of this whole thing was to take a look at theentire proposal. He stated that if they didn't get that one particular_ entrance into the parking lot, they would have to do something quite drastic which could affect the.Appeals Commission's decision. Chairperson Schnabel asked if this would fall under some specific inspection, and wondered if there would be somebody on top of the situation so they would know whether or not the clinic was able to obtain permission from the owner to use that driveway._ Mr. Holden replied that the Planning Department would be looking into it. He suggested the alternatives would be; 1) Get an easement, 2) Go off Osborne Road, 3) Abandon it, and 4) Provide a driveway on the North side of the building. Mr. Plemel said he would like to speak against the stipulation as he didn't think it had anything to do with the variances. Air. Kemper said he agreed it didn't have anything to do with the variances, but felt they should take a look at the affect of the total plans. Mrs. Schnabel said she respected what Air. Kemper was saying, and if the proposed plans would be drastically • changed by the failure.to get permission, she would agree with him. She said she was a little reluctant to go along with the stipulation because she felt the Planning Department was really in control of that situation. Mr. Kemper said that if the plan was going to change he would like some assurance that it would be reviewed carefully. He added that if he could have that assurance he wouldn't have any objection to removing that stipulation. Mr. Holden said that he had confidence in Mr. Boardman's review of the plan, and the petitioner was conscientious to respond to the Planning Department's wishes. Mr. Kemper AMENDED the MOTION to remove the stipulation. Seconded by Barna. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 5. RECEIVE MEMO TO WILLIAM NEE MAYOR FROM VIRGINIA SCHNABELt DATED JULY 30 1977 ON UTILIZATION OF 401 LOTS: Chairperson Schnabel said that she attended the Planning Commission meeting last Wednesday, and in the Planning Commission minutes was the letter that Fridley Appeals Commission Meeting of August 10, 1976 Page 14 the Appeals Commission received from Mayor Nee and her reply to him. She explained that when the members of the Planning Commission read Mayor Nee's remarks there was considerable discussion; there were some points brought out and questions raised. She continued that some of the questions raised were very similar to the questions the Appeals Commission raised, such as could certain allegations he made be substantiated, etc. Mrs. Schnabel said that another question that was raised was if these lots are taxed as buildable sites, and if so, did the City have any legal rights to deny building on ti -em. She said it appeared that they are not taxed as buildable sites, so there was no legal problem in that area. She stated that another question that was asked was what happened if the property was tax - forfeit land, and who would pay for the maintenance? A point made by Jerry Boardman, she said, was that in a discussion with someone from the Fridley State Bank he discovered that only 25% of families can afford housing as it currently exists. She said that the Mayor had stated that perhaps they had a•responsibility to the current residents of Fridley who possibly built with the intent of keeping some open spaces. Chairperson Schnabel said that the Planning Commission passed a motion to request an informal meeting with the members of the City Council at a time and date to be set. That motion passed, she stated, and it was also part of the recommendation in the letter the Appeals Commission sent to the Mayor. Mrs. Schnabel continued that following the Planning Commission meeting she met Mayor Nee across the hall and told him they had just had a discussion, and asked if he had received her letter to him concerning the 40' lots, and he replied he had. She said they talked about the situation and were joined by Dick Harris, Chairperson of the Planning Commission. She stated that they agreed they should take another look at the 40' lot as a building site, and agreed to set up a meeting. Mrs. Schnabel explained she would be having surgery the end of the week, and it was felt that when she was able to participate in the meeting following that surgery, a time would be set up. She stated it probably wouldn't be until September. Chairperson Schnabel said the one thought that came out of their discussion was that somehow or other they would like to see some type of control by the City over the type of dwellings that are put on 40' lots. She stated she had brought up that Mr. Barna had brought in a book of houses that could be constructed on 40' lots with no variances required. She said if they had some means of having control over 40' lots, a speculator couldn't come in and buy a strip of 40' lots just to make money. She stated that another thought that came out of their discussion was to perhaps put all lots that are under minimum size under a PUD code so that there could be some type of control. She explained that PUD stood for Planned rUnit Develop- ment, and the land in Innsbruck North where there was a combination of townhouses, apartment houses and private residences was all zoned PUD.* Mrs. Schnabel stated that thought was something they should probably pursue if they decided they wanted to have any construction on 40' lots, but they might decide for one reason or another that they didn't want to. *(Staff correction: North Innsbruck zoned by individual development). Chairperson Schnabel said that at this point it was the intent to get together the Planning Commission, -the City,Council, and any other people who were interested from the various subcommissions for an informal meeting concerning utilization of 40' lots. 77 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1973 PAGE 2 VISITORS: MR. CHARLES LARSON, REPRESENTATIVE OF FRIDLEY MEDICAL CENTER: Mr. Larson addressed the Council and requested approval of the use of a mobile home at the Fridley Medical Center facilities as temporary office facilities (not to include patient care). Mayor Liebl said he was aware that there had been a fire at the Medical Center. MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the request for the temporary use of a mobile home for the office facility at the Fridley Medical Center. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. MR. BAILEY TILLER„ 1335 GARDENA AVENUE N. E.: Mr. Tiller said he hoped the Council, during their invocation period, would also remember those persons who were hospitalized, handicapped, and crippled for life while serving in Viet Nam. Mayor Liebl said Mr. Tiller's thoughts were appreciated. MR. RAY MINARD, 6151 STARLIGHT DRIVE N. E.: Mr. Minard said his question concerned the work being done on Starlight Boulevard and he had heard that the curbing would be completed this year and the remainder of the project would not be completed until the next April. The City Engineer said the curbing and blacktop would hopefully be completed this year if the weather is not too severe. He said there is a possibility that the clean up would not be completed until next year. MR. JOHN CHURA•, FRIDLEY V. F. W., 5973 MAIN ST. N. E.: Mr. Chura said he would like to express his thanks for the cooperation the Fridley V. F. W. has received from the City and the members of the Park Board during the construction of the monument. He added, he is sorry the construction has taken so long, but they had not received the remainder of the monument from St. Cloud. Mayor Liebl thanked Mr. Chura PUBLIC HEARINGS: PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1972=1: MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to waive the reading of the Public Hearing Notice and open the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman Nee. Upon a i voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearing opened at 7:47 p.m. The City Engineer•said he was happy to report the final cost of the project was lower than estimated and previously given to the people. He added, this was the result of obtaining the bids during the winter months. The City Engineer said there is still some work to be done in the Innsbruck North area, but he would like to get the assessment roll to the County so the people would not have to pay the additional 72% interest for another year that would be due if there was a delay of a couple of months. Mayor Liebl said the estimated price of the project had been $593,000 and the actual costs are $434,000. The City Engineer said some of the streets in the project had been bid less expensively than anticipated. ALDEN WAY AND RIVERVIEW TERRACE: The City Engineer said the actual cost of the improvements in this area is $9.29 per foot and there were no catch basins in these two streets installed 76 THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF.THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1973 ....... ....� ...� ...... �. ....................... The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:35 p.m., September 10, 1973 by Mayor Liebl. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Liebl led the Council and the audience in saying the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. INVOCATION: Mayor Liebl asked for one minutes of silent prayer. for those missing in action in Viet Nam. ROLL CALL: i MEMBERS PRESENT: Breider, Starwalt, Liebl, Utter, Nee MEMBERS ABSENT: None. PRESENTATION OF AWARDS: CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION - MR. RICHARD HARJU BOARD OF APPEALS Mayor Liebl read aloud a note from the administration stating Mr. -Harju had called and would not be in. attendance at the meeting to accept the award. He directed the administration to forward the award to Mr. Harju. SPECIAL AWARD PLAQUE - MRS. HELEN JOHNSON, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: Mayor Liebl called Mrs. Johnson forward to accept the award plaque. Mayor Liebl expressed his personal thanks and appreciation +� to Mrs. Johnson for her aid in bringing industry to the City of Fridley. He added, on behalf of the Mayor and members of the Fridley City Council, what she had done for the community has been appreciated. Mrs. Johnson thanked Mayor Liebl and the members of the Council and said it had been an honor working with all of them. j APPROVAL OF MINUTES: PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1973: MOTION by Councilman Nee to adopt the minutes of the Public Hearing Meeting of August 13, 1973 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 20, 1973: MOTION by Councilman Nee to adopt the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of August 20, 1973 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Mayor Liebl said the following items were to -be added to the Communications • Section of the agenda: Communication from Mr. Edward H. Knalson, Superintendent of Schools, Independent School District Na. 16. Communication from Ms. Miriam F. Friend, 1520 Rice Creek Road. Communication from Mr. Roman S. Gribbs, President, National League of Cities, MOTION by Councilman Utter to adopt the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. Item #2 February 15, 1983 ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 7675 Madison Street N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.113, 4 (b) requires a minimum of 15 feet for a side yard setback. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space around commercial structures for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Existing sideyard setback is 13 feet. New addition would be built even with existing building. Additional space is needed for offices, orthepaedic coverage and physical therapy." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: This request is to vary a side yard setback in a CR -1 District from the required 15 feet to 13 feet, to enable construction of a 68 foot by 48 foot (3,264 square feet) addition to an existing structure. This addition will be used for additional office space and patient treatment rooms. On September 13, 1976, two variances were approved by the City Council: a front yard parking setback from 20 feet to 0 feet and a rear yard building setback from 25 feet to 13 feet. However, this request should have been to vary a side yard parking setback from 5 feet to 0 feet and another side yard building setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The actual variances would vary less than the request and since there was no opposition to the variance or construction, the request was not changed. If this variance is approved, the Appeals Commission may want to consider the following: 1. upgrade temporary concrete curbing to permanent 6 inch poured concrete. 2. plant additional landscape/screen along Osborne Road and Madison Street. 3. parking aisles are not 25 feet, but 20 feet 4. parking stalls are not 10 feet by 20 feet, but 10 feet by 15 feet. Items 3 and 4 may not be feaisble to complete, except to the south of the building. City of Fridley A G E N D A APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1983 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 18, 1983 1. TABLED: VARIANCE 11. G. , Fr - 2. VARIANCE THE U OF AN AD OFFICE A FEET OF UUTLUT 1, MELODY MANOR 41H ADDITION THE SAME BEING 7675 MADISON STREET N.E. Request by Vivian Hoese, B. M. C. & Associates Fridley Medical Center Bldg. & Land),7675 Madison Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432). 3. OTHER BUSINESS: 7:30 P.M. UANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, S LANE N.E. (Request ey, Minnesota 55432). QUEST PURSUANT TO CHP L✓ LlU\✓ VVI\\ V 1 1\V . V, I IIL JIIIIL ✓L11\V . & Mrs. Ing Siverts, 6850 Siverts Lane F I it ncD ►NWNA1A'f-NQS MN ncD ►NWNA1A'f-NQS 6.69017'19'E. I9'E. 217.82 2.g7 � 217.82 - . �. 40 5' oncrele "lk 1� 14 I ' 4.6.09 p� 6 VI •• � O C% Z canopy bate,Cli 3Z. ( f c v, • . tl 1 STORY \ 1 • pa {a`cFoa��a I •� V ti�,�p,P�S I I ,I O4G.�Q� C 140 I W � P I I I I • I I I ID 30.0 /87 82 I 217.82 - 4. i �*I V 11 P r, MEMORANDUM i ' • 1 ��• •on1, Di • • IDi Y J•_�1i_ � I:Yi\ _ _ V51 �4�1• • DI1 1 �• DATE: MARCH 14r 1983 Vivian Hoese, administrator of 11:]hi9=ftb% yr Mediaal_Cex�ter, is requesting that txie itvCout�4,ieview and�acttop�ath3s reguetYa_ r64—meetin9 rather than the March 28th meeting. Fridley Medical Center would like -to bin onsttuction as ,�uicJsl __.as:possible and feels that the two week delay would pose hardships. Request that this item be added to the agenda for the March 14, 1983 City Council meeting. Thank you. KH/bd 2/1/5/4 Appeals CoRmistion Meeting -February 15, 1983 _ Paae 2 pport beams. Ms. Gabel said, according to the blueprint, the fence can be e st cturally sound. Mrs. Gerou asked the petitioner why the angle support ms are ting the neighbor's and if he takes care of the property on the othe side of the fence. Mr. Siverts said the support beams are on his property a he does not tak care of the property on the other side of the fence. Ms. Gab noted that his neigh r objected to that at the last hearing. Mr.'Barna said visited the area and to ed at the walkway at the Medtronics building and he c Id not see the hardship s stated and said the Commission is looking for a under hardship. He said the pa ing lot is not on the street side and he does t have street sounds. Ms. Gabel said s e visited the area also and that everyone i the neighborhood is subject to the sa conditions and if they allowed a 10-fo fence to be put up, the whole neighbor h d could put one up. Mr. Siverts as d if the Commission thought the fence wou be out of place aesthetically d Ms. Gabel, Mrs. Gerou, Mr. Barna and Mr. Betz d agreed it would. He then ked how important.the neighbors opinions were and Ms. Ga 1 said it is one factor d that is why the public hearing _notices are sent out and h ing a definite herds p is another factor. Mr. Barna said if objections exist eit r with the neig rs or the commission, then it is up to the City Council and eve if the fent as a joint venture with the neighbors, there would still have to be a h dship. . Siverts presented two letters from two neighbors who had no objection to th fence. MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr arna, to receive the two letters from Mr. Siverts' neighbors and they both do of bject to the fence. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL ECLARE THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Siverts said there is a co tant humming and coming from somewhere and Mr. Barna said that it was the re ection of sound tires off Highway 65. Mr. Siverts felt the fence would be a p tector from he soun and in some placed a 7 foot fence would not be adequate beca a of the elevation of t terrain'in the area. MOTION by Mr. Barna, se nded by Mr. Betzold, to close a public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING YE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M. Mr. Betzold said has visited the area during the daytime an vening and he is not convinced of he hardship. Mr. Plemel said the Siverts' home in a unique setting and di not see where the fence would be readily visible by thers. Mrs. Gerou felt th fence is an eyesore and was not convinced of the hards Ms. Gabel said she was not convinced of the hardship either. MOTION by r. Betzold, seconded by Mrs. Gerou, that the Appeals Commission commend to the ty Council, through the Planning Commission, denial of the variance equest to in ease the maximum height of a fence from 7 feet to 10 feet in the rear y d and de yards of Lot C, Registered Land Survey No. 3, the same being 6850 Sive s La N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432. UPON A VOICE VOTE, THREE VOTING AYE AND Y ING NAY, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. 2. VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY t by Vivian Hoese, B. M. C. i Associates _MediCal ),7675 Madison Street N.E.. Fridley, MinnesotaFridl_ey--554 • Appeals Commission Meeting - February 15, 1983 Page 3 MOTION by Mrs. Gerou, seconded by Mr. Barna, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:05 P.M. Ms. Vivian Hoese was present for this matter. Mr. Hill presented the Commission with plans of the proposed addition. 14s. Hoese said they would probably put the airconditioning unit on the roof of the building. Ms. Gabel asked if there would be a loss of parking and Ms . Hoese said there would not be and Mr. Hill stated they would still be within the code but they are askith_e_petitioner_ to -rep -l -ace the empar_ary.;6uieper:_bl_ac.ks_Kith.�o_u�ed_conc�ete. 'the a ional landscaping suggested in the -Staff -Report was questioned --and Mr. Hill noted that the landscaping appeared adequate.. Ms. Hoese stated that the patient and employee parking will be separated and there will be no problems with entrances and exits. Mr. Hill said that Items 3 and 4 on the Staff Report, regarding parking, may not be feasible for this situation. Ms. Gabel noted that all they are doing is just extending what they have done previously and she could not see any problems. Mr. Barna said his only question he had was visibility in the parking lot and he drove through the area and found no problems. Chairperson Gabel read the Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 7675 Madison Street N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.113, 4 (b) requires a minimum of 15 feet for a side yard setback. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space around commercial structures for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Existing sideyard setback is 13 feet. New addition would be built even with existing building. Additional space is needed for offices, orthaopaedic coverage and physical therapy." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: This request is to vary a side yard setback in a CR -1 District from the required 15 feet to 13 feet, to enable construction of a 68 foot by 48 foot (3,264 square feet) addition to an existing structure. This addition will be used for additional office space and patient treatment rooms. On September 13, 1976, two variances were approved by the City Council: a front yard parking setback from 20 feet to 0 feet and a rear yard building setback from 25 feet to 13 feet. However, this request should have been to vary a side yard parking setback from 5 feet to 0 feet and another side yard building setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The actual variances would vary less than the request and since there was no opposition to the variance or construction, the request was not changed. If this variance is approved, the Appeals Commission may want to consider the following: Appeals Commission Meeting - February 15, 1283 Page 4 1. upgrade teRporary concrete curbing to permanent 6 inch poured concrete. 2. plant additional landscape/screen along Osborne Road and Madison Street. 3. parking aisles are not 25 feet, but 20 feet 4. parking stalls are not 10 feet by 20 feet, but 10 feet by 15 feet. Items 3 and 4 may not be feaisble to complete, except to the south of the building. MOTION by Mr. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:17 P.M. Mr. Barna said that this does provide open space around the structure for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes; it is still accessible and the addition will not change anything. Mr. Plemel stated he had no objection to this addition. MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mrs. Gerou, that the Appeals Commission t W Wdiee the required side_ya�d wetback from 15 feet to 13 feet, to allow the fon�uctian-of-a addlftio�: _ : - __ _ - +1�P� -- _.sq e.x# e , to be used for adyditional office and medical space, located on the north 400 feet of the west 217.8 feet of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition, the same being 7675 Madison Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432, with the stipulation that the petitioner upgrade the temporary concrete curbing to permanent 6 inch poured concrete. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. INESS: Ms. Gabe d she has spoken to Mr. Deblon and apparently he had a variance vet that he thoug s withdrawn and the petitioner thought it was on the a and further stated the uld discuss this matter but the Commission take no action on it as there h een no public notices sent out, . Mr. Hill explained that Mr.TAs Gerdin was pur Ing a home from Blanc el and they made a re- quest sometime in the middle of ary to vary t ode regarding the flood plain. Apparently, Mr. Gerdin was PI c rt the present garage into living quarters and to construct a new garage i nt of the present garage. He stated that the City ordinance, the Departm of Na 1 Resources and the federal govern- ment does not allow any buildin exist below t fl ood elevation. He also stated that this situation eight r re a special use perm ather than a variance and to go through the Planni Commission on March 16th. Ms. bel said the City staff is doing some resear on this now as this is a non -conform use. Mr. Hill suggested the pet oner to give some consideration to construc g vertical rather than horizont , that by building up, they would be outside the elevation. Mr. Hill ght it best that the parties involved get together with Staff to dis s this situation. Mrs. Erkel said she has talked to the neigh bo and ave no objections. Ms. Gabel said she could -dot see any problems eit except the flood plain restrictions. •-10 JLC._ * 1 ,. y.. � �`=�- -� � • ,,��2�yC Sid f aT�y�,.r,,g or .. t. t.: � ty'+[M> i` ?►"�;e`7'"y.-!'S1 r, �.�.� ti s F � Y 7i'c r •� ,,,E+.. ,•\ +. • i e J.-. •• •�� -a' � • ' _��/y-i`' i � � '1 ir.�•.y�(.^ u r 1 � ' S ��j �,Ni 7�^.A�! w g ♦AAUt\ y�. �f� � � � n �i� �• . � •i 7► IL 44. • M �; ,ani � F � `L � .frTta ..., • �t t/'- L.�' u � I � .� •a t 4r .r.ry �'y� �.� �.i i. r1' S�-f yam'.. �. :{ +�'� '.�• SYS•• C •O91 --STATE - -AI@- HMHWN 9— _R._.-.... I i30- ASO �. SSD -�- MAPLE - s4 •�• +� - " • �i w*• J • NORjWhW I ire 11 6A i - 11 1 X10 - X10 1i1� got k t i +� • i�r. �r• . l A DD/ T ON .. IL 1 736 i•� �i iir t: _ ` f 4'6 1 3 2 `� �! 7f77 1a�1 75l u • e 50 3 4,214 t " . is rte•- .• . �, � �zs � �'` � A� , � ..-� "" `� � 549 ••1 �.�► .3 2 45 is 1 .�� t• ' * tea'Alp '!� �t 741446 7 90 7411 1499 0 3f 'ti' .13 34; 35 Jf So as 2 All, DI yE LOW 7 i 74a 7410 �+! s d 74S* It CONCE RTO _.CURVE -14 •w_,�A ` � . !�. �R�L �e• 4M1 4� �� ...w•� .f w4i� f7� 1� s- �r4.V1,6Jfou/♦ ' r� � I J-Z8VZ,- J I 28 LB/ O'oE. of Oil I I I � I I I � o`c�1 ; . o • . f J� •"' t1�1 : i O. �'• J� ft O I 10 � �' �• � $ 2 o � � O 1 O i rd�� • _ � I OV (�� s Q 2 WON so•" i � •p O'C t O4. —ZSV7.1 z�ti 7.61,U•683 ��n1t & sty' � >•` .� g y^. +!�s,� '�..-r�°' r �,X_ + :a 'i.' .=`moi, �y '!< �i- t. rA ,�„' .� "'�i 3 `�' 'S s �� q�,• •: �� r��a. �r y-'�.� � F�vir`."� �. x ?} ai � "� ?„ t , ��.� •a'Z :�r� •s<; �' ¢�� ,�. ,z. 7t � y "�r'tfv �.. `i ,Y'Y, ;.� ,i•,skc •",:Z,1.�"..t •.,Y� 'S' r, : a:r. -� - ,.,4'.. .k. s qac '�, s'+_�,Ry y� xM a �`''' +` -r.�'T-at> , .Yn .,.^^xs�", i x.. ,q v y��P •►' - .a% � ✓ i,�-r,��+. `.. ,a rs� ..E-.: r sk^. • • ." � �.r�• < �+'R.: �s.�' �t X �S �,.c Y`pY -.<� `[s ry•). �`� '�-. 1..''A 'p`AS � � 4"Sx�'' �-''��:�`�`,;. t �`�41��.,}..Ri'��A t`a'��.�rl ��M��a�-� 'n�-.�� .. �V.t •�: .2:C<y y, � ;ty 'aa ,�: 4��'�� ')f.. ' ��J L�,t2 �,R �• Mr,� `5�f L r� 9,. .fir s fes+ ',� y a i�.* s„ r l ' *RR`• +� R., +'�i°S�x �,�,` ; � F• V �' i' L a � � " ' JF '1. "iMCFk�, *' �•'/.�f k +W�+� 4 ,d Z '�} i ,�� y Ni T• f, 7".`,, •ae =� � '� Y��p , v- �" �'e .,'. ` '`r"�.�'kk°' �:�: •'.'� � :z ,� k x I� n.¢ �� 2,. �"�a 'c :: �< z ii 3R.�'t . �'"4♦' ;�'!` ��w"C ��'� fir � rt >� •.`3Yr` .'�,Y •'x!<�,�i' �'� 3.�-f � ``•'=�-5, �.. �'�� E �� -•l.,yr �Hr �N �� ..tom Ra x r a f,d-,o *1`:=" `^1i . 5 - e ; �:s. ,., 4 1 T _ `t •c-..� �x _ `4 S. N, 4% ,�;`•" �,� �a� �^ a F`k s* •�s `s � � �r , . +ice ,,A"„.yGs +d` ,t c 'agr. �.. '-.,M� ,;� ryf ''�aF `„w r'>•, n' `�,.;�. ;C�. a3��jx^ -vk**i ' c., i r' �,.a.h7•,GrK.. NyY`'..:""� �,je• ,�,�r f YCs�,.�'�`'•° N*� ,,c k ��r �+? � : � �.� r-. ��,� _``� �' `'.�` �-?��'i., tr�,� ��# v;� �h � `+t,�. � � �•+ 'v * �nwK�'' '-� d' !'' „4 P P �...,,r ha. _ r , i`' C �e aa,�'-• t (%� r;i - �•1�4�. gip.- t 4 � rr� 3 -'Ft. �"`a.n ,��.� �•z ��-ail � '��-�_kF'� ��, ��I j.;Jy ��,��y�',i� f� t 4, ��{{ -�1 .a� �•.<; a� t eye w3��sw.: � �3c-' �T f v r A � �;� a py g�"'^•:tw1"°\VIJ!!! r"' '`'� Y <'"V ix •r�+P-"�°°�}•�.- _"�^.; �,k zsc� 3F r�-.', r 3 s,'k. '"ti\ +,. ,r F_.j•�A ,�. i, �"' .z 3 +vw`: k••7 d kP'6 3 k'`- � �.:;�'�r ;'� '^R'•4 .L4 � �^-� c rr =. +�:Y,- _. � ..*=£'' "+ �{Y� '� xt � N - -3 .f'z' "ti ; fi � r t i ��?X �,5' � z L ✓ +a T�'"gi�: is c' 't w"s�N ..* / aT !' ”: i it g r >, � � � r aa,, •` tai` � a �. � � i S �.' �C r � ��p�,�� ab. � � � `.•�, Y 2`� �-.b.,rt `i F h "•. "hN __r;, "uY r t '•'�'"� .n S J' '� his" �S-: ,��`"i� I;:.. $ ,i.S-�r. 'g "`€r��}+ r?;y ��i`a' y$°'" s� r `', t�; "�'�t�� ;�1 y��}� j=�, S 9..z �4. ,,�'� �tti ?yr•_xr`k"T°`f+. .'yr•-�='y •A'f� �",ai.�s�q^ its-•,., y''x '°` .'i' '; �` I '�•fn.A :..lei* ,w �" a� !/f d ±<. <,}, ', ,a }},,; "Si.( � q .� :2f X'� .w ","''.- ` r 44 m �:,• " } r. 4 �+ ✓�`,�: ,,q„y ¢'�. a-,.ry. ,t. ayv °..�'`..- `.i'..,r ;.laq; (,�-•... J?Y�bJ.` '}f, F,.Ia till +`ra,+ •aa.. <... a_' '.t '4'c:fi. .A '.'aF .e. ,.�� ! 'r .k ...'ira'C{ �i•- .�. *,c't^•S:t.'r'�,':' '1 Ift 61r� b } �4as 9 u� z� <✓` �`, }y A '� Y � 0.'. K t • -.., b F L}" � M � � ?.4 � Ai. �"Y, �` �'xR'.',-J��,�'1.' ' 1 � � 'rv. aG � - 'i -% r i y,� '_+....�� t '�`i?k`�° �^�.rsz�a«•�5i-•`', -��n,�' � �"?y" s r � ,� •-Sr4"s-�s: 'Jt• :r.z% } �dr ' =- St si7�- + r'Yw '��(� ``35wa faY < ,_,,♦,s•�pfd � rw��,e� r y �"�`�' '•< s J14i:'Y:-: :1 1 MR ?> {Y is• � - "-s'a `h`—"�e�" +�y ..s r ""`•'rf'tyk'•.{r'>k „p�4t.-,a, kp-y J�fi [ ' '.�°,.• .h: W •�� 1 i ii�� 'rs. ♦ <` 4 - 'S' n �`2 r $ N• s ,a�" +�` e... Y �°°y� g"t�ry�- �' ` �+ ltat^ � r r �• yy�f� e� �6 ' �, � �:� �� ^ - t �y�, (i �'�' �- a, "moi• < ..,,e^ +� „x�� . � tGi,'+t:.. � � � �1� <� 3£ ,µ♦ �)-<'. bit tr `�:Y 4.' 1v, sd(`�' w ,g 3 . •�£ �,y"�'. �+ ��,:.��- � 4��•xi� .eY � a?� �'+-<�...� >a�+'�� `.-. _ M1„i'�-1� ,<•�, � r� ��- e••"�R'iyY•�j''�� g�S�7"�r .i '' �^��+��,� {�•,".�.5 ` �'t'` r�_Sti � ,?a b' � �`. ':. �..,� :, 3a„'s hY' y s ,.,':' �X' e+ik��#, vF- Sf,' .� �'�. � .y.n fi ,� » , }-..-��iL ' i. '� i uN. ..�'7- } 'vv.`=l',x $'•`"Jr-' �j„�.-,-� y,� {+ �• '%y",r". � ,b� C`'x�,3' ��,. P. ' ..'. "'�' yjr� P'"x+•� ".� :.. `7 y # i �;, � ,�*' �1 rCC ter • ai�`'vC '`z'y •{ ?!'c �s •„�.,a< ( t z� :?�.. h - ",' .S.,a� ,'! g'�` "k �` �-F .Ft t �. � 3(` a�r� aeut • � -.;F M �1=�f� ,� ' �� `� } .r .. �a ,', � „J,�•-` "" / w�` jt�'` SYYa � �•,- �z •J'.s�'dw `�ttdilr �=_ �'.r, ^�*�' s-r�`,r."'d ,fir. "�^♦ �-`'1 .�;.1� � f .d fi.s -i'^- 5 � • f. 4'` ..�•Z' i,�"� . 2..�dn" p*•,�;.�sr'�'°�s -,+s ,�r �, s, �� u.y , �i . •yc^T, y ,iyA.. a � l i�. • �:. " •' Tr'i.`+. yA=S .rt, ;` ax -{.•-. JrC �S '' � a. . .i:)�.:X` �,� 7_ *'?"., --Nr so >•axr �.yvw.�irt ita(� xi yex ^a�'aX. "5' *�� k� d'a.$z{+r a x �a'.fi F,: �+.�,`• I �"� g..'rw,y�' ",r s,,., ist.sro.af•?. i,;r�� r q'�>?? . ri-i,.L•.. i-3ty- f -T- •�"{',•D",-. 3. a e,Y�xY r^y' •z'�'. �,.�,' 5...'�) "S ss�` �-i ad°s.� 01, ,y,<i'.,: i'�s :" •y,rs; v; 3a. �': +ate <'�Y r„ ,� .Y et` •"tJ� ;`y`if 2�� : ''i3�- 's. m�.T •� .3 �'' 4`i aaL `"v t nc•.^�'. w .. �. •:s.: a '4.> <lt '_�'i1-i"�- �:. 21, -tin.7. w•� 4 � �' a:�s,�r�'}y`f� �� '��i +;, s �'z 3 '� s ;�; .�_, �' r'.�-��..�,�'"i ,� �`7��p +a� � .Z•• t 4. ,r��'',.;...�'� ` "c�'• � g.,a .a. Y - y x. � �+) I .. �� } � � � t + �� e.+>ti_r :_a 1 "<'tz '%ty'�:ya a•':.,,P 7' a,- :.s --s•-.. x yk,>r +5 tir �(h1 .. _:k.�,.{,! •ri,<�. ,� n's; c ,. it y 'r r'< s _ ��w#- a•'"'"� a�z yr ri Pi' A. '& `' { `8 ,'r �,+ x,•? "'y' ,? „ °y�A4�r(;^-...e s '�? -'�t €' i' °'��f`,L Y' 1 .-'�v'6r � a .�� 'a,x :r, a..�, �3..'�` r C r.�->.vr' 's "�;.._�^^';� �°� �`� � '��A +•yt �•w Yc,y.` .:�'t � � �c*�2.' .� ...�y. � . 1-. �-°^ `°. � � •� } - y tc^r,.,�,A7s ,�3' � ; y ��.}, s�,� ,-ry, r�•c Xr,� J-'2.rr°a .1t i� +-�," r ..� a ,sC"'. -✓j`e C "� r:.�"?�;a :�::. a 9. ;:a'Z", �;,` -`'Sid `"' - { St its °ek- ti'a t `4:,', �.a^ ,�'�•,{ ka-.kcx.."q,.�h'k,pc+'t ! +"€i `(�.y� t+y' ''' t !!D s. v 'y,•.'r '�' ?��xfiyr �h'� 'i %rte ?� 1 z F xaq K` .Sy ,fir £f. �'j'?+�'si::�` r •s+.��'� � ;,.� 'g`'" x'n'`-'�•( c q�� r- -,*. ? f i,.. ��,11,, s i Y✓ D✓ +i`7� y�y��4 �,i �`^dY '�� gyp, 52�• > i 4Fi Ne I 5e jr-� 2 r� '��.�i�. ! �' h', i o .:� ['^"P ,'.x�} •' '?: a w's'_+ 3+� 3 r•(.} 1 ,�zas �"'3 A fy VIP' / lam. '1 Y t4.,I•H i i'r`'' '84. A�' f G �-'�^ *i '�N S -. "n. i. • •. "�� :,. �^T`.rr -•r o •r} -y.� ''/ i h`c �. ��S .^ s `�'�K. .�•e .��--) .�.:'n. �� '$ � � '•., `�^�D�'�.s'a;.. +. Aa T• .e%. \� �'1,7 xk- .�s4 5 S Ire' is �' ?,.,�� 'Y3 � K-'"'�'.c� -a .*r'Y•-a. '^'1-. ^�"s � .. � �.�'* `k�z-'i ' '� k� S�' t, 3- •Zit �++ C``g � �e.0 Y,.I �Cy � � ti yt � `�S ,r � t � �' •{ y �s_a.,,-�'+eS v a � �' ' �"� r�"£s C a� a a: z..ti• � ..;f,`a� ya � ' �, �� :•y i i..�,. Yy, � y �irZY" _ �O'W %a ( `�"-a X' t r> �: .n/ 4 aj SR. ?..c':,�, i' .a s ,'�c, °i �°.y. % t q. +�cF `' r`Ck �' _•. qv s _ '<, r. �' � �� +`�p°'r�`"aR, nt-. -r''?1 ,F� e: �. - ; jj .� �/ �' � as 3.. � Vii; "� � "2' :3:�s .��:s�it 1:•,:��21.,.�JF- �y .,�.`�` ? i5 k.°'x,a�s � „,�r� C,�.-`�y„ �,; i. :.`i � 1 �.Y �-zri. ��{�: '�`# +"'��I r "i.• �'s 'i.:S �ti � .��.� a - s..'w J� �, }'�� +.:.� `� ��+F v ��,r� � �� _. ...n - '"`"..:ori- Utrs: _ r; z, � ��- w� �,.`,� s";�X.,. �,".,..�, �.,..e..,�..•°.w.,��"�,�. ,• ..C�`q ice' � 'a•. r... �,Kw '+e+ r-� of Q„"'r" �.�, �> S ��' �y ; �� r"s b 'i:. .}.': "'�' � � 'Z..c �. x � 3< •r 7P n, �-�` � "a:n�L �� .a ^�� i 'fes, s - .,�.tq..,.';. � ^ Y'9+c�••s.?r+ � '°8'.''•',�S„ 3.K , -e •a- '�' fi i. �; fix•` `.,.z7 x,- y,y. .< _ ,q, ^v * ,," a .�, F„��..'!'' i `t r,�. � � •�•.. + br„� A '' � _. rp �-x i�..2 � s? � �, ''_' s~.> ( .€. �?p. �'♦'i'r':�^` �..,t, �'t�' '. t . •c'� y a _ o-1 RA ry 5 k'3”. fr,}T .''` x' &... rfi? }-" <� r _ y, �) -�a� ,,f.r C , , �,,r�,�:» � ,4 .tea ;�� "`'� {.i'� �;` �_ z� � ,✓ ��Y .i �} ��_� xY��»"Y�.->''� •x�`F ,�: "-v ,;;`, �� •-ver •c"2 "r" <ia n2t- t5..[�'�`tY'M�'i�r"rJ'-a,k-''r( } cDxi^X'•,�.,."�``.'t,;,•" k ,-!'!-' �. �.:r � -.�D "V �X�xY � 1 y '.." � a\?'�"�S,}� • t-.`. ry.,r. � :,e,{•, ^-h+ : S� .t c'�� _ �' "'� � �.�.,� :..`v. t _ -xx r -c - a r Y Y.A u+,. �iYp• .- r a� � : � � �'�' � r� ^ � '� � ,- 'fin. } �� ,� ,4�2''t S,i : � 'ry - � -� •� � p :�' ,a . rJ 1 7v.. ,f. �'- 3". i ,r e .iT .+'-.c, ,�. ,r'� i �+ •tr>v„t'2. Y s K } /` `(�- r, ,,,)•,y r3 :a�' . "S5 rtY > ; Zg' �`�„�"` �� s �a.'r� > .�fx �' 2ri� tiy�r � �.�.�� ,C• },�$�y .:. , A ��s �,.� � ♦ �� $r. /t ' +* ' { Fu � .�� s �� ;\ ■ �...i�F {.�.a.. �y.!<•Iv s. •�i�~a��AP� �. .�'^` �r• ; t"... �" �. �6 's�i.� �••$�.ri''.s `,� ° s v � %`?�, -1 r %� � ! (� r `+�^'S SFy�i ��a " ^'"` ti � � � -} ♦. r•• a� . n .x �. ' ,� r�`grK-.,� '� � 'S k : � < )f+C •k.°+S �. a ID � ,�„ z � C �t . ��. ' � `.t'" '. +� �4 a < �,' . � 1rc rc.� '"i. - '1 • ti � . S"...or^= ": h e"., '-, v YPc, ln' .0 � k .. �,aj�, ,. ,mss •� �' ' i. • ,y ,sy . ..�,�„`ar ��'..�� »'� � '� ,cy.,; � � + ,"t.,�' - � � � � `��#'4'r� e �• 2wsn �,ta< •d si - '9x" ,Y,;...:r r w COUNCIL- MEETING OF MARCH 14, 1981- AGE 10 14.1 CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE FOR THE FRIDLEY MEDICAL CLINIC: Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated a 2 foot variance to the side yard setback from the required 15 to 13 feet was requested by the medical clinic. Mr. Qureshi stated this item was approved by the Appeals Commission and staff would recommend concurrence by the Council, if there was no objection to the variance by the Planning Commission at their Wednesday night meeting. iR MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the Appeals Commission to allow the two foot variance to the sideyard setback from the required 15 feet to 13 feet, contingent on approval of this variance by the Planning Commission at their next meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. t - MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claims No. 055856 through 069Z02. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16 LICENSES• MOTION by Councilman Barnette to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 17 ESTIMATES: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the estimates as submitted. Herrick & Newman, P.A. 6279 University Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 For legal services rendered as City Attorney for the month of February, 1983 $2,422.50 Keys Well Drilling Company 413 North Lexington Parkway St. Paul, MN 44104 Partial Estimate #1 Repair of Well #2 $5,903.55 Repair of Well #7 t 990.00 $6,893.55 Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Inman, City Clerk, asked if Piper, Jaffray and Hopwood would be paid by the issue of the revenue bond. Mr. McNulty, representing Piper, Jaffray and Hopwood, stated they would be paid out of the proceeds of the issue and that the City would probably consult with their financial consultant as to the reasonableness of the fees. Councilman Schneider asked if someone is interested in industrial revenue bonds, if they could proceed, if this resolution is adopted. Mr. Casserly stated those firms that locate within one of the tax increment districts would be obligated to use them according to this resolution, however, those firms located outside of a tax increment district, could proceed in any way they wish. Councilman Schneider asked if, by adopting this resolution, they would be getting into a situation where future Council's are locked into anything that would occur under his program. Mr. Newman stated, as he reads the resolution, it is for a one-year period. Mr. Haggerty stated the way this evolved was, in discussions between himself and City staff in his own development, he sensed a feeling the staff would enjoy a situation where they could pick up the phone and receive advise from professionals. He felt the resolution would give the staff such an opportunity without any real commitments on the part of the City. Councilman Hamernik questioned how development outside the tax increment district would be handled. Mr. Haggerty stated O'Connor and Hannan would be looking at how the City could assist businesses outside the tax increment district. Mr. Casserly stated programs would be available for anyone who wishes to use them. If they are not in a tax increment district, you would have to amend the program to include it. Mr. Newman stated in reference to the last sentenence in paragraph 2 of the resolution, that limitation only explicitly applies in the event the Council adopts the program and it is funded by means other than the issuance of bonds. He stated that limitation doesn't refer to the fees that bond counsel would charge, if a bond is issued. Councilman Schneider thought perhaps an additional paragraph could be added to the effect that fees would be reasonable and customary. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 33-1983, with the addition of Paragraph 5 to read as follows: "O'Connor and Hannan and Piper, Jaffray and Hopwood, Inc. understand they would not charge more than customary fees and the City Council would have the right of review of those fee schedules". Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 0 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 16, 1983 PAGE 7 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MINUTES RECEIVED. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO CONCUR WITH THE APPEALS COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF A FENCE FROM 7 FT. TO 10 FT. IN THE REAR YARD AND SIDE YARDS OF LOT C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 3, THE SAME BEING 6850 SIVERTS LANE N.E., FRIDLEY, MN. 55432. UPON A VOICE VOTE, OQUIST, KONDRICK, SABA, SVANDA, GABEL, VOTING AYE, GOODSPEED ABSTAINING, VICE -CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Deblon stated that regarding Item #2, the City Council had already approved a variance request for the Fridley Medical Center, but the approval was based on approval by the Planning Commission. Ms. Gabel stated that at the City Council meeting, she had questioned why Planning Commission approval was needed when the Planning Commission just receives the Appeals Commission's minutes. Generally, the Planning Commission makes a recommendation on an item only when it something that stands out and Planning Commission input is requested by the Appeals Commission. She saw the variance request by the Fridley Medical Center as just a routine matter. Mr. Oquist stated this is one more example of how the subcommissions are not being utilized. All of a sudden the Planning Commission has to concur with the Appeals Commission's motions. The charter of the Appeals Commission is that its motions go directly to City Council. If the City Council didn't want to rule on this item, they should have tabled it and asked for the Planning Commission's recommendation. If action is always needed by the Planning Commission, then there is no need for an Appeals Commission. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO CONCUR WITH THE APPEALS COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 15 FT. TO 13 FT. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION OF APPROXIMATELY 3,000 SQ. FT. TO BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL OFFICE AND MEDICAL SPACE, LOCATED ON THE NORTH 400 FT. OF THE WEST 217.8 FEET OF OUTLOT 1, MELODY MANOR 4TH ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 7675 MADISON ST. N.E., FRIDLEY, MN., 55432, WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE PETITIONER UPGRADE THE TEMPORARY CONCRETE CURBING TO PERMANENT 6 -INCH POURED CONCRETE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 15, 1983, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SVANDA, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECEIVE THE FEB. 15, 1983, ENVIR- ONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON 'OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Y PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 16,1983 PAGE 6 2. DECEIVE JANUARY 13, 1983, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. GOODSPEED, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 13, 1983, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. UPON -A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 8, 1983, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SVANDA, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE THE FEB. 8, 1983, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 15, 1983, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE THE FEB. 18, 1983, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. Mr. Deblon stated it was his understanding that there was a motion on Item #,1 that needed action by the Planning Commission. The City Council had requested a recommendation on this from the Planning Commission. Ms. Gabel stated this was a surprise to her. She hadn't realized a recommenda- tion was needed by the Planning Commission. Ms. Gabel stated this was a variance request by Mr. & Mrs. Ing Siverts, 6850 Siverts Lane, to increase the maximum height of a fence from 7 to 10 feet in the rear yard and side yards. She stated there is absolutely nothing about the fence that is aesthetically pleasing. The Appeals Commission felt there was no hardship, and that whatever lights or noise there realistically is, a 10 ft. fence will not take care of the problem. Ms. Gabel stated the petitioner had asked if he needed to be at the Planning Commission meeting, and she had told him that the Planning Commission would only be receiving the Appeals Commission minutes. She was unaware that any action would be required by the Planning Commission, and this had come as a total sur- prise to her. Mr. Goodspeed stated that since the petitioner had not been notified about any Planning Commission action, he felt they should table any action until the next meeting when the petitioner could be in attendance. Ms. Gabel stated she did not feel any new or different information would come to light if they were to continue this discussion at another meeting. The information is already here, and it is just a matter of concurring or not con- curring with the Appeals Commission. Mr. Goodspeed disagreed. STATE OF MINNESOTA J ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss CITY OF FRIILEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract from the Minutes of THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING held MARCH 14, 1983 in said city, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to: 14. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE FOR ME FRIELEY MEDICAL CLINIC: WITNESS MY HAND as City Clerk of the City of Fridley and the seal of the City, this 16M day of APRIL, 1987. -.4, V4�4&%Iecl �- t/4'ap SHIRLEY A. #AAPALA CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF FRIMEY STATE .,,OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOM ) ss CITY OF FRIMEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract from the Minutes of a PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING held MARCH 16, 1983, with the original thereof on f it a in my of f ice, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 16, 1983 RECEIVE FEBRQARY 15, 1983, APPEALS MISSION MMTES: WITNESS MY HAND as City Clerk of the City of Fridley and the seal of the City, this 16TH day of APRIL, 1987. (sem) SHIRLEY A. ALA CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANORA ) ss CITY OF FRIDLEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract from the Minutes of a APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING of the City Council of said City held AUGUST 10, 1976, with the original there of on f ile in my of f ice, and the same is a f ull, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to: APPEALS CDMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 10, 1976 4. A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY C DDE, SECTION 205.113, 4, (All) TO REDUCE THE REQUIREMENT OF A MINIMUM FRONT )%M SETBACK OF 20 FEET FOR USES OTHER THAN THE MAIN BUILDING TO 0 FEET FOR A PARKING LOT, AND SECTION 205.113, 4 (C,1), TO REDUCE THE REQUIREMENT OF AN MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK OF 25 FEET TO 13 FEET TO ALLOW MORE CONVENIENT PARKING FOR THE ILL AND HANDICAPPED ON PROPERTY ZONED CR -1 (GENERAL OFFICE AND LIMITED BUSINESS) LOCATED ON THE NORTH 400 FEET OF THE WEST 217.80 FEET OF OUTLOT 1, MELODY MANOR 4TH ADDITION, THE SAME BEIM 7675 MADISON STREET N.E., FR MEY, MINNESOTA. (Request by FMC & Associates—Fridley Medical Center -7675 Madison Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432). WITNESS MY HAND as City Clerk of the City of Fridley and the seal of the City, this 16TH day of APRIL, 1987. 4 SHIRLEY A. ALA QTY CLERK�OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY STATE OF MINNE'S ) ODUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss CITY OF FRIrLEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract from the Minutes of THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING held SEPTEMBER 13, 1976 in said city, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to: FRIELEY MEDICAL CENTER, 7675 MADISON: WITNESS MY HAND as City Clerk of the City of Fridley and the seal of the City, this 16TH day of APRIL, 1987. -24At�' Z 'z46P--a-( !a- SHIRLEY A. &ARALA CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF F=EY STATE OF MINNESOTA ) OOUNTY OF ANOKA ) CITY OF FRIDLEY ) ss I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract from the Minutes of a APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING of the City Council of said City held FEBRUARY 15, 1983, with the original there of on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to: APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, TUFSnAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1983 2. VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT M CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIlY,EY CITY CODE, SO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 15 FEET TO 13 FEET, M ALLOW THE CONSTWCTION OF AN ADDITION OF APPROXIMATELY 3j,000 SQUARE FEET, TO BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL OFFICE AND MEDICAL SPACE, LOCATED ON THE NORTH 400 FEET OF THE WEST 217.8 FEET OF OUTLOT 1, MELODY MANOR 4TH ADDITION, THE SAME BEIM 7675 MADISON STREET N.E. WITNESS MY HAND as City Clerk of the City of Fridley and the seal of the City, this 167H day of APRIL, 1987. -� IJ4 t � �,4� SHIRLEY A. ALA CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF FRIMEY SPATE OF M ) O1)UNTY OF ANOKA, ) ss CITY OF FRITLEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract from the Minutes of a PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING held AUGUST 18, 1976, with the original thereof on f ile in my of f ice, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to: PLANNING ODMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 18, 1976 RECEIVE APPEALS OOMMISSION MINUTES: AUGUST 10, 1976 WITNESS MY HAND as City Clerk of the City of Fridley and the seal of the City, this 167H day of APRIL, 1987. SHIRLEY A. ALA CITY CLERK 6F THE CITY OF FRIrLEY