The URL can be used to link to this page

PRE 1989 DOCSk BUILDING STANDARDS -DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JULY 18, 1974 - Pg. 2 Mr. Smith agreed with the change on the front and south walls but not the north wall as future expansion would be done -on this side. The landscaping plan as shown will be used. All storage will be inside. Mr. Lindblad said in essance, then the Board can approve this plan but must require the same agreements as stipulated at the December 6, 1973 meeting. MOTION by Tonco, seconded by Simoneau to recommend to Council approval of the plans (dated June 6, 1974) for the building with the following stipula- tions: 1. Driveway be 25 feet wide. 2. 10 foot radius at entrance. 3. Concrete Curb (6" x 18") around blacktop area. 4. Use landscaping plan as shown on 6-10-74 plans. S. All storage of material and equipment must be inside. 6. Drainage plan be worked out with the Engineering Department. 7. Any outside storage of waste material must be screened, properly. 8. Any outside roof equipment must be properly screened. 9. Loading area on the north side of the existing building will not be used any longer, and all loading and unloading will be inside of the new building. 10. Provide easements for the westerly 10 feet of Lots 16 and 17, Block 7, Onaway addition. The Board strongly recommends that the City Council not issue a building permit for 7740-80 Beech Street until the City. receives a signed written agreement stating that an agreement was reached for providing joint parking between Assurance Mfg. and Sperco Tool, the City Attorney to act as mediator. Also that an agreement for landscaping be provided to the City for 7795 Beech Street. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. G CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST .TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDING TO BE USED AS A MACHING SHOP LOCATED ON LOT 7, BLOCK 1, NAGEL'S WOODLANDS; THE SAME BEING 7615 BAKER STREET NORTHEAST, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY Mr. Ron DeVriendt (co-owner) and Mr. 011ie Erickson (general contractor) were present for the request. BUILDING STANDARDS -DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JULY 18, 1974 - Pg. 3 Mr. Erickson said the building would be constructed of scored block on three side with break -off block in front, all painted. Mr. Boardman presented a sketch for the front which he felt would create a more balanced looking front. He changed the windows fron 2 on each side of the door to 2 on the north side and none on the south side. However a glass panel would be next to the door for enterior lighting and balance. Mr. Erickson and Mr. DeVriendt liked the change but said mortgage money is set up already and if this new plan would cost more they would not be able to do it. The glass panel next to the door, Mr. Erickson noted, would be quite expensive not only for the cost of the glass but by new building codes it would have to safety glass and wired for vandalism reasons. The Board stipulated that they would leave the decision of which design they would use after investigating the cost for the new design, but this should be decided before going to Council. All parties agreed to this. The Board asked if they would be painting the front. They felt a natural block would look better, especially on the new design. fir. DeVriendt said if they use Mr. Erickson's plan it definitely would be painted. The Board left this as an option, again depending on what design would be used. Mr. Lindblad said the shrubbery plan as presented was okay. Mr. Tonco asked about drainage. Mr. Erickson said he did not think there would be a problem. The Board suggested they work with the Engineering Depart- ment if there is a problem. It was pointed out that all outside dumpsters must be screened; all roof equipment, if any, be screened; enough parking stalls provided; and poured concrete curbing (6" x 1811) must be used around the parking lot (except on the east side as future expansion will be on this side and precast curbing can be used here) . The Board noted there was no security lights. They suggested lights on the corners to flood the east, south and west sides and possible decorative lights over the doors and windows. The Board said this sould be ready for Council. MOTION by Tonco, seconded by Cariolano to recommend to Council approval of the building with the following stipulations: 1. Check into financial feasibility of using new design. 2. Work with Engineering Department on drainage plan. 3. Security light plan be brought in for Council approval. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. e REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 5, 1974 PAGE 8 THE MOTION was seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF A REOUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDING TO BE USED AS A FR P The Assistant Engineer, Mr. Sobiech, said the City had prepared a new design for the proposed building. ,He pointed out the different facings.proposed for the building to the Council. Mayor Liebl asked which street the front of the building would face. The Assistant Engineer said Baker Street. Mayor Liebl asked if all of the necessary City requirements are met in the proposal. Mr. Sobiech said yes. He continued he has not seen their drainage plans at the present time. The Assistant Engineer pointed out the design for the facing of the building which had been prepared by Mr. Jerry Boardman, Planning Assistant. Mr. Erickson said he would concur in the design by Mr. Boardman. Mayor Lieble read the other stipulations to the applicant and Mr. Erickson said he concurred with all three stipulations. 47- i MOTION by Councilman Utter to concur with the recommendation of the Building Standards -Design Control Subcommittee and approve the request for the construction of the machine shop as requested by Top Tool.Company with the three stipulations recommended. Seconded by Councilman Nee. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN AP RTMENT BUILIING LOCATED ON LOT 13, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89: THE SAME BEING 1250 NORTON AVENUE NORTHEAST, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. RE JEST BY BY MR. KUTZIY., 209 NORTH SNELLING AVENUE, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA): and CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN i WRARTENT LOCATED ON LOT 13, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89: THE SAME BEING 1280 NORTON AVLNUE N. E. FRIDLEY, MINNCSO_f11. RE JEST BY MR. KUTZIK, 209 NORTH SN- LING AVENUE, S1. LFLMINNESOTA): The Assistant Engineer said there would be two 18 unit buildings on Norton Avenue. Mayor Liebl asked the number of square feet per unit. The representative of the applicant, Mr. Robert Weber, 14 -14th Avenue South, New Brighton, said there would be 804 square -feet per unit and this did not include the hallways, balcony or entryways. The City Manager explained that the applicant had followed all of the requirements of the Code and any additional parking would be a cushion. The City Manager said the landscaping plans should blend in with the work done by Medtronics. The City Manager also pointed out that there should be some kind of recreational activity in the complex. Mr. Weber explained that he planned to work this out with the administration. He explained he did not plan the installation of a swimming pool, but had planned on installing some type of recreational equipment such as playground equipment or picnic tables. Mr. Weber continued he had planned to work out these details in accordance with the wishes -of the Administration. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the construction of the two 18 unit apartment buildings with the nine recommended stipulations of the Building Standards Design Control Subcommittee on page 10-E of the agenda. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT TWO 14EW BUILDINGS TO BE USED AS SPECULATIVE WAREHOUSES LOCATED ON BLOCK 10, LUQITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 7-8-1THE SAME BEING 5951 AND 6051 EAST RIVER ROAD, FRIDLEY, hflt7f;ES07A RE JEST BY R. W. MURRAY COM&ANY OF ILLINOIS, 999 EAST TAUHYT, DESPLLAPfC- , ILLINUB): Mr. Sobiech said this item had been tabled at the subcommittee level. City ® "df' ANOKA COUNTY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE 560-3450 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421 City Council Building Standards -Design Control Subcommittee ACTION TAKEN NOTICE August 9, 1974 Mr. Ron DeVriendt Top Tool Company 1843 East Lake Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407 Dear Mr. DeVriendt: On August 5, 1974 the Fridley City Council officially approved the recommendation(s) of the Building Standards - Design Control Subcommittee with the stipulations listed below. If you have any questions regarding these stipulations, SAC Charges, exterior development bonding and/or building per- mits, please call the Community Development Office at.560-3450. Sin erely 11 . errold L. Boardman Planning Assistant STIPULATIONS: 1. Check into financial feasibility of using new design. 2. Work with Eng. Dept. on drainage plan. 3. Security light plan be brought in for approval. LL/ f� 560.3450 (Zit Of 1rd1e ANOKA COUNTY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE December 5, 1974 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 Mr. O. R. Erickson Erco, Incorporated 3231 Central Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418 Re: Top Tool Electrical Permit & Plan Dear Mr. Erickson: We recently received a call from Bacon's Electric informing us that they are no longer the electrical contractor on the Top Tool building located at 7615 Baker Street N.E. Since the City accepted the electrical plan as presented by Bacon's Electric, and now that they are no longer the electrical contractor on the job, a new plan must be submitted and a new permit must be acquired for the remaining work to be done. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 560-3450. Sincerely, Oak DARR'H:T• G. C Community Development Adm. DGC/mh CC: Bacon -s Electric c 560-3450 ® gralecy ANOKA COUNTY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE February 21, 1975 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 Mr. 011ie Erickson Erco, Incorporated 3231 Central Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418 Re: 7615 Baker Street Foundation Dear Mr. Erickson: You have asked us to make a report on the soil density and correction to substandard soil located on this site now known as 7615 Baker Street or the Top Tool Company. The City cannot certify or report on any technical results with reference to this matter, however, we are offering the following as notations made in inspection records; 9/16/74: Preliminary site inspection to determine soil type - Remarks: Excavation started - peat and wood apparent to a depth.of 5 or 6 feet. 9/17/74: Excavation Inspection - Remarks: The 5 or 6 feet of peat has been removed. 9/19/74: Backfill Inspection - Remarks: The 5 feet or so of peat is out - sand being brought in and compacted by excavator - most of the backfill complete - instructed the masonry contractor (D. W. Harstad) to use a vibratory compactor inside footing forms prior to asking for a footing inspection. 9/23/74: Footing Inspection - Remarks: Soils at footing elevation look good - some pumping in the N.E. corner - instructed D. W. Harstad-to widen the footing to 3 feet in doubtful area. 9/25/74: Routine Inspection - nothing noted 9/30/74: Routine Inspection - nothing noted • Mr. 011ie Erickson February 21, 1975 Page 2 Copies of these field inspection slips are available if you would like them. If we can be of any other assistance to you, please let us know. Sincerely, DARREL G. CLARK Community Development Adm. DGC/mh CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450 October 20, 1987 Ed Chanin Maslon Law Firm 1800 Midwest Plaza Building Minneapolis, Mn. 55402 Re: 7615 Baker Street N.E. Dear Mr. Qzanin: The property at Lot 7, Block 1, Nagels Woodland, the same being 7615 Baker Street N.E. is zoned M-1, Licht Industrial. Please see attachment. Sincerely, Kathlyn Castle Planning Assistant C-87-535 GiYOF FRIDLEY CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450 January 25, 1988 Opportunity Minnesota, Inc. United States Small Business Administration RE: Lot 7, Block 1, Nagel's Woodlands Dear Sirs: The site referenced above is in the zoned district M-1, Light Industrial, and is an appropriate zoning category for Top Tool, Inc. This property is not located in a flood hazard zone, as per Community Panel Rmiber 270013 0001 B, effective March 2, 1981. A copy of the Certificate of Occupancy is on file with the City of Fridley, dated February 27, 1975, for Top Tool Company. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at the Fridley Civic Center, 571-3450. Sincerely, James L. Robinson Planning Coordinator JLR/dm C-87-27 'Kemper & Associates Land Surveying • Engineering Innsbruck Office Park (Silver Lake Rd. & 694) '2722 Highway 694 New Brighton, MN 55112 Telephone (612) 631-0351 n ' PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS ' TOP TOOL COMPANY ADDITION 7615 Baker Street Lot 7, Block 1, Nagel's Woodlands City of Fridley Anoka County, Minnesota ' Prepared for: Planning & Design, Inc. 1611 Highway 10 N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 612/780-1920 Prepared by: Kemper & Associates 2722 Highway 694 New Brighton, Minnesota 55112 June 21, 1989 'Kemper & Associates Land Surveying • Engineering Innsbruck Office Park (Silver Lake Rd. & 694) 2722 Highway 694 New Brighton, MN 55112 Telephone (612) 631-0351 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report ' was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ' Al red B. Kemper-, No. 9296 LV I Da 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INDEX Page Introduction 1 Summary of Runoff Calculations 2 Methods 3 Existing Conditions Drainage Map 4 Post Development Drainage Map 5 Appendix A - Rainfall Intensity -Duration -Frequency Curves 6 Appendix B - Runoff Coefficient C related to rainfall 7 intensity and topography Appendix C - Drainage Calculations 8 -13 Appendix D - Retention Pond Volume Calculations 14 L Introduction To analyze the effects of the expansion of a flat roof concrete block structure for Top Tool Company, located at 7615 Baker .Street, Fridley, Minnesota, and an associated expension of an existing parking lot, the following report was prepared. ' To evaluate the stormwater management for this property, calcu- lations were made to determine existing runoff for the 1 year - 24 hour, 10 year - 24 hour, and 100 year - 24 hour storms for two ' drainage areas on the subject site. Calculations were also made to determine runoff associated with the anticipated improvements. The existing site consists of a 100' x 368' lot with an approx- imate area of 37,000 square feet. The site presently drains approximately 68% of this area to Baker Street and to a catch basin approximately 200 feet south of the subject lot. The remaining portion of the lot forms a natural low area serving to pond existing runoff. The lot itself is more generally located approximately 500 feet south of the intersection of Osborne Road and Baker Street just east of Woodcrest Elementary School. It was the purpose of this study to document these required calculations, to show a summary of their comparisons, and to use these numbers to calculate the sizing of a retention pond on the property to allow for storage of excess stormwater. It is the intent of this report to also show that no increase in storm - water drainage to Baker Street will occur above what already is in existance. The following is a summary of existing and post development drainage and anticipated storage requirements for a retention pond on the easterly end of this property. r--, L 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Post Development -2- Storage Required Presently drains to Baker Street Will drain to Baker St. @ reduced flow Presently ponded by low area on property 1357 Presently drains to Baker Street Will drain to Baker St. @ reduced flow Presently ponded by low area on property 2624 Presently drains to Baker Street Will drain to Baker St. @ reduced flow Presently ponded by low area on property 3732 Drainage Anticipated Storm Area Runoff 1 yr - 24 hr 1 3050 cubic feet Present Condition 1 yr - 24 hr 1 3009 cubic feet Post Development 1 yr - 24 hr 2 408 cubic feet Present Condition 1 yr - 24 hr 2 1357 cubic feet Post Development 10 yr - 24 hr 1 5273 cubic feet Present Condition 10 yr - 24 hr 1 5203 cubic feet Post Development 10 yr - 24 hr 2 706 cubic feet Present Condition 10 yr - 24 hr 2 2624 cubic feet Post Development 100 yr - 24 hr 1 7497 cubic feet Present Condition 100 yr - 24 hr 1 7397 cubic feet Post Development 100 yr - 24 hr 2 1003 cubic feet Present Condition 100 yr - 24 hr 2 3732 cubic feet Post Development -2- Storage Required Presently drains to Baker Street Will drain to Baker St. @ reduced flow Presently ponded by low area on property 1357 Presently drains to Baker Street Will drain to Baker St. @ reduced flow Presently ponded by low area on property 2624 Presently drains to Baker Street Will drain to Baker St. @ reduced flow Presently ponded by low area on property 3732 IJ Methods ' The following drainage calculations are based on the rational method using hand calculations and USWB Technical Paper #25 "Nomograph for Rainfall Intensities" and Figure 17 of the Portland Cement Association's "Handbook of Concrete Culvert Pipe Hydraulics to Estimate Runoff Coefficients". ISummary 1 1 To conform with the City of Fridley's Stormwater Management Plan, a retention pond with a volume of 3732 cubic feet was designed at the most easterly corner of the subject property. This retention pond would thereby stormwater due enable to development this parcel to of the retain on site any increases in property up to the 100 year - 24 hour storm. With the retention pond in place, it is anticipated that no increase in runoff to Baker Street would be expected. 1 1 `N�,rFa ct� vs CO NC. BLOCK EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS. w - - '- 368 03 - 1/7 o A •- - X2.9 TG FELE 0, �YoVpScD ASP.VIL"r — 1 - EWAGEIAR4 rlo S 1'21'✓ATF-;, EMerr_ • rte E✓n4aI LN ae I-VIveNAr Bao 0 SIG��Ek—p ANAarlLITYVDr ,EHENT OW S J�, - z s °' 1 OVWt1EAV Rl 1 t.fr h ' 9 E W . �o 0 W "r/ � H 1 - ail �I d `N�,rFa ct� vs CO NC. BLOCK EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS. w - - '- 368 03 - 1/7 o A •- - X2.9 TG FELE 0, �YoVpScD ASP.VIL"r — 1 - EWAGEIAR4 rlo S 1'21'✓ATF-;, EMerr_ • rte E✓n4aI LN ae I-VIveNAr Bao 0 SIG��Ek—p ANAarlLITYVDr ,EHENT OW S J�, - z s °' 1 OVWt1EAV I"J LUN(, 0LVL t� . P I Ir POST DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREAS ! _ � J - , -368.03 UUP OIL 12 c l 11.3: ' DRAINAGE AREA jmooF �. �� ="5" — *d(t - �" "� - iSt�NT `. J-0 I �- , -2 I - S CONC. BLOCK L n °z��E� ,•s:-.._- - II p N07615 I -.�2K.1:�!•.cA To/� ter.. y 1 NAGE AREA 1 �c 30 j s 9Li F,Ay, . -L--- : 5 F;Q1" FLaQ ELE\/ of -;,45 r � ✓.4 rte'PLA S S. 915: P—T, �44.5r ID B JQA zri '1 ax�sTrr♦G =S�L�' a... a_ :faLr Q -094 Cj -368 — 1— L-- �vEl1riE4V ' 4 i fbAEG' (tit w 4Npki=- 03 ✓�11E - 1,•stt W Nvu % POLE a DATA FROM U.S.WEATHER BUREAU TECHNICAL PUBLICATION 25. RAINFALL INTENSITY -DURATION -FREQUENCY CURVES MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA all YIOYTI/- - w OYN.TION 1 : . 1 . • 10" IN N ST PAUL. MINNESOTA .01 -_ _OtOYT10w — ■■.■ 1 : O 1 1 1 N It • M :NOTION IIOW: -6- Appendix A .V a a i . overage ralnfollIntensity, in. per hr. ®bond /-stesp, barren, impervious surfaces bond2-roll/ng barren/n upper bond values, f/o/ barren In lower port of bond steep forested £s sleep gross meadows band3-timber lands of moderate to sleep Mand mountolnous, forming uiwwtwuoand 4 -flat pervious surfaces, flat farmlands, wooded areas and meadows Fig. 17. Runoff coefficient C related to rain- fall intensity and topography. Appendix B KEMPER & ASSOCIATES ' 2722 Highway 694 NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 (612) 631-0351 JOB !O%- 7N., CO. �R -OZA%C SHEET NO. ! OF (12 CALCULATED BY "o /C DATE ( A/ /0-0 CHECKED BY m SCALE DATE p=W ml IVeBs Im. &ft' Mm Oltll. KEMPER & ASSOCIATES 2722 Highway 694 NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 (612) 631.0351 �, /�, 60, cX�ST✓N � JOB 99/2., //d/� /c7�. (A . 02A1n!A6,-r / SHEET NO. z OF ` 0 CALCULATED BY M� DATE A /8 CHECKED BY DATE Q: Al e L 4 ®1=. masa rm mm KEMPER & ASSOCIATES 2722 Highway 694 NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 (612) 631-0351 Yjz1-- % le P x EX�STO.tIG JOS �H�°AN� /7a4inr-46m_ SHEET NO. 3 OF CALCULATED SV -01-f-0 DATE CHECKED BY DATE C n fl 1 1 PRODUCE 2041®ht. GmbH Mm 01111. i KEMPER & ASSOCIATES 2722 Highway 694 NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 (612) 631-0351 JOB 5?1/z,6 6oP <OQL aH?f1,o/r 0.4sniA6C- SHEET NO. OF �D CALCULATED BY MOK DATE a lzd /g -i CHECKED BY DATE t r_ f. P90aICf 2*1 � Inc., Geon, Mm 01111. JOB /lZ(o To c. i.oHP��✓y !/ �a�46�' KEMPER & ASSOCIATES SHEET NO. $ OF 6 2722 Highway 694 Al O� 6 NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 CALCULATED BY DATE (612) 631-0351 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE � w- anon mm mm. 3-4) (� nd 1..2 3 .X .. 12 ; = s8 Sc s p ... Z ............ �..�/...Z.............. �%�'��... :SZa.... yz ..............�.. . .......�!....... ! I. s !.. .-................................... Zs/ = fzo / �X2y/t�t15 ..57Q j (o S:. $ .................................... ...... ...... ...... .... .... ...... i o�'��... �.....2 T ..... ...... , .............. :........... ...:... ........ ..;......... _;.........................;..............;......... ..... ........... ............. ....;..........._....... eo ..............: .... ........ ......... ............ .• ...... ..... ...... (�:/NGMES i .................................... >S,9� ...... ...... ..... ..... ..............................................:.............;......... ....... 'A/ .STI Z w > ....... .......... ..... .........;..............'� ! b J yb i(vb _7 I .............. .............! ...... ...... �� .................... ..... ... .......... nd 1..2 3 .X .. 12 ; = s8 Sc s p ... Z ............ �..�/...Z.............. �%�'��... :SZa.... yz ..............�.. . .......�!....... ! I. s !.. .-................................... Zs/ = fzo KEMPER & ASSOCIATES 2722 Highway 694 NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 (612) 631-0351 JOB 0//2 —r,,(- 7.,-,,. Co. - QRA,.A&,-- SHEET NO. OF 4 CALCULATED BY A40K DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE ............................ ............. ............... ... . ...... -1 T .............. . . . .. ... ........... . ......... ..... ............ ............. ...... . .... j 4 ............. .............. .... .............. .............. ............. Z q I%e Sae mlipull 1A Ll IL&-ciffk".M=01471. jl=�C —13— Fe /00 ..... ...... ........... pole .. .......... .......... . . .... .... ......... ... . ... .... ... ............................ ............. . ........ :75- . . .......... ........... . ........................ /4V >kRl,-' ...... . .... 4AA4L ............. ............. . . .... .............. ....... ..... .4 .......... i ............. .. ..... ..... ........ .. .............. ..... ............... ............ . .............. c): .. ........ .......... ............... ..... ..... I ............. .......... .......... .......... ............ ............. . . ... .. ... .. . . . ....... ....... ............. ..... - .............. ............. .......... .......................... ............. . ..... ....... . . .. ...... ... ............. ...... ..... ............. ........... . ........... ...... ....... ............. .............. .............. ........ ...... . ... ........... ............. . ............. .......... . ..... ............ .... . .. .... .. .. .. ......... tyvd 12Y JOB 0//2 —r,,(- 7.,-,,. Co. - QRA,.A&,-- SHEET NO. OF 4 CALCULATED BY A40K DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE ............................ ............. ............... ... . ...... -1 T .............. . . . .. ... ........... . ......... ..... ............ ............. ...... . .... j 4 ............. .............. .... .............. .............. ............. Z q I%e Sae mlipull 1A Ll IL&-ciffk".M=01471. jl=�C —13— Fe 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 KEMPER & ASSOCIATES 2722 Highway 694 NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 (612) 631-0351 • 2 ............ .. ..........., ............... ............ ...........................................................................r...........................;.............;..............;.......... ...... ...... ..... ..... rmaa4.lnree� W- cmma wa 0147L PE 14 JOB SHEET NO. a OF - CALCULATED BY , `9� DATE ZA/6 7- CHECKED BY DATE SCALE 2�, 8 .,L�• W v#aAdlow. Phone: (612) 434-6642 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 15850 Lincoln Street N.E. Ham Lake, MN 55304 August 3, 1989 City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Attention: Darrel Clark Dear Mr. Clark: Enclosed is a copy of of the soil test results which we received from Twin City Testing today. Sincerely, Alton R. Johnson Secretary/Treasurer ARJ:pe Enc. O tuwln city test"Q corporation 662 CROMWELL AVENUE 8Q_�j g ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/645-3601 SOIL OBSERVATIONS AND TESTING PROJECT: TOP TOOL COMPANY 7615 BAKER STREET NE August 1, 1989 REPORTED TO: FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA D W Harstad Company Attn: Dick Johnson 15850 Lincoln Street NE Ham Lake, Minnesota 55304 LABORATORY No. 4220 89-1723 This report concerns our observations and testing of the soil conditions for the addition to the Top Tool Company building in Fridley, Minnesota. Our work was requested by Dick Johnson on July 7, 1989. The scope of work we were requested to perform consisted of the following items: 1. Observe the soils exposed in completed excavations for the building addition. 2. Perform shallow hand auger borings to explore localized subsurface soil conditions. 3. Perform compaction testing of fill soils on an intermittent trip basis, when requested. 4. Judge whether the soils exposed are suitable for support of design foundation loadings. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our observations and shallow hand auger borings, it is our opinion the soils exposed within the majority of the observed areas of the building addition excavation consisted of naturally deposited sands. -These soils, in the condition observed, were judged suitable for support of fill and foundation loadings of 2000 psf. We did note a small area located about 25' east of the existing building where a few inches of organic topsoil remnants remained to be removed. In addition, we noted a small area located just west of the southeast corner of the planned addition where the waterbearing sandy soils had become disturbed by excavating equipment. The loosened and disturbed soils appeared to extend to a depth of about 1' or less, and were underlain by medium dense sands at our hand auger boring locations. We recommended these loosened/disturbed and organic soils be removed by backhoe excavating equipment prior to placement of fill. No observation of completion of these minimal amounts of additional excavation work was requested or performed. APA MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CUENTIL TME PUSUO ANO OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE PUPMITTEO AS THE CONFlOUNTIAL PROPERTY OF CUENTE, ANO AUTHORI- ZATION POR PUPUCAT:ON OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OA EXTRACTS PROM OR REGARCING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL LABORATORY No. C3 tumn CIL'Y testinq corp0rat10n " 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/645-3601 SOIL OBSERVATIONS AND TESTING 4220 89-1723 August 1, 1989 2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Cont.) At the time of our observation, the surface of the building area excavation within the majority of the addition appeared to be at or slightly above anticipated elevation of perimeter foundations. However, fill would be required to establish perimeter foundation grade in the southeast corner of the addition. Since no building corner staking was present at this location, we recommended the actual building corner be located and that at least a 1:1 lateral excavation oversize be provided. Because no deep penetration borings were put down in conjunction with a preliminary subsurface exploration, we cannot warrant soil conditions below the depth of our shallow hand auger borings. Although completed soils were observed in the excavated areas, this does not eliminate the possibility that compressible soils are present below the depths of our shallow hand auger borings. COMPACTED FILL TESTING On July 11 and 12, eight soil density tests were performed within compacted fill placed to re-establish floor subgrade elevation. These tests were evaluated in accordance with the Standard Proctor method (ASTM:D 698-78). The results of these tests, which are attached, indicate the specified minimum compaction level of 95% was attained at the location and elevation of these tests. PROJECT INFORMATION The construction in progress will be a single -story addition to the east side of the existing Top Tool Company building. The addition will have overall dimensions of about 50' x 801. The concrete slab -on -grade construction will be placed at an elevation corresponding to floor elevation of the existing structure. This structure will be supported upon a system of normal spread footings placed at minimum frost protection depth. We understand foundations have been designed to rest on soil having an allowable bearing capacity of 2000 psf. OBSERVATION METHODS AND RESULTS On July 10, 1989, we performed our observation of the soils exposed within the building addition excavation. During our visit, several shallow hand auger borings were put down within this excavated area to aid in depicting local subsurface soil conditions. The exposed soils and those retrieved by the hand auger borings, were visually classified in general accordance with the requirements of ASTM:D 2488. Estimates were made of their strength characteristics. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC ANO OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS TME CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OP CLIENTS, AMC AUT04014I- 7ATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS PROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS 18 RESERVED PENOIN13 OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. SEal LABORATORY No 13 MUM CIMP testInq corporation " 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 6121645-3601 SOIL OBSERVATIONS AND TESTING 4220 89-1723 August 1, 1989 3 OBSERVATION METHODS AND RESULTS (Cont.) At the time of our observation, the bottom of the excavated area ranged from about 2' below elevation of the floor slab of the existing structure in the northeast, to 5' below floor elevation in the southeast. In the higher portions of the excavation, the exposed soils consisted of brown, fine grained sand with silt underlain by gray sand with silt. Within the lower portions of the excavation bottom, the exposed soils consisted of gray, waterbearing sand with silt. Throughout the majority of the excavated area, the exposed soils were judged to be in a medium dense condition. These soils were judged suitable for support of fill and/or structural loadings. We did note the presence of a small area of organic topsoil remnants of about 6" in thickness located approximately 25' east of the west end of the existing structure. We recommended these topsoil remnants be removed prior to placement of fill. In addition, the gray waterbearing sands in the southeast portion of the excavation had become loosened and disturbed as a result of construction traffic. We recommended these loosened sands be removed by backhoe excavating equipment to expose underlying, undisturbed sands prior to placement of fill. We are attaching an information sheet concerning what we consider to be sound engineering practices for the construction of a fill sequence. It must be recognized that we do not practice in the field of surveying. Therefore, we must rely on elevation and location information provided by others. If the construction is redesigned or otherwise moved subsequent to our work, we should be informed so our firm can assess if additional engineering observation is required or suggest engineering alternatives. TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION Ga Larson Field Engineer 46649le Michael P McCarthy, P. . Manager, Construction services Geotechnical Department GAL/MPM/kmk AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THIS CONPIOENTIAL PROPERTY OP CLIENTS, ANO AUTWRI- SATION FOR PUBLICATION OF BTATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR RESAROINS OUR REPORTS 18 AEBERVEO PENOINO OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL tuuin city testing COrpOre' =0n 662 CROMWELL AVENUE y ST. PAUL, MN 55114 I; PHONE 612/645.3601 REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL PROJECT: TOP TOOL COMPANY DATE: Jul 31, 1989 7615 BAKER ST NE y FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA COPIES TO: REPORTED TO: D W Harstad Company Attn: Dick Johnson 15850 Lincoln St NE Ham Lake, MN 55304 LABORATORY No. 4220 89-1723 TEST NUMBER: 1 2 3 DATE TAKEN: 7-11-89 7-11-89 7-11-89 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sand with silt, SAnd with silt, Sand with silt, (Moisture -Density Sample Number) fine grained, fine grained, fine grained, brown (SP -SM) -1 brown (SP -SM) -1 brown (SP -SM) -1 LOCATION: 5'W & 5'N of 7'W & 5'N of Center of S wall SE corner of SE corner of addition addition DEPTH BELOW EXISTING FLOOR: 4.5' 3' 3' DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 1.5' 3" 3" FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Density in Place in Nuclear Density Method "B", ASTM02922-81 (- #4 Basis) Dry Density (pcf) 106.5 108 109.5 Moisture Content (°k) 9.6 7.5 7.4 Plus #4 Material (°i°) None None None LABORATORY MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-78, Method "A", (44 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 111.5 111.5 111.5 Optimum Moisture (%) 11.5 11.5 11.5 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 95.5 97 98 Specified Compaction (°k) 95 95 95 ATTENTION: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. These tests were performed by J. Stieben. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC, AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORI. ZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. Twin City Testing Corporatl 80.222 (8/85) By Apr twin city testing • ,. xDlo,yD� a Corporation 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/645.3601 REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL PROTECT: TOP TOOL COMPANY DATE: July 31, 1989 7615 BAKER ST NE FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA COPIES TO: REPORTED TO: D W Harstad Company Attn: Dick Johnson 15850 Lincoln St NE Ham Lake, MN 55304 LABORATORY No TEST NUMBER: DATE TAKEN: 4220 89-1723 4 7-11-89 5 7-11-89 [.1 7-11-89 7 7-11-89 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sand with Sand with Sand with Sand with (Moisture -Density Sample Number) silt, fine silt, fine silt, fine silt, f i nr grained, brown grained, brown grained, brown grained, brown (SP -SM) -1 (SP -SM) -1 (SP -SM) -1 (SP -SM) -1 LOCATION: 10'W of SE Center of S 61S & 25'E 6'S & 55'E corner of wall of NW corner NW corner addition of addition of addition DEPTH BELOW EXISTING FLOOR:. 1' 1' 1' 1' Moisture Content (°I°) 8.4 7.6 DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 3" 3" 3" 3" FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Density in Place in Nuclear Density Method "B", ASTM:D2922-81 (- #4 Basis) Dry Density (pcf) 107.5 109 107.5 110.5 Moisture Content (°I°) 8.4 7.6 11.4 7.4 Plus #4 Material None None None None LABORATORY MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM: D698-78, Method "A", (44 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pcD 111.5 111.5 111.5 111.5 Optimum Moisture (%) 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 96.5 97.5 96.5 99 Specified Compaction 95 95 95 95 ATTENTION: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. These tests were performed by J. Stieben. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC, AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORI- ZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. Twin City Teatin Corporation 4.222 (6/65) By • �,•.wM.a,, to mn city testinq a 862 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 812/8453601 REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL TOP TOOP COMPANY PROJECT: 7615 BAKER ST NE DATE: July 31, 1989 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA COPIES TO: REPORTED TO: D W Harstad Company Attn: Dick Johnson 15850 Lincoln St NE Ham Lake, MN 55304 LABORATORY No. 4220 89-1723 TEST NUMBER: 8 DATE TAKEN: 7-12-89 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sand with silt, (Moisture -Density Sample Number) fine grained, brown (SP -SM) -1 LOCATION: 75'E of SE corner of existing bldg DEPTH BELOW EXISTING FLOOR: 6" DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 611 FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Density in Place by Sand -Cone Method, ASTM:D1556-82 (44 Basis) Dry Density (pa 106.5 Moisture Content (%) 6.7 Plus #4 Material (%) None LABORATORY MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-78, Method "A", (44 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 111.5 Optimum Moisture (%) 11.5 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 95.5 Specified Compaction (%) 95 ATTENTION: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. These tests were performed by R. Vickery. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AuTNORF ZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. Twin City Testing Corporation SG -225 (Brea) By 109eiA&16--z • c3 twin c1tY testInq 882 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 i' 4 PHONE 812/845.3801 • MOISTURE -DENSITY CURVE SAMM.1 NO. 1 PROJECT: TOP TOOL COMPANY DATE: July 31, 1989 RIPORT® TO: D W Harstad Company COME TO: .LABORATORY NO. 4220 89-1723 METHOD OF TEST: ASTM: D698-78, Method "A", (44 Basis) TYPE OF MATERIAL: Sand with silt, fine grained, brown (SP -SM) MAXIMUM DENSITY: 111.5 Ib. /cu. ft. OPTIMUM MOISTURE 11.596 113 109 9 10 11 12 13 14 MOISTURE CONTENT _% Twin City Testin orix)ration By snail man maps!■ �!!iI' a!■ WU" !Far.. affiffloonso ■!■�■ ■■!a a■ ■ ■aaaa!!a as �MEEd. !a "at a i is■ mine u■■ a iaslnn ■ ■ 9■etiaa=ia■1�� a■�iiu ---- ----�' in piuu - - liaaa■�a ■ a �e=lii i u a ■ nounnans USIO ieL"Juu■!aa-- n■■ ■■ ss 0Sa 10— .�■■ :ice ��■■ s� aye ■aa ■! ■a t�ar�nn"gamiss aa�■aaaa!■■■ ■ ■■ ■ s i'W !ala i■� �ta■'ua!'�rna ■a a Kiln ■� � i iii lmie ammoa�! ■ la�e!■a!a �■ �`:. nans'ni �a a�iea! i�a■`aria nan l�iialq ■ara�i '`■ ■■ a ti ®enaisa am �a ■�� 1 �aw" la�i■!■a�a#�P' ■tea■►' ■iaHaiS a>i l�■;■ s"= ■ateema■a ! �am a0 ■ =IM aten &AMIN a! ■!"iaialaa non an •■! a!■ a ■lana ■■ ■ saau alna no an 9=�■ ■ a■�■a� Baan �aaa"M- -- - as s■ ■!!!■a �a ■a a ■ ■a■rse■ee ■ BMe�� monamnammo■■ a is a ■ttfa !! a! ■ • ■n■■a ■noun" ® �aia■!■ ! a�■ a A who an Boni an ::��:n : Howaus�sin■oons] a ----- ■ 9 10 11 12 13 14 MOISTURE CONTENT _% Twin City Testin orix)ration By G7YOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 March 19, 1992 Mr. Virgil C. Herrick Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. 200 Coon Rapids Boulevard, Suite 400 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Re: Land Title Summons File No. C5-91-5976 Top Tool Company Lot 7, Block 1, Nagel's Woodlands Dear Mr. Herrick: The attached above Land Title Summons was served upon the City today. Would you please take whatever action is necessary to protect the City. Very truly yours, Shirley A. Haapala City Clerk Enclosure cc: Ms. Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director, Mr. Clyde Moravetz. Engineering Aide/Administration Mr. Leon Madsen, Assessor IV, A k, ; STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF ANOKA TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT File No. C5-91-5976 LAND TITLE SUMMONS IN APPLICATION FOR REGiISTRATION OF LAND In the Matter of the Application of Top Tool Company, a Minnesota corporation, to register the title to --the following described real estate situated in Anoka County, Minnesota, namely; Lot 7, Block 1, NAGEL'S WOODLANDS, Anoka County, Minnesota, Applicants, vs. Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association; Small Business Administration; RMS Company, a Minnesota corporation; A.D. VanHorssen; Vilas M. Nagel; Theresa R. Nagel; City of Fridley; also all heirs and devisees of any of the above named persons who are deceased; and all other persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real-estate described in the Application or amendments herein, Defendants. THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the Application of the Applicants in the above -entitled proceeding and to file your answer to the said Application in the office of the clerk of said Court, in said county, within 20 days after service of this Summons upon you exclusive of the day of such service, and if you fail to answer the Application within the time aforesaid, the Applicants in this proceeding will apply to the Court for the relief demanded therein. Edward A. Bock, Jr., I.D. #9246 JENSEN, HICKEN, GEDDE & SCOTT, P.A. Attorneys for Applicants 300 Anoka Office Center 2150 Third Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 (612) 421-4110 WITNESS, Clerk of the seal in said day of _ Jane F. Morrow, said Court, and thereof, at Anoka County this 9th March , 1992 By /s/ Beverly Boyer Deputy