CCM 06/12/2017
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF FRIDLEY
JUNE 12, 2017
The City Council meeting for the City of Fridley was called to order by Mayor Lund at 7:07 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Mayor Lund
Councilmember Barnette
Councilmember Varichak
Councilmember Saefke
Councilmember Bolkcom
OTHERS PRESENT:
Wally Wysopal, City Manager
Darcy Erickson, City Attorney
Shelly Peterson, Finance Director
David Mol, Redpath and Company
PROCLAMATION:
‘49er Day Community Pride Day- June 17, 2017
PRESENTATION:
‘49er Day Ambassadors
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of May 22, 2017.
APPROVED.
Special City Council Meeting of May 26, 2017.
THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGEND AND PLACED ON THE
REGULAR AGENDA.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2017 PAGE 2
OLD BUSINESS:
1. Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending the Fridley City Code, Chapters 602.
3.2% Malt Liquor, Section 602.14 Patio Endorsement; 603. Intoxicating Liquor,
Section 603.26 Patio Endorsement; and 606. Intoxicating Liquor On-Sale Clubs,
Section 606.12 Patio Endorsement to Allow for Live Entertainment on Patios at
Liquor Establishments with Patio Endorsements
WAIVED THE READING OF THE ORDINANCE AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO.
1343 ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLICATION.
2. Second Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the City Code of the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, by Making a Change in Zoning Districts (Rezoning Request, ZOA
#17-01, by Brad Dunham with Round Lake Commons II for 7699 Highway 65 N.E.)
(Ward 2).
WAIVED THE READING OF THE ORDINANCE AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO.
1344 ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLICATION.
NEW BUSINESS:
3. Special Use Permit Request, SP #17-02, by Round Lake Commons II, LLC, DBA
Topwash, to Allow for a Car Wash Use in a C-2, General Business Zoning District,
Generally Located at 7699 Highway 65 N.E.;
and
Resolution Approving Special Use Permit, SP #17-02 to Allow the Construction of
an Express Car Wash Use Building Generally Located at 7699 Highway 65 N.E.
APPROVED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST, SP #17-02 BY ROUND LAKE
COMMONS II, LLC, DBA TOPWASH AND ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2017-27.
4. Resolution Approving a Six-Month Extension for Recording of Final Plat, P.S. #16-
01, by Fridley Land LLC, to Allow Further Redevelopment of the Properties,
Generally Located at 41 Northern Stacks Drive and 4800 East River Road N.E.
(Ward 3).
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2017-28.
5. Approve Construction Cooperation Agreement for Restoration of Community Park
in Fridley, MN, between the City of Fridley and the Metropolitan Council.
THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACED ON
THE REGULAR AGENDA.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2017 PAGE 3
6. Approve License Agreement to Allow Temporary Storage of Equipment, Materials
and overflow Parking at Locke County Park between City of Fridley and Anoka
County.
APPROVED.
7. Appointment – Parks & Recreation Commission.
Wally Wysopal,
City Manager, stated this is for the appointment of Elizabeth Graham to the
Parks & Recreation Commission. Her term will expire on April 1, 2020.
APPROVED.
8. Claims: 1705-ACH PCard; 176785 – 177005.
APPROVED.
9. Business License.
APPROVED.
ADOPTION OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Bolkcom
requested that the Special City Council Meeting Minutes be removed
and placed on the regular agenda.
Councilmember Barnette
requested that Item No. 5 be removed and placed on the regular
agenda.
Councilmember Bolkcom
asked when the trail would be reopened.
Mr. Wysopal
replied he did not have an answer at this time.
Mayor Lund
asked if she was referring to the one by the ball fields.
Councilmember Bolkcom
replied, yes, and over the trestle.
MOTION
by Councilmember Barnette to adopt the proposed consent agenda with the removal
of the Special City Council Meeting Minutes and Item No. 5. Seconded by Councilmember
Varichak.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2017 PAGE 4
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
No one from the audience spoke.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION
by Councilmember Bolkcom to approve the agenda with the addition of Special City
Council Meeting Minutes and Item No. 5. Seconded by Councilmember Saefke.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
NEW BUSINESS:
10. Receive the 2016 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
David Mol
, Redpath and Company, presented the 2016 Comprehensive Annual Report.
Mayor Lund
stated the abbreviated report shows the need for the 9 percent increase that Mr.
Mol spoke about in his presentation so the City could get back into the black. If they look at that
chart, the sewer, 10 out of the past 11 years, the sewer fund operated in the red. This answers the
question as to why the City had such a significant increase. In total among those three enterprise
funds, water, sewer, and storm water, it is interesting to note that 7 of the past 11 years, the City
operated those collectively in the red.
Mayor Lund
stated as to the water fund, he looks at the chart and then looks at how many years
the City was in the red. The numbers in the red do not agree with the chart. He asked if that was
because this chart includes depreciation.
Mr. Mol
replied, yes, that is correct. The summary on that page is the entire fund and, what the
graph is attempting to illustrate, is the operating side of things, and does not include the non-
operating income expense.
Councilmember Bolkcom
stated regarding the audit management letter comparing the City’s
percentage income vs. percentage of sales, the state average is 5.9 and the City’s is 7.9. She
asked if that was a big deal.
Mr. Mol
replied this is really some benchmarking information they included. This is comparing
the City’s liquor operations with a report that is published annually by the State Auditor on
municipal liquor operations. They have different groupings--metro area municipal liquor
operations, outstate, different regions. This is giving them benchmarking information to
compare their operations with an average of all metro.
Shelly Peterson,
Finance Director,stated the City is above average in good ways as far as
expenditures go and when they look at the gross sales for the liquor stores.
Councilmember Bolkcom
stated there was a recommendation stating the above balances are not
expected to be repaid within a reasonable time and that they recommend the HRA review the
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2017 PAGE 5
likelihood of repayment of the above loans and authorize transfers for any that may not be
repaid. She asked whether that is something they are going to be exploring?
Ms. Peterson
replied it is her understanding the intention is to pay back those loans.
Councilmember Bolkcom
asked if they would be reclassified as a transfer.
Mr. Mol
replied they would not be transfers. This is just really an annual reminder. There are
significant dollar amounts.
Ms. Peterson
stated the HRA just met with Greg, their accounting person, to go out ten years,
and based on the increment they are anticipating, these loans should all be paid off in full.
Councilmember Bolkcom
stated on page 24 there are two things that were noted, corrected and
uncorrected financial state adjustments. She asked if this is a normal pattern or if it is unusual
for the receipt of revenue for unbilled utility accounts that were not recorded as of December 31.
Ms. Peterson
replied there are three quarters in the current year, 2017, where they code a portion
of that back to the prior year. They had some computer issues the year before so they only did
two of those three adjustments. The system did one. That same entry was made this year, not
realizing that one of those months was a correction from the prior year in the system. It was an
anomaly they do not anticipate to ever happen again.
Councilmember Bolkcom
stated the second one there says the receivable from the Met Council
was overstated.
Ms. Peterson
replied, correct. That was a new system issue where the software vendor was able
to automate a process and they were still performing the annual journal entry not realizing the
system had automated it. It was a duplicate entry.
Councilmember Bolkcom
stated on page 25, for MSA, the recommendation is the City consider
improving cash flow by requesting advances for the MSA eligible projects. She asked if this was
something they were going to look at.
Ms. Peterson
said they are working with the Engineering Department and Mr. Kosluchar. When
they award the bid, the City is eligible to receive 90 percent of the MSA. In the past they would
wait until the project was nearly complete. They will be moving forward and asking for those
funds early.
MOTION
by Councilmember Bolkcom to Receive the 2016 Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report. Seconded by Councilmember Saefke.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2017 PAGE 6
11. Resolution Accepting and Ratifying the Council Action of May 22, 2017, to Adjust
the Original McGough Construction Company Request for Proposal (RFP) to Allow
a McGough Staff Fee of 3.0%, Rather than 2.4%; This Modification Will Not
Impact the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) from McGough Construction
Company, Fridley’s Construction Manager at Risk, for the City of Fridley’s Civic
Campus Project which Includes: City Hall, Police, Fire and the Public Works
Buildings.
Wally Wysopal,
City Manager, stated was brought to their attention at the Council meeting on
May 22, regarding the fee from the construction manager, McGough Construction. When they
set out on this journey of building the civic campus with a construction manager at risk, they had
good intentions that a 2.4 percent fee would cover that. As it turns out, there was a considerable
amount of additional work that was related for McGough to take care of in terms of personnel,
legal, and that type of thing as they were forging new ground into this whole delivery method.
Mr. Wysopal
stated when it came to Council for their approval at their last meeting, the
guaranteed maximum price, staff brought it to their attention the fee was actually going to be at
3 percent, not 2.4 percent; and that it did not affect the bottom line guaranteed maximum price.
They did not have the opportunity at the Council meeting to bring this resolution forward to
make it clear that the fee for construction management was 3 percent and not 2.4.
Mr. Wysopal
stated the Council’s action tonight is purely technical. It does not affect any price
or fees that are going to be charged.
MOTION
by Councilmember Saefke to adopt Resolution No. 2017-29. Seconded by
Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
12. Resolution Adopting Policy for Transfer, Sale, Disposal or Donation of Surplus
Equipment and Surplus Property.
Shelly Peterson
, Finance Director, stated on August 1, 2016, a law went into effect allowing
cities to donate surplus equipment to non-profit organizations. In order for cities to be able to do
this, a policy must be adopted by the City Council. There is a limited scope on what the City can
donate to non-profit organizations and includes equipment used in Public Works, firefighting
equipment, emergency medical equipment, and cell phones.
Ms. Peterson
stated with that limited scope, staff has developed a policy that will also
encompass all of the City’s other surplus property and provide staff with a point of reference
moving forward on how they handle any surplus equipment they need to dispose of.
Ms. Peterson
stated it does not change the City’s current process very much. They identify,
they determine the fair market value, and they have always prioritized. When they say
“prioritize”, what she means is they look to see if another department can use the equipment first.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2017 PAGE 7
They look to sell the equipment, and they look to trade in the equipment. Once those efforts
have been made, this policy helps outline disposal methods.
Ms. Peterson
said based on those disposal methods and what the fair market value is, what this
this policy will do is require staff to go to Council with a declaration of the surplus equipment
and property. That declaration will include any surplus equipment they have determined eligible
for donation, and then with all other surplus property with a fair market value of $25,000 or more
they wish to dispose of. Those would be items similar to the buildings over at the civic campus
that they were unable to sell, transfer, or trade in. They need to find the least expensive method
for disposing of the items.
Ms. Peterson
stated in anticipation of the move to the new civic campus, this policy will provide
staff with procedures to handle the significant surplus equipment and the surplus property they
are anticipating. Staff recommends Council adopt this policy for the transfer, sale, disposal, or
donation of surplus equipment and surplus property. They have given them two separate names
because surplus equipment is what the State defines as eligible for donation, and surplus property
is anything else the City may have that does not meet that criteria.
Councilmember Bolkcom
asked how they defined “minimal.”
Ms. Peterson
replied they look at what they have; for example, in the City’s garage they know
what a typical vehicle of that age and make is worth. The City has had its office furniture at city
hall looked at to see if they can repurpose, refurbish, or sell it. There is not a lot of desire for the
modular furniture they currently have at City Hall. Staff will go through that effort with every
piece of property to determine if there is any value in it.
Councilmember Bolkcom
stated they do not normally have things that have a value over
$25,000 they are basically declaring in the past. Is it more related to moving the civic campus or
are there things the City has actually looked at and have actually sold or given away?
Ms. Peterson
replied the State of Minnesota has a website staff can go to and sell property to
other cities. Fire trucks is a perfect example. The example that was recently brought up was the
City had some landscaping materials over at Public Works that needed to be moved. To dispose
of it would cost more than just putting a free sign on it to have somebody come and just take it
away. This was designed to be able to donate to non-profits for certain unique items, and
handling what is coming ahead with a lot of the equipment and materials the City needs to move
for the new buildings.
Councilmember Bolkcom
asked so only things worth $25,000 or more would come to the City
Council.
Ms. Peterson
replied, it would be anything the City is looking to donate that meets the
requirements of being donated, and/or anything the City needs to dispose of and was unable to
sell, trade in, or transfer. For those items, it would be $25,000 or more.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2017 PAGE 8
Councilmember Bolkcom
asked if that was what No. 8 said. Or was it covered in the previous
item, because that says donated surplus equipment.
Ms. Peterson
replied No. 8 states any surplus equipment. What she and Attorney Erickson tried
to do is distinguish between surplus equipment and surplus property. Surplus equipment would
be anything eligible for donation. Surplus property would be anything that is not eligible for
donation. Paragraph No. 8 states that any surplus property with a value of $25,000 or more
would come to Council to declare surplus.
Mayor Lund
stated surplus equipment, regardless of fair market value, and surplus property
over $25,000.
Ms. Peterson
replied correct.
Councilmember Bolkcom
asked with respect to No. 12, could donating be a conflict of interest
because both she and Mayor Lund are on the board of non-profit organizations who could be
receiving the property.
Attorney Erickson
replied she does not know that the donation would be of the type of
equipment their organizations would be looking for just because it is such a narrowly defined set
of types of property under the statute. She does not think that their membership in an
organization would be a conflict because they are not personally taking title to the property.
Mayor Lund
mentioned cell phones. He said he cannot imagine they do not have value.
Mr. Wysopal
stated there are some things that very well have value. The salt shed and pole barn
do have value. Under different circumstances you could probably make that work out.
However, with the City owning it, taking employee time to try and track down how to try and get
the money out of the cell phones, etc. will exceed the value of the cell phone donation. The
policy will allow the City to dispose of those items without incurring that additional cost to the
City. The same thing happened with some IT equipment, computers, etc. Staff had three pallets
wrapped up and no one will take them because they do not want to spend the time to take them
all apart. Eventually you will find somebody who will take them and they will go to third world
countries or wherever the labor cost is lower.
Mr. Wysopal
stated he thinks it is very clear that No. 12, under the examples that were
presented, would not prevent any member of the Council or a City employee who is a part of a
non-profit group organization from participating in this. What No. 12 is saying is that you are
taking it personally, you would take the property and say you are doing this for that organization.
That would not be the case. Staff would not work with it that way. They would make sure that
the Lions or Rotary Club, etc. would be taking possession of that property and not the individuals
themselves.
Attorney Erickson
stated they can certainly follow up with the League but that is a fair reading
of their model policy which they have tried to incorporate.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2017 PAGE 9
Councilmember Bolkcom
stated sometimes instead of saying City Manager, they say Designee.
Would that change that policy to incorporate others? For example, No. 14, the City Manager
may cause the title to be transferred.
Mr. Wysopal
replied he would prefer it that way because as the Charter sets things up in the
ordinances he is responsible for those things. Certainly it could be a delegated thing but when
there are titles and those kinds of things, his signature is on those. It would make the
responsibility chain complete and clear.
Councilmember Bolkcom
stated No. 15 is on transportation, and then in Exhibit A is ask how
they plan on transporting the equipment. There is no timeline.
Ms. Peterson
replied, she believed in this document it is up to the discretion of the department
that needs to dispose of it.
Councilmember Bolkcom
stated asked if they wanted to know how long it would take someone
to take the equipment. What if there is more than one person who is interested?
Ms. Peterson
replied they did not look at the possibility of two people giving them identical
offers for a piece of equipment. They would work with them.
Councilmember Bolkcom
stated it said somewhere else that if there were more than one
organization, staff would go back and let the other know so it is kind of a fair policy.
Attorney Erickson
stated the policy will address that in No. 12 because it talks about the impact
on the City. If the City needs to get rid of it by a certain date to accomplish clearing the property
or getting the surplus property out of City storage, that is a factor the City can consider and, if it
had competing identical offers from non-profits that is relevant for it to be considered.
Councilmember Bolkcom
asked who would fill out Exhibit A.
Ms. Peterson
replied the organization would fill that out.
Mayor Lund
stated the timeline is important because it has to work for the City, too. The other
thing is if it is agreeable for a non-profit to take it, then he would think they want to make sure
they are utilizing a licensed, bonded contractor that has insurance so the City does not have any
liability. There should be some show from this non-profit when it asks at the bottom of the form
how they planned on removing and transporting the equipment that they have someone who is
licensed, bonded, insured to protect the City’s liability.
Ms. Peterson
agreed that could be something they add to the policy.
Attorney Erickson
replied on Exhibit B there is a Disclaimer of Warranties, but they could also
put indemnification in there and require if there is any damage, harm, or loss caused by the
removal of the property and transport off of the property owned by the City that they indemnify
us.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2017 PAGE 10
MOTION
by Councilmember Saefke to adopt Resolution No. 2017-30. Seconded by
Councilmember Bolkcom with the inclusion of insurance and indemnification language.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
12A. Approve Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of May 26, 2017.
Councilmember Bolkcom
referred to the paragraph 6 on the second page of the minutes which
states, “Mr. Kosluchar said it was a small change but was unaware if there would be significant
cost savings in changing public works to a hydraulic type elevator.” They had discussion that
they truly did want them to pursue looking at whether there was a difference. They had to
approve the elevator bid that day because it was one of the first things they needed to do related
to starting the building, but they wanted them to look at the electric traction vs. hydraulic. The
City is not going to maintain its own elevators. It will have a service company take care of them.
Mr. Kosluchar said they needed elevators with this company in the specifications. He said they
needed to have an elevator that opened both ways for equipment. She asked that be reflected in
the minutes because she wants to make sure they look at that down the line.
Councilmember Varichak
referred also on that same page, second paragraph from the bottom,
the motion does not show it was seconded. She is sure it was done by Councilmember Bolkcom.
MOTION
by Councilmember Bolkcom to approve the Special City Council Meeting Minutes of
May 26, 2017, with the corrections as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Saefke.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. Approve Construction Cooperation Agreement for Restoration of Community Park
in Fridley, MN, between the City of Fridley and the Metropolitan Council.
Councilmember Barnette
referred to the third paragraph of staff’s memorandum for this item.
“It is important to note that this agreement relates to Community Park only, and the disposition
of Plaza Park and final restoration is subject to the City’s discretion, including removal and
repair of the temporary trail.” That really is kind of contradictory.
Councilmember Bolkcom
asked if it was going to be repaired back to grass.
Councilmember Barnette
stated in talking with the residents of that area, they would like very
much to have that trail removed. He realized that is up to the City, but he wants to make that
clear.
Mayor Lund
asked if that is what the City was planning on doing.
Councilmember Barnette
stated it is his understanding there was still some discussion about
that.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2017 PAGE 11
Mr. Wysopal
replied that is not what they are asking. They are not taking any action on that.
Councilmember Bolkcom
stated it was her understanding the temporary trail is going away.
Councilmember Barnette
said that was not his understanding.
Mr. Wysopal
stated this action they are asking Council to take is not going to impact anything
other than Community Park. The things that are related to Plaza Park and the trail
Councilmember Barnette is referring to is not affected by this resolution.
Mayor Lund
stated it does say after that the Parks & Recreation Commission and staff are
reviewing alternatives for park final restoration.
Councilmember Barnette
stated he understands but he wanted the City to understand almost
unanimously the neighbors want that trail out of there.
Councilmember Barnette
referred to paragraph 1 of the agreement. It talks about the
restoration of the City’s baseball field. In Item 4 again it mentions the baseball diamonds. In
No. 1 under Scope and it talks about upgrading the scoreboards. His understanding in listening
to the Parks and Recreation Director Jack Kirk and others, that Fields 5 and 6, were seldom used.
There was some discussion of moving the soccer fields from the Columbia Arena site over to
those fields. Why would they redo the baseball fields if they are not ever going to be used?
Mr. Wysopal
replied, this agreement allows the City that flexibility because the Metropolitan
Council will be providing them with the funds to do it. Basically the dollar amount that was
arrived at was based on restoring it to what it was previously. They cannot pay to make
something different, but they certainly can use the monies to do it as they choose to make it like
it was. It gives them that flexibility and the Parks & Recreation Commission is aware of that.
Councilmember Barnette
stated and the value was something like $23,754?
Mr. Wysopal
replied, right, and that estimate was derived at by the City’s engineering
department. The 7 percent fee includes the cost of City employees managing the program, etc.
They are covered and made whole by all of that.
Councilmember Barnette
asked if the decision would eventually be made by the Parks &
Recreation Commission.
Mr. Wysopal
replied correct. This will be a part of their discussion, so nothing will be
happening in that area until the Parks and Recreation Commission has final review of it.
Councilmember Bolkcom
asked when it would take place.
Mr. Wysopal
replied, it would probably be after the Parks & Recreation Commission’s next
meeting which he believed is in September, so it would be an October/November time period.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2017 PAGE 12
Councilmember Bolkcom
asked if they felt confident that late in the year they can put grass
down and have it grow. The money is theirs so they do not have “X” amount of time to spend it.
It takes longer than that. They do not have to use it up. The money is basically extended to the
City to use as it needs to repair it.
Mr. Wysopal
replied they will repair it after the Parks Commission looks at it. If the City
Council is satisfied with where they are going with it, then the Metropolitan Council has 30 days
to pay them when they turn in the receipts.
MOTION
by Councilmember Barnette to approve the Construction Cooperation Agreement for
Restoration of Community Park in Fridley, MN, between the City of Fridley and the
Metropolitan Council. Seconded by Councilmember Varichak.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
13. Informal Status Reports:
None.
ADJOURN:
MOTION
by Councilmember Barnette, seconded by Councilmember Varichak, to adjourn.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT
8:12 P.M.
Respectfully submitted by,
Denise M. Johnson Scott J. Lund
Recording Secretary Mayor