ZOA03-04 a w
//-�o-���a �-o00�
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
REZONING
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
CITY OF FRIDLEY )
In the Matter of: Rezoning, ZOA#03-04
Owner: Rudolph C. Bayer
The above entitled matter came before the City Council of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 26`h day of
January, 2004, on a petition for a rezoning pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for the following
described property:
A rezoning request by making a change in zoning districts, 1eg211� described as Lot 8, Block 1, Melody
Manor, subject to easement of record, generally locatetl at 371-74th Avenue NE �
�._
IT IS ORDERED that a rezoning be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons:
Approval with no stipulations. See City Council meeting minutes of January 26, and January 5, 2004.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF ANOKA ) OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CITY OF FRIDLEY )
I, Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk for the City of Fridley, with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I
have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a rezoning with the original record thereof preserved in
my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in the
County of Anoka on the a�day of `�Y1�,vi,�,P� , 2004.
DRAFTED BY:
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E. '
Fridley, MN 55432 Debra A. Skogen, City Cler
� ,,,•_, � : �SEAL)
! ` � ' : . .
- � �, ,
c J' , � . �� a
r� ,,.l•
, .f .
, ,.. : .
' �'RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 26, 2004 PAGE 3
APPROVAL OF PR OSED CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF TES:
City Co cil Meeting of December 8, 2003
City ouncil Meeting of December 15, 2003
AP�ROVED.
OLD BUSINESS:
1. ORDINANCE NO. 1183 TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZOI�TING DISTRICTS
(RFZONING REQUEST, ZOA#03-04,BY R.AS PROPERTIES) (WARD 11.
Dr. William Burns, City Manager, said the second reading of the ordinance would
complete the rezoning of twelve apartment properties in the 74�' and 75�' Avenue/Lyric
Lane area from R-2 to R-3. The rezoning also included, for purposes of eliminating spot
zoning, the rezoning of church property from R-1 to R-3. The rezoning conected non-
conforming use status for all of the apartment properties that occurred as a result of City
rezoning in the late 1960s. The Planning Commission approved this rezoning at their
meeting on December 17, 2003. Council approved the first reading of the ordinance at its
meeting on January 5, 2004. Staff recommended Council's approval.
WAIVED THE READING AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 1183 ON SECOND
READING AND ORDERED PUBLICATION.
NEW BUSINESS:
2. REC THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
JANU Y 7 2004.
RECEIVED.
3. SPECIAL USE ERMIT RE UEST SP #03-22 BY PROFORM THERMAL
SYSTEMS INC. O ALLOW LINIITED OUTDOOR STORAGE IN A HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL ZO ' G DISTRICT GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7805 BEECH
STREET N.E. 3 .
Dr. William Burns, City��vlanager, said the permit would allow outdoor storage at 7805
Beech Street. Petitioners wished to maintain existing enclosed storage of construction
equipment behind their buil 'ng. Since the storage met all nine requirements of the City
Code, staff recommended Co cil's approval with two stipulations.
, ' FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF ANUARY 5 2004 PAGE 23
20. Provide proof that any existing wells or individu sewage treatment systems located on the
site are properly capped or removed.
21. Property owner of record at time of buildin permit application, to pay all water and sewer
connection fees prior to issuance of a buildi permit.
22. The petitioner to provide a tra�c study at is approved by the County prior to issuance of a
building permit.
23. The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to
accommodate the traffic generat by the development including signalization or other
improvements, if determined nece sary by Anoka County.
24. A development agreement out ning the developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be
prepared by the City and shall e signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval.
25. The petitioner shall work w th City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to
provide adequate screeni consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening
between the proposed d elopment and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council
meeting on November 2 , 2003.
26. All drive aisles to be sed for 2-way traffic shall be 25' in width.
Seconded by Councilm mber Billings.
UPON A VOIC VOTE ON THE MOTION TO AMEND, MAYOR LUND,
COUNCILMEMB R BARNETTE, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND
COUNCILME R BOLKCOM VOTING AYE, AND COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE
VOTING NAY, YOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ON A 4 TO 1
VOTE.
UPON A VOI E VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED, MAYOR LUND,
COUNCIL BER BARNETTE, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND
COUNCIL MBER BOLKCOM VOTING AYE, AND COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE
VOTING N Y, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ON A 4 TO 1
VOTE.
18. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING
DISTRICT (REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #03-04, BY RAS PROPERTIESI(WARD
�
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to waive the reading and approve the ordinance on first
reading. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5,2004 PAGE 24 ` '
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to amend the first reading of the ordinance and change the
ordinance as follows: Under Section 2, strike certain language starting at "351 — 74th Avenue: Lot
10, Block 1, Melody Manor Addition" and ending with "350 — 75th Avenue: Lot 12" leaving the
words "Block 1, Melody Manor Addition." Strike "460 — 75�' Avenue:" Strike "450 — 75�'
Avenue: Lot l, Block l, Melody Manor Addition; and 476 — 75�' Avenue: Lot 2, Block 1, Melody
Manor Addition." Add "All of' before the phrase "Block 1, Melody Manor Addition." Add ";
and" after"Block 1, Melody Manor Addition." Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE ON T�iE MOTION TO AMEND, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR
LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
UPON A VOICE VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED, ALL VOTING AYE,
MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
19. INFORMATION STATUS REPORTS.
Mr. William Burns, City anager, said he would like to meet with Council after the meeting to
discuss pending litigation.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilmember B ette to adjourn the City Council meeting. Seconded by
Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL TING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSL D THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED.
Respectfully submitted,
Roberta S. Collins Scott J. Lund
Secretary Mayor
, ' �RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF�JANUARY 5, 2004 PAGE 14
�
Councilmember Bolkcom said she did not understan ;rt. It was only helping one developer.
Mr. Hickok said that bigger than the one developer was what the City had said it wanted to do on
this segment of roadway. The guide plan of the�Lomprehensive Plan said that if and when the area
was developed, the City envisioned it would Q from East Moore Lake Drive to Mississippi from
Old Central to mid-block. When someone e in and asked for half of it, we said sorry, they
needed to get the other folks on the bloc involved. If the other property owners said no, the
developer would have had a dilemma. Wf�hat was requested was consistent with the guide plan.
That was the bigger picture. It was what e City said it wanted.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked why e zoning for someone who was already there needed to be
changed. Nothing was going to be d ne with the other two properties. She asked why they were
included. If they made it S-2, many ings could be done.
Mayor Lund asked the City Attorn y if it was a legal requirement to rezone the entire block and if
it could be separated.
Attorney Fritz Knaak, City Atto ey, said the idea behind spot zoning was you were not supposed
to be taking and rezoning on case-by-case, development-by-development basis. They were
supposed to base their decisio on not only the needs of a particular development but the needs of
the City. If there was a bloc where a development may need or want a certain kind of zoning,
they were actually obligated to look at the remauung block and the areas surrounding that to
determine if additional rezo ing was necessary as part of the process. When Courts reviewed
these decisions, one of the t ngs they looked at was boundaries and whether they were rational. In
order to protect the needs o the City, they needed to look beyond the single site for redevelopment
and determine, based on e Comprehensive Plan, whether it made sense to extend the zoning
beyond what was being re uested.
Mr. Hickok said someo in the audience said the developer must prove there was a need. The
developer did a housin study to determine the demographics for the area, what the market
demand was for senior ousing, and what the market would bear in terms of price for the units.
They used a reputable rm to conduct the survey. The response proved that not only was there a
demand here but the ts were in a healthy price range.
MOTION by Council ember Wolfe to close the public hearing on Rezoning Request, ZOA #03-
02 and Preliminary P t Request,PS #03-08. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
16. CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #03-04, BY RAS
PROPERTIES, TO REZONE MULTIPLE PROPERTIES FROM R-2, TWO
FAMILY iTNITS TO R-3 GENERAL MULTIPLE UNITS GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 351 —74 AVENUE 361 —74 AVENUE 371 —74 AVENUE 389
— 74 AVENLTE 415 — 75 AVENUE 7400 LYRIC LANE 350 — 75 AVENUE
460—75 AVENUE, 450—75 AVENUE AND 476—75 AVENUE (WARD 1).
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5�2004 PAGE 13 ' '
Ms. Olson said it was not only creating a precedent for the nei orhood but for the entire city.
Traffic in the area was crazy.
Mr. Hickok said the first speaker talked about the data on th number of trips generated. That was
one of the reasons several sources were used. Seniors are getting more active. They do not want
to be tied down to yard work, snow plowing and shove g. Someone mentioned 9-foot parking
stalls in the site plan. Staff was very careful to go ough the site plan. The information they
have been provided was that the parking was going to e adequate and the sta11 dimension proper.
Mr. Hickok said there was discussion about th Comprehensive Plan and spot zoning. With
respect to the Comprehensive Plan, anyone wh was at the meetings had an opportunity to speak
and be involved in the process. He wa encouraged by the amount of interest in the
Comprehensive Plan, and he thought the should be interested in it. It was important to
understand that beyond the people who w e passionate about this issue, there were other voices
who put words into the Comprehensive P about what people needed. One of the things that was
clearly described and articulated by dis ussions at the Comprehensive Plan meetings was senior
housing and the opportunity it would p ovide seniors to say in the community.
Mr. Hickok said a question was br ght up about rental units. It appeared that the project would
allow up to 10 percent or up to 5 its. That would be governed by the body of the association.
There was a question about tree and landscaping. Trees when planted as part of a master plan
development needed to live. hey were very specific about trees in the landscape plan. The
zoning was consistent with st dard zoning practices used in the past.
Mr. Hickok said there was concern about the development across the street and City staff sending
someone out to buy prope . A gentleman came in and was interested in rezoning the north end
of the block. Staff aske him to look at the history across the street and the discussions that had
taken place. It was exp 'ned to him how spot zoning worked and what the standard practices had
been and what would e a proper zoning request. They had not received a formal development
proposal.
Councilmember Bo com asked if parking stalls were normally 9 feet wide.
Mr. Hickok said ' residential projects it was not uncommon to see a 9-foot parking stall. The City
did have the di retion to approve a master plan with 9-foot stalls. In a S-2 district, they could
approve the pl at it was. He said the 9-foot stalls did not raise a concern at this point. Turn-over
was an issue, d turn-over in a senior complex like this was proven to be low.
Councilme ber Bolkcom asked about spot zoning.
�
Mr. HickPk said there would be different opinions about what was and was not spot zoning, so
what the� relied on was the standard practices of the Ciiy and what the City had done historically
in makifig determinations about what was and was not an appropriate zoning demazcation. Half
the block was not an appropriate point to stop when looking at the Comprehensive Plan. It would
only accomplish half of what was set out in the Comprehensive Plan.
. ' ,�RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5.2004 PAGE 15
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open
the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, said this was a rezoning request by Rolland
Stinski. He was the owner of 450 and 476 75th Avenue. He would like to rezone the properties
located at 351 — 74�' Avenue, 361 — 74�'Avenue, 371 —74th Avenue, 389—74�' Avenue, 415 —75th
Avenue, 7400 Lyric Lane, 350 — 75�' Avenue, 460 — 75th Avenue, 450 — 75�' Avenue and 476 —
75`h Avenue from R-1, Single Family, and R-2, Two Family to R-3, General Multiple Units. The
Petitioner contacted all of the property owners regarding the rezoning request and obtained
signatures from all of them. There was a church located in the area, but it could exist in a R-1 or
R-3 district. The R-2 zoned properties were made up of multi-family units ranging from 4 units to
11 units. The properties were considered existing non-conforming uses. The City Code stated that
a non-conforming use could exist and could be updated provided the necessary repairs did not
constitute more than 50 percent of the fair market value of such structure. The code also stated
that if the non-conforming structure was damaged by fire, flood, explosion, earthquake, tornado,
riot or act of God, it may be reconstructed as before, if it was reconstructed within 12 months,
unless the damage of the building or structure was 50 percent or more of its fair market value. In
no case could a non-conforming use be expanded.
Mr. Hickok said in 1955, the zoning ordinance was adopted that added the R-3, Multi-Family,
zoning district. Multi-family was still a permitted use in the R-2 district. The subject properties
became non-conforming when the City adopted a new zoning ordinance in 1964 dividing the
permitted uses of the R-2 zoning district. The division did not allow multi-family uses in the R-2
zoning district, and made the existing multi-family buildings in the R-2 district pre-existing and
non-conforming. Last summer, petitioner applied for a building permit to teaz down the existing
garages and to build new ones. Since the property was non-conforming, a building permit could
not be issued. Staff suggested that the best way to resolve the non-conforming issue would be to
rezone the property to R-3. To accomplish a successful rezoning, the entire block between 74�'
Avenue, 75th Avenue, University Avenue and Lyric Lane would need to be rezoned. Currently,
there are at least 50 apartment units in the City that are zoned R-2, Two Family, and are used to
house multi-family buildings. Staff asked Council and the commission members on the 2001
counciUcommission survey if they would like staff to initiate a rezoning process for all of the
properties. The results of the survey indicated that Council preferred to evaluate each of the
properties on a case-by-case basis. The law gave the City the authority to rezone property from
one designation to another, as long as the zoning was in conformance with the Comprehensive
Plan. The Comprehensive Plan's current land use map and 2020 future land use map designated
this area as a multi-family azea. Rezoning these properties from R-2, Two Family, to R-3, Multi-
Family, was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and would promote preservation and
rehabilitation of the existing multi-family buildings.
Mr. Hickok said the Planning Commission considered this request and recommended approval.
Staff recommended Council's approval of this request.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5, 2004 PAGE 16 '
Councilmember Billings asked about Outlot#1 near 460— 75�' Avenue and if it was owned by the
church.
Mr. Hickok said it was.
Councilmember Billings said in the ordinance the legal description did not include Outlot #l. He
asked if it should be included in the legal description.
Mr. Hickok said it should be.
Councilmember Billings asked the City Attorney how the ordinance should be changed.
Attorney Fritz Knaak, City Attorney, said the better solution would be the shorter one. They could
move to strike and amend.
Councilmember Billings asked what the zoning was on Lot 11.
Mr. Hickok said currently, it was R-3, Multi-Family.
Councilmember Billings asked if they could describe the entire tract as all of Block 1, Melody
Manor Addition.
Mr. Hickok said they could.
Councilmember Billings said the short version would be to designate all of Block 1, Melody
Manor Addition as R-3.
Mayor Lund asked if 460 - 75th Avenue would have to be listed as an exception.
Councilmember Billings said 460—75th Avenue would be included.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if all of the owners signed the agreement.
Mr. Hickok said they did.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if someone could teaz down what was there and build something
bigger.
Mr. Hickok said there was a relationship between the amount of building you could put on a site
and the square foot dimension. In a multi-family development, 2,500 square feet of land per one
unit was needed. Parking would also have to be included. Each lot was individually owned and
in order to build something bigger, they would have to meet the current R-3 standards. Paxcels
would need to be consolidated.
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember
Barnette.
� �RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5, 2004 PAGE 17
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
NEW BUSINESS:
17. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE
CITY OF FRID�,EY, MINNESOTA, BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING
DISTRICTS ONING RE UEST ZOA #03-02 BY TOWN CENTER
DEVELOPMENT ARD 2 .
MOTION by Councilmember olfe to waive the reading and deny the ordinance on first reading.
Seconded by Councilmember B ette.
Councilmember Barnette said he ould like to make a few comments on this issue. About a year
ago, there was another rezoning iss e and there were problems. He wanted to make sure with this
rezoning that the bases were cov ed. He attended the Planning Commission meetings, the
Council meetings, and the neighbor od meeting that was held by the developer on this matter.
There were many arguments and most were against the proposal. One comment that was made by
a resident was that so often they felt th se issues were a done deal before they ever started. That
was not true. Another comment made that it would bring commotion to the neighborhood and
they wanted the neighborhood to stay e way it was. People said this was going to set a
precedent. A person who lived near the si e mentioned that because of the height of the building,
they would have to look at the lights from th building. Traffic concerns were expressed.
Councilmember Barnette said when he was i high school he wrote a book report on a book by
Ernest Hemingway, "For Whom the Bell Tolls." When it came back from the teacher, one of the
comments was "Do you know where the title that book came from?" He found out the title
came from a English philosopher by the name of hn Dunn.
Councilmember Barnette said people asked him o r and over again, if he would want this in his
back yard. He said he and his wife had lived in Fridl y since 1958. His first house was on Jackson
Street. When he built the house in 1961, Jackson Str et was a dirt road and did not go all the way
through. The City blacktopped the road and brought ore traffic by his house. In the 1960's he
moved to a house by Columbia Arena on a very qui street. In 1967, the City built the City
garage about one block from his house. Every single ehicle from the City went in and out of
there. The tornado hit in 1965, but another major thing t was happening in Fridley at that time
was University Avenue was widened to four lanes, which reated a lot more traffic. So much so,
that his neighborhood became very busy. He went around 's neighborhood with a petition to ask
the State to put a semaphore in so they could get out of thei neighborhood. The State said it did
not meet the criteria but that they would pay for part of it. • e State paid for 50%, the County
25% and the residents on either side of 69�' Avenue paid the o her 25% out of property taxes. In
1975, the County of Anoka decided it would be nice to build an 'ce arena in that area. The traffic
for the arena went right by his intersection and it became harder d harder to get out of there. In
1983, the City built a state of the art softball complex on 40 acres of land across from Columbia
Arena. Some of the neighbors in that area said if they built there,the would move. The City built
the complex. This last summer he was watching some softball g es during the `49er Days
�
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5,2004 PAGE 18 �� �
tournament and the same n ighbors were there. One neighbor told him he was watching his
grandchildren play and thou ht it was great that he could walk over to the park. In the 1980s,
Woodcrest Baptist Church st ed a school. They also decided that they wanted a gymnasium in
the lower part by the creek ne the backyard of two of his neighbors. His neighbors told him that
if they let them build that they ould have to move. Did the gymnasium help the school and the
kids? Yes. Those two neighb s are still there and are good friends of his. In 1987, the City
decided that they wanted a City occer field. They said a good place for the soccer field was in
Locke Park. The soccer program runs all siunmer long. People should park in Columbia Arena,
but they do not. They park along e street. Northco Industrial Park also used the service road.
The U.S. post office warehouse w s there and trucks go out in the morning and return in the
aftemoon.
Councilmember Barnette said we are p of a city. He received a telephone call on this particular
project from someone who lived in He her Hills. This person did not realize the problems the
builder had when building the homes in th t area because some of the neighbors did not want them
there. He said "not in my backyard" 'd not cut it. We are part of a bigger thing. Our
neighborhoods are not islands unto themsel es. They are part of a city. Things do change. We
are a changing community. We are in a r evelopment mode. The Comprehensive Plan was
mentioned. He did not think it was cast in s one. It was used though. Another area that was
redeveloped was the area of Totino High Schoo . It created traffic. Was it a good, positive thing
for the community? Yes it was. Traffic patterns 'd change. Buildings and development changed.
That was all part of a developing community. e did have to make some decisions and not
everything had to be approved. It was a positive p oject. Was it the best thing that could go in
there? He could not answer that. We do know that 'f it was not rezoned, other things could go
there. People have said to leave it alone. The wor was out that the property was for sale.
Somebody would develop that property. He listened to hat people have said. He was not saying
that he knew what was best. He believed Council was ch ged with making decisions. We had a
representative goverrunent, and the residents did not get vote on every issue. They elected
Council to do that. They were charged on making the b t decisions they could on the best
information they could with the best resources they could. He s 'd he would recommend City staff
to anyone.
Councilmember Bolkcom said Council did listen to what the reside s had to say. They continued
the public hearing because there were traffic concerns. As a City Co cil, they needed to look at
what they were going to do. There was a fair amount of traffic on Ol Central. They needed to
work with the County and County Commissioner Jim Kordiak to see i here was anything they
could do to move traffic in that area. The developer made the build one st lower. They looked
at parking and made some changes. Someone could build something else that property. She
had a concern about the whole block being rezoned, but they did have an oppo 'ty to watch the
other area.
Councilmember Billings thanked the neighbors for being involved in the pro�ess. Some
significant changes were made to the project as a result. People were heard.
ORDINANCE NO. 1183
ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY,MINNESOTA BY
MAHING A CHANGE IN ZOIVING DISTRICTS
The Council of the City of Fridley d�es orda.in as follows:
SECTION l. Appendix D of the Fridley City Code is amended hereinafter as indicated, and is hereby
subj ect to the stipulations as shown in Attachment 1.
SECTION 2. The tract or azea within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as:
All of Block 1, Melody Manor Addition;and,
That part of the east '/z of the northwest `/.of Section 11,Township 30, Range 24
described as following:beginning at the intersection of south right-of-way line of 75`�
Avenue NE&southerly extension of west line of Block 1 Osbome Manor,thence south
along said extended 161.33 ft,thence east para11e1 with said right-of-way line 270 ft.+or-
to Southerly extension of east line of said Block 1,thence north along said southerly
extension to said south right-of-way line,thence west along said south right-of-way line
to point of beginning, subject to easement of record.
Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District R-3 (General Multiple Units).
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administratar is directed to change the official zoning ma.p to show said
tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned District R-1 (Single Family), and R-2(Two
Family Units)to R-3 (General Multiple Units).
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF'TF�CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 26�'DAY
OF JANUARY, 2004.
�����
SCOTT J.LUND—MAYOR
ATTEST:
��
DEBRA A. SKOGEN—C CLERK
Public Hearing: January 5,2004
First Reading: January 5,2004
Second Reading: January 26, 2004
Publication: February 5,2004
ATTACHMENT 1
No stipulations were required as a result of this Rezoning Request ZOA#03-04.
ABSTRACT
Receipt# ,�j rCQ °O ❑ Incorrect/No Reference#
_25 / : 2 � Non-standard Document DOCUMENT N0.
Date/Time � Certified Copy/ 19 0 8 2 4 3 . 0 ABSTRACT
DocumentOrder of ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA
PINs � I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT WAS FILED IN THIS OFFICE
Recordability _� FOR RECORD ON T�i� 2� 2 0 0 4
p�O,/ AT 4 : 2 9 PM AND WAS DULY RECORDED.
Filing Fees $ PAID.
� Tax Lien/Release FEES AND TAXES IN THE AMOUNT OF $2 O . O 0
Copy/Additional Pg Fees $ 2 0 0 4 0 4 9 513
� Transfer RECEIPT N0.
Well Cert Fees $ Division
❑ MAUREEN J.DEVINE
� Incomplete Form ❑ Status ANOKACOUNIYPROPERIYTAXADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAROfTITLES
� Missing Attachment ❑ New legal Description BY PAF
� No Legal Description ❑ GAC DEPUIYPROPERIYTAXADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAROFTITLES
� Non-existent Legal Description ❑ Deferred Specials
� Part(s)Illegible o Change