The URL can be used to link to this page

ZOA 03-03 „ ,,� r,�� : ��o c�,-Ir� � . . � , f�;��a �,�N'�I ��1TY OF Fi�IDLEY �3b(7 (%�l + 643� UNfle'EF��lT'Y AVENUE t a-� i �. Y�1.�or� 1-� FRIDLEY, �J9N �5432 pY• ! (763) 572-3592 � COMMUNiTY DEVELOPNIEI�T aEPAR MENT � APPLlCATION FOR: � Rezaning Zor�ing Text mendment I �' pR.OPERTY INFOR ATIOM: si plan required for sub i#tal, see t ched) ( . �f� , � I Addr�ess: lP f'. � �.-�� '� ��.��, 1 Y 1�1.5� �� Property Identificatian Number: Le�al Description: Lot Block Tract/Add'ition � -h\r S� �-��.� � Current Zoni�g: C_�_ �� Square footage/acr�age: � � ' � �l(�� , '�equ�sted Zc�ning: __�_-�_______Reason for R�zoning��_ � � _ ; (__�]� �l�� J_'��-, (►�”�" 1"�c�► .� i . , Ur, S�ction oning Code to be Changed: ,�)I�r � � ��Attach requested language) Reason for Change: _ � _�� -� - -- -.__—. { I��ve �au o�zrated a busines� in a city which required a bus8ness licen�e'? � - I � ;'Y�s � M1�� If Yes, whiCh City? _ � { �if Y�s, anri��t ty�e of !�usiness?--- _ - � (Was tk�at �i�.+��se ever denied or r�voked`? Yes No _.�......,.a,�..,...�,_��.....,�. ..��..,.....��.,�_..,��..,....��....d.��..��...� r_...�... ..�. ��,� 1 1 F�EE 011VNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title)�� I''�L�� L��`��' `.M 1� ��'l � I�i � l �`� �� ' I�{G�ntract purchasers: Fee oyvn�rs must si n this farm prior to pracesser�q.)` -��,1 ��` c� �, � ;�,� f�AME:� 2: ._. �1 0� - ' AUDRESS:~ ' _ Yl��bt.vloEb �l i�v� DAYTfME- PH NE:��S"�� I NATURE/DATE�`7�1� __ � s ,�..1.�..��a�,�.�".�..,�,� . , - ��...�..,w^..�...��...�..... .........�,., ,��...w�..��....,��_ � � � PETiTlONER. INFORIVlATiON : iVAME: o�� C_''��lL ° ve_ Id rr��,c�7�" ��. � _ ', ADDRESS: 1,3 7S'U - ri rne2 �'j �ve � /f`��ll SS3!/ DAYTIME RHONE: � - � 'D4o� SIGNATlf�2E! ATE: " 8" a� ` �FEES Fee: $500.0 � �.% ';�ezoning $300.00 Z�ning Text Am�ndment Applica umber: Receip�t #: ��3 7 Rec�ive�i By:� i Scheduled Planning Commissior� Date: -� , �1-5-�3 " 'Scheduled Gity Council Date: - -O " 10 Day Application Complet� No#ification Date: _ �r _�._� �U-s �� 60 Day Date• ',_ � �� _ ^� _... , - � .--T�� '� �=��-- --- r -r-- "- � � � D (/� v � c ' �� . ci 3 ------------- o n� n� r- in Q. n �-p � o �G "d 3 � � � � � a � Q ? � A J 0 � � D �, m � ■ � N � �� O � ❑ �. � f/) C7 �j N �7 � r""' « � � (D � � � N � � C) �. � � � N (�p 3 0 � n,� p� �' O m (n � N — Cj � � (� � �� G� -, � c0 � � �' n n � � aa � � � � C � o' D<n' n y � � `9 0 3cQ � �� ■ 3 a� CD o 3 C� D � � � N � cD y �' N � O ta ; � 7 � �G ' (p � � � � ��_____�_��.�_ �1 � � � 3 � � ?. � � � � N D � �a e N � � N O � � � 3 �• � ■ N /�� Q � � / \ �� c � r �� n � � � � � � N � � p � � N Q � � � � 7 � O � � � � _ � � n O � N � N � � j �' �_�_______�____�__� O n. ^ � �.. (� -s � � � 3 Qo � � � � � ' N �. 4! w y � O r/ ■ � a, � = (v//d�j � � Cl. d � V v i i// � �. O ' O A � (�'D A � n � �G � N � lD 7 r m ._ ... m � CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSIT'Y AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (763) 572-3592 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR: �_ Rezoning Zoning Text Amendment PROPERTY INFORMATION: site plan required for submittal, see attached) Address: E 2� �. Property Identification Number: 1 336 3 op '3 Legal Description: Lot I Block 1 Tract/Addition P2 WA L ,�e ��z�QkT �e Current Zoning: C Z Square footage/acreage: I l�iGC� (�(�. Requested Zoning: � �.., Reason for Rezoning: Or; Section of Zoning Code to be Changed: (Attach requested language) Reason for Change: Q� �A►.� r'o� c,h� es o I.._o�'s � �" fia tr�� O n� �t- � er�'fi Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No If Yes, which City? If Yes, wfiat type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No ��_��_��_��.._��_��_��...��.._��...,..� FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract,purchasers: Fee owners ust sign this form prior to processing.) NAME: R..��.i, �� . � Z--r � 2 f1� �-��.� ADDRESS: 6 4 o a e�,--rc T R�.-� �(� , �_C. , DAYTIME PHONE�,�?-�f-� l- o o t � SIGNATURE/DATE: , \ Gj.- � p ...�.....�..,�_...��...�..,�..,��..,...�..,�.,,�.,�_...��,..��,..�..,..,�..,..�.,�...�..,��...��...,.,�.....,.��...�..�....�..,,��..,..,..,...�........,,.. PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: aw� Ce r.�-�e_� D e v�l o p vr�e o.�-E- � L1,._C'� ADDRESS: 3?So 2Q.� r+,Q,� '��,�e DAYTIME PHONE: ?63-'��--oQo z. SIGNATURE/DATE: ' a2 03 FEES ��..�� _��_�_�� Fee: $500.00 Rezoning $300.00 Zoning Text Amendment Application Number: Receipt #: Received By: Scheduled Planning Commission Date: Scheduled City Council Date: 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: 60 Day Date: , � � �s CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSIT'Y AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (763) 572-3592 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR: X Rezoning Zoning Text Amendment PROPERTY INFORMATION: (site plan required for submittal, see attached) Address: I 2 S 2.. N E M I SS l SS 1 P A I 5-�--. Property Identification Number: I 3 30 z. �}31 c�o 80 Legal Description: Lot Block Tract/Addition L � d S�, 0 88 EX SL, f s s 6 ' -t-o s� c,-�' e�e,� Current Zoning: -Z Square footage/acreage: Requested Zoning: -Z. Reason for Rezoning: C,o N s�1-R.u�,��,�.� ^, S �,� ,' ,�, +.�, � r.s � :r RN�D�G�S ►2e_s 2.9 N"'f Or; Section of Zoning Code to be Changed: � (Attach requested language) Reason for Change: Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No � If Yes, which City? if Yes, wt�at type o business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No �__��..��..��_��_��_��_��.��_�_��..��..� FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract.purchasers: Fee owners must sign this form prior to processing.) NAME: �� yY�S Irtc_, ADDRESS: I Z��.. �YL ss> s'�� 5-� N�. � n~� 554�3Z. DAYTIME PHONE: �� -� - 1 S� SIGNATURE/D� TE: Y _�'. ( � s p /V�V�V�V�V/V/V/r�V�V/VAV�V/V�V�V/�r1V�V/V�r/v�V1VAr�V�V/r�VAr,ViV/V�VrV/V/Vti/VN�V/�/N/Vtir�V/V�V/V�V�V/V�V /�r/�r/V/rr/v�VAr�rAr�r/�I�V/�rN.V,V/�r�V�r/�rAr PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: cx�e.� � e e.�o nr�eN'F� �.LC_ ADDRESS: Sp - e ,;,,�Q2. Q ,,e, � � DAYTIME PHONE:_7(v3 -�1�- �o Z- SIGNATURE/D TE: 9 ��_��_��_�� FEES Fee: $500.00 Rezoning $300.00 Zoning Text Amendment Application Number: Receipt #: Received By: Scheduled Planning Commission Date: Scheduled City Council Date: 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: 60 Day Date: SEP 15 '03 12�49 FR LAX 18006574447 TO 5711287 P.02 �b`�:Jttd .� . , �_. _ ...... • , ' SEP 95 '03 09�58 FR �AX ze09657aaa� TO 12485680718 P.03 CITY OF �RIDLEY 8431 UNIVfiRSITY AYENUE F�lDLEY� MN 55a32 (763) S7Z-3592 COMMUNITY DEVELOPM�N7' DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR: X Rezont+ng Zoning Text Amendment � PROP� TY [�FO l�l .At10N: (site plan �equlred far eubmtttal, see attached) � Address: � e . � YY7rtJ S.SY3 Z Property Identiticatlon Numbet: 100 Legal Oescriptlan: lot Biock^t tracVAddltlon t-�ea.��'"��_� � �r ��A� - Currvnt Zoning; Square foolege/acroage: 5S7oo 81dq Requested Zoning: � Reason fn�Rezoning: Or; Sectio� of Zoning Code to ba Changed: (Attach �equested language) Reason for Change: Have you ope�ated a bu�inatt� in a vty whteh requtrad � buefnesa lice�se? Yes Nv If Y�s, wh�ch Clty3 II Ye�,whet type of businesa? Was that Ilcense ever denied er revaked? Yes No .._.�r...,�.�_..�.,.�w._��___...,�� ___r..___.�� .._._._�,...__...__�..�....____��__�. FE�1��IER INFQRMATION (as ;t appeara en the propetty tltle) (Contract.purchasers: Fee owners muat sign this form prlo�to processing.) N4ME: � � ?' � AOpRESS: 1 Lt 7t- DAYTIME pHON�:�,,,,,�� -�. 91 NAtURE/DAT : . _��w�.__.......�....._��w...._...��....�..��...�_:...�_-_ �-___��....� ..__ P�TfTION R IN�'0 MATi NaME: ADbRES8: � t.., � v DAYTIME PHONE: �'� �ti,-c9aoY-- SI{3NA'fURE/OATE: � � ,....___��____--_��_��__�___....��__��..__..__,.,.��_..._ ��...... .....��__�._._..�__ � s �ee: �500.00 Rezo�ing $300.00 Zonln� tezt Amendment Appllcation Numher: Recelpt#: Received 8y; 3cheduted Planning Commisslon pate: Scheduled Clty Councll Date: 90 Day Applicatlon Complete Notlflcatlon Date: 60 Day Date: ZE5-9of ZU/ZO'd 61Z�1 :W01j gq:g► EO-2l-d3S ** TOTAL PAGE.02 ** OCT.29'2�03 15:44 703 424 5822 Loucks Associate� #b902 P.002/�02 �un�• SutJ Q�ubet 2�,�Q03 N�EMORANDUM ��:�,.�,i��, n.�iNl �,,.tr,<� TO: Stacy Stromberg, Pla,nner `�i��;�a i;� ��,.i.:�_��.;;��,. City of Fridley t;ivlt fn�incerin� I.�a 'hJ.�t!.4 tiNL: FROM: David Hagen, ia��d s�,►4�•yi„�; �iunirl•�'L�ip�..�n.(:i��,ui.��in Senior P.lanner i.an�hr,,pe Ar�hitu�turc �w�•��L�u��:r.m�I.��.iu.��ni �� T�affic Study for Town Centcr Eldezly Housir�g knvirU�tiii�!ntal Fifty(50)units o�'senior housing are proposod on a p�rcel of land on the �vest side of Old Central Avenue NE (Couzity Road 35) south of Missassippi Str�et (County Road 6/l06) in the City of Fridley. You have requestcd that a tra�fic study be conducted to determine the impact of the proposed projcct on tra#'�c levels in tha area. .�s part of the study you have requested that the impact on traffic levels also be determined i#'tho site�vere used for office tather than housing, The following schcmatic shows Minnesota Departme.nt o�Transportation average annual d�ily txa�t�ic leve]s (�1A�?T) for 2000 .for each of the fow legs of the ir�t,ersection of Old Ce�tra] Aveaue NE and lv,tississippi Street. �'he schemat�c also shows projeetod levels of tr�c at�d p�rcentage increase iz�trn.ffic if the site were used for 50 units of senior hou.cing and alternately 41,250 squ,�u� feet of o�ce spacc,the amount thaz could be accozt�morlated on th� site. I 9,000 AADT I 9,033 (,4% increa,se)with Scnior Unit� I 9,141 (1.6% increase vv�th Office I 6>500 A�DT I 4,700 AA1�T 6,582 (1.3%inczcase) Sr.Uz.uti 4,714(.4% incrcase) with Sr. Units 6.853 (5.4%increase) pff ce � 4.771 (].5%incrcase)wit� Office C I Miss.issippi Street e XX I f-Proj ect � n XX� Site 1 t I r� r I 7,800 E1,ADT a T 7,$33 (.4%incxease) with S�nior Units 1 I 7,94] ('1.8%increase}with Office EstimatQd d,aily tc�ic ge.nerlted&om the senior housing ("Rctirement Community'� �s 165 an,d frozn the o�'ice("Gene.ral Office")is 706 (�n.stitute of Transportation E.n�ineers). Estimistod traff c gene.rated was spXxt 50%west on Mississ�ppi gtreet, 20°/a nor'th and 20°!o south on Ccntra.l, and the remaining 1 p'/o e.ast on Mississippi Stroet. • „��,�,,: n��„��:�i,,,i�., ��. r:�� '_ C[TYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER•6431 UNIVERSITY AVE.N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432• (763)571-3450•FAX(763)571-1287 September 4,2003 Mr. Richard Whinnery Town Center Development 13750 Reimer Drive Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 Dear Mr.Whinnery: The purpose of this letter is to follow up on your request to explair�g the S-2 zoning designation in greater detail. A copy of the S-2 Ordinance has been attached for your reference. The purpose of the S-2 Redevelopment District zoning designation is to allow for mixed uses and provide flexibility in redevelopment projects. The uses permitted in the S-2 zoning district, are those uses in place and designated at the time that the rezoning occurs. Those uses approved during the rezoning are considered conforming in nature and may continue to exist and rebuild in the event of a disaster. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at 763-572-3599 or via e-mail: bolinp@ci.fridley.mn.us. Sinc y, . � � , . _ ,:_ , .�_.__... i ` � Paul Bolin,A Planning Coordinator C-03-105 _ : � _ ,. � ,.4. . z . , , ` *� _ ,_ ' ; ' ;�� " ;;a ._ . �� Development Review Committee Worksheet � _, �� :� .. . . . . .. . . . �yi Address: Town Center Development ,�� Land Use Case # PS #03-06 & ZOA #03-02 .� .�: � ❑ Paul Bolin ❑ Scott Hickok Layne Otteson � o Grant Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. � ❑ Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith `� o Steph Hanson ❑ Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg � ❑ Jon Haukaas a Ralph Messer � � . � Planninq Issues: En ig neerm Issues: �� ❑ Setbacks � Drainage .�' ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Utilities ❑ Allowable square footage ❑ Curbing requirements , � ❑ Height — � ❑ Landscape o , �K" � ❑ Hardship statement/narrative � a Fire Issues• ❑ Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements Building Issues: ❑ Hydrant location ❑ UBC/IBC ❑ ❑ , Stipulations: _ � : � � ��: Comments: � �� f . � , -- - �_ � � - �: � � � � � - - > � � Name: Date: � � s�;. :� :,, � _; . _� � . _ . - F _ . , , � , _ � � , . � ` . - � � � � - :� , � �F s f�: � t , - : .. , � , .. . , <�.".y�.. . .;.,* ' = ".. � J � . . . . . . . . . . t� ' 5 __ —"_ � � Development Review Committee Worksheet �� ,� � _ :°� �- , "�� Address: Town Center Development �� `� � Land Use Case # PS #03-06 & ZOA #03-02 � � . - � ❑ Paul Bolin o Scott Hickok o Layne Otteson � ❑ Grant Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. � ❑ Kevin Hanson � Julie Jones � Mary Smith A" ❑ Steph Hanson . ❑ Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg � ❑ Jon Haukaas ❑ Ralph Messer ` � ; ;�:� � :-.. . - ' . ��`- .. . � - . � . . 'r � _ } �-_ - . . . � . . . . . _ , . .�� Plannmg Issues: Engineerinq Issues. ,� ❑ Setbacks a Drainage ' � ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Utilities � ❑ Ailowabie square footage ❑ Curbing requirements �� a Height o � ❑ Landscape J� ❑ Hardship statement/narrative � � ❑ �. Fire Issues• :� ❑ Truck access � ❑ Sprinkler requirements � Buildinq Issues: ❑ Hydrant location ;� ❑ UBC/IBC ❑ =� _ � `� ,, _ _ 5 . . , � ; � . , _ , . . , - ; , ,, .� � ,. � . ; �;, , , . . . . � . : . _ � ` Stipulations: � fIL..'.'. . " .. . . . _ . . . . . . _ " �' . . . . . - . � - . � '.. . . . . . . . . ' 1 • 5,x . . . . . . . � . . . � . ' ,. - . . . . . . . . . . .. . fl•_,'��. . . ' Co ments: � , � . � � S�� - � (' , . � . ��n { _ +F . VLX/V ' . . . . . � � . � i�.. . . . .. .. .. . . � . . .. • _'., ' : l^� � ` _-". .'. - . . . . . . . ' . � . . . � . � - . . . . . . . . . . _ f:� -. . .. . . . . . . � .... .lY� {: . . . . � � . . . . � � � �� . . /� . . . . .. . .. . . � _ 4 L � � . . � . � . d Name. - Date: - '� , `;� " �- � � � _ _ � -� � h - � p� , q . . : � ... _ 1 Q k , ' Y� L ,y _ � � , 'e n � . , . � . � . ��i x' . . . , .. . � . . �. . , . . f C �t i� . .. � � - . . . . . . � . . . � i Development Review Committee Worksheet �� a. 4 . . . . . . . . . . Address• Town Center Development - Land Use Case # PS #03-06 & ZOA #03-02 L� F ❑ Paui Bolin ❑ Scot� Hickok ❑ Layne Otteson � r nt Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. � ❑ Ga � ❑ Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones o Mary Smith .� � Steph Hanson o Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg -� ❑ Jon Haukaas � Ralph Messer � ` � Planning Issues: Enqineering Issues: ;`� � ❑' Setbacks � � ❑ � Drainage� � � G ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Utilities � Allowable square footage ❑ Curbing requirements Y o Height � . ❑ Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative � ❑ �� Fire Issues• � Truck access � � Sprinkler requirements �� f Buildinq Issues: � H drant locatio ❑ UBC/IBC � �_ �� — � 1 ��'� - �� / ' �' � t ❑ ,��t c . ;, �,, ;a 5 Stipulations: '.. ,' F t . - - r., �; - i � . Comments: k- . . . . . . .. . . . � . � . .�2 . . . � . � ' � � . � .. �. . .. . . . . . � . �. �: . .. . .. . . . . .. Y � ._ �,.- .. . . .�. ..,.. � i, � . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . .� � � . � � . � . . . . .. . . . . �.A � � � z � E� Name. = Date• ' .� �,- �� C� �, . . � � , � , - . � , . . �.. r �� ._ � - . _ . _.. , ;:� ,�., , � � ��- ; ., . . �� - . e � : . � _ ;. , _ -� . �� - . , �' ' ; - � ;.., Development Review Committee Worksheet _ � - ` - �� ' Address: Town Center Development � k ` L� _ Land Use Case # PS #03-06 & ZOA #03-02 � x� ❑ Paul Bolin ❑ Scott Hickok � ❑ Layne Otteson �� ❑ G r a n t F er n e liu s o Dave Jensen ❑ Po lice Rep. � ❑ Kevin Hanson ,�S Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith � ❑ Steph Hanson ❑ Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg � ❑ Jon Haukaas ❑ Ralph Messer � . _ �. Planning Issues: ` �' En4ineering Issues: o Setbacks ,d� Drainage �' ❑ Lot coverage o Utilities ` }� ❑ Allowable square footage �' Curbing requirements �� ❑ Height ❑ �h,�;-�lcf r_v��.� l - �rn�. � �� Landscape � ��,;� ;n,�r.�� .�.� � ,��s � �' ❑ Hardship statement/narrative �;,-�„� r-�.��.,�.��, .s. '' , � ❑ Shc-t�i� S•�i b�CQ� �i�z� �,. , � _ s ..- �lc,��= �-�,,L;-�.1� r�� 1,�., _ Fire Issues: . _ ` � r � �,;�.f ��d a�-�� .-�� ❑ Truck access � �,;. � ❑ Sprinkler requirements Building Issues: _ ❑ Hydrant location ❑ UBC/IBC ❑ r>. ❑ , �, i ' _ _ . . . . . . � . � l . . , . . i� ' _ - . t ' , :. ... . . .. . .' , :., ,. .. ' ,. _ . . . � . ,. 4. Stipulations: � - ��; � � � �:;� � . � �. � � : �_ �,: Comments: ` �'" Y�� :�.: . . � . � . . .. .. . . .. „°... s, .." �' . . � . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . � � # � . � . . . . . . - . �� ' � � . - .� . . . . " . . . . . �� .^ ... . . . . � _ � � � �� •' _ � .. . . . . . r � 1^ J' � � � Name: �v�� J ��5 Date: 9� � - � 3 � �` _ _ ,�. . y,� ,. � , � � - { , � r - _ �§ � � .� �,: `� � ';� — r �i i q� 3 + {g� _ _. . . , . �,.�_. . .- �h"^ .r...n � . ,. .. . . _ . _ . . . .,. _ _' l,. ��.�.,h` 1 . . . _ . . . . t� � �. -� � � ' . . � . - . §'J � . . . � � . . .. yr�i , Development Review Committee Worksheet ` `� ,: � v� _ :� ' "� � � Address: Town Center Development � ' ��`` Land Use Case # PS #03-06 & ZOA #03-02 � . � . � .- . . . . �Y . . � .. . . . . . . � . . :.�� „� ❑ Paul Bolin a Scott Hickok o Layne Otteson ;� o Grant Fernelius �e ]ensen ❑ Police Rep. �� ❑ Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith � ❑ Steph Hanson ❑ Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Strom6erg � ❑ Jon Haukaas ❑ Raiph Messer � - _ � ;� � � � - ssues: En ineerin Issues: � Planning I 9 9 � _° ❑ Setbacks ❑ Drainage � ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Utilities ;;� ❑ Allowable square footage ❑ Curbing requirements �4 � o Height � _:-� � Landscape �� ❑ Hardship statement/narrative � � ❑ �� Fire Issues: � ❑ Truck access � � �. �' - ❑ Sprinkler requirements � - BuiY in Issues� ❑ Hydrant location ' � .� UBC/IB � � :� xx }, ,� � � _ - � � � � ; -• , . '- ,,-- T� Stipulations: " ; . , , � .: ; �- �._ . . . . . . � . . � . . 1.�y, � . . � . � .. � . � � . . � . �.)i � C0177 � - ! ` � � � �. .,. �._ _ . . , � - - .- „- � 4{ 1 ! � y� 4� Name• Date: � �� - t . . •�J . . , . .. . � ' . .. . .. . � . . � . � . . . � �. _ - � ' �ry� . � � -. � _ . . - ' ��3"; y � * E\ t� fi _ r %x � j� t _ r ,�C � � �y � . 4 �e - � � . . . . �` ,,.. . . ,.,... . . . . . � kf,. .0 . "'�. "tWG.. .. .3s✓.....,... . , . . . . . .. .. ,.u� _ . . , , . ` � - � _ Deveiopment Review Committee Worksheet �� t�� ¢j�}� 4'A ' � Address: Town Center Develoqment t.,� - -. �s ; � � ��" =. ; Land Use Case # PS #03-06 & ZOA #03-02 A� , ,.., . ,� � ❑ Paul Bolin ❑ Scott Hickok ❑ Layne Otteson , - � . � . � .. � �..sY-: ❑ Grant Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. " ❑ Kevin Hanson o ulie Jones ❑ Mary Smith " ❑ Steph Hanson �Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg � � o Jon Haukaas ❑ Ralph_Messer ,� �-: .� . �,-� ,_ . _ ;� � - R�� , . ; F- . Planning Issues: Enqineerinq Issues: " �� ❑ Setbacks o U�tatiese � � � - ".� ❑ Lot coverage e , ❑ Allowable square footage ❑ Curbing requirements ❑ Height ❑ � � ❑ Landscape � ❑ Hardship statement/narrative � � � �'� Fire Issues: .� - ❑ Truck access =f ❑ Sprinkler requirements "� Building Issues: ❑ Hydrant location ❑ �C/IBC ❑ '� � �_ � ;-,� . � � . . .. _ . . . . . . ... � ' . �.r�$ Stipul tions: � GC � R� - � � ��-�.� � S �� t� -� �� -�-� y p i � � C�on ents: � ��,�LLL- �4� �� Y� � . ; S i = . �- �T�._ `; � � , .> : :� - ; � : � � � �� ,� � , � �� - '� � �� oZ - �� `'' Name: Gl � - Date: � �- � _ ,,� � � ° t � � � t � �' k � r� � � ' _ - ��j .`n}j , _ ix � ' � ` 5- .,- ...,. t - ` _.: ..� .. � �. , j'�-. . t . . . � . � . , . , � .� . .. `� • � velo ment Review Committee Worksheet � De �� .:; Address• Town Center Develo�ment � .� - Land Use Case # PS #03-06 & ZOA #03-02 ,� ❑ Layne Otteson ' � ❑ Paul Bolin ❑ Scott Hickok � ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. � ❑ Grant Fernelius � �u�ie Jones ❑ Mary Smith � �Kevin Hanson ❑ Stacy Stromberg � ❑ Steph Hanson ❑ Ron Julkowski � ❑ Jon Haukaas ❑ Ralph Messer : � � � En4ineerin4 Issues: ,� plannin Issues: ❑ Drainage �� ❑ Setbacks ❑ Utilities ❑ Lot coverage � ❑ Curbing requirements � ❑ Allowable square footage � ❑ Height �� o Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative ' ° Fire Issues: �� ❑ Truck access :� ❑ Sprinkier requirements Buildin Issues: ❑ Hydrant location ,, 4 � '� ❑ UBC/IBC � ❑ � _ � � �� Stipulations: � - ;� � ;: , �� r Comments: �� . .� �: �. � �� . ;.� �� s � — /�'—� -c�� ate: � Name: �J _ � .� - �` �. , , . _ :: . . .. . � . ,- _ . , : ��- . : . . , . . ,, : . _ ; ;.. . �.: - � �; - �:� _ . . r d: 3' 1 +{•. � . �� ..;." . ,.- :�' , , ..... '-� .�.�:. _..' . . .. r �.�.:. �. . ... '.:.. .. ��._ . � . . , _ . . r ,� rt�� Q \ � S 1 (�1 <� �-�%�J ��'V' �i� `�� _ � �S , o�� _ r' � , ., � � � � ��'� � ' � �-` �°�'- '�` � �� ` �^1.0� ,-YE ► t� p �� 1 , . . . . . . . . . . .. . _ �. . � . . . �� .. � i� � :a�ueN `i :a�ea � �� ,,��; - _ ��_r.: � _ � � - � �►.�� ,.�� • , � ' � � ' �''-� �.� u J�' c�. i'�a`'�✓ a - � - � . .s,� aw o� � l S , � ` � 1 -�' � � r; 4]✓+",�� ;�, _ :suo��e�nd��s ,;' _ � wl y� � �,' ' �"/� . ✓'s_�--� °� �'�'v S \� � ~'�' �''� �� / y�f� ) ) ? (� .. , , � _`O CJ•;,.= �� ,� � � o - -D�' � � ! �ai/�en � UOI�p�O� �UpJp/�H o �j �` �`�' .sanssI u�p .ne � �� s�uawaainbaa aa��uiadS a _ ' �°l�>� � "'��"5 � �� ssa��e ��nal ❑ �� P� ' : �� :sanssI aa� � ; !� ' s � !"�ani�e.ia u/�uawa�e�s d�iyspaeH ❑ ade�spue� ❑ o �y6iaH ❑ s�uawaainbaa 6uiqan� o a6e�oo� aaenbs a�qenno��y ❑ sai�i�i�� ❑ a6eaano� �o� ❑ a6euieao ❑ s��eQ�aS ° "��: : :sanssi uiaaaui u3 _ :sanssI uiuue�d �"{'' � ��s �� _. _ , ; .._ , . � , . __ . _ ,_ � ` , �'� . aassaW d�e� ❑ see�neH uo� 6aaqwoa�s tie�s ❑ i�{snno��nC uo2i ❑ uosueH yda�S ❑ iw ,�pw ❑ sauo� ai�n� ❑ uosueH uina�{ ❑ ' u�. S ❑ sni auaa� �uea ❑ � •da� a�i�od ❑ uasua� aneo i � ;� d � o �i o� ❑ u!1�8 Inpd uosa�p au�e� �i �I .H � S � - ZO-�0# t/OZ '8 90-�0# Sd # ase� asn pue� ,� � - �uaw o�anaa aa�ua� unnol :ssaaPPd , ��:: -, �: t - �aays�aoM aa�i�uuao� N►a�na� �uaua o�anaa , , . ;a �: . �� F , r„ �:- ..� . ; .�.. . . : � _� ..- �F-t; _ . _ � . . , � ,, . . � > _ , . _ . . . ,: . ;_ . � �.� ,=:. , .. � � - .�� ._-: �.. ._.- ...� _ ,_..: �.; .�'.�: :��`. . .;`�. _�..�..- . .. . .. .. . .. � � . . . .. . ... .... . �i: r . . . � . . . . . . . � . . �� ' ' �+ � � � � . � � .� Development Review Committee Worksheet : � ,.; :� f� Address: Town Center Development . � Land Use Case # PS #03-06 & ZOA #03-02 � .� ,� ❑ Paul Bolin ❑ Scott Hickok ❑ Layne Otteson �� ❑ Grant Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. � ❑ Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith ❑ Steph Hanson o Ron Julkowski c� Stacy Stromberg � ❑ Jon Haukaas a Ralph Messer �` � `� Pianning Issues: EngineerincLIssues: � ❑ Setbacks o Drainage � ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Utilities � ❑ Allowable square footage ❑ Curbing requirements � n Height ❑ =� ❑ Landscape � ❑ Hardship statement/narrative ` '� � �,T' �'1 jyl G� . � : ' � '; , : .� i� � Fire Issues: �:, �( � - ❑ Truck access G Y {��.,� �� ,�j • . o Sprinkler requirements Building Issues: ❑ Hydrant location � n UBC/IBC ❑ ❑ {. � . ; . ; - � �. , : - ... ; Stipulations: Comments; : � . � _ � � � . ir.t O �_ /� `/' �,GJ ��L ¢ �-�w� �' �•✓ � % � � c � 'C �� ;; . � � G, �'�• l C 4�1 1 � �li�� " � v ; � �n 0� . � �D►'G� `"'' v�;l��r� . a �� _ � . ' � �.�. Name: � Date: G =� �,, : �;, � � - - �' _ _ a _ — _ � - yY 3 � A". .. ' . .. " . L .,.. � .. . . .�.� " g.. _ . _ ;. � , . _ . , .. .: . . _. __ _ �_ . __�:� _ _ CiTY OF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY ML��ICIPAL CENTER •6-131 liI�1IVERSITY:��'E. v.E. FRIDLEY, YtN »-�32 • (963j �71-3��0• F.�� (763) �?1-1287 September 8, 2003 Town Center Development, LLC Attn: Richard Whinnery 13750 Reimer Drive Maple Grove MN 55311 Dear Mr. Whinnery: Per Minnesota Statute 15.99, local government units are required to notify land use applicants within 10 working days if their land use applications are complete. We officially received your application for a rezoning on August 29, 2003. This letter serves to inform you that your application is complete. Your Rezoning application hearing and discussion will take place at the City of Fridley Planning Commission Meeting on October 1, 2003 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue. The City of Fridley City Council will take final action on your rezoning on October 13, 2003 at 7:30 P.M. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the process, please feel free to contact me at 763-572-3595. Sincerely, �. Stacy Stro berg Planner cc: Margaret Brickner Tamarisk Resources Inc. 7735 Silver Lake Road 1282 Mississippi Street NE Mounds View MN 55112 Fridley MN 55432 Frank Kitterman 6400 Central Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 C-03-108 _ CI'IYOF FR[DLE.Y FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER•6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E.FRIDLEY,MN 55432• (763)571-3450•FAX(763)571-1287 September 10, 2003 Richard Whinnery Town Center Development LLC 13750 Reimer Drive Maple Grove, MN 55311 Dear Mr. Whinnery: The following are items that are still needed for the plat and rezoning applications that you recently submitted: PLANNING COMMENTS: Sandee's ■ One way traffic requires 20 foot wide drive aisle. ■ Nose to nose (center parking) 20 feet length instead of 18 feet. ■ Breakdown storage areas in restaurant, including bathroom, hallways, & storage space. ■ Short 3 parking stalls. NEW DEVELOPMENT: ■ Need (2) handicap parking stalls underground. ■ Need (3) handicap parking stalls outside. ■ Condo association documents—need copy of. Brick or stone on garage—tie into building some how. Screening fence required on west property line. Show Sandee's landscaping, they need to be current on landscaping standards. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: �{ Need — Storm pond calculations `� Need something from the County regarding access points on Mississippi St. and Central Ave. � Need Storm Pond Maintenance Agreement. Need to know location for snow storage. BUILDING PERMIT: Signed plan, structural calculations, shrinkage calculations, shearwall and floor framing and roof layout plans, Energy calculations, braced wall panels, rated wall systems, Chapter 1374 S.B.0 for accessibility. FIRE DEPARTMENT: Comments on the way. Sincerely, , � '�_ � `1 ., 4 �� S a rn �r � Planner l i • - . •- Sept. 18, 2003 Paul Bolin and Stacy Stromberg City of Fridley Planning Dept. RE: Town Center Development Sandee's Site Dear Mr. Bolin and Ms Stromberg; Please remove our application for the city meeting coming up and we will resubmit for the next meeting on Nov. 5, 2003. Thank you for all your help but it is impossible to get the county highway department to complete there study before Friday of this week. Yours trul , , , Rich d Whinnery Town Center Development, LLC 13750 Reimer Dr. • Maple Grove,MN 55311 � 763-416-0002 • Fax: 763-420-6831 ---- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT � AUTHORITY Memorandum DATE: September 26, 2003 � TO: William W. Burns, Executive Director of HRA� FROM: Scott J. Hickok, Community Development Director Grant E. Fernelius, Assistant HRA Director SUBJECT: Consider S-2 Re-Zoning Request for Mississippi & Old Central Introduction Under the City's Zoning Code, the Authority has the responsibility to review and comment on all S-2 Redevelopment District re-zoning requests. While the Authority does not have formal oversight powers to approve or reject a project, it does have the ability to forward comments and concerns to the Planning Commission and City Council. The purpose of this memo is to provide details on the project and discuss related issues for the Authority's consideration. Background Town Center Development, LLC of Maple Grove, Minnesota, is proposing a 55-unit, senior condominium development at the southwest corner of Mississippi Street and Old Central. The project includes the site of the former Sandee's Restaurant, the home occupied by Tamarisk Services, and a large vacant lot. The total land area including is 3.78 acres. A copy of the proposed site plan and building elevations are attached. The building will be four stories in height, plus have underground parking for the residents. All of the units will have two bedrooms and two bathrooms, and range from 1,138 square feet to 1,255 square feet in size. According to the developer, the units will be priced between $170,000 to $190,000, with a few units in the $160,000 price range. The developer intends to keep the restaurant building, although it would be substantially remodeled. - Planning and Zoning Issues Currently, the zoning in this area is a rather odd mix of land use designations. Starting at Mississippi and moving south, the land is zoned C-2, General Business. This designation exists immediately next to Central Avenue, while the Tamarisk House at 1282 Mississippi and the back half of the Sandee's parking lot and the back half of the undeveloped site is zoned C-1, Local Business. Further south, the site where Advance Restoratior� is located is M-1, Light Industrial. South of Advance is a vacant property owned by the HRA. That site is zoned C-R1, General Office. Finally, at East Moore Lake Drive, Ziebart and another HRA lot are zoned M-1, S-2 Rezoning Request September 26, 2003 Paqe 2 Light industriai. This patchwork of zoning appears to be largely a product of applying zoning designations to the uses that existed at the time of the first zoning map in Fridley. This land has its future guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Redevelopment DistricY'. The Town Center Development group will be applying for a rezoning on the west side of Old Central from Mississippi Street to East Moore Lake Drive. Ziebart and Advance Restoration have agreed to aliow this petitioner to involve their properties in the request. The HRA will aiso be required to consider and would ultimately need to endorse the rezoning of this property in order for the Town Center application to be deemed complete. As a redevelopment district and under a new zoning classification, the !and would be subject to City Council Master Plan review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. In this situation, Town Center Development is master planning the north half of the block, but the City Council and HRA would wanfi to separately evaluate its Master Plan for the south half of the block, at such time as they are ready for further development on this segment of Old Central. Redevelopment Issues The area along Old Central has been identified for redevelopment in the City's Comprehensive Plan. As you might recall, in the early 1990's the Authority contemplated redevelopment of the northeast quadrant of Old Central and Mississippi Street, which included a small commercial strip center, automotive repair shop and gas station. That plan never materialized, and the Authority did not pursue the project further. In the late 1990s, the Authority contemplated the purchase of a vacant lot south of the former Zap-It Welding shop at the southeast corner of the intersection. Due to poor soils and possible contamination, the Authority decided not the purchase the site. Coincidentally, in recent months staff has met with two developers about redevelopment of the southeast corner, in fact the �atest proposal calls for the construction of 88 units of senior condominiums. A : separate memo is attached concerning the details of this project. Recommendation Staff.recommends that the re-zoning of the west side of Old Central seems to be prudent given the redevelopment interest in this area. M-03-143 _ _ CIIYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY �iti�ICIP.�L CENTER • 6431 UNI�"ERSITY,��'E. N.E. FRIDLEY. LiN 55�3� • (763) 571-3-�50• F.�X (763)�71-i?3� September 30, 2003 Town Center Development, LLC Attn: Richard Whinnery 13750 Reimer Drive Maple Grove MN 55311 Dear Mr. Whinnery: This letter is a follow-up to the discussion we had yesterday regarding your proposed development on the corner of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue. Due to the necessity of acquisition of right-of-way along both County Roads, the Sandee's restaurant site will become non-conforming. The following is what the City Code states regarding non-conforming structures: C. No structure shall be erected, converted, enlarge, reconstructed or altered, and no structure or land shall be used for any purpose or in any manner which is not in conformity with the provisions of this Chapter. 3. NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES A. Any structure or use lawfully existing upon the effective date of this Chapter may be continued after such date except as hereinafter specified or as allowed under special district requirements. B. Nothing in this Chapter shall prevent the upgrading of a nonconforming structure to a safe condition when said structure is declared unsafe by the City, provided the necessary repairs shall not constitute more than fifty percent(50%) of the fair market value of such structure. C. Whenever the nonconforming use of a structure is changed to a use permitted in a more restricted district, such use shall not thereafter be changed to a use permitted in a less restricted district. D. Whenever a lawful nonconforming structure is damaged by fire, flood, explosion, earthquake, tornado, riot, or act of God, it may be reconstructed and used as before if it is reconstructed within twelve (12) months after such calamity, except if the damage to the building or structure is fifty percent (50%) or more of its fair market value, as determined by the City, in which case the reconstruction shall be for a use in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. Whenever a lawful nonconforming use of a structure or land is abandoned for a period of twelve (12) months, any future use of said structure or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this Chapter. E. Whenever a lawful nonconforming use of a structure or land is abandoned for a period of twelve (12) months, any future use of said structure or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of - this Chapter. Town Center Development September 30, 2003 Page 2 F. Any nonconforming use shall not be moved to another part of the parcel cf land upon which the same was conducted at the time of the adoption of this Chapter. G. Any structure which will under this Chapter become nonconforming but for which a building permit has been lawfully granted prior to the effective date of this Chapter or of amendments thereto, may be completed in accordance with the approved plans: provided construction is started within six (6) months of the effective date of this Chapter or amendments thereof and continues to completion within two (2) years. Such structure shall thereafter be a legal nonconforming structure. H. Normal maintenance of a building or other structure containing or related to a lawful nonconforming use is permitted, inciuding necessary nonstructural repairs and incidental alterations which do not extend or intensify the nonconforming use. I. Alterations may be made to a building containing lawfui nonconforming residential units when they wiil improve the livability thereof, provided they will not increase the number of dwelling units or size of the building. J. The provisions herein for the continuance of nonconforming uses shall not prevent or interfere with action that may be taken to abate any nuisance in any manner provided by law. K. Any structure or any portion of a structure which is situated unlawfully within a public street or alley or other public way or thoroughfare, is hereby declared to be a nonconforming use, whether or not its use is othen�vise in conformity with the regulations of the district in which said structure is located. Any such structure shall be subject to any and all applicable regulations herein for nonconforming uses except in the event the City Council shall require removal of the structure or portion thereof for a public purpose in which case such requirement shall prevail. L. The provisions of this Chapter shall pertain to all lawful nonconforming uses or structures as applicable and specifically to the performance standards outlined in the established districts. As the Code states, a non-conforming structure can't be rebuilt if the damage is beyond 50% of the property's fair market value. City Staff has further evaluated the non- conformity issue and suggests that you consider alternatives for the restaurant including, but not limited to, reconstruction of a restaurant elsewhere on the site or including a restaurant within your new complex. This letter serves to inform you of the non-conformity and what that may mean to your development. If you have any questions, please feel-free to contact me at 763-572- 3595. Sincerely, , � �� ,�� . Stacy Str berg ` Planner C-03-115 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E . on Wednesday, October l, 2003, at 7 :30 p.m. for the purpose of : For a Rezoning, ZOA #03-03, by Town Center Development, LLC, to rezone property from C-2 , General Business, and C-1, Local Business, M-1, Light Industrial , and C-Rl, General Office, to S-2 , Redevelopment District accommodate redevelopment, generally located at 1282 Mississippi Street NE, 6490 Central Avenue NE, 6400 Central Avenue NE, 6352 Central Avenue NE, 6300 Central Avenue NE, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE, legal descriptions are as follows : 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lots l, 2 , & 3 , Auditors Subdivision No. 88, except road, subject to easement of record. 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive: Lots 1 - 5, Block l, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, subject to easement of record. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place . Any questions related to this item may be referred to Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator at 763-572-3599 . Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than September 24 , 2003 . The TDD number is 763-572-3534 . DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: September 18 , 2003 M R � .r � Su� �vcuS 1 �0..3 � � City of Fridley Legal PubliCation PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a pu� lic hearing of the Fndley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center,6431 University Avenue N.E.on Wednesday,October 1,2pp3, at 7:30 p,m.for the purpose of: For a Rezoning, Zpq#03-02, by Town Center Development,LLC,to rezone property from C-2,General Business, and C-1, Loca! Business, M-1, Light Industrial, and C-RI, General Office,to S-2,Redevelopment District accommodate redevelopment,generally locat- ed at 1282 Mississippi Street NE,6490 Central Avenue NE, 6400 Central Avenue NE,6352_ Central Avenue NE,63pp Central Avenue NE, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE, legal descriptions are as follows: 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lots 1, 2, &3, Auditors Subdivision No. 88, except road, subject to easement of record. 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive: Lots t -5, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace,subject to easement of record. Any and ali persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity ai the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator at 763-572-3599. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other per- sons with dis�bilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763- 572-3500 no later than September 24,2003. The TDD number is 763-572-3534. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION (September 18,20p3)F7JZOA#03-02 PUBLIC HEARINGS POSTPONED BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that the items listed below have been withdrawn by the applicant , for the Wednesday, October 1, 2003 , Planning Commission meeting. The applicant has postponed the applications, and may resubmit the applications on a different date not certain. Upon applicant resubmitting the applications it will be published in the paper. For a Preliminary Plat, PS #03-06, by Town Center Development, LLC, to construct a senior housing development, legally described as lots 1, 2 , & 3 , Auditors Subdivision No. 88, except road, subject to easement of record, generally located at 1282 Mississippi Street NE and 6490 Central Avenue NE. AND For a Rezoning, ZOA #03-02 , by Town Center Development, LLC, to rezone property from C-2 , General Business, and C-1, Local Business, M-1, Light Industrial, and C-R1, General Office, to S-2 , Redevelopment District accommodate redevelopment, generally located at 1282 Mississippi Street NE, 6490 Central Avenue NE, 6400 Central Avenue NE, 6352 Central Avenue NE, 6300 Central Avenue NE, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE, legal descriptions are as follows : 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lots l, 2 , & 3 , Auditors Subdivision No. 88, except road, subject to easement of record. 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive: Lots 1 - 5, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, subject to easement of record. If you have any further questions, please contact Paul, Bolin, Planning Coordinator, at 763-572-3599 . DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: September 25, 2003 . �� ' �1-�C �.S ._ � _ 2S__o� City of Fridley Legal Publication PUBLIC HEARINGS POSTPONED BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that the items listed below have been withdrawn by the applicant, for the Wednesday, October 1, 2003, Planning Commission meeting. The appli- cant has postponed the applications, and may resubmit the applications on a different date not certain. Upon applicant resubmit- ting the applications it will be published in the paper. For a Preliminary Plat, PS #03-06, by Town Center Development, LLC, to con- struct a senior housing development,legally described as lots 1, 2, 8 3, Auditors Subdivision No. 88, except road, subject to � easement of record, generally located at F 1282 Mississippi Street NE and 6490 Central Avenue NE. AND For a Rezoning, ZOA #03-02, by Town Center Development,LLC,to rezone proper- ty from G2, General Business, and C-1, Local Business,M-1,Light Industrial,and C- R1, General Office, to S-2, Redevelopment District accommodate redevelopment,gener- ally located at 1282 Mississippi Street NE, 6490 Central Avenue NE, 6400 Central Avenue NE,6352 Central Avenue NE,6300 Central Avenue NE, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE,legal descriptions are as fol- lows: 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lots 1, 2, & 3, Auditors Subdivision No. 88, except road, subject to easement ot record. 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 i East Moore Lake Drive: Lots 1 -5, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace,subject to easement of record. If you have any further questions, please contact Paul,Bolin,Planning Coordinator,at 763-572-3599. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: September 25,2003 (Sep 25,2003)F2/Pstpn PS 0306,ZOA 0302 • A i Develo�ment Review Committee Worksheet Address: Town Center Land Use Case # ZOA #03-03 & PS #03-08 ❑ Paul Bolin ❑ Scott Hickok a Layne Otteson ❑ Grant Fernelius o Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. �� Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones o Mary Smith °� Steph Hanson o Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg ❑ Jon Haukaas � Ralph Messer Planninq Issues: Engineerinq Issues: ❑ Setbacks ❑ Drainage � Lot coverage o Utilities � Allowable square footage o Curbing requirements ❑ Height ❑ ❑ Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative ❑ Fire Issues• o Truck access a Sprinkler requirements Buildin4 Issues: ❑ Hydrant location o UBC/IBC ❑ � Stipulations: Comments: Name: Date: �U '1 D?J' . - � Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: Town Center Land Use Case # ZOA #03-03 & PS #03-08 ❑ Paul Bolin o Scott Hickok ❑ Layne Otteson ❑ Grant Fernelius � Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. o Kevin Hanson ,(�( Julie Jones o Mary Smith ❑ Steph Hanson o Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg o Jon Haukaas o Raiph Messer Planninq Issues: Engineerinq Issues: o Setbacks ❑ Drainage � Lot coverage ❑ Utilities ❑ Allowable square footage ❑ Curbing requirements o Height ❑ o Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative �� _..- p i ,i.� �h L'.�,i'� 1"�1'-LJ t'�'v ��:-c� ��Zf Ct ��'i:i�,0��. (��tii�'l.."'�'�-�' ��E1.v-t ; f:1J �7� Fire Issues. t��;�-� ? ` ❑ Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements Building Issues: ❑ Hydrant location ❑ UBC/IBC ❑ ❑ Stipulations: Comments: ;> : , , � , � .. �l!;�/t c;G-�,.C't.�y-�. ��.k c-��-�r_ -F _ -r�i) £".i�A,...�r-L'•t.:�� -,;1v��:/•j �'"� �1C,/' �.��yv �.. '� � �, _� �✓ l� f ` `-Lfc ;. ,-r, �:ls� . , . `�c ,� _ W- " Z; . y, . f� j �/1 i.�• ',7+'-� ai,. c� c� • Name: < .�.�.�: �__ ;�-,�., Date: j�,._ 7- � 3 � � . t Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: Town Center Land Use Case # ZOA #03-03 & PS #03-08 � Paul Bolin ❑ Scott Hickok ❑ Layne Otteson ❑ Grant Fernelius � Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. ❑ Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith ❑ Steph Hanson ❑ Ron Julkowski �, Stacy Stromberg o )on Haukaas o Ralph Messer Planning Issues: Engineering Issues: ❑ Setbacks ❑ Drainage o Lot coverage o Utilities o Allowable square footage o Curbing reqUirements ❑ Height ❑ ❑ Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative ❑ Fire Issues• ❑ Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements Buildinq Issues: ❑ Hydrant location ❑ -d'B'E/IBC o 0 Stipulations: Comments: . �� v�n`��,��t c W �n �`�� v� �� I=�r�� i?-� � r�G�,��'C� n�� -ri-�.� �� "�( �i t" ��' t.�' (� 'r��Q /' •'�' 1� a' ��^ � �� C 1 f� �1 � � �! ( � 1 . Name: t/'� �� '� � Date: ' "! i;:� , t . Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: Town Center Land Use Case # ZOA #03-03 & PS #03-08 ❑ Paul Bolin o Scott Hickok � Layne Otteson ❑ Grant Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. ❑ Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith o Steph Hanson ❑ Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg o Jon Haukaas o Ralph Messer Planning Issues: Engineering Issues: ❑ Setbacks � Drainage ❑ Lot coverage o Utilities o Allowable square footage o Curbing requirements o Height o ❑ Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative ❑ Fire Issues• o Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements Building issues: ❑ Hydrant location ❑ UBC/IBC ❑ 0 Stipulations: � �1,� ` , �,,,►.., � �� ,cu.��.`g�`"'�`� '1.,:,.� .�1 ' ' ' � ��: � �-{� � YWa-'tJ�'�, Comments: � Name• �' � Date• ltr � D3 r� Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: Town Center Land Use Case # ZOA �03-03 & PS #03-08 ❑ Paul Bolin o Scott Hickok a Layne Otteson ❑ Grant Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen o Police Rep. o Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith ❑ Steph Hanson ❑ Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg ❑ Jon Haukaas a Ralph Messer Planning Issues: Engineering Issues: ❑ Setbacks ❑ Drainage ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Utilities o Allowable square footage ❑ Curbing requirements o Height ❑ � Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative ❑ Fire Issues: � Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements Buildinq Issues: ❑ Hydrant location ❑ UBC/IBC ❑ ❑ Stipulations: Comments: Name: ��'� - . Date:/C'-- ,� � U� � Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: Town Center Land Use Case # ZOA #03-03 & PS #03-08 ❑ Paul 8olin ❑ Scott Hickok o Layne 4tteson � Grant Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. ❑ Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith o Steph Hanson ❑ Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg ❑ Jon Haukaas ❑ Ralph Messer Planning Issues: Engineering Issues: ❑ Setbacks ❑ Drainage ❑ Lot coverage � ❑ Utilities o Allowable square footage o Curbing requirements ❑ Height ❑ o Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative 0 Fire Issues: ❑ Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements Building Issues: ❑ Hydrant location ❑ �IBC o ❑ Stipulations: 1wI _ l Y2- �c'�• c��ul^ G��G'✓1 dL , T � 1 Comments: Name: ` Date: l� � �3 . , Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: Town Center Land Use Case # ZOA #03-03 & PS #03-08 ❑ Paul Bolin `�Scott Hickok ❑ Layne Otteson ❑ Grant Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. ❑ Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith o Steph Hanson ❑ Ron Juikowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg o Jon Haukaas ❑ Ralph Messer Planning Issues: Engineering Issues: � Setbacks ❑ Drainage � Lot coverage ❑ Utilities ❑ Allowable square footage ❑ Curbing requirements ❑ Height I ❑ ❑ Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative ❑ Fire Issues: ❑ Truck access o Sprinkler requirements Building Issues: ❑ Hydrant location o UBC/IBC ❑ ❑ Stipulations: �Co ments: .A� �� /T—I�� v 2 ��v" t•(�i�� f� (�:,�f t1IG ��s /�S A /yi.ofJ�F��/v/l � � �i9✓`��'*�'�� , % Name: Date: d Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: Town Center Land Use Case # ZOA #03-03 & PS #03-08 ❑ Paui Bolin o Scott Hickok ❑ Layne Otteson ❑ Grant Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. ❑ Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith o Steph Hanson a Ron Juikowski o Stacy Stromberg ❑ Jon Haukaas � Ralph Messer Planning Issues: Engineering Issues: a Setbacks ❑ Drainage ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Utilities ❑ Ailowable square footage ❑ Curbing requirements ❑ Height ❑ ❑ Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative ❑ Fire Issues• .�'Truck access �a— Sprinkler requirements Building Issues: o�l-lydrant location ❑ UBC/IBC ❑ ❑ Stipulations: ,�.�,�'f'�.� n'��t��v� Comments: Name: Date: 1�d 9 �3 Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: Town Center Land Use Case # ZOA #03-03 & PS #03-08 ❑ Paul Bolin ❑ Scott Hickok ❑ Layne Otteson o Grant Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. o Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith ❑ Steph Hanson � Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg ❑ Jon Haukaas ❑ Ralph Messer Planning Issues: Enqineering Issues: o Setbacks ❑ Drainage ❑ Lot coverage o Utilities ❑ Allowable square footage o Curbing requirements o Height ❑ ❑ Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative ❑ Fire Issues: ❑ Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements Buildin Issues: ❑ Hydrant location ❑ / C ❑ ❑ ��"G Yi �`��— .C . ,,l�/,l� �L��-��/�-��. Stip ations: •�!� � � LC /L � �✓ .�. �- - ,� .J � IL / i .� b � � Name: G�� ' Date:,l� � Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: Town Center Land Use Case # ZOA #03-03 & PS #03-08 ❑ Paul Bolin o Scott Hickok � Layne Otteson ❑ Grant Fernelius ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Police Rep. o Kevin Hanson ❑ Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith ❑ Steph Hanson ❑ Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg ❑ Jon Haukaas o Ralph Messer Planning Issues: Engineerinq Issues: ❑ Setbacks �Drainage � Lot coverage �' tilities o Allowable square footage �urbing requirements o Height o ❑ Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative ❑ Fire Issues• ❑ Truck access o Sprinkler requirements Buildinq Issues: ❑ Hydrant location ❑ UBC/IBC o 0 Stipulations: � G%t�t.�l�C� �'v`-�► � f 3� S�� S L � ""'- N n!C .... . • , . '••�� • �. \�-�'�-�f' I P� ��•� r A��.�.�.re.,.n ��lw++.v�� j�►acXs..^.� ��c.�Ce_._....�_� [� ,�,�. � ��.� ,JGM4t�4w�.�C .� � � � i � � . r /� r. r -�,� _„_ w i��t+w•.F � V ! �'+� �'^-"�^�+�\ � I' __ � � ` ��.0 , . V �� Nam�: Date: /a �; - � ��ti _____ --'�L. _ �.�P�"L�f�� .��m -e�rc. � , o ��, �-�I �:�' __ � f�� G�3 A. .�_ ..... . _. .�.. .... . � ..___. ..._... .... . .._. _.. . ... .. .... . , . . . . .._._ . . __._"._,. ..._.__.. .._.__. ._... . - --_� ��-�C-Y_�,�_�S__ /��ri�.%�' � ._.. ..,_... -.- - . . . _.. . F . .. . . . . . .. . . . _ __ ... .._��S�a_�''� /'�� _ G�.r�_ �r��..� � � � � � �o lo� y� = � �t� f fs` _ __ ___ _ _ ,. _ . _ _ � _ _._ .._ ---__ ..___..�__-_._--__- '�S:tCi r c�,.� � C_�� '-c, o � �C� 1 � � . � --- _ � -- - ___. _ ____ }'; � f �� _� - / s��/ ls _.. _�____ _ __- - _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _�_.__..__�____ ... �e �z��c-�/ �-t��ls = � � ��at� (� � �_...___._ _ _ _ _____..._____ _ _._�___.__. _ .____.._ ._-- -- i' �!'1 e c �'t re �S�1 ��'i �?c T�`� .S ��t l l.S "— G�� i__ _ _ ___ ___ _ _-- �� __ _ _ __. _. _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ __ ,_.-------_---___��.____._: ;'; /�-� C' C v�..Y�c' - �/< __ . . _. . _._ ._ __ __ _ _ . ` �t,�ol�� -- � _- --- - _ ______ _----_.__ _ __ ____ _ __._ ---_ __.._ __._.�.�__,___. _ -_..._ __ .__ _ � � �n �- �;-�� (�e�.s t� � crt - � crt �o�-m ��t _. _ __. _ _ _ ____ _ -- - __ _�_. ` _. _ _'_si c�!�.._ � �'r rc?!.��c dYt�� n or� �on f�rm�. � - ,, _ _...__ __. ___ �.__t____... ,, �; ,, - . __. .__ __.._._ ____ __ �_ (s'c�c tn _ _ �,� - _��. .��__.�_�_�___�__�. � e � ' _��.�'__�_ �:r�'�__- _O� ,; �- � �� _— D/� �� ,.� ____ _.___.. ! �� f��S��-=1 < - z � , . - . . � /_l G' ��,r/c�� _ .�.�___-� / l�S`. _ r��:i�''��/ _ ..m.._�...�_._�__..__,__..�__._ � a E � 7 � �_�i ��. � � �- ._,�_�'.�'V--�-�'�.�_=_��_�� __. +�C�-f � C�Y�`"C"'�G� _ _ -.._ U�____��!._�_______.�__ ,;° _ � _ _ __ ��. . � ,� � Cl�� -- - ._ .. _ _ __ �____�_T_�. _ _ _____ _ __ __ --- _ _ , c , _ ; :_.�,r/��__ _�-�`�x�c�,� .._..._ _y _�t%� ��- � . .� ._ . G_��/_�. _ ---.. . _`.�'..__:��'-��_� :s __��e__�_�'t G�r-� ____�.��.� .._�r ` A G'��.__.__._� ��_�_✓_�-� _ .___ ��t.-�s�.o�--� ,. � ��--_��.��_-__ � _1s _.s�_!� �-� � �7� . _ ____ _ __��-�� .��__ : '� � CC/?��rC.�S G�l� .�_z� _��.i'1 _ _ �� S-f�_� �=-1 �%y C' U . �1 �f —�—�v�c _ -.----- , - .- �_�__��.�2_��_��_�.-G.e. �� _ e_�__a � l �?f: . . . c'_�c�� m-e•-��_ _ i _-- ;; ; . << .; ; ii . . . . _ � � _ � - � � , � . �, � - j - . • . . . __. ____ .._. .. ,- � � . . . � � . - � . . �i � 4 i . � i � � . - . . . _ _ . . . i� ' '{ . . . . .. . .� . . � � . . . . . . � . ( ' � . � . . � . . : I�i . . . . .. .. . .- . . . i.:� � � . ' . . , � . . . . � . � � . . ' �k . .• _ _' . . . ` � . � . . . ' . . . .. ' . � . . � � � . . . . . ' . . � . i 1 � _ . il ' � � . � ' � � J ' . � � . . . . . . . � �� . . . . . �� - . E�� - . . . .. - ' . ��. . - _ . . � � _ Ci1Y OF FIZIDLEY FRIDLEY �IL�vICiP,�L CENTER •6�31 li�iI�"ERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, �1N 5�-�3? •(763) �71-3d�0• FA�C (?63) �71-1�8; October 13, 2003 Town Center Development, LLC Attn: Richard Whinnery 13750 Reimer Drive Maple Grove MN 55311 Dear Mr. Whinnery: Per Minnesota Statute 15.99, local government units are required to notify land use appiicants within 10 working days if their land use applications are complete. We officially received your application for a rezoning on October 3, 2003. This letter serves to inform you that your application is complete. Your Rezoning application hearing and discussion will take place at the City of Fridley Planning Commission Meeting on November 5, 2003 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University Aven�.ae. The City of Fridley City Council will take final action on your rezoning on November 24, 2003 at 7:30 P.M. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the process, please feel free to contact me at 763-572-3595. Sincerely, Stacy St berg Planner cc: Margaret Brickner Margaret Brickner 7735 Silver Lake Road 17 Bluebill Avenue#405 Mounds View MN 55112 Naples FL 34108 Tamarisk Resources Inc. Frank Kitterman 1282 Mississippi Street NE 6400 Central Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Ziebart of Minnesota, Inc. 6300 Central Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 G03-123 ' . ��I PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E . on Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 7 :30 p.m. for the purpose of : For a Rezoning, ZOA #03-03 , by Town Center Development, LLC, to rezone property from C-2 , General Business, and C-1, Local Business, M-1, Light Industrial, and C-R1, General Office, to S-2 , Redevelopment District accommodate redevelopment, generally located at 1282 Mississippi Street NE, 6490 Central Avenue NE, 6400 Central Avenue NE, 6352 Central Avenue NE, 6300 Central Avenue NE, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE, legal descriptions are as follows : 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lots l, 2 , & 3 , Auditors Subdivision No . 88 , except road, subject to easement of record. 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive: Lots 1 - 5, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, subject to easement of record. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place . Any questions related to this item may be referred to Stacy Stromberg at 763-572- 3595 . Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than October 29, 2003 . The TDD number is 763-572-3534 . DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: October 23 , 2003 � �r � I��S�� l � �a��3 City of Fridley PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wsdneaday,November 5,2003,at 7:30 p.m.for the purpose of: For a Rezoning,ZOA#03-03, by Town Center Development,LLC,to rezone proper- ty from G2, General Business,and C-1, Local Business,M-1,Light Industrial,and,G_ R1, General Office,to S-2;Redevelopment District accommodate redevelopment,gener- ally located at 1282 Mississippi Street NE, 6490 Cenhal Avenue NE, 6400 Central Avenue NE,6352 Central Avenue NE,6300 Central Avenue NE, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE,legal descriptions are as fol- lows: 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: �ots 1, 2, & 3, Auditors Subdivision No. 88, except road, subject to easement of record. 6400 Centrai .Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue,and 1277 East Moore Lake Drive: ' Lots 1 - 5, Block 1, He�wal Rice Creek Terrace,subject to easement of record. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated t�me and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to Stacy Stromberg at 763-572-3595. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other per- sons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763- 572-3500 no later than October 29, 2003. The TDD number is 763-5723534. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION (Oct.23,2003)F2,TownCtr CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: All property owners/residents within 350 feet of property generally located at 1282 Nlississippi Street, 6490 Central Avenue, 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 East Ntoore Lake Drive. CASE NUMBER: Rezonin , ZOA #03-03 APPLICANT: Town Center Development, LLC Petitioner or re resentative must attend the Plannin Commission meetin . PURPOSE: To rezone property from C-2, General Business, C-1, Local Business, M-1, Light Industrial, and C-R1, General Office, to S-2, Redevelopment District to accommodate redevelopment. LOCATION OF 1282 Mississippi Street, 6490 Central Avenue, 6400 Central Avenue, PROPERTYAND 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 East Moore LEGAL Lake Drive. DESCRIPTION: 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lots 1, 2, & 3, Auditors Subdivision No. 88, except road, subject to easement of record. 6400 Centra! A�eraue, fi352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 �ast Moore Lake Drive: Lots 1 - 5, Block 1, Herwai Rice Creek Terrace, subject to easement of record. DATEAND TIME OF Planning Commission Meeting: HEAR/NG: Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 7:30 p.m. The Planning Commission Meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 17. PLACE OF HEARING: Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or FAX at 763-571-1287. SPECIAL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMODATIONS: Interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than October 29, 2003. The TDD # is 763-572-3534. ANY QUESTIONS: Contact Paul Bolin, Plannir�g Coordinator, at 763-572-3599 or Stacy Stromberg, Planner, at 763-572-3595. Publish: October 23, 2003 �` ��i► Cit of City of Fridley � � y Public Hearin Notice � � Fridley 9 � ;� � I ; 1��,,� �� ; ;; � I '!. I�,I�i I �� , , i j I i � � � II� I � l-!� I I� I __. �I� I et � � , , � , ; , I ', �, i � � ; � � I il ' I I I I 1� � � I � I I a� � I Q I I � � � � � U I � i � � Rice Creek Road L E G E N D Rezoning Request #03-03 N Sources: 1282 Mississippi St, 6490 Central Ave, /� FridleyGlSineering 6400 Central Ave, 6352 Central Ave, �i� Anoka County GIS 6300 Central Ave, and 1271 E Moore Lk Dr. Petitioner: Town Center Development, LLC Map Date: 10/22/03 Bad Address 11 Bad Address 12 Bad Address 7 Bad Address 8 ANDERSON CHARLES D & NANCY J ARCHER-KATH JULIE A , 1072 63RD AVE NE 1348 HILLCREST DR NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 AWAIJANE SAMIR& MINDY BARSNESS CURTIS A BATESON G &A& PIETRINI D & M 6588 CENTRAL AVE NE 6581 CENTRAL AVE NE 6196 HEATHER PL NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BATE ON G &A& PIETRINI D & M BATESON GEORGE F&ANN L BFRGANINI RICHARD L& DIANE C/O BA ESON GEORGE F 6196 HEATHER PLACE 6596 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLE , N 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BERGLUND ERWIN R&SUZANNE BERGMAN LEONARD E & DORIS L BERGSTROM JOHN W&SYLVIA B 6565 PIERCE ST NE 6435 PIERCE ST NE 1086 63RD AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BERNARDSON JOHN CLARENCE BJORKLUND ERIC T& HJORDIS L T BLISCHOK THOM &SHARLA TRUSTEE 1150 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1360 CREEK PARK LN NE 4244 E DESERT CREST DR FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 PARADISE VALLEY,AZ 85253 BOGDAN ALLA& POTAPENKO V BOHM SHIRLEY B BONA DAVID L&CHARLOTTE C 6532 CHANNEL RD NE 6580 CENTRAL AVE NE 6548 CHANNEL RD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 , BRICKNER MARGARET A TRUSTEE BRICKNER RICHARD T BROOS MICHAEL& HOAGBERG MIA 6260 HIGHWAY 65 NE#308 1233 12TH AVE NW 656 LUCIA LN NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 NEW BRIGHTON,MN 55112 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BRYTOWSKI MICHAEL J & LAURA A BUE MARK D & MARY K BUIRGE THOMAS R& LINDA J 6378 DELLWOOD DR NE 6229 CENTRAL AVE NE 6312 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BURDICK ROBERT M & DORA M BURKHOW JON R&ALLISON R BURMIS DELLA M 1316 66TH AVE NE 6300 SHINGLE CR PKWY 6459 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 55430 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BURNS DEBORAH J & KING WILLIAM BURNS GERALD P & BONITA L CALDERON BOB JR&JACKIE A 1371 CREEK PARK LN NE 6530 OAKLEY DR NE 6401 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CARLAND JOHN A& B D CARLSON RICHARD S CHRISTENSEN CHAD D 6416 DELLWOOD DR NE Bad Address 10 6245 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 COGLE MARIE C & GEORGE L R COUNTRY HOUSE INC CRANDALL CARRIE M 1376 66TH AVE NE PO BOX 818 6411 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 STILLWATER,MN 55082 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 1001 E MOORE LK DR NE 1050 63RD AVE NE 1109 E MOORE LAKE DR NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 1131 E MOORE LAKE DR NE 1200 E MOORE LAKE DR NE 1200 E MOORE LK DR NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 1250 E MOORE LK DR NE 1271 E MOORE LAKE DR NE 1299 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 1310 RICE CREEK RD NE 1358 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1376 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55421 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 1380 CREEK PARK LN NE 6217 CENTRAL AVE NE 6249 BEN MORE DR NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6301 CENTRAL AVE NE 6303 CENTRAL AVE NE 6315 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6325 PIERCE ST NE 6335 PIERCE ST NE 6343 HIGHWAY 65 NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6345 PIERCE ST NE 6352 CENTRAL AVE NE 6361 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6367 DELLWOOD DR NE 6373 PIERCE ST NE 6379 HIGHWAY 65 NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55421 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6381 CENTRAL AVE NE 6393 HIGHWAY 65 NE 6400 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6417 HIGHWAY 65 NE 6425 HIGHWAY 65 NE 6436 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6441 OLD CENTRAL AVE NE 6461 WOODY LN NE 6490 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6500 CHANNEL RD NE 6501 CENTRAL AVE NE 6501 CHANNEL RD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6531 CHANNEL RD NE 6533 LUCIA LN NE 6533 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6534 CENTRAL AVE NE 6542 CENTRAL AVE NE 6546 LUCIA LN NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6550 CENTRAL AVE NE 6552 CENTRAL AVE NE 6565 LUCIA LN NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6571 CHANNEL RD NE 6572 CENTRAL AVE NE 6610 LUCIA LN NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN S5�3Z DAHL JON DAHLMEIER BETH A DALZEN TERRY E & RUBY D 1065 63RD AVE NE 1358 66TH AVE NE 6308 DELLWOOD DR NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 DAVIS TERRANCE A&JENNIFER J DAYTON DAVID M & LINDA L DEMELLO FRANK&SHARON 6548 PIERCE ST NE 6435 HIGHWAY 65 NE 6134 WOODY LANE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 DEUSER THOMAS E & KAREN A DUBANOSKI CLARA J EAST WEST PROPERTY MGMT LLC 6452 DELLWOOD DR NE 6423 PIERCE ST NE PO BOX 270262 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 VADNAIS HEIGHTS,MN 55127 EDWARDS DENNIS B & BARBARA J ELMQUIST NICHOLAS A ELMQUIST RONALD D 1403 64TH AVE NE 2627 BUCHANAN ST NE 8140 LONG LAKE RD FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55418 MOUNDSVIEW,MN 55112 EVANGELIST PAUL A FEMRITE ROGER N & FAYE M FREEMAN JON L 8�SANDRA F 6378 PIERCE ST NE 4773 MANITOU ROAD 6440 DELLWOOD DR NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 TONKA BAY,MN 55331 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY I OF FRIDLEY ITY OF FRID E -CITY OF 6431 UNI RSITY AVE NE Bad A ess 4 Bad dress 5 FRIDLEY,M 55432 FRIDLE ,MN 55432 FRIDL Y,MN 55432 FRIDLE C OF FRIDL Y.HRA GADKE CAROL A Bad Add ss 6 6431 U IV AVE NE 6389 PIERCE ST NE FRIDL , N 55432 FRIDLE ,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 GARMAN KATHLEEN R GIBSON TERESA J GOLUBOWICZ ANNE E 6366 PIERCE ST NE 1255 66TH AVE NE 1220 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 GOULD FLORENCE M &JEAN E GRABOWSKt JAMES M GRANROOS MANUEL J & PAULA M 6448 PIERCE ST NE 6525 CENTRAL AVE NE 1114 63RD AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 GWIAZDON MITCHELL L & MARY HAGMANN BECKY L HALVORSON KIMBERLY J 6350 PIERCE ST NE 6250 BEN MORE DR NE 6555 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 HAUAN WILLIAM C & M E HICKS JANIS K HITCHCOCK W& I TRUSTEES 6301 DELLWOOD DR NE 1320 CREEK PARK LN NE 6532 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 HOLMGREN ENTERPRISES INC HOLZHEU CAROLINE E HORNER JACQUELYN A 1323 RICE CREEK RD NE 1314 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 2463 17TH AVE NW MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 NEW BRIGHTON,MN 55112 HORTON CHARLES L& PHYLLIS HORTON CHARLES L& PHYLLIS HUIE CHOCK S & LAI C 10761 181ST CIRCLE NW 10761 181ST CIRCLE NW 1328 66TH AVE NE ELK RIVER,MN 55330 ELK RIVER,MN 55330 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 IMBERTSON MARTIN B &ARDIS INTERNATIONAL MINISTERIAL FLSP JAEGER DAVID J &CHEVRE CARYL 6564 PIERCE ST NE Bad Address 1 6564 CHANNEL RD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 JANKOWSKI JOHN M JOHNSON CHRISTINE R JOHNSON DENNIS L & MARY J 1400 RICE CREEK RD NE 1379 CREEK PARK LN NE 6600 LUCIA LN NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 JOHNSON DOUGLAS E JOHNSON RANDOLPH E KACHINA PHYLLIS M 6388 PIERCE ST NE 6336 PIERCE ST NE 6476 DELLWOOD DR NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 KELLS ALFRED J & DORIS E KEMK COMPANIES KIDDER TIMOTHY J & DEBORAH A 6400 PIERCE ST NE 6301 HIGHWAY 65 NE 1311 CREEK PARK LN NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 KIRKMAN BRIAN A KITTERMAN F A& SUNDE S L KLUCSAR YOAVA 6540 LUCIA LN NE C/O ADVANCE COMPANIES INC 1420 RICE CREEK RD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 KOOTENIA HOMES INC KOOTENIA HOMES INC KORTE THOMAS G & NANCY B 7975 AFTON RD 7975 AFTON ROAD 6580 CHANNEL RD NE WOODBURY,MN 55125 WOODBURY,MN 55125 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 KOZER JACK D & KAREN P KRACL ADAM R&TUSSING M K KRAMBER KATHRYN L 860 86TH AVE NW 6449 PIERCE ST NE 2013 29TH AVE NW COON RAPIDS,MN 55433 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 NEW BRIGHTON,MN 55112 KRIENS BERNARD J & LORALEE KRUSE RICHARD &JOAN TRUSTEES KWONG ANDREW & SELINA 1362 66TH AVE NE 1383 CREEK PARK LN NE 1321 CREEK PARK LN NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 LABANDZ FRANK A&VALLIE R LAMERE KEVIN P & KIM M LANCELLO EDWARD F & MARGARET 1356 64TH AVE NE 6199 HEATHER PL NE 6597 LUCIA LN NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 LANDRY DONALD J & MARY K LANE MONICA L LARSON GRACE M 6597 PIERCE ST NE 1140 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1340 66TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 LEKANG RICHARD E &JOYCE E LIEB WILLIAM JR & KIMBERLY LlTTLER K E & B A& K A 6517 PIERCE ST NE 6390 DELLWOOD DR NE 41 RICE CREEK WAY NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 LONG GERALD D &JUDY A LUKE KENNETH W 8� KATHLEEN M MALONE DAVID J &JOSIE D 6366 DELLWOOD DR NE 1341 CREEK PARK LN NE 6283 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MARIHART BERNARD J MARTIN GREGORY D MARTINSON TERRY L& MARY JANE 1373 64TH AVE NE 6549 PIERCE ST NE 6568 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MASON JOHNNY E &JILL L MATTISON MARK J MCLAIN JAMES L 1361 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 6421 CENTRAL AVE NE 6554 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 . MCNAUGHTON MARVEL MEADOVWIEW HOMES INC MEHTA ROBERT 6300 PIERCE ST NE 14621 ABERDEEN ST NE 4113 MONROE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 HAM LAKE,MN 55304 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS,MN 55421 MELCHER HENRY T& ROSEMARIE MILES DOROTHY M MILLS LEATRICE H 6500 PIERCE ST NE 1370 RICE CREEK RD NE 6342 DELLWOOD DR NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MIRANDA LARRY B & SKIBA L J MOELLMAN RHONDA R MULROY PATRICIA S 6581 PIERCE ST NE 6609 CHANNEL RD NE 1384 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 — NAY ROX LTD PTNSHP NELSON JOSEPH J & LINDA P OKETCH RICHARD J 10425 28TH AVE N 1357 64TH AVE NE 6500 LUCIA LN NE PLYMOUTH,MN 55441 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 OLSON DENISE M OLSON HENRIETTA A OLSON KURT E &ANDREA R 6556 CENTRAL AVE NE 6425 DELLWOOD DR NE 1385 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 OUELLETTE EUGENE L &ANN OVERMAN ROBERT G & SUSAN K PALMER LOREN C & SHIRLEY M 6343 DELLWOOD DR NE 1340 CREEK PARK LN NE 6596 CHANNE� RD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 PARKS CAMILLES R PATTERSON JOSHUA L PATTERSON RICHARD A& BETTY 1341 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 6581 LUCIA LN NE 6328 DELLWOOD DR NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 PEHL GERALD A& DOROTHY T PERRON CAROLYN D PETERSON DANNY L 1250 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 6610 CHANNEL RD NE 1128 63RD AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 PETERSON THOMAS R PHILLIPS GARY P & PATRICIA M PHILLIPS JON S & DIANE M 6401 PIERCE ST NE 6519 CENTRAL AVE NE 1361 CREEK PARK LN NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 PODVIN RICHARD T& CAROLE E POLHAMUS MARNIE E PORTZLINE GERALD &JOYCE 1391 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 6599 CHANNEL RD NE 6291 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 . POWER ROBERT A& LAURIE A PRIOR RUSSELL L& BEVERLY Y QUALITY GROWTH LTD 6367 NE DELLWOOD DR 1340 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 3002 ELM ST FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FARGO,ND 58102 QUALITY,GROWTH LTD QUAL TY ROWTH LTD RAAEN LOIS E Bad Addr Bad ress 3 6501 LUCIA LN NE FRIDLEY,�J�'t`�I 55432 FRIDL ,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 RAD JOHN R RAMSEY SHARYN R RANDALL JOE M &VIVIAN M 1200 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1340 64TH AVE NE 1210 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 ' RAU JOHN D & SUSAN M REDEPENNING DARREL& DONNA REISNER DONNA M &JAMES W 1341 64TH AVE NE 6391 DELLWOOD DR NE 6424 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 RUSINAK JAMES J & RHONDA L SCHAEFER T R&WEATHERBY E V SCHERVEN BURTON H 6412 PIERCE ST NE 6391 CENTRAL AVE NE 6610 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SCHEWE ROSALIE A SCHMITZ TROY D & BONNIE B B SCHWALBACH RICHARD O 1153 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 6537 CENTRAL AVE NE 6501 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SCHWARTZ MARK A&JEAN D SHEA RICHARD J SHIMANSKI ROBERT D & MARY LOU 1372 64TH AVE NE 2132 150TH AVE NW 8025 GARFIELD ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 ANDOVER,MN 55304 SPRING LAKE PARK,MN 55432 SHOREWOOD PLAZA LLC SITZ GENE A&TERRI A SKYHAWK MARIAN E 4109 HIGHWOOD RD 1100 63RD AVE NE 6580 PIERCE ST NE ORONO,MN 55364 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SMITH CYNTHIA& STOLPE ROBERT SMITH MARY V SOLIS TRACY L & KEVIN A 6428 DELLWOOD DR NE 6437 DELLWOOD DR NE 1381 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SPAETH WARREN T&SHERRILL SPOONER CALEB J STARMARK NORTHWEST REALTY LLC 6516 CHANNEL RD NE 6271 CENTRAL AVE NE 5525 CEDAR LAKE RD FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 ST LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 STARMARK NORTHWEST REALTY LLC STEINBERG SANDRA J STONE THOMAS D C/O NORTHWEST ATHLETIC CLUBS Bad Address 9 1400 MISSISSIPPI ST NE ST LOUtS PARK,MN 55416 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SWANSON ANTHONY F&JOYCE J TAMARISK RESOURCES INC THE WELLSWOOD GROUP LLC 6601 LUCIA LN NE 1282 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 9637 ANDERSON LAKES PKWY N FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344 THOMAS DEAN B 8 BETTY J TIMO ELVINA J TOURVILLE ROBERT B &J M 6550 LUCIA LN NE 6517 LUCIA LN NE 6379 DELLWOOD DR NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 TRAHAN THEODORE C & RAMONA L ULVE GERALDINE US FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 6245 BEN MORE DR NE 6552 OLD CENTRAL AVE NE 6303 OLD CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 VANAUGH ERNEST D & K L VANDER HART GARY W& FERN L VANG KONG & CHOU T&THAO BAO 6449 DELLWOOD DR NE 6401 DELLWOOD DR NE 6516 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 VIRDEN LAWRENCE A& M F VOGT JAMES A& DARLENE S VUGTEVEEN CHAD W& SHERYL L 6413 DELLWOOD DR NE 6315 DELLWOOD DR NE 4142 AVONDALE ST FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MINNETONKA,MN 55345 WAZWAZ TAHANI &ISMAIL MOHAMMAD WESTBY PAUL A WILLIAMS JON J 6329 DELLWOOD DR NE 8320 BROAD AVE 6355 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 WRUCK GARY D YOUNG JACKIE R& G M ZERBY D MICHAEL&JUDITH A 6319 HIGHWAY 65 NE 6549 LUCIA LN NE 1400 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 ZIEBART OF MINNESOTA INC ZIMMERMAN THOMAS JR&JUDITH M 6300 CENTRAL AVE NE 7518 TEMPO TERR FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 • , , City of Fridley Land Use Application ZOA #03-03 November 5, 2003 GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: 6400 Central Avenue: Town Center Development, LLC 1959- Building constructed. 13750 Reimer Drive 1969 -Warehouse built. Maple Grove MN 55311 1975 - Lot is platted. Requested Action: 1988 -Addition to building. Rezone property from C-1, C-2, CR-1, M-1 to S- 6352 Central Avenue: 2. Vacant Lot Location: 6300 Central Avenue: 1282 Mississippi Street, 6490 Central Avenue, 1975- Lot is platted. 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 1976 - Building is constructed. 6300 Central Avenue, 1271 E Moore Lake Drive 1271 E. Moore Lake Drive: Existing Zoning: Vacant Lot 1282 Mississippi Street-C-1, Local Business Legal Description of Property: 6490 Central Avenue-C-1, Local Business 1282 Mississippi Street: and C-2, General Business Part of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision#88 6490 Central Avenue: 6400 Central Avenue- M-1, Light Industrial Lot 1, 2, and 3,Auditor's Subdivision#88 6352 Central Avenue- CR-1, General Office 6400 Central Avenue: 6300 Central Avenue- M-1, Light Industrial Lot 1, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace 1271 E Moore Lake Drive- M-1, Light Industrial 6352 Central Avenue: Size: Lots 2 &3, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace Approximate size of entire area to be rezoned: 6300 Central Avenue: 374,880 sq. ft. 8.6 acres Lot 4, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace 1271 E Moore Lake Drive: Existing Land Use: Lot 5, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace Tamarisk Resources, Sandee's Restaurant, Council Action /60 Day Date: Advance Companies, Ziebart, and vacant land City Council- November 24, 2003 Surrounding Land Use &Zoning: 60 Day Date- December 1, 2003 N: Office Building, Apartments & C-2, R-3 SUMMARY OF REQUEST E: Commercial & Residential homes & C-1, C-2 The petitioner, Town Center Development, LLC, S: Shopping Plaza & C-3 is requesting to rezone the property located at W: Duplexes & R-2 1282 Mississippi St., 6490 Central Ave., 6400 Comprehensive Plan Conformance: Central Ave., 6352 Central Ave., 6300 Central Future Land Use Map designates this area as Ave., and 1271 E. Moore Lake Dr., from C-1, Redevelopment. Local Business, C-2 General Business, M-1, Zoning History: Light Industrial and CR-1, General Office to S-2 1282 Mississippi Street: Redevelopment District to accommodate 1948- Lot is platted. redevelopment of 1281 Mississippi Street and 1952- House is built. 6490 Central Avenue and to expand the 1985 - Property rezoned from R-1 to C-1 redevelopment district to the end of the block. 1987- Lot split approved to split off the SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS northerly 213 feet of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision City Staff recommends approval of this rezoning No. 88, same being this property. master plan request. 6490 Central Avenue: ■ Proposed rezoning is consistent with the 1948- Lot is platted. Comprehensive Plan. Building constructed pre-1949 • Provides housing opportunities for Fridley 1954-Addition to building. seniors. 1966 -Addition to building. 1980-Addition to kitchen. Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg & Paul Bolin � . � City of Fridley Land Use Application PS#03-08� November 5, 2003 GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: Existing Legal Description of Proper�,jG<— Town Center Development, LLC 1282 Mississippi Street: 13750 Reimer Drive Part of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivtsion #88 Maple Grove MN 55311 6490 Central Avenue: ' Requested Actions: Lot 1, 2, and 3, Auditor's Subdivision #88 Replat property into 2 lots. Refer to attached Plat: Purpose: Council Action /60.Day Date: To create 2 separate lots to allow for the City Council —NoVember 24, 2003 construction of a 55 unit senior housing 60 Day— Decetnber 1, 2003 development. Public Utilit�s: Existing Zoning: Sandee's,fis connected and water and sewer C-1 (Local Business), C-2 (General Business) are avaitable near the site for the new Location: deveFfipment. 1282 Mississippi St. & 6490 Central Ave. Physical Characteristics: Size: Relatively flat, building, asphalt and some Total Area: 150,600 sq. ft. 3.5 acres landscaping. Lot 1: 24,525 sq. ft. .56 acres SUMMARY OF PROJECT Lot 2: 126,075 sq. ft. 2.89 acres The petitioner, Town Center Development, LLC, Existing Land Use: is requesting to replat the properties at 1282 Tamarisk Resources, Sandee's Restaurant Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue to Surrounding Land Use & Zoning: create finro separate lots, which will N: Office Building, Apartments & C-2,,�-3 accommodate the Sandee's Restaurant and a E: Commercial property & Residen ' I homes & new parcel for the construction of a 55-unit C-1, C-2 senior owner occupied condominium S: Advance Companies & M-1 development. W: Duplexes & R-3 SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Confor ance: City Staff recommends approval of the Plat Future Land Use Map desi nates this area as Request. Redevelo ment. Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg & Zoning History: Paul Bolin 1282 Mississi i Stre t: 1948— Lot is platte . 1952— House is b ilt. 1985— Property ezoned from R-1 to C-1 1987— Lot spli approved to split off the northerly 213 eet of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, sa e being this property. 6490 Ce ral Avenue: 1948— ot is platted. Building constructed pre-1949 1954—Addition to building. 1966—Addition to building. 1980—Addition to kitchen. ZOA#03-03 & PS#03-08 OVERVIEW The requests: Town Center Development, LLC, is requesting two separate land use actions from the City of Fridley in order to construct 55 senior owner-occupied condominium units at 6490 Central Avenue. The two actions being requested are a Plat and a Rezoning, both of which will be examined individually in this report. A Plat is being requested to create two new parcels, from 1282 Mississippi Street, currently Tamarisk Resources, and 6490 Central Avenue, currently Sandee's and the vacant lot south of it. Sandee's Restaurant will occupy one parcel and the other parcel will allow for the construction of the 55 senior condominiums. The petitioner is also requesting a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and E. Moore Lake Drive. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and industrial zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District The owners of Advance Companies, Ziebart, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have agreed to the rezoning request. ., __ __,�. .r. =r.� -� ��-� ,�,�,. �r,�.�,� � � ��t�.� �� ;� �_ �� s � :�� ,.�� ,�- �_. �� .,��" � —"' ,� � '�a � ��.� � '�� : �� s�v }'�,-� � � ��' +�-�^� i��5��f ty �^y'�M�� ,�� , v »�f r� �,�g"_ '�,�`��r3' �iur��,;+� �*C y�z*�`� � a��!��$'��r9 �ws,l�, ,��'x �,jt� . � � d�,<"�, ,.y *��''k�-° a A�-hg �+r �;r 7�'�c � ��P' ��r ��'f�a��'�'C� �'� �� d y�� ,. �wr �;�"� � v.�� +�# t � � '� ��n[ +,`h '�* 't�' �r�t,�!-� �t�',�q�" ^"�3 ^�f 'y �` �� '#� 4"3' X!k hrtf ��g�'T � 5�'�' ��P i , t� • � p+.!" -��r.d .�» j� R�.�V A#+n �..''i �� i�'dR- +�.y� .t j .+�" ' Yr z�'-'��°�+, '�"�a ,�,F r�,. t t �y. � f 7„�� t" °t� m'Y�'7`.��{ .e� 4 *t.. .a�t �ti ��c 6fisrsp_ � �af ,. � 2j*r k'"�'F:;fW � � � � ,�'��X"�-*�',��rs a�� '� ��"� ��'�� '� ��+��`'�-:t�e� �r^��'��``�s�c,a}'�,�'.� a�,-� '�`tA #';� �'t �- , r t�� t' � : b'; � .� t-,m �a .�'`.�'F` �:iitx x r5a _g� �r� � '� t w'v .R e� � � ``�'"r�"'�aq" fi ��^>y a��a" �+*r�'a� � � � 'v.� q'" ,r� 'e E+' &��"�L�.� '� `� �� F�,4 r ��X- f�'•i�" a � u r ' �* #� �r� ��§�"� � r� �`x ��^'' � � I � e� � �+ � '•"� zc� � r4a t`c �t�� p,t � w' —E. �y 3 � �,. �-- �� ¢ ;�r , f+;�@� � "v�i �,e.-'4�`��Rr�¢ }�� +�� y� - ��• � �4n-s�' "xx'�t t � . '4�+"n' G * �'� '��WyA�i��ro!��'�.afM1�,`R i: ��— 4 .' .�f ��;' � -�,�,c.�d'�'_''"� g �, �e � � 4 � 3 �x'�}:��% �� .f� ,J'�. �e1Q n z�°'� ��+'' + „�5�.�. �,"��;4t ,��+X:.:,� ��1r�� €v,+;.,i: ��'�,� �'�E`�''��"',#��+� � -�`��'� .� .,."...� ..a �� t ' J �'t,��s�'�: � rr��. I*' ;�'"'P 3.,.,�" � i�;� .' s� r � �'''ns x' '. �+�-,.k K�.��m.� ��''�!t_ ..?',c, '�}�� ' "� �' � ,�� .x+§� ��. t ��` p �r 4 �;�� y8 � � R � ^mr.`��pa,x� *5 •; � �,n.�et,�� '_� �-`^ � * -' �� p �* '�� r� �, �r'. t .,t � —+` ,u„. • t d� � �a_• � '� �� Y.-�'�' ,� C��,'`� �C`rf` .�'€.. :+ ;�»�� `a , �, �' � �� ,�_�+ � � ' � � � � ,�� r. , a, �3_ .� .:�.a.:�� ` �._._ ...., c, ,�.s__ ��..� ar� Proposed Project: Town Center Development, LLC, is proposing to construct a 4-story 55-unit senior condominium complex south of Sandee's Restaurant. Sandee's Restaurant will remain, but will be under new ownership. The proposed 55 units will be owner-occupied and comprised of 2 bedroom units. Thirty-one of the units will be 1,138 square feet, 8 of the units will be 1,185 square feet, and the remaining 16 units will be 1,255 square feet in size. The development will include 51 underground parking stalls and 4 garage stalls and additional surFace parking. A storm pond will be located on the south end of the project, with a trail system and landscaping surrounding the property. - SITE HISTORY In 1991, Tom Brickner requested a rezoning of the vacant property located south of Sandee's Restaurant and west of Central Avenue from C-1, Local Business, and C-2, General Business, to R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling in order to construct a 48 unit, three story apartment building. This rezoning request was similar to the one before us today; however, it requested a rezoning to R-3, Multi-Family and was essentially an island of R-3 zoning, surrounded by commercial and industrial properties. Ultimately, it was denied based on the fact that it was spot zoning. . ..,...�.o�_ ��.�i.� �� azsz x�� >:. '�ass � � � � � �s saas { 'c M � K� _ C3 /� � �{�� j �.� ,%� � � �� '�'1� �� "C^, m ..r3 )0 cn sao� ` � �' � � �g 6389 � fidUD :8 s637'3 � 5:, 83�67 � r.' 6355 C 63q$ ; � f ssss 1 s�z� � o � � � �s1s� � � � . Circle signifies that area that was proposed to be rezoned in 1991. ANALYSIS Rezoning Request ZOA #03-02 The petitioner is requesting a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and East Moore Lake Drive. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and industrial zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. The properties requesting the rezoning request are 1282 Mississippi Street (Tamarisk Resources, zoned C-1, Local Business), 6490 Central Avenue (Sandee's and vacant lot south, zoned C-1, Local Business and C-2, General Business), 6400 Central Avenue (Advance Companies, zoned M-1, Light Industrial), 6352 Central Avenue (vacant lot, owned by the HRA, zoned CR-1, General Office), 6300 Central Avenue (Ziebart, zoned M-1, Light Industrial) and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive (vacant land, owned by the HRA, zoned M-1, Light Industrial). The only properties that are proposed to be redeveloped are 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue; the others will remain as they exist today. ..r,,.�.�,.�� .._.�M. ��F� � � o �� ze2 �.�.�, � �. � � � � � � 6459 ~� M� � G8 6449 � G6 " u, � !4 � 6423 ' � Cfl �j f2 � 6411 � m � JQ (n ,6401 --� � 3g 5389 � 6400 .8 6373 ` � 3 r 636q � 1 � .6355; � 634g ' � i 6335 ; ' � °' "R 63z5 � o �, ' Li; 8315 � ; Zoning Map—Shows mix of zoning and properties to be replatted and rezoned. The City's Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. State Statute gives the City the authority to "rezone" property from one designated use to another, so long as the zoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan was developed with resident input taken from several meetings held between 1998 and 2000 and is a `�oo/intended fo help guide future growfh and development of the community...lt is a p/an because it contains goa/s, policies and strategies that all work together, looking to the future and working towards achieving a community wide vision': In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed senior owner-occupied condominium complex and rezoning of the property meet several of the objectives the residents of Fridley identified in the visioning session for the Comprehensive Plan. The area of Old Central between Mississippi Street and Rice Creek Road was identified as an area for future redevelopment. Redevelopment is described in the Comprehensive Plan as a form of community revitalization that transforms undesirable elemenfs into desirable elements fhat reflect the community collective vision. The purpose of redevelopment is to provide the opportunity for more e�cient/and uses and eliminate ine�cient/and uses and under utilized parcels. Redevelopment can also provide an opportunity to build new facilities, meet current market demands and desires of the City, and eliminate incompatible land uses. All the above purposes of redevelopment have the potential of being met with the rezoning of these properties. The Comprehensive Plan specifically states that for this portion of Old Central, "consideration should be made to replacing the current mix of single-family residential and commercial uses with higher density residential development that together with the health club may serve as an attractive residential/ocation for move-up housing". The Comprehensive Plan also states that for projects in these redevelopment areas requiring rezoning that the S-2 zoning designation "wou/d be the appropriate Zoning district to impfement for the redevelopment project. The intent of the districf is to provide the City with site plan review authority fo determine if the proposed project meets the goa/s and objectives of the Cify's Comprehensive and Redevelopment Plans". The Comprehensive Plan, in both the Future Land Use & the Housing chapters, addresses the desire for a variety of housing types in a number of goals listed below. • Ensure that adequate opportunities exist for the development of a variety of housing types at a range of affordability levels including low, low-moderate and high cost housing to meet the life-cycle needs of Frid/ey residents. • Create sustainab/e, se/f-reliant, mixed-use and mixed-income neighborhoods that contribute positively to fhe quality of life and image of Fridley. • Ensure a variety of housing types for peop/e in all stages of the life cycle. • Strengthen neighborhoods and improve upon the quality of the Cify's housing stock. • Diversify the housing supp/y to include move up housing both in the form of rental and owner occupied housing. As Fridley's residents continue to age, demand will increase for "empty nester" and senior housing. There will be an increased demand for senior rental, senior owned condominium/town homes, and assisted living facilities. The proposed project, 55 senior owner-occupied condominium units, will meet some of the current demand for those seniors seeking alternatives to their current housing type. To avoid spot zoning and achieve the Comprehensive Plan's goal for this area, the petitioner has received permission from Advance Companies, Ziebart, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to request the rezoning from their current zoning designations to the S-2, Redevelopment District. Plat Request#03-08 Town Center Development, LLC, is seeking to replat the properties located at 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue to create two separate lots. One of the newly created lots will accommodate the Sandee's Restaurant, and the other will be used to allow for the construction of a 55-unit owner occupied senior condominium development. The property at 1282 Mississippi Street is currently zoned C-1, Local Business. The existing building was constructed in 1952 and is currently being occupied by Tamarisk Resources. The property at 6490 Central Avenue has a split zoning of C-1, Local Business and C-2, General Business. Sandee's Restaurant occupies the northeast corner of the site and the remainder of the property is vacant. The proposed replat will consist of two lots; Lot #1 and Lot #2, Block 1, Town Center Development. Rezoning a property to S-2, Redevelopment District allows for the maximum flexibility for a redevelopment project; however, City staff asked the petitioner to design their project to try to meet the zoning classification codes most similar to their � . . intended use. The proposed Lot #1 will accommodate Sandee's restaurant. Restaurants are typically zoned C-2, General Business. Proposed Lot#1 is 24,525 square feet in size, which exceeds the minimum lot area requirement for the C-2, General Business District. Proposed Lot#1 also meets all the parking requirements for size and number of parking stalls required for a restaurant use. Anoka County has had the opportunity to review the proposed project and has stated that additional right-of-way on Central Avenue and Mississippi Street will be required for future reconstruction purposes. They anticipate that a 120 ft. right-of-way corridor will be required for both Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersections in order to provide the necessary turn lanes for future safety and operational purposes. The County assumes when the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection is reconstructed, it would be centered in the 120 ft. right-of-way corridor. Consequently, roadway right-of- way dedication needs for this site are 27-30 ft. adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 ft. adjacent to Central Avenue. Therefore, the County is requesting that at this time, both of the right-of-ways be dedicated. Due to the necessity of the right-of-way acquisition along both County Roads, the Sandee's restaurant building will be less than 1 ft. from the north property line, 3 ft. from the east property line, and the parking setback will be 5 feet from the north property line. The additional land acquisition will also require the petitioner to remove his existing patio area on the north side of the building. As stated above, due to the flexibility allowed in the S-2, Redevelopment district, the diminished setbacks can be recognized under this rezoning master plan approval. m, ,�� r .�� •s i � �„ �..'�°°�,�'. �a. 3 ��, � ��r-r-� � t�� „r�' �,. �'� d�i. � �� _; ya � _.�un� .e.� -as��'-'��" '' `"L., . .,. .,, F �* „. . a '� !�, �,"t�i . . .. � ,., , _. - � # �+' ��, - �w. . �-«,. ±� �, ° �.r� � ��' ..' �', . � '. �.� L�, �"�.'ri q�,° �g" .e��_�� {��. �, ' Y��".�,. ;'C �' ,v "'� �''.�� r�� ?� � f�4.' r,'> '� # „,x �'�i� � � .-b ,� ' „+^ � � � t ��i .`v a E '' t {�`�° ��f�*'`�� s� �� s�' . � & . Y � t��. "o �xs�'..� � �rk�t �lr �,.� t �� y�"�,;�� "`�w° f�^T� ,Q � �?�� p �� ',� �� rr�` '"E��.t,� � y��,� :��,�" � t'w�"�� 4'� '�"�� '� � � N�+,d��""�` �.a�,� a4 D �'t'�� ,y '�i +� �, s.:.��"n! m`'=�� ,��'� { i �' �'„��,� r, �i��`�;�� "°�"�, �' a�,` � ,y..��.,2.� . a�tu �p��..rr �"` +, � �,,�t�� '*� k�� _ �, � z ; a� � � t".. ,.�-, -,�� , �� , � �x�,��.,�� *��' �"'N��' ¢,�; ��=�..� -.: ''�� s= vn �a'��.� +�'+'i''t'1`�" � : �tT �:`�' �9 �c� � '� >.� #�d r � ��` � �# .s��- � � z° ; � � ,,,, �a r; h ��'�r�a�' ^� .� �^� �", � u'� � �� ' �`� ;�� - �',�ri � i x�`��. �':�.� � �' � p � �id�`�� t� E � � � ��,;x y ,� _. . � `�Y..��^ - .a �� ... �� . . ...��.. �'"'".'3._.�.. .,"s're.w'�`.�', . �.. The proposed Lot #2 is 126,075 square feet (2.89 acres) in size. The petitioner is proposing to construct 55 senior owner occupied condominium units. The development will include 51 underground parking stalls and 4 garage stalls located at surface level. Because of the underground parking and the high water table in this area, the height of the building will be 51 feet at the midspan. The parking setback will be 10 feet from the property line on the east side of the property, due to the additional right-of-way being acquired by the County. TRAFFIC Staff utilized a number of sources to determine the possible impacts that 55 senior owner occupied condominium units may have on the local traffic patterns. In addition to discussions with Jane Pemble, Anoka County Traffic Engineer, staff examined the Institute of Traffic Engineer's Trip Generation, consulted the Transportation chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and reviewed the traffic study supplied by Loucks & Associates. Anoka County City Staff contacted Jane Pemble, Traffic Engineering Manager at Anoka County, who stated that currently the County has no plans or allocated funding to reconstruct, provide safety improvements, or signalize the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection. Political and social pressures may determine when the intersection is re- worked. She also stated that it is not clear whether or not this development will have a significant impact on traffic volumes and/or turning movements. In order to determine the impacts, a traffic study for this particular intersection will need to be done. Institute of Traffic Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation The 4th Edition of ITE's Trip Generation manual does not have a specific category for SENIOR RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOMES. As a result, Staff reviewed the traffic generation numbers for RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS. The RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS are not age specific, meaning that the numbers provided include persons of all ages and family sizes living in condominium style housing. As seniors may have very different driving habits (ie. may be retired and rarely drive, or choose to drive at the least busy times of day) the numbers presented by the ITE Trip Generation manual may be viewed as a worse-case scenario for the number of trips to be generated by the proposed development. The ITE Trip Generation manual states that for residential condominiums, each unit generates 5.85 trips / day. A trip means any vehicle entering or leaving the complex. For example, leaving for work & then returning from work would count as 2 trips. Given the 55 units, it would be expected that a total of 322 vehicles would enter or leave the complex during the course of a day. When the data is further analyzed, by time, the impact of these vehicles on the surrounding roadways is negligible. During the morning rush hours of 7-9AM, an additional 24.5 vehicles are entering or leaving the neighboring roadway (Old Central) over the finro-hour timeframe. During the afternoon rush hours of 4-6PM, an additional 30 vehicles enter into or leave from the complex. The following table summarizes what the ITE Trip Generation manual states a residential condominium complex generates for traffic during peak rush hours. ITE PEAK HOUR TRIPS/UNIT TIME # of Tri s / Unit # of Units Total Vehicle Trips 7-9 AM .446 / Unit 55 Units 24.5 Tri s 4-6 PM .561 / Unit 55 Units 30 Tri s Comprehensive Plan —Transportation Chapter The City's Comprehensive Plan indicated that in 2001, the portion of Old Central adjacent to the proposed senior condominiums carried 8,000 vehicles per day and, at this traffic level, was only carrying 57% of the traffic for which the roadway was designed and constructed to function at a Level of Service (LOS) D. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates Old Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the year 2020, based upon increases in population for Fridley & surrounding communities, as well as redevelopment and reinvestment within Fridley. At 10,000 vehicles / day, Old Central will be carrying 71% if the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. Review of Loucks & Associates Traffic Analysis Town Center Development hired the Engineering & Planning firm of Loucks & Associates to perForm additional traffic analysis. The consultants viewed the numbers for RETIREMENT COMMUNITY in the ITE Trip Generation manual and determined that the proposed complex would generate a total of 165 trips per day. As the condominiums are available for those over 55, a number of residents may still be working and the retirement community numbers may be low. The true number of trips per day likely falls between the 165 trips/day generated by a RETIREMENT COMMUNITY and the 322 trips/day generated by the average RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM complex. A full copy of the consultant's report has been attached for your review. STAFF RECOMMEDATION City Staff recommends approval of Rezoning Request ZOA #03-03 and accompanying site p/an for the senior building and Sandee's site, with stipulations. � Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Provides housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. City Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat for PS#03-08, with sfipulations. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests, above. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1, dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering Firm. 2. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Ex#erior remodeling plans for Sandee's to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Patio on the north side of Sandee's to be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 7. Petitioner to provide clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. Existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 10.Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 11.Restoration of bike path along Central after will be required after completion of senior complex. 12.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run- off and management. 13.Storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 16.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 17.Petitioner to pay any required Park Dedication Fees. 18.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22.The petitioner to provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 23.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County . 24. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. • - . •- TO: Paul Bolin Planning Coordinator Fridley City Planning Dept. RE: Rezoning to S-2 District Dear Mr. Bolin; The purpose of this letter is to explain the reasons we feel that the rezoning the site at the corner of Mississippi and old Central Ave. should be changed from C2 & C3 to S2 is as follows: 1. The S2 district will allow for mixed uses and provide the area with , more flexibility for redevelopment. 2. The area we are targeting has never been developed for just that reason. 3. The need for development in this area is very apparent and will be very compatible with the neighborhood and will help all the businesses in the area. 4. With the senior home ownership building and remodeling of Sandee's Restaurant, the area will take on a completely new look and enhance this business area. If there are any other questions that I can answer, please feel free to call me at (763) 416-0002. Yours truly, , � Richard Whinnery Town Center Development, LLC 13750 Reimer Dr. • Maple Grove, MN 55311 • 763-416-0002 • Fax: 763-420-6831 • - . •- TO: Paul Bolin Planning Coordinator Fridley City Planning Dept. RE: Replating Dear Mr. Bolin; ,�'� . %i The purpose of this letter is to expl�in the reasons we feel that the replating the site at the corner of Missis,sfppi and old Central Ave. should be changed from Lot 1, 2 & 3 for Sandee,�'s Restaurant and Lot 1 for Tamarisk as follows: 1 The present site is pla d into 41ots. : 2 The new plat will be lots, one lot for Sandee's Restaurant and one lot for the seni r building. If there are any other que tions that I can answer, please feel free to call me at (763) 416-0002. Yours truly, ' /� � Vt� ,� Richard Whiz�iery Town Cent�r Development, LLC , ,,� � �✓ 13750 Reimer Dr. • Maple Grove, MN 55311 • 763-416-0002 • Fax: 763-420-6831 CITY OF FRIDLEY � FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PREVENTION PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS FOR TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT 6300 block Central Avenue,N.E Plans Reviewed: Commission 03-476, Dated 1 October 2003 Note: Plans are not signed See Plan Comment# 16 Plan Comments 1. Add to "Codes and Regulations" in Page T1: 2000 International Fire Code (IFC) with Minnesota Amendments (Minnesota State Fire Code) 2. Construct fire apparatus access roads to permit Fire Department access to within 150 feet of all portions of build.ing exterior first floor wall OR equip the complete structure throughout with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 3. Fire apparatus access shall have an unobstructed width of twenty (20) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches. Turning radii along apparatus access shall be 28' minunum. Note: a. Drive lane island off Central Av restricts required access width and must be removed b. Tree/landscape island obstructs vertical clearance and access width to front of building. 4. Owner shall post approved "No Parking Fire Lane" signs along curbed areas which obstruct maintenance of fire apparatus access and as designated by Fire Marshal. 5. Provide utiliry/site plan showing available fire hydrants in immediate area of proposed development. 6. If the fire sprinkler option is Section 2 is chosen: a. Locate a fire hydrant not more than 100' from Fire Department connection. b. Fire sprinkler system water supply and domestic water supply must be split outside the building. c. Fire Department Connection shall be a 4" Storz connection. d. Elevator pit and equipment room shall be sprinkled , e. Install a power shunt for fire sprinkler system in elevator equipment room £ Establish sprinkler system flow and tamper alaxm monitoring through a central station monitor g. Ciry of Fridley FD plan review and permit required for fire sprinkler system installation 7. Provide Class 1 standpipes throughout building as required 8. Install fire extinguishers as required 9. Install exit lighting as required 10. Install emergency egress illumination throughout exit system (access, e�t and discharge) 11. Install an approved fire alarm system throughout building including a fire alarm annunciator panel in front entry 12. Establish alarm zones as approved 13. Install smoke detection as required in building and dwelling units 14. Provide adequate ventilation throughout parking garage area. 15. Provide Fire Depart�nent access to basement parking area from FD vehicle-accessible area to each wing 16. Provide certified construction plans for review by this office prior to plan approval. NOTE: Construction materials and methods are not adequately shown to prepare a thorough building plan review 17. Note: Combustible material may not be stored in boiler, mechanical or electrical equipment rooms 18. Install lock box at an approved location Note: This reveiwer did not see significant changes from conceptual plans previously submitted and reviewed. Therefore, many items within the scope of the Fire Marshal's office remain unchanged. -�0O H�mlock Lanc Suiir .;{)(l October 29, 2003 ��. , :,,,i �� MEMORANDUM 5�:;60 Planning TO: Stacy Stromberg, Planner ,��i -� ;.,��; ,;�„ City of Fridley Civil Engineering i;. �i _a 55„ F7-� Land Surveying it�M. �1V1C�H�1.g811� I��nmc(�+'loucl:;m:la�.in�r,m �� Senior Planner�� Landscape Architecture �.,�,:.,,�i„��:�i:;�,�.�!.,��.��,:,,,,, � � - � Environmentai RE: Traffic Study for Town Center Elderly Housing �;' � Fifty (50) units of senior housing are proposed on a parcel of land on�-the west side of Old Central Avenue NE(County Road 35) south of Mississippi Street,(County Road 6/106) in the City of Fridley. You have requested that a traffic study be conducted to determine the impact of the proposed project on traffic levels in the area. As part of the study you have requested that the impact on traffic levels also be determined if the site were used for office rather than housing. The following schematic shows Minnesota Department of Transportation average annual daily traffic levels (AADT) for 2000 for each of the four legs of the intersection of Old Central Avenue NE and Mississippi Street. The schematic also shows projected levels of traffic and percentage increase in traffic if the site were used for 50 units of senior housing and alternately 41,250 square feet of office space, the amount that could be accommodated on the site. I 9,000 AA�4DT I 9,033 �;4% increase) with Senior Units I 9,14�°`�(1.6% increase with Office I 6,500 AADT I j 4,700 AADT 6,582 (1.3% increase) Sr.UnitI i 4,714 (.4% increase)with Sr. Units 6.853 (5.4%increase) Office I 4.771 (1.5%increase) with Office C I Mississippi Street e XXI�roject O n XXI� Site 1 t ,.� d r �'` I 7,800 AADT a I 7,833 (.4% increase) with Senior Units 1 � I 7,941 (1.8% increase)with Office Estimated daily traffic enerated from the senior housing ("Retirement Community") is 165 and from the offi e ("General Office") is 706 (Institute of Transportation Engineers). Estimated traffic generated was split 50%west on Mississippi Street, 20% north and 20% south on Central, and the remaining 10% east on Mississippi Street. � � � T E�� .� a/jir�°s: ,�linnc��uliti. tir. P;tul . .... � COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHV�/AY DEPARTIVIENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE SLVD. N.W., ANDOVER, MINNESCTA 55304 ��.T�T.� A �763) 862-4200 FAX (7631 862-4201 1�1 Z�-� �o�JT�� i � September 22, 2003 Stacy Stromber� Citv of Fridlev 6�31 University Ave. N.E. i-ridley, Nt�i »43? RE: Proposed Site Plan- Sandy's Restaurant�4c Senior Housin� Dear Stacy, We have reviewed the site plan for Sandy's Restaurant & Senior Housina, to be located in the S�V quadrant of CSAH 35 (Central Ave.) and CSAH 6 (Mississippi St.) �vithin the City of Frid(ey, and I offer the fullowinb comments. Additional right-of-way on CSAH 3� and CSAH 6 will be required for future reconstruction purposes. While other portions of CSAH 3� have been reconstructed within a 100ft corridor, it is anticipated that a 120ft right-of-�vay corridor will be required for the CSAH 35/CSAH 6 intersection in order to provide the necessary turn lanes for safety and operational purposes. At this point, it is assumed that whenever the CSAH 35/CSAH 6 intersection is reconstructed in the future, it would be centered in the 120ft right-of-way corridor. Consequently, roadway right-of-�vay dedication needs for this site are 27- 30ft adjacent to CSAH 6, and lOft adjacent to CSAH 35. The right of access along CSAH 35 and CSAH 6(with exceptions for approved access locations) shalt be dedicated to Anoka County. With increasin� traffic volumes and conDestion, the importance for limited access to county highways cann:,t be overstated. L::n:±:ng access is critical in minimizins highway congestion and is the single most important factor in reducing accidents on highways. As proposed,there are two access points to both CSAH 3� and CSAH 6,which is excessive for this site. The City should work with this developer to reconfigure this site plan and limit the number of direct access points to the county highway system. From a county highway perspective, it would seem reasonable to remove both access points on CSAH 6 and combine access on CSAH 35. For your consideration and use,we have prepared two sketches of revised access concepts for this site, one involving right turn lane construction on SB CSAH 35, and one without CSAH 35 turn lane construction. It is not clear if the proposed addition to this development will have a significant impact on traffic volumes and/or turning movements on CSAH 35/CSAH 6. As noted above, Anoka County has no plans or allocated funding at this time to reconstruct, provide safety improvements, or signalize the CSAH 35/CSAH 6 intersection. If the City of Fridley is concerned about safety or operational issues on CSAH 35 and/or CSAH 6 in conjunction with this development, the turn lane construction and/or intersection sianalization shall be completed as a part of the adjacent development. If any such county hijhway improvements will be required for Affirmative Action/ Equal Opportunity Employer . � this development, the design details, pavement sections and turn lane confi,urations shal( be reviewed and approved by this department as a part of the permit process. It is our understandinQ that there are also plans for another senior housina project in this area on the east side of CSAH 3�. Consequently, the City should take into account the cumulative impacts of both developments and their resultant impact on the safety and operations of CSAH 3� and CSAH 6, and base the decision for the incorporation of improvements to either county hiah�vay on those anticipated resultant impacts. Sivht corners in southwest quadrant of CSAH 6/CSAH 3� are deficient due to the existinQ buildina. The site plan sho�vs no chanae to this structure. However, the owner should ensure that no new obstructions are added to this corner. Please note that no plantings or business signs will be permitted within the county right-of-way. Care must be exercised when locatin� si�ns/plantin�s/berms/ etc. outside the county riyht-of-way, so as not to create si�ht obstructions. Detailed drainage calculations must be submitted along �vith a grading and erosion control p(an that delineates the draina�e areas for this site. The post-developed rate of discharge shall not esceed the pre-uev�ioped rate o*cli�cnar�e zo:the l�i-Y"ear rrequei�:;y 5�orm, utiiizi�b fne "Ra�iona.e �ietnou-'of design to determine the rate of discharge. It should be noted that residential land use adjacent to highways usually results in complaints rejarding traffic noise. Traffic noise at this location could exceed Noise Standards established by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Anoka County policy regarding new developments adjacent to eYisting counry highways prohibits the eYpenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures. The City and/or the Developer should assess the noise situation and take any action deemed necessary to minimize associated impacts at this site from any traffic noise. A permit for work within the county right-of-way is required and must be obtained prior to the commencement of construction. License Permit Bonding, methods of construction, design details for turn lane construction, work zone traffic control, restoration requirements and follow-up inspections are typical elements of the permitting process. Contact Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator, or Josie Scott, Permit Technician, for further information regarding the permit process. Installation of permanent traffic control devices deemed necessary within the county right-of-way for this proposed development will be coordinated, installed, and maintained by this department as part of the permit process. Thank you for the opportunity to_comment. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane K. Pemble Traffic Engineering Manager Yc: CSAH 6 +CSAH 35lPLATS/2003 Mike Kelly, Chief Right Of Way Agent Larry Hoium, County Surveyor Rojer Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator Josie Scott, Permit Technician Tom Hornsby, Traffic Services Supervisor- Si�ns .o IVIC�:;uh�V � O�� a�r G70vG� J�'C- _-'JJ 1 : 1Jh'!.1� !�'�C�.Q G/L ..., �:tia---��ntis . �-(�—��_ � J.i—�c_�� BY � . �{ ��V.� '� GUS -" � DQ 1 . � � MV.�ae . 1 �!`�{S I S S I ( ' S � N��— � '"l .� -�!----�z _ � q � � � ,� .�;. D • � ,O. ,` ►. ' �� f� ,� t r— i ` �, I ' �� I '� � 50 I ( � � � � � �� ° � � � � . -,l 1 r — 1 � � , I � — � � i — � � 3 { ' r-- � �� ' 1 ; ( cn � Q- �-— ! � � u�. ! i�--- I � � � � �o+cE rs c.�c-r�% � �-— � I � • , � � f 'REST Ci UME�~ j �, �--— � � I . � • r ,JG- , i...-� I � I I ; Q � � �t-— ��— ' ! ��' � i Z � � � � '� ` ,_ I p } � � 6::,,� _ � � � f " � f .i I ! ' --� _�—_� � , f � f -�-�:� �� - _ � � � �1 I _ � _ �Y: I , ...., . ' .� � ! � � � � �«—, � '� — `,. � T�.a� � � i T f � ' � .+v.�aazo 1� '- ; ! � � � ..� E _.1._� f � _ .ar�rw�a�� ' I ' J;�l . ----- ---- - � � - m I ..�rwo�st st�nw �� ° � t � f s � '; , � '� I 6--� � � ' � I �csa5�+/■ � ; �I NFST Ci UrE�� i � I —�—� ' � A `/ I,f + ^ y�� / �� I / � 17 i, � �e/ ' r � s �� ! �'y ; � � v ,� �'� � ^ , � - l�, I I I � ; � � � � I � I � � �_ '_ -., '* - -y� � d r �°"-- ;� � v r �� + = i `� ( "` —�'� ' i ,'n � � �, E ` ^ � , � � I �� - 3 �, � 1 � ' � v � oK�oF o�arao � ' '�� ' � b'►�AST IBC110M �' �/ _— � � ,�� y �__ � f , --_ � i ro � rv+cf rs ao rr, ; �_ �+ �� fe• , wrsr w u+c--' w�►�NM� � I � / � � \ �� _ ✓ � — _� Y ) �vJ�� C� , ' � �, +� ( '�r„ ., 1 y J s �; � I _ ;4 � � � '� "� , � �! � � � � I mec � ""'"`� �. < ( .� (� �rrL O � Iwl s M�a � � � Ei� _' � � i ' t ( ," -, � --- - , . � I rn � W iR:C.P±RP£-� f ,.. � � - • . .��_ . -��.a ` . .,. .. .. .. . -�:' ``i�� _ ...�� .� � � � f Y �i if � --_� _____ - - �� j �� _ 1, �n:«� z.� .�- _,� � 50 ! so � �;j �esr a:�c- I .,- �i� � I �e�irr a�°uc' 3�� `, � I �a0.�-' t �� _ I� „ i:; ' ` [ ' 11rYV.� V 4�� i � N � t SAN. W �� '��-�'� � �t ��_��'. .J I'r'I l.'�r-1 l:i=.I`J .i J i 4�! �.r-�.�'1 L � v � � ' ... i � � . � 7 �� ' G _ J..�.�1 I"CZS'� G:�� . � ...... W��"� �" � =u fj}'�89#' I � :U —'}�v.�S'��GS ....' , � NV.�aE _ O . �� _ . - "�� yl��ss�ss� � ' � �� . _. �'_' - � � �� 'l .��. � �� , �y (-� � I � 1 ` ' � ' p r— �_ � � i f � �1 :,� �. _ � � �� so � ! i � I,t�U `•� �� , � _ ';, , �-- I t N� ! �r.� � ; I ;' , 1 � °� � I — � /� J � �— ' �� . I !� � I I V� N � � � � . .I,' � T L _ ^ ! � — � M � � ' � I y ` � �t?w�rs c� :� ' � � ��_-" j ' �— I 1 � ' — � _ � f 1 i � ' � �.� _ t ,. �—�--, � ! , O � t— _ ►_ L I � � � ' I ,L � i i z � � �-, �,,�_- ,. , , ' � � � v � ,- _—x--� ( ; � I i �:� "''�� _ _ � � , � i i .� i � '�: ,! ' —'_�_�� _ �-� � i � _ ( R--- � ,__ � _ �-: - � , w ( � .«-, : , . , � - �_._. .._ _. •, _ J, . •�.a � _ � �Tt ,� � ., nV.�031.0�' ; I 1 , � � I i q , I _ ��7 f ! �� t� M`�- � ! �c rtr a ora,.w I .6'1�iY�6T�lCT1C11'� i � � ,' ———— —————-�... + 'A� � i � �a rwa.E f� I � L� � — � � v �j , I ' � ; , f � � ', j - � ' , .��a:s, %' � � ' � � - I; I .esT o�,,,e-' � _—_ _— __ _ � � � � + l -- � i I ! � � !- �� ' � � � � ,. < < , - � �- � � � � . � � � � �,� �� !� :� � �; ��- � � ; f �� ,� . � � i , � � � �� - . _ _ . � � �� f C� �� -� __ _ r r � �* _r` ��._ . ; v � � � �� : - , � � � � � :� � � �' � � "' �;: � — ! a � � ' � � � � I � , �. � �,o.��„a � — � I �� .� � � _r , ----- .,' i r'o+cF rs as r�/ ' � `- '� �� •' � � f � � 1 rTsr v�rc-.. ; i - g : '�"aca'"""" } � � l � �.-I �g � ► � f , _ r.... � , / � �.— — -� + � �, � J � _ � �.,� � � 1 y I `' , � � -' , t ; I � � ' I 1 y r � V .t , ►��[O ' M��L a� f �'� G. I f z � � ---- - � / �� -. _i � � � �' ' i ,� �' � � _�W � P'RP[_/ ��j� �. ..� .. _. - '�� .��... . � . � � � a�.a ,�y,-', � -�k.. ��_-��-~--' � � — � � �lNCe� zs f. . +:... .�J.i � Jr0 � '� I VEST OF:A.E� � � II., FE)/CY IS 0.i fT � ^ �l/TY JF IJE�� I ( . 1 FDCE K 0.P FT � I � 9artw a u+e-' �i� v � � � ^�s � — f i ( t�YP. ' T I SAM. IM i ��I �CP—aed.i I � � M V_—yM�.I ! I � MCLAGAN Plaming•Civil Engirieeri�•tand Surveying LaMuape ArchitMure•Env'�ronmenlal•Archaeology 70 East Thonpwn Avenue-Sui1e 205 SaiM Paul,Minnesaa 55119-318] I I PREL/M/NARY PLAT OF T�""°"`:`5,..5""5 Faa:651.457.861I www.loucksmclagan.can - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � ' , .` � TOWN CENTER �ProectName: f- — - — — — - ANOKA COUN , M/NNESOTA ------�. ._ _.,�__ , e , ,- _ _ _ _ �, �..°:.: �;,-�,�,�t��,.;.,rz:;�.�`__ .� _ __ _. -� - ,<,-- -- ,,.� ___ �OW R ^ . ' ' N �- l '�: ;42.JL �_ �., } �_ - ' ' " - - - FRIDLEY � --�- ., ,.—� , �: � 7Aississi�dpi,,_.�'t`_._-1V�' -- , � - �- r - � h - _"_ . ._"_...__ � � � � �_ _ �� i 1 � I I : [ � _ q __._ J. '__ -�J � — ... ...-en�' ... ..:.. . ........... . .............._.. ...... .. ..,+�Ts�.:.�X-��..�1�'/`:__ . ...... .. _.. � ,. t I � . . ...,... . . � g �— � f� �--- fi�-4 vs � , ��. �} G�.a '. y\ _ I � - � � -Roposed OramoFje&.'Lblity Easemmt'-�C --"1�� '� � , � LEGAL DESCRIPTION ---�,+.� � i �k r j5 j� ' ` i j o ._.f� ` � � Lots 1,2,and 3,Auditors Subdivision No.88,Anoka County,Minnesota FRIDLEY,MN 1 I I . ��Q56 ACR£S I` g _..___,_ � � � ; "i I f I � er Deve Name: \ � `' � � TOWN CENTER � > . , ,�. ,—,— � � � i I�- i i�,�', OTES '—; :," " ' ' "` �� `� I L------_��.��or---- J�� L1=� � PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL N REALTY,LLC , �„ , .., . , . • --—+-—--------,-��a SURVEYOI� OWNERlDEVELOPER: V �----- � �; I MAPLE GRO EE MN 5311 �� , ;_ __ _. ;n ' � ; .� � Loudcs Assodates,Inc. Town Center Realty,LLC I ,:'' � � ___, - -_ . _ ,_�, ' 300 � __;, ._._ �` �, ; '' �. :,: "i ' i , I 7200 Hemlodc Lane,Suite 13750 Riemer Drive �� --- - - � � �, u�9�.-s� �� ; i ` i -� Maple Grove,MN 55330 Maple Grove,MN 55311 v.n�n„c k. ^Y..4J f0' 76.�Z4-�J�JO�J 10 � �� j; � � � �c, I � �- —..___ _ +.1_�E�._ j �,N,i i _ _p-- I F�; � DATE OF PREPARATION: ' ' CADD ua i icalion: � _- " �M,t�c�.�or r,4� �o � I `- � A ust 29,2003 ��o�,�,�^"�°a��,�„�'�"a••,"'° � 7 .cNrn z�rs.on v�t a�tnd , : � � . I; � I, . I : Pa�.c,.ee.s..,..,�a.a � :�'� �`�.�"°�a�.e o"w.�'r,tic�m':. __��_'.. � I� ' I BENCHMARK: w�'d�+e�m�n�an.c�o"`�oa:..o ' r i I I. _ _.._ �a ; �..��e""+,..w...,�,.�"��..r+,� � i -+o - � � Top nut of hydrant on the west side of Central Avenue as shown hereon � �,�.��..,�.v � � i ;; ;�<;,�;; y';.., .,;:' i o w N ; � Elevation=886.47 Feet(NGVD 29) �� W . � i o� b �'' I ' �� $U611111Ia�: \ � � ; ; � �Zone G and GG: ; � i I� i �� " � BIOGk 1 f� i � � c � I+ c a i � i i i i�� ' I PROPOSED ZONING: „. „ i � ' � i i w ; Zone S-2 - a � ' � ' �"' ° �2 � �- � Pro essiona$i nature: ' � i 289 ALR£S ! ; "�� I � ,. i n..nr�nM n.n:.a.�,�a.�.o � � � I _.--,—_-1 , I w�w�aMm.aw.mva�enww�.a�.�ax. IsnaOulyU�etll�rtlSunapruMSNqw I � r I oltlwSUbcfMerr�f�. � ` f I 4 I -'-"-' � � ` I I Rkhardl.LicM-l5 � . I I 36]7< 6/1920D3 I - I � Liceme No. Date I I I I �' ua i Contro: I � � SEF RDT i � � � i i LEGEND P� a Y � � _ i �.,� ; � ; � a r.� STORM MANHOLE SANITAR7 SEWER � I _ -----'^" � � SANITARY MANHOLE - WATERMAIN eel n ex: . _.,.c_ . .. 40 I ..� l+�/l�• •• � � r C0.1 COVERkiEEf � �< �F � I � WATER MANHOLE � �-UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE : ,�io ci-i cumriccorminoNs �--- -�,-=• •,. -, _ NORTH cZ-i srren.w �� i�� ' .,s��t y 5.»w Ease„e�t � I GAS VALVE - -UNDERGROUND GAS �� •• ' r `v�-Pr osed Ormnog &Uf lity Easemmt-. ry � _. No.4IS19� 0=1 QU�ING�RAINAGE -- � Z84 � ' 0 50 100 TELEPHONE MANHOIE �- --FORCEMAIN _ aeaosionconreo� :^��:.��. � � ��..�� . I _ ( . � � csi oeManori� TELEPHONE PEDESTAL OVERHEAD UTIIITIES � pi,�N � r y�- f� 1�i�i i�� f� i i � �r �- t- �n� I I I -. LIGHT POLE ---..-_. •.--CHAIN LINK FENCE Cbt rqEtuur+utYaur � , �� . . ,-.,._ � �� .. �_ ..� .�_�_� . c�-� otrNts � I � I UTILIiY POLE - , --WOOD FENCE u-i rrtE�u.ursvnnT � -�F-F`�( , i, F_ � J SCALE IN FEET ....; GATE vA�VE CONCRErE CURB — Ll 1 PLVJ7ING�ETNIS 6 NOTES , ; �_ .;,, , .,�_ � _ _ , ; � � ,; .: HYDRANT CONCRETE — � I I ' �� I �-"� SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR — � I ' �`"' i .': TOP OF WRB EDGE OF WOODS = 6 LOCUST -(� COTTONWOOD eet Tu e: .-,'�," SPRUCE ':'-'_ ELM ,- ASH PRELIMINARY POP�nR PLAT ; MAPLE Pro�ect No.: 03603 Sheet No.: C6-1 � 9��',\ V � ' � ca , F��w v x a s m e- Z X U � � m b �~�a'� � a a >.�`'o Q� E., S o a =d'��ma c� ,� E- �' a.^ � w m o y� ��m � m.�+W T C�m,..,ro U E"m z p m a a �a�U✓� 9F� N �'S "'S� ' �" y � F >.�F C � ♦ � '<.,.� "F RI.� � � . `��._r�, �r ❑ - �� ' ��,- � ` t �{_ �� -. .��1,,` �- ti� ��_ � � �� f ..� � , �r �' � ti • ......� . _` �.- _ � �� i �i \'} � , � ' y` � .� r_ � _ , ��'� �..-. � . ..... _. __. _ � _„ .,.. ., •�.— ...�. ; --� \ �� ' ,�"'�g l. _ .. -- ,- � _ �—" ��! "� �''�e�� -' � �� __-• • ,��-�` :-� �,. � . � .. .� " �' t � �� - n�^ H�� i�. / t � ` �� f � �, � = ' ��".� � ,� .� _. -�,,�''� :� 'f �� , --_ � � �. � �.� �� . _.: .. _ � � . . . . „.. . ... r��,.�"- �- 4 O �� 'T'N .�y l f i i� 'y`a ( ,��'��Y,,' .- � '� - -' � w , -_ � ..__ _� _ _. . ' ' , . "`a'"�L. t i �'��' J : I • �� . , � c � w•„��. � t .�oo�er�- p1 M ia�a . \ rx _ �-� � +. �_ - ��'. i..... ', . �.. � . s ` � � _�.__eoo:� Ill��t1 F� - - „ . . , _ z\ n ... � . � i �r� w- _ :�- �_. �- , , � ,, � ��:=� �i�r �;�_. f(1� _ �. . - . . _� _ , �, .,� Y . �\ �- :��' -. . .� ='',.j'r r-.,;,r._��`-r:;;�:=- 1 r. �', � � .. � � �, •, ", }�:141trr _4�- _ � �� . _t, � — ' ' � , �3,�r- �s� A� �� /�� s�,�_ � -d ' �" � ,y/ _ �' /i \- � - V�� i 3 "`�. r r�r � '"� ' . ' � � . _ /� /��` .`�� - _� '^ 1� - ��4r�� __ �f �� , . ` . � , i 1�r.,� �4� '�'�+�jk`a r (�.�wa�.��r��i� �'.�� ' ' ' f. . -�� P•�Y�f,�� 1',ft�y= ��-� -__ �""�' .. .. J .- . - - . ,- � � � • ..�1 ,. . . • , _ . _ '�^�f� ,-- � •�, r . ;�'�. ; r .+s . .e-i �� c - . � 1_ ;�, _ � ' •: . �- _ E a e e i x �� _, � . , ; r „� .,, • " � � , . hf _,. . / � � .�� t 11� �j�'t __ � � tt 1 � ! . _va. . ��``.� ._ �. ... � '-' ._.-.'_ . ,__ ._.. /J �?�� '! •�� .,,�.. ��/�'{. :�� .� ~� �� }4��. _ �� . _ , n.+_� �'a� _ - - . ..�� M�.w 'a � .. � ` i�� "_ � � � � , . . . _ . .. _ _ � .�i'. ;:.� • • , �- ' i: � . �: '� _.w � r ��. . .7 Iuul C'�� _ •i , �: �.� �qrtrw� C` . .- .. _ ,,,..�. ��.:s.o , . _ . . -� . .� f' � �<"°* 1}, ' ' � ,'. . ' � � ! f i - .:i ![. ' - �, ; ,�; ,� � ��-_ � � �� cµ , ,+�.� `'� . , . � _ .� , .,,_ , . . _. _ _ ____ . . .�- - ," -� ,t l'' ' .�,�, � . _ �..� , •f,� ,��i, � ..r''`� : :�ji� t{,' - ��"° � i�� l ._ ' i .�:i�Ec:: �d e+��___ _ �E� # ....`��'��'\. , ,- a� . , :-� .-,� � n _ �� ' . . . ..,.. � a- _ ,r.� :," e _� . �i � . _�..3�� i�� ' .r,,=� s-��G-�.. ,��' '� �y.��.� .r a4 t:�.'° ,°S' �'�',g�d i.t, k3� me� "'�� . .o '.u. . . y`�',__ _ - _. � =�--. -.�S•�a _ _-- ��'l�i...;_. - -_ �"' ` r _*-;[� � , �i#3.l�__-; _. . ., ..�7' ^/��1 C.�,.�� L ��wGB�il � � �r�j'� 'R!"_ } �Y.,_.�._ n'r'_-. _ y' " '�. . -=T � � � � ��f �_ t _ .. � -_. i �i .-, � -- _ - a o �� .« �.l� �t�'. �7�.��'" .. � ��. ,' . �'�� ' .- � w. ,_ ..+� i'wr� ~ - � �:+�. �� - �... - - — - - x:' ^ w �n �� g �. �.�. ' a z m m . .- . . . •`R.^a� � ,+�`� 1 � __.... -. ,.,_ i�.�'�'_- ��p;""r' �,` .._c 1 ' �' - .. :'�� ._- � � o o � � � ' . . �'� . z ` ,` ...' . - ' � .:. 9�'K _ _s �. - �., — , '.' 'v, . 1 .� . � t' ��`+� �.."_..�� '�_ . I^.� �� _ .r o V � d _ _ .. ... - ' " . �", -. -.,,�., � ��,�' __ �ic �—�—.�- — c '= '._ � ` ',`�`�:��,. -- ;,.�. � � ., - = m o � z, �.,._ , -� .�_ �.r��: �j,' � _ ..�'"�.."�e , �: � � '. . �t` v S "< �.� *,r"-�+ --.,; K, �,;.:. -.=�-.• - ,� . },. -r_t , ,,�� , R�C,, ___ _�.� 'Y.�`' ""- ``'. `-� .. - � � . , . � � . �,��av/. �` - • � /' r ♦ _ .. � ' ' ' A y �.r„!p`��b►� . . . . . • �i � . �.�. i % �. � f . �'� e � .... . . ' ' --,.:,, •_ .. •� ..... '� "`t�:xx T��V.�l "�1M��1.�� .. S. . _- :,sr:i.+�.,r S:.�r:�;.esrij,.�i_,.;1�Ie.'�I ,� �r � ` � - -�: (.r ,�, �'� s' �p- � •1'=_ �■ .LL'.• �. ,�,..�,r . - _ .. Z a , . .. . _ . �W Z z � � f N Q � 0 = o d � � � d � SHEET CONTENT � COVERSHEET i� T1 '1 � OF 12 �a�� s� � q �� z ��N � m - \ w 0 � �� a _ W F z " I � - � .r' , �- �I w� `� t,:T i � ��r- ' i•�s t l - ��wr.eo�s1 ., -_; _ .� - - _» _....,� . ' L _ � �' �� ' �n . __ .�wrr�r�r--w�w...� � � �� d �° a _ � t '1 tr � .� r' ss+ri1��-�►t1ll��f� .... �;,�+r�qi•, �� .'.�' .a:,� -. ^}�� '<�. `` m°1 TG �� /� � ;a - '�'� �� `3� ' a a, o ._ .. • ,.., � ''i� ...� ' 9 . . � � '�� . � ..i ., .� t� � t . ._. _��j Q'. ��.a� �tr� r��-•H `f�yC �:• •f,rE: '.;9; F�a.�F; I . �,. ��..�: �;�,f1. �� _ _A� .�p�,s� �.- �;,... .b�_.. `!..f �.r-.. _ :'�''• :[;�. ,�,vr�; �' �n.cmQdU m�F .�.�,: � .��. , .. � _� i�. , . . . ... •� y a � ��;�'i^ �'.�'�! ��i:' il��,� �..k��-e�.� ��j��I'��..�` �t�:!` ,.s.l �.+�.ri 'l,�` ) 1, t im��a~ � �"m - s� � �� :� � . {��, F;� . .n, f.� -' ..� �.:� :''.t - �.��;�m' � - �m m m W '„ , . . , a . _. , , � ' : � ''s.wT ,p�� :'- s " ' 1 • t w �. ; r, Y.. t 'i6s... � M[ �j"'....... '1� , , �+t ,q� =■ '�■, "3 a m � .cm z e i};"�...:: �y . +�is_.4�. � � . i .� .` " i. . ^� ��:9 }ir;;ia �. �t •`� �.a ,��'� (.� �^ro �{J�. `!� ..�.. _ ` • a,C�a F z � .� . ,* r '� . . �. _ P .4 � ' .\ ..� I f„�.. �i `�� p� m'"a � ' " ..,�Z. �t ■. ;,,. � .... _i�,. . �r ..! �'(i�, �.r' � r�f .1'Jr . ��a� �� , � .:;�.� La�Y� �F� _ , . .. �. _± .. �_ � � t..� �. . _ �. .. � � • . _ ,f' y +F:� t T• .�� `� ._ L m T�F G N a 'd..,4 .� _. :�'a' •- 5 � ��;M. .. � '� "G... Ar=.T-�S '• " ;.! .. _'_ f. . - _- �w.� � o . . �>. .. �.. ��. a .�R� ' . .� i� � '�, . �� f �. ,.: ' ... ... �. ' y�;. -...e. -..•' ,..a a. ,': ' _ _ � Y � . . }S m R �,� ... } `��_ >:^ , , �,k :L �� ; il .,.. :... •,��._- uy�<., . M �y,. � , � ' � Y`�. - , : .' - - - - .. ,. ,� .:• � *. :. l�s . � —� .y��t. -_ ' :- ,.,�- . r.� « , ,` , , , ' �� - � "E- `� a =� ..-. ''` . ... ■ � . � — _ �� _r ��: . : . ,- �f � ::. ,-. ,__� '� ._��,�_-.�-�:-._: : ,� -- _.� EA51 ELEVATIpN VUHII-I !.LEVAtIi)V �� ' � Z/1 �� .�� L7 -�.�°.!>� W � �n � � �- .. .. � .. . ` _ � _ - . ....: �_ _ .,.. ---, -,. - - - �� .,- . �tww !'- - . . . !'pw, .� . .. - - . y�arr .r _ ... - a �' --` -- � .. _ ., .... . --. '�, ,.. . . .. -.. �.. 1... — �ei u� o ■o � � ■■ e■ .:._ �eii �a _ .-. ,. I �awap�y�,.,,o.,.,�-�r�r+��wa-...�.�-}w�w ,. .,._::._...;s'reN�r' . ��r�y��"..., .:�� _.. � _ _ . .,�,�_�_,��_ - , � � _ __ � � � .... � � _ � � u� �sga ca .�.�; ` , fh CZ3i �•�� rl� �� m�71 �� r ' ' :, �. _ � . . . :Y •' .. � i"� t R - __ � �o 'l ��. t �� -- i r■ - � .e uu n . � t�� s ii � .. , ' ., _ {,+�. .. •. . .... y .� ,.�� .� - � : �w - 4 . '� ,r; ; i .` , . r� � �y : � , !:. , , � , iiii ri _ ry��F`� ■� _ . � � r� a • c i x I ` , ' �� `.. � 7��■ �� ' � � � 4'� , �� , o� � ��a� �� ! 4 i �«wl.� . ��'` � *{r,` '' �``�4'� "�c. s �i � � � � ,��..,, ;,�, ,� s . , �f � ' � �' :�� s •+� `?� .� ,� } ti �r �r v4' � N � _� , . �' 4 � � _� �•7►�Y..�.Y- f. � .c� -��-rT .�� .� . e� '' ��.t.• ��r�, t .�� -� i -� ■� �� a._, • � ,s� � �a� ��Li,Uyy`iRr"b:r?; ,� .r �� 2., � a # ��_ ,� �r?� �,si , _. � �K.�x,�..�.�� -s ' �, •� Qf.�t.;��' � � �' _`4 t;��.�'�J � � }' 1�. � �:�iG � mi0 _ � �'y � fi. • � d��` �i .,i��> d._ . .� ° _ �rv�"` l. -,r'.' '� ::."��9.�--u �-- '� �, ' 'a -�•�—_ ',,,��,,;r '� t t WfST FI FVATION SOJTIi =LEVhTIOY `� � � m .o � m ., r � - .. z Q Q m v+ � x ,:��s ,," ..!11 _ �� -_'-- ' g o pF a i�'!�'"'� � _ `l�v��c_" �� J-- y� 7f%� �� _ _/e"_�� `� o o � � r �a F `-' _ ' �� . � m _ _ O • - - - r ' � ` ` .y�y"'�y'�� ■�: � t�-� � �! ' _ � �'�1.d .{_ �- � ` ' . _ �� - �--� _. , , � � � �� .__ ,-. �1�. � �� —:----� � _ :�- i ^T \_��` �._ , _ ,.,, � , _ ., .- - ---- ; � .. . � E' ��11 ,.,I � 1 — _ „ . ^, '- `� . � � `� ;r, �t� �� 1 'T �.� `' �- .�r.. �r ,�+� �+ r � � a= _ � �� . . �R , ,�-�+r.a y * i ,. .��,_ '°'� `iaau '� +�. . . � ' �:� ,� �� .. . �y � I�`r ' i¢z � �... � a � ,• .1`f_ c * � �-�-�. � .�{.� �+ � . .c`.�f a. :.s -i_ `• � F-'�" F_ ��1� '�' ��4 ��' .� �."�'.�' Vfll!llt4 I �' � , "a s$n �"�.;� . . �ir Xs',� �._� � ti;�:" ,1F � � � y ` .� -:. _ _ ' :. ,�, .. .w.. , . . � , �.. . -.. , � ; r .,. � - y �� — � - - - l ilfb __ � .a , ,-;i� , r 4�it'� tyG�lMF�..5.} .N 1 �, .. � .,�iG , ,5 .♦ �, _ '� .. '� _.p; �„��: . .d.�Mwl R�,s�y�" :s''j}.y _''".� • �-� '! . .�� ' _ ' ' ' '�9,'*a �r 7�'r---- �n ' _ �i �' ^'■ _ eT_L-` �-�- - `� Z � � . . . � _ . `_ . s-,�_ ', ' '� s ' '- - - _ �. � _a . _ � .. .��^ �a. ��s� 1 .;�:L^, ' -r .'• - ✓�, a fi+�- : .r_ • `` - �ist�a.�.',ri� - _. , _ - y,� W � � � .. �� •;. - ■'f�- . .. � . . `,� �.. � i � ..��•�.., •� - � .��. - - - -� . ._ �'f+� '. o �- rM. � . .... � .-. ': �- • t � ��r,,. . ._ _ )-. = V7 Z .. ,' . � � ._ 3 - �'—� . -"__" " Z :s. -. - ,. .. �pq� � . � w _ � ,�. a.`:_., __ w� _ 1 �� _ v1 � ,: , . ��F�Gs -is�"1'� .;- ,. �y�, a e,,,��.�--- � - J - . •• �'•,'�;-G - _.' �' . W � .. .._ . . , 4F _ . s��- �...- -- c G r = _ � � .. . - - � ,>- �. ' j - r.� � _ � . �. s. ,. . "...�: O J ,._�..'-.' . " ��,.- � '� _ '�. __ �_. 6 _. ..� . _..-� . . .. e.. ___ _ ,�. � _ _ �":�'J�'i'i�,... ��.f'��FRWG ICDKIN; ;_��_!T�I:?'E`.T CON�CPT�;A, RFhDERINV ATENTqAh(.-C CO�CCPTUI�I REND�RING LOOKING NO(7TIiViEST Q � � .. • �� . � ��„_,�-�, , � � !� ` „ ,�!!� Ii �:;�:S� , ��;�,- ' ��, ,�� `,�,-. �. ; r� _ .. , , � : n . t.. � . �,�;,; .�" , �. y _ , � .�. 1-� � � �� ,�;Y t �: r :� � � i 3� _- � �.�., :} �t ; � a, �_,,�.:� � � i, �.�,�. _", a t � C��s�. .. ` �_ ' ' ; 4 -� � � � � � '�k �� , �� `�-_� �� '' SHEET CONTENT '�.-,; v , ' � ti �, , ' �,� � �� .' - ' _ �� + �, "� � Fa T _ - � CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS �! �, � . �� E� � �.. _. , . . . � - - , ' � . � + -. . . , 4 „�' +... ,._ � � � .- ►: � . �.. . ;_.._ . ' . .. -_ - -_. . ' � I `. _��' � �,�... �-'��r..� � �- . � -- -- . . _.. . _ � , �' �� `{ - _. ..f�t� ' 32� ` -= . � _,:'� � 14- ` _ - . � _ ..-.. , � � � �Fs� ._ .�4. . \ � ' _.. . ': �. ,• .� + �..-s- ': • -. � .' � s � , y tS� �': - . -s; ;�"�11�� ,4' ,_,. - ""'° ." - .� f, 'ti�' � � � : �t-,y` -�- � .��" 4P . �� _ . � �w ��f. ."♦ . - �`� '- - �,. �' .�tSa. • . , - . ._ •.o-� r::-i�� . .�. r. . .- �ii -M_ C 01'l i F"_;A. RE NUt-� .h'F. A' (,AHF.C,f � ;h; , , , � � .. , � �,� .� ' .. � , T2 �a�,.�„�� 0 F 12 sr-m. zo-m. � � > G� � ° /Z1 J �i � . � o � o � i m �e � � � r o il �, r r o i Z � �i i i i i I � i i a i i e i o I k i � �' o � � I i i I i � J w �� • e ---- i - i a � i a i S o i 6J g k i � I i �`� �� -----------J 2745 �, ;.- _—__—_--_ _— --_______.-�,�-,� ----------; , � ' �. � � . . . � ..,_ . . °, � -- ----- _--- ----- --------- � ,, a ��, A g � --------- , o ; a , - � x , � I o ; ,� � , � , , ' , � i i i STORM POND i -- J i � � ''"` _- _ A � `� // P � � b �� 1 // �� , � � ��` �� ,,_----------'� i, � i '�_��' i ,' > � > � ;� � `.__, � � � - D = ]� . ° . y o � o � �i � � i � . • ` - x - � - � `� �� - m m v�% — - - -- -- - � � T � - � �� O D \ � � � � fff � Romp� r m .�� < i Di � � I �f °' ' ' o z ��t �� o . -- - ' � � � � I � � �I � s �� --� � � � , �; y�/ ; �� i � � � � , ,� spI{; A I II � ��: A—� ., � _ ' i � � � I � ��jZ �l � I N � � J spacas @ 04' 3 "' a �" `� i, � 20�� I_ 9'+1 @ � . �I �. �' I,o � N � 12 39 0 � � i � � � u, 3 spaces @ � N � N N � I1 11 U� O 9-?I O ' 9, I �, ,, a = ,—� ° � � v v < 25 „ � � '1,�♦ � W g \,. .�, � �� e '� � ' � w o N + �� il C �� ' °� �_ � � N� �� ' a � � o � o � � v� ;° � � �o �� _ � i �'�� a N a �� 5 spaces @ °' � �8' S0' I 9'=45' � �' 6ARAGE i�;. -. ��La A� - - ;�'�� I � � � I I_ � . � o � 8 - � � � � ' N 13 spaces @ 10'=130' 9 spaces C 10'=90' `� � -+ 10' a ITi o, 18' 25' 20' 20' 25' 20' 7' 25' 18' ,.�, .�10'0' -0 � r - - p - � ,. _—� � Z v r � N N _.._.. N N p _ 0 o a u�� I � s, � � � m m m M O � � N � � W Pn (P� nP � 7='(� \:: n �i s �i J � � � � s - D _ D I A N P 9 O o O �C o � B D I 0 � I , y�� - A O O O�—�� o0 fn I ,� cn � m � � �\�\ � � i a ,, .r� � �'� � A 1 Q A�1 I 1 �� o, 6 spaces @ 10'=60' N 5 spaces @ 10'=50 ITT � ��. �I� �" � ,� �� K � O . --25-. ' .._ "UI r � � r � � — _ m �� m = N � w�.,� .----.-.. �..._-. D o i � D � � vas O � O ) Z � � Z � � ---- �..�,,�, � ! :�-, ,; : I I l . I .:�. ._�...� �, � i MISSISSIPPI � �.. ;h , .��,�.,�.�; ��. ..._..�� _._ ;�,�„�..-�------ �� _ �.�.�,�:�.�;�.: m �-- - -- ----- �, n m� CO�EM1961ON NUMBER � itig G REVISIONS � � � �� 743 Bnebin 9treel � 'I� 03-476 � �f ThieePlan Was�PreThetd Moka NN 66303 � m � � � �,5� A pare 783/422 8500 S _ By Me Or Under My Fax 783/422-B540 � � _ � PROPOSED SENIOR �^TE �� n Direct 9uperv�efon ,�d 5 '�.C�] � _ That !Am A Duly � �Z � HOUSING 300CTOBER03 "�� - Regietered � �.. m �i� DRAWN BY ARCHITECT �� X Under Thet Lawe Ot � � FRIDLEY,MINNESOTA� PD$ � The 5tate ot � � Oo � APPROVEU BY e� �INNE$OTA � . �, N � y JTK �,� KLICK INTER ARCH DESIGN � �i �9 aetl.-�izee � , , Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 8 � � MOTION by Ms. Johns, seconded by r. Dunham, to recommend to City Council approval of Special Use Permit, SP #03-19, by D vid Bailiie, Furniture Outlets USA, Inc., to increase the lot coverage from 40 percent to 50 per ent, generally located at 5353 East River Road NE, with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shali o tain aii required permits prior to the start of construction. 2. Final �andscape pia showing size of piantings shall be submitted and approved by Ciry staff prior to is uance of a building permits. 3. The parking lot s II be restored to code requirements for paving, curbing, and painting after the addition is completed. 4. No outdoor stor ge of equipment or materials is permitted. 5. Screening of raoftop mechanical equipment shall be required. 6. The petitioner shall comply with all building, zoning, and fire code requirements. UPON A VOICE VOT�; ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. f' Ms. Savage stated tF�ese items will go to City Council on November 24 for final action. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a Rezoning, ZOA#03-03, by Town Center Development, LLC, to rezone property from C-2, General Business, C-1, Local Business, M-1, Light Industrial, and CR-1, General O�ce, to S-2, Redevelopment District, to accommodate redevelopment, generally located at 1281 Mississippi Street NE, 6490, 6400, 6352, and 6300 Central Avenue NE, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a Plat, PS #03-08, by Town Center Development, LLC, to construct a senior housing development, generally located at 1282 Mississippi Street NE and 6490 Central Avenue NE MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Johns, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:12 P.M. Mr. Paul Bolin stated Town Center Development is requesting two tand use actions to construct 55 senior owner-occupied condominium units at 6490 Central Avenue. A plat is being requested to create two new parcels from 1282 Mississippi Street (currently the Tamarisk House) and 6490 Central Avenue (currently Sandee's Restaurant), and the vacant lot just south of Sandee's. Sandee's Restaurant will occupy one parcel, and the other parcel will allow for the construction of the 55 senior owner-occupied condominiums Mr. Bolin stated the petitioner is also requesting a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and East Moore Lake Drive to S-2, Redevelopment District. Currently, there is a mix of commercial and industrial zones. The owners of Advance Companies, Ziebart, and the Housing 8� Redevelopment Authority have agreed to this rezoning request. Mr. Bolin stated Town Center Development is proposing to construct a 4-story, 55-unit senior owner-occupied condominium complex south of Sandee's Restaurant. Sandee's Restaurant will remain but will be remodeled. The proposed 55 2-bedroom units will be owner-occupied. Thirty- , t � � Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 7 Mr. Baiilie stated he had no problem with the stipulations; however, regar ing the parking stall widths, he believed they are 9 feet wide on the plan. Mr. Lee Coppy, Schoell & Madson, the civil engineer on the project, tated the parking stalis as proposed on the submitted plan are 9 feet wide. The reason for th 9 foot vNide stalls is they have a customer pickup area at the rear of the building so there ' no ►oading/unloading in the front parking lot. Those front stalls would just be customer par � g. Mr. Bolin stated the parking stalis need to be 10 feet wide. at is required by the City. He believed that there is enough room on the site to accompli h adding one foot for every stall width. Mr. Michael Diem, Archnet, Inc., stated he is the arch' ect who prepared the site plan. By going to 10 foot wide stalls, he believed they would lose 1 15 stalls. They would lose a partial stall on every row, but they are pretty much maxed at 190 talls right now. So, going to 10 foot wide stalls would bring them under the 189 parking sta requirement. Maybe there is a different parking ratio than 140 that could be considered. ven if they lost 10 stalls, they believe they would still have a lot more stalls than they nee . According to all the studies they.have done, even 1 to 500 square feet would be adequat . How does the City want to handle-ti�is? Mr. Bolin stated that since the building is i an industrial district, it may be possible to have some 9 foot stalls on this site. Mr. Kondrick stated the 9 foot wide sta s would be for employee parking. How many employees will there be? Mr. Diem stated that with total staff there would be around 80 employees. The retail store will be open 10 a.m. —9 p.m. Monday through Friday, Saturday and Sunday hours are usually 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. The customer pic p would be operating every day. Deliveries would not be every day. With a total of 80 e loyees, there would probably be around 50-60 at any one point in time. Mr. Diem stated that if they nly have to put in 10 foot wide stalls in the triangular area to the east which is mostly custo er parking, and the rest can stay at 9 feet for the employees, they may only lose about 5-8 s aces. Mr. Bolin stated staff wil work with the petitioner on the parking stalls. i' MOTION by Mr. Kondy�ck, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing. , UPON A VOICE VO�'E, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIE�`UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:10 P.M. MOTION by Mr. qquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to recommend to City Council approval of Zoning Text Ame�dment, ZTA#03-01, by Furniture Outlets USA, Inc., Inc., to add language to the code for furr��ture use parking requirement (to require a furniture store use to have one parking stall for!every 400 square feet of showroom space), generally located at 5353 East River Road N�� UPON A VO � E VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION C RRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � , � Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 9 one of the units will be 1,138 square feet, eight of the units will be 1,185 square feet, and 16 units will be 1,255 square feet. The development will include 51 underground parking stalls, four garage stalis, and additional surface parking. A storm pond will be located on the south end of the project with a traii system and landscaping surrounding the property. Mr. Bolin stated the outdoor dining portion of Sandee's will be removed. As part of the plat request, Anoka County has requested that the petitioner give the Counry 30 feet of additionai right-of-way along Mississippi Street and 10 feet of additional right-of-way along Central Avenue for future improvements. Mr. Bolin stated that in 1991, Tom Brickner requested a rezoning of the vacant property located just south of Sandee's Restaurant and west of Central Avenue from C-1, Local Business, and C-2, General Business, to R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling, to allow multi-family dwellings. That rezoning would have created a stand-alone island of R-3 zoning surrounded by commercial and industrial properties. That request was denied based on the fact that it was spot zoning. Rezoninq Mr. Bolin stated the petitioner is requesting a rezoning for the entire block on the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and East Moore Lake Drive to S-1, Redevelopment District. Of all the parcels, the only parcels that are proposed to be redeveloped are 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue; the others will remain as they exist today. Mr. Bolin stated the Ciry's Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. The City has the authority to rezone property from one designated use to another as long as the zoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan developed with resident input between 1998 and 2000. The proposed senior owner-occupied condominium complex and rezoning meet several of the objectives the residents of Fridley identified in the visioning sessions for the Comprehensive Plan. The area of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and Rice Creek Road was identified as an area for future redevelopment. Mr. Bolin stated the Comprehensive Plan specifically states that for this portion of Central, "consideration should be made to replacing the current mix of single family residential and commercial uses with higher density residential development that together with the health club may serve as an attracfive residenfial location for move-up housing�'. Tk�e Comprehensive Plan also states that for projects in these redevelopment areas, requiring rezoning to the S-2 zoning designation "would be the appropriate zoning district fo implement for the redevelopment project. The intent of the disfrict is to provided the City with site plan review autho�ity to determine if the proposed project meets the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive and Redevelopment Plans." Mr. Bolin stated that as Fridley's residents continue to age, demand will increase for"empty nester" and senior housing. The proposed project will meet some of the current demand for those seniors seeking alternatives to their current housing types. Mr. Bolin stated staff recommends approval of the rezoning request and the accompanying site plan for the senior building and Sandee's site as the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and provides additional housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. Staff also recommends the following stipulations: Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 10 1. The property shall be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1 dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering firm. 2. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. The petitioner shall meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. The petitioner shall meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The patio on the north side of Sandee's shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 7. The petitioner shall provide a clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. The existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way shall be approved by the County prior to planting. 10. The petitioner shall obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the County right-of-way. 11. Restoration of the bike path along Central Avenue will be required after completion of the senior complex. 12. The petitioner shall identify the ponding area and provide easements for storm water run- off and management. 13. A storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14. The petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15. The City Engineering staff shall review and approve a grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 16. The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 17. The petitioner shall pay any required park dedication fees. 18. The petitioner shall provide the City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19. The building shall be restricted to seniors, and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20. The petitioner shall provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21. The property owner of record at the time of building permit application shall pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22.The petitioner shall provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 23. The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any tra�c improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary to Anoka County. 24. A development agreement outlining the developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the petitioner prior to final plat approval. Plat Mr. Bolin stated Town Center Development, LLC, is also requesting to replat the properties located at 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue to create the separate lots necessary to accommodate Sandee's Restaurant and the senior condominium development. Proposed Lot#1 where Sandee's is located is currently zoned C-1, Local business, and C-2, General Business, and is 24,500 square feet. That exceeds the minimum lot area for the C-2, � Planning Commission Meeting. November 5, 2003 Page 11 General Susiness district. Sandee's lot would also meet all the parking requirements for size and for a restaurant use. Mr. Bolin stated that in terms of the plat, Anoka County has reviewed the proposed project and has asked for additional right-of-way along Central Avenue and Mississippi Street. They figure a 120 foot right-of-way will be required for both Central Avenue and Mississippi Street at the intersections to provide the necessary turn lanes for future safety and operational purposes. Consequently, the dedication needs for this site are 30 feet adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 feet adjacent to Central Avenue. The County is requesting that those rights-of-way be dedicated on any plat. Due to the necessity of the right-of-way acquisition along both County roads, the Sandee's Restaurant building wiil be less than one foot from the north property line, three feet from the east parking line, and the parking setback will be five feet from the north property line. The additional land acquisition will require the petitioner to remove the existing patio/outdoor dining area from the north side of the building. Due to the flexibility allowed in the S-2 district, the diminished setbacks can be recognized as part of the rezoning master plan approval. Mr. Bolin stated Lot#2 is 126,075 square fset in size. The petitioner is proposing to construct the 55 senior owner-occupied condominium units on that site. Because of the underground parking and the high water table in the area, the height of the building will be 51 feet at the r�idspan. The parking setback will be 10 feet from the property line on the east side of the property, due to the additional right-of-way being acquired by the County. Mr. Bolin stated that regarding traffic, staff had discussions with Jane Pemble, Anoka County Traffic Engineering Manager, examined the Institute of Traffic Engineer's Trip Generation, consulted the Transportation chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and reviewed the traffic study supplied by Loucks & Associates. Mr. Bolin stated Jane Pemble has told City staff that the County currently has no plans or has allocated any funding to reconstruct, provide safety improvements, or signalize the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection. Political and social pressures may determine when the intersection is reworked, and it is not clear whether or not this proposed development will have a significant impact on traffic volumes and/or turning movements. Mr. Bolin stated the Institute of Traffic Engineer's Trip Generation manual does not have a specific category for senior residential townhomes. Staff reviewed the generation numbers for residential condominiums which are not age specific. Seniors may have very different driving habits so the Trip Generation manual should be viewed as a worse-case scenario in the number of trips generated by the proposed development. Mr. Bolin stated the Trip Generation manual states that each unit in a residential condominium generates 5.85 trips per day. (A trip means any time a vehicle enters or leaves the site.)With 55 units, a total of 322 vehicles could enter or leave the complex per day. In analyzing the data by time, the impact of these vehicles on surrounding roadways is negligible. During the morning rush hours of 7-9 a.m., an additional 24.5 vehicles are entering or leaving Central Avenue from the proposed senior condominium development. During the afternoon rush hours of 4-6 p.m., an additional 30 vehicles are entering or leaving the proposed senior condominium development. Again, these numbers are not age specific. Mr. Bolin stated that in 2001 in the Transportation Chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the portion of Central Avenue adjacent to the proposed senior condominium development carried 8,000 vehicles per day and, at this traffic level, was only carrying 57% of the traffic for Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 12 � which the roadway was designed to function at a Level of Service D. D is considered the middie ground. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates Central Avenue carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by 2020, based upon increases in population for Fridley and surrounding communities, as well as redevelopment and reinvestment within Fridley. At 10,000 vehicles per day, Central Avenue would be carrying 71% of the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. Mr. Bolin stated Town Center DevelopmenYs engineering consultants, Loucks &Associates, provided the City with numbers for RETIREMENT COMMUNITY out of the Trip Generation manual and determined that a retirement complex would generate approximately 165 trips per day. As the condominiums are available for those over 55, a number of residents may still be working and the retirement community numbers may be low. The true number of trips per day more likely falls between the 165 trips per day and the 322 trips per day. Mr. Bolin stated that City staff recommends approval of the preliminary plan with the following stipulations: 1. The property shall be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1 dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering firm. 2. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. The petitioner shall meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. The petitioner shall meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The patio on the north side of Sandee's shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 7. The petitioner shall provide a clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. The existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the Counry right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way shall be approved by the County prior to planting. 10. The petitioner shall obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the County right-of-way. 11. Restoration of the bike path along Central Avenue will be required after completion of the senior complex. 12. The petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for storm water run-off and management. 13. A storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14. The petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15. The City Engineering staff shall review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 16. The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 17. The petitioner shall pay any required park dedication fees. 18. The petitioner shall provide the City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19. The building shall be restricted to seniors, and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20. The petitioner shall provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 13 21. The prope�ty owner of record at the time of building permit application shall pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22. The petitioner shall provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 23. The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 24. A development agreement outlining the developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the petitioner prior to final plat approval. Mr. Saba stated 120 feet of right-of-way is needed by the County in the future, 30 feet of which will come from the petitioner's property now. Where will the rest of the right-of-way come from, and will that be tied to stipulation #23 Mr. Bolin stated any additional right-of-way acquisition outside of this site would not be related to stipulation #23. That stipulation gives the County a lot of discretion to what they would require if these 55 units gravely impact that intersection. And, yes, additional right-of-way could be taken from the petitioner somewhere down the road. Mr. Saba stated that the bikeway/walkway patfi is going to be restored after construction. Will that right-of-way impact the bikeway/walkway path in any way? Mr. Bolin stated the bikeway/walkway is currently located within the right-of-way, and the additional 10 feet should accommodate a bikeway/walkway or sidewalk in addition to whatever is needed for an additional turn lane. Mr. Saba asked if the additional right-of-way takes into account any future or unknown plans for any future development. If there is more development in the future, will more right-of-way be needed? Mr. Bolin stated that any time the County has an opportunity to get additional right-of-way for something that may happen in the future, they can obtain that property now by demanding it through a plat. Mr. Saba asked Mr. Bolin to explain S-2 zoning to the Commission members and those in the audience. Mr. Bolin stated the S-2 zoning district itself functions similar to what some cities refer to as a "planned unit development" where, rather than applying for a strict rezoning, there is some "give & take" through the S-2 rezoning. The S-2 allows for some flexibility in approving a master plan for the site and allows a lot of discretion for the Planning Commission and City Council in approving that master plan. Mr. Kondrick asked where other S-2 zoning has been used in the City of Fridley. Mr. Bolin stated that S-2 zoning has been used for the Medtronic international headquarters, the Gateway East project, and Christenson Crossing. Ms. Johns stated that when an area has become redeveloped within an S-2 district, does the district ever become rezoned to what the development actually is? Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 14 Mr. Bolin stated the area stays S-2. In the event a building is proposed to be used for a different use, the developer would need to come before the Planning Commission and City Councii with a master plan amendment. At that time, the Planning Commission would hold a public hearing, take input from the public, and then the Planning Commission and, ultimately, the City Council would determine if that change should be allowed to happen in that S-2 district. Mr. Saba asked if the Tamarisk house is on the National Historic Register. Mr. Bolin stated City staff has requested the petitioner to get a letter from the Historic Preservation Officer for clearance to tear down the house. The petitioner has to prove to the City that it is not listed on any historic register, and that the building should be saved. Mr. Saba asked if there was any wisdom in demolishing a site that is a historic landmark in Fridley. Maybe an effort should have been made to preserve that piece of property. Mr. Bolin stated that would be a policy decision that would need to come from the Planning Commission or the City Councit. Mr. Richard Whinnery stated he is one of the owners of Town Center Development. Ms. Savage asked Mr. Whinnery if he had any problems with the stipulations. Mr. Whinnery stated he did not. To add some information on the Tamarisk house, they found out it was moved to its current site. It wasn't originally built there. They do not plan to tear it down; it will be moved, possibly within the City of Fridley. Mr. John Klick, Klick Interarch Design, the architect for the project, showed a power point presentation of what the development would look like. Mr. Kondrick asked approximately how far the condominium building is from Central Avenue? Mr. Klick stated it is about 80 feet from Central Avenue. Ms. Paula Granroos, 1114 63�d Avenue, stated everyone has talked about the intersections of Mississippi Street, Central Avenue, and Rice Creek Road, but no one has said anything about how this development will affect the two little blocks off Mississippi Street—Dellwood Drive, Pierce Street, and 63�d Avenue. She is really concerned about additional traffic on her street, 63`d Avenue. At the west end of 63�d Avenue is the Fridley liquor store, and they already have a lot of traffic going to the liquor store. So, she is concerned about how this new development will affect the traffic on these streets. Mr. Tim Byrne, 6053 Woody Lane, stated he was initially worried about the traffic. To go to work in the morning, he has to take a left from Hillcrest Drive onto Central Avenue which can be dangerous. Because there are no tra�c lights and because the traffic is constant, it is very difficult. It would be beneficial to have some kind of controlled traffic light at Rice Creek Road & Central or Mississippi Street & Central, or perhaps even at Gardena and Central to break up the traffic. The parking lot at Moore Lake Beach is also a parking lot for Totino Grace students. Students park there and walk up Gardena to the school. He realized these are county roads, but why couldn't the City put on a little bit of pressure for some signalization? Mr. Byrne stated there is another developer buying properties along 64th Avenue, Central Avenue, and Mississippi Street. So, this proposed development is just the beginning. . Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 15 Mr. Byrne stated that with the S-2 zoning, what is to stop the owners of the properties south of the proposed development from seliing their properties for another 100 unit development. The HRA property is not designated for any purpose at this time. Just with the proposed project alone, imagine in a neighborhood of single family homes that every house is turned into a 4- plex. That is the kind of traffic they would have. Even though staff is saying that the affects of traffic is negligible, common sense says differently. Mr. Byrne stated that regarding the parking, what senior is going to want to scrape ice off his/her car? The proposed one covered parking stall per unit is unacceptable. He has contacted other senior developments, and the average is 1.5 cars per unit. His parents have three vehicles, and they would not move out of their home into something like this. This may or may not be a good development for seniors. The median price for a Fridley home right now is $160,000, $10,000 below the starting cost of these units. If Fridley seniors are looking to move out of their homes, half of them could not afford these units. Mr. Byrne asked why the City did not go with the regular procedure of having the developer go to the HRA and ask them if they would like to participate in this project and also invite the public for input? Mr. Bolin stated he believed Mr. Byrne had already had a conversation with Scott Hickok, Community Development Director. He could also contact William Burns or Grant Fernelius, staff directors for the HRA. The HRA is not endorsing this rezoning; the HRA has simply stated that they do not have an objection to their land being included in the S-2 zoning. It is not necessary for the HRA or other property owners to participate. The Council can rezone all these properties with or without their permission. Mr. Byrne suggested that the Planning Commission continue this public hearing until such a time that the HRA can have a public hearing and hear from the neighbors. Mr. Mark Schwartz, 1372 64th Avenue, stated he has a concern about drainage in this area. They have had water drainage problems in the past. A storm sewer project was done that helped the north side of 64th Avenue; but, unfortunately, when the credit union building was built, that complicated the problems. Every time it rains, the HRA property gets about 6-8 inches of water on it. He realized the developer will have to have a drainage plan, but the credit union had a drainage plan, too, and that didn't work. Mr. Schwartz stated he is totally against the S-2 rezoning, because of more similar development that can happen in the future. He believed they should be very careful of this. Ms. Carrie Crandall, 6411 Pierce Street, stated her house will back up to the proposed development. How far away from her property line is this building going to be? Will there be some privacy fencing, and how high will that fencing be? Mr. Bolin stated the building itself will be 50 feet from the westerly property line, and a 7 foot high screening fence is required. A resident at 6423 Pierce Street stated he lives right behind the proposed building. He purchased this property because of the beautiful back yard. He is also concerned about the privacy of their back yards. How can a 7 foot high fence provide privacy from a 50-foot high building? He is opposed to this project. Plannin�Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 16 - Mr. Tom Myhra, 6360 Able Street, stated he is the chair of the Concerned Citizens of Fridley. He is also the past president of the Fridley Historical Society. As far as he knows, no one notified the Historical Society that a historical building could be demolished. He will bring that to the Society's attention. Could that be a stipulation that the Tamarisk building not be demolished and not be moved out of the City? He stated the Concerned Citizens of Fridley organization is very concerned about the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and if the goals truly represent the wishes of the people. He believed this constant move to make the City more dense in population is not particularly good. He stated the Concerned Citizens of Fridley organization is in the process of amending the Housing section of the Comprehensive Plan to what they believe is more what the City wants. Mr. Myhra stated everyone has talked about this as senior housing, except the architect's sketch said "muiti-family" housing. That leads him to believe that once the property is rezoned to S-2, there would be nothing except the Council to prevent this being made into regular mu(ti- family housing. The proposal is for two bedrooms, and he would guess that most retired couples are not going to want two bedrooms. Mr. Kurt Olson, 1385 64th Avenue, stated he has lived in Fridley since 1966. He does not want to see Fridley become multi-housing. Even though this is senior housing, he is still concemed about multi-housing and how it can become rundown. He and his wife are in the process of putting about $100,000 into remodeling their home. The last thing they want to see at the end of their street is a 4-story building. That is not why he purchased this lot. They also don't want the extra traffic. Mr. Jim Rusinak, 6412 Pierce Street, stated the view from his front wi�dow now is very nice. He does not want to see a 4-story building there either. They like the natural aesthetics of the woods. Was the 2001 traffic report done before or after Medtronic was developed and in full operation? Since Medtronic, there has been a big increase in tra�c on Central and Mississippi. The study that says these roads are underutilized may be antiquated due to the traffic generated by Medtronic. Ms. Andrea Olson, 1385 64th Avenue, stated they have a beautiful wooded one-acre lot in a quiet neighborhood with a lot of traffic on Central Avenue. Mr. Rusinak is right; Medtronic has greatly impacted traffic on Central Avenue. They don't need any traffic lights; they just need to keep the traffic down. She can't imagine adding more vehicles. She was concerned because the S-2 zoning just seems too open. What will happen to the other properties around this proposed development, especially the new housing development that is coming that will be in her back yard? Having this kind of development in a basically single family neighborhood just seems crazy. Ms. Jean Schwartz, 1372 64th Avenue, stated she has a major concern with the S-2 zoning. Her understanding of zoning is that when someone comes to the City with a specific zoning request, the burden of proof is on the developer of why the property should be rezoned. A development can more easily be denied than if the property is already zoned for that development. The S-2 zoning leaves them much more wide open. It makes more things allowable than would be otherwise allowed. It is shifting the burden of proof away from the developer, and now the City has to prove why it shouldn't go there. Ms. Schwartz stated she did not think there is any way the City can guarantee 100% that this would be senior housing only. What happens if the units are not sold? Will they become rental? Right now two bedroom units in Fridley have the highest vacancy rates than they have in years. _ Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 17 She did not think a lot of seniors will be able to afford these units. Fridley is not a high income community. She also did not think a 4-story building is going to fit very well in this neighborhood. Ms. Betty Carland, 6416 Deliwood Drive, stated she has lived here since 1965. They have seen the traffic grow every year, and it is getting pretty bad. With this new development, they are going to see more traffic, congestion, a landlocked area of small homes, and real estate values going down. They do need stoplights, because stop signs do not stop the traffic. She also agreed with what has been said about putting a tall building in the center of a single family area. Mr. John Klick, Interarch Design, stated he would like to address the concerns about more development in the S-2 zoning south of their proposed development in the future. In this area, if another developer wanted to make a change in that S-2 area, that developer would have to come before the Planning Commission and City Council for a master plan amendment, so it is doubtful that more higher density housing would be allowed in there. Mr. Klick stated there was some concern about whether this would actually be a condominium project, or could it become a rental project? He stated that one of the stipulations recommended by staff is that the condominium documents be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. The condominium documents would contain the information with respect to the age requirements, owner-occupied units, etc. However, if a developer came to the City with a propose� 45--50 square foot office building that would generate an additional 175-200 cars for this area, that would be allowed with the existing C-1 and C-2 zoning. That type of project would create more density, more cars, more trips per day, and would create a bigger impact on Central Avenue than the senior condominiums. Mr. Klick stated there was a question about when a traffic study was completed, before or after Medtronic's completion. He would like to reiterate that those numbers indicated that the capacity today is 57%, and in 2020. it would be 71%. That is without any highway improvements. Mr. Klick stated that one citizen stated that other senior developments were providing only 1.5 cars per unit. He stated they are providing 2 cars per unit in this development. Mr. Saba asked if there is anything that can be done to address the lack of privacy that some of these homeowners are concerned about, in terms of their back yards. Now, they have trees in their back yards, but soon they will have 4 stories of people who can look down into their yards. Mr. Klick stated there is a 50-foot wide strip between the condominiums and the neighbors' properties. The sanitary sewer comes through there. He definitely believed there are some landscaping materials that could be used in the back areas. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:35 P.M. Mr. Dunham stated that if a commercial building was built under the present zoning, what is the maximum height that building could be? Mr. Bolin stated that in a C-2 district, the height limit is 60 feet. Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Pa e 18 Mr. Saba suggested adding a stipulation on landscaping/screening that wouid inciude some piants and adult trees along the back property line to address the privacy concerns. That is his biggest concern with this development. Mr. Kondrick stated this looks like a nice development. He did not think the traffic is going to be that much of an issue considering that this is for seniors, 55 and older. He wili vote in favor of the development. Mr. Saba asked if the City is setting any kind of precedence for future units that will be difficult to address in the future for other housing developments. Mr. Bolin stated, no, each project has to stand on its own merits. Ms. Johns stated one citizen expressed concern over the drainage issue. If the proposed ponding is inadequate, will anything be done to fix it? Mr. Bolin stated the City's engineers have worked extensively with the petitioner's engineers, and the petitioner's engineers have worked with the Rice Creek Watershed District to size the pond accordingly. There should actually be excess storage capacity within this storm pond to handle the rain events for which t was designed. There is an outlet on the storm pond that puts the water into the City storm sewer. The storm pond has been reviewed extensively and will be reviewed several more times before building permits are issued to make sure it will hold the needed capacity. In addition, there is a stipulation for a storm pond maintenance agreement. If the City sees a problem and the storm pond is not being maintained properly, the City will fix it and assess the petitioner accordingly. Mr. Saba proposed the following wording for a new stipulation #25 regarding the screening between the neighbors and the development: "The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening between the proposed development and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24." Mr. Kondrick stated he would be in favor of that. Ms. Savage stated she realized that some of the people in the audience do not agree with the Comprehensive Plan that was developed by the residents of Fridley over several years. She stated State Statute 462.357 authorizes the City to rezone property for the purpose of carrying out the policies and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Regarding the rezoning, that does achieve the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, and she would be in favor of the rezoning. Mr. Oquist stated he is in favor of this development in lieu of what could go in with the existing zoning, like an office building. He did not see a traffic pattern during rush hours with seniors 55 and older. He believed there will be traffic throughout the day but not during peak hours. He agreed with Mr. Saba that the developers should do whatever they can to screen this development from the neighboring properties. Mr. Dunham stated that with the present zoning, they could have higher buildings and m�rEa traffic issues. He is in favor of the rezoning. Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 19 Mr. Saba stated he would suppo�t the rezoning with the idea that they are not setting a precedent for future similar developments, and that they will look at each development with tight scrutiny. His real concern is not necessarily the traffic, but the screening. He is in favor of the rezoning with the added stipulation. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to recommend to City Council approval of Rezoning, ZOA#03-03, by Town Center Development, LLC, to rezone property from G2, General Business, C-1, Local Business, M-1, Light Industrial, and CR-1, General Office, to S-2, Redevelopment District, to accommodate redevelopment, generally located at 1281 Mississippi Street NE, 6490, 6400, 6352, and 6300 Central Avenue NE, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE, with the following stipulations: 1. The property shall be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1 dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering firm. 2. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. The petitioner shall meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. The petitioner shall meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The patio on the north side of Sandee's shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. - 7. The petitioner shall provide a clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. The existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way shall be approved by the County prior to planting. 10. The petitioner shall obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the County right-of-way. 11. Restoration of the bike path along Central Avenue will be required after completion of the senior complex. 12. The petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for storm water run-off and management. 13. A storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits: 14. The petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15. The City Engineering staff shall review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 16. The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 17. The petitioner shall pay any required park dedication fees. 18. The petitioner shall provide the City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19. The building shall be restricted to seniors, and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20. The petitioner shall provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment - systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21. The property owner of record at the time of building permit application shall pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22. The petitioner shall provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. Plannin� Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 20 23. The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the deveiopment including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary to Anoka County. 24. A development agreement outlining the developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the petitione� prior to final piat approval. 25. The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neiqhbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening between the proposed development and the neighborin�properties prior to the City Council meetinc�on November 24. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The Commission members were in favor of the plat request as well. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to recommend to City Council approval of Plat, PS #03-08, by Town Center Development, LLC, to construct a senior housing development, generally located at 1282 Mississippi Street NE and 6490 Central AvPnue NE, with the following stipulations: 1. The property shall be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1 dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering firm. 2. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. The petitioner shall meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. The petitioner shall meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandes's shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The patio on the north side of Sandee's shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 7. The petitioner shall provide a clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. The existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way shall be approved by the County prior to planting. 10. The petitioner shall obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the County right-of-way. 11. Restoration of the bike path along Central Avenue will be required after completion of the senior complex. 12. The petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for storm water run-off and management. 13. A storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14. The petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15. The City Engineering staff shall review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 16. The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 17. The petitioner shall pay any required park dedication fees. 18. The petitioner shall provide the City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. • , . . Planning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Page 21 19. The building shall be restricted to seniors, and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20. The petitioner shall provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21. The property owner of record at the time of building permit application shall pay ail water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22. The petitioner shall provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 23. The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary to Anoka County. 24. A development agreement outlining the developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the petitioner prior to final plat approval. 25. The petitioner shall work with Citv staff and the neighbors to come up with a screeninq plan to provide adequate screening consistinq of adult trees and other creative decorative screening between the proposed development and the neighboringproperties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Savage stated both the rezoning and plat requests will go to the City Council for final action on November 24. 7. RECEIVE THE INUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 15 2003 PARKS 8� RECREATION COMMISSION ETING MINUTES: MOTION made by Mr. Kon ick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the September 15, 2003, Housing & Redevelopment A thority minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL V TING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMO LY. 7. APPROVE THE MINUTES F THE OCTOBER 2 2003 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTH ITY MEETING MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded b Mr. Oquist, to receive the October 2, 2003, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING A , CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE O TOBER 21 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING INUTES: MOTION by Ms. Johns, seconded by Mr. Saba, t receive the October 21, 2003, Environmental Quality & Energy Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRP RSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . , . Ptanning Commission Meeting, November 5, 2003 Pa e 22 t ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Ms. Johns, se onded by Mr. Kondrick, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, AL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND T E NOVEMBER 5, 2003, PLANNING COMMISSION IVIEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:50 P.M. Respectfully submi ed, ��1�"�'�-L c�� Lyr�e Saba Recording Secretary PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E . on Monday, November 24, 2003, 7 :30 p.m. for the purpose of : For a Rezoning, ZOA #03-03 , by Town Center Development, LLC, to rezone property from C-2 , General Business, and C-1, Local Business, M-1, Light Industrial, and C-Rl, General Office, to S-2 , Redevelopment District accommodate redevelopment, generally located at 1282 Mississippi Street NE, 6490 Central Avenue NE, 6400 Central Avenue NE, 6352 Central Avenue NE, 6300 Central Avenue NE, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE, legal descriptions are as follows : 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lots l, 2 , & 3 , Auditors Subdivision No . 88, except road, subject to easement of record. 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive: Lots 1 - 5, Block l, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, subject to easement of record. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place . Any questions related to this item may be referred to Stacy Stromberg at 763-572- 3595 . Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than November 18 , 2003 . The TDD number is 763-572-3534 . SCOTT J. LUND MAYOR Publish: November 13 , 2003 �u� ��S- I l-�3 -a.� City of Fridley PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a public heari�g of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Monday, November 24, 2003, 7:30 p.m. for the pur- pose of: For a Rezoning, ZOA #03-03, by Town Center Development,LLC,to rezone proper- ty from C-2, General Business, and C-1, Local Business,M-1,Light Industrial,and C- R1, General Office, to S-2, Redevelopment District accommodate redevelopment,gener- ally located at 1282 Mississippi Street NE, 6490 Central Avenue NE, 6400 Central Avenue NE,6352 Central Avenue NE,6300 Central Avenue NE, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE,legal descriptions are as fol- lows: 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lots 1,2, &3,Auditors Subdivision No. 88, except road,subject to easement of record. 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue,630U Central Avenue,and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive: Lots 1 - 5, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace,subject to easement of record. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item"may be referred to Stacy Stromberg at 763-572-3595. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572- 3500 no later than November 18,2003. The TDD number is 763-572-3534. SCOTTJ.LUND MAYOR (Nov.13,2003)F2/11-24#2hearing � AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 CffY OF FRIDLEY Date: November 20, 2003 To: William Burns, City Manager �� From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: Public Hearing for Rezoning Request, ZOA#03-03, Town Center Development M-03-170 INTRODUCTION Town Center Development, LLC, is requesting a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and E. Moore Lake Drive. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and industrial zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. The owners of Advance Companies, Ziebart, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have agreed to the rezoning request. [Supplementary reading materials available in Council's reading file] PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At the November 5, 2003, Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for ZOA#03-02. After receiving public comment and discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of rezoning request, ZOA#03-02, with the 24 stipulations as presented and an addition of stiputation #25 to read, "The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening between the proposed development and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24, 2003." THE MOTION CARRIED UNIMOUSLY. Since the November 5, 2003, Planning Commission meeting, the petitioner submitted a new landscape plan to city staff. The new plan shows that an existing grove of trees along the western property will be left and 10 additional evergreen trees between 8 feet and 12 feet in height will be planted. 50 PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Staff recommends concurrence with the Planning Commission. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests, above. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1, dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering Firm. 2. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Patio on the north side of Sandee's to be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 7. Petitioner to provide clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. Existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be remq,ved prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 10.Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 11.Restoration of bike path along Central after will be required after completion of senior complex. 12.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 13.Storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 16.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 17.Petitioner to pay any required Park Dedication Fees. 18.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22.The petitioner to provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 51 23.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 24. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 25.The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening between the proposed development and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24, 2003. 52 City of Fridley Land Use Application PS#03-08 November 5, 2003 GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: Town Center Development, LLC Existing Legal Description of Property: 13750 Reimer Drive 1282 Mississippi Street: Maple Grove MN 55311 Part of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision#88 Requested Actions: 6490 Central Avenue: Replat property into 2 lots. Lot 1, 2, and 3,Auditor's Subdivision #88 Purpose: Refer to attached Plat. To create 2 separate lots to allow for the Council Action/60 Day Date: construction of a 55 unit senior housing City Council— November 24, 2003 development. 60 Day—December 1, 2003 Existing Zoning: Public Utilities: C-1 (Local Business), C-2 (General Business) Sandee's is connected and water and sewer Location: are available near the site for the new 1282 Mississippi St. & 6490 Central Ave. development. Size: Physical Characteristics: Total Area: 150,600 sq. ft. 3.5 acres Relatively flat, building, asphalt and some Lot 1: 24,525 sq. ft. .56 acres landscaping. Lot 2: 126,075 sq. ft. 2.89 acres SUMMARY OF PROJECT Existing Land Use: The petitioner, Town Center Development, LLC, Tamarisk Resources, Sandee's Restaurant is requesting to replat the properties at 1282 Surrounding Land Use&Zoning: Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue to N: Office Building, Apartments & C-2, R-3 create two separate lots, which will E: Commercial property& Residential homes & accommodate the Sandee's Restaurant and a C-1, C-2 new parcel for the construction of a 55-unit S: Advance Companies& M-1 senior owner occupied condominium W: Duplexes & R-3 development. Comprehensive Plan Conformance: SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS Future Land Use Map designates this area as City Staff recommends approval of the Plat Redevelopment. Request. Zoning History: Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg & 1282 Mississippi Street: Paul Bolin 1948—Lot is platted. 1952—House is built. 1985— Property rezoned from R-1 to C-1 1987—Lot split approved to split off the northerly 213 feet of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, same being this property. 6490 Central Avenue: 1948—Lot is platted. Building constructed pre-1949 1954—Addition to building. 1966—Addition to building. 1980—Addition to kitchen. 54 ZOA#03-03 & PS#03-08 OVERVIEW The requests: Town Center Development, LLC, is requesting two separate land use actions from the City of Fridley in order to construct 55 senior owner-occupied condominium units at 6490 Central Avenue. The finro actions being requested are a Plat and a Rezoning, both of which will be examined individually in this report. A Plat is being requested to create two new parcels, from 1282 Mississippi Street, currently Tamarisk Resources, and 6490 Central Avenue, currently Sandee's and the vacant lot south of it. Sandee's Restaurant will occupy one parcel and the other parcel will allow for the construction of the 55 senior condominiums. The petitioner is also requesting a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and E. Moore Lake Drive. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and industrial zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District The owners of Advance Companies, Ziebart, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have agreed to the rezoning request. � �� ,;�, �a� ��,� �� _ � � , � �� ,� �`'� � a � � � t `f � � .a� �, '� �r• u � `°"� ��`�� _ �� '�� ,� �`� �� ' ��. ��°" ��t;t�.��s ��`� -'� �� "'� �l �'� � � � e. ��. �� s��; �, : RGZQflI�t �� „'�� ,� � � � �� " � �� r, �� ' �� ""� �* : '% ��d� y��•�„?� ,� �& .�.3 .�- ��y` , : � r�`r °�r, '+ ,.,^u, ��'�- � � s -� �� .� �i�, x.�, � �� $�.. � �"�� E` �' � ats: '�o�'3kt � � '� � ,� p�;,y - —�, s �s �' -l��r . ��"�`�'- �� ,%{2 ¢p. �'� � �.#� 4:ts-`Yv_ �, .._b` �.y a -�' �`�d�.�#i r,�J� `� �� - �"'� �.." � �*�"�'r'�, _,': $a+�a�"'�+e � ��K g �°•� � �s � r. _.� e �' �..:.,a ^P '�' - �• � � � � ��'� ay � �€�+��', � r� � �r��a .` ',+p��" ` "�'',�'�-�T_ � g � �R.,� ..4� � '� ,�"",!F"'�g �� '-°�¢. .��ifl" �`'��`,�..� �R } ..�s ' �.� �H' �w".�� €#�,� �� e�i. � g ��.a� .'.��.'�',. � � �>�� R � �� «,,� � a��, "��a�� ; ��4�� ;�. � s£-�a�4"� � �wh ��'�4 � d�-�� )�}� � D se�,.��t" �h �.� �' S <ti .y � 'h .�. e� � "�°[4� r� ' ,.x� 5,� � �� ' �R �`'s�`'� � �� t �'� a�� °'�" se "l. �,�� = ,�e:,n �' � .. � �S � a� � � �� u�€�� ,,�� "_,�� ' � � `�`a°�� ° �'� "�`�„ � ,�.a+ c. �� _ . N „ "� _ � _ ��.` �,b �: Proposed Project: Town Center Development, LLC, is proposing to construct a 4-story 55-unit senior condominium complex south of Sandee's Restaurant. Sandee's Restaurant will remain, but will be under new ownership. The proposed 55 units will be owner-occupied and comprised of 2 bedroom units. Thirty-one of the units will be 1,138 square feet, 8 of the units will be 1,185 square feet, and the remaining 16 units will be 1,255 square feet in size. The development will include 51 underground parking stalls and 4 garage stalls and additional surface parking. A storm pond will be located on the south end of the project, with a trail system and landscaping surrounding the property. 55 SITE HISTORY In 1991, Tom Brickner requested a rezoning of the vacant property located south of Sandee's Restaurant and west of Central Avenue from C-1, Local Business, and C-2, General Business, to R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling in order to construct a 48 unit, three story apartment building. This rezoning request was similar to the one before us today; however, it requested a rezoning to R-3, Multi-Family and was essentially an island of R-3 zoning, surrounded by commercial and industrial properties. Ultimately, it was denied based on the fact that it was spot zoning. _._...,��._`�� s �� za2 ��_-� , �:��; � � ea�� , �� ;�� aa� 1 �a,ss �. I rs � �� ,� .�'� �� . mE " 12 n 6411 : � m �)0 Cn'. 6401 . ---- � ,.� �._. �� - 38 63$S � 64tl0 r8 �` 63x3 '' � a '6361 � , s3�s� 1 � ssas I 6335 � � f .� a+ *� � 6325 : j a t� a � � 6315 � __�...� . Circle signifies that area that was proposed to be rezoned in 1991. ANALYSIS Rezoning Request ZOA #03-02 The petitioner is requesting a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and East Moore Lake Drive. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and industrial zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. The properties requesting the rezoning request are 1282 Mississippi Street(Tamarisk Resources, zoned C-1, Local Business), 6490 Central Avenue (Sandee's and vacant lot south, zoned C-1, Local Business and C-2, General Business), 6400 Central Avenue (Advance Companies, zoned M-1, Light Industrial), 6352 Central Avenue (vacant lot, owned by the HRA, zoned CR-1, General Office), 6300 Central Avenue (Ziebart, zoned M-1, Light Industrial) and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive (vacant land, owned by the HRA, zoned M-1, Light Industrial). The only properties that are proposed to be redeveloped are 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue; the others will remain as they exist today. 56 _�.�.�.µ�_�.r_...�.��.� � ; " lzsz � 5 � c��s I Ga �aa� ' � ss _� � >.a ?��`snza � � m �2 � s�a�� m , � )D Ct>'. 6-0D1 ��„.,_. �.. � 38 6389 � GdtED ,g � �373 � ��"`- � 3 E--�� r,, ! t. 6355. � � A6345 '' � � 8335 r � � --..�_{ � .� &325 � p �y � � � 531�5 � tY . . Zoning Map—Shows mix of zoning and properties to be replatted and rezoned. The City's Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. State Statute gives the City the authority to "rezone" property from one designated use to another, so long as the zoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan was developed with resident input taken from several meetings held befinreen 1998 and 2000 and is a "tool intended to help guide future growth and development of the community...lt is a plan because it contains goals, policies and strategies that all work together, looking to the future and working towards achieving a community wide vision': In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed senior owner-occupied condominium complex and rezoning of the property meet several of the objectives the residents of Fridley identified in the visioning session for the Comprehensive Plan. The area of Old Central between Mississippi Street and Rice Creek Road was identified as an area for future redevelopment. Redevelopment is described in the Comprehensive Plan as a form of community revitalization that transforms undesirable elements into desirab/e elements that reflect the community collective vision. The purpose of redevelopment is to provide the opportunity for more efficient land uses and eliminate inefficient land uses and under utilized parcels. Redevelopment can also provide an opportunity to build new facilities, meet current market demands and desires of the City, and eliminate incompatible land uses. All the above purposes of redevelopment have the potential of being met with the rezoning of these properties. The Comprehensive Plan specifically states that for this portion of Old Central, "consideration should be made to replacing the current mix of single-family residential 57 and commercial uses with higher density residential development that together with the health club may serve as an attractive residential location for move-up housing". The Comprehensive Plan also states that for projects in these redevelopment areas requiring rezoning that the S-2 zoning designation "would be the appropriate Zoning district to implement for the redevelopment project. The intent of the district is to provide the City with site plan review authority to determine if the proposed project meets the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive and Redevelopment Plans". The Comprehensive Plan, in both the Future Land Use&the Housing chapters, addresses the desire for a variety of housing types in a number of goals listed below. • Ensure that adequate opportunities exist for the development of a variety of housing types at a range of affordability levels including low, low-moderate and high cost housing to meet the life-cycle needs of Fridley residents. • Create sustainable, self-reliant, mixed-use and mixed-income neighborhoods that contribute positively to the quality of life and image of Fridley. • Ensure a variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. • Strengthen neighborhoods and improve upon the quality of the City's housing stock. • Diversify the housing supply to include move up housing both in the form of rental and owner occupied housing. As Fridley's residents continue to age, demand will increase for"empty nester" and senior housing. There will be an increased demand for senior rental, senior owned condominium/town homes, and assisted living facilities. The proposed project, 55 senior owner-occupied condominium units, will meet some of the current demand for those seniors seeking alternatives to their current housing type. To avoid spot zoning and achieve the Comprehensive Plan's goal for this area, the petitioner has received permission from Advance Companies, Ziebart, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to request the rezoning from their current zoning designations to the S-2, Redevelopment District. Plat Request#03-08 Town Center Development, LLC, is seeking to replat the properties located at 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue to create two separate lots. One of the newly created lots will accommodate the Sandee's Restaurant, and the other will be used to allow for the construction of a 55-unit owner occupied senior condominium development. The property at 1282 Mississippi Street is currently zoned C-1, Local Business. The existing building was constructed in 1952 and is currently being occupied by Tamarisk Resources. The property at 6490 Central Avenue has a split zoning of C-1, Local Business and C-2, General Business. Sandee's Restaurant occupies the northeast corner of the site and the remainder of the property is vacant. The proposed replat will consist of two lots; Lot#1 and Lot#2, Block 1, Town Center Development. Rezoning a property to S-2, Redevelopment District allows for the maximum 58 flexibility for a redevelopment project; however, City staff asked the petitioner to design their project to try to meet the zoning classification codes most similar to their intended use. The proposed Lot#1 will accommodate Sandee's restaurant. Restaurants are typically zoned C-2, General Business. Proposed Lot#1 is 24,525 square feet in size, which exceeds the minimum lot area requirement for the C-2, General Business District. Proposed Lot#1 also meets all the parking requirements for size and number of parking stalls required for a restaurant use. Anoka County has had the opportunity to review the proposed project and has stated that additional right-of-way on Central Avenue and Mississippi Street will be required for future reconstruction purposes. They anticipate that a 120 ft. right-of-way corridor will be required for both Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersections in order to provide the necessary turn lanes for future safety and operational purposes. The County assumes when the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection is reconstructed, it would be centered in the 120 ft. right-of-way corridor. Consequently, roadway right-of-way dedication needs for this site are 27-30 ft. adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 ft. adjacent to Central Avenue. Therefore, the County is requesting that at this time, both of the right-of-ways be dedicated. Due to the necessity of the right-of-way acquisition along both County Roads, the Sandee's restaurant building will be less than 1 ft. from the north property line, 3 ft. from the east property line, and the parking setback will be 5 feet from the north property line. The additional land acquisition will also require the petitioner to remove his existing patio area on the north side of the building. As stated above, due to the flexibility allowed in the S-2, Redevelopment district, the diminished setbacks can be recognized under this rezoning master plan approval. � � � � �� } � .%' � � '�-� � �� ...� �� :� � ��.�:�.� � , -'�� `� � �� .� a= �� ,. � � � , ��? _.�, _-� � �, � �. _ � �, � ' � � �; ,� �d� � � � � � ��.u.�.<, � " # � � � �' r�%�M� �� '�' �_;� � s- ��`,�� ` ��..� � � s 4� � � �}a ' � e � �� j�� 1"��*,. �' ��# ��. � � � , � £i.� ��• ,�.�€ ,��k4 �,� ,.a�`_ � � '. r �,��.. .� �5 ': a A� ° et=,. �' -r',,�°` t�° �� "'.�� .��` .,� � -. � � �,� °'� 33 �. � - w � f�� ' � �_,�,�'��` " � ��M ,� _��" '�` " ;��'� - �. � � ��° '� � ,�.� � �� -�''.�t�� . �� ;+,�y� . �. �� .. �� `.� � � Nw., �� ,t�� .�.� ,� � �� .� ��'w .�`�. �. �',�� 3 ; �,��.� � � �i,� ��; '� ��e,. � ��. �� _ �� g = A �.« � � � � � �� >.^�� .g �� :� �� ..,.�,�,� �.� �,,��s� �� h k?�f � ,.zS � � ; ��q"��4�. � �a�` �`� �� . �� y= ' � i�� sk.- t�.� � , '� �4:^�� 8^�, �t� �" -_ ��^' � '�"� �� 5`f��$ �� . � �'�` a� F:' #�b� �j��`.»f€�' '�� •�i.i � � -4 �jr.... ��{�� . . t ..e,.m .. $:�� .. A� � �.� .. ��':.. � ,.r .n �� The proposed Lot#2 is 126,075 square feet(2.89 acres) in size. The petitioner is proposing to construct 55 senior owner occupied condominium units. The development will include 51 underground parking stalls and 4 garage stalls located at surface level. Because of the underground parking and the high water table in this area, the height of the building will be 51 feet at the midspan. The parking setback will be 10 feet from the property line on the east side of the property, due to the additional right-of-way being acquired by the County. 59 TRAFFIC Staff utilized a number of sources to determine the possible impacts that 55 senior owner occupied condominium units may have on the local traffic patterns. In addition to discussions with Jane Pemble,Anoka County Traffic Engineer, staff examined the Institute of Traffic Engineer's Trip Generation, consulted the Transportation chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and reviewed the traffic study supplied by Loucks &Associates. Anoka County City Staff contacted Jane Pemble, Traffic Engineering Manager at Anoka County, who stated that currently the County has no plans or allocated funding to reconstruct, provide safety improvements, or signalize the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection. Political and social pressures may determine when the intersection is re-worked. She also stated that it is not clear whether or not this development will have a significant impact on traffic volumes and/or turning movements. In order to determine the impacts, a traffic study for this particular intersection will need to be done. Institute of Traffic Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation The 4th Edition of ITE's Trip Generation manual does not have a specific category for SENIOR RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOMES. As a result, Staff reviewed the traffic generation numbers for RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS. The RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS are not age specific, meaning that the numbers provided include persons of all ages and family sizes living in condominium style housing. As seniors may have very different driving habits (ie. may be retired and rarely drive, or choose to drive at the least busy times of day) the numbers presented by the ITE Trip Generation manual may be viewed as a worse- case scenario for the number of trips to be generated by the proposed development. The ITE Trip Generation manual states that for residential condominiums, each unit generates 5.85 trips/day. A trip means any vehicle entering or leaving the complex. For example, leaving for work&then returning from work would count as 2 trips. Given the 55 units, it would be expected that a total of 322 vehicles would enter or leave the complex during the course of a day. When the data is further analyzed, by time, the impact of these vehicles on the surrounding roadways is negligible. During the morning rush hours of 7- 9AM, an additional 24.5 vehicles are entering or leaving the neighboring roadway(Old Central) over the finro-hour timeframe. During the afternoon rush hours of 4-6PM, an additional 30 vehicles enter into or leave from the complex. The following table summarizes what the ITE Trip Generation manual states a residential condominium complex generates for traffic during peak rush hours. ITE PEAK HOUR TRIPS/UNIT TIME #of Trips/ Unit #of Units Total Vehicle Trips 7-9 AM .446/ Unit 55 Units 24.5 Tri s 4-6 PM .561 / Unit 55 Units 30 Tri s Comprehensive Plan—Transportation Chapter The City's Comprehensive Plan indicated that in 2001, the portion of Old Central adjacent to the proposed senior condominiums carried 8,000 vehicles per day and, at this traffic 60 � , . level, was only carrying 57% of the traffic for which the roadway was designed and constructed to function at a Level of Service (LOS) D. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates O�d Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the year 2020, based upon increases in population for Fridley&surrounding communities, as well as redevelopment and reinvestment within Fridley. At 10,000 vehicles/day, Old Central will be carrying 71°/a if the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. Review of Loucks &Associates Traffic Analysis Town Center Development hired the Engineering & Planning firm of Loucks &Associates to perform additional traffic analysis. The consultants viewed the numbers for RETIREMENT COMMUNITY in the ITE Trip Generation manual and determined that the proposed complex would generate a total of 165 trips per day. As the condominiums are available for those over 55, a number of residents may still be working and the retirement community numbers may be low. The true number of trips per day likely falls between the 165 trips/day generated by a RETIREMENT COMMUNITY and the 322 trips/day generated by the average RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM complex. A full copy of the consultant's report has been attached for your review. STAFF RECOMMEDATION City Staff recommends approval of Rezoning Request ZOA #03-03 and accompanying site plan for the senior building and Sandee's site, with stipulations. • Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Provides housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. City Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat for PS#03-08, with stipulations. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests, above. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1, dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering Firm. 2. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Patio on the north side of Sandee's to be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 7. Petitioner to provide clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. Existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 61 , , . 10.Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 11.Restoration of bike path along Central after will be required after completion of senior complex. 12.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 13.Storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 16.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 17.Petitioner to pay any required Park Dedication Fees. 18.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20.Provide proof that any existing welts or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22.The petitioner to provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 23.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County . 24. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 62 Friday, November 21, 2003 Fridley City Council Fridley, Minnesota Dear City Council Members: In regards to the proposed zoning change and a 55 unit multiple family dwelling to be developed on Old Central between Sandees Restaurant and Ziebart: We appreciate the difficulty involved with trying to chart a course into the future with community planning. One has to weigh the projected demands of the community while being cognizant that changes done to the community may in fact be counter productive and degrade the community. Dealing with a generalized public sentim„nt of"Not in my backyazd" is not an easy task. Crranted, in most applications the term "Not in my backyard" is more figurative than literal, but in the case of this development it is quite literally in our backyard, our front yard and our living room— all positions are within easy eyesight of a 51-foot high structure. Any activity that I do can be under the scrutiny of the town home dwellers— from mowing my grass to baz-b-queuing to sitting in my shorts in my living room drinking a beer. Talk about invasion of privacy . . . We are against the proposed rezoning which will haveethe effect of giving the green light to this proposed development for the following reasons, in no particular order of importance: 1. Contrary to what was v��ritten some time ago in an HRA brochure, there are those of us who appreciate natural beauty as it occurs, a�d do not feel that "Unused land is a blight on the community." The lots that would be im�olved currently constitute a mini-ecosystem, providing habitat, natural screening and drainage. And though the land has a poor aesthetic quality according to man, it is nonetheless vital to nature. 2. Traffic is a multifaceted issue. One issue is personal safety. Traf�ic has already increased greatly, with the biggest threats being tnose who cut through the neighborhood by going up Pierce, Dellwood and 63rd in an effort to avoid traffic lights or congestion from Highway 65. Because they are long blocks there is a tendency to speed by these drivers (40—45 miles;per hour). a. Another traffic related issue is the sheer voluine of cars. I raised the question at the planning meeting that the figures that were provided were before Medtronic went into full swing. If the numbers supplied were indeed before Medtronic's traffic contri�ution, then we're lookin� at a sizable increase. By the way, if the inciease in traffic is projected to increase from � 55%to �75% of road capaciry—that is not a 20% increase in crirrerit tra�c. Current traffic would increase 36°o - much the same��a}' that if you made $55 an hour and it v��ere increased by $20 an hour your increase in pay is 36%. With an increase in traffic you may be lookin� at future remedial measures, such as stoplights, which will be expensive. In the morning it can be difficult getting out of our neighborhood onto Mississippi or Old Central. This will not help. b. Volume of traf�c is not a trivial issue for us; these are some of the same questions we asked when the West Moore Lake Commons shopping area was developed. The city's traffic engineer assured the neighborhood that by configuring the mall exit on 63rd street by curving it north eastward, and installing a `right turn only' sign, would be enough so patrons would not cut through the neighborhood. Well the curve doesn't extend far enough to prevent people from exiting straight ahead or making a ]eft turn, and the sign is now gone. c. City of Fridley trucks servicing the substation at 63'� and Rice Creek also use the neighborhood streets. We don't ha�e a problem with that, this is an _ illustration of ways tr�c can increase in a neighborhood. We are not looking to ban traffic from the neighborhood; we aze just using these as examples of what has happened when development has occurred. 3. Related to, but not directly a component of, traffic— is parking. We heard what is proposed by the developer for parking, and it is probably 2dequate for those who will live there, but what about people who are visiting? Will it become "Let's park on Pierce and cut through someone's yard by the pond!?!" Even without trespass, will the adjacent streets become overflow parking for the.iownhouse? A case in point is the Bottineau Commons complex on University and 18�' in Northeast Minneapolis. It is our understanding that the developer promised adequate parking, but just take a drive and see for yourselves. So much for what is promised and what is delivered. The establishment on 63`d and Rice Creek has to already use 63ra for occasional overflow parking, and we are stressing occasional, with SS families movin� in how much of the overflow parking is the neighborhood supposed to absorb? 4. Some people on Pierce Street already experience water supply problems, with settling ground movement breaking the connection frQm the main to the house, ��vith has to be repaired at cost to the city. Can anyone foresee the settling effects on this particular building? A drainage pond may alleviate immediate problems but also may have far reaching effects other than draining the sites soil. It will drain an area a lot larger than that. On a large scale, it is noted that the e�austion of aquifers causes land to sink, as it is no longer supported by water. T�e surrounding land will drain so what will be the effect on all the surrounding homes if the land beneath them settles? 5. Population density— Vastly increasing the population density of the neighborhood. From our standpoint this is not a matter of being adamantly against higher density housing. If that had been the case, we would not have moved onto Pierce Street 21 years ago, as fourpleaes occupied the east side of Pierce from 63Td to 64'�'when we moved in. Also, with those structures in place v��e feel that our neighborhood already has it's share of higher density housing. Is it a goal to malce this area the future "Projects of Fridley?" t 6. Aesthetics or Not? We're somewhat confused by the mixed signals Fridle_y seems to be sending. On one hand, at a Planning Meeting approval was granted to a business owner on Main Street to store equipment in the back of his establishment, but with the proviso that it be properly screened so that the neighbors—we assume mainly those folks on the east side of Main Street—would not be able to view it. On the west side is railroad property. That is understandable. Yet by the same token, this 51 foot high structure would be viewed by everyone in the surrounding area and that seems to be fine. With only on or two story structures in our neighborhood this will stick out like a sore thumb. There is no screening that will block our view. We consider it an eyesore, but are our sensibilities going to taken to heart? We hope so; otherwise it would've been pointless to write this. 7. What becomes of the promise/stipulations of the developer owner if six months - down the road they seli out? What is to prevent this from becoming rental property?- Lastly, this area is a neighborhood. People have moved in expec�ing certain qualities that the area has to offer. People live here who appreciate the qualities it has to offer. We're at most two story dwellings. There is a measure of privacy that Moore Lake Highlands possesses, in large part because of the full-grown trees in the buffer zone from Mississippi Street to Rice Creek Road. Note that it is called Moore Lal:e Highlands. The city made the effort to name the neighborhoods to promote a sense of community. It is not named Moore Lake High Density Lands. It is easy for a developer to come in with pie in the sky prornises, it's the way they make their living and we respect that. But you know what'� It affects people who will always live here, while the developer goes on to some new project somewhere else. We'll bet it's not in his backyard! - Thank ou. p � t�/' � \� . Jim nd Rhonda Rusinak ' 6412 NE Pierce St � Fridley, NIl�' S5432 763-571-7862 Ncvember 25,Z403 � N � � ti 0 �.Pctlll�0�117, w CITY OF FRIDLEY �-- 6431 Universily Avena��I.B. o FRIDLEY,MN 55432 - � � L?�eac Mr. Rolin, �w rn I'm writing to a�+pnse yc�ur pl�nad r�oning and de�•elopm�t tor property in��olving E4�' w Avenue N.E. � � � �4 atec issues are still unreso(ved hom ti�e B!-ickner Rice Creek Sehool develapment. � �V atec v�as ponded snd the o�etflo�v;n•ent south oFPrlissi.ssip�i S�reet. '1l�at�ea flooded oul so it�vas�ioved s�euth of 64m A�enue N.E. Every-time it rains hanl,our basement is viet. This:s wate�•that was to�e ponded on site_etenkion The city tried to say it vras wetland but�owing�p in Fridley,oar fatrrily had a�rclen on ourback lot_ Trai�ic;s anoWer pJoblern. �i ou cau't fit ten pounds ofpotztoes int�a five�pound bag. y - Uoless you I�ve in the ar-„q it's impossible to:udge what traf�ic Jlow's liJc�. I leave i'ar �Z viatc at 3:20 a.m. and still bave`_o�t�ait to get onto Old CentraL Peak titne is irnposs�b{e. y Pri��acy is eaether con.,ern. Tsn't it amazine ho�v yon�e in�a•rr�r of p�ogreas�iong a�s�t � doesn't affect�ouc neighbortic�od. How xould you like a big complex in your bec�yard7 �v IFyou rnust build far impr��e�ent sake, �vhy r�oi h�vin riome�? "Ihis is s�ictiy for monetary gain not an irngrevement i.sue as is beine clai�ed. You ere tearmg dov�n � people's hocues in the grocess. Can't Pridley bear to see tt�e site of an e�,pty lot rxith trees and wildliFe7 Sincere!y, (.��:�..��'-�� Patricis Da6lberg 11+iulroy 1334 —6a�Avenue?V.E, Fridley,lv�V SS�32 (763j571-8?65 � ' o 0 N . , FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL i�IEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24,2003 PAGE 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 12. CONSIDER.aTION OF A REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #03-Og, BY TOWN CENTER DEVELOP�ZENT, LLC, TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM G1, LOCAL BUSINESS; C-2, GENERAL BUSINESS; M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL; AND C-R1, GENERAL OFFICE, TO S-2, REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, TO ACCONIMODATE REDEVELOPMENT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1282 MISSISSIPPI STREET; 6490, 6400, 6352 AND 6300 CENTR-�L AVENUE; AND 1271 EAST NTOORE LAKE DRIVE (WARD 2). MOTION by Councilmember Billings to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearina. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANI��OUSLY. Mr. Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator, said he would do one presentation for Items 12 and 13 on the agenda. The petitioner was Town Center Development, LLC, from Maple Grove. Town Center Development requested two separate land use actions. The plat was being requested to create two new parcels from 1282 Mississippi Street, which was Tamarisk Resources, and 6490 Central Avenue, currently Sandee's Restaurant and the vacant lot to the south. The petitioner also requested a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and East Moore Lake Drive. Town Center proposed to construct a four-story, fifty-five unit, senior, owner-occupied condominium complex south of Sandee's Restaurant. Sandee's Restaurant would be remodeled. The condominium units all had two bedrooms. Thirty-one units would be 1,138 square feet; eight would be 1,185 square feet; and sixteen would be 1,255 square feet. The development would include fift��-one underground parking stalls, four garage stalls and seventy additional surface parking stalls. A storm pond is also located on the south end of the project. There was a trail system and landscaping surrounding the property. Mr. Bolin discussed a drawing of the project. Mr. Bolin said in 1991 Mr. Tom Brickner requested a rezoning of the vacant land south of Sandee's Restaurant from C-1 and C-2 to R-3 which would allow general multiple family dwellings. At that time he planned to construct a forty-unit, three-story apartment building. That request failed because it was deemed to be spot zoning. Petitioner requested a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi and East Moore Lake Drive. They sought to rezone the entire block to S-2, Redevelopment District. He said 1282 Mississippi Street was the Tamarisk house, 6490 Central was the properiy currently owned by Sandee's, 6400 Central was the property owned by Advance Companies, 6352 Central Avenue was owned by the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 1271 East Moore Lake Drive was owned by the City, and 6300 Central Avenue was owned by Ziebart. The only properties proposed to be redeveloped were 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue. The other properties would remain as-is. The City did have the authority to rezone property from one designated use to another as long as the zoning was in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's vision laid out in the FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL ��EETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 7 � Comprehensive Plan. The proposed senior, owner-occupied, condominum complex and the rezoning o�the property met several of the objectives the residents of Fridley identified in the visionin� sessions for the Comprehensi�•e Plan. The area of Old Central between Nlississippi Street and Rice Creek Road was identified as an area for future redevelopment. The Comprehensive Plan specifically stated for that portion of Old Central, consideration should be made to replace the current mir of single family residential and commercial uses with higher density residential development that, together with the health club, would serve as an attractive residential location for move-up housing. The Comprehensive Plan also stated that for projects in these redevelopment areas that required rezoning, the S-2 zoning designation would be the appropriate zoning district to implement the redevelopment project. Mr. Bolin said Town Center De�•elopment also souaht to replat 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue to create two separate lots to accommodate Sandee's Restaurant and the senior building. He said the proposed Lot 1 would accommodate Sandee's Restaurant. Restaurants aze typically zoned C-2, General Business. The proposed lot was 24,52� square feet, which exceeded the 20,000 square foot minimum lot azea in a C-2 District. It also met the required number of parking stalls for a restaurant use of this size. Anoka County stated that a 120-foot, right-of-way corridor would be required for Central Avenue and Mississippi Street intersections for future work. The right-of-way dedication needed for this site was 30 feet adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 feet adjacent to Central Avenue. Anoka County requested that both of the right-of-ways be dedicated at this time. After the right-of-way acquisition along both county roads, Sandee's Restaurant would be less than one foot from the north property line, 3 feet from the east property line and the parking setback would be 5 feet from the north property line. The right-of-way dedication would require the petitioner to remove the existing patio area on the north side of the building. Due to the discretion given to Council in the S-2 Redevelopment District, the diminished setbacks could be recognized under this rezoning master plan approval. Mr. Bolin said that Lot 2, the proposed location for the senior building, was slightly under three acres in size. Because of the underground parking and the high water table in the area, the height of the building would be 51 feet at the midspan. The parking setback would be 10 feet from the property line on the east side of the property. Mr. Bolin said with respect to traffic, staff looked at a number of different sources to try to determine possible impacts. In addition to discussions with the Anoka County Traffic Engineer, they looked at the Institute of Traffic Engineer's Trip Generation Report, the transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, and reviewed a traffic study supplied by the developer's engineering firm, Loucks & Associates. The County indicated that they had no plans to do anything with the intersection. In the Institute of Traffic Engineer's trip generation manual, there was no category specific to senior residential townhomes. They looked at the numbers for residential condominiums which were not age-specific. The numbers presented by the manual should be viewed as a worse case scenario for the number of trips because it included people of all ages and family sizes. The manual stated that for all residential condominiums, each unit typically generated 5.85 trips per day. A trip meant any vehicle entering or leaving the complex. A total of 322 vehicles would enter or leave the complex during the course of the day. When the data was further analyzed by time, the impacts on surrounding roadways become more negligible. Based on averages, during the morning rush hour between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. ' - FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24,2003 PAGE 8 there would be 24.5 or 25 vehicle trips. Between the hours of 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., there would be about 30 vehicles entering or leaving the site. Mr. Bolin said in 2001 when the transportation chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan was prepared, the portion of Old Central that was adjacent to the proposed senior condominiums carried 8,000 vehicles per day. At that traffic level, it was only carrying 57 percent of the traffic for which tne roadway was desiQned. The Comprehensive Plan anticipated Old Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the year 2020. The numbers were based on projected population increases. At 10,000 vehicles per day, Old Central would be carrying approximately 71 percent of the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. The developer's consultants determined there w-ould be 165 trips per day which was similar to the amount of traffic generated by a retirement community, which might be too low. The true number of trips per day likely fell between 16� trips per day generated by the retirement community and 322 trips generated by the typical residential condominium complex. Mr. Bolin said the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 5, 2003. They added a stipulation that required the developer to plant additional large trees along the property line and that the developer share the new landscape plan with the neighbors. The new landscaped plan included leavina some existing trees and planting 10 additional evergreen trees, 8 to 12 feet in height. The developer indicated that he had attempted to meet with the adjoining property owners late last week. Staff recommended approval of the rezoning request with 2� stipulations as follows: l. Property to be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1, dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering firm. 2. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's to be reviewed and approved by City staff piror to issuance of a building permit. 6. Patio on the north side of Sandee's to be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 7. Petitioner to provide clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. Existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-�vay to be approved by the County prior to planting. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 9 � _ 10. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the County right- of-way. 11. Restoration of bike path along Central will be required after completion of senior complex. 12. Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 13. Storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14. Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES permit and provide NL1RP ponding for entire site. 15. City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building pernuts. 16. Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of building permit. 17. Petitioner to pay any required Park Dedication Fees. 18. Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the building's association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19. Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20. Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21. Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22. The petitioner to provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 23. The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 24. A development agreement outlining the developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 25. The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative ' � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 10 screening between the proposed development and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24, 2003. Mr. Bolin said the proposed rezoning was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and it provided additional housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat request subject to 25 stipulations. Councilmember Barnette asked how common it was for a petitioner to make a rezoning request for more land than what was going to be used. Mr. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, said it was not that typical. In this case, there was a mix of zoning along that segment of Old Central Avenue. They have asked to have the zoning in that entire segment match the zoning that was designated in the land use plan of the Comprehensive Plan. As long as they had the concurrence of the adjacent property owners, they could do that. Councilmember Barnette asked if they had any indication or request from any other developer on any other kind of development in this area. Mr. Hickok said he was not aware of any other development. � Councilmember Wolfe said he had a problem with calling the development a retirement community. He also had a problem with the traffic issue because people who were 55 still worked. He asked if the developer met with the residents and wanted to know how the rezoning worked. Mr. Hickok the S-2 rezoning was the ultimate discretion because not only were they approving the site plan which served as the master plan for the north half of the block, but the south half of the block would remain questionable. It would take a master plan review and approval by Council to initiate any sort of project there. It matched the goals and redevelopment objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Councilmember Wolfe said they discussed the Comprehensive Plan and the vision that the neighbors had. He had received many telephone calls from people and it sounded like none of them were part of the vision. He thought it would have an incredible affect on traffic. He asked when the traffic studies were done. Mr. Bolin said the traffic engineer's manual was the fourth edition which was printed in 1987. They are now in the process of updating the manual. Councilmember Wolfe said the manual was 16 years old. He thought this project would have a huge affect on the neighborhood. Mr. Hickok said they encouraged Council to look at the traffic numbers for the all-age condominum. It was important to understand that this manual was put together not with a random sample of a couple different units. That was the best manual available. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 11 Councilmember Wolfe said more people are drivin� today. Councilmember Billings asked if the 322 number of vehic(es per day was for condominium, residential, no restriction on age. Mr. Bolin said correct. Councilmember Billings asked what it was for a typical single family home. Mr. Bolin said 11 almost 12 trips. Councilmember Billings asked why there was such a difference between the two. Mr. Hickok said the ITE statistics were not speculative or projected. They were based on statistical data. Councilmember Billings said so using the 322 figure rather than the 165 was a more generous amount of traffic. He said the S-2 zoning was a special zoning, so any construction that would take place on any of the lots would have to go before the City Council. He asked if extensive remodeling could be done. � Mr. Hickok said any change to the site plan would be part of a master plan amendment that would need to be reviewed by the City Council. Councilmember Billings said under the rezoning, the sites would have to go through the same process that Town Center Development was going through. There would be a greater opportunity for the neighbors to know what was happening on those sites. Mr. Hickok said that was correct. Councilmember Bolkcom said with respect to the traffic study, it did not matter if it was a one or two bedroom unit. Mr. Bolin said it was broken down by unit type, such as condominiums versus townhomes. Councilmember Bolkcom asked what the most recent traffic counts were for Old Central and Mississippi Street and if they were readily available. Mr. Jon Haukaas, Public Works D'uector, said they had them from 2001. Councilmember Bolkcom said she was mystified that the traffic engineer manager from Anoka County said that it was not clear whether or not the development would have a significant impact on traffic volumes or turning volumes. Mr. Hickok said it was like a disclaimer. They were doing their best based on the information they had. � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 12 Councilmember Bolkcom said they had the traffice volume numbers for Mississippi and Central, and they would know how many trips were �enerated by this type of development. Mr. Bolin said that he thought the County staff was trying to say that they knew what the traffic counts were, without a more thorou�h analysis and more detailed information, they would only be speculatinQ. Councilmember Bolkcom said they did want more right-of-way. Mr. Bolin aareed. Ms. Tara Schaefer, 6391 Central Avenue N.E., said the project would be across the street from her home. She worked at night and slept until late morning and this would interrupt her sleep for two years, at least. She said there was a statistic of 10,000 cars a day on Old Central. She had two very small children. There were many near accidents on Old Central. She asked what would happen if there were not enough seniors for the complex. She wanted to know if it would be opened up to other people. Mr. Randy Johnson, 6336 Pierce Street N.E., asked if the project was going to be built no matter what was said. He said he thought they could only fight the height of the buildings. Mayor Lund said no decision had been made. It was just a public hearing. Councilmember Barnette said they were there to listen. Mr. Johnson said he did not want the project. He had two small children and Pierce Street was like a raceway. He asked how much traffic it would bring to the community. Councilmember Barnette asked Mr. Johnson if he thought the building on Central Avenue would affect traffic on Pierce. Mr. Johnson said he did. He said if the building did not fill up, they would let younger people move in. Councilmember Barnette said he asked that question at the Planning Commission meeting. He said when they took out the building permit,the building had to be for 55 and older and had to be owner-occupied. Mr. Johnson asked about the area south of the project. Councilmember Barnette said he asked if there were any plans for the area south of the project, and the answer was no. Mr. Johnson said it would bring commotion to their area. He said he picked the area because it was a small community. The only choice was for him and his family to move. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 13 � � Ms. Teresa Gibson, 12» — 66`h Avenue N.E., said she lived north of the project. She said she drove up Channel Road and turned left on Mississippi in the mornina during rush hour and it was dicey at best. She said there �vas an entrance from the project on to Mississippi and she did not think this would be an improvement to the area. �'here were some apartments on Channel Road, and they were a problem. In some of the literature she received, a future proposal for a 100-unit apartment compleY across the street was mentioned. Mr. Cash Burzynski, 618� Heather Place, said he was not opposed for rezoning to improve the tax base. He asked the City to measure the traffic that currently existed on Old Central Avenue. It was hard to get on to Old Central between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. in the afternoon. There w-as a lot of traffic from Medtronic. They were told oriQinally that Highway 65 would be the main highway. Old Central has now become another highway. Not only passenger cars are using it, but heavy trucks. He said if the property was rezoned, it would not be long for the people at Ziebart or Advance Carpet to want to change and build condominiums or apartments. Councilmember Wolfe said Onan and Murphy were also in the area. Mr. Jim Rusinak, 6412 Pierce Street N.E., said once a precedent was set it became easier. In the area he lived in, there was no access to any parks without crossing major roads. He said there was one issue that had not been addressed and that was visitors. He asked about parking and whether the roads in the area would become overflow parking. There was a stipulation that the cunent owners had to abide by a stipulation that the residents had to be 55 or older. He asked what would happen if the owners sold to someone else and if they would be required to follow the same stipulation. Mr. Hickok said the project was a 5� or older project and would be filed as such. Mr. Mark Schwartz, 1372 - 64`h Avenue N.E., said he had concerns about any development in that area with respect to drainage. Drainage has been an ongoing problem. When the credit union was built, the problem got worse. He asked what would happen if Ziebart or Advance Carpet were rezoned and if someone could buy the property and make a request to build condominiums. Attorney Fritz Knaak, City Attorney, said there would be less discretion if it were zoned something else. Everyone had to be treated the same by the City, but this particular type of zoning was developed specifically to provide greater discretion by the City in the case of larger projects. Mr. Schwartz asked if in his opinion the developer would come back with a lawsuit. Mr. Knaak said he could not say whether someone would sue. He said for him it was a question of how defendable the City's position be. It would be far easier to win that kind of lawsuit with a S-2 type of zoning than it would be �ti-ith other kinds of zoning. ' ' FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24,2003 PAGE 14 Mr. Schwartz said at the Planning Commission meeting it was stated that a sis-story ofi ce buildin� could �o there with the current zoning, but logically, it would probably not be built. He did not like the heiQht of the building. There were no other buildings in that area that were that height. There w-ere 1 % and ? story buildings and single family homes in that area. He asked if they were to receive a notice if they were w-ithin 3�0 feet. He did not receive a notice for the Council meetinQ and no one else did. Mr. Hickok said no mailing was made. Mayor Lund said the mailing would have been before the Planning Commission meetinb pursuant to State law. Mr. Schwartz said in the future, the distance should be extended to more than 3�0 feet. Mr. Knaak said it was pursuant to State law, but that was a minimum requirement. Mayor Lund asked if it could be extended. Mr. Knaak said if they chose to do so in and beyond all the other notices that were provided. He pointed out that if they failed to do that, it was not a basis for denial and it did not cause the procedure to fail. It was just additional notice that the statute required. Councilmember Wolfe said it had been discussed before. Mr. Schwartz said it seemed like it was being done hush-hush, instead of letting the people who owned property in the community and lived there know what was going on. Ms. Joan Olson, 6320 Van Buren Street N.E., said she was not personally affected by the project, but her son ��•as. She asked how much property had been rezoned to S-2 in the last 3 1/z to 4 years. Mr. Hickok said he would make that information available. Ms. Olson asked why the map she had received had not been revised since January of 2000. If the property was zoned to R-3,would it be put on that land. Mr. Hickok said the project was built to R-3 standards even though they asked for a S-2 rezoning. Ms. Olson said she was against it and thought it would be detrimental to the neighbors. Mayor Lund asked if there were updated maps. Mr. Hickok said they had updated maps. Mr. Haukaas said they tried to have maps printed out at all times and they had current maps. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 15 i�ir. Joe Randall, 1210 Ntississippi Street N.E., said he had lived at his address since 19�3. Traffic had arow�n tremendously. Several requests for zoning had also been turned down alon� Mississippi betw�een Old Central and Highway 65. He said he could not get out of his yard between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. �C"ou could talk about statistics, but when you lived in the area, you saw thin�s first-hand. He asked where the concern was for the people who lived in the area. They have maintained their properties, paid their taxes, and raised their kids. The project was for seniors, but he asked where they would aet the money to live there. Mr. Charlie Kocourek, 6330 Arthur Street N.E., said people have talked about traffic and zoning, and it was said that the lona-range plan was for higher density housing in the area. He said the question was hiah density housing, not the zoning. Ms. Dorothy Pehl, 1260 Mississippi Street N.E. said she did not object to the building. The traffic would be a problem. One of the things the bothered her was that they said the neighbors in the area would be contacted, and no one had tried to contact her. She said they also had a sewer problem that needed to be addressed. They have talked to staff and the problem had been ignored. She asked what would happen if the new building came in and they had problems. Councilmember Billings asked Mr. Haukaas to check on the matter. Mr. Hickok said Mr. and Mrs. Pehl talked with them about one month ago. Staff did some research and responded two weeks ago. They indicated that they would be present at the meeting to ask Council to revisit the issue. Councilmember Bolkcom asked what staff's response was. Mr. Bolin said he spoke to Mr. and Mrs. Pehl after the Planning Commission meeting. He said they found that nothing had changed since 1992. The pipe was there and the as-built drawings they had on file showed a 30-foot easement. He said they could not find any more recent records regarding the easement on the pipes. He told them if he found any additional information, he would get back to them. He indicated that staff had not found any additional information. Ms. Pehl said no one had gotten in touch with them. Their initial request was to fill the sewer with cement and pipe it the way it should have been done. She said they were told they could not get the permit unless they signed an easement. They had all the records. The value of their property had dropped because they now had to disclose the information. Mayor Lund asked staff to come up with a solution and to contact Mr. and Mrs. Pehl. Mr. Tim Byrne, 6053 Woody Lane N.E., said the area was commercial and industrial. He did not think any of the people in the area had a say in the Comprehensive Plan because not a single person had said this was what they wanted. It was improperly zoned. He thought it was misleading to say that there could be a siY-story office building there. There would not be any six-story office buildings. He asked how they could rewrite the Comprehensive Plan. The people in the area did not want a high-density housing corridor. Commercial and industrial was fine. It was his opinion that S-2 was a way of getting around the zoning law. He said nothing ' � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVE�IBER 24, 2003 PAGE 16 was being redeveloped_ With respect to traffic, at certain times of the day, EMTs and fire personnel could not Qet throu�h the traffic on Old Central. Someone needed to physically go to Old Central and look at the traffic. V1s. C. J. Smith, 6430 Dellwood Drive N.E., said she was worried about left turns. The projected development had two driveways comina out on to Central Avenue. Anyone who wanted to go north w�ould have a hard time makinQ a left turn. That w�as where the increase of traffic on Pierce Street would come from. People would be turning right and goin6 around the block. She said it would also affect the people by Moore Lake. NIs. Susan Hall, 1491 Rice Creek Road N.E., said she was for redevelopment, especially in the area she lived. She felt uncomfortable with the S-2 zoning district, especially rezoning it beyond the project area. It did not seem to fit the neighborhood. She asked how the area would look when it was completed and if there were any design standards for the area or the overall corridor. She wanted to know what the vision for the area was. If it was going to be high density housing, it should be rezoned for that. Mr. Curt Olson, 1385 — 64`h Avenue N.E., said a majority of the residents on 64th own one-acre lots. He was concerned about the lights from the complex shining into his yard. He said he was in the process of putting a major addition on his house, which he would not have been doing if he had known what was going to be built. If the ptoject was going to go through, people would like to see the building shortened to three stories. The developer sent a revised site plan and their idea of what the Planning Commission called mature trees was apparently 8 to 12 foot pine trees. There were no four story buildings in the neighborhood and they did not want to see it. It was detrimental to their neighborhood. Ms. Rhonda Rusinak, 6412 Pierce Street N.E., said the project would be in her front yard. There was already high density in the neighborhood. They were concerned about traffic when Moore Lake Commons was added. They tried to put up a sign to keep traffic out of the neighborhood which did not work. The neighborhood had absorbed the traffic, but 55 additional homes in this area would make traffic even worse. She was concerned about the value of her home. She was very disappointed that this was even thought about. Ms. Andrea Olson, 1385 — 64`h Avenue N.E., said she did not have a problem with the senior housing portion of the project but asked if it had to be a high-rise building. High-density housing was definitely an issue. People have spoken about the Comprehensive Plan and the fact that it appeared that they did not have much input. This was something that needed to be addressed. It was being used as a guideline and the neighborhood did not vote for it. Traffic was a concern. Mr. Roy DeMars, 1464 Mississippi Street N.E., said the project would not fit into the neighborhood. They would be setting a precedent if they approved the project. He said high density was not riaht. Ms. Jean Schwartz, 1372 — 64`h Avenue N.E., said she was not opposed to senior housing, but she believed they would be setting a precedent with a four-story building in this area. She asked why they needed more hiQh density housing in Fridley when the two-bedroom apartment FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING MINUTES OF NOVENIBER 24, 2003 PAGE 17 " � vacancy ri�ht now ran betw�een 12 and 16 percent. Rezoning to S-2 was a major issue. People purchased their property knowinQ w-hat the zoning cunently was. It had been said that S-2 zonin� would give the Cit� more control. It miaht give the City plannina department and the City Council more eontrol, but it ;ave the citizens almost none. They- could go to Plannin� Commission meetinas and City Council meetings, but most of what they said was dismissed. It took control away and also took the burden of proof off the developers. The Comprehensive Plan did not match with what the citizens wanted. ��Ir. Tom Myhra, 6360 Able Street N.E., co-chair of the Concerned Citizens of Fridley, said before the Planning Commission meeting he received a call about the development on Old Central Avenue. He went to the area and talked to some of the residents, and no one had heard a thing. He spoke with Mr. Hickok and asked why the residents had not been informed. Mr. Hickok told him it was goinQ out. People should have been informed earlier. Many people have talked about the Comprehensive Plan and the Concerned Citizens of Fridley was working on that. Mr. Virgil Okeson, 1423 — 64`h Avenue N.E., said he agreed with a lot of things that had been said at the meeting. He did not have anything against senior housing, but he had experienced the problems his neighborhood had in getting on Old Central in the morning and the latter part of the day. He was concerned about the additional traffic. Also, the driveway for the facility would probably be straight across from 64`� Avenue and the height of the buildin; was too high. It did not fit into the neighborhood. - �Tr. Richard Whinnery, Town Center Development, said they were at the meeting to make a presentation. Mr. John Klick, Klick Inter Arch Designs, said he was the architect for the project. The proposed project, 55 senior condominium units, not only contained the condominiums, but each floor also contained a common area, there were walking paths around the site, and the parking lot was landscaped. The south part of the site was an open azea used for the water retention pond. There were also water gardens along the area by Old Central. There were over two parking stalls per unit. Mr. Klick described the site plan and the proposed drawings for Sandee's Restaurant. Mr. Klick said that one of the concerns brought up was about pazking. The present zoning of C-1 and C-2 allowed for a variety of other uses, some with special use permits. There were some uses that could go into the site without having to be rezoned or have City approval, such as an office building. The impact of that type of use would be greater. People were talking about the traffic in the morning and afternoon. An office building at that location would make the traffic problem worse. Mr. Whinnery said when they were originally contacted about doing the development, they did look the site for many other uses, but they felt it would be better for the community if they kept Sandee's Restaurant and put a senior compleY next to that. If they had put an office building there, it �vould not have had to be rezoned. The reason for the S-2 rezoning was that they felt it FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL �IEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 18 would be better for the whole area to have the control. A senior building could go on that site with the current C-? zoning. The only thinQ needed was facilities to do some care work. The building would not be rental under any circumstances. A studv �vas conducted on the idea of rental versus ownina, and the results showed that there was a very bia need in this area for a senior building. Seniors were areat nei�hbors. VVith respect to the traffic count, they �vere told by the engineers w�ho did the traffic study, that the traftic count was belo�� 8,000 cars. The study was conducted in 200 i on Central Avenue N.E. It was somewhere around 7,000/7,�00 on Mississippi. This area was zoned C-1 and C-2 over 20 years. He believed this project would have the least impact. With respect to the property across Central Avenue, as far as he knew, there were no permanent plans. With respect to the water situation, he said they went to the watershed district and got their approval. They put in an extra large pond and rain gardens to make sure they did not change the flow of water into someone's back yard. The only other thina they could do was to put in a berm. If they did that, they would lose some trees. He said they wanted to be a good neighbor. With respect to Tamarisk's building, they planned on moving it, if it could withstand the move. The buildinj had been moved once before. They called the historical society and were told that it was not a historical building. Councilmember Wolfe asked how many underground parking stalls there were. Mr. Klick said 5 L � Councilmember Wolfe asked about outside parking. Mr. Klick said there were 4 garages and 70 additional surface parking stalls. Councilmember Wolfe said there would be 15 additional spots. He said there had been other projects and what had happened was the Planning Commission and Council had said that once it was there the residents would get used to it. He said that did not happen. Mr. Whinnery said the national average was one car per unit. He said they found,that in a senior building they do not have the extra cars. Mr. Klick said there would be very few people in the building who where 55. Most would be 65 to 75 years old. Councilmember Wolfe asked who approached them for the project. Mr. Whinnery said the City did not approach them. They found the site and it was for sale and they approached the owner of the property. Councilmember Wolfe said that at the Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Whinnery was asked to hold a meeting with the neighborhood. Mr. Klick said the meetinQ was to provide the neighborhood with information with respect to the different trees on the west side of the property. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 19 Councilmember Wolfe asked if that was done. �1r. Whinnery said that one of their staff inembers went and knocked on the doors of all the houses that abutted the west side of the property and gave them a flyer and layout. They did it last Thursday between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. They also mailed a letter and a copy of the site plan to 300 residents in the area. Councilmember Bolkcom asked when that was done. Mr. Whinnery said Friday morning. They were asked to do this two weeks ago. He told the Planning Commission that they could not get it all done within a two-week period of time, ,..: Mr. Klick said there was no requirement to send out the 300 letters. The requirement was to talk to the neighbors to the west. Mr. Whinnery said that was what they understood but after talking with staff, the� got it out to everyone. Councilmember Bolkcom asked how many property owners they contacted on the west side of the property. � Mr. Whinnery said they went to eight properties. Councilmember Bolkcom asked how many they actually had conversations with. Mr. Whinnery said about �0 percent. Some did not want to talk with them. Thev talked about having a meeting earlier this evening, but they felt they got everything out to ever��one. Councilmember Bolkcom said it was hard when someone came knocking on your door at 8:00 or 9:00 at night to have a conversation. She said the landscaping as they presented it would not be in the right-of way. Mr. Whinnery said some trees would have to be removed depending on what was done on Mississippi. Councilmember Bolkcom said there were some questions about the entrances. Mr. Hickok said initially there were two access points on Mississippi and they recommended that they go down to one. With respect to Old Central, those were the locations they submitted: No modifications were made. Councilmember Bolkcom said there was a lot of talk about traffic volume and the numbers were from 2001. She asked if they intended to do anything yet this year. Mr. Whinnery said the clock was ticking on the agreements they had. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24,2003 PAGE 20 Councilmember Bolkcom asked if it would be possible to put out traffic counters. Mr. Haukaas said it would be difficult this time of year, but it could be done. Councilmember Bolkcom said she �vas concerned about the traffic and would like to �et some traffic counts on Old Central and Mississippi and then talk with the County. She thouaht they should meet �vith the residents and discuss the project. She asked about the lights from the buildin� and ho�v it�vould affect the nei�hbors. Mr. Hickok said they were talking about the li�hting in the common area, not necessarily in the units necessarily. Councilmember Bolkcom said she was talking about both. Mr. Hickok outlined what the view would be from a house on Pierce Street and from other areas near the project. Councilmember Wolfe asked how many 1 '/z story houses were behind the project. Mr. Hickok said going south, it went from 1 '/z stories to split level homes, which were a bit taller. Going north, there were a couple of ramblers and there was a side-by-side duplex on the corner. Councilmember Barnette said the City had three senior buildings. He asked what kind of occupancy those buildings currently had. Mr. Klick said those were rentals. Councilmember Barnette asked what the estimated starting price of a two-bedroom unit was. Mr. Klick said that two bedroom units would probably start at $165,000 or $169,900 and go over $200,000. Councilmember Barnette asked what the average home value was in Fridley. Mr. Hickok said it was $163,000. Councilmember Barnette said if an older couple decided to sell their home, they could get into one of those units. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if they had any other senior housing developments near a residential neighborhood. Mr. Whinnery said they had some in Maple Grove and Plymouth. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if they were next to residential or single family homes. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL viEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 21 . Mr. Whinnery said they were. He said he would provide a list. �layor Lund asked staff how this would affect the City's tax base. It was his understandinQ that it would not increase the le�y but would spread the taxes out over more properties. vlr. Hickok said it would spread out the taY base. It allowed the City to ta.x more units at a valuable comparable to the existing neighborhood. It did not increase the levy. Mr. Burns, City Manager, said �vhen they started talking about taxes, it gave the impression that this was a project generated by the City. It was not. It was an unsolicited project and one the City had to deal with legally. Councilmember Bolkcom said there was concern expressed over whether the project should be rezoned S-2. She asked for an explanation. Mr. Hickok said initially the property owner was looking at a senior building that was an assisted senior building. The City Code allowed that in a commercial district. The developer said they were not interested in doing the assisted living. They were interested in doing senior condominiums. They conducted their own studies. Their studies indicated fhat the market was ready for senior units and there were no for-sale senior units available in the community. They looked at it from an R-3 perspective. They could not support spot zoning. It did not match the Comprehensive Plan. The developer did some more research and reviewed the Comprehensive Plan. The zoning that matched the area was S-2. They discussed options and it was suggested that they talk to the property owners who agreed to a S-2 rezoning. Mr. Klick said they could have done a rental property with some limited service areas for seniors which was a permitted use under the C-2 zoning. Mr. Whinnery said they found that by doing it this way, there was more of a personal involvement by the people who owned the property. Everything seemed to go much smoother and they made sure everything was taken very good care o£ He said there was a waiting list for rental properties for seniors. Mayor Lund asked if the outside parking spaces included the spaces being created for Sandee's restaurant. Mr. Whinnery said it did not include the parking for Sandee's. There was an area between the two lots. Mayor Lund said there was some talk about berms and they suggested that it would have to be a large berm. Mr. Whinnery said they would try to get the biggest trees in. He said if they did the berm, they would lose anv trees that were there. - w. FRIDLEY CITY COL'NCIL i�IEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 22 Mayor Lund asked if there were any advantages for Advance and Ziebart with�the rezoning. VIr. Hickok said there were not. Mayor Lund asked what the requirements were for lightina in the parking lot. Mr. Hickok explained what the requirements were. Mayor Lund asked how bliaht �vas determined. Mr. Hickok said it was a miYture of things. It could be under-utilized property, or properties that did not meet current standards in terms of the footprint of the building. Mayor Lund said he was concerned with the two driveways on Old Central and their proximity of one of the driveways to the intersection. Mr. Hickok said staff felt it would be an improvement over what existed currently. The proposal defined an entrance route. It did separate the uses and was much better defined. He said he would not recommend getting rid of one of the driveways because there were two uses with specific interests. Vlayor Lund said he was concerned with how close the entrance was to the intersection. Mr. Hickok said the County and City staff felt that this was an improvement over what currently existed. Mayor Lund said people mentioned the Comprehensive Plan and felt that it was not conducive to what the community wanted. He asked how people could take part in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Hickok said when they first started working on the Comprehensive Plan, people did not attend the meetings. They broke the City into different planning sections and had about seven or eight planning groups. Even though it was approved in March, 2001, it did not mean people could not look at it and suggest modifications. Councilmember Bolkcom said when they were working on the Comprehensive Plan, letters were sent out. They also talked about the meetings at Council meetings. MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to continue the public hearing until December 8, 2003. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. Mr. Hickok said that Stipulation No. 22 did require that a traffic shidy acceptable to the County be completed prior to them getting a building permit. He said they were at end of the 60-day period. He asked Council to consider that and formally let petitioner know. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVENIBER 24, 2003 PAGE 23 • tiPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, NIAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED tiNANI�IOUSLY". 13. CONSID RATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST, PS #03-08, BY TOWN C NTER DEVELOPI�IENT, LLC, TO CREATE TWO SEPARATE LOTS TO ALL W FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOP ENT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1282 MISSISSIPPI STREET AND 6�t90 C NTRAL AVENUE N.E. ARD 2 . MOTION by Council ember Wolfe to continue the.public hearing until December 8, 2003. Seconded by Councilme ber Barnette. UPON A VOICE, AL VOTING AY'E, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMO LY. 14. CONSIDERATIO OF A ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT, ZTA #03-01, BY DAVID BAILLIE, URNITURE OUTLETS USA, INC., TO ADD LANGUAGE TO�"THE CITY CO E WHICH WOULD ALLOW A FURNITURE STORE USE TO HAVE ONE P RKING STALL FOR EVERY 400 SQUARE FEET OF SHC)WROOM SPAC GENERALLY LOCATED AT �353 EAST RIVER ROAD N.E. (WARD 3). MOTION by Councilmember Bol com to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded b Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL TING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUS Y. Ms. Stacy Stromberg, Planner, said she w ld make a presentation on this item and Item No. 17, Special Use Permit Request, SP #03-19. etitioner requested a zoning text amendment to add language to the City Code which would allo a furniture store use to have one parking stall for every 400 square feet of showroom space. ��titioner was also seeking a special use permit to increase the .lot coverage requirements from ,`0 percent to 48 percent to expand the existing building located at 5353 East River Road N. ., so it could be used as additional furniture warehouse.space. Furniture Outlets USA purcha ed the building at 5353 East River Road N.E., formerly the Wickes property. They planned on us" g the building for an Ashley Furniture Store and warehouse. The property was zoned M-2, �eavy Industrial, as were all surrounding properties. The property received access from the E t River Road Service Road. The existing 141,986-square foot building was constructed in 1971. \ Ms. Stromberg said petitioner requested a zoning text ame dment to add language to the parking section of the City Code. It would allow a furniture store u�� to have one parking stall for every 400 square feet of showroom space. The zoning text amen � ent was requested because of the low parking demands of furniture stores. The City Code req'�red that all retail uses needed 1 parking stall for every 150 square feet of retail space. The pr osed showroom, including the clearance area was 47,200 square feet. Current code requirements vould require the petitioner to � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 36 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION C:�RRIED UNANI�IOUSLY. Councilmember Wolfe asked if they w re going to include a size limit. � ;� N1r. Vacka said Mr. Applebaum tol him how big the letters could be. / MOTION bv Councilmember � olfe to modify the sign criteria for the Moore Lake Commons West shopping center to allo for the installation of a non-conforming sign which would be specific to Life Time Transi on, Inc., for a period not to eYceed ninety (90) days. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. i Mayor Lund asked wha��t�he existing height requirement was for the signage. ;i Mr. Hickok said 30 i�ches was the ma�Yimum. Mr. Vacka asked hen the 90 days started. Councilmem er Billings said once the sign was installed. UPON VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTI0�1 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 19. REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #03-02, BY TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM C-1, LOCAL BUSINESS; C-2, GENERAL BUSINESS; M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL; AND C-Rl, GENERAL OFFICE TO S-2, REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO ACCOMMODATE REDEVELOPMENT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1282 MISSISSIPPI STREET; 6490, 6400, 6352 AND 6300 CENTRAL AVENUE; AND 1271 EAST MOORE LAKE DRIVE (WARD 2). and PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST, PS #03-08, BY TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, TO CREATE TWO SEPARATE LOTS TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1282 MISSISSIPPI STREET AND 6490 CENTRAL AVENUE (WARD Z). MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to table consideration of Rezoning Request, ZOA #03-02 and Preliminary Plat Request, PS #03-08, by Town Center Development, LLC, in order to ascertain the necessary information to fully examine and study the request and to extend the review period for City Council action an additional 60 days, and to notify the petitioner in writing of the 60-day eYtension as soon as possible. Seconded by Mayor Lund. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL `IEETING i�IINUTES OF NOVEMBER 24,2003 PAGE 37 tiPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, i�I�YOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANI�IOUSLY. 8. FI T READING OF �N ORDIIYANCE RECODIFYI�iG THE FRIDLEY CITY COD BY A�TENDING APPENDIX F TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADJUSTMENT OF LARIES FOR THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS IN ACCO ANCE WITH SECTION 2.07 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF FRIDLE ., � 1�10TION by Counci ember Bolkcom to deny the first reading of the ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Barne e. Councilmember Billings sked if a motion was needed to set the salaries for the following year. Attorney Fritz Knaak, Ci Attorney, said if the ordinance was not passed, the previous ordinance would stay in plac . Councilmember Billings aske if it would be meeting the requirements of the City Charter. He said a motion to substitute the 2 03 rate into the ordinance would suffice. �., . MOTION by Councilmember Bi�ings to substitute the 2003 salary rates into the ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Bolk om. Mr. Richard Harris, 6200 Riverview errace N.E., said it was his understanding that they were not going to accept an increase for the llowing year. Councilmember Billings said that was the otion. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTI G AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 20. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS. Mr. Scott Hickok, Community Development Di ctor, said earlier in the meeting Mr. Harris commented about coming to City Hall and not �etting service. He said that although the meetings �vith Mr. Harris have been unannounced, h had not turned Mr. Harris away except for today. He said he was in a meeting at 3:00 p.m. Wh he was told Mr. Harris would like to see him, he responded that he was not available but would e glad to meet with him tomorrow at any time he chose. ADJOURNMENT: � MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to adjourn the Cit Council meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. _ _ CITYOF FIZIDLEY FRIDLEY :�it'�[CIP.-�L CE�TER •6-�31 C.��I�-ERS[TY AVE. �.E. FRIDLEY. �i�i��-�32 • (76=.) ��1-3-t�0• FAX (76�) �?1-1'_87 December 4, 2003 Re: Update on the Plat and Rezoning Request by Town Center Development. (55 Senior Owner-Occupied Townhomes at Mississippi & Old Central) To Interested Parties: This letter is being sent to provide you with an update on the Plat and Rezoning requests for Town Center Development, LLC. As of the above date, Town Center Development, LLC has not completed the traffic study requested by the City Council at their November 24, 2003 City Council meeting. The Council required that this study be completed prior to the City Council taking action on the Plat and Rezoning requests. Additionally, the developer still needs to hold a meeting with some of you to further discuss landscaping and screening. The developer has requested that their items be tabled until the January 5, 2004 City Council meeting, to allow them adequate time to complete a thorough traffic analysis and meet with neighboring property owners. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 763-572-3595. Sincerely, � THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. . �,- + i�, � , � � � � , ��.' ��,, ,� �,�,, (.i,`'�f '� r � ��, ; Stacy Stro�nberg ,� Planner i ` ( , , ; � � AGENDA ITEM � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 7, 2003 CRY OF FRIDLEY Date: December 3, 2003 To: William Burns, City Manager !�� From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: Update on Public Hearing for Plat Request, PS #03-08 & Rezoning, ZOA #03-02, Town Center Development M-03-178 Town Center Development, LLC, has not yet completed the traffic study requested by the Council prior to taking action on these items. Additionally, the developer has not met with neighbors to further discuss landscaping and screening. The petitioner indicated to City Staff that they would complete these tasks prior to December 30, 2003 in order to be placed on the Council's January 5, 2003 agenda. City Staff recommends that the Council continue the public hearing on these items until January 5, 2004. 41 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 8,2003 PAGE 10 � MOTION by Councilme' ber Billings to close the public hearing on the 2004 City of Fridley budget. Seconded by Co ncilmember Ann Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE V TE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED i6NANIl�10USLY". i i ll. CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #03-(�, BY TOW1V CENTER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM C-1, � LOCAL BUSINESS; G2, GENERAL BUSINESS; M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL; AND C-Rl, GENERAL OFFICE TO S-2, REDEVELOPNIENT DISTRICT TO ACCOMMODATE REDEVELOPMENT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1282 MISSISSIPPI STREET; 6490, 6400, 6352 AND 6300 CENTRAL AVENUE; AND 1271 EAST MOORE LAKE DRIVE (WARD 2)(CONTINUED NOVEMBER 24, 2003)• MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to continue the public hearing until January 5, 2004. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. Councilmember Bolkcom said the reasons the public hearing was being continued were to allow the developer to ha�d a meeting on Saturday, December 13, at 2:00 p.m. at Sandee's Restaurant, and to receive traffic counts. Councilmember Wolfe said they were also waiting for more information on different uses for the building. Councilmember Billings said at the last meeting there was a motion passed to extend the 60-day period for a second 60-day period. Mr. Hickok, Community Development Director, agreed. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 12. CONSIDERATION t�F A PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST, PS #03-08, BY TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, TO CREATE TWO SEPARATE LOTS TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1282 MISSISSIPPI STREET AND 6490 CENTRAL AVEI�IJE (WARD 2)(CONTINUED NOVEMBER 24,2003). MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to'`�ontinue the public hearing until January 5, 2004. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. `�,� �� UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING �YE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. �� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 8 2003 PAGE 9 Mr. Harris said the City was not participating in the general state tax. �'� ;' Dr. Burns said that was his understanding. ' i , Councilmember Billings said the money went to the State's ge , ral fund. He said Mr. Hams would need to contact his State representative and senator. ,� ,�� ; Mr. Harris l�,�ked if there was going to be a hearing on the tax;es for 2004. Mayor Lund said this was the public hearing on the 2004�iudget. Mr. Harris asked about the property t� valuations. Councilmember Billings said that would be taken;`care of in the spring at the City's Board of Review hearing. When Mr. Harris received his ta�statement from the County in March or April, there would be some dates listed for the City'� Board of Review and the County's Board of Equalization. �� Councilmember Barnette asked why there was an increase on commercial, industrial and residential properties. � Mr. Pribyl said the State tax was one that the'City could not reconcile. There had been an effort by the legislature to move some of the tax burden to the residential properties. Councilmember Barnette asked if Mr. Hanis's situation was different. Mayor Lund said it was not. Councilmember Billings said the State legislature kept tinkering with the formulas. This was the end result. Mr. Harris asked who at the State level set the general State tax. Councilmember Billings said he thought the rate was set by statute and then applied to the valuations. Mayor Lund asked if anyone wished to address the City Council on the 2004 budget. There u�as no response from the audience. Councilmeznber Billings said by statute the budget could not be approved at this meeting. He asked if t�ie hearing had to be continued or of it could be closed. Mr. Pr' yl said the hearing could be closed. At the next Council meeting on Monday, Decemrer 15, 2 03. the Council would be considering a resolution to formally approve the budaet and the tax vy. Stromberg, Stacy From: Hickok, Scott Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:35 PM To: Bolin, Paul; Stromberg, Stacy Subject: FW: Traffic counts on Pierce Good afternoon: Here are the traffic counts from Pierce Street. Stacy will you please make sure that we use this information when the Town Center item is next prepared for Council. You may want to print a copy of this e-mail for the project file (How is that for being a micro-manager?). Scott Scott J. Hickok, AICP Community Development Director City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Phone: (763)572-3590 Fax: (763) 571-1287 -----Original Message----- From: Haukaas,Jon Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:16 PM To: Burns, Bill Cc: Hickok,Scott Subject: Traffic counts on Pierce We tried some traffic counts on Pierce Street on Monday and into Tuesday morning. I say try because of the equipment we have. A slow moving car may register as two cars because there is enough time between each axle crossing it for the counter to reset. We put out two counters and results varied from 210 to 281 cars in the 24 hour period. Below are averaged traffic counts for our reading increments. 9:40am - 12:40pm 25 cars 3 hours 12:40pm -3:40pm 57 cars 3 hours 3:40pm - 6:40pm 62 cars 3 hours 6:40pm - 9:40pm 41 cars 3 hours 9:40pm -6:40am 25 cars 9 hours 6:40am -9:40am 31 cars 3 hours Ray set the counters and did the readings during the day. I did the 6:40pm reading on my way to the City Council meetng, the 9:40pm reading on my way home from Council and the 6:40am reading on my way to work Tuesday morning. JHH i . � �0�1 M.S.�.S. TR.�FFIC VOI-UMES ' (SEE NOTE) MUNICTpAI,ITY OF FRIDLEY � PREPABED BY THE 14IINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM SUPPORT GROUP IN COOPERATION W1TH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMIlVISTRATION 1600 0 �E 1600 3200 FEET 500 0 500 1000 METERS 2001 BASIC DATA - 1993 N �y� a E S LEGEND � INTERSTATE TRUNK HIGHWAY.. .. .... ... . j5 U.S. TRUNK HIGHWAY. .. . ..... . ... 10 STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY... ..... ..... ... . 55 COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY... . .. . 23 COUNTY ROAD. ... ... . ....... . . .. .. . . . . � CORPORATE LIMITS. .. .... .... . .... �-�- PUB�IC ROAD .. . . .. . .. . . ... ... .. . PRIVATE ROAD . .. . .. .. . . ... .. . .. . ,:: � ��LJl�TI��][�AL1[� �°]CAL°IC]E ALg� ��IE�1E1�� l�l� g.EGIENI) _ __...._.. ..r.r� . �n crorrr .�� .." , � � - � , i � '� O �/' �r T��'�N N� � � ��L�N ��N�E� � � � � � � o _ � �� A000� �� r oa �� ; � � � MINNE.�POLIS � �/.p� � N? ? � �Nl Z� � ��tO��L�N �A�t� ;, � � •.� � y �/ � 24�' Zt. ? m i I � d . � � � .�- - - _ _ -- 1�' ��I w � o`� I / ��'`( a, A nc`� -�+i' � Lr . / � � /� p p � tn ; \ i 0'�y,�9 M1tH ST = � � 1jENNEPIN �' ,�- � � O a , � p, _ i� =� o n 3 `�� / �' ��,S� y �^9�� ' � � _ ' � - _ ti ' - - � S'rp RIvER - ` 7 ti' � - -l�lisstssibp1 - - - - _ � �'y C,➢9 e'P �'-�' r a � .�G� � �n '1 A �*O` C� '� W UJ�lI�"� i q� ' _ ' .� ' - ' /� ' �H0.RTM4N � - - FZiver� }d� ,flQ�` `�d ?$N �N� y �VE• N.E. � 7 7 r�1V p % 0A C� : cn Q '%-� �, � b RSvERVIEw: �� p B9 > o D' m C�. � s �.1 i AI4ERV/fW� TEA i � .n r� CIR. j LO a y � = 4t � 'k4RSH � P�' � �INOUSTA74 � �r � RIvERW00D DRTER. \ p�� o !� v� o,t = N 4�C w $7. N.E. � .Q � y o � �o -'�eO 4 Pi � �n" \v: � A 'j. � HICNORY a m ST• �, SH p I L � z 3 5 5 � n N N e a v E.� ; o < D Z �,m �,�� y j 1 N � -� �N�mz Td C M 4 D G E � y � v . . � m ' EAST F �`P' n R �( � "' L m c'� m � �� 1.1l� HICKORY yST. H�C = L t�'w� a S T. wl N RIVE ��` ' K j O � y A . A p ]�,d �a �' S m O'f� v 1� n �LQ 7 a �N lw u L. ti a = r\� 9 - n � � �n N �,� �' � '^ � -'c a= � z (u�'�� 147QO � 4SHTON dVE. �',Tj ~ � � HICKOPY PL. ; $ ` . � . (_lF.l 01 z � � / i t f N g � �• "'�� y ,t^' �4 j E�ECH " 5T. N.E. � N I,,,4 t� B. N. S. F. � � N � N r > a V"�' � a m < � "_ � � � � �I� p� av E. < ��' �A.. �9 t ' q�r0,y K n�� o� ELM �ST. N.E. q U 0� 5T. N.E. 3 3 4 � g N�=- I S H O H n d�E. v� Q� � � f � �� MAI�X� �_y�_.11�� Burli.tiwn Northerrt b Sanm Fe Ry. Co. < r� p � �� V o o c� y � � y z N orthrm C� SaNa Ft STARIITE '� �t j R a 1 4 w y C°• c' � O� �9 �oo S" �i �� __ a u x rn Q Burli�g+ton K B'.V p. 'nST i s a N :h z y m z �,C • MAIN 5T. �i� � � (�^t� �� . m a�71 (� - �� D � � � ^`' �C 42U0N.� 3�� RIHITT� oa. � :,� a� = sco ce �7n(1 `a �� CeIIFORNIa 5T. - s r/�y� � s ' U 57. -~� I M ✓ m `F z��1 1�V � a M A I N � N . y. � o r >� g` 2 r W S T. � '�r�' �.� '�I(�. 3 3'i L�A 1 d�A�� R A N C R D. 6VOO •�710 a r, C� MAIN �, � m 2nd �o ST. o N.E. ��Oµ �y0 '�` 70 <''�,, a S v� Q � a � 9 � � �� 2nd ' m ST. < N.E. < nRVIE �„ .� a ,� nt� y g -P' pl4 j d �F � ME`i+C � 39/ a Y 2/x ~St. µ � \! o i ST ' N � � � �N.E. RISF�3 11a; D yq � c� 4 q� s� � R SERVICE A� 6R. z O 43 0 2��z��1 ST. 'T N.E. _ �PA _ +- /I £ �7rd <ST. T4'p v Li�a 9L� � RSITY nnn� �d O 3rd < �� 5 T. o < N.E. f�"� ORIZ O N�Q dy 1 ��o �m _ n � Q SERVIC� L I r � O t� . • � 4 i h S 7. r v � 11NIVER5ITY . �^�E.��'�N'E J 4th %n SEP�ICE -� evE. � � � P o o Sr6a °' (� N UNIVFI2SITY 1l �� a' ST. RICE �E' -°er A P H� Ny 51h ST. � ^ V $T. 2 n Stha \ T. �a N.E. +� CREEK � < yC0 ST « �" _ < I �y O�l n n� � ra � a v� � N E. �.�9n h B l w. n m 7EM � ^ .4 Sth u� m 5T. m Y40 �,VW � � m� 'iq6a m z A P� C '< �N.E. ' � � c ME�F � `9 � � 6,h � � fl�5T. _ � 3 8� a � ' T � ' m a . �� 7 3l2 N.E. 3' r S �h � � CON r d0 �r o /2 h. < � W Hr � m COLUM�I� I�EIG�I]['I'S �, . � in m WASHINGTCY W 5T. i� �'iwE 'ST O M � "i � � .^WASH INGTON mST. y m SN�^, y O F'u �' �' MADIS � N m � m �p J£FFER ST• z JEF tRSO ,� t oA ?p 57, {� C1R m,1EFF ERSON $T•N.pp� �j � z N roy � m� 9 � G. �� w < z o 7 z p N MnD15 w< 5T. � 2��0 I 0 s� vi ST. W � �.Or c� v r � �' m = $i L� a �p o ��" y MONROE 5T.N.E. in U my0NR0E MO OE ' St• � � y < � p-2 Q� MAOISON � � < z n � T ,316�A � a JACKSON 5 T. o C� tp p l < n m �m o 31 OUIN� S�v v au�N 33 0� � , �� g /`+ a J m p�iNCY ST, o ZOOO � O� /'C.z ST.w m z y o � VAN BUREN ST, r+ i g� � z� � ? � wEST MOOa Ja:K. 50� � n o � Jacx50N �"� Cz,:,;� OL N o a y N�v C� � � ,�.33p \�a l,o� VAt.BUREN a 5 - J �,9 'a0 D�O 2 �7 PBLE 5T. � � "' i L+ $ 5T.32 ^ O �� .7` �'i � a ABLE �ST. a oy m Ae �� 3 BAKE � y� � m � Q n^ r B. �n y .�� P�Y e � 24 C r 330 ��. 3 p o � 22 ,KEa'�a5�2 OeKL DR. '�' ,y0 .a o. O �� , �� O V � m m�'� y � � N+� � � I a CCA� `�:P�� 3 N w� 7aYLOP 5 KVIEW T� DR.3$ W o v�p O� � a 51. N.E. iF C� � � f TAYIOR S7. K N u24. S y _ O � �o n T VIRON R0. �/ i n 4�, } '/ I n FILLMOR � � c'�, ��i Y • z CSA LA. :^ � „o U a � � ST. ; Q a �,e � ; �I OELLW000 DR. P� a n 'J n � N � � � � ;^ Fi LLMORE 5T. �L iPIERC ST F � � � '�' g ) RCE 5'. � ? � o O m a� � O �w � � I w o � m ti� m O T�4� s$RF 1°IfRCE 5T. '� a � n < � < m f m�(� �O � � BUCIiAN a o I REGIS�n D � �'p0 d� '••� < �= m � m � �"' �� 4.�1L. � . y NiENN150N DR. Of, q ,.. •da� �3 m AV S T. O.� O d `� • � C E N T R A L y p � � �INCO� 5�7. Ty p m 35/ Q p�1 ^� 78� �e� �"avE.C .E. w ERT z � u, ; o m � 57. � � m C7. o i Ir A (` . �rTR. A .ZEF� d C� �4 CIR v 1� a - O a` � O � p 7 p p o � I 3 3!3 y i a Ho7E5 . �N.E^�z 8 �'' n s �q�(�Q 'o�Z G ,, � � �',r � � SIVERTS � S� o � o A p � Wn17$E � o a �P ' o �+ ,f?'�'jC. �� s O � � � La.N.E. � BaCON 0� < z � F�INER PdSS�c� � W' o h� o A p i •� ... � y C I R,z � C� n � � y �?� � m n �' ' q C � �s � m � � m z z O piq ST.MORS}Z �q �W m LA. 57. . pqM = m a � !^ "� p THU S L edCON B ^� � �� F � n KE�RY � R�H3 w � � PI NE PEE �/OOON � I{� ^a i��.l�r� �g :�1 2. z .O� . � OAKw000 ��z f:k �F. �A" � OUIRE 3 6 CNOKG m S7. _ _ _ � O LP. � Pl. RD. � � 1 ✓ p a �-jQ .n9dV4R]dN N PqSS d R T H U P $7. MANOR � m N c S 0..� a � 5. �N O K P $T. '^ -N�z ' L A K E S 1 - - ' - J o �_ �E a m m a � a �' mN e, 15. z BEN AMIN m . SL �2 a � CKIN LEY 5T. p�T p p� � 2 ME'7Si �INNSBAUCX 42 MCKMlE7 m A WMCKI NDLEY \ 5T. !^ �� m� m I 8 w 8 �p lSl`'�A� C�• m `9 Eft p � 35,j$T)NSON BL`/D. S�.1MIER DR. m E BAVdR1GNmU ACT t�.� "' � � ST' a _ �\L \ \�_ \�1_ \\1_ � PLE�a00�IEw DR. 353,� � �N�g� C�] m P � sT�Ns�oN < e��o. �! vr RANSS�Y CO. _ 1�� Z\UPQSS�U.� - � - �BLVD. � ^ �N� l0 �/ 5TIN5\ z A Ra�l•5��.Y C�. i / � � ,. 0 1 m) o �_, . � � v oI�_ ' ��N�� W NIEW BRIG�IT�N 1 � 0 � � _ — _ _ .. . 274.5' � �j —... � • � /''r r ��__��_+.L?�� ,\ _ • I /�� , � / � / � i STORM POND i � � i , �� — � � � � 1 ' i + � �� `�� i r � . � �i ��.. ""� G � �t7 � �� ^� I �� - f � �� -----_� I �� _, � � >-;�� . ,;,� . � i�� , ,.. �t ��--�� '`� � 6 '�� ;�� '� �' � � � �� '� . - �. c 3 -� � n I A ' —_ ` _ — _ / � m � m /� �.�3��. I I m I ( `G N ^;� � m �-p II � I fk I � �'^ Romp—) �<dx I 1 ` 'd�' u`, i � � � . u � II �� ; � _ � .� ,� , � ��. � . U� � ;�i ` � i ; . , � ° ' -- n � � V• j • �\ /, '=~ ��i A � ` � � N � ^� I',:. 9 C ' , ' i�,' '�i z ` ; - .0 i � � / _l _ 4 spaces @ c� X < � � L 9'+l @ �� ;�� A� � I 20 �a'' �° a _ � � . + i2' 48' c� C � -./_ I p• 3 � � �� , �, � N �� p� v � ' � o (� � o '" = a - `�--�` � ; o N p� . a � � '; �'` � o e. � t ,��r u �o :� c Z 1 � a ° ' � Y � C � o � ;; _ �n , � ' ' ; � -� � �, � --� �, — --- -- � - . ��. � � ;` ,; � � � i �i „ �' � � �� o _ � b i �p � ' f� a i � — � i �V -_ — - -- �_��— - �._, - - - L__ i _ OVERfLOW PARKINQ� 1S ' � 5 spaces @ I SPACES e O � ��' 10'=50' 18' 25' 20' 20 25 20' 7' 25' 18' 10'_0' � i � - - j�j( � V v cn cn cn o _ � v � - :-�'�'�?� o v �n � � ♦ v fl O O O i jl O � u�, w v�Di n .;I p � � ' � � en en en � rn � M o 0 0 � � u ii u �', ii I�j�� cr cn cn o c+ v I � �\� s Ap� o 0 0 0 � -, I� � a c > D � \C' � M o 0 on� Z � 7�n7p � � , rn . �' � „�: n v�^m nvGi Z \M � N D � 'i�'i+� n �Av�iDp .n Cn I J.. �� "O (n I Z Ow � �w C -'� ii ~ I� =1 £�^D ^' DONDo � M i� r � a b spaces @ 1 0'=6 0' S spaces C� 1 0'=5 0' n �� n �� D � `\ .. . . .. _ Din p NDDv� � � S � 25' G i �G in A � � c z - - � - - - - - _ r _ . 274.5' .�.i � ' �t'` ,*^'`��_ � � � � �� • i_ • � • � � i.'r X _ _ � � _ . �___ ..,...... " ..:'� �...I' ...' � Z L1 � O N w vwi t�i� A N� O � MISSISSIPPI ' ' "' ' ' " � GGG G G G� o I� � � n � PZ Y m N � a � n n a n� n a a � G�G � rGG o p °N � `�; 4 REVISIONS ............... ,��e�io` � � Q_. I hereb�Certlty T6nt � a 7/1 03-476 Y 9= � Rhtp Plnn lfep Preperod .�y�,�_pbpp S � � '�' g s £ _ By 1(e Or Under 1�7 ��/,�-� g `� � PROPOSED SENIOR °"� �'� °'�°�`�"�""'°�"'° n � H 18 DECEMBER 03 E;� � ��R�rceroa Wy � _ � HOUSING ��,�, � — ,��a� m O � x Under'[het lawp Ol FRIDLEY,MINNESOTA PD$ The�tele Ot �, ,� .. ��7A .. � m C 7 Appppy�HY ... �D S y JTK _ • IQdOK INTER AROH DE,91dN �-` � I�d.-It2EE � AGENDA ITEM � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 2004 CffY OF FRIDLEY Date: December 29, 2003 To: William Burns, City Manager �� From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: Public Hearing for Rezoning Request, ZOA#03-Q�, Town Center Development M-03-189 INTRODUCTION Town Center Development, LLC, is requesting a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and E. Moore Lake Drive. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and industrial zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. The owners of Advance Companies, Ziebart, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have agreed to the rezoning request. [Supplementary reading materials available in Council's reading file] PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At the November 5, 2003, Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for ZOA#03-02. After receiving public comment and discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of rezoning request, ZOA#03-02, with the 24 stipulations as presented and an addition of stipulation #25 to read, "The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening between the proposed development and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24, 2003." THE MOTION CARRIED UNIMOUSLY. PAST COUNCIL ACTION The City Council tabled action on this item and continued the public hearing until January 5, 2004. The Council requested that a more detailed traffic analysis be completed and that the developer meet with surrounding property owners to further review screening of the site. Traffic Analysis The petitioner hired Traffic Data, Inc. to prepare a detailed traffic study of the areas 47 surrounding the proposed development. A full copy of the report has been included in the Council reading packet. The consultant determined that under all scenarios, the functioning of the roadways and intersections would not be negatively impacted by the senior development. Furthermore, the traffic-engineering firm stated that neither a traffic signal nor other roadway improvements would be necessary to accommodate the traffic from the development. The numbers presented in the study match closely the traffic counts conducted by the City's engineering staff. Neighborhood Concerns The developer invited 88 property owners to a meeting at Sandee's Restaurant on December 13, 2003. It was reported to staff that the neighbors were most concerned with the height of the building. To address the concerns with height, the petitioner met with staff on December 18th to discuss "Plan B" (also included in the Council's reading packet). Plan B is a 3-story, 54 unit senior condominium building. The loss of 1 story of building height requires that the building be extended to the north and east in a "U"shaped configuration. ' Plan B would allow for more (72 stalls) of the senior parking to be placed underground and would not impact the number of parking stalls required for Sandees. Staff did note that if Plan B should become the approved site plan, a minor correction would need to be made in regards to the drive aisle into the parking ramp. A 25' wide drive is required for two-way traffic and the proposed alternative site plan shows only a 20' wide drive aisle. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Staff recommends approval of the rezoning to S-2 and with it the accompanying master plan for the zoning district. Staff has reviewed both proposals, the original 4-story and the 3-story alternative, and determined that either building design would fit on the site, but that the 3-story alternative would be less intrusive to the neighborhood west of the development. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests, above (including stipulation #26 if Plan B is the site plan approved with the rezoning). 1. Property to be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1, dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering Firm. 2. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Patio on the north side of Sandee's to be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 48 7. Petitioner to provide clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. Existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 10.Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 11.Restoration of bike path along Central after will be required after completion of senior complex. 12.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 13.Storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 16.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 17.Petitioner to pay any required Park Dedication Fees. 18.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22.The petitioner to provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 23.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 24. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 25.The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening between the proposed development and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24, 2003. 26. All drive aisles to be used for 2-way traffic shall be 25' in width. 49 ORDINANCE NO.___ ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the Fridley City Code is amended hereinafter as indicated, and is hereby subject to the stipulations as shown in Attachment 1. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lot 1, 2, & 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, except road, subject to easement of record. 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive: Lots 1-5, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, subject to easement of record. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District S-2 (Redevelopment District). SE CTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned District C-1 (Local Business), C-2 (General Business), C-R1 (General Office), and M-1 (Light Industrial) to S-2 (Redevelopment District). PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 5'�" DAY OF JANUARY 2004. SCOTT J. LUND— MAYOR ATTEST: DEBRA A. SKOGEN—CITY CLERK Public Hearing: November 24, 2003 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 50 City of Fridley Land Use Application ZOA#03-02 November 5, 2003 GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: 1980-Addition to kitchen. Town Center Development, LLC 13750 Reimer Drive 6400 Central Avenue: Maple Grove MN 55311 1959- Building constructed. Requested Action: 1969-Warehouse built. Rezone property from C-1, C-2, CR-1, M-1 to S- 1975- Lot is platted. 2. 1988-Addition to building. Location: 6352 Central Avenue: 1282 Mississippi Street, 6490 Central Avenue, Vacant Lot 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue: 6300 Central Avenue, 1271 E Moore Lake Drive 1975- Lot is platted. Existing Zoning: 1976- Building is constructed. 1282 Mississippi Street-C-1, Local Business 1271 E. Moore Lake Drive: 6490 Central Avenue-C-1, Local Business and Vacant Lot C-2, General Business Legal Description of Property: 6400 Central Avenue-M-1, Light Industrial 1282 Mississippi Street: 6352 Central Avenue-CR-1, General Office Part of Lot 3, Auditor�s subdivision#ss 6300 Central Avenue-M-1, Light Industrial 6490 Central Avenue: 1271 E Moore Lake Drive-M-1, Light Industrial Lot 1, 2, and 3, Auditor's Subdivision #88 6400 Central Avenue: Slze: Lot 1, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace Approximate size of entire area to be rezoned: 6352 Central Avenue: 374,880 sq. ft. 8.6 acres Lots 2 & 3, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace Existing Land Use: 6300 Central Avenue: Tamarisk Resources, Sandee's Restaurant, Lot 4, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace Advance Companies, Ziebart, and vacant land 1271 E Moore Lake Drive: Surrounding Land Use&Zoning: �ot 5, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace N: Office Building, Apartments & C-2, R-3 Council Action/60 Day Date: E: Commercial & Residential homes & C-1, C- City Council-November 24, 2003 2 60 Day Date-December 1, 2003 S: Shopping Plaza & C-3 SUMMARY OF REQUEST W: Duplexes & R-2 The petitioner, Town Center Development, LLC, Comprehensive Plan Conformance: is requesting to rezone the property located at Future Land Use Map designates this area as 1282 Mississippi St., 6490 Central Ave., 6400 Redevelopment. Central Ave., 6352 Central Ave., 6300 Central Zoning History: Ave., and 1271 E. Moore Lake Dr., from C-1, 1282 Mississippi Street: Local Business, C-2 General Business, M-1, 1948-Lot is platted. Light Industrial and CR-1, General Office to S-2 1952-House is built. Redevelopment District to accommodate 1985-Property rezoned from R-1 to C-1 redevelopment of 1281 Mississippi Street and 1987-Lot split approved to split off the northerly 6490 Central Avenue and to expand the 213 feet of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, redevelopment district to the end of the block. same being this property. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS 6490 Central Avenue: City Staff recommends approval of this 1948- Lot is platted. rezoning masfer plan request. Building constructed pre-1949 • Proposed rezoning is consistent with the 1954-Addition to building. Comprehensive Plan. 1966-Addition to building. 51 2 Special Use Permit . Provides housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg & Paul Bolin 52 ZOA#03-03 & PS#03-08 OVERVIEW The requests: Town Center Development, LLC, is requesting two separate land use actions from the City of Fridley in order to construct 55 senior owner-occupied condominium units at 6490 Central Avenue. The two actions being requested are a Plat and a Rezoning, both of which will be examined individually in this report. A Plat is being requested to create two new parcels, from 1282 Mississippi Street, currently Tamarisk Resources, and 6490 Central Avenue, currently Sandee's and the vacant lot south of it. Sandee's Restaurant will occupy one parcel and the other parcel will allow for the construction of the 55 senior condominiums. The petitioner is also requesting a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and E. Moore Lake Drive. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and industrial zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District The owners of Advance Companies, Ziebart, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have agreed to the rezoning request. � . - , � — __ � m�. � ya4� ",� '``��y.� tf�z�`Y �`"�-s"'�'� �3t��'� Xu 4 ��°4��•�¢ �s--�z�a� .� ��s ��'��- �`"� �, ' � . �`� �� '' 9 � ��'�,��'�_ ��'��C�' �s� �s�i. �� ' � �' . �+� � ; ��t�t. z''A � � �"`��, *�9a '��.a b� '� �'- �".-�� n d' `��'.5 a��-��k��# a " �� -.. Rezonin �: � � � � �� °' �� , ` �,�� a� �� : & �� , � � � << � � �� ,. � � � z m �� k �< � � ��»° �� , �� _ � � y � ,�H 3 � �s #�.�� #' � �^ '�m� �` .. �� '� o �' �' ��:�� ,�� :.. ^��-� �� ,�'�,�<.�:;.,a ` ,�t� � ��tc� ��"� � r v , r . : . t. - ' S � � �aas`r; �, '' M`_ex' �,� -� . :€ 35�*r�;,,� « ,:: ,.. :.., a ,°. � "�� ' �';� �»�' ' � � � � � �,.. 5§�� ;�, ��.rt+ , s�� _ -;. '�", � �� ti � , , `",�;�� ..�� .��` ezoning � �� t � �� y � �;t �`- � � � �,-�m. _ '�`� � ��, �' � �� "``��f �+�� "%.� _ u p _ . , � Proposed Project: Town Center Development, LLC, is proposing to construct a 4-story 55-unit senior condominium complex south of Sandee's Restaurant. Sandee's Restaurant will remain, but will be under new ownership. The proposed 55 units will be owner-occupied and comprised of 2 bedroom units. Thirty-one of the units will be 1,138 square feet, 8 of the units will be 1,185 square feet, and the remaining 16 units will be 1,255 square feet in size. The development will include 51 underground parking stalls and 4 garage stalls and additional surface parking. A storm pond will be located on the south end of the project, with a trail system and landscaping surrounding the property. 53 SITE HISTORY In 1991, Tom Brickner requested a rezoning of the vacant property located south of Sandee's Restaurant and west of Central Avenue from C-1, Local Business, and C-2, General Business, to R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling in order to construct a 48 unit, three story apartment building. This rezoning request was similar to the one before us today; however, it requested a rezoning to R-3, Multi-Family and was essentially an island of R-3 zoning, surrounded by commercial and industrial properties. Ultimately, it was denied based on the fact that it was spot zoning. _ ,,.��._.,�._.._.,.�..�.�.�: � � � " ,2as , ' ; sass , � 48 � �; 6449 ' � �s � � � �..., ._� >�a �� s.�z s ia " � sa�� m _ � �o cn� s�oa _. _ a � �&389 3E ' &QDO `�..� ,8 &3T3 � r�'�` - ? 6361 ' y �.-___ �63SS ,:�s,� , ' � � 534� i . � � �,-`�-__ � � � &335 a y � � r� 63��r' j o � � �6315 � Circle signifies that area that was proposed to be rezoned in 1991. ANALYSIS Rezoning Request ZOA #03-02 The petitioner is requesting a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and East Moore Lake Drive. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and industrial zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. The properties requesting the rezoning request are 1282 Mississippi Street (Tamarisk Resources, zoned C-1, Local Business), 6490 Central Avenue (Sandee's and vacant lot south, zoned C-1, Local Business and C-2, General Business), 6400 Central Avenue (Advance Companies, zoned M-1, Light Industrial), 6352 Central Avenue (vacant lot, owned by the HRA, zoned CR-1, General Office), 6300 Central Avenue (Ziebart, zoned M-1, Light Industrial) and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive (vacant land, owned by the HRA, zoned M-1, Light Industrial). The only properties that are proposed to be redeveloped are 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue; the others will remain as they exist today. 54 �..�...�.a`�..,.�......�� ' 1282 � a � i 6459 �" � � l$ �fw349 �`�' `� m t6 �' � �-- � '4 �� 6423 � � �� 12 n 6411 : � rn ltI (p,, 6401 €�` ___ � �� 6389 � r i GdOfl ,8 r_ s�ra � � ~'___ ,,s�s�' 1 a ��--�� _ssss � � � �� ,� �s��r � ; 3 f 1 i�```-- j m «� �` G3,��_ 7 � "� � ^W � � � �3�� tj � . �� Zoning Map—Shows mix of zoning and properties to be replatted and rezoned. The City's Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. State Statute gives the City the authority to "rezone" property from one designated use to another, so long as the zoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan was developed with resident input taken from several meetings held between 1998 and 2000 and is a "tool intended to help guide future growth and development of the community...lt is a plan because it contains goals, policies and strategies that all work together, looking to the future and working towards achieving a community wide vision". In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed senior owner-occupied condominium complex and rezoning of the property meet several of the objectives the residents of Fridley identified in the visioning session for the Comprehensive Plan. The area of Old Central between Mississippi Street and Rice Creek Road was identified as an area for future redevelopment. Redevelopment is described in the Comprehensive Plan as a form of community revitalization that transforms undesirable elements into desirable elements that reflect the community collective vision. The purpose of redevelopment is to provide the opportunity for more efficient land uses and eliminate inefficient land uses and under utilized parcels. Redevelopment can a/so provide an opportunity to build new facilities, meet current market demands and desires of the City, and eliminate incompatible land uses. All the above purposes of redevelopment have the potential of being met with the rezoning of these properties. The Comprehensive Plan specifically states that for this portion of Old Central, "consideration should be made to replacing the current mix of single-family residential 55 and commercial uses with higher density residential development that together with the health club may serve as an attractive residential location for move-up housing". The Comprehensive Plan also states that for projects in these redevelopment areas requiring rezoning that the S-2 zoning designation "would be the appropriate Zoning district to implement for the redevelopment project. The intent of the district is to provide the City with site plan review authority to determine if the proposed project meets the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive and Redevelopment Plans". The Comprehensive Plan, in both the Future Land Use &the Housing chapters, addresses the desire for a variety of housing types in a number of goals listed below. . Ensure that adequate opportunities exist for the development of a variety of housing types at a range of affordability levels including low, low-moderate and high cost housing to meet the life-cycle needs of Fridley residents. . Create sustainable, self-reliant, mixed-use and mixed-income neighborhoods that contribute positively to the quality of life and image of Fridley. . Ensure a variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. . Strengthen neighborhoods and improve upon the quality of the City's housing stock. . Diversify the housing supply to include move up housing both in the form of rental and owner occupied housing. As Fridley's residents continue to age, demand will increase for"empty nester" and senior housing. There will be an increased demand for senior rental, senior owned condominium/town homes, and assisted living facilities. The proposed project, 55 senior owner-occupied condominium units, will meet some of the current demand for those seniors seeking alternatives to their current housing type. To avoid spot zoning and achieve the Comprehensive Plan's goal for this area, the petitioner has received permission from Advance Companies, Ziebart, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to request the rezoning from their current zoning designations to the S-2, Redevelopment District. Plat Request#03-08 Town Center Development, LLC, is seeking to replat the properties located at 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue to create two separate lots. One of the newly created lots will accommodate the Sandee's Restaurant, and the other will be used to allow for the construction of a 55-unit owner occupied senior condominium development. The property at 1282 Mississippi Street is currently zoned C-1, Local Business. The existing building was constructed in 1952 and is currently being occupied by Tamarisk Resources. The property at 6490 Central Avenue has a split zoning of C-1, Local Business and C-2, General Business. Sandee's Restaurant occupies the northeast corner of the site and the remainder of the property is vacant. The proposed replat will consist of two lots; Lot#1 and Lot#2, Block 1, Town Center Development. Rezoning a property to S-2, Redevelopment District allows for the maximum 56 flexibility for a redevelopment project; however, City staff asked the petitioner to design their project to try to meet the zoning classification codes most similar to their intended use. The proposed Lot#1 will accommodate Sandee's restaurant. Restaurants are typically zoned C-2, General Business. Proposed Lot#1 is 24,525 square feet in size, which exceeds the minimum lot area requirement for the C-2, General Business District. Proposed Lot#1 also meets all the parking requirements for size and number of parking stalls required for a restaurant use. Anoka County has had the opportunity to review the proposed project and has stated that additional right-of-way on Central Avenue and Mississippi Street will be required for future reconstruction purposes. They anticipate that a 120 ft. right-of-way corridor will be required for both Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersections in order to provide the necessary turn lanes for future safety and operational purposes. The County assumes when the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection is reconstructed, it would be centered in the 120 ft. right-of-way corridor. Consequently, roadway right-of-way dedication needs for this site are 27-30 ft. adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 ft. adjacent to Central Avenue. Therefore, the County is requesting that at this time, both of the right-of-ways be dedicated. Due to the necessity of the right-of-way acquisition along both County Roads, the Sandee's restaurant building will be less than 1 ft. from the north property line, 3 ft. from the east property line, and the parking setback will be 5 feet from the north property line. The additional land acquisition will also require the petitioner to remove his existing patio area on the north side of the building. As stated above, due to the flexibility allowed in the S-2, Redevelopment district, the diminished setbacks can be recognized under this rezoning master plan approval. �� ,� � � , � �� =s;. �� E • ��. �� _ �� ,, ��.�' � �"� � � '",� �: � �, �#`�+s. �', � `. �j `-- `"�� f r - ,� � �, � t�! * �- � �� , .. g � �� _.. ��, �ym. ��4� �'�_ `__� � �. . � � �.� � �e� � , g� � ,�*` .�. �: _ ¢ y ��,�y� ''�� ` �.� -�: �� -§. �� ' � �$� � �� € .� f�' . '�' '. e �� "'� ��fy�" � • �q"': � �rg ...�" ,.K :s " s � '�" � e� '��. g� �� 3 '�� _ �� -�1�� 'l" ,5��. E ' �+� y f �; �<� U d v; �f "` �`�v f.� � �� Y�' �� ,�, a.. � � �� , �; e� " e�. �"' y d''' �0�,(.,�,��''_ .r�� '��.�,�'�. ��i �e � r^ �'9 �3 ,, '�`E � � ��s1: ��. ��,��`�`�.�C` �� `�`� 3� � —�� '� +��, . . n� 5�"��, �� ;� �`a e '� . �� ,�` -�,',t �q�� *�S.a r , � a .� �� 4� .�', :�� , ��.,�,� i � Y 8 €��.11k�p � {, � «" � & 9 �. � �'ty �°�k�a`� 3 r 3 � ��..: . `•. � �, �°� .� ,�` �,�.L' ��+e'� . .. m � `�"�,`� � ,,,F�� az . �� s�. � � �� , �¢ #,* . � '..� �' �`:- s� `�" - �.4!_ :,€ ��" ��2'k .'C �l,a �k �'�%'' � 3�'d��:Ci� ��.. rv�q �� r..�.��,�,..,,.�,�. .,.,� �.. The proposed Lot#2 is 126,075 square feet (2.89 acres) in size. The petitioner is proposing to construct 55 senior owner occupied condominium units. The development will include 51 underground parking stalls and 4 garage stalls located at surface level. Because of the underground parking and the high water table in this area, the height of the building will be 51 feet at the midspan. The parking setback will be 10 feet from the property line on the east side of the property, due to the additional right-of-way being acquired by the County. 57 TRAFFIC Staff utilized a number of sources to determine the possible impacts that 55 senior owner occupied condominium units may have on the local traffic patterns. In addition to discussions with Jane Pemble, Anoka County Traffic Engineer, staff examined the Institute of Traffic Engineer's Trip Generation, consulted the Transportation chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and reviewed the traffic study supplied by Loucks &Associates. Anoka County City Staff contacted Jane Pemble, Traffic Engineering Manager at Anoka County, who stated that currently the County has no plans or allocated funding to reconstruct, provide safety improvements, or signalize the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection. Political and social pressures may determine when the intersection is re-worked. She also stated that it is not clear whether or not this development will have a significant impact on traffic volumes and/or turning movements. In order to determine the impacts, a tra�c study for this particular intersection will need to be done. Institute of Traffic Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation The 4th Edition of ITE's Trip Generation manual does not have a specific category for SENIOR RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOMES. As a result, Staff reviewed the traffic generation numbers for RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS. The RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS are not age specific, meaning that the numbers provided include persons of all ages and family sizes living in condominium style housing. As seniors may have very different driving habits (ie. may be retired and rarely drive, or choose to drive at the least busy times of day) the numbers presented by the ITE Trip Generation manual may be viewed as a worse- case scenario for the number of trips to be generated by the proposed development. The ITE Trip Generation manual states that for residential condominiums, each unit generates 5.85 trips/day. A trip means any vehicle entering or leaving the complex. For example, leaving for work&then returning from work would count as 2 trips. Given the 55 units, it would be expected that a total of 322 vehicles would enter or leave the complex during the course of a day. When the data is further analyzed, by time, the impact of these vehicles on the surrounding roadways is negligible. During the morning rush hours of 7- 9AM, an additional 24.5 vehicles are entering or leaving the neighboring roadway (Old Central) over the two-hour timeframe. During the afternoon rush hours of 4-6PM, an additional 30 vehicles enter into or leave from the complex. The following table summarizes what the ITE Trip Generation manual states a residential condominium complex generates for traffic during peak rush hours. ITE PEAK HOUR TRIPS/UNIT TIME #of Trips/ Unit #of Units Total Vehicle Trips 7-9 AM .446/ Unit 55 Units 24.5 Tri s 4-6 PM .561 / Unit 55 Units 30 Tri s Comprehensive Plan —Transportation Chapter The City's Comprehensive Plan indicated that in 2001, the portion of Old Central adjacent to the proposed senior condominiums carried 8,000 vehicles per day and, at this traffic 58 level, was only carrying 57% of the traffic for which the roadway was designed and constructed to function at a Level of Service (LOS) D. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates Old Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the year 2020, based upon increases in population for Fridley&surrounding communities, as well as redevelopment and reinvestment within Fridley. At 10,000 vehicles/day, Old Central will be carrying 71% if the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. Review of Loucks &Associates Traffic Analysis Town Center Development hired the Engineering & Planning firm of Loucks &Associates to perform additional traffic analysis. The consultants viewed the numbers for RETIREMENT COMMUNITY in the ITE Trip Generation manual and determined that the proposed complex would generate a total of 165 trips per day. As the condominiums are available for those over 55, a number of residents may still be working and the retirement community numbers may be low. The true number of trips per day likely falls between the 165 trips/day generated by a RETIREMENT COMMUNITY and the 322 trips/day generated by the average RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM complex. A full copy of the consultant's report has been attached for your review. STAFF RECOMMEDATION City Staff recommends approval of Rezoning Request ZOA #03-03 and accompanying site plan for the senior building and Sandee's site, with stipulations. . Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. . Provides housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. City Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat for PS#03-08, with stipulations. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests, above. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1, dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering Firm. 2. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Patio on the north side of Sandee's to be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 7. Petitioner to provide clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. Existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 59 V � � 10.Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 11.Restoration of bike path along Central after will be required after completion of senior complex. 12.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 13.Storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 16.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 17.Petitioner to pay any required Park Dedication Fees. 18.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22.The petitioner to provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 23.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County . 24. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 60 .' F RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5, 2004 PAGE 6 Councilmember Bolkco said she just wanted to make sure American Tower was willing to work with staff. She asked th to provide a copy of the study that was taken. Mr. Hall said the did�not have the actual soil borin tests that were done. The did have the Y f g Y tower manufacturer's drawings that showed the strength of the tower and showed that additional providers could go on e tower. Councilmember Bo com said the stipulations said a soil boring and foot analysis needed to be provided. She asked i they were necessary. Mr. Hickok, Co 'ty Development Director, said they needed that information and would work with the petiti ner. Mayor Lund said i the tower was found not to collapse upon itself as the code required, the building permit wo ld not go forward and they would need to go with some other plan. Mr. Hall said they ere able to locate the manufacturer's drawings. The pole that was used was designed to collaps upon itself. MOTION by Co cilmember Bolkcom to approve Special Use Permit, SP #03-21, by AT&T Wireless with the llowing four stipulations: 1. The petitioner to provide the City with a history on this telecomm 'cations tower and when the installation took place; 2. The petitioner to provide the City th structural plans on how the tower will break apart in the event that it would fall over. (Code r quires towers to collapse upon themselves rather than tipping in extreme wind conditions.); 3. The petitioner to provide the City with a soil report and footing analysis indicating that th existing soils and footings can support the tower; and 4. A landscape plan showing how the xisting ground control structure will be fenced and screened sha11 be submitted and approved by e City prior to issuance of a building permit for the new antenna. Seconded by Councilmember �arnette. UPON A VOI(�E VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CAR�iED UNA1vIMOUSLY. l PUBLIC HEARINGS: 14. CONSIDERATION OF A REZO1vING REQUEST, ZOA #03-02, BY TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM Gl, LOCAL BUSINESS, TO C-2, GENERAL BUSINESS, M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, AND C- Rl. GENERAL OFFICE, TO S-2, REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, TO ACCOMMODATE REDEVELOPMENT. GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1282 MISSISSIPPI STR�ET; 6490, 6400, 6352 AND 6300 CENTRAL AVENUE; AND 1271 EAST MOORE LAKE DRIVE (WARD 21 (CONTINUED DECEMBER 8, 2003)• ,�. .� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5,2004 PAGE 5 cities conducted sewer inspections and to let Council know what � charged and what the inspections included. Councilmember Bolkcom asked that Item No. 2 be removed to th regular agenda. No one in the audience spoke regarding the consent agenda ite s. MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to adopt the propo�'ed consent agenda with the removal of Item No. 2 and with the corrections to the minutes an to Agenda Item No. 10. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING A , MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNA1vIMOUSLY. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilmember Bollccom to dopt the agenda with the addition of Item No. 2. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VO�I'ING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLAR.ED THE MOTION CARRIED UNA1vIMOUSL . STATE LEGISLATIVE UPDATE. There were no Sta.te legislative me ers present. OPEN FORUM: There was no response from the audience under this item of business. NEW BUSINESS: 2. SPECIAL USE P�ERMIT REQUEST, SP #03-21, BY AT&T WIRELESS AND A11�RICAN T01�'ER, TO ALLOW A TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER_IN A M-2 HEAVY Il�DUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT UNDER THE M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING CODE, SECTION 205.18.1.C(3)(�, GENERALLY LOCATED A'l�5330 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD N.E. ARD 3 . Councilmember Bo om asked if they were comfortable with the fencing and the landscaping. She expressed some oncerns about the change in name. Mr. Jason Hall, a r presentative of American Tower who was a contractor for AT&T, said if the landscaping and encing were recommended, they would do it. The Planning Commission recommended ap roval of the request with four conditions. He had the necessary information for staff and Counci to review. Although the landscape plan was generic, they were willing to work with staff on th species of plantings and the location ,' FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5,2004 PAGE 7 15. CONSIDERATION OF A PRELINIINARY PLAT REOUEST, PS#03-08, BY TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, TO CREATE TWO SEPARATE LOTS TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. GENER.ALLY LOCATED AT 1282 MISSISSIPPI STREET AND 6490 CENTRAL AVENUE (WARD 2)(CONTINUED DECEMBER 8.20031. MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to reopen the above public hearings. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Billings asked if the public hearing on the rezoning request and the preliminary plat request should be opened together. Mayor Lund agreed. Mr. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, said Town Center Development requested two separate land use actions in order to construct a 55-unit, owner-occupied senior condominium building at 6490 Central Avenue. The plat was being requested to create two new pazcels from 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue and the vacant lots south. The petitioner also requested rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and East Moore Lake Drive. The zoning in the azea was mi��ed. He described the plat and rezoning area. Anoka County stated that a 120 foot right-of-way corridor would be required for Central Avenue and Mississippi Street in order to provide necessary turn lanes for future safeTy and operational purposes. Roadway dedications for this site were 30 feet adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 feet adjacent to Central Avenue. The County requested that both of the right-of-ways be dedicated. Mr. Hickok said with respect to traffic analysis, staff used a number of sources to determine the possible impacts a 55-unit, owner-occupied, senior building would have on local traffic patterns. In addition to discussions with Ms. Jane Pemble, Anoka County Traffic Engineering Manager, staff examined the Institute of Traffic Engineer's Trip Generation manual, consulted the transportation chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and reviewed the traffic study supplied by Loucks & Associates. Ms. Pemble indicated that the County had no current plans or allocated funding to reconstruct, provide safety improvements or to signalize the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection. Mr. Hickok said the 4�' edition of the Institute of Traffic Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation manual did not have a specific category for senior residential townhomes. Staff reviewed the traffic generation numbers for residential condominiums which were not age-specific, so the numbers provided included people of a11 ages and family sizes. The numbers provided by the ITE Trip Generation manual may be viewed as the worse case scenario for the number of trips to be generated by a proposed development. The ITE manual sta.ted that 5.85 trips per day should be expected for residential condominiums. A trip meant any vehicle entering or lea�ing the complex. The impact of the vehicles on the surrounding roadways was negligible. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5, 2004 PAGE 8 � Mr. Hickok said staff also used the Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to analyze traffic for this development. The Comprehensive Plan indicated that in 2001, the portion of Old Central adjacent to the proposed project carried 8,000 trips per day. At this traffic level, it was carrying 57% of the traffic for which the roadway was designed and constructed to function at a Level of Service D. The Comprehensive Plan anticipated Old Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the yeaz 2020. At this level, Old Central would be carrying 71% of the maximum amount of the traffic for which the roadway was designed. Mr. Hickok said that Town Center Development hired the engineering planning firm of Loucks & Associates to perform additional traffic analysis. The consultants viewed the numbers for a retirement community in the ITE Trip Generation manual and determined that the proposed complex would generate a total of 165 trips per day, which might be low. The true number of trips per day likely fell between 165 trips per day and 322 trips per day. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item on November 5, 2003. The Planning Commission added an additional stipulation requiring the developer to plant additional large trees along the property line and that the developer share the new landscape plan with the neighbors. The new landscape plan was prepared and presented. It included losing some e�cisting trees and planting ten additional evergreens that were 8 to 12 feet in height. Mr. Hickok said that at its November 24, 2003, City Council meeting, Council tabled action on this item for further txaffic analysis. Further analysis indicated no impact to the functioning of the roadways or intersections. The developer did meet with the neighbors to address neighborhood concems. As a result of the meeting, a three-level design was proposed. Mr. Hickok said the petitioner hired Traffic Data, Inc.,to prepaze a detailed study of the roads and intersections surrounding the project. Under all scenarios, the functioning of the roadways and intersections would not be negatively impacted by the senior development. No signals or roadway improvements would be needed to accommodate traffic from this development. The study numbers were similar to City traffic counts. Staff conducted traffic counts on Pierce Street. The traffic counts were conducted from Monday, December 8, 2003, through Tuesday, December 9, 2003. Anoka County counts indicated that there were 6,500 cars per day on Mississippi Street west of Old Central. On Old Central north of Mississippi Street, there were 9,000 cazs per day. Old Central Avenue south of Mississippi Street had 8,260 cars per day. Mr. Hickok said that with respect to the ITE Trip Generation manual, a new ITE manual was published in December, 2003. That information now included a senior adult housing category. For 55 units, it indicated a trip generation of 191 daily trips. The ITE manual was a national survey of developments to determine a realistic average. Mr. Hickok stated that the redesigned site plan was the result of a meeting held at Sandee's Restaurant with surrounding neighbors. The redesigned plan eliminated one of the units, so there were now 54 units and was now three stories instead of four. All of the site specifics worked except that one of the drive-outs on the site was only 20 feet wide. Two-way traffic needed a 25 foot drive-out. There was space to widen that. Staff recommended approval of Rezoning Request, ZOA #03-03 and the accompanying site plan for the senior building with 26 stipulations. The ,• �'RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5,2004 PAGE 9 proposed rezoning was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and it provided housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. Staff recommended approval of Preliminary Plat Request, PS #03-08 with 26 stipulations. Councilmember Bolkcom asked about the different levels of service. Mr. Hickok said the level of service had a gradation scale similaz to grading school papers. The letters A through F were gradation for levels of service at intersections. Grade A would be the best. Tr�c engineers talked in terms of a.m. and p.m. peak times when they are looking at intersections. If the traffic did not move well during those periods, it would not move well during the mid-day periods. At the point where the level of service got to be unacceptable, alterations needed to be considered at an intersection. The tr�c analysis showed there would be no drop in the level of service based on this development. Mr. Jon Haukaas, Public Works Director, said that a big factor in level of service was delay time. Level of Service A was a free-flow condition. Level F had a significant backup. Level B was very good with minor delays, probably at the worst times. Level C might mean six to ten cars at a four- way stop and it was still considered a very acceptable level of service. Councilmember Bolkcom said it only took into account the intersections. It did not include driveways. Mr. Haukaas agreed. Councilmember Bolkcom said asked what the Level of Service was for the intersection of 57th and University Avenues. Mr. Haukaas said that 57�'Avenue was at a Level of Service D. Councilmember Wolfe asked what the intersection was at the end of Moore Lake. Mr. Haukaas said he did not know. Councilmember Wolfe said that at one time it was an issue. After the azea was redeveloped, it became an F. He said the development was not going to change anything. Councilmember Barnette asked how the new plan affected the underground parking. Mr. Hickok said it broadened the footprint of the building. Initially there were 51 parking spaces below the building and there was an exterior detached garage that included 4 gaxage stalls. The new footprint included 64 below ground stalls. It also added storage space in the building. Councilmember Bolkcom asked Mr. Hickok to explain a document Council received regarding the condominiums. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5,2004 PAGE 10 ` Mr. Hickok said it was a draft document that discussed the rules and guidelines for the proposed residential development. He said he had three copies that were available for review. The document specifically sta.ted who qualified to live in the development. There was a 55 year minimum requirement to qualify for this development. It also addressed another question regarding the next generation of buyers or what would happen if the development was no longer owner-occupied. It allowed a maximum of five percent of the units, or 5 units, to become rental. There was a process,however,that had to be followed. It was their intent to have 90 percent of the units owner-occupied. Councilmember Wolfe said there had been discussions about widening Highway 65 to three lanes and asked how that would affect the traffic flow. Mr. Hickok said part of the planning process by traffic engineers was to determine destinations. The purpose for broadening a highway like Highway 65 was to handle capacity and move the tr�c. If there were other destinations off the highway that would draw people away via Mississippi Street, that would be a concern. Broadening the roadway would help the situation and allow people to get from point A to point B quicker. Councilmember Wolfe sta.ted it was said there was virtually no traffic going between the north and south Medtronic developments because they had their own shuttle. Mr. Hickok said when the Medtronic development came to Fridley, one of the things they were asked to do because of the traffic demands that might be generated was to look at alternative modes of transportation. They encouraged sta.ggered start times and a number of different things, including shuttles between their north and south development. MOTION by Councilmember Billings to receive a letter dated January 4, 2004, from Rhonda and Jim Rusinak, 5412 Pierce Street N.E. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNA1vIMOUSLY. Mr. Richard Whinnery, Town Center Development; Mr. John Christen, Christen Art Design; and Mr. Mike Stokart, Traffic Data, Inc., introduced themselves. Mr. Whinnery said they met with the residents. During the meeting they discussed the landscaping plan and it was accepted the way it was presented. They lowered the building to three stories and did a tr�c study that showed there would be little or no impact by the proposed development. Mr. Christen said the underground pazking area had 18 additional spaces. There were 54 units and 72 underground parking stalls and 53 above-ground stalls, for a total of 125 parking stalls. Mr. Stokart mentioned that there was no data available, and that was what they based the study on. There was a specific item that talked about senior adult housing. They also reviewed what would be a worse case scenario, and they felt that would be a large o�ce complex. Under that worse . FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5.2004 PAGE 11 case scenario, it would be operating at an acceptable level of service pursuant to traffic engineering guidelines. Councilmember Bolkcom said the problem was not just at the intersections, but with people getting out of their driveways. She asked if anything had been done on that. Mr. Stokart said nothing was done with that because tr�c congestion was at major intersections. He thought the tr�c impact would not be noticeable. Councilmember Bolkcom said Mr. Whinnery provided addresses for other developments. She went and looked at three and did not think any where similar. Mr. Christen suggested a building in Maple Grove. Ms. Joan Olson, 6320 Van Buren Street N.E., said she did not agree with the information about senior drivers. She said she had kept track and her and her husband generated between 16 to 18 trips per day. The building had no amenities. There was no park, golf course, or swimming pool near by. There was nothing in the azea. Traffic on Old Central was congested. There were no breaks i.n the traffic because there were no stoplights. Ms. Jean Schwartz, 1372 — 64�'Avenue N.E., said that according to the S-2 redevelopment district regulations, if this was approved, they would need a special use permit for several 9 foot parking stalls. She said a developer must esta.blish a legitimate reason for rezoning. The City was under no obligation to rezone. If the area was zoned S-2, it would make it very easy for a developer to build. It bothered her that the Planning Department suggested that land beyond the project be rezoned. Since the names on the plans seemed to be City sta.ff, she thought it was obvious who really developed the City's Comprehensive Plan. Since there was high attendance at Council meetings where high density housing was an issue, it should be cleaz where the residents actually stand. The Comprehensive Plan called for multi-family residential housing to decrease from 1999 to 2020. Some cities have gone against the Met Council in favor of the residents' opinions. She asked what was more important, the Met Council's opinion or the concerns of their constituents. With the rezoning to S-2 going beyond the project, they would be setting a precedent. That land will be rezoned for multiple dwellings and for redevelopment. Ms. Pam Reynolds, 1241 Norton Avenue N.E. Said that after the redevelopment on Norton Avenue, the Comprehensive Plan was something she looked at daily. The Comprehensive Plan talked about change of chazacter within a neighborhood. The Comprehensive Plan also said that the developer must make it cleaz that the project would benefit the neighborhood. Members of the neighborhood had been at meetings saying they did not want the project. Once the zoning was changed, they could do whatever they wanted. The Comprehensive Plan said the developer was the one who had to prove that the zoning was necessary and he did not prove that. The demographics regarding senior citizens in Fridley, the State of Minnesota and in all of the 188 cities encompassed by the Metropolitan Council did not prove the need for this kind of project. If the zoning was changed to S-2, the character of the neighborhood would change, and the Comprehensive Plan said that they should avoid changing the character of the neighborhood. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5,2004 PAGE 12 � Ms. Cindy Mabel, 1214 Norton Avenue N.E., said she traveled on Old Central every day. She said it was already busy. She said they needed to think about how society was changing. She did not think City staff was working for the residents. There were other areas that were better suited. She asked if it was the will of the people or the will of the Metropolitan Council. They did not want the project and did not think that Central Avenue could handle the traffic. Mr. Gary Brown said his family owned the subject property for over 20 years. The property had been zoned commercial since about 1957-58. They felt that developing the land into a senior facility was a good mix for the neighborhood. Central Avenue did carry a lot of tr�c during rush hour, so did a lot of roads. Concern was expressed when the Credit Union was built, when the Fire Department was built, and when the athletic club was built. That was progress. The City needed to grow and change. They needed to make a decision if they wanted to have senior housing in Fridley. It was time to develop the property and this was a quality project. Councilmember Barnette asked if City staff coerced or encouraged them to sell their property. Mr. Brown said they did not. Mr. Kurt Olson, 1385 — 64�' Avenue N.E., said the developer who was looking at developing on the east side of Old Central told him that someone from City planning, told him to talk to a11 the neighbors because there was an a11ey easement and see if they were willing to sell their properties. Councilmember Barnette said they were tallcing about the current project. Mr. Olson sa.id someone may have gotten that idea from what he was told. He did not like the idea of the S-2 zoning for the whole block. If somefliing was going to go there, he would rather have it be seniors than anydiing else. At the last meeting they said there would not be any rental units. Now, they were saying 5 percent or 5 units. If it was passed, he would like there to be no rental. There should also be a stipulation that when they planted the trees, if the trees died within two or three years,the development or the developer had to take care of the problem. �; Mr. Mazk Schwartz, 1372—64�'Avenue N.E., asked why the rest o�the.block was rezoned. Mayor Lund sa.id it was necessary because if not, it would be considered be spot zoning. Mr. Schwartz said he did not understand that. Ms. Andrea Olson, 1385 —64�' Avenue N.E., said it did not seem necessary to rezone the area that was not part of the project. By opening up S-2 zoning, they would be leaving themselves with less ground to manage what someone might do with the property. She appreciated that the developer brought the building down to a lower level. It would have less of an impact. That did not mean it was right for the neighborhood. It was a residential area. Councilmember Bolkcom said that the way it was zoned now, they could put sometlung much bigger there and there would be nothing they could do about it. The way it was zoned now, they could ask for a building permit, and as long as it fit into the footprint,they could put something in. ' . �'RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUA.RY 5,2004 PAGE 13 Ms. Olson said it was not only creating a precedent for the neighborhood but for the entire city. Traffic in the area was crazy. Mr. Hickok said the first speaker talked about the data on the number of trips generated. That was one of the reasons several sources were used. Seniors are getting more active. They do not want to be tied down to yard work, snow plowing and shoveling. Someone mentioned 9-foot pazking stalls in the site plan. Staff was very cazeful to go through the site plan. The information they have been provided was that the parking was going to be adequate and the sta11 dimension proper. Mr. Hickok said there was discussion about the Comprehensive Plan and spot zoning. With respect to the Comprehensive Plan, anyone who was at the meetings had an opportunity to speak and be involved in the process. He was encouraged by the amount of interest in the Comprehensive Plan, and he thought they should be interested in it. It was important to understand that beyond the people who were passionate about this issue, there were other voices who put words into the Comprehensive Plan about what people needed. One of the things that was clearly described and articulated by discussions at the Comprehensive Plan meetings was senior housing and the opporlunity it would provide seniors to say in the community. Mr. Hickok said a question was brought up about rental units. It appeared that the project would a11ow up to 10 percent or up to 5 units. That would be govemed by the body of the association. There was a question about trees and landscaping. Trees when planted as part of a master plan development needed to live. They were very specific about trees in the landscape plan. The zoning was consistent with standard zoning practices used in the past. Mr. Hickok said there was a concem about the development across the street and City staff sending someone out to buy property. A gentleman came in and was interested in rezoning the north end of the block. Staff asked him to look at the history across the street and the discussions that had taken place. It was explained to him how spot zoning worked and what the standard practices had been and what would be a proper zoning request. They had not received a formal development proposal. Councilmember Bollccom asked if parking stalls were normally 9 feet wide. Mr. Hickok said in residential projects it was not uncommon to see a 9-foot parking stall. The City did have the discretion to approve a master plan with 9-foot stalls. In a S-2 district, they could approve the plan at it was. He said the 9-foot stalls did not raise a concern at this point. Turn-over was an issue, and turn-over in a senior complex like this was proven to be low. Councilmember Bolkcom asked about spot zoning. Mr. Hickok said there would be different opinions about what was and was not spot zoning, so what they relied on was the standazd practices of the City and what the City had done historically in making determinations about what was and was not an appropriate zoning demarcation. Half the block was not an appropriate point to stop when looking at the Comprehensive Plan. It would only accomplish half of what was set out in the Comprehensive Plan. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5, 2004 __ PAGE 14 ' Councilmember Bolkcom said she did not understand it. It was only helping one developer. Mr. Hickok said that bigger than the one developer was what the City had said it wanted to do on this segment of roadway. The guide plan of the Comprehensive Plan said that if and when the area was developed, the City envisioned it would go from East Moore Lake Drive to Mississippi from Old Central to mid-block. When someone came in and asked for half of it, we said sorry, they needed to get the other folks on the block involved. If the other properry owners said no, the developer would have had a dilemma. What was requested was consistent with the guide plan. That was the bigger picture. It was what the City said it wanted. Councilmember Bolkcom asked why the zoning for someone who was already there needed to be changed. Nothing was going to be done with the other two properties. She asked why they were included. If they made it S-2,many things could be done. Mayor Lund asked the City Attorney if it was a legal requirement to rezone the entire block and if it could be sepazated. Attorney Fritz Knaak, City Attorney, said the idea behind spot zoning was you were not supposed to be taking and rezoning on a case-by-case, development-by-deve�opment basis. They were supposed to base their decision on not only the needs of a particular development but the needs of the City. If there was a block where a development may need or want a certain kind of zoning, they were actually obligated to look at the remaining block and the areas surrounding that to determine if additional rezoning was necessary as part of the process. When Courts reviewed these decisions, one of the things they looked at was boundaries and whether they were rational. In order to protect the needs of the City, they needed to look beyond the single site for redevelopment and determine, based on the Comprehensive Plan, whether it made sense to extend the zoning beyond what was being requested. Mr. Hickok said someone in the audience sa.id the developer must prove there was a need. The developer did a housing study to determine the demographics for the area, what the market demand was for senior housing, and what the market would bear in terms of price for the units. They used a reputable firm to conduct the survey. The response proved that not only was there a demand here but the units were in a healthy price range. MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to close the public hearing on Rezoning Request, ZOA #03- 02 and Preliminary Plat Request,PS#03-08. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 16. CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #03-04, BY RAS PROPERTIES, TO REZONE�MULTIPLE PROPERTIES FROM R-2, TWO FANIILY ITNITS TO R-3 (�ENERAL MiJLTIPLE LTNITS GENERALLY LOCATED AT 351 —74 AVENU�„ 361 —74 AVENUE, 371 —74 AVENUE, 389 — 74 AVENiTE 415 — 75� AVEN�E 7400 LYRIC LANE 350 — 75� AVENUE 460—75 AVENUE, 450—75 AVEIV�E AND 476—75 AVENiJE (WARD 1). � . .\ . , ,�'RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5,2004 PAGE 21 �_ ' 26. All drive aisles to be used for 2-way traffi shall be 25 width. It will also include the master plan w ch included three stories and 54 units. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, YOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE, COUNCILMEMBER BILLIN S AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTING AYE AND COUNCILMEMBER OLFE VOTING NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ON A TO 1 VOTE. Mayor Lund asked if the p liminary plat request needed to be approved. Mr. Hickok said a motio to approve the preliminary plat was required. Councilmember Bill' gs asked if they needed to officially amend the agenda to include the legislation. Attorney Knaak s 'd they did. MOTION by uncilmember Billings to amend the agenda to include under New Business, Item No. 17A, Co ideration of a Preliminary Plat Request, PS #03-08. Seconded by Councilmember Bamette. UPON VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTIO CARRIED UNAlvIMOUSLY. 17A. PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST, PS #03-08, BY TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT. LLC, TO CREATE TWO SEPARATE LOTS TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SE1vIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1282 MISSISSIPPI STREET AND 6490 CENTRAL AVENLTE (WARD 2). MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to approve Preliminary Plat Request, PS #03-08, by Town Center Development, LLC. Seconded by Councilmember Billings. Mayor Lund asked if the stipulations needed to be included. Mr. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, said they did. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to amend the main motion to include the following stipulations: 1. Property to be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1, dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering firm. ,! , FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5, 2004 PAGE 2'_' , 2. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. Petitioner to meet a11 building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Patio on the north side of Sandee's to be removed prior to issuance of a building pertnit for the senior complex. 7. Petitioner to provide clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. Existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way sha11 be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs sha11 be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 10. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the County right-of- way. 11. Restoration of bike path along Central will be required after completion of senior complex. 12. Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 13. Storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building pemuts. 14. Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES permit and provide NLTRP ponding for entire site. 15. City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building pernuts. 16. Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of building pernut. 17. Petitioner to pay any required Pazk Dedication Fees. 18. Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the building's association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. , . �RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 5,2004 PAGE 23 20. Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site aze properly capped or removed. 21. Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22. The petitioner to provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 23. The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 24. A development agreement outlining the developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 25. The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening between the proposed development and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24, 2003. 26. All drive aisles to be used for 2-way tr�c shall be 25' in width. Seconded by Councilmember Billings. RUPON A VOICE VOTE ON THE MOTION TO AMEND, MAYOR LUND, COUNC MEMBER BARNETTE, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND ��' COUNCI ' MBER BOLKCOM VOTING AYE, AND COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE VOTING �Y, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ON A 4 TO 1 VOTE. .X? �,� UPON A VOI �E VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED, MAYOR LUND, COUNCILME ER BARNETTE, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILME �R BOLKCOM VOTING AYE, AND COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE VOTING NAY, �'YOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ON A 4 TO 1 VOTE. �-- 18. FIRST READ ��OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRID�:�Y, MINNESOTA, BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZOI�TING DISTRICT ZO ,G RE UEST ZOA #03-04 BY RAS PROPERTIES ARD � �` , MOTION by Councilmember illi s to waive the reading and approve the ordinance on first reading. Seconded by CouncilmeinbeF olfe. \ � '� • � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES,�F JANUARY 5 2004 PAGE 24 MOTION by Councilmember Billings to amend th first reading of the ordinance and change the ordinance as follows: Under Section 2, strike ce language starting at "351 — 74�' Avenue: Lot 10, Block 1, Melody Manor Addition" and endi with "350 — 75�' Avenue: Lot 12" leaving the words "Block l, Melody Manor Addition." 'ke "460 — 75�' Avenue:" Strike "450 — 75�' Avenue: Lot 1, Block 1, Melody Manor Additi n; and 476 — 75�' Avenue: Lot 2, Block 1, Melody Manor Addition." Add "All of' before the p ase "Block l, Melody Manor Addition." Add "; and" after"Block 1, Melody Manor Addition Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE ON THE MO�'ION TO AMEND, ALL VOTING AYE, NIAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CAh2RIED UNAI�TIMOUSLY. UPON A VOICE VOTE ON THE MOTION AS AMENDED, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE OTION CARRIED UNAI�IMOUSLY. 19. INFORIVIATION STATUS R�PORTS. Mr. William Burns, City Manager, 'd he would like to meet with Council after the meeting to discuss pending litigation. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilmember ette to adjourn the City Council meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, L VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANI OUSLY AND THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. Respectfully submitted, Roberta S. Collins � Scott J. Lund Secretary Mayor . � ` AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 2004 ClTY OF FRIDLEY Date: December 29, 2003 To: William Burns, City Manager�l�� From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: 1� Reading Of An Ordinance for Rezoning Request, ZOA#03-C�, Town Center Development M-03-191 INTRODUCTION Town Center Development, LLC, is requesting a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and E. Moore Lake Drive. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and industrial zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. The owners of Advance Companies, Ziebart, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have agreed to the rezoning request. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At the November 5, 2003, Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for ZOA#03-02. After receiving public comment and discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of rezoning request, ZOA#03-02, with the 24 stipulations as presented and an addition of stipulation #25 to read, "The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening between the proposed development and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24, 2003." THE MOTION CARRIED UNIMOUSLY. PAST COUNCIL ACTION The City Council tabled action on this item and continued the public hearing until January 5, 2004. The Council requested that a more detailed traffic analysis be completed and that the developer meet with surrounding property owners to further review screening of the site. $2 PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Staff recommends the Council hold the first reading of an ordinance for the approval of the rezoning to S-2 and with it the accompanying master plan for the zoning district. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests, above (including stipulation #26 if Plan B is the site plan approved with the rezoning). 1. Property to be developed in accordance with site plan, sheet C2-1, dated October 29, 2003, by Loucks McLagan Engineering Firm. 2. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Patio on the north side of Sandee's to be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 7. Petitioner to provide clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. Existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 10.Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 11.Restoration of bike path along Central after will be required after completion of senior complex. 12.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 13.Storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 16.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 17.Petitioner to pay any required Park Dedication Fees. 18.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 83 22.The petitioner to provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 23.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 24. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 25.The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening between the proposed development and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24, 2003. 26. All drive aisles to be used for 2-way traffic shall be 25' in width. 84 - , •. ORDINANCE NO.__ ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the Fridley City Code is amended hereinafter as indicated, and is hereby subject to the stipulations as shown in Attachment 1. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lot 1, 2, & 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, except road, subject to easement of record. 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive: Lots 1-5, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, subject to easement of record. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District S-2 (Redevelopment District). SE CTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned District C-1 (Local Business), C-2 (General Business), C-R1 (General Office), and M-1 (Light Industrial) to S-2 (Redevelopment District). PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 5'�" DAY OF JANUARY 2004. SCOTT J. LUND— MAYOR ATTEST: DEBRA A SKOGEN—CITY CLERK Public Hearing: November 24, 2003 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 85 � AGENDA ITEM � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 26, 2004 CffY OF FRIDLEY Date: January 21, 2004 To: William Burns, City Manager �� From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: 2nd Reading Of An Ordinance for Rezoning Request, ZOA#03-�, Town Center Development M-04-04 INTRODUCTION Town Center Development, LLC, is requesting a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and E. Moore Lake Drive. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and industrial zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevetopment District. The owners of Advance Companies, Ziebart, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have agreed to the rezoning request. PAST COUNCIL ACTION The City Council approved the 1� Reading at their January 5, 2004, meeting on a 4-1 vote. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Staff recommends the Council hold the second reading of an ordinance for the approval of the rezoning to S-2 and with it the accompanying master plan (depicting a 3 story building) for the zoning district. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the rezoning (note a minor change to Stipulation 1, to reflect the site plan approved). 1. Property to be developed in accordance with site plan, depicting a 3 story building, approved by the City Council at their January 5, 2004 meeting. 2. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Patio on the north side of Sandee's to be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 68 - - - _ . � 7. Petitioner to provide clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation Office prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. Existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 10.Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 11.Restoration of bike path along Central after will be required after completion of senior complex. 12.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 13.Storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. • 16.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 17.Petitioner to pay any required Park Dedication Fees. 18.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22.The petitioner to provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a building permit. 23.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 24. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 25.The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening befinreen the proposed development and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24, 2003. 26. All drive aisles to be used for 2-way traffic shall be 25' in width. 69 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 26,2004 _ PAGE 13 20. ORDINANCE NO. 1184 TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZO1vING DISTRICTS (REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #03-02, BY TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT (WARD 2). MOTION by Councilmember Billings to waive the reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1184 on second reading. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if there had been any changes to any of the stipulations. Mr. Hickok said there had not. He said there was a clarification on Stipulation No. 1 just so that it was clear that what was approved was the three-story design as opposed to the four-story design. UPON A VOICE VOTE, MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE VOTING AYE AND COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE VOTING NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ON A 4 TO 1 VOTE. NEW BUSI�TESS: 21. SPEC USE PERMIT RE UEST SP #03-24 BY WALLBOARD INC. TO ALLO LIMITED OUTDOOR STORAGE IN A HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZOlvING DISTRI T GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5346 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD N.E. ARD . Mr. Scott Hickok, mmunity Development Director, said the request was for a special use permit to allow limited out oor storage in the side and rear yards at Wallboard, Inc., 5346 Industrial Boulevard N.E. The etitioner wanted to store steel studs and other accessories related to the building trade which w e used for the business. The property was zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. The City Code allowed 1 ited outdoor storage in the industrial districts with a special use permit as long as nine specific ode requirements were met. Those specific requirements related to height, screening, parking, ount of outdoor storage, and the types of materials allowed to be stored outside. Petitioner ked to be allowed to continue the existing outdoor activity on the property. Drywall, insulatio and other building materials were stored inside. Steel studs and other accessories related to the building trade were stored outside. The perimeter of the property . was fenced and landscaped. Th petitioner planned on installing slats in the existing cyclone fence to meet the outdoor storage scree� 'ng requirement. Mr. Hickok said the Planning Co ission held a public hearing on this request on January 7, 2004. During the public hearing, Pe tioner stated that when she bought the property in 1994, she received a letter from the City which s ated that outdoor storage could not exceed 15 feet in height. The existing outdoor storage on her sit\was 15 feet in height and she was unable to meet the 12 foot height requirement. The letter she received from the City stated that material, motor vehicles, and equipment could not exceed 15 feet�n height for incidental outdoor storage. The outdoor storage on this property has never been incic�ental. In order for the Petitioner to exceed the 12-foot � . �- • • _ _ CIZYOF FRiDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER•6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E.FRIDLEY,MN 55432•(763)571-3450•FAX(763)571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE January 29, 2004 Town Center Development, LLC Richard Whinnery 13750 Reimer Drive Maple Grove MN 55311 Dear Mr. Whinnery: On Monday, January 26, 2004, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a rezoning, ZOA#03-0�, Ordinance #11��}, `.o rezone property from C-2, Genreal Business, C-1, Local Business, M-1, Light Industrial, and C-R1, General Office, to S-2, Redevelopment District, to accommodate redevelopment, generally located at 1282 Mississippi Street, 6490, 6400, 6352, and 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive. Approval of this rezoning is contingent upon the following stipulations: 1. Property to be developed in accordance with site plan, depicting a 3 story building, approved by the City Council at their January 5, 2004 meeting. 2. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 3. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 4. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 5. Exterior remodeling plans for Sandee's to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Patio on the north side of Sandee's to be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the senior complex. 7. Petitioner to provide clearance letter from the State Historical Preservation C�ffice prior to the demolition of the Tamarisk building. 8. Existing Sandee's signs in the right-of-way shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 10. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county rig ht-of-�r.ay. 11. Restoration of bike path along Central after will be required after completion of senior complex. 12. Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 13. Storm pond maintenance agreement must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 14. Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 15. City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. - � . N E � r Action Taken Letter- Town Center Development Page 2 January 29, 2004 16. Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 17. Petitioner to pay any required Park Dedication Fees. 18. Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 19. Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents. 20. Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 21. Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 22. The petitioner to provide a traffic study that is approved by the County prior to issuance of a uu��diry ps�mit. 23. The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 24. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 25. The petitioner shall work with City staff and the neighbors to come up with a screening plan to provide adequate screening consisting of adult trees and other creative decorative screening between the proposed development and the neighboring properties prior to the City Council meeting on November 24, 2003. 26. All drive aisles to be used for 2-way traffic shall be 25' in width. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 763-572-3590. Sincerely, �� ¢� �� Scott Hickok, AICP Community Development Director SH/jt cc: Margaret Brickner Tamarisk Resources Inc. Ziebart of Minnesota, Inc. Frank Kitterman Address File Rezoning File Stacy Stromberg Mary Hintz Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy City of Fridley Planning Department by February 17, 2004. with act' . C-04-17 ORDINANCE NO. 1184 ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CTTY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, 1VIINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the Fridley City Code is amended hereinafter as indicated, and is hereby subject to the stipulations as shown in Attachment 1. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lot 1, 2, & 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, except road, subject to easement of record. 6400 Central Avenue, 6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue, and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive: Lots 1-5, Block 1, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, subject to easement of record. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District S-2 (Redevelopment District). SE CTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned District C-1 (Local Business), G2 (General Business), C-R1 (General O�ice), and M-1 (Light Industrial)to S-2 (Redevelopment District). PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. ,,��r� SCOTT . LUND—MAYOR ATTEST: �� DEBRA A. SKOGEN—C Y CLERK Public Hearing; January 5, 2004 First Reading: January 5, 2004 Second Reading: January 26, 2004 Publication: February 5, 2004 � n '� ei�5��rS - a -�--� y City of Fridley (Official Publication) ORDINANCE NO.1184 ORDINANCE TO AMENll THE CI'I'f CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, 1�IINNESOTA BY MAI{ING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as f'ollows: SECTION 1.Appendix D of the Fridley City Code is amended hereinaRer as indicated,and is hereby subject to the stipulations as shown in Attachment 1. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as 1282 Mississippi Street and 6490 Central Avenue: Lot 1,2,&3,Auditor's Subdivision No.88, except road,subject to easement of record. 6400 Central Avenue,6352 Central Avenue, 6300 Central Avenue,and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive: Lots 1-5,Block 1,Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, subject to easement of record. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District S-2(Redevelopment District). SECTION 3;That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned Diatrict C-1 (Local Business), C-2 (General Business), C-Rl (General OfTice), and M-1 (Light IndustriaD to S-2 (Rede- velopment District). PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 26th DAY OF JANUARY,2004. SC01"P J.LUND, MAYOR ATTF,ST: DEBRA A.SKOGEN, CITY CLERK Public Hearing:January 5,2004 First Reading.January 5,`L004 , Second Reading:January 26,2004 Publication:February 5,2004 f , (February 5,2004)F-2 ORD1184