LS70-01 .. . . ..._ ._ . __.._.
... ._ . . _.. . .. . _ .
�,�rm #5-68 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
CITY OF FRIDLEY
FUR CITY USE ONLY
� Applicant's NamP
APPI,ICAN'I': _F't�gAne N�nri lra�n
Lot S�lit I,. �p-�/
� .ADDRESS: "
� � � 5treet City ip Code D&te F�led� -��•�o
TELEYHONE # ?�� c���� F'ee:� I�DO Receipt L
+' � � Home �usiness Cpur�cil Aa�ion: '
��..;:,........
� � o R�A,RKS:
� � � PROPII�TY OWNE�i(5)Eugene Henriksen T
� � �
�c� � �
c�3 o s ame
o ,�
�,� � � ADDRESS(ES� same
Street City Zig Cc�e
.� m o ,�
� � �
+� m c� Street City Zip Cod�
o r° oo � TELEPHONE #(S� s at�te
.� b °' w � . �
� � � � Home Business
a4 c� �
a� o °�
� �',� � Froperty Location on Street
or Exact Street Address (IF ANY)_ �qth �trA��,� �
. .
W
U
� Le�al Descaciptiox� of Property:
x
r,�t� i ���► R i��k i Srxin�Sr�.�k--�s r�
9
. Reaeon for Lot Split: �
Aot��► te bt�, ht�i 1 t Knft l nn anri miiat hn .��t�,,�� ,.,��„.�,a� a,.,,q,"
ten feet on other.
,
�'otal Area of �'roperty�c��:3q, ft. Presgnt Zonir� C�,�e�]�f�,cat�Q��,l , ,�
_ 4
The underaigned hereby declares that all the fac�a and ,
representations stated in this application are true �nd
correct.
DATE:�,� S IGNATiTRE �u� t /,t�,,� � ��,y,
� -��— ��
BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Se4 t�everse eide for addita.oz�a1, ies��lip��
F'L�TS & SIIBS: Date pf Cox�aideration -
Remarka;
PLANNTNG CO1rIIrII8SI0N: Date of Consideration -
�am�rkes
CI'.[�C COIINCIL: Date Qf Consideration ' �
�ieaa,rk�€
..,..� ..,,_._,
— -
e
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCIDURE
1 , Obtain application form �,t City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley�
2, Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved arid the lot split fee of �15.00 for each original lot being split.
3. �'he applicatiox� will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivieiona and Streeta
8� Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Committee m�eta once a
mo.nth, when required. The City wiil supply the applicant With minutea of
the Subcommittee.
4, Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
mu�t then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the origin.al parcel or parcels
along xith the new perc�:� ;reat� '. W. 't-, sll ezietir� atrl,c?.�.iree tied in.
5. The Certificate qf Survey should then contain a eimple description of a pa,rt
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the �ineerizag Department
for Plannixig Commission recommendations. The Pla�nning Commission meet� on the
�eco.nd a,nd fourth Thursday af the mo.nth. The City will pupply the applicant
with minutes of the Planni.ng� Commission.
�. The recommendatio.ns of the Plannin$ Commission are submitted to tt�� C�,�y
Council for f�nal action. The Council meets on the first and thi�d Monday
o� tk�e month.
'�. The City Council app�oval ma,y be subject to certain s�ipulationa wh�ch muet
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to adviae him to comply with the conditione impoaed by the City. The
�etter will also contain any necessary deede for easementa �d other ��tinent
papers for his sigxiature.
9. Whex� a11 the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the appli.oant
�3hould file the lot �plit in Anoka County.
10. iz� all caeea where Council action hae been sought a.nd denied, no petition for
idez�tical action can be presented until a period of six monthe hae ela�$ed.
NOTE: THE RESIILTING REAL ESTATE T 'x� dND SPDCIAL ASSESSl'�ITS FO�t
THE NEW PARCII,S IN TOTAL AFTII�. THE LOT SPLIT, MAY DCCE�D THE
AMOUNT 9SSESSID TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTI�IT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATPD AMOIINT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMIIVTS.
�`� • •
>
. �,���crfi�,v`�''' ��I�a� �' � g ,�
��� �
/� G,
..e�� �.�.:� ���x� �.���,��..`�.�'-���
�
°�`"�-�-�'� '�-� � ,,��`--��.�-�
� r
; ^�
� �- .�.� � � ._ .,��f
G s� �� .�, r �����/. s`." ,�,��.
// � / //'
�d''"Z^c./� �G'1/✓`-r✓ J L� ,S �.✓� G.�.�.�!( w
�
I ��
.�!�-�.,�� . �.� ,t�',.� 3 �-�--� y l. � s '`��```
.
� ���� � � �
/�y�J�, ���//I�� ��,� �� (/, /�//�� � � � ��
1�- ��i�{ .�i Z"'�" �� A�+��� �yi
✓te+t"t
' ,�,..�.� ;�f� � � � S C���-v
.J� '� '.��^�+ '� -,�"�;ZJ .- ` �
,r t/ � �"
j {'_��/ ,r"�,t G/'� �
c.v�,��„t' /LY'C �t. ./_""! +�''s ./��L /N'O'Zt/ iLv —
�� �
// :i
�'`�"""� �� j`��.L'L-�t� •J a'.....�1 �G, s r 7 ��l'� ��
//� �,
,�i�,y�,� -� �� �,.�' ,�.vl'� ,�� /�� �
�
. . �
Ivnd Plannin9 6F7'S-N,qhwoy�GS N�.
� Lond Survecfin9 Minn�eo��is 3 2
So�ls Testrn9 E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. Minne.wta
CrvN fi Muniupv/ SUnset.G-6066
E rneer� � , .
� � En9ineers � Survec�ors
, , ( _.
J � '.i
� ;
1 y '
� A .,
cesti,�icate o� su,tve Fo: ������t ���� LRr�� . .����T.;.o,
�� � +�,�-„A` �.
, ,�� , _ ,
�o o� � �i� ;
, � V� �` . ,. . �
� � �
i � -�s/
—i; _ �,
• ��'�� �� _�._..___._I..__J ..,,,_..�,_., (r � '� . �
� ;_.' - - ��
-t
�o � ,
- �j i ,
�
. � � ,
� '`
� ,7 ,
i �
I� �
n �!� � ( � l� y i
` _� , ^ � ! ll� • � j ��
�
� , � `� �
. � �� �. , � r � ;
� � �� � , �r ►a �� � � �! �! � � , ,
� ' 3 , �;
� yiir.�i i/;� 1
' � . �g � V�GZU4"'O S C C�7 ' � i --1=---
I ( N j t'S��,1��_0�1►J�.:r �1
,� � ' �;;' , ' f _
,
,
�-- , _ *�
I,' � z� � - G �0 1 , � ., ^, _
�'�� __ ---� 1 � � ' , .
�� , � r���o�.►�., � � s��F��:.�
.�
k � ! m � !��;��� ��.,�,�, �
! � � ! ) r
� t.�, � 14•�:,) � �P.t,.) I '
� �I _ �_ �..� ' .1 .....�.... ____ � 1 SU7:`J1��.:T' �-O Tt-l� `'.����.-ITH
� � j "�'� ! + �".. -'�� .��4 ,`'• `� J I ZC] �C:� G�(�. �"�I�'.��.:.�..
O �I I ._ .t y 'r�-.r'tefc�"�-����A^�r�'C' � �7 � , -
.,
, .
......\ 1 . . }�'_� '^`wnY__ y�
� � --- � _ _� —'�— -- —I _ �--�5��l.C�h.!`i�
� . �. . �7 ^ �l�� y ' �
.- .��, - 1 i � ( ,,. �� l.�
—, ' > � r�-�.
� �
., . -���-r- ��1;'��` ��.�__.
� . .� .
ere�`Xy urfif'y lhot Ihis �s a fi ue a�d mrrtcf���senfof�an o�'o su^vet, �'�bov,►do�es q('�l�e oba�r d�uYb�/and,�and
v�'{fz ian o�'al/bvildin9s,1lxreon,�d d/r�sib/l dxroochmtnfs,i�anr�,�iZvn a'arsaid/and. As su�vet,ed�m�t flus �`-'%_abtf
� ��t,t�j'_'��, _ A.Dl9'�.
, °� s SUB URBAN ENG/NEE21NG, INC. .
/ l��' F 9��eerS E.'Surr J
� _, � � ; ;
� y.�.- a p ,1 J ,'�\,`__ � �, ; .T,J f" � —2., i.��. /,��;�.., ��/ �
, , , .
� .
�"' � '
�F3A. ; , .,
_ .._�
,
� .
�G� � � �/ � � '
�9�8 Gu,� Qola
►e�'�
tiS �.�� �` ____
�a 1 ��ot
� � e
�
c
i
� �
; 3b , �
; �
� � f%\
4 � M �
� � � �
��.c�:r��♦rt� � � % �1 . ,
1 � �
� � ' I
� , � �
�� 1 �
� �� I
i
'
_.___ � '�
�,o�' i�3 �
�7�� � ���
��,�� '`,,
i
i
� �
1
�
l
�
�
,
a. . . • . . .- --:: _ _ .- __.__ .. _. -. .
� .. , . . ... . � . .. . . . � . .. - .. .. �' ��
. ,
. . . . . .. . . . _ . .. . , .. > �;i'�
Lond Plonnrn9 6XTS Niyhn��`CS NE,
c�s���y;,� ��;,,,��i,s3�
.��,STes';�9 EN G I NEE R I N G, I N C. Minne�olo
Civil 6 A�funicip�al SUnset 4-6066
E,��rneeriny En9inee�s �, Surveyo�s
c errts�icate o� su�ve Fo: �� r � �� 3��-�. :a �'�� J
� '�-}'� � �.- r-�- /�
i l�_ ' � � f. �� 1 �`+\.Ii
.'I 1 . ,�J . �.. I�. ) ��
�wc�
.W._w...� --- -----
' I � ^ l
1
' � /1 ��
�
� � �
! 4' i i
��. '
� i � 1
� J � �
, ! ,-. , j � �J ;
! ,_i � ��i ��
��, � � � �
' ,, � �
� ��. � � � � ;�-
, , . '�' , �o ..� , ; � ;
__ � �� � , c.,
�'�O P�5�y;� ////'_.,
.� , °o
c' r5 U l�-C�tI.J`'.a��_ �� �
` ` `� � �. L�T a 3 ��,� � � .
,a {
; � ; ; t�'��C.1� � � 5t�ti�211�..1 �— .
,
i ° ���4�.'. PA�'�.,
' � N -
M � r'
i `-�a E�JE�T To TH� 5rxi'T�i
�J � '
�:. _. ltLo � 4D_a.J -_ N � 2.Q F��� F�t%':. °a"S'"i:�r=�"''"" i
_ . ... _____�,�,_.r.�1____ _ _,_,. .
�. ..:.,,,� _ co� .��^'~', f C�A'.'.._:��:Tr? <�''"
'1� ' r�1 gT2��",�" +� � i+.i �
� '� C'Pv�►'F���+3'�'�� '�" � � C.J � �
�,�. _;_.�.�P . ��.-.-- -- - -- -
��. _. .�. __�:� _ _� ,
�_ �.�,'�� ' .�,�.�:•n,o ni� � "`�--- G o _
pr (C5y i-oa jw�a !
.. . . . � J �� ✓ I � ` � V / \� ���, .
, � �
l hrl'ebcJ u�fi�y fhof lhis is a frue and cnrrrcf�e�esenfofian o�'a su^ret1 }�'flx b�.�,do�ies q�'�e abo,r aFsuyb�d/a�4,on�d
oF'Xir/acvffiivn yl'a!/bu�ld��s,tlxrean,and o//risible awnac%menfs,!£a►y,�vn or'a�.toid/on�d. As surveyed 6�nK 1l�is "?���
./'�n�.��...�.ta�- .�. A.0.1��
'�` SUB URBAN ENG/NEERING, INC.
� ' � � �R9�X�S ,� s�-���� , .� ,-
� ,
. ,
�Ik L�1 , �<,p�L�-� 1'':�,�;� _�_. �,✓ " � �� �� ,� ;� ,'/., �' '_;'
-� - r ..�. . �„
- ��� . . a� � .
� � �l�7� �y � • � . .
_ ^
- �
�i ��
":�, _
� ;;,>..,., _ �
� �-`,�_"�� ,"';"`'
4,.. �� ��' .. E'� .
t
('
I
�
I
I
i
li
�
I
�
i
PLANNING CO�IIrIISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 18 1970 PAGE 1
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Erickson.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present: Erickson, Mittelstadt, Jensen, Fitzpatrick
Members Absent: Myhra
Others Present : Darrel Clark, Engineering Assistant
APPROVE PI9ANNING CO�IISSION MINUTES: FEBRUARY 4 1970:
Mr. Jensen asked that the following changes be made: On page 10, the 7th
paragraph, strike the second sentence completely. On page 11, the final paragraph,
6th line, change "such road easement" to "such agreement".
Chaira►an Erickson asked that on page 2, the 9th paragraph, the word "other"
be changed to "the".
MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Jensen that the Planning Co�nission Minutes
of February 4, 1970 be approved as amended. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the
moti�n caxried unanimously.
RECEIVE PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOI+$�ITTTEE MINUTES: FEBRUARY 4 1970:
MOTION by Jensen, secanded by Mittelstadt, to receive the Plats � Subdivisions-
Streets � Utilities SubcoBanittee Minutes of February 4, 1970. Upon a voiee vote,
all voting aye, the �notion carried unanimously.
�iEC87.YE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES• FEBRUARY 11. 1970:
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Fitzpatrick, to rec�ive the Board of Appeals
Minutes of February 11, 1970. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
Mr. Mitteletadt asked that the record show that Mr. Myhra was attending another
meeting in City Iiall and would he available if needed.
� 1. LOT SPLIT RDQUEST: L.S. �70-01. EUGENE I�NRIKS�NT: Lots 1-4, Block 1, Spring
IBrook Park
Chairman Erickson asked if Mr. Henriksen was present.
i
!
; Mr. Allen Mattson, 6320 Riverview Terrace said that e
I , h was represeating Mr.
� Henriksen and would explain their problem to the Plannin Co�nisaion. The have
g y
a customer who wishes to build a 50' home on one of the lots. In order to have
10' of sideyard on one side and a 5' sideyard on the other to meet requirements
the 1 �
y wi 1 have to s lit the lot and ive
P g him 5 . This will make both lots
i g o � � �
ppr ximately 65 wide. One is now 60 wide and
the other is 71 wide. The lot
� split will e ualize the lots and make i o '
Q t p ssible to build a 40 home on the second
' PLANNING COl�lMIISSION MEETING - FEBRUARY 18, 1970 __ PAGE 2
lot. Othenaise they will only be able to build one home.
Chairman Erickson asked if Mr. Henriksen awned all of the lots im�olved and was
told that he did.
Mr. Mittelstadt asked how close the house next door was?
Mr. Mattson explained that there would be 30' separating the two homes.
Chairman Erickson asked if Lot 1 was a comer lot?
Mr. Clark explained that neither lot was a corner lot. There are no corner
lots involved.
Chairman Erickson asked if there would be garagea on the proposed buildings?
Mr. Mattson explained that both hames would have tuck-under garages. He
continued that as he understood it, these were the last two lots on the block that
it was possible to get building permits for because the land then slopes to the flood
area.
Chaixtnan Erickson caminented that the 50' hane would only be 6 1/2' frotn the
lot line and a 10' clearance is needed where thera is livable space. There is
livable space above a tuck-under garage. He continued that they would need a
variance from the Board of Appeals in oxder to �et a biiilding permit.
Mr. Mattson a�ked if he didn't still need the lot �plit first and was told
that he did.
Chairman Erickson inquired if the seoond ham�e was 72' back from the lot
line.
Mr. Clark said that it was 52' back from the lot line.
Chairman Erickson caa�ented that because the se�back could only vary 6'
from the average of the setbacks of the� ham�s on either aide, Mr. Henriksen would
also need a variance for the second proposed building. He was proposing a
setback of 35' and the average is 44' . Chairman Erickaon continued that Mr.
Henricksen should check with the Building Inspection Department about the var-
iances to see if he would be able to get a permit to build.
Mr. Mattson asked if the building had to be 10' from the lot line if there
ie a garage within 3'' of the lot line?
Mr. Mittelstadt explained that the living epace must be 10 feet from the
lot line and a tuck-under garage has livable space above it.
Mr. Jensen noted that there had been no new legal description supplied.
Mr. Clark stated that the petitioners were told that they would have to
supply a new legal description, but it did not have to be for this meeting.
It would be a simple description.
�
• ; PI.ANNING COT'IlKISSIGN MEETING - FEBRUARY 18, 1970 PAGE 3
I Mr. Mittelstadt asked what the legal description would be.
Mr. Clark answered that the description for the first lot would probably
be; Lots 1 � 2, except the Easterly 5 feet. The second lot would probably be;
the Easterly 5 feet of Lot 2 and all of Lots 3 & 4.
Mr. Mittelstadt asked if the lot numbers would be the same?
Mr. Clark explained that they would be.
I�TION by Jensen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Comnission
recommend to the City Council approval of Lot Split request L.S. #70-01,
Eugene Henriksen.
Chai�oan Erickson asked that the minutes shaw that the applicant was told
that recommendation for approval of the Lot Split to the City �ouncil does not
'� mean that the Planning Comnission approves of the proposed building location
as shawn.
# MpTION by Jensen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the first motion be amended
to read that the proper legals must be provided before the petitionex appears
before the City Council. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanisnous ly.
2. CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF REZOr1ING REQUEST: ZOA #70-01, NOAMAN E. RIEDEL,
Continued from Planning Caaanission Meeting of February 4, 1970.
Mr. Mittelstadt asked if the Public Hearing for the rezoning request had
beea closed?
Chaisman Erickeon explained that the Public Hearing had been elosed at
the February 4, 1970 Planning Coamission meeting but because of a meeting that
had been held between the Wall Company and the r�sidents of the area the
pre�vious night, he thought the Public He�,rin� shrnald be reopened.
1�DTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Jensen, t�at the Public Hearing for the
rezoning request: ZOA �70-01, Nornoan E. Riedel, be reopened. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanianously.
Mr. Lee Hoffu�an, a representative of the Wall Campany, stated to the
Plaaning Carmissian that the Wall Company had sent letters to the residanta of
the area, using the City's mailing list for the area, asking them to attend the
meeting for a more detailed presentation of the company's plans for the
development. Far ty-two people had attended the meeting.
The presentation had consisted of:
1. An Introduction of the Wall Co. explaining whnt the Wall Co. was and a
few of its projecta.
2. A Discussion of the Apartment Survey (Land in Use Tax Survey Report for
School District #14)
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1970 � PAGE 5
Mr. Wayne Sether said that the boring under East River Road was investiqated
thoroughly by the contractor and they felt that it was not a practical idea
and a concrete estimate could not be made. They estimated it at $1500, but
with an open end contract in case of unforseen trouble. He agreed that the most
practical idea would be a water line, but his neighbors do not want the line as
they are having no trauble with their own wells� He said that he would be
going from a 9' well to a 100' well. He said that the cost would be $3.50
per foot, or $350 for the well, and he could use his present pump.
Councilman Sheridan said that the water line would be the best solution, but
this would not provide relief xight now. The neighbors we11s may last for �
another 10 years or so. He said that he was in favor of granting the rec�xest.
Councilman Liebl pointed out that he would have to have his watex checked. He
said that he has always advocated hooking onto the munic�pal supply, but in
this case he agreed with Councilman Sheridan.
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to qrant the request for �3 �ennig tc� drill a
100° deep well at 7649 East River Road, request by �f,.r. 'taayne Se�I�e��.
Seconded by Coaancilman $reider. Upon a voice ve�es all votinc� aye, i�ia�%'c�c
Kirkham declared the mation carried.
R;'CEIVZNG THE MINUTES OF THF PLANNING COMMISSION I'2EE:1'I:i�C. O:E' FEBI�UAId]t' 1Fi, 1970:
� 1. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L,3. #70�01, EUGENE HENRIY.SE�v: Lc�,w� :L�-�4, Spx7nq �rook
Park
The City Engineer explaiz�ed that there are fous 'lots alor�g 7t�th L�..�y th�t are
all 30' except for one last lot that is �1.9° �. The reque�t is �o caxnbint the
lots, then split into equaT lots. They will be a.out 6�� foot lnts. '1'he
Planning Commission recommended apgraval e Now t�.e ��pla ca�i� i:, r�:quest:�nc�
that Lot 2, Block 1, Spring Brook Park be split i.�:tc two �ax��uQl� c�P 2U' aeid
10' width making a buildable parcel of 70' width so 4t�a�" �her� �.w .1�' s?de
yard on each side of the house and then there �,ril,l �.�e a �;idth of 61�5' left
between Lot 1 and 2.
MOTION by Councilman Breider to grant the lot split requested by Eugene
Henriksen. Seconded by Councilnian Liebl. Up�on a vo.ice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
2. REZONING REQUEST ZOA #70-01, NORMAN E. RIEDEL: On Sth Street to 7th
Street, from Mississippi Street to 63rd Avenue N.E.
The City Engineer said that this request was denied by the Planning Commission.
Mr. Noraian Riedel,. a member of the audience, requested a Public Hearing before
the City Council.
MOTZON by Councilman Liebl to set the Public Hearing date for the Norman
Riedel rezoning request for April 13, 1970. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to receive the Minu�es of the Planning Commission
Meeting of February 18, 1970. Seconded by Councilman Breider, Upan a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham dealared the motion carried.