The URL can be used to link to this page

LS74-15 For� #5-6e � LOT SPLI T APPI_I CAT I ON CITY OF FRIDLEY R CITY USE 0_ . X � . ..��amn��r�. Applicant' s Na.me = APPLICANT• ;,� �y �� „. .��- s c •�, ,3 P � � � S"s'%j Lot S lit / � A��E'S�:, � /� "'_ !�� /T"t� c-' � Lf�' '(.c c"r� �n.�f. _ �� Street City Zip Code Date Filed: � � � TELEPHONE # a�,_,5��'�/..> Fee:$�b`' Receipt #7 �v , � � � Home Businesa Council Action: L`a�e �d o RII�IA£t�CS: � � � F'ROPffiTY 0[�l�(S� .�c, �i'1 /�K ��r-sc.� +� .�" �d . � � � o � � f sa +� m ADDRESS(ES��H -/'t�� `'�--1�`� ,,/�� '�',.at• •�I�r �/` - 5-SS�3-� a� a � o � Stre�t C� � Zip Code - � .� m o •�+ � � +� m � Street City �ip .i.oae � � � � TELEPHONE #(S� �g� -?tCL I . o � � a Home Bueiness -N u� -+� � � N U U tx11 O � �r-1 � fa� � ProPerty Loc�tion orz Street �l �r or Exact Street �ddres� (IF ANY)1�kS�� - ["v„ Tra� /��,�. ___ _. w . U H Legal Deacription of Property: z ,1,� t �//.�-�,��..��.-=.��4Lt'7'��;- s -��!o�,�i��, s,c., ��n �� l�l L� G (-/� � � ' �� {J L4 :. ��+C� � � -� . Reaaon f'or Lot Split:` � /t �c /c" �c / JC. /a e� [?�-J � /�C I--i,� /l 0 � �L�9�i �/�/� Gr/ � // � � � C? c � � . . � . i /.��- Total Are -of �'roperty j�� t1 aq. ft. Present Zoning Classif:ication � The undersigried hereby declaxes that all the facts and repxesentations stated in this application are true and correct. � � DATE: � =' .��`�/ SIGNATURE �,f��'' /1rt>„�'sL�'�-y,� _. BELOW FOR CITY USE OP3I,Y (SeA reveree eide far aciditionai instrue�iona} ' ,�.�.�.�... ..�..�_.�- PI�ATS & SUBS: Date of Coneideration - � � � Remarke: . PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Coneideration - Remarke: � CITY COUNCIL: Date of Coneider�tion - Remarks: , . _ : ...�.. . . .;.... .....,.. .. . .. ..._._.. ...,..._ _..� ..... > F __ ._._. _ � , , ' . � _..:... . ... f �},,y ,. .. � E ' LQT SPL1T APPLICATION PROCIDURE . '1 1 . Obi;ain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. .N.E. , Fridley� � i I 2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property j involv�d and the lot split fee of $ 20.00 for each original lot being split. `:} j 3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdiviaions and Streets �i & Utilitiea Subcamnittee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a mo.nth, wheri required. The City will eupply the applicant with minutes of � the Subcommittee. � 4. Followin� the Plats & Sube Committee recommendation of approval, the owner ; must theri obtain a CQrtificate of Survey on the origi.r.al parcel or paxcels ! alo.ng� with tY�e new parcels created with all existing stxucture� tied in. � i 5. The Certificate of Survey shou]_d then conta.in a simple deecription of a paxt j of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department � , fox Planning Commi�;sion recomm�ndatio.ns. The Planning Commission meets on the second and fourth Thur�3ay of the month. The City .will supply the �ppli.cant with mi.nutes of tYie Plr�.nning Commission. � 6. The recommendatio.ns of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for fi.nal a,ctio.n. The Council meets on the first a,nd third Mo.nday of the month. 7. The City Council ap�rov�,l may be subject ta certain stipulationa �ahich must . i ' be complied with by the applicant: �, 8.. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council actio.n i • and to advise him to comply with the conditiona imposed by the City. The , letter will also contaixz any neceasary deeds for easements and other pertinent � pa:pere for his eigxiature. � 9. Wher� all the condition� of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant - ehould file the lot split in Anoka County. , 10. In all cases where Coun.cil a�tian ha� �enz� e�ug�:t �,nu. ��r.i�d, nc petiti��z fcr identical aetion can be preaented until a period of aix months has elapsed. . NOTE: THE RESIILTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSI�I�PS FOR THE NEW P�RCELS I2d T(YI'AL AF'ri'F�i THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXC� THE ,AMOUNT A.SSESSE�? TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. TI� FINANCE DEPARZ�'1F�IT OF FRIDLEY MAY BE A�3LE TO PR07II;E THE ESTIMATID AMOIINT OF ADDITIONAL TIiXES OR ASSESSN�NTS. . _ L.S. #74-15 W RUBY ANDERSON ,. n r. qc� , E L-�,,'C' \ . -� '�h ,,n . �6 .. _�i',.. M. . . ��V-' s�9 `.� cAJ� �[, M.Nr,. '� \ \�� 484..3301 .. `� �� ASSOCIATES�` . �- lon�,ul�in�; Engineers — L�u�A Su�veYort . �.>.,. Sn, rt�.�w�; . .. - M�n.,c'.:-.r ' � ��G OAK ST�, SkI�K Cl'�TkG,M�PiN _.... 3F.64 I hereby cert:fy that this Certl'icate of Survey� [%escr�ption❑ Easement ❑ Plan ❑ or Specification ❑ was prepared by T;p or ur�der my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land S�rJeyor � ?'rofessional Enyir�eer [] �nder the laws of the � State o� M�rii�esota. �_� � � . �''"^'e�'-�:�.-'�_+''�� Reg. No. _.�___�ate �.�ri 1 15 _ 1 A 74 _ -i6c - � --- ; ' � C,p ,., f�0 ��`� � �i I - � � so � -�io- ! , 1 � Q � � � I 3 'Q o ' � � - �n o � V � � � i Q 4 ; 1 rh � � e i � � 6A�P S[A6 �� 1 � ti v � zi e6 / .. � ¢� � � I � i � So - -ii0- - -� --- --- - - ,j ;�; o h l ^�n � `��I � ' r ,-__-- - - -- -I- - - - - �/Lo- - - - -- - --�;�s�. co,e. S.w Cv.e. ' That part af Lot 16, REVISED AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 10, Anaka County, Minnesota, lying northerly of a line drawn from a point on the east line of said lot distant 137.50 feet north of the southeast corner of said lot to a point on the west 1ine of said lot distant 137.50 feet north of the southwest corner af said lot; subject to easement over the West 50 feet for Hic�h�vay and subject to easement over the North 33 feet for road, 7¢-�zj �49-�a o L.S. #74-15 W RUBY ANDERSON . .1�� AVE . 5_E. �� `�Ui� W �ix'Y 90 .'. l;.�vG, r�!�NN � s �� ;T PAL'� i2, M ��'d "<`I 7"'S ��j .-, -�& �� 48a-3301 . � ASSOCIATES� Con;ul'ni� En�;inrert — Land Sur�rpor� .. � ... .�.n� �.i�in_�;�. 3i 1 'iAK 5T, SAIfK CFN`Rc�M;NN. �5�-3n64 I hereby certify that this Cer*ificate of Survey� Description❑ Easement ❑ Plon ❑ or Specification ❑ was prep�red by me or unc�er my direct supervision and that [ am o duly Registered Land Surveycr � Professienal Eny�neer ❑ under the laws of the StQte of Mint�esota. f ` ...-c_.-7 :.� ��;. ,,..-s" �,�,...,• . ��. ..c-.-�..,;�,.�c-�y �, ,.+r�-�Gc-�'`� R e g. N o.�—�a t e�r i 1 1 5 � 1 9 7 4 ; � � �_ -/60- _ � �-- -Sp - - - _ -//O- , �_� . ; i� �' . I � � � I � � I � ' � � �� 0 �i � � � � n i �� ^ � � � � � � �, � i � � � ; � � ;i � � � � � � ' l� o � � / " _ ¢o ' 1 � � _,o I - -/i0- _ 1 s w. co,P � se. co.c -/6 0- � I That part of Lot 1F,, REVISED AUDITOR'S SU�3DIVISION N0. 10, Anoka County, ,��inneseta, lyin� southerly of a line draVrn fror� a poir�t cn the east line of said lot distant 137.50 feet north of the southeast corner of said lot to a point on the west line of said lot distant 137.50 feet north of the southwest corner af s�icf lot; subject to easement over the West 50 feet far Hir�hway. 7¢-/l3 514�J fn0 C. /3 �, � "l3L " ?f� — ' —R . . _n,�! '""� /60�, ; /ug-T��`,a'''—=--7r6f2�.}_Y39�-� $J6t� /n ,.. 97a�.. �,�m., ,� � I J v ?" - � . � ; � + i ��• �-+r�-�--- ,,.,,� , � � h � ' ' 1� ��t ' . -.Z�- • � .. � w : . . ;�� - � _ : !0&'�1 : /320� �3�30 �3yo� /3�a , �6 �/36d 3y � � ,. �%/o /_r�n�o - ' = : I I� C � l\/� � �� '�� /��(7� . oQ /�jc. , . '0 � � tp � 0 � \r - � - - ----- ° -��,��1 �zz9��v �,��a> / �i,��` ;�. � ,� .. � o o I a a t � .. . ... ... Ih � � I� � ' � `ZjFO> � • � 1:"1 y<`� �� :� � _ S ^ 19 � 20 ,, � �� o�o � ojf ��; ;° �� _ _ __ _ �---- � _ ; � h�� fi�, h� � . ,�o �� m �� ,;�- (1�,.e ; � a ° � �n a �b�� ' tl.•v� e � : ;� '�,d � �� ,5� c , j ��-- i3 O �,_ � --5�b.i9 _ - _ �, � �� k ' •�c' 3iB/o 1o6v7 ---- 3 �- b�� o � �9v� � �'. p � � ;: � „ � � I_$42 �� f�� $ . ,, �y r o� C7 �D ': zoa o� � _ , 0 7 ,� E � P�O q �q y'� � B�rnai-S Bac.�i � �; ` , _,.fs ' � p 0 � . ��03 i F � < /00 , r k __'__ ___. ._ .'_ _ ` ---- B � �� O�v �.rvJ L.S. � � � ,�� v m 3 � #7 4-�1 ;� . � ��jA � �O• � RUBY ANDER ON� , �,��,f` '� � M � ��y J . C � �r�� .?: 2 � `O � ��,\ ` � T ,�r;�� Y � V . 'a , � . � a a �s+� � �,�4 � A � ��J r��' - � � � (50�> (900� �{ �'s 'ioe �30SJ �" 51a�L o�'.Y1�A.��n}iu�/� - i� �/�rea/� b' Ma6e�R. � "-n ;f- �O��aY.'r� — ---�r�'�A ' - 4i�'vr �< , 'h -- --516i7_ G6.ot - �;."�m�r -`•`'y � - --6412/ -- -- � �,� .`*� e6•- ///�� -4' �� /SiB,t g(/�� '�. �_fj. . . � �,� � ��__o� O� '''- _ __._. �1 .�� _ _ /� - -- - - - - 1 ~ � i ,4 � S�� '� (4.9p1 � �o-'� , w�- � � � J _ o�.� � r,�b� �' �� :�� G 4 C � 6zo� ( fl t� �p��6 t '� � � �� C:fr �F F��d/ey ^ � ° �1 4 / � 1 ° `� -- -i e � � T ,i,rsa� � i u (o+��d r��9o> -- ; �,� ; ' /� E a9as . � �f L j� ` � i i ire O s� � :< �>:rs� e,., ��70� �'_ sr��-��---- --- �S R ,yq �,c � o'GT �A � iaoo) -j v,� ( ♦ ,h i„�* 1� b, ��/� � ��i� I ` ' � •, S6�iY.�'a r ^t •. l�setY Lf . . � o�a 6 L_ _'7.'� r'� - _ � � • ""' ' ' _ I � Y �� 7 ; 1 ; ___�S/O � � 0 '0 � i �%� �- � ,- ,s��J�� -- �o --- ,�� o � � ��, r �, `) � � �^� (%v,zo) ;�-�o) ;�ai s¢�B i -B¢�B,y __ �/�e �r�p� !,� � Ay` � 0 4 � i � BP'B ¢z,9 ¢,.i-a.�`r_ :aZ, �� 6 r� � 7G �; G 6 �3 � I � �¢a �¢ , B� 8�.4 B�, ` — t' , _/fEz� � I � � I j 8.�4 � �� — �c��-�-- /��03 y ----,a � i � " �, ,. � ��s� i , Z; , � Q�/`//�/.� � � , _ � w --_ ; _,�___-: �r, :o> � ��h,`` °4 v. � ,,�� _ .�, -_. . F't � � (6/9� � � �� e ` �;__ � � __` -0�� ^'i ; � 6 l��/ ' (63 Z �� 9 � B`°��7 �—6 ^�--s' ¢ h .�' �i 2 � R ,ti ap�� G � � (,�J � � �,: -�' � ^,� . �� & C] �ii� _i � Q �i�� , � ; � ' r : C] � �m I I � �� T� +(7 �,� ,f �J�.e.s o� ` � �. ��: _ _ � � d i. � ,y ,� j .,s rafc,i L,� =�, / `�/y / I ` i r.� ;ti ,o ,s ` � - ��_.� D�✓V ;i _�M / � ' � !n �n :,� h I'Q u ;•� ' • i ae�(f � l _.1 , �3 _ _---- ----� ��O�O/ � ,. �� r�� / 1 y � k • M W ,,�,> ' , � /33 �3 3 � � , ►�020 =(°� � (7�aI � � a3 � B �7 s� � �S/ �` 36 3�S �� 3 � � ,,:�� i�'--- G 6�6 � � . �f/o � � r�ao�__ --- ___ - i.a��g e� _,� 6S TH �VE. N. E. �-�� L ��.� ��`` z¢ � � (O�0�� g�oi ��°or ' Y '-- b �f�' a ' .ir � i$.';: � �rr- c �o �o DO Q'° `'` zsa j ! 8a ---sea_ _ ¢i.c� _.� . � �" � a� 09 --� 6 s�i �� ,�3 ��o � ��3s8 , B7 ,��3'�Y ,�30 ; � �R� �� p _a io c60 ,� Q 4 -� f� . -.t =o (Bzo� Bao , ''y.'` -�J� �e� �(2/4�> i"\'� i .o � + � ��.. �� 4 < > � �,�90> �� -.o�o �..:h �o , ��--�.—' � �;� R�� N�"� -., �. _5_8/8_�j 9 2 � c��,5�m�. `�, � r,,��, ��.�_� o ;�;,.� � , � p M A e,� I H�O� Qarsnef5 ; \i . �.� Jti � , `v �., �� .� � � �e ��r/� '• � (9ao) W' ; `o � I � ��^i ''o � "� �7`�• h • �i � y ►�7�lJ � �, . ,- _ U i �� i Q�� J�� (/6zo) ' �� a� n , �-'�� -° ' C I �r I� Q� �o ; � ti L � > � _ M ,. , �y , � ,�_,._.... .. I 83 I AT o i �� _ L± I �...�. " . . a.u.�w.,�..ruu,.a. . .. � n .l . � � �'. � . �� r , � � � , � ,; � � � � �, ` � � � a , _ : ry , . .. # :. � _. � -.� _ � , i 4 , , F ' • � . � _. �..� —� . .,,. � � _. �. . . ' I � ' � �� i.? - _. . ,. � � � j � . . � . . . . . � � .. . _ . " . .� . �- . . . . . ` .. .. . ' � '� . . � .. - . � - . . ' Ii,�rn � . � � � F ` . . . . � � � ! .. . . . a . .. � . � . . . .F A � . . � i . i .., . . � ... i .. . .... . � � � - .� � .. . : �. . . .. . , . ..,�,.. ... .. . . � � . .w', . �� . � � . t ' � . � � S : a � � ' .. ..._ .r . . .... ... .. � s i '.� ! fi J N.f� ; T/��s S�efe� is 7. sl�ew �i af %1� /s �osi.��< 7; 6�, /� �i�•:•1 �� '� /,t �YI�AOk� Q� i�sri411Qt � ypr✓fvtt ��/S /S �e� ��OSSO�//y T�+ S/jt mN S�ep1 d � of f�.�s.s 7��f w�// G{iCNf�Q/� �6� �G�;/t L.S . #74-15 RUBY M. ANDERSON �o� �v ' �evlSp� ��c�r7at- s �v��tv�s /o�+ v'"'��Q i [S D o l ' li�n�r-� / ��.a , I , � . � I --,�— ___ _____ /.3?,SD _ _�__. _. _._ �_-- --_ l3�,So __ ..� � --�---�-- �_.,�__ `� ' , , � � �. , � _ ZQ ��Sn+pn - N'��,- _ _ �/S,w , — a►-��Q— _ _._ u r'l i�i�5 Te -��9T� � . q � 30- 1� . . �.- � � �o, ��_30. , -—��----�-3s.S 57.�, �' ° T , � � � r�' � - --�-- N J�.�, -�-- V ' �a.i�. T�e� , � , u�d�r � � i' � o ` � � Qt .�•�• \ _. ,O � ' Cehfru � f{ti� —r– - - _ _---- — � �, �}� � . 6 < ,..f ` . (. � . . _ f......_._. . ..,.._....... ._... . — _ -.. .. . ._. `!i::i-' _. . ._:i:. -. 'F. j} .'�5 � � - S- t . . .. .. r � , .1 - , - , , ! , . ' "J'_ r , el -� i ' , . : . ' . �.1 . .. . . ! ' , '. . �. . , � . ,� . 1' �_::?. ._, � , � �_ � � � . t_ x r., , , . .. ; c.. �.i i', . • , . � � � � . . . .. . . . .., . ' . — � � � . i . ... ,.. � ... , ,. � ' F (. .i, i . � ' � . . .. . . .; i. .. - II ._ . ,i _. , , . _.. � • , ' .. .. . .. � ' ' � � . _� i.. .:i.i _. . . � ._ . ' . . "�.t'.: .. 1 ;I ' _ { I — ,. _ .. . . .. ._. `�_ . � .i . J ..`, i '�' � s.� � . . ... . . . .... .'. . .— ' r ..•.. � • ' , • . . . ��'::�• ) e'. .. . . . �� 1 . � � �i .. . . •...)� � ��.�: .. . .. i. . .. .�t... . ' ' .� • ` ' ..�1 � . ) 1.�•. . . 1 ,.. .. ) ...i _. . . __ .. _ . . .. , � . .�. ..� � �. . �t . ..r . � ' . .. Sl ... . � ' . . �. . . : . 1. � � ! .. � ' ..,. � 7:.,1.,.. .. " ��'n�'�� . . � � . , 1 . � � w.i . , f . ... . . . ,.. . _•� .. ��. . r . ' . � . . � ' ' .i i.. ,. �.4. . ... . � . 1 . � .. ,.� �� ' ♦ ,� , � Plats & Subs.-Str. & Util. Sub. Meeting - August 14 , 1974 Page 4 ; 8. A11 Lots must meet minimum 1ot size and have minimum front footage and depth. 9. After the grades have been established by the engineers, the plat come back to the Planning Commission before Council approval . Mr. Harris said he would like to have an engineering determination on the lots to the south before this came to the Planning Commission. Mr. Dropps said he thought that could be done. He would check with his engineer. • Mr. Harris said he would like to see all the stipulations complied with before this went to Council so there were no loose ends. UPON A VOICE VOTE, aIl voting aye, the motion carried unanimously . 2. REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT, L.S . #74-15 RUBY M. ANDERSON: Split off . the Southerly 138. 5 feet , Revised Auditor' s Subdivision No. 10, to make a saleable lot, located at 69th� Avenue and Old Central. Mr. Blaine Edmundson, representing the petitioner, and Ruby Anderson were present. � Mr. Clark said that both r�sulting parcels were far in excess of our minimum requirements. The owner of the front lot, the one facing 69th, would have to grant an easement on either the east or we�t line, for sewer and water. It would depend upon whether or not this could be in the same trench if this easement would have to be 15 feet or 20 feet. Mr. Clark said that Mr. Edmundson was going to check the setbacks of the houses east of this property. They are far in excess of the 35 foot minimum setback requirement. This was to determine if a house could be built on the front lot without a variance. Mr. Edmundson said the house that had been on this lot had a setback of about 75 feet. The house on the fourth lot �own has a setback of between 60 to 62 feet. He thought the only way they could build on this lot without a variance would be to face the house on Central Avenue. Mr. Clark said that if this house faced Central Avenue, the setback requirement would be reduced in half for the sideyard setback, so the setback would be 35 feet. Mr. � Harris said he would then have a front and sideyard setback of 35 feet. Mr. Clark asked Mr. Edmundson if he could draw up a plan for a house that could be built on this lot witho�it variances. Then if this lot split was approved by the Planning Commission and Council, they would know that a house could be built on this lot, meeting the requirements. Mr. Harris said the house that would be built on the part of the lot being split off would have to face Central Avenue anyway, and it . , , . ,._. . . , .� .._. __ . ._ __.._ :_ _ . .�.�..,.. _.._. '�. �.. . .. .. `.. . n . � . � ' . . �_... . . *+ . . . _ .. ...... _. . .. . . . . � .��'t:�4 � ;f.a . � ...r's_ � . ." � � - . ... ..... . Fi:` ,c.� � ., . .. � � s . ' ..frJ� :,..,-. -. . ��. , ' �� . . , .._ , ...., �.! , . . ... . � ' . . .. . ....7 - .�, - . . ." : . " � . � � � .. � . �.� ? ' � .._. . . .�,. .. . . . , . } '.i _.. . .. � . . ; . ..�.,t �.. _� . .. . . . � . ... . ,.) _ • � 7��.., , ' . . . . . . . ' � .. . ' , � , _ ....� ... . ` �.. .�i - . � ,.. . . .. .... �. . � ... � ,.. � . ... � . .. ' ' � . -. ' . . . �1 -. . � . .. .i . s � ... . . . . .. , . ... , . ... .1 �. . .. . . . . .. . "•J . . . �. , . � : �� . _ . . -..SI .. � . ' .. . . . _. � ' . . . . � - � . -.. ' ,. .. ' . � .._� , � , .� . � . . . . 1�. , . 4.�,� i,. .. . � .- ' . ' � . � . ' . � ... . � . , . z �1-. , S � , �.. . �� , . . .:, �f.Y i,. . a:.i � .. � •� . � . .; � + � � ' . ..''1 _ .s , � - ., ..i .. � ... . . � ... � - .. � . ' 1 ? : . .. � �. � ' _ } . . ,,..: , . ., 'is. -. .. . . � . � . ��.�. . , . i� . ' . . . - � . ... . . . ±' ) . _ , ' �', , . . . . �, . ..... ..�. .. � S ri 1,` . i) . .1 . . �, ...,.,. . .� .., .i.. ... . S ..- �.�' � �. . ��., � � � .. � � ' . �.. .. .. . . ... ' 1 .. '�i .� . . �.. . . . i ) , .. �� . .. . ... .. _ . .� t - .. . ,. .. . . � �1.' � . . ,.., . , ' . . . J . . ..� � ... � . � " 'f , . . . . . .. - ' . � ' , i:' , .� . .. , '.( _ . l � , . t . � . _ , � . � Plats & Subs.-Str. & Util. Sub. Meeting - August 14, 1974 Page 5 would make a better appearance, if both these houses faced the same way. Mr. Clark said the City didn't care if the sewer lines were run along Central Avenue or along the East side of these lots. This easement wouldn' t hinder the construction on these lots because this �•art of the property would be in the setback areas. Mr. Edmundson � said they would prefer to have this easement on the Easterly 20 feet because it would miss some small trees they would like to keep. Mr. Harris said that N.S.P and the Telephone Company could use this same easement. Mr. Clark said the gas lines could use the same easement also, because their lines were more shallow than the sewer lines. Mr. Harris said he thought this easement should be 20 feet rather than 15, so that all the util:�.ties could use the same easement. MOTION by Meissner, seconded by Christensen, that the P1ats & Subdivisions-Streets & UtiZities Subcommittee recommend to the .Planning Commission approvaZ of the request for a 1ot split L.S . #74-15, by Ruby M. Anderson , to split off the Southerly 138 . 5 feet of Lot 16, Revised Auditor ' s Subdivision No. 10 , to make a saZeable 1ot, located at 69th Avenue and 01d Central , with the stipulations that a 20 foot easement for utilities be provided on either the Easterly or Westerly side of the Zot and that a tentative house be placed on a survey of these Iots to show that a house could be built without a variance being granted. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 3. VACATION REQUEST, SAV #74-03 , BY JAMES LUND: Vacate the Westerly 50 foot easement for public purposes on Lot 30, lying North of the Southerly 30 feet of said Lot 30, Auditor' s Subdivision No. 129 , located in the 1.500 Block between 73rd Avenue and Onondaga Street N.E. , and replatted as Jim Lund Estates. Mr. Clark said this easement on t is lot was an oversight by the staff as much as the petitioner. Whe this lot was tax forfeit, the City asked for and got, a 50 foot ri t of way along the West boundary of this lot. When it was platted a Jim Lund Estates , the street is further to the east. The way the treet pattern is laid out now, it will allow the people the west�to extend the street where the cul-de-sac is now. We r ommend:>` .that this 50 foot strip be vacated because the new street pat ern is acceptable. This easement was found at the time Mr. Lund receiv �he deed from the County. This easement was just recorded in April o , this year, but it was asked for some time ago. Mr. Harris asked abou�°' the 2 foot County easement on 73rd Avenue. Mr. Clark said that is ju� genera ractice by the County that whenever a lot goes tax f rfeit, th tr� to get the 120 foot of right of way along a County road, and they would rather not vacate this easement. The City staff checked the homes and apartment buildings on either side of this pl�at, and several of them are located 35 feet from the old right of way line. The County admits that they �;re never going to widen 73rd to the full 120 feet, and if they did wideri it., the most _ _ _._ _ _ __ .� I � � 4t � ._�;'y,,.. L �� , � � . .. . . ' . v. ..�"'"....... ..,�... ...... ...�.._.. . .._. . ... .: . ... . .... ... . . . . . ,�:. :t7rsr`, :�' r , . .__ , . , ,. • .. . . , . _ ..... . . . �.r . _.. . . . . . . . � ..._. '. , .�� . .� . � . . � � i � . � - , ' .. - . . ._ � . .. .. . . . _ .. . . .._ . 'i _ . . . . . , . .. , . . i i. . . . . . . ... . .. . . . _ � .... . � . �.�:. . - . . . i. . �i�':.. _ . . . . . .� . .._ � . ..� � �. . . � . .. .. . f l - _. � , . �. � . � . .. . . . � . ' .�i .... � ,. �. .�� .. . . . . . . . .. - . . 1 .7 I .., , .. .. ' f ._ . , .. ' . .. .. .. , .� .. . . I�� ' � . ... .. ... ,� ... . � . . . . .. . . ... , .. _, � , _ � . . . �.'". . ... ' ' . r ' �. .. . � .. . � . .. . , �. �._ . . , . . ��. . .. ..i.�._. . _ . . . ._.�. .. . ••. . .. .. .. . , ,.. . . _... . . ' ., ... t' . .. _ . � .. .. . .. . - . . �. . ' • ' , � :r' ., . . ... . � .. . . . . . � . . . ... . _ , .., . .. ,,. , � -. �.'E � ..i i.:. � �, ,ti .. . , ,_.: _ ..,. . . .... . . . . _. . � . . . . . . �. .. ., � . : '��. � S� . . . � . � .. . � . � . � ,.,.� -. . .�. . ,.. � . � ; ,, ;5 � ; '. ,� .,. � . �i.. _ ; ...,. ,. _ ':': . . _ , . Y <. �� ,, _,, . ; . .. , , � ,. ; . . � , ,. )li i ., �. �' .. . . .�..... .� . ..,� .._4 �.. . . �. . .. .. r . ' . 1 .. .. . � . . � . -.f .. ..:�.I�.. 7.\. -.. 3 �,�.,r _ .��I _ . _ . • .. . ` . . .�.._ ' . , ♦ tV� .... . _ .�( �. ��. 1 . - � . ' . , :. - ,- . . _ r. , � '� . . .. ... . .i(; ._..._ 3.�� .. ..... � � . .. . . . . ." A .... .. .i-.� �. . . .. . ... . . ... .. . = . . .. . . . . �. . ._ . •f i. .�v .. ' . . . . .� . -, . ... . .... . .� '. y, � .4.'�3 .�.'...� �' � � � . . . ,. . . , _ r, _ . _ , . . }' : . _ , . I� � e Planning Commission Meeting - August 21, 1974 Page 3 � Mr. Langenfeld said he would continue to ser�d the Planning Commission material as long as they found it useful. 1. REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT L.S. #74-15r'� RUBY M. ANDERSON: Split off the Southerly 3�, 5 feet of Lot 16 , Revised Auditor' s Subdivision No. 10, to made a saleabie lot, located at 69th and Central Avenue N.E. � Mr. Blaine Edmundson was present to represent the petitioner. Mr. Boardman said the main thing the City was concerned about � on this lot split was that a house could be built on the North lot without requiring any variances. The house that had been on this lot before the tornado, was setback 75 feet. If the house that could be built on this lot faced Central Avenue, then the sideyard setback could be reduced to half of the set�ack requirement, which would make a sideyard setback of 35 feet. Mr. Edmundson _present�d a sketch. of a house and gai-age on a � survey of" the No��h l.ot. On` this sketch, the house was 28 feet by '""` 46 feet with a 24 foot square garage. He said he had drawn the sideyard setback as 30 feet, but the house could be moved over 5 feet and still fit the lot. He said he would correct this drawing before this lot . split request went to Council. � Mr. Boardman said there had to be an easement granted on the � North lot for utilities to serve the South lot. The sewer and water - would be coming frcm: 69th Avenue. � ' . � Mr. Harris said the P1ats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities , + Subcommittee had recommended that this easement be 20 feet instead of 15 feet, so all the utilities could be on the same easement. This easement would be for sewer and water, gas, electric power and telephone ; lines. _ ; , � Mr. Drigans said the survey shows a garage slab on the North lot. Mr. Edmundson said that was left after the toxnado, but it would be , removed. ; : Mr. Edmundson said that because of the grade on these lots , the ; driveway for the North lot would exit on 69th Avenue, and the lot on ; , the South would have a tuck-under garage. � ` Mr. Drigans sa�d both of these ;lots were buildable lots'� th�n. � - ' Mr. Edmundson said they would prefer to have the 20 �oot easement on the East side of the North lot, the Central Avenue side. Mr. Drigans � said there were some trees on this property. Mr. Edmundson said they would lose some. trees whether this utility easement was put on either the East or West side of the property.. Mr. Harris asked where the existing power pole was. Mr. Edmund- son said it was on the Nortnwest corner of the North lot. Mr. Harris said the purpose of having the 20 foot utility easement was to have all - the utilities on the same easement. If the utility easement was put on ;- � r= ' � •..��,�.,.� x x � i =�i�.�t .� .. , a . . , ; _ � �._ ._.. -----.._ ___ _.... _ . __ .'_:. _._- . - : _ .. _ _ `'.._ y " _„�:} _:. c � _ _ . . . ,. - , . .f _ � . �� .. �:. t- ; r ._ � , :_. � . ,._ ., . � .�a' 7.`�-:'i( :� Jf.i:.�� ,. � � � � � >i?'..:..�i; , '` J i a l C G • �_ '/QC9 �`ti , � . , _ - �ti� Y ' `_','� f_3 Z :`.� j_, - . ,:.J �� , _ , . . . _ . . ._ . . _ .. . .. . . - � . .��`C7~. '.t .�.� i�l,. . {J . .-)j �._� . . � .. . . .. . . .. . ., . ._.. c�. . _.. l; . . . .� . _. . , . _._.J i_. >' . oi � .. .- . � i� _ . ., �. , �a . : . _ �� ... �>�_ 9i' . Y.�. -4 . ' � ,. . • . .�. _ , .,: . ; :� ;. , -3 c.. i�: r . ..�. : . � . ._ :. ,.. ., � �� _ . . _ . . .. , . � .. � _ . ._ ... _. ._ .. ... .. . _ .. . ,. . . . �� .. ' - - -_ i� ., . . ... � � x ',�L�! . ... ,1 �� . �3 . .��i.�- � � . . � . �::?.:. � ��1 � , . . • � . � .. _ ?�i.<�. . . £.�:. _ .�. :S' _.. , . � .,::1 . . .. ._ . - . . .. �. �. " . . � . h. ,,._C; . :. . ., ,.. ,C`.; .. . . . l : . _ . ..�., , . i � +. ._._. � _c _ .. . t_ , . �)�_ , �,� . _ �3 �" ��,. _ .. ��:.. '� _. . ) ��. � , i. _.� .: .. :. �..�.. �. : � c'...:,"' i, �� .}, : ,., : ,- . ..; -.�.. . -� . ^ . . _ . . . �.�.: ,.:_� � � . ��. . .... . ca J; . . . . . . . . . _ _ �. � .... � � � . . . :� , i ."^_ . _ ., ... . _ .- _ V _ � : , ''3:7.3 ) . >, i s.. , , +_. • � _ j . - -- _ _ c _. ,': ,�:'tr. , + , `';_ r�.: r_ .. ' _ , � `.... il.� . s`. ...f t... i . (��v� t�°r�..,. - ._.. � ... -. ' . . � ..` ._ _ . ., � _ � . . . `-)' _i � .r . 't.: . ::; � � ' _... . .`_c • .' rl> . . �.� . - ... . . . . . . . � ,_ t. . �- � . . . , , --� � ., . . .� . _ . . 11 ��1�iY ' . � ,..., „.: -- i' .. �. . � f . .. . ., ... ... � �� ,�_ . _" . . .. . ... .. ..<�, .3 °. _ ... .'�) . . . .. i ,. _ . _� .. � � .. J 1'l w. "�.' .'Cr. . _' . .. ., _:t :. t .. . . � ... � _.. . . . r!'�: . . .� it, .� _. , . -- . � .. _._, 1 :.0 i .... :�.�. � . 1' C: �' . ... -> �-� , . .. ... . . . .. i.. .. . .. . . .._ .. .' . . ...:. . _ . . . .. ; 1�.`.' '?..�. . -',(",. � .. '-F - , � :•.:.. .. -, - . a .. _ � ,�r _..� , .. 1. , s . � � . .. '� . -} ' - _ ' : . _,_. : ... . ,. , . - . .. � _ ,. . � , � nrj _ It:, ,� .,c� `1 , 1. t. .. _ � _ �. ` - . . _. . .,�... .., .i "Y�. r y . ... � � ; . 3_' . . .._ .'_� .. � c , ''J :i �:+i � . �� _ .. _ � _, ..; �_ . . _, �_ . � _ .. - . _ . . � . . '_ , :.'i� . . .. �`C _ = •'J.:. ' f 't _ . ' -,.r , � ..L �. .Y_,�� n • . . ' .. _: � �tt...� . r.. , . . . _ . .. _ � . .. _ }!' �. -".f �-' 7 r , ' �,..t r � ., - , . .,. . ..,-,, � . . ... � . , _ a i., . _ .� � i , _ _ � . , _ � � , ,. ; :�7 + � :. i '.C:_�;' t `. r �: r ; ; ... 1� _:. _�,'`� ,.. i . . � :;-,.� , , � _ . .i _ ; . 'r� .` . .�'v _ '1. . • �:,', i.�. . . t; a, ;�i .. ,.� , __ .r . �...-: ,"` ,- '1 r ,. , ; . ,.,r ,. , ., ._'r .: .... �.i ..✓��.. yt.'y � �) . ..� :._ . a.. ._.` SL. .l _. � ... . � . . - . . .... . . [. 11.`....`�:IIl�_f.:. .,l.i .w i . . ..�.ia C' �i..��_^ ' ." " ". _ - - . . ll . ...�.... � _-.. �..i 1 t '.\J .. ... .. .. � . J C � ' - ..:7 ., . ' .: � . . . I' . . ' [_,:i , �''_-3'�:�- i � °�.; :t .f T�:) .. . �� },Y � , , P ..._. ,'1 'if!'lr,'..+. ..'�'_:i 1t'`�`��, �'3 . , �_�: . , ��::' . .. - v .. . .. � .C, . .. r. . . .. , ... � _� . ._ .� '..�_ � .. � .:. . .. . . i. . . � _ � ,. ,; , ,,.t _ c y , .• ; 1 � ` . �" . . , : ;> : �; ., _ � . � , ;t �_� ,. _.. _ , ;� . , f. _.. . . _.. . !. .:., _ h . �, .i,. �,�. �; ,., ..., I 4. .,;� ' .� . . f'`i. . . .- . . � .., � r � . , . �- _,. . ,. . � .: • . .. . - . , - - , R� - ; � � t. . :t��'� . 'j �. � " - � .i .._ . � , �:1C. �.. •,t'y� - � . ' x..i ' � .. � .. ' -. �.�",. . _ . � � . .. "��lanning Commission Meeting = August 21, 1974 Page 4 the Easterly 20 feet, there would have to be another easement for the utility poles on the Westerly side of the lot, unless the power poles were moved. Mr. Edmundson said he thought there was a power pole Southeast from the Southerly lot, and maybe they could serve this property from that pole. He said he would check on this before this went to Council for the final decision on which side of the property the utility easement should be placed. - MOTION hy �indblad , seconded by Drigans , that the Planning Commission recommend to Council approval of the request for a 1ot split , L.S. #74-Z5, by Rub� M. Anderson, to split off the Southerly Z37 . 5 feet of Lot 16, Revised Auditor 's Subdivision No. 10, to make a saleable 1ot, located at, 69th and CentraZ Avenue N.E. , with the stipulations that a 20 foot uti3ity easement be provided on either the Easterl� or Westerly � side of the North Iot, and that the petitzoner bring in a corrected copy of a drawing ot' how a house could be placed on the North lot without � requiring variances. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carrier3 unanimously. 2. VACATION REQUEST. SAV #74-03 , BY JAMES LUND: Vacate the Westerly 50 foot easement for public purposes on Lot 30, lying North of the Southerly 30 feet, Auditor' s Subdivision No. 129, located in � the 1500 Block between 73rd Avenue Northeast and Onondaga Street and replatted as Jim Lund Estates. Mr. Boardman said this was more or less an oversight when this property was replatted as Jim Lund Estates. It would affect Lots 1 and 9, Black l; and Lots 1 and 8, Block 3 , of the replat. This easement was asked for when there was a different street pattern planned for this area. Because the administration feels that the street pattern as platted in Jim Lund Estates is a better plan for this area, it is a reasonable request to ask that this Westerly 50 foot easement be vacated. Mr. Harris said that when this lot was tax forfeit property, the County also took an additional 27 foot easement along 73rd Avenue, which they will not vacate. This easement is only on Lot 30. They don' t have this easement on the adjacent lots , so this easement is not going to do the County any good, but they want to hana on to it. The County has a policy that they take an additional 30 foot easement along every County road on any property that goes tax forfeit. He said Mr. Lund didn' t know about these easements until he got the deed from the � County. � Mr. Drigans asked how this County easement would affect the front setback on the houses facing 73rd Avenue. Mr. Boardman said this was just an easement and was being used as part of the setback requirement. Mr. Lund is going to setback one house 50 feet, and : three houses 43 feet, but this was because of the average f�+b.i�t yard setback requirement, instead of this easement. � MOTION by Drigans , seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission recommend to Council approval of the request for a vacation, SAV #74-03, by James Lund, to vacate the Westerly 50 foot easement for pubZic purposes, on Lot 30, Iying North of the Southerly 30 feet, Audi- tor's Subdivision No. 129, located in the 1500 BZock between 73rd 1 ; REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1974 PAGE 7 � I � MOTION by Couneilman Nee to adopt the Ordinance as amended, waiving the second reading ' and ordering publication of the ordinance. Seconded �y Counci7man Starwalt. Upon a roll eall vote, Councilman Utter, Counci7man Nee, CounciFinan Breider, and Councilman � Starwalt voting aye, Councilman Breider declared the mot�on carried unanimously, ' NEW BUSINESS: . CONSIDERATTON OF OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDTNP,NCE GF P,EZ�,tiING RE UEST, ZOA #74-03 BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, O REZONE CHASE ISLAND FROM CPR-2 F��OD PLAIN�TO CPR--1 FLOOp WAY : 4 R K Councilman Breider explained �that ;his ordinance w�s r��u�sted �s a correct��nal measure ; ' by the State. � MOTION by Councilman Nee to waive th� f�rst rcading �f �he ordinance and adopt the � first reading. Seconded by Counczlman S�tarwal+. Upon a ro�' ca71 vote, Councilma� Nes, > Councilman Breider, Gouncilma.n Starwalt, �n�. C��.�n��ilman Jtter voting aye, Counci7man : � Breider dpclared t'r�e motion carried. ', , RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNIIVG COMMISSI��1 MEETItiG OF AUGUST �l, �9�4: ; RE UEST FOR A LOT SPLIT, . S. #7✓�-75 RI:;�Y M. ANDcRSON: SALIT OFF TiiE SOUTHERLY � , 37.5 FEET OF LOT 16, REVI S SCfaDIV�SJON N0. l0, i0 MAKE A SALEABLE LOT,_ ' , ED 69TH ND CENTRAL VE UE N. E.: � Councilman Breider called on the P��blic Works �?irector t� expla�� he mat�ter to the �� Council. I � �he Public Works Director, ��r. 2ichard S�biech, said the Planning Cor�m�ssion had ' ' recommRnded approval of the reauest not9.r,g the-re sn9uld be a 20 foot. �,�tility ' �asement provided either on the west or past portion of the 7�ts to furn�sh the tots with utilities from 69th Aver;ue. t�e sa�d the property �ti�ner had requested � i t�a� this easement be on the east �ide to avoid ti-�e trees on tn� west :.i��•� Qt tne ' � i �roper7,r. � i � C:ounci'iman Starwalt asked the Publi� W�rks Director if th�r� was any prefer��,ce to the I � lcoation of the easemPnt from the engineering standpoin�. "rh�� ab7ir. �lar��s ��irect�v � said therP is no pre�erence. ' � ( The City Manac�er recalled that sometime in the past th� City 5�ad studie�� th�9s r�f��a � , ; and the plan at that time wa.s tn prnvide right of way on t'r�� sdath s�iti� nf the � properties in this area for access to the back of th,e lo��s. He furtr!Er �xp�ained , ' � that all c��f th� lots in this �rea are af double size and cocald be spi�� in �:i�e � � future and f.here woutd be a need for acczss to the southerly ,ots if they �r�e spl5t. Mr. B�aine Edmundsan addresyed the Cc�unc�l and said he reprEserted the a�plicant � Mrs. Ruby M. Anders�n. Nir. F.dmuncison said from tne �iscussion of pr~c�vious ybars, _ roncerning the split�ing of the �roperty on 59tn Avenue, it had �eer determined zhat ` � �this wou1d nov be feas�hle because the prasent homes are set back sn 7ar. He �'urther � � commented that *he con�ensus of the area people is that they v�r��t�!d n��Qr �a.nt t� split I the lots. � � �I ; Mr. Edmundson said the applicant would rather see the easement �far t�:e ut;lities � on fihe east side of the lot4 because there is an existing uti73�t,� po7e ir: this i area and there are many mature trees on the west side. I � Councilman Starwalt asked if there was a hope of developing the �roperty soon. � ' Wtr. Edmundson said the property owner had had a purchase agreement with t�e buyer � ; since June and would like to have this matter se�t'.ed. Ne said he did not believe ', if the lots were split �hat the property would be developed unt�1 the spring. , ; Councilman Breider said he believed that this would be a bad pl«ce to gain �ccess ' � to Central Avenue because of the traff:d i� the area. �� Councilman Starwalt said he tho�ght the peopie af tha area may change the~N minds concerning the splitting �f the lots in the area and he would ;�ot like to ta'r,e action that would box these people in in this c�se. The City Attorney asked if it ' would be feasible to gain ao�ess to the southeti^ly portion of these lots. He asked ; if the access could be from the east side where there is a street ra�her than ; onto Old Central. � I _�_Y -_ REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1974 PAGE 8 � i Councilman Utter said this would be from Sievert Lane. I The City Manager said his recommendation would be that the Counci7 go ahead and approve ;� the lot split unless Councilman Starwalt would want additional information. � � Councilman Starwalt aske� if it would be possible to installa cul-de-sac on the � I easterly portion of these lots and gain access from Sievert Lane. The Public Works , { Director said access from Sievert Lane would allow for the installation of a cul-de- � sac in this area rather than directing the street to O1d Centra1 where the traffic � � � is difficult. I MOTION by Counci7man Starwalt to approve the ]ot split with the stipulation that ' � I a uti7ity easement 20 feet in width be provided on the east side of the lots and a � stipulating that a turn around be provided for these properties when developed so , � f ture ro ert owners. , ; backin onto Old Central by the u p p y � there would not be any g x � ! Seconded by Councilman Nee. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Councilman Breider � � Ideclared the motion carried unanimously. , � VACATION REQUEST, SAV #74-03, BY JAMES LUND: VACATE THE WESTERLY 50 FEET FOR PUBLIC � PURPOSES ON LOT 30, LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION r � N0. 129, LOCATED IN THE 1500 BLOCK [3ETWEEN 73RD AVENUE NORTHEAST AND ONONDAGA STREET A��D REPLATTED AS JIM LUND ESTATES: , . � F The Public Works Director explained that this easement would have been necessary° ' � for the original plan for the permanent streets in the area, but this was no longer � required because there was a new street plan which is a better plan. {ie stated this � easement would not be needed. �I � jThe City Manager said there would be no action needed nn this matter a� the present E meeting since the Council had the public hearing ai: this meeting and the action would be taken the following Monday evening. � rrin �I , Councilman Nee referred to the minutes of 1:he Planning Commission Meeting nefe g � to some action on kennels in the City. He explained that there should be some � definition in the Code. He stated currently the cade defines a kennel and they I� ' ignore it. He said there is a situation in his ward where dogs are being raised � � and the yard is full of them and there should be some provisions for the neighbors � of this property. •j � The City Manager said this feeling should be passed onto the Planning Commission. j The City Manager referred the Council`s attention to item number five where a isuggestion is made for a joint meeting of the Planning Commission and the City I Council. The Council discussed various times and meeting dates that would make it � � i possible for everyone to be in attendance. � Councilman Utter finally suggested the meeting be set fior Tuesday, September 17, � and the Council concensus was to ask the Planning Commission if this �vould be • � feasible.. ' � MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission � meeting of August 21 , 1974. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, ' � I all voting aye, Councilman Breider declared the motion carried. r DING STANDARDS - DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE j � � RECE.VING THE MINUTES OF THE BUIL MEETING OF AUGUST 22, 1974: i CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR RELANDSCAPING AND FENCE WORK: LOCATED ON LOT l, BLOCK 1, EAST RANCH ESTATES 1ST ADDITION, PARCEL 10; THE SAME BEING 7b20 � UNIVERSITY AVENUE NORTHEAST, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA REQUEST 3Y FRANK'S NURSERY, 7940 PENN AVENUE SOUTH, BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 : ' The Public Works Director advised the Council that this item had been tabled ' � by the Subcommittee until the September 12th meeting. � � MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the minuties of the Building Standards� ' � Design Control Subcommittee of August 22, 1974. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt� Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Councilman Breider declared the motion carried. � I �I� 560-3450 -� � �y✓ ' • �� ° E � �� x.r, f�� (� � � ��"� � , �,. :;�a; :, �` ` - ANOKA COUNTY �' 6431 UNIVFRSI7Y AVENUE NE FRIDLEY, MIRfI�iESOTA 55432 September 12, 1974 Ruby M. Anderson 114 102nd Avenue N. W, Coon Rapids, Mn 55433 . Re: Reques� for a Lot Split, L.S. #�74-15 Dear Mrs. Anderson; Pleas� be advised that the Fridley .City Council grante�: you yaur request to spli.t Lot 16, Revzsed Auditor` s aubdivision No. 10, with the stipulati.on� that you grant the southerly parcel, a 20 foot utility easement along th.e easter_ly side af the north- er ly lo t. You must also provide a turn around on the drYveway existing onto Central Avenue so that cars will not have to back out onto the street. SincerelX, i , � � ' fl�rl� t t:'�•!" J EL CLARK `" Community Developmen�t Administrator DC�c�e cc: Blaine Edmundson f"� • �, p , ''� ,''. � L~