LS77-06 F_68 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
' CITY OF FRIDLEY
FOR CITY T1SP ONLY
Applicant' s Name
APPLICANT: !h�y J . l� 10 01 C lc s
Lot Split #
ADDRESS: J y5o YTI
sr' uk' I'✓�cel l e .7.r`f a
Street City Zip Code Date
TELEPHONE # S7 'L��7 y. ,-''4 Ci ' Fee: a ceipt T�
+ Home Business Coun '1 tion:]�ate
REMARKS:
rd 0U
� CdPROPERTY OWNER(S)
Pi 3 0
ADDRESS(ES)'
o Street City Zi Code
- M � �
-P m C Street City Zip Code
o �°� TELEPHONE #(S)
d a Home Business
-P W +> d
Na � ca
u) oH •H
P +' -C Property Location on Street �` �� •-
or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) l I
r
w
NLegal Description of Property:
/d Ti,acK 13— HYD1; P/4KK
Reason for Lot Split:
��� �c � �I Gn(C ✓ (IV"vG L i C,Gc.T I
Total Area of Property J�yc sq. ft. Present Zoning Classification
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this application are true and
correct.
DATE: l,' ( � SIGNATURE „-i b
BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (See reverse ide fo' Lditional instructions
CHECKED BY STAFF DATE
Remarks:
PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE '
1. Obtain application form at City Hall (6431 University Avenue N.E. , Fridley).
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
Involved and the lot split fee of $30.00 for each original lot being split.
3. The application will be checked over by Staff and the owner may be required
to submit a Certificate of Survey containing a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot, along with the new parcels created with
all existing structures tied in.
4. The application will then be submitted to the Planning Commission for their
recommendation. The Planning Commission meets on the Wednesday following
the City Council meeting, which is generally the first and third Wednesdays
of the month.
5. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. If a Certificate of Survey wasn't required before,
it will be required for this meeting. The City Council meets on Ahe first
and third Mondays of the month.
6. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must
be complied with by the applicant.
7. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for, easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
8. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
9. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
I
Lot-
-Y
----- ----
. 0
•
10
A-E-J-417-
��� -=�-------= - Vie►% �_ 1wvo
L
4
cv
1
_ f�
_ u
Clinton Coppicus P.S. #'77-06 Z
4 00
I,I
DTANCE (612) 545-5544 x
vE r NG d ENG'NEERtNG CO 10700 HWY. 55 WEST. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441
S[JI RVEY FOR: THE SLSSEL COMPANY
SURVEY OF : The South Half_ of Lot 8 and all of Lot 9 , and the East Half
of the adjacent vacated alley, all in Block 13, HYDE PARK
ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof , Anoka
County, Minnesota.
3G
- JS.
r 25 'S
W �
Y
LU i
V ; 24.G
QI
O
8 �
y, --,135. 06
o
"o Denotes Iron Monument Scale: 1" = 3 U '
1 hereby certify that this survey, plan. specification, or report was prepared by me or
under my direct superviS1or, and that I am a duly Registered
'Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
-z
`� .c' ✓ ✓ _Dat,Apri.l 19 , 197- Reg. No. 0535 -
amuel G. Parker
_71 f%M ra!
�O y of ;zC'
_J
5q ----.� Clinton Coppicus L.S. #77-06 NN
j
11
- x•'11 ! L -071
z �
. r
A
o- y0
(,
4ao-y Q
r 5 r.
° eCO
AVENUEN.E. (� `.> �- Sgati R ysgz�f sqt
,Z S �.• -� 2 17666 /li6c �t+:.
5�60
Q3
In
-6cl, ' I* 591 -
N �e ss
N0
500 J
_
c
5g THE 3
d 366 � v
'
�I? //
C ,��'�/jam/ ,o M �
o- 5 241 �/ ��� 07
g�� �� _ _ �. G
__ OV
:4V,
p
AVENUEz� �
` +� -- W-.E.e A Zsea a`A§�vF� 9" �j�1 , ,5 G..h C1 • 5 f3o
r AA15
-- �� G✓ — L v'p' h t
-3. ' '� " hS�l1 sac �;t� Sar,
40
a 6o
14
�!jJJA 9 I N
. ----_ "'' 7 fio�1.. -i:ate , ^� I �� ��` 3„J� �/ •J�C� .iL v 1_ 7
tS '
PACE
cyr:
31
, ' 13
p
4
57 TH - AVENUE
� A
k
CITY OF FRIDLEY,! SUBJECTI.
MII'++NESOTA I COMMISSION APPL1CAT1C1V
REVIEW
Deportment/Uivisiont
Number j 2Y aq9 Approved by t Date
S - 77"06
COMPLETE REVIEW. CHECKLIST FILE NO/ADO"Imss FILE COATS
'C944/� •/i ,fir f lo-6- 77
RETURN TO PLANNING 4ci /D /�� �, �+'YOE� OLIN OATS _-
COMMENTS
D=rrel &q4t,
4w `ia5 aw 90' /o4
M�.Tom
Dick
Jerry
PI.. ANNIN(, COMMISSION MEFTTNG — JUNE 22 , 1,977 PAGE 24
4 . REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT , L • � . x7-06 , B C�iON J . COPPICUS :
Sf�1 it of 1"t`rit_ -rio� T-'r`.erly f_ ,�,_;fir--� - f
Hyde Park Addition . To al r access to garage in back
yard of Lot 9.
Mrs . Sharon Jensen of 5946-4th Street N . E . was present at the
meeting .
Mr . Boarcman explained that the lot to tke south of 5950-4th Street N . E .
was an 80 foot lot . He said that Mr . Coppicus wanted to put in
a driveway . Fie said that in or6er to cio that and maintain the
steps out of the back-door of his home , he would have to obtain
four feet from the property located at 5946-4th Street N .E .
Chairperson Harris wanted to know how close to the property
line the house at 5946-4th Street N . E . would be after losing
four feet to 5940-4th Street N .E .
Mrs . Jensen said that she wasn ' t positive as to the number of
feet but that she was sure there would be plenty of space on
that side of the house . She indicated that her garage was located
to the South in the rear of the house and that there was only
grass on the area that Mr . Coppicus wanted to buy .
Mr . Bergman indicated that Staff had gone out to the home and
measured and ha_!;)' t indicated any problems .
MOTION by Mr . Bergman , seconded by Ms . Shea, to recommend to
City Council the approval of the request for a Lot Split
L .S . ??-06, by Clinto J . Coppicus : Split off the northerly
four T41 feet of Lot 10 , Block 13 Hyde Park Addition . To allow
for access to garage in back yard of Lot 9 subject to a
confirmation of no sideyard setback problems . Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously .
Chairperson Harris declared a short break at 11 :00 P .M .
Chairperson Harris called the meeting back to order at 11 :10 P .M .
5 . PROPOSED SIGN CODE
Mr . Boardman explained that he thought the Planning Commission
should go over the propsoed Sign Code and discuss the changes
that had been made and to better understand what was being
attempted by the Ordinance .
Mr . Bergman commended Staff for the work they had put into the
Sign Code Ordinance . He said that they took the ideas from
Community Development and converted them into ordinance form and
language . He said a lot of timely effort had been spent putting
together the Sign Code Ordinance on very short notice . He said
that there had been a big and pleasant change from what
Community Development Commission had submitted and what they got
back .
PLtNNING COMMISSTON MEETING — JUNE 22 , 1977 PAGE 23
Mr . Lc-,°e agreed with Mr . Johnson that the lot would definitely
sell sooner or later . He was only at the meeting because he
felt that Mr . Hall had a good plan and that he thought it would
be an asset to the community. He said that the people adjacent
to the property weren ' t objecting .
Mr. Walter Shupien of 6299 Trinity Drive said that he moved out
of multiple dwellings to live in an area of single-family
homes . He asked that the lot remain an R'-1 lot . He said that
it was or)ly a matter of time before rental property would go
down hill and it almost always happened faster than privately
owned, owner-occupied, property did .
MOTION by Ms . Shea, seconded by Mr . Peterson, to close the
Public Hearing . Upon a voice vote , all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously. The Public Hearing was closed at 10 : 45 P .M .
Mrs . Schnabel said that to grant a Special Use Permit on that
lot was • somewhat similar to a spot zoning — a direct change to
a neighborhood .
MOTION by Mrs . Schnabel , seconded by Ms . Shea, that the Planning
Commission recommends to City Council the denial of the request
for a Special Use Permit SP 177-06 by Norman Hall : Per Fridley
City Code, Section 205 .051 , 3 . D , to allow the construction of a
duplex/double bungalow in R-1 zoning {single family homes} on
Lot 1 , Block 4 , Sylvan Hills Plat 3 , the same being
6390-6392 Starlite Blvd .
Mr . Bergman said that he didn ' t consider it at all unusual
request to buffer other single-family homes with a double
bungalow that bordered on industrial .
Mrs . Schnabel said that the entire area was single-family homes .
She said that the zoning hadn ' t been set up to buffer the
industrial and the single-family dwellings .
Mr . Bergman thought that that had been a very drastic move as far
as changing a zoning directly from Industrial to single-family
dwellings.
UPON A VOICE VOTE , all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Mr . Lee indicated that he had never been to a Planning Commission
meeting in Fridley City Hall and he thought that the Planning
Commission had handled themselves very well. He felt they had
given everyone a fair hearing . He said that he had enjoyed
being at the meeting and he thought that the Planning Commission
had made a very wise decision in denying the request . He said
that if anyone contested something going into a residential
area, they should have the right to keep it residential . He
thanked the Commission for the opportunity of taking part in
their meeting .
109
REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 11 Page 7
i
I
' I
CLINTON COPPICUS, LOT SPLIT L.S. 077-06, 5 0 4TH STREET N.E.
j Mr. So i a lot split in order to split off
four feet from one parcel and add it to another parcel to allow the construction
of a driveway for a garage currently under construction.
He stated, in discussions with the Inspection Department, years ago the property
to the South was actually constructed in such a way that would allow the lot
split to exist. If the lot split is granted, 11 feet would remain and setback
requirements would be met.
i
Mr. Sobiech stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of this lot
split.
Councilman Hamernik stated his only concern is that there is going to be quite a
severe incline to get out of the garage up to the street level and hopes the
property owner is not going to all this expense and then will not be able to
use the garage in the winter.
MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and approve Lot Split #77-06. Seconded by Councilman Schneider.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of June 22, 1977. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
DISCUSSION REGARDING EXTENDING ISLANDS OF PEACE LEASE:
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he was requested to draw a lease for 25 years,
however, there was no discussion as to contents of the lease. He stated in
drafting the lease, he included the terms of the existing lease and added Item F
regarding any default on the part of the Islands of Peace Foundation in relation
to the Hayes lots. He indicated the Council may wish to expand this section to
include any other defaults on the part of the Foundation regarding their financial
j obligations.
Mayor Nee questioned if there was not another agreement with the Foundation and
upon locating a second lease signed by the City, Mr. Herrick indicated he was not
aware of it and suggested then that Items 4,5 and 6 be added to the lease the
Council is now considering.
Mr. Jim Langenfeld, President of the Islands of Peace Foundation, appeared before
the Council concerning the proposed lease. He stated on the first page of the
lease where reference is made to the description of the island and the words "it
is believed", it sounds like they don't know for sure where the island is located.
Mr. Herrick stated this was the legal description used in the previous lease,
and didn't feel this was of major concern.
Referring to Item (e) on the second page of the lease, he stated it seems the City
can also determine involvement in maintenance.
Mr. Herrick felt the way the new lease is written, the City has more flexibility
as far as providing maintenance and also less obligation, as it is left to the
descretion of the City. j
( Mayor Nee questioned then if the Foundation has any obligation for maintenance.
t Mr. Herrick stated he presumed it was the thinking that the language regarding
maintenance be spelled out more clearly.
i
Mr. Langenfeld felt Item (e), as written, gives the City control and"feels the
Foundation should be responsible.
i
110
i I
REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 11, 1977 page 8
Councilman Fitzpatrick stated it appears the agreement in the agenda packet is
based on an earlier agreement and wondered if the City Attorney could re-write
the lease in view of the contents in the March, 1975 agreement.
Mr. Langenfeld felt also that Items 4, 5 and 6 should be included and that Item
8 should be added to the lease.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated administration would like to have clear lines
of responsibility. He felt the agreement the City and Foundation signed in
March, 1975 points in that direction. He also felt, if there was a building or
future structure on the Hayes lots, there should be some expression of the
responsibilities.
Mr. Herrick felt, if there was any future construction on the Hayes lots, there
could be a supplement added to the lease covering the responsibilities of the
parties. He suggested, if the Council wished to follow the 1975 agreement, this
lease could be re-written and submitted back to them.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to refer this matter to the administration and
City Attorney to incorporate into the lease some of the provisions of the 1975
agreement. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski.
Mr. Ed Wilmes, 6350 Riverview Terrace, spoke on the importance of the Islands of
Peace Foundation and their responsibility for operation and programming.
He stated, as far as the maintenance, they are taking steps to take the load off
the City, and mentioned the possibility of CETA help. He felt action by the Council
to extend the lease for 25 years is vital now.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, referred a letter from American Improvement Corporation
to the Council which indicated there are outstanding bills owed them by the Islands
of Peace Foundation for work done in 1972.
Mr. Langenfeld stated he has presented this bill several times under the accounts
payable. Councilwoman Kukowski stated this matter was discussed at a Conference
Meeting last year. It was noted the bill was outstanding and suggested at that
time that perhaps the City could help. She felt there may have been a misunder-
standing when this work was done with the Foundation, assuming the blacktopping
could be put in and paid for with grant money.
Mr. Qureshi indicated this is not an obligation incurred by the City, but by the
Islands of Peace Foundation.
CONSIDERATION OF A REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED
GARAGE, TIM CHIES, 7513-7515 ABLE STREET NE:
Mr. Sobiech stated this is a request to reduce the rear yard setback from 35 feet
to 20.5 feet on property located at 7513-7515 Able Street.
i
He indicated the Appeals Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval
of this request. He stated this was not referred to the Planning Commission as
other lots in this area are developing the same way.
Mr. Sobiech stated the petitioner would like to ask if there is a way one variance
could be received on the other ten lots he has in this area.
Mr. Herrick stated, if the applicant wanted to include all the lots under one
variance and, if administration felt it didn't involve any additional work to
include all the lots instead of a variance for each one, probably one fee would
be justified.
Councilman Hamernik stated, if the variances were the same as this one, it !
would be in keeping with the development in progress now.
i
i
I
i
Note: You must bring this to the County to have the Lot. Split. recorded.
TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF ANOKA COUNTY:
The City Council of the City of Fridley on ,1u1 v 11 _ 1977
approved the following request for a lot split to allow:
Space for driveway arras,
on the following property:
Split off the Northerly 4 feet of Lot 10 and add it to Lot 9, both in
Block 13, Hyde Park Addition.
A stipulation to the lot split approval was to combine
appropriate parcels of property to ensure no defaulting of taxes
and avoid losing a parcel on a future sale of the property.
It is hereby requested of the County Auditor to check
the records and, if in order, combine the following parcels
of land:
Plat #
Parcels �'� -- ,
Lots -Southerly 30' of Lot 8, All of 9, and the Northerly 4 feet of Lot 10
Block 13
AdditionHy(ie park
Signed
Owner(s ) of Record
cc : Property Owner
Lot Split Folder
Fridley Assessing Dept. ,Real Estate File
Special Assessment Dept. File