LS76-06 Porm #5-68 , LOT SPLIT APPLICATION _rr
CITY OF FRIDLEY �3 42
• FOR C1 TY I1SF OI`dJ,Y
Applicant' s Name
APPLICANT: EVERETT MADSEN
Lot Split
bD ADDRESS: 246 Rice Creek Blvd, Fridley. MN 55432
.ri0 Street City Zip Code Date sl�ed:
m w 0 TELEPHONE # 574-9068 336-8641 F'ee:$_U. Receipt
-P XHome Business Council Action:Date
O REMARKS:
9 0 PROPERTY OWNER(S) EVERETT MADSEN
P -P � MARGRET R. MURPHY
f�+ 3 O I
u +' � ADDRESS(ES) 246 Rice Creek Blvd. , Fridley, MN 55432
P,-H Street City Zip Code
cu P4 ; o
to 0 -H 250 Rice Creek Blvd. , Fridley, MN 55432
-+� to d Street City Zip Code
a TE
LEPHOPdE #(S 574 9068 336-8641
d P-4 Home0 (D Business
-P to +3 cd
.sem.. P{ � to
to HH
D +, Property Location onStreet
or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) 246 and 250 Rice Creek Blvd.
w FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
U
Legal Description of Property:
0
See attached Survey by DEMARS-GABRIEL Surveyors
I
Reason for Lot Split:
More logical placement of Lot lines in relation to the two buildings located
i
on Lots 9 and 10 per attached Surve , nd t allow better access to rear of
building on Lot #10.
Total Area of Property sq. ft. Present Zoning Classification
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this application are true and
correct.
DATE: Sept. 3, 1976 SIGNA
BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (See reverse side for additional instructions) `
PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
PLANi1ING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarks: -
CI'T'Y COUNCIL: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
I
i
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE
1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley)
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of $30.00 for each original lot being split.
I
3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a
month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of
the Subcommittee.
4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel. or parcels
along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in.
5. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department
for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the
second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant
with minutes of the Planning Commission.
6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. The Council meets on, the first and third Monday
of the month.
7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council. action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
9." When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSNEITTS FOR
THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPAR^ll°".•124T
OF FRIDLEY M&Y BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
I RICE
CREEK
BLVD.
o De-naA-es Iron monumexxt
0
28.3
h•
o-
Z�`^Gj� finder C-0y .� a
a
r
\� //BOG
\ I hereby certify that this is
a true and correct representation
of a survey of the boundaries of:
Lot 10, Block 4, RICE CREEK PLAZA
NORTH ADDITION, Anoka County, Minn.
And of the location of all buildings , if any, thereon,
and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on
said land. As surveyed by me this 1st day of April,
1976 •
Revised 5-24-75
Minn. Reg. No . 10944 SVIOW 1AOU5e undcr- e.on5tr.
SCALE PREPARED FOR
DeMars-Gabriel Land Surveyors IN= 56
BOOK
3030 HARBOR LANE NO., MPLS., MINN.. 55441 9F-5"i Pine Tree Builders , Inc .
TEL. 559--0908 FILE
455 A
R RICE I hereby certify that this is a true and correct
representation of a survey of the boundaries of:
CREEK
E •s8 BLVD. QP y ..
PARCEL A
sgA52266 That part of Lots 9 and 10, Block 4, RICE
�6 Sya�� /r3 3y CREEK PLAZA NORTH ADDITION, according to
y. s "0 'prn�r �6 A� the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County,
,p k Gi +07cQ` Minne ota, lying westerly of aline passing
pt Q` s r` s• through a point in the northeasterly line of
an2h bs ar o •, said Let 10 c rant 6.40 fee north. terl y
of the no rhea., r v c ner cf -ate t :U
)AOV�a
v' \u v��� Ts measure¢ n.crtho-ster,V line
n ✓'' ' �/ and passing through a point in the sur,,ey
line in said Lot 9 distant 36.00 feet
/ roriheasterly of the westerly line of said
' PARCEL B Lot 9 as measured along said ^urvey
PARCEL P
PARCEL A w <JGa' ��� � Thit part of Lo* 9 and 10, Hlock 4, RICE
�t �' /� L OP.EEK "LAZA NORTH ADDTTTON. accofding t,)
T+ 'y /�/ the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County,
° i' ' / Minnescit,a, lying easterly of a line passing
through a point in the northeasterly line of
- i apo, // \L said Lot 10 dist ant 5.40 feet northwa terly
' �c cf the nor he ^t•2rly corner of ,aid , 10,
as �ea'rured ., ong said nor,hca erly line
1n;i p .,s: g through a point n the urvey
ir:e t 1
Lot ° :: ant fee
/�-
northeasterly c: the westerly ii,e e." said
�<1 Lot 9 as mensured along said sur•ley line.
And of the location of all buildings thereon ant-
�/ td tv tai all visible encroachments, if any, from or on
0 4:�,- said land. As surveyed by me this 27th day of
Augu^t, 1976.
Derjo}es '%ran rnc>nvmcnl 4,n
rano:., uea,�r.
rl Ln (D Land >u-veyor, Minn. Peg. tic. 1.0944
n Cn
(D
M _
� V
M C7
(D I .rte
�771 O L
Cn
DcMARS - GABMEL
LAND SURVEYORS, IMC, PROPOSED LOT DIVISION FOR=
.
3030 'AAARBOR LA. 1v14Z._ -EVEt'2�'T MADSON__ 9 1z
r. , PLYtv'•.UVTH, T,1iidN. --- -_—_-_--- i`1 S!':
September 27, 1976
CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 UniversitY Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Attention: City Council Members
Gentlemen:
This letter is to advise Council Members that the Lot Split Request
#L.S. #76-06 by Everett Madsen appearing as Item #5 on the Planning
Commission's Agenda of September 22, 1976 is a mutually agreeable
situation between the owners of the two properties involved.
#L.S. #76-06 was approved by our Planning Commission on Wednesday,
September 22, 1976 with the stipulation that a Letter of Mutual Agreement
on the part of the owners of both properties involved be furnished to
the Council before their October 4th, 1976 meeting.
Please consider this letter as compliance with that stipulation.
It is understood by both of the undersigned that approval by Council of
#L.S. #76-06 does not constitute the transfer of titles, or change in
legal description of the properties involed, rather said approval would
make it possible for the undersigned to file the Lot Split Application with
Anoka County, at which time legal description changes, and title transfers
would take place.
�Ev
erely,erett Madsen
246 Rice Creek Blvd.
Fridley, MN 55432.
Mai gret R. Murphy ,
250 Rice Creek Blvd.
Fridley, MN 55432
EM/MRM/hhk
Manning Commission Meeting - September 22, 1976 Page 18
12 or 13 parking spaces on that lot along with the building, with the required
setbacks and green areas that must be maintained. He stated at even in the
parking lot the City required a parking stall to be 10' x2 in size, and
there must be a place to back out of 25' to get out of parking stall. He
said that in trying to lay it out several different w >, the maximum he
could get in parking stalls was 12 or 13. E
Mr. Risk said t might as well throw away the,,�plan that was submitted since
it wouldn't fit, would try to come up wi ° a building that would fit on
the lot and meet co . Iie stated that thSF were trying to avoid a time lapse,
and once it was rezone it would be easy/to fit a building on there. Chair-
person Harris said that e couldn't in,fJood conscience vote for a rezoning
without knowing what woul e on the,,te.
yr,
s
Mr. Langenfeld asked if this r est would be good for .six months if it was
tabled, and Chairperson Harri s 'd that was correct, but if it was denied
the petitioner could not re rn fo six months to make another request. Mr.
Bergman asked what affect,,,,the remova of the request would have with regard
to fee, and Mr. Harris k id the peitio r would lose the fee. Mr. Leroy Smith
stated that since he yd'uld have nothing lose, he would like the request to
be tabled.
MOTION by Bergm , seconded by Shea, that the lanning Commis-ion close the
Publir Hearing n Rezoning Request ZOA #76-05, Wyman Smith. Upon a voice
vote, all vot- g aye, Chairperson Harris declare the Public Hearing closed
at 11:25 P. -O
MOTION Schnabel, seconded by Bergman, that the Plan ' g Commission table
Rezoning Request ZOA #76-05, by Wyman Smith, until the n t meeting. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimous
5. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. ##76-Ob BY EVERETT MADSEN: Split Lots 9 and 10,
Block 4, Rice Creek Addition, so the new property line runs
at an angle 6.40 feet from the existing Northwesterly corner of Lot 10,
to 36 feet northeasterly of the ,•,esterly .line of Lot 9, as per survey
of record with the City, Parcel A describing the new lot line for Block
10, 246 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E., and Parcel B describing the new "lot line
for Block 9, 250 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E.
Mr. Everett Madsen was present. He stated that he was the owner of Parcel A,
and this request was a mutually agreeable situation between the two neighbors.
He explained he had this house built when he was in Los Angeles, and the builder
made a mistake. He stated he felt it was a logical request. Mr. Leek said
that it was Staff's opinion that the request made sense, and was not objectionable
to them.
Mr. Bergman asked if both owners of Parcels A and B were 'present, and Mr. Madsen
stated that the owner of Parcel B, Mrs. Murphy, was not interested in attending
the meeting. Mr. Bergman asked if there was anything in writing from her, and
Mr. Madsen said he was told that wasn't necessary. Mr. Bergman stated that from
what he could see, approval of this request would reduce the size of Parcel B,
i
Planning Commission Meeting - September 22, 1976 Page 15
w
that would go on there, and the traffic over.-flow and traffic problems. Mr.
Bergman said that Ir. Smith was right in saying the code would restrict what
he could build the e within the constraints of how much parking they could
work out of the lot which apparently hadn't been worked out yet at this
point. He said tha secondly, it would seem conceivable that there .,ras some
risk on Mr. Smith's art in that this zoning request could get app oved and
that when he worked t the amount of parking spaces available w' h setbacks
and green areas as re ired by code and city administration, h ,fight find
there weren't enough p rking spots to accommodate the buildi . Yr. Bergman
said he would then have to be restricted to that, so /thereas some risk
involved in not having is all put together at this He added that it
would seem the assembly 11 which would need 100 paraces was out of
context with the size of e property.
Mr. Louis C. Gray, 11.70 Nor on Avenue N.E., stat that he felt the traffic
problem was the greatest con ern because it wo d vary, and he was also
worried about drunken drivers in the area.
Ruth J. Norton, 1252 Norton Ave ue N.E., id she was against the assembly
hall because the amount of cars ' oi.ng to a place like that couldn't be
determined. She said they felt i wou be a terrible thing to have in their
residential area with all those pe 1 drinking and causing the residents
problems they shouldn't have to put p with. .
Mr. Ia.ngenfeld asked under which ateg ry the assembly hall VTOLIld fall,
C-1 or C-2. Mr. Leek replied it could either, and the difference depended
on the capacity of the hall. explain that under 300 would be C-1
and over 300 would be C-2.
Mr. Bergman said they were onsidering Centra Avenue as one boundary street
and a primarily residentia street on the othe side of the property as a
boundary, and this added ome additional concer, to the parking situation.
He stated that the code equirement -for the assem y hall which was one stall for each
seating capacity of th e was a code minimum reaui ment, and in a condition
where parking was a rticular problem Council could equest something
additional to that. He explained he was referring bac to the assembly hall
and a capacity of 0. He said the code might say a mi 'mum number of parking
stalls of 100, bu it was entirely conceivable that with capacity of 300
there could be 300 cars, and that would be taken into con 'deration.
Mr. Risk stated. that at the last four weddings he had atte ed, there were
usually three people per car and many times two couples per car. 'He said
that if some of the other halls were looked at that had a capacity for 300
people, that many cars wouldn't be found in the parking lot. He added that
he didn't see any conflict between the office parking and the hall parking
because the office would be closed at 4:30 or 5:00 and assemblies didn't
start until 7:30 or 8:00.
Mrs. King stated she thought the building would.stick out-like a sore thumb
in that area because all the residences were one story structures with large
trees. She felt it should come dorm to a one-story building to fit in more
aesthetically with the neighborhood. Mr. Smith explained that it was a split-
entry building, so would actually be only a story and a half.
Planning Commission Meeting - September 22, 7.976 Page 19
and the owner of Parcel B ought to therefore testify in writing that she agrees
to the shrinking of that property. Mr. Madsen said he hadn't known it was
necessary to have her signature, but he would get it.
Mr. Madsen asked if it was any concern of the Planning Commission or the City
Council the amount of funds that would exchange hands. Chairperson Harris
explained that in Minnesota it would be necessary to give Mrs. Murphy a.dollar
and other valuable considerations to make it legal and binding, but it was
no concern of the Planning Commission or Council how much money exchanged hands.
MOTION by Shra, seconded by Schnabel, that the Planning Commission recommend
to Council approval of Lot Split Request L.S. #76-06, by Everett Madsen:
Split Lots 9 and 10, Block 4, Rice Creek Plaza North Addition, so the new
property line runs at an angle 6.40 feet from the existing Northwesterly
corner of Lot 10, to 36 feet northeasterly of the Westerly line of Lot 91
as per survey of record with the City, Parcel A describing the new lot line
for Block 10, 246 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E., and Parcel B describing the new lot
line for Block 9, 250 Rice Creek Blvd., N.E., with the stipulation that Mr.
Madsen obtain a written statement from Mrs. Murphy stating this is a mutually
agreeable situation. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
6. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. x'76-07, BY FRANK VOTH; Split the West 210 feet
of Lot -.9, Auditor's Subdivision No.-7,': three parcels as follows:
Parcel 1 (5801 Arthur Street N.E.) The South 80 feet of the ;Iest 2101 :
Parcel 2 (5805 Arthur Street N.E.) The North 80 fee. of the South 120
feet of the West 210 feet: Parcel 3 (5809 Arthur Street N.E. ) The West
210 feet of Lot 49, except the South 160 feet thereof. : all measured along
the West line of said Lot 49, and all parcels subject to an easement for
road purposes over the West 30 feet.
Mr. Frank Voth was present.
Mr. Leek stated that Staff had no problem with the lot split itself, but felt
there were two considerations. He said that Staff felt perhaps this should go
to the Parks and Recreation Commission as currently the garage on Parcel #3
was two feet on park property, and also, there was a road easement of 20' going
through the middle of that garage. He added this was all zoned R-1.
Mr. Voth stated that Mr. and Mrs. Jacob Wiens had lived on the property since
1940, and they would like to be able to straighten out the matter of the gargage
and the lot split. However, he said, at the current time they had Mr. Miens'
abstract being continued at Anoka Title, and added that wasn't done for many
years. He showed the Commissioners on the survey where Mr. Wiens' property
was, and which property was now being dedicated by Darrel Farr as park property.
Mr. Voth stated that he would like to take care of the matter of the lot split
first as he wished to build a house this fall, and would immediately thereafter
take care of the other matter at a later date following any recommendations from,
Council.
Chairperson Harris commented that the lot sizes appeared to be more than adequate,
and asked if there was any necessity for drainage or utility easements. Mr. Voth
Planning Commission Meeting - September 22, 1976 Page 20
replied that services were in and power lines were up.
Mr. Bergman stated that he was of the impression that the intent here was to
establish Parcels one and two for building purposes, and that these parcels
were on the East side of Arthur Street; the garage infringement was on the
wildlife center; and the park dedication from Darrel Farr was on the East end
of the property. Mr. Voth said that was correct. Mr. Harris asked if access
would be off of Arthur Street, and Mr. Voth replied that was correct.
Mr. Bergman asked Mr. Voth if he had been talking to City Administration with
regard to the right-of-way and the infringement, and Mr. Voth answered he had.
Mr. Leek said that actually there were three considerations, the third being
the minor consideration of the shed. Mr. Voth explained that Mr. Wiens did
not use the shed, but did keep up the maintenance on it .in order to keep up
the appearance, even though it was not on his property. Mr. Bergman asked if
it was Mr. Voth's intention to get back to Darrel Clark regarding alternatives
for the two considerations, and Mr. Voth said he would. Mrs. Schnabel asked
who owned lot 115 to the north, and :sir. Voth replied that was park area.
MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission recommend
to City Council approval of Lot Split Request L.S. #76-07 by Frank J. Voth:
Split the West 210 feet of Lot 49, Auditor's Subdivision No. 49, into three
parcels as follows: Parcel 1 (5801 Arthur Street N.E.) The South 80 feet of
the ',Jest 2101 : Parcl 2 (5305 Arthur Street N.E.) The North 80 feet of the
South 120 feet of the West 210 feet: Parcel 3 (5809 Arthur Street N.E.) The
West 210 feet of Lot 49, except the South 160 feet thereof: all measured
along the West line of said hot 119, and all parcels subject to an easement for
road purposes over the ?-Jest 30 feet, and requesting of Mr. Voth continued
communication with City Administration concerning two somewhat related elements:
1) right-of-way, and 2) infringement on park property. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission direct
the encroachment of the garage on Parcel #3 to the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Chairperson Harris declared a recess at 11:50 P.M. and reconvened the meeting
at 12:10 A.M.
7. WRITTEN SURVEY POLICY
Mrs. Shea noted that this was the same information that had been received at
the last meeting, and the Commission had just requested that it be made into
written policy.
MOTION by Langenfeld, seconded by Shea, that the Planning Commission concur
with the Administrative Policy on Survey Requirements as written. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
160
• REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 4, 1976 PAGE 3
I
DISCUSSION REGARDING POSSIBLE MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL WITH DISTRICT NO. 14 SCHOOL BOARD
TO DISCUSS ITEMS OF COOPERATION AND COMMON INTEREST:
jMr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated that there were a number of areas whereby they are
cooperating with the school board and school administration and perhaps a meeting of the
City Council and school board to explore the areas of further cooperation and future
policy direction would be helpful. Councilwoman Kukowski then suggested a meeting
date sometime in November. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated the meeting dates of November
4th and 18th would be acceptable.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick directinn the City Plananer to forward the letter to
iChairman Sangster of the School Board. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 22, 1976:
E. R. SWANSON; ZOA #76-03, 73RD AVENUE & CENTRAL:
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to set the matter for Public Hearing on November 8,
1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
CENTRAL TOWNHOUSE ADDITION; P.S. #76-08, E. SWANSON
AND
TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT PLANS, T. #76-03:
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to set the matter for Public Hearing on November 8,
1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the n carried unanimously.
E. MADSEN; S. #76-06 246 RICE CREEK BLVD. :
Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated that this was a request by Mr. Madsen to
split existing parcels of property at 250 Rice Creek Boulevard. Pie further pointed
out that the reason for the request for the lot split is to better describe the
property line in its relation to some existing dwellings. The Planning Commission
recommended approval of the lot split request with the stipulation that an agreement
be provided by the property owner. Mr. Sobiech then asked if there was a representative
present, and Mr. Madsen stated that he had nothing further to add -- only that it is
a mutually agreeable situation between Mrs. Murphy and himself.
MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to approve the lot split. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
F. J. VOTH; L.S. #76-07, 5801, 5805-5809 ARTHUR STREETS:
i
Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated that this was a request for a lot split
to portion off a large parcel of property in three building sites, and the Planning
Commission did recommend approval.
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the lot split, allow the building permit on
lot two and after he works with the property owner and prospective buyer to resolve:
(1) the garage encroachment, (2) the 20 foot street easement, and (3) the ownership of
the shed on park property, then allow the permit on lot one. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 15, 1976:
M. MAYER; 7431-7433 ABLE STREET:
MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals
Commission and grant the variance. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting
of September 22, 1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Uoon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
i
I
•
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 4, 1976 PAGE 4 I
i
i
CONSIDERATION OF ACQUIRING TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY ADJOINING NORTH INNSBRUCK PARK AND
TRANSFERRING PARK PROPERTY ALONG RICE CREEK EAST Of CENTRAL TO ANOKA COUNTY:
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated that on the proposal for the property that is east of
Central along Rice Creek, basically the amount the City is asking the County to pay for
is what the City's cost for the property is, which works out to be $9,062.79. Also,
on the acquisition of tax forfeit properties next to Innsbruck North Park, the proposal
is to acquire all the property except only acquire 12 feet access easement on Lot 1 ,
Block 1, Carl Peterson Addition.
Councilman Starwalt indicated maybe we should acquire that lot also and then later make
a determination to sell portions of Lot 1, Block 1 , Carl Peterson Addition, also Lot
42, Auditors Subdivision #92, and also acquire all these lots outright so that any of
these properties can be sold, especially these two lots.
Mr. Qureshi indicated that once the property is acquired, there might be some resistance
from the people to sell these properties because they would think the City was disposing
of some park property, even though the City is buying these properties with the intention
of selling it, and this route might be financially better for the City to follow.
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the Memorandum of Understanding with the
addition of Lot 1 , Block 1, Carl Peterson Addition, and the amendment of the assessment
figure to $9,318.82. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE CITY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF AN ARTIFICIAL AERATION SYSTEM AND A FISHING PIER
AT MOORE LAKE:
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the agreement. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR FUNDS TO SUPPORT THE NORTH SUBURBAN FAMILY SERVICE CENTER:
--------- -----
MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to table the matter until the next meeting. Seconded
by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the
motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY COUNCILMEMBERS KUKOWSKI AND HAMERNIK TO ATTEND THE NATIONAL
LEAGUE OF CITIES 1976 CONGRESS IN DENVER, COLORADO, NOVEMBER 28 - DECEMBER 1 , 1976
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the attendance of both councilmembers at
the conference. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 104-1976 - SETTING AN ELECTION FOR COUNCILMEMBER - WARD II:
MOTION by Councilman Fit-patrick to adopt Resolution No. 104-1976. Seconded by
Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 105-1976 - DESIGNATING, POLLING PLACES AND APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES_ FOR
THE NOVEMBER 2, 1976 GENERAL ELECTION:
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to adopt Resolution No. 105-1976. Seconded by Councilwoman
Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Mee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to amend the pay for election judges to $3 for head judges
and $2.50 for regular judges. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously:
RESOLUTION NO. 106-1976 - APPROVING MHD FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR TRAFFIC NOISE
ATTENUATORS; I.694 FROM "AIN STREET TO 7TH STREET:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 106-1976. Seconded by Council-
woman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
I
STATE OF MINAESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss
CITY OF FRIDLEY )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of
Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the
attached letter and lot split application, and they are true and accurate
copies of the documents we have on file. They are as follows:
the documents we have on file.
LETTER TO THE CITY FRIDLEY, DATED SEPTEMBER 27, 1976
FROM: EVERETT MADSEN, 246 RICE CREEK BOULEVARD, AND
MARGRET R. MURPHY, 250 RICE CREEK BOULEVARD
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION, L.S. #76-06
IAT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE
WITNESS MY HAND as City Clerk of the City of Fridley and the seal of the
City this 15TH day of JULY, 1988.
(SEAL)
SH IRL EY A. J&APALA
CITY CLERK
CITY OF FRIELEY
Af
CI'T'Y OF FRIDS. EY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N. E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
TELEPHONE ( 612)571 -3450
` October 12, 1976
CITY COUNCIL
`.` ACTION TAKEN NOTICE
Mr. Everett Madsen
918 North 3rd Street
Minneapolis, Mn 55401
L.S. #76-06 For Lots 9 and 10 Block 4,
Rice Creek Plaza North Addition
On October 4, 1976 , the Fridley City Council
officially approved your request for Lot split for 246 and 250 R.i.c"reek Blvd.
with the stipulations listed belo�a.
Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below, and
return one copy to the City of Fridley.
If you have any questions regardin'q the above action, please call
C the Community Development Office at 571-3450.
Sincerely,
LD L. BOARDiYiAN
ITY PLANNER
JLB/de
Stipulations:
NONE
Concur with action taken.
�pL.UT!p,v
7�8-t9T 6