LS76-05 norm #{5-68 , LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
CITY OF FRIDLEY 3�
ti�'�`� ���luflJ G'U� FOR CI'T'Y USE ONLY
Applicant' s Name
APPLICANT: ///()
Lot Split # ,�# to-os
ADDRESS: D6.� l� -� �i�- b 3a 3 t
Street City Zip Code Date Filed: t
TELEPHONE # 7�3r-7y�da2 %9/ v 7I Fee:$Q, , Receipt # IFS
P X ¢, Home Business Council Action:Date
rd REMARKS:
PROPERTY OWNERS) 0 0Cd Cd
�• •••L .I.�'t41��✓
ani � rd '
0 3
ADDRESS(ES)
o Street City Zip Code
�
c' -C -�
4-:) W Cd Street City Zip Code
0 0 ca -H TELEPHONE #(S)
d P r-1
Home Business
-P U) -P d
(D O O
Si �� ;:� w
U] O P
F4 �' Property Location on Street pG
or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) I >I L6 10 !1u lO /
w
H Legal Description of Property:
Reason for Lot Split: 14
Cc/LQ, `
Total Area of Prop y ,ovt! sq. ft. Present Zoning Classification
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this appl'cation are true and
correct.
DATE: G b - �1� r ZO/ SIGNATURE
BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY 6"everse side fo additio. a instructions) -
' PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration
Remarks:
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCFMURE
1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley)
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of $$J6.00 for each original lot being split.
3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a
month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of
the Subcommittee.
4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels
along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in.
5. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department
for Planning Commission recommendations. 'The Planning Commission meets on the
second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant
with minutes of the Planning Commission.
6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday
of the month.
7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
-171
�y3i
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY EE
JAMES L. KURTH
LAND SURVEYOR
4201 N.E. STH STREET 790C
177k 17
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 55421 4 �bl�i
1 HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY. PLAN. OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION
AND THAT 1 AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ,
DATE
. SCALE I " == 100
MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NO. 5332 0 = IRON MONUMENT
(� L.S. #76-05 GHJ CONSTRUCTION
IV
I�
� \ 1
0
j N 0° ' �� he ct s
5 3 3 O"W
--..----- F– iso —�• o'
N ._�.
�. � . 4 sewer and water services available
P0 This split can be described as follows :
The Westerly 240 feet of Lot 2, A.S. #94, except
that part taken for highway purposes.
The Westerly 100feet of the Easterly 200 feet of Lot 2.
The Easterly 100 feet of Lot 2.
Survey of
Lot 2, Auditor's Sub No. 94, .Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to
Hi3hway No. 694
w
HATI
Lu is
'; .4 � � , Jt fir.•1 N y .e 9 "�e 1 7
Y,NDA L '` J,tf 1 801,)LDERS
ti� i s Y n Ju
y t 1 a t4�
:AMI'}/
._ Jc.o M1Jo �a:OJJWIiP.'w w;U l'eh.fl f 75! Js ,3" I >y r'J Y.;
k „LYNDE DRIVE
so MY 75.s / / ti n n P c
1t�i5 dA'./. 1�I'PIl IfI OJJ'L�yJ/A'9��/lA'/J I�J.JM`. I:lf✓ •. 0.:11f � 3 tY y.'f
if 1
r 4 DDI
r n
AII
14
AUDITORS
- - 5 L.S. #76-05, GHJ CONSTRUCTION , s
s/7°A,� � 11 _.46•;a-------—....... __._ �- ---- _ - _.IA✓fj�►•,�+f .kAav/
lk
SUSDI Y ISION f ios
b
6 i I tti.
� 1
15
} o
Na -- - ,:
I --- -------------- \ -- _ _-
~�-- -11Yr2L 'qeP✓.Lr�'sr/ : --. _ _ tom\..-.. `V �J�'''--�`E`.-- --- Ip
• V' //1�
�J/
'♦ • _ �.,e,bg..... N•+u^� db�! .^ ...:8c9 �9�f '�^4 Ise
____.______- _
dig = i4:Z 1i.1 �.isy,,^_ ....;:;•&S-...
------- ZA KF
HEM
� -t-- �.,�: .- ♦ iii
IT
110
0 E3 D
T
�hAfJNs ,lsa ;..r1�✓ WW
`iJ' 1:0) .. •• O
at� i•• Per
+•,o� F �. .fb P I
• '/ Mt. .00�® 3
11 tt f`P
C �,: el ,� Jos
SW
3 • a� yrN I � S�' + V
8f� � COURT
I 'JI
I V I I0,tl is 6L gym. 8 r ..moi X.rir..Kt.
MARK Z . JONES ASSOCIATES, INC.
BUILDERS • DEVELOPERS
5290 VILLA. WAY 0 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55436 612-925-1020
MARK Z. JONES II
President
June 22 , 1976
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave . N . E.
Fridley Minn .
Re : Property at 1349 E . Highway 100
To Whom It May Concern :
We hereby grant G. H. J . Construction Inc. permission
for a lot split to the City of Fridley on the above
mentioned property.
Yours truly ,
Mark Z. Jones II
President
MZJ . mr
L.
APlanning Commission Meeting - June 23, 1976 Page 20
and tells them their time is up and not to come back for the rest of the day.
Mr. Bergman said it was a five-minute limit, and would like to ask how many
games of ping-pong a youth could play in five minutes. Mr. Boardman explained
that the Parks and Recreation offices were right off the outside play area,
and it was disturbing to those offices, and that was the reason the time limits
were imposed. He added that he was upset about the time limits, too, but they
were the rules that Paul Brown set on those things because of the type of admin-
istrative activity going on.
Chairperson Harris asked Mr. Storla if he had talked to District 14, and Mr.
Storla explained that they couldn't be in schools during school hours, and
after school hours they would be dealing with Community Schools. Mr. Harris
said he wondered if the Board of Directors couldn't be appointed and the whole
thing organized , ana at that time some discussion could be held with District
14. He said it seemed to him that the school districts had to be involved in
it'somehow. Pir. Boardman said that to his understanding, that was the direction
it would have to go to be any kind of successful operation, as a teen center
would not provide the type of activites that teens wanted, ie: dances, hayrides)
etc. Mr. Harris stated that it seemed to him that these people had carried
the ball about as far as they could and have come to the city to nelp them.
6. LUT SPLIT RFnUES L.��6_05, Y UFJCONSTRUCTION COTIPUY (JOHiy LOuAN) :
Split Lot 2, Audito Sion No. 94, into three building sites.
(Zoned R-2, will be developed as R-1). Uenerally located at Hillwind
Road and I.-694.
Mr. John Logan, representing UriJ Construction Company was present. He passed
out to the Commission updated copies of the application for the lot split as
the original ones lacked the name and address of the property owner. He also
distributed copies of a letter from Mr. Mark Z. Jones, the property owner,
granting permission for the lot split. He informed the Commission that Mr.
Jones was selling GHJ the lance contract subject to the lot split, and introduced
Mr. and Mrs. Del Johnson, prospective owners. Fie explained they wanted to
buy the second lot for a future home site. Mr. Logan said he checked with the
City Engineering Department to get the water and sewer locations so the connections
would be available to each of the three lots.
Chairperson Harris asked if he intended on building single-family houses, and
Mr. Logan replied he did. Mr. Harris asked if the lots had been checked for
size, and Mr. Boardman answered they were all large enough for single-family
under the code and sewer and water was available to all three lots. He added
th�.t the City Staff had no problem with the application.
i
Mrs. Shea questioned if he was going to have to use quite a bit of fill, and {
Mr. Logan replied the first two lots would need little or no fill but the third
lot may require some. He added that the building site itself would be on solid f
ground.
Chairperson Harris asked if there was a ten foot easement on the side of one
of the Lots, and Mr. Boardman said that was where the sewer and water lines
were. Mr..Boardman explained that these lots would face on Hill wind Road,
and on the other side was more R-1 property.
i
Planning Commission Meeting - June 23, 1976. Page 10Y
Further, that the City guarrintee the use of the library within 30 days after
acceptance of the charter as a teen center. Also, that a time limit of one
month be set for each Commission to appoint a person to the temporary board
of directors. If a commission does not make their appointment within the
one-month period, then the YPC has the right to appoint a person to fill that
position on the temporary board of directors. Further, that the temporary board
of directors consist of an ex-officio Parks and Recreation Commission member
or their designate.
Mr. Peterson said if he were on the City Council he would ask several questions
that have not been answered yet, as far as he was concerned, such as how many
people would be involved, were there any duplicate services within the community,
etc. He stated that in Parks and Recreation they had asked that the Y be
contacted, Community Schools, and if it was going to be a duplication of services
that already exist or if they were talking about thirty people out of a pop-
ulation of several thousand. He stated he did not think the City Council was
going to take action based on the information available, and he would be a
little unhappy if they did.
Mrs. Shea said that as far as the Y goes that was still five years away) and
would be strictly family membership and not individual membership. She added
if a family couldn't pay about $200 to belong, a member of that family could
not go there. Mr. Peterson said that wasn't true because he happened to be
on the Board of Directors for Northwest Y in St. Paul which was a family Y,
and there were many teenagers that participated. Mrs. Shea stated that they
had a one-night a week program in that Y, and Mr. Peterson said he didn't
think that was true. He added that he didn't know what the timetable was
for the Northeast Y, but maybe there were other services that were duplicated.
Mr. Storla said that if a youth wanted to go somewhere tonight, for example,
the only place would be the Family Fun Center which was a pinball hall, and
there was the question of value of the atmosphere there. He added that they
had not come up with any other activities where a youth could go right now,
and haven't seen any duplications.
Chairperson Harris said they had been talking around in circles, and what it
boiled down to was space allocation, and that was the hang-up with Staff and
Parks and Recreation. He said he honestly didn't know in his mind if putting
it in City Hall was going to work, but he felt there should be one. Mr.
Boardman said he didn't think that was the main hang-up, and said he felt
they could go with temporary space in the City Hall with no problem. He stated
he felt they should be thinking of a. more permanent type situation, and about
the programs for youth and if that space is oriented to the programs they want.
Mr. Harris said that then the next step in his mind was to get the thing off
the ground, have them put together a board of directors, and at that time
determine where the space should be.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, Harris, Bergman, Langenfeld, Shea and Gabel voting aye,
Peterson voting nay, the motion carried S - 1.
Mrs. Gabel said that a number of youths had told her about the ridiculous
rules and regulations that were imposed in the downstairs Parks and Recreation
area where there were some facilities for them to use. She stated she was
told that when the youth's ten minutes were up, some person gets crabby and
P1:-ming Commission Meeting - June 2.3, 1976 Page 21
Chairperson Harris asked about the power and gas, and Mr. Logan said he was not
sure how far the gas went, but there was gas to the last house on Sheridan Acres.
He stated he had tal-ked to the gas company and they said there would be no problem.
He added that he hadn't talked with the power company but there were overhead
wires available, and he said they were applying for underground service. Mr.
Harris asked if an easement would be needed for that, and Mr. Boardman said that
at this time he would anticipate there would be enough room in the boulevard area
for gas and the power company both, but he would check it out before this went
to Council.
MOT.iON by Bergmen, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission recommend
to City Council approval of the Lot Split Request, L.S. #76-05, by GHJ Construction
Company (John Logan); Split Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 94, into three
building sites. (Zoned R-2, will be developed as ?-1). Generally located at
Hillwind Road and I.694., subject to necessary utility easements. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Chairperson Harris declared a recess at 11:00 and reconvened the meeting at
11.:20 P.M.
7. RE-EVALUATION Or' STREET LAYOUT P:EAH NORTH PARK: (PtTITION 8-1976).
Mr. Bergman stated that Community Development had looked at this and spent
considerable time on it, getting into a lot of detail, and had Tom Colbert
point out the engineering aspects. He said they had gotten involved in state
aid funding, which would be lost if some of these vacations were granted,
and got involved in the recommendation of the cul-de-sac and agreed they were
undesirable and particulary so when they cut off an access to industrial-type
property. He said they also agree-.d that as far as preserving; the oak tree,
it was in the right-of-way but there was no plan for street improvement and
therefore not pertinent that any change be made at this time. lie continued
that if and when street improvement ever would go in, the approval of this
recuest would landlock some property without street access. In essence, he
stated, they saw no reason for the City to ,yield back gained rights-of-way
at the risk of not getting them back or having to buy back property when it
might be necessary because of someone's concern that something at some time
-might happen.
Mr. Langenfeld referred the Planning Commission to the minutes of the May 18,
1976, meeting of the Environmental Quality Commission, and the motion they
made on page 12 of those minutes. Chairperson Harris said it appeared from
that motion that they concurred with Community Development. Mr. Langenfeld
agreed, and said they had a good discussion on this and Mr. Boardman had done
a good job explaining some of this. He said he had indicated that he thought
Mrs. Sporre might be creating more problems than they would be solving.
Chairperson Harris asked what they were really trying to get at, and Mr. Board-
man said they were concerned with several things:
1. They are concerned about the traffic from the industrial traffic
down Ironton on to East River Road. The people who live along
there have small children, and think the traffic would be detrimental
to the neighborhood.
Planning Commission Meeting - June. 2.3, 1976 Page 2.2
2. Another one of their concerns was the vacation of streets, and were
worried that if it shows on a map that there is a street easement
then developers would anticipate that to be in.
3. Another concern was that the map shows behind the residential property
a right-of-way at 83rd between East River Roal rand the railroad trr:c'Vs.
That right of way is not in. 83rd has been designated as a state-aid
road, and Staff has agreed to change this map.
4. They were also concerned about 83rd on 1dorth Park side. That is a
dedicated right-of-way there. They want to vacate that portion of
Ashton, eliminate the railroad crossing, and vacate all of 83rd.
Mr. boardman stated that City Staff felt that although there would probably
never be a railroad crossing at that location, Ashton to 83rd would have to be
maintained in order to service the properties on Ironton if lot splits occur.
He said there was one lot split in there already; and although the people in the
area say they are going to keep those properties and never request it, if' they
dial sell there would be the possibility that the neer owners might request it.
Therefore, he stated, they did not feel the vacation of Ashton was a good idea.
Mr. Boardman continued that as far as on the East side of the railroad tracks
was concerned, he didn't feel that vacating the right of way at this time would
be a good idea either, and said he didn't see any purpose in it. He said that
if the area. develops, :it most likely wouldn't develop along 83rd, and thought
it would just be an exercise in futility. He stated that there was a utility
on 81st, and utility easements would have to be maintained.
Mr. Langenfeld asked if there wasn't an implied notation in this for preservation
of North Park, and Mr. Boardman replied that to a certain extent there was. He
said he didn't think North Park wanted an industrial road on its south boundary.
He added that he felt it was a mistake in the first place to run the sewer lines
where they ran them, because if any kind of development goes in there the line
could be detrimental to the road.
Mr. Boardman said that as to the question of the oak tree, it was located on
Ironton just East of the interesection of Ironton and Hugo Street. lie stated
that the curb that was presently on Ironton runs to Hugo Street, is blacktop
for a little ways and then is dirt road to Ashton and down to Ely, and the oak
tree did stick within the curb line. Mr. Harris asked what type of oak tree
it was, and Mrs. Shea answered a white oak.
Mr. Langenfeld said he would like to bring up two points. First, he said, the
Environmental Quality Commission felt that the petition was trying to stop
something that wasn't even planned yet; and secondly, the Environmental Commission
made a motion that any development that took place in this area be referred to the
Environmental Quality Commission in the beginning stages. He stated he would
also like to bring up that he would like this Commission to be referred to as
the Fridley Environmental Quality Commission because sometimes there was reference
to the State Commission and there was confusion.
MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission concur
with the motion made by the Community Development Commission and recommend to
the City Council that there be no change to present street patterns as requested
by .petition 8-1976 at the present time, and that signs be placed at Ironton
Street to prohibit industrial truck traffic on Ironton Street. The following
considerations apply:
• �fl
REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 12, 1976 PAGE 4
(PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CONTINUED)
Councilman Fitzpatrick remarked that the motion as passed by the Planning Commission
was in turn really a motion passed by the Community Development Commission, and would
that be sufficient for the City administration to get something underway? It
provides for the creation of temporary, board members with appointees from some of our
subcommittees.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the motion of the Planning
Commission with some changes: That this youth center should have a temporary board
of directors consisting of six regular members and two ex-officio members. Regular
members shall be appointed by the following groups: One by the Fridley City Council ,
one by the Fridley Planning Commission, one by the Fridley Human Resources Commission,
and two by the Fridley Youth Project Committee. One ex-officio member shall be
appointed by the Fridley City Council and one by the Fridley Police Department.
The temporary board of directors should serve for not more than thirty days during
which time they will write the charter, establish the interim rules for the youth
center and facilitate the election for regular members to the permanent board.
The appointed ex-officio members will also serve on the permanent board, and it will
be approved by the City Council. Administratively, the youth center will be under
the auspices of the Parks and Recreation Department who will assign staff to super-
.vise and carry out the guidelines established by the board of directors and approved
by the Parks and Recreation Director. Further that the City guarantee the use of
the warming house within 30 days after acceptance of the charter as a teen center.
Also that a time limit of one month be set for each commission to appoint a person
to the temporary board of directors. If a commission does not make their
appointment within the one-month period, then the YPC has the right to appoint a
person to fill that position on the temporary board of directors. Further, that the
temporary board of directors consist of an ex-officio Parks and Recreation Commission
member or their designate. The motion was seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski.
Further discussion ensured concerning possible financing of the Project in the
future and where the Youth Center could be housed if it were to be moved, how
it could be handled at staff level.
MOTION by Councilman. Hamernik to amend the motion to state that upon the establish-
ment of the charter that the board of directors submit the charter to the Parks
and Recreation Commission and upon their discretion to bring it before the City
Council for approval .
THE VOTE UPON THE AMENDMENT was a voice' vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion to amend carried unanimously.
THE VOTE UPON THE MOTION AS AMENDED was a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimou
GHJ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LOT LIT L.S. 076-05, ILLWIND ROAD & I.694:
The Public Works Director state t lair- i is a request to split a lot into three
building sites to allow a home to e built on one of them, the construction of an
R-1 single family type of dwelling. The property after a split would be in compliance
with the existing codes, and there are sewer and water facilities to the proposed
lots.
Mr. Sobiech further stated that the lots would be subject to raodway easements, and
that a noise abatement barrier would be forthcoming. Representatives of the
construction company were present.
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to concur with the Planning Commission recommendation
and approve the lot split. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski, and upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
RE-EVALUATION OF STREET LAYOUT NEAR NORTH PARK:
The Public Works Director stated that the City should not relinquish any right-of-way,
i
and Ironton could be posted for no truck driving.
Councilman Fitzpatrick said that there are many and varied considerations to be
i
applied to the overall consideration. We have the whole street pattern in the larger
I
i
i
CITY OF FRIDLEY
i
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N. E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
TELEPHONE ( 612)571 -3450
July 22, 1976
CITY COUNCIL.
ACTION TAKEN NOTICE
GHJ Construction Company
4002 10th Lane
Anoka, Mn 55303
Dear Mr. Logan:
On July_12_,_1976 the Fridley City Council
officially approved your request for Cot split, L.S. #76-05 _
with the stipulations listed below.
Please review t:he noted stipulations, sign -the statement below, and
return one copy to the City of Fridley.
If YOU have ary questions regarding the above action, please call
the Community Development Office at 571-3450.
Sincerely,
JERRt)I_D L. 30ARDMAfJ - '��
CITY PLANNER
JLB ae
f ulatiGllS:
No stipulations
Concur with action 'taken.
m