LS76-02 Form #5-68 '
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION 36
CITY OF FRIDLEY
R CTTY U-EL 0—&y._
1 Applicant' s Name
APPLI CA'VT: L �`� A
Lot Split _ 'O
ADDRESS:
treet Z'p Code Date Filed
TELEPHONE S 3 S 1 ��a `1- p„ Fee: O Receipt # i
+� x Home Business Council Action:Date
Cd � o
c� x REMARKS
Cd C PROPERTY OWNER, (S)
O 3 �
1 4' m ADDRESS(ES) S �—
s« Street City Zip Code
a) a o
,0wo •rA
+' m Qd Street City Zip .Code
0 o CQrA TELEPHONE #(S)
d a Home Business
j a) O U
Property Location on Street
M
`
ami�
or Eret Street Address (IF ANY)
Legal Description of Property: t
Reason for Lot Split:
0-�� �
Total Area or Property sq. ft. Present Zoning Classification
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this app on are true and
correct.
DATE: ��rD SIGNATURE
BELOW FOR CITYUSS (Seo reverse side for additional instructions)
PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
e
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE
f
1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. _N.E. , Fridley
i
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of 20.00 for each original lot being split.
I
3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations . This Committee meets once a
month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of
the Subcommittee.
4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels
along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in.
5. The Certificate of Survey should then. contain a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department
for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the
second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant
with minutes of the Planning Commission.
6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday
of the month.
. 7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which_ must .
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
I
kourVOtation to VorpornflocL --,Lw-.
-nifOrM CODveyancing bia"-3 (1931).
"'bin; Inbenture, Made this................13th.........................day of...........?!!aY................................... 19... ...
between .................
a corporation under the laws of the State of........... Minnesota
. ****'�... .......................................... pa7'hj of the first part, and
.......................................................I............................I Cit. r !�......
...q).... ...?�i ley
a corporation under the, laws of the State of............M#Re.s.o.t.a.....I...........................................................
party of the second part, ............
That the said party of the first part, in consideration of the sum Of
One dollar and other values received
................................................................................11...I........................................................................................................................................ DOLURS,
to it in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,
docs hereby Grant, Bargain, Quitclaim, and Convey unto the, said party of the second part, its successors
and assigns, Foy-ever, all the tract...........or parcel......... of land lying and being in the County of........................
......... ......................................and State of -411nnesota, described as follows, to-wit:
A 7.5 foot drainage and utility easement described as follows:
The East 7.5 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, Froid's Addition.
All lying in the North half of Section 3, Township 30, Range 24, City of
Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota.
The City of Fridley hereby accepts this easement for drainage and utility
purposes.
NO STATE DEED TAX REQUIRED
Marvin C-Brunsell City Clerk
Torrens Property
The original was filed at Anoka County-.Mkr-r4:!1 69�12U
2
To Jbabe anb to 3bolb the gbanw, Together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances there-
unto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns,
Forever.
0 In Tegtimoup Wbercof, The said first party has caused these
presents to be executed in its corporate name by its....................................
President and its...vice....P.r.es.i.d.ent and its corporate seal to
............................
be hereunto affixed the day and year first above written.
Sexter...DeKelopment Corp.,.................................
In Presence of
By.............................................................I..................................
Its....................................President
....* ***"*"**...*.....President
...............I.I.-...........................................................
................................................................................................
......................................................................................
Its.....................................................
ti
� V
r V
p�, O
R, � � c t4 rt -0,
y S;
R �; r�.
co
(D r► n O
V
cz CD
Co :9L
At
m y' p Z o° y ^► tvqo
1D d
ti
CD
sz, -0
I
f
i
...........6T ,.................... ......................raazdxa utnssnuczuaa hlY'
(ssajpp`Y)£'799 IZI 9TPT23
uual� .Fcguno�
........................................................................;"7gnd fualo.M
( #, zs.zaATun W79
...................................
+ 'L P� ---
—,r�
f A9 G3.LAV?3Q SWA .LN3wnH.LSN1 SIHI
•uat?v cod zoa
pluso paap puv ?av aa.r 3zf? aq o? ?uazun.z?su? gnus pa;pajnzou:yau.......... ........
PUD ................. ..........
zolozTp.cvo s z o �2zorL1nv r4 uvvzodroa p?vs �o �Tvzlaq u? palv �a
aspuv
pau;?s svoz ?uarun.zlsug prrs Ivy, pun
`uo??vcodcoo p?vs jo Tvas alvaodzoo Oql s? ?uauin.r?sul p?vs of paxWy lvas 9.q??irzll pun ?uaucnr?suz u?o acoj
alfl u? pazuvu uo?lvrod coa azll ala........................................... � a z...........q pun ?'ua zsar
11 p. cr....................................91
djaa?laadsac oav 1.raz(l ?v z(? rns pip................ u,roazs zTrzp azu Fq �java utaq `uaj;n u:ru�zc,j F12vuascad azzt o
.... .....
Ta xa; d q UVRI
puv..........................................................................................
pa.cnaddv R11vuoscad `fqunga pros .101 puvuptl?n.............................. ...-........-..za�xaS.....�.-pT�u�Q...............
.....................
..............................................X ..
u £jTand Xa• o
.....
v `aiu axoaq . o rn � yz p ........
............................:.................
E-4,ou J.................10 rqu noo
'p8
Land Planning stLl' r�'l �� 6875 Highway No.65 N.E.
Land Surveying ' ' +, • Minneapolis,
Soils Testing �l '111PP'( j /2C. Minn. s5432
Civil Engineering (J Telephone 784-6066
Municipal Engineering Engineers & Surveyors Area Code 614
Certificate of Survey for (:I LJP- G. - R01D
r
y
i
t
FRoIrDN � AOOIT10�►
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above
described land, and of the location of all buildings, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on
said land. As surveyed by me this day of T_,11 --A.D. 19_L_�.
,) SUBURBAN ENGINEERING, INC.
Cfit) Engineers , yeyors
.
IISV
9
CALVIN H. H E D L U N D 4818 Overlook Lake Circle
Bloomington,Minnesota 55437
Land Surveyor ♦ Civil Engineer
688-2080
Sawwr ifs ert� nate
SURVEY FOkc Village Builders Inc . J06 NO.
DESCRIdED ASt That part of Lot 3 Block 1 FROID IS ADDITION, except the -
easterly 75.5 feet. thereof as measured along the northerly and southerly
lines thereof, City - of Fridley, Anoka County, Minn. and reserving easements
of ecord
- 183. 31
33 luS.9 lU9.8! 97.8 755 Loi 3
z z 3 Y Sr
10 4.5 rots �►
• 4 r� 9f'8" �
`u• 104-57 10 lot,T
/
.0 1 (JAR. rJ
sl N
Y 2b r v
105%O n1
� v
It �.
U
� V
Q �
ro4.6 74.48
Cow
4♦+3
¢ IRONTON "rRAVELCU t-,'#%Y
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
I hereby certify that on ��7� I surveyed the property described above
and that the above plat is a correct representation of said survey.
Calvin H. Hedlund, Minn. Reg. No. 5942
CALVIN H. H E D L U N D 4818 Overlook Lake Circle
Land Surveyor a Civil Engineer Bloomington,Minnesota 55437
888.2080
SavewrofsCertilinate
SuRvEy FOR: village Builders Inc. Joe No.
DESCRIBED AS: The Easterly 75.5 feet as measured along the northerly and
southerly lot lines thereof, of Lot 3, Block 1 FROID'S ADDITION, City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minn #nd reserving easements of record .
97.8 VSs 9�.i
0-T I
P) ll0�•5 Iw•S
448• �
!4
GAK. N
a
fol.$
> M
CZ
7-5,5-
IDD-0
5.5IDD.O Assu,rned Ei-
Z RONTON 'rRA VE i_ED WAY
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
I hereby certify that on /V? I surveyed the property described above
and that the above plat is a correct representation of said survey.
loe
r
Calvin H. Hedlund, Minn. Reg. No. 5942
r
�%Z; )441114
�
080) 10 DD
ruo, 140 00 /GS mif {
'3! 4' 4f " „ L.S. #76-02 Donald Fer
F. Sext
Al f.37~,30_1! o �; f/ .i 3 6a3.
y.,r v"y • `" ' 2. jrl/� I Split Lot 3, Block 1 , Froid's Addition
w1��„ " •\," " \, f "� �, " into 2 10,000+ sites for double bungalows.
1 °,s 8 '��\ , �/ �° ' e oo Zaned R-3 ,
rav �G s 4 54%
o ,
2`9 &`\t X53► CITY
4R�32c *�R &` ` P!DS
J.A --COON
--•-togo..es'._..- �
.9GCc��' �qa�' <aJ�� �µ, ", SAG yw��r�� ;� . �• _ �6e. •�•,.�//.Z9=• •••__
J.. r
CITY
t f �/ n y � 'o <
` " 't �`/(,✓ q,i; Se\fie " �:�ennta yr '� RIDL E ! o /"'��.l�a�
5 EV.
rn)e
I$' -_ 3 � :,.,.,.r � s°. ; 9e•/44.46 �, '
7t
55 t ,3, �S`,? �c !d n�Z Qona/d ✓oM6. w 21
BV19� ,� .o ,4. 3 2 / a� ;v (.{'Doris brrt�iirr•• � y
e� w a ryry � p a /1.E/feria 3
r 14 4aa` w
,A' �• 0. V_� D'A • 216 14131\!
" 9 918 15 3qI0�� � v
j of �} � °
G11 xi , CS S 30'�e t 2 . �<,� a fs Vito N; w
ao , _q37
e
r s 5, 1.. �p �yof z 9_
7A C
,•00 �v tt r , \9 0 .w a i":.e � ,�-S ->3_P,j i�1
, i z 09' ;,• ti \\\ 7 9976 r 419 71 /70
�O�VI� 6 7181-9 Q / /1 3/4Cf�iEl/7'S11:1 ,wlW,
� ,• •- 1�. y• SSS y>s r} ' !�o �( -- �� /� •�-�s.fi,-',r v .rte• t' � w
^� IINC
7ijvFAI M 0 8/a2lf ;
'
G 9 ® 6 ��� •� }�... � rAbti 8//oL /�4k �.` �I/r kh /o ?rte
RA,;
S�0/ ♦ ��d f .�
/:� �4f•,t� /Od
.3 S 6 ` t �2�01 a,[ � ,. Zr•a sf .pseJ�. '' j+ /�'�y�,'
IV 8�.r l R C E
r5 -71� f„es �.ti. xf•,b 'V 1r Ir .V��}• t, F'i••�; 'Y t � !j.•
�s �! S/ �� 8 n19 (��� ��9:+3 ��Sr-a ��� !,_._a •« ss7 `' ��i� '• g��IR �
4 x,a • a!`s(eu, " e 4Y 7f I 's `� D ( `a+��r K�" '�y.�"
� . r S v w "� ag, In.rriCse �'>� � U '�`�ix �.x '� +•�s 3.
�Y"
13 Vfq\n� 7R��4 "
/
1
Planning Commission Meeting - April 7, 1976 Page 24
recommend to Council approval of a rezoning request, ZOA #76-01, by John
ffaluptzok, to rezone from C-ZS (local shopping areas) to M-1 (light
industrial areas) , Lot 17, Block 2, Central View Manor Addition, to make
zoning consistent with adjoining property. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, the motion carried unanimously.
5. REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT, L.S #76-0 BY DONALD F. SEXTER: Split Lot
3, Block 1 , Froid's Addition wo building sites, each at least
10,000 square feet, for the construction of double bungalows. (Property
zoned R-3) , generally located on the corner of East River Road N.E.
and Ironton Street N.E.
Mr. Donald Sexter was present.
i
Mr. Clark said this property was zoned multiple, and as recently as
last October, Mr. Sexter planned to build an 8-plex on this site, and due
to the handicap requirements that come into play when you build an 8-plex,
and other problems relating to the lot, such as drainage, made it economically
unfeasible to build the 8-plex. He was now proposing to split the lot
into two pieces and construct double bungalows on. this property. Mr.
Sexter has presented surveys of the two lots which show that both lots will
exceed the 10,000 square foot requirement for double bungalows . Mr. Clark
said one of the surveys shows the setback as 30' for the structure, and
this will have to be moved back 5' to meet the 35' front yard setback
requirement. Mr. Clark said there was another small problem in that he
did not quite meet the garage requirements for a double bungalow. The
zoning code states that you have to have 1 1/2 stall garage for each
unit of a double bungalow. Mr. Clark said that if you use the parking
stall requirement of 200' , this would mean that there would have to be
300 square feet of garage area for each unit. He said the garages in this
plan total 572 square feet. He said he felt that it was the intent of
the ordinance to provide two stalls for storage, and one stall for parking.
Mr. Clark said that maybe the garages- could be enlarged to meet this
requirement. Mr. Clark said Mr. Sexter didn't want to widen the garages
because it would obstruct the view from the house, but they could be built
two feet deeper.
Mr. Bergman asked Mr. Sexter if he was in agreement to increasing the
size of the garage by 2 feet? Mr. Sexter said he was in agreement because
the house could be moved back two feet on the lot. He said that everything
could be adjusted so they met the setback requirements of the code.
Mr. Clark said the staff recommendation was that this lot split be
granted.
MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission
recommend to Council approval of a request for a lot split., L.S. #76-02, by
Donald F. Sexter, to split Lot 3, Block 1, Froid's Addition, into two
building sites, each at least 10,000 square feet, for the construction of
double bungalows on R-3 zoned property, generally located on the corner
of East River Road N.E. and Ironton Street N.E. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Meeting- April 7, 1976 Page 23
then Lot 7 would be unbuildable. Mr. Bergman said there wasn't much land
to work with. Mr. Clark said the configuration of Osborne Road was not
the most desirable because it wasn't at right angles, and pulling it up
to meet the Osborne Road of this plat will improve that situation. He
said that as far as Mr. Doyle's .comments on whether he would be able to
use the St. Paul Waterworks easement in this plat physically or on paper,
as you drive past this area it will look like it was part of the rear
yards of these lots.
Mr. Hogen. asked if there would have to be any more land dedicated
for the widening of 75th Way. Mr. Clark said there was enough of the
existing right of way to allow the widening of this street.
MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Wahlberg, that the Planning Commission
close the Public Hearing on the preliminary plat, P.S. #76-03, Leigh
Terrace, by Leigh Investments, Inc. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Chairman Harris declared the Public Hearing closed at 11:10 P.M.
MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Commission
recommend to Council approval of a preliminary plat, P.S. #76-03, Leigh j
Terrace, by Leigh Investments, Inc. , being a replat of Lot 39, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 77, excepting Parcel 5640, generally located on the West
side of the intersecion of Osborne Road and East River Road, (former Dorstad
Plat) , with the following stipulations: j
1. The alignment of Osborne Road be moved 5' to the South.
2. That confirmation be obtained from the St. Paul Waterworks as to
the specific use of the property, and that be reflected in a
private covenant to be filed with the plat.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
4. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST,Q ZOA 71176-01 , JOHN W. HALUPTZOK:
Rezone from CJS J16cal shopping areas to M-1 Tlight industrial
areas) , Lot 17, Block 2, Central View Manor Addition, to make
zoning consistent with adjoining property, generally located just
West of 1240 73 1/2 Avenue N. E.
MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission open
the Public Hearing on a rezoning request, ZOA #76-01, by John Haluptzok.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the Public
Hearing open at 11:11 P.M.
f
Mr. Clark said that this rezoning request was the result of a stipulation
of the Planning Commission on a previous rezoning request, ZOA #75-07, to ?
rezone Lot 18. This will make the zoning consistent with the adjacent
property.
MOTION by Wahlberg, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission
close the Public Hearing on a rezoning request, 'LOA ##76-01, by John
Haluptzok. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Harris declared
the Public Hearing closed at 11:12 P.M.
MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Wahlberg, that the Planning Commission
jREGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 19, 1976 PAGE 10 '
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 7, 1976:
INSIDE IMPROVEMENT AND OUTSIDE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - MAPLE LANES, 6310 T.H. 65
ACCORDING TO RESOLUTION OF INTENT FOR LIQUOR LICENSE):
The Public Works Director stated that the matter was before the Council approx-
imately a year ago on a resolution for a liquor license. The applicant is
remodeling his building to bring it into compliance with the code as it pertains
to a liquor license, and the resolution stated that it would no through the
various commissions; that a certain exterior development plan would be laid
out and be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The applicant has agreed to
proceed with any additional shrubbery and trees necessary to the building's
exterior, and this would be completed on an agreed upon schedule and
Mr. Savakoul is here to answer any questions.
Mr. Savakoul made a short statement of his intent and purposes for the
building, and some discussion ensued.
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to concur with the Planning Commission's
recommendation and approve the landscaping. Seconded by Councilwoman
Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
LEIGH TERRACE, P.S. #76-03, OSBORNE ROA[ AND EAST RIVER ROAD:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to set a Public Hearing for May 10, 1976.
Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
J. HALjiPTZOK, ZOA #76-01 ; 1240 7312 AVENUE:
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to set the Public Hearing for May 10th. Seconded
by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
D. F. SEXTER T SPLIT #76-02 EAST RIVER ROAD AND IRONTON STREET:
The Public Works Director stated the land is zoned R-3, and the request is
for a lot split to build two double bungalows on R-3 property. There is a
concern here in that both the City Engineer and the County, at the appropriate
time, would like to secure certain easements for future improvements along
the East River Road, and we have been making this a consistent pattern here.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the Planning Commission in
granting the lot split with the stipulation that additional easements be
granted to the City on the East River Road. Seconded by Councilwoman
Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
SUBSTANDARD 40' LOTS:
The Public Works Director said the matter came through the Board of Appeals
for a guideline on building on 40' lots.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick the matter be discussed at the City Council
Conference Meeting, April 26, 1976. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
RESOLUTION #39-1976 REGARDING THE_ISSUANCE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE (JOHN G.
PURMORT, HOUSE OF LORDS):
Councilwoman Kukowski asked if they could change the agenda order and move the item
regarding the Issuance of an Intoxicating Liquor License forward on the agenda.
MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to suspend the rules and move consideration of the
Resolution forward. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to waive the reading and to adopt Resolution #39-1976.
Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
r
• r
34
i
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 19, 1976 PAGE 9
MOTION by Council Starwalt to table the first reading until the Council gets a report
from the Charter Commission. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a,voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION PS #76-01 INNSBRUCK NORTH TOWNHOUSE IV AND
V, AND APPROVAL OF TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT T #76-01:
The Public Works Director stated the Planning Commission did recommend approval
with certain stipulations,.and in working with Darrel Farr a letter of understanding
and agreement has been worked out and with certain stipulations that have to be
met. The Public Works Director then read the stipulations in the letter from
Darrel Farr of April 19, 1976.
The Public Works Director said Mr. Farr realizes that prior to the final approval
of the plat that certain items would have to be received by the City, and one of
them is the easements for the public walkway that is adjacent to the lake in the
4th Addition. THis would provide the City with the ownership of the existing walkway
that is presently around the public end of the park.
The second is a performance bond for the exterior development; the lighting, tennis
courts, and recreational facilities.
The City requires a copy of all deed restr4.-tions and agreements between Darrel Farr
and the Townhouse Association. Also required is a 7-foot walkway to parallel the
North Innsbruck Drive to Silver Lake Road, and to try to cope with the traffic
problem. The performance bond would also call for the construction of an additional
traffic lane at the Silver Lake Road to ease the access. A maintenance bond of
$5,000 to insure the maintenance of the streets.
The Public Works Director enumerated other stipulations, and stated these were the
basic outlines of understanding.
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the Final Plat Subdivision PS #76-01
Innsbruck North Townhouse IV and V, and approval of Townhouse Development T #76-01 .
Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor'Mee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
The group of citizens that met on the Innsbruck matter came back into the Council
room to give the results of their meeting.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P.S. #76-02,
INNSBRUCK VILLAGE AND TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT OF 100 UNITS, T #76-02, BY DARREL A. FARR
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR INNSBRUCK VILLAGE:
Mayor Nee stated the item now being considered is the Final Plat Subdivision
No. 76-02 and Townhouse Development T #76-02 for Innsbruck Village.
Mr. Farr stated that one of the homeowners has a list that has been agreed upon.
Gary Samuel said they had arrived at somewhat of an agreement, and it may not be
the perfect answer. The City offered to make a couple of compromises, which helps.
First of all, the Farr Corporation has agreed to move the units back a certain
distance. There would be one-way lane entering, and emernency vehicles could come .
up there.
The Farr Corporation has agreed to do whatever sodding or landscaping may be
necessary to keep the area, Arthur Street and West Barvarian, developed aesthetically.
Discussion ensued on the various aspects-of the agreement in relation to streets,
angles, etc.
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to close the Public Hearinn and approve the Final Plat
Subdivision P.S. #76-02 and Townhouse Development T #76-62, but subject to all the
agreements and the five stipulations. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Nee thanked the audience and Mr. Farr for a reasonable compromise.
The City Manager said that it is encouraging to see the people netting together
and solving problems, and the City would be glad to help in any way that it can.
If any one wishes to see any documents or plans, they should call the Public Works
Director and he will make that information available to them.
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFICATE Of 1111,1: p
t2cof 'fine City of Fridlcv of Couilty, Dlinncsot•a, Owner's Duplicate
r.(I
Certificate of Title No. l �
Witncsses
C+L!1t) of __ _ __� __._ __,_.__� c! ?j (/ ✓�•�' :7/ FFA
On this day of _ A.D. .19 before mc, a
Stotar•. Publ* withLLi and for said County, personal;.y appear"'
t0 r.c kno, 1.> C t}1C pCT5011 dCSCrlI?C<I an Elnld IQl!o executed the foregoing insi.runient
s
and ackno;e1cjved that. ho executed the same as_ . _ free act and ct:ed.
�c'y
Al