LS69-15 Form #5-68 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
CITY OF FRIDLEY
FOR CITY USE ONLY
r Applicant's Name
APPLICANT: -�- .Z DEV-5
ADDRESS; Lot Split 69-15
F4-2� 4)
Street City Tip Code Date Filed;TELEPHONE #Jf�O-��/2 � l-`�� `�/ E-xt s3 o5 Fee:$15.00ReceipU Home Business Council Action:D@U _.
( REURKS:
PROPERTY OWNER(S)_L!<! 1�
� zb
$4 44-3 3
°0
ADDRESS(ES) Ff,Idle k
a, a, o Street City Zip Code
4 m o .H
w o v Street City Zip Code
o
0 TELEPHONE #(S)
J11 Id °' i,
0 m Home Business
N O U
M O .Or{
Property Location on Street
or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) �n Ci «,
w
U
Legal Description of Property:
low 5 E1�Ci✓ TJ) %�y c% PAq d�,"f,0/V m.
Reason for Lot Split:
UW
/
Total Area of Property/ 1c c sq. ft. Present
ZoningCasafcat �n
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this application are true and
correct.
DATE: _� // SIGNATURE A
BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Se# reverse side for additional imtruct.ivo)
PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration -
Aewarkn s
3
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE
1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley)
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of $15.00 for each original lot being split.
3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Oommittee meets once a
month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of
the Subcommittee.
4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels
along with the new pare-le treat—? w. 1!: al Pxieting structures tied in.
The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department
for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the
second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant
with minutes of the Planning Commission.
4. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday
of the month.
7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAX33 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
n i n
134mim aild , �����[CXtGS, �l1lJ. Telephone 784-5480
LAND SURVEYORS %
10130 HIGHWAY 65 NORTHEAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55433
SCALE .
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY: 2444 - 154 — 55 5
i�GEN0 Ir.S -IRON
131.15 MEA _
51. 15
f � 1
I
I I
I 1
Ln I I J
Ln
2 C A R Rt
�. 1 1 cu 2 G.c O �► \�
I I —
A
O
W U 'L.41 � W
JN c - W
Q H t
, � 3.4r '
Lo
ori ti 74. 6 (�
- 01
-
p r -
130. 56 PLAT
31 A M
LEGAL ULSCRIPTI014:
Lots 3, 4, 5, block 7 , hyde Park Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct super-
vision and that I am a duly Registered Land
Surveyor under the las of the State of Minn-
esota. .
! v
Date -v a 1 y(:'.7Reg. No. '
INV. 9 � `f.�. r�� F?.............
r
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
BOARD OF APPEALS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of Appeals of the City of
Fridley will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on
Wednesday, July 16, 1969 to consider the following matter:
Mr. Arthur Deys, 6036-21 Street N.E. ,
Fridley is requesting three variances
of the City Code to allow him to split
his lots and make two buildable sites.
The variances are of Section 45.23-to
reduce the side
yard requirement on the
existinghouse from rom 10 feet to 2.8 feet,
Section 45.27 to reduce the average
depth of x'
p existing front yard setbacks
for
proposed house, from 48 feet to 35
feet and Section 45.35 (1) to permit
the movingof existing a
istin g gar ge into the
sideyard of existing dwelling located
on Lots 3, 4, & 5, Block 7, Hyde Park
Addition the same being 6036-22 Street
N.E. , Fridley, Minnesota.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter may be
heard at this meeting.
DONALD MITTELSTADT
CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF APPEALS
PUBLISH: June 25, 1969
m m
K--9r---moi va '
W
`)! `m
G
o
rr
�S
T' d
fD
d mam
Z*
m
O
� O
p
'�t
X Y
ry� 4}
H 4 �
y .
x
t5
J
L.S. IF'69-15 - Arthur Deys
Lots 3-5, B1. 7, Hyde Park Add.
NW 90n'
`V+Y ,` .'• a •G
C av 9
X27 ..i
�V
♦0._y �,♦_y� Z 8 gyp° g
Voz
*_ �a
zo
off-=- _ �` ♦�--- -��- -- - -�-- �
v ,2 V v /a" /'\9a vo/ ; ,/`dry•,
�6 -Eolz
: ,S �� ? /6 �='V �; .�tt'r'�fi '-�♦! o °v .6 --/�rt v o
Q I
�l at .tf.o.9 O . pSS e .• a . 77TJ7
O a
wi-
--
4 L
h h _ S
I
-�3 ��.-
3f =--� Z � "T -
/E
9
� -! /�5 2 i is q - •.yq�' /U5°�?° = 5q?3 -, ¢� .,
20
nye _
t Jk 9 Q+4 °� /� /9 /2 9 -
_
► ,.)T -! AVENUE N.E. Yc"
F7 4
F—Y -
�� B41
'3 g ha B
9�S : 9��r q 1.9
''
May 22, 1969
Gentlemen:
on March 5th, 1969 a meeting of the Fridley Church of Christ
was held in order to make important decisions relative to
future plans and progress of the congregation.
Among other things, it was agreed that the parsonage property--
-
Lots 3,4 and 5 Block 7, Hyde Park Addition--should be divided
so it could better serve our needs.
Mr. Authur Deys, associate minister, was authorized to proceed
with the execution of this matter.
Director of Church Board,
r
Burton W. Barber
May 9 , 1972
Mr. Leif Henriksen
495 14ississippi Street N.L.
Minneapolis , Finn. 55432
RE : Lot Split Request L. S. #69-15
Dear Mr. Henriksen:
Please be advised that the City Council approved
your request to split Lots 3 , 4, and 5 , Block 7 , Hyde
Park Addition at their meeting of Nay 1 , 1972 .
You will need a new certificate of survey before
any building permits will be issued, so please see
that the Engineering Department gets a copy.
,.-Yours very truly,
RLL CL
Engineering Assistant
i)c/nj s
} �
h
r
a�' ��°^�'" c.•�a�,�. 4• +y y..
AW � .., a h ,fir '� 'a.j. � �`"t,-,�'� � ?5+s, t,�.. '�?�'° �dt n•. •a
21
°+�'.r '1A
7d,=d 'x A 'r.;c' w �,`✓' v ,t^ 5 ;.: a
e
+ ., '• .}s y'- W"' �; ': wB� .,rrq' -:.
,ry
&
:.; ,�`"4 7 A t� �'-,�. ;e �'y t::t� v5, '.��` Y a o r"'�'`'n..•.,�. �� �v.�'t'�• ?+ �" an 3 a x '+.4 .�$�.� r�.r ,�_ -
'r� �aa` .+ n .� �,. t; , ��,w, .z* <«{. a „ a "�r• --f��+' ;;�,g� ,•. i; ��GAS •e:M� S r � .�� 1�: aA.
�.�. r +1 �7 s".-+ +�' f; �,�' te. :#r y.;,:., ,�.� }`Au :>,f 4f4�`it'�°`S k'$ �'::+ •.,R.4' `»�1� �� .i.....,. rMp :,� r
.,.t., �: "'r �"�y�,' rvEit' �'h:.�rti �+ �i*'t 'k ,a`iY..r`t'„ raw*. � t.� } y^�r'4:sr 7' ��•p�'��tl�^S<f '^fir*F�,.43 +t,• �.,L
�;*�r •tom' "aia'6 [Ni.b :H X13 r•r �"r _4 � a; d `• >.,t��,,rs s $"�?'Y a �"t �'� g.';' R`ti�"_w��" 4'# �s� ,.
n
i- k ,•�y
rr, .�.+ :, � �:�`..✓�. -Jr. r gg � ,.. '�`+/,.��' k F �4Y.k. i+• ; 4x+ �W '&'a � k+,, 7. �«' a x �
+`y, .�� '•�` F �� r ;k d � Y�,?Y�d a�' "S'a k J k }�..^x ,'�!Y ,�ry �, ,�, x E s.� w ;5 ,,;::-. r k,
!r P ?�F�d 7.#'•'. x_f,. � ! djia. .a q S' �� "`4a' �;Y �M� q c N� r's.''� .,yy, � �' �
�• ,�* � � a.� ri � 4�,. Y'` 4 f �.; e e Y"-, ^^,r�xs���� _Y rn i�;7� � '` �.;�'3 v, s
�. ,�� Y.b. �,.a•P 4�.. `•+Y}"`" @tYw r""5 k .•; "�'�� 4. '3•��„"a' 3. �y -5d :'.: ,�•n-•lam -.�e,p• n R+I�';�,.
Y.4, 'Q
rq.. ��aA s t�.. '�� � k �' a Sla, vs� 4 *` ��� n� ,l �� w3a 4c..` . '_�6 ,e?"g� -r,✓...r�� $ s
fir
*4 k
_
r•' d' '€^ ,yye � ^, u. `�, a a�'�. '��' i r � �' �'' ,� H� v;�t ;',�x+s? t "'3' ;�"'� .._:.
yy �` r.. b� �a^��'�`�`� x� j� �-�.. y,.� a� t.Hs'bJ KS � rt�'F. X 4'. �„ �•Y P�.,.I �(Y 'rv. ,
.a,. -!q•` +,i.7"' F :lf ;1"'t+ .ya;+r .3.. rv^''} 'aW .
f1 z his+Sky F ,° 'fia i ,'a,° 4 +, f �,>. x1`
;•-] _Ifs'• i. af'lr�,`�'ii � '_ >q �£ 7 *Y A � Y
'.' ,.�tw{� i ' ;,, >r f - .�q � s, "AI,r �t r •{` s�- h r �. .�
�{
Y
V. �
�rt.V:: fvi, iry S + f.'� iS' .,, Jy.i•;. }' +w .,y.f „p 4 t 5. .yS�^y rti ,�� " .Y a '� ,:ti a=k.."-e�� 1 .,� r a�'"x x..•'.' #�.4,
a� ,� ✓�. "��f,,_ t rra „�,,+I,tiW ���'.'ht +� .;:4��+� ��� a pC,-� �`x k �� ���' y!�y`^C`4� �� q"`�£` �?5
Y.a._ ;y k r. fi '' -4 .•` A ''f ,fir ,�j._ s"'C `` rr•'• Y- � ^F "A `'k
AFyr.
.�� F; ,4r yf .yri'�j�,,, `���`;s r V '7±,4._ '.4� �„ 'u+l������a�j� y � t-t a �tY 4. ti'+wi j ±.s �"d a ;x�� r x� '�•s
'�?»,. < '} yy{'4,�+-.•. ,y�', �s^:.a "'fFv%-t;,,`P"� w+. r y. �' +� ;��°+'.�•.�'^'•�''' 4 i�z �"�` ���+yy,�r t? a ,�".ar' � Fit,, �..1� a`t
t2'WW.:G2t J-e`' jia.{`•7� St' A«. S ,t ,�'. t
°•'i
-
r—All
.k �...r,r- y, n�Z�'^t�''��€....,!f... +:' mb}'r k� F' zk 1.,.tMA,.;+ � y.'� w '�.� .r .+ ��°; .Y' •1�'a�vx 8 �'�Y se ,�'.1,�2
+;. '� A �Y't'• •yS � :a;� + f J rrF-•' �,�,�'..�L� ,,:�,d s'r, r p„i �. .,1��.5�,
.i •:c '�<w'�'',�.. "�°.�.'� '',t� rf +r�:-� t ° :'.�P '';'}`.'�° `e.,r.�..: .�'1'a�' T7 � �� �`�+�' t, a i �, 3- •;�;
_
"' 4. '`, ,"' .yp �F$�-e �i u.$?'' rr, .t.^ ,) +"f_; �"� e •+ ir.°`'x � fik +` r rlf` ,�tiF;. ,y} r' � 1
.j
:
'�' •5'4 a.'y�,p �t
j
4+,V4. '�M X '�-• b �j� :: '����,-�Y +�ak�Y d � '2
kx, q< •� 'I+'Yg +p., a + f .y' ,4:..x d �:' u" p': �,r: sa ey 'sx
P v>:t. a _'�` ti.. r,Y a >r•:x�. �i^,� - :� � r: _fps x v ;yG- .:'� ,rt;;, 2 r
�` •`+'✓M 7> �.a .,;r, 4e -.>,�- R�'t•�r•'�'� s � :, �• v'i a!l'6 ti r..,t,' `f r ,�iyk: K ,Za, .;3's2:' a�`.x'* 't'r 4 �N` ;�...+;`� '%'�'"�"
,,,,. 'Y3�„ :.'�. .�•`".S4 t.j :.�-•;Y��."� �� +Kk .� �+, .�%., .�*fig �.7'.•.��.- .,� � w^ :` :'!,F1 '"� �.r � -c'.> � '"�'.�s`I e'ti'.?�!'k��R�: �" "�
o-•',y:. � � s t- �.� r a!:,. R '.F "'_tit.+
,..e „4: ,.y.�'<:,%�" �` �#.,, T•^ 'a r�',:v:: °r � + �"��++ r �''»�F w a Kx'�^Cr .`' "'" a '�a�#a�Y "`r 7e
- �.p 7, i_'`r' �i E4+`y a ::.:' 4' ,} a-K .� T+'r -.irA ,'�•+F y � ,,• "S
x'S 5�'Y,y,. i.,, .d r 'k +. �'• �'" k
rR �;` �r� .a, -„j•E �r � �,�.. 'r�'tib'..:. �tp.."�'fi-'' -.;�,� .i � y $ `� 4� .Y �R,v :i~
4 40-
la—
of''4
'a�; ° t a�`��� "`; �`� �,,. ','r'�t Yeti*a t `�.. '� � uY.., ,y ? },+rt�€�c•, .,a, a'v� �»; t��• ��', ,'!pl
,R� #-
z Up
r. 4 •�,�� ,.;f �'S �`°s+�.�y'� .t a�` b�. ,•b Y• K fig, ,ky:r ���'.Y��'��J '�I 3 Asn � �f r� '+:fiy l s4 t
MIS
`�, y ice; r K y�?� � ,,�,., m 4,� * �: S';..g¢fi° �% t s,g, k s,r`F'I'^ r. `>�, '' a.;2 �.a he; �' +� 5�+�9r T"sr�.%r•a
•„`• Q ..k, "."M' •:`� 1�G r 'i r r ,: S �`+ � C,yl ek 'k a '.�` ",fir �,z °"" qp Y' ,fi3F' Wx t. �y +
z f
' �'� rro,s f:'g y '2
'4''Y r �
r v k's`x � .�� e,.r� V'rt,.� � � � ees �*'Y; •-'�. �.ya �� �r�t s eta _.Wil
ftWw� •�`� �".q,�" y"t r. yr krt � " "�" '" c .` �+' ,,.; " ,o .A, '' <r .a
i � �.� Y>�, a. "• yk,r�' A t. Ayktf .7 + �;, r ,. k, �,'`y� ,f ,. ad
Plats $ Subs . -Streets $ Utilities minutes May 15 , 1969 Page 2
The matter of a certificate of survey came up , and the Engineering
Assistant explained that , in this case , where there is plenty of
land between the garage and the line of "A" , and no building permit
can be issued until a road goes through, it may not be necessary for
a certificate of survey inasmuch as , when a building permit is
requested, a certificate of survey would be required . Because of
this , the petitioner could ask Council to waive the requirement .
As far as the legal description of the proposed lot split was concer-
ned, it was felt this would not be complicated.
MOTION by Batterson, seconded by Crowder , that the Plats &
Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend to the
Planning Commission approval of Lot Split #69-14 , Stanley C . Dahlberg ,
of Lot 11 , Block 2 , Spring Valley Addition as shown on the diagram
presented with the request , subject to a 25 foot road easement
across the South portion of the lot , and that the petitioner bring
the suggested legal description to the Planning Commission. Upon a
voice vote , all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L . S. #69-15 , ARTHUR DEYS : Lots 3 thru 5 ,
TYocTc-7 , Hyde Parc A ition.
Mr. Arthur Deys was present.
The lot split involved Lots 3 ,4 , and S . Lot 4 would be split in
half. Mr. Deys explained that , if the lot split went through, the
existing garage would be on Lot 3 and have to be moved. He planned
to build on Lot 3 , and the existing house , in which he now lives ,
would probably be torn down within a few years . Now it is out of line
with the houses in the rest of the block. The side yard is close .
Vice Chairman Myhra suggested, that as a formality, the Chairman
of the Board of Trustees should submit a statement concurring with
the lot split request.
The question was brought up , regarding the existing house ,
that if the house were torn down could the foundation be built on?
The answer was that it could if it met the building code requirements .
Also, no permit could be issued on the new parcel until the garage
was moved.
MOTION by Crowder, seconded by Batterson, that the Plats &
Subdivisions-Streets $ Utilities Subcommittee recommend to the
Planning Commission approval of L . S. #69-15 with the following
contingencies : 1) Filing necessary paper work of obtaining a 5 foot
work and repair easement for the existing house which will remain in
force as long as the present house location requires an easement.
2) Removal of the garage , 201x12 ' , as shown on the sketch, before
that lot can be further developed. 3) That the Director of the
Board of Fridley Church of Christ submit his approval of this lot
split request . Upon a voice vote , all voting aye , the motion
carried unanimously.
Mr . Myhra suggested that Mr . Deys have the description of the
proposed lot split available for the Planning Commission meeting .
Planning Commission Meeting May 22, 1969 Page 5
The Engineering Assistant answered that this was a legal question, as he did not
know if a dedication would be handled in that way. Mr. Moore said if it could
be done in the instrument itself, it would be fine, but if not, a letter of
intent from the City could be satisfactory.
Mr. Jensen asked Mr. Moore if what he is asking for is that he wants a
street and utilities easement so that the ownership would still remain a pert
of the street, but if it were never used for a street, it would still be a
matter of keeping the street, but not being able to construct a building on
it and a reasonable base for a buffer. As far as the petitioner is concerned,
Mr. Moore commented, that area would be included for density purposes.
Mr. Dennis Herbst said that he did not want construction any further North
than the middle of his lot as he would have to give 25 feet and he did not
want the back of the apartments practically in his backyard.
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the rezoning request, ZOA #69-02, in its modified form
from R-1 (single family dwellings) to R-3A (general multiple dwellings) that
part of the North half of Lots 30 and 31 , except the North 125 feet with the
provision that the petitioner provide an easement for street and utility purposes
on the West 25 feet from Onondaga Street to a point 25 feet South of the
Southeast corner of Lot 26 and 'provide no vehicular access be allowed from
the multiple zoning to the street easement, and that such area of this said
easement be allowed in computing density of the multiple dwelling project in
the R-3A. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
4. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-15, ARTHUR DE'YS: Lots 3 to 5, Block 7, Hyde
Park Addition.
Mr. Arthur Deys was present.
The Subcommittee recommended approval of the lot split with provision that
the present garage will be moved across the line so that the garage will be
on the same land as the old house, and that a five foot work and repair
easement be obtained.-
Mr. Deys said the house he is living in at the present time is set way back
on the lot. He would like tobuild his new home this summer.
The Chairman informed Mr. Deys an Ordinance was passed so that a new home
could not be built in front of an existing home on an adjoining lot. In order
for 11r. Deys to build hisknew home on the new lot, he would have to get a
variance from the Board of Appeals. The Board would probably act favorably
because the old home is to be torn down. Mr. Day's was asked to get a
certificate of survey because the Board of Appeals would not act without it.
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Commission
table the lot split request, L.S. #69-15, Arthur Deys, of Lots 3 to 5, Block 7,
Hyde Park Addition, until Mr. Days can provide a certificate of survey. Upoa
a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Deys was asked to notify Darrel Clark if he was able to obtain the
oertifioate of survey in time for the next Planning Commission meeting on
Wednesday, June 11 , 1969.
j
Planning Commission Meeting - June 11, 1969 Page 5
A letter was received by the Chairman from Independent School District No. 16
dated June 6, 1969 maintaining its position of opposing the rezoning request.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission receive
the letter from the Independent School District No. 16, dated June 6, 1969, main-
taining its position of opposing the rezoning request, ZOA #69-08. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission continue
to July 9, 1969 the rezoning request, ZOA #69-08, R. W. Wormsbecker for the NWk of
the NWk except the North 16.6 acres and the SWk of the NWk of Section 2, also the
North 34.68 acres of NEk of NEk of Section 3, to be rezoned from M-2 to R-3. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
6. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-15, ARTHUR DEYS: Lots 3 through 5, Block 7, Hyde
Park Addition.
Mr. Deys brought the certificate of survey. The survey showed a definite problem
regarding the existing house as it was placed on the proposed lot line. Because
of the narrow lots, a setback problem is created which would require a variance.
It was suggested Mr. Deys go before the Board of Appeals and make an application
for a sideyard variance and setback.
MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission refer
the Lot Split Request, L.S. #69-15, Arthur Deys, of Lots 3 through 5, Block 7,
Hyde Park Addition to the Board of Appeals for their opinion. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
It was suggested that Mr. Deys should look into dividing the split by a diago-
nial line being approximately 60 feet on the street side and approximately 57 feet
on the rear lot line of the new lot.
7. REZONING REQUEST: ZOA #69-10, GEORGE BALTHAZOR: Lot 3, Subdivision 10 of Auditor's
Subdivision #94 (North side of Skywood Lane facing Hwy. #694). Rezone from R-1
to Triplex. Set public hearing date.
Mr. and Mrs. George Balthazor were present.
The Commission felt R-3A would cover the triplex request.
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Commission set
the public hearing date of July 9, 1969 at 8:00 o'clock P.M. for the rezoning
request, ZOA #69-10, George Balthazor, of Lot 3, Subdivision #10 of Auditor's
Subdivision #94 to be rezoned from R-1 to R-3A. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye,, the motion carried unanimously.
8. REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO FAMILY DWELLING IN
R-1 ZONING: Lot 3, Block 4, Ostman's Addition by Roger L. Peterson. Referred
by Council at June 2nd meeting.
Mr. and Mrs. Roger Peterson and Mr. Harland Berry (contractor) were present.
Mr. Mittelstadt said, explaining the action of the Board of Appeals, this was
a request for a special use permit to construct a two family dwelling in R-1
zoning with living quarters one on top of each other. The Code indicates that a
double bungalow, by special use permit, goes from the Board of Appeals to the
Planning Commission Meeting - August 6, 1969 e 7
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission recom-
mend approval of the lot split request, L.S. #69-19, North Air Home Association,
J. R. Plemel of the South 150 feet of Lot 18, Brookview Addition, subject to
road easement over South 50 feet. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the
motion carried unanimously.
9. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-22, RICHARD GJEVRE: Splitting a strip of land
approximately 10 feet wide along the Westerly edge of Lot 4, Block 1, Sand-
hurst Addition for additional yard.
The Engineering Assistant explained that the purpose was to acquire
more yard for Lot 5. Mrs. Lori Rakos, owner of Lot 4, signed the petition.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the lot split application #69-22, by Richard Gjevre
which calls for selling a strip of land approximately ten feet wide along
the Westerly edge of Lot 4, Block 1, Sandhurst Addition. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
10. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-15, ARTHUR DEYS: Lots 3 to 5, Block 7, Hyde Park
Addition. Referred to Planning CCoum_fssion Fy Board of Appeals at their meet-
ing of July 30, 1969.
The Chairman explained that the Board of Appeals requested denial of the
lot split until the old house was torn down and then Mr. Deys return for the
lot split.'
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Commission
acknowledge the action of the Board of Appeals and table the lot split request,
L.S. #69-15, Arthur Deys, for Lots 3 to 5, Block 7, Hyde Park Addition until
such time as Mr. Deys comes back. The lot split is to be granted at such time
as the new house is built and the old house torn down and the application be
made for the lot split showing that there are no variances other than those
already granted. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unani-
mously.
11. AMBER OAKS PLAT: To correct platting error, returning "triangle" from Lot 1,
Amber Oaks to Lot 2, Block 2, Worrel's Addition.
The Engineering Assistant explained that in the Worrel's Addition, part
of Outlot 2, a 50 foot strip out to Stinson Boulevard was proposed for future
street and a radius was included with it. However, in the plat of Amber Oaks,
this street was changed which caused this portion to be part of Lot 1. There-
fore, part of Lot 1, Amber Oaks is actually in front of Lot 2, Block 2, Worrel's
Addition. The owner of Lot 2 in Worrel's Addition is willing to accept a deed
for the small triangle which would result in a straight lot line between
adjoining lots.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission
has no objections to splitting off the "triangle" from Lot 1, Amber Oaks,
provided a proper lot split application is signed by the petitioner and the
party it is being sold to, being the property lying south of the south line
of Amber Oaks. Upon a voice vole, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF JULY 16, 1969
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Mittelstadt at 7:36 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mittelstadt, Minish, Harris
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ahonen, O'Bannon
OTHERS PRESENT: Clarence Belisle-Building Inspector
MOTION by Minish to approve the minutes, of July 2, 1969, as written.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
1 . A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.24 TO REDUCE THE SIDEYARD REQUIREMENT, FOR
ASSESSORY BUILDINGS, FROM 24.7 FEET TO 17.5 FEET TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
GARAGE TO BE LOCATED ON LOT 15, BLOCK 1 REARRANGEMENT OF BLOCKS 13, 1 & 1
PLYMOUTH ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 4591-2Z STREET N.E. , FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA.
Mr. Kopecky was present to present his proposal to the Board. Pictures of the
property were shown to the Board.
MOTION by Minish to receive a letter from the ajoining property owner, Mr. John
A. Reno, stating he did not object to the garage being built closer to the
street tha7h his house.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Kopecky explained to the Board that his present home faces 2J Street and the
garage will face 46th Avenue. Mr. Reno' s house also faces 46th Avenue. The
proposed garage will be in line with the applicant' s home but will be ahead of
Mr. Reno' s home. With this setback there will be enough room to park a car out
of the garage without parking in the street.
MOTION by Harris to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Minish. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Minish to grant the request for the following reasons:
1 . The sideyard setback will be in line with the existing home.
2. There will be no traffic hazard by placing the garage at this spot on the
property.
3. There will be room to park a car in the driveway without parking in the street.
4. There were no objections from the adjoining neighbor even though the garage will
be in front of his house.
5. It will be an improvement to the property.
Seconded a q,� Sended by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
t, unanimously.
2. , MR. ARTHUR D4YS, 6o36-2i STREET N.E. FRIDLEY IS REQUESTING THREE VARIANCES OF THE
CITY CODE TO ALLOW HIM TO SPLIT HIS LOTS AND MAKE TWO BUILDABLE SITES. THE VARIANCES
ARE OF SECTION 45.23 TO REDUCE THE SIDEYARD REQUIREMENT ON THE EXISTING HOUSE FRaK
10 FEET TO 2.8 FEET SECTION 45.27 TO REDUCE THE AVERAGE DEPTH OF EXISTING FRONT
YARD SETBACKS FOR PROPOSED HOUSE, FROM 48 FEET TO 35 FEET AND SECTION 45.35 17-TO
PERMIT THE MOVING OF EXISTING GARAGE INTO THE SIDEYARD OF EXISTING DWELLING LOCATED
ON LOTS 3, 4, & 5, BLOCK 7, HYDE rA i,.,�DITION, THE DAME BEING 6036-21 STREET N.E L,
FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA.
S "The Minutes Of The Board Of Appeals Meeting of July 16, 1969 Page 2
Mr. Arthur Deys was present to present his request to the Board.A Survey and.pictures
of the property were shown to the Board. The survey showed that the lot is being
split in an angular manner.
A discussion followed which involved where the present garage could be located,
having the garage torn down all together, having the house, which is presently
there, torn down before the lot split. They also discussed the distance between
the present structure and the proposed structure. As it now stands, there will be
10 feet between them and the Code does call for 15 feet for fire control.
The Board did recommend to the applicant that he should split his lots into 60 foot
lots instead of in the angular manner.
MOTION by Minish to table the request until July 30, 1969 to allow the applicant
to bring in a preliminary sketch showing how the proposed home is to be positioned
on the lot. This will show the Board a truer picture of the exact measurements
between structures.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Mittelstadt at 8:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
511137 4JW
O
MARY HINIZ
Secretary
THE �r; +;?'SES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS ME PING OF JULY 3O,
THE
the meeting was called to order by Chairman Mittelstadt at 7:34 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mittelstadt, Minish, Harris
MEMBERS ABSENT: O'Bannon, Ahonen
OTHERS PRESENT: Hank Muhich-BuildinC.
-& Official
MOTION by Minish to approve the minutes of the July 16, 1969 meeting as written.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
{%b unanimously.
-21 IDLEY IS REQUESTING THREE VARIANCES OF
1. MR. ARTHUR DEYS, 6�6 2 STREET N.E. , FR Q
THE CITY CODE TO ALLOW HIM TO SPLIT HIS LOTS AND MAKE TWO BUILDABLE SITES. THE
VARIANCES ARE OF SECTION 45.23 TO REDUCE THE SIDEYARD REQUIREMENT ON THE EXISTING_
HOUSE FROM 10 FEET TO 2.8 FEET, SECTION 45.2.7 TO REDUCE THE AVERAGE DEPTH OF
EXISTING FRONT YARD SETBACKS FOR THE PROPOSED HOUSE FROM 48 FEET TO 35 FEET
AND SECTION 45.35 1 TO PERMIT THE MOVING OF EXISTING GARAGE INTO THE SIDEYARD
OF EXISTING DWELLING LOCATED ON LOTS 3, 4 & 5, BLOCK 7, HYDE PARK ADDITION, THE
SAME BEING 6036-2 STREET N.E. , FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA.
Chairman Mittelstadt continued the public hearing from the July 16, 1969 meeting.
This item was tabled from the July 16, 1969 meeting to allow the applicant time
to bring, before the Board, a preliminary sketch , drawn up by his contractor,
showing the position of the proposed home on the lot. The Board requested this
sketch to find out the exact measurements between structures to determine whether
there could be room for adequate fire control. The sketch showed there will be
24 feet between structures and 18 feet between the garage and the living quarters
of the home. This is above our minimum code requirements. The new garage will
be 5 feet from the new lot line of the proposed lot split and the buildings as
drawn on the sketch would allow the applicant to diVicle his lot into two 60 foot
frontage lots instead of the angular split he first proposed.
MOTION by Minish to clue -le public hearing.
Secon� ed by Harris. Upor a vo:;.ce vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Minish to:
1. Deny var]'.ance No. 1 , of Section 45.23, and variance No. 3, of Section 45.35,
as they are now superfluous as a result of the relocation of the proposed
house o-.-, the lot.
2. Approve variance No. 2, of Section 45.27, to reduce the average depth of
existing front yard setbacks for proposed house from 48 feet to 30 feet
instead of proposed 35 f�e et.
3. Recommend to the Planning Commission to Deny the lot ---plit (L.S� #69-15)
before' them at the present time.
4. Also recommend to the Planning Commission the following order of events;
a. Applicant to renl-ve, existing garage.
b. Applicant to be allowed i;o build his proposed home on the lot as it is
now drawn on sketch submitted to the Board.
c. Applicant to tear down existing home as soon as possible after proposed
home is built.
d. Applicant to reapply for a lot split to split his lot into 2-60 foot
fxQt� age lR r
Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of July30, 196 page 2
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
2. A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF SECTION 45.27 TO VARY THE FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT
ON- THE AVERAGE DEPTHS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS FROM 37 FEET TO 45 FEET AND SECTION
45.23 TO REDUCE THE SIDEYARD REQUIREMENT FROM 10 FEET TO 5 FEET TO PERMIT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING TO BE LOCATED ON LOT 4, BLOCK 1 MOORE LAKE HILLS
ADDITION THE SAME BEING 6o56 WOODY LANE N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA. MREQUFST BY
OLIVER ERICKSON 1315 HILLCREST DRIVE N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 21.
Mr. Erickson was present to present his request. He brought with him a survey of
Lot 4 showing the layout of the house on the lot. The structures on either
adjacent side lot were also shown on the survey for the purpose of denoting how
many feet there would be between the proposed structure and the existing structures.
Mr. Erickson explained that there is a tremendous bank on the back of this lot
and it would require removing a lot of dirt to build back farther on the lot.
To build on the lot as it is now requires the two variances. Without the
variances the lot would be unbuildable.
MOTION by Minish to receive a survey with three property owners signatures on
it stating they know about but do not object to the requested variances. The
signatures are: Ben Douglas, 6054 Woody Lane, T.G. Schnagel, 6053 Central and
Richard Inlow, 6057 Central Avenue.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried.
unanimously.
MOTION by Harris to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Minish. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Harris to approve the request for the following reasons:
1 . The front yard setback is compatible with the adjacent structures.
2. The building is well situated on the lot to allow a 5 foot sideyard setback.
The structure does abut a drainage and utility easement, which is a ten foot
easement, so there should be no problem with distance between this structure
and any future structures that may be built by the adjacent property cwuer.
3. In order for the applicant to build on this lot he does need the variances.
This lot would be unbuildable without them.
4. The applicant also maintains the 15 feet between his structure and the structure
on the South.
Seconded by Minish. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
3. A RE9UEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.26 TO REDUCE THE FRONT Y Z SgL=g
RECUIREMENT FROM 35 FEET TO 30 FEET. ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF P1_3OPoSEp BUILDING
T0 PEBMT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 7 UNIT APARTMENT ON PARCEL 1500 TiRTTSEII ATmTTO "s'
SUBDIVISION NO 77, THE SAME BEING 20-77TH WAY X.E. ,
BY MR.. ED Mg-R. 361-81ST AVENUE N_E_ _ FRTTjja �+enme 55d32.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 18, 1969 PAGE 7
8. LOT SPLIT RE UEST: L.S. #69-22, RICHARD GJEVRE: Splitting a strip of
land approximately 10 feet wide along the westerly edge of Lot 4, Block 1,
Sandhurst Addition for additional yard.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to concur with the Planning Commission recommendation
and approve Lot Split Request L.S. #69-22. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
9. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-15, ARTHUR DEYS: Lots 3 to 5, Block 7,
/ Hyde Park Addition. Referred to Planning Commission by Board of Appeals
at their meeting of July 30, 1969.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to concur with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and approve Lot Split Request L. S. #69-15. Seconded by Councilman
Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried.
10. AMBER OAKS PLAT: To correct platting error, returning "triangle" from
Lot 1, Amber Oaks to Lot 2, Block 2, Worrel's Addition.
The City Engineer pointed out the triangle on the map that is to be corrected.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to concur with the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and approve the correction to Amber Oaks Plat. Seconded
by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the balance of the Planning Commission
Minutes of August 6, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice
vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
Councilman Liebl asked about the Multiple Dwelling Study the Planning Com-
mission is working on. The City Engineer said that -they were just waiting
for some additional information from the schools.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS - DESIGN CONTROL MEETING OF
AUGUST 7, 1969:
1. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN INDUSTRIAL SPECULATIVE
BUILDING TO BE LOCATED ON LOTS 11, 12, 13, 14 & 15, BLOCK 2, ONAWAY
ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 7800 ELM STREET N.E. , FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA.
(REQUEST BY ALLAN ZEIS, 225 94TH AVENUE N.W. , COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA) :
The City Engineer reviewed the stipulations recommended by the Subcommittee.
He said that they will need quite a bit of parking, so the building has been
moved further north which will be allowing parking closer to the roadway. He
recommended they make approval subject to all parking being on private property.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to concur with the Committee and approve the re-
quest subject to the stipulations listed with the exception that all parking be on
private property and no street parking be allowed. Seconded by Councilman Liebl.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried.
2. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONIC BUILDING
FOR ELECTRAMATIC INC. TO BE LOCATED ON LOT 26, BLOCK 2, COMMERCE PARK, THE
SAME BEING 7521 COMMERCE LANE N.E. , FRIDLEY# NTTTN. UEST BY VANMAN CON-
STRUCTION CO. , INC. 258 HUMBOLDT AVE. N. , MINNEAPOLIS, MiNN. 554Q5) :
REGULAR.COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 18, 1969 PAGE 8
The petitioner showed the Council the plans and pointed out the lot in Commerce
Park that it will be located on. He said that there will be parking space
for 28 cars and the building will be 13,375 square feet. He said he was
surprised at the required concrete curb as it does nothing for them except
add cost, and asked if this was a standard requirement. The City Engineer told
him it was.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to concur with the recommendation of the Building
Standards - Design Control Subcommittee and approve the request subject to
their stipulations. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, there
being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the remainder of the Building Standards
Design Control Subcommittee Minutes of August 7, 1969. Seconded by Councilman
Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1969:
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to receive the Minutes of the Board of Appeals
Meeting of August 13, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote,
there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING
OF AUGUST 7, 1969:
Councilman Liebl asked the Acting City Attorney if he thought the expenditure
for the literature about split liquor was legal as it was using taxpayer's
money for a controversial issue. Mr. Gibbs said that the City Attorney had
approved it and he had agreed with him. He said he had not seen the brochure
but their position would be the Commission could expend funds of this type as
long as the brochure was informational as opposed to taking a position for
or against.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to receive the Minutes of the Fridley Industrial
Development Commission Meeting of August 7, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Liebl.
Upon a voice vote, Councilman Liebl abstaining, there being no nays, the motion
carried.
Councilman Liebl said he would like to ask for an opinion in writing from the
City Attorney. He said that since he had been on the Council they had never
had such an issue, and he had received phone calls from people regarding the
brochure and some of them were mad. Mr. Gibbs said they would be happy to do
this, and he felt that it was in the nature of other literature the City had
put out.
PETITION #23-1969 - TO OPEN AND GRADE ALLEY BETWEEN MAIN AND SECOND STREET FROM
4560 UP TO AND INCLUDING 4544 2ND STREET NORTHEAST: (Received by Council June
16, 1969)
now wide enough to be opened,Mayor Kirkham asked if this alley was e e oug p , and if the
gentleman understood that the alley could not be plowed in the winter. The
City Manager said that Mr. Powers was willing to agree to that, he would just
like to have it opened up to his property. The City Engineer said that this
was a platted alley, but the City does not open or maintain these alleys as
normal policy. The.City Manager s4�4 there are no fengg§ obstructing the way,
just two utility poles that will have to be moven. H sl asted that if it is
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1, 1972 PAGE 16
RECEIVING REPORT ON REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENT OF WELLS #5 AND #6 AND CONSIDERATION
OF RESOLUTION #58-1972 AUTHORIZING CALLING FOR BIDSs
MOTION by Councilman Breider to adopt Resolution #58-1972. Seconded by
Councilman Mittelstadt. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared
the motion carried unanimously.
[Henriksen.
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR LOT SPLIT FOR SPLITTING LATS 3& 4, 51 R1= 71
DE PARK ADDITION INTO TWO LATS (LS #69-15) . REQUEST BY LEIF HENRIKSNNs
uncilman Mittelstadt noted that Mr. Henriksen had appeared before the Board
Appeals in 1969 and had been asked to remove his garage and tear down the
use. Had this request been complied with? The City Engineer replied that
had been done.
TION by Councilman Mittelstadt to approve the Lot Split request by Leif
Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor
ebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING INFORMATION REGARDING MERITORIOUS ACHIEVEMENT AWAMtD IN TRAFFIC
SAFETY ENGINEERING AND AUTHORIZING A PERSON TO ACCEPT THE AWARD AT THE BAN-
The City Nng}neer commented that this award proves that we are doing something
in the field of traffic safety and making progress.
JIMON by Councilman Mittelstadt to receive the information and authoaisze
a member of the Engineering Staff to accept the award at the banquet. Seconded
by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the
motion carried unanimously.
i
CLAIMS:
MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve payment of General Claims #28258 through
#28356 and Liquor Claims #6603 through #6638. Seconded by Councilman Mittelstadt.
Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
LICENSESs
DW of ticenee By Approved By Fee
USED CAR IAT Smitt's Motors
5649 University Ave.
Wallace Schmedeke Building Insp. $50.00
LIVESTOCK Audrey Theilmann
1540 Rice Creek Rd.
Audrey Theilmann Building Insp. 26.00
ON SALE BEER Howard Johnson .
5277 Central Ave. Police
Howard Johnson Co. Health Insp. 120,00
'u
ABGULAR COUNCIL MUTING OF MAY 1, 1972 . PAGE 15
NOTION by Councilman Braider to adopt Resolution 454-1972. Seconded by
Councilman Mittelstadt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl
declared the motion carried unanimously.
R680LUTION 455-1972 - DIRECTING THE SALE UM PURCHASE OF TEMPORARY IMPRONE-
JWT BONDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LANS OF 1957, CHAPTER 385: (SS&SW 4102)
NOTION by Councilman Braider to adopt Resolution 455-1972. Seconded by
Councilman Mittelstadt. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared
the motion carried unanimously.
SMSOLUTION 456-1972 - DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY IMPFOVEMENT BONDS
INAACCOJQX%NCE WITH LAWS OF 1957, CHAPTER 385: (ST. 1971-1, St. 1971-2 and
St. 1971-4)
NOTION
Councilman Braider to t Resolution 456-1972. Seconded b
by �p Y
Councilman Mittelstadt. ULxm a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared
the motion carried unanimously.
`RESOLUTION 457-1972 - DIRECTING THE SALE AND SSE OF TENPORARY nOTaVEMENT
BONDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAMS OF 1957, CHAPTER 385: (St. 1971-1, St. 1971-2
sad St. 1971-4)
NOTION by Councilman Braider to adopt Resolution 457-1972. Seconded by
Councilman Mittelstadt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl
declared the motion carried unanimously.
JMQU ZST POR SEWER HOOD BY tat. QUAM: (6895 tbaanel Road N.E.)
abs City Engineer explained that this line was too shallow when it was laid,
These people were assessed. We had a similar case on East River Road and the
Council at that time authorised an expenditure for sewage ejector pumps for the
home.
Mayor Liebl commented that he felt this Mas only a temporary solution and we
needed a permanent one. The saner was faultily installed in the first place
and we are asking for problems installing an ejector pog in each home. City
money should be spent on a permanent volution.
Councilman Utter asked what thet of a new lift station would be, and the
City Engineer said the cost could go as such as $20,000. The coat _for the
six sewer ejector pumps would be from $9,000 to $11,000. We would then get a
waiver from fie property owners saying the City was not responsible for any
future problems. The City would be investing 3 to a times as much money as
tbow people were assessed.
Mayor Liebl asked if this would not be wasting money on a temporary solution,
She City Engineer answered that'the ejector pumps would be a move in the
direction of a permanent solution..
NOTION by Councilman Braider to table this item until the Meeting of May 9s
1972 to enable the City Enginegr to givo the Council a cost comparison of the
two solutions. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all ayesp
Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.