LS71-01 Form #5-68 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
CITY OF FRIDLEY
FOR CITY USE ONLY
Applicant's Name
APPLICANT: C�,I��:��`, kA �rAiX
ADDRESS. !� l� �,,VZ9FA,A AL)( Lot Split �
F�ft -odl
Street City Zip Code Date Filed;TELEPHONE # ��,- 13�q Fee:$Home Business Council Action:DIL%
PROPERTY OWNER(S) ni,,L REMARKS:_
� �Zrd
r-4
w 3 0
o ,c
�L�' 0° ADDRESS(ES)
,0m'i0 Street City Zip Code
°o„ a
+' 00 0 Street City Zip Code
4-4
'�
0 r-q TELEPHONE #(S)_
� Id °' p,
m Home Business
M O m
Property Location on Street
or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) S
w
U
~' Legal Description of Property:
Lz iaS? f�� p� 1-6—j 31 A0 r-> TORS T0(' >iJlSidA) g Z /JnUKa C.T\t
Reason for Lot Split
IMA\4 S conk C D A^i W -4,/`T )--o ; 01 L rZ, A A-),5;7..,Cl/t /46J Ste,
r aye /iCC U /)P( i SNS n
Total Area of Property Ib 4y sq. ft. Present Zoning Class f catipn
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this application are true and
correct.
DATE: -i., -71 SIGNATURE
BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Se* reverse side for additional imtruilis,00
PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration
Reaarkes
3
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE
1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley)
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of $15.00 for each original lot being split.
3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Oommittee meets once a
month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of
the Subcommittee.
4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels
along with the new pare—.e ,,roat- ! w. *h al. existing strnct,ures tied in.
5. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department
for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the
second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant
with minutes of the Planning Commission.
6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday
of the month.
7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed b th Cit h
and r Yy e y The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
9• When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied,. no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
it ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
Quit Claim Deed. FoYllt NO. 2$- Miller-Davis Co.,Minneapolis,Minn.
lndividual to Corporation. Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks(19M.___
February 71
� Y �► t���irC, .Made thi.............................................dayy off.....................................................�. , 19 ..........,
between..........................CHARLES R. LA BEAUX? husband and PATRICIA ANN LA BEAUX, wide i
........... ................................................................................................................... .....................
. 1
Minnesota
of the County of....................A .oka.................................................and State of..................... ......................................................................
parties.. of the first part, and.................CITY OF FRIDLEY
.....................................................................................................................................................
municipal:........................................:.......................................................................................................:..............................................................................,
Minnesota
alcorporation under the laws of the State of................................................................................., party of the second part,-
witteaetb, That the said part..igs. of the first part, in consideration of the sum of
O.ne..and...No./..1.00....(.$.1..0.0)....and...other...V a l 1j.es..... .eceived--.-,-.___-___-_-- ._�_.7'._.DOLL.4RS,
to.......p.ar.tle.s...............................in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is
hereby acknowledged, do............ hereby Grant, Bargain, Quitclaim, and Convey unto the said party of
the second part, its successors and assigns, Forever, all the tract...... or parcel...... of land lying and being
in the County of....................Anoka................................................and State of .Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit: {{
je
i
Drainage and utility easements described as follows : !�
1
1) The North 6 feet of the South Half of the East Half i
of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92
2) The South 6 feet of the North Half of the East Half
of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92
i
I
I
iA street and utility easement described as follows:
i�
I The South 30 feet of the East Half of Lot 34, i
Auditor's Subdivision No. 92
I ,
1
All lying in Section 24, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley,
County of Anoka, State of riinnesota
� i
31tt Teztimonp Wbered, The said parti.�s... of the first part ha.Ye..... hereunto set....their
hands... the day and year f-rst abore zaritten.
In presence of
� '..... .............. :•� ...................... '
C'
::..: . �.., ...�....c...:.. ..... �.... ................................................................ .............................................
' CHAS. R. LA BEAUX: L.S. #71-01
sr
[ondFlcnniny � 68r5-Hi�hnvy,*GS ,VE.
'� Minrreo rrs3Z,
[and Surveying F
S ". � C; �}� XI
. � � dlinncsofo
Soils Tisfrnq �. I E.�""f:Z I 10 1 i I C,.
SUlbef 4.1"000
Civil Fr,tfuniupol
En9ineeriny -- En9i1-7CUS Surtleyars
vAr- 0—J,A
r r .
a
4
► _ J
� v` 69
rS,�tort• 44 t1"
:rj
W �C?TN:1T= GCc SE # ��►���+�4t
CIE
M
d' r
,n STC_C -{
coC.r:pct tom'
STQ cc 4 V-ri%.ITY
3a. 'Ko t +hewn j
z-
A` t �f_ pF- i _ lr r� _�G+ 1L'_ ; r ►Et. ;�.,� � ��r� i�,�_ �
`. _ —
1 L n Atn:0L!1. �ovLP-: rY i
1. �j� � +/ti ;S Q arre,r/Y I"SF'17 ur; :7 C�rG S r ycC/ y � �'174�7/!PS M 1170 Q�4i! r�CSCIYL�d'
!F -e,l c_ " 6it r
[[JJ 1.� y , L, _ ► t ,r, ��n pis s.•rvcr'�ty � N•,1" _ J
l:1rr ev%Y,-J.. Fh! .C' / C ."I:Cl:rf �.♦ .'�,�
A�i� ► A.O.OSUBU h,',N' Ef,,'Cj.E`[:,'NG MIC.
J
by;neerS fi' Svr►euo;s�f / ,
ti
ri , � � .M, SA r'�i��
s^ (tloJ $ 1 :t5`' w Z
f•C �� f" � , , P. �— IG
to
\ hp � ra i�v7f fJ ♦'. -_ i � 11 i./;.' T3 __ /JS s. � K � `
o `:S- ..,o• - - fi G3._j_ :.""'•a� �' . _ �_.. : JU f.OT/i,•�,-.n yea �..��
FH —AVS. - ,. �.• �� ,.
K p'
(700f i st ns 7T at AV•T � �f'�) � �lt��
10
,'C onrs/�ce Sa J.•-Psr' 1
• f Z� fi:_/cue �1 -i�.`Itr F--
/x. VAN
LEAVES '
• (720) 8 16
Qfll� MILL 'h
/1 C ♦ _
H++ � -
DITlOI��, —
�:.;r..Ga� �� n-/�-Lit �.� f �LJ D• � �� -.
,. -�Iv
• I • O1{9J. �' �//t� r�'t ( ` � iJcim.A�r� , G1aa' Eircr C. �1.�
7.
I (asp) �- ,.,+..,•►�a. ,.
22 aj 2324 2
N
5
�isfiit/AFz.M _ //HtO� .� - T! n„ •i .J
�}Q,
• x!190. j[-] •e C�/'�
)<
1 Y: /Esi AR to .:.r s {
CO) AV
37 7J
-Yd"-Air '`.�..
gt
— .—j.:_d¢?......
_,.y `.
1 W ti
3S 32 3`4 Jo 28 24 y
• A r;�•../� z r%fes'
I 'a -_ .f. a � 1C.•;:�roe- � - --
38
42
w a ti
40
Ly/fL
ti; 39
CHAS. LA BEAUX. L.S. #71-01 Q
-� Split E of L. 34, A.S. ��92 in half. (zo3o>
J Ora
47
a a 48_
!2o6Q!
! O •', `
~ ,
• _ �' 233 0,'
f , �1�1 `� i.
is I �
5 0
PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS
STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING 7:00 P.M. JANUARY 20, 1971 PAGE 1
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 P.M. by Chairman Schmedeke.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Schmedeke, Crowder, Engdahl, Pierce, Meissner
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Darrel Clark, Engineering Assistant
1. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #71-02, THOMAS R. SWANSON: Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block
5, City View Addition. To make two 60 foot lots out of three 40 foot lots.
Mr. Swanson was present.
Chairman Schmedeke explained that there are quite a few platted areas in
Fridley with- lots only- 40 feet wide, and this is one of them. The new Ordinance
requires 75 foot lots Eut provisions were made to accept 60 foot lots. By com-
bining three 40 foot lots and splitting them in half, the petitioner gets two
60 foot building sites. This procedure has been done frequently. Across the
street from these lots are a number of nice homes although they are not real
expensive ones.
Mr. Swanson stated he will he the builder of the homes.
The Engineering Assistant said there were homes on either side of these
three lots so that there is no more land available. He continued that normal
lots in Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville and Hyde Park Addition are 40
foot lots. Mr. Swanson is putting in garages for both houses, and this is a
requirement of the Ordinance now. The exit will be on 57th Place.
In answer to the question of legal description for the new split, the
Engineering Assistant said it would be Lots 3 and 4, except the East Half of
Lot 4, Block 5, City View Addition. The other lot would be East Half of Lot 4
and all of Lot 5, Block 5, City View.
MOTION by Crowder, seconded by Meissner, that the Plats & Subdivisions-
Streets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend approval to the Planning Commission
of the Lot Split Request, L.S. #71-02, by Thomas R. Swanson for Lots 3, 4 and
5, Block 5, City View Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #71-01, CHARLES R. LA BEAUX: To split off the
S11 of E;j of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision #92.
Mr. La. Beaux was present and said that the lot he owned was essentially
twice as deep as necessary. He had been transferred and expects to come back
and build on the South half of the lot trusting that access to that area
would, some day, be possible. Since they like the location, they would like
to hold that piece of ground.
Plats & Subdivisions-
Streets & Utilities Subcommittee Meeting- January 20, 1971 Page 2
Chairman Schmedeke commented that a 30 foot easement has been given by
the two lets on the South half of Lot 35, which adjoins Mr. La Beaux's property
on the East, and asked if he were prepared to give the same. Mr. La Beaux said
he was. Chairman Schmedeke also stated that the•City has acquired Lots 40, 41
and 42 which are South of Lot 34, for park purposes and there is a possibility
the City will want an access in that area.
The Engineering Assistant said there is the possibility .there might be
five building sites, at least they have the area, and access will be needed
from Stinson Boulevard. He added that situations, such as this lot split re-
quest, have come up before. When the improvements were put in, the cost of
street, sewer and water was compiled, the assessments were too costly. The
owners would let the lots go tax forfeit. In this instance, should that happen,
the City would not be adverse to acquiring the lots because they are adjacent
to a park.
The lot to the West (the West half of Lot 34) drops off quite severely
at the West property line and is swampy. It would require a lot of fill.
The Park Department has not had the land long enough to develop a plan for it.
It is possible the City would want access on Lot 42. The park land includes
Lots 40, 41 , 42, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51 and 52, and about half were given by
Viewcon, Inc. and the other half, tax forfeit.
Going back to Lot 34, the square footage for the South half was approxi-
mately 10,988 square feet.
Mr. Crowder asked if the split were granted, could the S� be built upon.
Darrel Clark replied that the lot could be red tagged until water, sewer and
a street would go in. Mr. La Beaux said he understood that he couldn't build
until the street was in. Darrel Clark said water and sewer were on Stinson
Boulevard. It was noted the whole area is zoned R-1. The description of the
proposed lot would be simple: the S� of the Ell, except the South 30 feet, of
Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92.
MOTION by Meissner, seconded by Pierce, that the Plats & Subdivisions-
Streets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend approval to the Planning Commission
of the Lot Split Request, L.S. #71-01, by Charles R. La Beaux, to split off
the S� of the E;� of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92, subject to a 30 foot
street easement off the South, and that the lot be red tagged until such time
it can be serviced by sewer, water and street. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, Chairman Schmedeke adjourned the meeting
at 7:30 P.M.
Respectfu�l� submitted
Hazel O'Brian
Recording Secretary
planning Commission Meeting - January 20, 1771 Page 8
1
�. 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #71-01, CHARLES R. LA BEAUX: To split off the
Sli of the Eli of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision #92.
Mr. La Beaux was present.
Mr. Schmedeke explained that this request was before the Plats & Subdivisions
Streets & Utilities Subcommittee earlier in the evening. Mr. La Beaux. is attempt-
ing to sell the house on the front part of the lot. The lots to the South,
Lots 40, 41, 42, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51 and 52 have been acquired by the City
for park purposes and the possibility is that the City will want a street access
h proposed ark. Mr. La Beaux has agreed to give a
ern edge of the he north P P
at t g P
30 foot easement on the South end of his property which will also line up with
a similar easement on Lot 35. The City would be asked to put a red tag on the
South Half of the lot until such date that street, sewer and water are put in
before Mr. La Beaux can build. The recommendation to the Planning Commission
was approval.
The Engineering Assistant added that some people worry about this sort of
property going tax forfeit. In this case, with a park adjacent, if this property
or adjacent property were to go tax forfeit, the City would take the property
to extend the park boundary on the North. If it should go tax forfeit, it
would not be a piece of ground lying unused.
BOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Schmedeke, that the Planning Commission recom-
mend approval of Lot Split #71-01, by Charles R. La Beaux to split off the South
Half of the East Half of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision #92 with the stipulation
of the dedication of the Southerly 30 feet of Lot 34 for street purposes, and
that no building permit be granted until the lot can be serviced by sewer,
water and street. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. X671-02, THOMAS R. SWANSON: Lots 3, 4 and 5,
Block 5, City View Addition. To make two 60 foot lots from three 40 foot
lots.
Mr. Swanson was present.
Mr. Schmedeke explained that this item was also presented to the Plats &
Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee earlier this evening. This is
one of the normal things that seems to be happening in Fridley -- taking three
forty foot lots and making two 60 foot lots. The Subcommittee approved this
type of request a number of times in the past and they approved this one, too.
He was certain the homes Mr. Swanson would build would be compatible in this
area, and probably more so. The homes will be facing 57th Place and will be
seen from the front and back as the backyard would abut 57th Avenue.
Mr. Swanson said the houses would be ramblers and he would use Masonite.
Darrel Clark added that there were homes on either side of these lots,
so that there is no more land available.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 0^ FEBRUARY 1, 1971 PAGE 11
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to approve the request for a building permit subject
to the agreement that the rent'of the garage must be included .in the rent for
the unit. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, -all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham decla=ed the motion carried unanime- ily.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1971:
The City Engineer r-ported that the first item: A rezoning request by Richland
Inc. has been continued by the Planning Commission.
LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #71-01, CHARLES LA_BEAVX: To split off the A
of the E� of Lot 34, Auditor's Stibdivision #92.
The City Engineer said that this lot split is for an area just south of Gardena
Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended approval subject to Mr. LaBeaux
granting a 30 foot road easement and with the understanding that the south lot
cannot be built upon until it is serviced with water, sewer and street.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve Lot Split #71-01, -by Charles LaBeaux
to split off the south half of the east half of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision #92
with the stipulation of the dedication of the southerly- 30-feet of Lot 34 for
street purposes, and that no building permit be granted until the lot can be
serviced by sewer, water and ..street. Seconded by Councilman J3reider. Upon a
Voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried
unanimously.
LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S.#71-02, THOMAS R, SWANSON: Lots 3, 4, and 5,
Block 5, City. View Addition. To make two 60 foot lots from three 40 foot
lots.
The City Engineer explained that this split is to make three 40 foot lots into
two. It is located between 57th Avenue and 57th Place, showing the location
on the screen. There are buildings on both sides of these lots. He will
provide attached garages and the Planning Commission recommended approval.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to approve the Lot-Split #71-02 by Thomas
Swanson to split Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 5, City View Addition in order to make
two 60 foot lots out of three 40 foot lots. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw.
Councilman Harris said that according to the Ordinance, to make a split of
lots less than 75' there will have to be an attached garage. The City Engineer
said that there was and showed the plans.
MOTION AMENDED by Councilman Harris that due to problems in the general area,
that the Council review the plans for these lots before the building permit is
issued. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the amend-nent carried.
THE VOTE upon the motion, being a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried unanimously.
NOTE: This item was again discussed at the end of the Meeting.
. . _ _
REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 17, 1978 Page -7 77
Bituminous Roadways Carlson La Vine Warren Excavating
2825 Cedar Ave. So. 2831 Aldrich Ave. So. 14525 Woodhill Terr.
Mols., MN - 55407 Mpls., MN 55408 Minnetonka, MN
BID BOND 5% Bid Bond - St. 5% Bid Bond - Fidelity 5% Bid Bond -
Paul Fire & Marine & Deposit Co. of Universal Surety
Company Maryland Co.
TOTAL BID $15,450.28 $16,888.49 $14,745.61
i SPRINGBROOK
PARK
` ( I
TOTAL BID $11,222.66 $11,500.44 $11,061.91
f FLANERY PARK
1
I TOTAL BID
CRAIG PARK $10,761.86 $11,618.26 $11,215.70
TOTAL BID $18,995.00 $18,545.11 $17,923.36
WOODCREST
TOTAL BID
BENJAMIN-
BRIARDALE $24,319.02 $24,996.57 $24,643.41
GRAND $80,748.82 $83,548.87 $79,829.99
li TOTAL
COMMENTS RECEIVED at
11:06 a.m.
i
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to instruct the administration to proceed
with negotiations with the current street contractor for the tennis court
i project. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBLE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR PARK PURPOSES:
Dr. Boudreau, Director of Parks and Recreation, introduced Mr. Charles
Labeaux who appeared before the Council regarding the possibility of
the City acquiring the back half of his property for park purposes.
Mr. LaBeaux stated 12 years ago he bought a piece of land as an investment,
based on the assurances of the City that a street would go in and make
the back half of his land buildable. He stated he finds now the City
has decided not to put in a street which, in effect, landlocks him and
I does away with the investment value of the land. He felt this wasn't
right and would like to see a street go in.
He stated, in talking with Dr. Boudreau, there is the possibility the
park people would like to acquire his land, as they have acquired the
(( two lots to the East of his property, for park purposes. He felt either
possibility was worth talking about.
Mr. Sobiech stated the lot split referred to by Mr. Labeaux was approved
( by the Council in 1971 with certain stipulations and an easement was
acquired in conjunction with the lot split of Mr. Labeaux's property, as
well as the two properties to the East of Mr. Labeaux, which have since
been acquired for park purposes.
Councilman Barnette questioned the purpose of obtaining the easements, if
no street was going to be put in.
i
i i
79 REGULAR MEETING Of APRIL 17, 1978 PAGE 8 _I
Mayor Nee asked if the Council ever adopted a street plan for this area.
Mr. Sobiech stated the lots were large enough for two buildable sites,
therefore, the easements were required in the event they were developed,
there would be access. He stated there was no overall plan which indicated
there eventually would be a street in this area.
Mr. Labeaux felt the corridor off of Stinson was clearly left vacant for
a street.
Councilman Schneider asked if Mr. Labeaux's property was presently a
single parcel of land, and if there ever was a commitment on the City's
part that there would be access.
Mr. Labeaux stated he petitioned the City to split the back part off when '
he thought he would be transferred from this area. He stated this was
agreeable with the City, but before it was to become a reality, he was
not tranferred and didn't follow up on it.
Mr. Sobiech stated Mr. Labeaux's property is now a single parcel. He had
approval from the City Council for the lot split, but it hasn't been
recorded.
Mr. Sobiech also pointed out, before there could be any street improvement,
a petition is necessary from the property owners and a public hearing must
be held.
He stated, since this lot split was approved, there has been a change of
philosophy regarding naturalist programs.
Mr. Sobiech stated the City could vacate the easement to clearly show
the Council's intentions, if they so desired.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated even if there was a dedicated right-of-
way all the way to Stinson, the Council still has the discretion on
whether or not to construct the street. He felt, in this particular
situation, there is not right-of-way all the way to Stinson so before
a street is constructed, additional right-of-way would have to have been I
acquired. Also, if the Council was thinking of putting in streets, sewer
and water obviously would have to be assessed against benefitted properties.
He pointed out, before any street plan could be considered, the Council
would have to determine how it would affect certain properties and how
those properties would benefit from the improvement.
Mr. Herrick stated another possibility which exists is for the Council to
revoke the authority to split the lot.
Councilman Barnette stated Mr. Labeaux is apparently interested in selling
the property and felt negotiations should be opened regarding the possibility
of acquiring Mr. Labeaux's property.
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to authorize the City staff to open negotiations
with Mr. Labeaux to acquire the back half of his property for park purposes.
Seconded by Councilman Hamernik.
Councilman Schneider questioned if the City has a definite need for this land.
He stated he realizes Mr. Labeaux's position and knows he would like to realize
the potential of his investment.
I
Dr. Boudreau stated it would depend on the price of the land, however, he
felt it would be beneficial as part of the natural resource area.
Mayor Nee felt this should be looked at from the point of usefulness of
the property for the park system. He clarified that the motion doesn't
entail acquisition, but only authorizes staff to negotiate with Mr. Lebeaux
regarding the price for the property.
if
1'
REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 17, 1978 PAGE 9 79
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF EXECUTION OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH NEW BRIGHTON
PERTAINING TO STORM SEWER OUTFALL IN INNSBRUCK NORTH AREA:
Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated this agreement would permit i
the construction of the remaining outfall for Innsbruck North drainage
system. He stated this outfall drains the final pond in Fridley on the
boundary line between Fridley and New Brighton. He explained the plan
was previously approved with the Innsbruck North development, but the
outfall piping was not previously constructed in anticipation of future
development and further outfall construction in New Brighton. He stated
development in New Brighton has now occurred to this point.
Mr. Sobiech stated a public hearing for the improvement was held under
Improvement Project 113 and there are pending assessments for storm sewer
outfall. He explained that, due to Fridley's ponding, the City does not
affect the capacity of the drainage system in New Brighton, and the only
cost sharing the City should be involved in is the outfall from the Fridley
ponds to the New Brighton storm sewer system.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize execution of the joint powers
agreement with New Brighton. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 35-1978 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENTS FOR BIDS: SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 125:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 35-1978. Seconded
by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 32-1978 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMRPOVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1978-2,
ADDENDUM #1:
f[ This resolution involves the construction of sidewalks on the East side of
7th Street form 61st to 63rd.
I
Councilman Schneider asked if the City had a final commitment from the
School District on splitting the costs on a 50/50 basis.
Mr. Qureshi stated he has met with Dr. Hansen and the School District
will share in the costs of the sidewalks and the costs for any other
changes. He stated that Councilman Barnette had been in contact with
the affected property owner, Mr. Saunders, and he will give the City the
easement for the sidewalk, with the understanding that there will be
no assessment to his property.
Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated the School District originally
indicated they would pay $18,000 or 50% of the cost, but he understood that,
since the cost figures have changed, they have agreed to share in these on
a 50/50 basis.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated Mr. Pierce of the School Board has discussed
these other items with the School Board and he didn't feel there was any
disagreement.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 32-1978. Seconded
by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 33-1978 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR REPLACEMENT OF
BRIDGES OVER I-694 AT MAIN STREET AND BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS:
{
i
80
REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 17, 1978 PAGE 10
Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated adoption of this resolution is
the initial step to allow the Highway Department to continue with planning
and processing for expansion of the railroad bridge that crosses I-694. He
stated, with the improvement, there would be an additional driving lane i
with appropriate shoulders, median and berming areas to allow more clear
driving space. He stated, in widening of the Burlington Northern railroad
bridge, it also necessitates the need for replacing the Main Street
bridge.
Mr. Sobiech stated it is his understanding there is no cost to the City, I
with 90% Federal and 10% State financing for the project. i
I ;
Mayor Nee asked about the drainage pipe located in this area. Mr. Qureshi
stated he didn't feel this would have any effect on the improvement.
Mr. Sobiech felt, however, this may be the time to have another water
crossing installed which would result in some cost to the City. He also
felt perhaps the City might want to insure they have adequate space for
I
bikeway walkway areas.
He stated this improvement is scheduled for 1981 and he would keep the
Council informed regarding the progress.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 33-1978. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider.
Mr. Qureshi felt it should be made known to the Department of Transportation
the City's feeling on the water crossing and that LaMaur's be notified
of the public hearings, as requested.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared i
the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 34-1978 APPROPRIATING MSAS FUNDS OF STATE AID SYSTEM ST.
1978-4
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 34-1978. Seconded
j by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
I
LICENSES:
i
MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to approve the licenses as submitted and
as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
CLAIMS:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize payment of Claims No. 102A11
through 102724. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING LETTER FROM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DATED 4-14-78.
MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to receive the letter from Mr. Mark Haggerty,
President, Chamber of Commerce dated 4-14-78. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the
motion carried unanimously.
ESTIMATES:
/ MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to approve the estimates as submitted. J
f
February 8, 1971
Mr. Charles R. La Beaux
1624 Gardena Avenue N.F.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Re: Lot Snlit Request, L.S. #71-01
Ell of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision x`92
Dear Mr. La Beaux:
Please be advised that the Fridley City Council approved
your request to divide the East Half of Lot 34, Auditor's Sub-
division No. 92 into two equal parts. However, you are asked to
please execute the enclosed document which will grant a 12 foot
drainage and utility easement along the new lot line bet-ween
the two new parcels, together with a street easement along your
South line. I have enclosed a drawing showing the location of
these easements.
Council also restricted the use of the South parcel
for building by stating that no building permit will be issued
until such time as sewer, water and street access is provided to
it.
If you have any questions , please call for additional
information.
Please return the easements as soon as possible.
_ . Yours v u1y
PAP.RF.L CT.A_T?K
Engineering; Assistant
DC:ob
Enc.
b�
te�t^•� � g�E_ � ya 5�3�' �"P'S`,� x����� �°y `i
fi:. e y � x,�t f•a„ ,'4"3 ALL.•:, s K- Ys'^: 5< r .A. - r �r£ z l '��i
'AL
k` Y a *` y �?
.• " { " r •P^ `'a' '` aE`
j r
w�
�'��- �'[N a a 1��,,�.s-r �^r "�•n��'r��,�°t t.-'' n+ i.' ,+Ti a ,+>'"'�r ,3,�:"` r �' .a �c'$'"a.,. .e�"'�R`' ��;.�"a' �`4 i ce
-,dam"y'<t i. ^� � � 3 �"�.- �'� �•�ilr� 'ts, zd�� �.<�'4,p�w,-�Cqr � � �' ���' y t'�,$'.; S� �, � by
i
±a- :*x a #` �s � ,, � �`�d' �x �d.ac •p :� t":"arc rY"3 •S} er R:,�� : +� .ti: .�a"a. r +�+ ��,,-. r�Nr
fR. 1 y-tnt� ',y r F?v,y'C` ;.' ., «:;�• r .r..' ,..! .Mae _ -y tw
wm
x r,ys r Pix. t y i't• a '� h :Fr is •r4q B`fi1'�.,,a. .ty '"`EN' � aY +i F w x '+,�, .p.M c,E'-'
rsr '�;
;
R
'�.i�� .� te�ri d+• �a' x'' c:�+ 's� " �''�ki •�' - �'*t'H` r �II+r •�,{r�f!L'tr"w fi':;i.r g� ",a.. .y ;
�� ;3�x��+ D; �C���,��,g a � -ro ,,l*�l__ _ rc yr 3{�L p %�F'`. � "� •�,.c L y''�•f' .S• z �' �.*'� -' i
__ � yt�� ,..:.„{a -. tY� � *rGT �t,>4�S w :.?' � ^5� 7'�°�-•,�'x�- � .'+�" 'n`�r +F� � `)m'Y�-•d��'2 •� ,��� `'�'_''
at �� t r 'F. '`• 5• . a '+'. t -h?.zr t s,< xk ..$
x r E" 'i $'• - � •L '':.i : ee ,T 5t :b _ �>Y'" r ri$_'`' .bwrfyT
+�'� � r''r +,� a '� s' � 2 :t sit ' ...fs � .,*t.�,, ,d�� <wvl � - t ,f•�.F
�
�-'� � r� 1 A,L ':� � � ,c�' . v:' _ 'r1� � .^, 'ir � '� _-z .Xy� �i 3 ..+✓` �� ; � +r.; '
S>
s .� 7 �„� ..i ra.` t "5 '; �'' •fix .•4 r -n �f w !''G o { a t�4 �
�r � �' r-45+� '+�' � y}` ks 5� � "� � •v,r a ,�� ` ��. '' +""` '#��'�t +�+f� 'a--¢�`
Row S'
Yr 19e 'h y 'M' 3
.x,kr W� ,. � �x fi v ,ri's �.,s�ca•w. �." � •^Yr #�' .�� ,w'�r'� ,.z- +�' ' .y}& r �-.,9"�'�` � �# •s
-TI
}K, z ,,,,`•.A '�,.','. . .M✓a`',' :�' AAs" .51•f ..,'Yn 'S �si' '� -,+` �G •�` �9r`.
t-
..
-� y� ".."+'i"yw � y,.t yam+ '�'"1`: � ^.s' '-... an s• � 3.. 'P _ ^�c.',n.•- "'74a `�
st"« ''r :F� t ,ir+�s .E„5 * r• 'i7 { —0�
n
.. ♦tx $ ., -i",1 -4.
*'f fist t'�" �' iOs � x't�' � 5 '�i �-� "Arm `-� �r.Y � �a s0➢, ffk �h,• �'
' 3 _ s�. 7 F ' $�'Q' �-,� y .•'; K,• j'�' _ aet r �*-c
+ 5t i 4F• §1 r � aa" ^`
�„� 'tr,�r �v'� ��� -°w:n -:Tkbt x;�na.� ..._ � �� ,+! t yp,.++,,�p^w ,h. r "'��, lay` � �'}"�'` _�++t�s• �� � -. "�' �'�
yt•s -'` lID, t t att;,ya, a.yF., �$r".bP 9PA k�^',.�F
Q
TIA
e- �
:����� � �.. �� •_' :-+� �� � W�-`§��� a �- sy ��s '<''F- 5r 1�y�'� c •� � ,y�Y r..�gta F ��3� R �:�„�� �a''. .
X
_._..y''-� � +�.1}y- .�yie '�. x � ��� ,f AJC! 'C-.,.•. �� �.^�G��.� _'Jj • �¢ti� r to �+' y i f.
A? py{t r Y! .•,4 y� ��. a "S�r ;yt �` a py�� :fie,, 'r �� �.. ,r.��j��� �g � -� �`.
-..F, �. '±��+�.�{::�s' �r �a '�t� .���t'rsgS x t�w� .<-n-`iv.t '�'• k- .�,�s �y ..r: ����+}�":: s�'o- ��'�.�..° ate�;g '�;
JAW
,: - T4s ��..; $ +• a4 ty, ys �X "+ ::` '}1•. t s a - 3 r<.
x f,
%p.
r'rz s4"� .y�t`c• y. x" +.n
T
,:sus1, ,�,g, `r }*' ��'+n.�, jiii 'f •W
q:';, t "wi,:.a" •1.�� 't 'r�•wf5t •at..+^y { �-. mv'f, 're' �y aq(.- a� k5 ,n'ys%,t,�a/ate.+ -:d;
..,�. ^x•'. +, f e@ .g„r �"'a�'.r,. ,' i'f»,ta" ..W "'�yy-fin y �>'_ "* "� �. � : '`^ vry A•M'^ +�p nL� ':, 'q„ .+ ^�'l's.
TK'L •Af 3'F-tY` �e_ s. :• �� ,� � ^� .PP. �r w ,`•�+ 'a"ti r .y���" ,4• " Yi to� '"ro' .��,:,w�78.s- ryk. ., �.-'�
'k I�1. § ��.� � - :;ca->L"3 .ta�b i�ate"•�:.: rr���,�,;.'Lw � �' �` '�•.yam,�°j�R' � � �'I c � � �� ; ..
VE Ov
-c-y¢'' 'f -Y ', f •i vr'y t 'fir.''° 5 4 'fir :r r'f ,.+" <:y `? -.c .?'
�� - s a,. N ,�` � r !...� �•r s14
i+' s,. .'� ° s "r' ta,�g��. �y.,. y �Sr,A •; �g.� x
.31 r Si��Y r,�„v „�ksZ�ys � ,a- F ,d' � ��_. � � �_i M a.- .#.tq ..ha i� t` u�6.•, '�•r`.. ��,
r.
, _ -,.. :s"r� `t>e .,,.. .,:=..- :. a�>.a at... s . .,.��.�.,,_� .,�`,� .;a -� .:»f'•:C:..,d._,e3iaA�t ,._- .- �.x_.;... +