Loading...
LS70-09 Form #5-68 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR CITY USE ONLY APPLICANT. � l l!)c� �� ��0 Applicantis Naipne L-� _._._ ADDRESS r� anAk1j���'I %/� Lot Split ��.� � fes,i���ti.Ss�j Street City Zip C de Date Filed: TELEPHONE # ZP ;�'D,}( f�,, �S�.G Fee:l� Receipt 7.1- Home Business Council Action:D ' v , REMARKS: PROPERTY OWNERS)_ �j�/. A P e $4 +2 W 3 0 o Z N — rS 7-- ADDRESS(ES) o a, o Street City TT- Zip Code m o r4 w, 0 0° Street City Zip Code o 0 TELEPHONE #(S) >.S�C am Home Business ad M O r4,0 Property Location on Street or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) / D �` ,�y �..AV W ~1 Legal Description of Property: x � Reason for Lot Split: SO G/fir e21� T, P e e d l a Total Area of Property,;tz. sq. ft. Present Zo.nin@, C1asn WNWW The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE: `' _ A'/ p SIGNATURE BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Seo reverse side for additional i=tr Atjs* FLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration - Remarks: PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration - Remarks: CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration - Reworks: 3 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE 1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley) 2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property involved and the lot split fee of $15.00 for each original lot being split. 3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets & Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Qommittee meets once a month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of the Subcommittee. 4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels along with the new pare-le .treat—! w. 4h al NxistinK strictures tied in. �. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of the Planning Commission. 6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday of the month. 7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must be complied with by the applicant. 8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and otherp ertinent papers for his signature. 9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant should file the lot split in Anoka County. 10. in all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed,. NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FON THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS. If /7 I Iva /917 4r4 r 1 T r r w ` W l 3 -- — ---- ----L.�s- X0-09: Wendell-r- R331 South 20 ft. of L. 1, -- ------. - Bl. 1-T-Sandhurst.Addition deeded to Sampson (L. 2) . jr L.S. #70-09: Wendell G. Elliott � So. 20' of L. 1, Bl. 1, Sandhurst d r � V. Add. deeded to Sampson CL. 2) ! ra' '}�— -�►M.G. 5 - 99 E3 8 lif N 0 d a' i'r 77A At 11 �,Fr�.� '}, 1 � `�Iy�rj ! I�' � 1 4�r.�,,.���pr•�forc/n� _ � ,� ��"n�IoT l e. -- bi r � �V � r •'• * .Y.1A0l tTt: � ` Nt. S 'eZ>i ♦, I w o oe I r'A, r5 a c �Q U_ i0 4 �/,��7 $ Q J , ,s` $ 28 Ad r3 V /V4, ` /��+'Y / `1 � /✓L/ 'h 'aux y `iD is3eE roi`u` I�/( 0 / IA L „fvA1a iw y IDi - '� r♦�l t;:, x vissry .s������ 5�a �t�„ � � � iy y� I (�oso) k, 1PaL�i�l T !9! A �' ry .moi k �'�� 3.1ib f! ♦a' 0- a r 4, y5 �:, ,fJ �:rf.�-tom�o,�... , �� -`�.� �� I�Q `\ •„� O. �_ ,, 1ti 9p fid ♦ o 1 t otl11 ♦' � Ir .M -\ i�. -- b ,-�,A6'. x6YM£ a �� Ns 10 � �� ♦ 1� "1 '�`^�•�, .. �.. ll1t� •.�zii1/ri itr y �i I • s� ., �"�, � A���• -•_els ..�4�' .`. A3 � y� �rtcd) f iY I� !.v ;. ••? ` �'!}�$ �Iibn) .� x+.M V`\• � 0. O1.{far ki'trCr .7 + - + ! 0 �� r' LPC��c' --, a 4�•t� I �',. 8L4 ~:'.i•`6�.:�15�D¢ t Q%SCY.4 /1C��i°(rt''-'rte'" fi�m/tfrfil�caje Ott _ RICA t� 6 � � - ...fid, � i''w.� t��"�,I, /;'•\ � _9 •�, �'' � CID� Lal S, Aer f'e! p. y � ` t PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS- STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE JUNE 17, 1970 PAGE 1 The meeting was called to order at 7:05 P.M. by Chairman Schmedeke. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Crowder, Schmedeke, Zeglen Member Absent: Meissner Others Present: Darrel Clark, Engineering Assistant 1. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L S 470-08, FREDERICK A SKOG: Ten feet of Lot 17 to be added to Lot 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks 1st Addition. Mr. Skog was present and explained that for seven years now, the "sharp cliff", belonging to his neighbor, and partly behind the garage, has been unimproved. There are rocks in the grass so that it can't be mowed. His neighbor, Mr. Harris, said he would give him ten feet of this area. Mr. Skog's garage is 3� feet from the South property, which was a mistake when the house was built. If he had the ten feet, he would make good use of the extra land for patio, and other recreational purposes. Mr. Skog said his neighbor's house was probably 4 or 5 feet higher than his garage level. The whole area is on a hill. There is a drainage easement North/South and East/West. The gully to the South is sodded for drainage but when water comes down from the hill, the dirt comes with it. The Engineering Assistant said that he felt if the two neighbors could divide the property up, as far as the City is concerned, there would be no objection. The easement would still be there the same as it is now. The description would be simple "the North 10 feet of Lot 17". MOTION by Crowder, seconded by Zeglen, that the Plats & Subdivisions- Streets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend approval to the Planning Commission of the Lot Split.request, L.S. #170-08, by Frederick A. Skog for the North 10 feet of Lot 17, to be added to Lot 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks lst Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST• L S #70-09, WENDELL ELLIOTT: South 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Sandhurst Addition deeded to Lot 2. Mrs. Wendell Elliott was present. f i The Engineering Assistant said that the two lot splits were similar, except in this case, the land had already been deeded. The petitioner is the person who sold the 20 feet. The reason for the lot split request is to make the transaction legal because a new street is being built and Mr. Elliott does not wish to pay for the special assessments. Mr. Elliott owns Lot 1 and all the Subcommittee is concerned with is that he has sold off 20 feet. Referring Plats & Subs.-Str. & Util. Subcommittee June 17 1970 Page 2 to the drawing on Page 5 of the Agenda, Darrel Clark said that in subsequent years, there has been other lot splits over a period of 10 years. On four lots, five homes have been built. Mrs. Elliott said there was approximately 52 feet between the houses, 20 feet between Mr. Sampson's garage and the new line and something around 40 feet between their house and the new lot line. MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Crowder, that the Plats & Subdivisions- Streets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend approval to the Planning Commission of the Lot Split request, L.S. #70-09, by Wendell G. Elliott, splitting off the South 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Sandhurst Addition to be added to Lot 2, Block 1, Sandhurst Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. r 3. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT: P.S. #70-01, ROGER M. JONES: Part of the SW's of the NW-4 of Section 2 for golf driving range - M-2 zoning. Mr. Al Davies, Mr. Fred E. Jones and Mr. Roger M. Jones were present to discuss the petition. The Engineering Assistant stated that last fall Mr. Jones first proposed the golf driving range. The land was purchased under an agreement that he would get a Special Use Permit for a driving range. The permit was processed through the Board of Appeals and Council approved subject to the dedication of 30 feet for 81st Avenue, also the Easterly 30 feet for Main Street and also a 50 foot looped service drive across the Easterly edge which is adjacent to University Avenue.Because this would be a very long description, Mr. Jones agreed to plat and record it prior to some time this early fall. At this time he will be platting the South 400 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and put up a temporary type building on the East side of the service drive. He has a three year agreement with the opportunity of renewing unless the area begins to develop. Referring to the loopback at the Southeast corner of the proposed plat, this is back from the highway to give more room for traffic. It was brought up that this would give another site for a filling station, however, it is 1.3 Acres and would not necessarily have to be a filling station. The plat and the area around it was zoned heavy industrial. Speaking of roads, Darrel Clark said that there was no reason to build a road until the land is developed, but when one is built, it will be 9 Ton design. Mr. Fred Jones said that the golf driving range was something they hoped would support the cost of the property until industry would build. They were contract purchasers of the property. Mr. Crowder asked if Mr. Jones could provide an entrance to University Avenue. Darrel Clark answered the Highway Department has built an approach and it is blacktopped goint to the property line at 81st Avenue. The street pattern lines up with those in East Ranch Estates 2nd Addition which is to the South of 79th Avenue. North of 85th Avenue, there is land being purchased by the City for Open Space. Planning Commission Meeting - June 17, 1970 Page 5 Mr. Skog explained that he has the opportunity to obtain 10 feet from the North edge of Lot 17 which would give him 10 more feet alongside his garage. The basketball area could then be in the back instead of the front yard. It would not be long before the children would be owning their own cars and this will create a parking place alongside the garage for the extra cars, if he needs it. The bank will be cut back. If his neighbor were to fill this, it would cost him a lot money, and it is quite a distance from his house. His garage was built too close to the line to begin with. The Engineering Assistant said that 6 feet of the 10 feet is an utility easement and Mr. Skog does not intend to build a structure on it. MOTION by Harris, seconded by Minish, that the Planning Commission recom- mend approval of the lot split request, L.S. #70-08, Frederick A. Skog, to split the North 10 feet from Lot 17 and add to Lot 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks 1st Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 5. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #70-09, WENDELL ELLIOTT: South 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Sandhurst Addition deeded to Lot 2. Mrs. Wendell Elliott was present. Mr. Schmedeke explained the Subcommittee heard this request tonight also. The land involved had been deeded several years ago, but Mr. Elliott continued to pay the special assessments. However, now a road is being built, and unless the lot split was done legally at the City level, he would be paying the assessments for the new road. The Engineering Assistant said that this 20 feet, which was deeded, actually is at grade with the neighbor and below the grade of the Elliott lawn and it does look logical. Both houses have about the same distance to the new lot line. MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the Council of the Lot Split, L.S. #70-09, Wendell Elliott, splitting the South 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Sandhurst Addition and deeding it to Lot 2, Block 1, Sandhurst Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 6. STREET SIGNS IN COLUMBIA HEIGHTS: On 40th Avenue between Central Avenue and University Avenue. Mr. Schmedeke again spoke about the difficulty of seeing the street signs in Fridley at night. The street signs he referred to in Columbia Heights are quite large, and he thought a sign of this type should be placed on the main arterial streets, such as Mississippi Street, 7th Street, T.H. #47, etc. If there were new men on an ambulance or fire truck, it would be easier for them to see the signs at night. He did not believe in taking down every sign, but to gradually replace them. He said the signs in Fridley look good and are easy to read during the day. The Engineering Department was to contact D. W. Harstad Co. to inquire about costs. Continued. No action. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 6, 1970 PAGE 6 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #70-08, FREDERICK A. SKOG: _North 10 feet of Lot 17 to be added to Lot 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks 1st Addition. The City Engineer reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request for this lot split. It merely takes a small section of land from one lot and adds it to the adjacent lot. He then passed out a map of the area to the Council. He said that this split would give the people a little more room. Councilman Sheridan commented that he recalled this house was one that the builder set the wrong way on the lot. MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to approve the lot split requested by Frederick A. Skog. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried. or X-- 4. LOT SPLIT.REQTJEST: L.S.. #70-09, WENDELL ELLIOTT. South 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Sandhurst Addition deeded to Lot 2. The City Engineer- said that this would be splitting the south 20' and deeding it to Lot 2. The Planning Commission approved of the request. This is the way the people have been maintaining their -lots and this would just .make the, split legal. This is necessary at this time as there are street improvements going in on Hartman Circle and the correct person shout be--assessed. MOTION by Councilman.Breider--to approve the lot split requested by Wendell Elliott. The motion was seconded and upon a voice:.-vote,-All voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried. MOTION by Councilman Breider .to .receive. the Minutes.--of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 17, 1970. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READ.ING.OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A. CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS .(ZOA #70-04) : Rezoning area generally located at the corner of 73rd Avenue and Central Avenue N.E. by .Cpl. James.L. Robinson by G.D.. Giancola, his Attorney. The City Engineer said that there were three items that need tobe considered. This is in Central Avenue Addition. All the'property is owned by one property owner at this time. It is being split to make a gas station site. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot split, special use permit and the rezoning. He said-that he would recommend-that an additional 15' be obtained along the .northerly.side of the property., acrose Central Avenue Addition to get an additional turning lane. Mr. G.A. Giancola .said that the plans have been submitted to the City Engineer. He said that he is in possession of a letter agreeing to deed the northerly 15' as requested. The City Engineer said that he had.hoped to shift the whole plat 15' to the south as his feeling was that this is not adequate property for development-.as a gas station site. Mr. Giancola said that -he had met with the City Engineer and they went over this problem. He-felt that if 15' was deeded across the north, this would suffice and still give room for the exits and entrances. Councilman Liebl asked if they were in agreement with the Planning. Commission's recommendation for evergreens along the west of the building. Mr. Giancola came forward with the plans and showed him how the shXAWY was planned. It „. does show shrubbery as a buffer zone on the west and south sides. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 6, 1970 PAGE 5 their homes with this new street. Because the street is not full right of way width, and never has been, his suggestion to the Council is that the people in Donnays Addition on 57th and Madison be excluded from the assessment for the improvement of Lakeland Avenue-and Jefferson Street. He added that he understood that the streets would be done in 1970 and would be on the assessment rolls in 1971. Mr. Ed. Marciniac, 601 58th Avenue N.E. , said that the east 30' has been in- corporated into their lots. Councilman Liebl said that if there is a motion made, he would like to comment that this is not full right of way width and the previous Council gave � of the street to Donnay, so that is part of their property. This makes this a specific case, and he felt that the people backing onto Jefferson could not be assessed that front on Madison. The street is there for the people living on the west side and they should bear their share of the assessment. Since there is no curbing, the assessment would be less. Councilman Sheridan said that the Council never vacated the east � of the street, as it was never dedicated. If the platting of Donnays Addition had gone in as the Adams Street Addition in' the normal grid pattern, they would have had to dedicate part of the plat for street purposes. MOTION by Councilman Sheridan that the east properties on Jefferson from Lakeland (57th) to 58th, and Lakeland from Jefferson to 7th Street on the south not be assessed the 25% assessment for the street improvements. This is no deviation from the normal assessment policy on double frontage lots as there was never full right of way. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried. MEETING WITH GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY: Mr. George M. Hansen was not present at the Council Meeting. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 17, 1970: 1. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #70-05, CPL. JAMES L. ROBINSON BY G.D. GIANCOLA, HIS ATTORNEY: To construct a service station on Lots 1 'hru 6, Lot 9, North 68 feet of Lot 20, Central Avenue Addition. The City Engineer said that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the special use -permit and that this item could be discussed all at the same time under consideration of the rezoning ordinance, the next item on the Agenda. 2. VACATION REQUEST: SAV #70-04, CPL. JAMES L. ROBINSON BY G.D. GIANCOLA, HIS ATTORNEY: Vacation of Brook Street - immediately south and abutting Central Avenue Addition. The City Engineer reported that the vacation was approved by the Planning Commission and the Council action would be to set the Public Hearing for August 10, 1970. MOTION by Councilman Breider to set the Public Hearing date of August 10, 1974 for the vacation requested by Cpl. James L. Robinson. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris. Pro tem declared the motion carried.