LS70-08 Form #5-68 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
CITY OF FRIDLEY
FOR CITY USE ONLY
Applicant's Name
APPLICANT: � r-Ay ,A ��g,
ADDRESS: J�Ea s`r' .� /v le s7.5-y2 Lot Split 7p n
Street City Zip Code Date Fil
TELEPHONE # 7; - 6272. � 3/ � 4.3 G, P Fee:$4 - Receipt �zo3o
+' Home Business Council Action:DtL�`
'�+ U `
REMARKS:
.�...-.-
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
-P Z d
yHy - �
GL 3 O
O C
m ADDRESS(ES S QY` 4^�ef A' a /�
Street
0 a 0 o City Zip Code
� 10 -
+' °° Q
CH o Street City Zip Code
° '-4 m 'rqTELEPHONE #(S) Z&E
m 4 Home Business
� O U
M OW rl
,W Property Location on Street
or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) _r6 ,,ri/
W
~' Legal Description of Property:
Reason for Lot Split:
1� e s- go
�r
n Y" re
a rAf y e A"f04
Total Area of Property sq. ft. Present Zo.nirW, Classification
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this application are true and
correct.
l)
DATE; Z - 7l' SIGNATURE- -✓ ; •'`''
BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Seo reverse Aide for additional instras�li afrl
PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarkss
CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration
�teewarks c
3
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE
1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley)
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of $15.00 for each original lot being split.
3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a
month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of
the Subcommittee.
4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels
along with the new pare-le „reat—� w:�h al pzisting structures tied in.
5. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department
for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the
second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant
with minutes of the Planning Commission.
6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday
of the month.
7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applioant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED TBE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
F 1
L.S. #70-08: 1 !
Frederick A. Skog
10' of L. 17, to be added to
L. 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks 1stAdd;.
ks-
ell
i
j ` 1
ti
1� 2,S-• � 1 r �.;
4
i
7 �ty
` Pf o"Oe Sec1 n/¢.J 4cZf 1Lrhe ! 'Lj
a
,t CAI
7
Ci
z ! 2S- I • -V.� f`"i � '_ . $' 1?
lk-
_i
A , �
----- ----- ---- ---
L.S. #70-08: Frederick A. Skog
10' of L. 17, to be added to
L. 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks lst Add. 47 }
i.�
rs
h /J95
_ BEC. r4
x x n
n ,s A. t. rE
� %^s-ol ,s _ -6lo f/-� ff� _•--._._.,
!l 3! !y I dp s.e4 s2f'
b �
�,J.Jf•dt E. p�;a `�..�.�Ayf exyef ,,E
1p1 10 j03 10gh 105 ' 464 j lb j zgD o `oaD� 'DO
8 �r ��i�f jro�.D h �� iIs
! °
\� r�
!Qo '1 k �a f= N /l6•N 94.19
AW FAt
1 st dx� yb !/f.c/E
f
°°t t101 '1q ry Abu 1
• tf :Y K 75' 7�' 7S :1� i 'p"i e V � - ► y�/( �. ��4 h
,.LYNDE DRIVE
.. � •, fs $ ,a n n /9 ,�5� may, � .
ss fs rs a 9�
V r I O O ^ O•faL-v7O «e rY /K.N
2
V 3 ,57 1
e +V
1
1—s N .lQ'-
. 13 „11DO i 1j10 �`� \^7� C
2�y /, ds. I•rxT f as,ts n-a-w'Js
41
,,> m, a
a'lSE1 J'
R
�aTC 4 :M .
oi- 1 9qM
b x ,
t
••,, eke i� Y�i^ 1�'� "' .M
:'-41A
3
� n
^
d ! `.
w �
v ;
•s L1l7tSi._____—____--- � �� %St I � ���"'1
15 25 /S
"'O of
.L•
J $$
. •., _ ". /sJ of � 1
��$/40,� ..7 ire, F � � ,•_ S">^ w{.. i!l11J NaJ-r54: _.___ -__—
1
�•.�.� � a�j �'P*m�;;' 7� � 'jj s L•e� � y Au�uEb�r Pork C6i.��dfl�f/isf
PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-
STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE JUNE 17, 1970 PAGE 1
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 P.M. by Chairman Schmedeke.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Crowder, Schmedeke, Zeglen
Member Absent: Meissner
Others Present: Darrel Clark, Engineering Assistant
1. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #70-08, FREDERICK A SKOG: Ten feet of Lot 17
to be added to Lot 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks 1st Addition.
Mr. Skog was present and explained that for seven years now, the "sharp
cliff", belonging to his neighbor, and partly behind the garage, has been
unimproved. There are rocks in bhe grass so that it can't be mowed. His
neighbor, Mr. Harris, said he would give him ten feet of this area. Mr. Skog's
garage is 331 feet from the South property, which was a mistake when the house
was built. If he had the ten feet, he would make good use of the extra land
for patio, and other recreational purposes. Mr. Skog said his neighbor's
house was probably 4 or 5 feet higher than his garage level. The whole area
is on a hill. There is a drainage easement North/South and East/West. The
gully to the South is sodded for drainage but when water comes down from
the hill, the dirt comes with it.
The Engineering Assistant said that he felt if the two neighbors could
divide the property up, as far as the City is concerned, there would be no
objection. The easement would still be there the same as it is now. The
description would be simple "the North 10 feet of Lot 17".
MOTION by Crowder, seconded by Zeglen, that the Plats & Subdivisions-
Streets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend approval to the Planning Commission
of the Lot Split.request, L.S. ##70-08, by Frederick A. Skog for the North 10
feet of Lot 17, to be added to Lot 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks 1st Addition.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L S #70-09, WENDELL E9LIOTT: South 20 feet of Lot 1,
Block 1, Sandhurst Addition deeded to Lot 2.
Mrs. Wendell Elliott was present.
The Engineering Assistant said that the two lot splits were similar, except
in this case, the land had already been deeded. The petitioner is the person
who sold the 20 feet. The reason for the lot split request is to make the
transaction legal because a new street is being built and Mr. Elliott does
not wish to pay for the special assessments. Mr. Elliott owns Lot 1 and all
the Subcommittee is concerned with is that he has sold off 20 feet. Referring
Planning Commission Meeting - June 17, 1970 Page 4
Chairman Erickson explained that HUD No. 236 is a special section of FHA
wherein the government will subsidize certain things by direct payment. The
Federal government requires that a person living in a financed building by HUD
pay 25% of his income, and would subsidize a $100.00 a month rental unit for
anybody with a low income. The government encourages the mixture of old people
with younger people. They cant rent to people with higher incomes.
If, in the future, the apartments were not rented to low income people,
this would be an apartment complex. Mr. Winters said that was not the intent of
the petitioner.
Mr. Marlo June said he had some thoughts on this problem. The suburbs are
getting a lot of pressure from the State and Federal government to build housing
for the low income and elderly groups. The State Government has the right to
take away our zoning ability or prerogative and tell us what to do and they
could take it away any time. All the communities are going to have to start
looking into it. He hoped this would be along the line to help the community
without going to' the State.
Mr. Winters read excerpts from FH 4700.1 Digest of Insurable Loans and
Summaries of other Federal Housing Administration Program, March 1970 -- a Hud
Guide. He said if the City of Fridley accepts the request, under the HUD
program, the City would have to pass a resolution "Under the Workable Program".
About two or three months ago, the City of Hopkins passed such a resolution
and he would try to get a copy of it.
Mr. Schmedeke wondered if the complex could get 40 families to come out
here and if the people would be interested in concrete floors and electricity
heating. Mr. June volunteered that the floors are carpeted. Chairman Erickson
said the Planning Commission is being asked to create a density equal to R-3
density and intended for the elderly but not necessarily knowing it will be
rented to the elderly. Mr. June said the government stipulated that no one
can live there with more than one child.
The Commission wished more time to study the possibility of making stipula-
tions to restrict the houses to the elderly only; how difficult it would be
to enforce the stipulation; and whether or not the City would have to draw up
an ordinance.
MOTION by Harris, seconded by Schmedeke, that the Planning Commission con-
tinue to July 8, 1970 the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #70-03, by
Edward Chies to construct housing for the elderly and senior citizens on Lots
6 thru 12, 15 thru 20, Meadowmoor Terrace. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
the motion carried unanimously.
4. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #70-08, FREDERICK A. SKOG: North 10 feet of
Lot 17 to be added to Lot 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks lst Addition.
Mr. Skog was present.
Mr. Schmedeke, Chairman of Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Sub-
committee, which met at 7:00 P.M. previous to the Planning Commission meeting,
stated the Subcommittee approved the lot split request.
Y
Planning Commission Meeting - June 17, 1970 Page 5
Mr. Skog explained that he has the opportunity to obtain 10 feet from the
North edge of Lot 17 which would give him 10 more feet alongside his garage.
The basketball area could then be in the back instead of the front yard. It
would not be long before the children would be owning their own cars and this
will create a parking place alongside the garage for the extra cars, if he
needs it. The bank will be cut back. If his neighbor were to fill this, it
would cost him a lot money, and it is quite a distance from his house. His
garage was built too close to the line to begin with.
The Engineering Assistant said that 6 feet of the 10 feet is an utility
easement and Mr. Skog does not intend to build a structure on it.
MOTION by Harris, seconded by Minish, that the Planning Commission recom-
mend approval of the lot split request, L.S. #70-08, Frederick A. Skog, to
split the North 10 feet from Lot 17 and add to Lot 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks
lst Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
5. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #70-09, WENDELL ELLIOTT: South 20 feet of Lot 1,
Block 1, Sandhurst Addition deeded to Lot 2.
Mrs. Wendell Elliott was present.
Mr. Schmedeke explained the Subcommittee heard this request tonight also.
The land involved had been deeded several years ago, but Mr. Elliott continued
to pay the special assessments. However, now a road is being built, and unless
the lot split was done legally at the City level, he would be paying the
assessments for the new road.
The Engineering Assistant said that this 20 feet, which was deeded, actually
is at grade with the neighbor and below the grade of the Elliott lawn and it
does look logical. Both houses have about the same distance to the new lot
line.
MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Commission
recommend approval to the Council of the Lot Split, L.S. #70-09, Wendell
Elliott, splitting the South 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Sandhurst Addition and
deeding it to Lot 2, Block 1, Sandhurst Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, the motion carried unanimously.
6. STREET SIGNS IN COLUMBIA HEIGHTS: On 40th Avenue between Central Avenue
and University Avenue.
Mr. Schmedeke again spoke about the difficulty of seeing the street signs
in Fridley at night. The street signs he referred to in Columbia Heights are
quite large, and he thought a sign of this type should be placed on the main
arterial streets, such as Mississippi Street, 7th Street, T.H. #47, etc. If
there were new men on an ambulance or fire truck, it would be easier for them
to see the signs at night. He did not believe in taking down every sign, but
to gradually replace them. He said the signs in Fridley look good and are
easy to read during the day. The Engineering Department was to contact D. W.
Harstad Co. to inquire about costs.
Continued. No action.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 6, 1970 PAGE 6
3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #70-08, FREDERICK A. SKOG: North 10 feet of Lot
J� 17 to be added to Lot 18, Block 2, Parkview oaks 1st Addition.
The City Engineer reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of
the request for this lot split. It merely takes a small section of land from
one lot and adds it to the adjacent lot. He then passed out a map of the area
to the Council. He said that this split would give the people a little more
room. Councilman Sheridan commented that he recalled this house was one that
the builder set the wrong way on the lot.
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to approve the lot split requested by Frederick
A. Skog. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried.
4. IAT SPLIT.REQTJEST: L.S. #70-09, ._WENDELL ELLIOTT.-. South. 20_feet of. Lot 1,
Block 1, Sandhurst Addition deeded to Lot 2.
The City Engineer, said that this would be splitting the south 20' and deeding it
to Lot 2. The :Manning C=iission approved of the request. This is the way the
people have been maintaining their lots and this would just make the split
legal. This is necessary at this time as there are street improvements going
in on Hartman Circle and the correct person shoul 'be--assessed.
MOTION by Councilman.Breider.-to approve the lot spUt, requested by Wendell
Elliott. The motion was seconded and' upon a voices-vote,-, ,all voting aye,
Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried.
MOTION by Councilman Breider .to .receive the Minutes--of the Planning Commission
Meeting of June 17, 1970. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried.
CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING-OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A. CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS (ZOA #70-04) :
Rezoning area generally located at the corner of 73rd Avenue and Central Avenue
N.E. by .Cpl. .James.L. Robinson by G.D.. Giancola, his Attorney.
The City Engineer said that there were three items that need tobe considered.
This is in Central Avenue Addition. All the property is owned byone property
owner at this time. It is being split to make a gas station site. The
Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot split, special use permit
and the rezoning. He said.that he would recommend.that an additional 15' be
obtained along the .northerly-side of the property.. across Central Avenue Addition
to get an additional turning lane.
Mr. G.D. Giancola said that the plans have been submitted to the City Engineer.
He said that he is in possession of a letter agreeing to deed the northerly
15' as requested. The City Engineer said that he had hoped to shift the whole
plat- 15' to the south as his feeling was that this is not adequate property for
development..as a gas -station site. Mr. Giancola said that -he .had met with the
City Engineer and they-went over this problem. He-felt that if 15' was deeded
across the north, this would suffice and still give room for the exits and
entrances.
Councilman Liebl asked if they were in agreement with the Planning- Commission's
recommendation for evergreens along the west of the building. Mr. Giancola
came forward with the plans and showed him how the shrQWY was planned. It
does show shrubbery as a buffer zone on the west and south sides.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 6, 1970 PAGE 5
their homes with this new street. Because the street is not full right of way
width, and never has been, his suggestion to the Council is that the people
in Donnays Addition on 57th and Madison be excluded from the assessment for
the improvement of Lakeland Avenue-and Jefferson Street. He added that he
understood that the streets would be done in 1970 and would be on the assessment
rolls in 1971.
Mr. Ed. Marciniac, 601 58th Avenue N.E. , said that the east 30' has been in-
corporated into their lots.
Councilman Liebl said that if there is a motion made, he would like to comment
that this is not full right of way width and the previous Council gave � of
the street to Donnay, so that is part of their property. This makes this a
specific case, and he felt that the people backing onto Jefferson could not be
assessed that front on Madison. The street is there for the people living on
the west side and they should bear their share of the assessment. Since there
is no curbing, the assessment would be less. Councilman Sheridan said that
e east of the street as it was never dedicated.
the Council never vacated th e � �
if the platting of Donnays Addition had gone in as the Adams Street Addition
iv the normal grid pattern, they would have had to dedicate part of the plat for
street purposes.
. , MOTION by Councilman Sheridan that the east properties on Jefferson from Lakeland
(57th) to 58th, and Lakeland from Jefferson to 7th Street on the south not be
assessed the 25% assessment for the street improvements. This is no deviation
from the normal assessment policy on double frontage lots as there was never
full right of way. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried.
MEETING WITH GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY:
Mr. George M. Hansen was not present at the Council Meeting.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 17, 1970:
1. SPECIAL USE PERMIT; SP #70-05, CPL. JAMES L. ROBINSON BY G.D. GIANCOLA,
HIS ATTORNEY: To construct a service station on Lots 1 '.hru 6, Lot 9,
North 68 feet of Lot 20, Central Avenue Addition.
The City Engineer said that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
special use -permit and that this item could be discussed all at the same time
under consideration of the rezoning ordinance, the next item on the Agenda.
2. VACATION REQUEST: SAV #70-04, CPL. JAMES L. ROBINSON BY G.D. GIANCOLA,
HIS ATTORNEY: Vacation of Brook Street - immediately south and abutting
Central Avenue Addition.
The City Engineer reported that the vacation was approved by the Planning
Commission and the Council action would be to set the Public Hearing for
August 10, 1970.
MOTION by Councilman Breider to set the Public Hearing date of August 10, 1970
for the vacation requested by Cpl. James L. Robinson. Seconded by Councilman,
Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared th14
motion carried.
July 14, 1970
Mr. Frederick A. Skog
5651 Regis Drive
Fridley, Minn. 55421
Re. Lot Split Pequest, L.S. #70-08, to Split
the Borth 10 Peet from Lot 17 and Add to
Lot 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks lst Addition
Dear Mr. Skog:
This is to notify you that the Fridley City Council,
at their regular Council meeting of July 6, 1970, moved to
approve your request for a lot split, L.S. #70-08 taking the
North 10 feet from Lot 17 and adding to Lot 18, Block 2,
Parkview Oaks 1st Addition.
urs trul.q
1,1Z
DARREL CLARK
Engineering Assistant
DC:ob
CC: Marvin C. Brunsell, Finance Director
*., .d: y- ;"yir� `�§ aY r r''� 4 +4 fl�A��%��8 may' �'+Yc'#+'�Y _,r't*ii' 'e 't• T u- g r .'-
v: ��� � t"" a � � � �y*�k�"�'+R'',�'C h:v �����,��� 'F, �'�` '� �s 3 '"�` �._ vim`'✓ �,
,• a .� n
y,� s
{. C.�.J rS 1,��>' S.��� P� 'RL r��� 3„G+'a.'{9 � f •4 T
"S .,�
*.�,s, ;, "'��s�,�a.., 'a!`.�^C, ":. A r�� .� � ''tses 9 ;�7• , ,_ '" '' �" g N: i '_ '�t*
vi
won
� r
PS, #t r v r�;..
TZ
_:� � -- "'Yy-'�"�, yy .)ac{{ �° �•c g r�4b��t '�{ � is �L � a � - A r '"-Y �'r �
,r '" •£' .-� s �' .n.�,s ��„+ '^yt,� �%r m 4 ~ ". 4:x syr q� :z Ake`
,� r a "� t;rt e;jt ^1 n, � r�,•�z'>` '.�c �,,.gwy:: ..�i5:. ., 't�-thadta' +"S. e�". ,`. '+ �s'.
.�x
^S*• .'..� �}� q � � � � Y y y,Y���� _k+2' � .�'�et �jt •y� Xt ����
r v - =", ` ,,q- -'+�'X a�`y °A�,'4' AIR zs' .gl,•n '} `f' �.
'�'#�, "`
t t any. •:�r �+ s r� '• w 4' tti �,},�
;� _a '��`, .;i. r �: '�- -s " �E ,�te+r � � k a§, .s �, ,s�• .
Mir
9c. 'a• > ;Fft K e 'S' y 'rti,- +p a t'> A. �p*r"a s's ._�t` t°'`+ e t''1'
ws �
(A._-" 'IP;',�4
"'''�X � - ..r .:"d +�., ,.�„#,yr} � i d«�t n�,'�'" �; � � .'t>A , �,�> ,a «r-'w s •i'#ti. �'. s
.x
-'4 T� `t= < `+5:' �. �. v��a `,',•Y ,,f,;'�•'�..k _ �'�`'�4'�+ a "�f' v
a,K "ff+. �>,,.v'r ,f°P �'
...�{d'Y ",�.L�g. -
`
��� � w s �o ` ^�' .�` ,,,,r ; � s a�f st . �,� �t��, '••�'��yF'2 �`� 3-X
Y •ri^..
a �. wt's �..:.;sa ,6'tc +'7w 'x k tw,
} S #c'' 3 ': ' L.a �.y
!�t >s+ -, ✓r y •i r'# ri Y tom* a .f.,
� at4 �, .. ,y, f �r'Ma
'•# "> >.= °Yap s 'e t"ta, *1k . " '",�,.' ,*,- 'r pa *`�a✓ �,';'�` _ � t£ �g' ,xx r+`i 'k',w�' � ;
,r
$ t
..
S
,ar E $ N{ b�,'+y{ .,,t .,ribs„ ,�ry'`�;•#,a: x
� � >4 "' 'T, k�'' ♦.: ua,� r'�4 ...
tz
;p4o.
q r
t a} >,, Seal s " ✓ �,?'r v+o- .� r.,ak''x�f .#'"^t ''' ,,,_°'�a`"".�a" Y' g' Y ,r' WaR
'
� a
{ • � n �� .a 3' €�'dk` -a "t �3,.".st` :r' x �:"�,.. .: ,� "x .$' ' } ss Lr ,,,�' :
,.��.+ ��w ���;,,�. .. �.� ..�5 � c.a%i �. �'•§�'••�,.ti��P!.�3��Y@��`,'�Yz'e��''�.�.ai r_ k .'�t��.`a; �.��