LS69-12 Fora, #5-68 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
CITY OF FRIDLEY
FOR CITY USE ONLY
r r Applicant'e Name
APPLICANT; &� A
Lot Split
ADDRESS;
Street I City Zip Code Date Filyd;
TELEPHONE #� Yd Fee: /s ' Receipti�
Home Business Council Action:Dp.%
I REKARKS: •----•.
PROPERTY OWNER(s) '
+' ,c b
11 4-1
0 � G
N,+' 0° ADDRESS(Es) `j 3
ri
0 P4 r' Street City Zip Code
4-' °0
w o v 0 Street City Zig Code
° '-q 00 0 w TELEPHONE #(S)-- z s5 U 70 7T
v p, H6me Business
+3 m +3
M0
Property Location on Street
or Exact Street Address (IF ANY)
W
U
H Legal Description of Property:
Reason for Lot Split:
t ,
- -C) 4.e
Total Area of Property sq. ft. Present Zoning' ClaesificatiQ;n t
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this application are true and
correct.
�f
DATE; l SIGNATURE 1/yjV7
BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Se# reverse side for/additional, i�atrt�o�liq/�
PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration
Remarks:
PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
3
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE
1 , Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley)
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of $15.00 for each original lot being split.
3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a
month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of
the Subcommittee.
4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel. or parcels
along with the new pare-:e .reaf - i w.*h al: -xisting structures tied in.
5. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department
for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the
second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant
with minutes of the Planning Commission.
6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday
of the month,
7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed,
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
TEE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
f
< M A3101 S11W 11 ^ vl w
o �
at " W - N S J� ?1 Vd ij 3
VO.WiS LA jb �`r
OM 0
Yc w '3'NwlPil m�•:'��, i
Wk Ilk It
Y r
'JS A3101a1 t
It
F � 1
m
'3'N 1S •MONY
U
V
♦♦ '' pa\
//O m h nr
ce
W6 r_ •� !
i-
lb
461
Mw o
�� -r—r- 6N►;dC ----•-- Wikt3A1I�
N i k w ♦ ;.
t�Js, f f
v c
c cl ~
Q ? \ TT < Q t 10 ~ m O
V
ri )
m _
b b s0 `y -f` 0 `a
t S8
ON l�IMH IH -ANnmi 7j 31T1S,, " Y
•- :�s4..�___3A t JA3UMOOaY4 1 /
z _ NQ 3 S. 3� " E31f9
4? fl; t 3 !
10 SM
�,T O• e� `/•Q. .` _ m Ohm
two
ti�♦ � �: 1• •� i r � � ^ ♦ 01
iT� . ,yrs M1• ap ti� ` �•,rf w- � n a dTe• p9Q• Z +I 3�
P
;w 1 4 ♦ ♦
OOV OZIF ?/31 +41340100N9 t.
L.S. #69-12
"t Lots 27, 28, 29, Bl. 4
aa) Oak Grove Additioh-
s°' Norbert J. Liesen ,
P
a�
' t
)pG (204
Ier
f �y /JUr!_nr
Riff
nfi_ xR3x?r 4
'++W•� �:.f'-1 �ea a•/.6 ii�o e, � ` •^ 1 .�
,4 f_
v A•o Z
a v Bt i .
eC HI
;reek_ % o > a
X42.. - • �� -—. �y , .
B1 sa.t gat
241 (O�G� ��G `►'-
� W
D
'e
,• (i r0✓S
/3 G /3s /387 /3 I Ienal 1�
",9 : F
(; o bal--
9 66 TA AVE.
/s D
000
>� 0a P G
8383 83
I 2 7
4 � .
• o� N
tzz3 ��
Ix I � - g A �3Cl)
•0 I— M p 1,� 6 M (� ---
�l \QC 0hV I {�?7OQ�
/O/ �3 f/� y D V 4 Ilip b_—.__ 2
2 r
fop
y„•.l3Mq� .z, y/S' X30
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
JAMES L. KURTM L.S. #69-12
LAND SURVEYOR L. 27, 28, 29, B1. 4,
Oak Grove Addition
4101 N.Ll . 5r,4 ger Norbert J. Liesen
Cot.umrslN muc-toms r.11 4K, '788- 5004
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN. OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION
AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
MINN. REG. No. 33 z
SCALE 1' - I DATE ��zc 15+ I4 bZ
I30 I 20 I
ZS
ON
it
J
- ------ ------
ti �
30'
I
I
SURVEY OF
"A" Lot 29, & the North of Lot 28, Block 4, Oak Grove Addition,
City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minn.
"B" Lot 27, & the South i of Lot 280, Block 4, Oak Grove Addition,
City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minn.
11�I
PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-
STREETS &UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING MAY 1 , 1969 PAGE 1
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Jensen at 8:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Crowder, Batterson, Jensen, Myhra, Zeglen
OTHERS PRESENT : Engineering Assistant Clark
1 . LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-12, NORBERT J. LIESEN: Lots 27, 28 and 29,
Block 4, Oak Grove Addition.
Mr. Liesen was present.
It was explained that the lots in the original plat were all 40 feet. Lot
30, which is vacant and lies north of Mr. Liesen's property, is a corner lot.
Mr. Liesen said he tried to buy this lot but was unable to agree on a price
with the owner. There is a home on Lot 29, but Mr. Liesen wished to split the
three lots so that he would have two 60 foot lots. If in the future, he could
purchase Lot 30, he would not object to a 100 foot corner lot.
A new street has just been put in with sewer and water. This would probably
amount to about $3,000 in assessments and Mr. Liesen felt he would have a better
chance to sell a 60 foot lot rather than a 40 foot one.
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Batterson, that the Plats & Subdivisions-
Streets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend to the Planning Commission approval
of the Lot Split #60-12, Norbert J. Liesen, of Lots 27, 28 and 29, Block 4,
Oak Grove Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, except Crowder voting
nay, the motion carried.
Mr. Crowder said the only reason he voted against the request was to call
attention to the fact that a problem does exist with regard to the 40 foot
corner lot and serious consideration should be given to what would Happen on
that corner lot.
2. CONTINUED REZONING REQUEST: ZOA #69-02, GEORGE M. NELSON: Road Pattern
Study. Referred by Council to Planning Commission.
Mr. George Nelson and Mr. Howard Moore were present.
The Engineering Assistant explained that Mr. Nelson has a request pending
before the Council for rezoning the North half of Lots 30 and 31 , Auditor's
Subdivision #129. The Planning Commission denied this request because of
probable increase of traffic and street pattern. Mr. Nelson has reduced the
size of his request so that there would be a strip of R-1 lots along Onondaga,
and the balance would be a future plan for multiples. The Planning Commission
thought the whole block should be looked at before they would make a
recommendation. From this Body, what they want to know is,if this plan is
adopted, what would be the recommendation as far as streets are concerned.
In 1962 a street plan was made, but at that time, the whole block was R-1 .
If the whole block was rezoned, the guess is that it would develop from 73rd
Avenue to the north line of the zoning group. In that case, the proposed
E.lanniCommission Meetina May 8 1969 P 6
out and traveled and as described in Book 702 of Deeds, Page 197 with th4
provision that the driveway easement described on the proposed plat dated
April 15, 1969 also be labelled utility easement. Upon a voioe vote, all
voting aye, the motion Carried unanimously.
4. L21 MIT RE VEST= L.S, J62-12, NORBERT J. LIESEN: sots 27 to 29, 13IQ04
)-- 4ak Grove Addition
Mr. Liesen, was present.
Mr, Jensen explained that the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets 4 Utilities
Subcommittee had a split vote for approval of this request in order to
call 4ttention to the corner lot which is a 40 foot lot, At one time
there was a small house on the lot and was condemned and forcibly removed
by the City and is separate ownership. It was noted that the lot* to the
South. in this block have been split into 60 foot sites. Mr. Liesen
explained he had made an offer to acquire the corner lot, but could nat
purchase it at a price he thought reasonable.
The question was asked that, as a matter of legality, if the owner
asked for a building permit, would he be refused? The answer wa* that
the owner could be refused, but h could to court, h t s
wa u d, e l o t, T e la size
g
such that he could not meet the City requirements. The Counoil, might
ask the petitioner to show in writing that he tried to purohase the lot,
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commis*ion
approve the lot split request, L,S. #69-12, by Norbert J, Liesen of Lotti
27 to 29, Block 4, Oak Grove Addi.tian, as it is proposed by the oertif oatg
of ourvey, Minnesota Registered No. 5332. Upon a voice vote, Mitteletadt
and Jensen voting aye, Erickson abstaining because of a oonflioting
interest, the motion carried.
5. REZONING REQUEST: ZOA #62-08, KAYE WESTERLUND: North $27,7 feet of the
West of the Northeast of Northeast of Section 13. Rezone from R�1
to R-3A.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission
vet the public hearing date for June 11 , 1969 (Wednesday) for the
rezoning request, ZOA #69-08, Kaye Westerlund of the North $27.7 feet of
W4 of NE4 of NE;'j� of Section 13, to be rezoned from R-1 to R-3Ae Upon a
voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously,
6. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT: P.S. 169-07, BRENTWOOD ESTATES 2ND ADDITION
BY 'IOM SWANSON: Part of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision F77,
MOTION by Mittelstadt, segonded by Jensen, that the Planning Commissign
set the public hearing date of May 22, 1969 at 8:00 P.M. for the proposed
preliminary plat, P.S. ##69-07, Brentwood Estates 2nd Addition by Tom
SwanoQa of part of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision #77, Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 19, 1969 PAGE 13
second reading required, then publication, and 15 days after publication, it
becomes law. Mr. Floer stated that there is a conflict of interest and he
intended to get a lawyer.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY
6, 1969:
MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the Minutes of the Parks and Recreation
Commission Meeting of May 6, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF MAY 7, 1969;
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to receive the Minutes of the Board of Appeals
Meeting of May 7, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 1, 1969:
MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission'
Meeting of May 1, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 8, 1969:
1. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT P.S. #69-06, VEIT'S ADDITION, LONDA ENGLUND:
That part of Lot 15, Revised Auditor's Subdivision #23 lying Westerly of
Westerly right of way line of Riverview Terrace as now laid out and traveled
and as described in Book 702 of Deeds, Page 197.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to set the Public Hearing for the Final Plat P.S.
#69-06, Veit's Addition as requested by Londa Englund for June 9, 1969.
Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-12, NORBERT J. LIESEN: Lots 27 through 29,
Block 4, Oak Grove Addition.
The City Engineer explained that this request is so that he can make two
buildable sites of 60' each. He pointed out that there is a 40' corner lot
owned by Mr. Dumphy which he understood Mr. Liesen tried to purchase, but he
felt that Mr. Dumphy was asking an unreasonable price. By granting this lot
split, there will be a 40' lot that nothing can be done with. Councilman
Sheridan asked if the corner lot had a building on it., Mr. Liesen said there
was one, but it has been removed. Councilman Harris asked if the corner lot
is maintained at all. Mr. Liesen said no. He said that his.%house is on Lot
29. Councilman Harris asked what the depth was. The City Engineer said 128' .
Councilman Samuelson asked if these lots would meet the minimum standards. The
City Engineer did some figuring and said that they do not, however, the other
lots in the area are the same. If he could get the corner lot, he Mould meet
the land requirements.
Councilman Harris pointed out that the 40' lot will n6t do Mr. Dumphy any good,
he cannot build on it.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 19, 1969 PAGE 14
MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the Lot Split Request L.S. #69-12 by
Norbert J. Liesen for Lots 27 through 29, Block 4, Oak Grove Addition.
Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
f' Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimsoulsy.
3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-13, GEORGE L. WALQUIST: West 150 feet of
Lot 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition
Councilman Harris asked if this was a rear-front split. The City Engineer
said yes, and added that the City will need some easements from him. Council-
man Sheridan asked if this was not the same type of split he requested behind
the mortuary. The City Engineer said no, because there is access in the back
of this lot. There is a 16' dedicated alley along the back of the lot so the
City will need some additional right of way for a future road. He explained
that the split is between the two zoning categories. The back portion is
zoned residential. These lots are 300 feet deep so they will not be double
frontage lots, they are plenty big enough to split.
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to grant the Lot Split L.S. #69-13 requested
by George L. Walquist on the west 150' of Lot 18, Block 1, Spring Valley
Addition, subject to his dedicating the easterly 34' for the purpose of a road
in the future. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of May 8, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING
OF APRIL 4, 1969:
MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the Minutes of the Fridley Industrial
Development Commission Meeting of April 4, 1969. Seconded by Councilman
Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried unanimously.
ORDINANCE #420 - AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A POLICE
SQUAD CAR:
The City Manager explained that the Police Department advertised for bids,
but received none. He said that it seems the manufacturers have stopped making
the special cars sooner than anticipated. He explained that they would be
going to several dealers to get quotations, on cars that would meet the
specifications as closely as possible.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Emergency Ordinance #420 on first reading,
waive the reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan.
Upon a roll call vote, Sheridan, Kirkham, Liebl, and Harris voting aye, Mayor
Kirkham declared the motion carried.
RECEIVING THE ANNUAL POLICE AUCTION REPORT:
MOTION by Councilman Liebl. to receive the annual .Police auction report, the
auction being held May 10, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice
gote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.