LS74-04 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
Form #5-68
CITY OF FRIDLEY
FOR CITY USE ONLY
Applicant's Name
APPLICANT: John M. Metcalfe
551+ -3a' Lot Split •,
ADDRESS: 6418 N.E. Riverview Terrace, Fridlev.Mi
- Street City Zip Code Date Filed: 6/27/72
a) m 0, TELEPHONE # 56o-3299 7$6-7350 Feer 15.O(Receipt
Home Business Council Action:Date
d o REMARKS:
0 PROPERTY OWNER(S) John M. Metcalfe
43 C .d -
a�i +� �
P4 .0
a-D m ADDRESS(ES) 611$ N.E. Riverview Terrace, Fridley, Minn 55A.213:�-
a� a o Street City Zip Code
W -C �
+' m Cd Street City Zip Code
o r° ami � TEL #(S) 56, 3299 7$6-7350
c Id H Home Business
� m -3 Cd
U]
O � rl -
0 Property Location on Street
ta or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) 611$ N. E. Riverview Terrace, Fridley, Minn.
554K-32--
Legal
54K3yLegal Description of Property:
z
Description of property is attached
-
Reason for Lot Split: Brick garage owned by Harry Smith and Betty Smith encroa-
ches approximately 1.4 to 1.$ feet onto Mr. Metcalfe's property along the South
line of the latter. Garage is incapable of being moved due to its heavy con-
struction. An action to register title to the Smith's property is pending, but
is being delayed as a result of this encroachment.
Total Area of Proper sq. ft. Present Zoning ClaseificationR-1 Single
Ti'am i•I ar T`h ml I jg�����
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this application are true and
correct.
DATE: w L I `� SIGNATURE
_ I IL
BELOW FOR CITY USE 0 Y (Seik Vv,499 side for additional instructions)
PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE
1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley)
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of $15.00 for each original lot being split.
3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a
month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of
the Subcommittee-111✓
�
4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels
along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in.
5. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department
for Planning Commiss'on commendations. The Planning Commission meets on the
second and fourth of the month. The City will supply the applicant
with minutes of the Planning Commission.
6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday
of the month.
7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
L.S. #72-04: John M. Metcalfe
Lot numbered Sixteen (16) of Revised Auditor's Subdivision No.
23; excepting therefrom the following described tract:
That part of Lot Sixteen (16), Revised Auditor's Subdivision No.
23, that is described as follows: Commencing at the most North-
easterly corner of the said Lot 16, and proceeding thence South-
westerly along the most Northerly line of said Lot 16 for a distance
of 165 feet; and proceeding thence Southeasterly and parallel to the
most Easterly line of said Lot 16 to the most Southerly line of
said Lot 16; and proceeding thence Northeasterly on the most South-
erly line of said Lot 16 to the most Southeasterly corner of said
Lot 16 and proceeding thence Northwesterly on the most Easterly
Tine to the point of commencement; subject to and reserving herein
an easement for ingress and egress purposes over a strip of land
twelve feet in width adjacent to the Northerly line of the above
described tract and bounded on the South by a line parallel to the
most Northerly line of the above described tract and twelve feet
distant therefrom as measured at right angles.
M �
L.S. Metcalfe: L.S. #72-04
In
� z
S
�4 M /i
.4 1 N '/
LrA 4.J
cd c�
W
cp
I A\
Fa„t,n.Is only
RT I ,, P I 1.
!a '_-:�1 1.1 D � ' 1
N Ox
T 11er@.`•V coo r !v that this ' trite a tri errs C.t
Plat of a survey of Lot 1(), Ravi Ser) Aur_ii+pr' s Suhdivi si ,n,
.nolo County, ' innesota , as sur.voyej by me ti. is
23st day of September, ] %5:? A.D. `.:,
, 5
EDWARD E. COLEMAN L•S• #72-04: L.S. Metcalfe
ATTORNEY AT LAW TELEPHONE
GERALD M. RANDALL 211 E. MAIN STREET 421.5424
ASSOCIATE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 AREA CODE 612
June 22, 1972
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Attention: Plats & Subdivisions and Streets & Utilities Subcommittee
Gentlemen:
Enclosed herewith are the following: Lot Split Application, together
with attached legal description of subject property and sketch of the
property, our check in the amount of $15 to cover the Lot Split fee.
Please advise of the action your committee takes on the Application;
kindly advise further whether it is advisable that I appear at your
next meeting on behalf of Mr. Metcalfe and, if so, the date of said
meeting.
Thank you very much for your cooperation.
Yours truly,
Gerald M. Randall
GMR:c k
Enclosures
J
Plats. & Subs.-- Str. 6 Uti1. Mtn- July 12. 1972 Page 2
Mr. Clark explained that before the lake was formed, the land was owned by
'
two people, 0* Ostman and Brew Scherer. They are still the owners of the
lake bottom. if one person owned the lake and everybody around the lake shared
• the cost of platting, the lake bottom could be divided into lots. Then the one
owner could deed the individual lets to the adjacent owner. For example, the
land in front of Mr. Schultz's house, because the shoreline has shifted, is owned
by another person and consequently, Mr. Schultz has no lake: access.
• Mr. Schultz said his surveyor may not have enough time to do- ito `Where will
be 50 different ideas of how it should be decided because there are 50 Lakeshore
owners. There are some people who will not deed their ptoperty to the lakeshore
because they had their property before there was a lake.
/ 2. LOT SPLIT REST' 1.3- X79-04, BY EDWARD E+ COLEMAN, ATTORNEY FOR JOHN
M. METCALFE: Lot 16, except East 165 feet, Revised Auditor's Subdivision
-- to -split off South five feet of Lot 16.
Mr. Gerald M. Randall, Associate, of the office of Edward E. Colemangrepre-
sented Mr. Metcalfe.
Mr. Clark reviewed the lot split request of a year ago referring to the map
on Page 8 of the Agenda, and said Mr. Metcalfe got approval to split the land
that runs from the Mississippi to the East side of Riverview Terrace, being one
large parcel into three R-1 lots. it was stipulated that he provide a second
utility and driveway easement for sewer and water and access for the house now
located on the river. When the survey was made, it was discovered that the
neighbor to the South had his garage built with a 1.+ foot overlap. The City
bas one deed already signed but not recorded for Riverview Terrace. The County
won't accept it because of the title which was in the name of the father-in-law
of Mr. Metcalfe,- but now Mr. Metcalfe has the title.
Mr. Clark continued that the driveway goes across the Southerly part of the
loco The utilities also may work out better on the South line. Nothing has been
recorded yet so that it wi-1I not be a problem. The lot now is 91 feet wide and
splitting off the South 5 feet would leave 86 feet. There is quite a bit of
room between the new lot line and the existing house so that line could slide
East or West. The contract for the deed has been paid off within the last few
caths. Be should get a new deed signed by Ift. Metcalfe for Riverview Terrace.
Mr. Gerald Randall said he thought this would be taken care of soon. There
Is a sortgage on the five foot strip that Mr. Metcalfe is selling. When the
sortgage is released, a sdrvey will be made of the whole area.
Mr. Clark said the serer Is rather shallow that co k-acts to the house on the
river. If It caw eve that houses it can serve the proposed bouse. However,
It -- dU have to be relocated. As you axwe South, you gain depth in the sewer
y
.12M a
He added that the lot split cannot be completed until a survey is made of
the entire parcel so that proper legal descriptions can be brought up.
At7rZlS by French, seconded by Forster, that the Plats a Subdivisions-Streets &
UtIlitlear SS'ubcvnwfttee recaoimiend to the Planning Comissiou approval of the Lot
Split Request, L.S. #7204, by John K. Metcalfe splitting of the Southerly 5 feet
of Lot l�, except the Bast 165 feet, Revised Auditor's Subdivisions #23 subject
t
Plats & Subs.-Stx & U_t_il Mtn. Jui�r 12n 172 Page 3
1 to receiving a certificate of survey of the entire Lot 16 showing the location
of all subsequent lot lines with proper legals describing them. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
3. .LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #72-05, BY LAUREN BORN: Lot 20, ick 1, Spring
Valley Addition --- to be split into four lots because of high taxes.
Mr. and Mrs. Lauren Born were present.
Mr. Clark explained that on the East side of the property there is an alley
going in a North/South direction. The lot is 335 feet deep. It is planned to
have a 50 foot street coming from Arthur Street towards Central Avenue. The
half of the lot abutting Central. Avenue is zoned commercial and the East half is
zoned R-1. Mr. Born submitted two proposals for his request-
Proposal "A"° is divided into four lots meeting the present R-1 land area
requirements without additional right of way for the North/South street along
the Eastern edge of the property. Proposal "B" shows these lots as being smaller
than the R-1 requirements. Mr. Born apparently feels because he has to give up
34 feet, the lots have to be smaller -- he might be able to get a variance° The
zoning line on proposed Lot 2 comes within about 8 feet of the Eastern line of
Lot 2. The existing house is on the corner lot. Mr. Born has spent quite a bit
of money remodeling it. The house had no basement.
Mr. Meissner wondered if a cul de sac could be used instead of Mr. Born
dedicating 34 feet for a street. Mr. Clark answered that a couple of years ago,
-there was a request for a lot split to the North of here. The petitioner was
asked to dedicate 34 feet for the North/South street. Because this area does
not have a storm sewer and will eventually have to have one if the split goes
through, Council probably will ask Mr. Born to escrow $8.00 per 100 square feet
for storm sewer. The lots would hook onto sewer and water from 64th Avenue.
W. Schmedeke said that he liked to favor the petitioner at every opportunity
he gets, but here two different zonings are involved. The house on Mr. Borns
property is in C-1 which makes it a non-conforming use. Most of the second lot
would be in C-1 so there would be a creation of a commercial lot which was under-
sized. He would prefer Plan B as shown on Page 12 of the Agenda because the
street is shown, but could not go along with the request at this time. He asked
the Stbeoumittee if there would be any way they could help this man, perhaps by
a change in the zoning. There could be the possibility of this being considered
spot zoning.
Addressing the Subcommittee, Fir. Clark asked if Mr. Born decided to rezone
the property and- it was approved, could he be assured the lot split would be
accepted.
Mr. Born was informed of the rezoning procedure.
Mr. Heissner noted that the two lots North of Lot 20 were zoned C-1 (Lots
18 and 19) and the two lots North of them were zoned C-2. He wondered if it
would be possible to rezone the three lots in the same category.
Mrs Clark said that the lots could be split along the zoning line. C-1
facing ural Avenue and R-1 facing 64th Avenue.
Planning Commission Meeting - July 19,_ 1972 Page
s ■ • ■F■■1■n■n.
4. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #72-03, BY DON A. SCHULTZ: Lots 1 and 2, blQck 11
$dgewater Gardens. To remove lot line from under adjacent house for edegUato
side yard requirement.
Mrs. Donald A. Schultz was present.
Mr. Clark said that this request k, i& before the Plats & Subdivisigne-S treete A
TItilities Subcommitt-at aa� ,t:,�y approv,.' _!Ie lot split. The North boundary of
these lots is the shoreline as it exist�u wren Edgewater Gardens were platten.
Between the South land and the present stY�re land there is land owned by another
party. Mr. Schultz is trying to hire a surveyor to plat the lake, Mr, Ostlg4an and
Mr. Drew Scherer have agreed to deed it to the people around the lake, One pet-
son will buy and plat and deed to the people around the lake. lir. Schultz to
working with the County Surveyor who said the platting will not affect the lot
split.
Mr. Schmedeke said that Mr. Schultz built an addition on his home that
extended over the old lot line. He owns both 1 )ts.
Mr. Minish added that Mr. Schultz wanted to develop Lot 1 and can't do �t
because of the property line going under his present home.
Mr. Clark said the peninsula that juts into the lake is on the same lot
as the house is on and the other lot would be separate. Lot 2, Block 1 1e legal,
Without considering the lake bottom property. The description was checkod -qUt
the County Surveyor and he will accept it.
Mrs. Schultz explained that the house was faring directly to the property
that belongs to Lot 1. If the house could have been facing in another ditec;40p,
they wouldn't have this problem.
Mr. Clark said it was difficult for the builder to decide whether to got
the house perpendicular to the street or the lot line. With the new lot linop
the house will be parallel to the lot line.
,MOTION by Minish, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning qQ 6+e490
recommend to Council approval of the Lot Split Request, L.S. #72-03! by DQn A,
SohpJtz, of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Edgewater Gardens to remove the Jot 1440
from under the existing house and provide adequate side yard. UpQn a y9loe y9t@f
all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
3, LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. X72-04 BY EDWARD E. COLEMAN FOR JOHN 4, MTCA1r.VRt
J,,Qt lb, except East 165 feet, Revised Auditor's Subdivision f23
off South 5 feet of Lot 16.
Mr. Gerald M. Randall represented the petitioner.
The Plats & Subdivisions-Streets 6 Utilities Subcommittee reco1,9A044 Apprp"
Val of the lot split. A survey was made of the property after the p'T6Y1QVO
request and it showed that the neighbor's garage was located on the NatCalfo Xa d�
Therefore, with the City approval, they would like to sell 5 feet sof thgtr Jo d,
to the neighbor.
Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 192 Page 7
Mr. Schmedeke said the Subcommittee felt that this would be the proper Way
to solve the problem of having a garage overlapping the lot line as it now 94 5 te,
MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Schmedeke, that the P.74nninq
recommend approval to Council of the Lot Split request, L.S. #7P-•04� ,by John M.
Metcalfe to split off the. South 5 feet of Lot 16, Revised Audi.tor's SubdiyisjoP
#Z3 except the East 165 feet subject to receiving a certificate of surrey 0 Me
entire Trot 16 showing the location of all subsequent lot lines with proper legols
.describing them. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion garp1e£ uNdnimousl}#.
L_-1
6. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #72-05, BY LAUREN BORN: Lot 20, Block 1, Spring
Valley Addition to be split into four lots because of high taxes.
Mr. Schmedeke explained that Lot 20 has two zonings, nearly dividing the lot
in half. If the Subcommittee went along with Mr. Born's requests they would be
creating two substandard commercial lots. After a lengthy discussiQp, the pnembers
of the Subcommittee recommended Mr. Born should attempt to make thie l9 t lt-Ito
three lots leaving the commercial as commercial and splitting the Bast half into
two g-1 building sites. In this way Mr. Born would still have two lots ill cpmmer-
cial area that would have to be rezoned before asking for the split, if he did
get the rezoning, he could still request a lot split. The commercial lot is now
in a non-conforming use because of the house. To the South and North there is
C=-1 Mocal business areas) property. Mr. Born also owns Lot 19, the lot to they
North.
Mr. Clark added that the Subcommittee discussed the future street on the
hest edge of Lot 20. Mr. Born would be asked to give 34 feet ip addition tQ the
16 foot alley making it possible for the lots facing 64th Avenue and Nie stssippi
Street to split in half. When Mr. Walquist requested a Lot Split far 149t 18a
part of the approval was t6 dedicate the East 34 feet for street.
Mr, Born said he plans to either sell or build. If he could sell, he would
•
poll. There is a house located on Lot 19 and one on Lot 20. He spent quite a
'fit of money for the house on Lot 20.
Mr, Clark said the figures suggested by Mr. Born for the 41menslouR Warg
gbgAged by the Subcommittee.
Mr. Schmedeke said that if Mr. Born asked for rezoning, it w9ulo bo spot
Boning. If both Lots 18 and 19 were rezoned to R-1, that may be the way to $9,
He then read the motion from the minutes of the Plats & SubdivtoIgns-5tp@eto A
Utilities Subcommittee meeting of July 12, 1972 found on pages 4 and 5,
Chairman Erickson said he thought the first part of the motion was lane, Tf
there is going to be any further request, Mr. Born should come In with a reran^°
lHl request and divide the property at the same time. He was Hot qu;o Ua WgUld
gpprpve that type of spot zoning.
Mr. Fitzpatrick said that so long as the house remains on loot 11 �t gap;jq'
be used as commercial
Mr. Clark said Mr. Born was told there are many types of vses ellq�Te l ' i
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 1972 PAGE 8
• Councilman Breider asked why the $5,000 if City personnel would be used. The
City Manager explained that We would be utilizing people that already have their
day to day jobs and there is a limited amount of people. None 6f the departments
can be shut down to free them for this job. There would also be some materials
and equipment costs, such as the railroad ties and air hammers etc. Councilman
Breider asked why specify $5,000, what if $7,000 is needed? The City Manager said
that the $5,000 is the upward limit of what they anticipate, but if more is needed,
the Council would then be asked to approve another transfer.
THE VOTE UPON THE MOTION, being a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the
motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 19, 1972:
1. SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #72-08, NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. : Parcel 1200,
SSS Section 22, zoned M-2. Sign to be 14'2" X 4919" to be parallel to railroad
tracks, south of T.H. #694 and west of railroad tracks, per City Code 45.04,2.
This item was continued by the Commission at the request of the petitioner.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #72-09, BY NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. : Parcel 5400,
Section 2, side by side poster, 12' X 25' per City Code 56.04,2. Located at
7940 University Avenue.
The City Engineer reported that the petitioner has requested a delay until August
21st.
MOTION by Councilman Mittelstadt to table this item to August 21, 1972. Seconded
by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion
carried unanimously.
3. PRELIMINARY PLAT P.S. #72-02, BY EINAR "TED" DORSTAD - DORSTAD ADDITION:
A replat of Lot 39, Revised Auditor's Subdivision #77, except part to
Greenwood (Parcel 5640)
The Council has already set the public hearing for August 14, 1972.
4. LOT SPLIT REQUEST L.S. #72-03, BY DUN A. SCHULTZ: Lots 1 & 2, Block 1,
Edgewater Gardens. To remove lot line from under adjacent house for adequate
side yard requirement.
MOTION by Councilman Mittelstadt to concur in approval of the lot split requested
by Mr. Don A. Schultz. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all
ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
5. LOT SPLIT REQUEST L S #72-04, BY EDWARD E. COLEMAN FOR JOHN M. METCALFE:
Lot 16 except east 165 feet, Revised Auditor's Subdivision #23, to split off
south 5 feet of lot 16.
MOTION by Councilman Mittelstadt to concur in approval of the lot split requested
by Mr. John Metcalfe subject to the Commission's stipulations. Seconded by
Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion
carried unanimously,
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 1972 PAGE 7
Mr. Richard Elliott, 210 Craigbrook Way, asked if there was any way to stop any
more hooking into a system that would dump more water into the creek until something
is completed on this project? He said at this point he did not want any more storm
water dumped in.
The City Engineer explained that this is all just a matter of moving storm water
from causing a problem in one place to another place. Before the culvert was
put in under East River Road the people east of East River Road were being flooded.
The culvert was made lower and larger to take care of their flooding, so the problem
was moved from one place to another. It is actually the same water, no more is
being added, the water was just being backed up behind East River Road before. To
go one step further, the people east of East River Road were in trouble because a
larger culvert was put in under University Avenue. As to Mr. Elliott's concern,
the work ordered in by the Council for east of East River Road has been completed,
so there will not be any more water added.
THE VOTE UPON THE MOTION, being a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared
the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION #94-1972 - A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND CALLING
A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS: STORM SEWER IMPROVE-
MENT PROJECT #102, ADDENDUM #2:
MOTION by Councilman Mittelstadt to adopt Resolution #94-1972, and set the public
hearing date for August 28, 1972. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote,
all ayes, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mrs. Martin asked if they could not get at least two hours of work done? She said
for instance, there is a very large willow tree that could very well be lost. She
said she is just not capable of moving a 300 pound tree. The trees and logs are
closing up the creek, so couldn't some funds be freed on the basis that the natural
drainage is being closed off?
The City Attorney said that there would not be a great problem in using public
funds to clear the creek, however, there should be a waiver signed by the property
owners before the City enters onto the private property. This waiver should hold
the City harmless. Mr. Elliott suggested that the waiver could be worked out for the
property owners to sign when Councilman Mittelstadt meets with them. The City
Manager suggested that the Council could aiithorize an expenditure of up to $5000
from the unappropriated reserve portion of the budget to be used for manpower and
equipment, contingent upon their signing the waiver.
RESOLUTION #95-1972 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CHANGING OF THE BUDGET
APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN THE GENERAL FUND: ($5,000 for Stonybrook Creek Work)
MOTION by Councilman Mittelstadt to adopt Resolution 495-1972. Seconded by
Councilman Utter.
The City Engineer said that this would provide for the immediate bank work,as to
go through all the legal requirements would require another two months. It was
pointed out that if a project is ordered in, this $5,000 would then be charged
against the project and would then be replaced into the unappropriated reserve
�_<,rtion of the budget.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF DECEMBER 7, 1972
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Zeglen at 8:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Zeglen, Tonco, White, Simoneau
MEMBERS ABSENT: Lindblad
OTHERS PRESENT: Jerrold Boardman, Planning Assistant
MOTION by White to approve the minutes of the November 21, 1972 meeting as written.
Seconded by Simoneau. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
1. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO MOVE A HOUSE FROM 6125 NORMANDALE ROAD, EDINA.
MINNESOTA TO PARCEL 2340, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0, 23, REVISED, THE SAME
BEING 6420 RIVERVIEW TERRACE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, (REQUEST BY MRS.
JOHN M. METCALFE, 6418 RIVERVIEW TERRACE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432.)
Mr. John Metcalfe was present to present the request.
Mr. Metcalfe said the surveyor was in the process of drawing up the survey
with the location of the proposed house. He said the lot the house was being
moved to was a walk-out lot and the elevation of the lot will raise the house
four -feet. Mr. Tonco asked if the grade will be left as is and the back
excavated for drainage. Mr. Metcalfe said that was his intention. Mr. Metcalfe
said the garage will have a higher elevation on the new site. He felt this
was an excellent house and was between ten and fifteen years old. . Mr. Zeglen
said this house will fit into the Riverview area.
Mr. Metcalfe said the house is brick on the first floor level, but not so much
of the front will be showing at the new location. Mr. Tonco asked if the house
met the Fridley Codes . Mr. Boardman said it did.
Mr. Tonco noted Mr. Metcalfe had not presented a landscaping plan. He said he
knew this would be difficult to draw up until the house was in place on the lot.
Mr. Boardman said we should have the elevation of the house and the lot.
Mr. Tonco brought up the subject of a performance bond. After discussion the
Subcommittee decided a $5,000 performance bond should be posed to finish the
house and the landscaping. Mr. Metcalfe said he had to post a bond with the
State of Minnesota to move the house from its present location by January 17,
1973. The Subcommittee gave Mr. Metcalfe until August 1, 1973 to complete all
the work covered by the performance bond.
MOTION by Tonco to recommend to the City Council approval of the request to move
a house into Fridley with the following stipulations:
1. $5,000 performance bond be posted for the completion of the house and
landscaping. (Landscape plan to be submitted to the Inspection Dept.)
2. Elevations be presented to the Engineering Department.
Seconded by Simoneau. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
August 15 , 1972
Mr. John M. .'Metcalfe
6418 Riverview Terrace N.L.
Fridley, Minn. 55432
RL: Lot Split #72-04
Dear A,r. Metcalfe :
This is to inform you that the City Council of
Fridley at their meeting of August 14 , 1972 approved
your request for a lot split with the following
stipulations :
D 1 . that you supply the City with legal descriptions
of the resulting lots
2 . that you supply the City with surveys of the
resulting lots .
If you have any further questions , please
contact me .
ours`-very f ,,
DA RL K
Engineering Assistant
DC/nj s
V7. ww'� 6 M sF �„
-'E "'.
e• r .F - 's -:71s � l'•�' ^s.¢ "rf+� -,. ♦ .a � �'.�; v 3' �r� + "..r .� ,4 ,N"T, r,�.
t w.� e� e' +" Kt���,,��x ^, s�§ � �, �'�•J,. .' �+ MS
Ik � "
q;... dI .,r, .v �," iP hr '4 � .c'M, r+v• r: *'lk' ,,]F". y r
QF
,� pdrt r. ,fit°
A. rz *t �%s z y f w ray r u to txe of y mw, t.
Xe
qn
�
3,4
�;x .`'�a �. r:,s.. p t'�ti�'+;, �°+ ry :� a.[ � T".7 •+,., 'lrb"'7;�.4z s"`
3
� d ,4 � ,..fit i`•p i' r5 ��� rt? r' g_ Rj�t
, V-10 Of
pi kv
'�+ +rSof
*�s x + k �i "C L •.o ':. r... a- ,+ ''rr -y, -"`F ."',n, 9
« �,�`�� y-
..�,,,_,, yam, j'.t. �, 11gr f:'. `+C•. Ak• 3'...KK, �r"Xs+! .? !W 'f "F K✓H^ '.:i
% wisx.r.c -w e; �`s
A
:. w s�t.t±p. -`s�y y •.x -,�.3�i'�'i,°v. �,.'� y .r y. :: ,Fx .� �..�:�6+. '{� r e� '�'., v,�' x ,�. ,s.y
,A ,aE,._ �.. # �,, � +�.w �.• �-f �t ,-t.'P! { ��t,� � e"r> `�:� .� moi, r' �s„�, S2 ... � �
_ �y �- a: t �� S�a�y-.Zr"'9• �j Xi'4 »�a �1^j��jJ 7: ° u y:�r �$ y� „f• -�Z»s �. '�' #-s, a':�:% �- : .� a..; `
-1 .,}�T� {{.� {Y.' � G' �y,#�S �. � 'i✓,�'��� ':��`t3+FC:,.� %� X � �,+ �'p.�. `�lh1Pi?y��1� ems" AR.' .
"F' "3. _ 5 �`AaA?��6`4' A aA-0 'p•^ �' .•,�. .y�l � "'+ty .. Yfi'
AYF�^ $a* .AAfk fes,
t` '•�r s. +d� � a 'x" F/ ,# ,.� qn ��,>•� � :';..,�pz AR s � s � nryi x� '"`_�.�w��`,�t.''h 'N
�
+ '..4� � �, a•: �'l. a "k4 ��''. "�' ,ey,,�-� - � 4s a�.?s y� "'x. ...YKa�' � ate;{�kw"'L� �f'°
�. �'yf,y�✓D� YXf "�`�' d'h§ .+.N � u�-���M tK t � � TN6• � LS J � ��
&''`o; a
7Mn'`�
It. 7, '1*' "'�F�`;� �'8E.#tea i �` �' .vu.::..c• '+n^�1..�� �+K :3 �' `ted � .7F',a '�uTA'-i K '., ._ x
WX
? ,^ .F�er '� � � } ff'+:yam.��" .rd��,,., +} ��`?��.�� � ��+����,� {� t� ► �%�,,. ��'�� � , ,,:
73
Oil
':r ;fil "`[ '�"�� ��'�' b :. ���.aa�r'*i� +'�A� _� � ��r �gr,t*���.'�^`�`�/E�L �S .r,rte'." __.e'� ,;,• _ •''� s
��b L•,,��ss ,ter b9 q ,�,�+ tz Y > � "ems, "
..,#� .,3��ni` v •,.-. # '.: G,.. �#.' a^T'PIK� _ ,� 4 - a �•�,-:� ,»�P,.:'3� t y �4 4`-Y,q� � 4 �' ^� h.�:;
e ��y"��°P" �•'g��.�6;'�" x FY.s sr��r ' .p'3'x+-i�+�' �' y �'._ �. ��,. >k � "-�.k� � "A .fiw�,
s.i.jj�.. ��A:3� �,y.��� `" tar .� 4c's �' � a, a '.�" f��5��?`kro'�"° �-. ••��rr$ ''i�'' ,._
`R' k ''#t i�`n '�rAe� - a�•aa,.' � Xw.fi �..'` �° .�y,,,.,�s{ �t � ...
.., �/AK•..,�.+aru _�.. t.,3f�~ ��.�. �� _�/..."kea. ..a.,rt 3.ntiN�., ,�_4�_ r ,..A _