The URL can be used to link to this page

LS84-06 J 51 • CITY OF FRIDLEY, SUBJECT LOT SPLIT LS f 6431 VNIVCRSITY AVE. NE. FRin�EY, MN. fi3�= 161zI 671-�+sSO RECORDED: 10 , ADDRESS: 4 DATE: PLANNING COMM SSI014: APPR( DISAPPROVED DATE NO CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO PARK FEE REQUIRED: AMOUNT PAID STIPULATIONS: AQ9 �j� waf�6-n a �,eu ,� I NAME , C E FEE,/(f a RECEIPT NO PROPERTY OWNER(S) / � `f,� 7MI P) �d Yt TELEPHONE NO 7�G .5 Z— TELEPHONE NO .S 7 y_ ::23t) ADDRESS(ES)_ / 73 PROPERTY LOCATION ON STREET 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY PRESENT ZONING_ REASON FOR LOT SPLIT) ,�L' Q.r f . The undersigned 'heteby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE: SIGNATURE 7i� -� �'��t • NOTICE: A sketch of the property and the proposed lot split with any existing struc- tures shown should accompany this application. ' (See reverse side for additional instructions) LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE 1. Obtain application fora at City Hall (6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley). 2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property involved and the lot split fee of $75.00 for each original lot being split. 3. The application will be checked over by Staff and the owner may be required to submit a Certificate of Survey containing a simple description of a part of a platted lot or registered lot, along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in. 4. The application will then be submitted to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. The Planning Commission meets on the Wednesday following the City Council meeting, which is generally the first and third Wednesdays of the month. 5. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for final action. If a Certificate of Survey wasn't required before, it will be required for this meeting. The City Council meets on the first and third Mondays of the month. 6. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must be complied with by the applicant. 7. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent papers for his signature. 8. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant should file the lot split in Anoka County. 9. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed. NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT MAY EXCEED THE AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS. - 54 4 W TeMphone 561.2506 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS CHERRIER WINTER & ASSOCIATES INC. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL a LAND SURVEYORS SUITE 306 VILLAGE NORTH PROFESSIONAL BLDG 7420 UNITY AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN PARK,MINNESOTA 5543 Certificate of Survey Y PROPERTY Of Dick Gregor. d9scribed as fol lows • See sheet 2 of 2 sheets for legal description. iP,xFT�re a —- 92.Bo ...: t N. N 416.2 2 I - - • 1� N _ _ TZ CA I J I. �I 'I 9Z.S/ r ►� I 1N, M I N 9z 7S Q \ N � ' �•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•. . . M •;•;•;;,;,. . . :•r; fa 1 - 4 • 9Z.76 �I V I hereby comity that this survey, plop, or report roe Prepared by me or under toy direct sipsr.�sjon and loot I Om a fly ReOrofered Land Su► StSl. ' I it1c�A e«t.ls. 46.0... .._.1a/f under the lows of it.. Stats of /trl,nttet.otd veym • - indicates from 1btMrM.0 .1 W - M1iNM Mat Mots,,..,f fives/ ��,_�� R o q No 9o,- 4e :NUE ..., : • N.E. , - _ �r o la t4 ss ! • �'�.. i s i S t y `.i i ? •1 j� .� r per Q /� `J V • s _ 40 JwAGIa o /JS27� i� /i /�� R 1 • �� • � u • . ' � � N . �- �9Jr7 ti io� �1i 7 _ crolI6•S F� to art S o W 7Sl ? If+N a�L Q :�! 1 - , ��) /� /L.I i la M M 1 1146 i o1 4 )AV s , 7S / Lf �O O ,, /? l4l� �� .�• foo p R F N sof �; P„ / « Q' Y f. „ • - 76 TN L=S. #84 Ab Annette Jjoesrmiel - AVE-.,,, 2`w. —r.•-•� .s�•,•s r!i �r 744014 W DITOR'S 7461 9 /i•h O•i! Z M rlwtfM �I = 16� �cto cob d 7, IP Z /t'M• T*o32 V mo.►�1+( 10j�.1 � 10 rI/�►•I /s4�3 'X.d4N0. i,� �f. U. ' Soo e 74 Rif `0/ /L// ,,' 406 n . �S J ,ONONUAGA STREET r • . Ile ► 1 t!•o i114 Zas 11434 1470 I�7L /4s�. ti l • !sI lrto /b�•.1�� u 33s A 2 24 26 28 „ - , -716 2 _..IWPI ,.m. r�•++ ) ice►' ! 7 tri y� 3 4 �• ti j•w 3 7J`•.�� Z . 1 /sN ►ry T3i R * r J.-ri� bio /l , • fs0 twH � � � } 23 25 12729 l �.► f lsos sas /sem' ' 1' ►�'�� s«r NO. 129 • ' �� : ��/ �..rr J401 l��fl 14 i 1 1476 N� - --- ' ' hf✓ '+•r a OWN&LAUk"W AMM All I' V .ry r CERTIFICATION OF STATUS OF SUBDIVISION OF LAND ✓ 02 f �J0 1. Property PIN No. �a �%� -� cP Plat No. 5 / Parcel No. 2. Applicant �G Tele. No. � 3. Type of Document: D Deed 0 Contract for Deed 0 Other (Specify) 4. Date of Document -J~ t' S. Grantor: N 6. Grantee : 7. Received by City Clerk of Date : ` Time : By: 8. Action by it Approved: Rejected: Date: Ce: e �� Time: Time : By: By: (If approved - complete stamp on Document) 9. Reasons : (Cross out inappropriate words) a. Subdivision Regulations do/.de-rro" apply. b. Subdivision -(,appzoved ofappro d- (If approved - attach certified .copy of Resolution. ) C. Restrictionsd - not wa e~ by Council . (If waived - attach a certified: copy of Resolution. ) 10. Conditions Imposed: Combination with PIN No. (Petition of Owner should be attached. ) Others : (Specify) NOTE: IF SUBDIVISION INVOLVES TORRENS LAND, CONTACT THE EXAMINER OF TITLES AT COUNTY COURTHOUSE FOR FORM OF DESCRIPTION. (MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 508. 47) _ - r� �� AONAN / 6 f s 7 � 07 G -tT lY 29E009 8/85 S CITY OF FRIDLEY, COMMISSION APPLICATION s, MINNESOTA REVIEW Deporlmen Psion Number Rev pags Approved by FILE NO/ ADDRESS FILE DATE COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST RETURN TO PLANNING pro- Ou5..9ATE .. / COMMENTS JIM2R�Cd El Darrel 34AZp1 V1,,W Mark Sv�7�� r "1`'0 ��S�•nQ,�r �ur-,f �lClyde_5-,&. El John 0/-7Leon a� N M �-�1 ►II PS'L �-rte �- �---i� LO LO II i Y7 V I :► 6•;., v, i i'I I '� +t 2b I I k� 3; (a - i , el _ Iii _•� �_ � G-' � ( , ., , j 45 I• _. M (* O - , ]: •.- ��7 1- I� - _ I� I I I� � ( I � 4 II�� ZI I I Z -� I COawl� '�: � ' yh1 •vats I '�'— I a/ - — I t.. 3 v II; M 71 nil 11 i.. I ol 77 U-1 livu •`,` ii - moi_. - j 'sx =_-----�t}--- --� n - x •n �l` • .� i �; � »-• y., 4X �.. �---- - 9z , g 5 � . � � �- I �� — �� o�� bl-� � � � � �, 7�5 9 � - - --� u., � � � 5 O N � /U ✓� G 4 Y K' - - - -_ - ;27P_A. E PAR 13 i 2 5 19 1 j .• -. .r' � � 6 s -� a � r- -- — u LA Ovi E +� L R _J 4 16 T Q 3 a• � r I .' - i IS •� 1� 76TH V UE ' 7 I 1014 z ` . 6 6 o II / 6 mJ 4 S u 12 13 2 6119� N � D S H 20 VO .♦i1 j `: t.�l I i 21 3 2 �p a I 4 Cl I /P // v j LroNs�h y 757m t-EN'JE N E TH M E '✓�bf z 4'Nd h e ' E51 s y qC _ . � FLAN RY LL J J�JJJJJJ - - _4 511�9t9'/ JS N „� 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 ]O J I s r 7 O O J O J J 0 0 0 J O J O J O J 0 7•� J O O O O O J O 6 O �O°° oJ oJooo oo0 o Y" P) .iJ f t �00000JJooJ0000 i o°o° �JJo° o io y B 3 y i°o°o° Jo°o°o oJo°o°i i o,o0° o°o°o°o O O O O J J O J. 0 J 0 0 0 JOpOp CO000)J00J000000 e J O O O O J O O O J 0 0 J O C J O J O J 0 0 0 0 0 i s J JOO�j OO J00000 J 000 JOOC 3 j •' � - • } ?s J [;U/'U6 _ 31 4 c Q 2 74 � 7j� z�E N 703SAV NUE KE. :.' . .�i .'�. r •�• ••• •••�•�» STAT �`• ••• �� r a j•Z i �s 1' + gV �� • Q 4' 104 _ • • • e 6 • • • :o CO.iWtr k, ENJ NE 73RD. A lyr ral I 000, / I , 1 I �r • . 1 • • • • • •'' 0^:ISLIE _ ' RTO _AV F N L,F _ • L 20 W-��W/,/M/00,0 01 09 • •, N f f • rRA vSFER U 00, _ Rq/�wqY W 0/00 0 z ui �� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 23 1984 PAGE 10 Mr. Hitchcock stated he strongly objected to thi ecause of the fact that he had made himself available to do everythi he Staff had requested. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY . GABEL, TO TABLE LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #84-05, BY JOHN HITCHCOCK, T SPLIT OFF THE SOUTHERLY 84 FT. OF LOT 8H, SECOND REVISED AUDITOR'S DIVISION NO. 21, THE SAME BEING 6530 OAKLEY DRIVE N.E. , UNTIL THE FOL ING CONCERNS CAN BE CLARIFIED: 1. THE VARIAN SITUATION WITH REGARD TO GRANTING VARIANCES WITH THE LOT PLIT. 2. NOT VING THE ACTUAL OWNER ON RECORD WITH THE LOT SPLIT REQUEST. 3. SETBACK IMPACT ON MISSISSIPPI ST. UP VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. LOT SPLIT RE VEST: L =#84-06BY ANNETTE POESCHEL: Split the South 138.10 feet except t and excep es .75 feet of South Half of Lot 31 , subject to easement over South 30 feet) into two parcels to allow zero lot line for a double bungalow, the same being 1571-1573 73rd Avenue N.E. Mr. Robinson stated this property was located to the north of 73rd Ave. and east of Hayes St. The property is zoned R-3. The property is surrounded by a mixture of R-1 and heavy industrial to the south. The existing lot is 12,822 sq. ft. The petitioner is proposing to build a double bungalow on the two split parcels with zero lot line. This meets all the setback require- ments. He stated Staff would recommend the following stipulations: 1. Signed zero lot line covenant (The City provides a standard agreement to the owners to promote good maintenance. ) 2. Park fee of $750 on one new lot 3. Lot split be recorded with the County. Ms. Schnabel asked if this double bungalow would be a one-owner building or would each half be sold off? The petitioner, Ms. Annette Poeschel , stated the bungalow would have two different owners. She stated she owns the property now. She will be the • owner of one half, and her partner will buy the other half. MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. NIELSON, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #84-06, TO SPLIT THE SOUTH 138.10 FEET (EXCEPT THE NORTH 1/2 AND EXCEPT WEST 92.75 FEET OF SOUTH HALF OF LOT 31, SUBJECT TO EASEMENT OVER SOUTH 30 FEET) INTO TWO PARCELS TO ALLOW ZERO LOT LINE FOR A DOUBLE BUNGALOW, THE SAME BEING 1571-1573 73RD AVENUE N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on June 4. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 23, 1984 PAGE 9 Ms. Schnabel stated the Planning Commission had a problem with the owner not petitioning for the lot split. The petitioner, Mr. John Hitchcock, stated he is under contras with the existing property owner to buy the lot. He stated he was su this had happened with the northerly lot that was split off some ti ago. At that time, the petitioner requested the lot split and was gr ed the lot split. Mr. Hitchcock stated there was a change in the lot it request. The 86 ft. should be changed to 84 ft. Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Hitchcock if he had tal d to any of the neighbors in the area across Oakley St. or west of the of about the visual impact of putting a structure in front because it ould be set further ahead of any other house in the immediate area. Mr. Hitchcock stated he has not talked o the neighbors across Oakley. The property owner to the west is the fa er of the person he is buying the lot from, and he was the only property wner he had talked to. Mr. Hitchcock stated when he dis ussed this with Bill Deblon, Mr. Deblon felt that since this house fac Oakley, it was applicable to the houses on Oakley. Ms. Schnabel stated she st' 1 had some problems with that house setting so far forward, even though ' was an Oakley St. house, rather than a Mississippi St. house. Ms. Gabel stated she d a problem with the variances being approved with the lot split. She d not think this had ever been done before with a lot split. Since it wa a housekeeping type of thing, that might be the reason for it; but by not following the variance procedure, it eliminated the public hearing process ereby the neighbors would be notified of what was happening. Ms. Schnabel s ated she saw the following problems with this lot split request: 1 . The variance situation--granting the variances with the lot split. 2. N¢t having the actual owner on record with the lot split request. 3. he situation of the setback impact on Mississippi St. This should be checked out with respect to the setback requirements in the Zoning Ordinance or a legal opinion. Would this be setting a precedent? Ms. chnabel stated she realized the petitioner was anxious to move on this, but she thought possibly the Planning Commission should table this request until their June 6th meeting when these problems can be clarified. Mr. Kondrick stated he agreed that this request should be tabled until these questions are answered. -- ----- .rte-rrtr' OF ��Tt�' 4. L 84 w use with the residential o approval of f the neighborhoodr and the the el the Rice Creek Watershed District special adCity permit be engineering requirements. Mr. Flora stated one other stipulation should be the removal of the existing bus and trailer off the site when construction is completed. l[)TION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recomme dation of the Planning Commission and grant special use permit, SP 4-Ola8n with the the following stipulations: (1) there be an approved lands pe p ( ) finish of the new building should be compatible with th existing building and in harmony with the residential character of the ighborhood; (3) the special use permit be subject to approval of th Rice Creek Watershed District and City engineering requirements; and ) the existing bus and trailer be moved off the site when construction completed. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all vo ing aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4B. 4-0 MO'T'ION by Councilman Hamernik to set the earing on this preliminary plat for July 2, 1984. Seconded by Counci Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the mo on carried unanimously. 4C. SPEC A-09. Mr. Flora Public Works Director, stated this is a request for a special use permit to locate a repair gara e on property presently owned by Dayton- Hudson. He stated the Planning sion recommended approval of the special use permit with seven stipulations. Mr. Flora stated if the pecial use permit is approved, there will be a need for three variances whi appears on the agenda later in the meeting. MOTION by Council Hamernik to concur with the recomendation of the Planning Commission d grant special use permit, SP #84-09 for a repair garage to be locat at 765 53rd Avenue with the following stipulations: (1) an approved 1 dscape plan be submitted to the City; (2) a manageable slope must be le t on the eastside of the lot not greater than 3:1; (3) if bad soils are f und, petitioner must provide a soil alteration plan which includes Prot tion of the car wash property; (4) petitioner must agree to have no outsi storage of cars or parts at any time; (5) require that the operationiage their used oil or other hazardous waste through appropriate ins; (6) Z approved drainage plan be required before a building permit is issued; and (7) this special use permit is issued to the owner and is not transferrable without approval by the Council. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FOR LDQU= 4D. IDT - -3- rrrinx,Ir. MfiFrrt7G OF �MTN 4, 1984 Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this is property zoned R-3 north of f 73rd Avenue and across the street from Onan Corporation. He stated the petitioner is requesting zero lot lines in order to construct a double bungalow on the property. He stated the petitioner plans to own one half and her partner wil buy the other half. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot split to allow zero lot lines, however, staff would like to add three stipulations which would include a signed covenant, park fee, and recording the lot split with the County. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant lot split, IS #84-06 to allow zero lot lines with the following stipulations: (1) a signed zero lot line covenant be expected; (2) a park fee paid of $750; and (3) the lot split and covenant be recorded with the County. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4E. ITEr1 FROM ApPEATS COM-- SION MEETING OF MAY 15, 1984: YARD SETBACKS MR A REPAIR GARAGE AT 765 5 U- N. E. BY RICHARD GREEN: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this i a request for three variances to reduce the required lot size from 35 00 square feet to 22,171 square feet; to reduce the required front yard etback from 80 to 66 feet; and to reduce the required rear yard setback ram 40 to 10 feet. Mr. Flora stated the Appeals Commiss' n recommended approval of the variances with several stipulations. He stated these stipulations were incorporated into the special use mit approved by the Council earlier this evening. MOTION by Councilman Hamerni to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and gra the variances to reduce the lot size from 35,000 square feet to 22, square feet to reduce the front yard setback from 80 feet to 66 feet; d to reduce the rear yard setback from 40 feet to 10 feet for propert at 765 53rd Avenue. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a oice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unan' usly. Zhe Council then eceived the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of May 23, 1984. 5. SET R DISPOSAL OF CITY PROPERTY FOR 7jjy 2 1984: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to set the hearing for disposal of City pr for July 2, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, 1 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. - 19 THE ENVIRONMENTAL OuALITY COMMISSION TO DFSIGNATE THE MINNFZQT PQ ION CONTROL AGENCY TO DO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR THE ANOKA_Q=-RLAIa AIRPORT_ E PANSION: , -4- 1 Ob CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE ( 612)571 -3450 CITY COUNCIL June 18, 1984 ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Annette Poeschel 1441 73rd Avenue N. E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Dear Ms. Poe`�chel : On June 4, 1984 the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for 0-lot lines for a double bungalow at 1571-1573 73rd Ave. N. E. with the stipulations listed below. 1. A signed zero lot line covenant be executed. 2. A park fee paid of $750.00 3. The lot split and covenant be recorded at the County. 4. A lot split resolution must be passed by the Council before it can be recorded (after we get an accurate survey showing the exact lot split). If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. Sincerely, JAMES L. ROBI SON PLANNING SPECIALIST JLR/de Please review the noted stipulation, sign the statement below, and return one copy to the City of Fridley. Concur with action taken. • STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS CITY OF FRIDLEY C6,8 317,15 In the Matter of of approval of a Lot Split L. S. #84-06 to allow 0' lot lines for a PLAT/LOT SPLIT double bungalow at 1571-73 73rd Avenue NE Annette Poeschel , Owner 1441 73rd Avenue N. E. Fridley, Mn 55432 The above entitled matter cage before the City Council of th�9CCity of Fridley 4 and was heard on the 4th day of June , on a petition for a plat pursuant to t-Fe City of Frid ey s atting Ordinance, for the following described property: Split the South 138. 10 feet (except the North 1/2 and except West 92. 75 feet of South 1/2 of Lot 31 , Auditor' s Subdivision No. 129 IT IS ORDERED that a plat be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: See City Council minutes of June 4, 1984 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss. OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CITY OF FRIDLEY ) I, Sidney C. Inman, City Clerk for the City of Fridley with an in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a plat with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the day of 19 X-3 . DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. --Q Fridley, MN 55432 SIDNEY C. 0 N t'Itl -CLERK < a S_ T ..-7gr C OF .T[1NF 4. 1984 with the residential character of the neighborhood, and the special use permit be subject to approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District and City engineering requirements. Mr. Flora stated one other stipulation should be the removal of the existing bus and trailer off the site when construction is completed. M3TION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recomme dation of the Planning Commission and grant special use permit, SP 4-08 with the following stipulations: (1) there be an approved landscl8�pe plan; (2) the finish of the new building should be ca�atible with the existing building and in harmony with the residential character of the neighborhood; (3) the special use permit be subject to approval of th Rice Creek Watershed District and City engineering requirements; and (4) the existing bus and trailer be moved off the site when construction i9 completed. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. _ Q ADDTT ON. BY HRA: 4B. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to set the earing on this preliminary plat for July 2, 1984. Seconded by Counci Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the mo on carried unanimously. 4C. SPECIAL UP PERMIT, - A RUATR GARAGE AT 765 IVARD Mr. Flora Public Works Director, stated this is a request for a special use permit to locate a repair gara a on property presently owned by Dayton- Hudson. He stated the Planning sion reccmmnded approval of the special use permit with seven stipulations. Mr. Flora stated if the pecial use permit is approved, there will be a need for three variances whi appears on the agenda later in the meeting. MOTION by Council Hamernik to concur with the recomendation of the Planning Commission d grant s cial use permit. SP #84-09 for a repair garage to be locat at 765 53rd Avenue with the following stipulations: (1) an approved 1 dscape plan be submitted to the City; (2) a manageable slope must be le t on the eastside of the lot not greater than 3:1; (3) if bad soils are f und, petitioner must provide a soil alteration plan which includes prot tion of the car wash property; (4) petitioner must agree to have no outsi storage of cars or parts at any time; (5) require that the operation ge their used oil or other hazardous waste through appropriate means; (6) ran approved drainage plan be required before a building permit is issued; and (7) this special use permit is issued to the owner and is not transferrable without approval by the Council. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. --<1 4D. LOT T - -3- A C L NNC'TT, MEETING OF JUNE 4. 1984 Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this is property zoned R-3 north of 73rd Avenue and across the street from Onan Corporation. He stated the petitioner is requesting zero lot lines in order to construct a double bungalow on the property. He stated the petitioner plans to own one half and her partner wil buy the other half. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot split to allow zero lot lines, however, staff would like to add three stipulations which would include a signed covenant, park fee, and recording the lot split with the County. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant lot split, LS #84-06 to allow zero lot lines with the following stipulations: (1) a signed zero lot line covenant be expected; (2) a park fee paid of $750; and (3) the lot split and covenant be recorded with the County. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4E. ITEM FROM AppFAT s COMMTssToN MEETING OF MAY 15, 1984: VARIANCE REQUEST TO REDUCE LOT SIZE AND R�EIXICE REAR AND ANT YARD SETBACKS FOR A REPAIR GARAGE AT 765 53RD AVENUE N. E. BY RICHARD GREEN: X" Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this i a request for three variances to reduce the required lot size from 35 00 square feet to 22,171 square feet; to reduce the required front yard etback from 80 to 66 feet; and to reduce the required rear yard setback ran 40 to 10 feet. Mr. Flora stated the Appeals Commiss' n recommended approval of the variances with several stipulations. He stated these stipulations were incorporated into the special use mit approved by the Council earlier this evening. MOTION by Councilman Hamerni to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission anXgra the variances to reduce the lot size from 35,000 square feet to quare feet to reduce the front yard setback from 80 feet to 66 feeo reduce the rear yard setback from 40 feet to 10 feet for propert65 53rd Avenue. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a oice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanusly. The Council then/received the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of May 23, 1984. 5. SET PUBLI DISPOSAL OF CITY PRDPERTY MR JULY 2. 198A- MDTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to set the hearing for disposal of City proper for July 2, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, 1 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. ION NO, 64-1984 DFSIGNATE THE MINNFSOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY TO DO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMUU WORKSHEET FOR THE ANDEA COUNTY-BLAINS AIRPORT EXPANSION: -4- C8375 lNumerical f Grantor Grantee , Recorded_�� Checked._. Margin Tr..Index OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER STATE OF 69iNNESOTA, COUNTY OF ANOKA hereby certify that the w1;fhi7 instru. Mer+ was fii l—V ice for record on the A.D., 19 o'clock 2-M,,and was du,y recorded in book page 241 C4nt y ecorder deputy , City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Attn: Planning Department