LS81-06 l l�f CITY OF F!_�1 al_r-y, L_OT SPLIT LS #, g/ _O
'1 >
F-41ULV_:•,. rAN. Eb,2, ,. � RL:CORQEQ:
ADS,;\L_ S; 1360 - 69th Avenue N.E. _. DATE: July 27, 1981
PLANNING COiNIMISSION: APPROVED r)IS;P1)R0VicD _ DATE NO
1
CITY COUE ICIL: APPROVED / � D1SAPPR0VED DAT �a� - _ NO
PARK FEE REQUIRED: �._ _ ..._._.. MIOUNT_5; oPAID
__.._ - --�.,--
�e, � �-,.�e,.Z� �G�� ,moi-�+-✓ �l.�u''�2c�-4�dyt
STIPULATIONS:
FE- �� � � RECEIPT NO 77
NAM
PROPERTY OWNERS%^ ������-` ------- TELEPHONE Nfl��y. �.��� t
TELEPHONE NO����
ADDRESS(ES)
Ic-
PROPERTY LOCATION ON STREETA �c AV!"._ - ��� X31 ,5 41- ..=
JI
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY� � �—_Kc'visSti _ /d
TOTAL_ AREA OF PROPERTY ` a1' : � 41
C PRESENT ZONING
REASON FOR LOT SPLIT
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this
application are trua and correct.
`y
DATE.� s�-� ��'� SIGNATURL
NOTICE: A sketch of the property and the proposed lot split with any existing struc-
tures shown should accompany this application.
(See reverse sid4 for additional instructions)
._... ..... K a_,.,W._....._ _ .. __,.__. _ .,.___. ... _ - ___ _._.. _---- ..
I
4
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE '
0
1 . Obtain application form at City Hall (6431 University Avenue N.F.. , Fridley).
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of $75,00 for each original lot being split.
3. The application will be checked over by Staff and the owner may be required
to submit a Certificate of Survey containing a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot, along with the new parcels created with
all existing structures tied in.
4. The application will then be submitted to the Planning Commission for their
recommendation. The Planning Commission meets on the Wednesday following
the City Council meeting, which is generally the first and third Wednesdays
of the month.
5. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. If a Certificate of Survey wasn'.t required before,
it will be required for this meeting. The City Council meets on '.the first
and third Mondays of the morith.
6. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must
be complied with by the applicant.
7. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
8. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoi:a County.
9. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
3 BLAINE LS # 81-06
1360 - 69th Ave.
RAPIDS �; Robert & Barbara Anderson
COON ❑�`' _
L
SPRING LAKE PARK
-- Ia9L�Ju LJLJLJ 65
6 Li1L1C ��® non.. � ,�� 1n71W leo•
c.».f
LA
-1
f Y.[
N.
N L
(Print.)
ow
W
f L' L.OGATION
• :I ,
LOcf. L_J� x
»�;
M [ IMLL- I1,LJ � Crflk
® oo
6
����
�o ���, •°Doo ° /III^III�I
//��
r �"® 66
lana Lsf. ®�L=
�000[ �00 ®4 s
a
694nri� _
COLUMBIA F HEIGHTS
a
4,
[.
.•..fw
000 .C
.,x I C
_ STREET MAP-CITY OF
°3=_ •, 000 C F R I D L E Y
»° ;�Wf 0 3,333 6,666
•• OR
U
2 p
41.
;J ANOKA CO.
IIEIM�PIN CO.
Il31
MK/NEAPOLIS
1981 POLICY STATEMENT ON PARK FEES
ON LAND SUBDIVISION
Date
In determining fair market value of public areas for land subdivision for
cash payment, as required by Ordinance 633, the following values will be used:
Residential subdivision $1,000.00 per lot
Residential lot split $ (-500.00 per lot
Commercial/Industrial subdivision or lot splits $ 0.015 per sq. ft.
This fee is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval . The
City Council may defer collectio a building ermit is requested,
.for individual lots created by such subdivision/ of split.
The City retains the option to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the
applicant for part or all of the portion required to be dedicated.
PARK FEE AGREEMENT
The undersigned understands that according to the City Platting Ordinance,
the following public park land dedication is required to plat residential ,
commercial or industrial zoned property.
It is further understood that the public park land dedication or cash payment
equivalent is at the discretion of the City.
It is agreed that a cash payment of $ will be paid according to the
above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split.
It is agreed that the following land dedication is provided according to the
above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split:
Dedication:
Subdivision/lot split:
The undersigned further agrees to notify all future property owners or assigns
of the cash payment requirement, if it is to be collected at the time of
building permit.
DATE
S GN?AAI URE Property Owner
0084A/1067A
ct
..
CI'T'Y OF FRIOLEY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N. E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
TELEPHONE ( 612)571 -3450
4
{
Re: Request for your Participation in a Discussion Regarding
the Splitting of Property at 1360 - 69th Avenue Northeast
Dear
The Fridley City Council has been requested to split the lot at
1360 - 69th Avenue N.E. , making two single-family lots. As con-
sideration of this lot split, we are concerned about access to
the remainder of the properties along 69th Avenue.
The Fridley City Council is inviting you to participate in a dis-
cussion on this subject on October 5, 1981, at 7:30 p.m. at Frid-
ley City Hall in the Council Chamber. We would encourage you to
attend this meeting since any decision by the Council could af-
fect your property.
If you have any questions regarding this item, please feel free
to call me at 571-3450.
Sincerely,
JERROLD BOARDMAN
City Planner
JB:ijk
C-81-59
h -
4 CITY OF FRIOLEY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N. E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
TELEPHONE ( 612)571 -3450
Octoher 15, 1981
i` Robert and Barbara Anderson
1360 69th Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Anderson,
It has been determined by the City of Fridley that your lot split request
L.S?81-06 would result in the South 138 feet being split from the total property
you own.
We have discussed this will Mr. Rollie Goodroad of Goodco Investment Realty,
Inc. With the 40 foot access easement on the South property line, this would
leave a 98 foot by 97 foot lot. This is acceptable to the City.
The address of the new lot will be 6865 Sivert's Lane N.E.
Sincerely,
ERROLD L. BOARDMAN
CITY PLANNER
JLB/de
CITY OP FPIOLF-Y.
SUBJECT
IVIIN1`4 !30TH C:I"uC101MF-S-Si6t'71',M APPLICATION
PEEVIEVY
Ueporuncnt/U(vs sion, tiumuer I tiev r"; Approved by DOle
FILE NO/ AODRE55 FILK DATE
COMPLETE: REVIEW CHECKLIST 01P
RETURN TO [PLANNING I�(pQ jQ9� 44,y-. Pt > Dq OAT /9 1071
- _ - COMMENTS `/a -
I � 77i - L.D �tLE
is aware o� l.o� �pi�} VA'rV- - will wa-A
aalo-necll ;,.,-. 'A 6�� P4rw.r � 'iSsoec3l
I-am lie-
01
eel C'
Ljf lel v✓ +�+
TME CITY OF
DIRECTORATE o0
o.• o
OF °o 0
MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC WORKS
FRII�LEY �
DATE !,September 24 1981
FROM D.P.W, John G Flora. Public W it TO ACTION INFO.
SUBJECT Nasim M. Qureshi . City Manager
Lot Split, LS #81-06
We have received a request to split the rear portion of the property located
at 1360 - 69th Avenue, identified as LS #81-06. This particular request is
adjacent to Siverts Lane and is readily serviced by the water and sewer system
installed a year ago.
The problem that arises with this lot split-request is how the_ four addi-
tional properties located to the east can_•.be_suppor_ted_wi h_util. ties if they
are__splt_i.n-the future.
In reviewing this problem, we initially considered placing a street midway be-
tween the lot splits , tying into Siverts Lane and the access road to the
future County bikeway/walkway park. Mr. Torkildson from the County Park Depart-
ment indicated that this cannot be supported since the property was obtained
strictly for County park purposes with Metro funds, plus this would seriously
effect the the development and security proposed for this park complex.
Constructing an access road at the south end of the properties with the cul-
de-sac in the vicinity of 1400 - 69th Avenue, will reduce the residential area
to be developed and be serviced by one side only, since the County plans on berm-
ing along the rear of all properties in question. Constructing a road along
the lot splits again will only service the rear lots, since the front lots are
already provided services off 69th Avenue.
Due to the questionable development of this area and the fact that there are
only five properties involved, it may be prudent to require access easements
across the properties at one of the_two_points previously discussed and allow
that development to maintain that drive as a private drive and access.
If it is desired that the City construct a road and install utilities and pro-
vide maintenance and snow removal for future development of this area, we will
require dedication of a right-of-way as soon as possible in order to ensure--'-__
orderly development of these parcels. -
The same will have to be considered for those parcels west of Siverts Lane and
south of 69th Avenue.
Request guidance on how to proceed with this area.
JGF:ijk
N
D1,9
d
3
I
o
..: .7p _.- •,-,qa-:c-�-,y;3,rzer-.-..-�t..:v"Yy"y�`-...^irr.F-;�r,...._x--.qy.•-..s ..r, .::-s, c.w,c
asii�� `s
ctz -rd t � '
R
x f' y
2�t s
3
1
t6 17 IS ~ 19 18
20 ro 9 20
10
/9
/7
--f76./9
MIaB of t /2 !Z
f��
g D o ; ;$ /4 iti
,ti ei
t09 01 25
E V\p O^ 1 Z 27 24 2J 22 2
za q C"E
29
40
38
30
3
v I h 36
5 i 3235 34 35
3
f
r 5401 ( F/o,d F. �1+TTc-rc G f v
A 'Fost`"� X� '•' State G`M K:/Y)f p Ourto7 11 {,
G: F.://ij•
tell
D
G
�;fy of f,-:a✓r�y �
WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 130
Water Lateral -- $8.12 per foot
Water Services -- $445.88 per service
Sewer Lateral -- $15.45 per foot
o Sewer Services -- $203.79 per service
1
1
//ffU'aEU tUll rr+� KA ! 'M 1',
:41) S I(o pREA� � J ,
i Front Footage 7X J d Area 14 Aud. Sub. y 10,(Rev) 1 69
580 /..•.-r-...,tom lik Tb. pt. of Lot 1 des.
as fol: Beg. at pt. on ,
rte- 6e4N. line dist. 642• E.
N me
i 54151 of TTA corner of Lot 16,
Lot No. Block No. Addition----58+-1 said Rev. Aud. Sub. #10;
th.i6v o 'r 4� 1-4/- E. along a line
3
Plat No. Parcel No. 97'; th. S. parallel
ASSESTS. TOTAL ANNUAL ANNUAL FACTOR FIRST INTERVAL YEAR YEAR YEAR I YEAR ( YEAR
PRINCIPAL I PRINCIPAL INTEREST YEAR
15937 " �:98 `''2 9420 ' I L 6.97 6.77 6.57 6.37 6.17
5 ! .`�` � 97 5.77 5.57 5.37 5.17
rund O� 47-� • ,., �: - 4.77 4.57 4.37 4.17
G�J
5 m 14.6q 3 3 Seo 5�
pnMi )'M F 1LLQ----- 2e.61.. 27.52.. 26.41 2531
185,67 18.57 11.14 1.11 OCT 3161 'u''7 to 28.60 27.49 26.38 25.27
_..W'-34 i'•i;` ��3 .L�..7./O L rE. 23.05 21.94 20.83 19.72
SW-d8 1111.39 sss7 66.68 3.33 .2� Pl,lo�' 14,4D IN _.-
88 1,111.39 55.57 66.68 3.33 SFP 23168 16.67 138.92 118.92 115.59 11226 108.93
�,;;' -1-79 102.27 98.94 95.61 9228
88.95 85.62 82.29 78.96 75,63
SEWER LATEfiAL' ASA - u��• ��� ^I, 72.30 68.97 65.64 62.31 58.98
sW-91 ss8./5- .2 . 67
88 558.15 2.7.91 33.49 1.67 SEP 23168 8.37 69.77 59.73 58.06 56.39 54.72
51.38 49.71 48.04 46.37
44,70 43.03 41.36 3 9.6 9 38.02
WATER LATERAL�,vA '�j �in ti6.35 34.68 33.01 31.34 29.67
,;968 606.25 60.63 45.47 4.55SFP1569 13.27 119.37 101.55 97.00 92.45 87.90
`83 -1-771 78.80 74.25 69.70 65.15
bf
7 112% INTERFS1 B Y
3200.00 per acre sewer _
main charge pending �, L_
im this property. .G9a c� c*�e+c.-A/3R AJ s•.3-�9
CITY OF FRI DLEY
ASSESSMENT LEDGER
CITY OF FRIDLEY
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1980-1
SIVERTS LANE (Blacktop street and curb)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT TOTAL
LOT BLOCK FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 10
Parcel 500 (Anoka Co. Park Prop.) 360 $ 6,382.80
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 3
Parcel 250 260 4,609.80
Parcel 260 100 1 ,773.00
Parcel 500 100 1 ,773.00
820 ft. 14,538.60
Total Cost: $14,531 .03 s 820 feet = $17.73 per foot
NOTE: Per Resolution No. 139-1979 dated 12/3/79, this street is not to be
assessed based on normal procedures, but instead on a front-foot basis
only with no side-yard assessments on 69th Avenue. Also--normally
Parcels 580 and 2400, Auditor' s Subdivision No. 10 (the corner lots
on 69th Avenue and Siverts Lane) would be assessed for the rear portions
of their lots which could be divided off and used as additional building
sites. The Council has stipulated that these assessments are to be held
in abeyance until such time as the lot divisions are requested by the
property owners.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 130
SIVERTS LANE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE-- WATER WATER FOOTAGE-- SEWER SEWER TOTAL ,
WATER LATERAL SERVICES SEWER LATERAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT
LATERAL ASSESSMENT LATERAL ASSESSMENT
UDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 10
Parcel 500 Anoka Co.
Park Property) 360 $ 2,923.20 - 360 $ 5,562.00 - $ 8,485.20
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 3
Pt. of Tract C,
Parcel 250 260 2,111 .20 $ 891 .76(2) 260 4,017.00 $ 407.58(2) 7,427.54
k,
Pt.of Tract C,
Parcel 260 100 812.00 445.88 100 1 ,545.00 203.79 3,006.67
Tract D (Parcel 500) 100 812.00 445.88 100 1 ,545.00 203.79 3,006.67
820 ft. ,658.40 $1783.52 820tom. 12,669.00 - 815.16 ,926. 8
Total Cost: $21 ,914.48
Water Lateral : $6,654.12 j 820 feet = $8.12 per foot
Water Services: $1 ,783.49 j 4 services = $445.88 per service
Sewer Lateral : $12,661 .73 j 820 feet = $15.45 per foot
Sewer Services: $815.14 4 services = $203.79 per service
NOTE: The assessments for the corner lots on 69th Avenue and Siverts Lane are to be held in abeyance until
such time as the rear portions of these lots are divided into a second buildable site:
Auditor' s Subdivision No. 10, rear of Parcel 2400--100 feet water and sewer laterals and 1 water
and 1 sewer service
Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, rear of 580-100 feet water and sewer laterals and 1 water _
1—sewer service �
BIZ
� S
i
r
LS #81-06
�Ix
f t .{ �,�. r- r. f r-:n „ ...• �.r; Y-..S' w-�y'�.ry .•�A •'rh�':.. _- � tq�'�.•lR...' Ji
,,T �fig r'' ; t y+ �- f 'L f a..F a. •.- - . . �w.t;
{s a i i 1• +i yyyaaa"f�_yel - trs'r?:• .,:%- At'� r F* � \ 4.t.- .r�- s .d►. � �• �w.
•rt��}.,"L'rf• °L " 4F T.' Yw 'YEN. `Crr 's ¢ . �' �''u��2T a+.r •`. f,
!`-aw,
L. jaR."
'�`, f '.'vP t F x may' .x: �s T 3.:1..tit•i • `' •s'.. a.'
rr`, .r•-r D# # #�"', ,, + 4 Wit!
�•: P" • r • ~ y r
_..
7•�!{ tyr J S��`r�Ji��}} } E4 �K r..� a s o f ry `�C tMJ.O; `y
,'Atir�• , Y j i.~7.l f1'S +��•.`S`• VL4i , } s `'1,,.-},i
• a +y�,.t� � i� �.�t-'iai'i''. __\\__ I'��i.,.j'4 ei'��!.�
•1 '?C� .s j�+ L1L .i r : xs` T J � s s R'y/ t+ :•�rd"4 1
+
''Fr
�`
" • y • t'�'1�r� "` " ��;�4 ` `� '��`i £ -ar �!r s
C ba.#l.t�� ti�.����'ar'i "tet a4 �•? a'M'f' •+}".��'0„/{�'��i���t= ,� t,p�.-,r.,M` �� •t o �. a • ��- �:,T•" * .a ..;
`��t. _f, '��t ��t+ j�i ..,.�;a a`'}-.. ��., � Lt'-i♦ r4'�3a• , � f. l.�1.'� a °}i :`
••\r .^+C ' 'Rr`.'i ,a"` t� rat'-�`cdl• ' :r an�E ri �, J•,ii
S +` �•$ Z }• •7, -•yP a,.
s `r a -4.•'i° _�+� ` -j[y
i.�•'75,�: !`t. -'A.',i ,i�+r 3�,ii1 ArtRy.it °f,�'-. s•' ,.;�, .s L. t• ,rte rt t f„a. =i S
�` .r,�3. �xt i•�. -�i..r�`�:.�d;� y,x� .�* i ri' .. /�. � t,� Y.
6-C
sI•i +y a"�.+1��.i'. ` +. E � �•!'4,ti sp 1�'� �H � Z�� ,._ ,�� ��.ips��i. -t •-�:
tti• .'���t t ,(::�� 'jt+�'.rf• ari•'�.}, ,�. +Y
'f�`i� � r% Y �.P � ♦ it�t a �r�ry sri SF s '7!i �t"7 �. L 5t+ 4 d i � r a, r •may 4 i i5 i' �r
�1.!�'r'a1-n. �� Y _y,4
4 ..•� +3. �G � (` S�Y �i{ 9 ."w 1 S •ri +t >sc�a ' ('tea• ; S a
.+:fid-s �. r;s tri ,inh ''^;��r'si,�ti''x' it ,T Z,r.� %` ...� a Y /' .♦ I' art:.
iKT}•�- �{. +,i 2 ti"�t>t/ �-r• •l�,�.i,7r�y�it `y 'tr• 4.�y.��'� �--� � .�v.�.,da- -• t R �s:: 1". �}'�
� i ri ��•�. '.�•�� � '�` r: 5R w►.��i.'� �.r *• �" Vii• �l '��y � :�:. r �." ,,s, (T �..,
'i��ti?•f�,�.�'a•'��cc i ;i.,.r+•s�t�syt. -w� i+;}�,i�:dC3 �„T � ami 9 '!o T :,X� �'�� �,OC�.:� -_ ••���',I � '
�P 1�tl�V'f -i��' �tiP �"�2i h-.1 �w`!•a, � 1`-.� r �4( LttN �c ; �j- ?i,. y w - t r .i
.'I' +':? �` 'r{� s• K'��a.l.•y. ��� a i X'S�i'' k a u* r �,vi - a .'! . /` t
t t .t ,cv..• �, .� itt btu
"'.� i ��.r-,�. t• 7yc�F' 'VJ .�'�Fa�i'�r y, � tt �r�• •°Y.��.r r'Y��'�fi,a:i �. .t-. e. �4?�•4�9 - .-.
'� HLv.x�'%� �t+I}�'t�.•-•�'�`"•'�i', ll/• .,.� .�. >f�.. Yin ( :♦ •i v}y`F{{((� �t,�.i•ys�"i�.{y _' I �^r •� ` -�1
t ' Y Vis- `t[.�`��lY , �1..� _i , 'X�j!r`rT--..�•+ .3 Y ' ' V° ;,t�ix ,s•. .l :I},.�''Y 1'.tj' {;,y,•. '{�^'� j$_{ I s = yy _
Is tf +r; ''�i •'� �.1J.x *,.► .t '"` 34i2rt'4 i{ �'t4k ..{Y:t 'R �.3y. 1�"t �•�`yr r• •y`(-r _ t... :`.J �ts. .'. .
PVI.
,t y a, t
•> a 1.�r } Tt,•• xF•�'' j (7�l :(a4T� "` ., �,. �#P�' = .�" 4 !!0.
.1a �?��� ry.,y�. ��'� a•_a.�'�3 "7►�t, -"� fir+ t ,, ai �'` � � '�• i ; �f�
t wFi� ��ti � r `Y' -S�•...�'t.�'!' rr1:�T.'r7 i•"+x •- }��,,i''+�_ �; - gs .gin •,;+1;•Ji :'�t» f r+a<"�i '�.a- - :i�- � :maw i v%'Xr s a •.F t
:t~fiY�i''•1.�� a'-.v _ a. �
W e"
9 _{.�ee ?r•{•' r. ~'ter`7' -: ,t� ' ` '
Rr" '8. �7w r� . V -" �'- �'t T �y Yl i��• � 1• � tF t
' " t ' }
,j..,1r 4�'{t?'�S.''�j{._94f�•1`tiy"S'=Y.it i K V .=.'yi4 s `!•. ! 't. s r T ! y t" r _e E 4.e
Ji°•,?µ•i.� a5 '' _>y lr�'__f ?c y`(i+'..,} it�v �t r
4
Y's.3•t ' A -.ig �.,,.+'?S 7t• ,v 5.,} ! a, r
♦a>�"` r:h*� r'. s. �r, r.iti's•}.jKti-.�.y,{ - -.T ...� ��,.�'' cr4� n., -,R` S ��• '.7 n n r ra,.:
,� ♦'•}1 fug '.C.ate y a w.,• X. .r. is�
�'
ti -• ,. `�+ s M.r. •r'f
R�r! 2,fit t °' p ; � �' t. t b ...r, rt n r♦�4= ?. s!- t f,
+.�aY,rb�r'�a�..�i.c f ���'•ry,�,+�. �^t wig`''�R `1�,7�.+r+•a x., N a: r � 4 �cC+�.. � 3 � � i <.
t. •.trt t � v' a r•. � ' : L.N•,Tr �y K _ ;r:. e"• 3 r*• '". 1 •T••
?eji tw a Ai: TFr y7•r.; r y'3' eP��Y �'` "4. :.`t �- ._ `-ice rCii Few. .r ..--,.Y+ '/Jr,•r�:,{'
f, +7,,t���•' ^P- L` •t5�y�_ ( d'... s r i'# i' `�� j{t'E,{S.� �l�' '��. Yi tV /
f•�txl t .tri�'ssY v'�S�(V���,�Y�-'��','4"�• 4'�'71�+a rt� S�+ ' �•1.,.,,xt" y R �Y.�'y 1i �• -1yrtf r. ..
C� y - L. L.. 2►, ah.Y ,�P,f..>�,.,.s .. }_rs .j ;. �,, r. /.+i:. -. ,rt` a,yM•r. i'ti
M ! tr r^�X'rr•ft''a�'.�a ► Oii4•SPLs 'c�•t*• r r-�y 2.1 r >l�t. � �,�R s�� �~ - -•`r r �•
'�� �••: �• 4 �N +� =R �� T� � y �. .moi � ••t'r h .�� ` ay Y,�• '�j� N,1 '
, 'fi "Ft� ,•yi r aY♦£ 4w,}� ��>�� .�•'r !n :e • �,'x. + � t �' �t4 .� i y
tri .r, ,..s{ 1'�t w a�' �,.. �• •i �'T'� '. .� nr, •s'`�. f
t1►ij..:�y T•r�,,f.. ti`'r'r �17' i -e t � �� Y_a' '� � +.�ir i-4.f,:'" i .-:t... �• +s ,.d•,. tc �. •* 4. 'M
♦
*�• r r 'Y i � +a �, 7 '1 r @� 1t' r !:i ��1. . ./� r t "¢j.♦rr
+ rJv 'if.ry$ y.! ZI3 :v.� , ;r►""31' r r t °tom �tief ,SY�� ♦at' _.�S•M,ttla` a .,(r¢..n. c i �•7 F •i ..y
-Y � L f ){..V •.r a � � f
:�> �t
�, a - #^°' s.Y'`. epi..- -,. '.', .�•
'.wi i�!':& 1►.�"�• J -,fir ' ♦� ; -rS„r d t''t � Z... .� t w� � Ktr x �`x .s �r •�1 t �.r� < • 1„� yr
.~tY aF�'�r' J a •jtt- t'p`l 6 yam p`!F }„.,` s t. 1,r` 1 .• iy�i gi ;<„ra .- r'�p�. '• s�l� ,.�i. •J''. i► y
�t}i�-s � ..,f� r {.t � �, i� i'� � r��,�,�/` i r . Y�•.,'�'f�4 •,+�`e .- � � 1 ,�Y' _ _�v
'� i � yr'/`+��•.. ' .YY
I'' �; . `� �4�'t•aa. �,,: .T:��r .� F4 :3
1►av
s�i� � �. . A`s �j a.c-t"l s�.�'ti'x .�lt �:fa'� s- ?;... ,tit.�••a �•:t
'�. ► ��( �:lr-' r'�-�`•F' ��rsiQ � x.;Z,�.V�_ ,r�yi •�y�°�"�.c 'Z
�.�c•� . jy�of � J/ / �r �•
'A: YS � s 'I !` �l',; �� �' l! �'V 1 2 ` � -i.1V • 4�-} a 4.���t �Fa. � ., .
�4
• y� x � C �•}:?Y' t;�t
�✓ ���a''r' fj�•4r f ';� •. T1 1,I .. M`s v 4�h � `c�--�S.t w::�. 3, • . .r. "{;+``k ay ti;k ty,tea`, `4'3.
f i 'te, d� .I"'�+�. i�•� - t��, r� I T i ,r �. / A:�i y s„ s. -.Y^ ? v
� I 1 r t •• R \ �. as =a
jl �.a f.• � � y,• !t ms's �t� j �t.ry t. d w. d :� r i- r. thy- r. �` �'� `f
?t �� Jh l l '� is ."{ 7"t.tS HZ 4'. ►•ref J.: l�rti r....-.+.-+ r....�..�, ':.,n" s t �•i.-.-••moi.�' � i.� ��ji
�y /s`� *a� � fi w ) -ir�...y,.• +t � t-� �:"9�•r 1; �, 1 tc t�a�� .3t^? Y )p 3 i.�_.:;� { :" .,�Y'.- !
a W-tic.Y'- F! i (l � 'dj` t i fy_,+� 3.n;�t{ -r �, „i- .• i {+. v ,.tSy^ ♦ .. + •r ��,'
,i.iT� 't] �f`r F'�f`•/ � v { '� �..! "'tt.-� sR � �..�` " �..--', � ��n�• _ {Q 7 �.�'14!
'r,,,r�,.� ♦.
�•.U�:�" leas'i c/,�T'{[ s'"t '3 :'� ! - s:t ty�.t i� 't}- 'as:{;rCt' �'✓...,. `� Sf f'r +{
�f t
t t. T t • �/ i t �. j -. 1�$ y .+ w • ~ +d» $!'. ,.le'
,.♦F fI¢ vl ;_�'/'�ik 'k 0. Y -.,t��'1 "'Sl ^t.� ,i'j��ar �I...,rry„' i t A
j•,;_
♦ S_�,�.,ris a ,{ �., .
f•'V'-J' �• r`tF r' -{h s yr`i t }► �, v ,� n"�3 .R.r x'y� ♦i- � 4 4 '; .a}��t(t ss��r.Fs..�,rc'SL' a !�„r� i3.;y
iT
!� 1:� ! '�,! Y ,. z t•tt' r t Z i +i �, 1 .:'X't► ert✓ jai l.`. ,,p 'Q �+ { r
AX♦• � a - _ �-�< x ° ��•�y->x. � .r � <c.dY��'� i Yy. a•,r �` T� 4-.i+ > �'`C a��� f
�i v !:• _>.
iit`�pe [ ' }��,y,�j� ti t�.+i s �' �+.�'k". _t - f^ '` ■ .,r' : i °4tt '�r o:
Mp,S:�/ � �.' .r. :r�'' .t. ,/ �i� �?/in;+9�'i _ ._t'r '�.�. *'Sy+\;vr \ iti' `'r:FL- _7. � ry ;i.l_?r -1 �`.' c si.• 7••'
.r � *+6 d-- �.,,?j � O �' � ^' .�a ' a ►` � �,'.j ?`a "�,-; -�ii{t•� -a t F sC- t. •tia�"+',►.is r - +-' �. 1••i
{ ) Y" i3= i� ` sY 1 •i �a �a7: tt��i.► F {j�i iTv 7Y• _ tr*s yt'-A
Jrh �at ; s.�k
,� iF � �i r l�� r t .r•�k• iy�• ��n`r t��tii�♦�?. ;:r lj�''t .,tie .•��♦� y. ;v� T. �:"�'t rA' t '� s �►1.ii'{{. s'.-
�i••M ��i y{j M tV t��'''''' `t jtY�#- jx !''_ :> y-.}y'b t �f {, "'3b j�_'�ae._ YY a:. •� �' � S t .��L' �g i�.
rf �l [>•' i.,( a�f ! i ^+,-b l• d, _t1f,r,�7a Va'��,'d,_ T .•� Y• __^.r _E�•� .l ayf• �L Y..�
It +:'i ]y } ►i'� /'Fri r ► 4 C YV7ee 7 � -�e -e4 k � { 'fC si~ t ;ti`� � .r C ♦Rf � �- t.
.1`--" '; .7 �A ,, � {- i .A i. - -4i �,•'••' :�r -,•�♦.x F w-�?./.'„ 4F�r 4..
y� � l •. .•., t ,l s t, t � • }
r "F+..s��yi� "'fi�i.,Yr .Yt �} �. � �rJ�: �'���� }{,4 �a �?1 t•��'L'��a��..�+�` 3" '�•' �•f" �sa�'yy�o1�� j�' s`►hx .fit
g
.+�...-*1- .. _S R ..,� + T.s:., .. .._, '.�r/ �.. '' F.•t,+ + .,.• �,.•. �''r.-4'".i.;a+' .4s, -;t�..±. ,;r_. , - •�.-., iC7 F'�` _ ..��•�u r_ .
-* '� rry 9}! - 4 •`' �.t � 1 y „t a� .;• � � T. Y` -� tea--.� PJ
`: } t f�� � �� �` � :.t k •� > r. �t r� l']F^ 'r .$u�" x�� •ul+}� 'ti �F V V.tr t# r '47 � ,�tt�M,lif�'�j
q �e ', �c t 55"'ar "}",,�j ja '`- r r, �A• '� t A .. y � '�4-. t �`r'+�` f�,�,h � �' r'
�;j 24c i t ro` ,p�} t '" f a•I,!.�r r�« ,.^ 3 } • i+ �,' � ',
S� °VI
s
? ,r 7X' r r �' �.#y ASF ��•�»-o +'����,y i •;3`i. ;E.
,� Y� Jp ,f W'lypM k' �r9y�,��}�'��,� '�,S�C. N k ���• +�'Y .� r
po
:: t��i 3 .Y.�j; ��r k c i. � tom+ €'�5 ,5�, .eyl: � •y ��`,.�'4 tjta ,rµ�l M¢ �
r�r.;. ..� +�cf �....,r } q � •. r ��i�K� 5t ;>, l� .^v'kf� t .' ;°, ryr.ti. ems•, e
� t'}�"���„�� +��� ��" „I+•'� ,,mak--_.4t {"«-'!'�i-eM+ y4.; � e.4p :+1. } ,
i"
�.�zt•
f �' '«.ir45,. � < �`Y -y _ � �, ,�?til ,v. •'�Y a+ YyR�•.�
y. :' Y. � •� ` � I " �t3'+%� i 1 t.,♦ `-,v. ��j, •y i�' f�ti �i;�( i' ±�f� e pa♦
� �� - _ Y ��7 k, �r`�..�k"N J�.�.•h - ��o l`�.... �`I � � ��SP �,R �`�k r•���" 91 .i,e
' ''• � r?i' � r7 { - :G. . 'wa a''�,.�t'�'{ -b,�it� �� •d?. a t�y��� '+�~����Z$�� 'r �{
¢,R��'�` `�r .Jw
__ - .^f .y: } 4' e 3 rr; u" ,..5 i •r't. Y sy'�`5$.`" +' i'T' �Q.A'�'
•' r r wtf'Ih ,#�'a �` t +� . '��Yyy� �4 � { 1`� i��1��, 4�'ia�,. L
r�•� yr .;Y r L ~4 �y, 'b' � �y��� �� �{ [�1jl ' '5���9� _
.�Pbua++ . •Rt:•�' a t if N 4 r tr�srju. S
bl
�r ' �~ + r
f
.�..� •+•�.. Qy.••1-tit
r
's
�yI 1 • •r i Ir �,r • i•1 �:�
r
! .r '•�',: }-=,f}jam•.
11 i
Zr
j��/ {t ♦ Ja�y -�<��raj , � � 1
r-
F.
k •1 i4o v i 1 fi -
vf�- `x '` '3'!►�T' 7. Ate' ��
t a' : per .ir` • ,y I`°f4 y �r ,,.+ ..
{b Z• .r;;` �."' A k
� y N4 `�Yp��' }' s+ a; S` Y` ✓h. `A!"r+ .at �;l�t �. �., .�',�.+ a '! ,:r: 't't zrA*' r fK•4. K` 1�= � }:
. .?;� 1 f � ,� ��+�'a� '� ,`,�_ Y' F � � }tF 'r� tq�� �'• t ���' ;'tr' {p�f� ,fy� :.
l �. { - �.� t�,�` xb�Y i �� ���� _�iC It x Y �;3"'� J 43•K' �(,
, �, L"" 4 ?d+ •� �i +"'�`'a .v r'r x s:�a'� r tl'„ .{,,�r#e� � �` � ,;. ,rt.!
a7 cfi^ i< � �S.`. ��#�,�8`iiR• l Y� ♦ '�,`k�r3',,,Y'+,�_'. �'��°"'•f�`4',.Y A 4 � s ' ,. Y 1
y 'tJi. , ' �''a'RS'ta fi •� r c'1, tya"'�r it
,Z •,•7 rp ;'a, �F: y � �< .�'.#•d I ,,ff`Y�'�'�.,Yt" 'p '�S Rt�� k'4� :.s
L• ,� ., 4,. I
! y s
�3V,�,b� • �.,. .`�@�'°i, _
xf
t
1, r��' ,- ry.
r
t, z
fit`
1P
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 19, 1981
CALL TO DER;
Vice-Chairper Oquist called the August 19, 1981 , Planning Commission meeting
to order at 7:3 .m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Mr. Oquis M.
Gabel , Mr. Kondrick, Mr. Saba, Ms. van Dan
Members Absent: Mr. Harris, Mr: ,Svanda
Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner
Muriel Sharpe, 5924 - 5h St. N.E.
Mary Eggert, 1080 Hathawa Lane
Robert J. Baumer, Suite 206, 403 Jackson St. , Anoka 55303
Lee Carlson, 7937 - 5th St. N. .
Peter Treuenfels , P.O. Box 21072, Mpls. 554210072
Allen & Carol Caldien, 1245 Norton Ave. N.E.
APPROVAL OF JULY 29, 1981 , PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO APPROVE THE JULY 29, 1981,
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1 . LOT SPLIT.REQUES ,.�, ,.__#$1_06, BY ROBERT & BARBARA ANDERSON: Split off
t e Northerly 208 ft. of that part of Lot , Au Subaivis�on #10, Rev. ,
Described as follows: Beginning at a point on North line dis. 642 ft. East
of NW corner of lot 16 said Rev. Aud. Sub. #10,thence East along North
line 97 ft. ,thence South parallel with West line 308 ft. , thence West
parallel with North line 97 ft. , thence North parallel with West line 308 ft.
to point of beginning subject to easement over North 30 ft. , the same being
1360 - 69th Avenue N.E.
Mr. Boardman stated the proposal is to split off the southerly 100 ft. to make
a 100' x 97' lot. He stated i vers Cane is�now an improved '1 ane With water
and sewer service; therefore. this lot c�an�get service.
Mr. Boardman stated Staff has no problem with the lot split. There is a $500
park fee requirement on a lot split which the petitioners have signed. Ther_e___is
also an understanding that when Siverts Lane went in, the cost of Siverts Lane
was delayed on these corner lots. The people on the corner lots claimed they
did not use Siverts Lane and, therefore, did not want to be assessed for any
development of Siverts Lane.
1C
f'
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGV AUGUST 19, 1981 PAGE 2
Mr. Boardman stated the City Council__did delay assessments on these lots until
such time as these lots were split for development. These-l`ots are`now`b'eing
split for development,and those people will be getting assessment charges on
this lot. He stated the petitioner was informed of this.
Mr. Boardman stated that at this time, the decision has not been made whether
easements will be needed. They are debating on how to handle access to all other
lots. They may want to have the access on the back ends within the county park
property for a street if a street is ever needed.
MOTION BY MS. VAN DAN, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #81-06, BY ROBERT & BARBARA ANDERSON: SPLIT OFF THE
NORTHERLY 208 FT. OF THAT PART OF LOT 1, AUD. SUBDIVISION #10 REV. , DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON NORTH LINE DIS. 642 FT. EAST OF NW CORNER OF
LOT 16 SAID REV. AUD. SUB. #10 THENCE EAST ALONG NORTH LINE 97 FT., THENCE SOUTH
PARALLEL WITH WEST LINE 308 FT. THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH NORTH LINE 97 FT. ,
THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH WEST LINE 308 FT. TO POINT OF BEGINNING SUBJECT TO
EASEMENT OVER NORTH 30 FT., THE SAME BEING 1360 - 69TH AVENUE N.E., WITH THE
STIPULATION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAKE SOME DETERMINATION ON THE ROAD ACCESS TO
SERVICE ADDITIONAL LOTS.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2.--,LOT IT REQUESTSL.S. #81-07, BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON: Split Lot 6 Auditor's
#89 to make two ui i—ng—s-1 tes each66.5...ft,,_ by_ 33.97 ft., the. same_.
beim,.. 39 and-1241_ Norton Avenue_N.E.
Mr. Boardman stated this whole district -isa.presently zoned RR-3, which is a multi-
t4-mi
ulti-
family district. Th homesites on the south are all duplex units. On Block 10
on the end of Norton.. on the corner of�01d,_CentralY and 1Jorton, there are 4-
unit structures. All the p operty_i,n_the _Trico Addition is quad units. There
is a large tract of land juss Orth, 1250 - 72nd Ave. , which is presently open
land. There have been several pro osals for multi-unit buildings on that piece
of land. A1200_ 72ndYAve. , there_ s an _apartment building.
Mr. Boardman stated Mr. Erickson is propos that Block 6 be split into two lots
and he will build two duplexes„ similar to the u lexes he built on the Norton Ave.
homesites. He is looking at two 66.5' x 133.97' Mr. Erickson must also
apply to the Appeals Commission f_or variances. These variances will be
6-r----1 ot
width and lot area. Even though the property is zone d=3 they must follow the
requirements for duplex zoning when putting- a _duplex in an zone. The width
requirement -75' , and the lot area requirement is__1.0_,000,_sgs-„�� Mr. Erickson has
8,909 sem�. ft. The building he is proposing will not require any s back variances
from the building itself. He is proposing 12 ft. on each side of the ildings
with tuck-under garages.
Mr. Boardman stated Mr. Erickson has talked to some of the neighbors and has
obtained five signatures�ofpeople in favor.of two duplexes,_
: a
RECULA.R t•JEETING OF DECEII&R 3, 19/9
` RESOLUTILrt•r:0. 137-1979 APPROVIMr, AGZEEFa t1T t!1Ti1 STATE OF t??t.'ES07A FOR
Ails lL
CUt�,IDERATIOtI OF APPROVAL OF AGREEitE;IT PITH AtIOKA COU,
FOR It;STALl.AT10 t OF
G'ETiI !Al 69111
AND
RECEIViNG Cr.i IUMICATIO-I ,FP.0'.•1 ANOKA COUNTY PEGARDING 25': P�.P.TICIPATJOP, ]tl
i 7F{E SIGItAY 1H�cOUGIY Fit7P:J^i:EGIU:iAL TRAILS FUi1D: 1
questioned the date of completion. Mr. Qureshi staPed
n Barnette q '
1 plans were dravrn by ttre State and the City grill be entering into agre_n_r, s
Councilma
t and
et the
Aal
ed
with t„e Stele and y t
withCthetCity sharing ino let the nthe ccost. �He stated 9the Countyis
and completed,1 i
' { attempting to get 25. funding from the retro trail sy;+.r. t, therefore, they = -
are proceeding on that basis. , -
{ Mr. Qureshi, City V-anager, felt, if the Council 'now takes action to proceed, i
t the signal should be completed by next year. i
tJ07ION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution tdo. 137-1:'79. Seconded by
ice vote, all voting aye, Mayor tree declared
Councilman Schneider. Upon a vo ,
. � the motion carried unanimously.
ttOTION by Councilman Barnette to authorize approval of the agreement with
� '. the County for installation of a traffic signal on TI,� 4,7 at 69th Avenue. ,
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,.* Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. _
1 NOTION by Cour�corticipationsinothereceive
traffic sional^ataTHo��47from
at (,9thAvenue County
!
{ regarding 25 p
on
through Metro Regionalails Fu
tia)'or t:eecdec'.ae cd tiiierrt motion carritd ur�alri ously.
La voice vote, ! _
RESOLUTIOti t10. 133-1979 GIVING PRELIti11NARY A?PFPVAL TO AN AGREEMEN j•F(�JOEt•
SIFTER PIIFiP CC'P�'Y�•'—:O IYiE Cl 1YOr fE:ID_____EY_E"CF
• IgDUSTRia'_ JE ir�t.G'•'?iC_ti? F'rtEta!r BGr'D: .
soution
ed
econ
rIOTI0.1t yb Councilman Fitzpatrick to mote opt Ralllvoting�ayelO. �Mayorgi.eesdecl�red
by Councilv:oman (loses. Upon a voice ,
the motion carried unanimously.
! ti0. 139-1919 ORDERING It•iPRO' tT A?:^ flt•",L PLAITS AND CiFICATI^:.S
RESOLUTION -
{U10 ESTItH4TES OF COSI TH J:EOF: STREET i.i: ,,U'►EY.cl17 F•^:OJEC7 1'�' ST
SIVERT_ S LAESE_
Mr. Qureshi, earing
City Manager, stated therelivirgson 6On ^tntAvenue and ic hdis- i
t r regarding side yard assessments for persons ��
but v:ould be
eussiari that the two corner lots not be assessed at VMS �ir.e, '
assessed if the lot is split. t;e stated,'if this is^the d:sire of the Council,
= a note of this v!ould be r.•ade in the proposed ass_ss..•_nt rolls v.-hen the, are
,•ed.
' brought back to the Council after the improve�ert is coxal«_
i Mr. Qureshi stated, at this ting, vrhat is before the CUUnCil is a resolution
to order the idt be n ecurb Ile
andsguttertandi the length of viter andesl�;n would be sever
and there wool
lines have been cut back.
apd
Cous:Cilan Schneider thencornertheselots vrould beJiucerporirg atcdv nen ordarincdthe
ferrel '
improvement. J
Qureshi stated the improve rent can be ordered With instructions to stat
that v:Aen the assessor:-nt is brought to Council. those iters be taken into !
consideration and the assessment roll prepared on that basis. ,
- it
r
.. :.
'VL
• Councilakin Schneider stated one other point was the vacation of the v.esteriy 4
• portion of a G6 foot right-of-wiiy 'or street. ;
Mr. Qureshi stated staff could be authorized to set up the process for this
vacation, with the understanding they will attc:n:pt to save the trees and a
,
well house.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, questioned, if construction couldn't beworka'd
around the trees and well house, so it wouldn't be necessary to vacate the
+ easement.
Mr. Qureshi stated a portion of the easement is already vacated and ttr. {
3 Siverts wanted to vacate an additional protion. t•ir. Qureshi stated lie S
didn't think, it would be harmful to the City because a portion••is al- .
ready vacated. s
,
i
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to'adopt Resolution No. 139-1979, with ; .
the understanding that at the time of assessment (1) There will be no �
side yard assessments split along 69th Avenue, but these costs will be
! absorbed by homes on Siverts Lane which are benefitting; (2) The costs
for seer, water and streets on the corner lots of 69th and Siverts Lane
be held in abeyance until such time as the lots are split; (3) That staff
work with the property o:mers involved with regard to the enact placement 1
of the road in order to minimize damage to trees and structures; and (4)
That the City initiate a vacation process for vacation of the westerly
_j 33 feet of the roadway up to a point four feet north of the tree.
Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Payor
Tree declared the motion carried unanimously.
i
Both "ir. Siverts and Mr. Smith expressed their thanks to the Council for
all their help. `
t CONSIDEPLATION OF A RESOLUTION FOR INITIAL APPROVAL OF T14E OFFICIAL DWAFT it
i Of THE CO i?r,EHENSIVE DE;'cL0rr'iFilT E'L/:: FO;: 7_;iF Cl"iY_Of FRiDLEi FO::
• F11SS10:! TO hDJ/;CEt;T CG;.,;L-: T1
! tIOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the Posolution for initial
approval of the Co:.;prehensive Development Plan. Seconded by Courcilw=sn
Moses. i
' S
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he recently attended some seminars
where the point was made that when a final Comprehensive Plan bas talo?ted,
it takes precedent over Zoning Codes. Ile felt this question should be
resolved when the plan is before the Council for final-approval.
t Fir. Herrick pointed out the statemerts in the plan are general, but if the
maps are included, and if there are specific Parcels that are indicate`
they are going to be used for other than t•:h,t they are zoned, that is the '.
area where he had concern. He felt, by adopting this clan, the Council
' would be prohibiting a property owrrer from developing his lard at the pre-
sent zoning, if tine plan s^o:•red some oth=r Cesi -ilat"On. He stated this
would h?peen if the Ca archensive Plan takes prec•_dent over the Zor.irg
Code. He felt there should be some statement ir, the Co.p Ai rsive Plan
that for any proposed land use that is inconsistent r•:ith the present
zoning, there would have to he a request fcr rezoning according to the
ordinances.
Mr. Merrick felt the point he is making is don't adopt the plan lightly.
He stated it is eventually going to be approved by the Mc-trc,oiitan Council
and feels the City is going to f i rd, in order for it to be a .':.pie:, changes
have to be approved by the t;ctropolitan Council and thin!:, ti:�t bOe is
going to consider Lire plait a tool for future develorr:eat in the area. ;
Fir. Herrick stated he has material in his office which Ire v.L-Id photo-
• copy and distribute to the Council t:hich rinht he of help in evallu tirg
the relationship between the existing zoning and tine Comprehensive Plan.
REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1981 PAGE 3
MOTION by Councilwoman Moses-Martin to authorize the Mayor and City Manager
to enter into this agreement of cooperation with the Fridley Housing and
Redevelopment Authority for the administration of community development
block grant funds. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 19, 1981:
CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L. S. #81-06 TO SPLIT OFF NORTHERLY
208 FEET OF PART OF LOT 1, A. S. #10 REVISED, PETITIONED BY ROBERT AND
BARBARA ANDERSON, 1360 69th AVENUE:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this parcel of property is located
just to the east of Siverts Lane and the request is to split off the
southerly 100 feet- to make a 100 x 97 foot lot.
Mr. Flora stated the problem with this particular lot split is the question
of how to handle access to the other lots since there is no way, at the
present time, to service them. Mr. Flora suggested possibly an easement
be provided by all the property owners which would allow a private drive for
access.
Mr. Flora explained, if it were a private drive, it could be a narrower
street than normally would be required of a regular City street, and it
would probably be less expensive.
Mr. Flora felt, if the lot split were to be granted, consideration should
be given on how to service the remaining lots.
Mr. Anderson, the petitioner, stated, as far as putting a road through
the back, he was certain everyone would not want it. He stated the only
reason he is splitting his property is that he borders Siverts Lane and
has easy access.
Mr. Qureshi , City Manager, stated he recognizes Mr. Andreson does not want
to put a road through, but asked if anyone else was present that had lots
east of Mr. Anderson's property. Since there was no one at the meeting,
Mr. Qureshi felt these property owners should have the opportunity to voice
ther comments as to whether or not they want access provided to their
properties.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin felt no decision should be made on the lot split
until the other property owners have the opportunity to attend a meeting
in order to determine if they want access for a future road and discussion
on where a future road might be constructed.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated there are also properties to the
west of Siverts Lane which do not allow for easy access to Old Central,
therefore, he felt whatever considerations were given to the property
owners on the east of Siverts Lane should also be given to the properties
on the west side of Siverts Lane.
MOTION by Councilwoman Moses-Martin to call for an informal meeting for
next week with the residents on the east and west of Siverts Lane regarding
this lot split and discussion on future access to their properties. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Nee stated the decision on the lot split will be tabled until the
meeting next week.
:cab
REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1981 PAGE 4
CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, LS #81-07 TO SPLIT .LOT 6, A. S.
#:,9 TO MAKE TWO BUILDING SITES, 1239 AND 1241 NORTON AVENUE, L.
ROBERT ERICKSON:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this request is to split Lot 6,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 89 in order to make two building sites each 66-1/2
by 133.97 feet for the construction of two duplexes. _
Mr. Flora stated the area is zoned R-3 and surrounded, to a degree, by
apartment houses, some quads, and duplexes.
Mr. Flora stated, in conjunction with the lot split, variances have also
been requested to reduce the lot areas and widths, and the Appeals Commission
has recommended approval of the variances, and the Planning Commission
recommends approval of the lot split.
Mayor Nee asked if Mr. or Mrs. Caldien were present at the meeting as they
had some objections when this item was before the Planning Commission;
however, there was no response from the audience.
Councilman Schneider questioned the comments made at the Planning Commission
meeting regarding the parking problem. Mr. Flora stated there were
discussions, at the Commission level, regarding this problem, however, the
Commission probably feltthis use would be a better use of the property,
rather than a larger unit which could add additional parking problems.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and grant Lot Split Request, LS #81-07. Seconded by
Councilwoman Moses-Martin. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
f ' RECEIVING HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES REGARDING FUNDING OF
ORGANIZATIONS:
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the Human Resources Commission has made
recommendations to the Planning Commission regarding funding of various
organizations. He stated their recommendation was to fund Southern Anoka
County Assistance and the Well Senior Citizen Clinic, with no restrictions,
which would amount to 100 of the budget request or $2,500 for Southern Anoka
County Assistance and $2,000 for the Well Senior Citizen Clinic.
Mr. Qureshi stated they further recommnded that the Central Center for
Family Resources and the Creative Play Center be funded to some degree,
as determined by the Council, and that the Family Life Center not be funded
due to overlapping services, they do not operate on a sliding fee scale,
and the amount requested seemed excessive.
Mr. Qureshi stated the Council also had the opportunity to hear from some
of these groups at their conference meeting.
Mr. Qureshi stated the following funding is proposed, which is essentially
what is recommended by the Human Resources Commission: $2,500 for Southern
Anoka County Assistance; $2,000 for the Well Senior Citizen Clinic; $4,000
for the Central Center for Family Resources; and $1,500 for the Creative Play
Center, for a total of $10,000.
Mr. Qureshi pointed out the Council has provided only $5,000 for service
groups and if they desire to commit the above amounts, additional funds
would have to be provided when the 1982 budget is adopted.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin stated she realizes another $5,000 will have to
be provided in order to provide the funding of these organizations, but
pointed out the Central Center for Family Resources has applied for a grant
next year and stands to receive this grant if the communities still support
this organization to the level they have in the past.
�C
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF
OCTOBER 5, 1981
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at
7:35 p. m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag.
f ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilwoman Moses-Martin,
Mayor Nee, Councilman Schneider, and Councilman Barnette
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
REGULAR MEETING, SEPTEMBER 28, 1981:
MOTION by Councilwoman Moses-Martin to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Mayor Nee requested the following items be added to the agenda: (1) Request
for a Temporary On-Sale Beer License, Bob's Produce Ranch; and (2) Discussion
Re: Liquor vs. Food Sales Ratio for Two Establishments in Fridley.
MOTION by Councilwoman Moses-Martin to approve the agenda with the above two
additions. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
` There was no response from the audience under this item of business.
OLD BUSINESS: _
CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST,S #81-Q6,�O SPLIT OFF NORTHERLY
208 FEET OF PART OF LOT 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION #10 REVISED 1360 - 69TH
AVENUE ROBERT AND B6RBARA ANDERSON TABLED 9/28/81 :
Mayor Nee stated this request for a lot split was tabled at the last
meeting in order to give the Council an opportunity to discuss this item
with residents in the area.
Mayor Nee stated this is not a formal hearing, but an informal meeting to
hear from neighboring property owners concerning the affect of this lot
split.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the property in question is
one lot just east of Siverts Lane, and the owner is requesting to split
off the bottom 100 feet of the parcel to make another 100 x 97 foot lot.
Mr. Flora stated, if the lot split is granted, and the other property
owners to the east wished to split thier lots, there may be a problem
i in the future in providing access and utilities to service these parcels.
Mr. Flora stated consideration was given to placing a street midway between
the lot splits, tying into Siverts Lane and the access road to the future
County park.
REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 5, 19£31 PAGE 2
He stated, however, the County indicated this could not be done since the
property was obtained strictly for County park purposes with Metro funds
and it would also seriously effect the development and security for the
park complex.
Mr. Flora stated another consideration was to provide a road between the
property being split which would require a cul-de-sac at the end, if a
City street were to be constructed. He stated the cost of this plan
would be considerable because the front properties already have a street
and sewer and water, therefore, any properties being split would have
to bear the full burden of the cost of the street and utilities.
Mr'. Flora stated another possibility is to require an easement, for a
possible future street and utilities, in the event the property owners
to the east, as well as to the west of Siverts Lane, wish to split
their lots.
Mayor Nee stated the question the Council wishes to explore is if the
property owners want provision made for access to the back of their lots,
or if it isn't the tention of the owners to split off the back of their
lots.
Mr. Ron Germundson, 1390 69th Avenue, asked if there would have to be a
road between the houses or on the south end.
Mr. Qureshi , City Manager, stated access would have to be provided, if
they wished to develop their property any more than it is now.
Mr. Germundson stated he didn't want anything to do with it and to leave
it as it is now.
Councilman Schneider clarified, for the record, it was Mr. Germundson's
position that he didn't intend to split his lot and wouldn't have any
problem if access, in the future, wouldn't be available.
Mr. Harry Nelson, 1370 69th Avenue, indicated he was against putting in a
road and against the lot split.
Councilman Schneider stated they are not talking about putting in a road,
the question right now, assuming this lot split is approved, is should
an easement be provided for the eventual future access to the rear portion
of the four remaining lots in case the owners would want to split their
properties at some future date.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin stated when tr. Anderson splits his property,
and depending on where a person builds who purchases this lot, it may
prohibit obtaining access to these other properties.
Mr. Erickson, 1360 69th Avenue, stated he was not in favor of a road.
Mr. Germundson stated, in listening to further discussion, he believes
property is getting scarce, and if he is requested to make a statement,
he would like to see an easement provided on the south for a possible
future roadway.
A realtor, representing Mr. Anderson, stated he is sure the taking of
property for an easement would affect the sale price of the house. He
also pointed out they have a proposed buyer for the lot which is to be
split.
Mr. Tikkanen, 1400 69th Avenue, stated the easement didn't make any
difference to him right now.
Lbl
REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 5, 1981 PAGE 3
S
Councilman Schneider pointed out if the easement isn't required at this time,
he may not be able to split his property in the future, depending on where
the house is built on the lot requested to be split.
Mr. Tikkanen stated on that basis, he would go along with requiring the
easement.
Councilwoman Moses- Martin stated she realizes some of the property owners
don't envision splitting their property while they are living there, but if
they do decide to sell, she felt it would be economically feasible for them
to split off the rear portions of their lot.
Councilman Barnette stated all the Council is asking right now is for an
easement on Mr. Anderson's property in order to make a corridor in the event
the other property owners want to split their properties at some future date.
Mr. Nelson, 1370 69th Avenue, and Mr. Erickson, 1380 69th Avenue, both
indicated they would then be in favor of requiring the easement on Mr.
Anderson's lot split.
Councilman Barnette asked Mr. Anderson how he felt about giving the 40
feet easement on the back of the lot for potential future access.
Mr. Anderson stated, when Siverts Lane went through, both he and the
Bacon's were told one of the benefits was they would be able to split
their lot and no one else would have this advantage.
Mrs. Anderson stated they were told, by putting in the sewer and water,
the privilege they would get would be to split their lot. She felt if
the easement is required, it would affect the sale of the house and
the proposed lot.
Mr. Anderson stated when he filed for the lot split, he was told there
wouldn't be any problems. He explained they have made committments and
{ monies have changed hands, as they bought a business in Wisconsin, and
was counting on the sale of the house and lot. He stated, if the lot
split isn't granted, it may affect the sale and they would be out the
back door with nothing.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the City has a responsibility to all
the property owners in the area. He felt Mr. Anderson has the privilege
of splitting his lot, but the City wants to make sure other property
owners are given the same opportunity.
Tie realtor, representing the Anderson's, stated he came to the City Hall
when he listed the property and asked about the lot split and was told
there would be no problem.
Mr. Qureshi explained the only body that can authorize the lot split is
the Council, and they may attach some conditions, if they so choose.
Councilman Schneider stated the Planning Commission in their recommendation
for approval of the lot split asked the Council to make a determination on
the road access to service additional lots.
Mayor Nee asked if anyone was present who lived on the west side of Siverts
Lane.
Mr. Ed Widzinski, 1320 69th Avenue, indicated he was opposed to the
easement as he didn't want to split his lot.
f
Mrs. Lois Aasland, 1330 69th Avenue, stated there is no possible way of
having an easement for a road because of the location of the homes on
the lots and the terrain, and indicated she was not in favor of it.
LG2
REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 5, 1981 PAGE 4 {`
Mrs. Joy Logid, 1340 69th Avenue, stated she enjoys her lot the way it
is and felt if she ever sold her property, the selling factor would be
the size of the lot.
Mr. Darrel Bacon, 1350 69th Avenue, stated he didn't think he would sell
his lot and liked it as it is now.
The realtor, representing the Anderson's, stated by requiring the
easement, it would take away from the value of the property and felt
the other properties should have to pay for the amount the Anderson's
lose.
Mayor Nee stated by obtaining the lot split, it also increases
the value of the land. He stated the Council has some responsibility
to the other property owners and that is what they are trying to fulfill.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated he would suggest if the majority of
the property owners want an easement provided, that 40 feet be given to
the south, with the understanding that these property owners to the east
will pay the full cost of the roadway and sewer and water, if the majority
of the people want the improvements when the properties are split.
Mr. Qureshi stated, as far as the property owners on the west of Siverts
Lane, all present have indicated they were not in favor of the easement.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and grant Lot Split Request, LS #81-06, with the
stipulation that a 40 foot easement be given at the south side of the
property, with the exact dimensions to be worked out between the petitioner
and staff somewhere between 93 or 100 feet. Seconded by Councilman Barnette.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
2 ORDINANCE NO. 740 ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982:
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated an adjustment has been made to increase
the contributions to service organizations from $5,000 to $10,000.
MOTION by Councilwoman Moses-Martin to waive the second reading of Ordinance
No. 740 and adopt it on the second reading and order publication. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, MayoriNee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
3 FIRST READING OF Ali ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 506 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 506 ENTITLED "VEHICLE
PARKING":
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, pointed out on Page 3D, Section 506.12 that
the way the ordinance is written is to only prohibit truck tractors,
semi-trailers, buses, mobile home and house trailers, or trucks having
a licensed gross weight over 12,000 pounds, from parking on public
streets in a residential district.
Mr. Qureshi stated the ordinance would not restrict recreational vehicles.
He stated there could be an interpretation that a bus couldn't be on the
street and if they want to make it more clear, an addition would have to
be made that this doesn't apply to any licensed recreational vehicle.
Mayor Nee stated he had a call from a school bus driver who takes the bus
home at times and parks it in the driveway. Mr. Qureshi stated the
ordinance would allow for this, however, it couldn't be left on the street.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N. E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
TELEPHONE ( 612)571 -3450
CITY COUNCIL October 9, 1981
ACTION TAKEN NOTICE
R; x Robert & Barbara Anderson
1360 69th Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
On- October 5, 1981 _ the Fridley City Council officially
approved_your request for Z-5- #81-06, to split Part of Lot 1 , Rev. A.S. #10
with the stipulations listed below: in o two bui in sites. 5-
Provide 40 foot access easement on the South property line.
Work with the City to determine and find lot line locations:
$500 park fee to be paid at time building permit applied for on new lot.
If you have any questions rec,arding the above action, please call the
Ccmrlunity Developi;.,r;t Office at 571-3450.
Sincerely,
JlI
F
ERROLD L. , R SAN
JLB/de City Planner
Please review the nr,ted stipulations, sign the statement below, and return
one copy to the City of Fridley.
Concur with acti��i t�;ken.