Loading...
LS82-02 12 SUBJECT < � CITY OF rl-41 LEY, LOT SPLIT LS E34,311 U!^.JIVC 4SITY AVE. NE. FRIDLEY. MN. B i43E! (01,'?) E�'71-3450 RECORDED: +S ADDRESS: DATE: -.5:V- PLANNING .5+/-PLANNING COMMISSION: APPROVED_ DISAPPROVED DATE_3-/D-s/Y NO pI CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED _ DATE PARK FEE REQUIRED: AMOUNT PAID STIPULATIONS: PL1J2vo� (/ T t NAME FEE /QQ RECEIPT NO -53.35 PROPERTY OWNER(S) �'� � C'_(C ffra n TELEPHONE NO TELEPHONE NO ADDRESS(-ES)___/,_t/`�`/ �`�Y/�r S�. - r PROPERTY. LOCAT I ON ON STREET_ s s s-S . 1 _ 1- T 07-7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY, � ��0E, ���-en{} d�� �. TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY O PRESENT ZONING` e-S REASON FOR LO"i SPLIT y� Alec j A L) The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct, l DATE:_ SIGNATURE NOTICE: A sketch of the property and the proposed lot split with any existing struc- tures shown should accompany this application. (See reverse side for additional instructions) v i ` N ?S 9- 75-7 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE 1 . Obtain application form at City Hall (6431 University Avenue N.E. , Fridley). 2. Return completed application form with the- required sketch of the property involved and the lot split fee of $75,00 for each original lot being split. 3. The application will be checked over by Staff and the owner may be required to submit a Certificate of Survey containing a simple description of a part of a platted lot or registered lot, along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in. 4. The application will then be submitted to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. The Planning Commission meets on the Wednesday following the City Council meeting, which is generally the first and third Wednesdays of the month. 5. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for final action. If a Certificate of Survey wasn't required before, it will be required for this meeting. The City Council meets on the first and third Mondays of the month. 6. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must be complied with by the applicant. 7. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent papers for his signature. 8. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant should file the lot split in Anoka County. 9. In .all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed. NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT MAY EXCEED THE AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS. a..ucu:V% Alortg gig Loan Survey fo G'! / L.S. #82-02, Mark Anderson 15 Nor�k Atte. Or' LOT 8 H Cjun d Cu6��V1St4r, v-�o — 33•� i C� LU W � •11.552 4 f^, =�2.�5� ;L4, ---�/ -4- -Q O J From c— 9 ciJ 0) 241 • 1� � �C•J � I r. I,l� I , i v1 *0f) pla stx- tnct0"Jre� Ui 00 • -4- ..-� J C+ o - n pill MEMEN 3 Ic- c- % c- c- I r--Ir__% I i \" a v 4a6 v 8 F I®� CITY OF FRIDLEY � I n \ •:1 1 aa�ao °$1 "s°>. v— —p A L.S. #82-02 Mark Anderson s• e '•' « s SPP AKE�� o C ®� Y t ` a OCR'T j pry1 E N �y N g Y _ LAKE MOOFE Li Sp W Y __�Dom= I �` ✓ I STT J W J 5 ` u N ... v.... 'L € R Ilrt _ — STREET MAP—CITY OF =u L „- — FRIDLEY _^ c 4 a s 8 1981 POLICY STATEMENT ON PARK FEES 13 ON LAND SUBDIVISION L.S. #82-03 Brandt & Anderson Date —/_/'— In determining fair market value of public areas for land subdivision for cash payment, as required by Ordinance 633, the following values will be used: Residential subdivision $1,000.00 per lot Residential lot' split $ 500.00 per lot Commercial/Industrial subdivision or lot splits $ 0.015 per sq. ft. This fee, is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval . The City Council may defer collection to the time a building permit is requested for individual lots created by such subdivision/lot split. The City retains the option to accept an equivalent -amount in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portion required to be dedicated. PARK FEE AGREEMENT The undersigned understands that according to the City Platting Ordinance, the following public park land dedication is required to plat residential , commercial or industrial zoned property. It is further understood that the public park land dedication or cash payment equivalent is at the discretion of the City. It is agreed that a cash payment of g p y $ 500 will be paid according to the above stated policy for the following sub ivision/lot split. It is agreed that the following land dedication is provided according to the. above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split: Dedication: Subdivision/lot split: The undersigned further agrees to notify all future property owners or assigns of the cash payment requirement, if it is to be collected at the time of building permit. DATE IGNATURE Property Owner 0084A/1067A Y CERTIFICATION OF STATUS OF SUBDIVISION OF LAND 1. Property PIN No. 13302q2 00/3 Plat No. 57'c//5'2- Parcel No. 2 2cP0 2. Applicant Tele. No. 3. Type of Document: Deed Contract for Deed Other (Specify) 4. Date of Document 5. Grantor: 6 . Grantee : / 7. Received by City Clerk of / iley Date : ( u( �Z Time : ell-73 4'A%-- By: 8. Action by City: Approved: / Rejected: Date: l Zl �Z Date: Time: l< 'Y/3 Q - Time : By: !/Y��i. .�J- By: (If approved - complete stamp on Document) 9. Reasons: (Cross out inappropriate words) Subdivision Regulations (do - 4kownpt) apply. Subdivision (approved - (If approved - attach e� �'� �(�rQdCSQP Q7�l�GCf/ed� certified .copy of Resolution. ) ND reso14,f,OnJ c. Restrictions (waived - not waived) by Council. (If waived - attach a certified copy of Resolution. ) 10. Conditions Imposed: [] Combination with PIN No. (Petition of Owner should be attached. ) Others: (Specify) NOTE: IF SUBDIVISION INVOLVES TORRENS LAND, CONTACT THE EXAMINER OF TITLES AT COUNTY COURTHOUSE FOR FORM OF DESCRIPTION. (MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 508. 47) S T A M P Approved for Transfer with - without Conditions (Circle one) City of 14�1 D Date : f 2/ By: J. i (SEAL) CERTIFICATION OF STATUS OF SUBDIVISION OF LAND L 1. Property PIN No. flat No. 5' (�Z Parcel No. 2 78v 2. Applicant Tele. No. 0 3. Type of, cument: D Deed Contract for Deed Other (Specify) �;; 2 k 4. Date of Document 5. Grantor: 6 . Grantee : 7. Received by City/Clerk of i G Date : S/3! �� Time : By: 8. Action by City: Approved: (Rejected - Date: Date : Time: Time: S Q� By: By: (If approved - complete stamp on Document) 9. Reasons: (Cross out inappropriate words) a. Subdivision Regulations do)- d apply. b. Subdivision (gp=a*s& - of approv (If approved - attach certified _copy of Resolution. ) c. Restrictions ( - of waived y Council. (If waived - attach a certified copy of Resolution. ) 10. Conditions Imposed: ❑ Combination with PIN No. (Petition of Owner should be attached. ) Others: (Specify) _ NOTE: IF SUBDIVISION INVOLVES TORRENS LAND, CONTACT THE EXAMINER OF TITLES AT COUNTY COURTHOUSE FOR FORM OF DESCRIPTION. (MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 508. 47) �� .. CITY Or- r-RIr]LU-Y, SUBJECT LJ nalNrvE!307'A ��CV'IB�,�t�..�St�;�S en.r—PE CMATCO6V � PiLrEMIEVV Ueiiurnuer t<eapproved ijy ua}o FI No/ ADDRESS �y� FIL"ATE COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST /-/ 7! RETURN TO PLANNING C_-_ MMENTS ' s 1 G� /0/ P/i 11 /,011e Sq7 5 l ,,I,QV41 reo,�— yQ�� I(�e S�ou�cv vezylzri� f/ctrr �rc� p�rocQG4�',� hs,�e � ,�►��' G:,-• /GGA-«h-.�- r� f f r It (0 4 or PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 24, 1982 page 2 MOST EASTERLY POINT OF LOT 31, THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 31, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND ADD IT TO LOT 30, BLOCK 1, OSTMAN'S THIRD ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 6909 HICKORY DRIVE N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Harris stated that L.S. #82-01 was recommended to City Council for approval and would go to City Council on March 8. 2. REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #82-02, MARK ANDERSON: Split off the North 81 feet of Lot 8H, Auditor's Subdivision No. 2 (9 53 Mississippi St. N.E. ) to make a new buildable lot, the same being 6530 Oakley Street N.E. Mr. Boardman stated the lot is located between Oakley and Mississippi Streets. Lot 8H is a large lot, 250' x 111 .37' . The lot the petitioner wants to split off is the lot along the back line in order to create a new lot. The location of that new lot creates some problems. The existing garage will be moved and relocated; however, with the existing Zoning Code, the required rear yard setback is 42 feet. The difference is about 20 ft. , so the petitioner would need a variance from 42 ft. to 20 ft. The petitioner is appealing to the Planning Commission to approve the variance along with the lot split to avoid going through the variance procedure. He stated this has never been done before and one of the problems is that a lot split does not require a public hearing, but a variance does require a public hearing. Mr. Boardman stated he had no problem with the lot size. It is an extra large lot and can legally be split into three 9,000 sq. ft. lots. Ms. Gabel stated she agreed with Mr. Boardman. She did not feel the Planning Commission should grant a variance. The variance procedure requires a public hearing, and she felt the neighbors should be notified. The petitioner was not in the audience. Mr. Boardman stated another thing is they will eventually be looking at a proposal for a bikeway/walkway along Mississippi St. and will be requesting 10 ft. easements for bikeway/walkway. Mr. Harris stated he would feel very uncomfortable acting on this lot split without the petitioner present. He would like the Planning Commission members to be able to talk to the petitioner before acting on the lot split request. Ms. Gabel stated she agreed, particularly when they will be asking for a 10 ft. bikeway/walkway easement. They need more information from the petitioner. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO TABLE THE REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT, L.S. 82-02 BY MARK ANDERSON UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 24, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Harris called the February 24, 1982, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mr. Harris, Ms. Gabel , Mr. Svanda, Mr. Kondrick, Mr. Saba, Mr. Oquist (arr. 7:55 p.m. ) Members Absent: Ms. van Dan Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Patricia L. Lester, 5484 Meister Rd. W. G. Doty, 6379 University Ave. N.E. Gary Wellner, 6221 Sunrise Dr. N.E. See attached list APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 3, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 3, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1 . REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #82-01 , PATRICIA L. LESTER: Split off part of Lot 31 ,B o� ck , 0� stm'an's Third Addition described as beginning at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 31 ; thence Southwesterly along the North- westerly line of said Lot 31 , a distance of 30 feet; thence Southeasterly to the most Easterly point of Lot 31 ; thence Northwesterly along the North- easterly line of said Lot 31 , to the point of beginning, and add it to Lot 30, Block 1 , Ostman's Third Addition, the same being 6909 Hickory Drive N.E. Mr. Boardman stated the lots in question are 6901 and 6909. The request is to take a 20 ft. triangle portion of 6901 and add it to 6909. He stated Staff has no problems with this request. Ms. Patricia Lester was in the audience and stated she had no statement to make at this time. MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR LOT SPLIT, L.S. #82-01, BY PATRICIA L. LESTER,TO SPLIT OFF PART OF LOT 31, BLOCK 1, OSTMAN'S THIRD ADDITION, DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 31; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH- WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 31, A DISTANCE OF 30 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TO THE J0 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 24, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Harris asked Mr. Boardman to contact Mr. Anderson and inform him of the Planning Commission's action. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #82-01 , BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER: Rezone the following escribe parce s from M-1 (light in ustria areas) to R-2 (two family dwelling areas) ,(except if this area is platted, 1 lot will be R-1 ) : That part of Blocks 8 and 9, Lowell Addition, lying South of the North line of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, extended in a Westerly direction to the West boundary of said Block 8, and lying Westerly of the plat of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, together with the Easterly one-half of vacated Elm Street, and that part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park, lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of the plat of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, together with the Westerly half of vacated Elm Street, generally located South of Mississippi Street N.E. , East of the Burlington Northern right-of-way. MOTION BY MR. SVANDA, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA #82-01 BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:50 P.M. Mr. Boardman stated that Mr. Doty and Mr. Wellner originally brought a rezoning request before the Planning Commission early in 1981 . At that time, the proposal was for a rezoning from M-1 (light industrial ) to R-3 (general multiple dwellings). Also included in that rezoning request was a street vacation. Because of neighborhood opposition to R-3, Mr. Doty withdrew the rezoning request, so it did not go to City Council . However, the street vacation was approved by City Council . Mr. Boardman stated this proposal was for rezoning from M-1 to R-2 (two family dwelling areas) and that a small portion be rezoned R-1 . This would have to be determined through the plat, and at some point in time, they will have to get both the platting and zoning together before it goes to City Council for final approval . Right now, they cannot split the land as far as the actual legal description on the zoning; however, the zoning issue is the key issue as to whether this project will go or not go. For that reason, Mr. Doty has not applied for a plat and is submitting only a rezoning. He asked Mr. Doty to explain his plans for development. Mr. Doty stated this property is bounded on the west by the railroad tracks, is bounded on the north by light industrial , and is bounded on the east by multiple residential . In an attempt to get along with the people, they made the concession to make an R-1 adjacent to the one R-1 property this property abuts. He stated the zoning is presently light industrial . He and Mr. Wellner felt M-1 was not the proper use for the property in that location because of the residential neighborhood. They felt that with apartment complexes, manufacturing, and industrial that R-1 was also not a proper use for the land. For that reason, they came up with what they thought was a realistic compromise--R-2 zoning. ti PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 24, 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. Wellner stated that Mr. Doty has expressed his thoughts, and he is in support of this proposal . Mr. Michael Larson, 6390 Starlite Blvd. , stated he wanted to point out that the drawing Mr. Doty had brought to the meeting was the first time the neighborhood had seen it. He stated his R-1 property was most affected by this change in zoning. He stated he and his neighbors have a number of concerns, and he sub- mitted the following letter to the Planning Commission members: The neighbors of the Sylvan Hills area most directly impacted by the proposed rezoning, are unanimously supportive of either maintaining the current M-1 zoning or upgrading the zoning to R-1 . We cannot conceive of an instance where we would approve of an R-2 zoning for this parcel ! Some of the reasons for our concerns are as follows: NEIGHBORHOOD INCOMPATIBILITY. . . Our neighborhood is almost entirely single family homes with the exception of the apartments on Satellite Lane. We are proud of our homes. We work hard to maintain a pleasant appearance and thereb7maintain the value of our homes. TRAFFIC & SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS. . . Satellite Lane is a narrow road and we have had to restrict parking to avoid accidents and assure the safety of our children. The proposed rezoning could allow 7 duplex structures or 14 iving units. If each of those units averages 1 and 1/2 cars, there would be 21 cars to park in an area comprised of a very short cul-de-sac and 14 driveways! The additional traffic would increase the traffic risks to an unreasonable level . IMPACT ON HOME VALUES. . . Whatever incremental profits would accrue to the developer by obtaining R-2 zoning would be more than offset by the reduction in the value of our homes. We are convince a eve opment un er - cou e pro—f-Itable to the developer. Consider the new construction of an impressive single-family home at 6380 Starlite Blvd. as proof of the viability of our area. CURRENT ZONING RESTRICTIONS. . . We see little risk_ in maintaining the M-1 zoning because this property is essen is y and-locked firem an in us rial development viewpoint. Even if some industrial development were pursued, we feel confident it may be preferential to R-2 development. THE LACK OF CONCERN FOR OUR OPINIONS. . . At no time has the developer contacted neighbors to discuss his thoughts and perspective. Apparently they feel they should be allowed to develop their property as they see fit to do so! The fact that theX didn' t do their homework prior to purchase of the property does77t mean we nave to surren er our home values to their ineptitude. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 10, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Vice-Chairperson Oquist called the March 10, 1982, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel , Mr. Svanda, Mr. Kondrick, Ms. van Dan, Mr. Saba (arr. 8:45 p.m. ) Members Absent: Mr. Harris Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Scott Wheeler, Planning Intern Ron Miller, 5705 Jackson St. N.E. Mark Anderson, 556 - 37th Ave. N.E. Allen Stahlberg, 305 - 89th Ave. N.E. , Blaine Donna J. Miller, 6430 East River Road Peter D. Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Dr. N.E. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 24, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 24, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1 . TABLED: REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT6.S. #82-02, BY MARK ANDERSON: Split off t e North 81 feet of Lot 8H, Au rTs _Subdivision No. 2 (953 lMississippi Street N.E. ) to make a buildable lot, the same being 6530 Oakley Street N.E. MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO REMOVE L.S. #82-02 BY MARK ANDERSON FROM THE TABLE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated this item was tabled at the last Planning Commission meeting because Mr. Anderson was not at the meeting. He is at the meeting tonight. He stated it is Staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission approve the lot split with the condition that a 10 ft. bikeway/walkway easement be retained along Mississippi St. He stated this easement has been discussed with Mr. Anderson. He stated Mr. Anderson has applied for variances and those variances will be going through the Appeals Commission. Staff will tie both the variances and the lot split together before going to City Council . PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 10, 1982 PAGE 2 Mr. Ron Miller, 5705 Jackson St. N.E. , stated he and Mr. Anderson will be purchasing the new lot. He asked Mr. Boardman to describe the bikeway/walkway easement. Mr. Boardman stated that right now there is a sidewalk along Mississippi St. , and the City needs to room to expand the sidewalk for a bikeway on the north side of Mississippi . At one time, a bikelane was striped on Mississippi , but when the County changed Mississippi to a four-lane road, they eliminated the bikeway. That is why the City is requesting a 10 ft. bikeway/walkway easement on all new requests. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MS. VAN DAN, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #82-02, BY MARK ANDERSON, TO SPLIT OFF THE NORTH 81 FEET OF LOT 8H, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 21 (953 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E.) TO MAKE A NEW BUILDABLE LOT, THE SAME BEING 6530 OAKLEY STREET N.E., WITH THE FOLLOWING TWO STIPULATIONS: 1. THE LOT SPLIT BE CONDITIONED UPON THE APPLICATION FOR REAR YARD VARIANCES. 2. THE CITY RETAIN A 10 FT. BIKEWAY/WALKWAY EASEMENT ON MISSISSIPPI ST. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated the variances will go to the Appeals Commission on March 16, and then both the lot split and the variances should go to City Council on March 22. (Mr. Saba arrived at 8:45 p.m.) 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #82-03, BY DONNA MILLER: Split Lot 1 , Block 1 , Veit's 2nd Addition, and Lot 26, Audito.r's Sub. No. 23, combined into three lots: (110 - 64 1/2 Way N.E. ) The easterly 65' of Lot 1 , Block 1 , Veit's 2ndddition together with the easterly 75.19' of Lot 26, A.S. #23, and (120 - 4 1/2 Way N.E.) The Easterly 140' of Lot 1 , Block 1 , Veit's 2nd Addition, cept the easterly 65' , together with the easterly 150.19' of Lot 23, A.S. 23, except the easterly 75.19' , and (110 - 64 1/2 Way) The westerly 128.01`', of Lot 1 , Block 1 , Veit's 2nd Addition, together with the westerly 121 .23' of Lot 26, A.S. #23. (This lot is presently. addressed as 6430 East River Road, but if the lot split is approved, it will require an address change. ) Mr. Boardman state this layout has now been changed and the legal description has been changed Before, the l t lines were uneven, and they have now evened up the lot lin for a simpler to split. MOTION BY GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. KO DRICK, TO RECEIVE THE REDEFINED SURVEYO MMAP OF THE LOT SPLIT. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 22, 1982 PAGE 10 OLD BUSINESS: 3 CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA BY MAKING CHANGES IN ZUNING DISTRICTS FRO`CA 10 CR-1 ZOA #80-02 1001 HILLWIf�D ROAD TED BURAND dba: SWING REALTY TABLED 1/18/82): Mr. Boardman, City Planner, stated an appraisal is 7d/one on the property by the Housing & Redevelopment Authority. Councilman Schneider stated Mr. Burandt, the petitioner for the rezoning, is in agreement with continuing this item to April 19, 1982. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table the second reading of this ordinance for rezoning application ZOA #82-02 until April 19, 1982. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4 ORDINANCE NO. 747 REPEALING OLD CHAPTER 2 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING NEW CHAPTER 220 ENTITLED RESIDENTIAL - RENTAL PROPERTY AND CONDOMINIUM COFiMOPJ REA MAINTENANCE CODE: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 747 on the second reading and order publication.. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: 6 RECEIVING CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 18, 1982: MOTION by Councilman Barnette to receive the minutes of the Cable Television Commission Meeting of February 18, 1982. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor ry Nee declared the motion Carried unanimously. ` RECEIVING_CABLE TE_L_UISION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 25, 1982 AND 7 A CONSIDERATION OF A• RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE SOLICITATION OF PROPOSAL FOR RENEWAL OF AfCABLE CONIh1UFj ICATIONS SYSTEM MW-0R T­HE-R"NCABLEVISION, INC.: Mayor Nee ask d this item be tabled and discussed at the Conference Meeting and rought on the Council's agenda for the April 5, 1982 meeting. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to table this item to the April 5, 1982 Council meeting. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Cable Television Commission Meeting of February 25, 1982. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. t Q C' Ri CEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 1982: The Council received the minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of March 10, 1982 and considered the f-clTowing items: R A CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST,_ . S. X82_0 MAKE A BUILDABLE LOT, 6530 OAKLEY STREET. MA SON: 63 COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 22, 1982 PAGE 11 Mr. Flora, PUblic Works Director, stated this is a request for a lot split for property just North of Mississippi at the intersection of Mississippi Street and Oakley Street. He stated the request is to split off the back portion of the existing lot to produce two lots. He stated staff has reviewed this lot split and has no problems, however, a bikeway/walkway easement should be required along Mississippi Street. Mr. Flora stated this item was reviewed by the Planning Commission and they recommended approval subject to the lot split being conditioned upon the application for rear yard variances and that the City retain a ten foot bikeway/walkway easement on Mississippi Street. Mr. Flora stated at the March 16 Appeals Commission meeting, the request for the rear yard variances was made and granted, therefore, the applicant has completed the stipulation regarding the variances. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the Planning Commission recommendation and grant Lot Split #82-02 subject to the granting of the rear yard variances; the City retain a ten foot bikeway/walkway easement on Mississippi Street; and the removal of the existing garage on the lot line. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. B CONSIDERFTICv OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L. S. #82-03, TO COMBINE INTO THREE LOTS�110 AND 120 - 64'-z AVENUE AND 6430 EAST RIVER RD---A�, DONNA MILLER• Mr. ora, Public Works Director, stated the property in question is locate to the West of East River Road at 641 Wlay. He stated.there are two exi ing lots, one facing 64� and another lot to the rear. Mr. Flora st ed the petitioner is requesting splitting the two lots into three l o Mr. Flora s ted the Planning Commission has recommended approval of this lot spl with the provision that the property owner check on the easement for a 75 ft. by 28.58 ft. portion on the East side of the property exten 'ng into East River Road and dedicate such easement to the County, if t 's has not already been done. Mr. Flora stated, in checking with Anok County, they have the right-of-way for that portion. Mr. Qureshi, City Mang , requested the item be tabled since at one time there was a proposal for n access through this parcel, and he wanted this checked into further. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatri k to table this item to April 5, 1982 Seconded by Councilman Schenide Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion car led unanimously. RECESS: .l A recess was called by Mayor Nee at 11*:*p. M. RECONVENED: \`� Mayor Nee reconvened the meeting at 11:45 P. m. All Council members were present. 8 C CONSIDERATION OF EXTENSION OF SPECIAL USE PE IT, SP 08-10 BY ALLEN STAHLBERG: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated Mr. Stahlberg received a special use permit in 1978 for construction of a single family ome in the flood plain and since that time, he has had three extensions. a stated the Council, at the last extension, stipulated if there were y further extensions, Mr. Stahlberg would have to reapply for a new s ecial use permit. -n OF F DIRECTORATE o0 0 -O OF °o o° n PUBLIC WORKS March 17, 1982 (YL MEMO NO. 82-18 .w Jerrold L. Boardman , Planning TO John Flora L.S. #82-02, Mark Anderson The Planning Commission at their March 10, 1982 meeting recomn Lot Split #82-02 with two stipulations : 1 . 10 foot bikeway easement along Mississippi 2. Subject to variance approval . The applicant has agreed to dedicate 10 feet of easement alon for a bikeway system. They also made a request to the Appeal rear yard variance created by the request for a lot split. T heard by the Appeals Commission on March 165 1982 and, by a u With the variance approved by the Appeals Commission, the onl the Planning Commission which needs to be brought to the City 10 foot bikeway easement on Mississippi Street. JLB/de i ,gig, 'a1i• P - h ,vr"sfr,Fja ,w" d ` " is"�..kms, ' 5R �+ Tz',.�E° t t, ?? a < t,4A y 3* � p� ,dl �a�"'�,* ', } + �x `�',-� a c� �� '�x �° •:-, � �' *��.�•. Y�ik-Ky-�n•. 7j� yy:rrNx.d x �'� ;. " � < '� C ",gx � �T,x�,.. �� ,�. r x 04., 40 • k4 �� L iX%.� Y ri"" '�, y T ' f�#S Y 4 _: fi.d �ry•I r � r�� � d �'��r. �9�1�' � c•fK - .z, L -�y,'71+¢r {iF�iF Y. w�oY�p•rNi""'"�t",.�✓` "VTk'k�.sr� +aa x%4.�Yt�'-2'y�kFl } 'M,2$la' ..*�tl 3 ¢vrE F'r9� M1 * •�� { � "^'f�� � = .Ee i t3S` ddrHr s C{. ,r`'Tp9� r'+ t, �i �� '7��". t f��v.++f�'�`� '� - � .r h "�+^ ''a�` '�; 2 y.,t tF z� �.w- t,� r,:+• "w.„' x �""�' 1�" � 1 id 4 a qn -_;»�`�t°rt Y r�` S,].}+, 1'Y"$p F•+'r�F C' „ '`- y ,'�c` n. i , dITfi•`fr'* `',!'a. ."PT, .. ".�(^t 'i• k f �: �• t »� i "i r' r ' rT ti., All ig `sem p.A �A y, aw d t+aer ,..•k tea,}.tri Y 3r;. i } 7e'a`I't '�i. •�'r k �.."{ I'...`x k��� 5£�J.: � �.* is .y�• ���" � � - �� � � Yrs .•ic �w '"ff ,'s ' bx .fY eFirnt} r•. � j Ysr�°fis �'�f*r'�s c 'r, " j' 4 f F' �' 1 4 '�� � s�od:•§ i NW�i �a�f � i a t F�}��•• � +r�- r1��.r, i �+ ,fit'.-� ��, ` x�„w�'''" s�`��'�� � �'�`�� t r W' '� S`` :" s ✓e it a ,+.. !'k 4 .a*q�" � - Y• fa"k � '� � r �K� .1't., r 1 r r-a+ -hY ��, '�f � k- n._ I—Aw a S ..L � aia�,i+w- a � 4tr�?-* F x+ a. tAk.'d�, � ��., Y�r� +.s s r i '�y4�+•"1 , # �� x� v��.' � t�s� �` a• Lr� ^tr a.,, gyp '�`���f t�,�,�¢� ` :.r .�.?,'� �`°.,,. .� ..s ':a r Yll a --. rc �� ��k e � �^� �"3,4 i ". f �p� �,yf �-•�-�ed 4�., s h wY",y i !'!c '. x� ntb s, Piz tom" s x k 'I r 9r l� c ,s t� �r �� ••..a �� h- �8;�' i �y +°�'�#°' ���ta#'"N'�� �. s� .,+ �� �s� 1�' � t l r �.ri E � +�� S "E L+� � ,�` `�..r.� X(� � : i C. } RY''-r �,yb� .�M� `.•.Ax3F gP _ } Eli- 74 „ WT s $ wit .r i tr *`�'i" 4.r'z ....t� G' ::�i #3k._�, 1<Su.F:I a.. ._.,. '” f tx` =,�,t t. :fir_ x.t,:?' ,_+;.&•''� r`r}K'. .,.. s_t7... f.f ..,.4' C�''C;:�� CITY OF FRIOLEY ' $431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.. FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA SS432 J TELEPHONE ( 612)571-3150 ' March 24, 1982 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Mark Anderson 556 37th Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55418 Dear Mr. Anderson: On__ �� gg? __ the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a Lot Split L.S. + O�n_n with the stipulations listed below: Mississippi Street N.E. and 6530 Oakley Street N.E. 1• Provide a 10 ft. bikeway/walkway easement along Mississippi Street. 2. The existing garage will have to be removed from the North 81 feet of Lot H, A.S. #21 (6530 Oakley Street N.E. ) If you have any questions reaarding the above action, please call the Coninunity Development Office at 571-3450. pSinely, D L. OARDMAN JLB/de Planner Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below, and return one copy to the City of Fridley. Concur with action taken.