Loading...
LS83-01 t corm #5-68 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION 53 CITY OF FRIDLEY R CITY USE ON-TJX Applicant's Name APPLICANT: Lot Split ADDRESS: O Street CityZip ode W Date Filed: 0 TELEPHONE # 7 7���1 Fee: `�Receipt #-V-/44!�5, +3 Home Business Council Action:Datefj . d o REMARKS: aPROPERTY OWTFER �s.� ?(S4cod � +- 5'- �d +� r-q �4 3 0 t +' m ADDRI�SS(ES ? ,c �� �.l-r_e-i,•-� o Street City Zip Code a) P4': w o •H -P !z! +> o m d Street City Zip Code o TELEPHONE #(S} Id Home Business +P w -P cd u —40', Rr U. U) O •r1 - . aProperty Location on Street;C3 Ile _ or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) N Legal Description of Property: 0 z j dzle elv 1 S/da 1 .1e `D /� Reason for Lot Split: / Total Area of PropertyA;"L_sq. ft. Present Zoning Classification ,e-/ The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE: CSIGNATURE' BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Seq reverse side for ditionai instructions) PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration - Remarks: PLANNING COMMISSION: Date o.� Consideration - Remarks: CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration - Remarks: LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE 1 . Obtain. application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley 2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property involved and the lot split fee of x. 20.00 for each original lot being split. 3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets & Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of the Subcommittee. i 4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in. ' 5. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant with migrates of the Planning Commission. 6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday of the month. 7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must be complied with by the applicant. 8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent i papers for his signature. 9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant should file the lot split in Anoka County. 10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.. ' NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS. 13 • CITY OF FRIOLEY. SUBJECT p LOT SPLIT LS # 4 3 `" c) 6 191 tJNtVCRS, ~E. NE. FRIMay. MN. G349e t6u►671-3450 RECORDED: ti ADDRESS: �. IS PLANNING COMMISSION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE � NO CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO. PARK FEE REQUIRED: AMOUNT PAID STIPULATIONS: NAME ) GGA/ �iF� FEE RECEIPT NO �7d PROPERTY OWN R(S)_�Cc/jaaf TELEPHONE NO ZLzll—/<,' 1, _ TELEPHONE NO ADDRESS(ES)_ ����/ 'C.C�-� >/ PROPERTY LOCATION ON STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY 2- 50 T PRESENT ZONING_ C REASON FOR LOT SPLIT 4V �/cVV_S� i The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE: /]j ?_ SIGNATUREf ell / NOTICE: A sketch of the property and the proposed lot split with any existing struc- tures shown should accompany this application. (See reverse side for additional instructions) L LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE 1. Obtain application fors at City Hall (6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley). 2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property involved and the lot split fee of $75.00 for each original lot being split. 3. The application will be checked over by Staff and the owner may be required to submit a Certificate of Survey containing a simple description of a part of a platted lot or registered lot, along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in. 4. The application will then be submitted to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. The Planning Commission meets on the Wednesday following the City Council meeting, which is generally the first and third Wednesdays of the month. 5. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for final action. If a Certificate of Survey wasn't required before, it will be required for this meeting. The City Council meets on the first and third Mondays of the -month. 6. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must be complied with by the applicant. 7. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent papers for his signature. 8. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant should file the lot split in Anoka County. 9. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed. NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT MAY EXCEED THE AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY KURTH SURVEYING, INC. 4002 JEFFERSON ST.N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 55421 788-9769 1 HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY. PLAN. OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DY M[ OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE 0/ MINNESOTA. - DATE -SO-AL3 (- 83 SCALE 1"= 30 MINNE REGISTRATION NO. 5332 O= IRON MONUMENT ►�LLL� SL .z '�Lp.-r o� St�2tK�� APEALA.tiCL 21< 3 O % L77L So , � pm �v �2 w J 104-0 ►- 10 1 3�o Cid Z 00 _. M � 1 0 1 N 158 ti J 1 In 1 r J 1 Q 1 10 -pP 5 � � Qa 1, PAQ� LAKL.31D� j 9� J �� CLOTHES POLeS x o rj tJ J �, rJ� 1 X J �v o N � , o + 00 � o • o K a8� 59 'S3"w Quit Claim Deed. Form No. 28`M. Millcr•Dwi, Cu., Atinncapuli% Individual to Corporation. Alinnc.uta Uniform Cunccq.incing Blank. (Rcvi+cd 1976 I �fjtg tt�entt�re e 9.er made this ..........15th..._....... day of..... .June..........................................1 19..8.3...., between ...............T.g....r-e.................e ................................................_............................................................................................................................ ofthe County of.............Anoka ......................................................and State of......Minnesota............................................................, part.y.,.... o he first part, and..........�i.ty...Of...Fri.dl.ey.......................................................................................................................... muni ci pa ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................., a corporation under the laws o the State o Mi.nn esota........... rt o the second rt po f f............... party f part, That the he sum of ' El)i dolaabr_and_.130E�Q.Q....Sa�..part.Y.-.. . of the first part, ..in consideration'of DOLL.gRS, t to..................................___................in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is lhereby acknowledged, does....... hereby Grant, Bargain, Quitclaim, and Convey unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assignS, Forever, all the tract. ... or parcel.... of land lying and being in the Count o Anoka..................................................and State of .Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit: A thirty-two (32) foot easement (the Northerly seventeen (17) feet for a street easement and the Southerly fifteen (15) feet for a bikeway/ walkway easement) over the Northerly thirty-two (32) feet of Lot 1, j Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside except the South 104 feet thereof. i A five (5) foot utility easement over the South five (5) feet of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside except the 104.0 feet thereof. The City of Fridley hereby accepts this easement for street, bikeway/ walkway and utility purposes. SIDNEY C. INMAN, City Clerk NO STATE DEED TAX REQUIRED. To babe alta to 3bolb the fWa111r, To_<_%cther with all tht, h•ereditaPtenI's and appurtenances there- unto belonging or in anywise appertaining', to the sr.iil party of the second part, its successors and assifIns. Forever. 31n Te5timonp Wberrof, The said party o,; the first part has hereunto set her hand the day and year first alana•e ir.•ritten. .......................................................................................... .__. .. ._..... .. _.._...._.._..........................................._ _............ ..... . .. . . ..... .......... ................................................................... . .. . .. ... 6tate of Binnce;otal, Countyof.__.._ .................................. ............................... vo, foredohid itistrimi(,iit icas acktiordedged before me this....... .... (lay of ....... by .. ........................................................................... (NAME OF PERSON ACKNOWLEDGED) .......................... ................................................................. .......... (SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT) .. ........ . ... ................. ........................................... ........ THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (TITLE OR RANK) ........................................... (Name) (Address) Q i A � � ° S, ~ r ~ '° r 4t io Q 4 0 0 ZZ Z 'P. z Z 0 U 0 El _Z Q 0 o. z U Z Quit Claim Deed. Form No. 28-M. Alillcr•v�ci� Cu., Alinnc�pul�� Individual to Corporation. Alinn—ni Unilurm Cunvc)A, ing Illink% (Rcci+cd 19 t,) ThisInbenture. Jlfade thrs............ ....day of................Ime..................................... 19...83..., between .................... a.r.WIP-t..A.,.....$.ese.r................................... .......................................................................................................................... Anoka........................................................and State o ..................Minneso.ta................................................ of the County of................Aan f party....... of the first part, and................C.ity...o.f.....F.ri d 1.ey.................................................................................................................... muni.c.i.R.a.l............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. V... a corporation under the laws of the State of.............Minnesota.......................................... party of the second part, Witneggetb, That the said part.;y(........ of the first part, in consideration of the sura, of ....Ane ..($.1..D0.).:dn.l.la r...an,d..noj 1OD.'s. ............ ........ ............. ...............................................................................DOLL.4RS, j to_.. ............................. .... . .__ in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does...... hereby Grant, Bargain, Quitclaim, and Convey unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, Forever, all the tract...... or parcel .... of land lying and being in the County of ........... ..........Anoka............... .......and State of Minnesota, described as follows, to-zcit: j A five (5) foot utility easement over the North five (5) feet of the South 104.01 feet of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside. The City of Fridley hereby accepts this easement for utility purposes. SIDNEY C. INMiAN, City Clerk NO STATE DEED TAX REQUIRED. To Jbabe anb to Kolb the *a111C, To<_%ether with (til thcc hcreditanzents and appurtenances there- unto belonjinn or in anywise appc7'tain;7?f, to thc; sc•iti party of the second part, its successors and assigns. Forever. 31n Tegtimonp tBbereof, The said party., of the first part ha S _.. hereunto set. her hand file dors and year fust abort zr.rittcra. J ............................................................................................ .. .. ........ .. _..............................._........_... . .........__ _..._ _ ._. . _.. .._ ..... ................................._........................... __ 6tate of Annezota, Countyof............................................................................ 7'he jorc.dobi-j instminent ivas acktiowled.ded before ine /I i.s, day of ............ ...... 19............... by....--__.... ........ ......... .. ....................... ................................... .......... (NAME OF PERSON ACKNOWLEDGED) ... .....................--....... .....................................—............................. (SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT) .......................—............................I......... ....... THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (rITLE OR RANK) ............. .................................. ........ (Name) (Address) t 4L, Q Q 0 0 z 0 U r6 0 0 0 C3 U00 X 04 Z z 01 Z 15 12 o 4 L.S. #�76�r 4RT L S`ECzE R! \_ /t E C O R IVER Split Lot 1 , Block 2,'-Sp 'ng``6a(� Pa.r..\� keside . SEC /2 �— - . . . ��' IL �T< ��`°�\ � y.• X30 (ioc� " i /00 16-14 NI nsOn- on } V VLijpq; yy ` FJ 1 •Q .. •'j' . ._.99.98 wo T N i c 65 .r J .,�q„ 79998 I� � i A'50 lop 4 yl� y y�3q .� ^ 7�62`fo /M1J�gJ ---..._._.r`.99Bf 60J a `r . I # r. ev 5 zmd �.�,♦ �/-� E,� ��' � $ , � rA(e�c/yKi N LEY)ST. ,� 76 W 4 J,�V^, 1,6 AK y�gy !. k •, '99Ec c39? •. • 23p6o _, <'39_59 T Mid /-3 99.4 'Jen• w E Joe W c o za cn o • �,�V -� ✓�, q W m; z......, M s g o N. ?� o 15 _ _ \_ s9� ! • � rat►'-s son .:919 ....... f $L 3 Nom. .....,..,..,v... 1- I, � � �o a �� F E ��.^t '� '�>�r 2515 •,y 7401 3 q 6, - �, _ ,...............,, , T, m cp�3 J s AVE-.— "i 3ne.ra�*:;s IV . 25 16 156' °100 ��OzO Moi/in r/ • 1\ �•SS/ film 7 ,f.. 9�. __�-_—�a 1i L9 93 8f Z'�._ • �4O' •'� . �� 564 7Y ° 6 -- Z ° l6s ' �� 7( 0�' • .d.•.rsv'i\ a (rt0f .'' ^ / y 9 �•_.. !y9!: 15 I^7 4 zs bt (SII so •'�',ae �`� 3� ,' CERTIFICATION OF STATUS OF SUBDIVISION OF LAND 1. Property PIN No. 2. Type of Documtl%t: //�� eh- T le �] Deed [� Contract for Deed ❑ Other (Specify) C1 t k 7 } 7L S JL 3. Date of Document 4. Grantor: All 5. Grantee : 6. Received by City Clerk of Date: s�Z [ , 7 Time: d By: 7. Action by City: �� Approved: Rejected: Date: Date: S 2 a Time : Time. By: By: z �� (If approved - complete stamp on Document) 8. Reasons: (Cross out inappropriate words) a. Subdivision Regulations do - ) apply. b. Subdivision ( - of approve (If approved - attach certified copy of Resolution) C. Restrictions (waived - of waived by Council. (If waived - attach a certified copy of Resolution) 9. Conditions Imposed: Combination with PIN No. (Petition of owner should be attached. ) F-1Others: (Specify) NOTE: IF SUBDIVISION INVOLVES TORRENS LAND, CONTACT THE EXAMINER OF TITLES AT COUNTY COURTHOUSE FOR FORM OF DESCRIPTION. / 56'G CERTIFICATION OF STATUS OF SUBDIVISION OF LAND 1. Property PIN No. lZ 3o ZL/ l/ 00 51 Plat No. 59I YT Parcel No. 0900 2. Applicant AV A�•-?i� SQ��- Tele. No. 7r(- 16 18 3. Type of Document: Deed D Contract for Deed 0 Other (Specify) 4. Date of Document 5. Grantor: P70<y a-e-f 6. Grantee : �0��� � . ►� 7. Received by City Clerk of Date : 1-5h j Time : - 3 By: 8. Action by City: Approve • / Rejected : Date: If 3 Date : Time : -� - 3 �. Time : By: �(.CLz., By: (If approved - complete stamp on Document) 9. Reasons: (Cross out inappropriate words) a. Subdivision Regulations (do - de-wosk) apply. b. Subdivision (approved - ) . (If approved - attach certified .copy of Resolution. ) Restrictions (waived - not waived) by Council. (If waived - attach a certified copy of Resolution. ) 10. Conditions Imposed: [� Combination with PIN No. (Petition of Owner shou d be attached. ) Others: (Specify) NOTE: IF SUBDIVISION INVOLVES TOR.RENS LAND, CONTACT THE EXAMINER OF TITLES AT COUNTY COURTHOUSE FOR FORM OF DESCRIPTION. (MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 508.47) OF SUBDIVISION OF LAND 1. Property PIN No: ,Z. 2 005-/ Plat No. 9rYP Parcel No. � '© 2. Applicant e- mer Tele. No. 3. Type of Document: Deed Contract for Deed 0 Other (Specify) J 4. Date of Document 7//5 Y 3 S. Grantor: .� 6 . Grantee : 7. Received by City Clerk of Date : l '`ft '3 Time: S. Action by City: Pprov Rejected: �_ / Date: �/ rf3 Date: Time: / Time: BY; '��'` :.r By (If approved - complete stamp on Document) 9. Reasons : (Cross out inappropriate words) a. Subdivision Regulations Adq'- dawvret) apply. b. Subdivision ( prow - L) • (If approved - attach certified .copy of Resolution. ) strfctions (waived not waived) by Council. (If. waived attach a certified copy of Resolution.) 10. Conditions Imposed: 0 Combination with PIN No. (Petition of Owner should be attached. ) 0 Others: (Specify) IM IF SUBDIVISION INVOLVES TORRENS LAND, CONTACT THE EXAMINER OF TITLES AT COUNTY COURTHOUSE FOR FORM OF DESCRIPTION. (MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 508.47) CITY OF FRIOLEY� 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. NE. COMMISSION APPLICATION FRIDLEY, MN. 5543E REVIEW DeImenf/ Number/I Rev oqe Approved by FI i ADORESs$�� �A r FI AT COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST � LY T ��� '' RETURN TO PLANNING S � D6�1 E COMMENTS 70'evo was ah o�p h'c el6s o1.� i r� �'7 5, �'�rt•*�►r^� Cv•n.«ISf.�Ow I barrel was tf��la�`w"Swe,�. ����,,�A�PMeds pd E �/ ref aipts. Mark John Leon y . -fie vC X4.1 h.) 1� �.OG. �Sl�'i� T /S / S.S v�',�• ��t'" ,+'ti+�d� �,�'I '�"c "��� � gje S rloo" q er j+ Atop 4 12N TM! CITU Of DIRECTORATE o0 OF °'d o MEMORANDUM PUBLIC WORKS FRIML Y DATE June 2, 1983 FROM D.P.W. John G. Flora TO ACTION INFO. SUBJECT Lot Split #83-01 Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager Ms. Margaret Seger is again requesting to split her lot on the southwest corner of Osborne Road and Lakeside Road. The County is interested in improving Osborne Road east of Old Central, but do not have sufficient right-of-way in this increment. The City also has identified a bikeway/walkway along Osborne Road in this section. Accordingly, a 32 foot easement should be obtained along Osborne Road to allow for future improvements. There are no internal lot easements required for this split. (Lot #2, 1578 Osborne Road is land locked and would have to provide internal access and utility easements if it is ever split) There are sewer and water services on Lakeside to support this lot split. If the City Council supports this lot split, a park fee of $500 in addition to a survey will be required. JGF/mc i r. 12 P L.S. A�= SEGER Split Lot 1 , Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside into two building sites �G ,poi jS�G O s bo Rr✓E N, c a a o O L.S. #83-01 Margaret Seeger s w 0 A � o W o ; e x� ' Planning Commission Meeting - June 25, 1975 Page 11 17 Mr. Harris said he would like all the prope/.: To n the block notified of this request. Mr. Clark said they had been, and ified again for the Public Hearing before Council . 5. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #75-02, BY RICHARD llow Lot 11 , Block 1 Rice Creek Plaza South Addition to be splits A & B, because of the error in fence location on Lot 10, the91 and 201 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. Mr. Richar Janke and Mr. Virgil Mullin/were present. Mr. Janke sa'd his mother owned the operty at 201 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. and when they built patio and retainin wall , along with the fence, there was an error made as to the ctual property li He said that rather than most the fence F and other improvements to this propert , the owner of Lot 11 , Mr. Virgil Mullins, t 191 Rice Creek Terrace E. , has agr��d to sell the property to his mother. Mr. Clark said that Mull ' es was present also, and he had also signed the request, and if both par ies ere in agreement, the City saw no problem with this request. Mr. Mullins said he was n reement with this request. Mr. Harris asked if b h lots ould still meet the setback and lot requirements of the City code. Mr. Cla k said the would MOTION by Peterso seconded by Li dblad, that the Planning Commission recomment to Council approval of the request for a hot Split, L.S. #75-02, by Richard Janke, to allow Lot 11, Block 1 Rice Creek Plaza South Addition, to be split into Parcels A and B, because of_a error in fence location, the same being 191 and 201 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. Upon voice vot voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 6. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #75-03, Y ARTHUR SEGER: Split Lot 1 , Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside Add' i create another building site, the same being 7650 Lakeside Road N.E. Mr. Arthur Seger was not present. Mr. Harris said it looked like the lots would be quite large. Mr. Clark said they would be. He said the present lot has enough area and street frontage to make two building sites. Mr. Clark said there really should be a survey made of the property as soon as possible. There was some question as to the rear yard requirement for the existing house. According to the rough drawing, the house would be 26 feet from the new side lot line of the property being split off, and the rear yard requirements was 25% of the lot depth, which would make this 30 feet. He said that this would create no problem because of the size of the property. The lot size of the property being split off could be reduced to 90 feet and would still meet the lot area requirements. Mr. Harris said that it could be reduced just by the 4 feet, and the lot would be 100' x 100' . Mr. Clark said the property South of these lots belonged to School District #13. Mr. Harris asked if there would be any easements necessary on this parcel : Mr. Clark said he was sure that there would be. 18 Planning Commission Meeting- June 25, 1975 Page 12 Mr. Harris said he would like to see this property surveyed and all the utility easements see before this went to Council . Mr. Clark said they have not always done it that way, but that was no reason it couldn't be done. They could stipulate that this all be done before it went on the Council agenda. MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission recommend that the petitioner have Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside Addition surveyed and all utility easements worked out with Northern States Power Company, Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, Minnegasco, Cable Television and the City Engineering Department before this appears on the Council agenda, and that both lots meet the setback and area requirements of the City Code, and at that time the Planning Commission would recommend to Council approval of the request for a Lot Split, L.S. #75-03, by Arthur Seger, to split Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside Addition, to create another building site, the same being 7650 Lakeside Road N.E. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Harris said he would like a copy of the completed lot split to be included in the Planning Commission agenda. Mr. Clark said he would see tLit this was done. 7. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #75-04, BY ROBER SCHROER: Split off the North 126. 1 feet of the East 200 feet of Lot 3, B-1 k 2, and the South 173.99 feet of the East 200 feet of Lot 2, Block 2, East anch Estates 2nd Addition, to create a building site, the same being 7810 niversity Avenue N.E. Mr. Robert Schroer was present. Mr. Clark presented a drawing th had been submitted by Mr. Schroer in 1972, and said that on the basis of t s drawing, we have previously granted lot splits for both Ca Homes and the To n Crier. The third parcel , which was this request, was for th Datsun Dealersh p. It does not disrupt the pattern thay may become evident at som future date, but it does cut off thes.treet access to the Western portion of Lot East Ran h Estates 2nd Addition. He said Lots 2 and 4 were L shaped lot splits, o they still have access. He said he had talked to Dave Harris , who has an int est in this also, and he told Mr. Harris that the staff would probably recommen pproval of the lot split, but we definitely would want an easement to the rear p r ion of Lot 3 for street access. Mr. Harris indicated to Mr. Clark that he would be ill ' g to grant this easement at this time, and that the City should drawn up the agreeme t, and he would sign it. Mr. Clark said that this would satisfy the acce to Lot Mr. Clark said that oth parcels meet the zoning requirements for C-2 Zoning. Mr. Clark said that he wa not saying that the road would go in as it was shown on the drawning, but we do gave to protect street access for Lot 3, and insist on a right of way. MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission recommend to Council approval of the request for a Lot Split, L.S. #75-04, by Robert Schroer, to split off the North 126.1 feet of the East 200 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, and the South 173.99 feet of the East 200 feet of Lot 2, Block 2, East Ranch Estates 2nd Addition, to create a building site, the same being 7810 University Avenue N.E. , with the stipulation than an agreement be signed to provide an easement for street_ right of way. on the West 30 feet of the Easterly 230 feet of Lots 3 and 4, together with the , Southerly 33 feet of the East 200 feet of Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates 2nd Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. MP- PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 1821983 PAGE 8 Mr. Oquist stated the other side of the issue is that the City needs to provide what is called "affordable housing", and this is affordable housing. Ms. Schnabel stated she was concerned about the density. She felt -it was more units than she would like to see go into this area. She, too,shared the concern about spot rezoning, but also did not see single family homes ever going in there. Mr. Saba stated he liked the concept despite the objections. He could see a development like this going in there eventually, but with fewer units. Mr. Deblon stated he looked at the positioning of this development as creating a quieter environment for the homes on Lucia Lane. He stated the concerns expressed were very valid, but he thought this was a positive aspect of a develop- ment of this nature. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF REZONING REQUEST, ZOA P83-03, BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON, TO REZONE THE WEST HALF OF LOT 4, AND ALL OF LOTS 5, 6 AND 7, LUCIA LANE ADDITION, FROM R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AREAS) TO R-3 (GENERAL MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS) TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 14-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT, THE SAME BEING 1133-1145 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E. Mr. Oquist stated the sewer issue and the County's plans for widening Mississippi and putting in a right turn lane should be resolved before this item goes to the City Council . UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWGNAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECEIVE INTO THE RECORD THE LETTERS FROM RUSSELL BURRIS AND JUNE JOHNSON AND THE PETITION FROM CLARENCE TIMO, AND TO FORWARD THESE ON WITH THE MINUTES TO CITY COUNCIL. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated that on June 6, the City Council would set the public hearing for June 20. 2. LOT SPLIT REQUESTL.S. #83-01 MARGARET A. SEGER: Split off the southerly 104.02 Feet of Lot , Spring Lake Park Lakeside, the same being 7650 Lakeside Road N.E. (Original Lot - 1586 Osborne Road N.E. ) Mr. Deblon stated this was an informal hearing as required by the subdivision ordinance for a lot split. Mr. Deblon stated this lot split was requested back in 1975. The request came before the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission recommended the PLANNI14G COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 7 Ms. Bystram stated that at this point, she thought they had to be realistic and maybe there needs to be some kind of balance. If this property was rezoned to R-3, was there any possibility of the developer reducing the number of units? She would like to see this as an option. Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Erickson if he riould consider reducing the number of units. Mr. Erickson stated he would not. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA N83-03 BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:20 P.M. Mr. Saba stated that one of the main objections expressed by the citizens was the sewer problem. Was there really a sewer problem? Mr. Deblon stated that was a question that would have to be answered by the Engineering Department. Engineering had not expressed any concern regarding this proposal . Routine maintenance is being done continually on the sewer system. He stated he would check the record to see if there would be a problem as far as capacity and get this information back to the Planning Commission or the City Council . Ms. Schnabel stated the sewer problem should definitely be checked with Engineering. Also, no matter what development eventually goes on this lot, something else that should be checked with Engineering is what the County's intention is in terms of a right turn lane. Ms. Gabel stated she had to speak against the rezoning. She felt it was a spot rezoning. The zoning is inconsistent with the neighborhood and the planning done over the years. She was also concerned with the sewer, and they needed more information about it. The traffic problems are obvious, but the biggest problem she had with it was the spot rezoning. Mr. Oquist stated he agreed with Ms. Gabel . It was spot rezoning; however, some- thing will be done with this property, and he did not think anyone would be putting in single family homes. He was also concerned about the traffic. Mr. Kondrick stated it would be great to be able to leave that property vacant; however, they have to consider the overall good of the community. Housing is needed in the City. He liked the set-up of the homeowners' association. He also could not imagine anyone wanting to live in a single family home on this corner. He agreed that it was spot rezoning, but his main concern was the traffic. Mr. Saba stated he did not have as many objections with the spot rezoning, because he felt it would never be developed as R-l. He had a problem with the density. He would rather see the double bungalows facing Lucia Lane, and he would prefer to see two more double bungalows instead of the carriage-type homes. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 9 petitioner have the property surveyed and that all utility easements be worked out with NSP, Northwestern Bell , Minnegasco, Cable Television and the City Engineering Dept. before going on to City Council (page 12, Planning Commission minutes, June 25, 1975). Mr. Art Seger stated he was representing his mother, Margaret Seger, who had to leave the meeting earlier. Mr. Deblon stated the lot is exceptionally deep, over 208 feet. The new lot would become 104 feet by 100 feet which would more than exceed the requirements for a buildable lot. He stated Staff had the following concerns: 1 . The petitioner get a survey after the decision of the Planning Commission. 2. There is a park fee requirement (applicant is aware of this) 3. There be a bikeway/walkway easement and street easement on the front lot along Osborne (tie believed it was a 17' street easement and a 15' bikeway/walkway easement totalling 32 feet. ) Mr. Deblon stated this lot split meets all the requirements thus far per the subdivision ordinance. He stated the sewer and water lines will be checked out before the request goes before the City Council . Other than that, Staff did not see any problems with the lot split. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.W. #83-01, BY MARGARET A. SEGER, TO SPLIT OFF THE SOUTHERLY 104.02 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SPRING LAKE PARK LAKESIDE, THE SAME BEING 7650 LAKESIDE ROAD N.E. (ORIGINAL LOT - 1586 OSBORNE ROAD N.E.) , WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. STAFF CLARIFY THE AMOUNT OF EASEMENT NEEDED OFF OSBOiRNE ROAD FOR STREET AND BIKEWAY/WALKWAY. 2. STAFF CHECK TO SEE IF ANY EASEMENTS WERE REQUIRED FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES AND CABLE TV. 3. STAFF CLARIFY THE SEWER LINE. 4. THE APPLICANT GET A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. A Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on June 6. 3. REVIEW OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 101 ENTITLED "ANIMAL TROL" AND REPEALING OLD CHAPTERS 301 ENTITLED "LIVESTOCK CONTROL% 302 ENTITLED "ANIMAL CONTROL" AND 303 ENTITLED WILD NI LS AND BIRDS" OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE INT EIR ENTIRETY. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO CONTINUE REVIEW OF THE ANIMAL ORDINANCE UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. r PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 10 MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE THE MEMO DATED MAY 18, 1983, FROM JIM PHILLIPS, LEGAL INTERN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. RECEIVE APRIL 27, 1983, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY AR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECEIVE THE APRIL 27, 1983, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. The Commission members agreed they would like Mr. Boardman to come to a future meeting and explain the HRA's financing process and the General Reserve System. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE MAY 5, 1983, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR.OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO RECEIVE THE MAY 5, 1983, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE MAY 10, 1983, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE THE MAY 10, 1983, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MAY 18, 1983, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:20 P.M. Respectfully subm' ,ted, Lynneaba Recording Secretary 7,7 2If IW3 ---------------------- a7( 7,7 _ i J � _ 32 z6 l ,% �-- -c 275 18A Page 7 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 7 , . 1975 of the adjoining property owner. He explained that rather than remove the construction, the applicant. is requesting a lot split and would sell the piece of property to the adjoining property owner. Mr. Mullins said rather than move the constructions, he agreed to sell e the property to the adjoining property owner. Councilman Breider said he would have no objection to this if the split would meet the code. The City Manager said at the present time, they would be creating an additional parcel , but this would be the only method of taking care of the current problem. MOTION by Councilman Breider to grant the lot split request as applied $$$ for by Mr. Richard Janke. Seconded by. Councilwoman Kukowski . Upon a voice vote. all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousl;. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L S #75-03 BY ARTHUR SEGER: SPLIT LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SPRING LAKE PARK LAKES TION, TO CREATE ANOTHER BUILDING SITE, l THE SAME BEING 7650 LAKESIDE ROAD N.E. : I There was no action necessary .on this item at this time. E LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #75-04, BY ROBERT SCHROER:- SPLIT OFF THE NORTH 1 6.1 FEET OF THE EAST 200 FEET OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2, AND __THE SOUTH 173.99 FEET OF THE EAST 200 FEET OF LOT 2 BLOCK 2, EAST RANCH ESTATES e ND ADDITION, TO CREATE A BUILDING SITE, THE SAME BEING 7810 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. : The Public Works Director explained that this piece of property is in the area where Win Stephens had planned to install the Datsun Dealership. He commented that the request was recommended. for approval by the Planning Commission at their June z8, 1975 meeting with several . stipulations. He read the suggested stipulations to the Council and audience.. 4 The Public Works Director explained the reason for the lot split being requested is to allow the future construction of a roadway to the rear of the lots abutting the frontage road. -He explained there would be an : appropriate amount of land, berming would be installed and the proper parking requirements would be met. The Public Works Director said the representative of Win Stephens, Mr. Roland.Benjamin, was .present to answer any of the Council questions. The Public Works, Director commented with the proposed roadway, the .boulevard should be shifted to make sure there will be a proper set back. He said currently, there is no road in the rear portion of the property in question. s• Mr. Sobiech said it would be in order for the Council to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approve the request with the stipulation set-by the Planning Commission. Mayor N'ee questioned when the area would be platted. The .Public Works _ Director said the City would have to wait for Mr. Schroer to produce the plata Councilman Breider asked Mr. - Schroer when the area would be platted, and Mr. Schroer answered that this would be after the restaurant is in operation. Mr. Schroer said the parcels would meet the proper lot size and it is the proposal to bring the road in -next to the building. Mayor Nee asked if there was to be wasted land c with this proposal . Mr. Schroer said the street would be needed for the lots in back of the Town Crier and Capp Homes. Mayor Nee asked if k this would be a proper solution to the problem, and Mr. Schroer said F it had been suggested.by the City Council because of the depth of the lots. MOTION by Councilman Breider to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant the lot split request to Mr. Robert - Schroer as requested for 7810 Universtiy Avenue N.E. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski . Upon a voice vote, all voting Mayor Nee �--� declared the motion carridd unanimously. COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 6, 1983 PAGE 10 1 2 REQE Im C"I,SSIDN_MINUTES OF MAY 18. 1283: 1 2 Ati R"NINC R_EO"'P, sAv #83-03. By L- ROBERT "Jaw" TO REzONE FROM R- TO R 3�AA 1 4 UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 1133-1145 MISSISSIP I STREET N E MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this rezoning request for July 11, 1983. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 1 un SPLIT REamsT, L 9� X83-01 BY MARGARET SEGER, 1586 OSBORNE ROAD AND 76 0 LAKESIDE 1B. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, state6 this is a request to split off the southerly 104.02 feet of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside. He stated the Planning Conuiission has recorTrien6eo approval of the lot split with the following stipulations: (1) stZ:ff clarifj, tl)F Zrourt cf easerent reeCee off Osborne Road for street and bikeway/walkway; (2) staff check to see if any easements are required from the utility companies and cable television; (3) staff clarify the sewer line; anC (4) the applicant get a survey of the property prior to the Council meeting. Vx. Flora stated a 17 foot street and a 15 foot bikeway/walkway easerr-ent for a total of 32 feet is needed along Osborne Road. He further stated, as far as the easements for the utility companies and cable television, these wouldn't be necessary as they are serviced off Lakeside or G.c:Tcrre Rc:aC:. t7. Flora 1-cirteO out a problem does exist, however, for aCjacert Lot 2, if a lot split is ever requested for this lot. Fir. Qureshi, City Manager, stated with this lot split, the City is trying to assure utility access for Lot 2, even though Lot 1 is the only one requested to be split at this particular time. He felt a five foot easement should be req uired on each side of the division (split) line. M. Qureshi stated another stipulation wcu1C be payment of water and sewer assessmients if they 1,aver't already been paid. Mr. Seger presented a certificate of survey and voiced concern over provieing a 32 foot easement or Osborne Roau, as it really ct:t ccF:r the :ize of the lot. Mr. Qureshi felt this wouldn't be a problem and the staff could work with the petitioner on this point. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Cormrission and grant lot split L. S. #83-01 subject to the following stipulations: (1) a 17 foot right-of-way easement be provided or, the rcrth side of the r�ortherly lot ar.0 the additional 15 foot bikeway/walkway easenent to the City; (2) a 10 foot easement for utilities be provided on the lot split line; (3) the property owner agrees to pay ary water and sewer utility lateral arC service connection assessmerts if tx.e1 haven't rlreaCy Leer, I E is &PC (4) payrent of the $500 park fee. SecondeC by Councilman Barnette. Upor a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 6, 1983 PAGE 9 Mayor Nee stated if the levee needs to be rebuilt, is there a requirement for the City to rebuild it. Fir. Herrick, City Attorney, stated if the inspection and evaluation is made by the Army Corps of Engineers and deficiencies are indicated and recommendation on what actions should be taken to correct them are naCe and the Council did not feel they could proceed with the corrections, t,e fc-1t there should then be some notification to the properties within the area as to the results of the study. Councilman Hamernik asked if there is the possibility that the current levee could be determined to be a permanent levee. Hr. Flora stated it would be a possibility , but the chances would be relatively slim. He felt possibly with sone modifications it could, in fact, become a substantial structure. VCTION by Councilman Fitzjrtrick to adopt Resolution No. 51-1983. Seconded by Councilman Han-errik. UFon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared t1e nation carr-Lc-(: unzir4p<c ly. APPOILMjEI�F! W IZUW -QQM,5j0K (TABLED 5/16/83) MO'T'ION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to table this item. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unari.nously. (� hFV, BUSIIEM: �k J cwTv ToIQF FIRST 1p� QF AN ORDINANCE j 1�NDING THE CI�' iiARTER OF THE CITE' DY YRIp Ej,EY =_QDpE EECjCEE VjSC.) (2,03,-2,05j-8.04 AND 8,05) MOTION by Councilman ScY.reider to waive the first reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unar i r.ously. 10 RFCFIVING LETTER FROM WALT ETARWALT. RIAN OF THE CHARTER COMMISION AN �?IS?P_ T�4�9 '�ETTTNC�.��j7�LIC HEARING ON WIEIVDEp SECTION 3 .Q7 OF Tl1E tMI0N by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing for July 11 , 1983. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING RTEISSION NDN ITEaS OF APRIL 21. 1.983: �ID ,S _ J Ej_C NFAR-JX —MR 7UEY� _��� 9N AMF�IDID SECTIONS OF THE CITY CHARTER SEC? $519�_f,42_AN)- MOTION NMOTION by Coucnilman Hamernik to receive the minutes of the Charter Commission meeting of April 21, 1983. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unarirrously.. =ON by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing for July 11, 1983. Seconded by Councilman Hancrrik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. f COUNCIL MEETIBG OF JUNE 6, 1983 PAGE 13 MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to receive the minutes of the Charter Commission meeting of April 21,1983. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a vv, all votmng aye, Mayor Nee dtmcu. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing for July 11, 1983. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a vv, all voting aye, Mayor Nee dtmcu. RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 18, 1983: REZONING REQUEST, SAV #83-03, BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON, TO REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3 FOR A 14 UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 1133-1145 MISSISSIPPI STREET N. E. : MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this rezoning request for July 11, 1983. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a vv, all voting aye, Mayor Nee dtmcu. LOT SPLIT REQJEST, L. S. #83-01, BY MARGARET SEGER, 1586 OSBORNE ROAD AND 7650 LAKESIDE ROAD: Mr, Flora, Public Works Director, stated this is a request to split off the southerly 104.02 feet of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside. He stated the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the lot split with the following stipulations: (1) staff clarify the amount of easement needed off Osborne Road for street and bikeway/walkway; (2) staff check to see if any a"-4-' easements .required from the utility companies and cable television; (3) staff clarify the sewer line; and (4) the applicant get a survey of the property prior to the Council meeting. / ^/G fthlc ' 4 � Mr. Flora stated a 17 foot street and a 15 foot bikeway/walkway easement' is needed along Osborne Road. He further stated, as far as the easements for the utility companies and cable television, these wouldn't be necessary as they are service off Lakeside or Osborne Road. Mr. Flora pointed out a problem does exist, however, for adjacent Lot 2', f�'✓1 if a lot split is_ or this lot, Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated with this lot split, the City is trying to assure utility access for Lot 2, even though Lot 1 is the only one requested to be split at this particular time. He felt a five foot easement should be required on each side of the division (split) line. COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 6, 1983 PAGE 14 W. Qureshi stated another _ _ stipulation would be payment of water and sewer assessments if they haven't already been paid. Mr. Seger presented a certificate of survey and voiced concern over providing a 32 foot easement on Osborne Road)as it really cuts down the size of the lot. Mr. Qureshi felt this wouldn't be a problem and the staff could work with the petitioner on this point. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant lot split L. S. #83-01 subject to the following stipulations: (1) a 17 foot right-of-way easement be provided on the north side of the northerly lot and the additional 15 foot bikeway/walkway easement 2) to the City a 10 foot easement for utilities be provided on the lot split line; (3) the property owner agrees to pay any water and sewer utility lateral and service connection assessments if they haven't already been paid; and (4) payment of the $500 park fee. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a vv, all voting aye, Mayor Nee dtmcu. ITEM FROM APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 10, 1983. VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 45.63% TO ALLOW AN ADDITION BETWEEN 7702 AND 7770 RANCHER'S ROAD N. E., BY ELO ENGINEERING: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant the variance to increase the lot coverage for the purposes of an addition between 7702 and 7770 Rancher's Road, with the following stipulations: (1) applicant work with the City and adjacent property owners to insure adequate drainage; (2) additional landscaping/screening be implemented; and (3) the two parcels be combined together to be one tax statement. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Councilman Hamernik questioned how the drainage would be handled. Mr. Flora stated there probably would be a small retention pond, but staff hadn't had a chance to work with them on it. He stated he was sure this could be worked out to detain some of the water before it goes into the storm sewer system. CITY OF FRIOLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE M.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE ( 612)571 .3450 June 10, 1983 Ms. Margaret Seger 1401 - 73rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Lot Split Request, L.S. #83-01 Dear Itis. Seger: On June 6, 1983, the Fridley City Council officially approved your lot split request on Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside Addition with the following stipulations: 1. A seventeen (17) foot right of way easement and an additional fifteen (15) foot bikeway/walkway easement be provided to the City on the north side of the northerly lot. 2. A ten (10) foot easement for utilities, centered on the lot split line, be provided to the City. 3. The property owner agrees to pay any water and sewer utility laterals and service connection assessments if not already paid. 4. The property owner agrees to pay a $500.00 park fee. Please sign the statement below acknowledging receipt of this letter and return a signed copy in the enclosed envelope to the City. As of January 1, 1983, the City is required by State law to record all formal City Council actions affecting real property with the County Recorder. Accordingly, it will be to your advantage to complete the above stipulations as expediently as possible. If I can assist you in this matter or any other matters, please contact me at 571-3450. Thank you for your time, cooperation and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 01 WILLIAM S. DEBLON Associate Planner WSD/mh I acknowledge receipt of this information ENC: 2 and agree to the listed stipulations. Signature Da to 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss CITY OF FRIDLEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract from the Minutes of a Council meeting of the City Council of said City held June 20, 1983 , with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full , true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to: RESOLUTION NO. 60 - 1983 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.S. #83-01 , AT THE CORNER OF OSBORNE ROAD AND LAKESIDE ROAD N.E. WITNESS MY HAND as City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and the seal of said City, this 14th day of July, 1983 I (SEAL) SIDNEY C. NMAN CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY 11 A RESOLUTION NO. 60 — 1983 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.S. #83-01 , AT THE CORNER OF OSBORNE ROAD AND LAKESIDE ROAD N.E. WHEREAS, the City of Fridley approved a lot split at the June 6 , 1983 meeting, and WHEREAS, such approval was to split off the South 104.0 feet of Lot 1 , Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside, and WHEREAS, such approval will allow the construction of a one family dwelling on the new site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley that the City Council directs the County of Anoka to record this Lot Split within six months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 2ntn DAY OF June 1983• WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SIDNEY C. INMAN - CITY CLERK 2/2/17/13