Loading...
LS83-02 17 1 . • CITY OF FRIOLKY, SUBJECT 6 131 LIMVURSITY AVE. NE. LOT SPLIT LS / a _�3- y FRIMOY. MN. 915430 40121.671-34S0 RECORDED: a ADDRESS: � DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO PARK FEE REQUIRED: AMOUNT PAID STIPULATIONS: FEE (�' RECEIPT NO NAME �J CC PROPERTY OWNER(S) TELEPHONE NO TELEPHONE NO ADDRESS(ES)_ /L OCL+i 1 M_1�1 PROPERTY LOCATION ON STREET Lo`f s I�� J.3 a l ld 15, 1 o f S 1 2 0, d 1 Ll'e r'c�n LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY PCI_Lti x c n(�/ /.3 ,U 30' s r1_ �A-r to t)F f.r r 9, C�G 2 2O TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY O 5q _ ' Fes PRESENT ZONING REASON FOR LOT SPLIT C, E t I r u rI i n�, C' ( 1 cit_c 5F The undersigned 'hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE: SIGNATURE NOTICE: A sketch of the property and the proposed lot split with any existing struc- tures shown should accompany this application. (See reverse side for additional instructions) * L LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE 1. Obtain application form at City Hall (6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley). Y. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property involved and the lot split fee of :75.00 for each original lot being split. 3. The application will be checked over by Staff and the owner may be required to submit a Certificate of Survey containing a simple description of a part of a platted lot or registered lot, along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in. 4. The application will then be submitted to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. The Planning Commission meets on the Wednesday following the City Council meeting, which is generally the first and third Wednesdays of the month. 5. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for final action. If a Certificate of Survey wasn't required before, it will be required for this meeting. The City Council meets on the first and third Mondays of the month. 6. The City Council approval may be subject to tertain stipulations which must be complied with by the applicant. 7. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent papers for his signature. 8. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant should file the lot split in Anoka County. 9. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed. NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT MAY EXCEED THE AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS. A V� 1�CE '- 5300 HIGHWAY 101 SOUTH D MINNETONKA,MINNESOTA 55343 SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 83268 JOB NUMBER STANDARD SYMBOLS 23 30 24 SEC/TWP/RN Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug Richard Peterson CLIENT bearing State Registration No. 9235, set. Lots 12,13 ,14 and 15 , LEGAL "®" Denotes iron monument found. Block 1, CITY VIEW DESCRIPTION Denotes cross chiseled in concrete surface. See reverse side for legal descriptions of new tracts "982x5" Denotes existing spot elevation measured at the point marked by "x", in this case, 982.5 feet above mean sea level. 7/26/83 DATE SURVEYED 7/27/83 DATE DRAFTED ``g82x5" Denotes proposed spot elevation at the 30 SCALE IN FEET PER INCH point marked by "x". PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: none °°>" Denotes proposed direction of storm water FIRST FLOOR runoff. TOP OF FOUNDATION CERTIFICATION GARAGE FLOOR LOWEST FLOOR I hereby certify that this plan, survey, report SANITARY SEWER or specification was prepared by me and that I BENCHMARK ELEVATION am a duly Registered Land Surveyor and Profes- BENCHMARK sional Engineer under the Laws of the State o DESCRIPTION Minnesota. J mes H. Parker, Minn. Reg. No. 9235 ---140.50 U .0°45'56"W, 16.5 T 1 1 I , 1 t I 1 0 1 C o c o o ------ ___ 1 1 1 1 1 • m - --- 140.50.._ D _ __ N.0045'5G' w. D D ` � -n J �6.15� w v yr N# v n t o S A - � 6.1 o � < I C-) Z M _�� _ 2.25 C00 m W v . 32.2 11�L . .ten 26.3` 1 , r 33 I N.0°5©�67"IN. �' 16.5 2 ---140.50 WEST TRACT: Lot 12, Block 1, CITY VIEW, and that part of Lot 13 , Block 1, CITY VIEW, which lies west of a line 70 feet east as measured at right angles to and parallel with the west line of said Lot 12 . EAST TRACT: Lot 14 and 15, Block 1, CITY VIEW and that part of Lot 13 , Block 1, CITY VIEW .which lies east as measured at right angles to and parallel with the west line of said Lot 12 . Together with the adjacent half of 2 1/2 Street Northeast. Yt o" BEUGEN & IVERSON, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2300 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55418 ROBERT J.BELIGEN TELEPHONE CLARK M.IVERSON 781-2788 STEVEN H.BERNDT 781-6824 THOMAS M.2APPIA October 20, 1983 Mr . Sidney C. Inman City Clerk Fridley City Hall 6431 University Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 RE: Richard D. Peterson Fridley Resolution No. 97 - 1983 Dear Mr . Inman: ki, Our office represents Mr . Peterson regarding the lot split over his property which is located in the City of Fridley. I have enclosed for your reference a photocopy of the Fridley City Council' s resolution referred to above. In a telephone conversation with Mr . Edward Bock on (�ctober 20th, 1983 I was advised that the legal description coria ained in the resolution was not satisfactory. Mr . Bock would be satis i d with either of the following descriptions: Lot 12 , Block 1, y View lying west of a line 70 feet east of , measure�d- 'a a right angle to and parallel with the west line of Lot; 12, Block 1 Lot 12 and that part of Lot 13 lying west of a line 70 feet east of, measured at a right angle to and parallel with the west line of said Lot 12, Block 1, City View. Mr . Bock indicated that these were not substantive changes but rather clarification of the existing legal. Please let me know if this matter can be cleared up without the necessity of another appearance before the City Council. Very truly yours, BEUGEN & IVERSON, LTD. 74710-] '1J J��2 Thomas M. Zbppa TMZ/mc Enclosure cc: Mr . and Mrs. Richard Peterson i z 5H e L.S. #83-02 Peterson 9W 0� 0 0 � d ti ? d X x Ex's rows k FENCE- X X i • r • + \ ♦ ♦ V J J • • •t • •. • ♦ • • ♦ • • • • ♦ Y V V J J it \' •' • •' Y Y Y V Y Y Y ♦ ♦ • • ♦ Y Y •• V J • Y L.S. #83-02 Peterson 20 B Ion FEBi •[NO ST. mm ti �S IIO� ST. ILL Ay 47, .. - .. J t ♦TM ST. KE:% i i :k;a •t•t`t- - o !i t _ .t.t•E k`R`trt, = i; k`t t-tit •tstrk� J^ 3 STN ST. M.E. J -- tok, k4 t:tila'y: t iR♦ _ t {TM 7 Vil t i .� . •t.k`t•t '�-�i�:to::1 t~ ��t � � •�„°_�..t.t.t � ��--��� i � �t`!`F t:. 1 �• `•E a ' i�_.•tom`. w >� t ; i`+`t' ' �� • a�3 i' S ; ,'�!k,t.k•l'�!» i :- a..... i_, c •iis.S-' a _ ` W Ip TOM ST N.E. O I sw�"r1Eff[IISOM -2'^ ST+ MADISON ST M.[. " ..• c t i.�'•`` ` —itISON M /. MONNOE S1. KE i a i.•... A., �Q f ,'�-a A J�. O Y • ilii .. `�•i moi' ` Quit .� �V ^ a h a.t. •I• i• O T ST ZZ JAM ST. "'Aftift.� . 4, 0 .�rh►1, � O :���3e PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 8, 1983 PAGE 3 Mr. Board m agreed with the fact that there is never goip(I to be a street connection in here that would utilize the whole 60 ft. 'He had no problem with vacating the str t right-of-way, but they should retain the storm sewer and access easement. that sense, the property is n longer owned by the City of Fridley but by the p erty owners; but the City ould still retain an easement so if they need to go hrough with a road ora ess for the alley, they can use that easement. Mr. Oquist stated another alte ative would be to access by the highway property if the Highway Dept. turns that p pert over to the City. .Ms. Vagovich stated that, as Mr. Zi man had stated, the main purpose for the vacation is so Mr. Zimmerman can b ld garage and access onto 4th St. They will jointly maintain the proper Mr. Boardman stated that if Mr". Zimmerman pu in his garage and accesses onto 4th St, over the 30 ft. easement, if the alley is improved and comes up to the street grade, it in effect replaces his driveway nd he would still have access onto the alley. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO RE MMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VACATION EQUEST, SAV #183-01, PETITION NO. -83, TO VACATE 54TH AVENUE ALL THE WAY TO THE H GHWAY PROPERTY AND THAT THE CITY OF RIDLEY RETAIN ACCESS EASEMENT OVER THE P OF THE EXISTING 30 FT. UTILITY EASE T. UPON A VOICE VOT , ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DE LARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMO SLY. Mr. Boardman tated the ublic hearing at C ' \' p g City Council on this vacation request would be on ul y 11 , 1983. 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #83-02, BY RICHARD & SONIA PETERSON: Split off Lot 12 and the Westerly 30 feet of Lot 13, Block 1 , City View, to make a new building site, the same being 241 - 57th Place N.E. Mr. Boardman stated the petitioners own Lots 12, 13, 14, and 15. These are 40 ft. lots totalling 160 ft. of lot area. They are requesting to split off Lot 12 and the westerly 30 ft. of Lot 13 so that Lots 12 and 13 will become a 70 ft. lot. The depth of the lot is 140 ft. It does meet the 9,000 sq. ft. lot requirement and meets all other requirements as far as lot splits. A lot split does require a park fee of $500. The park fee is payable at the time of approval of the lot split request; however, the City Council may defer collection to the time the building permit is requested for individual lots created by such a lot split. This would depend on whether the petitioner requested the City Council to delay payment of the park fee. The petitioners were in the audience. R PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 8, 1983 PAGE 4 MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. GOODSPEED, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #83-02, BY RICHARD AND SONIA PETERSON, TO BLIT OFF LOT 12, AND THE WESTERLY 30 FEET OF LOT 13, BLOCK 1, CITY VIEW, TO MAKE A NEW BUILDING SITE, THE SAME BEING 241 57TH PLACE N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated this request would go to City Council on June 20. 3. CONTIN ED: REVIEW OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADOPTING A NEW CHAP T 101 ENTITLE "ANIMAL CONTROL" AND REPEALING OLD CHAPTERS 301 ENTI ED LIVE- STOCK CO ROL 302 ENTITLED ANIMAL CONTROL AND 303 EN IT ED WILD IM LS N BIRDS F E RIDLEY CITY CODE I HEIR E I MOTION BY MR. SA\ee DED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO CONTINUE D CUSSION ON THE ANIMAL ORDINANCEE NEXT MEETING. The Commission mquested that Jim Phillips, Le 1 Intern, be at the next Planning Comeeting when this is discuss to answer any questions the Commissionerve.UPON A VOICE VOTI AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERS OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOU4. RECEIVE MAY COMMU TY DEVELOPM T COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED B MR. SV NDA, TO RECEIVE THE MAY 10, 1983, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MI TES UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VIC -CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. % 5. RECEIVE MAY 12 1983 HOUSING REDEVE OPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SABA/General D BY S. GABEL, T RECEIVE THE MAY 12, 1983, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMSSI N MINUTES. y UPON A VOICE VOTE, I AYE, VICE-CHAIRPE�ON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSL Ms. Gabel stated the last meeting, the Com 'ssion had asked that Mr. Boardman explaRA's financial process an the General Reserve System. Mr. Boardman stateneral Reserve System is a c plicated program to explain, but it isuite a simple tool . He sta ed he would put together for the Planning Cmembers a summary explainin the system. COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 20, PAGE 3 LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L. #83- i]L� CHARD & SONIA PETERSON, TO MAKE Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the petitioner owns four lots totaling 160 feet of lot area and the request is to split off Lot 12 and the westerly 30 feet of Lot 13 so that Lots 12 and 13 will become a 70 foot lot. He stated the new lot created by the lot split does meet all the requirements of the code, and the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the lot split. Mr. Flora stated no park fee has been paid at this time. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant lot split request, L. S. #83-02. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ITEM FROM APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 24, 1983: VARIA14CE REQUEST TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF_A FREE STANDIWG SIGN AT 5695 HAM1,AM AY= NE, UNION OIL COMPANY: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director , stated this request is to increase the maximum square footage of a free standing sign by;'adding a 3 x 6 foot section to the bottom of an existing 50 square foot sign./ Mr. Flora stated there are two existing free standing pylon signs on this Union Oil Company property. One sign was erected in 1970 and is a 12 foot diameter circle that is 113 square feet in -area and the second sign was erected in 1977 and is a 50 square foot gas pqce sign. Mr. Flora stated the existing signs were erected under the old ordinance and with gas pricing competition today, the petitioners stated the must have a way of advertising their products effectively. r Mr. Flora stated the Appeals Commission felthe hardship was self-imposed, as they have changed the use of the 50 squ re foot sign, and, therefore, recommended denial of the variance. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur ith the unanimous recommendation of the Appeals Commision and deny this vari;nce request by Union Oil Company. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a/voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. WIANCE REQUEST TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF A FREE STANDJWG SIGN AT 6525 UNL=ITY AVENUE-NE, TILE E&= Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this property is located on the northeast corner of Mississippi Street and Highway 47 (University Avenue) . He stated the request is to increase the maximum square footage of a free standing sign from the 80 square feet permitted by the code to 150 square feet. I Mr. Flora stated there is an exising 5 x 15 foot pylon sign at this intersection which is used by 10,000 Auto Parts, however, Tile Factory Outlet felt additional signage was needed due to poor visibility of the store itself. COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 20, 1983 PAGE 4 Mr. Flora stated Tile Factory Outlet has requested an addition to the existing sign of 5 x 15 feet and this location would only be acceptable to their use, if the variance is granted, in order to provide them with the needed advertising exposure. Mr. Flora stated the Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variance with the stipulation that the new signage not be put up until the present wall signage is cleaned up and brought up to the maintenace portion of the code. He stated they also recommended staff direct a letter to 10,000 Auto Parts advising them of the Appeals Commission decision and recommendation and that the new sign be of similar design and structure as the existing sign and the base of the sign improved through refinishing and installation of a planter. Mr. Flora stated staff has written a letter to 10,000 Auto Parts, as requested by the Appeals Commission, but has received no reply as of this date. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and approve the variance to increase the maximum allowed square footage of a free standing sign from the permitted 80 square feet to 150 square feet for the property at the corner of University and Mississippi with the following stipulations: (1) the new signage not be put up until the present wall signage is cleaned up and brought up to the maintenance portion of the code; and (2) the new sign be of similar design and structure as the existing sign and that the base of the sign be improved through refinishing and installation of a planter and plantings, as approved by City staff. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. `M ANCE BEST TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK TO ALILW PART OF A CONVERTED GARAGE TO BE USED FOR A BEAU'T'Y SHOP, 901 OVEITD- DRIVE: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this variance is requested in order to allow a portion of a converted garage to be used for a beauty shop at 901 Overton Drive at the corner of Able Street and Overton Drive. Mr. Flora stated the neighboring property owner, Mrs. Doyle, strongly opposed the idea at the Appeals Commission meeting and the Appeals Commission recommended denial of the variance to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 5 feet to allow conversion for part of the garage to be used for a beauty shop. He stated the real question is whether to allow a living space within five feet from a side yard line of the neighbor's garage. Mayor Nee asked if this wasn't defined as living area, if there would be a problem. Mr. Flora stated there probably couldn't be a problem, however, it was defined as living area because people being in that area change it from the definition of storage and accessors use. Councilman Hamernik asked if someone put in a workshop if it would be defined as living space. Mr. Flora stated a workshop would be a limited use and, in this case, the space would be used every day. CKAINCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 3, 1983 PAGE R 17. RESOLUTION NO 94-1983 SETTING AN E-1=10N FOR MAYOR AND QXMIL-MEPMER- LARGE: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resoluti n No. 94-1983. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, 11 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 18. RESf1LUTION NO 95-1983 DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AMID APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE NaAMER 8, 1983 GENERAL ELECTION: MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 95-1983. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 19. RESOLUTION' NO 96-1983 INFORMING THE ANXA OX7,NTY C"ISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY'S DECISION REGARDING BLACK SLAG FOR WINTER DEICING: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 96-1983 . Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 20. 1RESOLUTION NO. 97-1983 APPROVING A - SPLITTO E WESTERLY APPROXIMATELY 30 F ET OF LOT-111- BLOa 1, CITY V151, 241 57TH PLACE N.E. : Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the Council has a new resolution before them, as the original resolution indicated the westerly 29.58 feet of Lot 13. Mr. Flora stated, since this was not a straight rectangle, the wording from the surveyor was changed froM the westerly 29.58 feet to approximately 30 feet. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 97-1983. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 21. LICENSES: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the license as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 22. CLAIlSS: / MXION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claims No. 273 415 through 273W28. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 23. EST MATES: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted. nKIL MEE77 ING OF QM5M 3. 1983 PAGE 7 Councilman Barnette stated he had a number of calls last week regarding the recabling project, as a substantial amount of old cable was left throughout the City. He stated he had several calls from different persons and agencies on the potential danger of this situation. Councilman Barnette stated he couldn't get much information or response from the Cable Company. He stated what he was told was the company hired outside people to do the recabling and they had very little control over then. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to direct the administration to place on the agenda an item regarding discussion with representatives of the cable company and invite the Cable Commission to be present. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. RF,9QLUTIQISI, NO 89-1983 CERTIFYING TAX LEVY REOUIJUrJ-= FOR 1984 TO THE CD= OF ANDKA FOR COLLECTION: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 89-1983. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. 1'IMON NO 90)983 ODNFIRM11C ASSESSMIIyTT FOR 1983 WATER AND_SBqM MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE COIvTI=I021LE: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 90-1983 . Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. RESOLUTION NO, 91-1983 CDNT- IRMING ASSESSMENT FUR THE MEET= AMID REMOVAL-OF TREES (1983) : MDTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 91-1983. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 15. RESOLUTION NO. 92-1983 CERTIFYING CERTAIN-DELINOUENT WATER AND SE�F� CHARG THE COUNTY AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION WITH THE 1984 TAXES: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 92-1983. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. RESOILr oN N0. 93-19-D CERTIFYING CHARGES TO THE Q2.V-IY AUDITOR TO BE LEVI CII�'TAIN PROPERTIES FOR COI�LEC'TION h'ITH THE TAXES PARABLE IN 1984 (WEEDS) : MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 93-1983 . Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION ND. 97 - 1983 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.S. #83-02, TO SPLIT LOT OFF LOT 12, BOCK 1, CITY VIEW, AND KHAT PART OF LOT 13, BLOCK 1, CITY VIEW, LYING WEST OF A LINE 70 FEET EAST OF, AS MEARTRID AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND PARALLEL WI`ID THE WEST LINE OF SAID IDT 12 WHEREAS, The City Council approved a lot split at the June 20, 1983, meeting, and WHEREAS, such approval was to split off Lot 12, Block 1, City View, and that part of Lot 13, Block 1, City View, lying west of a line 70 feet east of, as measured at right angles to and parallel with the west line of Lot 12, and WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey from Richard and Sonia Peterson, and WHEREAS, such approval will make a new residential building site. M1, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the County of Anoka to record this lot split within six months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and void. PASSED AMID ADOPTED BY THE CITY COU14CIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 1983. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SIDNEY C. ' - CITY CLERK 2/8/9/1 CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE ( 612)571 -3450 June 29, 1983 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Richard & Sonia Peterson 247 57th Place N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Peterson: On June 20, 1983 the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a Lot Split, L.S. #83-02 to Alit off Int 12 and the with the stipulations listed below: Westerly 30 feet of Lot 13, Block 1 , City View, to make a new building site, the same being 241 57th Place N.E. 1 . The park fee must be paid prior to a building permit being issued at the appropriate rate at that time. 2. Provide the City with a Certificate of Survey. This must be done before the City can pass a resolution on this lot split, which must be done before the Lot Split can be recorded at the County. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Community Development Office at 571-3450. Sincerely, 5 R OLD B ARD N JLB/de City Planner Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below, and return one copy to the City of Fridley. lag 10 It,p� A Concur with action taken.