Loading...
LS83-03 12 • CITY OF FRIOLFY, SUBJECT LOT SPLIT LS / -o 6431 L"Vu*RsrTr WE. NE. FArcxs�. MN. 05,43C re%n.15r-3450 RECORDED: ADDRESS: � , Qi A 1. &t X� QATE: $ PLANNING COMMISSION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO PARK FEE REQUIRED: ' s AMOUNTPAID STIPULATIONS: NAME 11r/L -e FEE �� RECEIPT NO PROPERTY OWNER(S) .0 �.�'��� �L/ l✓�� P TELEPHONE NO—');,-/ ' o)gee7l , /,v/ TELEPHONE NO . `7/ ADDRESS(ES)_ � 0 z5 / �e ly�A Z /)O, . PROPERTY LOCATION ON STREET Cir4 l 1y�e �y�• LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPEAW // 4Y l,Z ���D�G �Allflf& S TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY cr_ U� PRESENT ZONING�/ __�___ REASON FOR LOT SPLIT o D '6A 4W 1i The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. J ATE: ✓'S SIGNATURE NOTICE: A sketch of the property and the proposed lot split with any existing struc- tures shown should accompany this application. (See reverse side for additional instructions) t LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE • 1. Obtain application form at City Hall (6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley). Y. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property Involved and the lot split fee of :75.00 for each original lot being split. 3. The application will be checked over by Staff and the owner may be required to submit a Certificate of Survey containing a simple description of a part of a platted lot or registered lot, along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in. 4. The application will then be submitted to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. The Planning Commission meets on the Wednesday following the City Council meeting, which is generally the first and third Wednesdays of the month. 5. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for final action. If a Certificate of Survey wasn't required before, it will be required for this meeting. The City Council meets on the first and third Mondays of the month. 6. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must be complied with by the applicant. 7. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent papers for his signature. 8. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant should file the lot split in Anoka County. 9. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed. NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT MAY EXCEED THE AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS. _ a►.. S • r Ar ,►IMF • wr-w r ie. N1� qAI a0i o� VNXAMR nii ISO Pop- (0040 %sem 16 700 S -..,. .-Vpv � '' r 37.E �7Laid rof 01-11f, • ( • fit, .. r �wT got ve AT Kul "' q AP { ��� 22'tl �� • � j i f gZLI •Oj .r WVU lw 'I 1S1 t si M � SIC ♦J- ,; S'n,1 jrowe N Irblo tstt n�aa ls�ep 9� ..�.� ..,�, as � OL ; N - ► .ice .y • ' IV %60 � t 9 _� � Mx r 5l aAtM 'l aLl«?l £Q-£8# .;S', .. .. . . • • . .: to . _4 . � � 1 1 � . ./moopte take H;16.- PROTECTIVE COVENANTS Property known as Yoore Ince HWA, V according to the plat thereof on file in the office of the Registrar of Titles of Anokn County,»ies otao This conveyance is made subject to the following covenants and restrictions which shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, until January 1, 1977, at which time said covenants and restrictions shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten years, unless by a vote of the majority of the then owners of the lots it is agreed to change the said covenants and restrictions in whole or in part. All lots in the tract shall be known and described as residential lots. No structures shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain on any residential building plot other than one detached single-family dwelling not to exceed two and one-half wtories in hei—ght and a private garage, and any other out-building incidental to residential use of the plot. No building shall be erected, placed, or altered on any building plot in this subdivision until the building plans, speci- fications and plot plan showing the location of said building have been approved in writing by an officer of Bronson- Erickson, Incorporated,.or_its_ authorized representative, as to conformity and harmony of external design with existing structures in the subdivision, and as to location-of the building with respect to property and building setback line. If said officer or officers of Bronson-Erickson, Incorporated, or its authorized representative, fail to approve or disapprove such design and location within thirty days after plans have been submitted, or if no suit to enjoin the erection of such building, or the making of such alterations has been commenced prior to the completion thereof, such approval will not be required. Said officer or officers of Bronson-Erickson, Incorporated, or its authorized representative shall act with- out compensation. Said officer or officers or authorized representative shall serve until five years from date hereof at which time the then record owners of a majority of the lots which are subject to the covenants herein set forth may desig- nate in writing duly reeord"mr ang-the land-recnrJs their authorized representative who thereafter shall.have all of the powers, subject to the same limitations, as were pfeviouslydelegated herein to the aforesaid officer. No dwelling shall be erected or be placed on any lot whose first floor area, exclusive of basement, open porches and garages, is leA than 780 square feet in the case of a one-story structure, or in the case of a two-story structure it is not to be less than 516 square feet. I No lot, plot or parcel shall be sold, leased, mortgaged, used or occupied nor any right 'thereto be granted, given or permitted to gny person other than a member of.the Caucasian race, except that this Covenant shall not prevent occu- pancy by persons of other races in domestic service upon said premises. No noxious or offensive trade or activity shall be carried on upon any lot nor shall anything be done thereon consti- tuting a nuisance. No trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn or out-huilding erected on the premises shall be at anytime used as a residence temporarily or permanently, nor shall any structure of a temporary character be erected, use •or occupied fnr residence purposes; and all structures shall be completely finished on the exterior within six months after commence- _ ment of the excavation or construction thereof. No sod, soil, sand, or gravel shall be sold or removed from said premises except for the purpose of excavating for the construction or alteration of a residence or an appurtenance on said premises thereto or for the proper grading thereof. That until sanitary sewer mains are extended to the tract, sewage disposal shall be by means of private septic tanks or cesspools so constructed and so located on the lot as to meet the written approval of the proper health authorities. *# An easement is reserved over the rear five feet of each lot and the side five feet of any lot where necessary for in- stallation and maintenance of utility service. If any party shall violate or attempt to violate any of the covenants or restrictions prior to January 1, 197'J'kL,'h3ll be lawful for any party or parties of interest in any plot, parcel or lot in said tract, to institute and prosectffe profeed ings at law or in equity against the parties violating or attempting to violate, either to prevent the sai4'v* t1p3k0es.t6 recover damages. `: ;•' Any invalidation of,any one of these covenants and restrictions by judgment or court order shag lo' e a}fo . any other of the covenants or restrictions, which shall remain in full force and effect O The foregoing restrictions establish a uniform plan for the benefit of all lot owners in said suLdiC. continue as covenants running with the land in favor of all grantees of the premises in said subdivision= Lot 1 Block 3, free from all above restrictions. '%j ••••.•,••'i�a �� �•� "T'���'7�.�`Illi esence o Br, ns c n dent " Secreta27 -- —► STATE OF SOTA)ss COM= OF BEMMPIN) On this 8th day of July, 1948, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared John G. Erickson and V. J. Olson to me personally known, mho, being each by me duly sworn did say that they are respectively the President and the Secretary of the corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrummnt was signed and sealed in behalf 'of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said John G, Erickson and V. J. Olson acknowledged said instrtmlent to be the free act and deed of said corporation, of ary Public Q M. CAi1HART, "Oty.public, Ramsey.Churltw,Wfth, .Mpp,Q � q - t ^ A X ~ � + l AVE.NUC• � a IL - - Mo. 65 ' M C) x n o • � r ; r A 4 � i •• a � . v r� ! t y • A � kra 10 0 .. P . -4 r- . t « G s ao '• ` to n v lz L Z p �« c o Z m 33 r r CD 0 0 w V O - O Z 1 - , 1 _ l 1 1 — I FormAoprovrvl OMB No.2502-0204 U S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBANDEVELOPMENTmotion 8, Section 236, Section 22i(d)(3) Below„Af-r!ce-Interest Rate HOUSING - FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER (BMIR), Rrnt Supplement, Rental Assistance Payment (RAP) and Low- CERTIFICATION/RECERTIFICATION Income Public Housing Programs. For Instructions, refer to Handbooks OF TENANT ELIGIBILITY 4050.4,4350.3, 7420.7 and 7465.1. PART I - GENERAL AND TENANT INFORMATION i. Re{wi t Tytx,(Enter one Codvi Q 12. Picripam Typic(Enter one Codr) a 2.PHA or Project Name 1 InitialCortification 1 - tion 8 1 Metro of i an Council HRA 2- Scheduled Rmerhfieatton 2 RAP - - 3 EMIR 6= HUO Owned 4.Protect Number 4 Inti inn Rrcritilication 4 - Rent supplement 7= Lovt'Incoine (FHA/PH/EH) c5 Section 236 Public"o:sing 5.Section 8 Project Number FM , 4 ,6 , 1 ,6 ,3 0 0 -67-Previous Housutrt Initial Certification ONLY I7. Displacement Status - Initial Certification 8a. M.nnrity Enter one Code (Enter one Code/ ❑ ONLY/Enter one Code) El 1 White 2 _ Black El 1 = Substandard 1 = Government Action 3 = American Indian or Alaskan Nahvt 2 -Without or About to be Without Housing 2=Natural Disaster 4-Asian or Pacific Islander 3 = Standard 3 =Private Action1:1= 4=Not Displaced ob. Ethnicity(Enter one Code) 4 Leasing in Place b. Household Statue (Check as many as apply) t-JI 1 Hispanic 2= Non•H,spanic Head Spouse is: a.l_JAge 62 or over b.`c--}}t_1Disabled e.!_ Handicapped d.[J None of the Previou, PART it - HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION 1o.Fam. 11a. lib. tic. 17. 13. 4. Mbr. La;t Name of Household Member First Name of Household Member M I iRelation- Sex Nation ship ality No. Head , I -❑ F� �; ❑ ❑ o E1El El El ,A-] ❑ ❑ ❑ RD -El ❑ o © i i ❑ ❑ _ F71FN ❑ ❑LJ 0 15. Place of Birth rl6 DrteI3irth 17. 1£' tin 15b.U5 Occupation U.S.Ciry or Foreign Country MM YY -w Social Security No. 15a. State Of Of 7 I l ! 1 IBJ 19,No.of 120. No.of 8 Family Minors Mbrs. PART III - INCOME PART IV- NET FAMILY ASSETS [27.Tota 22. Wages, 23. Social 24. Public 25 Income 26. Type Amount Salaries, Security, Assistance From Other etc. Pensions,etc. Assets 1 29.TOTAL NET ASSETS I 30.Ten Percent(10%)of Item 29 1 1 1 1 PART V - ELIGIBILITY 31. Eligibility Income 32. Income Limit Amount I I 1 1 28. ANNUAL INCOME 33. Income Type(Enter Code) PART VI - INCOME AFTER ALLOWANCES PART VII - PROJECT RENT INFO. 34b. 7, Ilowable Ica 42-Contract Rent F34,Farn. 34a. m-n -ne3 Medical Unusual .Total Unusual 9.Allowance for Minors 43.Utility Allowance i (5300 x Line 20) _ 1 1 1 1 O.Total Allowances 44.Gross Rent(Line 42+Line 43) (Lines 37+38+391 PART IX - FAMILY RENT& SUBSIDY INFO. 1. Income Atter Allowances ❑ (Line 28 minus Line 401 47. Did 1981 HCDA limitations affect Tenant's rent? PART Vlll-CALCULATE FAMILY RENT ❑ ties El No ❑ 5- (Check the percent of income Tenant willpay 48.Net Gamily Contributions(If Negative, per 1981 HCDA)(Not applicable to BMIRJ enclose in parentheses.) ❑ ❑26% 1:127% ❑28% ❑29% ❑30% 49. Gross Family Contribution (Line 48 4 Line 43) TotalCompute Tenatli s rent using ore i 50. Assistance Payment (Sec. 8, RAP and L Rent .396 of HUD 500591 or the instructions for this Item Stipp. ONLY) (Line 42 minus Line 48) I cnN 7R r PART X -UNIT ASSIGNMENT AIM DD YY 52. Effective Date of This Certif t- MM DD YY 53.Scheduled Effective Date of MM YV_ 51. - - Next Recertification Original Move In Date � cation/Recertification 154. No.of 55.Unit Number/ .County Code(Section 8 Existing, 7.Census Tract (Sec. 8 Berlrooms , Letter Moderate Rehabilitation ONLY) Existing, Mod. Rehab., , 58a-Street 58ti.St. No. c.Pre- d.St. _Nu, t,,,,,, Suffix Direction Name , 58e.Street 58f.Post58 y.City 58h.State 58i. ZIP Type Direction NameCode Code i 1 1 I 1 PART XI -TENANTlS1/OWNER/PHA OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT -The itloiination on this form is being collected by the Department of HUD to determine an applicant's eligibility;the recom mended unit so,,*-;and the amount of contribution by the tenant(s). It will be used to provide the basis for managing the programs covered by this form,for protecting the Government's financial interest, and for verifying the accuracy of the information furnished. It may be released to appropriate Federal,State and local agencies when relevant,to evil,c,immal or rrgulalory aivestigalors or, osecet:^r ;t iS ntst m?r a-y to prnvide social security numbers. However, lailurc to provide any other information may result in a delay or reieeton of your eligibility approval.. The Department is authorized to ask for this informa ton by the U.S. Housing Act nl 1937, as amended, 42 U.S.C., 1437 et seq., the Housing aril Community Development Amendments of 1931. P.L. 97-35, 85 Stat., 348, 408. TENANT(S) STATEMENT - INVe certify that the statements m Parts II,Ill, IV,and VI above are true and compiete to the hest of my' our knowledge and belief I/We understand that false statements or information are punishable tinder Federal Law. (Signature,of Head of Household) (Date) (Signature of Spouse) (Date) OFFICIAL'S STATEMENT - I cwtify that the Information on this form has been verified as required by Federal Law and the family Is ellglble to live in the,dwelllntl unit. (Signature of 9 i to IPHA/Representativel (Date) HUD-50059 (1-82) tN P dncn 4 41c,0 3 7420 7 8 7465.1) ANDREW G. KOHLAN Attorney and Counselor at Law 726 MIDLAND BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS 1. MINNESOTA FEDERAL 9.4675 September 14th, 1962 TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF FRIDLEY: RE: Wilson request to subdivide property. Gentlemen: The undersigned has been requested to advise you relative to the Wilson request to sub-divide their property consisting of Lot 3 and part of Lot 2 in Block 12 Moore Lake Hills. The property is subject to certain covenants and restrictions, one of which provides that not more than one dwelling shall be erected on any one lot. Originally, Lots 1, 2 and 3 faced in a Northerly direction abutting Hillcrest and, during the past years, the ownership of Lot 2 was divided so that approximately one-half was attached to and was used with Lot 3, and one-half was attached to and used with Lot 1. The Wilsons now propose to sub-divide their parcels by a line running East and West and lying approximately in the middle. If they so choose to sub-divide it, it appears that the area in each parcel to be used as a building site will be at least 12,000 square feet and, therefore, adequate as a building site under the Ordinances of the City of Fridley. The City, of course, has no legal concern with respect to the private covenants, but the property owners will have to assume the risk of any objections from abutting property owners or owners of other land in the platted sub-division by reason of the private covenants. However, also the manner of sub-division as presently proposed by one line, leads to what I believe is a meets-and-bounds description and not in accordance with the strict requirements of the Ordinances governing sub- divisions. Accordingly, this requirement would have to be waived because of the peculiar circumstances of this property, or else the property re-platted or sub-divided under a Registered Land Survey. Both the re-platting and the making of a Registered Land Survey involve surveying and engineering work of more than a nominal expense. I believe it is within the discretion of the Council and the Planning Commission to grant this sub-division request in a manner as they see fit. s truly, Andrew G. Ko f Fridley City Attorney AGK/f 788-6746 DR. L. W. WILKE CHIROPRACTOR 4268 Central Ave. N.E. Minneapolla, Mlnn. 66421 Parch 26, 1986 James Robinson City Planner City of Fridley Re : Lot Split, L.S. 183-03 Dear Sir: First I would like to thank you for the opportunity to explain my position on the lot split. Enclosed is a copy of the letter that the City of Fridley sent me after it O .K'd the lot split, giving only the date of September 4, 1984 as the date that I should have removed my old garage. ,'dhich I indeed had done a year earlier than that date. The Park fee had no date as to when it should be paid nor did the sewer and water fee. I had asked 1!r. J. Boardman, then city planner, when it should be paid. His words given to me over the counter in City Hall was, I would be crazy to pay it until I or a builder was ready for a building permit at which time the Park fee should then be paid. The Sewer & water fee I was told by Mr. Boardman could wait until the closing of the house to be built. At no time thru' the weeks of visiting City Hall about this lot split, was a time limit given to me. Piot in my wildest imaginations would I have thought that a political process would be reversed if I did not act in a specified period of time. Sincerely, L. W. Wilke MEMO TO: John Flora, Public Works Director MEMO FROM: James Robinson, Planning Coordinator MEMO DATE: March 31 , 1986 REGARDING: Request for Reapproval of L. S. #83-03, by Leslie Wilke Attached is a letter requesting reapproval for a Lot Split, L. S. #83-03 that was approved July 25, 1983• The lot split was never recorded at Anoka County due to Leslie Wilke' s misunderstanding that lot splits must be recorded at Anoka County within 180 days of approval. After 180 days the lot split becomes null and void. Two of the three stipulations stated in the City Council Action Taken Notice have not been initiated. Mr. Wilke has not paid the park fee and has not paid the water and sewer lateral assessment. The amount of the park fee has changed from $500 to $750 per lot. The amount of the water and sewer lateral assessment has changed from $1 , 877. 8+ to $2,005. 88. Both of these fees do not have to be paid until a building permit is applied for. We are asking that this request for reapproval of L. S. #83-03 be heard at the April 7, 1986 City Council meeting. It would then be appropriate to address the changes of park fees and sewer lateral assessments. Please find attached the letter from Mr. Wilke asking for reapproval of L. S. #83-03, a location map, a verifying survey, City Council Action Taken Notice and Resolution No. 66-1983 approving the lot split. CITY OF FRIOLEY� 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. NE. COMMISSION APPLICATION FRIDLEY. MN. 55437° REVIEW DwWmea sim Numbs iev age Approved by I . I j FILE NOS ADDRESS FILE DATE COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST ! k3- U} �t ; RETURN TO PLANNING �� 7 r' DUE DATE f COMMENTS rv,ls��ry� Darrel Mark t/� &A-� John Leon o►r�o. ,, _ - A P/Iy qty-3 o - XV— Z/ OLO 3 6. pcvl�/f�- = LESc/F jtJ. � Ov�ca7h+y yyicltF 5G THE GIT / OF DIRECTORATE o0 IOF 1qV �o o° Fqt L Y MEMORANDUM PUBLIC WORKS _ DATE July 20, 1983 FROM D.PW. John Flora TO ACTION INFO. SUBJECT Nasim Oureshi, City Manager Lot Split LS #83-03 At the Planning Commission meeting of July 13, 1983, they approved the Lot Split at 6061 Central Avenue N.E. By approving the Lot Split, the portion remaining is reconfigured in relation to front and side yard definitions. The existing detached garage needs to be removed to allow the Lot Split and a new double garage provided to the existing dwelling. This new garage will now be located in the rear yard instead of the side yard and will therefore require a setback variance from 30 feet to 7 feet. Recommend the City Council approve the rear yard setback variance in conjunction with the Lot Split and stipulate that the existing detached garage be removed and a new two-car garage be constructed within a designated period. In addition to the Park Fee of $500 there are pending water and sewer lateral assessments of $1,877.84 provided for this lot split. Recommend the Park Fee and pending assessment be paid prior to filing of the Certificate of Lot Split. JGF/mc cc: Sid Inman A - L.S. #83-03 Leslie L. Wilke ?a - ---- -14.. S i r S i� 1 I 0 W I T- iF ! rz o. N ! � h Wye C� Ile �il6G��s 1t1C.)L JL►r ILP%-X A la I-w.s. ` �1: II, ,"T`, "471 1 "soggy unTo" TMAT TMI• {VItV<r, rL^w. OA "lK-qT WAS wagPIAMI.D •Y Vf CSA llNf rw MV VIwVCT SUrf Mo11 O.nN Iwo TMAT 1 • OI/-y �QIs Tapso LAND •'-'Pv" 'O-4 UMO<A TN[ LAW* ni Ty• ATATg n• v•ft&MFMT♦ y, r�,-o r'C A L E: 1 - MINN97SQX PF:-ISTPATION NO 5332 0 - IPCN MON,.lk4E•'`1T 4*7 pp 9,170 So.Cr, � "r • 40 _ 'P O (70 J A • 4/ Col; IV � / CaP \ y Pp N •� .S g y4 v 1%,510%cA T-r. ,��A. AY/ q 0 0 cw 4 ry i 4 y �y, 4Vj jr •��y Yx ,a�f �~� K� • �, gam. t`��� r ,. �: , ' � ,�.,�a5 •� .5 i j. a-�. �.F _ + �Y ,Y..� I0. Pte. n:. i�:.. ",'S$'. .N f s+� �'�Yy`x ,i>w sr• � ... r : 'Tse .'3< .k" �`^f•'.,y ' .`,�^sf�" r.� �� yYl! � i• M: R .* f � >j 1 i ' Wit y , �,. �.. 44 «- r CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 13, 1983 - CALL TO ORDER: _ Chairwoman Schnabel called the July 13, 1983, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Ms. Schnabel , Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel , Mr. Svanda, Mr. Saba, Mr. Kondrick, Mr. Goodspeed Members Absent: None Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Bill Deblon, Associate Planner Leslie W. Wilke, 6061 Central Ave. N.E. Bob Schroer, 490 Rice Creek Blvd. APPROVAL OF JUNE 22, 1983, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST, TO APPROVE THE JUNE 22, 1983, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1 . LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #83-03 BY LESLIE W. WILKE: Split off the northerly 75 feet of Lots and 12, Blo—ck 2-, 1Moore Lake Hills (6061 Central Avenue N.E. ) to make a new building site, the same being 6063 Central Avenue N.E. Mr. Boardman stated this request is to split the northerly lot from the southerly lot. He stated the lot split does meet all the code require- ments. The lot is 75.8 ft. wide and 122.2 ft. long, totalling 9,170 sq. ft. There is a $500 park fee required in a lot split. Mr. Boardman stated there was one concern raised by Staff in the last few days. According to city code, the shortest distance on a lot is considered the front yard,so presently, the front yard on Lot B faces Hillcrest, even though the address is 6061 Central . With the lot split, in terminology, the frontage of the lot changes. The front yard will now face Central , and what used to be the side yard will become the rear yard. The distance from the house to the lot line in the rear yard is 29 ft. The code calls for 30 ft. so there is one foot off in the rear yard. Ms. Schnabe asked about the existing garage as it will need to be moved. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 13, 1983 PAGE 2 Mr. Wilke stated he intends to raze the existing garage and build an attached garage. Mr. Boardman stated that if Mr. Wilke is going to attach the garage to the house, because this is now the rear yard and because of the setback requirement, he would need a variance. He stated that per city code, "A rear yard with a depth of not less than 25 percent of the lot depth is required, with not less that 25 feet permitted, or more than 40 feet required for the main building except as follows: Accessory buildings may be built no less than 3 feet from any rear lot line not adjacent to the street." Mr. Boardman stated that at this point in time, he did not think it was necessary to hold up the lot split because of this setback problem. There is enough land for the lot split, and the only problem is that, by definition, the side yard becomes the rear yard. There has to be some opinion made on it at some point in time; but by approving the lot split, the Planning Commission essentially approves the variance. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #83-03, BY LESLIE W. WILKE, TO SPLIT OFF THE NORTHERLY 75 FEET OF LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 2, MOORE LAKE HILLS (6061 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E.) TO MAKE A NEW BUILDING SITE, THE SAME BEING 6063 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E., ACKNOWLEDGING THE 29 FT. REAR YARD SETBACK. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated Staff will discuss this and clarify the interpretation in the code regarding the setback for an attached garage. Mr. Boardman stated this lot split request would go to City Council on July 25. Mr. Boardman stated he would like to request that the Planning Commission amend the agenda to add a request for a special use permit by Mr. Schroer. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO ADD AS ITEM #2' A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT BY ROBERT SCHROER. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #82-09, BY ROBERT SCHROER: Per Section 205.101 , 3. 0, to allow the erection of a 30 ft. by 45 ft, fire retardent tent, for outside display and sales , located on Lot 1 , Block 1 , East Ranch Estates, the same being 7620 University Avenue N.E. 1 R CITY Q MIL MEETING OF JULY 251 1983 PAGE 7 Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated staff didn't want to start talking to these people unless they knew the Council's feelings and if * they wished to consider the item. He indicated they would also check with Bloomington and Brooklyn Center regarding the pros and cons in their community. Councilman Schneider stated, if possible, he would like to see a comparison regarding the manpower cost factor with and without sprinkled buildings. Councilman Hamernik suggested at the time of the second reading on August 22 that staff submit any futher * information. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Pro Tem Barnette declared the motion carried unanimously. 5 RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION MIN[= OF JULY 13, 1983: 5A REQUEST FOR A IAT SPLIT, L. S. #80-03. ZO SPLIT OFF THE N. 73 FEET OF LOTS 11 AND 12., B10a 2. MORE LAKE H ILLS. TO MAKE A NEW BU LLDLNG SITE AT -& f CENIRAL. BY LESLIE L. WILKE 4466-1 CENTRAL) &043 606J Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this request is to split off the northerly 75 fet of Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, Moore Lake Hills, in order to create a new lot on Old Central Avenue. He stated the lot would satisfy all the requirements of a buildable lot totaling 9,170 square feet. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Caammiission recommended approval of the lot split. He stated, with the splitting of this parcel, the terminology of the frontage of the lot changes. He stated the front yard will then face Central and what used to be the side yard will become the rear yard and the distance from the house to the lot line in the rear yard is 29 feet and the code requires 30 feet, therefore, a one foot variance is required to the rear yard setback. Mr. Flora stated the petitioner intends to raze the existing garage and build a new garage, therefore, it would reduce the setback from the required 30 to 7 feet also requiring a variance. Mr. Flora stated a park fee of $500 will have to be paid, as well as pending Water and sewer lateral assessments of $1,877.84. MYTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Planning CorTrTdssion and grant lot split, L. S. #83-03 withtthe stipulation that the existing garage on the property be removed not later than September 1, 1984 and that the park fee of $500 and pending water and sewer lateral assessments be peid prior to the recording of the lot split. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Pro Ten Barnette declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider that in conjunction with the lot split a one foot rear yard variance from 30 to 29 feet is granted due to the unusual configuration of the lot and, in practicality, this is the side • yard and the reason for the variance. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Pro Tem Barnette declared the motion carried unanimously. * Corrections made at Council meeting of 8/8/83. Y 75. 198" PAGE A5 Mr Newman, representing the City Attorney's office, stated that in order to handle the garage variance in an orderly fashion, Mr. Wilke should make • application for the variance to construct the new garage. He stated, if the variance would be denied, he doesn't have to file the lot split. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated if no one objected to the lot split, he didn't feel there would be any problem with the variance. ncrTrT TISE )MMIT, Sp X82-091 70 ALTOW FP=ION OF FIRE To- A DISPIAY AREA A 5B 7628 UNIVERSITY -- gVEN►F N E., BY REM SCNRQhXI Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated Mr. Schroer has requested a special use permit in order to erect a tent at the East end of his building for outdoor storage and sales. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Commission recommended oval of this special use permit, however, prior to erecting the ent, staff would request at the necessary permit be obtained and revi ed by the Police, Fire, and Departments. He further explained a other items to be considered re (1) reduction in driveway entran s to 32 feet maximum; (2) landscapi screening along Osborne Road an the West Service Drive; (3) screening utside storage; and (4) installi g concrete curb and gutter around the park area. Mr. Schroer, the titioner, stated in�egard to the concrete curb and gutter around the rking area, they h�ve a drainage problem and if this were to be install the whole parking lot would be a ponding area. He stated, as far as the opening of the droff voewhis driveways s, he was phecday before over a year ago by the County City t.0/ close Memorial Day in order t restructure the openings. Mr. Schroer pointed out his business was se o '1 and Memorial Day is probably one of his biggest days for business. Mr. Schroer stated he ofe ed another proposal in giving land for an additional turn lane but h sn' t heard for the County or City on this proposal. Mr. Schroer stated, as far as e landscaping, they have spent several thousand dollars in redoing the 1 caping area. In regard to/ `screening the parking 1 t, Mr. Schroer stated he has a tough time with this requirement. He state it is impractical because of the waterworks easement along Osborne Roa and to put up a fence is totally asinine. Mr., chroer felt they have taken care o most of the problems and are ,7t Icing on the ones that haven't been done• nt year and will or Mr. Schroer stated the tent wouldn't be pe Y be for sales of products. He stated he plans o leave the tent up during the sumer months and offer it to non-profit or zations to utilize the tent for sales at no cost to them. . COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 7, 1986 C-3A. DRAFT REVISION OF SIGN ORDINANCE: MDTION by Councilman Schneider to direct staff to have a—proposed draft revision of the Sign Ordinance presented to the Co the last meeting in May, with or without a recommendation the Appeals Commission. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion ca unanimously. MOTION by Councilm arnette to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission mee ' of March 19, 1986. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a vo' vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried una ' usly. 7. RESOLUrION NO. 34-1986 REAPPROVING AUBDIVI ION PLIT �#83-0TO PLIT OFF THE NORTHERLY 75 FEET OF LOTS 11 AND 12 MOORE THE SAME BEING 6061 AND 6063 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. : Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this lot split was never recorded at the County and the petitioner was not aware he had to record it within 180 days of approval by the Council which was July 25, 1983. Mr. Flora stated Mr. Wilke has not paid the park fee or the water and sewer lateral assessment. He stated these fees have changed since 1983 and the park fee is now $750 per lot, instead of $500 per lot, and the assessment has changed f ra m $1,877.84 to $2,005.88. It was the ooncensus of the Council that since Mr. Wilke was advised not to pay the fees and assessment, until such time as a building permit was issued, the original fees should apply. MDTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 34-1986. In addition the park fee should be $500 per lot and the water and sewer lateral assessment should be $1,877.84 , and the lot split recorded as soon as possible with the County. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR WORKING HOURS EXTENSION OF WHO, LF ;ALE CLUB/FRIDLEY LOCATED AT 81ST AND UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. : Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated a request was received f rom Park Construction to obtain an alternate hour w_or-K'permit for periods beyond the City's Construction Ordinance. He stated this was requested in order to prepare the site for the Whol le Warehouse building on 81st and University. Mr. Greg Felt, 2::?e Street, presented a petition to the Council signed by 22 families w opposed to this permit for Park Construction. Mr. Fe stated the work at the site is very loud and didn't feel the ne' rhood should have to put up with this noise. He stated he was not gainst the project, but didn't feel the night work was warranted by the inconvenience to the neighborhood. _8_ COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 7, 1986 Mr. Benjamin stated they now have a total sign package, including the fascia, of 589 square feet and this new sign package would be only 431 square feet, which is actually a reduction in signage. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated every time they consider an item such as this, they hear the City's Sign Ordinance is out of line with other cities. He felt it was probably time to compare the City's ordinance with others in the metropolitan area. Mr. Flora stated there was a proposal presented to the Appeals Commission to change the Sign Ordinance to comply with the various Zoning Codes predicated on lot size. He stated they are trying to work that approach into the sign proposal. Mayor Nee felt there is a real problem in this block and businesses aren't very visible or people have trouble getting off University to get to these establishments. Councilman Barnette stated he has taken the position they have to encourage businesses to stay in Fridley and give then a break, when possible. He stated this was done with Viking Chevrolet and for the motel in Skywood Mall. MJTIDN by Councilman Barnette to approve the variances to increase the maximum square footage of a free standing sign from 80 to 160 square feet and to increase the maximum height of a free standing sign from 25 to 34 feet at 7810 University Avenue N.E. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Councilman Goodspeed stated he is in, favor of the variances because this business is located so far frcm University Aveue. Councilman Barnette stated hef ored encouraging business in Fridley. Councilman Schneider felt the would ould be getting a lot of variance requests, if this is approved. He felt the Sign Ordinance should definitely be looked at, but until that is done, it would seen inappropriate to grant these variances. He fel " the problem should be resolved on a systematic basis, rather than hit r miss. Mayor Nee stated he 'dn't feel adding 80 more square feet would have any visual impact and at you had to consider the relationship of the area. He /peed ltted they "are reducing the signage on the building for more space on sign an itzpatrick felt there should be a serious study of the Sign o see if the ordinance is out of line and how it compares with es and then possibly make some overall changes. LL CALL VOTE CN THE PBOdE MJTIDN, Councilman Barnette, Councilman d and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Schneider cilman Fitzpatrick voted against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the arried by a 3 to 2 vote. -7- RESOLUTION N0. 66 - 1983 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.S. #83-03, TO SPLIT OFF THE NORTHERLY 75 FEET OF LOTS 11 AND 12, MOORE LAKE HILLS, THE SAME BEING 6061 AND 6063 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. WHEREAS, The City Council approved a lot split at the July 25, 1983, meeting, and WHEREAS, such approval was to split off the Northerly 75 feet of Lots 11 and 12, Moore Lake Hills, the same beomg 6061 and 6063 Central Avenue N.E. WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey from Leslie L. Wilke, and WHEREAS, such approval will allow construction of a new dwelling at 6063 Central Avenue N.E. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the County of Anoka to record this lot split within six months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 25th DAY OF 1983. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SIDNEY C. INMAN - CITY CLERK REL33/O/9/1 f A7-7— UI TY OP FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N. E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TEL EPHON-E ( 612)571 -3450 CITY COUNCIL August 4, 1983 ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Leslie W. Wilke 6061 Central Avenue N.E. Fri dl ey, Mn 55432 On July 25, 1983 the Fridley City Council officially approved your request fora lot split, L.S. #83-03 to split off the Northerly with the stipulations listed below: 75 feet of Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, Moore Lake Hills, to make a new building site at 6063 Central Avenue N.E. including a rear yard variance (old side yardl to 29 feet. I . Existing garage be removed from new lot no later that September 1 , 1984. 2. Pay $500 park fee. r7 x/0 0 , 'xg" 3. Pay water & sewer lateral assessment 4. All stipulatdons must be complied with before new lot can be recorded. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Community Development Office at 571-3450. Sincerely, /ER.'(tOLD . B ARDMAN JLB/de City Planner Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below, and return one copy to the City of Fridley. dncur with action taken. 1� OFFICE OF ANOKA COUNTY RECORDER Ted J.Omdahl,Recorder The enclosed is being returned unrecorded for the following: Recording fee of due(Payable to County Recorder) Delinquent tax not paid(Payable to County Treasurer) No State Deed Tax stamps(Payable to County Treasurer) No Statement of State Deed Tax Due No Draftsman's Statement Marital status not shown Signatures not complete(spelling;body and acknowledgment not same as signature) Recording information not completed Acknowledgment not complete(expiration of commission,etc.) No notarial seal or stamp No corporate seal Date of instrument and acknowledgment should be inserted Legal description faultyop4wesne WIP— P IP— Mortgage Registration Tax of due (Payable to County Treasurer) Certificate of Real Estate Value(Items: ) Document is not legible.Better copy required. Name and address of grantee or other person acquiring or claiming an interest No Affidavit of Purchaser of Registered Land (Owner's-Mortgagee's)Duplicate Certificate of Title required Should be filed in County o er: The Wilkes do not own all of Lots 11 & 12. We must have all of the Owner's E DUplica S involved Ted Y.Omdahl limiting it only to the County Recorder Wilkes' property. Anoka,Mn.55303 STA1*E OF MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS CITY OF FRIDLEY In the Matter of L. S. #83-03, Lot Split Request PLAVLOT SPLIT 6061 Central Avenue N.E. Leslie W. Wilke Owner The above entitled matter came before the City Council of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 25 , day of jul 1) 1983 , on a petition for a plat pursuant to tie City of Frid ey s atting Ordinance, for the following described property: Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, Moore Lake Hills IT IS ORDERED that a plat be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: Split off the northerly 75 feet of Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, Moore Lake Hills to create a- buildable single family lot to be addressed as 6063 Central Avenue N.E. 1 foot variance granted along with lot split STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss. OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CITY OF FRIDLEY ) I, Sidney C. Inman, City Clerk for the City of Fridley with an in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a plat with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto 'subscred my hand at the Ci y Qf Fridley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the . .)�'/, day of 19 1-3- . DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. �r--� Fridley, MN 55432 SIDNEY C NMA CITY CLERK (SEAL) 3 PAGE 7 COLT►_+x'IL MEE'I'II� OF .�.Y 25, 198 _ Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated staff didn't want to start talking to these people unless they knew the Council's feelings and if * they wished to consider the item. He indicated they would also check with Bloomington and Brooklyn Center regarding the pros and cons in their community. Councilman Schneider stated, if possible, he would like to see a prison regarding the manpower cost factor with and without sprinkled buildings. Councilman Hamernik suggested at the time of the second reading on August 22 that staff submit any futher * information. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Pro Ten Barnette declared the motion carried unanimously. 5 RECEIVING PLANNING HISSION MIM�= OF .1iTT.Y 13, 1983 5A BIXX7EST FOR A IAT SPf.TT, T- S. #80-03 70 SPLIT OFF TH.E N. 73 FEET OF LOIS 11 AM 12, BLOCK 2, MOORS LAKE HTT q, TO MAKE A NEW B 1TTI T E SITE AT 4663 CE=,, imT.TF. L. WTT.KF. -WP� ('FTTTitAL) Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this request is to split off the northerly 75 fet of Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, Moore Lake Hills, in order to create a new lot on Old Central Avenue. He stated the lot would satisfy all the requirements of a buildable lot totaling 9,170 square feet. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Ccmmission recommended approval of the lot split. He stated, with the splitting of this parcel, the terminology of the frontage of the lot changes. He stated the front yard will then face Central and what used to be the side yard will become the rear yard and the distance from the house to the lot line in the rear yard is 29 feet and the code requires 30 feet, therefore, a one foot variance is required to the rear yard setback. Mr. Flora stated the petitioner intends to raze the existing garage and build a new garage, therefore, it would reduce the setback from the required 30 to 7 feet also requiring a variance. Mr. Flora stated a park fee of $500 will have to be paid, as well as pending water and sewer lateral assessments of $1,877.84. MMON by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant lot split, L. S. #83-03 withtthe stipulation that the existing garage on the property be removed not later than Septenber 1, 1984 and that the park fee of $500 and pending water and sewer lateral assessments be paid prior to the recording of the lot split. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Pro Ten Barnette declared the motion carried unanimously. MJTION by Councilman Schneider that in conjunction with the lot split a one foot rear yard variance from 30 to 29 feet is granted due to the unusual configuration of the lot and, in practicality, this is the side • yard and the reason for the variance. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Pro Tem Barnette declared the motion carried unanimously. * Corrections made at Council meeting of 8/8/83. OF am-Y 75 PPL R Mr Newman, representing the City Attorney's office, stated that in order to handle the garage variance in an orderly fashion, Mr. Wilke should make • application for the variance to construct the new garage. He stated, if the variance would be denied, he doesn't have to file the lot split. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated if no one objected to the lot split, he didn't feel there would be any problem with the variance. 5B RWJEST MR A SPECTAr rtcF pg TT, SP $2-091 TO ALLOW EBECrTON OF A 'TRFT,....,�T,�*fi r RF USM S n DPRK ny AREA AT 7628 UNIVERSITY rtr �rt �� AVENUE N. E. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated Mr. Schroer has requested a special use permit in order to erect a tent at the East end of his building for outdoor storage and sales. Mr. Flora stated the Planning commission rpcerecting ,d antovalstaofthis special use permit, however, prior ould request at the necessary permit be obtained and nevi ed by the Police, Fire, and Departments. He further explained the other items to be considered re (1) reduction in driveway entrances to 32 feet maximum; (2) landscape screening along Osborne Road and'the West Service Drive; (3) screening utside storage; and (4) installing concrete curb and gutter around the park area. Mr. Schroer, the titioner, stated in,tegard to the concrete curb and gutter around the rking area, they hoe a drainage problem and if this • were to be install the whole parks g lot would be a ponding area. He stated, as far as the opening of the driveways, he was approached over a year ago by the County City t6 close off his driveways the day before Manorial Day in order t restrt,�ture the openings. Mr. Schroer pointed out his business was se o 1 and Memorial Day is probably one of his biggest days for business. Mr. Schroer stated he fe ed another proposal in giving land for an j additional turn lane but h sn't heard for the County or City on this proposal. Mr. Schroer sta , as far as a landscaping, they have spent several thousand dollar in redoing the 1 caping area. In regard to creeping the parking 1 t, Mr. Schroer stated he has a tough time with is requirement. He state it is impractical because of the waterworks` easement along Osborne Roa and to put up a fence is totally asinine?/` ;Winghroer felt they have taken care o most of the problems and are on the ones that haven't been cone. Mr. Schroer stated the tent wouldn't be pe nt or year-around and will be for sales of products. He stated he plans o leave the tent up during the sumer months and offer it to nonprofit or zations to utilize the tent for sales at no cost to then. • CITY OF FRIDLEY CIVIC CENTER 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY,MINNESOTA 55432 PHONE(612)571-3450 Leslie W. Wilke CITY COUNCIL April 9, 19$6 6061 Central Avenue N.E. . Fridley, MN 55432 ACTION TAKEN NOTICE On April 7, 1986 , the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for reapproval of a lot split, L.S. 4183-03, to split off the northerly 75 feet of Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, Moore Lake Hills, to make a new building site at 6063 Central Avenue N.E. including a rear yard variance to 29 feet. with the following stipulations : 1. Pay $500 park fee prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Sign agreement for water and sewer lateral assessment of $1,877.84 by Pfay 7, 1986. 3. Lot split to be recorded within one hundred eighty (180) days. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. Sincerely, ames L. Robinson lanning Coordinator JLR/dm Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by April 23, 1986. Concur with action taken 7A RESOLUTION N0. 34 - 1986 A RESOLUTION RE-APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L. S. #83-03, TO SPLIT OFF THE NORTHERLY 75 FEET OF LOTS 11 AND 12, MOORE LAKE HILLS, THE SAME BEING 6061 AND 6063 CENTRAL AVENUE N. E. WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at the July 25, 1983 meeting; and WHEREAS, such approval was to split off the Northerly 75 feet of Lots 11 and 12, Moore Lake Hills, the same being 6061 and 6063 Central Avenue N. E. WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey from the Leslie L. Wilke; and WHEREAS, such approval will allow construction of a new dwelling at 6064 Central Avenue N. E. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the County of Anoka to record this lot split within six months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 7TH DAY OF APRIL 1986• WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 3/7/3/32 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss CITY OF FRIDLEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the RESOLUTION attached hereto, was adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley at said meeting on APRIL 7, 1986 with the original record thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to: RESOLUTION NO. 24-1986 A RESOLUTION RE -APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.S. #83-03, TO SPLIT OFF THE NORTHERLY 75 FEET OF LOTS 11, 12, MOORE LAKE HILLS, THE SAME BEING 6061 AND 6063 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. WITNESS MY HAND as City Clerk of the City of Fridley and the seal of the City, this 14TH day of APRIL, 1986. (SEAL) SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK CITY OF FRIDLEY