The URL can be used to link to this page

LS84-01 A - 37 + 4 • CITY OF FRIDLEY. SUBJECT LOT SPLIT LS 0 (( ft431 LWJIVURSITY AVE. NE.2171 L FRIMUY, MN. 0563e 661 .6 -3430 RECORDED: t2 Wv- t, ADDRESS: 14 �0 WE: PLANNING COMMISSION: APPROVED _ DISAPPROVED DATE NO CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO PARK FEE REQUIRED: _ AMOUNT PAID STIPULATIONS: FEE ` /U -d RECEIPT NO NAME PROPERTY ONNER(S)2,�� TELEPHONE NO a - as TELEPHONE NO ADDRESS(ES)_- A PROPERTY LOCATION ON STREET c:--� �i �1 3 i A:`=� LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY '1 .,' Lj �C� PRESENT ZONING__ REASON FOR LOT SPLIT �,, _ •� C •� , , �.�C� The undersigned •hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE: \ _ SIGNATURE NOTICE: A sketch of the property and the proposed lot split with any existing struc- tures shown should accompany this application. (See reverse side for additional instructions) /,f�/ &/ LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE 1. Obtain application form at City Hall (6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley). 2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property involved and the lot split fee of $75.00 for each original lot being split. 3. The application will be checked over by Staff and the owner may be required to submit a Certificate of Survey containing a simple description of a part of a platted lot or registered lot, along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in. 4. The application will then be submitted to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. The Planning Commission meets on the Wednesday following the City Council meeting, which is generally the first and third Wednesdays of the month. 5. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for final action. If a Certificate of Survey wasn't required before, it will be required for this meeting. The City Council meets on the first and third Mondays of the month. 6. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must be complied with by the applicant. 7. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent papers for his signature. 8. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant should file the lot split in Anoka County. 9. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed. NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT MAY EXCEED THE AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS. r• REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA I 7601-73rd Avenue North 560-3093 7 C Minneapolis,Minnesota 55428 l3i ntgara Otrtiffra#r HERB KNUfSON / L// T H ALJ / — --(.70D- - 0 Fo,,nd JudlGlal13D J"dlc,aj I L.a n d m a r k. — ILandmar(L V I 'T� - L_ c_ I 1 I I � � I / /3,o Landmare - 617.00-- - - --70.2 -- - fo�nd—�u�lcial- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - r') arks. PROPOSED DIVISION OF Lots 1,2 and 3,Block 15, FRIDLEY PARK PARCEL "A": All of Lot 3 and that part of Lot 2 lying West of the Fast 13.00 feet thereof, Block 15, FRIDLEY PARK, Anoka County, Minnesota together with that part of the North 1/2 of the vacated alley lying between the extensions across it of the east and west lines of the above described property. to PARCEL "IT: Lot 1 and the East 13.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 15, FRIDLEY PARK, Anoka County, Minnesota together with that part of the North 1/2 of the vacated alley lying between the extensions across it of the east and west lines of the above described property. The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. �o�Yn�gL �AT� CAINE 8 0MALLEY LAND SURVEYORS, INC. /7600 Centro/ Ave. N.E. Sodervi//e Professional Bldg. Soderville, Minnesota 55304 434-7646 L6URVEY FOR: Delores L . Ponessa c/o John M. Giblin DESCRIBED AS: _Juts 1 , 2, and 3, Block 15, FRIDLEY PARK; That part of the north half vacated alley in Block 15, FRIDLEY PARK which lies betwcer. the souther of the west line of Lot 3 and the east line of Lot 1 , sai,,: Bloc}. 11 . I Cast 2,-On ' at the N.E the SE 14 Q 10 t y, 64 - WA Y H89°4043'E <' 143. 43 743.41 4 7i. 7i x 71.-72 03,9i 1 S 89 44 , k ;V i I I N, O >-- 66.76 YACAT£p oN 89 W-¢8' E SO I iz" '. ✓ SE Corner of LOT SURVEYS COMPANY9 INC. INVOICE NO._ 13494 F. B. NO. 251-28 LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I" 0 — DENOTES IRON REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 - 73rd Avenue North 560-3093 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55428 Ountgara (trtiffratt HERB KNLrf SON T" Y - - - X7. OD- - - - -- 7 . 43 - - - �Fd Foond jvjlc.ial i 13.0 JLJAIG►a1 I !_and rn a r1C_ ILand mark- - T - Al I � I I � N I � V � I /3,o I'oun� Jed IG fa roL)nd_�v�iera l— _ - -67. 0 0 - - - PROPOSED DIVISION OF Lots 1 ,2 and 3,Block 15, FRIDLEY PARK PARCEL "A": All of Lot 3 and that part of Lot 2 lying West of the Fast 13.00 feet thereof, Block 1S, FRIDLEY PARK, Anoka County, Minnesota together with that part of the North 1/2 of the vacated alley lying between the extensions across it of the east and west lines of the above described property. PARCEL "B": Lot 1 and the East 13.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 15, FRIDLEY PARK, Anoka County, Minnesota together with that part of the North 1/2 of the vacated alley lying between the extensions across it of the east and west lines of the above described property. The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and vis- ible encroachments,if any,from or on said land. � f ---�' Signed Surveyed by us this Sth day of June 19 84 Aayrnond A. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 6743 N LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. INVOICE ONO. 1251-28 3494 F.LAND SURVEYORS SCALE 1" 0 0 — DENOTES IRON REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 - 73rd Avenue North 560-3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 oururgara 01truftratt HERB KNUTSON TH (NIA Y - - - DoT OD- - - - - - 76.. 4 - - Fog,-,r) Foot) , ud lcl a � 13,o Jtj 1 -.71 I L.a n i m a r- . mark- T - /It I I I I /3,o Laid m arm 7. 00 - - - - �-- - - -70.2 -- - - - '-- I rou>7�—�u�le.lal- - - - - --X— — -- - - - - - - -_ - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - l.a� � �� arlc.. PROPOSED DIVISION OF Lots 1 ,2 and 3,Block 1S, FRIDLEY PARK PARCEL "A": All of Lot 3 and that part of Lot 2 lying West of the Fast 13.00 feet thereof, Block 15, FRIDLEY PARK, Anoka County, Minnesota together with that part of the North 1/2 of the vacated alley lying between the extensions across it of the east and west lines of the above described property, la PARCEL "B": Lot 1 and the East 13.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 15, FRIDLEY PARK, Anoka County, Minnesota together with that part of the North 1/2 of the vacated alley lying between the extensions across it of the east and west lines of the above described property. The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and vis- ible encroachments, if any,from or on said land. Signed Surveyed by us this 5th day of June 19 84 l aymond A. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 6743 at toD Opp A 00 A .0, L.S. #84-01 Herbert Knutson 7 B 1 1+0177f � • �� , ase - � � � �T- 44 PAPj.. 1`0 ±_,r.a= 0141 T ) ? o 2 4� 28 '= " 1 3 1 to 10 4,TM►AY ��i 41 r�� ; mat P. J f� 171 a♦� � - -a�- ► 6 D�0 � I,$ l � � ;� + t Sp E3 _ --WAYI,Ij �► — � , Ir 4p �+ 4300 WAY • � : r " - ' 4 2 Y 4 y AR 4230 14 fr / r • _ , 10 TAY a j Ac lip' s Itl rll 4 30 t s �w r • t T t j l t�'��!0Its t f I ,I SGNv T ZI sl !m �e. _, 4190 �/1! �110; T $ ! ? k a_ ,� AD i2 w0 wAY 61! CITY OF FRIDLEY, COMMISSION APPLICATION MINNESOTA REVIEW Dapatman ?e, ev aqa Approved by tl FILE IYO/ COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST ADDRESS FILE RETURN TO PLANNING v/� 9L OU 9L /U � L�,d�Gfr £✓ COMMENTS Darrel I�. -[I,, Mark t. aClyde John Leon .�� ✓� S i a,� Seo v L D �F �fGo�i��.� !� ?" �ryo i�� Cp . �tro�E` 47--1 y`a ` ��1`� ''�•� ' 4,`��/C. � ''�i� tib �+,a"i;, J� .y N �` !• f 7 < G• r + 'i"� �,' .tri Mr ♦� 3`•� �,�H r.y � , .J \ .eros. s r' �• � •.�. + < : .rN �` .�yi• 4♦: • 5 3 i �r ; Y 'T t��i. � >G"r ' . • ,ate�} � t - l_ J �i' ! , �" �q�'.•y�,: `l S Y¢j '40 �.°'t6' �. -14 f- i � - ' - y.,f '��•.�,�'• � � � � : = mat �+x Y;,;y ,�` IIFX ;. IF r ilii ,: the vest lij.c of Lot 3 and the east line of Lot 1 , sa1%.: U10C)' I ') . Z Let 3 -rev c,�; �►+�s .4'c 21,6 17 U _ Lb-r Q 1�'t NGS 4a STN-�p$'`- (�q zt- ac (or 2- L%?j;j t, 27 .G PgLr- P400. Cas t 1 rcn 11-1 at the N.[ L.S. #84 01 Herbert Knu sonSE %4 r 'so th 64- — WA Y o N 89040'43'E /43. 43 743.41 -- --- �.� OV t ► -* X43 , 5 69 394 ( . ��I•� � 4 � �y��Z J V, KOO . �8 (30 o , r- 60 ;;6 ore.79 O VACA O O /37. R6 N89°48 SO'E LQ �. SE Corner of JC C:oil)er 0f T /,;ve •r'�,�o��9, 9Z 7 L ( 35 /4188 �z N _ // zo ��i • 1 SO 117z% u T PAS w'U��h� 0 NO- L S � L_s �:�.►c. Sri b� ��ip N � �. o :• . • • • •'•moi•• • • • • • • • • • �••••• ••�'•••••:o.oy ••••:.• �� o . . . . •r.•. . . .s•:.•.•.•.•.•.•. .•.•.• •.•.•.•: •r: o ti e • : : . : :• • :•: : : . • • : : •• �. •. . . r. . ;. ::•::•�:�:•:•:•• h o . . . . . . . . . . . . . .•. . . . . . . . . . . . . .•.•. . . .�:.•. . . . . . . s. . �' 0 1� o h o a,4��•' h a� o o .N�• �� o t ARE h `�---- .✓sa 'so'.s�'W q /80.oo w I � � NO. 30 30 PARG CL /✓BB 'Zo :09'"N,- Zoo .00 /Q� SG/h. Ala. Z I 9, 9 N I - ItF,il!�SAGrc uND s•Srs'-o l IV 7K • Lot Split 85-�' S 50 E A"awl am9 L.0 A O-UmO a ff D t • r L.. � S RDE s' 17.0 i• .... I EL 004 E ENTi4 Ismi i I � �� Q 22 24 25 491 .t~A uw, 1.'!'~ it�5 1341 IL ILK Xb3 . .. J t�oi 1423 Kia i A NA, yam:: �.. t A uE I«o I z 413 123 142 Hct ;' �q15, oiSN 1401 =� Ow. s �S3 . � � e o 164 - eb313 sess38 (a" + ►y sea, » �- % � .�, - w� 40 41 • '•!rilr L/ 39 •• i' _ • t,rN47 • �:ittor .s WrION i. • • • • z0 •.51 • . Silos � ••• 1_ sr . PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 14, 1984 PAGE 10 MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY ASS. SCHREINER, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT P.S. #84-01, CREEKRIDGE, BY THOMAS BRICKNER, BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS 2, 3, AND 5, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 10, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 66TH AND ARTHUR STREETS N.E. , WITH THE CONSIDERATION THAT THE CITY DEVELOP SOME KIND OF PATHWAY FROM 66TH AVE. TO THE NEW PROPOSED PARK. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AY,- CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5 LOT SPLIT�R_E�U�ES.T: L.S. #84-01 BY HERBERT KNUTSiN; Split Lots 1 , 2, 3, Block 1 5, Fridleyint o building sites, by splitting off the westerly 27 feet of Lot 2, and combining it with Lot 3, and the description of Lot 1 will add that part of Lot 2 lying east of the westerly 27 feet, all in Block 15, Fridley Park, the same being 10 and 20 64th Way N.E. Mr. Flora stated this property was just south of 64th Ave. and west of Ashton Ave. There are three lots, Lots 1 , 2, and 3, which are being proposed to be split into two lots, one 67 ft. wide and one 70.26 ft. wide. This particular plat was platted before 1955 and, as such, the code requires a minimum of 50 ft. The code also states that if it was an early plat, the lot width and the lot area may not be satisfied but all other setback criteria must be satisfied. Mr. Flora stated that in talking with the developer, it was first proposed to split the property in half and make each lot about 72 ft. in width. Because the corner lot requires a 172 ft. sideyard setback, they thought it would be better to make the first lot a little wider and the second lot a little smaller and still satisfy the setback criteria. Mr. Flora stated Staff would recommend three stipulations if this lot split is approved: 1 . There be a park fee of $750 2. That no building permit be issued until the lot split is recorded with the County. 3. The outstanding assessments be paid. Mr.John Dunphy, 155 Stonybrook Way, stated he was representing Mr. Knutson who could not be at the meeting. He stated Mr. Knutson plans to put single family dwellings on both lots. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #84-01, BY HERBERT KNUTSON, TO SPLIT LOTS 1, 2, 3, BLOCK 15, FRIDLEY PARK, INTO TWO BUILDING SITES, BY SPLITTING OFF THE WESTERLY 27 FEET OF LOT 2, AND COMBINING IT WITH LOT 3, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF LOT 1 WILL ADD THAT PART OF LOT 2 LYING EAST OF THE WESTERLY 27 FEET, ALL IN BLOCK 15, FRIDLEY PARK, THE SAME BEING 10 AND 20 64TH WAY N.E. , WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. THERE BE A PARK FEE OF $750 2. THAT NO BUILDING PERMIT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE LOT SPLIT IS RECORDED WM THE COUNTY. 3. THE OUTSTANDING ASSESSMENTS BE PAID. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 14, 1984 PAGE 9 Mr. %1�,ik Podvin stated he was representing the principles on the Gena- Rae tion. They have obviously been negotiating with the City on the sale of ` his property and, at this point, an appraisal is being made on the value\of the land. He stated the only exception he could see to the park plan 'at this time was the proposed walkway to the park from Mississippi St. They would not agree to that because of the foot traffic that would be between houses. He stated the dedicated road was forced on them in order for them to go\t the building permit. The reason they have resisted selling this property is because they did not want to develop the property with that road being forced on them. They feel the property being developed as a park was a very favorable option to them with the exception of the road and assuming they get fair market value for the land. Ms. Mary Loschy, 1399 - 66th Ave. N.E. , stated she thought this was a very good plan, it was a good compromise, and would be very good for the neighbor- hood. She had one request and that was that it was going to be a little difficult for people fr6)t 66th Ave.to get to the park. She would like to see the City consider some, foot traffic access from 66th, if that was possible. Mr. Flora stated that was something the City could probably work toward in the future. Mr. Brickner stated he had no strong feelings one way or the other. If it was an easement, it should probably be fenced. Ms. Schnabel stated it was a very good point and she would like to see the City explore the possibility of some easement from 66th Ave. to the new park area. Mr. Robert Thayer, 6051 - 6th St. N.E. , stated he was at the Planning Commission meeting two weeks ago and criticized the City's proposal at that time. He would like to say that this proposal made a lot more sense. It answered the concern about developing adequate park area, and he thought it allowed for an organized sensible development for all three parcels of property. MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MS. SCHREINER, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:22 P.M. Mr. Oquist stated he felt this total plan was more in lir with what he was concerned about at the last meeting. What he thought they needed to do was to plan the whole area as long as there were three parcels of property that were available. It seemed to him this was a reasonable development for this whole area. Ms. Schnabel stated she was very pleased with this plan. It was worth delaying this for two weeks. From the standpoint of the City, providing a park in the Gena-Rae Addition was the best solution they could come up with. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 14, 1984 PAGE ll UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAI1RP70MAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 28, 1984, ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO RECEIVE THE FEB. 28, 1984, ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR OQUIST, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MARCH 14, 1984, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, LynnSaba Recording Secretary �;Q , . x:311 �Cnn, 5;C 1,-e 47- 41, _ l37'7 6 % ,v S 1.47 ` 42 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 20 1975 PAGE 5 it z the terrain is quite steep and irregular. It drops down quite rapidly. They ! I are trying to save some of the trees by constructing the house at the 20 foot I j setback. A variance was previously granted to the lot next to his one. The street. is being constructed with a 10 foot offset to allow a large boulevard in that area. • r i ! The Appeals Commission recommends approval of this request for a variance and ; there were no objections. ; MOTION was made by Councilman Starwalt to concur with the Planning Commission to approve the variance. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2. CONSIDERATIO`J OF PARKS AND RECREATION C0MMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 2", A. FR_I.DI�E)L�PAR OTS 1-3, BLOCK 15 O T 'X FoRFEIT L6?S The Public Works Director reported that this item was considered by the Parts and Recreation Conmission to try to deter ne if the Parks 9eoprtrent needed these lots on 64th and Ashton. At this t,me, they do not propose to develop or construct a park in that area, and accent should be placed on access to adjacent park facilities and with the bikeway system, we would have that access. Councilman Fitzpatrick said that the Parks and Recreation Commission quoted some figures on a very small number of children in that area. Phat area are they talking about. i Councilman Fitzpatrick continued to say that he knew ;Mich lots vera involved, but it was difficult for him to believe that would serve such few persons of that ; j age. It depends on what they define as the area. He said he had not checked these figures out and it may be true that there are that few childron. Council- man Fitzpatrick continued to say that another question he had ws that he did not really feel that the facilities at Stevenson School answer h e need for that area for 4 and 5 or 8 and 9 year old;. The adults have trouble driving cars on i East River Road, let along the thildren crossing it. He felt there is a need for a park and asked if there was any urgency in releasing these red tags. r The City Manager said that the problem basically was that we had some inquiries and he helieved the question was raised on whether we would retain these lots. He also said he thought this item could be discussed further if Council so desires. j Councilwoman Kukowski asked if it was being used by children in the area now. ! She said if it was being used by 30 or 40 children, they were not playing on the ; railroad tracks. The City Manager explained that there are very few children in that area. It is an older neighborhood and he would guess there is less small children because of the age. of the parents. The City Mam per said he felt they should come back with + some additional material concerning this item. ; r , Councilman Starwalt said he agreed and he had some relunctance in releasinq these lots. He felt that there was not much discussion in the Planning Commission minutes. k MOTION by Starwalt to table this item and obtain additioval information. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, i•;ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. • ( 1 It was suggested that this item be brought forward at the Conference Meeting of j October 27, 1975. f i a i 1 r 15G 43 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 3, 1975 PAGE 2 Councilman Fitzpatrick suggested going to the Park Board with this request for their recommendations. The Park Board will meet on the last Monday of the month. Councilman Starwalt said he thought there should be some follow up on all of the costs involved - such as attendants. etc. Mr. Moore stated that he lives in Fridley and he would like to see his tax-dollars going to. our kids rather than to foreign aid. f I Councilman Breider said that he felt going through the Park Board was the right japproach. The proposal should be evaluated as to what it would cost, be aware of the advantages and disadvantages and take an affirmative or negative action at that time. Mayor Nee said that he feels this should be taken to the Parks and Recreation Meeting of November 24th. He explained that the problem is that it needs to be 1 gone over thoroughly and costed out. He told Mr. Moore he appreciated his leader- ship and that the Parks Board is the proper direction to take. OLD BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF RELEASE OF RED TAG FORFEIT - LOTS 1-3, BLOCK 15 FRIDLEY PARK ADD ITI,01;: _ MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the release of the red tag on tax .forfeit lots. He said fie felt this item was discpssed thoroughly at the Conference Meeting of October 27th and he was prepared to move to accept it. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. 'Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ' NEW BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDI14ANCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 123 - JUNK VEHICLES: 3; MOTION was made by Councilwoman Kukoa:ski to waive the second reading and adopt this Ordinance. She said she felt that the changes made, as requested at the first reading of October 20, did clarify that it is a violation to have a junk vehicle on a property 10 days after notification by the City. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Alex Barna, a citizen of Fridley,asked the Council what their definition of a junk vehicle was. Mayor Nee explained the definition as stated on page 2 of the agenda. Nr. Barna asked if they would consider antique cars as junk vehicles. He further explained that a person could wait for a long time to get parts for a antique cars so they would be inoperable during that time. Mayor Nee explained that as long as the vehicle was properly licensed there would be no problem. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P.S. #75-03, PAYER'S LAKESIDE ?NH ADDITION, BY RUDOLPH BAYER, GENIERALLY LOCATED BETb.EEN 75TH AND 76TH AVENUE N.E. ON THE EAST SIDE 0I.1C KI('LEY S?REFT h. E. The Public Works Director said basically this is a replat of the West 162.24 feet as �\ measured along the North and South lines of Lots 4,5 and 6, Block 1 , Spring Lake Park Lakeside Addition, generally located between 75th and 76th Avenue N. E. on the east side of McKinley Street. He pointed out that the Planninq Cceanission did recommend approval with certain stipulations regarding drainage and utility ease- ment. He said also there were no objections noted at the public hearing meeting of October 20, and it would be in order for the City Council to approve this ordinance with the stipulations of the drainage and utility easement. e CITY 000NCIL MEETING OF MARCH 26, 1984 PAGE 11 April 2, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. I 17D. LCT .SPLIT REQUEST. L S #84-01, TO SPLIT LOTS 1, 2, 3, BLOsCK 15, FRIDLEY PARK, INTO TWO BUILDINGS SITES. THE SAME BEING 10 AND 20 64TH WhY N.E. BY HERBERT KNUTSON: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this is a request that Lots 1, 2, and 3 be split and combined into two parcels. He stated the lots were platted before 1950 so the minimum lot required by code is 50 feet and eliminates the requirement of 9,000 square feet of area per lot. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of this lot split with stipulations regarding the park fee, building permit, and outstanding assessments. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Planning CaTmission and grant lot split, LS #84-01, with the following stipulations: (1) there be a park fee paid of $750; (2) no building pemit be issued until the lot split is recorded with the County; and (3) the outstanding assessments be paid. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated there could be an added stipulation that this would become two taxable parcels, instead of three. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he assumes the Planning Commission felt this would be taken care of when it is recorded at the County. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of March 14, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 18. 0C)NSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RELOCATION OONSULTANT FOR RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the City is in the process of hiring a relocation expert as a consultant in the acquisition of the three properties in Riverview Heights. He stated the City received two proposals for this service and, based on conversations with these two firms regarding final relocation and total cost, it is recommended the f irm of Federal State Relocation Consulting Service be hired. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the recommendation of the City Engineer to hire the firm of Federal State Relocation Consulting Service for the relocation in Riverview Heights at a fee of $5,250. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 19. CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT NO 67 WITH METRO WZk STE CONTROL OOMMISSION: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this agreement supports the MWCC 41 L. S. #84-01 Herbert Knutson \� f -- �f. RESOLUTION NO. 153 1973 i 7 Page 2 01 �i FRIDLEY PARK #2890 Lots 1 , 2, & 3, Block 15 �f Beginning at the NE. cor. of Lot 1 , block 15, Fridley Park Add. ; thence W. along the N. line, a dist of 48' ; thence deflect to the left at an IF angle of 135 degrees along a line in a SE' ly direction to a line par. to and 18' W. of the E. line of said Lot 1 ; thence S. along said par. line to the S. line of .said Lot 1 ; thence E. along the S. line to the SE. corner of said Lot 1 ; thence N. along the E. line of said Lot 1 ; to the point of beginning. All lying in the S'2 of Sec. 15, T. 30, R. 24 City of Fridley, County of Anoka , State of ,Nimmesota. BE IT RURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Council of Fridley desire to hold the following parcels: , f AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 129 II' #720 Westerly 21 feet of Lot 11 FRIDLEY PARK !t #2890 Lots 1 , 2, and .3, Block 15 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Council of the City of Fridley 14i hereby releases the balance of the parcels mentioned in the list sent to it by the County Auditor in November 1973. �;. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 19TH DAY t 1' OF NOVEMBER, 1973. i} NP— -L I B ATTEST: �' CITY CLER RVIN C.- BR SELL CITY OF FRIOLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N. E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE ( 612)571 -3450 CITY COUNCIL April 4, 1984 ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Herbert Knutson 11501 134 1/2 Avenue North Dayton, MN 55327 On March 26, 1984 the Fridley City Council officially approved your request fora Lot Split L. S. X84-01 to split three lots into with the stipulations listed below. ktwo lots, the same being 10 and 20 64th Way N. E. 1 . Pay a park fee of $750. 00. 2. That no building permit be issued until that lot split is recorded with the County. 3. The outstanding assessments be paid. ($883.40 after 84 taxes) cc: Fred Lundstrom Route 1 Isanti , MN 55040 John F. Dunphy 155 Stoneybrook Way N. E. Fridley, Mn 55432 If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. Sincerely, 6I JAMES L. ROBINSON PLANNING SPECIALIST JLR/de Please review the noted stipulation, sign the statement below, and return one copy to the City of Fridley. Concur with action taken. f RESOLUTION NO. 82 - 1984 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.S. #84- 02, TO SPLIT LOTS 1 , 2 AND 3, BLOCK 15, FRIDLEY PARK, INTO PARCELS "A" AND "B" TO MAKE TWO BUILDING SITES, AT 10 AND 20 64TH WAY N.E. WHEREAS, The City Council approved a lot split at the March 26th, 1984, meeting, and WHEREAS, such approval was to split Lots 1 , 2 and 3, Block 15, Fridley Park, into Parcels A and B, described as follows: Parcel "A": All of Lot 3 and that part of Lot 2 lying West of the East 13.00 fee thereof, Block 15, Fridley Park, Anoka County, Minnesota together with that part of the North 1/2 of the vacated alley lying between the extensions across it of the east and west lines of the above described property, the same being 20 64th Way N.E. Parcel "B": Lot 1 and the East 13 feet of Lot 2, Block 15, Fridley Park, Anoka County, Minnesota together with that part of the North 1/2 of the vacated alley lying between the extensions across it of the of the east and west lines of the above described property, the same being 10 64th Way N.E. WHEREAS, The City has received the required Certificate of Survey from Herbert Knutson, and WHEREAS, such approval will make two new residential building sites. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the County of Anoka to record this lot split within six months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 16TH DAY OF JULY, 1984. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SIDNEY C. INMAN - CITY CLERK 3/7/17/27