The URL can be used to link to this page

REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 94 CTTY OF FRIDLEY REZONING REQUEST ZOA * 11� t.l? 1 UNIVER3iTY A" ' N.E. V;tAnLEY, MN 5543 VACATIOAREQUEST SAV (812)571-3450 PLATTING REQUEST P.S. * / q /i � REQUEST FEE �O� PARK FEE RECEIPT #`� S SCHEDULED PLANNEIC COMMISSION MEETING DATE SCHEDULED CITY O)UNCIL MEETING DATE PROPERTY INFORMATION r PROPERTY ADDRESS LFTAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BLOCK TRACT/ADDITIDN PRESENT ZONING 0/ REQUESTED ZONIIU 5� � REASON FDR REQUEST: A site plan showing the proposed future use is required for all rezoning. -- bAu 6 fold . G2oec v (inz P 61 ************************************************************************************ OWNER INFORMATION G/ NAME (please print)OL I C, .r XL PHONE # ADDRESS v 3 - �. T t A)- New �yLI �1 'fitSZiJ '' cr.r'f�l v SIGNATURE DATE _ _- ************************************************************************************ PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME (please print) 9) C1-141W _ dZtc,CA1(-R PHONE # -- ADDRESS / 1. 3 l V � V C01v, 4J SIGNATURE DATE PLANNING COMt-iISSION APPROVED DENIED DATE CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED D1.24IED DATE STIPULATIONS: The petitioner hereby understands that: 1. The City will notify all residents and owners of property within 350 feet (rezoning) or within 300 feet (platting) of said property. 2. This application must by signed by all owners of the property, or an explanation given why this is not the case. 3. Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resulting frau the failure to list the names and address of all residents and property owners of property in question, belongs to the petitioner. 4. A scaled plan of proposed property and structure must be drawn and attached, showing the following: North direction Location of proposed structure, and f ront and rear setbacks. Landscapinc it applicable Street names Location and use of adjacent existing buildings within 350 feet. 0 C 1F FRIDLEY 'y X34 UNIVERSIT"f A N.E. pA FFeIDLEY, Mill 5 43W LOT SPLAORM L.S. � ��- 09 (512)571-3,650 LOT SPLIT FEE PARK PARK FEE RECEIPT # (� I SCHEDULED PLANNING CDMMISSION MEETING DATE,. Z SCHEDULED CITY CXXJNCIL MEETING DATE: PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BLOCK T ACT/ADDI T IDN _ PR ES ENT ZONING _ REASON FOR LOT SPLIT: A sketch of the property and the proposed lot split with any existing structures shown should accompany this application. OWNER INFORMATION NAME &I �_Ic f v i C ky N E. PHC NE #� ADDRESS 12-.�_ Z c ) i SIGNATURE ! �.ti---- _ DATE ) L- 0 - 5` S- PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME �A-m PHONE # ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE -- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * dr PLANNING CDrMSSION APPROVED DENIED DATE CITY CDUNCIL APPROVED DENIED DATE STIPULATIONS: M IAT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCMM 1. Obtai n appl ica ti on f orm at Ci ty Hal l (643 1 Univ er si ty Av enue N.E. , Fr idl ey) 2. Return oanpleted application form with the required sketch of the property involved and the lot split fee of $100.00 for each original lot being split. 3. The appl ica ti on w it l be ch ecked ov er by Staf f and th e caner may be r eq ui red to submit a Certificate of Survey containing a simple description of a part of a platted lot or registered lot, along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in. 4. The application will then be submitted to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. The Planning Commission meets on the Wednesday following the City Council meeting, which is ge„erally the first and third Wednesdays of the month. 5. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for final action. If a Certificate of Survey wasn't r eq ui red before, it will be required for this meeting. The City Council meets on the first and third Mondays of the month. 6. Me City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must be compiled with by the applicant. 7. If approved, the applicant shall then have the land involved in the lot split surveyed. Upon receipt of the required Surveyor's Certificate, the Council shall pass a resolution approving the lot split. 8. After final approval, a oertified copy of the resolution approving the lot split and a "Certificate of Status” form shall be attached to the notice of approval and forwarded to the applicant. The lot split, together with a certified copy of the resolution and "Certification of Status" form, shall thereafter be recorded among the records of the County within one hundred eighty (180) days after the date of the resolution, unless a longer period of time is granted and provided for r eco r di ng at the time of approval. 9. In all cases where City Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed. NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NEW ERRCELS IN WIAL, AFTER THE LCT SPLIT MAY FEED THE AUNT ASSESSED TO THE C RMINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEFART�§W OF FRIMEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AKXJNT OF AMITICKAL TAXES CIt ASSN. RECEIPT �rc c/1 6'131 UniversitY Ave. N.E. Fridley, Minne,ota 55432 Tel. 571-3450 i i RECEIVED OF �O c $loo _ DPT/DIV ACCOUNT AMOUNT _ GLF PROJ J i RICHARD D. PRIBYL i Treasurer B No. 19119 \ 'LIT' 1-(8)MOORE BUSINESS FORMS.INC, -N :..•ane-YN. t.e.Mw..N .... Form No.2a-M—OU1T CLAIM DEEO Minnesota Uniform Coowyencfwa Blanks(1078) ...._ _. Inal-dual(s)to Corporation ..or Partnership No delinquent taxes and transfer entered;Certificate of Real Estate Value ( )filed ( )not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No.- '19- County o.,19 County Auditor by ( fs 7 3 , Deputy : yM .}tr; STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ None Date: w '19- ' (reserved for recording data) J FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Beth A. Dahlunier, A Single Person ,Grantor(s), (marital status) - hereby convey(s)and quitclaim(s)to city of Fridley ey Grantee, yw, r• P a ,rn,r,;ci i i ky, under the laws of Miruiesota � '!�' real property in Anoka County,Minnesota,described as follows: A drainage and utility easement described as follows: The south 10 feet of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 94 ' The City of Fridley hereby accepts the above-mentioned easement for drainage and utility purposes. SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK (if more space is needed•continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. ri I'.se:;t8mp f Irrr STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Anoka The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by Grantor(s). NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL(OR OTHER TITLI OL IANC) - SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT I Tex Statement. for the real property d. ribed In this in trwneet should be sent to(Include name and addree.of Grantee): THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY(NAME AND ADDAM)t l City of Fridley 6431 University Ave., N.E. City of Fridley Fridley, PTI 55432 6431 University Ave., N.E. i Fridley, MV 55432 Ii f I .- ahteX•Wwe Lo.,4nrwyWie - Mlnnrsots Unlfotw cM"Veniews Siawka(t�• - a) .. _-......-... .. Form No.28-M—QUITCLAIM DEEO .- - � - l)1- ladiv,dualIS)to Corporation - - or Partnership No delinquent taxes and transfer entered;Certificate of Real Estate Value ( )filed ( )not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No.- 119— County o.,19 County Auditor j by Deputy1 s'f ► w, l vrA. STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: S None i Date: 19_ (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Bernard J. Kriens and Loralee M. Kriens, Husband and wife Grantor(s), (marital status) hereby convey(s)and quitclaim(s)to City of Fridley Grantee, a municipality under the laws of Minnesota real property in Anoka County,Minnesota,described as follows: A drainage and utility easement described as follows: The south 10 feet of Tract B, lbgistered Land Survey No. 94. The City of Fridley hereby accepts the above-mentioned easement for drainage and utility purposes. form No.28.1 Ordividuallsl r. . � rfMrsryip SHIK" A. HAAPALA, City Clerk NO delinq,e. If Real Esta Certificate of (it more space is needed,continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. --�_ !'�,.:;tamp iL•rr• 6y�. STATE DEED Tq_ STATE OF MINNESOTA j Date; COUNTY OF Anoka FOR VAGUggLEC( The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Ile- by 1Q_eby hereby Grantor(s). y co NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL(OR OTHER TITLR OR RANK) 1 Huey(s)and, I a -114 i SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT - real i ptOPetty in Tu Statements for the real property described In this instrument should ' be tent to(Include name end addrete of Grantee): A drainage and util south 10 peer THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY(NAME AND ADDRESS)7� - City of Fridley City of Fridley 6431 University Ave., N.E. 6431 University Avenue, N.E. I Fridley, NIDI 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 I together With all het menus do STgTE OF ti11�rN,rc,,,_ • 611 enpnmGo. annaeapwr -- Form No.28 M—QUITCLAIM DEED M4w,esesa UAUosat coavovancin{Blanks(1918) I rKI—dual(s)to Corporation or Partnership r No delinquent taxes and transfer entered;Certificate of Real Estate Value ( )filed ( )not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No.- 119- County o.119County Auditor by Deputyw a: STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ none Date: '19- (reserved for recording data) � FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Robert G Buksa and Donna Buksa, Husband & Wife Grantor(s), (marital status) hereby convey(s)and quitclaim(s)to City of Fridley Grantee, r a municinLajitv under the laws of N,Lnnesota « .' t' + � ,K it� lj�.' real property in Anoka County,Minnesota,described as follows: A drainage and utility easement described as follows: The north 10 feet and the westerly 10 feet of Tract C, I;iegistered Land Survey No. 94. The City of Fridley hereby accepts P the above-mentioned easement for °"^NO•?a r fndlVidUil drainage and utility purposes. ,t oIs) Part ahrp Aro deli 9 SHIIUM A. HAAPAIA - CITY L1,EEW of Real Esta, Certificate ot, (if more space is needed,continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. by 1 "fsx:;tamp Ilero `�.. i STATE DEED TA: STATE OF MINNESOTA Date: 9S. COUNTY OF Anoka } � FOR V A LU , byThe foregoing instrument wa acknowledged before me this da of 1$ I ABLL C G r hereby conv Grantor(s) e NOTARIAL STAMP Oa SiwL(Oa OTNiL lrTLi Oa IANR) 1 a y(s)aad 9 iSIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT Ir ret prOpe _ Tax Statements for the real property described In this instrument should '`)q be sent to(Include name and address of Orantae): Aczr aJnage and utilii The s ' oUth10 feet RAi THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DfTiiaY(}tAMRANDAODaisa)t City of Fridley City of Fridley 6431 University Ave., N.E. i 6431 University Ave., N.E. � Fridley, M 55432 Fridley, M 55432 I I together with all hereditaments a, STATE OF,t tI,1,:^1Fc,rer_ Form No.28-M—OUIT CLAIM DEED Minnesota Uniform Cnover»nates bl»nks I ndmdual(s)10 Corporation •�•'+» .'"'•1• ' or Partnership ie x. Z No delinquent taxes and transfer entered;Certificate \ •;.' of Real Estate Value ( )filed ( )not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No.- 119- County o.,19 County Auditor by Deputy �I STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ None Date: ,19_ (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Richard T. Brickner, A Single Person Grantor(s), (marital status) . hereby convey(s)and quitclaim(s)to City of Fridley Grantee, a municipality under the laws of Minnesota real property in Anoka County,Minnesota,described as follows: A drainage and utility easement described as follows: That part of Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 94 lying northerly and easterly of the following described line. Commencing on the northwest corner of said Tract D; thence south along the west line of said Tract D a distance of 35 feet to the actual point of beginning. Thence, deflect to the left in a northeasterly direction 135 degrees, 00 minutes to a point on a line 10 feet south of, and parallel with, the -"'��t north line of said Tract D; thence east along said parallel line to a point on a line 10 feet west of, and parallel with, the easterly line of said Tract D; thence ^aniNo.?B, southerly along last said parallel line to the south line of said Tract D and there 4 erfnei�ip terminating. The City of Fridley hereby accepts oto de1in9uc the above-mentioned easement for Real Esta, drainage and utility purposes. Cett)f)cate of (if more space is needed,continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto.SHIRI,EY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK by STA TE DEED T.4. STATE.OF MINNESOTA l Date; )} COUNTY OF Anoka ss. EOR The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 119 V ALUABLE Ct, by Grantor(s). hereby cony NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL(OR OTHER TITLR OR&ANK) } a y(s)and t, i SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT nem lizQ ProPe Tax Statements for the real proNm rtY described in this instrument should rtY in be Sent to(Include name and addrea of Grantee): A drayage `fid utili, The soumlpfeet At ` TH151NSTRUENT WAS DRAFTED BY(NAME ANDADDaiapt City of Fridley 6431 UniversityAve., N.E. City of Fridley Fridley, rN 55432 i 6431 University Ave., N.E. Fridley, IM1 55432 I I I together with a!)hereditarnen is at, STATE OE IWNNEsn", RONALD F. MEYER LAND SURVEYOR LAND 6U/w`YINO 8Uvo1V1slON Damon T1KL9►N0N6 771.4066 i' see jgGels By. 6T. PAUL. MINN. 55101 I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. /G� _-,r Reg. No. 9051 Date:—August 21. 1986 7f 97 -DEN/V/S yip B Scale: 111 = 60' 16 2 %• l N, f I � I r. r� �1 /6 2 NE Rz�xyTnqzD Z ,41vo i Owner and developer: Richard Brickner _ -- �1/ �• 1233 12th Ave. N.W. New Brighton, MN 55112 -� Description: Part of Outlot A. DENNIS ADDITION and part of Lots 6 and 14. Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 10. Number of Lots: 3 Total acreage: 0.93 acres Lot sizes: A = 9000 sq. ft. B = 10440 sq. ft. C = 21220 sq. ft. Acreage and square footages are more or less figures. Volume No. 182 Certificate of Title ,TRICT COURT FILE No. NO. 57467 nsfer from No. 21905 Originally registered the 27th day of March 1923 Volume 2 page 1 Ar Ite of Minnesota, REGISTRATION unty of Anoka Sts is to certify that P. Herbert Johnson who resides at 1381 Mississippi Street N. E., in the City of Fridley, County of Anoka at State of Minnesota, is tv the owner of an estate, to wit:in fee simple and in the following described land, situated in the Count o Anoka and State o Minnesota to wit: County f , Lot One (1), Block One (1), and Outlot One (1), Gena-Rae Addition; according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to the Utility and Drainage Easements as shown on Plat Gena-Rae Addition filed as Document #36798 on the 25th day of September, 1961. ',ject to the encumbrances, liens and interest noted by the memorial underwritten or endorsed hereon;and subject to the fulluu inn right., I; umbrances subsisting,as provided in Section 508.25,Minnesota Statutes namely: Liens,claims or rights arising or existing under the laws or the constitution of the United Stales,which this stale cannot require to appear of record. The lien ofany real properly tax or special assessment for which the land has not been sold since Sept. 25th, 1961. Any lease for a period not exceeding three years when there is actual occupation of the premises thereunder. All rights in public highways upon the land. The right of appeal,or right to appear and contest the application as is allowed by this chapter. The rights of any person in possession under deed or contract for deed from the owner of the certificate of title. Any outstanding mechanics lien rights which may exist under Section 514.01 to 514.17. t the said P. Herbert Johnson is 84 years of age, is single and is under no legal disability. (aAR OF In Witness Whereof,I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of my office ithis 12th day of March 1986 7 20 COUNT Registrar of Titles,In and for the County of Anoka and State of Minnesota Memorial By DEFT. of Estates, Easements or Charges on the Land described in the Certificate of Title hereto attached. UMENT4INSTRUMENT DA TE OF REGISTRATION DATE OF INSTRUMENT AMOUNT RUNNING IN FAVOR OF SIGNATURE OF ,MBER REGISTRAR MONTH DAY YEAR HOUR MONTH DAY YEAR CityofFridley to condemn fee title of the above described property of ns Oct 31 198 1:35 PM Oct 29 1984 - - - Outlot One & Outlot Two of Gena Rae Addit'lon (Al— filed on C 42 Ted J Omdal l "y Section in I N1 tle c i� ed as se (24), descr i _y F,&r `t -- . ,Cj r,,7 the sout*,-Alest Iine a :Ows: at a Point WhI.Zh s 742.Z� TC;C,,, i, I 1061 west line of said quarter section anc. 467-5 feet east on a corner on the -1 with the South line of said quarter sect1pn; thence east which is parallel - said quarter section a distance the south line o est line on a line parallel with 'h I with the w angles and paralle of 412.5 feet; thence south at rightirst course of said quarter section 107.25 feet; thence west parallel with f thence north a distance of 107.25 feet to place a distance of 412.5 feet; d two and one-half rods more or less of beginning, containing one acre an described as part of Lot according to the Government survey thereof, also WN AS Lot Fourteen Six (6), Auditor's Subdivision No. Ten (10) AND NOW KNO Two hundred (14) Revised Auditor's Subdivision Number 10, EXCEPT the East plat thereof on front and rear, according to the forty-nine C249) feet, f f the Registrar of Ti,tles in and for file and of record in the office o Anoka County, Minnesota. also t That part of Lot Six (6), Revised Auditor's Subdivision Number 10, described Commencing at a point 467.5 feet East of the Southwest corner as follows: ith the West boundary line of of Said Lot Six (6); thence North parallel w th the South boundary said Lot Six (6)-140.25 feet; thence East parallel wi cast line line of sa-',d Lot Six (6) 412.5 feet, more or less, to a p6int in the _ 1 of said Lot Six (6); thence South along the East boundary line of said t to the Southeast corner of said Lot Six (6); thence 'Lot Six (611 1,410.25 i:ee th of beginning, EXCEPT the line to the point file and of West along said South boundary i ording to the plat thereof on , Min- East 249 feet front and rear, acc for Anoka County Office of the Registrar of Titles in and record in the nesota. the East 249 Iot A, Dennis Addition,All of out ion, excepting therefrom he Wesi 417.5 feet, accordinto the feet and except ir.g therefromnthe office of the Reg gistrar ofmap or 3 plat thereof on file and ,of record tit'jes in and for Anoka county, Minnesota. -_ ��_ents for the real property described in this instrument should be sent to(include name and address of Gra tee): A -Y Tax Ste er, NNA couil My Contsim Expires May 7.1987 Richard T. Brickner 1358 66th Avenue N.E. 'HIS INSTTLUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY(NAME AND ADDRESS): Fridley, MN 55432 B. William Ekstrum 1 6401 University Avenue Fridley, Mti 55432 (Official Publication) PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Plan- ning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 Uni- versity Avenue Northeast on Wednes- day, June 4. 1966 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M.for the purpose of: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat,P.S.N96-02,Creekridge Plat 2 byy Richard Brickner, betn a r.plat of that part of the Vest one-half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, T-30. R-24. de- scribed as follows: Commencing at a point which is 742.5 feet North of the Southwest corner on the West line of said quarter section and 467.5 feet East on a dine which is parallel with the South tine of said quarter section: thence East on a line parallel with the South line of said quarter section a distance of 412.6 feet: thence South at right angles and parallel with the west line of said quarter section ►07.25 feet: thence West parallel with first course a distance of 412.5 feet: thence North a distance of 10725 feet to place of beginning. con- taining one acre and two and one half rods more or less according to the Government survey there- of,also described as part of Lot 6. Auditor's Subdivision No.to and now known as Lot 14. Revised Auditor's Subdivision No.10.ex- cept the East 249 feet,front and rear,according to the plat there- of on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County. Minne- sota.and also that part of Lot 6. Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. to. described as follows: Commencing at a point 467.5 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6:thence North parallel with theWest boundary line of said Loth 140.25 feet:thence East parallel with the South boundary line of said Lot 6 412.5 feet.more or less,to a point in the East tine of said Lot 6:thence South along the East boundary line of said Lot 6 140.25 feet to the Southeast cor ner of said Lot 6: thence West along said South boundary line to thepoint of beginning.EXCEPT the East 249 feel.front and rear. according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota. and also all of Outlot A.Dennis Addi- tion, excepting therefrom the East 249 feet and excepting there- from the West 417.5 feet,accord- ing to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota. and also all of Lot 1.Block 1.Hidden Woods, and also all of Outlot I. Bleck 1.Gena-Rae Addition.all . IyinQ in the North Half of Section 13. T-30. R-24, City of Fridley. County of Anoka.State of Minne- sota. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opTdportunity at the above stated timeailPATRICIAplace. GABEL Chairwoman Planning Commission (Mal'19&26.1996)-FRID 12 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING ODMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, June 4, 1986 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat, P.S. #86-02, Creekridge Plat 2 by Richard Brickner, Thanas Blomberg and the City of Fridley, being a replat of that part of the West one-half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, T-30, R-24, described as follows: Commencing at a point which is 742.5 feet North of the Southwest corner on the West line of said quarter section and 467.5 feet East on a line which is parallel with the South line of said quarter section; thence East on a line parallel with the South line of said quarter section a distance of 412.5 feet; thence South at right angles and parallel with the west line of said quarter section 107.25 feet; thence West parallel with first course a distance of 412.5 feet; thence North a distance of 107.25 feet to place of beginning, containing one acre and two and one-half rods more or less according to the Goverment survey thereof, also described as part of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 and now known as Lot 14, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, except the East 249 feet, front and rear, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, and also that part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor' s Subdivision No. 10, described as follows: Commencing at a point 467.5 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North parallel with the West boundary line of said Lot 6 140.25 feet; thence East parallel with the South boundary line of said Lot 6 412.5 feet, more or less, to a point in the East line of said Lot 6; thence South along the East boundary line of said Lot 6 140.25 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 6; thence West along said South boundary line to the point of beginning, EXCEPT the East 249 feet, front and rear, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, and also all of Outlot A, Dennis Addition, excepting therefrom the East 249 feet and excepting therefran the West 417.5 feet, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, and also all of Lot 1, Block 1, Hidden Woods, and also all of Outlot 1, Block 1, Gena-Rae Addition, all lying in the North Half of Section 13, X30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. Any and all person desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. PATRICIA GABEL CHAIRWOMAN WOMAN PLANNING ODMMISSION Publish: May 19, 1986 May 26, 1986 • P1 an�ng 5/16/86 13 J Council 6/20/86 MAILING LIST P.S, #8642 Richard Brickner Richard Brickner Douglas Nyberg Gary Braam 1233 - 12th Avenue N.W. 1376 - 66th Avenue N.E. 1436 - 66th Avenue N.E. New Brighton, MN 55112 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Byron Bacon Joseph Menth Herbert Egeness 6525 Central Avenue N.E. 1388 - 66th Avenue N.E. 1465 - 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Brickner Curtis Barsness Gerald Jensen frill 1358 - 66th Avenue N.E. 6581 Central Avenue N.E, 1475 - 66th Avenue N.E. `"' Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Nelson Grace Larson Kurt Creager 1439 Mississippi Street N,E, 1340 - 66th Avenue N,E. 1360 Creek Park Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Myron Ostlund Roger Riebel Robert Overman 1400 - 66th Avenue N.E. 1475 Creek Park Lane N.E. 1340 Creek Park Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas Blomberg Robert Traczyk Robert Thompson 1661 Camelot Lane N.E, 1455 Creek Park Lane N.E, 1320 Creek Park Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Herbert Bacon Brickner Builders Tor Gloppen 6523 Central Avenue N.E. 1425 Rice Creek Road N.E. 1421 - 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Camilles Parks Brickner Builders Robert Gambrel 1341 Mississippi Street N,E, 1405 Creek Park Lane N.E. 1341 Creek Park Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Howard Young Robert Swanson Andrew Kwong 1361 Mississippi Street N,E, 1400 Creek Park Lane N.E. 1321 Creek Park Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Gary Phillips Steven Gaynor Thomas Blomberg 6519 Central Avenue N,E.. 1414 Creek Park Lane N.E. 1311 Creek Park Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Chock Huie Brickner Builders Harry Erkenhbrack 1328 - 66th Avenue N.E. 1410 - 66th Avenue N.E. 6537 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Burdick Russell Japs Herbert Johnson 1316 - 66th Avenue N,E, 1422 - 66th Avenue N.E. 1381 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 • i 14 MAILING LIST - PAGE 2 P.S. #86-02 Richard Brickner Richard Podvin Frank Ratasky 1391 Mississippi Street N.E. 1363 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Edward Gottwaldt Jane Hoppe 1415 Mississippi Street N.E. 1351 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Edward Cebula Walter Peterson 1427 Mississippi Street N.E. 1339 - 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Country House Inc, Grace Larson 6501 Central Avenue N.E. 1340 - 66th Avenue N.E, Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 James Deline 1327 - 66th Avenue N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 David Mech 1315 - 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 George Peek 6633 Central Avenue N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Larue Riewe 6617 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ronald M. Ennis 6601 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Curtis Loschy 1399 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Roland Zacharias 1387 - 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Bridgeman 1375 - 66th Avenue N.E, Fridley, MN 55432 Aw I I CREATING A HUMANE ENVIRONMENT 193 tonal free- 1 TABLE 10-1. Recommended space standards by classification and popu- mmon aim, lation ratio. (Source:Adapted from Robert D. Buechner, ed., NATIONAL Bracy"; this PARK RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE STANDARDS, Washington, D.C.: :hoice, not National Recreation and Park Association, n.d. [issued 1970], p. 12.) .t, there is bpular pur- Acres per be said of 1,000 ation plan- Classification people Size range Population served Service area :-sont try spezed Playlots * 2,500 sq. ft. 500- 2,500 Subneighborhood t are some- per acre facilitates Vest pocket parks * 2,500 sq. ft. 500- 2,500 Subneighborhood per acre k°r uses but Neighborhood parks 2.5 Min. 5 acres- 2,000-10,000 1/4-1/2 mile up to 20 acres that some District (community) tion plan- parks 2.5 20-100 acres 10,000-50,000 1/2-3 miles (riving for I Large urban parks 5.0 100-x- acres One per 50,000 Within 1/2 hr. recreation driving time highways, Regional parks 20.0 250-{- acres Serves entire popu- Within 1 hr. areas. The lation in smaller driving time sous as the communities; should be distributed t con- throughout larger ianc al re- ttal conse- metro areas or misuse * Not applicable. uses, most subjective nonquan- ratios divided into the component units in a other purpose, so it must be functionally de- battle be- comprehensive park and outdoor recreation signed. pers" and system. There is no substitute for the talent and ick up' re- expertise of skilled planners, architects, engi- the con- Functionality neers, and craftsmen. They provide a service .. Demand different from the service of a park and recre- aoth fires. A facility is not an end in itself. There is a ation agency. But even the best of them cannot Zizing the reason for its existence, and the reason is that assure that the facilities will function as they "r 'i x 1 City Park. 100 to 200 acres. Usually includes: facilities for boating,swimming,picnicking, hiking, field sports, day camp, zoo, arboretum, nature museum. County Park. 200 acres or more. Usually includes: preschool play area (3 acres), elementary play area (4 acres), sport fields (15 acres), paved courts �^Q (3 acres), multiple-use court (1 acre), family picnic area (30 7 �Ycn&xcs acres),open area for special events (10 acres), amphitheater (7 acres), natural area (40 acres), cars (15 acres), day and weekend camping area t(25 ng for 0clubhouse and recreation center (5 acres), maintenance yard (5 acres), • The following excerpts illustrate the kinds of empirical landscaped area (15 acres), service roads (20 acres). data and tools available to recreation area designers. Natural Environment Area. 5-acre minimum—no Iimit cited. Usually includes: picnic area (8 acres), tent camping area You are asked to approach them.with the precautions (6 acres), trailer camping area (6 acres), hiking trails, boat expressed in Chapters 2 and 4 in mind. More extensive tables related to these and other design matters are access, boat marina, sight-seeing facilities, parking areas. Nine-hole Golf Course. 75 acres(double for eighteen holes). found in many of the books listed in the bibliography. Usually includes: fairways, roughs, greens, and tees (43 acres), clubhouse (.25 acre), parking area and service roads (1.75 acres), natural area (20 acres), landscaped area (10 i acres). APPENDIX 1 Selected Park and Activity Size and Facility Standards Natural Water Body Swimming. Totlot. 2,400 to 5,000 square feet. For every 25 linear feet of shoreline: 5,000 square feet for Usually includes: chair swings, sandbox, regular swings, sunbathing,2,500 square feet for buffer and picnicking, 1,000 slide, climbing apparatus, wading or spray pool, playhouse, square feet of water area for swimming. turf area, paved area for wheeled toys, benches. Nature Trail. 1 to 2 miles long each. Neighborhood Playground. 2Y2 to 10 acres. Fifty people per mile of trail per day. Usually includes:play apparatus,turf area,paved court, play- Rural Hiking Trail. field, story-telling ring, shelter, wading or spray pool, table Forty people per mile of trail per day. game area, picnic center. Neighborhood Park. 2 to 5 acres. Urban Hiking Trail. • Usually includes: open lawn, trees, shrubbery, walks, Ninety people per mile of trail per day. benches, focal point such as ornamental pool or fountains, Family Picnic Area within Communities. apparatus, table game area. Sixteen units per acre,each unit consisting of table and cook- sandbox, play app ing facilities. One off-street car space per unit. Community Pinclud. : e r acres. Family Picnic Area outside of Communities. Ninety to one hundred Usually includes: separate sport fields for men and women, courts for tennis, boccie, horseshoes, shuffleboard,etc.,lawn twenty units per area. areas for croquet,archery,etc.,outdoor swimming pool,band Ten to fifteen units per acre,each unit consisting of one table- shell,family picnic area,children's playground,running track, bench combination with one charcoal-burning stove per two day camp center, parking area. tables; one comfort station per each thirty units serving a 1147 Appendixes 56068 p. -Wert & Gena Johnson 24 Front Foo ' ' Area NA- 13 30 24 13 0041 56068 0015 IN Plat No. Parcel No.T \\' ' ASSESS. TOTAL ANNUAL ANNUAL FACTOR FIRST INTERVAL YEAR YEAF NUMBER PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST YEAR REG. S. & FUND 146.10 9.74 7.31 .49 '60 17.05 1t 14.60 It 12.15 1: LA1„EIMLS.,788.82 89.44 107.33 5.37 '61 26.83 223.60 19 169.92 16 143.07 13' 116.22 11( ,974 <967.20 96.72 72.54 7.25MARV(15 57.48 226.74 162 21/2 % INTEREST 133.01 125 7.5a3444 7i`.A3 w 184 179;14 1,600:13 x,399 70#j4 - 7144 _ .. L11247 1,041 /q�- 1,663.72 94.19 178.95 8.95 IM I1A x+4:73 317:67 264 . .. , . 228.39 219 q41 - 1E3.•64 1744 ` 1 -78. !! J 129 1,64447 166A7 1 633 15A3 ICT 184 3947 36447 399:: '__ 245-85 2'50.1 I h CITY OF FRIDLEY �� /L ASSESSMENT LEDGER __ _ _ � � �'y� � � �� ,e►� _ a. ��s �� GV sJ- tr�.t �� 7 .► � ��'� � �� X � o � �� ___.� � v �, Geo a,- 3�i5. 98 x 31 /C50 A/00 = /O, Oco 'YO.0 I x lb5 = 'i2Oi . 5 JA . ZC)1 .0 5 X22 , '753. lam, 0I . 0 Pa /0 8'155 2 . 75 .� . 75 s , 9T , � a x 9 121 . gs � I Cv D too Ai , O ,24,,�� n --e� 1OZ-5 76, leg qa o� i i -0-PSV3, t S-6 TV, �' l Cl�T �GJY COC�u b Gtr h Molm 7�is I617 err 3,1 5&YI/`t° Dui I-of a oa / iLl�-n�li Ej 2 4,55 SSS mac( '7 �i 5! eh1-5 PA(6 7 aN ur✓�e /(oa67 as �grr�� t I 1-2-7:53 2J ��_ ►� -13-D i6� C �� t3- F-b -OICZ. CC-� Baa►a �� S SRu r- '�' G 3� T4 �) r ?11-� tl� °1 1 c�v'e5 4Ak�r �� f -� G"` J�„,„,, �� :�,,. r ��5 �v Soo - Yao� ifw�iG� — w .- �.,-� _ ,,,�,� � -° ZTS La dh�— PO* -�I -ted JuJti, � - b�w1 - SQUARE 1983 EST. 1983 PIN # OWNER ADDRESS FOOTAGE MARKET VALUE TAX 1 . 13 30 24 13 0002 Richard Johnson 6536 Arthur St. 10,800 $ 59,200 $ 766.29 2 0003 Janet Schmidt 1489 Mississippi 10,800 56,100 463.97 3. 0006 Cletus Nei 1465 Mississippi 28,035 64,900 825.19 4 0007 Robert Nelson 1439 Mississippi 26,433 51 ,500 528.09 5. 13 30 24 13 0009 Curtis Barsness 6581 Central 35,952 42,100 326.83 6. 13 30 24 13 0010 Grace Larson 1340 66th Avenue 17,928 62,600 639.98 7. 0011 Chock Soo Huie 1328 66th Avenue 17,928 55,900 461 .56 •8. 0012 Robert Burdick 1316 66th Avenue 17,928 57,900 505.96 9. 0013 Bacon ----- ----- ----- ----- 10. 0014 & 0025 Brickner ----- ----- ----- ----- 11 . If 110015 Donald Hengel 1376 66th Avenue 20,667 55,400 455.57 12. " 11 0016 Joseph Menth 1388 66th Avenue 20,667 55,200 453.16 13. If " " " 0017 Myron Ostlund 1400 66th Avenue 20,667 66,000 736.92 14. If " If " 0018 Bacon ----- ----- ----- ----- 15. " " " " 0020 Camilles Parks 1341 Mississippi 10,908 61 ,200 600.06 16. of " If " 0021 Newton Larson 1361 Mississippi 9,090 57,600 497.44 17. If " " " 0022 Ernest Gertzen 6519 Central 25,200 72,200 3,012.70 18. " " " " 0024 Bacon ----- ----- ----- ----- 119. If If " " 0026 Leon Paquette 1479 Mississippi 29,904 66,000 736.92 20. " " " " 0028 State of Minnesota ----- 2,475 Exempt Exempt 21 11 If If 0041 Herbert Joh nson__ __] $l Mi tsi ssi pRi Z2>45Q_____. _ __ 5 ,400.___ 667.21 22. " 0042 Richard Podvin 1391 Mississippi 11 ,400 56,900 562.91 23 " 0043 Edward Gottwald 1415 Mississippi 67,410 52,400 423.76 0 24. 0044 Edward Cebula 1427 Mississippi 11 ,400 59,900 648.44 25. If " If If 0045 Country House, Inc. 6501 Central 23,735 142,000 6,022.58 26. 0047 1 Bacon ----- ----- ----- ----- • J Rice Creek watershed ds leb "1585 LEXINGTON AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 0177 ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 55112 TELEPHONE (612)483-0634 ' October 10, 1984 Board of Managers Regular Meetings: 2nd and 4th Wednesdays at Arden Hills City Hall Mr. Thomas Brickner BONNIE TORPE, Admin. Asst. 6170 Heather Place Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Re: Permit Application No. 84-120: Thomas Brickner Location: 6600 Arthur Street, Fridley Purpose: Approval of a Land Development Plan for a single family residential development referred to as Creek Ridge, 29 lots, 9.3+ acres . Dear Mr. Brickner : Receipt is acknowledged of the following exhibits : 1 . Permit application dated September 8, 1984. 2 Runoff calculations prepared by Ron Meyer undated and received October 5, 1984. 3. Grading Plan including erosion control measures prepared by Ron Meyer undated and received October 5, 1984. 4. Plat for Creek Ridge (Sheet 2 of 2) undated and received from Ron Meyer on September 14, 1984, 5. Calculations for Gena-Rae Park stormwater detention pond undated and received from the City of Fridley on October 5, 1984. 6. Aerial photo with sketch of proposed stormwater improvements for the Gena-Rae Park undated and received from the City of Fridley on October 5, 1984. We have reviewed these exhibits and have the following comments concerning your permit application . BOARD OF MANAGERS A J.CARDINAL.SR DIANE N.HARSTAD C.T KING L H.SCOTT,SR E A.PETRANGELO ANOKA COUNTY RAMSEY COUN1 Y VVAS"!NC;ION CU WAMSE. :;.`,JNT� ANOKA COUNTY E A HICKOK&ASSOCIAIES Consuginy Enguieei>479.422.1•FRANK J MURRAY -,!;omev.:..-554y Mr. Thomas Brickner Page Two October 10, 1984 1. In order to meet District requirements, rate control and treatment must be provided for runoff from subwatersheds A-1 and A-2 as identified on the above referenced Grading Plan. Rate control must be provided for both the 100-year and 1-year storms while treatment must be provided for 1-year storm runoff. 2. A portion of the proposed development is shown to drain to an existing low area adjacent to the south end of your property. Even though it appears that no increase in runoff to this low area will occur as a result of your development, it is a requirement of the Rice Creek Watershed District that all storage basins have outlets. Design information should be submitted which will show an outlet is provided for this low area. If it is not feasible to provide an outlet to this low area, detailed information should be submitted in support of this position . 3. Exhibits No. 5 and 6 listed above were received from the City of Fridley and in part concern runoff which will drain from subwatersheds C-1 and C-2 of your development as identified in the above referenced Grading Plan. The City's Stormwater Management Plan will be reviewed by .the Board of Managers during their October 24, 1984 meeting. Approval of this plan is required before a permit can be approved for your development. 4. The proposed erosion control measures for your development should be revised to include the installation of erosion control barriers along the top of the bank of Rice Creek on the north end of your property. Also, proposed restoration measures should be revised to include the mulching and disk anchoring of mulch for all seeded areas. 5. Ponding and flowage easements will be required over all ponding areas on your property. If you have any questions , please feel free to contact us at 473-4224. Very truly yours, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District VA,.t.�,. e ' jJl`r'' Steven G. Miller, Engineer cc: Board District Office F, urray ark Birch, City of Fridley Ron Meyer DIRECTORATE 000� ® of .-� o PUBLIC WORKS - - CI D F MEMORANDUM �— FW ATE 10/11/84 PW 190-84 q0M p,p.ry. John Flora, Director, Pub.Works TO ACTION INFO. 1d.JECT Nasim Qureshi , City Manager DRAINAGE PLAN BRICKNER, GENA RAE, BLOMBERG During the negotiations for residential development of the Rice Creek School property by Tom Brickner, Staff presented a number of city park options for the area. Incorporated within these park properties were the storm water considerations and the existing retention depressions located on the adjoining properties . The plats and improvements finally approved by the City Council on May 7 maximized the residential lots (29 for Brickner, 9 for Blomberg and 5 future splits) and the conversion of the Gena Rae Plat into a park facility. Upon final approval we commenced preparation of plans for the streets, sewer and water. The overall storm water drainage plan was put on the back burner because of the demand for construction and development of these lots. The development properties consists of six separate drainage areas. The area associated with the Gena Rae Park consists of the Gena Rae Plat and a portion of four of Brickner's lots The storm water plan development and inherent in the storm water assessments for this development satisfies the Rice Creek Water Shed District criteria for water quality and control of run off through a pipe and weir system. Because the pipe is sized to reduce flow velocities, an area is required to hold the water that is backed up. Within the park area and the existing depression, we have restructured the shape to maximize land use without infringing on the principal use of baseball , tennis , basketball and tot lot. Normally no water will be retained in this depression, but during excessive long term rains, in wet soil conditions, water could be backed up for a period up to 3. feet. Brickner's plat consists of three other drainage areas. One goes to Rice Creek, one other to 66th Street and the third into the existing depression Dehioc. his plat. Blomberg has two drainage areas; one onto Old Central and the other through a retention pond into Mississippi Street. None of the work has been completed. Final plans have been submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District and approval is expected at their October 24 meeting. In the meantime, we have attempted to consolidate the construction in conjunction with the street and sewer system so that they would work regardless of any changes that Rice Creek Watershed District should require. Once the plan has formally been approved and construction completed, the concerns about retention, and property lines should be eliminated. JGF:jmo r January 6, 1986 City of Fridley 6431 university Ave. j.L. Fridley, Mn. 55432 City ,tanager: 'Mr. .Jureshi Re: Creek Park lane (excess land). As Owner of the land adjacent to the city property I an. requesting that the city consider allowing said land to become part of the adjoining property belonging to Mr. Bloomberg and myself. The following advantages to the City of Fridley would be: a. Additional tax revenue from (4) new homes. b. $4,500.00 in park fees. c. Removal of existing rented older home. d. Elimination of special assessment costs with interest accruing against the city property. e. Eliminate maintenance cost of unbuildable substandard lot. f. Said property would than comform to adjacent new developments. It was my understanding that the land was a trade-off for my granting the park walkway easement to run along the east side of my property. Your consideration regarding this matter will be appreciated. Sincerely, Richard Brickner r M E M 0 A N D U M TO: Jim Robinson FROM: David P. Newman RE: Disposition of Property DATE: March 25, 1986 You inquired about the disposal of certain excess pro- perty contained in the Gena-Rae Addition. It is my understanding that the excess property is unbuildable due to its substandard size and that the City wishes to convey it to the ajoining property owners . I would recommend that you convey this property by the following procedure: 1 . The City Council must make the decision to sell this property by Ordinance. The City Charter, Section 12 . 06 . Further, the City Council must determine by a two-thirds vote that the property to be disposed of has no relationship to the comprehen- sive plan, M.S.A. Section 462 . 356 , Subd. 2 . If the Council fails to make this additional determination then it will be necessary for the Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing on the question of disposal . 2 . Upon passage of this Ordinance the City should enter into a purchase agreement with the ajoining owners for the disposal of this property. I would suggest that the purchase agreement be reviewed by our office. The reason being that the standard con- ditions contained in a routine purchase agreement in many cases would not have any application to this particular transaction. 3 . It is my understanding that the ajoining property owners wish to plat the subject property. The plat should be commenced at the property owners expense with the City joining in on the platting of this property. 4 . After the plat has been filed the City can then Quit Claim Deed its interest in the disposed property to the desired parties . The Quit Claim Deed will cover the entire lot. This will alleviate the need for procuring a legal description for the property being conveyed. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to con- tact me. For your information I have enclosed a copy of a memo which I prepared on a similar subject two years ago. P *PLANNING DIVISANi ! CITYOF MEMORANDUM FRJ DL.EY MEMO TO: Nasim Qureshi, City Manager MEMO FROM: James Robinson, Planning Coordinator ? . MEMO DATE: April 15, 1986 REGARDING: Disposition of Excess Property The acquisition of the Gena-Rae Addition property for park purposes and the subsequent construction of Creek Park Lane has left a small piece of property, 6,562 square feet, lying north of the park and road. This piece separates a 23, 800 square feet parcel, owned by Thomas Brickner, from direct access to the new road. In order to make his lot buildable, Mr. Brickner is requesting to purchase this property from the City. Mr. Thomas Blomberg who owns the lot directly to the west would be involved to a lesser extent, by acquiring a small piece of the City's property to better align his lot to the street. The proposed plat which would include five new lots, three off of Creek Park Lane and two off of 66th Avenue, is shown on the attached sketch. The enclosed memorandum from Mr. Newman outlines the proper procedures related to this proposal. If the Council agrees with this scenario we will schedule a first reading of the attached ordinance for the May 5, 1986 Council meeting. JLR/dn Encl. N:-86-7 3 3 07 Co X2 .72. r s 1/'✓�l�c/ � �� b�M �/7dM S ! w ------------ z VI O kn 4. c� o J ,j lz 0 ' 4 Z x = l� r 'BfJb '1[ � d ,>+- }I''r�€• � r�s a �� i�. e al�,y j... ,�x'.�'i•'1i'� ... Aw 1 t- � � ► � �.�'•" � ' ` _' ' lid 1� R to to ke 9 - 6 E r �7y��3% `tf /Q •' la \ .�r -y o `��...7. a ,►' "y. cc T. SEK Qof , a f 4 .. CRE • K°P LN. EEK RID ' Q PARK vex A LIZ owtrA IN 49777. 44, d -...A[SaC .+_...._.b' /•I1. ,fie � 3 • . f 1 I t .i EXCESS LAND PROPOSED AS' PORTION • > ~� r ! OF NEW SINGLE FAMILY PLAT M E M 0 A N D U M TO: Jim Robinson FROM: David P. Newman RE: Disposition of Property DATE: March 25 , 1986 You inquired about the disposal of certain excess pro- perty contained in the Gena-Rae Addition. It is my understanding that the excess property is unbuildable due to its substandard size and that the City wishes to convey it to the ajoining property owners . I would recommend that you convey this property by the following procedure: 1 . The City Council must make the decision to sell this property by Ordinance. The City Charter, Section 12. 06 . Further, the City Council must determine by a two-thirds vote that the property to be disposed of has no relationship to the comprehen- sive plan, M.S.A. Section 462 . 356 , Subd. 2 . If the Council fails to make this additional determination then it will be necessary for the Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing on the question of disposal. 2 . Upon passage of this Ordinance the City should enter into a purchase agreement with the ajoining owners for the disposal of this property. I would suggest that the purchase agreement be reviewed by our office. The reason being that the standard con- ditions contained in a routine purchase agreement in many cases would not have any application to this particular transaction. 3 . It is my understanding that the ajoining property owners wish to plat the subject property. The plat should be commenced at the property owners expense with the City joining in on the platting of this property. 4 . After the plat has been filed the City can then Quit Claim Deed its interest in the disposed property to the desired parties . The Quit Claim Deed will cover the entire lot. This will alleviate the need for procuring a legal description for the property being conveyed. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to con- tact me. For your information I have enclosed a copy of a memo which I prepared on a similar subject two years ago. r ORDINANCE NO. "`.•.. AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12. 06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: 1. The City of Fridley is the fee owner of the tract of land within the City of Fridley, Anoka County, State of Minnesota, described as follows: /�- r�r60y7 Oudot 1 , Blocl 1, Gena- ae Addition, PIN 2 -30-13-13-0041 � � All lying in North Half of Section 13, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. 2. It is hereby determined by the Council that the City no longer has any reason to continue to own said property and the Council is Horn w, o �all--or enter intq-&-eo tP � as C 'td �y. s The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the necessary 7 contract and deeds to effect the sale of the above described real estate. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1986. V* LIU Z.t A7 " p 4AWILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY HAAPALA - CITY CLERK First Reading: Second Reading: Publish: 3/5/19/14 a A116 From she eesk of NASIM QURESIU MEMORANDUM JR-8 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE DATE: June 16, 1986 TO ACT;Qr; I INFO SUBJECT: 6/20/81) Planning PS #86-02 and Creek Ridge Development Action-Request by Councilman Schneider Please see the attached memorandum from Councilman Schneider and collect the appropriate data and information so that we can provide the necessary information to the City Council . Thank you for your assistance. NMQ/la cc: John Flora Jim Robinson TO: NASIM M. QURESHI FROM: SAD1�V\7HA ORDUNO SUBJECT: COUNCILMAN SCFINEIDER'S REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON CREEKRIDGE PLAT DATE: JUNE 16, 19% Please find enclosed all the information which was in the Creekridge Plat 2 file. I have contacted Mark Burch and he is checking to see if we have any sketches of alternate road patterns which were discussed in 1983. I will prepare a more complete file as information is made available. CITY OF FRIDLEY M E M O R A N D U M TO: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER FROM: DENNIS SCHNEIDER, COUNCILMAN WARD 2 DATE: JUNE 16, 1986 SUBJECT: PLANNING PS8602 AND CREEK RIDGE DEVELOPMENT Nasim, I have just been reading the June 4th Planning Commission Minutes regarding the planning for Richard Brickner and Tom Blomberg. As I was reading through the comments that Mr. Podman made, I do have to admit that the number of coincidences that seem to have occurred certainly do raise some question. If an impropriety did not occur, it certainly appears that one may have. I guess I would like to get some background information from you prior to the public hearing on July 7th regarding the different options that you and I and Brickner looked at before coming to the final plat for Creek Ridge . In particular, I am curious if the convenient corner access parcel happened to be available in all of those so that lot 1620 always had access to Creek Park Lane. It seems to me that we are going to have to progress very carefully on this matter. We are already being accused of favoring Tom in all of his developments. For a while, I have been believing that that ' s not the case , perhaps there is more to it than meets the eye. What is our usual procedure with regard to triangular pieces of property such as this. I remember that on Hillwind Drive, when the developer was trying to get some excess property, we put him through about 6 to 8 months of legal maneuverings in order to finally allow him to use the parcel of property. It seems to me that the cleanest alternative would be to sell the parcel , declaring it excess property, and allow it to go on open bids. Certainly the property owner to the immediate West should have as much claim or right for use of the property as the property owner to the North. In any event, I would really like some background information prior to the public hearing. At this point, I could not support the replat until we can answer some of the questions that Mr . Podman has raised. Thanks for any information you can provide. DIRECTORATE OC F �0 0 b'1r � CS — PUBLIC WORKS CIlYOf f R1 DLEY MEMORANDUM �- TO: Nasim Qureshi, City Manager PW86-207 FROM: John G. Flora;fPublic Works Director DATE: July 21, 1986 SUBJECT: Creekridge Park, Plat 2 The Planning Commission suggested the City Council convey the triangular outlot property of Gena Rae Addition to Mr. Richard Brickner and Mr. Tom Blomberg for develognent of the Creekridge Plat 2. We have determined this triangular outlot to consist of 6,918 square feet. The Planning Cmrdssion received testimony from a Mr. Povin that the purchase price of the Gena Rae Plat was $.765 cents per square foot. Based upon this information, the triangular outlot property has a value of $5,292.27. Request the Council identify a value for this triangular outlot if they decide to sell it for this development. JGF/ts cc: Jock Robertson CITY OF FRIDLEY 8C M E M O R A N D U M TO: JOHN FLORA, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: LEON MADSEN, ASSESSOR SUBJECT: ESTIMATED ACQUISITION COST OF RICHARD BRICKNER PROPERTY LOCATED AT AT 1358 - 66TH AVENUE NORTHEAST DATE: JULY 24, 1986 Parcel "A" -- 75' wide x 120' deep Parcel "B" -- 88.5' less 15' walkway = 73.5' wide x 120' deep Parcels "C" , "D" , and "K" total 128' x 163.5' less 15' walkway, (or) 19,000 sq. ft. net area Parcels "A" and "B" are situated at approximately 1358 - 66th Avenue Northeast. There is paved street and curbing. Currently, only one lot is served with water and sewer. An additional service would cost $2,100.00. Recent sales of similarly situated lots are, as follows : 1 . Lot 7, Blk. 3, Creekridge -- 78' x 159' -- sold 2/85 for $24,454.00 including specials. 2. Lot 9, Blk. 3, Creekridge -- 75' x 120' -- sold 11/85 for $18,636.00 plus specials. * 3. Lot 10, Blk. 2, Creekridge -- 75' x 127' -- sold 11/85 for $21 ,000.00 plus specials. * 4. Lot 14, Blk. 1 , Blomberg Estates -- 75' x 137' -- sold 7/85 for $26,500.00. * Specials were about $5,590.00 per lot. Sales Nos. 1 , 2, and 3 are located in the same general neighborhood as the sub- ject. All sales are with all streets and utilities in and paid for. The average selling price is $25,000.00. This would indicate a value for Parcel "A" of $25,000.00 less $2,100.00 for water and sewer, or a net value of $22,900.00. Parcel "B" is indicated to be $25,000.00. Parcels "C", "D" , and "K" are legally landlocked. Value of this parcel is only as expansion, either for Parcels "A" and "B" or lateral expansion of the adjoin- ing properties . The only sales of landlocked land for expansion that we are aware of are sales by the County Auditor of some tax forfeit land sold to owners of 5191 and 5179 Lincoln Street Northeast. These were an expansion of lot depths . The parties paid only a small fee to transfer the ownership. Two other adjoining owners even refused to accept the same opportunity to add depth at this' low cost. This would indicate a very low demand for land to expand an already buildable site. We would estimate the values of Parcels "C" , "D" , and "K" , which are currently totally one parcel , to be $.25 per square foot or $4,750.00 maximum. LM ps COMMUNITY DEVEL&MENT DEPARTMENT CIWOF FMDLLY MEMORANDUM MEMO TO: Chuck Boudreau, Recreation Director MEMD FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Developnent Director f-EAD FATE: July 25, 1986 RMARDIIC: Creekridge Park Presently Mr. Richard Brickner is attempting to plat the northwest corner of Outlot 1, Gena Rae Addition in order to create two buildable lots fronting Creek Park Lane. Jim Robinson tells me that this is part of a parcel taken by the City for park purposes. At both the Planning Commission and City Council hearings people expressed concern over the use of this property (taken for public purpose) for private Bevel opnent. On July 21, 1986 the City Council requested that the City staff look at the potential of adding some or all of Mr. Brickner' s land to our corner of Outlot 1 for the purpose of expanding the present park. This park would of course be subdivided by Creek Park Lane. Jim recalls that while working on the layout of the present park, the staff thought more property would have been desirable. the obvious question now is would an expanded park divided by a local street be a safety hazard? Jack Kirk and Jim discussed the possibility of a passive use of a portion north of the road, perhaps moving the tot lot across the road and adding some benches. phis would allow for less conflict with the existing park area being mainly active in use. Jim noted that Summit Square is laid out in a similar fashion on both sides of Hughes Avenue. Chuck, if you would address the following questions in a memo it would be very helpful in our response to Council's request: 1. Would the addition of a half acre (two southerly proposed lots) be an asset to the park? 2. Would the addition of an acre (all four proposed lots) be an asset to the park? 3. Would there be a cost efficient method of developing the property as park land considering our previous expenditures in the existing park? 4. Would the bisecting of a possible expanded park ty the existing road be such a zw--gative aspect. as to preclude further study, in your opinion? 5. Do you feel. the Parks and Recreation Commission motion on July 14, 1986 to sell the leftover triangle of land to Brickner would have been different if they felt there was potential for a significant park addition? Thank you for your cooperation. JLR/dm M-86-171 cc: Jim Robinson John Flora t. 4 t fi T t p.,'. 3'`• r a .�,i >'. �"",rat ,.� �,,,,.,,� .�� fid. - Iq•'r .' a��« 9q'y{ J'. �t t� �.�,ti �� .t•Z , r v4 x Ilk rn I 4�11 i :+ P.3 is 1 u=. y�u 'I SAt x ato y ? p , if a Y �* t rrr�,✓,r. � c � w 0 t t I -:.: ;�.. ,.,..L..:'r' ala. ''. ",.,,. - � ,'�:... _ a.,' .• ,. .. %.._ ..'..4 v HERRICK & NEWMAN, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW VIRGIL C.HERRICK 6279 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. DAVID P. NEWMAN FRIDLEY,MINNESOTA 55432 JAMES E. SCNMECKPEPER M E M O 571-3850 TO: Nasim Qureshi FROM: David P. Newman, Assistant C:%.ty Attorney DATE: July 25 , 1986 RE: Gena-Rae Dear Mr. Qureshi : I am writing for the purpose of confirming for you that in fact the City of Fridley acquired title in fee simple abso- lute to the property which was the subject of the above condemnation . Because of the fact that the City has this type of title, it is free to use the property as it so desires . Additionally, the certificate in condemnation also states that the property is being acquired for the purpose of maintaining "public park, recreation area, and for other public purpose. " At the July 21 , 1986 City Council meeting , the question was raised as to whether or not the City Council had the authority to vacate a special assessment which has pre- viously been levied. It would appear that this question is addressed by Minnesota Statute Section 429 . 071 . Subdivision 1 of this section states that a City Council may make supplemental assessments to "correct omissions , errors , or mistakes in the assessment relating to the total cost of the improvement or any other particular . " In this particular case it would be my opinion that assessing property on the mistaken belief that it has public access would constitute either an error or mistake and that by way of supplemental assessment, this erroneous special assessment could be removed. Additionally, subdivision 2 of the same statute provides a process for reassessment. This subdivision most specifi- cally addresses the question of the procedure available to the City when a court has previously set aside a prior assessment. However , this subdivision also provides that the City Council may reassess a piece of property if it finds that the intitial assessment is excessive or if upon advice of the city attorney is determined that for any reason the original assessment is invalid. The particular real estate question would also seem to fall under this category in that if the street access is not provided, the amount of the imposed assessment is far greater than any benefit which the property owner would derive . You next asked the question as to what right a property owner has to place a driveway over the property. As a general rule , it is our opinion that if the City owns fee title to the property, then an adjoining property owner has Mr . Nasim Qureshi • July 25 , 1986 Page Two no right to use that property as access without the express permission of the City. In most instances, when streets are constructed, the City' s right to construct those streets is obtained through the dedication clause provided for in the plat of the property. In this type of instance, the adjoining underlying fee owners continue to retain a legal title to the property upon which these street and boulevards are constructed. In this type of situation then, when the adjoining property owner constructs his driveway across the boulevard, he is doing nothing more than constructing a driveway upon his own property. This same principle would apply if the City were to acquire by right of condemnation an easement for the construction of a street and adjoining boulevard. The Gena-Rae situation is different in that the City has not acquired an easement but rather has acquired underlying fee title to the City property. Because this property has been acquired for public purposes it is completely legal for the City to use a portion of it for the construction of a street. However , for a citizen to then construct a private driveway across the City property would constitute a trespass . Although not identical, an analogy could be made to the situation where a resident for some reason were to decide he wanted to construct a driveway across park lands . In both cases , the City owns the property and a resident does not have the right to construct a driveway on his property without the permission of the City. You have also indicated to me that in the past the City has often acquired roads through the process of eminent domain. As noted above, a critical question is whether or not the City acquired underlying fee title to these roads or whether the City merely acquired an easement for the construction of these roads . If in fact the City acquired underlying fee title to the road and the boulevard, then in theory the property owner could not cross the boulevard with his drive- way without first obtaining the permission of the City. However , an argument could be made that the reason for obtaining the title to the roadway in the first place was to provide access to the property, and that the City has impli- citly consented to adjoining property owners constructing driveways across the boulevards . I realize that this may appear to be somewhat confusing . In summary, customarily when a City constructs a road, it acquires the. right to do so either through the dedication clause contained in the plat or by obtaining a permanent easement. In both cases the adjoining property owner retains the title to the underlying property and this is Mr . Nasim Qureshi July 25, 1986 Page Three what gives him his authority to construct a driveway across the boulevard. We do not believe that the same authority exists when the City has acquired the underlying fee title for the boulevard and the road. In this instance the adjoining property owner needs to obtain an easement from the City although it could be argued that consent to this easement has been explicitly given since this access is the public purpose behind the construction of the road in the first place. Sincerely yours, David P. Newman DPN:KLS 3 - �-- 80 uj 7c rte- 13 �� 3 .S=S-413� o 4LANNING DIVISION ci riroF MEMORANDUM FRIDLEY MEND TO: Jock Robertson, Community Developnent Director MMD FROM: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator MErD DATE: July 30, 1986 REGARDING: Creekridge Park Expansion At Council's request staff has analyzed the possible acquisition of some or all of Richard Brickner's property north of Creekridge Park. PARCEL AREAS 'Ihe total area of the existing park is approximately 2.8 acres. The park is presently improved with a single lighted tennis court with an attached basketball play area, a tot lot, a free play area with backstop and a holding pond. In the winter, a lighted skating area approximately 150' x 50' is also provided. Acquisition of the southerly two proposed Brickner lots as well as all four proposed lots would yield the following park areas: (The triangular portion held by the City of Fridley is included in both options.) Parcel Areas Total Acquisition 2.9 acres R.0.W. - 1W .43 acres Triangular Portion - TP .16 acres Existing Park - EP 2.3 acres Parcel C - D .47 acres Parcel A - B .46 acres Assemblage Areas (2 Options) EP + TP + C-D = 2.93 acres EP + TP + A-&-C-D = 3.39 acres PARCEL COM Presently the Assessors 1986 estimate of market value includes: $47,700 for the northerly parcel with the previously existing house (proposed parcels A-B) and, $6,100 for the back lot (proposed parcels C-D) which is valued as additional square footage for the front lot only. Both existing parcels with the house in place were purchased by Mr. Brickner in August of 1983 for $47,000. The costs of acquiring the Brickner lots has been estimated using three methods: Jock 8A Robertson • • July 30, 1986 Page 2 1. Assessors estimate of acquisition cost assuming landlocked status for proposed Parcels C and D with buildable status for proposed Parcels A and B. (Also see attached memo) 2. Assessors estimate of acquisition cost assuming buildable status for all four proposed parcels. 3. Estimating Parcels C and D at $.76/sq. ft. (based on Gena Rae costs) with Parcels A and B estimated as buildable lots. Although actual acquisition costs would be based on a negotiated or court determined settlement, the following table provides a range of financial exposure based on assemblage options and property status, i.e. buildable vs. landlocked: POTENTIAL ODSTS FOR CREEK RIDGE PARK EXPANSION I Proposed ( Assessors I Assessors I Estimated I Parcels I Estimated I Estimated I Acquisition I I I Acquisition I Acquisition I value of C&D I I I Costs I Costs I Property Basedl I I (C & D Land- I (C & D Build- I on Gena Rae I I I Locked) I able) I Cost I I I I I I I C & D I $ 4,750 ( $52,000 I $2 I j, j�j�9• 3 I I I I I I A & B I 47,900 I 47,900 I 47,900 I ABC & D I $52,650 I $99,900 I 175-� I (A3 7 I An additional cost associated with the possible acquisition includes waiving the assessment on the existing southerly parcel (proposed parcel C-D) which are currently held in abeyance but are accruing interest. The assessments for two future lots, for sewer, water and street, come to a total of $17 ,944 plus accrued interest of $3,046 .62 (through 7/30/86) for a total of $20,990.62. I spoke with Chuck Boudreau and Jack Kirk regarding two other issues related to the potential acquisition including, the safety ramifications of having a park subdivided by a street and the usability of the additional acreage. The creation of an attractive nuisance is a major concern by staff. Safety would need to be analyzed, addressing street signage and crosswalk designation. Good visibility would also have to be maintained. An existing City park, Summit Square is presently developed on the north and south of Hughes Avenue. Dr. Boudreau knew of no pedestrian/auto accidents associated with this park layout. 8B Jock Robertson • • July 30, 1986 Page 3 In discussing usage, we concluded that the potential acquisition parcels would only be usable for passive use such as tot lot play, seating/picnicing and use for the playground program (especially if an open type shelter was provided) . Moving the tot lot across the street could be readily accomplished. However, the benefit to the active use of the existing park is questionable due to the irrplace development which places the tennis court in the middle of the park precluding expansion of the existing softball/play area to a more desireable size. Finally, Dr. Boudreau felt that the Parks and Recreation Commission would most likely be interested in analyzing the potential for any significant addition to the existing park. At their last meeting on July 14, 1986 they made a motion urging Council to sell the triangular piece of property on Creek Park Lane to Mr. Brickner. It should be noted that at that time the Commission was not apprised of the potential addition of any or all of the Brickner property. cc: Leon Madsen John Flora Chuck Boudreau Jack Kirk Attach. M-86-177 r RONALD F. MEYER SND SURVEYOR LAND SURVEYING SUBDIVISION DESIGN TELEPHONE 771-4586 985 JESSIE ST. ST. PAUL. MINN. 55101 August 21, 1986 James Robinson City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley MN, 55432 Re: Proposed Registered Land Survey Dear Mr. Robinson: Enclosed are 10 prints of a proposed Registered Land Survey as requested by Tom Brickner for your review. If you have any questions please call me at 298-5278. Respectfully, �� -Q-�c~-'x/ W/ -c_.- Ronald F. Meyer, R.L.S. *PLANNING DIVIWN 1 6 rm MEMORANDUM CITY OF HU DLEY MED TO: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director MEMD FROM: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator MEMD DATE: September 3, 1986 RBSMDING: Disposition of Gena Rae Triangular Piece/Brickner 'Plat In order to effectively evaluate the present proposal by Richard Brickner to subdivide his property north of Creekridge Park, it is necessary first to determine the disposition of the triangular piece. The most recent registered land survey calls for a large lot of 21,220 square feet, Lot C, to be set aside with an unbuildable status. This lot would have no direct street access. City Code requires each lot to have at least 25 feet of street frontage. In discussing this concern with the City attorney we came to the conclusion that the platting procedure should be delayed until such time as the Council concludes the fate of the triangular piece. Three options for the triangular piece are as follows: 1. City retains. In this case Mr. Brickner should plat two lots double deep fronting 66th Avenue N.E. 2. Make a determination of excess property and opt for public bidding to determine buyer. If Mr. Brickner was successful in acquiring the parcel he could plat accordingly with four lots as previously planned. If not successful he should plat as in #1 above or, he could plat Lot C provided it be sold to the successful bidder (owner of triangle). 3. Make a determination of excess property and negotiate a sale to 'Mr Brickner. Mr. Brickner then plats with the four lots as previously planned. In the event Council decides to sell the triangular piece it must do so by ordinance according to City Charter, Section 12.06. Further, the City Council must determine by a two-thirds vote that the property to be disposed has no relationship to the Comprehensive Plan, M.S.A. Section 462.356, Subdivision d.2. If the Council fails to make this additional determination then it will be necessary for the Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing on the question of disposal. Note, above procedure according to memo from David P. Newman dated March 25, 1986. The Comprehensive Plan consistency issue is addressed in the Plan under Parks am Open Space. Objective one, Policy 3B "The City should release excess property which does not complement the park system." 1 6 A r � Jock Robertson September 4, 1986 Page 2 In order to allow Council to move ahead with the sale of the parcel, if they so choose, staff has prepared two ordinances which would enable them to do so. Note there is differing language on the two documents regarding the method of sale; which the Council should choose fran. Should Council opt not to sell or in the event that Mr. Brickner is not successful in acquiring the triangle then it is staff's and legal counsel' s opinion that the assessments imposed against Mr. Brickner's property be vacated. If this is Council's desire staff will prepare a resolution to affect this amendment to the assessment rolls. JLR/dm M-86-218 rloorIT L DIRECTORATE o . o. o OF o:.Q.o PUBLIC WORKS CITYOF MEMORANDUM ' FRIDLEY /-J/Aoi 'W: John G. nora f Publ is Works Director PW86-275 FROM: Mark L. Burch, Asst. Public Works Director DATE: September 11, 1986 SUBJECT: Hidden Woods, Creek Ridge and Creek Park Lane Storm Sewer System We have reviewed the drainage plans for the Hidden Woods plat, Creek Ridge plat, and the Creek Ridge Park area in response to residents' complaints that storm water has been overflowing the detention basins. Our review indicates that the grading in this area was completed as designed and approved by the RAID. We have discussed the problems with 9bm Blomberg and 4bm Brickner, the developers of the plats, and feel that we can make a few refinements in the storm sewer system in this area which will improve the drainage system. Our recoamendations are as follows: 1.) Increase the height of the south berm on the Hidden Woods detention area by approximately one foot to elevation of 884.5 and adjust the oontrol weir to provide treatment for this new water level. 2.) Relay the overflow line fram the Hidden Woods detenion area north of Creek Park Lane so that the inlet invert is at elevation 885.5. This line cannot be tied into the catch basin on Creek Park Lane and will have to be tied into the spillway at the Creek Ridge Park pond at elevation 882.8. Ibis will prevent water from backflowing into the north detention area from the street if the catch basin fills with water. 3.) Increase the height of the south and west berms along the Creek Ridge Park pend to elevation 886.0 and adjust the control weir so that it overflows at elevation 885.0. Ibis will allow increased detention in the park detention facility, increased protection for properties on the south side of the park and prevent backup of water froom the park detention .pond into the north Hidden Woods retention area. Page 2 - IW86-275 Zhese improvements will increase the amount of storm water controlled•into the designated detention ponds in the Creek Park Lane area and should eliminate the problems being experienced by area residents. Residents must realize that during heavy rainstorms, water is intended to collect in these areas for short periods of time and be let into the storm sewer drainage system slowly. We will continue to monitor and maintain these drainage structures and with the help of area residents should be able to keep the system flawing. NLB/mk • From the desk of NASIM OURESHI MEMORANDUM JF-325 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE DATE: September 9, 1986 TO ACTION I UPDATE SUBJEt,'r": John Flora, PWD 9VI1/86 Brickner, Blomberg, Gena Rae Park Area - Park Storm Sewer System There have been repeated complaints from various people about draining in this area. I have requesting that you provide information concerning the following items : 1) Actual designs and layout approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. 2) Provide information that all construction has been either in conformance to the design and if not what has changed. 3) What future actions we can take to make sure that the system works well . Have all information collected and discuss with me. Thank you, NMQ/la 4 *LANNING DIVISO)N MEMORANDUM CITY OF FRIDLEY MEK) W: Jock Robertson, Go muni ty Development Director MSMJ FROM: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator I - , MEMD DATE: September 16, 1986 REGARDING: Disposition of Gena Rae Triangular Piece In analyzing the methods for possible disposition of the Gena Rae triangular piece of property, two options seem most viable: 1. Make a determination of excess property and opt for public bidding to determine buyer. 2. 'Make a determination of excess property and negotiate a sale with an interested party. In the event Council decides to sell the triangular piece it must do so by ordinance according to City Charter, Section 12.06. Further, the City Council must determine by a two-thirds vote that the property to be disposed has no relationship to the Comprehensive Plan, M.S.A. Section 462.356, Subdivision d.2. If the Council fails to make this additional determination then it will be necessary for the Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing on the question of disposal. Note, above procedure according to memo f ram David P. Newman dated March 25, 1986. Ube Comprehensive Plan consistency issue is addressed in the Plan under Parks and Open Space. Objective one, Policy 3B, "The City should release excess property which dues not complement the park system." In order to allow Council to move ahead with the sale of the parcel, if they so choose, staff -has prepared two ordinances which would enable then to do so. Note there is differing language on the two documents regarding the method of sale; which the Council should choose from. Should Council opt not to sell or in the event that Mr. Brickner is not successful in acquiring the triangle, then it is staff's and legal counsel ' s opinion that the assessments imposed against Mr. Brickner's property be vacated. If this is Council's desire staff will prepare a resolution to affect this amendment to the assessment rolls. JLR/dm M-86-229 DIRECTORATE o0 • ' • o, o OF PUBLIC WORKS CITYOF MEMORANDUM FM DLEY W: Nasim 4ureshi, City Manager IW86-279 FROM: John G. FlorafRihlic Works Director LATE: September 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Gena Rae Storm Water System Since the decision was made to redevelop the Rice Creek School into residential development, there has been considerable discussion and concern about the facility and storm water in the immediate areas of the City. It was a decision of the City Council to acquire the Gena Rae Plat parcel for park purposes to provide similar facilities, i.e. , baseball field, skating, tennis court, totlot and open play for the neighborhood due to the loss of these faclities with the Rice Creek School. It was also the Council's decision to construct the road (Creek Park Lane) to provide access to the park property for the neighborhood and the plats, Hidden Woods and Creek Ridge. Zhe street utilities and park were constructed in 1984. 7he land north of Mississippi Street between Old Central and Arthur allowed surface flow to the east and west of an approximate center line of the property. Zhe lands to the east which consisted primarily of the Rice Creek School sloped to a depression on its southern boundary. 4he lands to the west sloped to the south to a depression which is in the location of the current Creek Ridge Park detention pond. (See Enclosure 41). With the establishment of the Hidden Woods and Creek Ridge Plats and the Creek Ridge Park, the Rice Creek Watershed District approved a storm water plan which took the majority of the Rice Creek School property and drained it to the north into Rice Creek. the southerly portion of the Rice Creek School property (south half of Creek Ridge Plat) was improved by the construction of Creek Park Lane catch basin system which took the f ront yards of the new plat and conveyed the water into the Creek Ridge Park detention pond. This then allowed only the rear yards of the parcels on the south side of Creek Park Lane to continue to drain into the original depression. Ibis depression was improved by the installation of a pipe which provided an outlet from the depression into the Creek Ridge Park detention pond. In addition, the northern half of the Hidden Woods plat was programmed to be collected and piped into the Creek Ridge Park detention pond. the rear portions of the southern half of the Hidden Woods lots were onntrolled by a new detention pond which was outletted to Mississipiu Street W a Pape which was also connected to the Creek Ridge Park detention pane outlet.. This storm water plan reduced the original runoff area and directed it into the ponds fox control and conveyance. (See Enclosure #2). Page 2 - EW86-279 As a result of construction, it has been found that the outlet for the northern pond within the Hidden Woods plat which is connected to the street catch basin may occassionally sur-charge due to minimum slopes. The southern detention pond of the Hidden Woods Plat was not constructed as designed and therefore did not provide design capacity. Accordingly, it is proposed to install a new outlet pipe for the northern detention pond in the Hidden Woods Plat which will connect directly to the inlet pipe to the Creek Ridge Park detention pond. This will ensure that water will not back up and it will provide an outlet below the existing new residential basement floors. It is also recommended that the berm line along the southern three parcels of the Hidden Woods Plat be raised with the weir structure in order to provide the design capacity and also prevent water flow out of the plat to the south. these items have been discussed with Mr. Blomberg, the developer, and a formal letter is being sent requesting the improvements be initiated as soon as possible. In addition, it is also proposed to raise the detention pond walls on the west and south sides of the Creek Ridge Park detention pond to provide additional storage for storm water runoff f ran Hidden Woods and Creek Ridge plats and will not ov e r f 1 ow into the property to the south. finis work is being initiated at this time. (See Enclosure #3). In the existing condition, we have reduced the quantities of water which originally flowed into the natural depressions in this area. With the suggested improvements, we will provide a means whereby we will reduce surface water runoff to the properties to the south from the original and existing conditions. Therefore, properties along Mississippi will experience a reduced quantity of water which continues to flow over the natural drainage course. 7his entire drainage system flows under Mississippi Street to a depression and then by surface flow to the south into the Harris pond ditch. The efficiency of this system can be materially improved which will not only benefit the properties north of Mississippi but also those between Mississippi and the Harris pond ditch by the installation of a pipe f rom Mississippi within the street right-of-way to the Harris pond ditch. This improvement while is not the total solution for the stone water within this area, would satisfy those concerns of the neighborhood that we have heard this past year when we encountered these extra-ordinary rainfall events. With the noted improvements for the Hidden Woods and Creek Ridge Plats, we will in fact improve the storm water problems in this area. With the conntruc-tion, of a pipe outlet, we will not only enhance the Hidden Woods and Creek Ridge Plat systems but also the neighborhood between Arthur and Old Central, and Mississippi and the Harris Pond Ditch. If the Council desires, they should consider an improvement project for this stone water line construction. This area has not had a stone water system installed nor a atom water assessment levied. (See Enclosure #4) . JGF/ts Attachments r..:nte., `Till •r'ti� �� i��:::::;;: .....;;�::: it:�l11111111111r►•�1. � 1111111►ir! 1 ►•, +;'•Ixxl►11111111111' I�It � 11111i11ih11.11i' 111111114 4111Ni11►111't.+• 11111114111411II�i.NlllillllllN11111►11 11'nN11111't:r{1:►11111111 1+ � * 1 f 11111111 11111!1111'1►1111144 4f+!11111�`If1►1111 1f;'1`111'.:111111111..x1t1 #� l ' ,111 fllll1x11►f11�11i?`t11�1ii14111i1/ 4411!1►11111III 1!11'lot '1 1111114. ,:111.1111 `•1114 11`•1�111111''lllllsli lilllfllll! Il.flllllllfi141414 1111. _ 11111►11411 s x 11141 N 141111 X4,1'.•/4��1 l 1 i��t ili l l 1111 l ii j+l ii`��1�►ititt X141 1111l141,I,.IIli11 11111111 ►111+ 11111.14x11►flllil`1111►t'x11111111'1�1`x1 !111 111 11111111111►r;:::111141�•` II/II,I:t11111111111',11{► )Illlltlll.t. flll�t !.111121 111111.1111 111;411111•: 111!x14111111111411 i'rfi'.Illl.ill:rilr`tli� Irl NN'1111ii�'t,,i•.x11+1,11!1� ! •• �1!11f141111►N1III{,111f1r•1► .1"14111{1; 11:1r►111" !114111411111 4115111.4111.!`1►1�111111111•• X1111111.►:i iir.:x411111:�'II'1`1{1�1� i 4111114111i441.11Gtllll;t111.•Ilf:►ii 11`'.11'tr+•�11!11,111111�!11�11111411+i1�1'i1'�� Illllllllllilll,lllfllfl:tl! ..!1111 111: �1 ... 1111111: 41141111111111111:1!141111.1131!?111:.�M 1:4 ill�i111!I l it l l l 41114041 1,11111111111111111.1/N1111�.�,. r ►�►►►• 1►1►. ► 1 +1141.r,r {r.iirll{irl++.l..tl tl.1,t. ., 11 111fi111 111. ! 4•. 11111114111141111111+`111111111tI 0 II �i l x 11�l 411'1��34�11�' 1111�If 1�•f,i�!i1111';. N1I1141111111111111111 N4111N;1•'Illlx 11111' `11111� � • 11114114111141111115114,111111111,.NN`':;rr►rflllllll 1411411111i+11�. 4114 21111411141111411 141111if1111/11i1��1 l ltl l l l l l+1111�111 rx�:It11111111111111i1t 1�41�11�It�1 1411 11111,IIIH1111,1, ►....• � � 1.••+!►"1x!11,1.. II1141191,4111!xillfIIfIffllll.'AIII111•' 111,11%1I 11+ 1I 1�i►iiiiiii 1 ' 'f►1 • 1111111lItx►111lIIIf411111111..1f•41111.txlllt llt 11111 .1111 x111 xl.s�f 4r �I'4141111141141111111111 i 11111111 i 1111.11+ it l l l l 11'11111'!1,1 111411111 1111"""{i 411 1111 i 11,1,1 t" 1111,1►If111111111411111111�11t'►!! r.r.n r+►..•..•.••. fll111111111411{1141111 11111�111111l14111111111111stxf111111�!Illllllllill:lli11:4111111111!i111111i111f'1!tt �� 111111i411111111411114f4!r�11111111111.111i11111111111 Ill��tt++rtllllflll1111�111c'� � 111111111111111111111142111111' 11�1l111''' (11111111:11111111111111141�11111��1!�.tl��i 1111/111111111111111;1144111•�11l1i�4►41�1;1111111111►" 11111H�1�1111111111 111111111121111111111111111411' 11 ,1,illl;,l,llx,;1111,1,1,1,1 1,11x:...: 41141111111.,1'"111�>R�il� (llllllllllllllllillllllf4 1!%`111,..•.....+....:.,.:...,•1111111111!11111114+t1'•1�11•1'' 1111111111f111��•1t�11111111111!'::.:" 11'li`11�;i1111!11111"1�1112tllllllllillflllll�lllt1414t��•* 11111111111, t 1111411. l If 1112112111x.. 111 114111111141f4!Ilill! l1111111114111112441111t11141i►14 `Illilllllfll:+!`(111161411111141111411t11112111�1111111 1r111111111111114,1!.x1111f 11111,1.1 11111111111IIIf it xII IIIlflfllllllfl!►Illlllflllll�'x► .r;`•1111111111►lllll�•�" clt•11111141114IItI 144!1414!41 ,� 11lillllllHll!N111l1l111'i�:,:lll:'illl►r. 1111!!!1'' yll;fllll!•'.Ix 4lillfllllllls11411,11.111•Illt 111 t11•�1►11��C��. 1}•14111 � •%. 1111111111'1'11,i1i /�� `�� 'i 1�+ 11111 x 111 � � -��•�.�••—a . ��•baa� �•i ._�i �• ��I.��w�� .rte �• 'mow.�.��►�.a.r�.��..�w��.�� w�.•�w�...�.-mow w\��www ww r\i�w•�w\r�•.•�w�ww�w��w�� Ifill11 votei___ _ _ _ SSSS_ S;__ - �r�• 1-.=--_=_==�-= -1=== j 11 II ► ,,.o! �� I IE_-- E — —=SEES= —_=-- —_ -- -- —_— �► gyp► =_-_ _:__ E _ •___ = - -:= _ -_ -_ -'= = _ _ - -_ - �, �. �_ ��-�� -�::_-==- ��--_� � -� �___ �_ ___ ___`- -__ - _ - __�- SSSS_ � _--'_�__• - - - __ _- - - SSSS •`^__� - -_ - -._- __�SSSS_ _ --- -- _ _ E _�- - _ ` •__�_' - -•_�' _ - ••'a' '_ =�-_ _ 1 _ _ SEES __-•►-_ SEES __ _ _ — low ��t� q QI ,► - =- -- -- -=--- _-_=--=_: _" :' -:,SSSS-- -_ = ip: J - - - lljj��Iilllllqll Gas •' s 1 i• � � # � � IR • ,=� •111► 111NI'f,rl' ��!� •• x/111/11>1111111►11{1 .��•�� ? AMML = g tr;�.►,;,t11r11111+tt+loff ._�.� "�---.�.,1.1:1111.(11111 ►u••J��T��3� •, '—�� •�•'••'�'itii11f1111111i•�� t111111 IN•/!!',irN ��:��!:��.�.�.. � 1 !.•..;ii11flllllllr•�� .�•r f+ tll 111 111 111 11111 ��_•� � >ar �.....�.�.�IIt/1111••1111111111+1111��.��.�+� i, �•.�IIIIIU.!1.1,E 111 111 11111 ��-�:.�� •11,111111111 .4 _ "'1111H1►••1G 16; .f ve I -------------- Y to NEr"•RIL---------------- ul0 E �f -J' J •[ /�/llr•�s I Be (>•AM1[l •p•O Te SIC FLUME N O •� �vEti. t 6. S P . 1 6 J•6`� •�[ruE ` u[ - Kim MIN -1 M it-IMEW i � • A/d R.R • • • • . . �g . � a d • r�SS Ssao � � RESOLUTION 0. 73 - 1973 O Ip• �r C.Y.R 800. PER BLDG. SITE I. not Eor M •• �" - - �c as n 2 ;.�.� . it •SCE .. M••�►« [an@suu fs• •� \ *' �'f•.�� 0 TLY PENDING) Ef !» M � 5< omete = �z WOOD@" fl . Nd 4. u clap, foil � . RI•RO• `� �C• � w l[ RG V_ • UATWR PLAN 19 S h • J 9.6 ` J cow r IMOJ 1 T� • IL TIM — September 22, 1986 R. J. Gambrel 1341 Creek Park Ln _ Fridley, MN 55432 ~ Mayor Nee: Since the last council meeting , I have had the opportunity to discuss our drainage problems with the city staff (Mark Burch , and others) and found them extremely helpful in trying to understand the problem, and patient in dealing with a frustrated landowner. They have spent a great deal of time explaining the proposed drainage plan , and given me a great deal of information useful to my own assesment of the problems and solutions. The 9/17 proposal appropriately recommends lowering the outlet of ' the north Hidden Woods pond and connecting it directly to the inlet of the Creek Ridge park pond. The mentioned lowering was about 6 inches. I think that is appropriate, and it should be done. 1 ) Problem with recommendation I have a problem with another part of the recommendation , which is to raise the height of the berm of the Creek Ridge park pond (by approximately one foot. ) The result of this could be backflow from the Creek Ridge park pond into the north Hidden Woods pond. The possible back flow is unacceptable, especially since the level of the resulting water would be within inches of Our basements. Please see the attached for specific objections. 2) Problem not addressed in recommendation The proposal does not address another concern we have with drainage in the north part of Hidden Woods: the persistant flooding of two backyards during many of the recent storms. The second attachment describes details of a plan to use the Creek Ridge park triangle north of Creek Park Lane to retain some of the storm water that has been consistantly flooding my yard and my ' neighbor 's yard (Phillips) . Please refer to that attachment and its diagrams. The trianqUlar. piece of Creek._Ridge park. should be used to solve the persistant +loodi.n.q probl.ems of the north half of.....Hidden Woods. It should not be sold for development..,.. as bUildinq residences on that property would result in ingrqasLed flooding. Thank you in advance for your careful consideration of these proposals. Sincerely, KL ( 'fj RoberJ. Gambrel Height of Berm effect an north Hidden Woods pond The attached drawings indicate the cross sectional view of the � north Hidden Woods pond (our backyards) and the Creek Ridge park pond. In the first simplified view of the current condition, it can be seen , that in the case of a storm that fills the Creel.-: Ridge park pond , water will rise in the pipework connecting the two ponds to a point with the same elevation of the berm containing the Creek Ridge park pond. After raising the berm about one foot and lowering the north Hidden Woods pond outlet pipe about six inches (as recommended in the proposal ) , the situation would change significantly. Assuming that the Hidden Woods pond is not filled already, water rising in the Creek Ridge park pond would rise up the pipework and flow out the pipe into the north Hidden Woods pond. With continued filling of the Creek Ridge park pond , the north Hidden Woods .po. d would actually overfill . The suggested changes in elevation are such that the berm height ^ would be within . 12 feet of the basement level ! I believe that the back flow from the Creek Ridge pond to the north Hidden Woods pond is unacceptable, and request that the Creek Ridge park berm not be raised. The appproximate one foot difference between the current berm height and basement level and the proposed lowering of the outlet pipe by 6 inches seem to be acceptable margins of safety that should not be tampered with. Lower the outlet pipe, as proposed , to protect the basements, but do not raise the berm to put them in jeopardy again. I object to the possibility of any backflow. I strenuously object to also jeapardizing the basements with the backflow. You must solve the Creek Ridge park pond capacity problem some other way. There are probably other possibilities, but one that comes to mind is to make the Creek Ridge park pond into a retention pond by deepening it. It could even be of compound design with a normally detaining pond overflowing into a deeper retention pond in especially heavy rains. I stand ready to consult with the staff as required to discuss this in greater detail . 4/ -Vyd asp,., 1>sJ.) f� �� ys,y nM-,•. �0,+,. �.►pow INS ► � r � T VO r � I _ ! ✓ CJ VON srm VIM �IrJM� �� n S -7-7.::r�d 4-7-7-v-LQ4 glvdd 3594=v *39y,) s QN ov =10 S-7��/%�V-7 � Using Triangle piece to retain storm water Historical Drainage Patterns (see A) Storm water historically (before development) flowed through our yards, then through the triangle piece across the street to the south and into the depression at the Creek Ridge park pond. Development has consisted of Hidden Woods residences which have increased runoff and street construction which blocked the flow from north to south. If the original plan of a cul de sac had been followed , the flow could have been maintained. The city (presumably) filled the triangle piece with an estimated 20-30 truckloads of fill after the street was constructed. (Question: why was this done? It had the effect of further altering drainage. ) Expectations (see B) Based on discussions with the builder (Mr. Blomberg) , we expected the following drainage pattern: water would flow from west , across our yard, across Phillips yard , then into a pipe. No mention was made of it ponding up to a foot or two before entering the pipe. No mention was made of it nearly filling our backyards. The expectations were confirmed by early plat maps showing a pond easement on the north lots, which was subsequently removed , finally showing only a pond easement on the south lots. Recent History (see C) On 9/3/86 a 2. 25 inch storm completely flooded our backyard and the backyard of Jon Phillips. A less than 2 inch storm on 9/21/86 flooded nearly half of our yard. Several other lesser storms in the intervening time resulted in nearly continuous standing water in our yards. Proposali (see D) It is proposed to use the triangular piece, currently unused , to retain water that is now retained on our property. The drainage plan for Hidden Woods, approved by the city, did not include the triangle piece, an essential piece in the original historical drainage pattern. By building the road to connect the Blomberg and Brickner additions, the city caused a barrier to the normal flow. Note that , historically, there was never a pond to the north. The water flowed naturally to the south. The road became a dam. If the triangle piece is instead sold for development , there will be additional roofs, walks and driveways contributing to the already excessive flooding problem we have. That would mean that we would be flooded more frequently and more deeply. ` _ _ • QNT Lo C � � y CREEK Pd-K K �..�-�vE �► � I ! �is+-o�,�al ( 7rA/A2S r Dr4,n15t I cou 2'r � i I — J r ,c „ N 2 � W k�f we Wert }old wo�(d hA p p�e GOND FifSEhENT a / � D OLA T- 1-o T- 13!3 c Op ` 2 � C Se et 19 F�6 A) yari.s oif.�r D) (�(dT c.o T- c C u rt r5 2 � Fr.fased Arra rN i i r October 6, 1986 R.J. Gambrel 1341 Creek Park Ln Fridley, MN 55432 f M Mayor Nee: Our understanding of the elements of the revised drainage of the north Hidden Woods properties is as follows: a) improvements to the outflow pipe (DONE) - lowering pipe - different tie-in b) addition of a detention pond in the triangle area c) other revisions to the drainage system "downstream" - weir changes - raising berm d) other revisions to the drainage system "upstream" (to the East) - drainage easements between double lots to east - drainage easements between Brickner lots My understanding of the specifics of the plan are included in the attachment. If incorrect, I request clarification. Decision to sell the triangle Element (a) above has been completed. Element (c) has been started and we would expect it to be completed soon. Elements (b) and (d) relate somewhat to the disposition of the triangle and the development (if any) of other properties such as the Brickner property. Understanding that the council would like to make a decision soon on whether to declare the triangle as excess and sell it, we would like to fully understand the consequences of that decision on the implementation of elements (b) and (d) above. A) If the city were to keep the triangle, what portion of the plan could be implemented, and when would the work be completed? B) If the city were to sell the triangle, what portion of the work would be done by the city prior to selling, and when would the remainder of the work be completed? We are worried that the flooding of our backyards could be even worse next spring when storms are likely and the ground might be frozen. It also concerns us that there is not much time left this year to perform grading work. �Assumina triangle is sold to Mr. Brickner If the property is sold for development, we would see the following as a necessary short term, temporary measure: 1 ) Grading of the triangle and part of "outlot C" to keep most of the water coming from the triangle and properties to the east (the eastern watershed) from entering our backyards. When would this be done, and by whom? Our expectation is that the city, in conjunction with Mr. Brickner would take care of that this year before the ground freezes to avoid Spring flooding. We would expect the implementation of the other features of the plan to be taken care of during the normal development of the properties . We would expect though, that: 2) Until the permanent implementation of elements (b) and (d) , the temporary measures of (1 ) would be maintained, even during construction, so that the water coming from the east does not at any time enter our backyards. Who will maintain the temporary measures? If the answers to above are satisfactory, I will have no objection to the sale of the triangle piece to Mr. Brickner. If unsatisfactory, I would prefer that the city indefinitely keep the triangle until some suitable implementation plan can be devised. i If the decision is made to sell the triangle: 3) What mechanism will be used to document the agreed changes, especially in the triangle area and the Brickner property? Would it be via ordinance, purchase agreement, stipulation on permit, or some other means? May I obtain a copy of the expected agreement? I should add, too, that while the city seems to have done a good Job in proposing solutions to our flooding problems, we reserve the right of final judgement as to the effectiveness of the plan until such time as it is demonstrated that the solutions as implemented actually do solve our problems. Sincerely, jzh�Q Robert J. Gambrel Attachment • My understanding of the revisions to drainage in our area The following is based on a discussion with Mark Burch on October 3, 1986. a) Changes to the invert of the outflow pipe that have the effect of lowering it below our basements, while keeping it above the berm of the Creekridge park pond. The pipe routing would also be changed to not tie into the street catch basin, but rather tie in at a point less likely to cause the pipe to surcharge. (All this work seems to have been completed. ) After implementation, the elevations are supposed to be: Basement: 86. 12 Outflow pipe invert: 85. 23 Berm elevation: 85. 00 b) Division of the watershed feeding "our pond" into two parts, a West part which would still feed our pond, and an East part which would feed a "new pond" created in the triangle area. The new detention pond would be in the front yards of lots developed from "outlot C" and the park triangle, and would be located roughly where the triangle is now. The pond would drain via pipe into a storm sewer system catch basin. In no case would the water from that pond overflow into our pond. (None of this work has been done. ) c) Other revisions being made to the drainage of Hidden Woods and the park , "downstream" , that were all to have the effect of solving other aspects of the drainage problem, while not adversely affecting us. (At least some of this work has been started. ) This includes raising the berm of the park pond and the south Hidden Woods detention pond, and adjustments to their weirs . d) Obtainment of 15 foot easements and construction of drainage ditches or swales to insure that water flowing from the east (that doesn't already drain onto Creek Park Lane) would follow a course into the detention pond mentioned in (b) . DIRECTORATE o0 0 LO® OF o PUBLIC WORKS CITYOF MEMORANDUM FRIDLEY TD: Mark Burd, Asst. Public Works Director IW85-295 FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Director DATE: October 8, 1986 SUBJECT: Gena Rae Triangle At the City Council meeting of October 6, 1986, the Council had a first reading of an ordinance to vacate the triangular piece of Gena Rae property and to sell it to Rick Brickner for a minimum cost of $.765 per square feet based upon the actual survey area. Proceeds f ran the sale were to be directed for the Creek Ridge Park improvements. In addition, they identified three stipulations and authorize the issuance of two building permits for the Brickner lot, Creek Ridge Plat II with four stipulations. The main issue was to insure that Brickner will construct an earth berm along the westerly boundary line of Lot C from Creek Park Lane north to preclude any surface water runoff to the west and to construct a retention area in the north western portion of Lot C adequate to hold a five-year thirty-minute storm both to be completed by November 30, 1986. In addition, drainage utility easements were to be obtained from the properties and a detention pond between the two driveways off of Creek Park Lane. The detention pond would have a design outflow into the street catch basin. Also associated with the agreements was the need to coordinate with NSP to relocate their electric services from Creek Park Lane to the new back yard areas so all future construction along Creek Park Lane will have underground electric services. The exact stipulations are in the Gena Rae f ile in accordance with the drawings you have prepared. Please insure the necessary easements are obtained within the RLS or plat, that the necessary construction is completed as scheduled and tht the overall drainage system proposed for Hidden Woods, Creek Ridge Plat I and Creek Ridge Plat II are completed this fall. JGF/ts cc: Jock Robertson Jim Robinson Darrel Clark Amr From the desk of00, IUM NASIM OURESHI CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM JF-329 DATE: October 9, 1986 TO ACTION UPDATE SUBJECT: John Florr, PWD 10/ 10/E6 Rick Brickner 63 1- 1886 Re: Drainage Rick Brickner telephoned me and he is att: ieus to discuss the retentiotl -rea cn Lot C, part of the building of the first house sc �;e need to Give the layout of how lon- end how deep this retention Erea has to be aloe ; with the location on Lot C. Also, I need to get the whole drainzge boundaries along with the Cifferent assessment charges drainin,u, into Moore Lake so that lie can work towLrds a plan to further improvements in the area. of 64th and the catch directly to the south and to give the necessary information to Councilme.n Schneider and receive further direction from him. ThLnk dor. for your assistance. NMQ/1-a ------------------------------------- --------------- ----- ------- TO: Nasim Qureshi FROM: John G. Flora r---DATED:--October-10, 1986 I have been attempting to contact Rick Brickner for 1z weeks with no success. Both Mark and I are available to discuss the requirements identified by the Council for the property to be developed by Mr. Brickner. In response to your Speed Message, we have provided you on October 9, 1986 the detailed plans, computations and proposal for the storm water system in this immediate area. We are currently devleoping a project and estimated costs for the continuation of this system into the Harris Pond Ditch. We will be providing you that information shortly. JGF/ts • • RONALD F. MEYER LAND SURVEYOR LAND SURVeIING SUBDIVISION DCDIGN TELEPHONE 771-4586 885 JZSSIE ST. ST. PAUL. MINN. 58101 Nov. 5,1986 James Robinson City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Proposed Registered Land Survey Dear Jim; Enclosed are the three sets of prints you requested. Please keep me informed as to what action has to be taken. I wrote Richard Brickner that he will have to get the owners of Lot 1, Block 1, Hidden Woods to sign a form before the council can hear his subdivision. 1 YRespe tfully, j Ro ald * PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM F"A CITYOF FM DLLY MEND TO: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director MEND FROM: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinaton')P-- MEND DATE: November 14, 1986 RFIiARDING: Brickner Registered Land Survey On September 22, 1986 the City Council approved a registered land survey for Richard Brickner, generally known as Creekridge Plat 2. The subdivision which was approved at this meeting included three lots, two with access to 66th Street on the north and a third large lot to the south with no street access. See attachment A. This subdivision has not been recorded. On October 6, 1986 and October 20, 1986 the City Council approved the f irst anti second reading of an ordinance declaring the triangular piece of property northeast of the park as excess property. This surplus property was to be sold directly to an interested party. In order to make Mr. Brickner's property buildable for four lots, Mr. Brickner is pursuing the acquisition of this surplus property. In conjunction with the acquisition of the property, Mr. Brickner has prepared a registered land survey which includes the triangular piece and allows for the four buildable lots. This new plat is the same concept which was the subject of public hearings on 6/4/86, 7/7/86 and 7/21/86. See attachment B. Petitioners in this plat would include Mr. Brickner, the City of Fridley as the owner of the triangular piece and Mr. and Mrs. Phillips, which own the house immediately to the west of the triangular piece. I have been in contact with Mrs. Phillips and I should point out that they have not yet decided as to whether they will take part in this plat or not. However, she did indicate that they would have an affirmative answer prior to the Council meeting on November 17, 1986. At this point there would appear to be two procedural possibilities for processing this plat: I. Modify the September 22, 1986 Resoltion No. 99-1986 so as to approve this new plat. 2. Call for a new public hearing at the City Council to ensure neighborhood awareness of the revisions. Should Council opt for the second option it would be appropriate to set the public hearing on the evening of November 17, 1986 for December 8, 1986 Council meeting. This will allow sufficient time for publication and notices to be sent to the appropriate parties. Once the revised registered land survey is recorded at the County, the appropriate quit claim deeds may be filed assiqning property rights of the various segments. JLR/dm M-86-298 r law *PLANNING DIVIVON 8 MEMORANDUM CITY OF FWDLEY MEMD M: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director MEMO FROM: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator MELD DATE: December 2, 1986 RDSARDING: Brickner Registered Land Survey (R.L.S. ) Based upon City council input at their November 17, 1986 meeting, staff is placing the Richard Brickner revised P. L. S. on the agenda for formal approval. NDte that this new R.L.S. does include the Gena Rae triangle and canes not include any of Lot 1, Block 1, Hidden Woods lot (see attachment A) . Mr. John Phillips, the fee owner of said lot, has declined to participate in the subdivision at this time (see attachment B). Me necessary drainage easements required by Council have been signed for by Mr. Brickner (see attachment Q. A resolution to approve the R.L.S. is included as attachment D. Once the R.L. S. is recorded in both the City's and Brickner's name the conveyance of the subdivided triangular piece can be recorded. JLR/dm M-86-309 tRRICK & NIEWMA N R.I. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Virgil C. Herrick David P. Newman December 16 , 1986 James D. Hoeft Jerry Randall RANDALL , DEHN & GOODRICH 2140 - 4th Avenue , North Anoka , MN 55303 RE : City of Fridley/Johnson Dear Jerry : I am writing for the purpose of confirming our recent phone conversation in which I requested that you provide to me the Owners Duplicate Certificate of Title in the above matter . The Anoka County registrar of Titles has informed our office that you received Certificate of Title No . 57467 in June of 1986 . In as much as your client has now been paid in full , I would appreciate it if you would forward this Owner ' s Duplicate on to my office so that we can complete the transfer of the City ' s interest . If you anticipate any delays in doing this , please advise me so that we can schedule accordingly. Sincerely yours , David P . Newman DPN :kls cc : Jim Robinsons-� Suite 205, 6401 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432, 612-571-3850 ® PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM CITYOF FRIDLEY MEMO TO: David Newman, City Attorney MEMO FROM: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator J�. MEMO DATE: February 20, 1987 REGARDING: Sale of Property to Richard Brickner As per our conversation this week I am forwarding the legals of the triangular piece of property which the Council has agreed to sell to an interested party. Mr. Richard Brickner is desirous of purchasing this property to add to his adjacent parcels. The legals are Tracts G, H and I, Registered Land Survey No. 94. The agreed upon price is $.765 per square foot or 76.5 x 6790 = $5,194.35. Once you have prepared the appropriate deed I will arrange for Mr. Brickner to bring in his payment. JLR/dm M-87-48 IHIIERRICK ,lJi. NE V V Ind LlA V P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Virgil C. Herrick February 26, 1987 David P. Newman James D. Hoeft Jim Robinson Planning Coordinator City of Fridley Civic Center 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Jim: Enclosed please find a Quit Claim Deed from the City of Fridley to Richard T. Brickner, together with an Affidavit of Purchaser of Registered Land for Tracts G, H and I, Registered Land Survey No. 94 , Anoka County, Minnesota. Liil cere , DPN:JJH ewman Enclosures Suite 205, 6401 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432, 612-571-3850 HERRICK &-NEWMAN ICAO ATTORNEYS AT LAW Virgil C. Herrick March 19, 1987 David P. Newman James D. Hoeft Jim Robinson City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 RE: Richard T. Brickner/Tracts G, H and I , Registered Land Survey No. 94, Anoka County, Minnesota Dear Jim: Due to the circumstances surrounding the acquisition of title regarding the above referenced property, I would like to briefly review the status of the title for said property. Originally, the above referenced property was the subject of a condemnation proceeding. Pursuant to the condemnation, the city was adjudi- cated as the fee owner of the property and a final Certificate of Condemnation was memorialized on the Certificate of Title. In the case of the property being deeded to Mr. Richard T. Brickner, it should be made clear to Mr. Brickner at the time of closing that the Quit Claim Deed will not be able to be filed with the County Recorder' s Office until a new Certificate of Title is issued to the City of Fridley as fee owner, pursuant to the aforementioned condemnation proceeding. A Proceeding Subsequent is currently being done in order that a new Certificate of Title be issued showing the City of Fridley as fee owner. Upon completion of the Proceeding Subsequent, the official records of the County Recorder' s office will show the City of Fridley as fee owner of the above referenced property and Mr. Brickner will then be able to file his Quit Claim for the record. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the above, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, James D. Ho ft JDH: jeb cc: Richard T. Brickner Suite 205, 6401 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432, 612-571-3850 �y CITY OF FRIDLEY CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 PHONE(612)571-3456 September 30, 1988 Richard Brickner 6230 Highway 65 N.E. , Suite 104 Fridley, MN 55432 RE: Registered Land Survey, R.L.S. No. 94, Plat P.S. #86-02 Dear Mr. Brickner: During a review of your Plat/Registered Land Survey #94, I discovered that the following stipulations have not been completed: 1. Provide retention and drainage easements per City plan (see attached) . 2 . Park fee for 1371 Creek Park Lane N.E. will be charged with Building Permit. My main concern is item #1. My research has indicated that these easements were not recorded due to the fact that the parcels created by the Plat were sold to new property owners. To record these easements, the attached documents must be signed by the property owners and notarized by a notary public. Once signed, please return the documents, along with the owner's duplicate of title, to me so they can be recorded by the City at the Anoka County Courthouse. The owner's duplicate of title is needed to record the easements because the property is torrens. I will review this item on October 26, 1988, and I hope to have received the documents by then. Please contact me if you have any questions. I can be reached at 571-3450. Thank you for your cooperation. Your development has been an asset to the City. Sincerely, Kathlyn Castle Planning Assistant KC:ls C-88-452 CITY OF FRIDLLY CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 PHONE(612)571-3450 November 23 , 1988 Richard Brickner 6230 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 RE: Registered Land Survey, R. L.S. #94, or Plat, P.S. #86-02 Dear Mr. Brickner: This past week, I tried contacting you to determine the status of the survey's outstanding stipulations. These are: 1. Provide retention and drainage easements per City plan. 2 . Park fee and assessments for 1371 Rice Creek Road N.E. will be charged with the building permit. Regarding #1, the drainage and retention easements were sent to you on September 30, 1988 so the individual property owners could sign the documents and have them notarized. These documents need to be returned to me along with the owners ' duplicate certificate of title so the City can record them at Anoka County. The owners duplicate of title is needed to record the easements because the property is Torrens. Please call me and update on the status of these easements. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Kathlyn Castle Planning Assistant KC/dn C-88-602 COMMISSION SON APPLICATi REVIEW Department Number File Date Meeting Date CITYOF Planning 25 5/9/86 6/4/86 FRI DLEY File Address/Description P.S. #86-02 COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST Richard Brickner, Creekridge Plat 2 RETURN TO PLANNING &] DARYL COMMENTS EBB 1 Ea✓ -e 4z. � L e �� a-e /VQ V� JIM �. � �, , 1 2 ' /v� � r DEBBIE �� ¢ s�G Jj % /, y-3 O H N5 DEBBIE DARREL 4-)SO , dAa E B B I E �vY✓ V�LG �.-+�'VcicS�" / b -e CLYDE 1 II EBB 1 E okV� (�'1��"1 w �`i vied � �1� FA 1 , MARK / , E B B I E 'Y 12/L"'EON DEBBIE �5 COMM SSI ON APPLICATION REVIEW Department Number File Date Meeting Date CITYOF Pl anni ng 25 5/14/86 6/4/86 FRIDLEY File Address/Description P.s. #86-02 COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST Creekri dge Plat 2, Richard Bri ckner RETURN TO PLANNING El JIM COMMENTS D JOHN [0- DARREL Q,,� -.-� LYDE MARK c%%lC � r� CS-�S��t�tiTS � �?�� p � r� 20d i )BLEONS-?P P.S. #86-02 55 • Creekridge Plat Parcel Areas EP = 2.3 acres RW = .43 acres TP = .16 acres C-D = .47 acres A-B = .46 acres i N Af g) 7s i O T / - T - I ,80 XN �T MISS ISS / PP / ST" 1 Y P.S. #86-02 8N Cee ge r krid Plat nye. 1 I ry N 1 � 1 1 i LANE Qp' , 7s - - i L O T / - - T - - I i ao I X HlP l T Reo•tzitl&o R. I RED LAND SUR '-Y N0. B -Sec• /3, Tja R24 %North //ne of O(/TLOT A, JJENN/S ADD/T/ON NM'lorner OC/TLOTA i� iC SBB°47%7"E L{ .--_. ` ...149 —E /oN • t T— ..467.5 /6as.B9.50 •-149... EXCEPT/ON '-•S. Ira 14 75.00 BB.50 �V� S 4717"e6•SO a to v O `� h ll QN GENA-RAE ADD. ..?49•-- _ OS*4 Tll 7E 77. r..- -7 .G4 s (� k +• s .E. Coiner -sw c". Gof 6 Ci��' 5. to y- �P NGENA-RAE ADO/7/0N 11 �aoA1 \q°�50oq �p9 s8P44'4TE h� i A e \' 1 49 R 10 .01 _ �a� `'"fes. •59 � h � ,'; I t N88°46fB"W _ j ...44 40 4 i D a /Bo.07 ;.• NBB°5'2'//"Iv � eek O '+ice^ � _ 0e ►� h h 1 q C W G ::-2-07 o RrIf3 D9 SO°/44q E 4�4 L v TA/I- S.IS! Gomer ha oo / Nof fa rca/e Sew 1h /ine NE/4 o L �h - I Scor/e; 1 inch - aO feet 00 -00 R, 0 50 /oD ifc D,5 � I I I i GrsPhic Sca/e in Feef � • Ino/icafes Iron Monvrnenf Favrnd I Ind sofas Ir°n MOnu.�enf P/aced/Y/onFed iQLS 90f1. Orienfafion of Phis beai/nf system /s assumed. Sheet 2 of 2 Sheefs i I FRED LAND SU6/EY N0. 8 I, Ronald F. Meyer, Surveyor, hereby certify that in aocaudanues with the provisiomn of Chapter 50M, Minnesota Statutes of 1949. as amended, I have surveyed the following described tract of land in the County of .Anoka. State of !Minnesota. to-wits That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Qsartsr, of Section 13. Township 30, Range 24 described as follows Beginning at a point on the north line of the plat of QBNA-RAZ AUDITION distance 249.00 feet neat from the northeast corner of said plat1 thence vast, along said north line and its westerly extension, a distance of 163.50 fasts thence north a distance of 247.50 feet, amore or less. to a point on the south line of Outlet A. DENNIS ADMTION distance 417.50 feet east from the southwest corner of said Outlot Al thence east. along the south line of said Outlet A. a distance of 163.50 feet] thence south a distance of 247.50 feet, sore or less, to the point of beginning. All of Outlet A, DENNIS ADDITION. excepting therefrom the Eat 249 feet and excepting therefrom the West 417.5 feet, according to the sap or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles In and for Anoka County, Minnesota. That this survey shorn hereon is a correct delinestim of said sir thda day of i9b_ Ronald F. Meyer. Registered'lamd surveyor Ninnesota Registration No. 9051 We do hereby certify that on the day of , 196_. the City Council of Fridley, Minnesota v approed this Registered Land Survey. Mayor Clark Pursuant to Chapter 7. Minnesota Laws of 1976. this Registered Land Survey has beenre fulfilled. viewed and approved, this day of . 198_, and the conditions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03. Subdivision 2, have been Roland W. Anderson Anoka Comty.Surveyor Shee! I of 2 Sheets 7Q9 H n s (D w h e- e HI'dciev, U-)ooC` w I ' n6 7 �� vo � , ,-, J my pYr, � ,� i - - �? � • /� �'� .'S '�' "• � Nom— � - _�� _ 0 r Mb 407 07 I. wvv - '► v U4 ��.` ill: �.�. • �I:.e s.-+•_�..��.,.. ~� .• �f• - ja 33 ART44" . r ANOKA a I M 'J tQ iii. �.G`• _ 's :. :♦ •- --• �� f • _� alp V A �► k v `D �► r Ir ` Ix- eo IFRIDLE'Y-I- ST. JE- e: .c `Q it L •e � � � � Q r � � t - P.S84-0'• . 13 ' CREW GE BY BRICKNER \,000 --, • / / �s � 1 / 1 1 . it / I ♦ 4 w I V V � I i + f Idsh, I wl • � 4� V cz � > � 4 K � ��.•sJ a,� �, , F 4L, j PP I '2;r 4 W) .'P.) QSS+`111 IJir aw w e,• "� � __ _ 14 R 400, h 4 E Ov 27 •� i�� I �?poi ;,::•; Y � , �_� ••• d L- 3 t 4F 28 eV Q • <u� , 0 TO 10,� W «)- . r f�,-> (►�� f. _ , #0466 TH AYE. N. E. lBBO :�:- ' (�) 4 j) ctAli,4>ri✓ iso ;� l i+� t�� '' � " t. '•f2fk alp. L��i. ' ,i1� �swslr '^• \ i �` `. (!.F20) •' t l' +: (ef• type) `T' Q` ; to �4)? t V1 k �3 $ ,�� W� sJ ;,► l at �Vy •� i = ��'J 4 L1 Z • • -tg o � 6 POP) t I �,a � i II •Y. w .t t►' ' � 2 7 ,• « •3 /�S,I ��, i� rote ��,�.. ° . ` 1• �.' r "* , 33 ,p tl r ISO So STR ,,•1`Tnc�T11!fl_ -..• ...,► •J11 .� •IrS.. - EN T EC. l , z EEK •s ss:yo° ,b RK M—,,o at,7 41;.7 vio- fcl4 - fJ Si j Ls_ � 15 ^+� 'b •.1�j/e I3 � f fro/1 / O' r ,4z o eXB s Lz:") cry) �: ,r 2. 66TH AVE. N. E. y3�I) w vJ Sys) e� eo C 3 G p E, r 14, i o °�i R ��P p It ti r (,42�% ^� i .�., Mr .�00 h1�2 r 9 63 14W 2,10 41 7 V Q z0 24-687) >� 121 j1 40 f p c�) �,�ro, 4 21 toy) X813 ti 's qA 23 ° 15 , 3 -. P i -k 0 l , n V - � zdS.e �l. •va.f5 ._ fo _i'��' 1 39� � "�-�_•- f1 _1 /�L :L � m � EN rE EC. / 13 ' 15 FRIDLEY PARK ALER AMIL �xK 66TH AVENUE PROPOSED ADDITION TO PARK N : : (CURRENTLY WOODED, VACANT a PROPERTY) I WALKWAYS/BIKEWAYS CREEK PARK LANE j TENNIS COURT CREEK R I DGE TOT PARK (APPROX. LOT 2.28 ACRES USABLE AREA) JUNIOR BALL ....__ --_ DIAMOND HOLDING POND NOTE: PROPERTY LINES ru ARE TO SCALE. MISSISSIPPI STREET THE CITY COUNCIL HAS SUGGESTED THEY MIGHT LIKE TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL LAND WHICH, WHEN ADDED TO CREEK RIDGE PARK, WILL BRING THE PARK SIZE CLOSE TO THE 3 ACRE '.1 1 N I MUM THAT THE CITY FELT THEY MUST HAVE IN THIS AREA TO SERVICE THE NEEDS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IF THE CITY DOES NOT GAIN ACCESS TO THIS PART I CULAR PIECE OF r ROPERTY NOW, THEY WILL NEVER AGAIN HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO INCREASE THE r'nR►'; S!ZE TO ABOUT 3 ACRES. WE FEEL THE CITY SHOULD NOT PASS UP THIS CHANCE. WE FEEL THIS ADDITION TO THE PARK WOULD GIVE AN EXCELLENT SHADED AREA FOR THE ' TOT LOT, AS WELL AS A PICNIC AND BARBECUE AREA, WE WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT IN THIS MATTER. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DEALING WITH THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD ON AUGUST 4TH AT 7:30 P.M. AT CITY HALL. PLEASE COME AND VOICE uR OPINION. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL RICHARD POD V I N OR PODVIN AT 571 -2390 (DAYS OR EVENINGS). THANK YOU. i� s oJ AA a ft dL r c Tr• •• ,A f ritrt '' � � r , A y � •a, a r f♦1 r Z r v •t X11-�i► ,.'' �. � � i j� �:•ir. °�y,./�• y l � •t - `ab -•• 'd T a. ^ fi' � •:` - m'`�`.� #° +.fly. }z . D. 3_ .\, 46 i� �I \.� a.+�.. ■_- �� •Yh t••�..may.,�-4' X77 Q �'. '!�. �.�y a a�t� o�. a �'•L ��{�� 'Tim ;m `3, �' a. P'� 11♦y'' ,ani: �.°. = cn N F J Y •:ty i � 'M� t � \ -a cp n 0 Ilk a) r ` AN '-lS/orfh /iii of OUTLGT A �E//N/S ADJ/!�✓// Qj \ � • "vjOo .... 9 S � \� o (4N ti ?. p46 9:4- 58 w G-Sos7,j�k J SRB Myo�G E V4 I r h • prev f"t,l c cl 9/1 ZlBG RONALD F. MEYER I.JNrD SURVEYOR u.+e swov"v"." eww.n«a.W".w vsiLs...r.a•nwaus eM Ja"M ev. et. PAWL, r+w... 1111101 I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me and that I am o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Reg. No. 9051 Date: August 21. 1486 to 6 rN A 1/E. /(/.z- 71� 97 LO!/TLOT A �EA'N/S AIJD. I A N B % A. _' 7S B 7 —f— — — 162 _ I �v , Scales 1" = 60' A;2 �,•' P / � /'i5'OPOSE�^ RzG/1%5 J-fRZD L ANI � �. Owner and developers Richard Brickner '• ._-� r 1233 12th Ave. N.W. C 16-O I� Now Brighton. MN 55112 Descriptions Part of Outlot A. DENNIS ADDITION and part of Lots 6 and 14. Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 10. Humber of Lotas 3 Total acreages 0.93 acres Lot sisess A - 9000 sq. ft. B - 10440 sq. ft. C - 21220 sq. ft. Acreage and square footages are more or less figures. `90 00 ol 8 6 84 190 ?AGE ' REMO E 91.8 88.9 187.0 t Z wo $EWC� S WC SE 4 wo- ' 1 2 \ 95.3 _ 9 -492 , 4 - 4 4.3 94.3 % � , 97, O \ \ � 93.I 92.2 � 91.4 ' 93.9 I.I I%- ' ... 93.0 92.5 --y.- 904 EK _ 91.3 ::R::::K:. LAN ; 93.1 , 0 92.2 , � I 9 3:8 0 93.2 i 2 i 0 a 1 L� Wo Wo I — I 86,5 PROPOSED PAF ' ��/ B-5.9 84 84 lez 1 ' --- ' o 78 80 82 ,8 I 1 A _ rN r- IST I ' omtCol. • - BLDG. SITE �� IN NNW, 41 V tM 1 ��;11►�'►Tfu►►►7►►►►►aA&$►►T►i.'!'1rrr�r•�—' tTil�l-11111�1��i`R� +fp111111144 llKlllllirill:i4! ►''► +, 11.+41 Iflll 1 (1111111!!!!11+111111111411 fill C!r(1 .%mo 11�� IN+ l01►.►1i1111O11,1111111 1,101!'!;il'! 1 111:'•+11111111111.1 I�IN114.N1141+11, 4 011 1 1,1f 1,11 4 N1U:�'lh4'r`IN1111 511+11111111111! lilr .4,11f +Ihi`►H1H t. 4i,1•I411N`!lll,lll',t� ; � 111�11411111f1.4'4111111..IH1 101 ,111111,11•+;•1,1.1101.1.1,;011.11!..' +11'01111111,1►.111`11111. 4!r1141,l11t;. + ;,, •4{/n 111::1►• i� ' • 111►Illlilt.rllflll:►111.+:1 4111,'!11+1111 1111111:►!"111111' ! 111►1111' 44IIIIf1111.",rf11,1;`I,Illtll 1.1111,1,1,11 111114141!'. � �. 111+,i,1'rl•'IIl11�14:r1,+Ifl ►�r 1111 1111 �1►,:.1�1,1;�!;I,II,II•';► • 11l.,1l11'.114 1 1111111 U1.1t;,,,++'.,'•�,;►•,+1,01! � .! .1111'1111"•+. 1 If1101111. 4f41l1011!!n►:'If1►1111;�.�tl+�:ll1;! > •1.111111►'lll.•:IIf+IHlll'',t•., ►+�itl 1 1'h► lilt 111 111...., '111.111{Illllt`fll' 111=+4+:.1111 .11f'►;, :!'I;I,Illil:4111.14f1,11+►+►� ' 111►/INI011►`Il1r!1► IN►"Ilrll,l.+11111+++1,111101:f11141�1fi4%'4 M 1 HI1i411114111 !' ,111t11►./.1 Ifilflitill' 4,111114'111t.:h11.1•, 4 _ /IIIL411411141;1' +011111111111111+11141 +++++If . t!++!'! a, 'l111:+Illlllll�t•'llfi4111111'flll,fll �1•fl•1'll!1'1.�'•lt`lli:;; 44Ili►4,1011111,1.•11111!101f,1.2N+►";, 1111+111'�li,!r,111N `11111,110111414, )LIN•"' .1All 1+Ill flll4`441`t;l.l.t1!+11� !1141140111111"'' rrtN:'1'1111H11;:••t.,. rllllll,lll,`lt�/+`It=+1 10111`11!1 '1`'114101011,41N�1141': 4111illllllll+lf,',Itlll}t 114 Illll�lll"►4`1111144111.!IIIHIh'lll'r •;;;i:;.HI►� .t��tllt: 1� 11111�111.!111111f,),Illl;141:1111 ;+• 1141!!!4!fM. . fW!O1( ' 1014111411f 111#1141111111110411 fit; fHf.11l�i!.(il,;lll;c // fllf:ili�)11 Illlllftllll,+,I,i►!,1, 4111+1ini41h11,111f1 •fl,l.';. 11111►II Nl,,,,,,,,,,;,,,'.,,.. llfl,►111111011111110141/r,14 lllfll�I1�f 1►111111111��1ltl111111lel`f!1+11 lift';1'40116.��.i1►1 Il �1111f1f11111f�f�flll�IIt/:: ♦j 1;11111!')II,IN11�►'411114411141 11111�11l11111111111 /'ttrllr� a 1111►►1:.11114111111.+111111111►:!411,f1'►1111111111111l,If'ft11 s 101111f1i+l11111111�It,�+1/11,1,1,14„Ith. •!+I,IIIININ/tr11t11'�� 1111111.• ii;. .,..,' ..,}4111 1}41/411}}666!t!+;'to: 101;It•�, �%►,f'ii�ri,444441il�iil►ii;�4,41'41011:0114l;;';111'011'� H,!+1f +411011+I1t;l+11,11111111111141!1►11111111111111011+N S � 114111�f1111 lil 111 41111111111111111 I l t if!1!fl�llfllfl►1'11'fl l�llllllll►11111If11111f111�Ir� � 11111111/►;:''!!1'1111141111111111,1+,1111, 01.111111411111,!!1' �� .;,a�• flll,+!;•�111!+1111;;!!14�N111114414,1111r 41�10111111 X11 t•y 111.1111 +M+1. 1►:14111t,llllllllfllllll,rl,1 141410111, 111 11+1'41 1111 4=4111101',11111111011101111'0111111'+III01r � >7� +111'111��11'11,411{11f4r1f1/11l1!illl!111 ;11::11!'1+1111: '1f 1► !1.•'lllflll►11,1►;1111111!;illll!11111/41f11111•,1011r � �alllllt:?l+X44►� II1141144111;1i � fill M off Mit+114!;1}1111,14+!r11111111�;Nf101!;14f11111!111141' f41 +11fr,it':1►f� 11►►11►1►I,,t,1,1;1}If t 1,10 l,l l►'•.00111111111 1!'►►411111!1.1,1 C,1111�i iii�iii t ilrlli1111/41►ice;1,1,1111,11,1,1,111►; 1111+1+'/+a:• �Cflll•1111411!111!11.14,11011'1101111111101+!;"!!►101111;41 ��1111!!1N6; 11;1111,+f11111k1.11111►y;till 4 10111;:!I,Ih 41141+++H111:414�141!;-t1H1141'11111111 111111►► 11`14 >Dt 1101111 off ,tiff `,010 111411111111 !1111 1 ,1116 111,4 ••�i;11111`r11411r111111111111111111+1►1►�11,1.14!!;111f11,111+.1i��1!e•'._ � 11, � �'��+ 1`lillll!,411t11111•'Nf1111flllllf011011 fit '+11:.1 • X11;1,111+;111`lillll;lcfllllllllllillillllll ''1►: 1111,►1!1!1►i i�'i��1►li 441.1 i'i i i 164!:f_ff_1s�1 i'�1� 1�iil�� K �101(1;11;'11'111•i.:�1111`1111111H01111111 41 ;1!!!;,1.1111!►14!t:ll' 1141141010111011 •" 1►' �• flllfl�'4;1tNli{1.►' '11.//1/41,11101',. 11 .��H!;:H:'11114101' . ..,.,.• /+;,, X111 �'�� 4l111111;H'+!rll: 111►” ,.•i�1714 + � �.� �� :11111i111�,1111+ i! lil►'►►!1,• ►-1 +��'1111 X11.1;1'•t '.. .►►u r►'1 r_..... -.+.� �•� _�,}11 a.'•,,i;it).1�.1r 1.:•!111-r `��' —_ 1.111,11111111 4 01'•IIIt1,',��- � IfIf111l l l • Ifill 111411411111 111111+11 ,. 1111111 114 ; -_ f1111110110101101b•}fflflll�� .�-- - M,;# 1111411 l 01 off 1101ff+'1;:;i:. 1111/1tt�••��.•� •111,1.141+wasw =' _ 111111:101101114.•► }/r•►1 _ . 1' .,.61111 ;It4flll�;! ��• , ��'�::•�-�011:!!1401011:01,--11011111 G��=- • � X11011.90+111�1.1".U011111.�� ' IN11.111411.11 AND =mw 1W.111 41 fit, folio� +Illllill1111111••1111'411 ir1•NlI=all riiii itf^Ill 1111 t'1%' 41,�l ti 44411►I�li,!' F, •�� AM ^-'..moi+11111111,111 X11114 �dDl .�, DisposiA of Q Gena Rae Proper cfy tr E O ✓ o icor.. h I j b CO 6q�o Creek, 8s�B #1H svzi ° y( 4 k� ^ty) t 2 db ti AA / 9 - - �u>- - - ��'��' �•� C2�J ��)ef,,e ` p�ti V. .,.. � s) Z 3 t 22(71) � D1 TIO �h p 66 A a. UZ ' - - - 14 d 13 �t3 aB 9/N) /9` AVE. co tl`) el ai r• •sf /OC79� h 'O ° 75z. 14, )' )/¢ (/l9oJ ,.� ' b° tit ss�/P,• //.t4 L o n n o (/tao) �e 0 v v �^. !) ! '°�2�' L,ANEh 25-A)? 6 ^ +tufo. wf•t f u° , ` ��Iti o ',bo" �� `• f>; 6! s • ) 70 '0 1J SL M� z p e �/ a • •� _ _ _ CRE K e � Z7(W) 4 !— pE s r+ � j N . ° (t . i , r : •% I/of/ rs �?S `.�.°3 o j4'f 7i 2-.;7*) • tap k 6 2f oY lf��ZZ� i��o �� T� �!�,�l+"�6 � 25 CK'PARK LN. �:4, h1 "- (n' <9O N 24 r� 7 a I�1 2 `13• �{s_ >{•I'I60 t1! ��jl� !S[f LB 4 lam.,t�E - C • AVI «.sPly �/o a 2 A $o v foo ° 15,r . . �' w� lsoio�j w Z 2 a s `+� W �)Of R,LS, 2T :ora �..,�, ;� �� Dew& fI /3 Mort ��; \ L't yore o, �s \V /330 Azek �7* PI Y ( ct o �f„U4A _ t y� xi �..1YS.aie•�, ieA.fS _ fe ."•Z�'7��1 Bf / r 4T. 60 a 0 70 m ' POSSIBLE EXCESS PROPERTY. r c. ' - r fir+ ?r• +? y POTEMIA,L COM FOR CREEK RIDGE PARK EXPANSION ► Proposed ( Assessors ( Assessors I Estimated ) ( Parcels ( Estimated ( Estimated ( Acquisition I ( Acquisition ( Acquisition I V al ue of C&D I I ( Costs I Costs ( Property Based ( I ( (C & D Land- I (C & D Build- ( on Gena Rae ( I Locked) 1 alle) ( Cost I I I I I I ( C & D ( $ 4 ,750 I $52,000 I $29,412 I I ( ( I I I I I I ( A & B I 47 ,900 ( 47 ,900 ( 47r900 I I I I I i i I I I I ABC & D I $52,650 ( $99,900 I $77 ,312 • i 1 I I I r. An additional cost associated with the possible acquisition includes waiving the assessment on the existing southerly parcel (proposed parcel C-D) which are currently held in abeyance but are accruing interest . The assessments for two future lots, for sewer, water and street, come to a total of $17 ,944 plus accrued interest of $3 ,046 .62 ( through 7/ 30/ 86 ) for a total of $20 ,990 .62. • • R�� $S` i- � ;m t�.� _ fr$+{a 1 � P �5� f3s• s 5 � 53 G to3'2oat o `��'�°� i • � � ° �j�� . N Ldp jM ;y � . � ' �� ' . '_q zzS'� n ,� . , a � ��i � . .�, _ - �• 10030¢ ± �lb3o� �o �b � ;o86S•s m1p ±;2S2p -; r �I A'!0 253 a , r s , .o �5 ' r G. olp Ice te/t' _ _ '• tic if A j, Com) ty� C �'�J y ,,, p 6,►� T 4 •i:10 1r of l, Is • $ �R__ 1. �•��{ .. Abs AV I so air 1 :1 4� 0 'ANE; AP :• w �i SIr CRE K 0% App �•sa.oT o.c..a•Ra ♦ t.a.a.ot.a — AW ; /fit o� DITION , `y � 0 v- • R I / .. ...�. ! o I ul r 0 P. s. -o -- Creekridge Plat 2 � Do c� ' G � (6z>1 E O`+ O�rcoT /Pals Zljf o° r 0 a, /67) 3a Rf�ti ;%r9 -sa ; a� 6 k: tI v BP.3g �Sr.H �,9 _d�Tt ---542./ •-- R�. A''; `4°b1,y -�dy) 2 r sr3.ir t=y6 _(�) 8A'� �'• 6 (IW) EN v`� 1 !•. ii D fit 5 B IL) 6 - 5 BB• 61:>. Kj* � oon, -IE'v ti Pyr F sz+' S) 23 P 5(rr) 6� ( � (34) o N 2 iou_ • &A .Al(3BJ e K D T/® 8:n ..� .5f 20lf.•.: �- s, 9(r) 1 u My �� gay. �8�t.o$ 2 �I /O 1pik 66TH AVE. tial s gl 83 - • • �� 4� �' s R /0�79� h +o 75)' 04) �'�rTis RrBx/r tie h`4 v 'tC. °' Z ae ig: ¢ 0'. 015 Bir�sieets v �� • • • V�° c u h - ¢� all 3 , OV) / g lal �J . . . s ♦ ,�(a) / N,/* � L(ANEh 7-177 6 47.0. nbj ••'•••'•• ° � ) 9 �1. Z 83 7.4- DE 3 P ° ' / _ _ z► ACRE K �p.� F z7(» ' 10 4 �i Z 11 5co ?N q ' ` •( / o hof ' o 611►> = s 25 —7-TI (�+ 4' /sV CREMPARK LN. �� / zAV p, (J �T� 3 ? / (/-'Zo) 0 Nl/o aro � � �, o � M v a 2/ TWT Q RLS. 27 . ^ (v� 022, '' / Z /3 ' Yozo Nsw ♦ y Ociinis 9urr ! A H�sf �' � P7f'0') /¢ I 13 J. n � m t. , �GENA � R A E A DDI TIC� C/TY OF rR/DLEY — COUNTY OF /ANOA�.A — lumen l Norff7 f/i/e o0als a and 9,Re✓/sed Aid fors J`ubd/V/S/CV7 N'f0 n �' fnrnJ 29�3.Pa15 6vSf o/•iYie r✓esf 4w 'hie NEi4 es l J -i o�I � • �1�. �,n=nsurrD ob�q a ane paoiii/wifh 1Ne.kvrlh/iit cf•Mt,1�%_ ! IL 395.98 - - – ---- �� --------v=-/75.99---- ---- I /05 BOOS y4f i a � o \ bee&) 5LdARAU� 75 i {�+' C o � l OL/7'Z-Or 2 " o 560 $ - Y/ 35 40.0/. I 2 -- i \ 5 e O s0 all O OT i O ' ►1 � `o o ,�v o r}.o� 59- U,rlm, and Omave -r w 67seneMA v o °l Q - -----179.98 _- --1-__ - - �- --------17599--�--� � Iz I i � J n u F }. � ?R 75 / /W.9-9 � 75 T M/55/5540,01 1m 67EET_ r m t Z/999 Oy3 i,e"93) - /75.99 e C �ldni�iiy '�" /AnJ7yrq P3'�j,pA�S Easf sF//e S/Ycamm oFfiSe.4E/ — ' 51A line ey-Zo1s Bald 9 o/so&IMI ._ -- ---– --— ----- ----– – —----- the Savfh/ne arhiie AIEYot o/Sec./3.Twp 3a.P.74 E.. 4 x.. i��h3L:!!`��i�� ✓r�i._ `yam aEE+c 12 1acz,E PP21< 'To-T a %- PAek OTR t.- sheet —_- 0 a1 39 A,00 Pi kJA a woy 1 7;-1P` '7-2iA0G(.0 CCU+L-o,� GeAN0 ToT14C- IoZ6� �{$8 6��, vi:90 ASC": Cw-L0+ 1 1 I our r Our,, or 2 1 1 N �i91-E � �„Sa"�• to r _ 4M '0 i za 46AI rry This map is the Addendum to the Prelim. fC4 4,(A14 Engineering Report on stree improvements ®N < to 66th Ave. 6 Park Creek Lane. This was t� v revised & presented to the City Council 46%1 on April 2 1984. - P ' 11�� tM SO f� -- Kr9 _ 041w6 jj s� T A1E . M. ESEE* ., 000G — � X391 r�'s •�S• i�.;� Q.&..� 4AZ .• yr �" RowM0"0 jr O i Ai� t. 16537 toot I�44 -W S to, I 11 4r 13 r18% _ j ? •••d , •,•. m. l I •� 4,A®O. f,� . RLS I� �' :• ...,.. 07 /► Ir AINA wow A a _ & . • Vic : � 000, 3B Nf,w 1,- i A"V, a, a . t � BI•Mber� P/�t. �'''' .'S t.et �plhf's tri� �t �,. •R N< ,� I ^1 / 6I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 14, 1984 ,� PAGE 6 ION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. SCHREINER, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPR L OF VACATION REQUEST, SAV #84-02, BY DISPLAY ARTS, INC. , TO VACATE THE 12' EY SOUTH OF LOT 11, BLOCK 6, ONAWAY, AND THE BALANCE OF GUMWOOD STREET, SOU F THE ALLEY, WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. FILING AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISPLAY ARTS, INC. , AND ACTION PA CO. WITH THE COUNTY. 2. EXECUTION OF A W LOT DESCRIPTION WITH THE CITY ASSESSOR. FOR PARCELS NOW BEING ABLISHED. 3. 10 FT. UTILITY EASEME WN THE ALLEY FOR NORTHWESTERN BELL 4. 10 FT. UTILITY EASEMENT B EN GUMWOOD ST. AND 77TH FOR MINNEGASCO LINE 5. ACCESS AGREEMENT FOR NSP TO SERV THEIR LINES 6. LANDSCAPING REQUIRED FOR PROPERTY A 77TH AVE. 7. PAYMENT OF OUTSTANDING ASSESSMENTS FOR P L ON THE CORNER OF 77TH AND BEECH ST. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DEC THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. TABLED: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #,84-01 ' Z`REEKRIDGE, BY THOMAS BRICKNER: Being a replat of Lots 2, 3, a 5, _ Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, generally located at 66th and Arthur Streets N.F. Public Hearing closed. MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO REMOVE P.S. #84-01 BY THOMAS BRICKNER FROM THE TABLE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON P.S. #84-01 BY THOMAS BRICKNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING REOPENED AT 8:40 P.M. Mr. Flora stated that at the last meeting, they were addressing the plat which essentially included the Rice Creek School property. The plat sub- mitted by Mr. Brickner identified 29 lots, 5 of which were dedicated as a park in accordance with the city platting ordinance for this particular development. As was discussed at that meeting, Staff was concerned about the park size of .9 acres in that it seemed inadequate as the only park to service the area between Old Central and Stinson Blvd. and Rice Creek and Mississippi St. A number of alternatives had been discussed with Mr. Brickner. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Commission had suggested the City look at obtaining some other properties, specifically the property to the west of Rice Creek School , as a potential park site. On March 12, the City Council passed a resolution authorizing the City Administration to acquire a portion of the Gena-Rae Addition for public purposes. Based on that direction, Staff has looked at both the Rice Creek School property, the Gena-Rae Addition, the 6J Y • PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 14, 1984 __ PAGE 7 property directly to the north and also the vacant property to the west of Gena-Rae, and found they can provide a road system which will allow Mr. Brickner to construct the 29 lots as originally proposed, allow con- struction of a 2.2 acre park, allow the development by Mr. Blomberg of an additional nine lots to the west, and open up the large lots to the north for the future splitting into five lots. This would essentially provide access from the various areas being served to the park, would provide street parking, and would provide those items recommended by the Parks & Recreation Department (tennis court, softball field, tot lot, passive play area, etc. ). Mr. Flora stated the City feels this new proposal not only satisfies the concern expressed by the Planning Commission, but also the concerns addressed by the City Council in preliminarily reviewing this plat with Mr. Brickner. Mr. Flora stated the City will be attempting to purchase the property in the Gena-Rae Addition for a park. They have made some contact with the owners, and they seem favorable to the idea of a park being constructed on the property. Mr. Brickner stated this proposal provided for a fine project, a nice park area, street parking, and it looked like it was certainly in the best interest of the City and all the people involved. Ms. Schnabel stated it was their understanding then that, instead of dedi- cating land,Mr. Brickner will be entering into a fee negotiation with the city for the park. Ms. Betty Ann Mech, 1315 - 66th Ave. N.E. , stated she was representing a lot of the neighbors in this surrounding neighborhood. She stated she had a petition she would like to present to the Planning Commission. She read the following petition dated March 13, 1984: "We the undersigned residents of the area near Rice Creek School urge you to establish a public greenway on the Rice Creek side of the property when it is developed. Traditionally, this has been public property, available to all the residents for hiking and viewing the Creek. (There is not a better view in Fridley. ) We believe to make this private property available to only a few people would seriously diminish the quality of life for the present residents and the new residents who will have even more pressure from expanded numbers. "Long ago the City of Minneapolis , despite heavy pressure, showed us the way by saving the shores of its lakes for the public. We will applaud your foresite if you do the same." Ms. Mech also showed four slides of the view of the creek from this side. � K PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 14 1984 PAGE 8 Ms. Mech stated there is already an existing path at the top of the cliff, and they would like to have this available to the residents of Fridley as it has always been. MOTION BY MS. SCHREINER, SECONDED BY MR. GOODSPEED, TO RECEIVE PETITION #i1-84 DATED MARCH 13, 1984. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHAABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. M. Larson, 1340 - 66th Ave. N.E. , stated she felt the City really needed to do something like this in this area. It was true that the people in their area have not had a park, but they have not really felt the void because there has always been a lot of open space they have used and enjoyed. They now see this slipping away, and they feel this is something the City should think about and attempt to do for the whole community. Mr. Brickner stated that with the houses he would be constructing alone the bluff line, after the setback requirement, the houses would be very close to the bluff. Probably most of the houses would have decks that would overhang the bluff. He was not sure where the path was now, but if it comes on' top of the ridge, he would suspect the path would be right by the houses. From his point of view, it would be very difficult to sell a lot with a public path in its backyard. Mr. Brickner stated that if he were to move the road to the south, it would require his taking out a number of lots on the other side. Ms. Schnabel stated she agreed with Mr. Brickner. There were about four lots that after the 35 ft. setback would be sitting right about where the path is now. She did not see how Mr. Brickner could agree to that walkway if it is going to be by people's houses. Mr. Oquist stated that if the City was to provide a path or walkway along the cliff, there were potential problems with liability to the City if someone should fall and get hurt. Ms. Mech stated it was just a shame that there will be only four or five people who will be able to enjoy that beautiful view. Mr. Curt Loschy, 1399 - 66th Ave. N.E. , stated he owns the lot adjacent to the school on the west side. He stated the path runs behind the school fence, generally from Arthur St. , across two lots and part of a third lot, then down to the old dam. Since the pathway was put in by the County on the north side of the Creek, the amount of foot traffic on this side has decreased significantly. The path itself has almost grown over. He felt there was not enough foot traffic now to keep the path open. GL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 14 1984 PAGE 9 Mr. Dick Podvin stated he was representing the principles on the Gena- Rae Addition. They have obviously been negotiating with the City on the sale of this property and, at this point, an appraisal is being made on the value of the land. He stated the only exception he could see to the park plan at this time was the proposed walkway to the park from Mississippi St. They would not agree to that because of the foot traffic that would be between houses. He stated the dedicated road was forced on them in order for them to get the building permit. The reason they have resisted selling this property is because they did not want to develop the property with that road being forced on them. They feel the property being developed as a park was a very favorable option to them with the exception of the road and assuming they get fair market value for the land. Ms. Mary Loschy, 1399 - 66th Ave. N.E. , stated she thought this was a very good plan, it was a good compromise, and would be very good for the neighbor- hood. She had one request and that was that it was going to be a little difficult for people from 66th Ave.to get to the park. She would like to see the City consider some foot traffic access from 66th, if that was possible. Mr. Flora stated that was something the City could probably work toward in the future. Mr. Brickner stated he had no strong feelings one way or the other. If it was an easement, it should probably be fenced. Ms. Schnabel stated it was a very good point and she would like to see the City explore the possibility of some easement from 66th Ave. to the new park area. Mr. Robert Thayer, 6051 - 6th St. N.E. , stated he was at the Planning Commission meeting two weeks ago and criticized the City's proposal at that time. He would like to say that this proposal made a lot more sense. It answered the concern about developing adequate park area, and he thought it allowed for an organized sensible development for all three parcels of property. MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MS. SCHREINER, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:22 P.M. Mr. Oquist stated he felt this total plan was more in line with what he was concerned about at the last meeting. What he thought they needed to do was to plan the whole area as long as there were three parcels of property that were available. It seemed to him this was a reasonable development for this whole area. Ms. Schnabel stated she was very pleased with this plan. It was worth delaying this for two weeks. From the standpoint of the City, providing a park in the Gena-Rae Addition was the best solution they could come up with. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 14, 1984 PAGE 10 MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MS. SCHREINER, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT P.S. #84-0I, CREEKRIDGE, BY THOMAS BRICKNER, BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS 2, 3, AND 5, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 10, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 66TH AND ARTHUR STREETS N.E. , WITH THE CONSIDERATION THAT THE CITY DEVELOP SOME KIND OF PATHWAY FROM 66TH AVE. TO THE NEW PROPOSED PARK. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AY,- CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #84-01 , BY HERBERT KNUTSON: Split Lots 1 , 2, 3, oc Fridley Park, into two building sites, -Ey-splitting off the w terly 27 feet of Lot 2, and combining it with Lot 3, and the description of Lot 1 will add that part of Lot 2 lying east of the westerly 27 feet, all in B ck 15, Fridley Park, the same being 10 and 20 64th Way N.E. Mr. Flor stated this property was just south of 64th Ave, and west of Ashton Av There are three lots, Lots 1 , 2, and 3, which are being proposed to be split 'nto two lots, one 67 ft. wide and one 70.26 ft. wide. This particular p was platted before 1955 and, as such, the code requires a minimum of 50 . The code also states that if it was an early plat, the lot width and th lot area may not he satisfied but all other setback criteria must be satisfied. Mr. Flora stated that 'n talking with the developer, it was first proposed to split the property i half and make each lot about 72 ft. in width. Because the corner lot re ires a 1712 ft. sideyard setback, they thought it would he better to make th first lot a little wider and the second lot a little smaller and still sat fy the setback criteria. Mr. Flora stated Staff would re end three stipulations if this lot split is approved: 1 . There be a park fee of $750 2. That no building permit be is ed until the lot split is recorded with the County. 3. The outstanding assessments be pa Mr.John Dunphy, 155 Stonybrook Way, stated he as representing Mr. Knutson who could not be at the meeting. He stated Mr. nutson plans to put single family dwellings on both lots. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO REC END TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. 1184-01, BY HERBER UTSON, TO SPLIT LOTS 1, 2, 3, BLOCK 15, FRIDLEY PARK, INTO TWO BUILDING TES, BY SPLITTING OFF THE WESTERLY 27 FEET OF LOT 2, AND COMBINING IT WITH T 31# AND THE DESCRIPTION OF LOT 1 WILL ADD THAT PART OF LOT 2 LYING EAST F THE WESTERLY 27 FEET, ALL IN BLOCK 15, FRIDLEY PARK, THE SAME BEING 10 AN 0 64TH WAY N.E. , WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. THERE BE A PARK FEE OF $750 2. THAT NO BUILDING PERMIT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE LOT SPLIT IS RECORDED W.M THE COUNTY. 3. THE OUTSTANDING ASSESSMENTS BE PAID. `�, CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 4, 1986 CALL TO ORDER: Acting Chairperson Kondrick called the June 4, 1986, Plann' q Commission meeting to order at 7.:34 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Ri and Svanda (for Wayne lJellan) , Donald Betzold Members Absent: LeRoy Oquist, Sue Sherek Others Present: Jim Robinson, P1 ning Coordinator Jock Robertson Community Development Director Myron Ostlu 1400 66th Ave. N.E. Richard Br'ckner, 1233 12th Ave. N.W. , New Brighton R. Podv' , 1391 Mississippi St. N.E. Jon & Rachel Gottwald, 1415 Mississippi St. N.E. Robert & Doris Nelson, 1439 Mississippi St. N.E. Joseph Menth, 1388 66th Ave. N.E. APPROVAL OF MAY 28, 1986, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY,MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO APPROVE THE MAY 28, 1986, PLANNING C01fMISSn' N MINUTES AS WRITTEN. i UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, ACTING CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1 . PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT,. P.S. #86-02, CREEKRIDGE RICHARD BRICKNER, THOMAS BLOMBERG, AND THE CITY--AF FRIDLEY: Consideration of a Preliminary Pat, P.S. #86-02, Creekrige Plat 2 by Richard Brickner, Thomas Blomberg and the City of Fridley, being a replat of that part of the West one-half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, T-30, R-24, described as follows: Commencing at a point which is 742.5 feet North of the Southwest corner on the blest line of said quarter section and 467.5 feet East on a line which is parallel with the South line of said quarter section; thence East on a line parallel with the South line of said quarter section a distance of 412.5 feet; thence South at right angles and parallel with the west line of said quarter section 107.25 feet; thence West parallel with first course a distance of 412.5 feet; thence North a distance of 107.25 feet to place of beginning, containing one acre and two and one-half rods more or less according to the Government survey thereof, also described as part of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision Pio. 10 and now known as Lot 14, Revised Auditor's Sub- division No. 10, except the East 249 feet, front and rear, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, and also that part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, described as follows: Commencing at a point 467.5 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North parallel 0 4k,• if PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING,, JUNE 4, 1986 PAGE 2 with the West boundary line of said Lot 6 140.25 feet; thence East parallel with the South boundary line of said Lot 6 412.5 feet, more or less, to a point in the East line of said Lot 6• thence South along the East boundary line of said Lot 6 140.25 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 6; thence West along said South boundary line to the point of beginning, EXCEPT the East 249 feet, front and rear, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, and also all of Outlot A, Dennis Addition, excepting therefrom the East 249 feet and excepting therefrom the West 417.5 feet, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, and also all of Lot 1 , Block 1 , Hidden Woods, and also all of Outlot 1 , Block 1 , Gena-Rae Addition, all lying in the North half of Section 13, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, ACTING CHAIRPERSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANINOUSLY. MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, ACTING CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:36 P.M. Mr. Robinson stated the property was located north of Creek Park Lane and east of Central Ave. Proposed was a replat of four parcels , 2140, 1620 all of Outlot 1 , Block 1 , Gena-Rae Addition, and Lot I , Block 1 , Hidden Woods. The replat was being requested primarily because two large lots could be sub- divided into four buildable lots. In order for lot 1620 to gain access to Creek Park Lane, an easement must be granted across the northeast portion of Outlot 1 , Block 1 , Gena-Rae Addition. The City would retain ownership of that portion of the property. Mr. Robinson stated that lot 1620 was currently being assessed for sewer and water and street for two lots. Mr. Richard Podvin, 1391 Mississippi St. N.E. , asked that if the City retained ownership of that corner of the property in order for driveways to access onto Creek Park Lane, who held liability for those driveways--the City or the homeowners? Mr. Robinson stated the City was just granting access easement, and it would be the owner's liability. It wasn't any different than anywhere in the City where driveways cross city boulevards. Mr. Podvin stated he would like to state the following questions as "food for thought" for the Planning Commission members: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 4, 1986 PAGE 3 1 . Why would the son of a successful developer purchase landlocked property on November 15, 1983, unless he knew in advance that there would be a way to open up the land? 2. Did the fact that the school was put up for sale on April 14, 1983, have anything to do with his decision to buy the property? 3. How else could he open this land without the corner of Gena-Rae? 4. Did it help to have his father, Tom Brickner, appointed to the Sites and Disposition Committee of the School Board on Dec. 14, 1982? 5. Did it help him to have his father suggest to the City that they obtain Gena-Rae as a park knowing the road would be built to the north? 6. The City had a choice of running Creek Park Lane to the north, thus landlocking lots to the south, or running it straight east and west, and landlocking land to the north. Was the road run to the north because Brickner owns land there? 7. Did Brickner offer a small strip of land for a walkway in exchange for the corner of Gena-Rae? 8. The walkway is approximately 2500 sq. ft. in area. The corner is approx. 8000 sq. ft. Is that a fair exchange for the taxpayer? 9. At the time Gena-Rae was condemned, the City ultimately paid the owners 76.5¢ per sq. ft. Using this as a figure, the Brickner strip is worth approx. $1 ,912. The corner of Gena-Rae, being approxi- mately 8,000 sq. ft. , is worth approximately $6,120, leaving a difference of $4,208. Is Brickner going to pay the taxpayers the difference? 10. On November 21 , 1983, fir. Boudreau stated,"The City needs a minimum of 3 to 5 acres." The park presently is down to 2.28 acres after subtracting the holding pond, the street, and the unusable 9 foot strip to the north of the street. The Planning Commission is now considering a plat submitted by Richard Brickner which will reduce the park even further, to a total of approximately 2.1 acres. Doesn't the City of Fridley have an engineer on staff creative enough to make use of the corner of the park for the children of this area? 11. At this time, somebody is already building a house on the Blomberg lot included in the preliminary plat you are considering tonight. Because Richard Brickner submitted this plat, we assume he is the one building. How can he be buildinn when his plat has not even had preliminary approval yet? i • PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 4, 1986 PAGE 4 12. Based on all of these possibilities, could one not assume that the acquisition of this corner was cut and dried as far back as 1983? 13. Mayor Nee, in 1985, gave me his personal word that the corner in question would always remain a part of the park as long as he was Mayor. Is he still the Mayor? Mr. Joe Menth, 1388 66th Ave. N.E. , stated he shared some of the same concerns expressed by Mr. Podvin. He stated he was primarily concerned with the two lots from this subdivision that would face 66th Ave. He stated that currently all the hones along 66th Ave. are sinqle story dwellings that have been there for about 30 years. He would be concerned with continuity in the neighborhood and that homes not be built that would be out of character such as two story hones or split entry homes. Mr. Richard Brickner stated he had no plans at this time for these houses, but he would keep fir. Menth's concerns in mind. Mr. Robinson stated the City cannot regulate the style of a house. If Mr. Brickner chose to build a certain style of house, that was up to him. Mr. Menth stated he would strongly urge Mr. Brickner to consider building single story houses on 66th Ave. to maintain continuity in the neighborhood. Mr. Kondrick stated that Mr. Podvin had some very valid concerns, and he urged fir. Podvin to express these concerns to the Citv Council also as the City Council would make the final decision on this preliminary plat. Mr. Podvin stated that because the City of Fridley felt it needed 3-5 acres of land for a park, the Gena-Rae property was condemned to use as a park. He stated the neighbors had a promise from Nasim Qureshi , City Manager, that every square foot of this land would remain a park forever. He stated he had witnesses to that statement. It was his feeling that when land is taken for a park, the land should remain as a park and not be given away just so Mr. Brickner can build houses. He stated it was sad when tax revenue was more important than children in a neighborhood. Pitting driveways across that corner of land would make it unusable for children. This was the builder's problem, not the City's or the other property oven ers' . He stated it was unbelievable that the City of Fridley would give away a corner of this park land for free. The taxpayers paid $6,200 for that piece of land, and now the City wants to give it away so someone can build on two lots and put two driveways across it. Mr. Menth stated he had attended the meeting when the City said they had to have a certain amount of area for a park, whether it came out of the Rice Creek School property or somewhere else. He felt this corner piece of property could he used as a tot lot or something. Mr. Robinson stated he questioned the safety of having a part of a park across the street from the main part of the park. He stated fir. Brickner's property is being assessed, and he should be allowed to build on his property. i PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 4, 1986 PAGE 5 Mr. Podvin stated that by granting this easement, the City would be opening up the north lots, but the south lots were still landlocked. fie stated there were people in the audience whose double lots were landlocked because-of the way Creek Park Lane was put in, and they are not happy about that. Mr. Brickner stated that most of the things said by Mr. Podvin had nothing to do with him personally. He stated with the easement he could build on two lots. He could still build two lots on 66th Ave. , and if he is not allowed the easement onto Creek Park Lane, he would want to make sure the assessments are taken off that property. fir. flyron Ostlund, 1400 66th Ave. , stated that when the Rice Creek School property was developed, it was developed on the basis of opening up as much landlocked land as possible. The way Creek Park Lane was developed did open up five lots. MOTION BY MP.. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO CLOSE. THE PUBLIC HEARIIIG. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, ACTING CHAIRPERSON KONDP,ICK DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M. Mr. Svand a stated this land was condemned for use as a park. What limita- tions did that place on the City for uses other than a park; in this case, an extension of new homeowners' front yards? fir. Robinson stated that in discussions with the City Attorney it was expressed that the City was fee owners of the property and, as such , would be authorized to gran easements. He stated he did not know if the land was condemned for a park or a public purpose. The corner piece of property right now is not doing the citizens much good. It is basically unusable and is landlocking usable R-1 property. fir. Svanda stated he did agree with Mr. Robinson that to utilize this corner piece of property across the street from the main part of the park would not be very wise. Mr. Betzold stated he was uncomfortable with the City retaining fee ownership of a piece of property that was of absolutely no benefit to the City but was of benefit to the landowners. There may be some valid reasons for retaining the fee ownership, and maybe those reasons should be addressed at the City Council meeting. He did not like to see property landlocked, and there was the option to either expand the park on both sides of the street or go ahead and allow the landlocked land to be developed. Mr. Kondrick stated he was the Chairperson of the Parks & Recreation Commission, and he shared some of the same concerns as the neighbors about this park. However, he did agree with Mr. Betzold about this triangular piece of property; and since there did not seem to be any use for it, it might as well he used � r PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 4, 1986 PAGE 6 for access onto Creek Park Lane and open up the two lots for development. He stated that if it was advantageous for the new lots, he felt that triangular piece of property should be purchased by the homeowners or the developer. Mr. Saba stated he agreed with that. Mr. Robinson stated the issue of sale versus the granting of an easement was an issue that would have to be taken up by the City Council . MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #86-02, CREEKRIDGE PLAT 2 BY RICHARD BRICKNER, THOMAS BLOMBERG, AND THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOFIING STIPULATIONS: 1. THAT THE PROPERTY BE SOLD TO THE DEVELOPER SO EASEMENTS ARE NOT NECESSARY. 2. MR. BRICKNER PAY THREE PARK FEES OF $1,500 EACH WITH FIRST THREE OF FOUR BUILDING PERMITS. 3. PENDING ASSESSMENTS PLUS INTEREST TO BE PAID WITH THE BUILDING PERMITS ON TRACTS C AND D. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, ACTING CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Kondrick stated this item would go to City Council on July 7. 2. RECEIVE MAY 20, 1986, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: Minutes not available at the meeting. 3. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Proposed Ordinance Change - Dean Saba Mr. Saba stated he would like to reco nd that the Planning Commission consider recommending to City Counc' a change to Ordinance No. 115.01 .7 regarding Swimming Pools. He st ed one problem with the ordinance is that it treats above ground a below ground pools the same as far as the height of fencing. Mr. Saba stated the St a Code requires 4 ft. fencing, and so do most of the surrounding co ities. What the current code is doing is forcing people to build 6 t. high fences around their yard or pool in addition to existing fe ng for the express purpose of meeting code. He stated it was virtu y impossible for a child to walk into a yard and fall into a pool tha is already 4 ft. high (above ground pool ). Mr. S a stated he felt the fencing requirement should be changed. He st ed he had no problem with any of the requirements for below ground ols; his objection was to the fencing requirement for above ground (Official Publication) PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Monday,July 7,1986 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m.for the purpose of: Consideration of a Final Plat, P.S.#86-02;Creekridge Plat 2 by Richard Brickner, Thomas Blomberg and the City of Fridley, being a replat of that part of the West one-half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13,T-30,R-24, described as follows: Commenc- ing at a point which is 742.5 feet North of the Southwest corner on the West line of said quarter section and 467.5 feet East on a line which is parallel with the South line of said quarter section; thence East on a line parallel with the South line of said quarter section a distance of 412.5 feet; thence South at right angles and parallel with the west line of said quarter section 107.25 feet; thence West parallel with first course a distance of 412.5 feet; thence North a distance of 107.25 feet to place of beginning, con- taining one acre and two and one- half rods more or less according to the Government survey there- of,also described as part of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No.10 and now known as Lot 14, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No.10,ex- cept the East 249 feet,front and rear,according to the plat there- of on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minne- sota,and also that part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, described as followsi Commencing at a point 467.5 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6;thence North parallel with the West boundary line of said Lot 6 140.25 feet;thence East Parallel with the South boundary ine of said Lot 6 412.5 feet,more or less,to a point in the East line of said Lot 6;thence South along the East boundary line of said Lot 6 140.25 feet to the Southeast cor- ner of said Lot 6; thence West along said South boundary line to the point of beginning,EXCEPT the East 249 feet,front and rear, .according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, and also all of Outlot A,Dennis Addi- tion, excepting therefrom the East 249 feet and excepting there- from the West 417.5 feet,accord- ing to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, and also all of Lot 1,Block 1,Hidden Woods, and also all of Outlot 1, Block 1, Gena-Rae Addition, all lying in the North Half of Section 13, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka,State of Minne- sota. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time andplace. LEROY OQUIST Vice-Chair Planning Commission (June 23&30,1986)-FRID PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Monday, July 7, 1986 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Final Plat, P.S. #86-02, Creekridge Plat 2 by Richard Brickner, Thomas Blomberg and the City of Fridley, being a replat of that part of the West one-half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, T-30, R-24, described as follows: Commencing at a point which is 742.5 feet North of the Southwest corner on the West line of said quarter section and 467.5 feet East on a line which is parallel with the South line of said quarter section; thence East on a line parallel with the South line of said quarter section a distance of 412.5 feet; thence South at right angles and parallel with the west line of said quarter section 107.25 feet; thence West parallel with first course a distance of 412.5 feet; thence North a distance of 107.25 feet to place of beginning, containing one acre and two and one-half rods more or less according to the Goverment survey thereof, also described as part of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 and now known as Lot 14, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, except the East 249 feet, front and rear, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, and also that part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor' s Subdivision No. 10, described as follows: Commencing at a point 467.5 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North parallel with the West boundary line of said Lot 6 140.25 feet; thence East parallel with the South boundary line of said Lot 6 412.5 feet, more or less, to a point in the East line of said Lot 6; thence South along the East boundary line of said Lot 6 140.25 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 6; thence West along said South boundary line to the point of beginning, EXCEPT the East 249 feet, front and rear, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, and also all of Outlot A, Dennis Addition, excepting therefrom the East 249 feet and excepting therefran the West 417.5 feet, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota, and also all of Lot 1, Block 1, Hidden Woods, and also all of Outlot 1, Block 1, Gena-Rae Addition, all lying in the North Half of Section 13, 111-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. Any and all person desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. LEROY OQUIST VICE-CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: June 23, 1986 June 30, 1986 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETIIG MARCH 26 1984 PAGE 2 J ------------- m are still down, that may be justification to either eliminate or desi a different alternatives for those hockey rinks. They started wi ce rinks designated for the City, 9 of them used by the HAF. To his the HAF used 3 of those rinks last year. b. Rice Creek School Dr. Boudreau stated he would give the Commission a brief overview of what has developed with the Rice Creek School property. He stated Tom Brickner has purchased the land at Rice Creek School from the School Board. It is going to be developed residential which means the City should develop some type of park facility to service the Rice Creek School area residents. Mr. Brickner's required dedication to the park development was .09 acres. At the last meeting, the Commission agreed that amount of land was not adequate, because the City had recommended 3-5 acres to service over 2,000 people in this isolated Rice Creek School area. Dr. Boudreau stated discussions were held with Mr. Brickner, but Mr. Brickner was not willing to give up prime buildable lots for park land. He had suggested some land further to the south by buying two back lots of two existing homes. There is a 7 ft. drop between what park is there now and this new land, and it is essentially a drainage area for the neighborhood. He stated he could not accept that land because it was substandard, and the Commission agreed with him. Dr. Boudreau stated that since that time, Tom Blomberg has bought some property from Herb Bacon and the Gena-Rae Addition which is in the center and West of the school . Between the three parcels of property, the City will ena up with 2.2 acres of dedicated park land. He stated that in his estimation this was the best they could do with the given parameters• Mr. Kondrick outlined the proposed developments and park area on the map. Dr. Boudreau stated the Commission might want to stipulate that there be an easement from 66th Ave. to the new proposed park. Mr. Kondrick asked about the recreational facilities presently located at the school . Dr. Boudreau stated he has been told by Mr. Brickner that there would be no problem in removing the recreational equipment; however, he stated it might be a good idea for the Commission to make a motion as part of the final commitment by the City Council on this plan, the City should be allowed to remove all the equipment on the school ground that is currently there and usable for park and recreation purposes. This would include PARKS & RECREATION C01VIISSION MEETING JANUARY 6, 1986 PIIG'' A j e. Re est - Raffaele's Blazers Broomball Team Dr. B dreau stated this was a request from a broomball team to hold a broonb 1 tournament at the two Columbia outdoor rinks. He stated the Citi doe not have a broonball league. It was a situation of a private organizati wanting to use city facilities to raise funds, and it has been the Ci 's policy to discourage these types of requests. Staff's recorimendati was that this request be denied. Mr. Kondrick st ed they have had sinilar requests in the past, and he felt the philosop and policy should remain the sane for this request also. POTION BY MR. ALLEN, ECO':DFD BY MR. NELSON, TO DF171' THE RFQUF.ST BY Ti!r RAFFAF.LE'S BLAZERS BR (BALL TEA:f FOR THE USF. OF 01F-DOOR RINKS FOR A TOURUA7EUT, BASED 0:7 TH CURRENT CITY POL_C'Y FOR Rl'"I::II:G TO►►RNANF.NTS. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VO X AYE, CHAIRPERSON K0'7DRICK PECLARF.D THF MOTIOa CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Dr. d oudreau stated fie had inf ed fir. Adans that the public outdoor rinks were available on a first/cone- st/served basis. f. Request - Region 4AA Minnesota Stat High School League Softball Tournament f Dr. Boudreau stated he would recomnen his tournament to be held '1av 20, 22, 27, and 28, 1986, be approved with a following modifications: 1. Game times be 2:00 and 4:00 p.m. 2. Appropriate fee for use of the fiel '!OTION BY 11P.. ALLEU, SECO.':DED BY MR. NELSON, TO PROVE .THF RFGIna 4AA STATE HIGH SC:TOOL LEAGUE SOFTBALL TOURNAME:, FOR MAY 20, 22, 27 A:ID 28, 1986, WITH THE FOLLOis'IilG ,STIPULATIONS: 1. G«1E TIMES BE 2:00 AND 4:00 P.M. 2. APPROPRIATE FF.F.S FOR USE OF THE FIELDS. UPON A 11OICE VOTE, ALL VOTLIG AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK CLAP,F.D THE MOTION CARRIED 17NA!;1MDUSLY. g. 1986 T*eting Dates The Connissioners agreed to meet on fiarch 3, flay 5, and July 7, 'th a decision to be made in July as to the neeting dates for the ren 'nder of the year. h. Request - Purchase of City Property Dr. Boudreau stated for. Brickner was requesting that the City consider allowing the purchase of the triangular piece of property on the northwest 1 corner of Creek Park Lane. The advantages to the City would be: v • PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 6, 1936 PAGE 9 1 . Additional tax revenue fron four new homes 2. $4,500 in park fees 3. Removal of existing rented older home 4. Elimination of special assessment costs with interest accruing against the city property 5. Eliminate maintenance cost of unbuildable substandard lot 6. Said property would then conform to adjacent new developments. It was the concensus of the Commission members that they saw no nroblem with the Cite pursuing this purchase with t:r. Brickner and Mr. Blomberg 3. D BUSINESS: a. 'eadowlands Park Report M r. ustafson stated the Conmissioners had received the proposal developed by th citizens for the development of Meadowlands Park site dated 'Nov. 1R, 1085. Mr. Gusta on stated basically they got a representative from each block of hoi,ies aroun the park area who net and put this report together. The input was from thos residents and from studies of the proposals and cost esti►lates done by TKDA in une 1935. Mr. Gustafson state that more than anything else, the residents want to work with the City in ettiny things started, realizing everything cannot be done at once. They ld like to put together sone kind of plan where over the next 3-4 years, dowlands Park will he taken care of to rake it more usable park land. Mr. Gustafson stated they felt development should take a three-fold purpose: 1 . drainage system 2. ponding with aeration 3. improve land with passive use htr. Gustafson stated they felt it was imperati that the drainge prohlen be handled first as no other developnent is plau <'ble until this is complete. Mr. Gustafson stated questions arere raised about the rohlem with mosquitoes with a pond. They contacted Anoka County, and Anoka C ty will take care of those kinds of problems. Mr. Gustafson stated that regarding purpose -3, it was the c ensus of all the neighborhood that they really do not wish to see the ci put a lot of money into ballfields, basketball courts, etc. They just want walkinc trail , plantings, trees, possibly picnic tables, etc. Mr. Gustafson stated it was cost effective in putting it together. Ins ad of S240-250,000 as proposed last year, they are looking at approx. S135,0. . PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 14, 1986 PAGE 6 u.� The Commission members discussed the possibility of having the meeting at another location other than City Hall . Mr. Kirk stated- one possi- bility would be to hold the meeting at the Community Education Center which was right across from Commons Park. MOTION BY MR. GARGARO, SECONDED $Y-SIR. YOUNG, TO HOLD THE AUG. 4TH PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING"REGARDING COMMONS PARK AT THE FRIDLEY COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER. UPON A VOICE IVOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTS"CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. b. Creekridge Park Triangular Piece of Property Mr. Kondrick stated there was a triangular piece of property in the northwest corner of Creekpark Lane that a developer wants to use for easement for driveways to buildable lots. Mr. Kondrick stated that in the Jan. 6, 1986, Parks & Recreation Commission minutes, Dr. Boudreau had stated that Mr. Brickner was requesting that the City allow the purchase of the triangular piece of property in the northwest corner of Creekpark Lane. Dr. Boudreau had stated the advantages to the City would be additional tax revenue from four new homes, $4,500 in park fees, removal of existing rented older home, the elimination of a special assessment cost with interest accruing against the city property, elimination of maintenance costs on buildable substandard lots, and the property would then conform to adjacent develop- ments. Also stated in the minutes was that it was the consensus of the Parks & Recreation Commission members that they saw no problem with pur- suing this purchase with Mr. Brickner. Ms. Schreiner stated she did not see any value in this property remaining as park property. She also did not think the property should be given away. The other Commission members agreed. MOTION BY MR. GARGARO, SECONDED BY MR. YOUNG, TO REAFFIRM THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION'S POSITION AS .D0<71.MENTED IN THE JAN. 6, 1986, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION NINUTES AND TO URGE THE CITY TO SELL THE TRIANGULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY ON CREEKPARK LANE TO MR. BRICKNER. UPON A VOICE, NOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. c. Meadowlands Park Update Mr. Kondrick stated that it had come to the Ci-ty's attention that after the Parks & Recreation Commission received--the comments and ideas from the Meadowlands Park citizen=-,comtiff tee, they had not made a motion to pass these comments and deas on to the Planning Commission and City Council . PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14 1986 PA5E 5 Mr. Kirk stated he would notify Mr. John Flora, Public Works Diector, of these requests by the Craig Park neighborhood. /% Mr. Kondrick thanked Ms. Stevenson and Ms. Nelson for coming to the meeting and expressing their concerns and the things they Mould like to see in the park. He stated Staff would review this req u t to find out what, in fact, could be done, and this would be discuss d again at the October Parks & Recreation Commission meeting. b. Minnesota State High School League Request Mr. Kirk stated the Commission had received a request from the Minnesota State High School League for the 1987 f1innesota ,5tate High School League Girls Class AA Softball tournament to be held at the Community Park on Tues. and Wed. , June 2-3, 1987. � MOTION BY MR. YOUNG, SECONDED BY MR. GARGARb, TO RECEIVE THE LETTER REQUEST FROM JOHN BARTZ, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF THE MINNESOTA STATE. HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE, DATED JUNE 17, 1986. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MR. YOUNG, SECONDED BY MRI. GARGARO, TO GRANT THE REQUEST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE FOR A TOURNAMENT TO BE HELD ON JUNE 2-3, 1987, AT THE COMMUNITy'PARK WITH THE STANDARD RENTAL FEE, AND WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IN,^CASE OF RAIN-OUT, THE ONLY EVENING THE FIELDS CAN BE USED IS TUESDAY/EVENING, JUNE. 2. L' UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY'. c. New Commission Member - ,� ahn Gargaro Mr. Kondrick stated he would like to welcome Mr. Gargaro to the Commission. He felt that because°of Mr. Gargaro's background, he was going to be a tremendous additi''on to the Parks & Recreation Commission. Mr. Gargaro stated he has lived in Fridley for 16 years and is employed at Fridley State Bank. 3. OLD B/or a. Ck - Public Information Meeting Mtated Mr. Robinson, Planning Coordinator, was organizing this mHe stated it would be held on August 4, 1985, and would be he purpose of getting ideas from the citizens and to get their rto the concepts being suggested by Staff. He stated Mr. Flora hed that this is an informational meeting only and that nothing hpproved as far as monies for the park. i PARK:' RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 4, 1986 PAGE 7 4. 0_.D BUSINESS: a. Triangular Piece of Property at Creekridge Park Mr. Gargaro stated he had noticed in the July 21 City Council meeting minutes, pages 10-13, that a motion was made by Councilman Schneider "to direct staff to prepare a careful analysis of the cost for acquiring parcels A, B, C and D for park purposes". fir. Gargaro stated he would like to know if, in fact, this was feasible. Mr. Robinson stated that at the City Council meeting that same night, the City Council was reviewing the Creekridge plat again. Staff has done some analysis as requested by the City Council related to how much acreage would be added to the park and the cost. He stated that at the July 14 meeting, the Parks & Recreation Commission did recommend that the City sell the triangular piece of property on Creekpark Lane. Mr. Robinson stated in his report to the City Council , he brought to the City Council 's attention the fact that the Parks & Recreation Commission was not apprised of the fact that there might be some additional park land available and that if there was a decision to buy more park land, the Parks & Recreation Commission would probably be interested in looking at the feasibility of adding that to the park. Of course, one of the key concerns was that the land was cut through by a street and might be an attractive nuisance. fir. Kirk had pointed out that Summit Square was laid out in a similar fashion on two sides of a street, and as far as the City knew, there have been no accidents at that park. Mr. Robinson stated there are four parcels that are proposed to be split off by Mr. Brickner. The two southerly portions are 1/2 acre and the two northerly portions are 1/2 acre. The Parks & Recreation Commission could decide to recommend the City pick up none of the parcels, all of the parcels, or the two southerly portions. If they were to add the two southerly parcels of 1/2 acre to what was existing with the triangular piece,there would be about 312 acres. Mr. Gargaro stated a petition has gone around this neiqhborhood by the neighbors asking the City to acquire more park land. He stated he wanted to re-emphasize that the Commission never had any knowledge of this additional property and the Commission hoped this would come back to them. Mr. Kondrick stated he had talked to Councilman Schneider and had told him that at the July 14 meeting, the Parks & Recreation Commission acted only on the information they .had at that time. • PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 4, 1986 .AGE 8 ADJOURNMENT MOTION BY MR. ALLEN, SECONDED BY MR. GARGARO, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE,ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE AUGUST 4, 1986, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:10 P.M. Res ectfully sub 'tted.- Lyfil Saba Recording Secretary ✓- F �- FIlGE_2 rYYTTa!'TT. MFFTTTQ; n �RTj, 2, 1984 PUBLIC TNGS. 1. PUBLIC HEARIWj ON FINU PIAT, MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:43 p.m. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this proposal is for a residential plat on the property bounded by Arthur Street and south of Rice Creek and formerly the Rice Creek School property. Mr. Flora stated the plat consists of 29 lots, five of which were set aside for park area. He stated, however, during the Planning Commission hearing on this plat, there was considerable discussion regarding a park in this neighborhood. Mr. Flora stated the school currently provides a recreational facility for persons in this area and these facilities will no longer be available with development of this plat. He stated the residents felt the lots proposed for a park area were inadequate to maintain the level of recreational services for this area so it was requested the City look at adjacent property in the Gena-Rae Addition for additional park space. Mr. Flora stated, during this negotiation period for additional property, Mr. Blomberg came in to develop an adjacent area to the west as residential lots. He presented a sketch showing the location of Mr. Brickner 's lots and the location of the lots proposed by Mr. Blomberg. Mr. Flora stated the City is attempting to purchase property in the Gena- Rae Addition for a park which would provide a 2. 2 acre park for neighborhood residents. Mr. Flora stated, based on this concept, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the plat at their March 14, 1984 meeting. Mr. Flora stated Mr. Brickner could then construct residences on the 29 lots, as originally proposed. He further stated, along with Mr. Brickner's plat, a road system can be provided which will allow construction of the park, the development of Mr. Blomberg's nine lots to the west, and open up the large lots to the north for future lot splitting. He stated this also would provide access from the various areas being served to the park. Councilman Schneider questioned the intentions in regard to the park property. He stated his concern is the situation which arises by approval of this plat; that is, the recreational facilities provided on the Rice Creek School property will vanish. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the Council authorized staff to initiate negotiations for acquisition of park land. He stated he anticipates the City would be able to acquire the property this year and, with adequate funding provided, the park would be at least partially completed in 1985. He stated the tennis courts and ball fields would, realistically, be available in 1985, providing the City has control over the land. "crr, MF'F'1'ING_ . PAGLI ' Councilman Schneider stated he would like to attach a timetable as to when the park facilities would be available to residents in the area. Mr. Qureshi stated the City is presently negotiating with the owner for acquisition of the property; however, the City does have the right of eminent domain, but would prefer working with the owner and this may take a little longer period of time. Councilman Schneider stated he didn't want to get into a situation where the school is torn down and the recreational facilities are gone and the land for park purposes isn't under the City's control so there would be several years of waiting for these recreational facilities to be completed. Mr. Qureshi stated he felt the most they would be looking at is next year and didn' t feel it would go beyond that date before the recreational facilities are available. Mr. Joe Menth, 1388 66th Avenue, stated the fences around the tennis courts have been taken down. He stated he also had a concern regarding the assessments. Mayor Nee suggested to Mr. Menth his concern on the assessments be discussed this evening under the item of the public hearing on the improvements. Mr. Myron Ostlund, 1400 66th Avenue, stated his concern is primarily where the roadway will be constructed in respect to the end of his lot. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the roadway is all on the Gena-Rae property and wouldn't be on Mr. Ostlund's lot. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Ostlund if he had any plans in the future of splitting his lot. Mr. Ostlund stated he felt, at this time, he would like to maintain the large lot. Councilman Schneider questioned why the fences and the recreational facilities at Rice Creek School were being torn down. Mr. Flora stated the Parks and Recreation Commission had recommended that the Parks and Recreation Department remove all the recreational equipment at the school property. Councilman Schneider stated he felt ths action should have been concurred with by the Council before any removal of these facilities began. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this plat. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8:08 p.m. 2, PUBLIC HEARjNG ON VACATIONE A - VACATE T AVENUE ADJATO BLOCK 2, OAK CURTIS LARSON: AM RECEIVING PETIT O;;;::�2ITION TO VACATION RE MOTION by Co �rmn rnik to waive the r of the public hearing `! J the lots are develod. He ted these Fercels aruditor' s Subdivision No. 10, Parcels 1620 (two buil 'ng sites) , 1640, 16 and 1680. Mr. Inman stated this impravemen also covers a sewer line for Midas Muffler at a cost of $2,328.63 and a sewe line for the golf driving range at a cost of $4,657.38. He stated the asse sment for the golf driving range plus interest will not actually be levi until the lot is developed. Mr. Inman stated the improvement also ers a water loop between Fridley and Anoka Streets at a cost of $7,2 5.80 which is to be paid from the Utility Fund. No persons in the audience spoke regarding these proposed assessments. mDTiON by Councilman Schneider to close the ublic hearing. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vot all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and t e public hearing closed at 8:00 p.m. 5. PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSES21T FOR O RTTifCE , PRWECT ST. 1984-1 84-1 AM 2 AND ADDEMO NO 2 AND 3: MJTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:00 p.m. Project ST 1984-1: Mr. Inman stated the first portion of this project covers the east service drive on TH No. 65 betwen 72nd and 73rd Avenues. The total cost is $58,656.80 with $32,847.81 to be spread to the north portion of the lot and $25,808.99 to be spread to the south portion of the lot. Project ST 1984-1 (Addendum No. 2) : Mr. Inman stated 1984-1 (Addendum No. 2) covers the improvements in the Creek Ridge Plat by Tom Brickner and the improvements in the Hidden Woods Plat by Tom Blomberg. He stated the cost for street improvements on 66th Avenue are $2,944.71 per lot and $720 per lot for storm sewer. Ube cost of storm sewer improvements on Arthur Street are $720 per lot. The cost for street improvements on Creek Park Lane (Creek Ridge Plat) are $3,839.82 per lot and $720 per lot for storm sewer. the cost for street improvements on Creek Park Lane (Hidden Woods Plat) are $6,243.24 per lot and $933.34 per lot for storm sewer. The cost on Creek Park Lane for the proposed park segment is $7,543 .44 for each outlot for street surfacing. The park property has no assessment for storm sewer as there will be a 7� holding pond. He further stated the cost of street surfacing to properties on the north side of the street is $3,017.38 per lot; cost of right-of-way for these properties is $1,280 per lot; and cost of storm sewer to these properties is $907.20 per lot. -5- Mr. Inman stated Assessments for street surf a*, right-of-way, and storm sewer plus interest on the lots on the north side of the street will evied until such time as lot splits are not have their assessments actually l requested and approved to create new building sites. mese are Parcels 1620 (two building sites, 1640, 1660, and 1680 of Auditor's Subdivision No. 10. Mr. Inman stated the assessments for pond improvements are to be paid per an agreement between the City, Mr. Brickner, and Mr. Blomberg. He stated one-third of the total amount, $10,000, would be paid f rom the Park Fund, one-third paid by Mr. Brickner, and one-third paid by Mr. Blomberg. Mr. Blomberg would receive a credit of $667.00 which results in an assessment of $114.95 per lot for Mr. Brickner's plat and an assessment of $296.26 per lot for Mr. Blomberg's plat. Oouncilman Fitzpatrick questioned the depth of this ponding area. Mr. Flora stated with a very intense long duration rain it probably wouldn't be over two feet and, with normal rainfall, it would probably only be inches. Councilman Schneider stated he felt the city went through plans over and over and acquired property so there wouldn't be any ponding area. He stated this doesn't have any bearing on the assessment, but he felt a lot of work had been done in order to eliminate any ponding areas. Project ST 1984-1 (Addendum No 3) . Irman, City Clerk, stated this improvement covers street surfacing and co rete curb and gutter on Capitol Street from Main Street to Hughes Aven . He stated the front foot assessment rate is $37.85 per foot and the side y d assessment rate is $7.14 per foot. The total cost for this project $47,918.00. Mrs. Dorothy reza, 5221 Capitol Street, stated she was appearing on behalf of Mrs. Hazel ar who was out of town and left a letter with her to be read to the Counc' regarding this proposed assessment. The letter which she read statedMrs. Osfar had already been assessed for the front and side yard of her lot at 51 Hughes Avenue. These remarks were incorporated into the minutes during the ption of the resolution (Item No. 18) . Mrs. Breza stated, from wha she understands, Ms. Osfar' s home actually fronts on Hughes, however, the 'ty maps show her as fronting on Capitol Street. She stated Mrs. Osfar w assessed ten years ago and understands she again would be assessed for 93 et. She also wanted to know if she would be charged for the new curbing. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated Mrs. Osf would not be charged for the curbing which was replaced on Huges. Mr. Inman, City Clerk, stated Mrs. Osfar's lot isng charged for 93 front feet as this is the narrow side of the lot. He stat in reviewing the assessment for improvements under Project 1978-1, this cel was charged as if its side yard was abutting Hughes Avenue and its fro yard abutting Capitol Street. He stated, at that time, this property wasarged a side yard assessment for one--third of the balance or 45 feet, the fore, this -6- COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNEG. 1986 0 Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, felt one thing that might be of some pr !C� value is to look at various businesses in the City and de ich signs the Council feels are aesthetically pleasing anxid give some thought to standardizing the ordinance around those that are acceptable. He stated he was referring to future signs andel t existing signs. M)TION by Council nette to table this item indefinitely. Seconded by Councilma zpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declar the motion carried unanimously. 6. RECEIVrNG THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1986: A. _CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT, P.S. #86-02, CREEKRIDGE PLAT 2, GENERALLY LOCATED ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, HIDDEN WOODS; OUTLOT 1, GE;IA RAE ADDITION; PART OF OUTLOT A, DEIZNIS ADDITION; PART OF LOTS 6 AID 14 , REVISED AUDITOR' S SUBDIVISON NO. 10, BY RICHARD BRICKNER, THOMAS BUJMBERG A.'M THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: I.IDTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing date for consideration of this final plat on July 7, 1986. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the notion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of Jae 4, 1986. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried una nirnously. 7. CONSIDERATION OF AGREEME2U FOR THE LEASE OF THE "A" FRAME BY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14: t-DTION by Councilman Barnette to authorize the Mayor and Ci Flanager to enter into this agreement for the lease of the "A" frame by col District No. 14. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voi vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimous 8. RECEIVING BIDS AMID CON IDERATI N OF AWARDIN ONTRACT FOR SIG NAL SYSTEM PAINITING PRWECT NO. 167: Mr. Fl or a, Publ is Wor ks Di rest or, st ed f our bi ds w er e r eceiv ed f or Pr of ect No. 167. He stated there was a basic bid for Fainting the entire pole and an alternate bid which did no include Fainting the metal above the signal. Mr. Flora stated the bids e higher than what was expected because of the items required such as ocking traffic and using a cherry picker. Mr. Flora stated aff would recommend the low base bid from Al Erickson Service be:a pled in the amount of $29,243 which includes Fainting all the signals a poles. NDTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for Project No. 167: -9- 0 COUNCIL MEE'T'ING OF JUNE 16, 1986 PLANHCLDER TOTAL, BASE BID ALT. A BID Al Erickson Service 538 Virginia Street St. Paul, MN 55103 $29,243.00 $26,493.00 Painting Systems 1004 Lowry Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, MSI 55418 $38,385.0 $25,194.00 Valley Contracting P. 0. Box 8599 White Bear Lake, DN 55110 $38,7 .00 $29,379.00 Eagle Construction 8181 Riv ery i ea Ter r ace Fridley, hN 55432 $ 6,958.00 $45,811.00 Seconded by Councilman Barnette. n a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried nimously. MJTION by Councilman Schneider o award the contract for the Signal System Painting Project No. 167 to th,6 low bidder, Al Erickson Service, for the total base bid in the amaUnt of $29 ,243 . Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. RESOLUTION NO 47-1986 ENDORSING THE EFFORTS OF THE NORTH METRO TRAFFIC TASK _FORCE SUPPORTIIJG ADDITIONAL RIVER CROSSING CAPACITY NEEDS AND REQUESTING A COMMITMENT OF RE URC E FROM THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE METROPOLITAN CQU'NCIL TO IMPLEMENT F&SPONSES TO IDENTIFY RIVER CROSSING NEEDS IN THE NORTH METRO AREA: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this resolution requests the Minnesota Departm t of Transportation and the Metropolitan Council initiate a detailed study the bridge needs of this area and to designate necessary resources to des gn and construct appropriate facilities. bDTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 47-1986. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a roll call vote, Councilman Barnette, Councilman G peed, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilman Schneider voted in favor Ve the motion. Mayor Nee voted against the motion. Mayor Nee declared motion carried by a 4 to 1 vote. Mayor Nee stated he didn't feel the State had been responsive to the City' s past requests regarding traffic congestion through Fridley. 10. RESOLUTION NO. 48-1986 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST 1986-3• PDTIDN by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 48-1986. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared -10- • THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF JULY 7. 1986: 2ie Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was caller] to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Goodspeed, Cbtncilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider and Councilman Barnette MEMBERS PBSENT: None PRESENTATION OF AV M: ELMARS PRIEDITIS - HCUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: Mayor Nee stated there are a number of citizens who contribute to the planning and development process of the City by serving on City commissions. He stated the Council is not in asition to compensate them for their services, however, CertificatY, to Appreciation are awarded at the end of thei r terms. Mayor Nee stated he was honorpresenta Certificate of Appreciation to Mr. Flmars Prieditis who has served on the Housing & Redevelopment Authority from February, 1976 to Apr' , 1986. He stated Mr. Prieditis has made a significant contribution the improvement of the City. Mayor Nee and the Council members extended eir thanks and appreciation to Mr. Prieditis. Mr. Prieditis stated he was honored to receive this recognition and enjoyed the experience and results of serving on the Housing & Redevelopment Authority. APPROVAL OF MIDI CC)UNCIL METING, JUNE 16 1986: MJTION bycilman Barnette to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Council an Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared e motion carried unanimously. CIL MEETING JUNE 25, 1986: MD iON by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes as presented. S r d by Councilman Schneeider. UpDn a void vote, all voting aye, Mayor ee lared the motion carried unanimously. -1- 7 COUNCIL METING OF*9 7. 1986 e j ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Cbuncilman Schneider requested the following item be added: Receiving Petition No. 5-1986 for the Installation of a Street Light on 75th Avenue. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda with the above addition. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, ali voting aye, Mayor Nee declared them on carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITDRS: mere no response from the audience under this item of business. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. PUBLIC HFAR.ING ON THE MATTER OF A FINAL PLAT, P S #86-02, �REEKRIDGE PLAT 2, LOCATED ON IAT 1, BLACK 1, HIDDEN WOODS•\-Q[ITLOT 1, GENA RAE ADDITION, PART OF OUTLOT A, DENNIS ADDITION• PART OF LOTS 6 AND 14, REVISED AUDITOR' S SUBDIVISION NO 10, GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE AND SOUTH OF 66TH AVENUE, BY RICHARD BRICKNER, THOMAS BLOMBERG AND THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: MDTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:40 p.m. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this plat deals with a portion of the Gena Rae Addition, the Blanberg Hidden Woods development, and Brickner's creekridge development. Councilman Schneider asked if the City is a petitioner and if so, how this came about. Mr. Flora stated Mr. Brickner made application for this plat and Mr. Blomberg also signed it because he is an involved party. He stated the City became involved because of some City property in the plat, but the City isn't the petitioner. Cbuncilman Fitzpatrick stated on Page 1C of the agenda, he could only see where three parcels are listed and asked about Parcel 2140. Mr. Flora stated Parcel 2140 is part of a lot split the Cbuncil approved at an earlier date. Mr. Flora stated Creekridge Plat 2 involves the Creekridge plat, a portion of the Gem Rae plat and the Hidden Woods plat. Mr. Flora stated a replat is proposed to make four buildable lots across the City-awned portion of the Gena Rae parcel and involves some of the Blanberg plat to provide a better alignment of the curve in the street. Mr. Flora stated the original plan was for an easement to be provided across the City property so access could be provided as a normal boulevard into the parcels of land. Mr. Flora stated at the public hearing before the Planning Commission, testimony was heard from the neighborhood regarding the continuity of construction along 66th Avenue and Creek Park Lane. He stated other -2- COUNCIL MEETING of JULY 7, 1986 discussions involved the amount of property owned by the City for park and the contention was there was no need for this triangular parcel because it is too small to construct any park facilities and would require children to cross the street to access this parcel. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Comni ssi on recommended approval of this plat with three stipulations which he outlined. Councilman Schneider stated there were a number of issues raised at the Planning Commission meeting. He asked when the size of the park was discussed, if it included the corner parcel. Mr. Flora stated this goes back to the original. Creekridge plat. He stated there were a number of proposals submitted for a park. He stated in the final analysis, the City agreed on a plan which provided for the construction of Creek Park Lane to provide access fran Creekridge and Hidden Woods plats and to use the majority of the Gena Rae parcel for a baseball field, ice skating rink, tennis court and tot lot. He stated during discussion of the Creekridge and Hidden Woods plats, it was decided to construct Creek Park Lane providing for the eventual subdivision and future access for the properties on the north with everything south being devoted for park purposes. Cbuncilman Schneider questioned the size of the park and requested staff to check and advise on the amount of acreage. He also questioned the bikeway/walkway to the park. Mr. Flora stated the City has obtained an easement for the bikeway/walkway with the original Creekridge Plat and this easement would not be affected by this plat. Mr. Flora stated the recommendation of the Planning Commission was for the City to sell this triangular portion of City property to the developer, rather than providing an easement. Mayor Nee questioned haw the final plat could be considered when the issue hasn't been resolved if there should be an easement or if property should be sold to the developer. Mr. Qureshi stated the plat could be approved and the Council can decide the direction they wish to proceed, either an easement or sell the property. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated the City assessed parcels C and D for the street improvenents and for sewer and water on Creek Park Lane. He stated, therefore, the City is required to provide access to the property for which they were assessed and this can be accomplished either by an easement or sale of the property. He stated whether the Council decides to sell the land or not is a policy decision. He stated whether the Council gives access to the street is a legal question and having assessed them for the construction, the City is bound to give then access. Mr. Richard Podvin, 1391 Mississippi Street, stated if the City assessed -3- CQJWJL MEETING OF JULY 7. 1986 those lots, he questioned why it couldn't be removed as opposed to having to provide access. Mr. Podvin stated the property in the Germs Rae Addition is never referred to as park property. He questioned who decided the corner of the park wasn' t of any value to the residents. Mr. Herrick stated he thought the suggestion came from the Planning Commission because when it was submitted to the Commission, as an easement was originally requested. Mr. Podvin stated the City staff member at the Planning Commission meeting referred to this as a loan of the land and asked how the City loans land. He stated if the two lots were loaned and driveways constructed, there is no way the City could ever get them back. Mr. Podvin stated this corner of the park in question was condemned on the strength of sworn testimony by Dr. Boudreau that the City needed this acreage for the park desperately. He stated the area is over 8,000 feet and you could put a number cf activities on that land. Mr. Podvin stated Mr. Brickner bought the property in 1982 knowing it was landlocked and questioned why the residents should lose park property in order to solve the owner's landlocked problem. He stated he wonders who authorized Richard Brickner to include that corner of the park in his plat. Mr. Flora stated Mr. Brickner didn't include it in his plat as the original request was for an easement. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Herrick if he represents Mr. Brickner. Mr. Herrick stated he has represented Mr. Brickner on a number of different projects, but has not represented him on the original Creekridge Plat or on this proposed plat. Mr. Podvin stated the drawings on Pages 1H and lI of the Council ' s agenda were the ones presented to the Planning Commission and the corner of the park was included. Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated these drawings are the same ones which were used as exhibits at the Planning Commission meeting. Councilman Schneider asked if this plat was presented to the Planning Commission as having been petitioned for by the City. Mr. Robertson stated he couldn't recall, but it should be in the minutes. Mr. Podvin stated the City has been added to the legal notices as being petitioners in the plat. He asked who put the City's name on the plat. Mr. Flora stated the petitioners were Thcmas Blcmberg and Richard Brickner and the City is included, if the decision to sell parcels G and H is approved, as recommended by the Planning Commission. -4- COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 7, 1986 Oouncilman Schneider stated in the Planning Commission minutes on Page 1B, it contains the name of the City under the public hearing item. Mayor Nee stated he assumes the plan was to incorporate City land in the pl at. Oouncilman Schneider asked if someone could define P. S. #84-01 which was approved on April 2 , 1984. Mr. Flora stated this was approval of the Creekridge plat. Mr. Herrick stated on Pages 6 and 7 of the Council minutes of April 2, 1984, there is discussion about assessments, lot splits, deferring assessments until lots are split and that is part of what the Council is discussing this evening. Mr. Podvin stated the point he is trying to make is they started out with the right of the City to condemn property on a sworn statement they needed three to five acres for park. He stated the size is then reduced to provide a holding pond to drain Mr. Brickner's property. He stated the City is now giving another corner of the park away to another Brickner. He stated since the land was condemned on the basis of the need for a park and then to give it away, he didn't feel it was right. He felt someone could come up with a use for this corner of the park. Mr. Podvin questioned why Mr. Brickner bought the property when he knew it was landlocked. He stated he makes the prediction that Mr. Brickner will end up with the park property. He stated it has been the history that whatever Mr. Brickner wants, he gets. Ms. Mary Leather, 1472 66th Avenue N.E. , thought it would be nice for houses to be built facing the park. She stated, as it is now, the park is hidden from visa and subject to vandalism. She stated she wasn' t aware the land across the street could be added to the park, but wouldn't want her children running back and forth across the street. Ms. Mary Laconic, 6644 Arthur Street N. E. , stated she has concerns with children in the park because it is rather desolate. She stated if there were houses facing the park, she would feel more comfortable. Ms. Laconic stated she would rather have two houses than the additional park property. Mr. Herrick felt the Council had several alternatives to (1) grant an easement across that property for the two parcels, C and D, for which improvement costs were assessed; (2) declare the park property surplus and sell it to the developer; or (3) possibly revoke the assessment if the landowner agrees to it. Mr. Herrick stated he is not sure once the assessment is made and the time for appeal has expired, if an: assessment can be revoked, as this situation is not addressed in the State statute. Mr. Podvin stated he felt a deal was made with Mr. Brickner for him to construct the bikeway/walkway and the City, in turn, would give him a corner -5- COUNCIL MEETING O*M 7, 1986 of the Fark. Mr. Fbdvin stated he had been assured by Mayor Nee that while he was Mayor that corner wouldn't be sold oft. Mayor Nee stated he has difficulty believing he made that statement. He stated on the face of it, without any reference to the persons involved, it makes some sense to sell that corner of the park. He asked Mr. Fbdvin if he felt it would be a good use of the land to have hares constructed on the two lots. Mr. Fodvin stated the land was condemned on a statement tnat the City needed the park property desperately, but the City is giving it away in pieces; first, for a holding pond and now to open up 1 andl ocked property. He felt when you go before a judge and swear you need it for a park and then do the exact opposite, this isn't right. Councilman Schneider stated given the situation where it is today, it appears the sensible thing to do is to allow the development. He stated he wishes to go beyond this presentation and questions the motivation of the intensity in which this is presented and the confusion. He stated it certainly appears there is a conflict of interest. He stated he cannot get straight answers from the staff regarding the size of the park and the holding pond. He stated the situation is what it is and it doesn' t make much sense to have more park there. He stated he doesn' t understand the plat and who are the petitioners. Mayor Nee asked Dr. Boudreau if this parcel of property would be useable for park purposes. Dr. Boudreau stated when you have a street that divides a park, it creates a hazard and maintenance problem, and he would recommend that this parcel not be used for park purposes because it is too smali. He stated it is an unwise expenditure of funds trying to maintain these small parcels and could see no practical use to serve that area. Dr. Boudreau stated he wished to comment regarding Mr. Fbdvin' s statement. Dr. Boudreau stated the National Parks and Recreation Association has established criteria and recommends there be three to five acres of park land based on the population and believes this was his statement made under cath at the time of the condemnation proceedings. Councilman Goodspeed stated they have at least one park in the City divided in half by a street. He stated the important question is if the Council can revoke the assessment. Councilman Goodspeed felt the decision, if that corner of land is useable for park purposes, has to come fran the Parks and Recreation Commission. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated if the City needs a park of three to five acres, if parcels A, B, C and D were added, it would just about meet the criteria in regard to the size. -6- COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 7, 1986 Councilman Schneider asked if the developer was willing to purchase the property from the City. Mr. Richard Brickner stated he is willing to purchase it and pay the assessments. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to continue the public hearing with instructions to staff to: (1) obtain an opinion on the ramifications of forgiving the assessment; (2) submit the proper final plat with the appropriate items shown for an easement or for the sale of the park property; (3) submit plats which have been approved in this area such as P.S. #84-01 and others that may be pertinent; (4) contact the developer to determine if they are willing to purchase property from the City and at what cost; and (5) determine the oust for the City to acquire parcels A, B, C and D for park purposes. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: 2. ORDINANCE NO 858 FOR A VACATION, SAV #86-01, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 55 - 77TH AVE. N.E. : MDTION by Councilman Goodspeed to waive the second reading of ( dinance No. 858 and adopt it on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINi'Mm rs To PLANNING, QM4UNITY DEVELOPMENT, APPEALS, ENEFCY AND PARKS AND RDCREATION COMMISSIONS; PLANNING COMMISSION• Mayor Nee stated Mr. Steve Billings has contacted him and expressed his views and would like the Council to consider him for appointment as Chairman of the Planning Commission. MDTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to nominate Steve Billings for Chairman of the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. There being no further inations, the following action was taken: MOTION by Council ma Barnette to cast an unanimous ballot for the appointment of Steve Billings as Chairman of the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PARKS ANj>4ECRFATION COMMISSION: rR, Co lman Barnette stated Steve Nelson has accepted a position as hockey ch in Superior, Wisconsin and has resided. f ran the Parks and Recreation i ssi on. -7- • I COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 7, 1986 MDTDDI by (buncilman Barnette to nominate John Gargaro, 6615 Fridley Street, to the Parks and Recreation Commission to fill Steve Nelson's vacancy. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. 9bere being no further nominations, the following action was taken: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to cast an unanimous ballot for the appointment of John Gargaro to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. APPEALS, ENERGY AND COMMUNITY DEVEUJPMENT COMMISSIONS: MOTION by Councilman Barnette to table the appointments to these commissions. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. pon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried nimously. NEW BUSINESS• 4. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE CREATING A CHAPTER OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO A TAX IMPOSED UPON IQWING: Mr. Rick Pribyl, Finance Director, stated a survey was conducted of cities who had a motel/hotel tax. He stated there are a variety of ways they proceed with the collection of this tax. He stated one of the cities felt the administrative costs were act -ly their part of the contribution toward the betterment of their community Mr. Pribyl stated some cities retain 10% of the tax collected for admini ativ e costs and, in talking to them about the City's proposed 5%, some felt it was a little low based on the actual wording of the ordinance. Mr. Pribyl stated the wording of the first paragraph under Section 7 has been ganged so it doesn't have the implication the director is totally responsible for the authenticity of the return. He stated under Section 9B, the City Attorney may institute legal action to recover any amounts due plus interest, penalties, and costs and disbursements of any action. He felt, therefore, the 5% adtinistrative cost would be appropriate for the City. Cbuncilman Barne a asked if the City Attorney then acts as the policing Power. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he didn' t feel this is much different than any other license in the City. Councilman Schneider asked how long this tax would be in effect. Mr. Herrick stated it would exist for as long as the Council wanted the ordinance. Mr. Lowell Johnson, Director of Sales for the new Ramada Hotel under construction in Brooklyn Center, stated he was present to answer any q)jesti ons from the Council. -8- _ COMCIL MEETING OF dIY 21, 1986 3. t'LBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER OF A FINAL PLAT, P S #86-02, CREEKRIDGE PLAT f2, LOUTED ON LCT 1, BLOCK 1, HIDDEN WOODS; OUTLOT 1, GENA RAE ADDITION; PART' OP CC= A, DENNIS ADDITION• PART OF LCIS 6 AND 14, REVISED AUDITOR' S SUBDIVISION NO 10, GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF CENTRAL_ AVENUE AND SOUTH OF 66TH AVENUE, BY RICHARD BRICKNER, THOMAS BLOMBERG AND THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: Mayor Nee reopened the public hearing which had been continued from the July 7, 1986 meeting. councilman Schneider stated he received a phone call frau Karla Blomberg and she indicated she wasn't sure haw her name appeared on this petition as she and her husband have no interest one way or the other in this plat. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated Mr. Brickner requested a lot split to split a large parcel into four buildable lots and an easement for parcels C and D. He stated the Park and Recreation Commission has stated they no longer need the triangular piece of property, adjacent to Creek Park Lane, and the Planning Commission suggested this piece of property be sold. Mx. Flora stated the Blomberg property became involved because of the possible realignment to provide a better site of three hones on the curve of the street. He stated a registered land survey was required describing these lots, the Brickner property, Blomberg property and City-owned property. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the registered land survey with three stipulations which he outlined as follows: (1) the property be sold to the developer so easements are not necessary; (2) Mr. Brickner pay three park fees of $1,500 each with the first three of four building permits; and (3) pending assessments plus interest to be paid with the building permits on tracts C and D. Mr. Flora stated at the July 7 meeting there was a question whether to allow an easement or allow sale of this triangular piece of property. He stated the plat before the Council now is the one recommended by the Planning Commission. He stated it is a revised plat to which the petitioner is agreeable. Councilman Schneider asked the cost for the City of acquiring parcels A, B, C and D for park purposes. Mr. Flora stated the assessed values for those four parcels is $77,400. MT. Flora stated if you look at it from the perspective of need and use, there is a park on the other side of the street which provides the amenities previously provided at the Rice Creek School site. Councilman Schneider asked if anyone else, besides the petitioner, is interested in purchasing this property. Mr. Flora stated the City, in the past, has attempted to urge adjacent property owners to purchase these types of excess property. -10- COUNCIL MEETING OF �ft 21. 1986 Councilman Schneider felt the City acquired the parcel under the pretense it was to be used for park purposes. He stated the recommendation of the Planning Commission is it be sold to a specific individual and not be used for park purposes. Mr. Flora stated the Council made the decision to provide park land for the two plats, Creekridge and Hidden Woods, and obtain the Gena Rae parcel for this and also provide a road. He stated the plan approved by the Council provided the best park space and connection to the two plats. Councilman Schneider stated the reason it was connected was because of the Staff's recommendation. Mr. Qureshi stated it was the desire to provide a road and it was constructed in the most logical location which left the most amount of useable park land. He stated if it is the Council ' s desire to assess parcels C and D, you have to provide access to them. He stated if the Council provides access and still sells the lot to someone, it didn' t make sense frau a planning point of view, as the Code would not allow anything to be built on this triangular piece of property. Mr. Qureshi stated the original proposal was not to sell the parcel, but provide an easement to the roadway. Mr. Ralph Skinner, 6217 Central Avenue, felt if this parcel was to be disposed of in any fashion, other than to go back to the former owner, it should be put up for bids. He stated he would be happy to bid at least $10,000 for this parcel and would use it as a lever with Tom Brickner regarding his property on Old Central and Heather Place. Councilman Schneider stated he is not trying to condone developers buying property to prevent the other one frcan developing. He stated he is not trying to obstruct development of two or four homes, but he is concerned about the fairness when the City takes property for one purpose and changes the use and, because it is an excess parcel, not giving the one they acquired it frau the first opportunity to have it. Mr. Flora stated the Council addressed part of the issue in the assessment. He stated they identified tax assessments against the parcel as far as it being a future buildable lot. He stated they probably didn' t address the specific issue of the triangular piece of property. Mr. Richard Brickner, the petitioner, stated he is willing to purchase the land, pay the park fees and all assessments. He stated the question on the fairness is for the Council to decide. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Brickner what he would do with the land if he couldn' t receive access. Mr. Brickner stated he would still like to plat Lots A and B and keep C and D as outlots. Mr. Richard Podvin, 1391 Mississippi Street, stated at the July 7 meeting, -11- COUNCM MEETIM1986 • �� ' Mr. Herrick indicated those parcels had already been assessed, therefore, the City must give access. He felt this position misled the Council. He stated, as of last Friday, these assessments haven't been levied until the plat is approved by the Council. Mr. Fbdvin stated he is seeking a legal opinion for this property to be returned to the owner, before it was taken by eminent domain proceedings, or for this parcel to be joined with the park. Councilman Schneider stated it seems the issue is the legitimate disposal of land that was condemned and not used. Mr. Newman, Assistant City Attorney, stated unless there are restrictions contained in the final court order, there has to be a public purpose and, at the time, it was intended to acquire the parcel for park purposes. He stated there are situations where plans have been changed and that being the case, the Statute allows it to be declared surplus and sold. He stated he understands the City acquired fee title to the property and it is his opinion the City would be able to grant an easement. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Newman's opinion on haw this surplus parcel should be handled. Mr. Newman stated the Council is not required by State law to go to public bidding. He stated for certain policy reasons, if an individual lot is buildable, the City may wish to solicit bids. He stated when you have a parcel that is not buildable, it is a unique situation. Mr. Newman cited the case of the property along I-694 which was turned back to the owner in order to make productive use of the property. He stated there have been instances in the past where the City has acquired property through the condemnation process and sold it to other parties, providing there are no restrictions in the deed or court order awarding the condemnation. Mr. Newman stated, in that case, the lots were buildable and it was in the best interests of the City to obtain bids. He stated in a parcel that is not buildable, the Council has to make a decision if they should place it on the open market or allow it to be joined with other property to make it buildable. Mr. Flora stated the Gena Rae plat has never been platted since the City acquired it and if, for example, the broken line is eliminated, the issue of the triangle becomes a mute point. Ms. Mary Loschy, 1399 66th Avenue, stated she was disappointed the elected officials didn't know what they did with their park property. She stated the park is adequate, but not so adequate they can throw a triangle away here and there. She stated she has a hard time dealing with the City acquiring property from one taxpayer and turning it over to another for free. She stated to be practical, she can see that Mr. Brickner will be given the easement. Ms. Loschy suggested perhaps A and B could be used for hares and C and D purchased from Mr. Brickner for a passive area of the park where picnic tables could be provided. She felt they should have something to compensate for the space being used for the holding pond. She stated she -12- �1 +, COUNCIL MEETING OF 21, 1986 • hoped the Council appreciated the fact that the neighborhood needs some park space, and a great deal of the land acquired for park is not useable for park space. Ms. Nary Luther, 1472 66th Avenue, stated she is against a park on both sides of the street as she felt it was a hazard to children. She stated she would like to see homes facing the park for the safety of the children and to try and cut down on the vandalism. .Mr. Joe Menth, 1388 66th Avenue, stated he would like to see the City acquire parcels A, B, C and D to expand the park. He stated he agreed with Ms. Lawler that having children running across the street could create some problems. He felt if the tot lot was located in the area of the C and D parcels, it would help keep the children off the street as this is a nicer area than where it is now located. Mr. Podvin stated if the tot lot was moved to the north side of the street, there are a lot of children on 66th Avenue and in the Brickner development so you would have no worse of a situation than there is now. Councilman Schneider stated he believed some serious mistakes were made in the development of this area. He felt drainage problems were created and thought they were putting in a three acre park and it is only 2.2 acres including the holding pond. He stated apparently folks are suffering from the City not working together. He felt it may be reasonable to acquire parcels C and D and if this doesn't happen, the triangle piece should be opened to bids. Mr. Jon Gottwald, 1415 Mississippi Street, stated the City could have purchased their land without condemning it, but there never were any negotiations. NDTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayoror Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 10:50 p.m. NDTION by Councilman Schneider to direct staff to prepare a careful analysis of the cost for acquiring parcels A, B, C and D for park purposes. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4. PUBLIC HFARIM ON REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #86-02, GENERALLY_ LOCAtED SOUTH OF RNE ROAD AND Wr OF HIGWAY 65 BY DAVID HARRI NDTION by Councilman Schneider to waiv e reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hear.i Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all votin , Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the c hearing opened at 10:50 p.m. Mr. Robert , Cdxmunity Development Director, stated this is a request to rezone perty from C-3 to C-2 so buildings on this parcel could be set -13- I COUNCIL MEETING OAMY 21, 1986 back 35 feet instead of 80 feet. Mr. Robertson stated there are also plans to realign the frontage road in this area at Osborne Road and Highway 65. Mr. Robertson stated the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the rezoning. Mr. Harris stated the reason they are asking for a 35 foot setback is to place the parking to the rear and sides of the building rather than i front. MDTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconde by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayo Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing clo ed at 10:56 p.m. 5. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER OF A FINAL PLAT P.S. #86-03 A & R DITION GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF OSBOPNE ROAD AND EAST OF HIG191AY 65 4 BY DAVID HARRIS: MDTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the lic hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilma' Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the otion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 10:56 p.m., Mr. Robertson stated this plat is located on the southeast corner of Osborne Road and Highway 65 and consists of approximatelyv five acres. He stated the Planning Commission has recommended approy/al of the plat with four stipulations which he outlined as follows: 11) plat approval contingent upon approval of the rezoning; (2) drai4iage and utility easements are provided on final plat as requested by/Staff; (3) petitioner agrees to assessments for one-half cost of Viron oad improvements; and (4) park fees on the four lots to be paid with bui ing permits (subject to prevailing rates) . Mr. Harris stated he agreed, fore the plat was submitted, when staff wanted the loopback for Viron oad, he would pay one-half the cost of the road improvements even thou he had given 80% of the right-of-way. NDTION by Councilman S ider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. pon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried nimously and the public hearing closed at 11:00 p.m. RECESS: Mayor Nee cal ed a recess at 11:00 p.m. RDOG Mayor ee reconvened the meeting at 11:15 p.m. All Council members were pre t. 0 BUSINESS: -14- COUNCIL MEETING OST 4, 1986 • Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS• 7. RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY 1987 BUDGET AND S=ITU PUBLIC HEARING: Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the City Chart requires the City Manager to submit a budget to the Council on the first-meeting in August. He stated this budget has been pZngkea the Fri Focus. Mr. Qureshi stated theer is great number of State and Federal aids available and it i pated the City would qualify for any revenue sharing funds e. He stated it is proposed the City live within the revenues resome adjustments and reductions will be necessary in certain aMDTION by Councilmanto receive the preliminary 1987 budget. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Go ilman Barnette to set the public hearing on the budget for September 8 1986. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voti aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Cour man Schneider asked staff to prepare a summary of what services would be t to accommodate the decrease in the budget. 8. RECEIVING REPORT ON THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE AND SOUTH OF 66TH AVENUE, BY RICHAP.D BRICKNER, THOMAS BLOf�IBERG ADID THE CITY OF FRIDLEY• Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated staff was requested to prepare an analysis of the cost for possible acquisition of Parcels A, B, C and D for park purposes. Mr. Robertson stated the existing park is 2.9 acres with .43 acres of right-of-way. He stated if Parcels A and B were acquired, it would add .46 acres; if Parcels C and D were acquired, it would add .47 acres; and if the triangular portion (TP) were acquired, it would add .16 acres. He stated if the triangular portion and Parcels C and D were added to the park, the acreage would be 2.93 and, if the triangular portion and Parcels A, B, C and D were added, the acreage would be 3.39. Mr. Robertson stated the cost of acquiring the lots has been estimated using three methods. He stated the first method was assuming landlocked status for Parcels C and D, with buildable status for Parcels A and B, the cost would be fi52,650. b;Ir. Fobertson stated another method was assuming buildable status for all parcels, A, B, C, and D, the cost would be $99,900. He stated the third method was estimated acquisition value of Parcels C & D based on the Gena Rae costs of 76 cents a square foot and Parcels A and B estimated as buildable lots, the cost would be $77,312. -7- COUNCIL MEETING OF&UST 4. 1986 f .R Mr. Robertson stated an additional cost associated with the possible acquisition includes waiving the assessment on the existing southerly parcel (proposed Parcels C & D) which are currently held in abeyance, but are accruing interest. He stated the assessments for two future lots, for sewer, water and street, total $17,944 plus accrued interest of $3,046.62 (through 7/30/86) for a total of $20,990.62. W. Robertson stated in addition to the cost, several issues need to be addressed concerning the safety raanification of having a park subdivided by a street and the usability of the additional acreage. He stated the creation of an attractive nuisance is a major concern. Councilman Schneider stated it is his understanding, there has been discussion in the neighborhood and putting costs aside, there isn't an unanimous feeling whether or not expansion of the park is a good idea. Mr. Podvin, 1391 Mississippi Street, stated a petition was circulated and with the people they spoke to, 90% signed in favor of the park. Mr. Podvin then read the language contained in the petition which supported the Council acquiring these parcels for park purposes. Councilman Schneider asked when the petition was circulated, if there was discussion about possible cost sharing. Mr. Podvin answered in the negative. Councilman Schneider asked then if the assumption was the City would acquire the parcels at no charge to the residents. Mr. Podvin stated one person asked if they would be assessed a park fee since they had already paid one and he had replied he didn't think so. He stated the residents apparently weren't concerned about haw it would be financed, but did indicate they wanted it. MJTION by Councilman Schneider to receive petition No. 8-1986 submitted by Mr. Podvin in favor of expansion of the existing park. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Podvin stated in regard to the estimated costs for acquisition of the property, the people in Gena Rae would have appreciated this kind of reimbursement. He stated the City is saying the property is worth twice as much as Gena Rae was worth. In reviaaing these figures, Councilman Schneider stated if C & D are about 21,000 square feet and the cost is based on 76 cents a square foot, the cost would be about $16,000, not $29,412. Mr. Robertson stated he was not sure if another factor was involved in arriving at the $29,412 figure, however, if they use the 76 cents a square foot alone, the figure would be $15,560 instead of $29,412 and the total would be $63,460 rather than $77,312. Mr. Bob Gambrel, 1341 Creek Park Lane, stated he was not. approached to sign -8- COUNCIL MEETING OST 4, 1986 , the petition presented by Mr. Podvin, and he hasn't met with any of his neighbors on 66th Avenue. He stated he is very much for parks, but objected to splitting the park as he felt it would be unsafe because of the curve and sight lines. He felt if a cul-de-sac was constructed and then increase the park area, it would be a good idea, but not with a through street. Ms. Mary Lawther, 1472 66th Avenue, stated several persons who signed the petition stated they didn't know all the facts involving the safety factors. She stated she was opposed to expanding the park across the street. Mr. Dave Larson, 1410 66th Avenue, stated he didn't see the petition, but is opposed to splitting the park. He stated he is concerned about the safety and felt the existing park is adequate, but would like to see improvements to the park. Mr. Jeffrey Johnson, attorney representing Richard Brickner, stated he would like to ask a question as to procedure. He was not certain if this was just an open discussion regarding the park or if it involved the actual plat. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the motion the Council made at the last meeting was to bring back information regarding possible land acquisition. He stated the Council has the option of adding the consideration of the plat to their agenda, but it isn't officially on the agenda at this time. Tor. Johnson stated if it is the Council's desire that they want the property for a park, assessments are deferred that are accruing interest and he would like to proceed as soon as possible. He stated he views this as a planning issue on what is the best use of the land. Mr. Johnson urged the Council to make a determination so Mr. Brickner could proceed with his plans. Mayor Nee stated even without action by the Council, Mr. Brickner has two building sites. He stated the proposed plat established two landlocked lots and he has a problem with even considering any replat, if this is true. Mr. Johnson stated if Mayor Nee is referring to the plat including two landlocked lots because the City includes the triangular portion, it is a correct statenent. He stated if the City wanted to retain the fee title, an easement for each lot would have to be granted. Councilman Schneider stated there was an assumption that the triangular portion (TP) automatically belongs to Parcels A and B. Mr. Johnson stated he dicWt believe they made that assumption, but only proposed a better use of the land by including the triangular portion in the plat. Councilman Schneider stated he would like to come to some resolution on the park issue and, beyond this, there is the issue of what to do with the triangular portion. Councilman Fitzpatrick pointed out most people now have to cross the street to get to the park, and he is sensitive to the safety issue, but it seems if -9- • COUNCIL MEETING OFOXST 4. 1986 the park is expanded to the north, it doesn't change the situation where most people now cross the street to access the park. Mr. Gambrel stated people do not cross at the curve and if you have attractions on both sides of the street, there would be constant crossing of the street. Mr. Johnson stated the City has a piece cf property that is under-utilized and the developer has a piece of property that is unbuil dabl e and felt to combine the parcels works for the best interest of the City. Councilman Schneider stated presuming the Council doesn' t proceed with expansion of the park, there is more than one person interested in that triangular portion of property. Mr. Johnson stated a sale cf the property to an individual who couldn't put that parcel to use wouldn't be a good planning prospect for the City. Mr. Fbdvin stated in the event the City decides to sell the parcel, Statutes 161.44 and 171 are the ones to review which return the land to the original person f ran wham it was condemned. Ms. Pat Harff, 1311 Creek Park Lane, stated she is opposed to expanding the park across the street. She stated a lot of parents use the tennis court and their children play in the tot lot and didn't feel these should be separated. Mr. Month, 1388 66th Avenue, stated he is certainly concerned about the safety, but there are two sides to every argument. He stated he would like to see the park expanded as the hazard doesn't change whether kids are going back and forth across the street to the park or to the bike path. Mr. Menth stated when he bought his home, there was a large park, picnic area and hockey rink on the Rice Creek School property, and this isn't the case anymore. He stated he appreciated the comments from those who don' t want the park expanded because of the safety problems, but felt the existing park is too small and the safety issues could be addressed. Mr. Curt Loschy, 1399 66th Avenue, stated, in theory, he would like to see the park expanded. He stated, in his judgment, it isn't a good idea to turn over current park land to a developer. He felt Parcels A and B should develop with residential homes and Parcels C and D utilized for park purposes. Mr. Loschy stated there is a need for a permanent hocky rink in the area. He felt one way to solve the safety issues to put the hockey rink on one side and this would keep the older and younger children separated. Mr. Gambrel asked Mr. Fbdvin if he had talked to the owners of the property surrounding Parcels C & D on whether they wanted a park on these parcels. Mr. Fbdvin stated he talked to one who was not in favor because she felt they would have more vandalism, but he could not contact the other property caner. Mr. Gambrel stated the person opposed to the park is Mary Larson. Councilman Schneider stated the policy followed is to provide neighborhood -10- COUNCIL MEETING Q49=4, 1986 • parks which are primarily paid for by the park fee paid by developers. He stated, in this case, it would be expansion of an existing park and wondered about the residents' feeling on a cost sharing arrangement, if it would cost them about $1,000. Both Mx. Loschy and Mr. Njenth indicated they would be willing to contribute to the cost of expanding the park. Mr. Gary Bram, 1436 66th Avenue, stated for the people who want the park enlarged, they may have to pay over $50,000. He wondered if these people would be in favor of improving the park, or if they are just grinding an ax because Mr. Fbdvin' s property was taken. Mr. Podvin stated the corner was taken for a park and as long as he is alive, it will stay that way. Mr. Braam asked if anyone feels they would like to see the park improved rather than having it expanded. Mr. Gottwald, 1415 Mississippi Street, stated the City took their land without even trying to reach an agreement with them. He stated a lot of promises were made which haven't been kept. Councilman Schneider stated, in his judgment, he felt it would create a hazard by expanding the park on both sides of the street simply because of the crossings back and forth. He stated he would be in favor of improving the existing park and safety conditions. He stated, in the risk of alienating a lot of people who signed the petition, he didn't feel, from the safety point of view, expansion of the park was a good idea. Councilman Schneider stated his recommendation would be not to proceed with expansion of the park, but the issue still needs to be resolved on that triangular portion. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Fbdvin to send him a letter on what promises had been made and what was not f ul f it l ed. Mr. Newman, Assistant City Attorney, stated he is not sure of the status of the assessments on Parcels C and D. He stated he understands an assessment has been levied and, if Council does not approve the plat, those assessments should be vacated. Mr. Qureshi, City Nariager, stated when the assessment roll was adopted, Council instructed staff when these properties were split, the assessments plus interest would be paid. He stated these assessments are being held until the property is split. Councilman Schneider stated from a financial viewpoint, the City has potentially two people interested in the triangular portionn and it could be put up for sale to the highest bidder. Mr. Newman stated in this type of situation, the City isn't obligated to -11- COUNCIL MEETING 0 ST 4, 1986 sell to the highest bidder. He stated a decision has to be made as to what makes good sense from a planning standpoint. Ms. Pat Klarkowski, 6560 Arthur Street, asked if the City was so affluent that the property didn't need to be sold and developed. She stated she is bothered by the fact that the Council doesn't seem to care when the property is sol d. Mayor Nee stated eventually the property will be liquidated at a cost plus interest. Councilman Schneider stated the issue to be addressed is if the triangular portion should be given to a developer free or to try and get the best price for it. Ms. Klarkowski felt there is an opportunity now to get the money for this piece of property and it was important for the Council to take an action. Councilman Schneider stated it is not worth playing favorites in order to have four hones built there. Mr. John Phillips, 1361 Creek Park Lane, asked what would happen to the triangular portion of property if it wasn't sold and not turned into a park. Councilman Schneider stated the City would have to maintain it and adjoining property owners would probably be given an oportunity to acquire it. Councilman Schneider stated his suggestion would be not to pursue the expansion of the park and go to an open bid for the triangular portion with a minimum price of 76 cents per square foot. He stated funds generated f ran the sale of this property should be dedicated to improving the existing park. MDTION by Councilman Schneider to place consideration of Mr. Brickner's plat on the Council ' s agenda for September 8, 1986. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NDTION by Councilman Schneider to direct staff to place consideration of the disposition of the triangular portion of property on the Co un ci 1 ' s agenda for September 8, 1986.. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated there were several different options regarding this plat and questioned which plan the Council wished submitted. Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated the original plat proposal is shoran on Page 8N of the Council's agenda. Mayor Nee stated this plat contains Fart of a park and asked Mr. Brickner if this was his proposal. Mx. Brickner stated he cans parcels A, B, C and D. Mayor Nee stated the plat, as submitted, contains half of a City park. -12- COUNCIL MEETIW3 OF BUST 4, 1986 • Mr. Brickner stated the Council is making this complicated. Counclman Schneider asked Mr. Brickner why the park is included in his plat. Mr. Brickner stated he didn't know. Mayor Nee asked who was the engineer who drew up the plat. Mr. Brickner stated it was Ron Meyer who drew the plat. Mayor Nee advised Mr. Brickner to submit what he wanted and the Council would look at it as a substitute for this plat he submitted with the park property included in it. 9. RECEIVING REPORT ON THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MISSISSIPPI STREET AND IIIGHt;'AY 65, BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON: Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated staff wadi rected to look at what could be done in terms of taking the value of Lots 5, 6 and 7, Lucia Lane Addition, and spreading the costs of acquiring these lots against properties on Lucia Lane. Mr. Robertson stated taking into account the current asking price of $100,000 and the Assessor's estimate of market value of $63,300, leaves a difference of $36,700 and an assumed negotiated difference of $30,000. He stated based on these figures and considering 20 es involved in a 15 year assessment at 9% interest the total cost per pr perty owner would be $1,634 or an average of $175.60 per year. Mayor Nee stated he felt the benefit received by these property owners wouldn't be equal to the assessment. Councilman Schneider asked Mrs. Timo if she had reviewed this proposal. Mrs. Timo, 6517 Lucia Lane, stat she had not seen the proposal, but stated a lot of property comers wer not interested in this possibility of an assessment to acquire these ts. Councilman Schneider stat d he was contacted by a representative of the developer and he indica d he wanted this tabled. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated to his knowledge, no one has contacted staff and the Council could consider this proposal, deny the rezoning or table it. Councilman Schwider stated he would oppose the rezoning. He stated he felt it was the best proposal for this property he has seen to date and something a lot more negative to the neighborhood may eventually be constructed on these lots. Councilman Schneider felt he couldn't support the rezoning as themei boyhood was not in favor of it. No was present at the meeting representing the developer. ,ItTION by, Councilman Schneider to dery rezoning request, %t3A #86-01 for the -13- • • v . COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1986 west half of Lot 4, and all of Lots 5, 6 and 7, Lucia Lane Addition, as filed by L. Robert Erickson. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A 160NING REQUEST, ZOA #86-02 GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF OSBORNE ROAD AND T OF HIGHWAY 65 N.E. , BY DAVID HARRIS• Mr. Robertson, Community Development Direct or, this rezoning is for property generally located south of Osborast of Highway 65 to r ez one f ran C-3 to C-2. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to wding and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Secondedn Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nthe motion carried unanimously. 11. RECEIVING THEM ES OF TEE PLANNING ING OF JULY 23 1986: Councilman Schneider stated since he ould not be present at the August 18 Zmeeting, he requested tapes of the lic hearings be made available to him. A. M-11SIDERATION OF A REZONING ZOA 86-04 TO P.EZOT, FROM C-3 GENERAL SHOPPING CENTS TO -2 GENERAL BUSINES GENERALLY LOCATED ON PARCEL 2570 THE/SAME BEING 7699 VIRON ROAD .E. BY I^TAYNE DAHL• NDTION by Councilman Schnei r to set the public hearing on this rezoning request for August 18, 198 . Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Nay r Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. B. CONSIDERATION OF SIXTING A PUBLIC HEARING RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CHAPTEW 205 AS IT PJU ATES TO DAY CARE C=ERS ARID HQI'E FAMILY DAY NOTION by Council* Barnette to set the public hearing on this City Code amendment for AuNst 18, 1986. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all% voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. I C. COrSID ION OF Sr-,TMG A PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION REQUEST, SAV #86-- 3 TO VACATE THE FIVE FOOT UTILITY FITT-7 AL011G THE c=-aftc=-aft PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 4 BLOCK 1 INNSBRUCK NORTH TOT 7R�i SES PLAT 4 TO A POINT TEN FEET WEST OF THE SOUTH PP.OP . LINE OF THE SPIT TAT GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5462 MEI ER ROAD N.E BY DARREL FARR: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this vacation reque for September 8, 1986. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voi e vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. -14- COUNCIL MEETING OF OM22M 8. 1986 Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the property could be sold and a drainage easement retained. Councilman Fitzpatrick felt it may be pre-mature-to oonsider disposition of this parcel before :the report is receiv the drainage. Councilman Schneidestated was prepared to make a motion to dispose of the parcel, but. nf they should keep their options open as an additional holding; d may be needed. MDTION by (bun-cilman Schneider to table this item until the drainage study report is available to the Council at the next meeting. Seconded by Colman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED REGISTERED LAND SURVEY FOR P. S. #86-02 , CREEKIWE PLAT 2. GENERALLY IQM= ON PART OF OUTLOT A. DENNIS ADDITION AND PAD'S OF = 6 AND 14 , REVISED AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 10, BY RICHARD BRIC'KNER. THOMAS BIBMBERG AMID THE CITY OF FRIDLEY* Mr. Robertson, Cbnunity Development Director, stated Mr. Brickner was asked to clarify his final plat and has sukmitted a registered land survey for the property directly north of the triangular piece of property. He stated this plat involves two lots, A and B, fronting on 66th Avenue N. E. and Outlot C left as unbuildable with no access. Mr. Richard Brickner, the petitioner, stated this plat would enable him to construct two hones and give the Council time to work out the problems with the triangular piece of property. (buncilman Schneider asked if the drainage frau the two additional homes could be handled. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated most of the drainage would be to the north to 66th Avenue for Lots A and B. Mayor Nee stated he felt Mr. Brickner should understand he may or may not be able to develop Outlot C. Mr. Brickner stated he is aware of the situation. MDTION by Counc-lman Schneider to approve P. S. #86-02 dated August 21, 1986 with the follcwz.ng stipulations: (1) park fees of $1,500 each to be paid with building permits on Lots A and B and Lot C subject to park fees if built on; (2) registered land survey to be recorded prior to building permit; and (3) staff review elevations for storm drainage. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS 17. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RDCODIFYIM THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, aiA= 205. AS IT REIATES TO DAY = CENTERS -AND HOME FAMILY CARES Mayor Nee felt there sho -55e some clarification on haw this ordinance -17- COUNCIL NEL'= OF SEETEMM 8. 1986 relates to day care centers in the hare. Mr. Newman, City Attorney, felt by the definitions the intent is t is ordinance would apply to a day care facility that would serve more tha 12 children and not in the hare. He stated if there is day care in a h and they have less than 12 children, it is a have occupation. He felt if' there is a problem the term "Day Care Centers" should be changed to an Out-of-Hare Day Care Center or Commerical Day Care Center. NOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to request a minor language change, before the second reading, to clarify Day Care Centers as Qut-of-Home Day Care Centers. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a oice vote, all voting aye, mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimo y. 18. CONSID=ON OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINN'1ANW\CE ZOA #86-04, BY WAYNE D,AHL• Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated Dr. Dahl has applied for a variance and requested this item be tabled to be considered at the same time of the variance. NOTION by Councilman Schneider to table ,this item until a recommendation is received regarding the variance. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayo Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 19. SAV #86-04 , BY THE CITY OF Mr. Robertson, Comm7arianoe.� ment Director, stated Dr. Dahl has applied for a variance and s item be tabled to be considered at the same time of the va NOTION by Councilmao table this item until a recommendation is received regarding Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, allMayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 20. CONSIDERATION OF "CENSURE FOR AUTO RECYC LERS IN FRIDLEY: Mr. Robertson; . Community Development Director, stated results of the environmental tests performed by Turin City Testing have not been received for the auto ,recycling businesses. He stated Mr. Flaherty of Central Auto Parts was going to try and receive these results today. Mr. Buzick, representing Central Auto Parts, stated he had received these results/'at 5 pm. today and submitted then to the Council. -18- i • COUNCIL MEETING OF EMU= 8. 1986 assessable cost is $12,390.00 and assessment rate is $11.53 per front foot. He stated the City's portion of the cost, per agreement, is $55,000.00 and the City's share is $31,216.00. He stated $9,500 is to be id f ran the Utility Fluid for a total cost of the improvement of $108,106.0 . No persons in the audience spoke regarding this propose assessment for Street Improvement Project ST 1986-3. MDTION by Cbuncilman Fitzpatrick to close the public tearing. Seconded by Councilman Barrette. Upon a voice vote, all voting ale, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:27 p.m. OLD BUSINESS: 13. REVIEW OF COMPLIANCE OF APACHE CAMPIM Mr. Robertson, Community Development Dire or, stated the owner/operator of Apache Camping Center, Mr. Pawelski, h agreed to install five Russian olive trees and three silver maple tr He stated there is some question about the feasibility of three ornam ntal trees in the front and, as an alternative, there is a proposal to similar species and continue the row along East River Road. Cbuncilman Schneider stated the ner admits he has violated the conditions of the special use permit and ndered what was being done in this regard. Mr. Robertson stated Mr. Paw ki has complied and mored his trailers so the only other issue is the 1a caping. Mr. Nelson, attorney re esenting Mr. Pawelski, stated there has been discussions between Mr. welski and Mr. Wiersma of the City staff regarding the landscaping. He tated he understands the additional landscaping suggested by the City s acceptable to Mr. Pawleski. He stated the question is if they should pr d with the landscaping, if the special use permit is to be revoked. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Pawleski intends to violate the terms of the special use permit. Mr. Nelson stated it is not his intention to violate it. Cbuncilman Fi patrick questioned the landscaping proposed and if it was adequate. H stated he is not too impressed with the plan. Ms. Mary rtin, 133 Stonybrook Way, stated she also was not impressed with the lands ping they are proposing. She stated the majority of landscaping is on 77 and would do absolutely nothing to block the unpleasant view from East er Road. She felt rather than planting the trees, a shall evergreen hedge ould be planted across the front of the property. She felt there shoal be some trees, but in front the plantings should be low. Ms. Martin fel perhaps a four foot fence that could be moved may be considered along wi the plantings. She felt some fencing to cover the vehicles and pl ing a hedge would serve her purpose. Gbuncilman Fitzpatrick felt they shouldn't lose sight of the purpose which -15- COUNCIL MEMIM OF SEPTEMBER 8. 1986 is to provide screening. He felt both the neighboring residents and the owner would want the top of his display to be visible. He felt they should have screening with shrubbery rather than a raw of trees. Mr. Nelson stated his client is waiting to hear fr the City and is willing to comply if a plan can be worked out. KMON ty Councilman Fitzpatrick to to this item for further details and submission of a new landscaping pl t the next regular Council meeting. Seconded by Councilman Goodspee Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carr' unanimously. 14. ORDINANCNO 863 RECCJD3F M CHAP= 6 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, PLANNING COMMISSION• MDTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 863 and adopt it 'ge" the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilm an Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared redthe�Uon carried unanimously. 15. ODNSm=ON OF DISPOSITION OF EXCESS PROPERTY, GENERALLY LOCATED ON PART OF OLM01 1, BLOT 1. GENA RAE ADDITION: Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated staff was directed to submit options for the disposition of the Gena Rae triangular piece of property. He stated three options recommended are as follows: (1) the City retains this triangular piece and, in this case, Mr. Brickner should plat two lots double deep fronting 66th Avenue N. E. ; (2) the City make a determination this is excess property and opt for public bidding to determine a buyer. If Mr. Brickner was successful in acquiring the parcel, he could plat accordingly with four lots as previously planned. If not successful, he should plat as in #1 above or, he could plat Lot C provided it be sold to the successful bidder; or (3) the City make a determination of excess property and negotiate a sale to Mr. Brickner. Mr. Brickner then plats with the four lots as previously planned. (buncilman Schneider asked if there is the possiblity the City may use this piece of property in record to drainage retention. Mr. Flora stated there is that possibility as, originally, the Bloomberg Hidden Woods plat called for a retention area in back of certain lots. He stated this was incorporated in the overall Rice Creek Watershed District plan which comprised the Blomberg and Brickner plats. He stated it may be possible to move this detention pond to this parcel. Mr. Bob Gambrel, 1341 Creek Park Lane, stated the problem is the current shape of the land and the triangular piece caused water to flow into his back yard. He stated he is getting drainage off all the lots on 66th that are to the north. He felt the drainage problem should be resolved, but didn't want to delay the decision on the triangular piece of property. He stated he saw water coming out of the drainage pipe rather than going into it. He stated he supports the idea of a study of the drainage. -16- f COUNCIL H=M OF MMMM 8. 1986 Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the property could be sold and a drainage easement retained. Councilman Fitzpatrick felt it may be pre-mature to consider disposition of this parcel before the report is received on the drainage. Councilman Schneider stated he was prepared to make a motion to dispose of the parcel, but now felt they should keep their options open as an additional holding pond may be needed. MDTION by Councilman Schneider to table this item until the drainage study report is available to the Council at the next meeting. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED REGISTERED LAND SURVEY FOR P S #86-02 . CgEEKR_TmE PLAT 2, GENERALLY LOCATID ON PART OF OUTLOT A. DENNIS ADDITION AND PARTS OF LOTS 6 AND 14 , REVISED AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO, 10, BY RICHARD BRICKNER, THOMAS BLOMBERG AND THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: Mr. Robertson, immunity Development Director, stated Mr. Brickner was asked to clarify his final plat and has submitted a register land survey for the property directly north of the triangular piece of perty. He stated this plat involves two lots, A and B, fronting on 66th enue N. E. and Outlot C left as unbuildable with no access. Mr. Richard Brickner, the petitioner, stated is plat would enable him to construct two homes and give the Council ti to work out the problems with the triangular piece of property. Cbuncilman Schneider asked if the drainage from the two additional homes could be handled. Mr. Flora, Public,Works Director, stated most of the drainage woul ne to the north to 66th Avenue for Lots A and B. Mayor Nee stated he felt W. Brickner should understand he may or may not be able to develop Outlot C. Mr. rickner stated he is aware of the situation. MDTION by Councilman Schnei r to approve P. S. #86-02 dated August 21, 1986 with the following stipul 'ons: (1) park fees of $1,500 each to be paid with building permits o ots A and B and Lot C subject to park fees if built on; (2) regist ed land survey to be recorded prior to building permit; and (3) staff,'review elevations for storm drainage. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. / Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried'unarumously. NEW BUSINESS- 17. , MAJ�JM 205, AS IT REIATES TO DAY CARE CENTERS AND HOME FAMILY TARP: ' Mayor Nee felt there should be some clarification on how this ordinance -17- COUNCIL MEETING OF $F'Pi'h7NRF'R B. 1986 relates to day care centers in the hane. Mr. Newman, City Attorney, felt by the definitions the intent is this ordinance would apply to a day care facility that would servemore than 12 children and not in the hone. He stated if there is day care in,�a have and they have less than 12 children, it is a have occupation. He t if there is a problem the term "Day Care Oenters" should be changed to an Out-of-Home Lay Care O`nter or Commerical Day Care Oenter. MDTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading"and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declare4,"the motion carried unanimously. INION by Councilman Schneider to request a minor language change, before the second reading, to clarify Day Care Centers as Out-of-Home Day Care Centers. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried nimously. 18. ZOA #86-04, BY WAYNE DAHL• Mr. Robertson, Cbmenunity Development rector, stated Dr. Dahl has applied for a variance and requested this i be tabled to be considered at the same time of the variance. MJTION by (buncilman Schneider table this item until a recommendation is received regarding the variance Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting ay , Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 19. CQNSIDERATION OF FIRST ArYrll- OF ORDINANCE APPRMM A VACATION REQUEST, SAV #86-04 , BY THE CITY O� FRIDIM: Mr. Robertson, Cbmmuni Development Director, stated Dr. Dahl has applied for a variance and req sted this item be tabled to be considered at the same time of the vari ce. MJTION by (buncil Schneider to table this item until a recommendation is received regarding the variance. Seconded by (buncilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, al voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 20. CONS LIQMM FOR Mr. Robert Community Development Director, stated results of the environmen tests performed by Twin City Testing have not been received for thea o recycling businesses. He stated Mr. Flaherty of Central Auto Farts w going to try and receive these results today. Mr. ick, representing Central Auto Parts, stated he had received these res is at 5 p.m. today and submitted them to the (buncil. -18- Comm MFFTim of SEP mM 22. 1986 (buncilman Schneider stated the developer has been surcharging a lot and there has been a fair amount of run-off, especially during these last few days of rain. He stated he understood the developer was to keep both public and Townhouse Association streets clean and he had some calls that this hasn't occurred. Mr. Danko, 1510 Trapp Cburt, stated there is a lot on West Bavarian Pass that was filled and a silt fence installed. He stated there has been run-off frau this lot and the Townhouse Association cleaned the gutters, but not the street. Mr. Mark Burch, Assistant Public Works Director, stated he has been in contact with the developer and some fencing was installed and the lot seeded. He felt until the seed becomes esti,61ished, there may be some problems, especially with the amount of rain the last several days. Mr. Danko stated the area between the silt fence and curb experiences constant erosion. (buncilman Schneider asked if the area could be sodded. Mr. Burch stated to install sod from the silt fence to the curb would certainly help. Mr. Dan Farr, representing Darrel Farr, stated the surcharging is almost completed so building should begin in the next several weeks. He stated, in the meantime, they could install some sod. Mr. Farr stated in regard to the improvement of the asphalt pathway around the pond, he stated this pathway is either owned by the Townhouse Association or the City. He stated they cannot be responsible for something that was built 10 or 1.2yea s ago. Mr. Robertson stated as understands, the City owns and maintains the portion on the west aro d the pond and the Townhouse Association still owns and is re:;ponsible for a remainder. Mr. Farr felt this t, em would have to be brought up with the Townhouse Association. Mr. Farr stated i regard to the pedestrian lighting, there are four or five lights in the ouse developnent, but nothing in the single family area. He stated with mpletion of the other townhouse units, lighting in the townhouse area oul d also be completed. Mr. Robertso stated it is staff's interpretation that lighting should go on both sides f the street and not only the townhouse side. Mr. Farr ated as far as Items #3 and #4, these are the responsibility of the Tow ouse Association. Mr. rr stated in regard to the piles of dirt, they are not hauling out thi material as their plans are to berm, seed, and sod it. Mr. Robertson stated, as outlined in a letter dated February 26, 1981, unbuilt lots were - 5 - CMCTL MEETTNC OF SFP=ER 22. 1986 not to be used for dumupi ng. (buncilman Schneider felt there needs to be further work done to determine what the City and what the Townhouse Associaton awns and to make sure sans n the commitments made by the developer have been adhered to. He stated he would like to see the City staff, members of the Townhouse Association and Mr. Farr meet to discuss their responsibilities. (buncilman Schneider stated he would be willing to recommend approval of the vacation, if the developer is willing to post a surety bond in the amount of $10,000, or else he would rather table this vacation r st for two weeks. Mr. Farr stated he is willing to talk and felt th could come to some mutual agreement. Ms. Mulvihill asked if the developer was in agreement with Item #9 to restore the buffer between the townhouse at 1511 North Innsbruck Drive and her property. Mr. Farr stated he has no pr�dblem with this item and can replace the tree, but not with a 40 foot Oak,tree. Mr. Danko stated north of Innsbruck Drive, the landscaping is not complete. He stated Mr. Farr failed to stabilize the bank and some plantings have not been installed. He also stated in Mr. Farr' s filling operation, heavy equipment and loaded trucks caused extensive damage to a large area of the Association' s street and this matte has not been resolved. Mr. Farr stated his father, Darr Farr, will review this matter when he returns to the Twin Cities and me to some agreement with the Association. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney stated this is an area where the Townhouse Association should deal di ctly with the developer. MDTION by Councilman S ider to approve vacation request, SAV #86-03, with the following stipula ns: (1) the developer post a $10,000 surety bond, or a lesser amount as determined by staff, and discussion be held between staff, the develope , and the Townhouse Association to resolve the issues raised by staff; ( maintenance problems on the vacant lot on West Bavarian Pass be resolve (3) landscaping at 1511 North Innsbruck Drive be completed; an (4) resolution of the erosion problem on the lot being surcharged. conded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, yor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. (bu ncilman'Schneider stated it was not his intent to have Mr. Farr pay for maintenance items. He did feel Items 2, 5 , 7, 9 and 10 as well as the ruga-of f;/from the lot on West Bavarian Pass were the responsibility of the develger. ;�/Farr stated he has talked to the Townhouse Association regarding Item 7 they will take rare of this problem. 5. CONSIDERATION OF DISPOSITION OF EXCESS PROPERTY GEREMTJY U)CATED ON PARI' OF nrn*irn' 1 B [xCK 1. GENA RAE ADDITION• -6- s • Comm m=NG OF $FPPF IRFR 22, 1986 Councilman Schneider felt one of the primary issues is whether this triangular piece of property is needed to retain or detain storm water. Mr. Mark Burch, Assistant Public Works Director, explained the drainage plan as originally proposed for this area. He stated this plan was reviewed with several residents in the area and suggestions were made to improve the drainage by making some minor improvements. He stated he felt the drainage could be improved without using this triangular piece of property. Mr. Bob Gambrel, 1341 Creek Park Lane, submitted a letter and photographs to the Council. He stated the letter was written before he received clarification frau %rk Burch on the City' s recommendations. He felt the recommendation by the City to lower the pipe below the level of his basement is a good one. He stated, as far as the recommendation to tie the pipe across the street into another pond, he felt it would reduce the water entering the pond behind his home. He stated the Council can ignore his first objection as the berm is actually a foot lower than the elevations shown on the plan and, as long as the berm doesn't rise above the level of the outtake pipe, he would be satisfied. He stated his other concern is the triangular piece of property. He stated he reviewed contour maps and the traditional flaw of water goes through this triangle. He stated there is no ponding to the north of the road and all the depressions are to the south. He stated these were the circumstances before any development took place in this area. Mr. Gambrel submitted a drawing which had been distributed by the builder. He stated the water flowed across his yard into a pipe. He stated nothing was shown in regard to the ponding behind his property. He stated he bought his property assuming the water would flaw through and not remain standing. He stated he understood there would be some drainage and ponding on the south side of the road, but not on the north side. Another drawing submitted by Mr. Gambrel showed the perimeters of the ponds behind his hone. Contours A, B, and C outlined flooding that had occurred on certain dates and Contour D depicted the constant state of the water problem on his property. He pointed out how close this water comes to Mr. phillips' property at 1361 Creek Park Lane. Mr. Gambrel felt the contour of the property should be changed. He stated there is a depression in Nx. Phillips yard to the west and he would propose this be cutdown two feet so the water flows into the triangle and build a depression into the triangle. He felt this would allow the water to flow naturally into the pond. Mr. Gambrel felt the drainage plan didn't take into account the triangle' s affect on the water and the fact that the City decided not to put in a cul-de-sac. He felt the City should consider the use of this triangular piece of property to solve some of the drainage problems. Mr. Gambrel stated he doesn't object to everything proposed to improve the drainage, but there are problems beginning at Mississippi Street where -7- MinrIr K=M OF SMMM 22. 1986 enough descent isn't allowed to get rid of the water. He felt the City' s plan didn't solve the ponding. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the original plan submitted by the developer and approved by the City and Rice Creek Watershed District provided there be a retention area, without an outlet, on three lots (1, 2 and 3) . (buncilman Barnette asked if the property owners knew they had a retention area in back of their lots when they bought their hares. Mr. Gambrel stated the original plan showed two drainage easements, one on the north and one on the south. He stated the plat they finally received showed a drainage easement only on the south side. He stated one would then assume the idea of putting a pond on the north side was rejected. He stated the builder went into great detail about the pond on the south side. He stated he assumed the water would be going into a pipe. Mr. Qureshi stated on Lot 2 the elevation is lower than what is shown on the plan. (buncilman Schneider asked why the hane was built lower. Mr. Burch stated the developer wanted to build a walkout which was permitted with the addition of the pipe. Mr. Qureshi stated the pipe is too high to do much good for Mr. Gambrel' s and Mr. Phillips' properties. He stated what is proposed is to have a direct pipe frau the back yards to the park retention area and also provide an additional back inlet pipe with small retention area connected to the catch basin on the street, which would intercept the drainage fran the east which forms about 1/3 of total drainage area now draining into the back yards. (buncilman Schneider asked if this proposal would assure there would be no standing water. Mr. Qureshi stated the drainage would improve, but he couldn't say there would be no standing water. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he didn' t think there is any question regarding the City's right to store water on these properties. He stated this right was acquired when the City approved the plat and development grading plan. (buncilman Schneider questioned how a prospective property owner would know there is a, retention area on his property. Mr. Gambrel stated in the original drainage plan, there was the concept of an easement on the property. He stated on the lalat under which they bought their hare, there wasn't ars easement on the north side. Mr. Qureshi stated the plat doesn' t have contours on it. He stated if someone wished to review the drainage plan, they could receive it f ram the City or Rice Creek Watershed District. Mr. Gambrel felt the berm could be lowered on the other side of the park to -8- CrxUnrrr MEETIM OF SEPTErSBER 22. 1986 retain the water on the south rather than on the north. He felt there are a lot of alternatives, but they have to resolve the problem of water in their back yards. Mayor Nee stated the question the Council wished to address this evening is whether they should keep or dispose of the triangular piece of property in the Gena Rae Addition. Mr. Richard Brickner stated he would be interesting in purchasing this piece of property should the Council decide to sell it. Mr. G3nbrel stated he would like to see a plan to lower the berm and pipe before he gives up the idea that this triangular piece of property is not needed to resolve some of the drainage problems. MDTION by aiuncilman Schneider to refer the matter of the drainage back to staff to rework with the interested parties and to bring it back at the next meeting along with various resolutions on the disposition of this triangular piece of park property. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECESS: A recess was called by Mayor Nee at 9:55 pm. REQONVENE� Mayor Nee reconvened the meeting at 10:00 p. m. All Council members were present. 6. RESOLUTION N0. 99=1986 APPROVING A RDGISTERED I�F1I�ID SURREY FOR P S #86-02 . C'RF�EKg,p F PIAT 2. vC 'RATry LOCATEn ON PART OF OUTLOT A. DENNIS ADDITION A'N.?' PAJaS 0I' ED AUDITORS NQ` 10. By RICHARD BRIC'KNER' MDTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 99-1986 with the following stipulations: (1) park fees of ,500 each are to be paid with building permits on Lots A and B. Lot subject to park fees if built on; and (2) registered land survey to be- ecorded prior to issuance of building permit. Seconded by Councilman rd6odspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the xi on carried unanimously. 7. KH`pLUl I ON No. 100 19Q6-,CONFIRMING ASSESSKOr FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER TMp2f7VF.MFATT PF ,JEC'T. NO 150 MDTION W Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 100-1986. Seconded by Cbu'icilman.Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. CONSTDERATION OF LICENSURE FOR AUIt7 RECYCLERS IN CITY OF FRIDLEY: Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated at the time these -9- • i COUNCTL MFFTTTx; OF SEPTEMER 22. 1986 licenses came up for renewal last April, there was the question of soil contamination. He stated the Council ordered testing of the soil and the results have been received from Turin City Testing. Mr. Robertson stated the testing results indicated no contaminat' n of the soil or surface water has occurred as the result of the exi ing use of these properties. He stated at one location at Central Auto its a lead concentration was identified above the State' s disposal 1 Au; 't, however, a secondary testing to identify the problem indicated it was very localized and far below the hazardous waste limits set by the State Mr. Robertson stated, based on these results, it is felt another testing wouldn't be necessary unless there is some major change in the operation, however, this cues not preclude the need for the annual license renewal, based on the visual appearance of the property., He stated Council had extended these licenses until such time as these / test results were known. FDTION by Councilman Schneider to renew the t�pril 30, 1986 licenses for Satin's Auto Parts, Bargain Auto Parts, and Central Auto Farts for the current year and period ending April 30, 1987 with the following stipulations: (1) San's Auto Parts is to have no storage of vehicles on the lot east of Sam's; (2) Bargain Auto Parts is to improve the condition of the main gate to the storage yard and renove the wood pile from the customer parking lot; and (3) Central Auto Parts is to fix the w it at 1136 73-1/2 Avenue to specifications from the Assistant Pplic Works Director, Mark Burch. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upo a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. (buncilman Barnette felt staff's tecommendation to photograph these sites for a visual record of the existing conditions and used for future comparisons would be a good idea. Councilman Schneider asked if staff was proceeding with any actions regarding the property at the northwest corner of 73rd and Old Central Avenues. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the recommendation of the City Attorney' s office is to develop a case and then proceed. He stated a plan of action and a timetable could be given to the (buncil. 9. ""' INANE Np 864 RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 205 , AS IT RELATES �T ANS HOME FAMIj�Y DAYS: Mayor Nee stated the second reading of this orinance includes some minor changes from the first reading in order to provide better clarification. MDTION "uncilmn Barnette to waive the reading and adopt Ordinance No. 864 on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Schnei,der. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW(/BUSINESS -10- r COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 6, 1986 Mr. Qureshi stated the Advisory Board would have input and review of the prograns and the day-to-day operation would be supervised by the City' s Recreation Department. He stated as far as use of facilities, this would be provided by the School District. Ms. Ruth Smith stated the Advisory Board wholeheartedly suppo is the hiring of a Progran Coordinator. Councilman Barnette asked if all of the problems and re nsibil ities have been worked out for use of the school facilities. Mr. Ki rk stated he has met with representatives of;the School Di str ict and came up with this cooperative agreement which is /ubnitted for the Council' s consideration. He stated the Advisory Board ha also reviewed the agreement and felt it was workable. rDTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to appro e the City-School Cooperative Agreement dated September 10, 1986 relativ to the Senior Citizens Programs. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimo, ly. Mr. Qureshi suggested that staff work out a proposal to authorize funding of the Senior Citizen Progran Coordinator. MDTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick; o authorize the administration to submit a proposal at the next Council meeting for the commitment of funds necessary to hire a Senior Citizens Pr 'gram Coordinator. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: 2. ORDINANCE . 865 ADOPTIM THE BUDGET FOR THE FILL REAR 1987: Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated when the first reading was held on the budget, he pointed out there would be certain adjustments at the time of the second reading. He stated the funds for Revenue Sharing have been removed frau the budget as' this has been cut at the Federal level and there are minor adjustments' regarding State Aid. He stated the General Fund budget remains the same and there is an overall budget decrease of 1.8%. Mr. Qureshi stated'this is the first time in the history of the City where a bu/eb(e' g adopted which is lacer than the previous year's. Mated these adjustments should be included in the ordinance for theading at this time. MDuncilman Schneider to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 86t it on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Coodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared thrried unanimously. -3- COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 6, 1986 3. ORDINANCE NO, 8 RE THE FRIR= CITY CODE BY RE EAL NG CHAPTER 703, TLED -SNOWM0131LETABLISHINGNEW CHAPTER 703 , ENTITLED " ti BLE T , "• ;he TION by Go man Barnette to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 6 and it on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by ilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Nlayor Nee declared motion carried unanimously. 4. CONSIDERATION OF DISPOSITION OF EXCESS PROPER'T'Y GENERALLY LOCATED ON PART OF OUTLOT 1, BLOCK 1, GENA RAE ADDITION• AND CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12 06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF: AND CONSIDERATION OF A RDC)UEST FROM RICHARD BRICKNER TO BE ALLOWED A SECOND BUILDTNG ON HIS DEVELOPMENT SITE BEFORE THE REGISTERED LAND SURVEY IS REGISTERED BY THE COUNTY: Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated information was submitted to the Council regarding this triangular piece of property in the Gena Rae Addition. He stated it is not a piece of property that could effectively be used for park purposes. He stated the Council can declare it surplus and sell to the highest bidder or negotiate a sale with an interested party. Mr. Qureshi stated if the Council wishes to dispose of the property, there are a number of restrictions which should be placed on the property, and the property to the north, in order to minimize the drainage impact on properties to the west. He stated a drainage easement should be provided to retain water ooming from the east of this parcel and the retention should be used on a five year storm. He stated if construction is authorized for any hones, a temporary berm should be constructed. He stated there would also be an outlet provided which connects to the catch basin in the street. He stated if the angular property is sold, the value should be at least what the City paid when they acquired the parcel which was 76-1/2 cents per square foot. Mr. Qureshi stated several ordinances are submitted for the Council ' s consideration to either authorize the sale of this surplus property to the highest bidder or to sell it to the interested adjoining party with certain easements required and certain conditions followed. (buncilman Schneider stated the drainage issue was worked out between staff and adjacent property owners. He stated staff has indicated this triangular piece of property can and will be used for, detention and directing of storm water regardless whether or not homes are constructed on this parcel. He felt, therefore, it would make sense to proceed with the sale of this property. Mr. Gambrel, 1341 Creek Park Lane, submitted a letter to the Council regarding his comments relating to the proposed drainage improvements. He -4- COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 6. 1986 stated he wanted to make sure what is proposed would work whether or not this property is sold. He stated he wanted to make sure if the land is sold and the developer doesn't begin work immediately, what temporary measures would be taken in regard to the drainage. Mr. Qureshi stated if the Council considers Mr. Brickner's request to allow him to build two homes on 66th Avenue, prior to recording the registered land survey at the County, there are certain stipulations which he must follow. He stated whether or not these hones are constructed, a detention area must be provided on Lot C. Mr. Gambrel stated an immediate problem is the runoff into his and Mr. Phillips' back yards frau the park property. He felt a dam or berm should be created along the westerly boundary regardless if any other construction takes place or not. Mr. Qureshi stated if it is practical, a temporary detention area would be made either by Mr. Brickner or the City. Mr. Gambrel stated he didn't have any objection to selling this triangular piece of property based on the requirement that easements be provided for drainage. He stated Mr. Phillips did have some doubt as to whether this would solve their drainage problems. Mr. Qureshi stated a retention area is being requested and under normal circumstances, Mr. Gambrel ' s and Mr. Phillips' s property shouldn' t have standing water in their back yards more than 8 to 9 inches. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading for the sale of this surplus property directly with an interested party, with the following stipulations: (1) retention and drainage easements are to be provided on Lot C; (2) surface water flow onto Lot C from adjoining properties to the east are to retain a flow to a five year design storm; and (3) a berm is to be constructed on the west side of triangular piece and Lot C to prevent surface water runoff frau the east by November 30, 1986; and (4) the sale of this parcel be for a minimum price of 76-1/2 cents per square foot, with the square footage determined by the actual survey, and funds from this sale are to be dedicated to the improvement of Creek Ridge Park. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Mr. Pbdvin, 1391 Mississippi Street, stated he believed this would be the outcome for this property. He stated everything that has been done directed the sale to the developer. He stated a petition with 74 signatures was submitted to have this Parcel used for park and no attention was paid to it. Councilman Schneider stated many people in the immediate area did not sign the petition. He stated evidence was presented, from a safety standpoint, it wouldn't be a good idea to use this parcel to expand the park. He stated residents in the immediate area also indicating they objected to enlarging the park. Mr. Podvin stated the point he is making is the petition was worthless. He -5- COUNCIL MEETING OF OCMBER 6. 1986 stated they may have had people in the immediate area objecting, but that is against 74 other persons who signed the petition. Mayor Nee felt the question is whether or not it is a good or bad idea to sell this parcel. He stated staff felt the parcel should be sold and they are paid to advise the Council. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Podvin, without getting into personalities, if he felt it was a good idea to attach this parcel to what is now landlocked property. Mr. Podvin stated he didn' t know if the drainage would work. He stated there are problems generated from the Creekridge development. He stated Mr. Brickner is now using other people's back yards as a retention area. Councilman Schneider stated there may have been some mistakes made in the past, but the Council has to go forward from this point and he felt the proposal before then would allow an orderly development and provide a correction for the drainage problem that exists. Mr. Podvin stated this parcel is more than 6,000 square feet and the City should make sure they are paid the correct amount. Councilman Barnette stated he personally didn't feel this parcel would serve the residents well for use as a park. He felt, however, consideration should be given to change the name of the park and urged Mr. Podvin to follow through in this regard. Mr. Podvin stated this request has already been submitted. He stated the entire matter is the principle, as this parcel was condemned for a park and should remain as park property. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN CN 'IHE ABOVE M)TION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. In regard to Mr. Brickner's request that he be allowed a second building on his development site, before the land survey is registered by the County, the following action was taken: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize staff to issue two building permits for the Creek Ridge II Plat, P. S. #86-02, with the following stiulations: (1) Builder assumes responsibility for any mistakes in staking; (2) A 10 foot utility and drainage easement be provided along the south side of Lots A and B; (3) A retention pond be provided on the north side of Lot C by November 30, 1986; and (4) Builder work with staff to provide underground electric service to hones on Creek Park Lane. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the :notion carried unanimously. 5. ORDINANCE NO 867 APPROVI22 A VACATION, SAV #86-03. TO VACATE THE FIVE FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTHWEST PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 4 . BLOCK 1, INNSBRL)CK NORTH TOWNHOUSES PLAT 4 --TQ- -PojNT TEN FEET WEST OF THE SOt QST PROPERTY LINE OF THE SAME LOT, GENEgAL y LOCATED AT 5462 MEISTER ROAD N.E. , BY BARREL FARR• -6- axwiL rt=NG oFwamm 20. 1986 selling items that were 10 x 12 or 10 x 14 feet in size. She stated the items they are now selling are 12 x 38 feet in size. She stated Russian olive trees were lasted on the site when the special use permit was issued and the permit was predicated on those trees remaining, and now_there is no screening. Ms. Martin stated the Council directed that the City and/or Mr. Pawleski meet with her. She stated she met with Mr. Pawleski and his attorney and they agreed to hedging and thought they had some agreement. She stated what is now projected is the original plan and nothing is different. She stated it appears the original stipulations on the special use permit are being ignored. Mr. Pawleski, owner of Apache Camping Center, stated he was presented with the landscaping plan by Mr. Wiersma of the City staff. He stated in regard to the fence which was discussed with Ms. Martin, he didn't take any action as he wanted to see if the City would allow it. He stated he didn' t know what type of moveable fence could be installed. Ms. Martin stated her concern is screening and didn't care if it is a fence or greenery. She stated she wanted the trailers screened which was supposed to happen when the special use permit was originally issued. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated it was the purpose of the original stipulations to screen everything behind the front of the building and it seems the proposed plan does not provide for this screening. MDTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to refer this item to staff for a recommendation on some type of screening, either fencing or plantings. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he would recommend staff contact Ms. Martin before the plan is brought back to the Cbuncil. Mr. Pawleski also requested he be notified when a meeting would take place so something can be resolved. Mr. Robertson stated staff has prepared at least four diffferent plans and a meeting could be held this week. Councilman Fitzpatrick requested staff contact him when the meeting would be held. 3. ORDIMNCE NO 868 UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITy CgAgTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE M BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THE—RE-OF: MDTION by Oouncilman Schneider to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 868 and adopt it on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Barrette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. -3- COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 8. 1986 Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, reviewed the stipulations associated with this plat for Richard Brickner, as follows: (1) Provide retention and drainage easements on Lot C per City Plan; (2) Surface water flaw from Lot C and adjoining properties to east to retain flaw to a five-year design storm; (3) Construct berm along west side of Lot C to prevent surface water runoff from the east; (4) Sale of property at 76.5 cents per square foot (76.5 x 6,790 sq. ft. = $5,194.35) ; (5) Payment of three park fees of $1,500 each with first three of four building permits; and (6) Pending assessments plus interest to be paid with the building permits on Tracts C and D. MDTION by Oouncilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 123-1986, with the following stipulations: (1) Provide retention and drainage easements on Lot C per City Plan; (2) Surface water flow frau Lot C and adjoining properties to east to retain flaw to a five-year design storm; (3) Construct berm along west side of Lot C to prevent surface water runoff frau the east; (4) Sale of property at 76.5 cents per square foot (76.5 x 6,790 sq. ft. = $5,194.35) ; (5) Payment of three park fees of $1,500 each with first three of four building permits; and (6) Pending assessments plus interest to be paid with the building permits on Tracts C and D. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. RESOLUTION NO 124-1986 OF THE CITY ODUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, ANOKA CQUNrY, MINNESOTA, APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL AND RESTATED INDENTURE OF TRUST RESPECTIM THE CITY'S COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE ANDS (FRIDLEY BUSINE ASS PLAZA LIMITED PITZRSHIP PROJECT) • -- Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated this resolution is necessary due to an error in the actual letter of credit which is $10,000 less than the f igure which was presented to the Oouncil at previous meetings when this issue was discussed. He stated the previous figure was $2,800,000 and the actual letter of credit is for $2,790,000 and the amount for which the bonds will be issued. He stated the only change is just the actual trust indenture and realigning the dollar amounts because of the $10,000 error. MDTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 124-1986. Seconded by Gbuncilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. RESOLUTION NO125-1986 AUTHORIZING CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE GENERAL FUND, REVENUE SHARING FUND, HOME OWNERSHIP FUND, AND THE HRA FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1985• Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated these are the yearly changes in appropriations and adjustments for the 1985 budget and the resolution provides inter 'visional changes within the General Fund. MDTION by Cbuncilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 125-1986. Seconded by Oouncilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. REgOLUTION NO 126-1986 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING THE AGREEMENT -10- ODUNCIL MEETM OF DECEMBER 8. 1986 between nine and ten feet wide. Cbuncilman Schneider stated he prefers ten foot stalls, but questioned if a precedent hadn't already been established when reduced widths were allowed for Unity Hospital, Target, and parking at City Hall. Mr. Flora stated it may be possible to double stripe the stalls, if the Cbuncil approved a reduction in the width. Mayor Nee stated he would like to see what has to be given up to meet the requirement for a ten foot wide parking stall. Ms. Fisher stated they have developed a contingency plan, however, this would not allow as much open space. She felt it would have an adverse effect on the development. She stated they would like to keep the number of parking spaces they are proposing, which is in excess of the ordinance, in case they lose spaces to meet requirements of the Army Cbrp of Engineers. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he didn't feel allowances should be made on the basis of the plan being disrupted as he felt the plan never should have been designed for nine foot parking stalls. MDTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to deny VAR $86-32 to reduce the parking stall widths f ran ten feet to nine feet. Seconded by (buncilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, (buncilman Fitzpatrick, Cbuncilman Goodspeed, Councilman Schneider and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Barnette voted against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4 to 1 vote. MJTION by Counclman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of November 19, 1986. Seconded by Cbuncilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. CONSIDERATION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ANOKA QOUNTY COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOP (ACCM : Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated this agreement provides that the ACCW would receive 40% of the franchise fee plus the 1986 interest accrued in a Cable Television Fund. Council Schneider asked if the City's cable channel was being used to the fullest.,` He stated during the election, there was not lengthy coverage by Fridley in comparison to coverage by other neighboring cities. Mr. Hunt stated there was coverage provided, however, it terminated about 11 p.m. a :� by Councilman Schneider to approve the agreement with the ACCW. mnded by Cbuncilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. gESO UrION Np 123-1986 APPRC7LlIIG A REGISTERED LAND SURVEY (CR_EEKRIDGE PLAT 2) . BY RICHARD BRIC KNER• -9- Final Assessment Roll PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 145 October 1 , 1984 CITY OF FRIDLEY r MEMO TO: NASIM M. QURESHI , CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: SIDNEY C. INMAN, DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL SERVICES/ CITY CLERK SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR WATER AND SANITARY r SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 145 DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 1984 r Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project No. 145 involves the construction of water and sanitary sewer laterals, services, grading, and other facilities located on 66th Avenue Northeast Creek Park Lane, and Arthur Street to facilitate the development of two new plats, Creek Ridge and Hidden Woods , and also sewer work in the area of 81st and University Avenues. A brief summary of the assessment rates follows : 66TH AVENUE NORTHEAST (Proposed Creek Ridge Plat) The assessment rate is $2 ,992. 13 per lot for water and sewer. C0 ' ARTHUR STREET NORTHEAST (Proposed Creek Ridge Plat) x The assessment rate is 12,449.98 per lot for water and sewer. S 9� ' X CREEK PARK LANE (Proposed Creek Ridge Plat--East Segment) O cl The assessment rate is 13,364.93 per lot for water and sewer, p Y� X CREEK PARK LANE (Proposed Hidden Woods Plat) ` '9 /9 The assessment rate for sewer lateral is $1 ,963.05 per lot. a The assessment rate for water lateral is $2,523.93 per lot. S CREEK PARK LANE (Proposed Park Segment) `o The cost of the laterals and service to the proposed park on the south side of the street is $3,767.43. The assessment rate for the laterals and services is $3,767.43 per lot for the building sites on the north side of the street. These assessments plus interest for the building sites will not have the assessments actually levied until such time as lot splits are requested and approved to create new building sites. CITY OF FRIDLEY WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 145 FINAL COSTS: Construction Costs $ 127,944.23 -(Includes bid and change order) Overhead (administrative, etc. ) Total Improvement Cost S 159,930.23 UNIT COSTS: Water and Sewer Laterals--66th Ave. $ 41 ,889.76 (Proposed Creek Ridge Plat) $41 ,889.76 + 14 lots = $2,992.13 per lot Water and Sewer Laterals--Arthur St. 12,249.90 (Proposed Creek Ridge Plat) $12,249.90 + 5 lots = $2,449.98 per lot Water and Sewer Laterals--Creek Park Lane 33,649.30 (Proposed Creek Ridge Plat) $33,649.30 + 10 lots = 53,364.93 per lot Water and Sewer Laterals--Creek Park Lane 35,334.90 (Proposed Hidden Woods Plat) Sewer Lateral--$17,667.45 + 9 lots = $1 ,963.05 per lot Water Lateral--517,667.45 + 7 lots = $2,523.93 per lot IrWater and Sewer Laterals and Services-- Creek Park Lane (Proposed Park Segment) 22,604.56 Cost of laterals to proposed park property-- $3,767.43 + 2 = $1 ,883.72 per lot * Cost of laterals to properties on north side--$18,837. 13 + 5 lots = $3,767.43 per lot * The assessments for sewer and water laterals plus interest on the lots on the north side of the street will not have their assessments actually levied until such time as lot splits are requested and approved, to create building sites. Sewer line for Midas Muffler Property 2,328.63 Sewer line for Golf Driving Range 4,657.38 * The assessment for this sewer line plus interest will not have the assessment actually levied until the lot is developed. Water Loop Beettween Fridley and Anoka Streets: 7,215.80 (the amgunUtiyity hF*s ater loop is to be paid • i CITY OF FRIDLEY WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 145 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT: To be spread over a twenty-year (20) period at an interest rate of nine and one-half (9�2) per cent each year on the unpaid principal . HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: October 1 , 1984 ( F_ �-�__�is''� Y,;}i + .7':,f. T��x3..f�"ie•y. "��'a.�'�t=��i'�i.��:��St� �c��'� �.�ir- ��7ii� �_�,a i.�_'� .i.. � t CITY OF FRIDLEY FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL = WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 145 ' CREEK PARK LANE (Proposed Park Segment) LEGAL DESCRIPTION WATER AND SEWER LATERALS f ' AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 10 * Parcel 1620 (2 building sites) $ 3,767.43 ) $ 7,534.86 3,767.43 ) Parcel 1640 3,767.43 ' Parcel 1660 3,767.43 Parcel 1680 3,767.43 GENA-RAE ADDITION Outlot 1 1 ,883.72 E I Outlot 2 1 ,883.72 I $ 22,604.59 I Total Cost: $22,604.56 Cost of Laterals and Services to Proposed Park Property: $3,767.43 j 2 = $1 ,883.72 per lot Cost of Laterals and Services to Properties on North Side: $18,837.13 , 5 lots = $3,767.43 per lot * The assessmen s or sewer and water laterals plus interest on the above lots on the north side of the street will not have their assessments actually levied until such time as lot splits are requested and approved, to create wilding sites. RESOLUTION NO. 114 - 1984 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1984-1 AND 2 (AND ADDENDUMS NO. 2 AND 3) BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the , STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1984-1 AND 2 (AND ADDENDUMS NO. 2 AND 3) in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in regular session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed, except Harold Haluptzok, 1240 - 731-2 Ave. N.E.--Felt it unfair to be assessed as he had no access. Access will be provided. Hazel Osfar, 5180 Hughes Ave. N.E.--Letter questioning whether method of assessment was correct for her property. 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: None 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1984-1 AND 2 (AND ADDENDUMS NO. 2 AND 3) in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. Page 2, RESOLUTION NO. 14 - 1984 • 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirme , adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed ass ss- ment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and alterations herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper spe ial assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land respectivel 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified bo by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1984-1 AND 2 (AND ADDENDUMS NO. 2 AND ) 8. The amounts assessed each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear intere t from the date hereof until the same have been paid at the rate of nine and one-half (92) per cent per annum. 9. Such assessment shall be payable in ten (10) annual installments, payable on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1985, and co - tinuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each install ment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the Count Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January in each year. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 1st DAY OF October 1984. MAYOR William Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman r Final Assessment Roll PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1984-1&2 (AND ADDENDUMS NO. 2 AND 3) October 1 , 1984 Page 2, Memo to Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager, and City Council September 24, 1984 Final Assessment Roll for ST. 1984-1 and 2 (and Addendums No. 2 and 3) CREEK PARK LANE (Proposed Hidden Woods Plat Blomberg) ST 1984 1 , ADD No 2 Blacktop street surfacing, concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer were constructed. The rate for the street surfacing is $6,243.24 per lot. The rate for storm sewer is $933.34 per lot. CREEK PARK LANE (Proposed Park Segment) ST 1984-1 , ADD NO 2 Blacktop street surfacing, concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer improvements were constructed. The cost to the park property for street surfacing is $7,543.44 for each outlot. The park property has no assessment for storm sewer as there will be a holding pond. - The cost of the street surfacing to the properties on the north side of the street is $ 3,017.38 per lot. The cost of the right-of-way to the properties on the north side of the street is $1 ,280. 00 per lot. The cost of the storm sewer to the properties on the north side of the street is $907.20 per lot. The assessments for street surfacing, right-of-way, and storm sewer plus interest on the above lots on the north side of the street will not have their assessments actually levied until such time as lot splits are requested and approved, to create new building sites. ASSESSMENTS FOR POND IMPROVEMENTS PER AGREEMENT Improvements are to be made to the pond for the developing properties in the amount Of $10,000.00 Per an agreement between the City and the two developers of the new plats, each party has agreed to assume one-third of the cost. One-third of the cost of $3,333.34 is to be paid from the City Park Fund. One-third of the cost of $3,333.34 is to be paid by the developer of Creek Ridge Plat. The cost is $114.95 to each of the twenty-nine lots. One-third of the cost of $3,333.34 minus a credit of $667.00 for costs already incurred is to be paid by the developer of the Hidden Woods Plat. The cost is $296.26 to each of the nine lots. SITY OF FRIDLEY . STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1984-1 AND 2 (AND ADDENDUMS 2 AND 3) UNIT COSTS: ST. 1984- TH No. 65 East Service Drive (72nd to 73rd) $ 58,656.80 Northern portion of lot--$32,847.81 (56% of_ area) Southern portion of lot--$25,808.99 (44% of area) ST. 1984-1 (ADDENDUM NO. 2) 66th Ave. , Arthur St. , Creek Park Lane Hidden Woods and Creek Ridge Plats $ 216;202.88 66th Ave. (Proposed Creek Ridge Plat) $ 51 ,305.81 Street Surfacing: $41 ,225.81 4 14 lots = $ 2,944. 71 per lot Storm Sewer: $10,080.00 4 14 lots = $720.00 per lot Arthur St. (Proposed Creek Ridge Plat) 3,600.00 Storm Sewer: $3,600.00 1 5 lots = $720.00 per lot Creek Park Lane (Proposed Creek Ridge Plat-- East Segment) 45,598. 18 Street Surfacing: , 38,398. 18 j 10 lots = $ 3,839.82 per lot Storm Sewer: $7,200.00 4 10 lots = $720.00 per lot Creek Park Lane Proposed Hidden Woods Plat 64,589.13 Street Surfacing: S56,189. 13 4 9 lots = $6,243.24 per lot Storm Sewer: $8,400.00 4 9 lots = $933.34 per lot CREEK PARK LANE (Proposed Park Segment) 41 ,109.76 Street Surfacing: $30,173.76 + $6,400 R/O/W 1/2 Cost to Proposed Park Property--$ 15,086.88 4 2 = $ 7,543.44 per lot 1/2 Cost--$ 15,OB6.88i 5 proposed building sites = $ 3,017.38 per lot $6,400.00 R/O/W 4 5 proposed building sites = $1 ,280 per lot Storm Sewer: $4,536.00 4 5 lots = $907.20 per lot (Park property will have holding pond) The assessments for street surfacing, right-of-way, and storm sewer plus interest on the new building sites on the north side of the street will not have their assessments actually levied until such time as lot splits are requested and approved, to create new building sites. CITY OF FRIDLEY STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1984-1 AND 2 (AND ADDENDUMS 2 AND 3) UNIT COSTS: (Continued) METHOD OF ASSESSMENT: To be spread over a ten-year (10) period at an interest rate of nine and one- half (9=,) per cent each year on the unpaid principal . HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: October 1 , 1984 f 3 CITY OF FRIDLEY FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1984-1 (ADDENDUM NO. 2) CREEK PARK LANE (Proposed Park Segment) LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET COST R/O/W COST STORM SEWER COST TOTAL COST AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 10 Parcel 1620 ( $ 3,017. 38 $ 1 ,280.00 $ 907.20 ( $ 5,204.58 * (2 Building Sites) ( 3,017.38 1 ,280.00 907.20 ( 5,204 .58 * Parcel 1640 3,017.38 1 ,280.00 907.20 5,204.58 * Parcel 1660 3,017.38 1 ,280.00 907.20 5,204 .58 * Parcel 1680 3,017.38 1 ,280.00 907.20 5,204.58 * GENA-RAE ADDITION (Proposed Park Outlot 1 7,543.44 7,543.44 Outlot 2 7,543.44 7 ,543.44 $ 30,173. 78 $ 6,400.00 $ 4,536.00 $ 41 ,109. 78 Total Cost: $41 ,109.76 Street Surfacing Total Cost: 30,173.78 plus $6,400.00 R/O/W Costs 1/2 cost to Park Property -- $15,086.88 1/2 cost-- $15,086.88= 5 proposed building sites = $ 3,017.38 per lot $6,400.00 R/O/W c 5 building sites = $1 ,280.00 per lot Storm Sewer 4,536.00 j 5 proposed building sites = $907.20 per lot (Park property will have a holding pond for storm sewer water. ) * The assessments for street surfacing, right-of-way, and storm sewer plus interest on the above lots on the north side of the street will not have their assessments actually levied until such time as lot splits are requested and approved, to create new b0 llinq sites. ri 1 RESOLUTION NO. 113 - 1984 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 145 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: I . The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be spec- ially assessed for the WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 145 in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in regular session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed, except None 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: None 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 145 in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. PAGE 2--RESOLUTION NO. 113 - 1984 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and altera- tions herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land res- pectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 145 8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereof until the same have been paid at the rate of nine and one-half (9%) per cent per annum. 9. Such assessment shall be payable in twenty (20) annual installments payable on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1985, and continuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each install- ment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January in each year. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 1st DAY OF October 1984. MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: ITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman Mylar YrooteU c- r, P YABLE 198& _J' Paperwork Proofed New Plat ontractfo eed � Division • Warranty De z Combination Quit Claim Deed O Add as Omitted Request ' Date of Transfer 10jaOther, specify Special Assessment FundsU/ / b� � L . t l � I �t I t t t ► t I t t � t i I � i i t L I t � I � t � L i i i� tr.1_L..J [1 Plat Name: Lacd Y t' P.[o, 0� The following Parcels are now out: PIN (s) Key Deleteq by Date r7 I� ��'�ll.J LLL C��LLLLJ I I I i t �1YJ t I I t I W W l_L.1 L�� ► I I I I I I L I t w I I I I t i I I I I I W W W I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I I J I l i t t l t t l I I 1 l i l l l l I I I l I I t I l l L I The new Parcels are: �G� � Added by Date I I I 1 I l 1 l I I I I 1 1 I t I I 1 ► I L t I w t_ 1 1, i 1 j_ I I I A i ! I I I I I IJ l t C j 1 11 1 I I I I I l—jJ L 1 1 I I ( I I I 11 I I I 11 l I t_ 1 I t I i i C� t o L!1_J w t—!_.J j._I_j ► I I i 1 1 I I I I I i ► t 1 1 (_ I t I I i I � i FC to Assessor , ( FC from Assessor , Lr Date Completed ( I Date to Auditor I , 1 r To Assessor Values Entered , i • sheet Iof� New Plat Plat Name: Map No. Accounts Generated b Date PKJ45q-00M,i -QCT PIN (s) - Key -Cert Blk Leyals f 139 A en 112 IrtlwWI , I � , 1 l ' W l�J �J LTJ Ls�J u I W W W t , , I I i , A LTJ LTJ L-i L I I I W W W t_ 1_uJ i I I I I I WJ t I I WJ t_LJ t-LJ 1 , i i A t W L-J-j L--.LJ -L_I.J LCLJ L_ 1J u I I I I W W J I I I I , I I l I I 1A LJ--LJ W W W Ii ,J L_, , f W t , , LTJ W I I I W i , 1 11 l 1_ W--.J l�W I W W W J I i , J I l 1 1 L i I I I I I I �t-L-J-� I , i i 1 , t r , 1 L_ L , I I W W W L- I L_, , , W�J L.Li-J u t , I I , I t , I L Lj L , , iI l I 1 , 1 W. -L-J 1 , I u l I I L1—i t --L1 W W-1-J I W L-Lj I I I I 1 „ . , , , . I I i l t 1 • New Plat • slieet(i o� Plat Name: VAO .A.4, I I If Map No. Accounts Generated Date I #PK 45900(0 . . . . PIN (s) Key Lem Blk Leya13 � I 13 � Ar LO LL�J L1!! �h n/L 1.A1J kzim LO 9-er I OQ I I I u 111 L-LJL-LJI III if I I t l l L--LJ I l , l l� 1 l 1 1 1 t ) 1 1 Li LLI_1 W W W LL� LtJLLJl..1.Jl tail I � � I u I i i 1 W W W I I I t Li I I f LuJ W W W I t I4 A u LuJWI I I I I t � � � � � � � � 1 LL,Jt „ I u LTJ L1J W L�� LuJWLL1W LWJ W W W t I iLI t I L , J u WSJ W W LJ-J I , , I I t , , I u L_t_LJ W W W II L ,- I t , 1 LTJ L-j WJJ W W W L_t_1_�J l , I 1 , 1 . . 1 u Lit J W W LJ-1 Li u l + l t I I W W l_L_1_�J I + I I I�iJWW l> • New Plat • slieet� of� Plat Name; l 44- Map No. Accounts Generated b Date -Fpx-r , PIN (s) - Key Blk Legals qglq u L -,-Li � I W LW WSW L L j W� L1 I ( , l L--LJ L 1 1 I ( I 1 1 1 t , 1 1 , I L1-L-J L--LJ W W LI�J W W W i i 1 W I I I tW 1 -L--L--LJ l 1 f , u L „ WWW1 , , , 1 WSJ W w L--LJ I , , I W J W W W I , I , _ Ll W I L1W W I , J i t Lt i I W lW I , I LJL-L----L'J 1 t 1 I I IW L , � I , J WW L1W Li LW LTJ W L-l-j--.Lj I tJ LAW I i u L, } LW W L W I , , , l I . „ 1 1 L , 1 w L-W W L , t , t I I tW L-,J L-, 1 W�J W L-,-J I - I L , � c NEW PLAT GUIDE SlIE :T _ .EGAL TITLE = CERTIFIED IIYi !MUNICIPALITY: �� '�J '°��/ DATE CERTIFIED: i PIN FEE OWNER (CONTRACT PURCHASER) RESIDUE? DATE OF N` T'F.P - oo, TAXPAYER NAME: , C/P NAME: ADDRESS - �'� ' P �l ADDRESS: 11 �� CITY:f Fes• `� �� '� STATE: ZIP: /�- CITY: STATE: _ZIP: NEW PARCELS LOT BLOCK LOT BLOCK LOT BLOCK LOT BLOCK R - C n C r= F • ACCOUNT'STATUS CHANGE • ASSMT AREA AREA CODE p(/ ASSMT YEAR PAYABLE YEAR 00 FROM: LEVY PIN# * R/EJF P M (D) 3a OC�I l�_ KEY# �qE4 CODE TDS VV GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG' OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED TO: LEVY PIN# *�R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE , CLASSIFIED L LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE =-R CLASSIFIED IIiIT REASON: ABATEMENT. . . . . . .. ❑ BY DATE: REAL ESTATE: CLERICAL ERROR. . . ❑ ASSESSOR's CORR. . ❑ ASSESSOR: LpABATEMENTS: ADD AS OMITTED. . . ❑ STIP/JUDGMENT.. . . ❑ TRANSFER,: SFEC ASSMTS: LAND SALE.. . . . . . . ❑ OK ON DIVISION .. .. . . . . '� PCR: DATE: PARLI4K CORR: JMS 11/ 5 _ - -------- ---- ACCOUNT STATUS CHANGE °v v �oSi 1 ASSMT A AREA CODE ASSMT YEAR9r7 PAYABLE YEAR FROM: TK A C T PIN# * R©FPM (D) ;�a4 ��f LEVY KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG" OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED TO: LEVY PIN# *�E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED =R LEVY IPIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE I I I I I I — CLASSIFIED INIT REASON: ABATEMENT... . . ... ❑ BY DATE: REAL ESTATE: CLERICAL ERROR. . . ❑ 1 ASSESSOR's CORR. . ❑ ASSESSOR: ATEMENTS: ADD AS OMITTED. . . ❑ STIP/JUDGMENT. . . . ❑ TRANSFER: SFEC ASSMTS: LAND SALE.. . . . . . . ❑ OK 014 DIVISION .. ... . . . PCR: DATE: PARLNK CORR: JMS 11/65 /oG • ACCOUNT STATUS CHANGE • ASSMT AREA AREA CODE C�O ASSMT YEAR PAYABLE YEAR FROM: -MACT gu LEVY PIN# * ROE F P M (D) 13 3L/ D4,7 ~O/03 KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED I I E LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG' OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED l TO: LEVY ' PIN# * E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED INIT Q REASON: ABATEMENT. . . . . . .. ❑ BY: DATE: �(> REAL ESTATE: CLERICAL ERROR. . . El ASSESSOR's CORR. . ❑ ASSESSOR: ATEMEI4TS: ADD AS OMITTED. . . ❑ STIP/JUDGMENT. . . . ❑ TRANSFER: SPEC ASS14'TS: LAND SALE.. . . . . . . ❑ OK ON DIVISION . . . .. . . . C[ PCR: DATE: PARL14t: CORR: JMS 11/85 ACCOUNT' STATS CHANGE w 107 ASSMT A AREA CODE Q; ASSMT YEAR PAYABLE YEAR O FROM: T KA Cr ,T PIN# * R /E JF P M (D) p24 13- Dl(/¢ KEY# 9m LEVY CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MY.T VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT F,KT VALUE CLASSIFIED [ J LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG' OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED TO: LEVY PIN# *�R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (U7'1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE • ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW C014ST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED INIT REASON: ABATEMENT. . . . . . . . ❑ BY DATE: REAL ESTATE: CLERICAL ERROR. . . ❑ ASSESSOR's CORR. . ❑ ASSESSOR: Ln7e,:�--�BATEf�r,IdTS: ADD AS OMITTED. . . ❑ STIP/JUDGMENT. . . . ❑ TRAI4SFER: SPEC ASSt-ITS: LAND SALE.. . . . . . . ❑ OK ON DIVISION . . . . . . . . PCR: DATE: PARLNK CORR: .TMS 11/85 ACCOUNT STATUS CHANGE . ASsmT AREA AREA CODE ASSMT YEAR E PAYABLE YEAR FROM: –TKAC-r 10 LEVY PIN# * E F P M (D) J 3D p2-4 -/3 o KEY# QW�7 CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE — CLASSIFIED L J LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG' OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED TO: LEVY PIN# *OR E FPM (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE —�— CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UT1) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EXE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE CLASSIFIED LEVY PIN# * R E F P M (D) KEY# CODE TDS GREEN OPEN AG (UT2) (UTI) ACRES SPACE PRESERVE EKE ASSD VALUE LAND BLDG OTHER TOTAL NEW CONST PCA PCS DOL PCT MKT VALUE — 1 = CLASSIFIED IIiI _ REASON: ABATEMENT. . . . . . . . El B ': DATE: ��X?- REAL ESTATE: CLERICAL ERROR. . . Cl ASSESSOR's CORR. . ❑ ASSESSOR: QZX-C—ABATENIEIlTS: ADD AS OMITTED. . . ❑ STIP/JUDGMENT. . . . ❑ TRANSFER: SPEC ASS14TS: LAND SALE. . . . . . . . OK ON DIVISION . . . . . . . . PCR: DATE: PARLNK CORR: JMS 11/85 • RESOLUTION NO. - 1984 RESOLUTION AUIIiORI Z IIz THE CITY ADM I N I S TRAT ION TO ENTER DM NEGOTIATIONS TO ACQUIRE PROPER'T'Y FOR A F'U'TURE PARR WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that there is a need for a City Park in the area bounded by Central Avenue on the west, Rice Creek on the north, Stinson Boulevard on the east and Mississippi Street on the south; and WHEREAS, outlots 1 and 2 in the Gena Rae Addition and the adjacent street and cul-de-sac are essential to the development of a City Park in this area. NQi, THEREFORE, BE IT RESC LVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley that the City A3ninistration is authorized to acquire outlots 1 and 2 in the Gena Rae Addition and the adjacent street and cul-de-sac by negotiation or condemnation for a future City use. PASSED AMID ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS Uth DAY OF March 1984. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR AT=: SIDNEY C. II'ZWl - CITY CLERK 2/8/17/9 6801 � _ _ -s/1.► � - _ .y .� ,�.�' ' •'• i /tea Q� -, '-. :.;• ..-;�._ .s, :• �e. �:•• s' :> . �.�-; 171-AW pa i, 3 •' -2.• ,J'. .• -lam �L:' `'` y �'-�'�:- '" /►' �4�U' 6700Feeek :e ,x• ••,• •?may ?j ,_' h1 ••a _lrY� . o 41675 tr��6 (243 NI -Acte,- — � F , �!► ... - � � "-" r,► � t. • G�,1_._ �, •� • ,' �f.•. -- . �r� ^-r � • God 1 4434 1 �4t ✓! Isis � Q ; 327 134 1351 � 1s�� t31s 1]d� 1»f .6dd s __cc,4_ a 3 86 T 1 GG Iqo) �a - AV E. N. E. Wo bse� p `w 1RE , • 1 � 1s tp —! 350 otco9 4 �;_ • � cl.�,;�.�,„ � ? � 3�� 'OQ`aA!�.> TAR 000 Np Pr •:4 �. CR TG53� /1"'y �(/ .• , 1 IN, mow 6 � « t>N E 2 /!s f'„fi �� 1 _�".�:, �.. 1341 2 •, � 'v �A�...A v"� 41 ,s . �- 1k - L .� ��t•31 fik ca:•^� a 7 �'�Vf' 11,7 17 .� . . �� • . .r. '-s�= t Z. LY+i cY•�a .�� •tip• � � 'r, %�:. :' r . -�! = 3 �i••r., '•� r•'• !� .ryr•L'T�•�•.• _K 3� .1�1ii o, t.�•�.J,L•�• * •''•:�:• �� ' • i afZ.Y �, gip: „ r . !rL._ $-�� Y f'� f;' +� Tj a' • .. - .�. a .�L :ice.i. t- • �.. ORDINANCE NO. 868 AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: 1. The City of Fridley is the fee owner of the tract of land within the City of Fridley, Anoka County, State of Minnesota, described as follows: Tracts G, H, and I, Registered Land Survey No. 94 (that part of Outlot 1, Gena-Rae Addition lying North of Creek Park Lane) All lying in North Half of Section 13, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. 2. It is hereby determined by the Council that the City no longer has any reason to continue to own said property and that the sale of said property is not inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council hereby authorizes the City Manager and the City Clerk to a effect the sale of said property by negotiating a sale directly with an interested party. 4. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the necessary contract and deeds to effect the sale of the above described real estate. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986 K� WILLIAM J. N - MAYOR ATTEST: Al SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CI Y CLERK First Reading: October 6, 1986 ( J Second Reading: October 20, 1986 Publication: January 12, 1987 i P: k CONDITIONS TO SALE OF TRIANGULAR PIECE OF GENA RAE PROPERTY STIPULATIONS 1. PROVIDE RETENTION AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON LAT C PER CITY PLAN. 2. SURFACE WATER FLOW FROM LOT C AND ADJOINING PROPERTIES TO EAST TO RETAIN FLOW TO A 5-YEAR DESIGN STORM, 3. CONSTRUCT BERM ALONG WEST SIDE OF LAT C TO PREVENT SURFACE WATER RUNOFF FROM EAST. �j /yo Y � • 6A RICHARD BRICKNE2 P .S . X56-02 STIPULATIONS 1 , PARK FEES OF $1,500 EACH TO BE PAID WITH BUILDING PERMITS ON LOTS A AND B. LOT C SUBJECT TO PARK FEES IF BUILT ON . 2 . REGISTERED LAND SURVEY TO BE RECORDED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT . CONDITIONS TO BUILDING PERflIT FOR CREEK RIDGE II PLAT P.S. #86-02 STIPULATIONS 1. BUILDER ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY MISTAKES IN STAKING. Z. PROVIDE A 10-FOOT UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOTS A & B. 3. PROVIDE A RETENTION POND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LOT C. y /vp 4. WORK WITH THE STAFF TO PROVIDE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE TO HOMES ON CREEK PARK LANE. ORDINANCE NO. 868 t)oo v AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY CHARTER F� DECLARIM CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THERmF S . The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: I. The City of Fridley is the fee owner of the tract of land within the City p of Fridley, Anoka County, State of Minnesota, described as follows: cj \ A portion oftlot 1,�tlogk 1., Gena-Rae Addition, lying 25 feet north of the center line of C -e-e D r� , PIN ( •— o��/, All lying in North` alf of Section 13, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. 2. It is hereby determined by the Council that the City no longer has any reason to continue to own said property and that the sale of said property is not inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council hereby authorizes the City Manager and the City Clerk to effect the sale of said property by negotiating a sale directly with an interested party. 4. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the necessary contract and deeds to effect the sale of the above described real estate. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDL EY THIS 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER , 1986. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR -- ATTEST: SHIRLEY HAAHUA - CITY CLERK First Reading: October 6, 1986 Second Reading: October 20, 1986 Publish: October 2.7 , 1986 3/7/4/6 ` n 746445 STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY In the Matter of a Registered Land Survey PLAT/LOT SPLIT Richard Brickner , Owner The above entitled matter came before the City Council of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 8 day of December , 19 86 , on a petition for a plat pursuant to the City of Fridley's Platting Ordinance, for the following described property: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, of Section 13, T-30, R-24, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of the Plat of Gena-Rae Addition distant 249.00 feet west from the northeast corner of said plat; thence west, along said north line and its westerly extension, a distance of 163.50 feet; thence north a distance of 247.50 feet, more or less, to a point on the south line of Outlot A, Dennis Addition distant 417.50 feet east from the southwest corner of said Outlot A; thence east along the south f line of said Outlot A a distance of 163.50 feet; thence IQTu IS �RD tED ctPhaotf a p1at0 be g4'anted oaslupo'n �e o lowing bc� i i ogds or reasons: See Council minutes of December 8, 1986 with 6 stipulations. STATE OF MINNESOTA } COUNTY OF ANOKA ) OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CITY OF FRIDLEY ) I, Shirley A. Haapala, City Clerk for the City of Fridley with and in for said City' of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a plat with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Frid, le innesota, in the County of Anoka on the 9 day of DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 SHIRLEY A. H APALA, CITY CLERK Gil (SEAL) COUNCIL MEL'1M OF DECEMBER 8. 1986 between nine and ten feet wide. (buncilman Schneider stated he prefers ten foot stalls, but questioned if a precedent hadn't already been established when reduced widths were allowed for Unity Hospital, Target, and parking at City Hall. Mr. Flora stated it may be possible to double stripe the stalls, if the Gbuncil approved a reduction in the width. Mayor Nee stated he would like to see what has to be given up to meet the requirement for a ten foot wide parking stall. Ms. Fisher stated they have developed a contingency plan, however, this would not allow as much open space. She felt it would have an adverse effect on the developnent. She stated they would like to keep the number of parking spaces they are proposing, which is in excess of the ordinance, in case they lose spaces to meet requirelments of the A.=Ly Carp of Rngir.:e-ers. (buncilman Fitzpatrick stated he didn't feel allowances should be made on the basis of the plan being disrupted as he felt the plan river should have been designed for nine foot parking stalls. MJ'I'ION by (buncilman Fitzpatrick to deny VAR 186-32 to reduce the parking stall widths from ten feet to nine feet. Seconded by (buncilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, (buncilman Fitzpatrick, (buncilman Goodspeed, Councilman Schneider and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Barnette voted against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4 to 1 vote. MDTION by Counclman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of November 19, 1986. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. CONSIDERATION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ANOKA COUNTY COMNMCATIONS WORKSHO (ACCK)i W. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated this agreement provides that the ACCW would receive 40% of the franchise fee plus the 1986 interest accrued in the Cable Television Fund. (buncilman Schneider asked if the City's cable channel was being used to the fullest. He stated during the election, there was not lengthy coverage by Fridley in comparison to coverage by other neighboring cities. Mr. Hunt stated there was overage provided, however, it terminated about 11 p.m. MDTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the agreement with the ACCW. Seconded by (buncilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. RESOLMON NO 123-1986 APPFDV r,2 A REGISTERED LAND SURVEY (CREEKRIDGE PLAT 2) . BY RICHARD BRICKNER; -9- COIINCIL UZZIM OF DECEMBER 8. 1986 Mr. Flora, Public works Director, reviewed the stipulations associated with this plat for Richard Brickner, as follows: (1) Provide retention and drainage easements on Lot C per City Plan; (2) Surface water flow fran Lot C and adjoining properties to east to retain flow to a five-year design storm; (3) Construct berm along west side of Lot C to prevent surface water runoff . frau the east; (4) Sale of property at 76.5 cents per square foot (76.5 x 6,790 sq. ft. = $5,194.35) ; (5) Payment of three park fees of $1,500 each with first three of four building permits; and (6) Pending assessments plus interest to be paid with the building permits on Tracts C and D. NDTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 123-1986, with the following stipulations: (1) Provide retention and drainage easements on Lot C per City Plan; (2) Surface water flow from Lot C and adjoining properties to east to retain flow to a five-year design storm; (3) Construct berm along west side of Lot C to prevent surface water runoff frau the east; (4) Sale of property at 76.5 cents per square foot (76.5 x 6,790 sq. ft. = ;,5,194.35) ; (5) Payment of three park fees of $1,500 each with first three of four building permits; and (6) Pending assessments plus interest to be paid with the building permits on Tracts C and D. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. MSOI MON NO 124-1986 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, ANOKA CXTRj'Y, M?NNESOTA, APPROVING A SUppLEM2 _ANp gE,STATED INDENTURE OF TRUST i SpECTIiw TBE CITY'S ODMI ERCIAL DEV WPMLM REVENLIF BONDS (FRIDBUSINESS Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated this resolution is necessary due to an error in the actual letter of credit which is $10,000 less than the f igure which was presented to the (buncil at previous meetings when this issue was discussed. Be stated the previous figure was $2,800,000 and the actual letter of credit is for $2,790,000 and the amount for which the bonds will be issued. He stated the only change is just the actual trust indenture and realigning the collar amounts because of the $10,000 error. MJTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 124-1986. Seconded by Cbuncilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. RESOL ION Nn 125-1986 AUTHORIZING CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE GENERAL Ftp, REVENUE SHARING FUND, HOME OWNERSHIP FUND, AND THE HRA FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1985: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated these are the yearly changes in appropriations and adjustments for the 1985 budget and the resolution provides interdivisional changes within the General Fund. PDTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 125-1986. Seconded by (buncilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. RES=ON NO 126-1986 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING THE AGREEMENT -10- .er 746445 Numerical Grantor Grantee Recorded -�— Checked Z' Moron /✓ Tr. Index I i • 0 0 a n X. OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER riI STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF ANOKA I hereby certify that the within instrtt+ CIO ment was tiled in this office for record 3 on the FEB 13 1987 P.j 6A`'4@k o'clock . M.,and was duty resord¢d four ecorder c By �Cl 'MnNr c.. I C11YOF FR[DLLY CIVIC CENTER 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE(612)571-3450 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Richard Brickner December 12, 1986 1233 - 12th Avenue N.W. New Brighton, MN 55112 On December 8 , 1986 the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a Registered Land Survey (Creekridge Plat 2) with the following stipulation: I. Mr. Brickner to pay three park fees of $1,500 each with four building Permits. 2. Pending assessments plus interest to be paid with the building permits on tracts C and D. 3. Provide retention and drainage easements per City plan. (Plan and easement document attached. ) y 4. Surface water flaw from Lot IC and adjoining properties/to East to retain flow to a 5 year design storm. 5. Construct berm along west side of Lot-W.to prevent surface water runoff from East. 6. Sale of property at $ .765 per square foot (76.5 x 6790 = 5194.35). If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. Sincerely, James L. Robinson Planning Coordinator JLR/dm Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by December 26, 1986. �91i;L2n/ US) Concur with action taken | Novo "W1,5TERED LAND SU Y NO. 7067 f In 144\a 6"A-RAe APP. 77-f4 75.4 4 4S,1Z 47 4 IID 10 46JS"W 'Alf Ir In ...SAY Corner Ne�14 PE rA IL lot 0 ) _ of - -'_-- . . ATTACHI Form No.28-M. Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis )) �on.C..____ _ nesota Unilonn Come ncin�Blanks SRevised 1976) 7� Xbi!5 3naenture. .blade this .......................................day Of................................................................ 19............. betiveen......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... I 1 ofthe County of........Anoka............................................................and State of............................................................................................ i part............of the first part,and................................................................................................................................................................................. ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I a corporation under the laws of the State of......................................................_.......................... party of the second part, Witnealit1b, That the said part............ of the first part, in consideration of the sum of _............................................................................................................................................................................................................................DOLL.4RS, to............................................................in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof U hereby acknowledged, do............ hereby Brant, Bargain, Quitclaim, and Convey; unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, Forever,all the tract._...or parcel......of land lying and being in the County of....................................................................................and State of Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit: Drainage and Utility easements described as follows: The south 10 feet of Tract A and Tract B Registered Land Survey No. The north 10 feet and the westerly 10 feet of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. That part of Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. lying northerly and easterly of the following described line. Commencing on the northwest corner of said Tract D; thence south along the west line of said Tract D a distance of 35 feet to the actual point of beginning. Thence, deflect to the left in a northeasterly direction 135 degrees, 00 minutes to a point on a line 10 feet south of, and parallel with, the north line of said Tract D; thence east along said parallel line to a point on a line 10 feet west of, and parallel with, the easterly line of said Tract D; thence southerly along last said parallel line to the south line of said Tract D and there terminating. The southerly and southeasterly 15 feet and easterly 10 feet of Tract H, Registered Land Survey No. The westerly 10 feet of Tract G, Registered Land Survey No. To Jbabe anb to Jbolb tlje Oame, Together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances there- unto belonffing or in anywise appertaining, to the said party of the second part,its successors and assigns. Forever. i 3n Z:egtimonp Whereof, The said part ........of the first part ha. hereunto set hand ..the day and year flrst above nritten. i ............................................................................................................... .. i ........................................................................................................... ............................................................................ _ i