Loading...
SP-1969 DENIED CITY OF FRIDLEY TYPE OF REQUEST MINNESOTA Rezoning PLANNING AND ZONING FORM Special Use Permit Number Variance APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE, i �= G'y:C�E Imo:- �_. ,{ �� i L��-i r 'Lot Splits Address �% Approval of Pre- Telephone Plat Telephone Number _.. Approval. of Final Plat PROPERTY OWNER'S �- Streets or Alley...... Address �7 �-?,��� f7. _ Vacations Telephone Number Other Street Location of Property! Legal Description of Property Present Zoning Classification Existing Use of the Property Proposed Zoning Classification, Special. Use, Variance or (other request -�:�'+ ,. 1 _� �L���, ��-��1.Y�'� -7 �it.- ,C/ice-��-<<_ .�� z-�,<•'t. Describe briefly the Type of Use and the Improvement Proposed i Acreage of Property j ,Y % Has the Present Applicant Previously Sought to Rezone, Plat, Obtain a Lot Split, Obtain a Variance or Special Use Permit on the Subject Site or Part of It? When? What was Requested r —__Fee Enclosed Date Filed �_� _ Date of Hearing PLANNING AND ZONING FORM PACE 2 Numb e r The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of pro- perty -oithin 300 feet must be attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by all owners of the property, or an explanation given why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the pro- ceedings resulting from the failure to list the names and addresses of all residents and property owners of property within 300 feet of the p;:opczty in question, belongs to the undersi-ned. Residents and Owners of Property within 300 feet: PERSONS ADDRESS A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn on the back of this form or attached, showing the following: 1. North Direction 2. Location of Proposed Structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side set-backs. 4. Street Names 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 300 feet) . The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE i �.✓.. c� - SIGNATURE �E!��-.�- ,-� 'i-.z,c_ (APPLICANT) Approved Denied By the 3oard of Appeals Subject to the Following Conditions: date Approved Denied by the Plannin- Commission on Subject to the Following Conditions: date Approved Denied by the Council on Subject to the Following Conditions: date .Form PC 100 , v APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS AND CITY COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE IN REQUIREMENTS OF CERTAIN ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY r' (Applicant to cbmplete items ij 2, 3) 1. Name and Address of Applicant, '�= c ?Z- G9vL� � r 2. Legal Description of Property (also general location, such as :"north•• east corner of 64th Avenue and 5th Street" or 6415 Fifth Street") 3. Describe the variance requested. (Attach Plat or Survey of Property showing location of proposed building, etc. , also adjoining properties and ownership within 200' of said property.) 4. Comments by administrative official denying original request for building. permit or other permit. (To be completed by administrative official. Appropriate ordinances and section of ordinances to be cited.) - 2 _ 5. Notice of Hearing appeared in Official Newspaper on the following dates:_ March _17 _, 24. ig67 - Anoka County Union & Shopper, Inc. (must be at least once 10 days before meeting -- copy of notice to be attached). 6. Board Members notified of meeting by mailing of notices 3/16/67 (List Members, Date Notified, and "Yes" or "No" for plans to attend hearing). A Name Data Plan to Attend All members notified by mailing of notices 3/16/67 7. Person making appeal and the following property owners having property within 200' notified: By Phone Notified by Name Date or Mail (Initial) Severin & Eleanor Chmielewski, 7531 University Avenue N.E. 3/16/- Duane Olson, 7549 University Avenue N.E. 3/16/67 --Bernard wo_lke 251 Rice Creek Terrace 3/16/67 U!)42- th St. N.E.) 8. The Following Board Members and interested parties were present at the Hearing: March 29 1967. BOARD AEN11BERS CITY OF FRIDLEY TYPE OF REQUEST MINNESOTA Rezoning PLANNING AND ZONING FORM Special Use Permit Number Variance APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE, -i,'�.�;f;�J�ii` j y�l ✓L.�'j�:4 ':� � Lot Splits Address ///7 Approval;r,�.' � Approval of Pre- liminary Plat Telephone Number , �., �/ �// '� 7 Approval of Final � Plat PROPERTY OWNER'S S IG?IATURE_ ;�z Streets or Alley.- Address )i,— / 7���;, ' ' Vacations Telephone Number Other tl% Street Location of Property Legal Description of Property Present Zoning Classification r. Existing Use of the Property ;� . rj���. : }< Proposed Zoning Classification, Special Use, Variance or other request � U Describe briefly the Type of Use and the Improvement Proposed IL Acreage of Property ; / Z3 Has the Present Applicant Previously Sought to Rezone, Plat, Obtain a Lot Split, Obtain a Variance or Special Use Permit on the Subject Site or Part of It? When? What was Requested Fee Enclosed $ Date Filed Date of Hearing PLANNING AND ZONING FORM PACE 2 h%-nber The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of pro- perty within 300 feet must be attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by all owners of the property, or an explanation given why this is not the case, (c) Responsibility for any defect in the pro- ceedings resulting from the failure to list the names and addresses of all residents and property owners of property within 300 feet of the propeyty in question, belongs to the undersi-ned. Residents and Owners of Property within 300 feet: PERSONS ADDRESS / r A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drai:m on the back of this form or attached, showing the following: 1. North Direction 2. Location of Proposed Structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side set-backs. 4. Street- Names 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 300 feet) , The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. _ DATE SIGi3ATURE -��� -- y /�r�t� ....••�.-y- - -- (APPLICANT) Approved Denied By the yoar•d of Appeils, Subject to the Following Conditions: date Approved _ Denied by the Planning Commission on _ Subject to the FollowinC.g Conditions: date Approved Denied by the Council on Subject to the Following Conditions: _ date Form PC 100 r � Survey i or:.,\ ,Severin Chmiel v.ski SURVEVORS 2825 HARRIET AVE. F ►IyNf ,°C� S. MINNESOTA s I I fit 3 I � Description: Lot 12 , Clock 2, ,rS: v!►I c ,ut� . ,�. We hereby certify that this is ' a true and correct reppresentation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of 21 buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. �ftated this 4LI day of 1,arc�� , 1:;G7 E G a FIELD & N 0 W Engineers &; Surveyors File No ^-�}��� BookVia. ; ,� - ; by. 1 V i ' Surveyfor.-- Severin Chmie ewski ;Ina SURVEVO 2825 HARRIET AVE. ��Iyti °gg S. MINNESOTA ES�I18. 1171 r� 4 c 41 4t y f f, n' U— , ! C - � s U— ScaIc : 1 20' ) r • I c> 2 Block 2 OS UR111E 1%k,",NGR. Description : Lot 1 , , We hereby certify that this is a true and correct -representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated this 1�t� day of II'arch , 1BG7 0 E B A N7 ! r L D & 'J 0 '�� A K Engineers &., Surveyors '7 r. No. Book bio. - b ' �j y G -1Y ' },,'��_` �{.2-�y f�' ��, '•!L'�`�`�•ft y � �:l'/� ';�•,ts���'"r�'t';�i.) CITY 11`4 I? ( ;�J N� +s. �,r<;�: /`f kl r�: .� ! � ,1� • ,^ h KS QSgQR , CH .l k/ fir:` : oto, `L iA NIT HOSPiTAL LL Ll J� }����1.{'�f f, 2b •:� �.f1�� • 1 9— to r+�•�s "/ .\,A\%1��i\,sti� f � �,. (fJ a��5, _4�. :ice •h! ` y 1 y� 42 '" r.�• �?.�,1/`�'` �:� 25. f. 5 TIN AvlE`N.E. - �' `, 1i�LF�!� a Al f (fir /JJ�.. 2!'+ ` -`t 2 �' _•F '� z VQ ' n�!/¢ ' 1 N E a ! - ,� :_J ► L� _ ENUE _ � > �1_..�>� L_•�- "_` 7.3?2 r3 AYE N - -- (STATE AID 30j r)_ r s s •' ' r �c� JT� t�,f /•j ,x� `�frf'� 11' .� �:�,,. r.�: .,. .��: .�; _,�` I �•��: �,�' ,j�� : •f, �� .�., .,l,�i• �l: �,:����:��r��j:�;r , fir;� r'�• :��� ������������ '�>' -: .. �f��'- f; ; /' � _ yy . � , r ! { d• y /10 �.�•�� 'l.'l' ,,�'. r- �;�^ /%• `�''fes�>� �'�=r � ���� %:�' ���� ,�����,.� �:/•j'�r>:r,j'�' '.r.f�-;. :T j'- est,�:J c�3 ' fi-, f- -' � - J' � � � :,fir J., J.��• .�•r.1�. Jf �� ,7.,/.' f��1� �_j��;s`.��1` �. . +t le ,r r. JI {.1 X J� 7 .� .T._!./• ` -�� y �� - ��tea,. .zt A f / /l r- .� ��•f.�,,��r�-fry . . BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 29, 1967 The Meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M. by Chairman Ylinen. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Ylinen, Ahonen, Minish, Mittelstadt, Saunders MEMBERS ABSENT: None 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A DOUBLE BUNGALOW IN AN R-1 DISTRICT AS PER SECTION 45.19 (2A) , CITY CODE OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 1963, REVISED DECMEBER 1964, ON LOT 12, BLOCK 2, OSBORNE MANOR (LOT NORTH OF 7531 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NORTHEAST) ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA,_ SAME BEING 7541 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NORTHEAST_, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY SEVERTN & ELEANOR CBMIELEWSKI, 7531 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NORTHEAST, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, 55432) : There was no one present for or against the request for a Special Use Permit. MOTION by Saunders, seconded by Minish, to continue this hearing to Wednesday , April 19, 1967 at 7:30 P.M. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Ylinen declared the motion carried. f 2. PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 45.24, CITY CODE OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 1963, REVISED DECEMBER 1964, BY WAIVER OF A SIDE YARD REQUIRE- MENT ON A CORNER LOT FROM 17 FEET 6 INCHES TO 17 FEET TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON LOT 1, BLOCK 2, HOLIDAY HILLS SECOND ADDITION, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA SAME BEING 400 RICE CREEK BOULEVARD, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY ARTHUR J SILSETH, 48 TALMADGE WAY NORHTEAST, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, 55432) : There was no one present for or against the Variance. The City Manager advised that in construction very often there could be a variation amounting to up to 6 inches, but that this has been brought to the Board because Mr. Silseth is a City employee, and too, the City Manager was not aware of either this Board's or this Council's attitude toward allowing the Administrative people to permit a small variance like this. rather than going to the work of holding the Public Hearing. MOTION by Saunders, seconded by Middelstadt, to grant the requested variance. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Ylinen declared the motion carried. DISCUSSION OF ORDINANCE: Member Saunders brought to the attention of the Board, the fact that in Section 6 of Ordinance 358, it was stated that all decisions of the Board of Appeals are final, but of course subject to appeal to th2 Council and/or later Judicial review. The City Manager advised that he assumed that the City Attorney had 1 I t OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Appeals of the City of Fridley will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:30 o'clock P.M. , Wednesday, March 29, 1967, to consider the following matters: 1. A request for a Special Use Permit to permit construction k, of a double bungalow in an R-1 District as per Section 45.19 (2A) , City Code of Fridley, Minnesota 1963, Revised Decerfwer 1964, on Lot 12, Block 2, Osborne Manor (lot north of 7531 University Avenue Northeast) Anoka County, Minnesota, same being 7541 University Avenue Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota. (Request by Severin & Eleanor Chmielewski, 7531 University Avenue Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota, 55432) . 2. A request for a variance from Section 45.24, City Code of Fridley, Minnesota 1963, Revised December 1964, by waiver of a side yard requirement on a corner lot from 17 feet 6 inches to 17 feet to permit construction of a single family dwelling on Lot 1, Block;2, Holiday Hills Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, same being 400 Rice Creek Boulevard,. Fridley, Minnesota. (Request by Arthur J. Silseth, 48 Talmadge Way Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota, 55432) . Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matters will be heard at this meeting. Harry Nawrocki CHAIRMAN publish: March 17, 1967 BOARD OF APPEALS March 24, 1967 Planning Commission Meeting - April 6, 1967 Page 5 approximately 110 feet, 125 feet, 109 feet and 90 feet, subject to verifi- cation and clarification by the Engineering Department. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. It was noted there are two zoning categories in the above parcel, but the Commission felt that no further action was required now, but there is the possibility of a request later on to extend the commercial zoning. 4. APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS: S. CHMIELEWSKI: Lot 12, Block 2, Osborne Manor, special use permit for two family dwelling. Member Ylinen said he visited the property and talked to adjacent property owners and only one indicated mild disapproval. He stated it was a good lot. The petitioner lives in one of the adjacent homes. The proposed structure would be two stories. MOTION by Ylinen, seconded by Jensen, to recommend approval of the petition of Severin or Eleanor Chmielewski, to the City Council for this two family dwelling on Lot 12, Block 2, Osborne Manor with the specifica- tion that there be a garage stall for each dwelling unit, connected to the street with a hard surfaced driveway, and the remainder of the lot shall be sodded including the boulevard, and further stipulate that the owner enter into an agreement with the City in connection with the above requirements that if the owner does not comply with said requirements, the City shall complete said requirements and assess the cost back to the I property. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 5. THIRD STREET PATTERN: Copies of the letter from Erickson Petroleum Corp. indicating their desire not to participate in plans concerning carrying Third Street through to 57th Avenue were passed out to the Commission members. In answer to Chairman Hughes question, Member Jensen (chairman of the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee) said it is pretty hard to summarize. It involves literally months of study by the Subcommittee and resulted in a fairly complete division of opinion as to the merits or demerits of the proposal. The Subcommittee made two motions, the first motion failed which favored the recommendation of the proposal. Since there seemed to be no real feeling for continued review of the problem, it seemed to be the wisest move to forward it to the Planning Commission. This letter from Erickson Petroleum Corp. is a complete surprise in view of the Subcommittee meeting which took place on March 30th. In a very short time they have more or less reversed their feeling. Mr. Wagner called me after a discussion with Bob Rote so that I would be aware of the reversal and I called Bob Rote, because the comments made to me really did not say anything except they were no longer favoring this pro- posal. Bob Rote informed me they own additional property north of 57th Avenue across the street of their present site and it is the feeling now of Bob Rote and the management that the street which they have in the past proposed could actually become a deterrent in the development of this property. They could be in the position of having fostered a road which, in a year or two, they might wish not to be there at all. They have not developed specific plans at this writing, but did not wish to delay any action if the Committee wished to continue the study. Chairman Hughes said that sometime ago a number of the members toured OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO WHOM IT MAY CO-.vCERtj: NOTICE IS HEP.EBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Fridley will meet in the Council Chamf3ers of the City hall at 8:00 O'clock P.M. , Monday, May 1, 1967, to consider the follo.ving matter: A request for a Special Use Permit to permit construction of a double bungalow in an R-1 District as per Section 45 .19 (2A) , City Code of Fridley, Minnesota 1963, Revised December 1964, on hot 12, Block 2, Osborne Manor (lot north of 7531. University Avenue Northeast) Anoka County, Minnesota, same being 7541 Univ- ersity Avenue Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota. (Request by Severin & Eleanor Chmiele.jski, 7531 University Avenue Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota, 55432) . Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. r Jack Oo Kirkham MAYOR Publish: April 21, 1967 April 281 1967 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING, APRIL 10, 1967 PAGE 32 �'► MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to grant a lot Split to Mylo Parks on Lot #10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 (Revised) so that starting from Central Avenue going East, the first ;parcel size will be approximately 235 feet, the next parcel to the East will be 109 feet, and the third parcel, which is the ` farthest to the East, will be 90 feet. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. 3RD STREET PATTERN: i Councilman Liebl asked if every member of the Council was aware that Erickson Petroleum had dropped the proposal, and was not going through with their request that 3rd Street go through to 57th Avenue. Councilman Liebl asked if any member of the Council had anything to do with it or had discussed it with Mr. Rote. He asked the City Manager if he knew what the reason was for it being dropped. The City Manager said that Mr. Rote had just asked him to take it off the Planning Commission's agenda, which he said he could not do. He told Mr. Rote he should write a letter explaining why they wanted it taken off. He said that the letter had arrived on the same day as the Planning Commission meeting. He said that Mr. Jensen had talked to Mr. Rote and he understood that they were concerned that someday they might want a building there. Councilman Liebl said that in the Minutes of the Plats and Subdivisions Sub-Committee Meeting, two had voted in favor of it, two against, and Mr. Jensen had abstained. He asked why Mr. Jensen had abstained. The City Manager said he did not know, and he did not believe anyone had asked Mr. Jensen. Councilman Liebl said that last year Erickson Petroleum had been very anxious to get this road through, and he had been very astonished when they had dropped it. Mayor Kirkham said he was curious also, and had a call into the office now, although he did not ,know if they wanted their reasons made public. t Y TWO FAMILY DWELLING - 7541 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NORTHEAST- CHMIELEWSKI: The City Manager said that the Board of Appeals had only had a few days to look at this request prior to the hearing, but all five members of the Board had gone out and looked at it on the following Saturday. He said that it had come to the Planning Commission Meeting April 6th because the new Board of Appeals Ordinance did not go into effect until April 8th. He read the motion of the Planning Commission recommending approval. He said that the ordinance requires that the Council call a Public Hearing, so the Council can either concur and set the hearing, or deny the request. Councilman Harris asked Mr. S. Chmielewski about the lots to the north and south of his lot. Mr. Chmielewski said there is a house to the north and a house to the south zoned residential. Councilman Harris asked about the size of his lot. Mr. Chmielewski said it was 175x135. Councilman Harris asked if this will have to go to the Building Board. The City Manager said that- they will have to go to the Building Board with the plans for the structure. Mr. Chmielewski said he had found some smashed footings on this lot. The City Manager said that if this was from over 8 years ago, there would be no record. Councilman Sheridan said that at' one time there was a high water table in this area which may explain the old footings. Mayor Kirkham said he thought this area was complete. Councilman Samuelson said that it was R-1 on both sides and R-1 in back. The Council discussed a date for a Public Hearing and decided on May lst. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING, APRIL 10, 1967 PAGE 33 �y MOTION by Councilman Samuelson that the Special Permit Application go through the normal procedures, and a Public Hearing be set for May 1, 1967 to fill the Council's obligations. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Councilman Sheridan said that he would like to explain to the parties applying that the Council has only granted two or three Special Use Permits for multiple dwellings in residential districts in the past, and those were considerably larger lots. He said that he would -like to express his opinion, that regardless of the hearing, he would not be in favor of the permit because of the lot size, but the Council will go through the necessary procedures. Mayor Kirkham said he did not like to discourage the petitioners unnecessarily, but they should be apprised of the fact that with the knowledge he has so far, he will be in opposition, but that the Council will go ahead with the hearing May 1st. UPON a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, Mayor Kirkham declared the Special Council Meeting of April 10, 1967 closed at 9:22 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Mary Lu Strom Secretary to the Council REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, MAY 1, 1967 PAGE 2 said that it was. Councilman Sheridan said that the $3.05 top figure has been for street drainage, and this project is for a pocket in the back of the lots, and not of any benefit to any other part of the District. He said that he felt the cost was high, and as there were no representatives present, he suggested postponing it at this time. He said that if the Council is to go through with the project, he thought including it in the whole project would set a precedent on packets or holes in the drainage district, and the City would be obligated to go back and pick up water holes. Councilman Harris said he would agree with this, but he did not feel that the project could be forgotten, as the problem will be magnified when curbs and gutters go in. Mayor Kirkham said he felt this had a direct bea-wing on the whole project. The City Engineer said that up to now the policy has been not to pick up back yard drainage. Councilman Harris said that as no one is here for or against the project, he would suggest they close the hearing and take the matter under advisement. Councilman Liebl said he would like a chance to talk to the people and see how they feel. MOTION by Councilman Liebl that the Public Hearing for Storm Sewer #5C (Addendum Yfl) be continued until the Regular Council Meeting of May- 15, 1967. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, r„ •� Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. f; PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT - TWO FAMILY DWELLING IN R-1 DISTRICT, SEVERIN & ELEANOR CHMIELEWSKI: �� The City Manager read the Notice of Hearing. The City Engineer handed out maps of the proposed location. Mayor Kirkham asked if the involved parties were present. There was no answer. The City Engineer said that everything is built up in this area except an old partial basement that has been there for years. Mayor Kirkham said he felt this amounts to spot zoning and that to change the zoning on this would be contrary to what the Council is trying to do throughout the City. Mayor Kirkham said that hearing no other interested parties, the hearing was closed at 8:19 P.M. CONSIDERATION OF POLICE COMMISSION REPORT OF NOVEMBER, 1966: Mayor Kirkham drew the Council's attention to six letters in the back of the agenda relating to this matter. MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the communications from Mr. Marvin W. Smith, 6801 Oakley Street Northeast; Mr. Walter Miller, Electro Cote Company; Mr. Kenneth M. Holmes, Minnesota Linseed Oil Company; Mr. Harry Henerickson, Fullerton Metals Company; Mr. John F. Haines, Unity Hospital; and S. W. Carlson, Park Construction Company. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. Councilman Liebl said that since he had asked that this matter be on the agenda, he would like to read the following letter from the agenda which he had addressed to the Council: t REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, MAY 15, 1967 PAGE 3 MOTION by Councilman Harris that this project not be put in at this time, . but be returned .to the Administration for an alternate solution on enforcing the off-street parking for the affected property. t " The City Engineer said that the Administration had written letters in 1962 telling the people they were in violation and that they had to provide parking in the back, but they had come to the Council about the water problem, so it was now up to the Council on whether it be done now or not, but he felt that it should be brought to their attention. The Motion was seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Councilman Liebl asked the people present in the audience if there was a water problem. One of the visitors said that the first apartment has water in the spring as it runs down the slope, but an alley would just make it a runway and increase the problem. The vote upon the motion was a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. SEWER USE AGREEMENT (TABLED 5/8/67) : Mayor Kirkham reminded the Council that this is the letter he had read at the last Council Meeting, and the Council had decided to reconsider the last paragraph. Mayor Kirkham suggested that they just eliminate the first two sentences of the last paragraph, and start the last paragraph, "If this be your position, we suggest then that you commence a declaratory judgment action to have the meaning of the supplemental agreement determined by the District Court." Councilman Samuelson suggested that in the fourth paragraph, they eliminate the word "ignore" and substitute the words, "to use their own interpretation of". MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt the letter to the NSSSD with the proposed changes. The motion was seconded and upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. DOUBLE BUNGALOW USE PERMIT (HEARING CLOSED 5/1/67) : Councilman Samuelson said his feelings were that this was spot zoning and would be putting a multiple dwelling in the immediate center of an R-1 District. MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to deny the Double Bungalow Use Permit. Council- man Liebl asked about the zoning surrounding this lot. Councilman Harris said that it was all R-1. Councilman Liebl said he assumed that the people opposed this. Councilman Samuelson said there had been no one present at the meeting either pro or con except the people making the application. Councilman Harris said he thought this had been disposed of at the last meeting. Mayor Kirkham said that the hearing had been closed but no action had been taken. The motion was seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. REZONING REQUEST IN SPRING BROOK PARK AREA (TABLED 5/1/67) : s The City Engineer pointed out on the map the different zonings requested. Councilman Harris asked if Ashton was a deadend. The City Engineer said that it goes to Ironton now, and eventually will go to the City limits at the railroad tracks. Councilman Samuelson asked if this was the Planning Commission's scheme. The City Engineer said that it was.