The URL can be used to link to this page

SP96-14 S� ze- CITY OF FRIDLEY p 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: 1-4 Oq N E 5 � Oa[e 1' r l d teu M Property Identification Number(PIN) fR.-2:3 20 �( 2V 620E0 ®O L/75a l y Legal description: C; 'I-t�iGL„) Lot Block Tract/Addition I R o0o700 f Current zoning: R '='S H 5 T-0 Square footage/acreage 8!6 D S G, E:t Reason for special use permit: U 5 e Ck 5 >e Cavi r Section of City Code: Of V Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No x; If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) ~~~~~ (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME ADDRESS DAYTIME PHONE SIGNATURE DATE PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME _�,�r ADDRESS A16- , l � ��y� 31;7— DAYTIME PHONE (,)o r Fc Z? SIGNATURE DATE Fee: $400.00 $1 0.00 for residential 2nd accessory buildingsH~H ~~N Permit SP# 9Lo -!q Receipt# /-)C l c. Application received by: , Scheduled Planning Commission date: Scheduled City Council date: 2.05 .05.04 . 4 . SPECIAL USE PERMIT ' A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to provide the City of Fridley with a reasonable degree of discretion in determining the suitability of certain designated uses upon the general welfare, public health and safety. In making this determination the City may consider the nature of the land upon which the use is to be located, the nature of the adjoining land or buildings, the effect upon traffic into and from the premises or on any adjoining roads, and all such other factors as the City shall reasonably deem a requisite of consideration in determining the effect of such use. For the purpose of recording, the terms Special Use Permit and Conditional Use Permit shall be said to mean one and the same pursuant to M.S.A. Section 462.3595, Subdivision 4. B. Application. Whenever this Chapter requires a Special Use Permit, an application in writing must be filed with the City together with such filing fee as may be established by the City Council and shall be accompanied by a site plan or other documentation as required by the City. C. Referral To The Planning Commission. The application and related file shall be referred to the Planning Commission for study concerning the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan and on the character and development of the neighborhood. The Planning Commission shall hold an official public hearing within sixty (60) days of the date of filing such petition. D. Hearing. A notice of public hearing shall be published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days but not more than thirty (30) days prior to the date of the hearing. E. Action By The Planning Commission. (1) Notices shall be mailed to all owners of property within 350 feet of the parcel included in the request not less than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the hearing. Failure of a property owner to receive notice shall not invalidate any such proceedings as set forth within this Chapter. (Ref. 1026) (2) The Conunission shall make its recommendation to the City Council within sixty (60) days of the date of hearing of the petition to the Planning Commission or within sixty (60) days of any continuance of such matter granted at the applicant's written request. 03/94 205-25 City of Fridley PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University/venue N.E. on Wednesday, August 21, 1996 at 7:30 p.m.for the purpose of: Consideration of a special use permit, SP #96-14, by Roger Serdahl, per Section 205.07.0l.C.(1) of the Fridley City Code, to allow an accessory building other than the first accessory building, over 240 square feet, on Lot 3, Block 4, City View, generally located at 409-57th Place N.E. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stat- ed time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Community Development Department at 572-3593. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than August 14,1996. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION (August 8,15,1996)Fridley Focus News PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, August 21, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a special use permit, SP #96-14 , by Roger Serdahl, per Section 205. 07. 01.C. (1) of the Fridley City Code, to allow an accessory building other than the first accessory building, over 240 square feet, on Lot 3, Block 4, City View, generally located at 409 - 57th Place N.E. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Community Development Department at 572-3593 . Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than August 14 , 1996. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: August 8, 1996 August 15, 1996 SP #96-14 W Qy F- W 7 N SP #96- 14 409 57th Place Roger Serdahl LOCATION MAP W Q I. W N VAR #96- 15 409 57th Place Roger Serdahl LOCATION MAP SP 14 ROGER SERDAHL 409-57TH PLACE NE MAILING LIST MAILED 8/2/96 ROGER SERDAHL OTTO TAUER RESIDENT 409 57TH PLACE NE 520 S CEDAR LAKE RD 359 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 FRIDLEY MN 55432 M R KONIECZNY&J W FRANK ROBERT& KATHLEEN AMBORN MONIQUE EMERY OR RESIDENT OR RESIDENT 405 57TH PLACE NE 451 57TH PLACE NE 369 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 EDWARD &MARY JO GUZEK MICHAEL HEATH OR RESIDENT ALFRED & BETTY ENGELSTAD OR RESIDENT 5830 5TH STREET NE OR RESIDENT 455 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 5820 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 MARTHA FUENTES OR RESIDENT STANLEY GOZEL JR OR RESIDENT THOMAS GABRELCIK OR RESIDENT 5810 5TH STREET NE 5800 5TH STREET NE 5801 4TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 J P GRAVELLE& K J KALLMAN DELORES PREEKETT OR RESIDENT REGINALD &SHARON COSTIGAN OR RESIDENT 5821 4TH STREET NE OR RESIDENT 5811 4TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 5840 6TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 NINA LANDT OR RESIDENT ELIZABETH PEKA OR RESIDENT JAMES & LUCILLE LEWIS 5830 6TH STREET NE 5820 6TH STREET NE OR RESIDENT FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 5810 6TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 JOHN &CAROL SLOPEK RICHARD& BARBARA HUBBARD JAMES & KATHRYN OLSON OR RESIDENT OR RESIDENT OR RESIDENT 5800 6TH STREET NE 5801 5TH STREET NE 5811 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 ROBERT DE LA MARTRE LYLE &LAVERNE RICHTER FLORUS & ELEANOR ROBECK OR RESIDENT OR RESIDENT OR RESIDENT 5821 5TH STREET NE 5831 5TH STREET NE 5841 5TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 WAYNE &JANE SIMONEAU GLEN &CHERYL RAMSDELL WARREN &ANN SUNDERLAND 465 57TH PLACE NE OR RESIDENT OR RESIDENT FRIDLEY MN 55432 400 57TH PLACE NE 410 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 SP#96-14 409-57TH PLACE NE MAILING LIST- PAGE 2 DAVID PUDNEY OR RESIDENT MARILYN YOUNG OR RESIDENT CAROL OLSEN OR RESIDENT 420 57TH PLACE NE 430 57TH PLACE NE 440 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 DAVID& NOREEN YURKEW RESIDENT ACCAP 6502 HICKORY STREET NE 360 57TH AVENUE NE 1201 89TH AVENUE NE STE 345 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 BLAINE MN 55434 RESIDENT DANIEL O'NEILL OR RESIDENT THERESA SCHOENBERGER 380 57TH PLACE NE 390 57TH PLACE NE OR RESIDENT FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 435 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 J J HEIDER&J A KARSTEN ANN AGNES MISTELSKE STEVEN & NANCY JACKSON OR RESIDENT OR RESIDENT OR RESIDENT 417 57TH PLACE NE 5801 6TH STREET NE 5821 6TH STREET NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 DARLENE SORENSON OR RESIDENT DENNIS &MARION BJORK RAYMOND GULLICKSON 5632 6TH STREET NE OR RESIDENT HC77 BOX 170 FRIDLEY MN 55432 5659 5TH STREET NE PINE RIVER MN 56474 FRIDLEY MN 55432 RESIDENT JOCHEN WOELFLE OR RESIDENT SANDRA JOSWIAK OR RESIDENT 5648 5TH STREET NE 5638 5TH STREET NE 450 57TH PLACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 DONALD&SHARON HIPPEN DIANE SAVAGE, CHAIR CITY COUNCIL OR RESIDENT PLANNING COMMISSION CITY MANAGER 464 57TH PLACE NE 567 RICE CREEK TERRACE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 CITYOF CITY OF FRIDLEY FRJDLEY COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW File Number 41 File Date 7/23/96 Meeting Date 8/21/96 ----------------------- Description: Special Use Permit, SP #96-14, by Roger Serdahl, to allow a second accessory structure over 240 square feet at 409 - 57th Place N.E. Return to the Community Development Department Barbara Dacy Community Development Director John Flora Public Works Director Ed Hervin City Assessor Scott Hickok Planning Coordinator Ron Julkowski Chief Building Official Dick Larson Fire Marshall Michele McPherson Planning Assistant Dave Sallman Police Chief Jon Wilczek Asst. Public Works Director ............. .................. .............. ........ .......... ....... . . »:;: =TY iF FRIDLEY PRUTECT 8vA1MARY -, . .... SERDAHL - 409 57TH PLACE N.E. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST Agenda Item: 1 Applicant: Roger Serdah3,: Cam Number: SP #96=14 ApplicBtiO mates JulyE 196 Staff Reviewer: Scott' J. Hickok Meeting``Date. hut . 21, 2996 5eptem. er city ,Manager Authorization: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Roger Serdahl has requested a Special Use Permit to construct a second accessory building over 240 square feet. The property is a double-fronted lot located at 409 57th Place. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Code Section 205.07.O1.C. (1) , states, "Accessory buildings other than the first accessory building, over 240 square feet [shall require a special use permit]". As proposed, a variance will also be required. The Special Use Permit Section of the Fridley City Code has been included to provide the City with a reasonable degree of discretion in determining the suitability of certain designated uses upon the general welfare, public health, and safety. In making this determination the City may consider the nature of the land upon which the uses are to be located, the nature of the adjoining land and buildings, the effect upon traffic into and from the premises or on any adjoining roads, and all such other factors as the City shall reasonably deem a requisite of consideration in determining the effect of such use. M.S.A. 462.3595 A 30' x 20' house and a 20' x 16' free-standing garage currently exist on site. Access to the existing garage is taken from 57 1/2 Avenue N.E. The current proposal would provide a second, detached 12' x 22' garage that would also take access from 57 1/2 Avenue N.E. Staff discussed options that would consolidate the buildings on the Serdahl property. Mr. Serdahl expressed an interest in building a separate structure due to his desire to not disturb the asbestos siding that exists on his home or existing garage. Staff has discussed this issue with the City Building Official and individuals in the asbestos clean-up industry. Staff determined there are disposal mechanisms that would allow this property owner to remove the asbestos siding and dispose of the siding in an environmentally conscious manner. There are numerous alternatives for either an attached or detached garage structure on this site. Without consolidating structures this addition will create visual clutter and create a "compound" of structures near 57 1/2 street. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff recommends denial of SP #96-14 due to the existence of alternatives that allow consolidation of structures and elimination of a need for a special use permit or variance on this site. If the Commission chooses to recommend approval, staff recommends stipulations. ti P R O J E C T D E T A I L S Petition For: A special use permit to allow construction of a second accessory building of 276 square feet on a double fronted lot. Location of Property: 409 57th Place N.E. Legal Description of Property: Lot 3, Block 4, City View Addition Size: 5,680 square feet Topography: Gradually sloped from 57 1/2 Avenue toward dwelling Existing Vegetation: Urban landscape Existing Zoning/Platting: R-1, Single Family, City View Addition Availability of Municipal Utilities: Available Vehicular Access: 57 1/2 Avenue N.E. Pedestrian Access: NA Site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE SUMMARY OF ISSUES: HISTORY: 1953 - House and garage constructed 1962 - A 9' x 12' bedroom addition was constructed. 1965 - Storm damage repaired 1996 - A variance is requested to allow a reduces setback from 35' to 22' adjacent to 57 1/2 Avenue. 1996 - A special use permit is requested to allow a second detached accessory structure in excess of 240 square feet. Code Section 205.07.0l.C. (1) , states, "Accessory buildings other than the first accessory building, over 240 square feet [shall require a special use permit]". Code Section 205.07.03. (D) . (4) . (b) , states, "The setback for garages and accessory buildings in the rear yard will be the same as for the front yard". A 30' x 20' house and a 20' x 16' free-standing garage currently exist on site. Access to the existing garage is taken from 57 1/2 Avenue N.E. The current proposal would provide a second, detached 12 x 22' garage that would also take access from 57 1/2 Avenue N.E. Staff discussed options that would consolidate the buildings on the Serdahl property. Mr. Serdahl expressed an interest in building a separate structure due to his desire to not disturb the asbestos siding that exists on his home or existing garage. Staff has discussed this issue with the City Building Official and individuals in the asbestos clean-up industry. Staff determined there are disposal mechanisms that would allow this property owner to remove the asbestos siding and dispose of the siding in an environmentally conscious manner. Staff believes there are numerous alternatives for either an attached or detached garage structure on this site. Without consolidating structures an addition such as the proposed will create visual clutter and create a "compound" of structures near 57 1/2 street. Several garages exist along 57 1/2 Avenue that do not meet the current 35' setback requirement. Engineering Issues: Recognizing a grade differential between 57 1/2 Avenue and the house a trench drain may be necessary to accommodate runoff and eliminate flow toward the garage if a garage is constructed closer to the home. This is not an uncommon condition. ADJACENT SITES WEST: Zoning: R-1 Land Use: Single Family Residential SOUTH: Zoning: R-1 Land Use: Single Family Residential EAST: Zoning: R-1 Land Use: Single Family Residential NORTH: Zoning: R-1 Land Use: Single Family Residential Comprehensive Planning Issues: Consistent Public Hearing Comments: To be taken RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff recommends denial of SP #96-14 due to the existence of alternatives that would allow consolidation of 3 structures and elimination of a need for a variance on this site. If the Commission chooses to recommend approval of a special use permit staff recommends the following stipulations: 1. Approval of VAR #96-16 to reduce the setback from 35' to 22' . In the alternative the garage shall be constructed at least 35' from the property line. 2. A hard-surfaced drive shall be installed within 1 year of the City Council's approval of SP #96-14. 3. The garage shall be architecturally compatible with the structures that exist. This compatibility shall include siding, roof pitch etc. 4 zi=t 1W MEMORANDUM P.M . <,:. ►fit edevelopment " ;ik PLANNING DIVISION u:>'::v:r •' 4onomic z�;:. >.">x` k�evelopment ME DATE: August 30, 1996 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Keith and Donna Maahs Lot Split Request, L.S. #96-02; 1241-43 Norton Avenue N.E. On August 28, 1996, staff contacted Keith and Donna Maahs to inform them that their lot split application could not be processed. The letter outlined that the request lacked a number of vital component parts that would be essential for a successful lot split. These component parts included: 1. A minimum lot dimension of 10,000 square feet. The Maah's lot is 8,892.38 square feet. 2. A minimum lot width of 75 feet. The Maah's lot is 66.5 feet. 3. Structural components within the home such as a two hour fire wall separation between the units, which would be required for individual ownership. The Maahs' structure was constructed without the required separation. This item was left on the Planning Commission agenda so that it is clear to the Commission and surrounding property owners what the issues were and why the application was not processed. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 572-3599. SH/dw M-96-402 SP #96-14 Roger Serdahl PLOT PLAN t , ( w� ARAGES F. ....... r NAME/ i. ....., -.i.... .... ....,., -. Mr Roger Serdahl 409 NE 57th Place . . I Fridley, MN 55432 i I � CITY : I , _.. Y LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT: .._.-.w.... � .�........ E s BLOCK: - I T1- ADDITION: 7777t. ..7;—� p — r — , f i LOT SIZE: r Vo J HOUSE SIZE: y a + SQ. FT. CROSS STREETS: I AND 9 t } I DIRECTION Wim- --- �'t�`s�� '';00v Mr. Roger Serdahl #6497 409 NE 57th Place 1852 COMO AVENUE NAME— Fridley, MN 55432 ST.PAUL, MN 55108 H 571-8072 W 785-8885 Permit by JOB ADDR LegBLDG COD al Descript on_ Lot 12x22 Det.Allbilt W/ConC. Blk 6/19/96 Dennis Jarnot r ' Add'n_ SALESMAI` Value _ Type Const. --- j j SLAB: ' ^_l_.'. y EI By SUSSEL / I 1 4 Vl J I __AL1 ❑BY Owner Approx. $ ❑In It-t- 2-STARTING POINTS ONLY -- i. I. t .i.-• i..- 1-:-_ I S.P.L. S.S.P.L. R.P.L. - Alleyi L House F. Street Other E)Square With (A. ❑Sod Rem. - By -- ❑A.B.U. .l ❑0 Grade Point /� �- OConduij Blocks: ❑By Owner❑By Sussel ❑Wtr.proof: ❑By Own. ❑By Sus. 1 (at �- ❑Backfill: ❑BY Own.❑BY Sussel 0Ll41aintain 8' Total Wall Height ��t✓J._:_.. � Including Blocks OR i O Maintain 8'Wall Height on Top of Blocks Block Size (Top course) \ ��'El 41 ~-I Wall Height other thn 8' i.. �'• 3 /wiz oa----_ - ; --�- Existing garage: No ❑[.-!Detached ❑Attached Yes ❑ / - •-� =-' Size of existing:____x � Sl A�-3Existing garage garage will be: / '• J�- ' r ---t ❑Left as is Converted to L.S.-By owneri L7 Removed By: Owner ❑ u �P ��(•Q ( s,� t I Sussel ❑ i Junk Must Be Removed By Owner ��`J f+-c Stakes visible U Yes ❑No } -- Survey available- O Yes ❑No + ii 7 Special instructions from Cement Man --- --- ACCESS DIRECTION 0 Good ❑ Fair 0 Poor PURCHASER'S INITIALS: LUMBER SPECIFICATIONS MEMBER FORCES FROM LEFT TO RIOHT: TOP CHORD 2X4 1850E=1-SE MSR 3-P-F TOP CHORD BOTTOM CHORD WEBS REACTIONS T 1= -1081 B 1= 1028 W l= In REACTION o 8 t= 9t2 BOT CHORD 2X4 18SOF-t-SE MSR 3-P-F T 2= -1081 8 2= 1028 REACTION e B 3= 912 WEBS 2X4 x3/STUD S-P-F TRUSS LOADING ICON 1) BEARING REQUIREMENTS UNIFORM LL ON TOP CHORD = 40.0 PSF ALL BEARINGS SHOWN ARE 3.5- EXCEPT A3 NOTEDI UNIFORM OL ON TOP CHORD = 7.0 PSF UNIFORM OL ON BOT CHORD = 10.0 PSF 013UQ TOTAL DESIGN LOAD = 57.0 PSF LOCATE INTER-PANEL SPLICES AT t/4 PANEL LENGTH •/- ADDITIONAL LOADING 12 INCHES FROM EITHER END OF THE PANEL INDICATED. CONC1 TC VERT 228.01 180.OLL) LBS AT PANEL POINT 1 REGISTERED CONC: TC VERT 228.01 ISO.OLL) LBS AT PANEL POINT 3 THIS DESIGN HAS BEEN PREPARED FROM COMPUTER INPUT LOAD DURATION INCREASE = 1.15 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPED BT THE COMPONENT MANUFACTURER. ENGINEER F I` JAN 1 9 11Q8 PLATE ROTATED 90 DED. 3.5-4 12 12 4 - 4 3-4 1.5-3 3-4 6'-0.0" 6' ,p• 24.0 12'-0.0' OVERALL SPAN 24.0 " PLATE CODE SPACING DATE 11 16 IMF RESPONSIBILITY Of OTHERS t0 R6tER7 AIN THAT THE LOADS UTILIZED ON 7418 DESIGN MEET OR CICEED THE MODEL20 TPI 24.00 O•C• I/IB/B9 nCIUAL DEAD LOADS IMPOSED Si INE LRUCTURE ANO IRE LITE LOADS IMPOSED BY THE LOCAL BUI1p1N0 CODE OR H1MENR ICAL CLIMATIC RECORDS. MO REBFONSIBII Iii IB fl6SUME0 FOR DIMENSIONAL AC[URpCi. VERIFY ALL GIME N610N6 PRIOR 10 FRBRICAl10M. CONNECTOR FLATEO 6HONN ARE TAUSMAL 16. IB- OR 20 OR Gf AS SPECIFIED. FRBRICRIION SHALL COMPLY NI1N THE -QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL' OF THE IRU36 FLAIE 1NSTilUlt IIP11 ANO IME IRUSNAL IRUICOM MANUAL. ALL FRHELI MOT SFEC 1FiCALLY DE SiDNR7E0 RRE 10 SE EQUAL LT OIYID EO. • OENOIES t- i 1 N R N Y T R U S® D E S I G N �' R U S W A NO R IOP CUIIING. ONLY LIE pl SRRCINO RE QUINEO OF ]NO SPACED B TRUSS MEMBENB IB NOTED ON 1416 ORRN)N0. L "'EC OE61CR A66UME6 111E TOP CHORD TO BE CONT IHUOUSIT BRACED Si 6HEATNlNO UNLESS OTHERWISE $14 110 NHE RE NO RIG10 CEILING 16 R/►L lE0 DIRECTLY TO TMC BOTTOM CHORD. IT SHRII BE BRACED AT INTERVALS NOT ERCEEGING !0'-0-. PERSONS ERECIIN0 TRUSSES ARE CAUTIONED TO SEEM FROFEBSIORAL ADVICE REGARDING TEMPORARY ERECTION BROCINO WHICH IS RLN076 REQUIRED TO PREVENT 10►FLINO ANO '00MINOIN0-. REFER 10 -BRACING WOOD InusicBI i�- 2 ^V.y Fy Ln"MA L,ENIRflI RHO RECOMMENDATIONS- EOC lFl 1. NHEflE CDNFU610M MRT EXIST CONCERN[I NG PROPER FIELD EAEC110N. OND• 9 7 1/ FILE- � + � SYSTEMS IMSIRLLRI ION- HINU66ES 6NAL L NNOTL BE PLACED INN AN 1E ENVIRONMENTH I HATON ILL OF 'HE T HE SI SIO l&TO IU11E R[OMT[NiMOFO IME IRU31Ril !1!T[M3 COR►ORMIION R lI OMORE tOMPANT 11000 10 EXCEED 19X RM010R CRUSE CDNN(CiDR 'LATE CORR031O% CAMBER. NHEN NECESSARY. 13 SERI DETERMINED BY JItOlC1Ul16 RF PI ICRI)ON OF [TPE RIf NCE pN0 INE NEF ORE IB OUISIOf IME SCOPE Of RESPOMSIBILIII OF IRUSNAL. ROOF �GABLEREVERSE GABLE HIP h SUSSELGARAGES EAVE OVERHANG: RAKE OVERHANG: SEAL DOWN SHINGLES WITH PLYWOOD OR WAFERBOARD ROOF SHEATHING AND 15 LB. FELT - Roof Sheathing Seal Down Shingles Trim 1"x4" Manufactured Trusses 2''x 4'' Double Top Plate Sub Fascia — Fascia — Soffit 3i4''Cove NOTE: 1) Roof approved by Minn. State Building Dept. as meeting Minn. State 2''x 4''Studs Code Requirements of 30# snow load. 2) Hip roofs consist of 2" x 6" rafters, 2" x 6" cross ties 48" O.C., 2'' x 8" Siding hip rafters and no plywood gussets are used. RAFTERS: Trusses ® 24" O.C. STUDS: 2" x 4" 16_' O.C. 24" O.C. WALL SHEATHING: WAS-K--&0,4-- — SIDING: (2~ 5SM HA ZO OVERHEAD DOOR HEADER Double2" x 12" or 2 - Micro Lams x 11'2"x 7' Anchor Bolt Slab on grade construction approved per Minnesota State Code. Refer to State Building Code Letter Number 11. 2"x 4"Treated Bottom Plate SLAB 4' WITH MESH 6'' x 6" #10 Gauge "v r Grade �45 ` v ��/ %�� ROOF: SE REVERSE GABLE HIP SUSSELG GES EAVE OVERHANG: &q RAKE OVERHANG: 46 SEAL DOWN SHINGLES WITH PLYWOOD OR WAFERBOARD ROOF SHEATHING AND 15 LB. FELT Roof Sheathing Seal Down Shingles Trim i-x 4' Manufactured Trusses 2'•x 4"Double Top Plate Sub Fascia Fascia Soffit 3i4••Cove NOTE: 1) Roof approved by Minn. State Building Dept. as meeting Minn. State 2"x 4"Studs Code Requirements of 30# snow load. 2) Hip roofs consist of 2" x 6" rafters, 2" x 6" cross ties 48" O.C., 2" x 8" Siding hip rafters and no plywood gussets are used. RAFTERS: Trusses ® 24" O.C. STUDS: 2" x 4" 16" O.C. 24" O.C. WALL SHEATHING: W,4R!-((—&004-1'Q SIDING: (21*, : M• "Q . OBJ OVERHEAD DOOR HEADEReo'-Double 27-1-27-77-7) 2 - Micro Lams —x- 1 ams x1 i2"x 7'•Anchor Bolt Slab on grade construction approved per Minnesota State Code. Refer to State Building Code Letter Number 11. 2'•x 4"Treated Bottom Plate SLAB: 4•• WITH MESH 6'• x 6•• #10 Gauge '�L•_; 'v Grade—, 45 ` ;ter x.. r� I' { Cl) I 1 i { i i � i { a Z CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 21, 1996 CALL TO ORDER: Vice-Chairperson Kondrick called the August 21, 1996, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:38 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dave Kondrick, LeRoy Oquist, Dean Saba, Connie Modig Members Absent: Diane Savage, Brad Sielaff, Larry Kuechle Others Present: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant E. Jean & Clayton Hicks, 106 Hartman Cir. Gabriel Giancola, 105 Hartman Circle John Hinsverk, 170 Hartman Circle Dave Johnson, University Avenue Keith King, 525 W. King Robert Lester, DVM, VETsMART APPROVAL OF JULY 10, 1996 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to approve the July 10, 1996, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK --DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #96-14 , BY ROGER SERDAHL: Per Section 205.07. 0l.C. (1) of the Fridley City Code, to allow an accessory building other than the first accessory building, over 240 square feet, on Lot 3 , Block 4, City View, generally located at 409 - 57th Place N.E. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Modig, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:40 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the special use permit request is to construct a second accessory building greater than 240 square feet. The property is a double fronted lot and fronts 57th Place. The driveway access and existing garage are on 57 1/2 Avenue. This request would provide a second accessory building on this site. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 21, 1996 PAGE 2 There is a simultaneous and separate request for a variance to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 22 feet. Mr. Hickok stated staff has evaluated the surrounding area which is R-1, Single Family Residential. The area is developed with existing garages along 57th Place. There are also garages to the north which are set in a similar fashion, but in most cases they are one large consolidated garage. We do not have a condition with a second accessory building in this neighborhood. Mr. Hickok stated the special use permit process is used to evaluate the suitability of certain uses for an area. In evaluating this site for a second accessory building, staff determined that the existence of buildings along the street at the area proposed has a cluttered feel. Staff believes the impact to this site and surrounding sites by granting the special use permit would be detrimental. As an alternative, staff recommends a consolidation of the accessory buildings into one larger garage. Staff has talked to the petitioner about the potential of adding a second stall onto the existing garage or building a consolidated garage at the proper setback. The petitioner's first response to that was, because of asbestos, they did not want to disturb the first garage. Mr. Hickok stated staff believes that their recommendation is the best for this area and for this site to have a consolidated building. Staff recommends denial of the request. Mr. Kondrick asked if there were any comments from the neighbors. Mr. Hickok stated staff did receive comments from one neighbor who is opposed to a second accessory building and would hope for a consolidation. Ms. Modig asked, when talking about asbestos removal, is that not quite costly and a factor to worry about. Mr. Hickok stated his understanding is that the regulations for residential is different from that for industrial disposal. Properly packaged, it can be collected by existing sanitation hauler. He thought it was a matter of care in removing the material. There is some cost associated with it, but he thought the cost was nominal in a residential application. Ms. Modig asked who had received the mailing. Mr. Hickok stated residents living either side of the street on 57th and 57 1/2 Place would have received notices. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 21, 1996 PAGE 3 Mr. Oquist asked if it was feasible to put a garage at the 35- foot setback so there is no variance. Mr. Hickok stated staff thinks it is feasible. There is a grade difference toward the house. One alternative staff looked at was attaching the garage to the house which is feasible. There would need to be some type of a draining system to insure run off. It may be a nice alternative if the homeowner was planning to increase their living space over the garage. Staff would encourage that alternative or a larger garage at the 35-foot setback. The petitioner was not present at the meeting. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner did not attend the Appeals Commission meeting either. The Appeals Commission chose to table discussion to the next meeting. MOTION by Ms. Modig, seconded by Mr. Saba, to table this request to the next meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2 . PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT 96- 15, BY VETsMART• Per Section 205. 15.01.C. (9) of the Fridley Cit Code, to allow a veterinary facility in conjunction I a PETsMART retail store on Lot 2, Block 1, Home Dep o Fridley Addition, generally located at 5660 Main Street E. MOTION by Ms. Modig, seconded by Mr. O ist, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING A , VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:50 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the' request is for 5660 Main Street which is at the intersection 57th Avenue and Main Street. The proposed location of the re est is for the currently under construction PETsMART which i located north of the existing Home Depot and attached to Ho Depot. They share a zero lot line. The PETsMART fac' ity will be 24,960 square feet in area and is a retail pet supply store. In addition, the facility will have a groomer, fish, birds, and they propose to provide veterinary servic s. The veterinary services part of the facility occupies appr imately 6% of the store area. Ms. McPherson reviewed the f or plan which includes exam rooms, X-ray rooms, a surgery area, general reception area, and pharmacy. m CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Savage called the September 4, 199-6, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7: 30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Diane Savage, Brad Sielaff, Connie Modig, Larry Kchle Members Absent: Davd- Kondrick, LeRoy Oquist, Dean Saba Others Present: ' Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator APPROVAL OF AUGUST 21, 1996 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. Modig, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the August-21, 1996, Planning Commission minutes as written. Urk A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED HE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. (Tabled 8/21/96) PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST, SP #96-14 , BY ROGER SERDAHL: Per Section 205. 07.0l.C. (1) of the Fridley City Code, to allow an accessory building other than the first accessory building, over 240 square feet, on Lot 3, Block 4 , City View, generally located at 409 - 57th Place N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr Sielaff, to remove the matter from the table and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, .ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the request was presented at the last meeting. The request is for a special use permit for a second accessory structure. The petitioner has requested the special use permit as well as a variance in order to construct a garage at this location. Mr. Hickok stated the proposal is to supplement the existing 16- foot x 20-foot garage with a new detached garage measuring 12 feet x 22 feet. The existing garage is located 5 feet from the property line on the 57th Avenue side of the property. The petitioner has appeared before the Appeals Commission. Staff had recommended denial of the variance request to 22 feet. Staff is also recommending denial of the special use permit request. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 PAGE 2 Mr. Hickok stated the issue is that the request compounds difficulties in a neighborhood that already has existing detached accessory structures closer to the road than allowed by code, including one existing on this property. Having another garage close to the curb creates a compound of structures. There are also alternatives on the site for consolidation into one garage at a typical setback. There is also an opportunity to attach the garage and provide potential living space above the structure. Options exist on this site that do not require a variance or special use permit, and will not detrimentally impact the neighborhoods' open space. For that reason, staff recommends denial of the request. Staff will work internally to have the remodelling counselor see if there is any remodelling advice that can be given to consolidate the dwelling and the garage. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner was not present at the meeting. Ms. Savage stated the petitioner was present at the Appeals Commission meeting on August 28 and had the opportunity to speak. The Appeals Commission recommended denial of the request. In her opinion, the Planning Commission should act on the request. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:35 P.M. Ms. Savage stated the petitioner had the opportunity to speak at the Appeals Commission meeting and-had the opportunity again to be present at the Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Kuechle was present at the Appeals Commission meeting but all members present felt there were alternatives. The site is now crowded. Because of the alternatives to consolidate into one garage, the Appeals Commission unanimously recommended denial of the variance. Mr. Kuechle concurred. The existing garage is 43 years old so it not a particularly valuable structure any more. The biggest expense that the petitioner would incur would be the removal of the old garage. He thought the petitioner knew the procedure and knew to be here. He did not think they needed to be concerned that the petitioner did not understand the process. Ms. Modig stated staff had mentioned one reason the petitioner wanted to keep the existing garage as it is was the cost of removing the asbestos. Staff checked into the regulations to see if the processes were the same for residential and commercial projects. Has the petitioner been made aware of that? PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 PAGE 3 Mr. Hickok stated yes. The petitioner seemed to be seeking alternatives. When asked if he wanted to continue with this process, the petitioner request the City Council act on it. Ms. Modig stated she talked to some of the neighbors. Those that she talked to did not have any problems with the request. Mr. Hickok stated staff received one call from a neighbor who indicated they had a problem with the request as problem as proposed. They would prefer to see a consolidation. Mr. Sielaff asked if the petitioner had any objections to the alternatives. Mr. Hickok stated he thought the alternatives seemed to be something the petitioner may be willing to pursue. He thought the petitioner was looking for an opportunity for inexpensive garage space as opposed to a more complicated process. He thought the petitioner saw the merit of consolidating even though it is more expensive. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to, recommend denial of Special Use Permit Request, #96-02, by Roger Serdahl, to allow an accessory building other than the first accessory building, over 240 square feet, on Lot 3, Block 4, City View, generally located at 409 - 57th Place N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Hickok stated the City Council would consider this request on September 16., 2. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #96-02, BY KEITH AND DONNA MAAHS• To split the East 66.50 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89 into two separate parcels, despribed as follows: Parcel A: The East 33.25'-f-66t of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, APP"' County, Minnesota. Subject to easements, if ani Parcel B: T West 33 .25 feet of the East 66.50 feet of Lot 6, ditor's Subdivision No. 89, Anoka County, Minneso Subject to easements, if any. This p erty is generally located at 1241-43 Norton Avenue N.E. Sep- 11 -96 02 : 15P P . 01 I + 7'1-) c t icKoK 5rI/- �2J7 J —�-D cl 'i C.C,�T V Se. �2f � y Vkv `I ak 6 e Ce ue.S-rt Cr err e �.`t y lJe ( Do 7'o o7kcV- O`' +o tL t G U.) 6