Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
LS96-02
CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612)571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LOT SPLIT APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: 12,4i) N o r to A Q V e C, • . if-"r; d l e. y Property Identification Number(PIN) 1 3 ©1r'e�4 3 Legal description: 6:• G( • S f'& o F Lo+ 6 Q kd. Su.6. No. ?9 Lot Block Tract/Addition Current zoning: JR- -3 Square footage/acreage g� Cl � � 51 met, -��C Reason for lot split: t 0 G Ce-og,-'c L $i n q le, o-v\d S e�t l ti%e m 4D owner O GC LAP tS Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No ✓ If yes,which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form. prior to processing) NAME Kt,*k 0.4*,d 'D o r n . YYI ala, 5 ADDRESS 12.43 No r+-or% ave . W E. )9:�rf'dl e y MN S$ 3 Z DAYTIME PHONE 9w'/- 6 cR OD SIGNATURE •�a�_ DATE 711719,6 PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME-lti4-A E- Dan►N a f,n'n`0.A.k5- ADDRESS 1 .2.- 3 No r f-v n a vc.. ti A9 5552- DAP NE 6 A 06 SIGNATURE Y U� 7,62 hU Fee: $250.00 Permit L.S.# Receipt# Application received by: Scheduled Planning Commission date: ^ Scheduled City Council date: CITY OF FRIDLEY PLAN REVIEW CHECALIBT Applicants for vacations must submit they legal description of the B. Site Plan: parcel (easement, street, etc.) to be vacated. 1. Property line dimensions, location of all existing and proposed structures with distance from boundaries, Complete site plans, signed by a registered architect, civil distance between structures, building dimensions and engineer, landscape architect, or other design professional, to floor elevations include the following: A. General: 2. Grading and drainage plan showing existing natural features (topography, wetlands, vegetation, etc.) as well as proposed grade elevations and sedimentation and storm 1. Name and address of project water retention ponds. Calculations for storm water 2. Legal description (certificate of survey may be required) detention/retention areas. 3hone number of applicant, 3. All existing and proposed points of egress/ingress . Name, address, and telephone PP showing widths of property lines, turning radii abutting engineer, and owner of record rights-of-way with indicated center line, paving width, existing. and proposed median cuts, and intersections of 4. Date proposed, north arrow, scale, number of sheets, name streets and driveways of drawer 5. Description of intended use of site buildings, and 4. Vehicular circulation system showing location and g dimensions for all driveways, parking spaces, parking lot structures including type of occupancy and estimated aisles, service roads, loading areas, fire lanes, occupancy load emergency access (if necessary) , public and private streets, alleys, sidewalks, bike paths, direction of 6. Existing zoning and land use traffic flow, and traffic-control devices 7. Tabulation box indicating: 5. Landscaping Plan (i) Size of parcel in sq. ft. 6. Location, access, and screening detail of trash (ii) Gross floor area of buildinos enclosures (iii) Percent of site covered by building 7. Location and screening detail of rooftop equipment (iv) Percent of site covered by impervious surface 8. Building elevations from all directions 9. Utility plan identifying size and direction of existing (v) Percent of site covered by green area water and sewer lines, fire hydrants, distance of (vi) Projected number of employees hydrant to proposed building (vii) Number of seats if intended use is a restaurant or place of assembly (viii) Number of parking spaces required (ix) Number of parking spaces provided including handicapped (x) Height of all buildings and structures and number of stories 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 * PloI mn LAND SURVEYORS • CIVIL ENGINEERS (612) 681-1914 FAX:681-9488 * eA eer LAND PLANNERS• LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 625 Highway 10 N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 * * (612) 783-1880 FAX-7W-1W3 Certifica to of Survey for: /li454V$ House Address: IZ 3 160o17 ,Ale House Model: (,lo.so 33, 5 1A G� � Ppb N ° Ao Z- 576rzy, WWW M /243 A 70-A/ AVG-. I o. N A/04%V �� AVr�tlU� x 900.o Denotes Existing Elevation � _ — Denotes DrokWW Flow D&Wtion - ---- Denotes Drainage & Ut#Ry Easement —o— Denotes Monument r PARCEL A:The East 33.25 feet of Lot 6,Auditor's Subdivision Numuer 89,Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to easements,if any. PARCEL B:The West 33.25 feet of the East 66.50 feet of Lot 6,Auditor's Subdivision Number 89,Anoka County,Minnesota. Subject to easements,if any. We hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or my direct su ervision and that I am duly licenced Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this �3 day of _ �(,-j _ A.D. 19� Signed: PIONEER ENGINEERING P.A. ------------ _ Scale. 1 inch - 2 0 feet BY I Robert B. Sikich, L.S. Reg. No. 14891 or �— (0/6 3 Terrence E. Rothenbacher, L.S. Reg. No. 20595 CITY OF FM DLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER •6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612)571-3450• FAX (612)571-1287 August 16, 1996 Dear Property Owner/Resident: The City of Fridley Planning Commission will be holding an informal public hearing on a lot split request, L.S. #96-02, by Keith and Donna Maahs, to split the East 66.50 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89 into two separate parcels, described as follows: Parcel A: The East 33.25 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, Anoka County Minnesota. Subject to easements, if any. Parcel B: The West 33.25 feet of the East 66.50 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to easements, if any. This property is generally located at 1241-43 Norton Avenue N.E. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than August 28, 1996. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, September 4, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department at 572- 3593. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION SEC. /2 T. 30 CITY OF FRIDLEY I/f CORNER FRIOLEY 102 SEC. It 2 IPtAr 1q/AL PARK U2' CENTER s - - -- - _qT t. ►FE t r� - --_ i Ec re R . L± —�'–I. m ::phi ..� _E- 14) rARGou G Z o HERN i ,/,J t n U =' r DNO -rloN s ENTER ER IAACTB ex+x an N �.� y r10 A90 4.1 1A co o = r N 89 4 • rola (,s .(< 7 Is TARGET _. x. ---- e- a 13 �[ y x r+++e I eF[ 6 S J OM S/T S a '•'SSS Eore.,renl --t '. y O - N y NpU PSA o o0. CI +•rnx+.x.<a CL Locke H Park z e/rr, e( FB/O[Er ° k:re R. / Z 82 r 1 - _ n + S W CORNER L.S. #96-02 Mailing List Mailed: 8/16/96 Keith/Donna Maahs Keith and Donna Maahs Current Resident Tillie Berglund 1243 Norton Avenue NE 1241 Norton Avenue NE or Current Resident Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 7112 Central Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Terrance Dreyer Terrance Dreyer Donovan/Sharry Elias or Current Resident 23290 Melanie Trail or Current Resident 1232 Norton Avenue NE Scandia, MN 55073 1240 Norton Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Donovan/Sharry Elias Donovan/Sharry Elias Delores Ponessa 7390 Concerto Curve NE or Current Resident or Current Resident Fridley, MN 55432 1250 Norton Avenue NE 1260 Norton Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Delores Ponessa Philip Rustad Philip Rustad 1327 Hillcrest Drive NE or Current Resident 5568 W Danube Road NE Fridley, MN 55432 1270 Norton Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Donald/Nancy Nelson Donald/Nancy Nelson Cynthia Mabel or Current Resident 1998 - 29th Avenue NE or Current Resident 1280 Norton Avenue NE New Brighton, MN 55112 1214 Norton Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Lowell Burkstrand Charlotte Gray Medtronic, Inc. or Current Resident or Current Resident 7000 Central Avenue NE 1200 Norton Avenue NE 1170 Norton Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 R. Crowell/P. Muesing A. Schiro/H. Virginia A. Schiro/H. Virginia or Current Resident or Current Resident 2630 Eastman Drive 1237 Norton Avenue NE 1241 Norton Avenue NE New Brighton, MN 55112 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 John Crist John Crist Ruth Norton or Current Resident 3881 Stonebridge Dr. No. or Current Resident 1263 Norton Avenue NE Eagan, MN 55123 1251 Norton Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Leslie Moore Thaddeus/Carol Hyatt Neil Itzen or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 1245 Norton Avenue NE 1215 Norton Avenue NE 1175 Norton Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Rosecrans Wayne/Gloria Shier Wayne/Gloria Shier or Current Resident or Current Resident 1715 Heritage Lane 1163 Norton Avenue NE 1295 Norton Avenue NE New Brighton, MN 55112 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 James/Violet Isler William/Faye Covey Russell Beck or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 1287 Norton Avenue NE 1275 Norton Avenue NE 1230 - 72nd Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Russell Beck William Figge William Figge 1236 - 72nd Avenue NE or Current Resident c/o Gary Bailey Fridley, MN 55432 1250 - 72nd Avenue NE 484 No. Wabasha Street Fridley, MN 55432 St. Paul, MN 55101 George Knoll George Knoll Donald Harstad or Current Resident 1923 - 40th Avenue NE or Current Resident 1276 - 72nd Avenue NE Minneapolis, MN 55421 7151 Highway 65 NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Donald Harstad Edric Associates Edric Associates 7103 Highway 65 NE 1200 - 72nd Avenue NE 5024 Normandale Court Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Edina, MN 55436 Diane Savage, Chair City Council Members Planning Commission 567 Rice Creek Terrace NE Fridley, MN 55432 CITY OF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER •6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (61 2) 571-3450• FAX (612) 571-1287 August 28, 1996 Keith and Donna Maahs 1243 Norton Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. and Ms. Maahs: We received your request to split the property located at 1241-1243 Norton Avenue N.E. Upon further review of your request, we have determined that we cannot process your lot split application, as the property does not meet the minimum 10,000 square foot lot area or 75 foot lot width requirements set forth in the R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling district. In addition, the wall between the two halves of the structure would be required to meet a two hour fire rating as required by the Uniform Building Code. It is the Building Inspection department's interpretation that the structure would not meet those requirements without major reconstruction of the dwelling. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. The City will be refunding $200.00 of the $250.00 application fee to you. The $50.00 was utilized for preparation of a mailing list, hearing notice, and postage. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at 572-3593. Sincerely, Michele McPherson, BLA Planning Assistant MM/dw C-96-193 CITYOF CITY OF FRIDLEY FRJDLEY COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW File Number 45 File Date 8/2/96 Meeting Date 9/4/96 Description: Lot Split, L.S. #96-02, by Keith and Donna Maahs; 1241-43 Norton Avenue N.E. Return to the Community Development Department Barbara Dacy Community Development Director John Flora Public Works Director Ed Hervin City Assessor Scott Hickok Planning Coordinator Ron Julkowski Chief Building Official Dick Larson Fire Marshall Michele McPherson Planning Assistant Dave Sallman Police Chief Jon Wilczek Asst. Public Works Director PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 PAGE 3 Mr. Hickok stated yes. The petitioner seemed to be seeking alternatives. When asked if he wanted to continue with t is process, the petitioner request the City Council act o�t Ms. Modig stated she talked to some of the neighbors. Those that she talked to did not have any problems with the 'request. Mr. Hickok stated staff received one call from a neighbor who indicated they had a problem with the request as problem as proposed. They would prefer to see a consolidation. Mr. Sielaff asked if the petitioney'had any objections to the alternatives. / Mr. Hickok stated he thought the alternatives seemed to be something the petitioner may be willing to pursue. He thought the petitioner was looking for an opportunity for inexpensive garage space as opposed-'to a more complicated process. He thought the petitioner saw the merit of consolidating even though it is more expensive. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend denial of Speplal Use Permit Request, #96-02, by Roger Serdahl, to allow an ,accessory building other than the first accessory building, ver 240 square feet, on Lot 3, Block 4, City View, generall located at 409 - 57th Place N.E. IIPON VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE OTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. r. Hickok stated the City Council would consider this request on September 16. 2. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #96-02 , BY KEITH AND DONNA MAAHS• To split the East 66.50 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89 into two separate parcels, described as follows: Parcel A: The East 33.25 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to easements, if any. Parcel B: The West 33.25 feet of the East 66. 50 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to easements, if any. This property is generally located at 1241-43 Norton Avenue N.E. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 PAGE 4 Mr. Hickok stated this request came to the City for a lot split. The structure is a side-by-side double bungalow at 1241-43 Norton Avenue. There was a sense by staff that historically some of these requests have been approved. Staff wanted to get a sense of what has happened on lot splits in the past. It seemed there should be a policy that lot splits should have components outlined. Lot split requests must meet the following requirements: 1. A minimum lot area of 10, 000 square feet prior to the lot split. 2 . A minimum lot width of 75 feet prior to the lot split. 3. The structure must be proven to meet all minimum building code requirements for unit separation. Mr. Hickok stated many of the homes of this vintage were constructed with a common wall similar to a single-family residential exterior wall and not quite the fire-wall as required by the code. With the three items lacking, staff contacted the petitioners to let them know the lot was substandard and the structure would need modifications before the request could be considered. Staff did not hear from the petitioners since they received the letter. In the future, applications will not be accepted without meeting these minimum requirements. Mr. Sielaff asked what the two-hour fire wall was. Mr. Hickok stated this is basically two finished walls with sheetrock on either side and an a.ir space in between. It allows separation in the event of a fire in one of the units and gives approximately two hours time before it seriously 'affects the adjacent unit. The fire wall goes from the foundation up to the ridge line. Older homes often have open rafters so the flames can carry across and involve the entire structure. Ms. Savage. asked if staff's memo reflects something new in the analysis of lot split requests. Mr. Hickok stated it reflects something new internally. We have had four requests for lot splits recently. In real estate, a unit that has been split can be more marketable. Staff felt it necessary to have a uniform statement for these requests. Ms. Savage asked if this petitioner was led to believe they could apply. Mr. Hickok stated he did not know details of conversations that lead to their making the application. The application was PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 PAGE 5 accepted but, during the review process, it was determined the property lacked these components. Ms. Savage asked if there was a need to inform the public of this decision. Mr. Hickok stated the lot area and lot width requirements are already part of the code and the fire wall requirement is part of the building code. Mr. Kuechle stated he did not see it necessary to inform the public. This is nothing new. It just clarifies the requirements. Mr. Hickok stated the City has a number of double bungalow lots that meet the requirements. It is not unusual. Staff's feeling is that, in the event a unit should burn or be destroyed, we then have two owners to deal with on the parcels. If the sites have a minimum 75-foot lot width, we then have the opportunity to join them into one lot. Mr. .Kuechle asked if this •lot was 8,892 square feet before the lot split. Mr. Hickok stated yes. The lot width after the split would be approximately 33 feet. Mr. Sielaff asked if this policy needed to be approved by the City Council and if the City Council had delegated this to staff. Mr. Hickok stated he thought the Council would be comfortable with staff making this type of decision. Internally, it boils down to what staff will accept at the counter as a minimum standard. Home owners can still go through the process. The requirements are now a part of the code and the code is very . clear. With the 60-day agency action law, he felt the City Council would prefer that staff not accept these types of applications. Ms. Modig asked if there are buildings that would meet these requirements. Mr. Hickok stated yes. Mr. Sielaff stated he was trying to separate what is policy and what is code. Is this something staff is doing to be sure the code is being enforced? Mr. Hickok stated the minimum lot area of 10, 000 square feet and the minimum lot width of 75 feet is in the code. The fire wall PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 PAGE 6 requirement is a safety issue. It is a major reconstruction project and we want to petitioner to be aware of this requirement. The cost of this reconstruction can be prohibitive and staff wants to identify that for the petitioner. Mr. Kuechle stated the two-hour fire wall is a building code requirement. Mr. Hickok stated the policy portion is putting this information together and informing the petitioner at the time they come in to make the application. Ms. Savage stated there is no need to notify the public because this is nothing new. It is just enforcing what is already in the code. Mr. Hickok stated this application could have been moved forward but staff feels this would have been a disservice to the petitioner. Ms. Modig asked if there was a time where buildings were required to have this type of construction. Mr. Hickok stated it would be easy to go back to the Uniform Building Code as to what is required between unit. He thought the fire-wall requirement was changed in 1976 or 1984. Ms. Modig stated perhaps it would be helpful to state on the application that any buildings constructed prior to this date must meet these requirements. Mr. Kuechle stated, when something happens to buildings, they• • must then be brought up to code. That may be the case here. Mr. Hickok stated that is a consideration. There is cost involved and what value this has in relationship to the rest of the building. Beyond 50% of the value of the structure, it would require being built to all new standards. 3. _RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 16, 1996 Mr. Sielaff stated these minutes hav not been approved by the Environmental Quality & Energ mission. The next meeting will be in October. MOTION by Mr. Si f, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minutes of t nvironmental Quality and Energy Commission meeting my 16, 1996.