The URL can be used to link to this page

ZOA67-08 DENIED �d- �I dL"CITY OF FRIDLEY � TYPE OF REQUEST MINNESOTA %_Rezoning PLANNING AND ZONINC FORM Numberfv- Special Use Permit ��7-o� 'i � - � � v VariRnce APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE4 /-, Lot Splits Address DriveMinnolis Minn. approval of Pre- 21 liminary Plat Telephone NumberL8-5307 Approval of Final John &. Agnes Cochran signe Plat PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE -� �--- Streets or Alley Addressy 3 l l'�� - K��2 Vacations Telephone Number_ Other Street Location of Property. 6561 Central Ave. N.E. Legal Description of Property par at.t.arhPd i Present Zoning Classification xi-2 Residence (Vacant) Existing Use of the Property Proposed Zoning Classification, Special Use, Variance or other request R-3 :yen. Multiple Family DW,3S Describe briefly the Type of Use and the Improvement Proposed Multiple Dwelling, 22 story 14 unit apt. Acreage of Property. _-1.6.61 .x '2141 '1 Has the Present Applicant Previously Sought to Rezone, Plat, Obtain a Lot Split, Obtain a Variance or Special Use Permit on the Subject Site or Part of It? When? What was Requested Fee Enclosed $ Date Filed August 7, 1967 Date of Hearing September 14, 1967 : .. . .,'� ,. " � F � - ! �, il: .. 1. .. _.k., ..f .s, �., cx. �y. _. �.. ..�-...h�... .,:+�_.�+v... `c�^..z.'.�d.. �x ... .,w,� , .. ..-r. .._..+. ".,"S°i'x. .ae`�.. ��fd4.��...i.�.s.�._:.:a .. ., s _. �._. _. .. •. � � � .. . .' . . � f � 't . . � �. 1 " . . t� :C.;i � ,, t . . :..: _. 1� _ _ _— — — r PLANNING AND ZONING FORM PACE 2 Number 410-�L 7-b V The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of pro- perty within 300 feet must be attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by all owners of the property, or an explanation given why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the pro- ceedings resulting from the failure to list the names and addresses of all residents and property owners of property within 300 feet of the property in question, belongs to the undersigned. Residents and Owners of Property within 300 feet: PERSONS ADDRESS .Tnhn n_ ang-Sarah Jane Hoppe 1351-66th Ave. N.E. Minneapolis, a,:inn. 55432 Harnld 7.. AND Kathleen L. Jameson 1339-66th Ave. N.E. Minneapolis, Minn. 55432 -Ed-ward-G. and Judith K. Simko 1327-66th Ave. N.E. Minneapolis. Minn- 55432 David L. and 3etty A. Mech 1315-66th Ave. N.E. Minneapolis, Minn. 55432 _George H, and Zitte Peek 6633 Central Ave. N.E. Minneapolis, ;-:inn. 55432 Darwin F_ Bogell 6617 Central Ave. N.E. Minneapolis, P inn. 55432 (See attached sheet for adOi tonal names agd tddrfesses) A sketch of proposed property and structure must is form or attached, showing the following: 1. North Direction 2. Location of Proposed Structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed Per sketch attached* structure, and front and side set-backs. 4 4. Street Names 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 300 feet) . The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE IGNATUR$ - (APPLICANT) Approved Denied By the 3oar•d of Appalls Subject to the Following Conditions: date Approved Denied by the Planning Commission on Subject to the Following Conditions: date Approved Denied by the Council on Subject to the Following Conditions: date Form PC 100 ZOA #67-08 •''- Thomas Brickner Dalberg Realty Part of L. 6, A.S. #10' / Rezone from R-2 to R-3 vv/?'N/ �14,04A)f,- ,P.v iT A"W go XMgt C ff�u TiQAC Avf . rn MR< Etc! e 01r Ae,N4p ' U Lot Six (6) Revised Auditor's Subdivision Number 10, except as • /� follows: Commencing at a point 467.5 feet East of the Southwest Q t� corner of said Lot Six (6); thence North parallel with the West boundary line of said Lot Six (6) 140.25 feet; thence East parallel with the South boundary line of said Lot Six (6) 412.5 feet, more of less, to a point in the East line of said Lot Six (6); thence along the East boundary line of said Lot Six (6) 140.25 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot Six (6); thence West along said South boundary line to the point of beg- inning; AND EXCEPT the East eighty-three feet of the West 467.5 feet of Lot Six 6) , Revised Auditor' s Subdivision Number 10, Anoka County, Minnesota, excepting the South 33 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the West one-half (W-21) of the East 166.0 feet of the West 467.5 feet of Lot Six (6), Revised Auditor's Subdivision Number 10, Anoka County, Minnesota, excepting the South 33 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the West one-third (1/3) of the East 249 feet of the West 467.5 feet of Lot Six (6) , Revised Auditor's Subdivision Number 10, Anoka County, Minnesota, excepting the South 33 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the South thirty-three feet (33' ) of the West 467.5 feet of Lot Six (6), Revised Auditor'sSubdivision Number 10. according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota y6 OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: j Notice is herebyVven that there j will be a Public Hearing of the Plamming Commission of the City ' of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Sep- ,$ tember 14, 1967 in the Council Chambers at 7:30 P.M. for the pur- pose of: Rezoning request by �T_h��o�m��Mass Brickner (ZOA No 67-4aT� R=2-"(ItTnited multiple family dwellings) to R-3A (limited i multiple dwellings) the follow- ing described parcel: Lot Six (6) Revised Auditor's Subdivision Number 10, except as follows: Commencing at a point 467.5 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot Six (6); thence North parallel y with the West boundary line of said Lot Six (6) 140.25 feet; thence East parallel with the South boundary line ofsaid lot Six (6) 412.5 feet, more or less, to a point in the East line j of said Lot Six (6); thence along the East boundary line of said Lot Six (6) 140.25 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot Six (6): thence West along said South boundary line to the point of beginning; AND EXCEPT the East eighty- three feet of the West 467.5 feet of Lot Six (6), Revised Auditor's Subdivision Number 10, Anoka County, Minnesota, excepting the South 33 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the West one- half (W 3z) of the East 166.0 feet of the West 467.5 feet of Lot Six (6), Revised Auditor's Subdivision Number 10, Anoka County, Minnesota, excepting the South 33 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the West one- third (1/s) of the East 249 feet of the West 467.5 feet of Lot Six (6), Revised Auditor's Sub- j division Number 10, Anoka 4 County, Minnesota, excepting the South 33 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the South thirty- three feet (33') of the West 1 467.5 feet of Lot Six (6), Re- vised e- vised Auditor's Subdivision iNumber 10. j according to the plat thereof li on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of ( Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota Lying in the North Half (Nih) 1 of Section 13, R-24, T-30, City of Fridley County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. I Avenue Soy uthcofe66thtAvenue.) III Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter, will be heard at this meeting. ROBERT J. HUGHES Chairman Planning Commission Publish: August 25. 1967 September 1, 1967 (Published in the Anoka Union & Fridley Free Press 4u¢. 25 & Sent. J. 1967) OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on September 14, 1967 in the Council Chambers at 7 :30 P.M. for the purpose of: Rezoning request by Thomas Brickner (ZOA #67-08) from R-2 (limited multiple family dwellings) to R-3A (limited multiple dwellings) the following described parcel: Lot Six (6) Revised Auditor' s Subdivision Number 10, except as follows: Commencing at a point 467.5 feet East of. the Southwest corner of said Lot Six (6); thence North parallel with the West boundary line of. said Lot Six (6) 140.25 feet;; thence E:,ct parallel with the South boundary line of said Lot Six (6) 412.5 feet, more of less, to a point in the East line of said Lot Six (6); thence along the East boundary line of said Lot Six (6) 140.25 feet to the Southeast corner of said Let Six (6) ; thence West along said South boundary line to the point of beg- ir_ning; AND EXCEPT the East eighty-three feet of the West 467.5 feet of Lot Six (6) , Revised Auditor' s Subdivision Number 10, Anoka County, Minnesota; excepting the South 33 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the West one-half (G�) of the East 166.0 feet of the West 467.5 feet of Lot Six (6) , Revised Auditor' s Subdivision Number 10, Anoka County, Minnesota., excepting the South 33 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the West one-third (1/3) of the East 249 feet of the West 467.5 feet of Lot Six (6) , Revised. Auditor's Subdivision Number 10, Anoka County, Minnesota, excepting the South 33 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the South thirty-three feet (339 of the West 467.5 feet of Lot Six (6) , Revised Auditor's Subdivision Number 10. according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar. cf Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota Lying in the North Half (NZ) of Section 13, R-24, T-30, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. (Generally located at Central Avenue South of 66th Avenue. ) Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter, will be heard at this meeting. ROBERT J. HUGHES CHAIRMAN Publish: August 18, 1967 PLANNING COMMISSION August 25, 1967 ZOA #67-08 Thomas Brickner 'by Dalberg Realty Part ofL.6A.S. #10 From R-2 to R-3 6. _ 4 O 4 j°' a' �L... ell � �•' ri ., � � � � �' ;7 � p' � [F � d. ,�-f f�j.r/crf D ! f'�"a j( ("\ i• o, 'ti -0 3 s�.lr:::�' ,�� 4�,k 3f t;* 9_. ra962- D__.,1 0,�• --- .1. ---66.x•-- b..;�.I__�° �, i � � ; �`�' AV,_• F 7• C. .j X7. _..._.. _'::. \, Jr Q 41 • � i IL • - �� .• = _ �� :'•-- -Z ---- -- -T.1. ��93 Iia i •`. --_--�--^^-- _-n:, +ii1 �-.Zs��- •-r-•_-�l.�d...�3 I I VSfOJ �'i��) .• I � v LE'090I'��✓l"J.T�cG.�/P/1 -' ti� 9 I, � � I 9f 5 C.9 ' t.+T S i:,rJ Z j T M ci 4j�Y; lb 'tie � � !.` �1 � I ' •� h •�3':3�9 `i �C C� Z!_ ^� - `_� - ./..�i dl.,,,.,,,. •Jr�I,SO �L�rcr� �" � � �y5 •�I � �.,J ( . ,n — i Lir-.�...�• �' ~ �"�7��.....�...w �•,I Q ' -'4.:.--- -...lYCJt� _�_j7j lr-___ —M 'I � ...-,.....ti_ .._.."..... .w:. .t.'"•-u,..r....:,rw..dl �- �) I r. • 4. REG IST ER Ap (Up. I, Um.J. PUSiAGE K � ElLAVOTEa553E2 BRINKNER, THOMAS REZONING: ZOA #67-08 PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 14, 1967 P.C. MAILED: AUGUST 21, 1967 REGISTIER IEr EAc s� � iU.S.GOS1Aai: avn- AUG 22'67 .0 5TE Wk- ' f• ra.535362 i 1 ','ILL f:: AND IH-LEN A. CLAIR dley t REGISTER -,' EAo NIVE3251TY AVENUE �� < U.J.POSIA F": IOKA COUNTY ] in�:!- <; AUG 22'67 'MINN[,E�S.OT•yA_-55421 (`/ .`/y (•}.�•�J� 5 I< V V T E '< u 00 l K 'cL �•kl, 'ti/IN PU.5353�2� i. t' TJTRISTA 65 9 =I ROAD IT. FRIDLEl 5543-- 'oD eey -- lNlVER51TY AVENUE REGISTER EAjo 40KACOUNTY �� \ /��U.S.POSIAUE�K MINNESOTA_5,5421 AUG 22'67 U 5 � T OTE METER V K � PB.535362 _T4 _g -- r� JOHN D. A:— ?r'_:i HOPPE 1351 66" Av L. N.E. T.1D TT%T TTtt R EG IST ER �� NIVE'RSI'TY AVENUEU.J.POSIA�E,� OKA COUNTY an AUG 22'67 i Mf�INNyESO.TA-.15421 �� r:] ;�T1 'L, k .ems �. M ,T E R .O R V MIS P8.5,53H �f in 11 i HAROLD L. AND KATHLEEN JAMESON 1339 661h AVENUE N.E. IRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 7o riale IYERSITA Y VENUE RYREGISTERS 55353&2 KA''000NTY /�,iI U.J..POSIA'G_L�; AINNESOTA-55421 AUa 5t EqFv VOTE �R EDWARD AND JUDITH STMKO , 1327 66", AVENUE N.E. r FRIDLEY ' MINNESOTA 55432 '01 gridle REGISTER INIVER.SITY---AVENUEU.S.GOSia;E ,'�1 vOKA COUNTY AUG '67 M:INNESOTA_:55421 � .% J K B. �VOTE 2l -1«ss i/ sVj r r KARL L. 6588 CF i _ N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 �oj 3ridleg REGISTER 4 vEkslT.Y AVENUE � � j��U.S.GQSiA�I�« 6KA-'COUNTY' �� AUG 22'67 �PINNESO_TA`-._55421 !< � CJ Mi IR ! G VOTE ppM.! 535K 50 MYRTLE •�,E'—�:'� NN. f . 532 K r , 1 _ �/- MYRTLE H. SCHMIDLEft �~ 6604 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 7ridleg REGISTER % � 11[t1lERSfTY AVENUE j�Iu.SASTA I K OKA COUNTY and auG 22•67 +AINNESOTA•_55421 -.0 5VOTE p 8. i« M E T ER "J 1\ remit l- HAROLD J. NEIL 6616 CK IRAL AVENUE N.E. FRIDLE'f MI171111ESOTA 55432 of J1' e f4IVERSIT___AVENUE REGISTER Y/�—U.Su.P—OSTU:J_ '. dOKA COUNTY < Q� AUG 22'67 MINNESOTA:-55421 —.0 5 .� M(1 TsZill� • VOTE '+�IyN" P.B.s-ss�sz h � 1 I - ' RONALD M. E:;:; : 6601 CENTRAL FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 REGISTER �E A NtIVER5ITY AVENUE ��f �� , - "U.S.POSTA"iEjR OKA=-"COUNTY� aGe�'LGt� /:I I` � AUG 22'67 v' MINNESOTA-55421 �•. `�� Q 5 r. !� VOTE E MINK P�553E•2 R WILLIAM J. AND MARGARET' WHITING 1316 661' AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 �of, 7ridle REGISTER EA,o -- 2 T. 41YER51TY. AVENUE , ,-� �� U 'd" " OKA ''COUNTY Cif' n ��I�U.J.P�STAG� t MINNESOTA-•..55421 AUGAUG22'6T VOTE M,yt, ` 1 pMETER 9IIIl;t PU 5353&2 s !'I��•. ,.rte-N,'"_..:Z iI I�k j ' RALPH L. SAUM 1328 661' A=TUE N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 ol 7ridle RIEGISTL INIVERSITY -AVENUE C '4OKA'�COUNTY / � AUG 22'67 -.S5421MINNESOTA I � 05OTE MET � 353E6R2 L wa r� 6?32 OITr 37Oa DRPi—El N.E. FRIDLEI MINtE50TA Yrfdte REGIS ER EA DIVERSITY AVENUE ,IU �� OKA"'COUNTY= /I S.P0S"ACE�K MINNESOTAA--55421 �� AUG 22'61 ® (< =.0 5 1 . �� t METER H 1 ;7j- P8.5353'2 ►I r DR. EDSON V. FUGLESTAD 5174 ST. =ER N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 'ol .7ridleff'r RE6S TEP Sp EA a S _ 1VERSITY A.VENUE � °<� °U.S.POJi AGE dKA-kAG!.Hd AUG 22'67 in;% I< INNESOTA 55421 �% .1 ; Q 5 u VOTE .< METER « MtNN PB.53s3E2 t oxi- r If lV' SPCA ASSOCIATES J MIDWEST FEDERAL SAVINGS MARQUETTE AVETNE AT 81h STREET MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55402 olREGISTER SNE A`•► ` =�,� NIVERSITY AVENUE � 55353C JOKA"COUNTY awd AUG 22MINNESOTA_-55421O RVOTE �. 2 Y-1 m. rC� LEONARD COCHRAN 6537 Cali-1L AV= N.E. FRIDLEY MT TWP-q(1rP A _ REGISTER �jEAP NIVERSITY _AVENUE �,/J �� o�k� lU.S.P0STAGE!< OKA ` COUNTY' a�'L�. � ' /,I � j�111INNESO.TA-.45421 AUG 22'67 �� i fZ vPZI =.0 5i� � '� 1��✓ VCS ! pp M E T E R PU.5353L.2 lo It - STEIGER & GERTZEN GARAGE, !ITC. l- 6519 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 41YER,SIT_Y ,AVENUE U222'67 A COUNTC`w'GiLa.�U.S.POSIh�_!AllNNESOT,A_--55421zt, VOAl'. 5553 R�1.SJ S3E2 t 54 r _- �-G P. HERBERT C;-'A JO ;SON ' 1381 MISSISSIPPI S ,^ r N,E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA ' F 4 f `ol 7ridley REGISTER NIVEkS1TY _AVENUE �� / �.SI pOSTkUE t OKA COUNTY' AUG22'67 MINNESOTA_-55421 aQ 5 1 K VOTE g' WILBUR C. .� _ 1.0; LnRSON 1340 661h AT-: ..,. FRIDLEY i-- -- REGISTER NI.VER,SITY AVENUE �� ,�►+^' IOKA"-COUNTY �U.J.�OS;i1G"= LL�'�,(i AUG 22'67 (MINNESOTA--55421 _ Ilkp MFTFN P45353G2 GERALD -R. JOHNSON 1358 66th AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 1, i `, r�icl1 47 REGISTER SEA o 41VERbITY AVENUE o r OKA' COUNTYAUG �wIU.�.�USTAGE , . 22'67 I ! INNESOTA_..55421 oo �M- VOTE �1Itok. PM U 5E T E R35362 r HERBEi3�T W. BACON JR. 6515 CE'ilTPRAL AVENUE N.E. FRIDLE MINNESOTA �OTA %� 55432 \oj, [9 :. /U.S.POSTAGE « N(VERSITY. AVENUE u, a IO�A'PCOUNTY �1 AUG 22'67 ♦: •i� • SOTA_-_55421 �` `.0 5 ►NINNE. ,\ 1 pMETER R 1. I.. PU.535362 K > ir; lye 1 ' 1,� z THEODORE GINSBERG 346 NORTH JUSTINE AVENUE CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60607 eff ol o� NiVERSItY'__AVENUEU.S.VOSTAflf 4f(AL'COUNTY /y�J AUG 22'67 �,� I« ffA'INNESOtA_--55421 , L' • M E T E R VOTE 114� � �✓.t . .5353E•2 : It CL . C� RICHARD G. WILSON 6568 CEN'T'RAL AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY I MINNESOTA 55432 `oj ,gridle REGISTEi t11fERSILY�A1%ENUEU.S.POSIAGEi< OKA "COUNTY- ir AUG 22'67 01NNES0tA.45421 �: • O C �` o ` �� ,�(NN. P.B 53536 i r. 44 6580 C'—=-dL AVENUE N.E. __ FFtIDL�: OTA 55432 idleg NIVERSITY AVENUE ��O O(, U.S.PUSIAGE OKA COUNTY caf AU522'67 u' i •� I` MINNESOTA _55421 _ +� • Z.O 5 V OT T Ll t' MINK. p METL < - Win.•u i4— PU.s353&1 < DAVID L. A .D ByF:7f KECH 1315 66:n AVE'.—UE N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 'o r¢dLe PEG I S i RE ADZ < .dw < WIVERSITY- AVENUE O(Ea�. 'U.S.POSTAGE1< OK ICOUNTY AUG 22'67 w rV014NESOTA_55421 =Y .O 5 « VOTEIN�' pp mETER « < tI P0.535352 lK Cc"l GEORGE`AND ZITTE PEEK 6633 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 `al Ir_udlerf REGISTER V1VE_RSI1'Y AVENUE OKA 'COUNTY: CLYLGv ��EA ��F"r�"w' r <• - AA,INNESOTA_55421 AUG 22'67 N i IR •q L� p E T[ --IIVOTE Ng S P&5 5 R E s DARWIN E. BOSELL �— 6617 CENTRAL AVElTwE II.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 IriIVEIR51Yl(• AVENUE dc?KA `COUNTY y/ IU.J.P0SMG[ K MINNESOTA-A54,21 21VOTE AUG 22'67 114N• r'o M E T E R rU 5353E2 i �j•y r� - J; JAMES F. ELL 6641 CHU-., L :'GAD N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 NIVEII_SITY AVENUE �� i.iw \`��EAoO`\ _' '.OKA COUNTY /�IJ.JI PUSTAGEIK AUG 22.67 N'✓ �' i' MINNESOTA_.55421 •1�' iK rl� • i --�_. • Orf' G.a "�J I N l I•M E T E R 1 < PB C MERLE E. ANSTINE 6631 CHANNEL ROAD N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432 of Iridley REGI.STERvvEt ANUE �� sfi VE O �{w i1 �,'.- °a U.S.PaSTAGEIK INNESQTA-,55421 AUG 22'67 < _ < 4. 't UTrY AND DORIS JACOBY 2 5 C IAIPi EL ROAD NE nK IDLEY 112"I'`'OTA 15. 32 r ol NIVERSI7Y AVtNUE �� U.J.POJIAGO'. y0KA COUNTY. r NIINNESOTA_55421 AilIG22'67 cn d `I It FB.5353E2�.�_.�R THOMAS BRI}: 5840 TE ETISON DRIVE N.E. MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55421 EAP NIVE�I jY__AYfNUE �' �'�� IU.).pOJ;AGt(K OKA.,=COUNTY-- CL�1� Z UG 22*67 �NNESGTQ;.55441 33 •+., ! 0 5 _ 1 S.. /INN' 1 3FE" ` PB.53536c GL l_ DALBE G D. IL f 1121 BC'�: n'rE:+'mac: 2T.E. PMNiTF�JOLIS NJIR' OTA s CITY OF FRIDI.,EY PETITION COVER SHEET Petition No. 32-1967 Date Received 8 September 1967 Object Against rezoning of Part_of Lib, Audi_tor'_�_ ulz. 1Il Petition Checked By J_ - Date Percent Signing Referred to City Council _ Disposition _ 4 Aur,ust 23, 1967 We, the undersigned_, are-opposed to the rezoning of this area from limited multiple dwelling residence to apartment buildings. Our homes were built here because the area was properly zoned for private hones, and : e feel it would be unfair to us to change it now, as it would adversely affect the value and liveability of our hones. ADDRESS _»�_ C 9!� Al = ti _ ... . L . . r. < 7 j�' —� Gam« 6( 3 61 �` L:l1 ✓/ ! - / L L")1 Zc G C !_ G� (/6 l �• ,��' C) . < f 4 C Q C?ono/a'L s';'�aryvr:f I �6 ion/ouie t aL'' - -,. 4 L 4 41'l S 4 4 ` 4 D c.•.:f G�� w j 2 +'+ F 133E /3Sl 13(,s /39� /3g� 3yq 'zo��ya �9 IWb 66TH Ml E. N. E. _ 1 ro go U % [t_ „s4F l o\ f w r ZOO 14 i2 3 /4 r o t zs 1 E;r If • �: �j--• 1 .•.N �(f ' -vf3ic ,i 7S !o/ �b7f ` 2 ti ti 10 STRE L !-`aie ccn m _. E,A1 TE' EC. / Petition #V-32 Against ZOA #67-08 = Bricknex Part of L. 6, Rev. A.S. X1'10 From R-2 to R-3 t �E �.f o`► O � �'F+►5_._�..SF c. _!.__S7aR y Nle 6��Y � �o /TS00 a z sra,c y a�per, 69 RAL ,qvr --�, . _ _ .} .L.....__....� ' — ... . ..._ .. t i I ,} {, ".. _,. ! �'j _,, fJ 1i � �I � i �. i II I t , Cti„� � r ��+.i ' JM ,�J F _ ` t ,{ :! �, i1� \ .`` 4 ....' T1 (_,f _,,._. _..._.__ � ,f" ..- _ � ,..- 3 li -. Vi''`i, � --- :a '" '_ ,. E � ._ E ,.. y F__._.__ _..:_....._._�._ ._._ __. �x I ' � i j ,,, - � , �-r . .. ,, .. . . �/ 1 .. ... �'� f - _ � I �- q, .y4. 3 a� �.1 r :; - � t .� _ �. a +. h � �- v ` ` _ Planning Commission Meeting - Augustlo2 1967 Page 2 in 1964, by actual count, there were 6,000 vehicles a day on East River Road, and the projected figure for 1985 was 5,000 vehicles . The 1964 figures were taken before rerouting of Highway #10 to University Avenue, and another reason for the reduction in traffic was new cross roads. Mr. Johnson hoped that the Subcommittee could present their final report on the effect of traffic as it relates to their property and the development as a whole at the August 31st meeting inasmuch as the time element is important. He requested that the Public Hearing be scheduled for September 14, 1967, which was consistent with the presentation made at the July 27th Planning Commission meeting. He also suggested that whatever pressure could be brought upon the State Highway Department for their traffic information would be appreciated. MOTION by Ylinen, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission set a public hearing on September 14, 1967 for ZOA #66-16, at 8:00 P.M., Harold Schroeder for a Planned Development District of Block 1 and Lots 10 through 12, Block 2, Bourdeaux's Spring Brook Park Addition, Lots 2 through 9, Block 2, Bourdeaux's Spring Brook Park Addition and Block 1, Spring Brook Park 2nd Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. Engineering Assistant Clark asked that it be noted if the plan is adopted, it would necessitate vacations, although this would be included in the plans. 2. REZONING'REQUEST: ZOA #67-08, DALBERG REALTY FOR THOMAS BRICKNER: Part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, rezoning from R-2 to R-3. Mr. Arne Folstad, representing Dalberg Realty Company and Mr. Thomas Brickner, the applicant, were present. Inasmuch as it has been the practice in the past to suggest to the petitioner of R-3 zoning that he request R-3A, which permits only multiple dwellings, Mr. Brickner was asked if it would be agreeable with him to do so in this case. He answered that it would be all right. Mr. Brickner had plans of the type of buildings proposed, two bedroom units and one story in the back. He stated the existing house on the land will be removed. Mr. Brickner requested a public hearing for September 14, 1967. MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission set a public hearing date of September 24, 1967 at 7:30 P.M. for the re- zoning request, ZOA #67-08, Dalberg Realty for Thomas Brickner, for part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 to rezone from R-2 (limited multiple family dwellings) to R-3A (multiple family dwellings only) . Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. City Attorney Herrick entered at 8:00 o'clock. 3. REZONING REQUEST: ZOA 2`67-09 FEDERAL LUMBER COMPANY BY SAM ROSENBAUM, TRF4SURER: Lots 5 thru 8, Lots 25 and 26, Block 2, Commerce Park Addition. Rezone to CR-2 or M-1. Mr. Sam Rosenbaum and Mr. Louis Segal were present. Mr. Rosenbaum PLANNING CO1%1MISSION MEETING - SEPTEMBER 14, 1967 Page 1 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Hughes at 7:33 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Myhra, Jensen, Hughes, Yli.nen, Erickson Others Present: Engineering Assistant Clark APPROVE MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: AUGUST 24, 1967 : MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Jensen, ibat the Planning Commission Minutes of August 24, 1967 be approved. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. APPROVE MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: SEPTEMBER 7 1967 : MOTION by Ylinen, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission Minutes of September 7, 1967 be approved. Upon. a voice vote, all voting aye, the motior carried unanimously. RECEIVE MINUTES OF PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & U_TILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING: AUGUST 31, 1967: MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the minutes of the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee of August 31, 1967 be received. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE MINUTES OF BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL MEETING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1967 : MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Ylinen,that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Building Standards-Design Control meeting of September 6, 1967. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST (ZOA #67-08) DALBERG REALTY FOR THOMIAS BRICKNER: Part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivision #10 - rezoning from R-2 (limited multiple family dwellings) to R-3A (limited multiple dwellings) . Member Jensen read the official Notice of Public Hearing. Mr. Folstad of Dalberg Realty said he is the broker between the seller and buyer and that he believed the apartment building would put the land to the highest capacity. Mr. Brickner presented the plan of the building which would be a fourteen unit two bedroom apartmZIAts . Mr. Folstad explained his statement of"the best and highest use of the land"by saying that he was an appraiser and whenever a piece of property was in a spot zoning area, it would be pretty hard to build a $25,000 on it, so that multiple or some type of multiple would be putting the land to the best and highest use for the developer. • planning Coi�nnissi_on T1eet i.iig - September_ 14, 1967 Page 2 The Engineering Assistant was asked to show the audience the present zoning of the area on the wall map. - Chairman Hughes referred to Petition #32-67 given to the Planning Coin- mission that evening against the rezoning of part of Lot 6, Auditor's Sub- division #10. MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Ylinen, that the Planning Commission receive Petition #32-67 opposing the rezoning of part of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision #10. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. The audience were then asked to express their opinions. Bill Whiting, 1316 66th Avenue: "My tax statement does not refer to a spotted neighborhood. My property abuts and adjoins the property under con- sideration for rezoning, and after I saw the sign go up on the property, I went around and looked at apartment buildings. I looked for the good points. I ran into places that have flood lights lighting the parking area. I don't know the size of the proposed building. I am wondering if there is any space left for parking. I also found several apartment buildings that had indivi- dual garbage and rubbish cans assigned-by number. Several were left uncovered which attracted flies. I think I overheard that these would be two bedroom units. In the units I have checked, there could be anywhere from one to four children. This is quite disturbing. I would ask the Planning Commission to deny the petition for rezoning." Mrs. David Mech., 1315 66th Avenue: "We have a very nice street. It is all one family dwelling, and the children are well behaved. Right now Central_ Avenue has plenty of one family dwellings and the apartment will be right in between one of them. The children in the proposed apartment will not have enough room to play, as there will have to be parking for twenty-one cars. It will change our whole neighborhood." Thomas Moore, 6580 Central Avenue: "I live across the street from the proposed apartment house. The children in the apartment behind us do not have any play facilities. Also, during the winter, I have to back up an incline going up the driveway and more traffic will create an additional hazard." Richard Wilson, 6550 Central Avenue: "This would be a traffic hazard. There has to be an entrance and exit for the apartment. Our driveway goes up an incline and it is a traffic hazard coming out our driveway." Mrs. Wilbur Larson, 1340 66th Avenue: "In this particular area at the time the Rice Creek School was built, the City and School went into partner- ship for a combined school and City playground area. It is already too small for the number of children in that area now, and if you increase the possibi- lity of more children, some consideration will have to be given to that fact." Mrs. Ralph Sauer, 1320 66th Avenue: "According to the drawing of the parking facilities, I am sure there would have to be more cars than shown and they will use our dead end street. Parking on both sides of the street would be hazardous." Mrs. Ronald Ennis, 6601 Central Avenue: "I'd like to point out it is already a business corner, post office mail box, school bus stop, children crossing the street. There is a traffic hazard problem now. The children Planning Commission Meeting September 142 1.967 i Page 3 would have to use the playground in summer and winter." Mrs. Darwin Bosell, 6617 Central Avenue: "There will be more traffic from the Onan plant. Cars park on Central Avenue or on 66th, it will be hard in winter time to see the children." John Neil, 6616 Central Avenue: "What is the size of the building? The cars would have to be parked there which would fill up most of the area. People coming off 66th would find their view would be obstructed substantialli_ It is a safety hazard." J Charles E. Carlson, 1399 66th Avenue: "In view of all the things brought up so far, what came to my mind was, if you were to vote in favor of this proposal, that this would set a precedence. I would not wish to see one apartment building and then more. I was very much disturbed when I first noticed the sign that read "Site for 14 Units Apartment". I urge • you not to vote for it." Loren Palmer, 6596 Channel Road: "It is no fun living across from an apartment and trying to keep a decent yard. It would be a hazard. Twice this summer a child has been hurt on Channel Road and that street is not even used as much as Central Avenue. ' I don't see how you can put 14 families in an apartment of this size." Mr. Whiting: "There are no sewer or water facilities in front of this property. We were told, at the time the sewer was put in, that it was a limited sewer facility. There would have to be sewer and water put in on Central Avenue which creates a problem for the home owners across Central." A citizen said that we did live in an area of one bedroom apartments and the maintenance was not what it should have been. It does depreciate a neighborhood. Mrs. John Neil, 6616 Central Avenue:, "On 66th Avenue, North of this proposed site, lots which are zoned R-2 are built R-1; on the other side of Central Avenue, two of these R-2 lots are. built R-1. Directly South is R-l. South of Mississippi on R-2 lots, there are four houses built R-1. I feel this would be rather bad zoning, and to rezone one little strip for an indi- vidual's financial gain. If you are going to have an apartment, it should be a number of planned units. Apartments can be nice as I have seen some in other parts of the country with planned playgrounds, recreation centers, etc. I am against this rezoning." David Mech, 1315 66th Avenue: "I certainly think our neighborhood has been somewhat misrepresented in being called"spotty". The commercial devel- opment is all South. There is a motel, but it is not a regular motel. Really the commercial aspects of the neighborhood are South. Most of the area, even though rezoned R-2, is built R-1. We have some photos (they were given to the Planning Commission and then passed through the audience). We try to keep the neighborhood clean, peaceful and quiet. All of us are opposed to the rezoning. We are disturbed because of spot rezoning. Because of one individual proposing to come into an area to rezone for his own financial gain, we do not believe this is a reason to disturb the peace of the neighbor- hood." Member Myhra said he would like to make one comment in defense of the petitioner. Anyone has the right to come and make a rezoning request. It is perfectly all right, and there is nothing wrong legally with this applica- tion. Planning Commission Meeting - September 14, 1967 Page 4 Myron E. Ostland, 1400 66th Avenue: "If you rezone this piece of property, which is in the center of our particular area, you would set a precedence for a lot of areas around that have the same situation." Karl Klopper, 6588 Central Avenue: "I live directl across from the proposed building site. Can you give me the size of the lot?" Member Jensen said they did not have that informaticn, but the follow- ing figures he had just compiled have not been checked: Area of the lot is 35,524 square feet, area of building 5,603 square feet, footage on Central Avenue is 214 feet, and on 66th Avenue is 166 feet. Mr. Klopper said there is a 30 mile speed zone, but who lives up to it? He would like a speed trap set because of the traffic and excessive speed. Mrs. Jack Hoppe, 1351 66th Avenue: "My mother lives in an apartment and I came here now from visiting her. I definitely would not want some- thing like that around here. I feel our neighborhood is pretty special and we would like to keep it that way." Mr. Moore: "When I moved in ten months ago, I made a point to check on vacant property. I called City Hall and was assured it was limited multiple. I hope that you gentlemen will not see fit to rezone at this time." Another citizen said in regard to the traffic situation that they are trying to say this is a very hazardous location. Two more driveways coming onto Central Avenue with 14 or 20 cars coming out, will make it all the more hazardous. With the situation as it is, plus a new apartment, they believe it is just going to make .it so bad they are going to have more accidents than now. Ralph Sauer, 1368 66th Avenue: "I agree with most of the statements made and I oppose the rezoning." Edward Simko, 1327 66th Avenue: "I, too, am opposed to the apartment building. I agree with the statements of my neighbors. I would say that, before the Commission would even consider granting the request for rezon- ing, more should be found out about the apartment building's utilities, sewer and water." Jack Hoppe, 1351 66th Avenue: "I go along and say, with the rest of neighbors, I would like to see a denial of this petition." Mr. Brickner: "In regard to parking, there is adequate parking and adequate play area. The proposed play area is on the South side of the building and is 64'x166' . We have allowed for a 35 foot setback in front and on the North, and 12 parking stalls. The City required only one drive- way." Mr. Whiting: "Regarding a setback of 35 feet, all of the homes have from 50 feet to 65 feet setbacks. This building will stick out like a sore thumb on the corner. The parking area would be adjacent to my front yard." Mr. Holm said that with Onan coming in the area, where will the people live? It will create an increase in the traffic flow, but there is a 30 mile speed limit now, and an arterial stop sign could be erected. Planning Commission Ming - September 14, 1967 pages A citizen said, regarding a ratio of 1i cars per unit, almost every family is a two car family. Mr. Holm answered that young families can- not afford to buy a home early in married life. That does not degrade their earning power or social status. Speaking of two cars, you will also note a young married couple can barely afford two. Chairman Hughes said to the audience that we are to consider a request, which is a proper one, on its merits. It is not a cause for high emotion. The decision will be reached by a quick and more satisfac- tory way for all concerned if we can avoid the emotion. A citizen stated that the back part of the building is going to be the front view of everybody on 66th Avenue. This is one of the reasons for opposing the rezoning. Mrs, Edward Simco, 1327 66th Avenue: "I feel it is too crowded to build in the area. We will have no guarantee that the children will be in the play area. We have thirty or forty children now, and we are fine as we are," MOTION by Ylinen, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission close the Public Hearing for the rezoning request (ZOA #67-08) by Dal- berg Realty for Thomas Brickner for part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivision #10 from R-2 (limited multiple family dwellings) to R-3A (limited multiple dwellings). Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Ylinen, that in the matter of the re- zoning request, ZOA #67-08, by Dalberg Realty for Thomas Brickner, of part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivision #10, to rezone from R-2, (limited multiple family dwellings) to R-3A (limited multiple dwellings), I move that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the denial of the rezoning request. Member Myhra said that he thought he should repeat the fact that for anyone who has property, it is perfectly legitimate for the property owner to make the best use of the land as they see it. Here is a case where, to permit the request, would change the neighborhood. In situa- tions like this, the major concern, if this were a road, it would be considered at government level, but if it is a major concern to that particular area, we do pay a lot of attention to the people living in that area. Member Ylinen said that he found himself agreeing with some of the people who have been heard. The most striking and significant matter is that, even though the present area on both North and South, in fact, in in all directions, the areas are zoned R-2, but really are used as private residential homes. I think if the petition were approved, that it would change the character of the neighborhood quite drastically. For that reason, I approve the denial of the petition. Chairman Hughes asked for a vote on the motion that ZOA #67-08 be denied. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Planning Commission Meeting - September 14, 1967 Page 6 Chairman Hughes informed the audience that this matter will be before the City Council on Monday, September 18, 1967 and acted upon on October 2, 1967. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, HAROLD SCHROEDER (ZOA #66-16) : Springbrook Park property development. Chairman Hughes explained that this was the first public hearing for a Planned Development District and the Planning Commission had no prece- dent to go by, but would do their best. He said, that in the past, the Commission first listens to the petitioner, then will provide a time for the Commission and open the meeting to the public. Mr. Schroeder said, in preface, they started out with the property all zoned R-1 and part commercial. The owner wanted to see if something could be done to benefit the property and general area of the neighborhood. To start out, the Planning Commission was amendable to P.D. Development which gives the landowner the possibility of developing the property other than what it is zoned for, but a plan has to be followed. They diad get the property rezoned to P.D. District and since then have had a couple of meet- ings with the Planning Commission. They plan to develop the commercial zoned property as it exists and try to develop multiple residents. Single family residents did not work in the past. Mr. Schroeder gave out a booklet on the preliminary development plan, and used it for an outline of his presentation. He also had an overall watercolor of the area showing the shopping center, bridges over the creek, multiple dwellings, landscaping, lighting, proposed exits and garages. Mr. Schroeder said the purpose of the preliminary plan presentation is to show the kind of plan they are proposing. If this is agreeable,. we will go into more detailed studies and work with the City on the final performances of building guides and com- pliance with ordinances. Member Jensen referred to the PI 3 & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities minutes of August 31, 1967 which the Planning Commission received at this meeting and said for some reason, there has been a decrease in traffic on East River Road. The previous count was 5,000 and in April of this year, 4,000. The projected count in 1985 from the Minnesota Highway Department is 10,000 vehicles a day. Prior to knowing this information, Mr. Schroeder brought E. Bather, a consulting engineer in the traffic field to one of the Subcommittee meetings and discussed the proposal for a single entrance coming into the commercial area. One of the most important points by Mr. Bather was what can be anticipated in a shopping center of this size. He indicated a certain volume, but in view of his projected figure for traffic to and from commercial area, we questioned him on what he thought the East River Road could reach before we had a serious traffic hazard and he said, at that time, he would not like to see it reach above 10,000 a day. However, since that time we have had to change the plan and introduce a second entrance on East River Road. The result of the Subcommittee meeting was recommending approval based on traffic considerations. Member Myhra asked if provisions were made for a semaphore in the study of the traffic in the area. Member Jensen answered that the fact that we have a State Aid road approximately 4 mile North and South a State Aid road planned, that the alternate results of a major State Aid road East and West connecting Highway #47 with East River Road would be signalization of one or both intersections which would have the effect of bunching traffic and allowing REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 18, 1967 PAGE 15 purchase agreement would require the proper zoning. Mr. Root said he would restrict the lots for 15 or 20 years, and nothing larger than double bungalows could be built there whether S & S investment bought them or someone else. Mayor Kirkham said he would like to see the development, because the next time someone wanted to develop it, it may 'take a 4 or 5 story apartment to make it feasible, and he recommended the Council accept the proposal. Mr. Root said that Arvid E Carlson & Sons, Inc. will enter into a Contract for Deed, with restrictions on the 3 lots, but no restrictions on the 6 originally discussed lots. The City Attorney asked who would have the authority to enforce the restrictions. Would they be done as protective covenants, because the City cannot enforce protective covenants. Mr. Root said it could be put in the deed. He said that they will only be asking for the rezoning of the 6 lots, not the other three. The City Attorney said that even if the deed is restrictive, it would still have to come before the Council again. MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt the ordinance upon first reading, with the provision that the lots across the street have a restrictive deed so that nothing more than R-2 zoning .will be used for a period of 20 years. Councilman Sheridan said he had told the people he had talked to that he did not think the Council would act on this tonight, so he could not vote. He said he was not against the proposal, but had told the people they would be contacted. Councilman Liebl said he felt the people were owed an explanation of this discussion, although they had been told it would be �-- " .taken up again if the people wanted to wait until later in the Council -,Meeting. Mr. Root said he would draw up the restrictive deed and show it to the City Attorney. The Council decided that this item should be back on the agenda of the Regular Council Meeting of October 2, 1967. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, SEPTEMBER 14 , 1967: 1. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST (ZOA L,6 -_Q.U. DALBERG REALTY FOR TU=S BR OVER: PART OF LOT 6 REVISED AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION #10 REZONING FROM R-2 (LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS TO R-3A (LIMITED MULTIPLE DWELLINGS) : MOTION by Councilman Liebl to concur with the Planning Commission's recommendation that the rezoning request be denied. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. BUS ROUTE: Mayor Kirkham suggested that this item be tabled. MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to table discussion of the bus route. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.