The URL can be used to link to this page

SP00-02 CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR: Residential Second Accessory Others PROPERTY INFORMATION- -site alar,required for submittal, see attached Address: ,Y 6 65- F oz S,f grin d SSK-S�2 Property Identification Number: Legal Description: Lot. Block. Tract/Addition..,, G v 1 1 1 X16, Current Zoning: - Square footage/acreage: C,cA 7 Fs Reason for Special Use: Trr) �uic-o IS /uo;- U�� !� c� r=� �,�; A c c° � ► r� tut' �� Q2 1 Otic-e Ajo. Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No If Yes, which city? If Yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No A" -------------------~-------a- ------- FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract purchase=Feenmust sign this form prior to processing) ers NAME: K;;e--O-VA ADDRES '7 S L� rve� e21 , DAYTIME PHONE: .k 3'Fz-C�-63 % SIGNATU E/DATE: .-k- 5- PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: - &-) A— 5PI (Li ADDRESS: EoroS tet _ - t � DAYTIME PHQNrE: x -6. SIGNA URE/DATE: X j NM.V.V.V.V M.VV.VMbN� .V N.V ArNNN.VN-----.V.VN.V.V.Y/r.V.V�r/rrV.VV/Y.V.1u.V.►r+V.V.V/V.V.V A..V ASN Section of City Code: Z �l' FEES Fee: $100.00 Residential Second Accessory 400.00 Others Application Number:-"S '°�' Receipt #: Receive y: Scheduled Planning Commission Date: , r . LTi c� Scheduled City Council Date: Pj2"I 06- 10 e10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: Feb..., ; n(p `tic,�) 60 Day Date: - SPECIAL USE PERMIT PROCESS x 'au:�' r W Purpose: A special use permit allows the City with the discretion to determine the suitability of cer rt uses on the general health, welfare and public safety. Ve rTt ic Considerations: The City may consider the following to determine the vek*n-w suitability of a certain use: 1. the nature of the land on which the use is to be located, 2. the nature of the adjacent land or buildings, 3. the effect on traffic into/out of the site, or on adjacent roads, 4. any other factors the City shall identify as appropriate to determine the effect of such use. The Special Use Permit process begins by filling out a SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. This, with a site plan, and other appropriate drawings, must be submitted to the Planning staff. A fee is associated with the application; $100 for second accessory building applications, $400 for all other applications. Fees are non-refundable. Once the application is received, the application is reviewed by staff from the Planning, Engineering, Assessing, Fire, and Police Departments. The impacts to adjacent properties are discussed, and stipulations are developed. Simultaneously, a mailing list of all properties within a 350 foot radius of the property is generated. Notices of the request are sent to these property ovmers. There is approximately four weeks between the application due date and the Planning Commission meeting. Prior to the meeting of the Planning Commission, a staff report is written, and the petitioner called regarding the staff recommendation. The Planning Commission is made up of seven residents of the community. The meetings are held the first and-third Wednesdays of the month at 7:30 pm in the Council Chambers in the Municipal Center. The Planning Commission is an advisory commission to the City Council. It is the responsibility of the Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing, gather testimony and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding all special use permit requests. Additional information regarding the Special Use Permit Process may be obtained by calling the City of Fridley Planning Department at 572-3599 or 572-3593. 26l PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N. E. on Wednesday, March 15, 2000, at 7 :30 p.m. for the purpose of : Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #00-02 , by Gary & Sally Bannochie, to allow a residence to be built in a River Preservation District . Permit is specifically required for homes proposed to be elevated, but not built on fill (Ordinance No. 1056) , legally described as Lots 13 , 14 , 15 & 16, Block V, Riverview Heights, City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, generally located at 665 Dover Street NE. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place . Any questions related to this item may be referred to Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator at 763-572-3599 . Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than March 9, 2000 . The TDD number is 763-572-3534 . DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: March 2 , 2000 March 9, 2000 KUDLA ROBERT J COOK RICHARD E & NORMA E RUHLOW JULIE A 688 FAIRMONT ST NE 690 FAIRMONT ST NE 7941 RIVERVIEW TER NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 MAHER MONTE Q & MICHELLE M LIPA STEVEN A HOLMGREN LELA C 71965 RIVERVIEW TER NE 7995 RIVERVIEW TER NE 8001 RIVERVIEW TER NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 WALL MICHAEL T PRINCE DENNIS R& DIANE K RICE JOHN M JR& KARLEEN V 8021 RIVERVIEW TER NE 8031 RIVERVIEW TER NE 8041 RIVERVIEW TER NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 STAHLBERG ALLAN B BJq 1 HE UND MARIAN J 8055 RIVERVIEW TER NE FRINLEY, MN Bad kdress 2 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDL , MN 0 Bad\Address 3 D'AIGLE FRANK R & MARGARET D'AIGLE FRANK R & MARGARET 14252 55TH ST NE 14252 55TH ST NE ROGERS, MN 55374 ROGERS, MN 55374 City Of Fridley aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763- PUBLIC HEARING 572-3500 no later than March 9,2000. The BEFORE THE TDD number is 763-572-3534. PLANNING COMMISSION DIANE SAVAGE Notice is hereby given that there will be a CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Public hearing of the Fridley Planning (March 2, 9, 2000) Fridley, Columbia Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, Heights,Hilltop Focus News 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, March 15, 2000, at 7:30 p.m, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit,SP #00-02,by Gary&Sally Bannochie,to allow a residence to be built in a River Preservation District. Permit is specifically required for homes proposed to be elevated, but not built on fill (Ordinance No. 1056), legally described as Lots 13, 14, 15& 16, Block V, Riverview Heights, City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota,generally located at 665 Dover Street NE. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may tif-I referred to Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator at 763-572-3599. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other per- sons with disabilities who require auxiliary CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: All property owners/residents within 350 feet of property generally located at 665 Dover Street NE. CASE NUMBER: SP #00-02 APPLICANT. Gary & Sally Bannochie Petitioner or representative must attend the Planning Commission meeting. PURPOSE: To allow a residence to be built in a River Preservation District. Permit is specifically required for homes proposed to be elevated, but not built on fill (Ordinance No. 1056). LOCATION OF 665 Dover Street NE PROPERTY AND LEGAL Lots 13, 14, 15 & 16, Block V, Riverview Heights, City of DESCRIPTION: Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. DATE AND TIME OF Planning Commission Meeting: HEARING: Wednesday, March 15, 2000, at 7:30 p.m. The Planning Commission Meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 35. PLACE OF Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers HEARING: 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or FAX at 763-571-1287. SPECIAL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMODATIONS: interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than March 9, 2000 . The TDD # is 763-572-3534 ANY QUESTIONS: Contact Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator at 763-572-3599 or Paul Bolin, Planning Assistant at 763-572-3593. Publish: March 2, 2000 March 9, 2000 City of Community Development Department Fridley Land Use Permit Notification E IEE r . B�rnxE � rsrxE a l i It ;y r E : r i m �E F �qE � C =R-1-One Farrrly Units M-1-Light Industrial Sources: 0M R-2-Two Family Units EM M-2-Heavy Industrial N Fridley Planning R-3-General Multiple Units M•3- Outdoor Intensive Heavy Industrial Fridley GIS Z R-4-Mobile Home Parks P-Public Facilities L LI PUD-Planned Unit Development Anoka County GIS ®S-1-Hyde Park Neighborhoods 0 ROW Anoka County Assessing QD S-2-Redevelopment District RR-Railroads Special Use Permit Application, SP#00-02 w L G1-Local Business /V Parcel/Lot Lines 665 Dover Street J i G2-General Business Water Features Gar aBannochie IM G3-General Shopping y&Sll y GR1-General Office HEDLUND GORDON HEDLUND MARIAN J DICKSON DALE A& SHARON L 1255 PIKE LAKE DR 1255 PIKE LK DR 600 ELY ST NE NEW BRIGHTON, MN 55112 NEW BRIGHTON, MN 55112 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 KOSTOHRYZ GERALD & PATRICIA RUTHERFORD ROBERT& NANCY BOOTS GERALD R& CHRISTI A 609 CHERYL ST NE 610 DOVER ST NE 615 CHERYL ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 ANDERSON DONALD R& LEANNE L KELLER T P &VAN WAGNER SARA L CURRE RESIDENT 620 DOVER ST NE 625 DOVER ST NE 625 ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 F. LEY, MN .5-513A MELCHERT SCOT P & MARY H CLARK CONSTANCE K COOK 96UGLAS E � 627 CHERYL ST NE 630 CHERYL ST NE 630 -Y ST NE '� FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 F�LEY, MN 55432 TICHY JAMES ALLEN MALONE MICHAEL J & KATHLEEN KOHLS ROBERT E & PATRICIA J 631 DOVER ST NE 635 ELY ST NE 640 CHERYL ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 LAFAVE MICHAEL A&JUDITH A SMITH RITA I HUDYMA KIM B & KIMBERLY A 640 DOVER ST NE 640 FAIRMONT ST NE 641 CHERYL ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 MARTH DAWN M CURRE ESIDENT �� ERICKSON WILLIAM E 641 DOVER ST NE 650 D ER ST NE 650 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FR EY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 LERUM DONALD O KUENSTING TIMOTHY J JUST MARVIN D 651 ELY ST NE 655 ELY ST NE 661 CHERYL ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT ESIDENT DAVIS NICHOLAS J KOCZUR JOHN JR 665 D R ST NE "V 670 DOVER ST NE 680 ELY ST NE FRID EY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 WAGNER WILLIAM A& DEBRA J REITER DONALD KORICH DOLORES M 681 ELY ST NE 684 ELY ST NE 687 DOVER ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 KUDLA ROBERT J COOK RICHARD E & NORMA E RUHLOW JULIE A 688 FAIRMONT ST NE 690 FAIRMONT ST NE 7941 RIVERVIEW TER NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 MAHER MONTE Q & MICHELLE M LIPA STEVEN A HOLMGREN LELA C 7965 RIVERVIEW TER NE 7995 RIVERVIEW TER NE 8001 RIVERVIEW TER NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 WALL MICHAEL T PRINCE DENNIS R& DIANE K RICE JOHN M JR & KARLEEN V 8021 RIVERVIEW TER NE 8031 RIVERVIEW TER NE 8041 RIVERVIEW TER NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 STAHLBERG ALLAN B BcN Address 1 HE UND MARIAN J 8055 RIVERVIEW TER NE FRINLEY, MN Bad Aodress 2 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 0 Bad\4ddress 3 D'AIGLE FRANK R & MARGARET D'AIGLE FRANK R & MARGARET 14252 55TH ST NE 14252 55TH ST NE ROGERS, MN 55374 ROGERS, MN 55374 O Effective Date: 1/1/99 PERMITS FOR 1 & 2 FAMILY DWELLING THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND ALL FEES PAID BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT FOR A NEW HOUSE CAN BE ISSUED: 1. Building permit application 2. Legal description of the property the structure will be on 3. Properties requiring an individual sewage treatment system must have a site evaluation, including percolation test and system design submitted. 4. Two (2) sets of construction plans; one set will be reviewed and returned to you. Certificate of Survey or diagram of structure on property specifying setbacks, drainage, and elevations. 6. Completed energy code worksheet with signature. Forms are available from City Hall, if needed. BUILDING PERMIT FEES BUILDING PERMIT: Fee based on estimated building valuation (Table 1A of the 1994 Uniform Building Code) FIRE SURCHARGE: .001 of permit valuation (1/10°/x) STATE SURCHARGE: 0005% of estimated value SAC CHARGE: $1,050.00/SAC Unit LICENSE SURCHARGE: $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractor) DRIVEWAY ESCROW: If determined necessary (by lineal foot) EROSION CONTROL: $450.00 Conservation Plan Review PARK DEDICATION: Fee determined by Engineering. SEWER MAIN CHARGE: Agreement necessary ( ) Not necessary ( ) ISSUED PERMITS The permit card must be posted and available to the inspectors. The permit will become void if work does not begin within 180 days from the date issued, or if work is suspended for a period of 180 days. A Letter of Occupancy must be issued before occupying structure. PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS, call 612-572-3604, 8:00 a.m - 5:00 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday; 8:00 a.m - 7:00 p.m., Tuesday. BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION, 612-572-3604 FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER, 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, MN 55432 NEW[ ] � Effective 5/10/99 ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY L, ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 1 j BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION D3-� 0087 Construction Address: tbty 9 Legal Description: C�D 61L V 31m ic-01 1 l4' Owner Name & Address: �A L UMIUCM E Tel. # 5l4 0131 Contractor: LAKY EYINNIM - MN LICENSE# b-5a-Z7)-bif,3- �Zy Address: "1 M 5 glkam -it 113 Tel. # 511-01 -3) Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF EMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: Construction Type: Na - Estimated Cost: $ YO, (y( Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Ft x $ _ $ DATE: 1p-rr�- ; APPLICANT: Tel. # W-f'013 32�w'b r 3 CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee $ Fee Schedule on Reverse Side Fire Surcharge $_ .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) State Surcharge $ $.50/$1,000 Valuation SAC Charge $ _ $1050 per SAC Unit License Surcharge $ $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Driveway Escrow $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Erosion Control $ $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Park Fee $ " Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] TOTAL $1. STIPULATIONS: BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE The Chief Building Official shall, before issuing permits for the erection of any building or structure, or for any addition to any existing building or structure, or for any alteration or repair to any existing building or structure, upon application therefore, require the payment by the applicant for such permit of fees to the amount herein below set forth and in the manner herein provided to-wit: TOTAL VALUE FEES $1 to $500 $23.50 $501 to $2,000 $23.50 for first $500 plus $3.05 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 $2,001 to $25,000 $69.25 for first $2,000 plus $14.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 $25,001 to $50,000 $391.25 for first $25,000 plus $10.10 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 $50,001 to $100,000 $643.75 for first $50,000 plus $7.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 $100,001 to $500,000 $993.75 for first $100,000 plus $5.60 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000 $500,001 to $1,000,000 $3,233.75 for the first $500,000 plus $4.75 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000 $1,000,001 and up $5,608.75 for the first $1,000,000 plus $3.15 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof DRIVEWAY DEPRESSION ESCROW (Concrete Curb Streets Only) Alternate "A": Removal.and replacement of curb and gutter only - Driveway width plus 6 feet times $15.50. Alternate "B": Removal and replacement of curb and gutter and install a 3 foot wide approach with 6 inch depth- Driveway width plus 6 feet times $23.25. VERIFICATION OF FOUNDATION Permits for construction will be issued a minimum of 24 hours from the time of application to allow for proper review of the proposed structure and of the construction site. A Certificate of Survey of the lot, showing the location of the foundation once it has it has been constructed will be required before proceeding with the framing. EXTERIOR ENVELOPE THERMAL TRANSMITTANCE RULES FOR ENERGY CONSERVATION ALTERNATIVES IN CONSTRUCTION " 2MCAR F§ 1.6007 - 1.6008 • (ADOPTS 1983 CABO MODEL ENERGY CODE BY REFERENCE) 1 n \ Owner L("(4 >A Phone NO/ : Date 7-.7 Site Address c r a Contractor �. ici.`( � /;� �� := . �'�=' Phone Building Classification: Type Al (Single Family & Duplex) Type A2 (Residential 3 stories , or less) (Other) (Over 3 stories) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Building Perimeter ft. 2. Wall height (ground to top of top plate) /,�7 ft. 3. 1. x 2. (above) gross wall area sq. ft. 4. Building dimensions (L) wc� / x (W) :- _ /Il2r sq. ft. roof & floor area. `5. Square foot area of rim joist - Floor ,joist + plate x perimeter +" , (1) o'!'.' sq. ft. 12 x 6. Doors - Area U factor Model //_'-KG> - Area -'! U factor Model 2 ,' Manufacturer 7. Windows: Manufacturer ' '~ -1tC % moi✓�-3z-- Type U Factor Size Area Sq. Ft. of Ea. No. of Units Total Sq. Ft. -52 .;f ✓ ( / l f 8- Total sq. ft_ of window units g.. Fireplace area. Width x height + x sq.. ft. 10. Exposed Foundation: Height (Low x Perimeter x j'!7/ sq. ft. 11- Framing area - 10% of gross wall area 16" o/c or 83k of gross wall area 24" o/c. 11A. Gross wall area (3) ��!l sq. ft. Window area sq. ft. II windows - II x A- 6�_%c1d Rim Joist area CSD sq. ft. Ti rim joist= ?< II x A= /D.. Door area `~ sq. ft. II door area- II x A- 3 Fireplace area sq. ft. II fireplace= `- II x A- Exposed Fdn. area sq, ft- II foundation= II x A-- 9 Framing Area sq. ft- II framing area- ' II x A- Net wall area ft. II wall `-?`! IIx A- 6�, 11B. Total - Must be less than or equal. to (12) ... ............ II x A= 12. Gross wall area x 0.11. (A-1 single family and duplex) (A-2 3 stories or less) Fill in "II" Values (Other buildings. 3 stories or less) Based on Degree Days / G (All buildings over 3 stories) & Figure No. 4 in A(11A) x II/code g Model Energy Code TUH 13. Ceiling framing area equals 10% of ceiling area 16" o/c or 8% of ceiling area 24" o/c. 13A. Gross ceiling. area = (L) Sq. ft. 13B- Net ceiling area U ceiling x Aie '171-91' Q ceiling x AIC x Q' fraaing x Afe x - Q framingx Afc x i. I3C_ Total R x A---_--_--- _-- .._...... . �x• �2� must be less, than or equal to (I4) Ceiling area (I3A) x 0.026 (A-I s iagle family & duplex) X (A-Z 3 stories or less)--- =- FLU in *Q» Valises Based ort Degree (other). "Days r. rigum Ilk pa No. 5 in NodtT s(z3a = II(cod's .c .: �St aatls.8�s#.Td ag ffiwat Desiga- ..�.zop.:tcx (I2) /• y �- cl4) . rte �� `' .gnat to aost:be«l"�ss thea or .w 11";Ti1,R rlrFr.;. �~ .. •. C.rriA/,� ;; N.: �`•. U YAWL, UAL#CULA'1'IUI4:i R Value U Value Inside air film ,68 WALL Interior wall �8 SECTION (Wall) Insulation /!;'•D U 1/R Sheathing Siding f Outside air film .17 R Total Inside air fIl m .68 STUD Interior wall SECTION h" stud 4.3$ •—�- 6" stud 6.88 d .(Framing) Sheathing , G Z U= 1/R J Siding Outside air film ,17 R Total Inside air film R = .68 2ND WALL, Interior wall SECTION Insulation /,,r,v (Wall) CG.►,,•nr� ✓�1 Sheathing U - 1/R Exterior wall. covering • Exterior air film R = .17 R Total Interior air film R = .68 RIM Insulation s 3� JOIST 1'j inch soft wood R = 1.88 (Rim Sheathing Z foist) Exterior wall covering U =_1/RoZ Exterior air film R •I7 R Total FOUNDATION .._... ._._.,...Interior ^it film R' =.-6 8 WALL ABOVE Insulation - inside GRADE or outside Foundation (Fdn. ) • Exterior air film R = ,17 U = 1/R� GRADE R Total Pnge 3 TRUSSED CEILING wi,rH VENTED ATTIC SPACE IIBUVE . 17 Air film • 17 Roof Deck Framing �O Insulation 3� Framing �$ Ceiling .61 Air fila .610. _ S S7 Total R Afc Are Area of Framing 6 d'� ,U = 1/R ' G'�" Area of Framing Center of Roof Edge of Roof Air film 17 Insulation S� Ceiling ' s� . 61 Air fila •61 _ Xie ATotal R Ix 34 Aic U ' 1/R Area of Insulated Root Area of Insulated Roof Center of Roo Edge of Roof t FLAT ROOF OR CATHEDRAL CEILING .1T Air film Roof Deck Framing Insulation Ceiling • :� .61 Air fila .61 Total A _ U - 1/R FRAMING AREA INSULATED AREA Page 4 City of Fridley 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432-4383 612-571-3450 14-Feb-00 Special Assessment Search And Statement of Charges TO: On all that tract or parcel of land lying and being in Anoka County,Minnesota described as follows to wit: PIN: 03-30-24-32-0185 665 DOVER ST Lot: , Block: , LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS This is to certify that I have examined the records in the office of the Clerk,City of Fridley,Anoka County, Minnesota, and for such search,certify that the following special assessments appear unpaid with respect to the above described tract or parcel of land: Term Initial Interest Remaining Project Number Project Description (Yrs) Year Initial Amount Rate Balance 3000-0013-00 00 W/S 20 1959 $140.00 6.00% $0.00 3000-0021-00 00 W/S 20 1960 $1,369.11 6.00% $0.00 9100-0000-00 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer Mains) 15 1961 $27.52 5.00% $0.00 6000-1969-03 00 ST 10 1971 $870.00 7.50% $0.00 Amount Certified to Anoka County Auditor for Current Year Taxes Is: $0.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS For the purposes of this document the City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council has awarded a contract on the improvement intended to be assessed and prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. Therefore,potential assessments or improvements ordered by the City of Fridley for which a contract has not been awarded will not be shown as pending assessments. If you seek further information,you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Term Initial Interest Project Number Project Description (Yrs) Year Rate Estimated Cost 4000-1999-01 01 SS-RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS 15 0 6.500% $1,400.00 4000-1999-01 00 SS-RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS 15 0 6.500% $1,000.00 $2,400.00 MISCELLANEOUS FEES Description Status Date Fee Amt. Weeds 1993 Paid 10/18/93 $97.75 UTILITY CHARGES You shall be responsible to verify the status of any outstanding utility charges.To check utility charges (water and sewer)contact Fridley Utility Billing Department at 612-572-3529. The records referred to above are public and may be inspected by anyone during regular business hours. The search of these records was made by the undersigned as a public service on request. The undersigned certifies that the above indicated searches were made and are believed to be accurate,however,the undersigned or the City of Fridley does not insure the accuracy of the above statements and does not assume liability for errors and/or omissions. The above figures are good through November 15, 20 Date Prepared:Monday,February 14,2000 By Pagel of 1 i City of Fridley Land Use Application SP-00-02 March 15, 2000 GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: Legal Description of Property: Gary& Sally Bannochie Lots 13-16, Block V, Riverview Hghts. 7845 East River Rd., Apt. 113 Public Utilities: Fridley, MN 55432 Available in street. Requested Action: Transportation: Special Use Permit Property is accessed from Dover Street. Purpose: Physical Characteristics: To build a home in a Flood Fringe Lot is relatively flat, typical suburban lot District. Permit is specifically required vegetation. for homes proposed to be elevated,but SUMMARY OF PROJECT not built on fill. Mr. &Mrs. Bannochie, petitioners, are Existing Zoning: requesting a special use permit to construct a R-1 (Single Family Residential) home,not elevated on fill, in the Flood Fringe Location: District. 665 Dover Street SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS Size: City Staff recommends approval of this special 9,978 square feet .23 acres use permit, with stipulations. Existing Land Use: Homes that are not elevated on fill are a Single family home. permitted special use in the flood fringe district Surrounding Land Use &Zoning: provided that all FEMA and State floodproofing N: Single family; R-1 regulations and standards provided in Ordinance E: Single family; R-1 #1056 are met. S: Single family; R-1 CITY COUNCIL ACTION/60 DAY DATE W: Single family; R-1 April 24, 2000 / May 2, 2000 Comprehensive Plan Conformance: Consistent with Plan Zoning Ordinance Conformance: Ordinance#1056 requires a special use permit for homes proposed to be elevated,but not built on fill. Zoning History: 1922 - Lot is platted. 1964 - Dilapidated home removed. y, r17i 1994 -SP #94-05 granted,but home never built. 1996 - SP#94-05 expired, due to adoption of the floodplain ordinance. Staff Report Prepared by: Paul Bolin SP 00-02 Analysis Mr. &Mrs. Bannochie, petitioners, are requesting a special use permit to construct a home,not elevated on fill, in the Flood Fringe District. Ordinance#1056 requires that a special use permit may be issued to construct a home using alternative elevation methods, such as a tuck under garage in this case, provided that all living space is located at an elevation above the flood level. These alternative elevation methods must be designed and certified by a registered engineer or architect as being in compliance with applicable building codes, including federal standards for flooding. On this particular property, there can be no living area below 824.1' in elevation. When homes are built on fill, there is generally a 15' area of compacted fill surrounding the structure. On this property, the petitioner is utilizing a retaining wall on the east side of the home rather than the compacted 15' of fill in order to preserve the natural drainage found on that side of the lot. Prior to making application for the special use permit, the petitioner removed a number of trees from the site and drastically changed the character of the lot. In all land use cases, staff places a stipulation stating that all trees proposed to be removed must be marked and approved by City Staff. In this case, the trees have already been removed and staff is requiring that 5 trees be planted on the site by the petitioner. In 1994, this property was one of three properties, owned by George Hedlund, granted a special use permit to allow construction in the CRP-2 (Flood Fringe)District. This special use permit, which has since lapsed due to the fact that a home was never built and Ordinance#1056 was developed, had a list of 12 stipulations attached to approval. The applicable stipulations have been transferred to this special use permit. Staff Recommendation City Staff recommends approval of this special use permit, with stipulations. Homes that are not elevated on fill are a permitted special use in the flood fringe district provided that all Federal and State flood-proofing regulations and standards provided in Ordinance#1056 are met. Stipulations Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the special use permit subject to the following stipulations: 1. Soil testing be completed and submitted prior to pouring of foundation footings. 2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction. 3. Siding and landscaping shall be used to minimize the impact of flood-proofing materials. 4. The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate as part of a verifying survey prior to the foundation being capped, which shall verify that the minimum first floor elevation is 824.1'. 5. The petitioner shall flood-proof the garage in accordance with current Federal and State flood-proofing requirements to a minimum of the 100 year flood elevation. 6. Retaining wall shall be installed on east side of home to maintain existing elevation and drainage along eastern property line. 7. The builder shall grade the property to conform with the grading plan dated 2/11/00. 8. The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies with the grading plan dated 2/11/00. 9. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines prior to any work done on this site. 10. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liability if damage occurs as a result of flooding. 11. Petitioner shall plant a minimum of five (5)trees. These 5 trees can be a combination of over-story deciduous trees having a 2 '/z"minimum caliper at planting and coniferous trees at least 6' in height at the time of planting. 12. The removal of any additional trees must be approved by City Staff. 13. The petitioner shall sign a combination form, combining the property into one tax statement prior building permit issuance. 14. The height of the structure shall not exceed 30 feet as measured from the street elevation which is 818.54 feet. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES INC. 715 Florida Avenue South, Suite 406-B Golden Valley MN 55426-1759 TEL [612] 546-8500 FAX [612] 546-9490 January 10, 2000 Gary Bannochie 7845 River Road, Apartment 113 L�-e Fridely MN 55432 RE: Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 Block V CA River View Heights City of Fridely Anoka County Minnesota Dear Mr. Bannochie: Thank you for asking me to investigate the suitability of these lots. My suggestion for you is not to build a structure on these lots. Listed below are some of the reasons I think this is the better option. My investigation determined the proposed site is within the 100 year flood level of the Mississippi River. This compels you to consider three options. The first option is to not build here because of the difficulties of the site, added insurance problems and the possible sale of the home. The second option is to build on the site making sure that several special construction and design technic are followed. 1) A civil engineer must determine the elevation of the 100 year flood datum. Using this datum, the lowest floor must be a minimum of one foot above this elevation. There can not be space below this elevation into which a person can enter. This means the home rests on a slab on grade foundation- no basement, no crawl space. Secondly, this firm would design the fill or pad supporting the home. The design requirements include such topics as size (thickness, width, length) drainage of the surface water, erosion control (during a flood and when in the dry) and develop a site plan ( a drawing indicating where things are placed). Mr. Bannochie January 10, 2000 2) A geotechnical engineer must be hired to complete several duties. The first thing is to complete an investigation into the soils located on the site. This firm will drill a hole into the soil to a prescribed depth. At given depths, they will determine the soil properties. Among them, is the ability of the soils to support the house and selected fill needed to bring the lot surface up to a certain elevation. This firm will recommend the type of fill material, size and construction methods. The fill must be designed to support itself and the home. The critical time when support is needed the most is during a flood. Another topic is the stability of the fill material. There is a possibility that the top few feet of the site needs to be removed because the soil is too weak to support the fill and home. This is called site correction. Part of the report made by the geotechnical engineer is recommendations as to the size and extent of site correction. Another issue of the site correction is amount of trees and tree roots needed to be removed to construct the pad. 3) A structural engineer is needed to design the foundation and framing systems The most important design feature is the selection of a system capable of supporting the home during a flood, when the soil is saturated. The framing elements of the home need special attention in sizing the connections. Under ordinary conditions, this is not a critical because of the lack of lateral forces caused by flood water. 4) An architect is needed to develop a floor plan making sure there are no spaces below the above described elevation. There are some provisions needed in the design. For example, a landing is needed in case the home is surrounded with flood water. Also the drawing I reviewed need to be expanded so they show more detail about framing, connections and other topics. PAGE 2 Mr. Bannochie January 10, 2000 A third option to consider would be to build the home without setting the first floor one foot above the flood elevation. This option may not be possible because of the cost. A) Any space below the flood elevation has to be design as if it is filled with water. This requires special walls for the basement. The floor has to be design to resist up lift. The connection of the home framing to the foundation wall has to account for the force developed by a flood. The basement will need special pumps installed for controlled filling and emptying. They must be capable of adjusting the water level inside of the basement to match that outside of the basement. Also the home has special needs for any lines installed for sewage or portable water. B) The space can not contain mechanical nor electrical distribution equipment. The space can not be use for sleeping rooms. Points listed above are only the beginning of the problems which serve to increase the cost of construction. This letter is not intended to discuss all the special problems this site presents. It is meant to be an indicator of the magnitude of problems with the idea that it gives you some information needed to make an informed decision. Building code requiremnts do not stop you from building on these lots. Please be aware that if a flood causes more than 50% damage, you will not be allowed to build again. This means you will not be allowed to repair your home. After the third occurance of flood on your property. you will be required to abondon the site. Respectfully Submitted, Robert E. Ferguson, P.E. CC: Ron Julkowski- Chief Building Official, City of Fridely PAGE 3 �� i'� ice' 7-1 IT J.H. Dahimeier Engineering Inc. January 27, 2000 Gary Bannochie 7845 E. River Road, Unit#113 - - - - - Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Proposed Residence Lots 13, 14, 15 & 16, Block V River View Heights, City of Fridley on Dover Street Commission No. 20019 Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to provide foundation design for proposed construction of this residence. __- ASSIGNMENT J. H. Dahlmeier Engineering Inc. has been retained to provide structural engineering regarding foundation design for this lot in the flood plane as directed by Gary Bannochie, owner of the property. OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS - 1. The City of Fridley has established that this lot is in the flood plane. City Council action dated September 12, 1994 addressed Special Use Permits for these areas. SP No. 94-05 allows construction on this lot based on stipulations 1 through 10. 2. Kyro & Associates, Inc. Land Survey certified by Jim Kyro, Minnesota Land Surveyor LPLS No. 1267; has-addressed items 1, 3, 4 arrd 5. 3. -- In addition, the survey will need to show trees to be preserved and-erosion control procedures (6, 8). 4. Gary Bannochie will execute and record a Hold Harmless Agreement as specified in Item 7. Gary_ Bannochie will sign a combination form for. tax purposes as indicated in Item 9. 5. The structure does not exceed 30 feet in height above--street elevation (less than elevation 848.154 feet) (Item 10). 2434 Commerce Boulevard - • Mound, MN 55364 !__ (612) 472-4746 • FAx (612) 472-4761 Gary Bannochie January 27,2000 Page 2 of 2 6. J. H. Dahlmeier Engineering Inc. drawings S-1thru S-4 dated 1/27/00 attached provide design for flood proofing of the garage in accordance 'with current requirements to a minimum 100 year flood elevation of 824.1 as set by the Special Permit SP No. 94-05 (Item 2). GENERAL 7. The observations-.. and opinions. expressed.:_in this report were- based- on---my professional engineering judgment and professional practice as well as the visual inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, - H. AHLMEIER ENGINEERING, INC. -- Ale n H. Dahlmeier, P.E. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under thews the St a Minnesota. Min sota Registration No. 9212 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES SCOPE OF WORK SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES DESIGN OF FOUNDATION SYSTEM FLOODPROOFED TO COMPLY WITH THE CODE FOR A FLOODPROOFED STRUCTURE TYPE FP2. ALL SPACES WILL BE CLASSIFIED W2 (ESSENTIALLY DRY). FLOODPROOFING PROVISIONS WILL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODE: WATERPROOFING: TYPE B STRUCTURAL LQADS: CLASS 1 _ CLOSURE OF OPENINGS: TYPE 1 WALLS, CEILINGS AND CONTENTS: CLASS 2 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODE, FLOODPROOFING PROVISIONS WILL BE APPLIED TO THE ADDITION NEW WALLS ONLY AND WILL REQUIRE NO CHANGES TO EXISTING STRUCTURE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 703, MANUALLY INSTALLED CLOSURE DEVICES TO BE USED AT OPENINGS WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE OWNER'S CONTINGENCY PLAN. THE PLACARD AS FURNISHED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WILL BE INSTALLED BY THE OWNER ABOVE THE RFD IN A VISIBLE PLACE. DESIGN DATA STRESSES FC = 2500 PSI - COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS - CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE FOOTINGS FC = 3000 PSI- COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS - CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE -ALL OTHER CONCRETE - FY= 60000 PSI - REINFORCING STEEL -ASTM A615 GRADE 60 F'M=2500 PSI -TYPE M MORTAR-ASTM C476 F'M_= 1500 PSI -ASTM C90 BLOCK I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERMSIDN AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED _ PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS 'j F ESTATE QF SI E RISTRATT N,�MBER DATE r BANN❑CHIE RESIDENCE COMMISSION N0, J. H. Dahlmeier 200Q19 LOTS13-16,BLK V DMWN D Engineering Inc. S - 1 RIVER VIEW HEIGHTS CHECKED 2434 Commerce Boulevard 612-472-4746 FRIDLEY, MN D Mound, MN 55364 Fax 612-472-6103 1�27�� LOADINGS SNOW LOAD =40 PSF - - - FLOOR LOAD =40 PSF _..._. ._.--- WIND =UBC, METHOD 2 EXPOSURE B FLOODPROOFING LOADS HYDROSTATIC LOADS =62.5 LBS. PER CUBIC FOOT PRESSURE HYDRODYNAMIC LOADS BASED ON SECTION 602.3.1 VELOCITY 10 FEET PER SECOND UPLIFT AS CALCULATED NORMAL IMPACT LOADS - 1,000 LBS. TRAVELING AT 10 FEET- PER SECOND ON ONE SQUARE FOOT. OTHER LOADS TO BE CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 6 OF THE FLOODPROOFING REGULATIONS. SOIL BEARING ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESURE=2000 PSF ASSUMED CODES BUILDING CODE - STATE OF MINNESOTA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE AWS OF E STA OF IN " S A ,..R _,S ATION NUMBER DATE ! Z1 COMMISSION N0. J. H. Dahlmeier BANN❑CHIE RESIDENCE 2M9, LOTS13-16,BLK V OMW By D Engineering Inc. S - 2 RIVER VIEW HEIGHTS CHEC 2434 Commerce Boulevard ,612-472-4746 FRIDLEY, MN D Mound, MN 55364 Fax 612-472-6103 1/27/00 / " 4- 'Yee r-0, " l SO G 1�- NLL IF T1 NLS S 1, tAj t7 S� VPS �- - �, 0R- sY� _CLO ��4 VE- 2''Q NC�J V5� -0? S0 so�T m" DID w6-- ��.�.- c,02'gy"g t Cott , I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY A DULYREG S � OR UNDER, I IAA DIRECT I IO AND THAT I AMA DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER f THE �'V STA f, 'l Wz -pSIG TU vi,n REG TR �N}1�R -DATE ` � G �7 BANNOCHIE RESIDENCE x0200 J. H. Dahlmeier LOTS13-16,BLK V DRAWN DEngineering Inc. S - 3 RIVER VIEW HEIGHTS � CHECKEDJH 2484 Commerce Boulevard ,612-472-4746 1/27/�� F-R I D L E Y, M N Mound, MN 55364 Fax 612-472-6103 .- .......... -- r 1 �r�.e f +ON 't Ir CONC.BUCK r RIGID INSULATION CONC. FTG C - - - RAIN TII._E TO SUMP. �• M} J Y i I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, C �(vJ v SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER � � MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND ^ THAT I AMA DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER YYY SI TU 16 'FL'b0 R S ATIOyNUMBER clu' =DATE BANNECHIE RESIDENCE CO2010N N0' - J. H. Dahlmeier L❑TS13-16,BLK V DRAWNEngineering Inc. S - 4 RIVER VIEW HEIGHTS CHECKED 2494 Commerce-.Boulevard. ,612-472-4746 1/27/00 F R I D L E Y, MN J Mound, MN 55364 Fax 612-472-6109 LOG OF BORING f PROJECT: BPDX-95-012A BORING: ST-5 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: Riverview Heights See attached sketch. Proposed Single-Family Residences Fridley, Minnesota DATE: 2/3/95 SCALE: 1" = 4' ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPF WL .. 819.0 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488) SM SILTY SAND, very fine-to fine-grained, dark o brown, moist, loose. Benchmark: Top nut of fire 0 (Topsoil) hydrant at Dover Street K C_ 6 Broad Avenue E 816.0 3.0 (Elevation = 824.69) t SP POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine-grained, w SM brown, moist, medium dense. (Coarse Alluvium) 13 L fU ll 812.0 7.0 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine-to 14 medium-grained, trace of Gravel, light brown, ro moist to wet, medium dense to loose. c (Coarse Alluvium) 0 - 9 ro 807. > 0 12.0 W ML SILT with SAND, gray, wet, medium dense. 18 o (Fine Alluvium) 4- 805.0 14.0 w SC CLAYEY SAND, very fine-grained, trace of Gravel, 13 03.5 15. light reddish brown, wet, medium dense. a (Glacial Till) v L END OF BORING. c ro (n Water not observed with 14 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. C ro •«- Water not observed to cave-in depth of 12 feet L immediately after withdrawal of auger. . a a Boring then backfilled. Qjw to bFDX-Y.')-012A Braun Inicriec Corporation-_ pa'ec of ASPHALT SHINGLES /6S VINYL SIDING ❑ a ELEVATION ASPHALT SHINGLES 0 0 VINYL SIDING ELEVATION CEW SIDING CULTURED STONE 2!bypING 2 FRONT ELEVATION ASPHALT SHINGLES VINYL SIDING s ELEVATION NOV-08-99 MON 07;05 PM LYMAN LUMBER FAX NO. 6124704810 P. 01 Lyman lumber Company the professional builder's supply Center DALE CARLSON Branch Manager 18900 WEST 78TH STREET CHANHASSEN,MINNESOTA 55317 • TELEPHONE(612)470.4800 • FAX(612)470-4810 Fax Transmittal Form Craig Olson Sales Assistant John Skjerping Office: 470-4855 Sale Representative Fax: 470-4810 Office: 470-4835 Pager: 527-6457 Jen Langenfeld Mobile: 210-2185 Sales Clerk Fax: 470-4810 Office: 470-4830 Fax: 470-4810 Date: TO: 4 i�Iyiye ew, Attn: Number Of Pages- Message if any: �',�.ss /�lr9irv�'.x�v,c�� u�� '�,;�Eo✓ cST�v��S ON J�*C.✓ yrs S, c'i Sender. NOV-08-99 MON 07:05 PM LYMAN LUMBER FAX NO, 6124704810 P, 02 L..... .. .....,. _.......... .............. ............. ............... .................................... . . ............... ......... . .............. ....... ............. ryt lot W cl fit UNNOME CONST ball �n zjrv. --HANNOCRIERmuCE _t!VER ST. m INE flew. SURVEY FOR: Mr. Mrs Gary Bannochie atm Xro & As.ocla&4 _Jna. DESCRIPTION: Lots 13, 14, 15 & 16, Block V, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS River View Heights, City of Fridley, AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS ) 421-9126 Anoka County, Minnesota. 13621 VINEWOOD LANE DAYTON.MN 55327 o Denotes Iron Monuments Set • Denotes Iron Monuments Found x Denotes Spikes set for Building Control xxx.x Denotes Existing Ground Elevations (xx.x) Denotes Proposed Final Grades PROPOSED TOP FOUNDATION ELEV. Qom' The top foundation elevation as shown PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. 4�:Z, _ is as required by the City of Fridley plan >ng and building dept. PROPOSED LOWER FLOOR ELEV. f/0• / 2S0jripit NOTE: Verify all proposed grades and dimensions with all actual final plans. 01,011 8 Lo,t (,.qG E,•, = Z 0 45� Irn {ouno� 8i9,.91 — 99,, 7$ Meas { 8�3 0 Q 70?� �jNc5e �� 0 � Q-v� � � _ �� Woo d 4-1 m N 1 � qo4 elqiti�e•L � _ g►y;s3" fm1ea —mss--- p - � •D ,,`Ipdere 7 1 e14 r LitrYJ 0 0 er /y 16o &ee4 Sj�-ee�) RIM; 9/y•�o9 jqt I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of n esota. Da ed October 20, 1999. By , Minnesota License No. 12267 Grading Plan for Gary Bannochie Lots 13,14,15 & 16, Block V of diver View Heights City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. 820.9 820.8 Proposed Top Foundation Elev.= 824.1 Proposed Garage Floor Elev.= 822.1 / \.l �i �i �i L_ < < i r 7 < / Z_ / 100.00 PLAT 99.78 MEAS. 0 of 82 1 8220° i 14 74 I 823 �I ,r �7 cn g 1D1 M o vi ^� ,\o)' `�'L tr (823.4) oNo `'v Q)* (823.4) o0 w 819.6 �-°° —2 .78 Retaining 1 w , Q Q �� PROP SEDCL WallQI J o a�9, l GE � N S� 0 0 � � NO I P I 0 � �,� ►� o 0 �Ln �I 00 o 0 �\ 823.4) N oN J � 1 I oo 00 — —_� 819.4820.5 (822.0) x-823 ,� 1 I 4- 0 ��p 8 2 O � COQ I O I L 82 81 820 I 818.0 C� �9 �� Concrete Curb 99.78 MEAS. 0 N 100.00 PLAT N ^ Sanitary MH im=819/- —l— r R6 O / / / / I / /- - /- l I- r' /- - f- - / 0 Inv.=810.19 N N L / \ / V L _ \ .4 Notes: Verify all proposed grades and dimensions I with all actual final plans. 1 , / Denotes Drainage Flow Existing topographic and proposed house elevation information referenced from survey by Jim Kyro & Assoc. (819.3) Denotes Proposed Elevation 0 20 Verify Jim Kyro & Assoc. datum elevation with the City of X 819.3 Denotes Existing Elevation Fridley prior to any construction so that minimum first floor elevation is 824.1 as stated by the City of Fridley. SCALE IN FEET DATE: 2/11/00 1 hereby certify that this plan was BK PG: prepared by me or under my direct DRAWN BY: BG supervision and that I am a duly BODART, PEDERSON CHECKED BY: DDP Registered Engineer under the laws S ASSOCIATES, INC. of the State of Minnesota. LAND SURVEYING REVISIONS: lu CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING 13078 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308 TEL: 812-281-2900 FAX: 812-281-2902 Signed: — DRAWING FILE: FILE NO. Date: 2 11 A0 Reg. No. 1?900 Banno_cert.dwg 100034.0 '3 A d O dA ws c I I I I I i I I I i ► w �DO o I i77 C-i CID ' " I N i I '1 N N ti � M oo•,f� I _ ° . ,� M IIID ► ' Il Ia ! ' _ _ ao j ! I �`k III III l l _.------�_ __ 002' 14 - ` _ N14) III IIi i I � Ilt lk C\j ' I — _ N CID N II it i i ± jl h + i� CY Ix i I ► I � II I I I I I I I � � _ ' � ��•,-�� - � *� it j I � � I i � N t CID ' II �> ISI--.- - I \�!il C� b N iin _ C" Ito Cf ( . \ ' ' M3iAa3nia F�-- bef9 I I I I . I it l I ' I I � I I II I � ! II i II � i + I I CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMISSION MEETING, MARCH 15, 2000 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Savage called the March 15, 2000, PI ning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Diane Savage, Lar Kuechle, Brad Sielaff Connie Modig, D n Saba, Leroy Oquist Members Absent: Dave Kondric Others Present: Paul Boli , Planner Gary a Sally Bannochie, 7845 East River Road, Apt. #113 APPROVE THE MARCV1, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. M/n%eeting seconded by Mr. Oquist, to approve the March 1, 2000, Planning Commissminutes as presented. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1 . PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #00-02, by Gary and Sally Bannochie to allow a residence to be built in a River Preservation District. Permit is specifically required for home proposed to be elevated, but not built on fill (Ordinance No. 1056), generally located at 665 Dover Street N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:34 P.M. Mr. Bolin stated that the petitioners, Gary and Sally Bannochie, are seeking a special use permit in order to construct a home not completely elevated on fill in the flood fringe district at 665 Dover Street. Homes that are not elevated on fill are permitted as a special use in the flood fringe district provided that all FEMA and State floodproofing regulations and standards provided in City Ordinance #1056 are met. Mr. Bolin stated that City Ordinance #1056 requires a special use permit for this proposed home because a portion of the living space is going to be elevated by the PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 15, 2000 PAGE 2 tuck-under garage rather than by fill. On this property there can be no living area below 824.1 feet above sea level of elevation according to City Code. Mr. Bolin stated this property is zoned R-1, single family residential, as are all of the surrounding properties. This lot was platted in 1922. An old home on this site was removed in 1964. In 1994, a special use permit was granted to this property and two others in the Riverview Heights neighborhood to allow these homes to be built in the flood fringe district. On this particular lot and on at least one of the others, the homes were never built. Since that time, the special use permit has expired; and in 1996, City Ordinance #1056 was adopted. Mr. Bolin stated the legal description of the lot actually states that this was four individual lots that has since been combined into one tax parcel. The home will be flood-proofed through the use of siding, cultured stone, and landscaping. The City's required setbacks are met with 11 feet along the eastern property edge, a 35-foot front yard setback, and almost 21 feet on the west side of the property. There is a retaining wall to the east of the home because the ordinance generally requires homes built on fill to have that fill extend 15 feet out all the way around the foundation of the home. In this case, in place of that on the east side is a retaining wall. The City's engineers and the petitioner's engineers looked at it and decided to do a retaining wall to not affect the natural flowage and drainage along that edge of the property. Everything will still come out towards the street as it always has. Staff recommends approval of the special use permit with the following stipulations: 1. Soil testing shall be completed and submitted by a soils engineer as required by Chapter 17 of the Uniform Building Code prior to pouring the foundation footings. 2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction. 3. Siding and landscaping shall be used to minimize the impact of flood-proofing materials. 4. The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate as part of a verifying survey prior to the foundation being capped, which shall verify that the minimum first floor elevation is 824.1 feet. 5. The petitioner shall flood-proof the garage in accordance with current Federal and State flood-proofing requirements to a minimum of the 100-year flood elevation. 6. A retaining wall shall be installed on the east side of the home to maintain existing elevation and drainage along eastern property line. 7. The builder shall grade the property to conform with the grading plan dated 2/11/2000. 8. The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies with the grading plan dated 2/11/2000. 9. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines prior to any work done on this site. 10.The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liability if damage occurs as a result of flooding. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 15, 2000 PAGE 3 11.Petitioner shall plant a minimum of five (5) trees. These five trees can be a combination of over-story deciduous trees having a 2 '/2 feet minimum caliper at planting and coniferous trees at least six feet in height at the time of planting. 12.City Staff must approve the removal of any additional trees. 13.The height of the structure shall not exceed 30 feet as measured from the street elevation, which is 818.54 feet. Ms. Savage asked Mr. Bolin if he has had any calls from any neighbors. Mr. Bolin stated that he has not had any comments from the neighbors. There is another lot similar to this about a block away, and they have had a lot of interest in that site lately too. People are finding out that it is possible to build in these areas if proper procedures are followed. Ms. Savage asked if any other authority such as the Watershed District has to look at this request. Mr. Bolin stated that only City Council has to look at this. It does have to go through the building permit process and be in conformance with all of the FEMA and State and Federal standards. Mr. Kuechle asked if the first stipulation was required on all lots or only lots in the flood plain. Mr. Bolin stated it is only required because it is in the flood plain and there will be some soil hauled in. Mr. Kuechle asked if stipulation #11 should have a more specific date; for example, by September 2001 . Mr. Bolin stated that would be a good idea. Mr. Oquist asked if stipulation #9 was only during construction. Mr. Bolin stated that was correct. Ms. Modig asked if the City usually has stipulations similar to #11 regarding planting trees on these types of properties. Mr. Bolin stated that the City tries to place a stipulation on these properties going through a special use permit or a lot split. Staff will go and look at any trees that are being proposed to be removed and give approval. In this case most of the trees came down last summer. The trees probably were where the home would be located; but in order to return some of the character that the property had prior to the trees coming down, they would like to see some replacement of the 12 to 15 trees that came down. It PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 15, 2000 PAGE 4 Ms. Savage asked the petitioner if he had any problem with the stipulations. Mr. Gary Bannochie stated that he only has a problem with stipulation #11. This is a wooded lot and is not really big. The house is going to take up a lot of the lot. There are still some trees in the back and to plant five more may just add too much with the limited space in the yard. There are still some trees in the back that he really wanted to get rid of because they are dying. The neighbors on the one side let the vines grow so thick that it pulls the trees down, and they needed a tree trimmer to dress up the whole place. He may need someone to come back out and take a look at the tree situation. Mr. Bolin stated that it would be up to the Planning Commission to amend the stipulation. Mr. Bannochie stated there are quite a few trees in the lot already. Ms. Savage stated that it is necessary to try to replace some of the trees that have been cut down already. Mr. Bannochie stated that when the house in finished, there will be such overgrowth with the neighboring trees that shade out the lawn already, it will be hard to get sunlight in there. A lot of the trees in the back corner are dead. He does not have a problem with planting more trees, but he would rather not. Mr. Saba asked how many live trees he would have left. Mr. Bannochie stated that there are a few in there. They will be doing some landscaping, but he is not sure if adding five trees would work out. The trees in the summer time fill up on top like a big dome. Ms. Savage stated that he does have a choice with the trees he wants to plant. Ms. Modig stated that he has to have a certain amount of coniferous trees at least six feet tall at the time of planting. Mr. Bolin stated that was correct, but he could also have deciduous trees at least 2 '/2 inches in caliper. Mr. Saba asked Mr. Bolin how staff arrived at five trees. Mr. Bolin stated they came up with five trees by looking at the size of the site and the number of trees that were removed. There were a number of trees that were not in the way of the house site that could have stayed up, but it is hard to tell what shape they were in. The City thought five was a fair number with the option of planting coniferous trees or deciduous trees. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 15, 2000 PAGE 5 Mr. Oquist stated that they do not require this for other house construction. He knows that the lot is fairly wooded, and he can appreciate what Mr. Bannochie is talking about with it having some overgrowth. Just because he takes a tree down, he should not be required to replace it. Ms. Savage stated that maybe they should. Mr. Bolin stated that over the past year, the tree issue has come up more and more with the lot splits they have had. In the past they have been able to get a good look at the lots and have a say in which trees come down. They have not had to come in after the trees came down and play catch up. Mr. Bannochie stated that maybe that situation is more in a development than this type of lot. Ms. Savage stated that she can recall a number of cases where they have prohibited the removal of trees without the approval of the City. Apparently, in this case, Mr. Bannochie took down trees without approval. Mr. Bannochie stated that was true, but the trees were where the house would be built and the driveway. The two trees near the driveway area presently might need to be knocked down because they may be too close to the driveway. He might have to talk to the City about those two trees. Mr. Oquist stated that he thinks the City has to be careful about what trees to take down. He just took down some big trees in his yard. Is the City going to be coming in to each individual home and ask what trees are going to be cut down? He had to cut his down because of the big limb hanging over the house. Ms. Savage stated that she thought this was a different situation. Mr. Bannochie stated there are a lot of big trees in the neighborhood and to add five more will be a lot. They are going to do landscaping with shrubs, etc. He probably would add a few trees, but to say that he has to plant five makes it hard to say where he would put them. Ms. Modig asked Mr. Bannochie how he would like to see stipulation #11 changed. Mr. Bannochie stated that he would like to see it changed to two trees. Possibly he would put five, but it is hard to say because he has not gotten into the landscaping part of it. Ms. Savage stated he does have a choice in the trees he has to plant. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 15, 2000 PAGE 6 Mr. Saba stated that he can understand Mr. Bannochie's dilemma. A tree is a permanent thing and to try to plant it within a time limit and within certain spaces is a tough decision to make. Ms. Savage asked how many trees he took down. Mr. Bannochie stated that he probably took down 15 where the house will be situated. Many were dead and they had a huge pile of root that was pulling the trees down and he had to get a professional tree trimmer to clean it up. Ms. Modig asked Mr. Bolin if Staff was saying that Mr. Bannochie has to come in and play catch-up because the trees were taken down. If he is saying that he took down dead trees and trees in the way of the house, is the City telling him where the trees should be planted? Mr. Bolin stated that they can be planted anywhere in the yard. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Modig, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 8:04 P.M. Ms. Savage asked if they could leave the same number of trees to be added but change the size of the trees. She likes the idea of encouraging planting of trees. Mr. Oquist stated that one of the problems with having too many trees is that grass does not grow. Mr. Saba stated that trees have been controlled in the past when developers have bought the land; but, in this case, this is going to be Mr. Bannochie's own home. Coming up with the locations for trees is a tough decision. He thinks this is going to take care of itself, they do not need the stipulation. He would support taking the stipulation right out. Mr. Oquist stated he agrees with that. Mr. Kuechle stated that he feels they should keep the stipulation but have the petitioner and City staff work together to come up with a landscaping plan between now and the City Council meeting. It seems that another tree would be lost in the front yard and they would want to look at replacing some of those. He could fairly quickly mark where the trees would be in the site plan presently. Mr. Bannochie stated that as the house gets built, it would be easier to see where the landscaping should be. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 15, 2000 PAGE 7 Ms. Savage stated that she feels that there is a bigger issue. Should the City have a say in whether people should be able to cut down trees or not. This is a special use permit and the City is mandating a number of stipulations versus a situation where the home is already owned. Mr. Oquist stated the petitioner owns the property. Ms. Savage stated that he still had to get a special use permit. Mr. Oquist stated that this is a single family lot versus a big commercial project and they should be careful with this. Once he puts all those trees up, are they going to prevent him from taking them down? Ms. Savage stated that the City has a requirement for residential properties that people have to follow. Mr. Saba stated that in this case, he sees an exceptional situation because it is already wooded. Ms. Modig stated that most of the trees have been cut down where four houses are being built on Central Avenue at 61St. Why didn't the Planning Commission intervene there with the trees? She does not want anybody to tell her that she can or cannot have a tree. She does not think they can tell someone how to landscape their property. Mr. Saba stated that he did not think that they need to. People want to plant trees where they want them, but it may take a while to make that decision. Trees add to the value of the property. It is almost self-regulating, because the property owner wants the property to look the way they want it to look. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Modig, to approve Special Use Permit, SP #00-02, by Gary and Sally Bannochie, to allow a residence to be built in a River Preservation District, with the deletion of stipulation #11 as follows: 1. Soil testing shall be completed and submitted by a soils engineer as required by Chapter 17 of the Uniform Building Code prior to pouring of the foundation footings. 2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction. 3. Siding and landscaping shall be used to minimize the impact of flood-proofing materials. 4. The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate as part of a verifying survey prior to the foundation being capped, which shall verify that the minimum first floor elevation is 824.1 feet. 5. The petitioner shall flood-proof the garage in accordance with current Federal and State flood-proofing requirements to a minimum of the 100-year flood elevation. 6. A retaining wall shall be installed on the east side of the home to maintain existing elevation and drainage along the eastern property line. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 15, 2000 PAGE 8 7. The builder shall grade the property to conform with the grading plan dated 2/11/2000. 8. The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies with the grading plan dated 2/11/2000. 9. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines prior to any work done on this site. 10.The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liability if damage occurs as a result of flooding. 11.(Stipulation deleted.) Petitioner shall plant a minimum of five (5) trees. These five trees can be a combination of over-story deciduous trees having a 2 '/2 feet minimum caliper at planting and coniferous trees at least six feet in height at the time of planting. 12.City Staff must approve the removal of any additional trees. 13.The height of the structure shall not exceed 30 feet as measured from the street elevation, which is 818.54 feet. Ms. Savage stated that she believed stipulation #11 requiring the five trees is a reasonable requirement and she will not be able to go along with the motion without it. It seems to her there are many situations where they have required homeowners to not cut down trees without approval of staff. Mr. Oquist stated they have not had the requirement for homeowners to plant trees and how many. He agrees with Mr. Saba. Mr. Bannochie stated that he is planning on putting at least two trees in. Mr. Oquist stated that if Mr. Bannochie did not have a special use permit, they would not even be talking about the trees. Mr. Kuechle stated that this is the only place they have leverage. He agrees with Ms. Savage. He would be in favor of granting the special use permit with some flexibility of stipulation #11. He feels they need to send the message that they want the City to look good and this is one way of doing it. Mr. Oquist asked Mr. Kuechle what he meant by being flexible. Mr. Kuechle stated that he believes that the petitioner could work something out with City staff. Mr. Oquist stated that Mr. Bannochie cannot work something out until summer comes so he can see what the existing trees look like and whether he will need five trees and how many will survive. Ms. Modig stated that if Mr. Bannochie did not want any trees, he would not have bought the lot, so it is not a matter of him trying to get rid of the trees. I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 15, 2000 PAGE 9 Ms. Savage stated that is not the issue. The issue is whether the City should have a say in the appearance of the City. Mr. Oquist stated that they would then have to change the ordinance. When they issue a building permit for a new house, they would have to dictate what the landscape would look like. Mr. Sielaff asked if the real issue is whether they retain the trees on the lot. Mr. Oquist stated that he has got that with stipulation #12. Ms. Savage stated that he has already removed a number of trees, which is the reason for stipulation #11. Ms. Modig stated that he removed the trees because they were dead. Ms. Savage stated that when you remove a dead tree, you should replace it. Mr. Oquist stated that there are reasons to plant trees and reasons to cut them down. He does not.think they should tell a person to put more trees on a lot when you do not need them. Mr. Sielaff asked how many trees would remain on the property when the house is built. Mr. Bannochie stated that there are quite a few trees remaining. He is going to replace some trees, but he does not know how many. There are trees in the back and front and pines on one side that are half-dead. Mr. Kuechle asked if they could vote on stipulation #11 separately. He is in favor of granting the special use permit but does not want to vote "no" because he objects to elimination of stipulation #11. Mr. Saba stated that he has that opportunity to put that on record. Ms. Modig stated that she does not think the motion will pass if Mr. Kuechle votes against it. Mr. Kuechle stated that if Mr. Saba withdrew his motion and made a motion to delete stipulation #11, Mr. Kuechle and Ms. Savage could vote against that and they could bring up the whole thing and they could all vote in favor of it with stipulation #11 separate. Mr. Oquist stated they should leave the motion and make a second motion afterwards to make a recommendation to add or delete it. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 15, 2000 PAGE 10 Ms. Modig stated that someone could issue an amendment to the motion on the floor and vote on it as a separate issue. Mr. Saba stated that they would have to remove the motion completely and reconfigure the whole thing. Mr. Kuechle stated that if Mr. Saba withdrew the motion, could they vote on including stipulation #11 or not? Then, they could vote for the overall approval of the special use permit. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Modig, to withdraw the motion UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to exclude stipulation #11 from the list of stipulations for Special Use Permit, SP #00-02. UPON A VOICE VOTE, OQUIST, SABA, SIELAFF, AND MODIG VOTING AYE, SAVAGE AND KUECHLE VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED 4-2. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to approve Special Use Permit, SP #00-02, by Gary and Sally Bannochie to allow a residence to be built in a River Preservation District, at 665 Dover Street N.E., with stipulation #11 excluded and renumbered as follows: 1 . Soil testing shall be completed and submitted by a soils engineer as required by Chapter 17 of the Uniform Building Code prior to pouring the foundation footings. 2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction. 3. Siding and landscaping shall be used to minimize the impact of flood-proofing materials. 4. The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate as part of a verifying survey prior to the foundation being capped, which shall verify that the minimum first floor elevation is 824.1 feet. 5. The petitioner shall flood-proof the garage in accordance with current Federal and State flood-proofing requirements to a minimum of the 100-year flood elevation. 6. A retaining wall shall be installed on the east side of the home to maintain existing elevation and drainage along the eastern property line. 7. The builder shall grade the property to conform with the grading plan dated 2/11/2000. 8. The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies with the grading plan dated 2/11/2000. 9. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines prior to any work done on this site. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 15, 2000 PAGE 11 10.The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liability if damage occurs as a result of flooding. 11.City Staff must approve the removal of any additional trees. 12.The height of the structure shall not exceed 30 feet as measured from the street elevation, which is 818.54 feet. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Saba stated that City Council will make the final decision. 2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 15, 2000. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING: MOTION by Mr. Sielaff to recd ve the minutes of the February 15, 2000, Environmental Quality and Energy Commissi meeting. Seconded by Ms. Modig. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL V TING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANI�OUSLY. y OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Bolin updated the Commission o past City Council actions. Mr. Bolin stated this was Mr. Sielaff s I4st Planning Commission meeting, as he has chosen not to be reappointed to the EnvVnmental Quality & Energy Commission. Mr. Bolin thanked Mr. Sielaff for all of his yea of service on the Planning Commission, Environmental Quality & Energy Commiss n, and other committees he has served on for the City of Fridley. Mr. Sielaff stated that he has really enjoyed is time on the Commissions. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, t adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAI ERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE MARCH 15, 200 , PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURNED AT 8:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Si , e L. hnson Recording Secretary_ THE APRIL 10 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 4 "temporary" exterior storage with n definition of temporary. The second change relates to storage at the fuel pumps. Th new language does not allow the storage of products between fuel pumps. The ordi nce also allows for storage of up to 20 pound propane tanks in a manner that is c sistent with the City's Fire Code. Staff recommended Council's approval. WAIVEED THE RE AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 1138 ON THE SECOND READING D ORDERD PUBLICATION. APPROVED OFF IAL TITLE AND SUMMARY ORDINANCE. NEW BUSINESS: 2. RECEIVE E MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 15(. 2000: RECEIV D THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCR 15, 2000. 3. SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #00-02. BY GARY AND SALLY BANNOCHIE. TO ALLOW A RESIDENCE TO BE BUILT IN A RIVER PRESERVATION DISTRICT GENERALLY LOCATED AT 665 DOVER STREET N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the petitioners are asking for a special use permit to construct a home in the Flood Fringe District at 665 Dover Street. There are no issues with this project other than a stipulation that the petitioner plant five trees on the lot to replace trees that they have removed. While the Planning Commission asked that the stipulation requiring the trees be removed, they approved the special use permit at their March 15 meeting. He asked that the original Stipulation No. 11 requiring five trees be restored. If Council approved the special use permit it would be with the tree stipulation. Staff recommended Council's approval. THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACED AFTER NUMBER 14 UNDER NEW BUSINESS. 4. EXTENSION OF A VARIANCE, VAR #99-03 BY SCOTT AND AMRIA ST. ARNOLD TO DECREASE TH RE UIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 28 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 96 SQUARE FOOT ENTRANCE FOYER GE RALLY LOCATED AT 350 IRONTON STREET N.E. ()YARD 3): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that sta\VAR t the variance be extended one year to April 14, 2001. This varianconstruction of a 96 square foot foyer. APPROVED EXTENSION OF A VAR3. THE APRIL 10 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE Mayor Jorgenson stated that the existing chain link fence on the west side up through U iversity Avenue along the Fridley border to I-694 would be removed, and a wood fence woul be put in as a sound barrier. Mr. Flora stated that he understood that the cyclone fence along University A nue would be removed and a wall would be put up that is fifteen feet high. There would only e a wall, not the fence. Councilmember Wolfe asked how much closer to University Avenue the f ce would be. Mr. Flora stated that it would be about fifteen feet closer to University venue. Councilmember Wolfe asked if the neighbors would be allowed to e that space. Mr. Flora stated that there are gas and electric lines in that area. se of the land would be fine if it did not interfere with the utilities. Mr. Hickok stated that the City had an excellent turnout the home improvement show. This year' show was at the Mounds View Community Ce ter. They had not only remodeling information but recycling information as well. A great umber of people stopped and talked to them and picked up information on recycling and re deling. The home improvement show is held each year in the spring. Mr. Hickok said Rya Jendro, HRA Home Remodeling Advisor, encouraged anyone thinking of doing a remodeling roject at home to call him at 572-3515. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of March 15 2 0 Mayor Jorgenson stated tha/TNEE e first sentence should state that "Mayor Jorgenson stated that a wheelchair woused to get into some of the places with the step up to the sidewalk"versus Counciom making that statement. APPROVED CITY COING MINUTES OF MARCH 15, 2000 AS AMENDED. OLD BUSINESS: 1. ORDINANCE NO. ING SECTIONS 205.13 205.14 205.15 205.16 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY USES AND SECTION 11.10/PERTAINING TO FEES ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT ZTA #99-02 BY TH9 CITY OF FRIDLE : Mr. Burns, ty Manager, stated that the ordinance makes two changes in the outdoor storage req irements for service stations/convenience stores. First, the owners and managers f these establishments may now store products within four feet of the front of their bui ings on a permanent basis. The current ordinance provides only for y i THE APRIL 10 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 31 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR J ORGENSON DEC D THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to amend the stipulation#1 as follo : Any tenant who's use does not comply with the C-2 zoning district requirements shall vac e the premises by the end of their current lease. Seconded by Councilmember Billings. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORG NSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH THE FOLL ING STIPULATIONS: 1) ANY TENANT WHOSE USE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE C-2 ZONING DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS SHALL VACATE THE REMISES BY THE END OF THEIR CURRENT LEASE; 2) NONE OF THE EXIS NG LANDSCAPING SHALL BE REMOVED. IF ANY OF THE EXISTING L DSCAPING IS REMOVED OR DISPLACED, PETITIONER SHALL SUBMIT A ANDSCAPE PLAN, THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS ALL CURRENT CODE REQU MENTS FOR STAFF APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SIGN PERMI , 3) NO ADDITIONAL PYLON SIGNS ARE ALLOWED ON THIS SITE; 4) IF T E PARCELS ARE SEPARATED AT A LATER DATE, THE SIGN MUST COM INTO COMPLIANCE; 5) THE CITY IS RELIEVED FROM ALL LIABILITY C SED BY THE SIGN BEING LOCATED IN ITS PROPOSED POSITION, ONLY FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE; 6) PETITIONER SHALL PAINT ALL ACK DOORS THE SAME COLOR TO GIVE CONSISTENCY TO THE APPEA NCE OF THE BUILDING FROM RANCHERS ROAD PRIOR TO ISSUANCE THE SIGN PERMIT; 7) PETITOINER SHALL INSTALL CODE REQUIRED G AGE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES FOR TENANTS. PETITIONER SHALL SUBMI PLANS FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES WITH A LETTER OF INTENT TO ILD SAID ENCLOSURES PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SIGN PERMIT; 8) HIS VARIANCE SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT UNLESS ANY OF THE FOLLOW G OCCUR: a) THE SIGN IS ALTERED IN ANY WAY, EXCEPT FOR ROUTIN MAINTENANCE AND CHANGE OF MESSAGES WHICH MAKES THE SIGN ESS IN COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS; b) THE SUPPORTING STRU TURE OF THE SIGN IS REPLACED OR REMODELED; c) THE FACE OF THE SI N IS REPLACED OR REMODELED; d) THE SIGN BECOMES DILAPIDATED R DAMAGED AND THE COST OF BRINGING IT INTO COMPLIANCE S MORE THAN 50% (FIFTY PERCENT) OF THE VALUE OF THE SIGN, AT W ICH TIME ALL OF THE SIGN AND ITS STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED; 9) NOTWITHSTANDING SUBPARAGRAPH (a) ABOVE, UPON THE CHANGE F THE NAME OF THE BUSINESS BEING DISPLAYED ON THIS SIGN; AND 10 IT REPLACES THE EARLIER VARIANCE SO THAT THE CITY'S RECO S REFLECT THAT ACCURATELY. 3. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #00-02, BY GARY AND SALLY BANNOCHIE, TO ALLOW A RESIDENCE TO BE BUILT IN A RIVER PRESERVATION DISTRICT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 665 DOVER STREET N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the petitioners are asking for a special use permit to construct a home in the Flood Fringe District at 665 Dover Street. There are no issues with this THE APRIL 10 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 32 project other than a stipulation that the petitioner plant five trees on the lot to replace trees that they have removed. While the Planning Commission asked that the stipulation requiring the trees be removed, they did approve the special use permit at their March 15 meeting. Staff recommended Council concurrence with the Planning Commission and that the original Stipulation No. 11 requiring five trees be restored. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that she asked to have this removed from the consent agenda for discussion about the trees. She thinks the trees are an issue on this lot. She is shocked that all the trees are gone. She could only see about five trees on the fence line. She felt they needed to look more at tree preservation. She is concerned that all of those trees are gone. She realizes that they need to situate their home on the property, but at some point they need to replace some of those trees. She would be willing to approve the special use permit if they could put in a stipulation that they work closely with staff on the trees. Councilmember Barnette stated that he wanted to remove this item from the consent agenda for the opposite reason. He thinks there comes a time when the City dictates too much to people about what they should do with their own property. If he did put in the five trees, once the home is constructed a year later, he could remove that stipulation. He felt it was silly to add a stipulation when he does not want the trees on his property. Councilmember Bolkcom asked at what point Council allows a resident to stop cutting down mature trees down just to cut them down. Councilmember Wolfe stated that he himself has cut down fourteen trees in his yard. He felt that Mr. Bannochie should be allowed to do what he wants with his property. Mr. Gary Bannochie, petitioner, stated that the trees were cut down where the house would be built. The trees on the neighboring properties had big vines that pull the trees and deform the trees. He has about six trees left. Now he has to look at having about eleven or twelve trees on a lot that is not that big. The neighbor to the back wanted the tree between their properties taken down also. They had to take it down because if a strong wind came it would have dropped it down on both of their houses. Mr. Bannochie does not object to trees. He has a landscaping plan to plant more trees, but it is hard to landscape in a place where there is a lot of overgrowth. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that there are trees in the back that are probably going to come down. Mr. Bannochie stated that he would like to put a fence in there, too. The neighbor behind him wants to take down the huge tree by the power lines. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if he had a landscaping plan with him. Mr. Bannochie stated that he did not have the plan with him. He did not want to finalize the landscaping plan until he gets the house built to see how it is going to look. To say that he has to put in five more trees will make twelve trees which he felt was a lot. THE APRIL 10 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 33 Councilmember Bolkcom asked him if he could agree with Stipulation No. 11 and then if anymore trees are removed they would have to be replaced. Mr. Bannochie stated that there is another tree he would like to take down. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that her concern is that it looks like there will more trees removed and that he was not going to have many original trees left. Mr. Bannochie stated that they would be planting some sort of trees when they get involved in landscaping. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if there would be a privacy fence in the back. Mr. Bannochie stated that there would be. Councilmember Barnette stated that he thought Council should stay out of people's business sometimes. He was sure the petitioners will have a nice home and a nice yard and that eventually they would plant trees in the right locations. Councilmember Bolkcom asked Councilmember Barnette how he would feel if it was commercial property. Councilmember Barnette stated that if it was a commercial development it is different because this is a private property with an individual. A business is talking about more visibility in the City. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that Council would not be doing anything that they are not allowed to do. Councilmember Barnette stated that he knew that. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that communities are looking at keeping trees. Mr. Bannochie stated that the tree in the front may interfere with his driveway and might also have to come down. Councilmember Bolkcom asked how he could say that he has so many trees in his yard. Mr. Bannochie stated that it was hard to see in the photograph but there are some in the middle of the lot. Mr. Hickok stated that he could mix different types of trees and put them on the edge of the lot and add some conifers. Adding more trees would recreate some of the natural appearances that this lot once had. Mr. Bannochie stated that he just does not want another twelve trees in his yard. THE APRIL 10, 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 34 Councilmember Bolkcom stated that they are only asking for five trees. It seems several of those trees that are there presently are going to be removed. Mr. Bannochie stated that he might not take all of the trees down. Some of the ones on the back are not even on the property. Mayor Jorgenson asked how many trees are on the property. Mr. Bannochie stated that five or six trees are on his lot. Mayor Jorgenson stated that the trees that he is talking about removing that are close to the driveway may be boulevard trees. Mr. Flora stated that they could be. Mayor Jorgenson asked if the residents would need permission from the Public Works Maintenance Division to remove that tree by City ordinance. Mr. Flora stated that they can only remove it with permission if it is on City property. Mayor Jorgenson asked if the City replaces a tree when they remove one on the boulevard. Mr. Flora stated that when the City cuts down a boulevard tree, the City replaces it on the property. Mayor Jorgenson stated that she understands that this tree could cause problems with The Bannochie property. Trees add character to the neighborhood and provide screenage. She would like to see some stipulation that some trees are replaced on the property. They do not have to be huge trees. They could be small ornamental trees as well. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if they could compromise and plant three trees. Councilmember Billings stated that was his suggestion. He asked if Mrs. Bannochie could live with putting in three trees on the property Mrs. Bannochie stated that she is going to have a vegetable garden. Mr. Bannochie stated that he would probably plant about three or four trees, but having the City determine what he can and cannot do draws the line. Mr. Bannochie stated that the neighbors have been using this lot as a dumping ground for brush and trees. Some residents are getting irritated by some of these trees. It actually looks cleaner after removing the dead trees. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if he could live with three trees. THE APRIL 10, 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 35 Mr. Bannochie stated that he would like to make that decision on his own if that is okay with Council. Councilmember Wolfe stated that this is the Bannochie's property. He thinks it will look nice, and he did not think the City should tell him what to do. Councilmember Bolkcom asked Councilmember Wolfe why he was so concerned about the Varichek's property last summer. Councilmember Wolfe stated right from the beginning that Mr. Steve Varichek could cut every tree down on his property. Mr. Varicheck kept the trees because he knew as a realtor that his properties worked for him and kept as many trees as possible. Councilmember Bolkcom asked Mr. Bannochie if he would plant three trees on his property. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to approve Special Use Permit, SP #00-02. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to amend Stipulation No. 11 as follows: Petitioner shall plant a minimum of three trees. These three trees can be a combination of over-story deciduous trees having a 2.5 inch minimum caliper at time of planting and to coniferous trees at least 6 feet in height at time of planting. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. Councilmember Barnette stated that they should add Stipulation No. 13 as follows: The petitioner shall sign a combination form, combining the property into one tax statement prior building permit issuance. Mr. Bannochie stated that they have done that. Councilmember Billings stated that it was not necessary then. Mayor Jorgenson asked for a vote on the amended stipulation. UPON A VOICE VOTE, MAYOR JORGENSON, COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS VOTING AYE, COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE AND COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE VOTING NAY, MAJOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A THREE TO TWO VOTE. Mayor Jorgenson asked for a vote on the main motion. UPON A VOICE VOTE, MAYOR JORGENSON, COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS VOTING AYE, COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE AND COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE VOTING NAY, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A THREE TO TWO VOTE WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1) SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED BY A SOILS ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 17 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE PRIOR TO POURING OF THE FOUNDATION 1 THE APRIL 10, 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 36 FOOTINGS; 2) ALL NECESSARY PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION; 3) SIDING AND LANDSCAPING SHALL BE USED TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT OF FLOOD-PROOFING MATERIALS; 4) THE PETITIONER SHALL SUBMIT AN ELEVATION CERTIFICATE AS PART OF A VERIFYING SURVEY PRIOR TO THE FOUNDATION BEING CAPPED, WHICH SHALL VERIFY THAT THE MINIMUM FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION IS 824.1 FEET; 5) THE PETITIONER SHALL FLOOD-PROOF THE GARAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE FLOOD-PROOFING REQUIREMENTS TO A MINIMUM OF THE 100 EYAR FLOOD ELEVATION; 6) A RETAINING WALL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE HOME TO MAINTAIN EXISTING ELEVATION AND DRAINAGE ALONG THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE; 7) THE BUILDER SHALL GRADE THE PROPERTY TO CONFORM WITH THE GRADING PLAN DATED FEBRUARY 11, 2000; 8) THE VERIFYING SURVEY SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE GRADING COMPLIES WITH THE GRADING PLAN DATED FEBRYARY 11, 2000; 9) EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE WEST, SOUTH, AND EAST LOT LINES PRIOR TO ANY WORK DONE ON THIS SITE; 10) THE PETITIONER SHALL EXECUTE AND RECORD AGAINST THE PROPERTY A HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT RELEASING THE CITY FROM LIABILITY IF DAMAGE OCCURS AS A RESULT OF FLOODING; 11) PETITIONER SHALL PLANT A MINIMUM OF FIVE TREES. THESE FIVE TREES CAN BE A COMBINATION OF OVER-STORY DECIDUOUS TREES HAVING A 2.5 INCH MINIMUM CALIPER AT PLANTING AND CONIFEROUS TREES AT LEAST SIX FEET IN HEIGHT AT THE TIME OF PLANTING; 12) STAFF MUST APPROVE THE REMOVAL OF ANY ADDITIONAL TREES; AND 13) THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL NOT EXCEED 30 FEET AS MEASURED FROM THE STREET ELEVATION, WHICH IS 818.54 FEET. 5. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACTS FOR THE 2000 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT UPGRADES PROJE T NO. 328: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this is the ixth and final year of the current playground equipment upgrade program. Parks included i this year's program include Community, Flanery, Locke, Jubilee and Creekridge. Bids were o ened on March 22. Neighbors in the areas served by the parks were afforded an opportunity to re 'ew the various proposals. The Parks and Recreation subsequently considered citizen input and rec ended that the bids for all parks but Creekridge be awarded to Flanagan Sales. These amoun come to a total of $113,000. They also recommend that the bid for Creekridge Park be awarded to Minnesota/Wisconsin Playgrounds, Inc. in the amount of$21,000. Staff recommen d Council's approval. Mayor Jorgenson stated that the playground equipment had b n removed from the capital improvements budget. They approved the budget for the year 2000. There was an appropriation to the budget to allow for the equipment. She asked where the funds ould come from to pay for this equipment. Mr. Burns stated that it would come from the Parks Capital Improvement fu d. CIZYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER•6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432•(612)571-3450•FAX(612)571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE April 13, 2000 Gary & Sally Bannochie 7845 East River Road, Apt. 113 Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Bannochie: On April 10, 2000, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a Special Use Permit, SP #00-02, to allow a residence to be built in a River Preservation District, legally described as Lots 13, 14, 15, & 16, Block V, Riverview Heights, City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, generally located at 665 Dover Street NE. Approval of this special use permit is contingent upon the following stipulations: 1. Soil testing shall be completed and submitted by a soils engineer as required by Chapter 17 of the Uniform Building Code prior to pouring of the foundation footings. 2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction. 3. Siding and landscaping shall be used to minimize the impact of flood-proofing materials. 4. The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate as part of a verifying survey prior to the foundation being capped, which shall verify the minimum first floor elevation is 824.1 feet. 5. The petitioner shall flood-proof the garage in accordance with current Federal and State flood-proofing requirements to a minimum of the 100 year flood elevation. 6. A retaining wall shall be installed on the east side of the home to maintain existing elevation and drainage along the eastern property line. 7. The builder shall grade the property to conform with the grading plan dated 2/11/2000. 8. The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies with the grading plan dated 2/11/2000. 9. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines prior to any work done on this site. 10. The petitioner shall execute any record against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liability if damage occurs as a result of flooding. 11. Petitioner shall plant a minimum of three trees. These three trees can be a combination of over-story deciduous trees having a 2.5 inch minimum caliper at time of planting. 12. City staff must approve the removal of any additional trees. 13. The height of the structure shall not exceed 30 feet as measured from the street elevation, which is 818.54 feet. -Ak- Action Taken Letter-Bannochie Page 2 March 23, 2000 If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 763-572-3590. 0Si ely, ara Dacy, AICP Community Development Dire BD/jt Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by April 23, 2000. Z12 Concur ith action taken. C-00-72 F 2 li98392 P,-i- T 63-3o-a-�t-3z-6�8S STATE OF MINNESOTA ) CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL USE PERMIT COUNTY OF ANOKA ) CITY OF FRIDLEY ) In the Matter of: A Special Use Permit, SP #00-02 Owner: Gary P. Bannochie and Sally K. Bannochie The above entitled matter came before the City Council of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 10th day of April, 2000, on a petition for a special use permit pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property: To allow a residence to be built in a river preservation district, legally described as Lots 13 through 16, Block V, Riverview Heights, subject to easement of record, generally located at 665 Dover Street. IT IS ORDERED that a special use permit be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: Approved with 13 stipulations. See City Council meeting minutes of April 10th, 2000 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CITY OF FRIDLEY ) I, Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk for the City of Fridley, with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a special use permit with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the Jf,f day of , 2000. ♦\4'4\yl 1 DRAFTED BY: ��:bti.�".�•"�"•`�' ��;.'r City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Debra A. Skogen, City Cler ��::��'•,•f ,;� .� ,'tic� ;: (SEAL) f � THE APRIL 10 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE// Mayor Jorgenson stated that the existing chain link fence on the west side up through U iversity Avenue along the Fridley border to I-694 would be removed, and a wood fence woul be put in as a sound barrier. Mr. Flora stated that he understood that the cyclone fence along University A nue would be removed and a wall would be put up that is fifteen feet high. There would only e a wall, not the fence. Councilmember Wolfe asked how much closer to University Avenue the f ce would be. Mr. Flora stated that it would be about fifteen feet closer to University venue. Councilmember Wolfe asked if the neighbors would be allowed to a that space. Mr. Flora stated that there are gas and electric lines in that area. se of the land would be fine if it did not interfere with the utilities. Mr. Hickok stated that the City had an excellent turnout the home improvement show. This year' show was at the Mounds View Community Ce ter. They had not only remodeling information but recycling information as well. A great umber of people stopped and talked to them and picked up information on recycling and re deling. The home improvement show is held each year in the spring. Mr. Hickok said Rya Jendro, HRA Home Remodeling Advisor, encouraged anyone thinking of doing a remodeling roject at home to call him at 572-3515. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Citv Council Meeting of March 15 2 0 Mayor Jorgenson stated that on page 13, he first sentence should state that "Mayor Jorgenson stated that a wheelchair would be hard p essed to get into some of the places with the step up to the sidewalk" versus Councilmember lkcom making that statement. APPROVED CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 15, 2000 AS AMENDED. OLD BUSINESS: 1. ORDINANCE NO. 1138 AMENDING SECTIONS 205.13 205.14 205.15 205.16 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY USES AND SECTION 11.10/PERTAINING TO FEES ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT ZTA #99-02 BY THt CITY OF FRIDLE : Mr. Burns, ty Manager, stated that the ordinance makes two changes in the outdoor storage req irements for service stations/convenience stores. First, the owners and managers f these establishments may now store products within four feet of the front of their bui ings on a permanent basis. The current ordinance provides only for f THE APRIL 10 2000 MINUTES OF THE F LEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 4 "temporary" exterior storage with n definition of temporary. The second change relates to storage at the fuel pumps. Th new language does not allow the storage of products between fuel pumps. The ordi ce also allows for storage of up to 20 pound propane tanks in a manner that is c sistent with the City's Fire Code. Staff recommended Council's approval. WAIVEED THE RE AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 1138 ON THE SECOND READING 1 D ORDERD PUBLICATION. APPROVED OFF IAL TITLE AND SUMMARY ORDINANCE. NEW BUSINESS: 2. RECEIVE E MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 1 2000: RECEIV D THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCtI 15, 2000. 3. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #00-02, BY GARY AND SALLY BANNOCHIE, TO ALLOW A RESIDENCE TO BE BUILT IN A RIVER PRESERVATION DISTRICT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 665 DOVER STREET N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the petitioners are asking for a special use permit to construct a home in the Flood Fringe District at 665 Dover Street. There are no issues with this project other than a stipulation that the petitioner plant five trees on the lot to replace trees that they have removed. While the Planning Commission asked that the stipulation requiring the trees be removed, they approved the special use permit at their March 15 meeting. He asked that the original Stipulation No. 11 requiring five trees be restored. If Council approved the special use permit it would be with the tree stipulation. Staff recommended Council's approval. THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACED AFTER NUMBER 14 UNDER NEW BUSINESS. 4. EXTENSION OF A VARIANCE, VAR #99-03 BY SCOTT AND AMRIA ST. ARNOLD TO DECREASE TH RE UIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 28 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 96 SQUARE FOOT ENTRANCE FOYER GE RALLY LOCATED AT 350 IRONTON STREET N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that sta\VAR t the variance be extended one year to April 14, 2001. This varianconstruction of a 96 square foot foyer. APPROVED EXTENSION OF A VAR3. THE APRIL 10 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 33 Councilmember Bolkcom asked him if he could agree with Stipulation No. 11 and then if anymore trees are removed they would have to be replaced. Mr. Bannochie stated that there is another tree he would like to take down. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that her concern is that it looks like there will more trees removed and that he was not going to have many original trees left. Mr. Bannochie stated that they would be planting some sort of trees when they get involved in landscaping. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if there would be a privacy fence in the back. Mr. Bannochie stated that there would be. Councilmember Barnette stated that he thought Council should stay out of people's business sometimes. He was sure the petitioners will have a nice home and a nice yard and that eventually they would plant trees in the right locations. Councilmember Bolkcom asked Councilmember Barnette how he would feel if it was commercial property. Councilmember Barnette stated that if it was a commercial development it is different because this is a private property with an individual. A business is talking about more visibility in the City. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that Council would not be doing anything that they are not allowed to do. Councilmember Barnette stated that he knew that. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that communities are looking at keeping trees. Mr. Bannochie stated that the tree in the front may interfere with his driveway and might also have to come down. Councilmember Bolkcom asked how he could say that he has so many trees in his yard. Mr. Bannochie stated that it was hard to see in the photograph but there are some in the middle of the lot. Mr. Hickok stated that he could mix different types of trees and put them on the edge of the lot and add some conifers. Adding more trees would recreate some of the natural appearances that this lot once had. Mr. Bannochie stated that he just does not want another twelve trees in his yard. r 4 THE APRIL 10, 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 34 Councilmember Bolkcom stated that they are only asking for five trees. It seems several of those trees that are there presently are going to be removed. Mr. Bannochie stated that he might not take all of the trees down. Some of the ones on the back are not even on the property. Mayor Jorgenson asked how many trees are on the property. Mr. Bannochie stated that five or six trees are on his lot. Mayor Jorgenson stated that the trees that he is talking about removing that are close to the driveway may be boulevard trees. Mr. Flora stated that they could be. Mayor Jorgenson asked if the residents would need permission from the Public Works Maintenance Division to remove that tree by City ordinance. Mr. Flora stated that they can only remove it with permission if it is on City property. Mayor Jorgenson asked if the City replaces a tree when they remove one on the boulevard. Mr. Flora stated that when the City cuts down a boulevard tree, the.City replaces_it on the property. Mayor Jorgenson stated that she understands that this tree could cause problems with The Bannochie property. Trees add character to the neighborhood and provide screenage. She would like to see some stipulation that some trees are replaced on the property. They do not have to be huge trees. They could be small ornamental trees as well. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if they could compromise and plant three trees. Councilmember Billings stated that was his suggestion. He asked if Mrs. Bannochie could live with putting in three trees on the property Mrs. Bannochie stated that she is going to have a vegetable garden. Mr. Bannochie stated that he would probably plant about three or four trees, but having the City determine what he can and cannot do draws the line. Mr. Bannochie stated that the neighbors have been using this lot as a dumping ground for brush and trees. Some residents are getting irritated by some of these trees. It actually looks cleaner after removing the dead trees. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if he could live with three trees. THE APRIL 10 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 35 Mr. Bannochie stated that he would like to make that decision on his own if that is okay with Council. Councilmember Wolfe stated that this is the Bannochie's property. He thinks it will look nice, and he did not think the City should tell him what to do. Councilmember Bolkcom asked Councilmember Wolfe why he was so concerned about the Varichek's property last summer. Councilmember Wolfe stated right from the beginning that Mr. Steve Varichek could cut every tree down on his property. Mr. Varicheck kept the trees because he knew as a realtor that his properties worked for him and kept as many trees as possible. Councilmember Bolkcom asked Mr. Bannochie if he would plant three trees on his property. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to approve Special Use Permit, SP #00-02. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to amend Stipulation No. 11 as follows: Petitioner shall plant a minimum of three trees. These three trees can be a combination of over-story deciduous trees having a 2.5 inch minimum caliper at time of planting and to coniferous trees at least 6 feet in height at time of planting. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. Councilmember Barnette stated that they should add Stipulation No. 13 as follows: The petitioner shall sign a combination form, combining the property into one tax statement prior building permit issuance. Mr. Bannochie stated that they have done that. Councilmember Billings stated that it was not necessary then. Mayor Jorgenson asked for a vote on the amended stipulation. UPON A VOICE VOTE, MAYOR JORGENSON, COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS VOTING AYE, COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE AND COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE VOTING NAY, MAJOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A THREE TO TWO VOTE. Mayor Jorgenson asked for a vote on the main motion. UPON A VOICE VOTE, MAYOR JORGENSON, COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS VOTING AYE, COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE AND COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE VOTING NAY, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A THREE TO TWO VOTE WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1) SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED BY A SOILS ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 17 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE PRIOR TO POURING OF THE FOUNDATION THE APRIL 10 2000 MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PAGE 36 FOOTINGS; 2) ALL NECESSARY PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION; 3) SIDING AND LANDSCAPING SHALL BE USED TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT OF FLOOD-PROOFING MATERIALS; 4) THE PETITIONER SHALL SUBMIT AN ELEVATION CERTIFICATE AS PART OF A VERIFYING SURVEY PRIOR TO THE FOUNDATION BEING CAPPED, WHICH SHALL VERIFY THAT THE MINIMUM FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION IS 824.1 FEET; 5) THE PETITIONER SHALL FLOOD-PROOF THE GARAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE FLOOD-PROOFING REQUIREMENTS TO A MINIMUM OF THE 100 EYAR FLOOD ELEVATION; 6) A RETAINING WALL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE HOME TO MAINTAIN EXISTING ELEVATION AND DRAINAGE ALONG THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE; 7) THE BUILDER SHALL GRADE THE PROPERTY TO CONFORM WITH THE GRADING PLAN DATED FEBRUARY 11, 2000; 8) THE VERIFYING SURVEY SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE GRADING COMPLIES WITH THE GRADING PLAN DATED FEBRYARY 11, 2000; 9) EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE WEST, SOUTH, AND EAST LOT LINES PRIOR TO ANY WORK DONE ON THIS SITE; 10) THE PETITIONER SHALL EXECUTE AND RECORD AGAINST THE PROPERTY A HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT RELEASING THE CITY FROM LIABILITY IF DAINIAGE OCCURS AS A RESULT OF FLOODING; 11) PETITIONER SHALL PLANT A MINIMUM OF FIVE TREES. THESE FIVE TREES CAN BE A COMBINATION OF OVER-STORY DECIDUOUS TREES HAVING A 2.5 INCH MINIMUM CALIPER AT PLANTING AND CONIFEROUS TREES AT LEAST SIX FEET IN HEIGHT. AT THE TIME OF PLANTING; 12) STAFF MUST APPROVE THE REMOVAL OF ANY ADDITIONAL TREES; AND 13) THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL NOT EXCEED 30 FEET AS MEASURED FROM THE STREET ELEVATION, WHICH IS 818.54 FEET. 5. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD C NTRACTS FOR THE 2000 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT UPGRADES PROJE T NO. 328: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this is the ixth and final year of the current playground equipment upgrade program. Parks included i this year's program include Community, Flanery, Locke, Jubilee and Creekridge. Bids were o ened on March 22. Neighbors in the areas served by the parks were afforded an opportunity to re .ew the various proposals. The Parks and Recreation subsequently considered citizen input and rec ended that the bids for all parks but Creekridge be awarded to Flanagan Sales. These amoun come to a total of$113,000. They also recommend that the bid for Creekridge Park be awarded to Minnesota/Wisconsin Playgrounds, Inc. in the amount of$21,000. Staff recommen d Council's approval. Mayor Jorgenson stated that the playground equipment had b n removed from the capital improvements budget. They approved the budget for the year 2000. There was an appropriation to the budget to allow for the equipment. She asked where the funds ould come from to pay for this equipment. Mr. Burns stated that it would come from the Parks Capital Improvement fu d. I ABSTRACT " Receipt# I ❑ Certified Copy �/ , 0 v Cate Mailed DOCUMENT NO. 1498302 . 0 ABSTRACT Cate/7ime: S Coc.Order ,� of fTax Liens/Releases ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA ❑ Muiti-Co Occ Tax Pd I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT WAS FILED IN THIS OFFICE ./by: Pins: �'7�� FOR RECORD ON MAY 02 2000 Recordability'Celgs: Transfer ❑ New Desc. AT 5 : 00 PM AND WA DU YSECORDED. G FEES AND TAXES IN THE AMOUNT OF $1� ' �" PAID. Fling Fees: (l1 S 11 Civision ❑ GAC RECEIPT NO. 2000034410 'Nell Certificate ❑ Status ❑ Def.Spec Received this Date: EDWARD M.TRESKA Anoka County Recorder ❑ Other XNo Change ANOKACOUNTY PROPERIY.TdXADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES Notes: BY JCiD DEPUTY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES F 1c. jj nf,rwGT" 1 r f 4e