LS69-02 Form #5-68 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
CITY OF FRIDLEY
FOR CITY USE ONLY
s Applicant►s Name
APPLICANT: .c ,,i.�� //��'�-, s f ;��' C'C—
Lot
_ Lot Split C�9 D"�,,�3�ay�'
a► Street City Zip Code Date Filed;
TELEPHONE # /�y„- 3 7� = Sl6 f s Fee: Rece�.pt 2�.
o q Home Business Council Action:D@U
o PROPER REMARKS:
,� TY OWNERS)
+1 �r. �d
f a -P .-►
3 0
O C
ADDRESSES) /4
N a a Street City �T— Zip Code
.0 m o 'r4
0 m 0 Street City Zig Code
b °' -4 TELEPHONE #(S)
Home Business
mw 0 �
Property Location on Street
or Exact Street Address (IF ANY)__T_� S-/ 7f
w
U
Legal Description
of J Proprty:
SS�� r rr
=
44
Reason for Lot Split:
Total Area of Property sq. ft, Present Zoning Classaficat ,pn a
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this application are true and
correct.
DATE: — /i SIGNATURE
BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Se* reverse side for additional iastr w*b1eY�I
PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration -
Remarks;
PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration
Reaarko:
1
3
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE
1 , Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley)
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of $15.00 for each original lot being split.
3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a
month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of
the Subcommittee.
4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels
along with the new pare-.'F -;rest- '. w. *h ai: struct.aree tied in.
The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department
for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the
second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant
with minutes of the Planning Commission.
C, The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday
of the month.
7, The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for hie signature.
9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TA)M3 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
`( 7) L.S. #69-02-03-04-05:
Smith & Anderson, Inc.
L. 4, 6, 11, 13 Block 3,
N1/4 CORNER Adams Street Addition
l Sfc. 13
_—AVENUE- - ,N.E.-
Go J,3o s. a 40 = se t .o Go t7f 1
6 / z9 z Z9 2 29 Z
1 K 29 2 29 2
28 3' - 8 3 18 3 28 3
17 A 27 4 17 4 27 4 27 ¢
l¢ g 2G ► 26 S 26 5 z 9 2s S _
23 O 2S 6 2S 6 Zf f ZS 6
Z4 Z4 _7 ¢ 7
8 Z3 B Z
/2 wi S I Z2 9 ZZ 3F 22 9 22 9 9
Z/ .
/o z/ /0 2/ /o
Ze to // 20 W 20 // zo ---
'M"f
W /
sr ° B /g 3
/7 /4 i /7 /4 Y i 17 /¢
z
t AVENUE s N.E. ;
22 °
0 ! 1f 2 29 2- F
9 2 2 _ Z
° 2B 3 28 g B 3 Z 3 1d 3 jG
a 2/ Z 27 4 17 I
12 4 27 4 O 17 4 27 4 P°bk .
$ Pf S Zs -' 8f S N ?f S 26 S �QI
3 ° i — - - «"
Z3 6 Z f f 6 23 Jr Z3 - i
° PB 1 uJ 24 7 W z4 � 24 7 W : yf 7 �1
;Z 13 B 23 /
B O 23 B
9
W W 2z 1 Z i 22; 9 Z 2z 22 X t1
v Z m /Be Z 2/ /o , Z7 /O 2/ 1/ /o ZO
6 ¢'. zo // 20 // zo // zo //
i7., /�// •q /.1 /Z /9 /Z /9 /2 /9 /L /9 /2 m
N a /6 i /7 /4 t /7 /4 t /7 /¢ : /7 /¢ /7
� /4 ni 9 w /�., w nrr. p a t',t' ! 30 ! s•• ^� , 2 ,.
ti ° /7 « Z Z w /7 2 Z 2e 3 ,4 . >t .
Ar O 2' 4 s g 59TH AVE. N.E.
((�.p , ,
S W '+ 3• - 0 3�
N.E. /s 4 ,_' rJ ¢" ti-
N.E.
' 2s c j 9 tea. o 5 4 3 �.. 4, •.�`\_
_ W Z4 7 ti
'` 5 ~8a` A0 1 W 23 v >r ;�f�� 1� �ie3' 5•' t
�. — 1 " 6 y 3 9 AaL_ —�' 22 q ., .r N °. D 0 '■ /o�✓ /zR :6 1�0�
a 9 `� /2 ti i /3 N rof 6 2/ /c ..nl •a . 7 g 9 // ! v /3 {
tau— ya �t f 7 ,
.w ° I /.Z 7 r ° /.Z I' 7 Zo / 2
e
f-:3 {} � /9 /Z tic_ MARIGOLD TERRACE
B N •, -
/ st 7S >3 u s >s •cc st , �� >
;. /f, !S a . 4
6 5 " � �
G
/i
s• �
H----AVEs�a.°.r-�L-. O -
2 /7"* /B /9 20 2l
a >t » 24,5
58TH AVENUE
'ff•�'G. 6 5 I /o $ /O 5 I '+. a, ve • a'• q -F /; 26, '
9
7-0 B1 7
i /G / :/B.. / 5 R ,• N.
/a/sl/s/G! z - Z I �tf..°
„ /f 3 i' 3 /3 N B 9 •1 /O !/ti /4
/z s i2 s /a ` p HELENE PLACE N
. .. .. I•. !/ f !r 6 'S . N .. c. � » r �n n , n j at c•�° •", :+ /.•t �
/z/3 /i 0/f /0 7 i0 .7 O ► In 2/ B
9 7
O n
NT R
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO . _____
ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
o Denotes Iron:
0
CL
Bearings Show.
N89022'W c W Scale- I inch=
63 North line of Lot 15 -North line of Lot 2X60 April, 1969
�� --128.97Meas•. `' -128.97Meas.-• O
- 129.0 Plat-- -, 129.0 plat LOT SU r
M
12 128.97 c
0
-- o ► I Land r.
:> a
0 0 o y' '3
TRACT A _j TRACT B x
W N o c 3 CO
,v6 128.98 128.98 N
Co
d E
%D cv NOT INC U DED "a
128.9$-- 128.9-8 p -
M
WD T R ACT C TRACT ~ O
O
F— 128.99 128.99 O OW Co __
Z
. _
(VC
TRACT E � T RACT F `0 w Q .,
Ly
t 17-9.0 129.0 1 L T RACT G �2 T RACT H 60
m 57th 1 S 89° 22' E �I E. °
South line of Block 3 AVE. N
rti.rid � i F.• � � 1 !_'*A;
LJ .iiVlli 'A .� i_r1i�. �_ '� :._ :7 i'i� .- .'� •_ • ' i-lei `.
I 60 _
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IN AG"0R_i)PNCE itITH THE FROVI3l C-' - • .L Y ;�, !::';:;LSC:A
ANCKI ANu STFTE G"r' �i;C;SC'1 A TO 'a iT s
LOTS 2, 3, 5s 6., 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 AND
April 10 , 1969
Smith z, Anderson, Inc .
912 - 40th Ave . N.E.
itiinneapolis , .klinn. 55421
ATTETr'TION : 1,4r. Ronald E. Smith
RE: Lot Snlits #69-02-03-04705—
Dear i�lr. Smith
On March 17 , 1969 City Council denied your Lot
Split requests and asked that the property he platted.
As indicated in the enclosed minutes , the reason
for this denial was the complexity of the description.
No further action will be taken on this matter
until you sut;,nit a neva request for platting .
Yours very truly,
Engineer Assistant
DC/njf
FW,
qty\n
'�;i ` W. {' Y'Y Yom' '<'siJ'-+- 1,,YrS _ ':1tII$ T`. Sfry 1 xtl•Y at -0' ".$'
f.
i yre 7
a•- "�w t y,ar w a"� si' � 3 ,a 1 ,. s ti r3.frw e�,. ��
r .,,�c.,: ,»�'� +c �.�"'" •tr'�;.�'' iw« +4 = x 4 ^�,#t� t- � ' �>c � �" *apTa
3'.*4°� +�+`�'t�r �'•i+ �"� t� �c 'w� .� � p,yl ��.'��'�s �' �r�'�` ,a i✓'s ����` �,} �
r .fi} Sa s+'[f• 'r .� ",z'" cy ,t�"
>• '' �' ark"�v.;p"�+` � - +i-' s: ,,"+RX'fiw', yd% 3 '�S� :`�,tp ,�"inr"n •'�
? >t; wi � ''
.i
R,
V.•`R }i,.rK \ .•. �p rop `"1'R+!'fY J� j1' 'ri` 4 f✓. Y'A`, 7a ` �• _
+. ate'!^r •ya
gSt >eti: x.`�- y� ""��" �'y.'�, g X'r R`F 'r'•f �+ :x, r ,.'"Y* ci•`Y `lw
� v�
n. •�' J'X' � v�L '�' tri-�A��+ �p {�. '� V� S ,� Y"g "�Z1�'� � .,v � i�s",
y, +r°^' r � �'F' i '�'r M.k,..' xb�1»yy,'Ya rLT'tTA
a:t� a, ,. r v .'� ': I L„H�kw, a�; rat +�a' tri°+"' '}r.'u a�, ''kc'
Y "i
AT
(,+n-.y. k wt et t• .9an+� ', ',� � a � r ..k.�',:�+'"'�"t �;4,�' ;,. �1�,,w� t �'-,r�
s � y, +s+Qir of y �'n.. �SFb x+` Y -,.� +yf L!L :l' r `�•
�4ir' sR � a��`.,moz k"�a,� 't•-���9y-f4F:e % .M:'�+ *ro ',+' r t>��'���` � i4�' �.s.
f5
T
•,'� �```�•�` � "�° .:: r �� ��� ; ,� �
•�•=' -+'2rs*P- S ' Ge •j ,�,l'a :.may a d:. • tr< s* s'Pp3`l,{ t'Vy.y -.�r: � .. d •y N.+� s�4`.. ti ` "
+��' v°.¢lgz4 .j
- .r,�''r"".�.a,-��ysw,i n'�.�tk'Y'.� .�.�'�y �i"R�•i'� � A t `'^v� �_�aF^� 'i+yR r'y�t'vm L
�,
�YSi ''iN
'�._ c '"• < v� - ,t,6, :r l 'Sv ,� ,•. .y kY r.:.. ..s`h 4'sJf'
a* i 1
k�
Wit
T,- '" �"]dx. may., �r3 ,�` t �, z� .^•.�*,�'� � �i is '�'�:.� 3 7�' �`�� i _,��5 W-3
1 y�
raj '
c- .'G�re t �' ,!a}� a. k#4z �i� -'a s"f% ':�'a'ky�� � ;�+'+.`z�`s�r"�,�y't•*Y•,q+..,�:r ^�� ,
43
�r
v5 { b-l4kw<,H Ma ';� 6q.43
:.f :sz' '-,,r,t5+'-�v+ ,1�'':�;�@x; 4 -+ry, ix Fyt''"^'w�r, .,` ,4�,,,,�• :\"5l 'fit.t'." „' 4 C' - �' •”`
4
q fit. .X 5./ I 1
RF.t is <*st ��' o x': '�''•' '°- ~f a� +^-.• � Y" '�
QUM
'� `�'^ �t`a. �;yaY,v,.s t��=` h C �e5 ^ >e�"•.z.e�'�+' Y` ��'�+�.�''� au.'
y x„.
v ,
� �-� '�.,. Y. �� - 5 '� y k4t ,y<, :'�$ '«' T �' t+' k � y� "�h♦ �� -. y -. 'a'. .' p�y'�ar��_Y�`�
� g'+t i-. ;� � c� t!�,��y� S.r fir} w-'<,,�� >�;,•t t� s ,, "" '�-a l t't �.w, .s
-
�M h �..,}q �i?��•a���'1:� ��x S � �. �',"�*�,`' y r & a y"�.v r �a ' y.�y � �'i 4aay,�
k � .. y 3 � � .. � r-” `..a�u.X$ .'Vs�y�',t�^'-A�" �"t t is '�.acfi�"ro ��� s w"k, � �' ✓
sus u C ro, ♦ h y
rGY� � .abd,r*<a .kite y, *";'c. rx TdfY may., n r �fogtlt
IA
��1�,�,A>�'.« +. .rpt '+�`. ' sz %;r.�r r�, ,� ,' � �� '^r � i+ � ,�'t„.•a#.4�.�ti.� �.� t � � �r.
s r �' ftKsXt i'7`fit.s�.s�-'camf »y' '£•s .E" 'S'�a1aC f; z-_lieh�Fi .,.
t �Y'`'d't�?�''�C .°Y 1✓{'a y�,Y S+� .'s � D r ;t � r�+� k 3 .'
OU
x %�"t. �\ ��vr�':� t� •' ` rye �4 aa'fi s��' r � r¢� �_' t�?r ggra 5��t�:+ +
+1 „i.� G'ySp�'tr:'M.� ~��'!'�.� �,2•r :,9a fd xis - -Ar',t Y `k'�'" pl�a,' 5�„A�'':. � R�.grF':. � •. ,i'q+'� �-
'�:,, �_:SID. �• 1`S+7 �` Y`"'� 3`=5 � a •+� �' t 35t
n
m
�E� �+N�€YS 'kyi''� rf" :.\`�-i a ,; ''t�.,r � _ �& '�YYt,h 1 ���,r,� r. ♦�-.} ���.!� �t�� .,�
�Qti„ '_����"� ,,m� 4"'+ �..,a. �` �r�>'" �.-'c _�t*{x r*T`J";ss. -rY"av F ._ F T��ar x � •,ac '�..Jy�E!` s(.c '
:. r'l` .r ak.. � n � •;� - > ass 'rn �t'a h > .t '�4i'.' + ,sa, a '` +�+1'v ' �'S aLb1 ..z n"{E�'.'= 3 - � tyy «
I
May 19, 1.959
Smith & Anderson, Inc.
912 40th Avenue N.E.
11inn"poli8, Minn. 55421
Re: Registered Land Survey #69-01
Cent leen:
Please find enclosed the easements for streets and
utilities necessary in the Adams Street Addition.
Would you please have the Sorenson't sign the documents
D and return then to us with the owner's e4y, of the Torrens Certi-
ficate. We will theta record and return the owner's certificate
to you.
Yours very truly
DARF= CLARK
M,IGINEERIitG ASSISTAIIT
DC:ob
Enc.
ie '' �.B�r-t .. •.qx. `d`'� „�x`�, ++, ;�s�t'cs; �.,,n 1,'f c � r y, 8 x•
,� �. •--•�.r
ay"+4
tpi
e.
`'r
,r` �._:y' ;'as'..� ,. .Y�p�•'vy ����..y�
"11
� ^ '. aF^s trc .j,"`bi r C� .. suy,. skc� y;� .: ° .y •� ,� t�'.� moi)' Yr'16+"� "�!t«�.�
}:,. ��n+bt.� a+�ts tr.� �•�'�,.� f z �"3qr 4t .�• s*a ?`3 tt ' r'}"�•',�,•�c� T :_rY�' "�'� � �;;
`:'c6+ -u� 1 �•'.:�v��#" ad: a h. t t�a--.� i �:3 * �Z � �'pt t'Ys},t_.� �'„„���{ • i t '� •� -�i�'a�t{ n�. `'xs at ,ti�'`'�x'' 'iri-'S fi'
.�,'�R'�¢�� �'+p�da �i}k, a r� •'�'y"y� -�� �-d'�"4t`.� .�� s�id � � -`fit ,.c�_
' p •9 .�i y- :�.y^ ”,9�`{+y� �1,'�:L'�p4�. 4h' d 'L —Y {y 0 ,�y&:
.W �r__� '*R.'I '�•" Yqv, S� � 4>���(� "'i'h� � {K ��J ..4 atl l� r,��lr�h*'
g xy �. {. i�fir,;e,�' ,v � ��" �,d''� ! ,��"SA ).,F .� .;� � h�,t'tr :r �':r�' � •!` � a
•,,., �. +4 _ r,'. �����,r- .a. h. -f-Yk�6. f''� ry i,Yr' "�"' - nr r _w� :# r.
'-�"i`A �g - � } `�'i+k �� 'r x s'fFx a{N.•r• 1 ,a `c t,� 'N4
W
�:. � S'e'45h � ��Y ♦!� i tl'� v '' a `.>'s +. e a �� � h+ x' ,1' Sr
a�� a^ `� �'.�,. c •{rg "`` �� w�'SF�,�`,' ,� i�r'�,�ti�' t�,. +a�:.. '"' - ���:-�,t3,�"'�*'y�`i�.}>• �`.
'). "4 K 4"'��� � '' "�y�t*#'w .�i �a �-�� i�� ��`� �3 "`' �i•�t',�,` �''�.'^.'�"r FY*�- t�'t�y�"+"F'y��.{.�c-.
Ae
-E, r. lea tai � "x ,�3..�+. C '�'i. .+..q 4- � + �1�,, €•''��^'`�''t� .
4 � f- x_--�`� �^} � 9 `� � �tf �'�` ��y:."?� 'W. 1:k'e, s- s• {�.,�. r>x, r r.# �¢. "E#y � ? .dtf � `.
.-3 'rF � �� {, '.J � "',+ ' +Y '.M `�"-r tlsM� C .k, ,� ��- i '�y..' •thk,l,,z; ,x`^',3wgyt ,', tL 'sXSa y„
�r �: ,, t _ ,5 ,,�� <c it...�. v.� :• �� k"� �#.� ��yrr`sy :t yt $`�� ,�• �+ r��
Vi
i�w7'. "�'��":?.t, g ,y',a. }r �j�(!, _ ,�L`�is, # �r `� *�--�'y,�s,'�`1'• ' 3s�.�',.s�`'.
�r T* :r,.-.u a'. e"t�.:u`�''� riJ•�' �^h��y w :. $ dS"i`:,s{ �yst
I ;'�Y a fid.a, � Y � � _•µ��..4
,. p�Y, �� :7 �F 1 � "°+ � �. t aw r 7L4 � t.s.' > � ° 4i-^• a ��. Ste.
-
'I
`�'. :✓ � s4 '� r " �x s,�s`� �"� 9 x3'��,4�3,�s""„ Sri s.'� ''ar
� "�.#•,I.• r �K �.rD.t R"v4< .�.r¢S a#��g A�+, `v - �e� . R��.���"'S
O
_ M1 TY.,M .yg..�P.�+�j 1 4 1i ti C i r �P f �!f ��•.d B�MZ Y'€' 'r} � p �� ��"..
� � .P it� � �iy h ri +y'' ♦:�i+. �f'f.f�'��•�d,,y,'�i�l,.'�R� �i�a 'i
r,,� .t>� � ,, a ¢'8 FiY.^ _..�+a'it'�a wr-�`iax�e�`"p"' ��6"x'S,;ji �.. .✓w.a
�f ;� - y` � e'KrSn �is l,r Ka Y-:- '" �. ^k '��'`` F�,4�' � :x"'�r '?r• s.�.4r :+� r ty,
y ,,a a�. ":g, �-., ` s�'r �'r� r-�� � �y ?1'�«t+R.t .;k� j��, „�w5���� sr i y %;!•x` � ,� 4"; s,3�.
'�� �:a vtti^ r� + � d `�d ,A�6• ac' '1`x ,: ♦� ,�,. a g.` st w, t$ ,•
�i'�;,A- 'k vrc�a�y ��': rD .7; d {F,,..t,�ti y, :� Sy n:��„*+• .[L* �;t t�X�'� `�'�i' '!s .... �
��"'� 4• + ay,�,y.w° �'`` ,":. P r moi' w�i 1i .x`sI� M �`tFF.„, `' -
.��.',���
}r � ,•' �'�'. ,erg �i� �'§' `s yr- .[ ,r6 �+'•g- a �#�f z� � ,y'�+vec 't '� �•''` f s3 e, .c+ ,�, ..,,p'�`��• S Fg,� ,y •�'
� .. {�•"
WN d 'T
_.
..... :7Fr�rLr
$ a ..,Vy'4..r-rte ss 3x^4 r1 YR,r t r x 4 riS 14r' 4'i f xs )'i 4 '!, fd,..:, y r Gsr d•�^.: 1
q Y't a `' t`s ,, d°' c �j y 'Y, ` ..L „' '°" -,, zK� }•-�`+!,•-q ,�+a:a r Y
-�Fy
gs,3�--� Sx xb ,;#� A`n-�-1^ ✓� =T L„� .z^d+;"°d�
"gps�� � -- 4 � '� a dr k�V �' ,#.•f.6.-`�., � r� � 'k `� �. ti Y �:�4 �, a..• � - +.1 �� '�i�s'�,�� �' :1f ,*�iw-.�a�•r� z
k" Sia. ,'r'-y , t s�:; ` 2' °4 e:''�,.i 8 .x Ar 5...p is 'Lwa'•,t an j 'aid j'' -,• ryx t )C
i .�s '� yy,,,, M ..tr 3�: i• �?` + T t �. 7ce a'"i> qty' ,spy '.� ,i. �v �
R`!S•INYC„ rw;tAYa a�C^tPw'7e teratar :1yw �'rirtn.
4$ � r`' F4c f' r". ^wbz` €ir '
A 4 � d Y��r i .i�-+�� �4�; tx'r z:_z a�4£�2"�i °�..: kss"`•y -r w '�r �5„"yl`> t �r�.�-'x9r- A tiy:k� ���-�m d��'3kia� t����
aqF* v - � ��r }-��.`"�b,�`+¢. s t' .9,. � s.ii.. a`,,y ��� is y..n.•r���4 �;;}�.t ,y3.:.�.,p$.� � y������°�
ck, 'fat.s. � ��)cr��s�..w r 3k � ��� ^ �l�h� -.� � t� ati -.. <;✓•,�� '�'� >,, x ,,, +,� R�: ��,. � .,,� W�',
r t�
n;�t 1� tA.}t�"r 'n,�.- �, :_��'«>tk� 4 M+>�y aJ'' r. e . `x'.4 Ors r'"\t �.'' � a�s^"�'t.} `�'p+• r h�:.
�?"i,t�aG� f w� a �,�e,rh s� �a W b �l.k-,� 4' x '+P"`a�^x t>�'' ', �'•'r .a t "` s� q r t "�'' e
ha`~ ,� � r �s -? � ) �s �r �Bents .rq�!�s� r3,r� a ` d� � .f,,, � y�, t ��, . r �
Fxw "`
! f y'L •+,-�-rf "" � 1=5}!a "{L`4� t�s'� �-'4�y, 1 w -•Yf1� �' �.�i, .t���.'�2'h$' �'Pt F y��i, '..� '�
�
INI
y t v
{tpt r_'r,
` r 2 �,t ,ra c y, k ,,., 2 t� a �„akt�t R�`p„S- q•w ? �v
t Z7, t S �.' -f ?���r�'Bn^ s �O�` ��° ,!",�tM •. hYu -=c'� F; � e ... �. �•�
't" r � : '�' �" ,��C°i dvi § '•�,per '� 'E"�4" ���� Y�' '' �! 9.s4> .x� �"''5E: s � '� y,,,ey�.'Nx fit.a3 ��,' +y q,r �,
�* � l _ "`,r�^,y` ?o• l i.',�a'1 ar -.�" 'y «a t�1•R. yy�. ���� .. wn ". GL >s�r 5 'il.+� .. n �k
t•,K � '��� � ���Ly,$b"` C� �.��.',y r•°,'� �y N � r '!yk-h yY� h �e -fT" .:3 „�est w"r'-t¢� �~ .ny may, -r s"-x� v y r.
.0
.i• ♦A*4" F.��i�y.^�'f' - � '�r+���¢S^a�7 Y� k` s!i ,o u�-'. s x y `h�'"'Pr"WY`�4��xs'' � t �� ttt"y l•., y� �"
J ,
Plats & Subdivisions-
Streets & Utilities Subcommittee March 6, 1969 Page 1
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Jensen.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Zeglen, Batterson, Crowder, Jensen, Myhra
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Engineering Assistant Darrel Clark
ORDER OF AGENDA:
Because the first three petitioners were not present, Chairman Jensen
suggested the meeting begin with Item #4 which then becomes Item #1.
1. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-06-07-08, GUNDER R. ANDERSON: Lots 1, 2, 3,
Block 2, Riverwood Manor.
Mr. Anderson was present and explained the reason for the request was
that he had Lot 1 and 3 surveyed because he was going to build a house on
Lot 1. Then the people he was going to build for decided on Lot 3, so he
put the foundation in on Lot 3 five feet from the property line for proper
setback and had the house partly up when a couple of old stakes were found.
He called the surveyor who rechecked it and found a mistake had been made
in the surveying. As a result of the error, the house was 4 feet on the
other person's lot, making a total error of 9 feet. In order to correct
this, there was an exchange of 9 feet on the three lots with no change in
the overall measurements of the lots.
Mr. Myhra asked if this affected the easements in any way and was told
it did not.
Chairman Jensen said it was possible there would be an awful lot of
stakes in the ground, the older stakes and the new stakes, and suggested
the older ones be preserved by pounding them down below the new ones.
All the papers in connection with this lot split, such as letter of
approval by the owners of Lot 2, necessary quit claim deeds and survey
drawing of lot descriptions were in order.
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Crowder, that the Plats & Subdivisions-
Streets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend approval to the Planning Commis-
sion the Lot Splits, #69-06-07-08 as described by survey drawing received
March 6, 1969. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-02-03-04-05, SMITH & ANDERSON INC. : Lots 4,
6, 11 and 13, Adams Street Addition.
The Engineering Assistant explained that Lots 4 and 13, 6 and 11 are
being split, and combined with other lots, will make building sites
Parcels K and J, M and L and H and I as indicated on the drawing. The
Plats.& Subs.-Str. & Util. Subconanittee - r;-:rch 6, 1969 Page 2
. purpose of this lot split request is to give a 20 foot sewer easement and
still retain the legal size lots. They are combining lots, and here again
the descriptions are fairly simple. The descriptions on the land survey
are clear, but the changes take a little study.
Mr. Anderson said they had to make the lots larger in order to take
in the easement, otherwise they would end up with a 20 foot strip with no
building on it and no one would own it.
Darrel Clark said the easement falls in line with 57th Place. There
is only one comment and that is the "walk easement" should be termed "street
easement".
Mr. Crowder asked if they could not build if they did not get this split.
Mr. Anderson said if they give 10 feet for a street on the South which
the City needs, he would have two 70 foot lots and one 120 foot lot. He
is attempting to level it out to make usable lots of substantial size.
Mr. Myhra asked if it would have any bearing on utilities, and secondly,
does it resolve some kind of legal descriptions, and are we actually
improving the building situation?
Mr. Anderson replied that they had to put laterals in. The laterals
on one lot were put in wrong in the first place. They are putting their
own services in. He did not want to get involved with a vacant lot.
Parcels G and F are not involved. Washington Street is not in but the ease-
ments are already there. Water is in Washington, and he planned to take
the sewer off the easement into the alley.
The Engineering Assistant said water would be no problem, the water-
main is in Washington and 7th Street. All lots North of the easement are
served by sewer. A manhole could be installed over the sewer line and a
short stub down the alley. We may have to double up and extend the
Washington line also, but there is no problem in serving this area as it is
a short run.
MOTION by Crowder, seconded by Zeglen, that the Plats & Subdivisions-
Streets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend approval to the Planning Commission.
of Lot Split, L.S. #69-02-03-04-05, of Lots 4, 6, 11, and 13 as described on
the drawing received March 6, 1969 identified as Parcels from H to M. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
3. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT: P.S. #69-02, AMBER OAKS, DAVID HUBERS: Lot 4,
Auditor's Subdivision #92.
Mr. David Hubers and Mr. Norman Dalberg were present to discuss the
request.
The Engineering Assistant said he had called Julian Johnson, who was
platting the land south of this request. He had not been able to get any
. place with the people to the south of his plat. He thought he might have
to develop his plat as originally planned, and he had no objection going
on the Planning Commission.
This problem started back in 1962 when the Worrels wanted to plat their
land. He came in with several different proposals. No interest was shown
glannIag Commission Meeting, - March 13, 1969 Page 7
Ohio called Mobil Corporation. It has been their intention to eventually
bring a rezoning petition and now they want to build, so this has been
brought to a head. The only parties who would object would be the Bonanza
people and no word has been received from them.
Chairman Erickson brought up the letter received from Larsen's Mfg.
Company stating they would like to go on record as supporting this change.
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Commission
receive the letter dated March 10, 1969 from the Larsen's Manufacturing
Company, 7241 Commerce Lane, Fridley, Minnesota 55432 signed by William L.
Fudge, President. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
Because of conflict of interests, Chairman Erickson withdrew from
action and William Jensen took the gavel.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning
Commission close the public hearing of the rezouing request, ZOA #69-05,
Commerce Park Investment, Robert A. C'uzzy � ' LCIz 26 pnd 27, Block 2,
Commerce Park to be rezoned from C-1 to CR-2. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye except Chairman Erickson abstaining, the motion carried.
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Commission
approve the rezoning request, ZOA #69-05, Commerce Park Investment, Robert
A. Guzy, of Lots 26 and 27, Block 2, Commerce Park to be rezoned from C=l
(local business areas) to CR-2 (office service and limited business), as
they feel it is an excellent proposal for this particular area, it is
restricted to the north by Bonanza building and other limitations. There
was no negative action by anyone in the area concerned. The letter from
the Larsen Metal Fabricators stated they approved the rezoning request.
Upon a voice vote, Chairman Erickso- abstaining, the motion carried.
Chairman Erickson returned to the chair.
5. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-02-03-04-05, SMITH & ANDERSON. INC. : Lots 4,
6, 11 and 13, Adams Street Addition.
Mr. Smith was present and explained that due to an easement which ran
through one of the lots, and the way it would come out, they would have a
strip of land that could not be used. They wanted to include it in the lot,
It would be used as part of a lot instead of losing a strip out of the lot,
Mr. Jensen said that the Subcommittee recommended approval because they
felt he was making more desirable building sites. The descriptions that
would be formulated later on would be better understood. They have talked
about utilities before the Subcommittee and there seems to be no problem
there.
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Commission
recommend to Council approval of the Lot Split Request, L.S. #69-02-03-0445,
Smith & Anderson, Incorporated, of Lots 4, 6, 11 and 13, Adams Street Additign,
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
REGULAR COUNCIL MELTING OF MARCH 17, 1969 PAGE 5
4. REZONING REQUEST BY COMMERCE PARK INVESTMENT, ROBERT A GUZY (ZOA #69-05) :
Lots 26 $ 27, Block 2, Commerce Park. Rezone from C-1 to CR-2.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to set the Public Hearing date for the Rezoning
Request by Commerce Park Investment for April 7, 1969. Seconded by Councilman
Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the
motion carried.
5. LOT SPLIT REQUEST BY SMITH AND ANDERSON, INC. (L.S. #69-02-03-04-05) :
Lots 4, 6, 11, & 13, Block 3, Adams Street Addition.
I .
The City Engineer explained that- the purpose of these Lot Splits is to divide
the land into buildable lots. He pointed out that it was hoped that this land
would be replatted. If the road pattern stay the same, there could be some
heavy assessments on some of the lots.
Councilman Harris asked if there were not homes being built now on 7th Street.
The City Engineer said yes there were. Councilman Sheridan asked if there were
utilities on Washington Street. The City Engineer said yes and added that the
lot splits result in combining two 40 foot lots, then shifting the whole area
to allow for right of way needed. Councilman Samuelson asked if it would not be
better to vacate the whole plat and make a new registered plat of this area.
This would allow for better descriptions to be made of the land. This new
entity could then be made up into the hard shell form.
It was agreed by the Council to set this aside until about 8:30 as Mr. Smith
had indicated that he would tryto come to the Meeting but could not arrive
v,
until about 8.30 P.M.
6. LOT SPLIT REQUEST BY GUNDER R. ANDERSON (L.S. #69-06-07-08) : Lots 1, 2,
& 3, Block 2, Riverwood Manor
The City Engineer explained that this Lot Split is requested as an error was
found on the survey. It is a split of only a few feet. By granting the lot
split, proper side yards would be obtained. The City Attorney added that the
house was about half built when the error was discovered and that he had seen
the instruments and he could foresee no problems. Councilman Samuelson com-
mented that he did not feel that the Lot Split would cause the City any dif-
ficulties, but it might with the mortgage companies.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to concur with the Planning Commission and grant
Mr. Gunder Anderson the Lot Splits. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried.
7. LOT SPLIT REQUEST BY GEORGE L. WALQUIST (L.S. #69-01) : North 100 feet of
Lot 4, Herwal 2nd Addition
The City Engineer pointed out that there was a letter from the owners of the
proposed pet clinic included in the Agenda concering getting sewer into this
area. He said that the north part of Lot 4 will be used for parking by the
Funeral Home.
Mr. Walquist said that he did not wish to develop the back of the lot at this
time. He said that he did not need water to serve the back of the lot, and that
he could get water from the water line on T.H #65.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 17, 1969 PAGE 6
Councilman Samuelson asked if this split would give adequate area on the south
one half of the lot to put in a good building if desired in the future. Mr.
Walquist said that it would be 150' X 250' and felt that was adequate. He
explained that the parking requirements for the Funeral Home has forced him to
request this Lot Split. Councilman Samuelson said that he could see no pro-
blem. The City Engineer said that utilities are needed to serve these parcels.
Mr. Walquist said that the error was the City's in not providing sufficient
depth of the water line, but it seems that the burden of correcting the error
is on him. The City Engineer explained that the water line was put in in 1959,
which was before this City Administrations's time, and he supposed that it was
not foreseen that this area would develop.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to concur with the Planning Commission recommen-
dation and grant a Lot Split to Mr. George Walquist. Seconded by Councilman
Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared
the motion carried.
8. REZONING REQUEST BY ELDON SCHMEDEKE (ZOA #69-06) : Lots 16 through 19,
Block 12, and Lot 30, Block 21, Hyde Park Addition. Rezone from R-2 to C-2.
Councilman Liebl asked what was being done about this. The City Engineer pointed
out that the Planning Commission is holding a Public Hearing on April 24, 1969,
and the City Council is holding a Public Hearing on the Rezoning of Hyde Park
on April 14, 1969.
9. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT, MAPLE MANOR ADDITION, HIGHLAND PARK DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY (P.S. #69-03) : Outlot #1, Melody Manor 4th Addition except the
North 400 feet of the West 217.8 feet.
The City Engineer said that the applicant would like the Council to set the
Public Hearing date. He suggested that it be held April 7, 1969.
MAYOR KIRKHAM ARRIVED AT 8:22 P.M.
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to set the Public Hearing date for the Public
Hearing on Proposed Preliminary Plat Maple Manor Addition for April 7, 1969.
Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried.
S. LOT SPLIT REQUEST BY SMITH AND ANDERSON, INC. CONTINUED:
This item was again taken up, but Mr. Smith was not present.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to require a replat of the area rather than
subdivisions by Lot Splits for greater ease in legal descriptions. Seconded
by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro
tem declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to receive the -Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of March 13, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING
OF FEBRUARY 6, 1969:
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the Minutes of the Fridley Industrial
• REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 7, 1969 PAGE 5
PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL PLAT P.S. #69-03, MAPLE MANOR ADDITION, HIGHLAND PARK
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, AND RECEIVING PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO APARTMENTS:
Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition except the North 400 feet of the West 217.8
feet.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive Petition #9-1969. Seconded by Councilman
Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried.
Mayor Kirkham read the Public Hearing Notice to the audience. The City Engineer
explained that as this land encompasses a large portion of property, it was felt
that the developer should plat the land for ease in legal descriptions. They
are following the regular procedure for platting. He said that no one objected
to the plat, as such, but there was considerable amount of objection to the
apartment houses, however, the zoning is correct on the property for the apart-
ment complex. The Planning Commission has already seen the plat, and they have
continued the Public Hearing. He said that he would suggest that the Council
hear the people concerned and then continue the Public Hearing until the recom-
mendation of the Planning Commission is received.
Mr. Richard Cartright, 7503 Tempo Terrace, said that he would like to know more
about what is going in on the land before the re-plat is approved. He asked if
the action is irreversible, and if the plat is approved, these buildings would
go in. Mayor Kirkham explained that this is not a re-plat, but a new plat and
that it has nothing to do with the zoning. The zoning is correct for the
applications made upon the land. He then explained the platting procedure, and
said that Council action will be to either accept of deny the plat, nothing
else. The City Attorney pointed out that the same thing could be accomplished
without a plat, but for greater ease in legal descriptions, both the County and
the City would rather work with a plat than a meets and bounds description.
Councilman Samuelson added that meets and bounds descriptions can become very
lengthy. This property was zoned to multiple dwellings in 1966.
Mr. Richard Cartright asked if there was a principle signer on the application.
Mr. Donaldson said that he had signed the application, but that there are five
owners. Mr. Cartright asked who they were. Mr. Donaldson replied: Mr. Vernon
Plaisance, Mr. Winslow Chamberlain, Mr. Joseph Getis, Mr. William Goldberg, and
Mr. Leo Wolk.
Mayor Kirkham asked if there was anyone else present who wished to be heard.
There was no response.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to continue the Public Hearing on the Final Plat
P.S. #69-03, Maple Manor Addition, Highland Park Development Company. Seconded
by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried.
Mayor Kirkham suggested that the consideration of the rezoning Ordinances for
Mr. Momchilovich and Hammer-und Enterprises, Inc. be held until Councilman
Sheridan arrives.
LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #69-02, SMITH AND ANDERSON, INC. :
Councilman Samuelson said that he understood that this will be a Registered Land
Survey rather than a plat. The City Engineer said yes, and added that he had
asked that the applicant be in attendance, but that he is not here yet. It was
agreed to wait with this item for the appearance of Mr. Smith. This item was
considered later in the Meeting.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 7, 1969 PAGE 6
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS - DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE
MEETING OF MARCH 26, 1969:
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NURSING HOME IN THE N.E. QUADRANT
OF MADISON STREET AND LYRIC LANE, THE SAME BEING LOT 1, BLOCK 1, PROPOSED
MAPLE MANOR ADDITION. (REQUEST BY HIGHLAND PARK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,
500 GREENHAVEN ROAD, ANOKA, MINNESOTA, APARTMENT #107) :
The City Engineer said that the Building Standards - Design Control had studied
the plans, and had felt that they would like the plans improved. Their principal
consideration was the aesthetics of the south elevation. Mr. Donaldson had
indicated that he would like to appear before the Council even though his present
request had not been approved by the Building Board, and the Board had told him
this was his right. He said that the Board had suggested reversing the north -
south elevations.
Mr. Donaldson said that he would like to expedite this project as much as possible.
He said that a balcony has been added onto the south elevation to improve the
aesthetics, and some trees have been added.
Councilman Samuelson said that he felt that the addition of the balcony improves
the elevation a great deal, however, he would like to have the plans re-submitted
to the Building Board, as he would not like the Council to over-ride the Building
Standard - Design Control's decisions. Councilman LIebl agreed, that the changes
should be returned to the Building Board. Mayor Kirkham commented that he also
liked the addition of the balcony.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to instruct the applicant to re-submit the changes
as shown to the Council to the Building Standards - Design Control for their
comments and suggestions, before the Council acts on the plans. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the Building Standards - Design Control
Subcommittee Minutes of the Meeting of March 26, 1969. Seconded by Councilman
Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1969:
A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO REMODEL AND INSTALL ADDITIONAL BAY
AND STORAGE ROOM TO PRESENT SERVICE STATION AT 7650 HIGHWAY #65, THE SAME
BEING LOT 1, BLOCK 1, LAMPERTS ADDITION, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY
AMERICAN OIL COMPANY, 1405 MELR.ObE AVENUE, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426) :
The City Engineer explained that the Board of Appeals has approved this request,
as did the Building Standards - Design Control at their meeting of March 12, 1969.
However, Councilman Samuelson at the Council Meeting of March 17, 1969 had in-
dicated that he would like all perr4 ssion held until the Council had an oppor-
tunity to talk to the applicant because of the poor maintenance of the Standard
Stations in the City.
Councilman Samuelson asked Mr. W.G. Housenga, Area Engineer for Standard Oil,
when the Standard Stations within the City will be maintained. He said that they
are all dirty, some have junk cars, some of the light standards have paint flaking
L ' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 7, 1969 PAGE 9
changing their Meeting nights to the Wednesday following the first and third
Monday, beginning in June to facilitate preparation of the Minutes for inclusion
into the Agenda. The Council said Thank You and that they appreciated this
consideration.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of March 27, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #69-02-03-04-05, SMITH AND ANDERSON, INC. CONTINUED:
The City Engineer said that this request is merely to divide the lots into
buildable parcels. He reminded the Council that they had moved to request that
the application be made for a re-platting or registered land survey for greater
ease in describing the land, rather than lot splits as, the descriptions could
become cumbersome with the lot split proc6dure.
Mr. Smith said that he had talked to a surveyor and he can get this registered
land survey. The City Engineer suggested approving a building permit, with the
Certificate of Occupancy being held until the registered land survey is com-
pleted. He added that the applicant has been made aware of the pending assess-
ments.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to grant building permits to enable the petitioner
to start construction, and hold the Certificate of Occupancy until the registered
land survey is completed. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM ADVANCED HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING, INC. FOR
AUTHORIZATION TO INSTALL TI-KROME STAINLESS DISTRIBUTION PIPING INSTEAD OF
SCHEDULE #40 AT HIRSCH BROTHERS COMPLEX AS REQUESTED:
The City Engineer explained that this request is for a different material than
is presently allowed under the City Code. It has been used in Minneapolis on
a trial basis and he would- recommend trying it in Fridley.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to grant the request from Advanced Heating and
Air Conditioning, Inc. to install Ti-Krome Stainless Distribution Piping instead
of Schedule #40 Black Piping at Hirsch Brothers Complex. Seconded by Councilman
Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried.
CONSIDERATION OF PLOT PLAN AS REQUESTED BY MURPHY OIL CORPORATION:
Mr. Ralph Tully, representing the Murphy Oil Corporation, was present and gave
a brief history on the proceedings concerning the Gertzen property on the
intersection of Mississippi Way and East River Road to date. The City Engineer
showed the plan which the Council had approved (Plan on Page 73 of the April
7th Agenda) which had two curb cuts on Mississippi Way and one on East River
Road and said that he understood that Murphy Oil Corporation has indicated that
the plan is agreeable to them, with tha exception that they feel that they must
have two curb cuts also on East River Road. He then asked Mr. Tully if this
was correct. Mr. Tully replied it was, and added that they have also agreed to
give some land in the northwest corner for a right turn lane.
Councilman Samuelson asked if the plan with the inclusion of the four curb cuts
would be acceptable to the City, in the Engineer's 9stimation. The Q ty Engineer
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 7, 1969 PAGE 10
replied that he was not too sure, however, the two cuts were worked out for
Mississippi Way. Mr. Lundberg, of the Murphy Oil Corp. was also present, and
agreed that Murphy Oil Corp. has felt that it is essential that there be a total
of four cuts. He said with the setbacks, it would make an impossible situation
without the four cuts. He said that Murphy oil Corp. would be happy to put in
sidewalks.
Mr. Tully asked how long it would take to try to work out a plan with the four
cuts. The City Engineer said that he would work with Mr. Lundberg this week, and
would try to have it ready for presentation at the Council Meeting of April 14th.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to approve the concept, contingent upon Council
approval of the plan worked out by the City Engineer and Mr. Lundberg for two
curb cuts on East River Road and two on Mississippi Way. Seconded by Councilman
Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH
24, 1969:
MOTION made and seconded to receive the Minutes of the Parks and Recreation
Meeting of March 24, 1969. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried.
DISCUSSION REQUESTED BY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGARDING PARKS RESOLUTION
#1-1969 ADOPTED JANUARY 27, 1969:
Mr. Edward Fitzpatrick, Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission was
present to explain that in January the Parks and Recreation Commission sent a
Resolution to the Council concerning the use of park land by the City for other
than park purposes, and that the Commission would like some expression from the
Council on the Resolution. He said that the intent of the Resolution was to
establish a principle for the future. He pointed to Minneapolis as an example
of how park land can be used by the City to th.e detriment of the Park Board.
This may seem petty now, but it might not always remain so. He referred to the
statement made by Comstock and Davis when talking about well sites, that park
land is free and pointed out that it is not free, but is taken at the expense
of the park users.
Councilman Samuelson said that if this was the intent of the Resolution, he
could agree with it, however, he was hurt by the wording of the Resolution. It
implies that the Council does not work with the Parks and Recreation Commission,
and he felt that the Council has always done a great deal for the park system.
Mr. Fitzpatrick said the purpose of the Resolution was not to cause offense, but
rather an attempt to establish a working principle between the Parks and Recreation
Commission and the Council for future City use. Councilman Samuelson said that he
felt that the Council has been quite choosy in regard to placement of well sites,
and pointed out that the 1.57 acres referred to in the Resolution was replaced
with 12 acres when the City Garage was built.
Councilman Liebl commented that the point about the replacement of land to the
park system on a "when done" and "as done" basis is right, and thought perhaps it
was more a matter of lack of communication between the Parks and Recreation
Commission and the Council. Councilman Samuelson said that he had suggested at a
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 21, 1969 PAGE 18
Kirkham, Liebl, Harris, Samuelson, & Sheridan voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried unanimously.
�L CONSIDERATION OF REGISTERED LAND SURVEY (L.S. #69-02) SMITH AND ANDERSON,
INCORPORATED:
The City Engineer said that this is the same plan as was proposed by.lot.
splits, but is now under a Registered Land Survey. This was approved by
the Planning Commission and he recommended approval subject to acquisition
of a right of way easement.
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to approve the Registered Land Survey by
Smith and Anderson, Inc. subject to the acquisition of the necessary right
of way, and authorize the City Clerk and Mayor's signatures. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 10, 1969:
1. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #69-02, AMBER OAKS, DAVID R. HUBERS,
JULIAN JOHNSON: Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision #92, Lot 1, Block 3 mad
Outlot 2, Worrel's Addition
The City Engineer said that this is for the area north of. Gardena Avenue and
east of Benjamin Street. There have been problems with the property owners
not being able to get together on whether a road should go through and if so,
where. This is the third proposed plat for this area. Mayor Kirkham said
that there is need of storm sewers in this area. The City Engineer said yes,
and that the drainage would go to Rice Creek Road. Councilman Sheridan
pointed out that there would be a need for some right of way. The City
Engineer said that in the past the City has put in some streets and assessed
the right of way as part of the project cost. Councilman Harris pointed out
that Lot 14 would only have 40' frontage. The City Engineer said that the
house would have to be set back. Councilman Sheridan commented that there
is some nice development in this area, but that the terrain is rough.
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to set the Public Hearing for the Proposed
Preliminary Plat P.S #69-02, Amber Oaks, for May 12, 1969. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried unanimously.
2. PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #69-04, EAST RANCH ESTATES 1ST ADDITION, ROBERT
SCHROER: East 621.87 feet of that part of NWS of NWS as measured along
the north line thereof of Section 11 lying northerly of centerline of
Osborne Road subject to portion taken for T.H. #47, Osborne Road and
St. Paul Waterworks' easement.
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to set the Public-Hearing for the Preliminary
Plat, East Ranch Estates 1st Addition for May 12, 1969. Seconded by Council-
man Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried unanimously.
3. PRELIMINARY PLAT P.S. #69-05, EAST RANCH ESTATES 2ND ADDITION, ROBERT
SCHROER: SA of SWC of Section 2 subject to portion taken for T.H. #47
and subject to easement for sanitary sewer purposes over south 33'
thereof.
r
REGULAR COUNC7T4 MEETING OF APRIL 21, 1969 ?AGE 17
Councilman Sheridan said that he felt that the first thing you would see
when coming from the west would be the front elevation and he felt that this
should be brick. The freeway side should give a good impression.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to concur with the recommendations to grant the
permit with the stipulations imposed by the Building Board, with the additions
that the parking lot should be paved, and concrete curb and gutter be placed
around the parking areas and the rest sodded and .landscaped, there should be
brick on all three sides of the office building and on the warehouse
elevation facing the freeway, and acquiring the necessary easements. Seconded
by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried unanimously.
•
4. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NURSING HOME ON THE N.E.
QUADRANT OF MADISON STREET AND LYRIC LANG THE SAME BEING LOT 1, BLOCK
1, PROPOSED MAPLE MANOR ADDITION. (REQUEST BY HIGHLAND PARK DEVELOP-
MENT COMPANY) :
The City Engineer said that the changed plan was submitted to the Building
Standards - Design Control Subcommittee, but they still did not feel that
the changes offered were enough of an improvement, so they denied the request.
All five of the owners of the Addition were in attendance and came forward
to the Council table for a discussion of the plans. Councilman Liebl said
that he had felt that there should be some trees. The City Engineer pointed
out that there are trees shown on the plans now. Councilman Harris said that
he had conversed with some of the Building Board members and it was their
feeling that :the long expanse should be broken up somehow. He pointed out
that it is 250' long. Mr. Donaldson said that they made several suggestions
at the Building Board Meeting, but they were all turned down. One of the
Representatives said that they had built 13 nursing homes throughout the
country and they felt that through the use of vertical lines, the long
horizontal look is minimized. He said that on the plan it is hard to
visualise haw the completed structure would look. He said that they had
already obtained approval from the Board of Health on their plans and this
takes about six months and bids have been taken on the building, so to alter
the basic construction of the nursing home would mean they would have to
start all over again. He said that the homes they have built throughout
the state have been quality homes. Through the proper use of shrubery and
the window treatment, the horizontal look is minimized without a structural
change. Councilman Harris asked about the possibility of breaking up the
long expanse of roof line.
There followed a discussion while looking at the plan of possible changes.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the plan and grant the permit based on
the addition of about a 52' wide by 22' deep gable cap and the use of hand
split shakes; the plan to meet the approval of the City Engineer when com-
pleted. The motion was seconded �.nd upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE FOR REZONING REQUEST (ZOA #69-05) TO REZONE
FROM C-1 TO CR-2, LOTS 26 & 27, BLOCK 2, COMMERCE PARK. COMMERCE PARK
INVESTMENT COMPANY. (ROBERT GUZY) :
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to approve the Ordinance on first reading and
waive the reading. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a roll call vote,
GERALD T. COYNE RAYMOND A PRASCH
300 BRUNSWICK AVE. S LOT SURVEYS COMPANY /� /fC 6917 IDAHOAVE N
GOLDEN VALLEY, MINN. /i ���iv� BROOKLYN 'ARK, MINN. I
LAND SURVEYORS 7- 6 �
REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
LICENSED BY ORDINANCE OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
6917 blah": Ave. N. 533-9922
Minneapolis, Nlinnesota 55428 z
P
[0 T H AQ D E �Zsc hi t,�
Z A
1P! a
t
PARCEL *A" Lots 1 and 2, 9lock 2, Adam Street Addition `uv 2, i
to lti nne sP alis.
. w
PARCEL "B"n
�, P1�'tC1GL 1t C
_,� __---
PARCISL Ba Lots ll sad 12 Block 2Adam Street Addition q_, ------ .
1 to Minneapolis.
j PARCLL "C" Lots 3 and L, Block 2, Adm Street Addition � Q
#� Yin:taapolis.
PARCEL *D" Lots g scarf lo, Block 2, Ad&= Street Addition
to Mi.anaapo2i6.
1 � u
PARCEL "E" Lots 5 and 6, Block 2, Adam Street; Addition
to 1dinneepo i€.
PARCEL "D" F PpiEL "E"
} .RARCE;L "P'" Loot 8, blc"ok end Lot 16, Bld3zx Ad sm
i+broaS: Adds tic¢r, to Vinnespolis.
PARCEL OG" Lot 7. Block 2 and Lot I, Block 3. Ad am '
Street Addition to HLaneapolis•
PARCEL "H" Lot 13 except tele South 26 feet thereof sad all c; `_;� !~ '" '' _ •!'
of Lots 14 and 15. Block 3, Ads.sa Street Addition � U
to 1Lmsspolis. co
c
c
PARCEL L Y Lot 4 except the South 26 fast thereof am all of
Lata 2 and 5. Bloch j, Ad errs Street Addition
ito Mi nne a po l i.s t a ---- -- � °
f1
FAR(!F1. 0.1" 1 Tnt 11 wrnaa%t. t-its 7!) i'rrt tkwr►wnf'_ all ^f sem DtiiCa'T "tI�
. - �-..o. v.saaer[y arar yne aorLr► til root or the
1 _
I
Sou tts 26 teat of said Lad 13.
PARCEL "K" Lot 6 except the South 10 feet thereof, all of Lot I
5 and the South 26 feet of Lot 4t Block j, Adam � t
Street Addition to Mi.anospolis. Subject to a Sewer
f essement over the ilortb 20 foot of the South 26
feet of *aid Lot 4.
PARCEL *L" Lot q except the South 10 feet thereof, ell of Lett 30 d'AIdCBL "ii" Gs PARCEL "I"
I' and the South 10 feet of Lot 11, Bloch 3, Adam Q
Street Addition to Minneapolis. i4
PARCEL "M" I Lot R except the South 10 feet thereof, all of Lett 7
1 uui the South 10 feet of Lot 6, Block 2, Adam —' ------
Street Addition to Minnespolis. I F, ! t
i6`/ WI F I -, �r ,1 j Ni
A�� PJt
I PARCEL "J" " ?
o PAROL Kr
i.
\\
PARCEL "`L"
PARCEL "U"
f I V
10
1.
t� {#
9 t
CK
t
1
We hereby certify that this is a true and correct reP resenta-
tion of a surveyf the b
oe ou ndaries of the above described
land and the location of all buildings and visible encroach-
ments, if any, from or on said land.
Signed
Surveyed by us this _ day of LOT SURVEYS COMPANY