LS75-01 i
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
Form #5-68 �
CITY OF FRIDLEY
R..CITUUU-ON LY
Applicant's Name
APPLICANT: r,r/i✓ � /�d�� _
Lot Split T
LUQ ADDRESS: D4 c,r-,A�� `J 7 J
Street City Zip Code Date Filed:
TELEPHONE # �( C'%U Fee: �_Receipt
Home Business Council Action:Date
Ej
•d o REMARKS:
PROPERTY OWNER(S)Cd
�/-;qil// , l7/� //��/✓ - -
-3 51 I
P4 3 0
0 xi
+- . ADDRESS(ES) / i ✓/� /' /i^ L -'
ami a o Street City Zip Code
+ M c
4-3 m C ~ Street City Zip .Code
o � CQ � TELEPHONE #(S)
Ici Id P4 Home Business
�
m P d
0 O 0
-Y. P, m _
a m [ Property Location on Street
or Exact Street Address (IF ANY)j(� -" C��/�'�' /�G�i� _
w
U
H Legal Description of Property:
� Parcel 440
Pq ThP Nnrth 113 of lot 4, axcept the Fact @y6@pt the West 26 and
except the North 30 feet for public utilities. & street, Auditor's Sub. #108
Reason for Lot Split:
Parcel 440 ParCel, 4 0
Onondaga. 1600 Onondaga will be 80'Lot 1618 93' Lot
X �9p' x/yo
Total Area of Property aq. ft. Present Zoning Classification R-1
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this application are true and
correct.
DATFy-/- -2 "7S SIGNATURE
BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Se0 reverse Bide for additional instructions)
PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE
i..
1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. _N.E. , Fridley)
p pp q
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of 120.00 for each original lot being split.
3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a
month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of
the Subcommittee.
4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels
along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in.
5. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department
for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the
second and fourth Thuroday of the month. The City will supply the applicant
with minutes of. the Planning Commission.
6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday
of the month.
7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which_ must
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of' six months has elapsed.
a
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NEW PARCE1S IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
II�-
L y0c 5CCr t
Surveyors Certi icute "A' 7+'�s
COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors
1446 County Road J,Mpls.,Minn. 55432, 784-9346
LOT SURVEY FOR: DEAN HARMON
PART OF LOT 4, 1618 ONONDAGA ST. , N.E.
AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 108 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
ANOKA .000NTY, MINN.
-- 93.00-- - Alat'I /%!e Aval Sub. No. /09
vzf '---f O/VOAIDgGA ST.
--93.00--
N
-93.00--N
� M
N ^� N<
Ilk
N
W
-
/99.oB M
� /28.8.4" �'. ilkou ioe o 0 4, Av . SJ. No. /08
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The East 93 feet of the North 1/3 of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision
No. 108, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to an easement to the City of Fridley
over the North 30 feet and subject to other easements of record, if any.
SCALE:
® C�eno�eS iron monuil7en� �puno/
p denofes iron /nonvmenf set
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
/0832 i/z 417.3' .3474-
Reg. No. Date Job No.
l
�y (9 w
�-- M LEY ST. q f
/vv ion r
L.S. #75-01 DEAN HARMON
00
r7
te
7 i
„ ......_._.._..._
f�Cc
o y5z/s ,5ANDC01 ° ° � o
C ' 13
0 Z 299.49 �a� �r.• f
.cZ?528 _3 1 W o '1�1 7s
.va. ys• • .'g9Q' I ZbV fce ��� g.'z '
Uj 2
- 7518
7N L 572 '°
a -
�.<<
H t�
I
^�
501 vh� � °m W ae •��s
III -
'�V, 29 ` !" yo: 66 ay Lj
wC.J1
O , ^ - J251
,✓b'Y•/{.V R ami
M M
67R-..M Y E. — �• n ='i Ir;�'. — -- h •.�
15lq 166y
, O u
Jr/felIx / � 1%„bpD: 'i7U°i -
e 1�r j
cam) 1: k>Nrdlei �
7
9 o ff 19y
IM m -:.�/ays yyZ Yo 8;.,.37' -Z^
41_ w_ y
N
„
//
Zs Lx
�s "1: iio uo ii o '0 1f/La
i 1
yy ° 7�y.5 b
N ''y xv/6
MI a Jl9oroP/t , M w 94& 116 9�
0
1533y0
17 Se pD�bl9 �
3
B6
BEET ON� c ON DAG � ..F� 6'sB93a'�•�
pro •. ;
�yrb IN9Z ,Bss ;,mss 5 16i$ 6�0
16 n' I
�57 5601 ti
1 N
A p. y37,6
26► ° 281 ,�3, .,�
I 1 (JIO)
i D 93Olf
\ R •
e. 8 7369/GP�
0� 1 — 73V2
AVE N.F.�^ 4
!#
�� 2oc� l7iBo)
T 1
12
/e�ef "hoilv/7 7 .
973 flo
a} 7 i 29�I N b. 129J4.i) (630 (Ff4�
10 FI
1`l�' ly8s'j I156� �.� 159 16J9 (Sao) ,i NO 108,
•� �6y I�� X67 /6 F.5
R-D - AVF 'a F
Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 1975 Page 3
the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Drigans said he felt that the question on whether th 'business was
an allowed use in M-1 zoning has been answered to his satis 4 ction by the City
Attorney. He said he didn't know if the Planning Comm' ion had discussed any
other stipul ions. _
Mr. Clark sa the stipulations had been etty well covered by the Building
Standards-Design Con of and Board of Appeals`' Subcommittees. He said both these
subcommittees had reco nded approval subject to the rezoning being approved.
Mr. Clark said the onl stipul,aifion that should be made was that this business
meet the noise transmission s tion of the City Code and the P.C.A. standards. He
said he was sure the petitioner, s aware of these standards.
MOTION by Drigans, s9elonded by dblad, that the Planning Commission recommend
to Council approval of e rezoning req st, ZOA #74-05, by RAO Manufacturing Company,
to rezone from .^.-2S ( neral shopping are to M-1 (light industrial areas) , Lots
3 through 15, Lots through 32, parts of s 2 and 16, all in Block 9; vacated
alleys in Block 9- and the East Half of vacate Main Street lying adjacent to Block
9, all being in , well Addition to Fridley Park, e same being 200 Mississippi Street
N.E. with the tipulation that RAO Manuafacturing any meet all the noise trawl
mission req rements of the Fridley City Code and the P.C.A. standards. Upon a
roll call ote, Lindblad, Blair, Drigans, Harris all vote aye, no nays, the motion
carried nanimously. IIN
r. Clark told the petitioner he would send them a copy of the City Attorney's
me o.
3. REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLI L.S. #75-01 , DEAN HARMON: Split off the Easterly 8
feet of the North 1/3 kf Lot 4, exc t the East 85 feet, except the West 25
feet, and except the No for public utilities and street, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 108, (Parcel 440) and add it to the East 85 feet of the North
1/3 of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 108, (Parcel 450) , the same being 1600
and 1618 Onondaga Street N.E.
Mr. & Mrs. Dean Harmon, 1618 Onondaga Street N.E. and Mr. & Mrs. Charles
Brisbin, who are purchasing 1618 Onondaga Street N.E. , were present.
Mr. Clark said that Mr. Harmon owns both parcels. When the attached garage
was built at 1618 Onondaga Street an error was made and this garage infringes on
the next parcel by 3 feet. This parcel is 85 feet and with the additional 8 feet
the lot will be 93 feet wide. Then the garage will meet the sideyard requirement
of 5 foot. The remaining parcel will be 80 feet wide and this will meet the front
yard and area requirements of the code. This lot split was an obvious thing that
should be done, to place the garage on the proper lot. The administration would
like one stipulation and that was to obtain a fifteen foot triangle on the Northwest
corner of parcel 440 (1600 Onondaga Street N.E. ) for future radius on a street that
will probably go in sometime on the Western boundary.
Mr. Harris said that request had not been before the Plats & Subdivisions-
Streets & Utilities Subcommittee. Mr. Clark said that at the time this request
was made, the petitioner had a loan closing that would have prohibited thexe-being
time to schedule this meeting. Because of the cancellation of the February 5th
Planning Commission Meeting, there would have been time, but as this was a fairly
simple split, he felt that it would not be necessary to have this go to the Sub-
Planning ommission Meetinc `Februar _19, 1975 _ _ Page 4
f
committee.
Mr. Harmon said he was selling his property at 1618 Onondaga Street N.E.
and just bought the adjoining parcel so he could split off the 8 feet.
Mr. Harris asked if the street on the Western boundary was improved. Mr. Clark
said it wasn't. It was part of a future street that fits in with a street pattern
that would exit out to Lakeside. At the time this street would be put in, the
other half of the street would be taken from Lot 32.
Mr. Clark said that at the time the house and garage were built at 1618
Onondaga Street, the City did not require a verification survey and this was how
the garage was incorrectly located in the first place. According to the application
for the building permit, this garage was to be located 5 feet from the present lot
line.
Mr. Harmon said he was agreeable to the dedication of the 15 foot triangle on
the Northwest corner of what will be 1600 Onondaga Street N. E.
MOTION by Blair, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission recommend
to Council approval of the request for a lot split, L.S. #75-01, by Dean Harmon,
to split off the Easterly 8 feet of the North 1/3 of Lot 4, except the East 85 feet,
except the West 25 feet, and except the North 30 feet for public utilities and street,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 108, (Parcel 440) and add it to the East 85 feet of the
North 1/3 of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No.. 108, (Parcel 450) , the same being
1600 and 1618 Onondaga Street N.E. , subject to a 15 foot triangle being dedicated
on the Northwest corner of Parcel 440 (1600 Onondaga Street N.E.) for future radius
on the street easement. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Blair, seconded by Lindblad, that the meeting be adjourned. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Vice Chairman Harris declared the Planning Commission
meeting of February 19, 1975 adjorned at 9:20 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Dorothy Eve on, Secretary
T.
301
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 1975 PAGE 11
CONSTRUCTION OF A BUILDING FOR RUST PROOFING OF AUTOMOBILES, ETC., PER FRIDLEY CITY
CODE, SECTION 205.131 , A,10) IN AN M-1 ZONE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AREAS TO BE LOCATED
ON LOT 5, OF PROPOSED PLAT, P. S. #74-08, HERWAL RICE CREEK ESTATES, THE SANE BEING
1271 RICE CREEK ROAD N. E.
Mayor Nee informed the Council that this item did not need Council action at the
present time. r;
CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #74-05, BY RAO MANUFACTURING COMPANY:
TO REZONE FROM C-2S, GENERAL SHOPPING AREES TO M-1 LIGH1' INDUSTRIAL AREAS,
LOTS 3 - 15, LOTS 27 - 32, AND PARTS OF LOTS 2 AND 16, ALL IN BLOCK 9; VACATED
ALEYS IN BLOCK 9, AND THE EAST HALF OF VACATED MAIN STREET LYING ADJACENT TO BLOCK 9,
ALL BEING IN LOWELL ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK, TSAME BEING 200 MISSISSI-
HE I STREET
N. E.
The City Manager said this item was still under consideration by the Planning Commission.
i
REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT LS. "74�O1,/DEAN HARMON: SPLIT OFF THE EASTERLY 8 FEET
OF THE NORTH 1/3 OF LOT 4, EAST 85 FEET, EXCEPT THE WEST 25 FEET, AND 1
EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND STREET, .AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION
NO. 108, PARCEL 440 AND ADD IT TO THE EAST 85 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/3 OF LOT 4,
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 108, PARCEL 450), THE SAME BEING 1600 Ai1D 1618 ONONDAGA
STREET N. E
The Public Works Director, Mr. Richard Sobiech, explained to the Council that according
to a verification survey, the garage construction was three feet into the abutting
property. Hepointed out now the property owner owns the adjoining property or both
parcels and is requesting a lot split of eight feet to place the construction within
the bounds of the parcel. The Public Works Director explained that Mr. Harmon, the
applicant was present to answer any questions.
Councilwoman Kukowski asked if this sort of thing could happen again in the future.
The Public Works Director said this had been constructed prior to the time that
a verifying survey was required and now the applicant owns both parcels. Tile
Public Works Director said the verifying surveys are now required on all new
construction.
MOTION. by CouncilmanBreider to approve the Lot Split #75-01, 1600 and 1618 Onondaga
Street as requested by Mr. Dean Harmon. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon ?
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Brieder to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting
of February 19, 1975. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING_ OF JANUARY
21, 1975: t
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Environmental Quality
Commission Meeting of January 25, 1975. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
i
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE CITIZEN BIKEWAY COMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 29, 1975:
MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the minutes of the Citizen Bikeway Committee r `
of January 29, 1975. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all I
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE CITIZEN BIKEWAY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 5, 1975: I
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Citizen Bikeway
Committee Meeting of February 5, 1975. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE CITIZEN BIKEWAY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 1975:
MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to receive the minutes of the Citizen Bikeway
Committee meeting of February 12, 1975. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF AWARDIN6—BJFOR TRUCK MOUNTED SEWER RODDISICL MACHTNF (BIDS OPFNFD
FEBRUARY 3 1975, 11:00 A.M.):
The Public Works Director said the bids had been opened on February 3, 1975 and only
302
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 1975 PAGE 12
one bid had been received. He continued to explain that the specifications for ?
the. equipment had been sent to eight companies. He said the City needed a very
tough piece of equipment to remove roots in many parts of the City and this called '
for a very specialized type of equipment. The Public Works Director said there
are also many instances when the equipment would be needed on the back property
lines and this type of equipment would be used to work within this type of 6
easement.
The Public Works Director recommended the Council award the contract in the amount
i
of $10,147. f
MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to receive the bids from the Flexible Pipe Tool Co.
of Minneapolis and award the Contract to the Flexible Pipe Tool Company in the
amount of $10,147. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilwoman Kukowski asked if in the future the Council could be provided with
an illustration of the equipment proposed for purchase so they would know what j
they are purchasing. The Public Works Director said this would be possible.
s � 1
RECEIVING MEMORANDUM FROM ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FINANCE DIkECTOR REGARDING PROPOSED t
AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER:
The Finance Director said he had talked to Mr. Sheridan, Chairman of the Charter
Commission and he had indicated that the Charter Commission would not be submitting
any additional items for consideration on the special election ballot. The Finance
Director said the Commission would be submitting their comments on the matter to
the Council.
t
CONSIDERATION OF SETTING UP TIME FOR SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, ,
F
1975 FOR SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS: 1
i
t
The Finance Director said this meeting would be for the purpose of awarding the '
bid for the refunding bonds.
The City Manager pointed out that the City's rating had been raised from A to
A-1. Councilwoman Kukowski asked if the rating could be any higher than it is i
at the present. Mayor Nee said it could go to AAA. Mayor Nee noted that New
York had been eliminated from the rating system because their rating had become so $
low.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to set the Special Meetino for the sale of the
General Obligation Refunding Bonds for Tuesday, February 25, 1975 at 5:30 P.M.
Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee #
declared the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 31-1975 - ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 19 5-1 AN\D ST. 1975-2 1f
MSAS
Mayor Nee asked if the portions of the improvement requested had been deleted.
The Public Works Director said HIckory and Capital had been removed from the
project. He explained that within the total project, two trees would have to ;
be removed and in these instances, the trees would be replaced. I
i `
MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adopt Resoluti-on No. 31-1975, ordering improvement e
approval of plans and ordering advertisement for bids, Street Improvement Project
St. 1975-1 and ST. 1975-2 (MSAS). Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 32-1975 - TO PETITION TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TO REVISE THE
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION'S SERVICE AREA #1 AND #2 BOUNDARIES WITHIN
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
The Public Works Director explained that this revision related to areas #1 and #2
l and this action was required by the approval of the Comprehensive Sewer Plan. He
I pointed out on"Page 14-A of the agenda where this requirement is listed within
the Resolution No. 73-225 of the Metropolitan Sewer Board.
The Public Works Director pointed out that this would increase the total cost of the
system at the completion of the ultimate system of about $500 per month. He said
��. now the total increase being the system is not complete would be about $100 per
month.