Loading...
LS74-02 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION Form #5-68 CITY OF FRIDLEY J / Applicant's Name APPLICANT• 'e ADDRESS: Lot Split 7�v' 1 �,3 � f� �'7�h�f y S �� z � �- �+ Mt_ City ^T Zip Code Date Filed: o m 0 TELEPHONE # d" 5 a �7 Feer Receipt # . XHome Business Council Action:Date REMARKS: o PROPERTY OWYER(S) '- �. Ccf a•4-3 m ADDRESS(ES)3p� 7 fi fThUl_ r Q J ` �- Q) as o Street city Zip Code m O •ra +' Street City Zip Code o r° M •H TELEPHONE #(S) a� � Home Business -P W� C N O V w O rl P m Property Location on Street or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) w , H Legal Description of Property: / z o-/ % u Reason for Lot Split: Total Area of Property/ & lsq. ft. Present Zoning Classification The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated'in this application are true and correct. DATE:,v( — a o - 7 T SIGNATURE' BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Seo reverse side for additional instructions) PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration - Remarks: PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration - Remarks: CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration - Remarks: { k LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE i 1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley 2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property involved 'and the lot"--split fee of J. 20.00 for each original lot being split. 3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets & Utilities Subcomait'tee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a f month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of the Subcommittee. 4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in. 5. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of the Planning Commission. 6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday of the month. 7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must be complied with by the applicant. 8. -A letter will be sent to the*applicant to notify him of the Council action and to advise him to comply with the conditions-imposed by the City. The letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent papers for his signature. 9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant should file the lot split in'Anoka` County. 10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for identical action can be presented until a period of' sir months has elapsed. f .NOTE: THE RESULTING-REAL ESTATE TAXES'AND ,SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT . OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL. TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS. +M��MgTiRWM�M✓#:..:7� 7WAlRihirNRfimu"�rw r:..+' ••.•, �•.. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY JAMES L. KURTM LAND SURVEYOR 4"l N.E. STH STRUST COL.UMSIA WKIGHTS U421 7WS004 1 HUMay C MFV THAT THIS SURVWY. PLAN. OR RQORT WAS PMWARSD OY Mt OR UNDUR MY DIRRCT SU1[MVIf1O01 AND THAT 1 AM A DULY 11"WT40WD LAND WJWVtYOR U"V THU LAWS Or TH<SYATS OF MINMCWTA. DATE �kPk \04-v4 SCALE i"= hJQ' MINNE A REGISTRATION NO. 5332 IRON MONUMENT '' �l•L 1Nt; l..o'� 3�1 .o. r• ` r r Cr fir � 4 G -5O a J Z 11 i Z� �- — -1 _ S• L�NL L.OT3h I t I s The north 99 feet of Lot 39, Auditors Subdivision No. 92, Anoka County, Minnesota CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY JAMES L. KURTH LAND SURVEYOR 4201 H.K. 5TH 5TNUUT COLUMBIA MKIGMTS 55421 �i•5e04 1 146MMY CONT1/Y THAT TM/S SNIIVrY. PLAN. OR IIIIIIIORT MAS PPWPA1 w MMt OR YMOSR MY DON CT K1�fIVIpOM AND THAT 1 AM A DULY MOMITWIS0 LAND 1080110 THt LAWS OF T1IS OTATt Or MIM41100TA. DATE ` (0--1 %( . SCALE 1"= Lol MiNN TA EGISTRATION NO. 5332 IRON MONUMENT � I 30 vo 0 C- V 3 II 0 0 iM Y 0 J � i J S. LINk. LC)T 3q nL I The south 101 feet of the north 200 feet of Lot 39, Auditors Subdivision No. 92, Anoka County, Minnesota 1 j i -•i CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY JAMES L. KURTH LAND SURVEYOR 48111 N.t. STM STRR<T GOLUMINA HIZIiHTS SS4t1 1 paMmr Cgwrl" TMAT TM/1 IM1WMV. /LAM. ew'ftwowT wA/ PM WMIM OT Mt OA W� Mr OAST WAPOW OWN AND TMAT 1 AM A CULV PWO"n�LAW "a LAWG OF Vm wrAT'R N YM0 mft?A. (MTE 4- t a•'1�F SCALE I"_ ..(90_..r.. MINNE T REGISTRATION NO. 5332 a= IRON MONUMENT 1 'SL-A.y O 50) ,9 9 rJ O O O a J r v7 tT rf1 r O Q � 0 2 ly �, _Y 12 J 0 O Q 9�6 k—oT 31=1 Lot 39, Auditors Subdivision No. 92, Anoka County, Minn to except the south 90 feet and except the north 200 feet 1 I• CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY JAMES L. KURT" LAND ;URVSYOR 4is/ N.K. STN STRUST COL.UMSIA NUIONTS 55421 7"SF�MD 1#=May CROMFY THAT TH/i*LWWV. /LAN. M FMW4M WPM POWWWAMP DY Mt M MMMT My OIUT O1MM'YIMW AND THAT 1 AM A DULL RiOWMMD LMMt OWMBVM WoTM AMD M TSM 1TATt M MNM4@wRA. OATS A- 12- 34, SCALE 1' ml SO REGISTRATION NO. 5332 C-1 RON MONUMENT N. UNE DoT 3g 9b 3Q `' r r _ o 1 J a- 1ij An �M r J ' �) 4 2 0 J G- 5• LkN= T 32 The south 90 feat of lot 39, Auditors Subdivision No. 92� A ka County, Minnesota B13RNARD URB ICY, L.S . 02 Split Lot � #�74- 9, A.S. #92 into 4 building .. sites. EXHIBIT A --------------------- 3i-> t ►y q� cr w i a . i r i O S � C4 1- p C 4 v� 1 � 6' ' e s 1 1 { V - - - - -- 328 -- -- - _ f f j . y s k, IOL 7 �: :•k ` ISoS l5 \IZi `��� a vj (oH BERNARD URBICK L,S. #74-02 t Split Lot 39, Auditor' s Sub NO.92 ..�K•r o -60 TH —AVE.- '"" 1f ite: \.♦,..'Y° ..r E_ into four building sites 10 1- j 'l c+/ {J0 f 570 1510 V 7l w I ..Yu/CdLE 4L✓,- �.. , -__'------- -: �� '/ � CIL - 1�.ryb WDRI HIL L 4 DI TI ' III Zs' ` 2�i JJl , as '� SI) O }r.��/� e ° Q Ar,fiiey_ .2•,na<�f s` !?!aye 1 , �0 �T �[J .�1.�t�y I` '•,V~--Ti>xs � 22 2"t D.sfi.d t6 ,yo 2 1 , - 26— ' 0 N4Q3 + ►/s s �z : 158'3 X1601 ` PODy h� 1623 t� 116 ���� �rwhsAP or A1�ih� thGY�Yt Fir�r -- — }f 75 ,S V661 i..--..__._ __. . _ _.L__F - • t��Y. �` � G•'/h'� U f��-sa� ��i Jafa., litiF ` � iI63o) a� 130 _i r/:C40� a Y y J ( s_f ro cry f , 29' 3113 �� � � �, 3 3 .37 !/aooJ i � �� ,3 ' -�/43D� :i/�(o0} O — _ (15E off. . (/5Bo) .� 4W. •. 6 / _�. � � t , r .i.'.a+•7 taus .� 38 42; A 1 40 , � {yyzJ d 537 rz i 39 . 11 c 1 j 5 N I c OF d �.d22� `'!' 2]0J _Y 6 -T ! 5 `I I ti ;ZZS�J w i .48 w (2490) \ ZS 70' 49 r ;5 0 5 '♦�j f 14 G \ \ �'�.�,PFWrTi�'`ja "�'tir:Y� .:'::..�, r_.Y41T.Y�'!l.`.d ..:.- ,.. .�T'.7.�'}�Yt -�AJ1t1>✓}��P{4ldf .- .. .r•.sw+r........_...., _.__..... -.n�w I i _ I 20 SO / ��� �J( ._� �_.— 'W.Ur ,4^ '._ _.$;.. 'Y.Cf.I I' ( a 74 ,_ iT. /� ..•r� i� .�{. �_ 'T:e. �"w err• f�_1.�:. At _. 1 7 ' 97 A4. i 41 ! Vol {{ I � I f: r I !. / I i1,71 , f , i ! I �, I , ��..___..____ •i-- _.._......._---__---_ �_._.._...__ it _.._ ._��_.. _ ,,.....��,_. f — �'N!('l.:N.(,1.h•:(,i`MtMtY1 U'i A,.'Y:OI IiMM N411F••G/[MIA IMIUIX.O Y1G:lML'WYMrN(:'•NUUAU.H1i 0.'Vt rhU QOM -.. _...� bJinutes of the Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting, March 4, 1974. Pagd 2 RICE CREEK ESTATES (CON'T) ; MOTION bc! Wagan, Seconded by Stimm'Eeh to necommend to the City Council that the City pmchase the baeanee o6 �t6ie aeheacte. toeated to' hin Rice Cneek E,6tatu which -us oven the 10% neocwced by ,the C,cty be designated on pa4k puApozez and .that to the event that the cutduac .t3 fr. o-cated making tots 12 and 13 unbu,iedab2e that the City atzo PuAchaze -these tu!o tots az paAt a the 12aAk puLqeAty. The Motion cawu ed. NORTH INNSBRUCK PARK Mr. Ken Sjodin was present at the meeting, representing Counselor Realty and Bernard Urbick, 5837 Arthur Street NE, Fridley. Mr. Urbick is the owner of three lots which are located immediately south of his home. Two lots are proposed for private sale, and the most southerly lot needs fill and is proposed for sale to the City. This lot is adjacent to the newly located A-frame building which was donated to the City. The lot is approximately 86' wide and would cost the City a roughly estimated $5,000.00. It would require approximately 1500 yards of fill to bring the lot up to the standards of the area. Mr. Blair recommended that the Commission ask the City Council to negotiate for the purchase of this additional. land. He asked Mr. Brown if it was the intent of the Department to maintain a skating rink? Mr. Brown said that it was. MOTION by Peterson, Seconded -by Gla aA, to necommend that the City Counc t negotiate otc the u c ass e o,� tie-ta2d Zocated within Notct z Inns .'cue z and a fac 5n to t,i.e -name cue "ng, on a etc,e _enc foot as.is, us the e►ian e 40,' , as ptuented to the PaAk,6 and Reetceat wn Comm vss�on. T ie h o; on cvu, ed. MOORE LAKE STUDY. Jim Langenfeld, a member of the Environmental Quality Control Commission and the Moore Lake Study Task Force, was present to discuss Moore Lake and the progress on the study. Mr. Langenfeld asked if the Commissioners had received copies of the study prepared by National Biocentric, Inc. of St. Paul, concerning Moore Lake? The study which the Commissioners had received was concerned with Highland Lake but was prepared by the same company. The Moore Lake report was #246, dated August 27, 1973.. . Mr. Langenfeld said that he would see that the Commissioners each receive a copy. This report is a proposed study for Anoka County lakes. There is the possibility that some federal funds may be available for this study, but nothing has been finalized in respect to this. Mr. Langenfeld asked if we were planning to proceed with our weed control for this Summer and Mr. Blair responded that we were. Mr. Langenfeld explained that several well-versed individuals had been at a meeting of the task force and after listening to their plans for a detailed study, it would be completely impossible for a group-of people to attempt such a task and have any success which could be beneficial to solving the problems at Moore Lake. These individuals represented the University of Minnesota and companies which deal with studies of this type. Even if the data could be collected, it would be almost impossible to compile it into data which could be processed and conclusions drawn. .n Planning Commission Meeting - March 6 , 1974 Page 5 do think there was a misunderstanding, but regardless of Mr. Skinner' s intention, the results are the same. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously . 3 . REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT,: L.S . #74-020 BERNARD URBICK: Split Lot 39 , Auditor ' s Subdivision No. 92 , into four building sites , located at 58th and Arthur Street N.E. Mr. Ken Sjodin, Mr. Urbick ' s realtor, was present to represent the petitioner. Mr. Clark said this request had been before the Plats & Subdivisions- Streets & Utilities Subcommittee briefly, after their last meeting, and they agreed to the concept, but there was no agreement on whether this should be handled as a lot split or a plat. Mr. Clark continued that it has also gone to the Parks & Recreation Commission on March 4th in regard to the purchase of the most Southerly lot that is adjacent to a park. This is an 86 foot lot and the Commission would like between 86 to 90 feet to add to our present park property. The A-Frame the City has acquired is just South of this lot next to a pond. With the acquisition of this land, it will make it possible to have a walking path all around the pond, which will be improved. We met with Mr . Urbick and his real estate man today to talk about negotiating for the land. We have a basis for placing a valuation on the land and although it is not clearly defined, it will cost the Park Department somewhere between $1500 and $2 , 000 for about a 90 foot lot. We arrived at this figure by using the front footage value the realtor _ put on the property, subtracting the special assessments, subtracting the 30 foot dedication to the City for park land, and subtracting $1 , 000 it will cost for fill to make this a buildable site. Mr. Urbick has been very, very fair. Mr. Fitzpatrick asked if this property for the park was across from Grace High School. Mr. Clark said it was. He said the City might need a 25 foot triangle off the next lot also. Mr. Clark said the petitioner does not want to plat because of the time factor. Platting would require Public Hearings by both the Planning Commission and Council and he would have to provide hard shell copies , etc. The descriptions covering the three remaining lots will not be difficult to place. We felt that because Mr. Urbick and his realtor have been so fair with• the City, if we can help him get division of his lot the easiest way, we should. Mr. Harris said that he was unaware that the City wished to purchase a lot from the petitioner at the time the Plats & Subdivisions saw this lot split request. It was his feeling at that time that the property should be platted. As long as the City is considering pur- chasing one lot and there will be only three lots left, one of which is already built upon, he had no objection to this being handled as a lot .split. Planning Commission Meeting - March 6 , 1974 Page 6 Mr. Clark said that by the City acquiring this lot, it would be a real asset to the City and the Park Department because it would enable the City to place a walkway around the pond. Mr. Clark said the way the cost was determined on this property was that the realtor set a cost of $85. 00 per front footage with the special assessments paid. We deducted $40 per front footage for specials (water, sewer and streets) . Then we deducted $1 , 000 for fill, and 30 feet of the 90 feet for park dedication and our figure was $1,775. Mr. Harris said no money for the park fund or park dedication is necessary on a lot split. Mr. Clark said it would be if this property was platted. Although the petitioner is dividing this property with a lot split, he is willing to make the park dedication. Mr. Clark said there has been agreement between the City staff and the property owner, but the City Council has not agreed to this. MOTION by Harris , seconded by Drigans , that the Planning Commission recommend to Councilapproval of the request for a lot split , L .S . #74-02, by Bernard Urbick, to split Lot 39 , Auditor 's Subdivision No . 92, into four building sites located at 58th and Arthur Street N.E. contingent upon an agreement with the City to provide park property . Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously . 4 . TREE ORDINANCE Mr. Clark said this ordinance has been passed down' to the Planning Commission by the Council . It is not required that the Planning Commission have a Public Hearing, but you may want to have one. We are somewhat bound in by the number of days we have to react to this ordinance. Council has 65 days to react to this ordinance, which is May 8th. They have to adopt an ordinance that is agreeable to the. committee, or within 45 days after May 8th, there will have to be a referendum. If they adopt an ordinance that is not agreeable to the committee, it will still have to go to a. referendum. This ordinance refers to all public land. Mr. Fitzpatrick said he would like to get some input from the Environmental Quality Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission but because of the time element, there wasn' t time for them to have individual meetings, so maybe a joint meeting could be considered. Mr. Drigans said it might make a cumbersome board to have so many committees conducting the hearing. He said he thought they could expect quite a turn-out for this hearing. Mr. Langenfeld, Chairman of the Environmental Quality Commission, felt if the members of the other committees were in the audience, it would accomplish the same thing. Mr. Clark said that as far as setting up a Public Hearing date,- I don' t think we have to have the required 14 days notice. This could be publicized in the paper and as people are aware of this ordinance, they will be watching for any Public Hearing. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 18, 1974 Page 8 7 REQUEST FOR LOT SPLIT, L. S #74-02, -RNARD URBICK: SPLIT LOT 39, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 9[, INTO FO G SITES, LOCATED AT 58TH AND ARTHUR STREET i N. E, The City Manager advised the Council that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the request with the stipulation that park property be provided. i MOTION by Councilman Utter to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant the lot split as requested by Mr. Bernard Urbick, Lot Split #74-02. Seconded by Councilman Nee. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, s Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. i I i The City Manager said he had an extension of the current item which would need Council action at this time. He explained there was an agreement by the property ! owner to sell 30 feet for park and 60 feet of additional land for a total price of $2,594.72, w;+ich is a fair price for the land, he added. He pointed out this 1 property to be in the Innsbruck North area. He said this would be two buildable sites and more than where the home.is. i jMOTION by Councilman Utter to execute the agreement between Mr. Bernard Urbick and the j City of Fridley for the purchase of land in the amount of $2,594.72. Seconded by I Councilman Starwalt. i Councilman Starwalt said this property is in the same area as the 12 acre park site in Innsbruck North. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. . TREE ORDINANCE: The Cit Manager said the PlanningCommission had set a Public Hearin on the Tree Ord Ordinance for March 20, 1974 and there would be no action necessary by the Council at this present meeting. REVIEW OF FINAL PLAT, RICE CREEK ESTATES, P. S. V74-01, GOODCO, INC., AND PINE i TREE BUILDERS; BEING A P.EPLAT OF PART OF LOTS 9 AND 10, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 22, LOCATED BETWEEN RICE CREEK ROAD AND 61ST AVENUE N. E., AND WEST OF BENJAMIN STREET N. E.: The City Manager said this item had been taken care of earlier in the meeting. j REZONING REQUEST ZOA #74-01, KENNING NELSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY: TO REZONE LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 13, RIVERWOOD MANOR, FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AREAS) R-3, GErERAL MULTIPLE FAMILY DUELLING .AREAS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 24 NIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE LOCATED SOUTH OF 71ST WAY N. E., AND WEST OF EAST RIVER ROAD: The City Manager said the item had been continued at the.Planning Commission ]ever. !I I The City Manager said the remaining items on the Planning Commission agenda were discussion items and would not require any Council action, but the Council could discuss the items. MOTION by Councilman -Breider to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of March 6, 1974. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF MARCH 3, 1974: I A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF SECTION 214.0313, FRIDLEY SIGN ORDINANCE, TO INCREASE TH E MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN; FROM 6 SQUARE FEET ' "24 SQUARE FEET SIGN rl AND FR ,1•t 6 SQUARE FEET T0 75 SQUARE FEET (S G 0 ALLOW THE ERECTION OF TWO TRAFFIC DIRECTIO,'AL SIGNS TO BE LOCATED ON PARCELS 600 6E�D 2400, SE R-24, ;0CONY ; INGOE R D R HEAST, FRIDLEY, MINNEsOTAT.—�REQJEST BY UNITY H SPI + , :)OO OSBORNFR—OZ—N. E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA.): The City Manager said the first item in the minutes dealt with a request for a variance in the sign ordinance requested by Unity Hospital. He explained the Board of Appeals had recommended denial of the variance. �' MUTUAL AGREEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) This agreement made and entered into this day of March, 1974, by and between Bernard L. and Constance C. Urbick, hereinafter referred to as the property owner, and the City of Fridley, a municipal corporation in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the City. WHEREAS, Bernard L. and Constance C. Urbick are the owners of Lot 39, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92, Section 24, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the property owner intends to split this property for single family homes; and WHEREAS, the City at the present time wishes to acquire an additional area not less than. the Southerly Ninty (90) feet of said Lot 39, shown on Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part of this agreement; and WHEREAS, the City and the owner have agreed that the fair market value of land in this area is worth eighty-five ($85.00) dollars per front foot with the special assessments paid. It has been determined that special assessments on the Southerly Minty (90) feet of Lot 39, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92 are $35.94 _. ' per front foot. It also has been estimated that it would cost the owner One Thousand and No Cents ($1,O00.00) to fill the lot to make it marketable and also it has been agreed that the owner would dedicate Thirty (30) front feet which represents Ten Percent (10%) of the frontage being split, less the lot being occupied by his present home. NOW, THEREFORE, be it agreed by the owner and. the City that the owner will deed the Southerly Ninty (90) feet of Lot 39, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92 in return the owner will receive $1,943.60 compensation. Said $1,943.60 has been arrived at by the following method, Ninty (90) feet less Thirty (30) feet park dedication results in a Sixty (60) foot purchase by the City Eighty-five ($85.00) dollars per front foot market value less $35.95 _ per front foot special assessments multiplied by Sixty (60) equals __,L2_,.943.60--.-- less $1,000.00 for fill. II '1, t i Vol � f a 1 ' i__ Total value of the Southerly Ninty (90) feet of Lot 39, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92 is _$1,943.60 The City also agrees to pay to the owner $651.12 to cover the real estate taxes and special assessment installment due and payable in the year 1974. Therefore, upon receipt of a deed for the Southerly Ninety (90) feet of Lot 39, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92, the City agrees to pay the yaw-ner $2,594.72 In presence Of: Bernard L. Urbick Constance C. Urbick City of Fridley By Mayor And City Manager