Loading...
LS71-09 Form #5-6a LOT SPLIT APPLICATION CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR CITY USE ONLY _ Applicant's Name APPLICANT: /!' i L� c Lot Split # 7/-- o L ADDRESS: ��SD SUF�t' N &/DL.E✓��// % ✓� � Street City Zip Code Date Filod: &&V TELEPHONE # ,7 7,Pp' 4Z"l Fee:$& Receipt Lz +� Home Susiness Council Action:Date rd oREMARKS: 00 PROPERTY owNER(s) 77 �,� _ _ cS'%f/E�'res Zlive- P4 3 0 1 {' ADDRESS(ES) m a 9 o Street City Zip Code -P m Cd Street City Zip Code o TELEPHONE #(S) Home Business m +) Cd N O a M P4 + m Property Location on Street or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) w H Legal Description of Property: Reason for Lot Split: / T � l-- jND/!/iyuAZ G�/A'lICTI / d Sf= a a /71 � Total Area of Property ? sq. ft. r Present Zoning Classification -I The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE: SIGNATURE ` BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Seo rzv ee side for additional instructions) PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration - Remarks: PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration - Remarks: CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration - Remarks: LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE 1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley 2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property involved and the lot split fee of $15.00 for each original lot being split. 3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets & Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of the Subcommittee. 4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels along with the new parcels created with all existing structures tied in. 5. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of the Planning Commission. 6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday of the month. 7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must be complied with by the applicant. 8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent papers for his signature. 9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant should file the lot split in Anoka County. 10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed. NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS. 01�71-- © 7 L.S. 471-09 Ing. Siverts, Jr. Part of Lot C, RLS No. 3 For a bldg. site � ,.- g / Lj 0411 uj Q I 1 AI©— - 305 }+ I z 7 /B /9 ,2G V) D � 6 R /sk D U a et.. ROA^ � -- -LI AU /T-OR'S SUB 23 1a B�C [J O. oil 2Z k ,i irj AVENUE N.E. 0 4 M s RISE GREE jSTEIGE 4^ ; 4 RICE CRE K v� .F RAC !i'C 4-f iG I AV 6 w.� w �� .P 'C�"� 5 �v1 .� �� ^i to twi7p2 2 a H. AVE N C�� N O� Q- 30 _j 14.� - -� N. w A _1� t 66TH. AVENUE N. . H z rslc 1- 14 1 G Q II J =.//i Imo- /vV S r ' 13 2 � -- - F .,�, N .Ro�1. 4 4{�Q - G� IpN _ - — ' pf Y .!is _z . . _ _ CL Csti B 7 117 11 MISSISSIPPI (STATE AID 304) STREET_ i -' w I Lot Split L.S. #71-09 Ing. Siverts, Jr. OFFICE OF Portion of Lot C, RLS No. 3 64#00 cav#ry SURVEMOR Roland W. Anderson Room E227, County Court House County Surveyor ANOKA, MIIMSOTA 55303 Home Phone: 421-4366 421-4760, Ex. 275 & 276 August 18, 1971 Reguarding lot split - of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 3 To-Ing T. Sivert, Jr. and Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Fridley. In a telephone conversation with Mr. James M. Nielson, examiner of titles in Anoka County, Minnesota, a decision was made to except the legal descrip- tion as shown on the copy of Mr. Ing Siverts Mortgage Loan Survey, subject to corrections of directional wordings in the description. Mr. Nielson explained that a description that does not completely bound a tract of land by courses and distances is exceptable under the Registered Land Survey Plat Law. This letter is to inform you that this description will be acceptable in the Anoka County Registrar of Title Office. Sincerly yours, Roland Anderson ` M Planning Commission Meeting - August 18, 1971 Page 7 Roger Larson, James Wiensch and Frank Reese were present for the townhouse development. The improvements in the green areas were noted. Mr. Reese said that attached garages or tuck under garages are better adapted to sloping land-- this land is level so that it would be no improvement in this instance. They now have 60 feet between structures. The sidewalks and doors are basically the same circulation system. Dumpsters will be inside of the building and refuse will be hauled away. There is a forty foot right of way along the East side, which will be deeded over at the time of the building. They are allowing for a future right of way along the West side. Chairman Fitzpatrick explained that the City will have a slope easement of 160 feet North on Rice Creek and the developers cannot build on it, but can use it for density and the City would retain ownership. Mr. Reese continued that there will be trees around the homes. The homes will be three bedrooms, full bath, full basement, no walkout, have individual furnace and central air conditioning. Darrel Clark explained that the preliminary plan before the Planning Com- mission becomes the basis for the final plan after Council approves it. The Commission now is to approve the arrangement of buildings, density and the units for every 3,000 square feet and accept the layout. Mr. Zeglen had some doubts about the parking. MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Minish, that the Planning Commission recom- mend approval of the preliminary plan of the Townhouse Development as submitted and presented to the Planning Commission, dated August 18, 1971. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 6. CONFIRM PUBLIC HEARING DATE: REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #71-12, HARLAND E. BERRY: To construct a double bungalow on Lots 3 and 4, Block 4, Ostman's Third Addition per City Code, 45.051, 3, D, on September 1, 1971. MOTION by Minish, seconded by Zeglen, that the Planning Commission confirm the public hearing date of September 1, 1971 of a request for a Special Use Permit, SP #71-12, by Harland E. Berry to construct a double bungalow on Lots 3 and 4, Block 4, Ostman's Third Addition per City Code 45.051, 3, D. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 7. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #71-09, ING SIVERTS, JR. : Part of Lot C, Registered Land Survey No. 3 - for building site. Mr. Siverts' request is to split Lot C. His home is on the North end. The area of Lot C is approximately 34,450 square feet. The Southern portion would be split in such A fashion so as to give the proposed buyer about 20,000 or more square feet. The County Surveyor, Roland W. Anderson, submitted a statement addressed to Mr. Siverts and the Planning Commission. to inform the:,; that the Mortgage ` Planning Commission Meeting - August 18, 1971 Page 8 i Loan Survey dated August 17, 1971 would be acceptable in the Anoka County Registrar of Title Office. Mr. Clark explained that when a lot split is not complicated or involved, it is not necessary to go to the Plats & Subdivisions Subcommittee. The Chair- man of this Committee, Mr. Schmedeke, met with Mr. Siverts. MOTION by Zeglen, iseconded by Minish, that the Planning Commission recom- mend approval of the request for a Lot Split, L.S. #71-09, of part of Lot C, Registered Land Survey No. 3 for a building site as indicated on Mortgage Land Survey by Suburban Engineering, Inc. dated August 17, 1971. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 8. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE: REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #71-13, DICK'S NORTH STAR: Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 7, Berlin Addition. To sell recreational trailers per Code 45.101, 3, N. MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Minish, that the Planning Commission confirm the public hearing date of September 22, 1971 for the request of a Special Use Permit, SP #71-13, Dick's North Star to sell recreational trailers as per Code 45.101, 3, N, on Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 7, Berlin Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 9. DISCUSSION OF LOW SWAMP LAND NORTH OF 79TH BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AND BURLING- TON-NORTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS: Chairman Fitzpatrick said that the letter from Mr. Winston Jacobson dated July 18, 1971 regarding this land came before the Park Commission. Because the amount of the property involved is large, they felt whatever could be done should be by the County Commissioners in conjunction with the City. The area is too large and expensive, but it is the kind of thing they would like to preserve for open space. Mr. Jacobson's concern was that he was afraid the City of Fridley was about to dump Burlington-Northern excavation there. The area is much more wild and populated with wild life than any other piece of property in Fridley. Mr. Clark said that the City would have to give the land owner permission to have fill dumped on the land. The land will be opened up with sewer and water soon. Chairman Fitzpatrick wondered if the City could postpone the land getting fill. Mr. Minish wondered if it would be permissible to make a recommendation now to permit fill to be dumped in that area while the City contacts the appropriate County Agencies for their recommendation. In the meantime, the boundary lines should be set. Mr. Clark suggested Main Street which runs about 1300 feet West of Univer- sity Avenue and at the East edge of the park. This lanJ is lower than the park land and has peaty soil. Council's attention could be trought to the fact that filling this land and developing it would be a los-, of wild life preserve. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 30, 1971 PAGE 12 bar-b-que pits with clustered picnic tables. They do not have a swimming pool because they cause too much trouble in a development of this type. He added that they had to rent these buildings and if any additional facilities were needed to rent them, they would be put in. MOTION by Councilman Liebl to concur with the Planning Commission and approve the preliminary plan for the Townhouse Development as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Harris with the stipulations that the green area to the north be set up as a ,park and play area and the area along the railroad right of way be screened and fenced. With the approval of the amendment by Councilman Liebl , there was a voice vote, all voting any, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. f 5. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #71-09, ING SIVE_RTS, J PART OF LOT C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0. 3 - FOR BUILDING SITE: MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to concur with the Planning Commission and approve the Lot Split request, LS #71-09, Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting ay, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. 6. DISCUSSION OF LOW SWAMP LAND NORTH OF 79TH BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AND BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS: The City Engineer said that he wished to advise the City Council that there have already been quite a few actions taken by their body for putting in water, sewer, and roads in this area and the owners have been told that they can fill. If the Council has any reservations they should act now because they have already gone too far. Councilman Harris commented that they would have a problem if they did not allow the owners to develop. This would be confiscation without compensation. The City would either have to allow development or buy the property. Mayor Kirkham added that he felt they should go ahead with the development. Councilman Kelshaw asked the City Attorney if there were any ordinances which stated that you could not fill in swamp land? The City Attorney replied that you could not impede the flow of lakes, rivers or drainage ditches. If there were any drainage ditches in this area they would have to be careful not to fill them. Councilman Kelshaw added that he felt the developers should be made mindful of the fact that any traffic coming from the area after it was developed should not be channeled to East River Road. MOTION by Councilman Breider to proceed with the plans and improvements previously authorized by the City Council. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FRIDLEY FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION AND THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE CITY GARAGE EXPANSION AND CONCURRENCE OF THE AWARDING OF THE BID TO LOEFFLER-ENGSTRAND HARRIS, BROS. & BACON'S ELECTRIC (BIDS LISTED IN MINUTES OF AUGUST 16, 1971) : Mr. Dick Harris said that 'he wanted it known that the Harris Bros. mentioned in connection with the bid on the City Garage did not have anything to do with his company, they did not even bid. He went on to 1 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 30, 1971 PAGE 11 the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee. Edison Mobile Homes had been the former owner of the building and had been in the area before a Special Use Permit was required, so, now that ownership was changing hands, Viking Chevrolet required the permit. Councilman Harris asked if there was any possibility that Edison could move their operation to the back of the lot and continue selling. Mr. Smith answered that they made the provision when they bought the property that if all the mobile homes were not sold, they would have to be moved. The latest information they had was that the hardware had been sold. The City Attorney commented that if the area had been used in the past it could be grandfathered in. Mr. Smith replied that it had only been used for storage, not for selling. Councilman Harris asked if Viking Chevrolet has purchased the building and the land and was told that they had. He continued that he felt this was a good use for this area and will improve it . Councilman Kelshaw asked if they had not rezoned a piece of property on University Avenue for this same purpose. Mr. Smith explained that they had, but General Motors would not approve building in that area. MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #71-10, by Viking Chevrolet, with the stipulation that the request be referred to the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. 4. APPROVE PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT BY ROGER LARSON: THE NORTH 813 FEET OF THE EAST 3/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SECTION 13 (69TH AVENUE AT EAST CITY LIMITS) : The City Engineer reported that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this request. This area had been approved for apartments by the City Council, but their survey had shown that apartments would not be a good idea in this area so- they had decided to go with townhouses. His only recommendation would be that they provide more adequate recreational facilities in the complex. Mr. Frank Reese was present for the development. Mr. Reese explained that none of the grades in the area would be changed more than 2 feet . There would be intensive landscaping done on the property. Each home would have trees and shrubs. The townhouses would be 55 feet from back to back. The homes were built in clusters with not more than six townhouses to a cluster. Each had three bedrooms, with 1200 square feet of living space upstairs and 600 square feet in the lower level. Councilman Harris asked what the densityl. of the project was. Mr. Reese answered that there were 10 homes per acre but, if you included the land which the developers had deeded to the City for park, it came out to six homes per acre. This does meet the density requirements. 1, They had originally planned 260 apartments. There will only be 141 townhouses. Councilman Kelshaw asked what the value of the units was. Mr. Reese answered that they rented for $275 a month plus utilities and they were strictly rental units, none would be sold. The City Engineer commented that they had given the City 15 acres of land for development into recreatonal facilities. Generally their requirements are satisfactory and our only concern is with these recrea- tional facilities. We don't have any in the area now. Mr. Reese explained that their lender is very strict about recreational facilities. He said they are planning one tot lot, but there are green areas where another could be added. There will be tennis courts, which the City will actually own and F I i Z/7 79 c• 3 • ^+ -� to Zr A �• to { 3• c� 1 V _\ UZI ." —75 co w i n co o c Mler 49/ a n o, w v w A ON Do• z o s I AN If 1-7 o• r �Jev¢Qri $p� X1.2 \ M F6 61-1 IN moo' - 31.4' 33.5t— That 3 5tThat part of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying norther of the following described line towit: Beginning at a point on the eastsdgy line of said Tract C, distant 200 feet southe&W of the most southerly corner of Tract F, of said Registered ara,K; qf= Land Survey; thence northwesterly toAjdre intersection with the wester line of said Tract C, distan* ,* 217 .79 feet souther of the northwest corner of said Tract C and there terminating. This is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. This survey is made only in connection with a mortgage loan now being placed on the property and no liability is assumed except to the holder of such mortgage or any other interest acquired by the reason of such mortgage. It is understood and agreed no monuments have been placed for the purpose of establishing lot lines or boundary corners. Dated this 17day of A. D. 192, Z. SUBURBAN ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers Surveyors 32$ by f ' �