LS73-05 Form #5-68 LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
CITY OF FRIDLEY
FOR CITY USE ONLY
Applicant's Name
APPLICANT: d 1�,fv���?� �i ���� u(,:'�a I`. I _ —
/( 11 �l/� Lot Split 3
ADDRESS: vy C� /�(nit d 6• `LCA1�1�2,1 ►I F1 Vl
Street City Zip Code Date Filed:
W m TELEPHONE # 434-"7C�f•8 199- Feer Receipt
Home Business Council Action:Date
d o REMARKS:
00 PROPERTY OWNER(S)
IcId
aa)
P, .0
ADDRESS(ES)
0a 9 o Street City Zip Code
- m C
+' M ad Street City Zip Code
o ami TELEPHONE #(S)
Home Business
m C
M P4 04 .w
O -
0] � W
�
M m H Property Location on Street
or Exact Street Address (IF ANY) �L- `� /'�f k)le
w
U
H Legal Description of Property:
16
Reason for Lot Split:
Total Area of Property sq. ft. Present Zoning Classification
The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and
representations stated in this application are true and
correct.
DATE: � � 3 �*� SIGNA 1✓ GJ`�. -
BELOW FOR CITY USE ONLY (Seo reverse side f additional instructions)
PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
PLANNING COMMISSION: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
CITY COUNCIL: Date of Consideration -
Remarks:
l
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION PROCEDURE
1 . Obtain application form at City Hall. (6431 University Ave. N.E. , Fridley
2. Return completed application form with the required sketch of the property
involved and the lot split fee of $15.00 for each original lot being split.
3. The application will be submitted to the Plats & Subdivisions and Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee for recommendations. This Committee meets once a
month, when required. The City will supply the applicant with minutes of
the Subcommittee.
4. Following the Plats & Subs Committee recommendation of approval, the owner
must then obtain a Certificate of Survey on the original parcel or parcels
along with the .new parcels created with all existing structures tied in.
5. The Certificate of Survey should then contain a simple description of a part
of a platted lot or registered lot and be filed with the Engineering Department
for Planning Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission meets on the
second and fourth Thursday of the month. The City will supply the applicant
with minutes of the Planning Commission.
6. The recommendations of the Planning Commission are submitted to the City
Council for final action. The Council meets on the first and third Monday
of the month.
7. The City Council approval may be subject to certain stipulations which must
be complied with by the applicant.
8. A letter will be sent to the applicant to notify him of the Council action
and to advise him to comply with the conditions imposed by the City. The
letter will also contain any necessary deeds for easements and other pertinent
papers for his signature.
9. When all the conditions of the lot split have been complied with, the applicant
should file the lot split in Anoka County.
10. In all cases where Council action has been sought and denied, no petition for
identical action can be presented until a period of six months has elapsed.
NOTE: THE RESULTING REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NEW PARCELS IN TOTAL AFTER THE LOT SPLIT, MAY EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED TO THE ORIGINAL PARCEL. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OF FRIDLEY MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS.
S'
t
Iond Plonnin9 6875-1M/9h1-117y*C5 NE.
la>d Swwecy A1inneu1Vhs31.
Soils Te5hmq ENGINEERING, INC. C'/Mrnnrsofa
C/Yll&"WKIP0l Sa7wl d 066
E /leer%n9 En9 ineers Surveeyon5
L.S. #73-05 Bernard Julko ski
Split of part of Lot 6, 7
Aud. Sub. #153, to develop
land either multiple or Conm.
1 A .L i
That part C` ..ots 6 nzd 7 Auditors SUdivisior :rc . 1553
An-:.,ka Ccunt7, MiI:nesEft`.a described Is fc1.l.-ws' :3e�: ini":lm— a
t'-,e _ntersectiori of the Sout l liiie 7 -"n(d R 1 n
W iicn Is parallei with and 257 Feet illnst of the West f
Se:ctior. 25, ."own ship -10, Isar ,e 2)i ; thencei:rxst ' c;:r: :a_i
.:ut' li;e of !x-It 7 a distnnce of 17O feet- thence ::;rtn
parallel with said West line R d`,stpnce of 12.:') feet; `f �_'Yxe
West and parallel iJiti: said :;Cllt:l 11^e of Lot 7 R ttii 'i'X?CC
of 110 feet, thence Nora-n Lsnd parallel with the west 1 ine of
said section to the Toortfl Line of :ct C3's '.-;fence Went Rion,?
said- Ncrth line to its intersection wit.n nfcresaid lire w—cr,
is 277 feet Fast of the 0Iest 'Line of "ection Pj; thence ;~•cutrl
to the point of berinrinr. Sub,ie 1 , a -�,..ent, r
Ct 'tC 3.�� e.. :.....,.,�., Ui 1
record.
l
1
+7+
i
1
g4�JCL
��as � c�.,E .r 'L 0 fi 2
/03 --
i_
37146C
L.S. #73-05 Bernard Julkowski
Split of part of Lot 6 and 7
Auditor's Sub.. '
y t r, �'t""y' ��''"' develop land either Qom��x/goal or
E �a H*R.! `R I Nt INC. multiple.
�' (irtl.L•d/ui'r, ,til' 11;', �
11 CC
Ar
i
iL' ,Mi..JF:."abs a;. r 'QRJ•'.T1�., 1 7i�{'s tAYy�. X44 4!
1
FIT
�', {."! Y �q' t.� . , s :•.CAS 1 .:V '
T i ,
1i (Uo
. I ,
r
- 1
H6 E
' ��rc'>( '�•� u r 1't�;t ;� r 'i.,', r,Y'f Ur rl>;,t ,] >r v r f x.91 i`n;: ( i •;)•r•2'i/ � LCh` th'1�h'f7r 1l'] �l l'i' J lI Y'.4 '(r.r 1r al>' ' ,•t.l' i
: r i
r f..f!u. i I.J�• 7./.'ural,r 1.• , �'!C f p., .l,la. Ji/ r>;JJ., r,,. . �tlht.') :• ,,. r:r,l 01,:.r/ WJ 14114 �a i`. ..,/ r. 41"'y
-
,
. r
`.Nt-
a
Lots ano x , 1,uditor's Subdivision Number 153 , Anoka County ,
I hereby certify that th a is a true and corr-ct rei'rr-sent ,tirr
of the location of all buildingsi thereon, and all visible er,cr(
�4 day of A.D.19E4.
s
L �.m ,,-ar; x.36 m 4 kfJ` �I
. \ fieLr .
110
1t1o {"l ,il 1fU llfrjP.l
'sora
y
SURVEY FORS E. R . JULKOTS KI
1
_L
-_,
N `
;0� N`tH � N
� � �
i
rnesota , except tl�e West 257 feet thereof.
' of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land, and
chmr-nts , if any , from or on said lard . As surveyed by me this
i
I
622.53
- o.aa
+�•-1.--1�� 1:. ;R'l btu ' ' ��_rt�-r-� c .� � � � �
Coo
s
l i n
M a
. C
- � co
- - C'j :o
_r
14P t-cou
a C•
�jtw oft
u
w., 1 rise btti,.r 4 ►t tif,q «� aWe ,Q�So �wi fiA i►na 47 ,o? 7 �
BAN VNGIWFBINGI INC .
Engineers & Surveyors By /
N w CORNER
s rrrw�
L.S. #73-05 Bernard Julkowsk
Split off part of Lot 6 and 7
_ rrf Csc1 2 Auditor's Sub. #153, to develop
(n land either multiple or commericial
rYhAWeJWY
,,^^ .� W:,
+ 6i/-"a,- Aw. 01
a /Z+oJ 3 �itia F
--- A U D I T O R S r $ o 9 a ° '.br,'r '4
= ti c'4GoJ ; Lti�V Q 85217; �t/ti
h
wa
' C'g65 Ij " = 6� 0i
Ise � y2o > e Z y� ,LTJ
f-O.r. ow •Jn•so•r.ts �,A' ,�Q�IM
go --- .n�.0--- r�Y•d'�-'u of
2.,•.;" 52 �4� ASZb
_-- 1 (�'6o) (600) (64 0) AV E.
0. /?✓v/k ow ki !l `
Z601 �28'0,l /3o�„
�S MSI N p a
AIC
12
f 10 \` o.A+e N 2•Mt3r ` arrc / e iti Mr
N 4.161
,!"; i
3: 11c C/ y °� �•:�' 3
' _� I d � r �'t.-� �C�F ~ t��; '• ir�. �' �� / e � Vie.
4 2/•`!r. A - 0 t� S'ice' fu'"\e'd Ot-'%,ate`e _�l•t , a
Le$ iR! 1.ZA �� 3'•V`° /lf�;� 's-��'�e�yy+�.'� �r7f.s 3n.i 3n t� ,� .r�a
t R 7
I w A
J.IkI � �9•yt�tY�� �\'i �4t ;.wY.. f •y'°'�
li=sew c0 7%d 31 E
90 41
/J7 i i ate'`n -9 /e _3', r?
Z �� s • /0 �, // /2? ��RR * . � ,tom
w I; I 27 w 2 >`, ;`v i zYIN �
PIEF CE 4;
-
I 9 'woo
7 R; ' 2a
6L/1 V_ S/I'f.Rdp'! �1., wl i ♦M iC
r�ate,"Jr�t, t� l�� i I :t,a• •.
- i
s,-
n
1
r
,w
3 y
w
s
ii wL + a._.'.._
,U
CT
C P
e/ �p
•�
S
12GSr �/
(� voC,>% � / /�It .V� / o
1,4
'A C 14
ye L,4
/
con �Z7
L �/ c
ti� OFF .Y F, 3 33
^
K!:ALTC.f;ZV INSURERS
N
4: R AO / iv.. 6 h
March 1
1973
Calhoun Realty Company
1405 Silver Lake Road
New Brighton, Minnesota 55112
Attention: Gay Johnson
Re: 1050-1090-1120-1170 52nd Avenue N.E.
Dear Mr, Johnson:
In regard to your inquiry about spliting of part of Lots
6 and 7 to be sold as a separate parcel from the apartment com-
plex, we offer the following suggestions.
First, there has been no split approved by the City, there-
D fore, if a portion is sold, the City would not issue any building
permits . Consequently you should make application for a lot
split or plat.
With your application you will be required to show that the
resulting apartment site meets present code requirements for
area and parking.
If you have any questions please call.
Sincerely,
DARREL CLARK
Community Development Administrator
DC/de
March 28, 1973
Calhoun Realty Company
1405 Silver Lake Road
New Brighton, Minnesota 55112
Attention: Gay Johnson
Re: 1050-1090-1120-1170 52nd Avenue N.E.
Dear Mr. Johnson:
We have received your lot split application. The $20 fee
was not inclosed.
We will not be able to put this item on the agenda until
the other request in our letter of March 1, 1973 has been answered.
D We requested that with your lot split application you would
be required to show that the resulting apartment site would meet
the present code requirements for area and parking.
When we receive this information, your lot split application
will be processed.
Sincerely,
i
L—A ,cil
r /I
DARREL CLARK
Community Development Administrator
DC/de
560-3450
a
1
City o �NidCe
ANOKA COUNTY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE May 17, 1973 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421
i
Robert Hall of Fridley
333 West 34th Street
New York, New York 10001
Gentlemen:
The City of Fridley has received a request for a lot split,
L.S. #73-0511 by Bernard B. Julkowski, to split off part of Lot 6
and 7, Auditor's Subdivision No. 153, to develop the property either
multiple or commercial.
This property is located East of the Robert Hall store in
Fridley, on the South side of 52nd Avenue N.E.
There will be an informal Public Hearing on this request
on Wednesday evening, May 23, 1973. The Plats & Subdivisions-Streets
& Utilities Subcommittee will consider this item at 7:00 P.M. The
Planning Commission will consider this item the same evening at 8:00
P.M.
As any development of this property may affect the Robert
Hall store in Fridley at 5151 Central Avenue N.E. , it was at the
request of the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets $ Utilities Subcommittee
that Robert Hall be notified of this request.
Sincerely,
Dorothy Evltnson
Planning Commission Secretary
cc: Mr. Getzel
District Supervisor
Minneapolis Area
C/0 Robert Hall
5151 Central Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421.
i
June 6, 1973
Planning Commission
Fridley, Minnesota
Dear Chairman and Members;
I am sorry I am unable to attend this meeting due
to prior committments. My land is not sold! The new
owners of the apartment complex behind Robert Hall have
shown interest in buying this piece but nothing is defi-
nite. I will continue serious discussions with them but
I have been talking to them for months, so I think I have
done all I can do. In view of the 10 years I have waited
now, I hope you will approve this lot split. Thank you
for your time and cooperation.
Bernard R. Julkowski
ATTENTION OF: SUSPEND: AUGUST 14, 1973 CITY OF FRIDLEY
Darrel 6431 University N. E.
To Minneapolis Minn. 55421
612-560-3450
L J
Bernie Julkowski Lot Split on 52nd Ave. Aug. 9, 1973
SUBJECT DATE
Sketch for office building.
Would you please sketch an office building on Bernie's property on 52nd Ave. to show
how the parking, landscaping and the building would sit on the lot? Theidea isthat
the office building would be closed in the evenings, so the apartment dwellers could
use the facilities.
I would like this done fairly soon, to allow time to discuss the plans- with-Bernie,
then present the plans to the Council on August 20th.
NMQ
SIGNATURE
17
REPLY:.
DATE SIGNATURE
REPLIER'S COPY—RETAIN FOR YOUR FILES
ti From the desk of
JUEL MERCER
8-22- 73
Darrel - Would you see that this
material is sent to Bernie Julkowski
telling him that this is a rough
sketch of a proposed commercial
building on this property which does
use a common driveway and with the
' common use of the parking lot we
can minimize the problem of the apart
ment complex parking . Tell him to
talk to us if he wants to discuss
this proposal further, so we can
reach an agreement and then we. can
advise the Council . This should be
taken care of before the Meeting of
September 10th so this problem can
be resolved.
1-4-74 Checked with Darrel - He hasn' t heard
a word. Considered _.a__dead issue unless he
re-opens the request.
• r
a
i'
' 560-3450
city0
kJ �-
. T !` i ANOKA COUNTY
...."y. �r 'J
I� Y 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE August 28 , 1973 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421
n
1
Bernard Julkowski
1504 205th Avenue N.E.
Cedar, Minnesota 55011
Dear Bernie,
Please find enclosed a copy of a drawing indicating
a possible commercial building and parking plot plan.
Since the City is interested in seeing this land
developed in such a manner as to provide overflow parking
from the adjacent apartment during after-business hours,
we suggest you contact us for the purpose of coming to
an agreement prior to possible Council approval.
The next Council meeting is on September 10th and
items for their agenda should be confirmed by the preceding
Wednesday, therefore, if you desire Coucil action on the
10th, please contact me prior to September 5 , 1973 .
Sincerely,
DARREL CLARK
Community Development Administrator
DC/de
cc: Nasim Qureshi
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLATS $ SUBDIVISIONS-
STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING MAY 23, 1973 PAGE 1
CALL TO ORDER:
Acting Chairman Meissner called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Meissner, French, Forster, Christensen
Members Absent: Harris
Others Present: Darrel Clark, Community Development Administrator
APPROVE PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES:
MAY 23, 1973
MOTION by French, seconded by Christensen, that the Plats & Sub-
divisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee minutes of May 23, 1973 be
approved as written. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
1. CONTINUED: REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT: L.S. #73-05, BERNARD JULKOWSKI:
Split off part of Lot 6 and 7, Auditor's Subdivision No. 153, to
develop land either multiple or commercial.
Mr. Bernard Julkowski was present. Also-present were Mr. Jack Getzel,
District Supervisor for Robert Hall, and Mr. J. Klava, Manager of Robert
Hall in Fridley.
Mr. Meissner said this item had been continued to allow time to notify
the adjacent property owners of the proposed lot split.
Mr. Darrel Clark said the apartment complex that adjoins this property
has changed ownership several times. The present owner is having a parking
problem and has requested the City to remove the 'no parking' signs on 52nd
Avenue N.E. so there will be room for visitor parking.
• Mr. Clark said this parcel has been split off by the County for real
estate taxes, but the City doesn't honor the lot split and will not split
assessments or issue a building permit until the City Council approves
the lot split.
Mr. Julkowski said that when he built the apartment complex nine years
ago, it did meet all the codes. He said one of the owners is in the hospital
and he had just visited him there tonight. He said there is an interest in
buying this parcel, but there haven't been any serious negotiations. He said
he has held on to this property for nine years and has been unable to do any
thing with it, and he didn't want to hold onto it for another nine years while
they apartment owners decide �f t4gy will purchase it for additional parking.
• Plats & Subs.-Str. $ Util. Subcommittee Meeting- May .23, 1973 Page 2
Mr. Clark said Mr. Julkowski was correct when •he said the apartment
complex set all the codes at the time it was built in 1964. If the apartment
owners are having problems providing parking, they will soon be having a
problem renting their units.
Mr. Meissner asked how wide 52nd Avenue was. Mr. Clark said he thought
it was 30 feet. Mr. Meissner wondered if parking could be allowed on one side
of the street during certain hours. Mr. Clark said that according to the City
Code, off-street parking should be provided.
Mr. Clark said we have been discouraging this lot split because we have
felt additional parking areas are needed for the apartment complex.
Mr. Julkowski said that in 1964 he had a permit to construct 16 more
units on this parcel, but due to financing, he didn't construct them. Now
with the different requirements, he could only built 8 to 10 units on this
parcel.
Mr. Meissner asked Mr. Julkowski if he had any plans for this parcel.
Mr. Julkowski said he couldn't make any plans until he had the lot split.
He said he could sell the land to the apartment complex.
Mr. Clark said if Mr Julkowski did utilize this parcel and put a fence
around it, the apartment complex would have even a bigger problem, because they
do park some cars, on occasion, on this parcel now.
Mr. Julkowski said he has had property for nine years he hasn't been
able to use. He said it shouldn't have to be his consideration that the
apartment complex has parking problems.
Mr. Clark said the parcel Mr. Julkowski wants to split off was 27,240
square feet so it is large enough to be built upon in commercial zoning.
Mr. Christensen asked who owned the property West of this parcel. Mr.
Julkowski said it belonggd to Robert Hall. Mr. Getzel and Mr. Klava. said they
had no objection to this lot split. They said if Mr. Julkowski should need
additional land to construct something on this parcel, he probably could
purchase some from Robert Hall. Mr. Clark said Robert Hall would have to
keep enough property so they met the zoning requirements.
Mr. Clark said if Mr. Julkowski should want to build apartments on this
parcel, he would have to rezone to R-3. The apartment complex should be
rezoned to R-3 at the same time because they are now a legal non-conforming use.
Mr. Heissner said nothing could be built on this parcel until the lot
split is approved.
MOTION by French, seconded by Christensen, that the Plats & Subdivisions-
Streets i Utilites Subcommittee recommend to the Planning Commission approval
of the request for a lot split, L.S. #73-05, by Bernard Julkowski, to split
off part of Lot b and 7, Auditor's Subdivision No. 153, to develop the land
either congrcial or multiple. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Meeting - May 9, 1973 Page 10
6, REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIL.S. 973-05 BERNARD JULKOWSKI: Split off
part of Lot 6 and 7, Au ' vision No, 153, to develop land
either multiple or commercial.
Mr. Clark said this property is located East of Robert Hall on the
South side of 52nd Avenue N.E. The property is zoned C-1S. When the
apartment houses were built that• are on part of this property, they could
be built in C-IS zoning, Mr. Julkowski originally owned all this property,
but he consequently sold the apartments and sold this parcel. This has
already been split by the County for real estate tax purposes, but the City
does not honor this split. He has to get City approval of the split before
the special assessments can be split or a building permit issued. The part
he wants to split off does meet the requirements for C;41S zoning.
This was continued by the Plats $ Subdivisions-Streets $ Utilities
Subcommittee because they would like to give the owner of the apartment
complex and Robert Hall a chance to be heard. The apartment complex is
having parking problems. They met the code requirements when the apartments
were built but according to our present codes *hey should have 108 parking
stalls and they only have 73. If the owner of the apartment complex should
want to purchase this property, it should not be split off.
Mr. Harris said some of the cars for this apartment complex are being
parked in the fire lane.
Mr. Clark said this will not be considered by the Planning Commission
tonight, as it was tabled at the Subcommittee level.
7. ZERO SETBACKS
Mr. Fitzpatrick said this wa referred to the Planning Commission
by the Board of Appeals. At the' last meeting they approved zero side
yard setbacks f r two proposed ildings, but they weren't quite comfortable
with their decis ns, so they re asking the Planning Commission for any
recommendation we ight wish o make on zero setbacks.
Mr. Clark prese to a colored rendering of the area between 77th
and 79th Avenue N.E. a between Main Street and the Burlington Northern
right of way. The tw p posed buildings that had zero side yard setbacks
approved are in this rea.
Mr. Drigans aid there e 40 foot lots in this area and the petitioner
felt that in ord r to build a u ble building he asked us to consider zero
side yard setb ks.
Mr. Harris said this is Onaway Addition that was platted in 1911. All
the lots are 40 feet wide except the end lots which are a little larger. The
lots facing 77th Avenue are 25 foot lots. The alley in Block 7 has been
vacated. Mr. Harris said everyone else who has built in this area followed
the rules of the City. Block I is the only block in this area without
industrial development.
r
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 6, 1973 PAGE 1
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Fitzpatrick called the meeting to order at 8:20 P.M.
•
ROLL CALL: .
Members Present: Fitzpatrick, Harris, Blair, Drigans, Lindblad
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, Planning Assistant
APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 23, 1973
MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commission
approve the minutes of the May 23, 1973 meeting as written. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVE PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITJES SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES:
MAY 23, 1973
MOTION by Harris, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission
receive the minutes of Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee
meeting of May 23, 1973. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: MAY 23, 1973
MOTION by Blair, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission
receive the minutes of Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee of
the May 24, 1973 meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: MAY 29, 1973 _
MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Harris, that the Planning Commission
receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals for the May 29, 1973 meeting.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carx ' unanimously,
1. CONTINUED: REQUEST FOR A IAT SPLIT, S. #73-05, RNARD JULKOWSKI:
split off part of Lot 6 and 7, Auciito 's Subdivi on No. 153, to
develop land either multiple or commerc
Chairman Fitzpatrick said this item was continued at the last meeting
to have the petitioner continue to negotiate with the apartment owner for the
purchase of this property, for their needed parking.
MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commission
receive a lettyr from BgTpard Julkowski, dated June 6, 1973. Upon a voice
Vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Meeting - June 6, 1973 Page 2
Mr. Drigans said the letter states that there has been some further
negotiations on this property, but nothing definite has been accomplished.
Mr. Fitzpatrick said he was still asking for the lot split.
Mr. Boardman said the apartment complex does need additional area
for parking. Mr. Julkowski and one of the apartment owners did come in
to the City offices and discuss this, and the aparment owner was quite
vehement about purchasing land for parking only.
Mr. Drigans said that in previous discussions, it has been stated
that if Mr. Julkowski got the lot split, and rezoned the property, he
could build eight or ten apartment units on this parcel , but if the
apartment complex purchased the property, all they could use it for was
parking, because it would be considered as one parcel, and they would
need this additional space to meet the present parking requirements for
t`he existing units.
Mr. Fitzpatrick asked if administration has a recommendation. Mr.
i Boardman said as this property is zoned commercial, if the lot split was
granted, as commercial property, it would be too expensive for the apartment
owner to purchase. For this reason, a lot split at this time would not be
favorable for any negotiations for purchase of this parcel by the apartment
owner.
Mr. Lindblad said the apartment owners have had several years to decide
if they want to purchase this parcel or not. If there are serious negotiations
going on, the apartment owner should be here to ask for a continuation for
the time he needs. There is no way we can force him to purchase this
property. .
Mr. Drigans said that when the apartment complex was constructed, it
did meet the existing standards. If the owner of this property we are
considering, wants to use this parcel for something else, I think he has
the right to use it. The problem is that if it is developed for a different
use, it could well compound the parking problem.
Mr. Harris said he didn't think we could force the apartment complex
to use this for a parking rot only. For all practical purposes, this lot
is split. It is split at the County and only needs City approval. If this
parcel is developed commercially, maybe there can be an arrangement worked
out so the apartment complex can use some of it for their additional parking.
NOTION by Blair, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission
recommend to Council, approval of lot split request, L.S. #73-05, by
Bernard Julkowski, to split off part of Lot 6 and 7, Auditor's Subdivision
No. 153, to develop land either multiple or commercial . Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
2. LOT SPLIT REQUES : L.S. #73-07 ID S. MYCKA: Split off the
Westerly 10 feet Lot 32evised Auditor's Subdivision No. 77,
to be purchased by t er of Lot 31.
'x p Yi4 Mycka „ jyr. Dona Nielsen, owner of Lot 31, were present.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1973 PAGE 10
s;
JUCE_IVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COKMISSICN MEETING OF MAY 23, 1973: s
CONTINUED: VACATION REQUEST: SAV #73-08, DENNIS A. RANSTROM: VACATE 20 FOOT
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT LINE BETWEEN LOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK 1, RICE CREEK SCHOOL r
ADDITION, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A HOME ON TWO LOTS. SAME AS 6700 ARTHUR STREET N. E.;
The City Engineer said a Public Hearing had been set for June 11, 1973 on this item.
CONTINUED: REQUEST FOR LOT SPLIT, ! S. #73-05 BERNARD JULKOWSKI: SPLIT OFF
WT OF LOT 6 AND 7, AUDITOR'S SUBD 153, TO DEVELOP LAND EITHER MULTIPLE
4A COMMERCIAL,:
The City Engineer said there was action required on the item.
LMR USE DISCUSSION: RODGER CHRISTENSON: PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A SCHOOL GARAGE ON
,LOT 1, AND THE NORT!i 25 FEET OF LOT 2, BLOCK 6, RICE CREEK PLAZA SOUTH ADDITION,
,S�§JECT TO ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD.:
The City Engineer said this item concerned the proposed construction of a School Bus
Garage by Rodger Christenson. He said a letter had been submitted by Mr. Carl Newquist,
Attorney for Mr. Christenson.
MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the letter from Carl Newquist in regard to the
construction of a school bus garage dated May 30, 1973. Seconded by Councilman
Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried
unanimously.
Mayor Liebl read the letter to the. Council and audience. He said nothing could be
done on the matter that evening. ..
Mayor Liebl said Mr. Christenson was trying to make an offer to the City for the land
for $35,000 or perhaps less. He said he understood the complaint of the neighborhood,
but the applicant has to be out of the current business structure by fall. He said
he would like to know if the City could exchange land or reimburse Mr. Christenson.
Acting City Attorney, James Gibbs, said he had talked to Mr. Herrick and there was
some question on the value of the land. He said the land is zoned light industry
and the applicant could build the proposed structure on the land. He said perhaps
there could be an adequate compromise worked out. He said it was his considered opinion
that Mr. Christenson had a right to build the school bus garage on ttki property.
MOTION by Councilman Breider to table the item to June 11, 1973 and that the Administration
investigate the possibility of using the land for a park facility and exchanging some
other facility. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the Planning Commission minutes of May 23,1973.
Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl
declared the motion carried unanimously.
ItECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE METG
OF MAY 24, 1973:
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO APPROVE THE REMODELING OF THE RESTAURANT FOR THE PURPOSE
OF $ERVING FOOD, COCKTAILS, AND BEER. LOCATLD ON AUDITOR S�nIVISION #153, LOT 2,
PARCEL 80; THE SATE BEING 5247 CENTRAL AVENUE N. E. ' -FRiDLEY, MINNESOTA. MQITEST BY
HSP-JnHNSON - GI:nUNn RC1117D =2100 NORTH SNELLING AVEN?' ROSEVILY MINNESOTA 55113)1
i 1;
I r
REGULAR COUNC 1 L M I. 91� JUNI' 18 , 1973 PAGE 16 11
3D
MOTION by Councilrnai, Breider to appoint Mr . James Hill , Assistant
City Manager/Public Safety Director , as actin; City ;`Tanager for the
two week period of the City Manager ' s vacation . seconded by Council-
man Nee for discussion .
Couacilman Breider said lie was talking about a period of two weeks
and there are two Assistant City Managers . He said he was thinking
about the efficiency of having more than one man able to handle the
duties of the administration. He said if they would rotate , this
would be good for the City.
Mayor Liebl said the City Engineer and the Administrative Assistant
could also be considered in the rotation.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, Starwalt , Liebl , Nee , and Breider voting aye,
Utter abstaining , Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES ,OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 6 , 1973 :
RE UEST FOR LOT SPLIT L . S. #73-05 BERNARD JULKOWSKI ,
SPLA' OFF PART OF LOT 6 AND 7 AUDITOR' S SUBDIVISION NO.
157 , TO D VM0_P L D EITHER MULTIPL OR COMMERCIAL :
The City Engineer said that there is a parking problem in
the area. He said the Administration has tried to work out
the problem with Mr . Julkowski and the apartment owner to
make it a part of the apartment area. He said negotiations
had gone on and no progress had been made .
The City Attorney suggested tabling the item until Mr.
.Julkowski was in attendance at a meeting .
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to table the request for the
lot split by Mr . Bernard Julkowski . Seconded by Council -
man Breider . Upon a voice vote , all voting aye , Mayor
Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously .
LOT SPLIT REQUEST : L . S . #7. 3-07 , DAVID S . MYCKA: SPLIT
F THE WESTERLY 10 FEET OF LOT 32 , REVISED AUDITOR'S
SUBDIVISION NO , 77 ? TO BI: PURCHASED BY THE OWNER OF LOT 31 :
MOTION by Councilman Utter to concur with the Planning
Commission and approve the lot split requested by Mr . David S.
Mycka . Seconded by Councilman Nee . Upon a voice vote ,
all voting; aye , Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried
unani „lousy .
The Citi fncineer said thy: remaining items did not require
Coul4c11 aC1. iOil .
MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the minutes of the Planning
Commission meeting of June 6 , 1973 . Seconded by Councilman Utter.
Upon a voice vote , all voting aye , Mayor Liebl declared the motion
carried unanimously,
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 18 , 1973 PAGE 15
REQUEST FROM LL:0,1,01- OV WNIEN VOTERS Ri.f-,)ULSTIXC 11 TI;IF ON AGENDA FOR MR.
A L A N MA H L, D T R 1:CTUR I: 0 P F—R.f%T 10 N S T T! F; N Ajjffka71�, 1 H—N C F- -FOR—�OFT—1i
EDUCATION :
Mrs . Barbara addrc� J t DMICil and said Mr . Mahl was no
"\' She 'said iie had made a short
longer in attendant . over view of the
funding and has some
ucitions in the area of spending $200 , 000 ,
Mrs , Hughes said ��Vllr . -� had left a sample budget with Paul Brown
and the City Manager. Mrs . Hughes said Mr . Mahl would submit a
letter with valuable in ormation the next week.
MOTION by Councilman Nee to receive tlie letter . Seconded by Council-
1
man Breider. Upon a voic vote , allkoting aye , Mayor Liebl declared
the motion carried ujian\imo sly .
Coucnilman Nee asked Mrs . I ghes o encourage Mr . Mahl to get the
letter to the Council before the hearing .
Mrs , Hughes said an unsigned I t
tvcr would be corrins from him followed
by a signed letter .
RECEIVING COMMUNICATION FROM /JAN E . PRAIRIE VOTING ON NORTH PARK:
MOTION by Councilman Nee to eceive the letter from Duane E. Prairie,
I
dated June 13 , 1973 . Seconded by Co ncilman Brelder . Upon a voice
vote , all voting aye , Mayor Liebl dec ared the motion carried
unanimously.
RECEIVING COMiN4LINICATION FROM DOUGLAS A. �ETERSON VOTING ON NORTH PARK:
MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the �letter from Mr. Douglas A.
Peterson, dated June 13,1', 1973 . Seconded by'•Councilman Breider .
Upon a voice vote , all ,'voting aye , Mayor Liet-yj declared the motion
c4rried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE NORTH PARK MEETING ",OF MAY 22 , 1973 :
MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the minute's of the North Park
Meeting of May 22 , 1973 . Seconded by Councilman Utter . Upon a voice
vote , all voting aye , Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unani-
movely,
REQUEST OF CITY MANAGER TO TAKE VACATION LE-AVE JULY I - 184 1973 :
AND
APPOINTMENT OF ACTING CITY MANAGER:
MOTION by Councilman Nee to approve the request b)r the City Manager
to take vacation from July 1 , to July 18 , 1973 . Seconded by Council-
Upon 4 voice vote , all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared
atl'e"'mo"ttio�'n'�eariied unanimously
r
REGULAR COUNCIL NIF LY 1 NG OF AUGUS"1 6 , 1973 'AGE 13
CONSIDERATION Of: APPROVAL 0 L . S . #73 -05 , BERNARD JULKOWSKI , T SPLIT
FF PART OF LOTS 6 AND 7 A. S . LTIPLE OR
M CIAL (TABLED JUNI" 18 , 1973)
The City Engineer Said there is a concern of the parking problems in the
area, He added, in 1964 all of the property was under the control of
Mr , Julkowski and since: that t irie a part of the property was split and
sold as an apartment complex . The City Engineer said the apartment
complex now has 40 parking spaces and this is short of the requirement
of the City code . He said there has been an attempt made by Mr . Julkowski
to sell the portion of land in question to allow for additional parking
for the apartment complex . tie said the negotiations for sale have not
come to any point of settlement to date . The City Engineer said he
would suggest the land in question be utilized by some sort of business
which would only require limited parking or from 5 - 8 parking spaces .
He said he would suggest this solution of the situation if legally
possible . He said this would allow Mr . Julkowski to construct some
commercial enterprise in the area.
Mr. Julkowski said he had built the apartment building 9 years ago
when the complex was according to code and it has been sold three times .
He said at the time of construction the building conformed to all regu-
lations by the City . He said at this time he would like to do some-
thing with the additional piece of land. Mr. Julkowski said the Plats
and Subs Subcommittee had recommended the Council approve the lot split
and the Planning Commission has also recommended the Council approve the
split . He said he had made this request and attended meetings concerning
the request five times in nine years . He said the piece of property
has been split by the County and also by the Finance Company. He said
at this time he would need a building permit to continue to develop
the land, He said the matter that he is paying' taxes on the property
and also paying for the removal of the weeds must be considered, Mr .
Julkowski said he did not think he should be forced to sell the property
to the apartment owner . He said he did not want to complicate the issue ,
he just wanted to build on the property , as it has been split by the
County, he would like to have it split by the City,
Mayor Liebl said he knew of the situation, and there are some problems
with his neighbor , He said he is aware of the parking problem and
the recommendations from the subcommittees , but the members of the
Council would have to look at the matter as what is best for the entire
City of Fridley. He said there are problems with the parking and other
considerations also . Mayor Liebl said the Council would have to go
along with the recommendations of the Ward Councilman in the matter ,
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to grant the lot split to Mr . Bernard
Julkowski as requested.
Mayor Liebl asked if there would be any problems arising from this
action,
REGULAR COUNCIL \1LETTNG OF AUGUST 6 , 1973 PAGE: 14
The City Attorney suggested the matter be tabled until the adminis -
tration has met with Mr . Julkowski and determined the limits , He
said he would like this established to the type of commercial building
to be constructed there . fie said there is a very serious problem
with the size and the shape of the lot . fie sai ;i frankly , he thought
the property should be used for the overflow parking or a definite
restricted type of use be determined. tie said the use should be
e rmined the- _ �„ prq,blems . He said he would , like to present
the same type of agreement that had been drawn up between the City
and Erickson Brothers , He said then a reasonable use would be
worked out and they would not be creating a more severe problem than
exists at the present time .
COUNCILMAN STARWALT SAID HE WOULD LIKE TO WITHDRAW HIS MOTION
APPROVING THE LOT SPLIT.
Councilman Starwalt said he would like Mr. Julkowski to attempt to
sell the property to the apartment owner again,
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt that Mr. Julkowski be directed to work
withthe Engineering Staff to come up with a suitable use for the
property . Seconded by Councilman Breider . Upon a voice vote , all
voting aye , Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF .FINAL PLAT P . S . #73-04 VEIT' S SECOND ADDITION BY
T 15 , REVISEDA D R I I 3 ,
EXCEPT THAT PARTTIS ADDITION:
Mayor Liebl read the stipulations suggested by the Community Devel-
opment Administrator , Mr. Darrel Clark, in his letter to Mrs . Londa
England, dated July 23 , 1973 .
MOTION by Councilman Nee to approve the final plat with the stipu-
lations recommended by Mr. Darrel Clark as follows :
1 . Show a six foot drainage and utility easement along the
following property lines :
a. South line of Lots 1 , 21 3 , and 5
b. West line of Lots 1 and 3
c . East line of Dots 2 , 4 , and 5
2 . Submit a letter to the City acknowledging that Lot 1 , Block 1 ,
is not a buildable lot and that until other lands are com-
bined with it , no building permit will be requested on said
lot .
3. Above letter shall also indicate that if and when the City
of Fridley requests a forty foot wide street and utility ,
easement across Lot 1 , Block 1 , Veit 's Second Addition, the
owner will grant Said street and utility easement without
any cost to the City of Fridley.
Seconded py Councilman St4rW41t . Upon a voice vote , all voting aye ,
Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
- 57 58 - -
in:.. OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL HEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL, AUGUST 20, 1973 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 20, 1973 PAGE 2
! The Regular meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:33 p.m.
on August 20, 1973 by Mayor Liebl. 3. What rules would be
governing the use of the golf course. He would
assume they would be for all people.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGL°';CE: 4. What assistance is expected from Blaine.
:ayor Liebl led the Council and the audience in saying the Pledge of Allegiance Mr. Anderson said he thought this was a very interesting proposition, and Blaine
to the Flag. - does not have any plans at the present time to build a golf course in their
own community.
ROLL C.,'-L•
Councilman Breider then answered Mr. Anderson's questions by giving some back-
Ni• EERS P'ES""T: Liebl, Utter, Braider, Starwalt, Nee. ground information. In answer to question number 1. he said the exact location
M:3 °.'.S :T: None of the golf course has not been decided, other Char. the fact that it will be
eighteen holes with all the necessary accessories, number 2, the Council has.
not decided when this facility would be constructed, 3, at this t:mz the priority
system would be set up with basically use for Fridley residents, but it would
REG= C"S';CIL Y.?E11,NG OF AUGUST 6, 1973• be open to everyone. In answer to question number four, Blaine's assistance in
this has not been discussed other than the fact that the City of Blaine's "OK"
M.3=3': by Councilman Starwalt to adopt the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting is needed before the Airport Commission's request can be submitted by the City
of Aug•,st 6, 1973 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote of Fridley.
all voting aye, ayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Liebl then noted that it had been noted in some of the news sources that
__ Or
A'=-_'--DA: some of the people on the Council are not in favor of this project and Mr.
Anderson commented that basically the Council action as a whole would be to say
Mayor Liebl ode the following additions to the agenda: that they are not opposed to it, but just like any other consideration, the
1. PUL'IC 'r•rARINGS: Letter from Burlington Northern was added to the action may not always be unanimous.
( agenda under N T EC Improvement STORE Project No. GIBBS:, Addendum se Mayor Liebl then thanked Mr. Anderson for comic and the Council resented Mr.
2. r.`: ESTI__ATE U?i THE LIQUOR STORE BY MLR. BILL GIBBS: to be presented Y 8 p
under item 26 estimates. Anderson with a North Park study report for his further review.
3. Iter 25A, consideration of sending a representative to the National MIR. DAVE HARRIS:
Leao,e of Cities convention in San Juan, Puerto Rico December 2nd
through December 6th. Mr. Harris stated that a private golf course is now available in the area, at a
'_!OTIC:! by Council-An Yee to adopt the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilman cost below market value and he could give information to the staff if requested.
Bre_?zr. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion I MR. PETERSON: AMERICAN LEGION:
ca_-rigid u-:ani=usly.
Mr.Peterson stated that the American Legion has an opportunity to move its
ti S _C?.S: - facilities from the basement to the upstairs of its present facility and
would like to get permission from the neighboring gas station for additional
Mayor Lia-1 brought to the attention of the Council problems at the north end of
Co—ons Park. He said the horseshoe players rowdy behavior should be investigated parking.
r
b3 the staff. `•I
vThe staff was asked to look into the American Legion plan and see what they
Y
'a. LEO F:'.;S L.'E0:7: COC:��C ILS_;"! PRf�•i L'LA 1(2E: r can do to assist in implementing Mr. Peterson's proposal.
1rr,
Mr. aderso� was present to discuss the possibility of a gulf course in BlaineADDITIONAL VISITORS ADDED:.
Mr ezpr;,,<:d the thankn of tSe City of $Laino and .^.gated that 0- MR. WILLIAM R. BL•'RCS'1EDT: SUB`IrTED A L':1'ER TO THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THE
Elaine Ccnncil at their August 2 meeting felt that this needed further discussion SKYWOOD APARTMENTS WHICH ARE EAST TO THC c:OBERT HALL PROPERTY:
and at the present time sufficient information was not available. They felt that at
this ti=a they had no opposition to this request because the airport commission now MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the letter. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt.
o--s the land and the City's proposition would not take any additional property � Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
off t-a City's tax rolls. `!r. Anderson bad the following questions: p 8 Y Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried
unanimously.
1. '.;::ere, approrirately on the Janesville property, was the golf course I MR. FRED YESNES• REQUEST FOR HUG0 STREET:
to be located. '
2. :.'pan were these plans proposed to be acted upon. The Council informed Mr. Yesnes that his request was taken care of at their
August 13, meeting.
60
REGin kR COUNCIL ?.T-ETT_SG OF AUGUST 20, 1973 PAGE 3 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 20, 1973 PAGE 4
f YJ3LIC - GS:
j MOTION by Councilman Braider to authorize the City to submit the 11-9lSAN
H.`A. I':'; ON T1P20VF_'!E:T: STREET I?4PROVli?1Ehf PROJECT ST. 19%3-1, ADDENDUM U3: application with the stipulation that the Islands of Petite Foundation will be
responsible for the City's share of the project. Seconded by Councilman Nee.
The City En7,in,,er stated that this project had been petitioned by the property Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried
owners affected by the improvement. The location of the property is University unanimously.
Avar._s Service Road with loop acks from 79th to 81st Avenues. The estimated
cost of the project is $37,298.76. DISCUSSION REGARDING SIDE STREET ASSESS`_INT FOR 7TH STREET (OR:G l`_:L :\'D TWO
ALTERNATE ROLLS)(TABLED JUNE 18 1973 JULY 2 1973 A_NM JULY _e. 1973):
MOTION by Council= Braider to waive the reading of the Public Hearing _
Notice and open the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice Councilman Braider commented that he did not feel the di._F
erante is cost
vote, all voting aye, Mayor declared the motion carried unanimously and the would merit changing our existing policy.
public heari.ug opened at 7:55 p.m.
MOTION by Councilman Braider to reaffirm the present poli[,:. Seconded by
::OTIGN by Councilman Braider to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman Councilman Nee. Upon a voice vola, all voting aye, Payor Liebl declared the
Utter. Upon a voice vote:, all voting aye, :Mayor. Liebl declared the motion motion carried unanimously.
carred unanimously and the public hearing closed at 7:59 p.m.
ORDINANCE 11545 - AMENDING ORDI\,INCE i'521_ (CABLE TELECISIC\):
PUaLiC OS L':PDO'iE?2'f: STREET I'•L'ROVnENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1, ADDENDUM A4:
Mayor Liebl acknowledged the receipt of Councilman See's coc.ar.Ys concerning
M.OTIC': by Councilman Braider to waive the reading of the Public Hearing Notice some possible alternatives to the present amendment. ?Savor Liebl felt that =any
andoea the aublic hearing. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice of the proposals Councilman :vee made would be very acceptable after the General
vote, all voting aye, !..,yet Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously and Television firm had received [heir certification, �t he did reel than it was
the Public Hearing opened at 8:02 p.m. necessary at this time and that it would not be an advantage to theCity to
delay the certification any longer than what has already been done. He said they
suggested that the comments from Councilman Nee be given to.the staff and reviewed
MOT!2", by Councilman Utter to receive the letter from Burlington Northern,
+ ro`.est, dared .L for further action. He felt the City does not have the expertise or the funds
p j;;•i s:t 20, 3973. Seconded by Cni:nrilmnn Stanmlt. Upon a voice at this cine to press this Item any lurcher with the F. C. C.
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Breider asked Mr. Hinkley, a representative from General Television,
The City Engineer com_ented that the street is being designed only to provide what his comments were. Mr. Hinkley commented that they had also read the
access wick the minimus: amount of cost. The street will have no curbing and the F. C. C.'s letter and had felt that it was quite plain that a further delay
apprc-..-.mate cost of the improvement will be $10,632.46. would onlydela their imolementaion of their cable broadcasting. Hinkley
y 5
?'r. John Heron from Burlington Northern was present. He stated that the reason stated that without certification they cannot broadcast and their plans are to be
in operation around November 1st of this year.
Nortilern had oLjected was the fact that there was an inference that
t;ould be responsible for one fourth of the cost of the whole project. Mayor Liebl commented again that once we are broadcasting, we will be is a better
-_- erg, the ^asign:vare Attorney, was present and said he felt that they hadthe
a_s: t_iad to negotiate for a percentage of the cost and at this time, no position to bargain. Councilman Nee said that act Attorney General's rytoa has
been apprised of our situation and the Council action would be necessary for
I been made. They feel they did not have any need for the road, further action by the Attorney General's office.
are stip willing to negotiate. Mayor Liebl commented that the reason
road oras to protect the neighborhood and the City Attorney should work Councilman.Nee also wanted to reaffirm his position that he does not want the
wJt``t.._ staff, Burlington .northern, Designware and Mr. Christenson to work company ready to do business and not have the certification, but he does believe
.
out an equitable solution of the pro..:mem. that Mr. Schildhause from the F. C. C. wanes a gaud system in operation and they
will not delay the City's project.
`:G-10" by Conncilma^ Utter to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman
Starwalt. Upon a -ioice vute, all voting ayc:, Mayor Liebl declared the motion MOTION by Councilman Braider to amend the amendment as proposed by removing
carries unanimously and the Public Hearing closed at 8:23 p.m. the words 'maximum and 'gross subscriber' from the Section ;05.05 Payment Teo
The City to read as follows: "The Company shall pay to the City on or before
OLD aCST::ESS: March 1st of each year following the commencement of cable casting an amount
equal to 5% of the annual gross subscriber revenues or such additional percentage
F.':T_ 0?IZ '70`; IO P'EPf:PE A Lr':F:CO:T R'r:OL'EST FOR PORTIOti OF PROPERTY ON EAST BANK of revenues that may in the future be deemed reasonable by t::a F. C. C. or such
OF THE `_IS3:SS=?PI "LIVE'. (IS'•.J:D 01' PEACE FOUNDATION): other regulatory bodies that may have authority ever tha establish--en`_ of
franchise fees taken in and received by the Company for services provided
Mr. Andrew Rohlan was there representing the Foundations of the Islands of Peace within the City during the year, for the use of streets and ether facil{ties
and he requested the City to apply for the funds. He felt that there was a of the City in the operation of the CATV system for the municipal regulation
ti_nima.l amount of money available in the Metro area and that the deadline was thereof: This payment shall be in addition to any other tax or pa}-ent owed
August 24, 1973, so he would appreciate that the request be submitted as soon to the City by the Company in the event that any payment is not =, e by March
as possible since it has already been prepared. 1st as provided above, interest on the amount due, as deter=fined from the
gross subscriber revenues report of the certified public accountant shall accrue
w