HRA 12/09/1982 t ;
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MEETING
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1982
7:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
City of Fridley
AGENDA
I _ -
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING THURESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1982 7:30 P.M.
Location: Council Chamber (1st Floor)
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
APPROVE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: NOVEMBER 18, 1982
1. MOORE LAKE DISTRICT
A. Proposal for 96-unit Condominium Project by Erland Eckberg
(Information previously sent).
(This is an open hearing based on notices sent).
2. NORTH AREA DISTRICT
A. Request fo Assistance by G. W. Paschke
(I will be meeting with Mr. Paschke on December 6, 1982 - he may
want to delay this item until the January meeting).
3. FINANCIAL
A. Check Register
B. Financial Report
4. OTHER BUSINESS:
ADJOURNMENT:
CITY OF FRIDLEY
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MEETING •- - -
NOVEMBER 18, 1982
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Commers called the November 18, 1982, Housing & Redevelopment
Authority meeting to order at 7:34 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Larry Commers, Elmars Prieditis, Carolyn Svendsen,
Duane Prairie, Walter Rasmussen
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner
Gerald W. Paschke
Sid Inman, Finance Director
Bill Von Klug, Von Klug & Assoc.
Richard M. Carson, President, Clothing Liquidators
CONTINUED: APPROVAL OF JULY 21 , 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES:
MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO APPROVE THE JULY 21, 1982,
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 19, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES:
MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN, SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDITIS, TO APPROVE THE OCT. 19, 1982,
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
I. OLD BUSINESS AND CONTINUED ITEMS
A. Proposal from Gerald W. Paschke (Continued from 10-19-82)
(Letter from Mr. Paschke dated Oct. 5; Memo #82-77 from Executive Director)
Mr. Boardman stated he would like Mr. Paschke to explain his request
for aid from the HRA.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, NOVEMBER 18,1982 PAGE 2
Mr. Paschke stated he has started work on a 4-acre piece of property
on Main St. between 81st and 79th. He stated they excavated approx.
12,000 ft. of peat before they stopped. He stated he had talked to
Mr. Boardman 6-7 months ago about obtaining some help from the HRA.
It was his understanding at the time that anything that was done in
that area had to go out for bids. Since they do all the work themselves,
that would not help them very much. He stated that if the HRA would
just give them the fill, they would do their own excavation, placing
the fill in and compacting it, which was about the cheapest way he knew
of to develop this area.
Mr. Commers asked Mr. Paschke if he had any estimates of how much fill
would be needed.
Mr. Paschke stated he would estimate 15,000 yards. He has had some
quotes at $2.50/yd. delivered to the site. He stated he thought they
could put in a 40,000 sq. ft. building on that site.
Mr. Boardman stated he has done some quick estimates based on some of
their bond estimates with the 70,000 sq. ft. building Elo Engineering
was looking at earlier, and the HRA can provide assistance anywhere
from $2.10-2.60 per sq. ft. of building that goes in on Mr. Paschke's
site. That would be the range on the bond issues as the bond issues
were sold. A 20,000 sq. ft. building would have a bond sale of approx.
$50,000. So, the HRA could probably assist to that extent. He stated
the HRA can work with Mr. Paschke in providing some assistance, but
that assistance would not come until there was a commitment for construc-
tion. It is a matter of what the HRA wants to do on that property.
There are some buildings under way there. Mr. Paschke has just finished
a building on the corner that the HRA will gain some development monies
from. However, they have to be a little cautious in that area, because
there is going to be a considerable amount of drainage and ponding required.
Mr. Prairie asked if it was possible for the HRA to make a commitment
for "x" amount of dollars.
Mr. Boardman stated that was not done in the sense that the HRA is still
commiting itself and they are saying, yes, they have "x" amount of
dollars, and if Mr. Paschke goes ahead, the HRA will pay him back. The
HRA could open itself up to quite a bit of negative comment. The HRA
has consistently said they would prefer not to do that and would prefer
not to take on any project until there is a financing commitment. He
did not know the legality of the HRA paying for things that have already
been paid for.
Mr. Paschke stated he very seldom has any financing until a project
is completely finished.
Mr. Commers stated it would be fine if Mr. Paschke wanted to give a
guarantee that he would do his own construction financing. It didn't
matter how it was done.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, NOVEMBER 18, 1982 PAGE 3
._ -
Mr. Boardman stated it didn't matter how the project is financed, as
long as it is on paper and there is a guarantee the building is going
to go up. If there is a default and the building does not go up, the
HRA doesn't have the taxes that would be generated on that building to
pay off the work or the money the HRA puts into it.
Mr. Paschke stated he has three projects that are going into the tax
increment district or the HRA, and he has not received any financial
assistance on those projects.
Mr. Commers stated it would be appropriate for Mr. Boardman and Mr. Paschke
to sit down and work out an agreeable proposal to be brought back to
the HRA at their Dec. meeting. He stated he did think they should get
a report on the income they are generating on these three projects. If
they are generating tax increment dollars from three of Mr. Paschke's
properties, that may be something the HRA will want to take into
consideration.
MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM
UNTIL THE DECEMBER MEETING, AND TO ASK STAFF TO WORK WITH MR. PASCHKE
TO WORK OUT AN AGREEABLE PROPOSAL TO BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE HRA AT THEIR
DEC. 9TH MEETING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Paschke stated the special assessments on this property are 3-4
times higher than anywhere else, and he would also like some assistance
in paying off the special assessments.
Mr. Commers stated this was something else Mr. Boardman should address
and report back at the next meeting. They may run into this same
problem with other developers.
B. NAHRO Request for Funds (Continued from Oct. 19, 1982)
Mr. Commers stated the HRA members had a copy of a letter dated Oct. 28
from Mr. Herrick in response to the HRA's request on the legality of
contributing funds to NAHRO. Mr. Herrick was of the opinion that this
would be a valid expenditure of funds and would not jeopardize the HRA's
tax status.
Mr. Boardman stated he had called other HRA's as well as Nancy Reeves,
Chairperson of the Legislative Committee, to get an indication of any
tax status effects on the donating cities. The response was that the
pledge is to NAHRO as an organization to help cover the costs of NAHRO
activities and is not affecting any individual HRA. NAHRO is consulting
for legislative assistance similar to the League of Cities and other
non-profit organizations and is not paying for registered lobbyists.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, NOVEMBER 18, 1982 PAGE 4
MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN, SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDITIS, TO SEND A CONTRI-
BUTION OF $250 TO THE NAHRO OFFICIALS.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
C. Memo from Sid Inman - Government Accounting Problem
Mr. Commers stated the HRA members had raised a question at their last
meeting regarding the separation of powers between the City and the
HRA. They had requested that Mr. Inman and Mr.Herrick attend this
meeting to better explain that problem.
Mr. Inman stated Mr. Herrick could not be at the meeting. He stated
the issue that is of concern is informing the City Council that in an
extreme situation they have a liability; they have complied with, and
the auditor has concurred. Whether the City reports the HRA on the
City's financial statement or not is really irrevelant, other than
cost. When George M. Hanson Co. has done the HRA's audit in the past,
they have merely walked in and done it. In this case, the City will
have prepared documents ahead of time. That should, in fact, reduce
the auditor's bill . The major part of the expenditure will be the
City preparing the HRA's documents for the City's report, and the City
stands to bear some of that load, because it is the City's responsibility.
The HRA will see no increase in their month-to-month statements, and
the City is going to try to estimate for the HRA what it will cost.
Hopefully, it will not cost any more than the HRA has received from
their auditor. This is something new, so it is really hard to say how
much it is going to cost.
Mr. Commers stated that at least now they know what their auditor's
cost is; it is a fixed cost. If the City is going to prepare it and
then turn it over to the auditor to provide the HRA with an audited
statement, there may be an added cost. What he heard Mr. Inman saying
was that the City is going to include the HRA in their financial state-
ment, other than in a footnote.
Mr. Inman stated he does not have any decision power. The City Council
has the decision power, and the auditor has clearly said that if the
City does not include the HRA, they could jeopardize their Certificate.
of Conformance. Again, that has no affect on the HRA, other than
whether or not the HRA pays the City to do that.
Mr. Commers stated there are some questions as to the auditor's opinion
in the first place. There is nothing set down. They are asking that
the criteria be extended and not be implemented for another year. There
is no information whatsoever that this is a necessary requirement or
the criteria that has to be met in order to get the Certificate of
Conformance. He did not see why the City was going ahead and doing it.
If the City decides to do it, it should be the City's obligation and not
the HRA's and the HRA should not have to expend any more money.
•
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, NOVEMBER 18, 1982 PAGE 5
Mr. Inman stated if the HRA was of the opinion they would like to have
the auditor do the whole report, he was willing to accept that. The
report the auditor prepared has to be combined in the City's report.
He agreed that if the City chooses to make that decision, it should be
the City's responsibility, but that was not his decision to make.
Mr. Inman stated that as far as Mr. Commers' comment on the criteria,
the decision in 1979 on two similar issues was they did lose the
Certificate of Conformance because they chose not to do the two activities
because of the fact that it wasn't extended. Because of that, he would
be very reluctant not to include it in the City's report.
It was the concensus of the HRA members that if the City makes the
decision to include the HRA in the City's report, the City should bear
the cost of doing that.
Mr. Inman stated that if this decision is made that it is the City's
responsibility and they will do it, if he prefers to present the report
to George M. Hanson Co. and the City is willing to bear the cost, would
the HRA be willing to let him do that?
Mr. Commers stated the HRA was willing to reimburse the City for what-
ever it would cost the HRA to hire an outside auditor to prepare the
report.
D. Check Register
MOTION BY MR. PRIEDITIS, SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO APPROVE THE
CHECK REGISTER DATED NOV. 16, 1982, TOTALLING $309,754.49.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
E. Financial Statement
Mr. Boardman stated he had given the HRA members a breakdown of
personnel and supplies as requested at their last meeting.
Mr. Inman reviewed the financial report with the HRA members.
MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE, SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO ACCEPT THE FINANCIAL
REPORT DATED NOV. 18, 1982.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Coroners declared the InterDesign contract summary dated Nov. 18, 1982,
accepted and received into the record.for informational purposes. He
stated he felt InterDesign should report to the HRA on a quarterly
basis.
•
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, NOVEMBER 18, 1982 PAGE 6
II. CENTER CITY
A. Report & Claim - Relocation of Lennies' Laundromat
Mr. Boardman stated that Mr. Von Klug was at the meeting to
explain his report.
Mr. Von Klug stated the relocation of Lennies became more complex
than was originally anticipated. Lennies had a unique relationship
with the landlord. With items that were normally attached to the
building and could have been classified as part of the building,
Lennies not only had the right to remove those items, but had an
obligation to remove those items. These items were, in essence,
personal property. Mr. Von Klug stated he confirmed with the real
estate appraiser who was previously hired that, indeed, he did not
include those items with the real property. As a result, they became
aware they were responsible to pay relocation costs on those items.
The items referred to are included in an appraisal done by Patchin
Appraisers. Those items were "process electrical" , "process plumbing",
"raised concrete floor" ,"door openers", and "vent system".
Mr. Von Klug stated the next step was to determine the least cost
approach. He stated the least cost approach is a strange thing in
the relocation process, because they still have an obligation by
Minnesota State Law to make sure the business gets the maximum com-
pensation it is entitled to. They had an appraisal done by Patchin
Appraisers called a fixture appraisal ; also referred to as an "in-
place value appraisal ". The "in-place value appraisal" came to
$67,670. That was for the bulk of the items that were attached in
some type of fashion to the building, In addition to those items,
Lennies very clearly had personal property such as washing machines,
laundry carts , wastebaskets, desks, arcade machines, etc. , so they
got a moving cost estimate on those items. The total cost of the "in-
place value appraisal" and the moving cost estimate was almost $75,000.
Mr. Von Klug stated that in going back to the fixture appraisal done
by Mauser and in going through Lennies, he noticed there was a certain
amount of duplication under "process electrical ". Though they did not
include in the real estate appraisal the 400 amp and 200 amp service
throughout the building, they did include some electrical and some
plumbing. Though it is not a good idea in the relocation process to .
negotiate relocation costs, it became evident, mainly from the needs
of Lennies, that it would be a prudent thing to do. So, with the
concurrence of Mr. Boardman, he negotiated with Lennies and reached an
agreement of $58,500, rather than the $74,490.
Mr. Boardman stated Lennies has been paid the negotiated purchase
price and Staff has sent a letter giving them 90 days in which to
remove all personal items from the facility. He stated he needed
official approval of the purchase price of $58,500, even though he
had polled each HRA member by telephone earlier.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, NOVEMBER 18, 1982 PAGE 7
MOTION BY MS. SVENDSEN, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO AFFIRM THE ACTION
PREVIOUSLY TAKEN BY STAFF WITH REGARD TO THE RELOCATION_COST OF
$58,500 FOR LENNIES LAUNDROMAT AND BILLIARDS.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
B. Report - Relocation of Fridley Auto Repair
Mr. Boardman stated he received the report on the Fridley Auto Repair
after the agenda was mailed out. He would like to discuss this item
and possibly take some action while Mr. Von Klug was at the meeting.
Mr. Commers stated since this again was not an ordinary approach where
a payment is being recommended rather than the actual expenses incurred
with the relocation of the business, he thought the HRA should have
some time to review this approach and why.
Mr. Von Klug stated that with business relocations, they have pre-
dominately two types of payments: (1 ) actual and reasonable moving
expenses--within that is the cost of the personal property items such
as professional services necessary for the moving of personal property,
stationery reproduction, searching expenses, telephone, leased equipment
expenses; and (2) payment in lieu of moving and related expenses. The
business has the option of selecting which type of payment it wants.
The business has to meet three tests, the most crucial test is that the
business cannot be relocated without a substantial portion of its
patronage. They are under HUD regulations in this state because that
is what the state law adopted. He stated their office tried to demon-
strate the proof that there was a substantial loss of patronage in this
case.
Mr. Von Klug stated one of the considerations the agency has to take is
increased operating expenses at the new location. So, their office
has to take into consideration two major factors: (1 ) the business has
to be assumed; and (2) if, indeed,there is going to be a substantial
increase in operating expenses, is the business eligible in that respect?
Mr. Von Klug stated the amount of payment is not based upon increased
operating expenses. The Fridley Auto Repair went from a unit with an
appraised value of $77,500 to a unit where they paid $200,000, plus
they have increased operating expenses. As far as the amount of pay-
ment, once the determination of eligibility has been made, the payment
amount is based on average annual net earnings of the business averaged
over two years prior to moving. The minimum payment is $2,500; the
maximum payment is $10,000. With the Fridley Auto Repair's circumstances,
they had approx. $30,000 of average annual receipts, so the payment
was cut back to $10,000 which is the maximum possible payment under
current legislation.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, NOVEMBER 18, 1982 PAGE 8
MOTION BY MR. PRIEDITIS, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO APPROVE THE
RELOCATION COST OF $10,000 TO FRIDLEY AUTO REPAIR.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
C. Bond Bid Opening (Memo #82-81 from Executive Director)
Mr. Boardman stated the tax increment financing bond base was officially
opened on Nov. 8 at Ehlers office for the $600,000 HRA bonds related
to the Fridley Plaza Office building. The bonds were sold for a 9.2605%
interest rate based on the City's Aa-1 rating and was approved by the
City Council that night at their meeting.
D. Lease of Hardware Building for Proposed Retail/Liquidation Operation
Mr. Boardman stated Mr. Dick Carson was at the meeting in regard to
this lease request. Mr. Carson has made a proposal to lease the hard-
ware building with an 18-month lease and a month-to-month lease after
that.
Mr. Boardman stated that in discussions with Mr. Carson, the parking
was discussed. The hardware building itself has a limited amount of
parking and this business would generate a need for more parking.
Mr. Carson has worked with Fred Levy and they have reached an agreement
on the parking situation.
Mr. Commers asked for Staff's recommendation.
Mr. Boardman stated that at $3/sq. ft. , it was the most advantageous
offer they have had for the hardware building. He stated he would like
to get the building leased, and he felt this was an adequate operation.
It will probably generate quite a bit of traffic into the area. There
has been concern expressed by the businesses in Holly Center that the
walk-in business is down 60% and the businesses are having a difficult
time. It is important to get something into the hardware building.
Mr. Rasmussen stated he thought there should be more research into the
kind of operation this is. He felt it was very important to have a
financial statement, and at least some type of inspection of what the
operation looks like.
Mr. Carson stated he would be happy to provide the HRA with a financial
report. He had not been aware one was wanted. He stated he has a
store in Cambridge and would be happy to show them that store. He will
also be opening a store in Bloomington. He stated he felt this was a
good location for his business and that the business would be good for
the community.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, NOVEMBER 18, 1982 PAGE 9
Mr. Rasmussen stated he was very concerned about this type of
operation.
Mr. Carson stated he would clean up the building and operate it as
a clean, nice business. He did not plan to put a lot of money into
the building with an 18-month lease and a month-to-month lease after
that.
Mr. Commers stated he thought that if they can be provided with an
adequate financial statement and that the Cambridge store, upon
inspection by Staff, presents itself well , it would be better to have
a business in that building than to leave it vacant.
Mr. Prieditis agreed and asked Mr. Boardman to poll the members by
telephone after this information has been obtained.
MOTION BY MR. PRIEDITIS, SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO APPROVE THE
LEASE OF THE HARDWARE BUILDING FOR A PROPOSED RETAIL/LIQUIDATION
OPERATION SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS:
1. A SATISFACTORY LEASE BE NEGOTIATED BETWEEN MR. CARSON
AND STAFF;
2. STAFF INSPECT THE OPERATION IN CAMBRIDGE AND PROVIDE A
POSITIVE REPORT; AND,
3. ACQUISITION OF A FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND THE GUARANTEES
OF INDIVIDUALS
Mr. Rasmussen stated he objected to a motion of that type on the
grounds that it left the decision up to Staff.
Mr. Commers stated that was a good point. It was a question of where
they want to draw the line in delegating authority, and this too is a
very arbitrary decision on what authority Mr. Boardman should and
should not have. However, he would be comfortable with letting
Mr. Boardman make the decision on this operation.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, COMMERS, PRIEDITIS, SVENDSEN, AND PRAIRIE VOTING
AYE, RASMUSSEN VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4-1.
E. Memo from Richard Larson - Re: Standard Oil Station
Mr. Boardman stated this memo was in regard to the gasoline tank
that is still underground at the Standard Station that the HRA
presently owns. There is a Minnesota Uniform Fire Code that states
that any underground tanks which have been abandoned for a period of
one year shall be removed from the ground and properly filled.
Mr. Boardman stated he had tried to delay on the removal of the tank
until such a time as they had a developer and could go in on develop-
ment costs. He had gotten some estimates last year on the cost of
removal . He stated he would check into this again and keep the HRA
members informed.
•
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, NOVEMBER 18, 1982 PAGE 10
III. MOORE LAKE DISTRICT
A. Moore Lake Condominium Project
Mr. Commers stated each of the members had received a handout entitled,
"Proposed Project, Moore Lake Redevelopment District".
Mr. Boardman stated that at the last meeting, the HRA had requested
Staff to put together a packet of information, including a letter,
that was being proposed for mail-out to the residents prior to the
public hearing on Dec. 9. He stated he would like them to look the
information over to see if it was adequate for mailing. He stated
slides have been taken, and there will be a slide presentation at the
public hearing. The architect is working with City Staff in putting
together a scale model of the project, and the architect is also
doing a color rendering design of the building that will also be at
the meeting.
Mr. Boardman stated he would like the HRA to decide how far out they
should mail the packet of information--700 ft. or 350 ft. The normal
process is 350 ft.
It was the concensus of the HRA members that the packet of information
be mailed out 350 ft. of the project site, with the exception that
all the homes along Woody Lane also be included because of the visual
site lines from the homes on Woody Lane.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS:
A. Minneapolis Star Tribune Article (Information only)
Mr. Commers stated this article dated Nov. 4, 1982, was about an
interview with Mr. Boardman regarding the Center City Project.
B. Correspondence on Eisenhower Square Monument
Mr. Commers stated there was a memo from Mark Burch, Asst. Public
Works Director, to John Flora, Public Works Director, concerning the
status of the monument. In the process of moving the monument to
the Moore Lake location, it fell and broke. There is insurance
coverage, and the rebuilding will be done in the spring. Also, the
VFW is very satisfied with the new location at Moore Lake. They
feel it is a much better location and will be more visible to the
public.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE, SEC. BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A
VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE NOV. 18, 1982,
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:00 P.M.
Respectfully subjitted,
,►_ ii.
yn - Saba, Recor.ing Secretary
MAILING LIST FOR 96-UNIT LUXURY CONDOMINIMIUMS - . November 19, 1982
Gary Pierce Mr. & Mrs. Tommy Waki Margaret R. Nelson
Star Route 2, Box 152 6020 Woody Lane N.E. 6090 Woody Lane N.E.
Bismarch, ND 58501 - Fridley, Mn 55432 Fridley; Mn 55432
(6132 Central Avenue)
Mr. & Mrs. Clark Peterson Mr. & Mrs. Clinton Strand
Scott B. Kohanek 5988 Woody Lane N.E. 6122 Woody Lane N.E.
6116 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Fridley, Mn 55432
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Beck Mr. & Mrs. Clairmont
St. Anthony Village Shopping Center 6014 Woody Lane N.E. LiaBraaten
25 University Avenue S.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 6128 Woody Lane N.E.
Minneapolis, Mn 55414 Fridley, Mn 55432
(6199 Highway #65 N. E. )(Parcel 2000) Mr. & Mrs. Edward Zylka
5948 Woody Lane N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Frank Demello
Mr. & Mrs. Daniel Nelson Fridley, Mn 55432 6134 Woody Lane N.E.
6080 Central Avenue N.E. Frildey, MN 55432
Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. David Landes
(also own 6070 Central ) 5948 Woody lane N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Everett Utter
Fridley, Mn 55432 6084 Woody Lane N.E.
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Gray Fridley, Mn 55432
6062 Central Avenue N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Robert Sather
Fridley, Mn 55432 3909 West 58th Street Mr. & Mrs. Harold Lind
Minneapolis, Mn 55424 6076 Woody Lane N.E.
Mr. & Mrs. Carl Wiemann (5927 Central Avenue) Fridley, Mn 55432
6044 Central Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432 Agnes C. Johnson Mr. & Mrs. Leo Nelson
5947 Central Avenue N.E. 6065 Central Avenue N.E.
Mr. & Mrs. Edward Rush Fridley, Mn 55432 Fridley, Mn 55432
6028 Central Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. James Iacono, Jr.
5971 Central Avenue N.E. Mr. & Mrs. James Reiland
Nhoth C. Chouravong & Fridley, Mn 55432 6068 Woody Lane N.E.
Cecelia M. Lira Fridley, Mn 55432
6045 Gardena Lane N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Leslie Lee
Fridley, Mn 55432 6001 Central Avenue N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Leslie Wilke
Fridley, Mn 55432 6061 Central Avenue N.E.
Mr. & Mrs. Charles Lentz Fridley, Mn 55432
6053 Central Avenue N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Walinski
Fridley, Mn 55432 6021 Central Avenue N.E. Isabelle H. Jordal
Fridley, Mn 55432 6133 Woody Lane N.E.
Mr. & Mrs. Bennie Douglas Fridley, Mn 55432
6054 Woody Lane N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Harold Swanson Mr. & Mrs. Loren Adolphson
Fridley, Mn 55432 * 6064 Woody Lane N.E. 6131 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432 Fridley, Mn 55432
,t Mr. & Mrs. Louis Welle
6059 Central Avenue N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Kazimierz Tomczykr. & Mrs. Walter Rydberg
Fridley, Mn 55432 6060 Woody Lane N.E. At 6127 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432 Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Kermit Ness
6057 Central Avenue N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Keith Johnson Mr. & Mrs. William Gagner
Fridley, Mn 55432 1306 Hillcrest Drive N.E 6125 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432 Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Walter Lindeman
6040 Woody Lane N.E. Bonnie J. Fater Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Welch
Fridley, Mn 55432 6096 Woody Lane N.E.
6115 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432 Fridley, Mn 55432
•
Page 2 96 -Unit Luxury Condomimiums November 19, 1982
Dave Kim
2124 Upper Street - t. _ -
St. Paul, MN 55117
(6105 Woody Lane)
Mr. & Mrs. George Lohmer
6095 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Raymond McAfee
1360 Hillcrest Drive N. E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs . David Sallman
6061 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Flolid
6053 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Anthony Strouth
6083 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Mauricio Garcia
6075 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Paul Agnew
6069 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr & Mrs. Robert Allie
1313 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Zwicky
6041 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Hubert Lindblad
6021 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Paul Frerichs
04 6015 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Bernard Bissonette
6001 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432